Abortion and Its Access



UFL PRO VITA

NEWSLETTER OF THE UNIVERSITY FACULTY FOR LIFE, WASHINGTON, DC,

VOLUME XV, NUMBER 3 ---March, 2005

Frank Zapatka, American University and Thomas King, Georgetown University ---Editors

Senator Clinton and the Numbers

Senator Hillary Clinton, addressing about 1000 who gathered for the 28th annual conference of Family Planning Advocates of New York in late January, claimed a 25% decline in the number of abortions during her husband’s first term and an 11% decline during his second. She also told of the abortion rate increasing under President Bush.

Senator Clinton did not say where she got her figures, but for the first claim she probably relied on an account by Dean Roche of Notre Dame University that appeared as an op-ed in the New York Times on October 11, 2004. Roche argued that abortion totals had dropped a whopping 36% during the Clinton years. But the National Right to Life News (Feb, 2005) claims, first, that the decline began during the administration of the first President Bush. And, more significantly, the article speculates Roche used figures from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control that show an enormous decline from 1992 to 2000–a decline of 37%! But, if the CDC was his source, Roche ignored the fact that in 1998 Alaska, New Hampshire, Oklahoma, and California stopped sending the CDC its abortion numbers–for 1997 (the last year these states reported) these states had reported 285,868 abortions. This explains most, but not all, of the decline. Some have ascribed the decline to the increased use of the morning-after pill–a pill which frequently produces an abortion, but such abortions are impossible to count.

The claim that abortions had gone up under Bush appeared in a widely printed article by Glen Howard Stassen, a seminary professor from California. He had no national data, but claimed that data gathered from available state reports showed abortions increasing in 11 out of 16 states. The NRL News claimed that in 2 of the states he presented as showing an increase actually showed a decrease. Stassen made much of the 26.4% increase in Arizona and the 67.4% increase in Colorado. But the NRL News said that Stassen ignored the explicit cautions by health officials in releasing the figures warning the increases were likely to have reflected improved reporting rather than actual increases. Once these figures are removed from the total and the Illinois decline is factored in there is a net decline in abortion in the 14 remaining states considered by Stassen. Since Stassen’s article appeared, the CDC issued its report for 2001–yes, it takes time to develop statistics–this shows 3,990 fewer abortions in 2001 than in 2000.

The article in the NRL News was written by Randall O’Bannnon, who did much to get the UFL started while getting his doctorate at Georgetown. After telling of women dying by legal abortions he concludes that the Clinton legacy is not a world where abortion is increasingly rare, but increasingly dangerous.

The UFL announces a LISTSERV discussion site for members.

The UFL has launched UFL-Dialogue to facilitate life-issue dialogue among its members. An Email invitation was sent to all members, but many could not be reached because of dated or inaccurate Email addresses. UFL members wanting to join should contact Keith Cassidy at kcassidy@uoguelph.ca.

THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH

In the president’s second State of the Union address (2.2.05) we read a much longer and more directly life affirming passage than in years before:

“Because a society is measured by how it treats the weak and vulnerable, we must strive to build a culture of life. Medical research can help us reach that goal by developing treatments and cures that save lives and help people overcome disabilities. And I thank the Congress for doubling the funding of the National Institutes of Health. To build a culture of life, we must also ensure that scientific advances always serve human dignity, not take advantage of some lives for the benefit of others. We should all be able to agree on some clear standards. I will work with Congress to ensure that human embryos are not created for experimentation or grown for body parts and that human life is never bought or sold as a commodity. America will continue to lead the world in medical research that is ambitious, aggressive and always ethical” (Qtd. in Washington Post, 2.3.05: A14).

Regarding the death penalty:

“Because one of the main sources of our national unity is our belief in equal justice, we need to make sure Americans of all races and backgrounds have confidence in the system that provides justice. In America we must make doubly sure no person is held to account for a crime he or she did not commit. So we are dramatically expanding the use of DNA evidence to prevent wrongful conviction. Soon I will send to Congress a proposal to fund special training for defense counsel in capital cases, because people on trial for their lives must have competent lawyers by their side” (op.cit., A15).

