Massachusetts CHIA
THIS VERSION IS AN ACCESSIBLE, MACHINE-READABLE VERSION. PLEASE SEE THE PDF FOR THE FULLY-FORMATTED DOCUMENT
[pic]
Fair Share Contribution: Filing Year 2010 Results and Analyses
September 2011
Deval Patrick, Governor
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Timothy P. Murray
Lieutenant Governor
JudyAnn Bigby, Secretary
Executive Office of Health and Human Services
Seena Perumal Carrington, Acting Commissioner
Division of Health Care Finance and Policy
Table of Contents
Overview of Fair Share Contribution 2
Background on Health Reform and Employers 3
Key Findings From Filing Year 2010 (FY10) 4
Fair Share Contribution (FSC) Standards 5
Results for Filing Year 2010 6
Take-up and Contribution Trends 12
How Failing and Passing Firms Differ 17
Employer Health Insurance Responsibility Disclosure (HIRD) Data 21
Data Considerations 26
Overview
What Is the Fair Share Contribution?
Under the Massachusetts 2006 health reform law (Chapter 58), an employer with 11 or more full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) must make a “fair and reasonable” contribution toward the health care costs of its workers. This policy was created to help finance the care of uninsured individuals and to provide for a more level playing field between “contributing” employers and “non-contributing” employers.
The statute (MGL c. 149, § 188) requires an employer that is determined not to make a fair and reasonable contribution to pay a Fair Share Contribution (FSC) of up to $295 per FTE.
How Is the Standard Set for “Fair and Reasonable?”
The Division of Health Care Finance and Policy (the Division) is responsible for setting the standard via regulation regarding what constitutes a “fair and reasonable” contribution toward the cost of health coverage.
Where Do the Contributions Go?
The revenue generated by the Fair Share Contributions of employers is deposited into the Commonwealth Care Trust Fund, which finances Commonwealth Care, a subsidized insurance program for low-income residents of Massachusetts.
How Will National Health Reform Affect the Fair Share Contribution in Massachusetts?
The new national health reform law (the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act or PPACA) signed into law on March 23, 2010 includes many new opportunities and responsibilities for employers. There is an employer assessment in PPACA that goes into effect in 2014. It has not yet been determined how the national employer assessment policy and Massachusetts’s Fair Share Contribution policy will be reconciled.
However, Massachusetts policy makers and Division staff are currently working to determine how to best prepare and support Massachusetts employers for those changes, and will work to ensure a smooth transition between Massachusetts policies and national policies.
Background
Background on Massachusetts Employers and Health Reform
• Massachusetts’s high rate of insurance coverage (over 98%) is due in large part to the continued engagement of the Massachusetts employer community. Policies enacted by Massachusetts health reform laws of 2006, including several that directly affect employers (such as the Fair Share Contribution and the requirement that employers have Section 125 plans in place) have contributed to Massachusetts having the highest insurance coverage rate in the nation at more than 98%.
• Since reform, the Massachusetts employer offer rate has increased to 77%, despite the economic downturn.
• Since the implementation of the Fair Share Contribution policy, the vast majority of employers – across firm sizes and industries – have been able to comply with the standards (e.g., were determined to be making “fair and reasonable” contributions toward the health care costs of their workers).
• The Massachusetts health reform laws of 2006 require that all employers with 11 or more FTEs must offer a Section 125 plan as a way for workers to be able to purchase health insurance using pre-tax income.
Sources:
Division of Health Care Finance and Policy, Massachusetts Household Insurance Survey, 2010.
Division of Health Care Finance and Policy, Massachusetts Employer Survey on Health Insurance, 2010.
Division of Health Care Finance and Policy, Analysis in Brief: Massachusetts Employers and Health Reform, 2009.
Key Findings
Key Findings From Filing Year 2010 Fair Share Contribution/Health Insurance Responsibility Disclosure Analysis
• Approximately 95% of all FSC-subject employers meet the FSC standards and do not owe a liability. This is likely a result of the fact that Massachusetts employers continue to offer coverage, even in the face of an economic downturn, with 77% offering health insurance coverage, compared to 69% nationally.
• The number of employers subject to FSC and filing their FSC information with Department of Unemployment Assistance (DUA) has remained roughly consistent across years.
