Application: 2005-2006, No Child Left Behind - Blue Ribbon ...



2005-2006 No Child Left Behind - Blue Ribbon Schools Program

U.S. Department of Education

Type of School: High School

Name of Principal: Mr. James N. Fotinakes

Official School Name: Templeton High School

School Mailing Address: 1200 Main Street

Templeton, California 93465-9421 City State Zip Code

County: San Luis Obispo State School Code Number: 40-68841-4037701

District Name: Templeton Unified School District Telephone: (805) 434-5800

Telephone: (805) 434-5890 Fax: (805) 434-0743

Website/URL: E-mail: jfotinakes@tusdnet.k12.ca.us

I have reviewed the information in this application, including the eligibility requirements on page 2, and certify that to the best of my knowledge all information is accurate.

Date: ___________________________

(Principal’s Signature)

Name of Superintendent: Dr. Gary Duke

I have reviewed the information in this application, including the eligibility requirements on page 2, and certify that to the best of my knowledge it is accurate.

Date: ___________________________ (Superintendent’s Signature)

Name of School Board President/Chairperson: Dr. David LaRue

I have reviewed the information in this package, including the eligibility requirements on page 2, and certify that to the best of my knowledge it is accurate.

Date: __________________________

(School Board President’s Signature)

PART I - ELIGIBILITY CERTIFICATION

The signatures on the first page of this application certify that each of the statements below concerning the school's eligibility and compliance with U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights (OCR) requirements is true and correct.

1. The school has some configuration that includes grades K-12. (Schools with one principal, even K-12 schools, must apply as an entire school.)

2. The school has not been in school improvement status or been identified by the state as "persistently dangerous" within the last two years. To meet final eligibility, the school must meet the state’s adequate yearly progress requirement in the 2005-2006 school years.

3. If the school includes grades 7 or higher, it has foreign language as a part of its core curriculum.

4. The school has been in existence for five full years, that is, from at least September 2000 and has not received the 2003, 2004, or 2005 No Child Left Behind – Blue Ribbon Schools Award.

5. The nominated school or district is not refusing the OCR access to information necessary to investigate a civil rights complaint or to conduct a district-wide compliance review.

6. The OCR has not issued a violation letter of findings to the school district concluding that the nominated school or the district as a whole has violated one or more of the civil rights statutes. A violation letter of findings will not be considered outstanding if the OCR has accepted a corrective action plan from the district to remedy the violation.

7. The U.S. Department of Justice does not have a pending suit alleging that the nominated school, or the school district as a whole, has violated one or more of the civil rights statutes or the Constitution's equal protection clause.

8. There are no findings of violations of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act in a U.S. Department of Education monitoring report that apply to the school or school district in question; or if there are such findings, the state or district has corrected, or agreed to correct, the findings.

PART II - DEMOGRAPHIC DATA

1. Number of schools in the district: 2 Elementary schools

1 Middle schools

Junior high schools

1 High schools

3 Others: Eagle Canyon Continuation

Templeton Independent Study

Templeton Home School

7 TOTAL

2. District Per Pupil Expenditure: $6,783

Average State Per Pupil Expenditure: $7,244

3. Category that best describes the area where the school is located:

[ ] Urban or large central city

[ ] Suburban school with characteristics typical of an urban area

[ ] Suburban

[ X] Small city or town in a rural area

[ ] Rural

4. Number of years the principal has been in his position at this school: 14

Number of students as of October 1, 2005 enrolled at each grade level.

|Grade |# of Males |# of Females |

6. Racial/ethnic composition of the students in the school:

White 83 %

Black or African American 1 %

Hispanic or Latino 12 %

Asian or Pacific Islander 2 %

American Indian or Alaskan Native 2 %

Total 100 %

7. Student turnover, or mobility rate, during the past year: 11 %

|(1) Number of students who transferred to the school after October 1 until the end of the |28 |

|year. | |

|(2) Number of students who transferred from the school after October 1 until the end of |61 |

|the year. | |

|(3) Total of all transferred students [sum of rows (1) and (2)] |89 |

|(4) Total number of students in the school as of October 1 |792 |

|(5) Total transferred students in row (3) divided by total students in row (4) |.1123 |

|(6) Amount in row (5) multiplied by 100 |11 % |

8. Limited English Proficient students in the school: 2 % Total Number Limited English Proficient 14

• Number of languages represented: 6

• Specify languages: Spanish, French, German, Italian, Portuguese, Japanese

9. Students eligible for free/reduced-priced meals: 8 %

• Total number students who qualify: 63

10. Students receiving special education services: 6 %

• Total Number of Students Served: 49

Autism 2 Orthopedic Impairment 2

Deafness 0 Other Health Impaired 1

Deaf-Blindness 0 Specific Learning Disability 41

Emotional Disturbance 2 Speech or Language Impairment 0

Hearing Impairment 0 Traumatic Brain Injury 0

Mental Retardation 1 Visual Impairment Including Blindness 0 Multiple Disabilities 0