On Jan. 24 President Bush in his telephone remarks to the 2005 March for Life referred to pro-life legislation passed during his first term saying “infants who are born despite an attempted abortion are now protected by law...so are nurses and doctors who refused to be any part of an abortion... [and] prosecutors can now charge those who harm or kill a pregnant woman with harming or killing her unborn child” (Qtd.in Catholic Standard, 1.27.05: 8).

CAMPUS

An editorial in The Christian Science Monitor (1/25/05) titled, “Within the Ivy League, a Shift to the Right on Abortion?” tells of members of the University of Pennsylvania Right to Life group doing their home-work by bringing “history, philosophy, science, law, and public debate to a case which more often has been associated with theology…. Members field the familiar arguments for abortion rights by quoting poets and writers, orators and medical research where others may have turned to Scripture.”

THE COURTS

Members of the U.S. Supreme court held a private session to consider taking up again the case of Norma McCorvey, the former Roe of Roe v. Wade, who wanted the court to overturn the Roe case because of new information shows abortion hurts women. She presented over 1,000 affidavits from post-abortion women. But the Court declined to consider the case.

LEGISLATURES

On Feb. 15, the “Polish parliament... voted not to consider a ...bill, which would have allowed abortion up to 12 weeks into pregnancy. It would also have made sex education a separate subject in primary schools and allowed young people to seek abortions without parental consent.... Consideration of the bill was defeated...by 199 votes to 183.” The “bill ...had been proposed by the ruling Democratic Left Alliance” and was opposed by “the Catholic church and pro-life groups, widely supported by public opinion” (SPUC news, 2.16.05; New Kerala, 2.15.05). The vote “effectively kill[ed] the bill until after elections expected in the Fall” ( 2.15.05).

On February 17, California state legislators introduced legislation to make California the second state in the nation to allow doctor assisted suicide. The bill is expected to receive strong opposition; California voters previously defeated a ballot initiative in 1992 to legalize assisted suicide and a previous bill failed in 1999. (Pro-Life News, 2.20.05.)

CAMPAIGN 2006

“Abortion rights advocates are fuming over reports that some key Democrats are backing anti-abortion candidates in at least two Senate races, a sign that the emotional issue continues to vex the party after the 2004 election losses.

The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee [DSCC] is backing Pennsylvania Treasurer, Robert P. Casey Jr. [eldest son of the late pro-life Democratic governor of Pennsylvania, Robert P. Casey Sr. who died in 2000], in an effort “to oust” third ranking Republican, pro-life Sen. Rick Santorum (R-Pa.). The DSCC is also backing Rep. James R. Langevin (D-R.I., 2nd) against pro-abortion Sen. Lincoln Chafee (R-R.I.). (Washington Post, 2.13.05: A5). [Rep. Langevin opposes abortion, but supports embryonic stem cell research]. “‘It’s disturbing’, said Kate Michelman, a past president of NARAL Pro-Choice America. ‘It concerns women and it concerns the pro-choice community that the party would preempt the [nominating] process and anoint someone who doesn’t share the party’s core values’ “—in this case, legalized [i.e., decriminalized] abortion” (ibid.). LEXIS

“The [former] congressman [Tim Roemer, D-Ind., 3rd district] said there should not be a [Democratic party] litmus test on abortion, but I told him it’s a values test....Abortion is part of a much broader set of values [sic] (Outgoing president of NARAL-Pro-Choice America, Kate Michelman’s curious distinction is qtd. in 1.19.05).

Harold Ickes, deputy chief of staff to former president Clinton, a supporter of Howard Dean’s DNC chairmanship, declared recently that “Democrats must find a way to talk [our italics] differently about such issues as abortion, [homosexual] rights, guns and the environment. We’re on the right side of those issues, but they have hurt us with a lot of people....We have to learn how to talk [our italics] about those [issues] without sacrificing our principles” (Washington Post, 2.11.05: A6).

“Choice is a positive concept, an attractive concept. That’s why abortion apologists use it...but the way they use it is a lie and, increasingly, Americans are catching on. There is hope in this develop-ment” (Cardinal William H. Keeler of Baltimore in his homily during a 1.23. 05. Mass celebrated as part of a Prayer Vigil for Life at the Basilica of the National Shrine, Washington, DC).

QUOTEWORTHY

“Children too are a gift from the Lord/ the fruit of the womb, a reward” (Psalm 127: 3, NAB).