• Revisions to the FSC standards that became effective shortly into FY09 appear to have slightly increased the number of employers found liable and the amount of liability generated. These revisions, explained on the next page, set a slightly different standard for employers with between 11 and 50 employees and those with 51+ employees.
• Since the implementation of the FSC policy, roughly $62.8 million in liability has been determined by the Commonwealth from non-contributing employers.
• Compliance with the Section 125 requirement has risen across all employer sizes. The latest data shows that 95% of subject employers are offering Section 125 plans, a figure that has increased over 9% since 2007.
Key Findings
Fair Share Contribution – Filing Year 2009 Test Standards
This slide contains a table that shows the fair share contribution standards for firms with 11-50 full time employees (FTE) and more than 51 full time employees.
Firms with 11-50 FTE
• Must offer to contribute at least 33%
towards the cost of a group health
insurance premium for full-time workers
OR
• Have at least 25% of full-time workers
enrolled in a group health plan.
Firms with more than 50 FTE
• Must offer to contribute at least 33% towards the
cost of a group health insurance premium for
full-time workers AND have at least 25% of
full-time workers enrolled in a group health plan
OR
• Have at least 75% of full-time workers enrolled
in a group health plan.
Note: The Fair Share Contribution standard outlined here is the standard that became effective during the second quarter of filing year 2009. Prior to that, the standard for all 11+ FTE sized firms was the standard that now only applies to the 11-50 FTE sized firms (i.e., 33% contribution or 25% take-up). The test standards were changed, effective 10/1/2008. In this report, “FY” refers to Filing Year, not Fiscal Year.
Fair Share Contribution
Filing Year 2010 Results
Results for FY 2010
Fair Share Contribution Policy in the Context of Entire Massachusetts Labor Market
This slide contains a pie chart that shows the number of employers subject to the Fair Share Contribution (FSC) in the 2010 filing period.
• Employers Subject to FSC, but Not Liable in 2010 Filing Period – 21,307
• Employers with FSC Liability in 2010 Filing Period – 1,017
• All Other Employers – 165,676
The sidebar reads:
• Massachusetts has approximately 188,000 employers.
• Only about 12% of all Massachusetts employers are subject to the Fair Share Contribution policy (the rest have fewer than 11 FTEs).
• Of those subject to Fair Share rules, approximately 4.6% did not meet the standard (0.5% of all Massachusetts employers) and therefore, are required to pay a Fair Share Contribution.
Notes: Reflects results of FSC FY10 Q1 filing period. Total employer count in Massachusetts based on Division of Unemployment Assistance data on employers that filed for Unemployment Insurance in 2010. Figure does not count sole proprietors with no employees, IC’s and partners without employees and people in the underground economy.
Source: Based on data filed with Division of Unemployment Assistance as of June 30, 2011.
Results for FY 2010
Firms that Filed Fair Share Contribution Data by Filing Year and Firm Size (2007-2010)
This slide contains a bar chart that shows the number of firms who filed fair share contribution data from 2007 to 2010. The data is broken down by the number of full time employees (FTEs).
For firms with 11-26FTEs:
• FSC 2007 – 12,590 firms
• FSC 2008 – 11,604 firms
• FSC 2009 – 11,023 firms
• FSC 2010 – 10,020 firms
For firms with 26-50 FTEs:
• FSC 2007 – 5,265 firms
• FSC 2008 – 5,211 firms
• FSC 2009 – 5,060 firms
• FSC 2010 – 4.640 firms
For firms with 50+ FTEs:
• FSC 2007 – 7,066 firms
• FSC 2008 – 6,875 firms
• FSC 2009 – 7,191 firms
• FSC 2010 – 7,664 firms
For all firms with more than 11 FTEs:
• FSC 2007 – 24,921 firms
• FSC 2008 – 23,690 firms
• FSC 2009 – 23,274 firms
• FSC 2010 – 22,324 firms
Note: Based on data filed with Division of Unemployment Assistance as of June 30, 2011. Note that the total number of employers in Massachusetts is roughly 188,000.
Results for FY 2010
Fair Share Contribution Liability by Filing Year (in millions)
This slide contains a bar graph that shows the fair share contribution (FSC) by liability for FY07 to FY10.
• FSC FY07: $14.8 million
• FSC FY 08: $14.4 million
• FSC FY 09: $16.5 million*
• FSC FY 10: $17.1 million
Note: Based on data filed with Division of Unemployment Assistance as of June 30, 2011. For FY 2009 and 2010, data is from Q1.