11. Full-time and part-time staff members:

Number of Faculty & Staff

Full-time Part-Time

Administrator(s) 2 0

Classroom teachers 35 8

Special resource teachers/specialists 2 0

Paraprofessionals 0 4

Support staff 5 9

Total number 44 21

12. Average school student-“classroom teacher” ratio: 21:1

13. Attendance Patterns:

| |2000-2001 |2001-2002 |2002-2003 |

| | | | |

|All Students | | | |

|Percentage of students passing (Score of 350+) |96% |97% |98% |

|Percentage of students proficient (Score of 380+) |80% |80% |75% |

|Number of students enrolled |193 |194 |194 |

|Number of students tested |185 |188 |189 |

|Percent of total students tested |96% |96% |97% |

|Number of students alternatively assessed |0 |0 |0 |

|Percent of students alternatively assessed |0% |0% |0% |

| | | | |

|SUBGROUP SCORES |2005 |2004 |2003 |

| | | | |

|White | | | |

|Percentage of students passing (Score of 350+) |96% |97% |98% |

|Percentage of students proficient (Score of 380+) |84% |80% |78% |

|Number of students enrolled |167 |162 |170 |

|Number of students tested |159 |158 |167 |

|Percent of total students tested |95% |97% |98% |

| | | | |

|Latino | | | |

|Percentage of students passing (Score of 350+) |91% |96% |100% |

|Percentage of students proficient (Score of 380+) |52% |71% |56% |

|Number of students enrolled |22 |26 |19 |

|Number of students tested |22 |24 |19 |

|Percent of total students tested |100% |96% |100% |

| | | | |

|Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | | | |

|Percentage of students passing (Score of 350+) |100% |100% |100% |

|Percentage of students proficient (Score of 380+) |67% |79% |48% |

|Number of students enrolled |22 |25 |24 |

|Number of students tested |22 |24 |21 |

|Percent of total students tested |100% |96% |88% |

| | | | |

|Other Sub Groups (Less than 10 not listed) | | | |

Adequate Yearly Progress - Mathematics

Subject: Mathematics

Grade: 10

Test: California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE)

Publisher: Educational Testing Service (ETS)

Testing Month: March

|SCHOOL WIDE SCORES |2005 |2004 |2003 |

| | | | |

|All Students | | | |

|Percentage of students passing (Score of 350+) |98% |95% |77% |

|Percentage of students proficient (Score of 380+) |66% |63% |75% |

|Number of students enrolled |193 |194 |194 |

|Number of students tested |187 |192 |191 |

|Percent of total students tested |97% |98% |98% |

|Number of students alternatively assessed |0 |0 |0 |

|Percent of students alternatively assessed |0% |0% |0% |

| | | | |

|SUBGROUP SCORES |2005 |2004 |2003 |

| | | | |

|White | | | |

|Percentage of students passing (Score of 350+) |99% |97% |80% |

|Percentage of students proficient (Score of 380+) |68% |64% |78% |

|Number of students enrolled |167 |162 |170 |

|Number of students tested |161 |160 |167 |

|Percent of total students tested |96% |98% |98% |

| | | | |

|Latino | | | |

|Percentage of students passing (Score of 350+) |95 |84 |33 |

|Percentage of students proficient (Score of 380+) |57% |62% |56% |

|Number of students enrolled |22 |26 |19 |

|Number of students tested |22 |26 |19 |

|Percent of total students tested |100% |100% |100% |

| | | | |

|Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | | | |

|Percentage of students passing (Score of 350+) |100% |96% |48% |

|Percentage of students proficient (Score of 380+) |62% |52% |48% |

|Number of students enrolled |22 |25 |24 |

|Number of students tested |22 |25 |21 |

|Percent of total students tested |100% |100% |88% |

| | | | |

|Other Sub Groups (Less than 10 not listed) | | | |

-----------------------

REVISED: MARCH 14, 2006

................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download