Among the remarks that were delivered for Pope John Paul II from his hospital window in the Gemelli hospital in Rome was the affirmation that “people should ‘trust in the life for which those not yet born silently cry out. So many children, who are without families for various reasons, are asking for trust so that they can find a house that will accept them through adoption and temporary care.’” This message was read on Sunday Feb.6, a day in Italy “devoted to celebrating life” (, 2.7.05).

“We know that in a culture that does not protect the most dependent...the handicapped, the elderly, the unloved or [those who are] simply inconvenient become increasingly vulnerable” (From President Bush’s 1.24.05 telephone message to March for Life participants qtd.in the Catholic Standard, 1.27.05:8).

“As noted, divisive, inter-generational conflict is already observable in Europe. The most ominous development, of course, is the growing normalization of the extermination of persons who have become inconvenient and burdensome to maintain at life’s frail beginnings and endings” (Mary Ann Glendon (Harvard Law), president of the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences commenting on that body’s spring 2004 meeting in Rome in “Discovering Our Dependence,” First Things, 10.2004:13).

“From 1994 on, John Paul suffered from an increasing number of physical burdens.... In a world tempted to think of the elderly and disabled as disposable, the pope’s witness to the dignity of human life was magnified by his evident physical suffering” (George Weigel, “John Paul II, Pope, New Catholic Encyclopedia, Second Edition, vol. VII, p.1005 ).

“Any discrimination based on the various stages of life is no more justified than any other discrimination. The right to life remains complete in an old person, even one greatly weakened, it is not lost by one who is incurably sick (Declaration on Abortion of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, 1974, par.12.

“Just as painted icons are revered because they contain a likeness of the holy, so should all human beings be revered as images of God” (Richard Stith (Law, Valparaiso), “Icons, Law, and Life,” 19 Nov., 2004 conference paper).

“If we can be a community that speaks first of mercy and forgiveness, it may be easier for us to speak the words of truth and justice our culture needs to hear about abortion” (Monika Rodman, Respect Life Coordinator for the Catholic Diocese of Oakland CA, qtd. in U.S. Catholic (Feb. 2005:17).

“You know, as I grow older, I realize maybe we can get beyond vengeance” (Joseph R. Lentol New York Assemblyman for Brooklyn commenting on the death penalty “which the [state] legislature appears poised to toss out.” Assemblyman Lentol observed further that “The death penalty is fraught with the possibility that you could execute an innocent man [sic]” and asked “who could live with that?” (Qtd. in Washington Post, 2.12.05: A3).

In 1995, Mr. Lentol voted to reinstate the death penalty in New York; he is now “ready to vote against it” (ibid.)

HISTORY OF THE ISSUES

On January 27, Gloria Feldt, a 30 year veteran of Planned Parenthood and its president for 8 years unexpectedly stepped down. In 2004 for the first time, Planned Parenthood ‘s political arm endorsed a candidate for president and doled out a considerable amount of financial support. But Feldt was not happy with the result: “I have great respect for John Kerry, but there is no doubt he did not articulate these issues well. He seemed equivocal.” According to the latest annual report, Planned Parenthood received $265.2 million dollars in “Government Grants and Contracts.”

“Abortion during the first trimester [in Russia] is legal for any reason and during the second trimester for...all medical reasons (although in practice there may still be obstacles, such as doctors who do not want to perform abortions. In 1996, the Russian government passed Bill No. 567 which created thirteen ‘social situations’ in which” abortions were permitted “between the twelfth and twenty-second weeks of pregnancy.” Two such situations were “when one parent was unemployed or when the family already had three or more children. This law was the first limitation on the [legal] right to an abortion since the Stalin era....On August 11, 2003, the Russian Government issued Decree No. 485...which reduced the ‘list of social indications for induced termination of pregnancy’ from thirteen to four.” viz. 1. when “a court ruling related to depriving a person of parental rights or restricting one’s parental rights” has been made; 2. when pregnancy results from rape; 3. in the case of “incarceration in a detention center;” and 4. when the husband is severely disabled or dies “at the time of the spouse’s pregnancy .....” (Meghan Stewart, “ Curbing Reliance on Abortion in Russia,” Human Rights Brief (American University, Washington College of Law), Spring 2004: 51-52.