Liability determinations are distinct from actual revenue collected by DUA, which may take place after the filing year has ended, and liability determinations may be subject to change due to subsequent audits and appeals. Therefore, liability determination should not be compared year-to-year due to fluctuations. For example, in the October 2009 report, Filing Year 2008 liability was reported to be $7.1 Million. It now stands at $14.4 Million.
It also should be noted that Filing Year 2009 data includes one quarter of the original FSC test (where all 11+ employers were subject to the “or” test) and three quarters of the “new” FSC test (for more details, see slide 5). *
Results for FY2010
Percentage of Firms Meeting Fair Share Contribution Standards by Filing Year and Firm Size
This slide has a table that shows the percentage of firms by number of full-time employees (FTE) for Filing Year 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010.
11-26 FTEs:
• Filing Year 2007 – 93.7%
• Filing Year 2008 – 94.9%
• Filing Year 2009 – 95.0%
• Filing Year 2010 – 95.1%
25-50 FTEs:
• Filing Year 2007 – 96.6%
• Filing Year 2008 – 96.7%
• Filing Year 2009 – 96.5%
• Filing Year 2010 – 96.1%
50+ FTEs:
• Filing Year 2007 – 97.5%
• Filing Year 2008 – 97.0%
• Filing Year 2009 – 96.8%
• Filing Year 2010 – 95.5%
All 11+ FTEs:
• Filing Year 2007 – 95.4%
• Filing Year 2008 – 95.9%
• Filing Year 2009 – 95.9%
• Filing Year 2010 – 95.4%
Note: Based on data filed with Division of Unemployment Assistance as of June 30, 2011. For FY 2009 and 2010, data is from Q1.
Results for FY 2010
Percentage of Firms Meeting Fair Share Contribution Standards by Filing Year and Firm Size
This slide includes a table that shows the percentage of firms who met the fair share contribution (FSC) standard by industry.
• Full-Service Restaurants – 79.0%
• Offices of Physicians (except Mental Health Specialists) – 98.9%
• Snack and Non-Alcoholic Beverage Bars – 94.0%
• Elementary and Secondary Schools – 99.5%
• Nursing Care Facilities – 98.9%
• New Car Dealers – 99.4%
• Offices of Lawyers – 100.0%
• Religious Organizations – 99.7%
• Child Day Care Services – 97.4%
• All Industries – 94.9%
Note: Based on data filed with Division of Unemployment Assistance as of June 30,2011. Total Industry filings in FSC FY10 include 21,175 businesses which indicated their industry type via a reported NAICS code. Filings that do not indicate a NAICS code are not included in the calculations. Industries with fewer than 50 employers were excluded. Data collected FSC FY 2010 Q1.
Take-Up and Contribution Trends
Take-Up and Contribution
Median Employee Health Insurance Take-Up Rate
Firms Filing Fair Share Contribution Data (2007-2010)
This slide has a bar graph that shows median employee health insurance take-up rate for firms who filed fair share contribution (FSC) data from 2007 to 2010. The data is broken down by the number of full time employees (FTE).
11-26 FTEs:
• FSC 2007 – 72%
• FSC 2008 – 75%
• FSC 2009 – 71%
• FSC 2010 – 71%
26-50 FTEs:
• FSC 2007 – 75%
• FSC 2008 – 76%
• FSC 2009 – 74%
• FSC 2010 – 73%
50+ FTEs:
• FSC 2007 – 77%
• FSC 2008 – 77%
• FSC 2009 – 77%
• FSC 2010 – 77%
All 11+ FTEs:
• FSC 2007 – 74%
• FSC 2008 – 75%
• FSC 2009 – 74%
• FSC 2010 – 74%
Note: Take-up rate is the percentage of full-time employees eligible for health benefits that choose to participate in the group health plan offered by their employer. Based on data filed with Division of Unemployment Assistance as of June 30, 2011.
Take-Up and Contribution
Mean Employee Health Insurance Take-Up Rate
Firms Filing Fair Share Contribution Data (2007-2010)
This slide has a bar graph that shows the mean employee health insurance take-up rate for firms who filed fair share contribution (FSC) data from 2007 to 2010. The data is broken down by the number of full time employees (FTE).
11-26 FTEs:
• FSC 2007 – 66%
• FSC 2008 – 68%
• FSC 2009 – 66%
• FSC 2010 – 65%
26-50 FTEs:
• FSC 2007 – 69%
• FSC 2008 – 70%
• FSC 2009 – 68%
• FSC 2010 – 67%
50+ FTEs:
• FSC 2007 – 71%
• FSC 2008 – 71%
• FSC 2009 – 71%
• FSC 2010 – 72%
All 11+ FTEs:
• FSC 2007 – 68%
• FSC 2008 – 70%
• FSC 2009 – 68%
• FSC 2010 – 68%
Note: Take-up rate is the percentage of full-time employees eligible for health benefits that choose to participate in the group health plan offered by their employer. Based on data filed with Division of Unemployment Assistance as of June 30, 2011.
Take-Up and Contribution
Median Rate of Employer Contribution Towards Employee Health Insurance Premiums
Firms Filing Fair Share Contribution Data (2007-2010)
This slide has a bar graph that shows the median rate of employer contribution towards health insurance for firms who filed fair share contribution (FSC) data from 2007 to 2010. The data is broken down by the number of full time employees (FTE).
11-26 FTEs:
• FSC 2007 – 70%
• FSC 2008 – 68%
• FSC 2009 – 68%
• FSC 2010 – 67%
26-50 FTEs:
• FSC 2007 – 70%
• FSC 2008 – 70%
• FSC 2009 – 70%
• FSC 2010 – 70%
50+ FTEs:
• FSC 2007 – 75%
• FSC 2008 – 75%
• FSC 2009 – 75%
• FSC 2010 – 75%
All 11+ FTEs:
• FSC 2007 – 73%
• FSC 2008 – 71%
• FSC 2009 – 70%
• FSC 2010 – 70%
Note: Contribution rate is the lowest percentage of the cost of a monthly premium an employer offers to pay for any of its full-time employees. Based on data filed with Division of Unemployment Assistance as of June 30, 2011.
Take-Up and Contribution
Mean Rate of Employer Contribution Towards Employee Health Insurance Premiums
Firms Filing Fair Share Contribution Data (2007-2010)
This slide has a bar graph that shows the mean rate of employer contribution towards health insurance for firms who filed fair share contribution (FSC) data from 2007 to 2010. The data is broken down by the number of full time employees (FTE).
11-26 FTEs:
• FSC 2007 – 64%
• FSC 2008 – 64%
• FSC 2009 – 64%
• FSC 2010 – 64%
26-50 FTEs:
• FSC 2007 – 66%
• FSC 2008 – 66%
• FSC 2009 – 65%
• FSC 2010 – 65%
50+ FTEs
• FSC 2007 – 69%
• FSC 2008 – 68%
• FSC 2009 – 68%
• FSC 2010 – 70%
All 11+ FTEs
• FSC 2007 – 66%
• FSC 2008 – 66%
• FSC 2009 – 66%
• FSC 2010 – 66%
Note: Contribution rate is the lowest percentage of the cost of a monthly premium an employer offers to pay for any of its full-time employees. Based on data filed with Division of Unemployment Assistance as of June 30, 2011.
How Failing and Passing Firms Differ
How Failing Firms and Passing Firms Differ
Mean and Median Take-Up Rates (Filing Year 2010)
This slide includes a double bar graph that shows the mean and median take-up rates for passing firms and failing firms.
Passing Firms:
• Median take-up rate – 75%
• Mean take-up rate – 71%
Failing Firms:
• Median take-up rate – 0%
• Mean take-up rate – 5%
Note: FY 2010 data based on June 30, 2011 data from DUA.
How Failing and Passing Firms Differ
Mean and Median Contribution Rates (Filing Year 2010)
This slide includes a double bar graph that shows the median and mean contribution rates for Passing Firms and Failing Firms.
Passing Firms:
• Median contribution rate – 73%
• Mean contribution rate – 69%
Failing Firms:
• Median contribution rate – 0%
• Mean contribution rate – 4%
Note: FY 2010 data based on June 30, 2011 data from DUA.
How Failing and Passing Firms Differ
Industries – Passing vs. Failing Firms
This slide is a table that shows the industries with highest and lowest passing rates and the percentages of passing and failing firms.
Industries with the Highest Passing Rates:
• Offices of Lawyers – 100%
• Custom Computer Programming Services – 100%
• Insurance Agencies and Brokerages – 100%
• Other General Government Support – 100%
• Machine Shops -100%
• Software Publishers – 100%
• Research Development in Biotechnology – 100%
• Portfolio Management – 100%
• Commercial and Institutional Building Construction – 100%
• Office of Certified Public Accountants – 100%
Industries with the Lowest Passing Rates:
• Temporary Help Services – 56%
• Security Guards and Patrol Services – 65%
• Employment Placement Agencies – 70%
• School and Employee Bus Transportation – 75%
• Janitorial Services – 79%
• Full-Service Restaurants – 79%
• Limited-Service Restaurants – 83%
• Home Health Care Services – 87%
• Supermarkets and Other Grocery (except Convenience) Stores – 88%
• Landscaping Services – 89%
Note: Industry data based on NAIC code. Industries with fewer than 50 employers were excluded.
Data from Employer Health Insurance Responsibility Disclosure
(“Employer HIRD”) Filings
Employer HIRD Data
Overview of the Employer HIRD
What Is the “Employer HIRD?”
Employers with 11 or more FTEs are required to file an Employer Health Insurance Responsibility Disclosure report (Employer HIRD). The form asks employers for information about their compliance with the M.G.L. c. 151F requirement to adopt and maintain a Section 125 Cafeteria Plan. It also asks questions that allow the Division to monitor trends in employer-sponsored health insurance coverage in Massachusetts, such as costs of health insurance premiums, waiting periods, benefit design, and coverage trends.
Where and How Do Employers Submit Employer HIRD Forms?
Employers fill out the Employer HIRD online following the submission of their FSC data.
How Frequently Do Employers Submit Employer HIRD Forms?
Employers that are required to submit FSC data quarterly are also required to submit HIRD data quarterly. Employers that are required to submit FSC data annually are also required to submit HIRD data annually.
Employer HIRD Data
Key Data from Filing Year 2010 HIRD Filings
Section 125 Compliance, Waiting Periods, and Median Premium Amounts
This slide consists of a table that shows the Section 125 Offer, Waiting Period, Individual and Family Median Monthly Plan Premiums by Industry.
Full Service Restaurants: Section 125 offer – 80.8%; Waiting Period – 3; Individual Median Monthly Plan Premium - $308; Family Median Monthly Plan Premium - $745
Offices of Physicians (except Mental Health Specialists): Section 125 Offer – 92.7%; Waiting Period – 1; Individual Median Monthly Plan Premium - $453; Family Median Monthly Plan Premium - $1,230
Snack and Nonalcoholic Beverage Bars: Section 125 Offer – 93.7%; Waiting Period – 3; Individual Median Monthly Plan Premium - $358; Family Median Monthly Plan Premium - $912
Elementary and Secondary Schools: Section 125 Offer – 95.9%; Waiting Period – less than 1; Individual Median Monthly Plan Premium – $422; Family Median Monthly Plan Premium - $1,146
Nursing Care Facilities: Section 125 Offer – 98.5%; Waiting Period - 2; Individual Median Monthly Median Plan - $439; Family Median Monthly Premium - $1,176
New Car Dealers: Section 125 Offer – 99.0%; Waiting Period – 3; Individual Monthly Premium – $404; Family Median Monthly Premium - $1,105
Offices of Lawyers: Section 125 Offer – 94.1%; Waiting Period – less than 1; Individual Median Monthly Premium - $423; Family Median Monthly Premium - $1,166
Religious Organizations: Section 125 Offer – 72.1%; Waiting Period – less than 1; Individual Median Monthly Premium - $0; Family Median Monthly Premium - $0
Child Day Care Services: Section 125 Offer – 92.9%; Waiting Period – 2; Individual Median Monthly Premium - $386; Family Median Monthly Premium - $976
Wholesale Trade Agents and Brokers: Section 125 Offer – 95.6%; Waiting Period – 1; Individual Median Monthly Premium - $364; Family Median Monthly Premium - $1,054
All Industries – Section 125 Offer – 91.2%; Waiting Period – 1; Individual Median Monthly Premium - $384; Family Median Monthly Premium - $1,047
Note: Based on data self-reported with Division of Health Care Finance and Policy via the Employer Health Insurance Responsibility Disclosure questionnaire as of June 30, 2011. Total Industry filings include 21,175 businesses which indicated their industry type via a reported NAICS code. Industries with fewer than 50 employers were excluded. Data collected during Filing Year 2010 Q1.
Employer HIRD Data
Health Insurance Responsibility Disclosure: Section 125 Offered by Employer Size
This slide shows the health insurance responsibility disclosure by employer size.
11-26 FTEs
• HIRD 2007 – 79.4%
• HIRD 2008 – 84.4%
• HIRD 2009 – 86.2%
• HIRD 2010 – 92.0%
26-50 FTEs
• HIRD 2007 – 90.2%
• HIRD 2008 – 91.4%
• HIRD 2009 – 93.6%
• HIRD 2010 – 95.8%
50+ FTEs
• HIRD 2007 – 93.1%
• HIRD 2008 – 94.1%
• HIRD 2009 – 90.5%
• HIRD 2010 – 97.4%
All 11+ FTEs
• HIRD 2007 – 85.5%
• HIRD 2008 – 88.8%
• HIRD 2009 – 88.7%
• HIRD 2010 – 94.8%
Note: Based on data self-reported with Division of Unemployment Assistance and Employer Health Insurance Responsibility Disclosure, both as of June 30, 2011.
Data labeled FY09 and FY10 collected during Q1.
Employer HIRD Data
Health Insurance Responsibility Disclosure: Premium Reimbursement Arrangements
This slide includes a table that shows the percent of employers, listed by the number of full-time employees (FTEs) who indicate they offer Premium Reimbursement Arrangements for HIRD filing year 2010.
• 11-26 FTEs – 2.2%
• 26-50 FTEs – 2.1%
• 50+ FTEs – 1.5%
• All 11+ FTEs – 1.9%
Effective October 1, 2009, the Division amended its Fair Share Contribution regulation to indicate that Premium Reimbursement Arrangements (PRAs) could meet the standard of a group health plan if certain criteria were met by employers. PRAs enable employers, particularly small ones that may not be able to offer a traditional group health plan because they are lacking sufficient take-up, to meet FSC offer standards by allowing workers to purchase an individual health insurance product and then be reimbursed by the employer for a portion of the cost of the premium. The Division intends to monitor usage of PRAs in the market using HIRD data.
Note: Based on data self-reported with Division of Unemployment Assistance and Employer Health Insurance Responsibility Disclosure (HIRD), both as of June 30, 2011.
Data Considerations
Data Considerations
• All HIRD and FSC data are self-reported by employers.
• Data are subject to some fluctuation because of late filing firms and ongoing compliance reviews by the Division of Unemployment Assistance.
• Only firms with 11 or more FTEs that submitted their Fair Share Contribution filing data are reflected in this analysis.
• A small number of outlier filings based on unrealistic reported payroll hours and/or number of full-time employees were removed from the population subset for purposes of analyses.
• All data are current through June 30, 2011 and based on analyses of Division of Unemployment Assistance Fair Share Contribution data, unless otherwise noted.
• Data include filings from employers with 11 or more full-time equivalent employees from:
– FSC Filing Year 2007 (Oct. 1, 2006 – Sept. 30, 2007) n = 24,921 firms
– FSC Filing Year 2008 (Oct. 1, 2007 – Sept. 30, 2008) n = 23,690 firms
– FSC Filing Year 2009 (Oct. 1, 2008 – Sept. 30, 2009) n = 23,241 firms
– FSC Filing Year 2010 (Oct. 1, 2009 – Sept. 30, 2010) n = 22,324 firms
END OF REPORT
Division of Health Care Finance and Policy
Two Boylston Street
Boston, MA 02116
Phone: (617) 988-3100
Fax: (617) 727-7662
Website: dhcfp
Publication Number: 11-256-HFC-01
Authorized by Gary Lambert, State Purchasing Agent
This guide is available online at
When printed by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, copies are printed on recycled paper.
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related searches
- massachusetts car tax calculator loan
- military lodging massachusetts for retirees
- cannabis in massachusetts recreational
- massachusetts military base
- massachusetts department of higher education
- boston massachusetts hotels
- massachusetts ancient and honorable
- massachusetts teaching license
- massachusetts department of education lookup
- recreational marijuana in massachusetts 2019
- massachusetts marijuana dispensary locations
- massachusetts recreational marijuana stores