STATISTICS

“It is estimated that almost 40 percent of women between the ages of 18 and 45 have had at least one abortion. Rarely though, does one hear the obvious corollary that a similar proportion of men have fathered a child who has been lost to abortion” (J. Peter Nixon, graduate student at the Jesuit School of Theology at Berkeley, “The Other Half of the Story: Men and Abortion,” U.S. Catholic (Feb., 2005) 13).

Throughout its history, New York has put 695 people to death, second only to Texas. New York has not executed anyone since the law was reinstated in 1995. The last execution was carried out in 1963 (Washington Post, 2.12.05: A3).

BIBLIOGRAPHY

C.T. Coyle, Men and Abortion, A Path to Healing. Essence: Ont. Canada, 1999.

Linda Cochrane and Kathy Jones, Healing a Father’s Heart: A Post-Abortion Bible Study for Men (Baker: Grand Rapids, 1996).

J. Peter Nixon, “The Other Half of the Story: Men and Abortion,” U.S. Catholic (Feb., 2005 : 13-17.

MEMBERSHIP NEWS

Frank Beckwith was recently elected Vice President of the Evangelical Theological Society. As Vice-President he will be the Program Chair for 2006. This means he will select the speakers for the 2006 meeting which will have as its theme “Christians in the Public Square.” Then he will be President in 2007.

Joanne Angelo, M.D. (Psychiatry, Tufts) and Elizabeth Fox Genovese (Humanities, Emory) are among the contributors to the recently published The Cost of “Choice”: Women Evaluate the Impact of Abortion (San Francisco: Encounter Books).

The Reverend John J. Conley, S.J. (Philosophy, Fordham) serves as an assistant editor of the International Philosophical Quarterly. That journal’s editor in chief is Father Joseph Koterski, S. J.(Chairman of the Philosophy Dept., Fordham U.). Father Koterski is one of the contributors to the 2005 lenten issue of Magnificat.

James Kelly (Sociology, Fordham) was a panelist at a conference called “Religion and the Future of Liberal Politics” sponsored by the Fordham Center on Culture and Religion (11.11.04).

William E. May (McGivney Professor of Moral Theology, John Paul II Institute for Studies on Marriage and Family) presented a paper titled “Marriage and God’s Plan” at a conference called “Marriage: The Great Adventure” held at the Catholic University (12.4.04).

Richard Stith, (Law, Valparaiso University) was invited by several Spanish universities (in Navarra, Valencia, and Alicante) to do a pro-life lecture tour in the spring of 2004. Professor Stith also published “The Priority of Respect: How Our Common Humanity can Ground Our Individual Dignity” in the June 2004 issue of the International Philosophical Quarterly. In July 2004, he made a pro-life presentation on a panel called La salud como mensaje incluyente at the 10th congress of Ciencia y Vida in Montivideo at the Universidad Libre Internacional de las Americas and in November, presented a paper called “Icons, Law, and Life” in which images of God” at a conference titled “Epiphanies of Beauty: The Arts in a Post-Christian Culture” held at the University of Notre Dame.

NOTES AND NOTICES

The National Referral Line phone number for the National Office of Post-Abortion Reconciliation and Healing is 1-(800)-5WE-Care. Its web address is home.wi.noparh . Founded in 1990 it works with “post–abortion support services within secular and religious settings” It publishes the international Post-Abortion Support Services Directory and sponsors the Healing Vision conference at Marquette University, “the only international conference on abortion’s aftermath and its resolution” (From the Office’s home page ).

Terri Schiavo’s parents “will ask a court to order new medical tests” for her “because of a recent study that found patients with brain damage may be more aware of their surroundings than doctors previously thought” (Washington Post, 2.18.05: A15).

CULTURE OF LIFE

The Knights of Columbus have founded and dedicated (10.20.04) in Stamford, CT the Villa Maria Guadalupe, an international retreat center “for all those seeking to be inspired by the culture of life and love: for women facing crisis pregnancies and for those whose pregnancies have ended in tragic circumstances; for couples contemplating marriage; for young adults seeking an authentic understanding of sexuality, chastity and love; for married couples; for priests and religious, and for all those seeking to deepen their commitment to the service of life and to its defense.” The center will be operated by the Sisters of Life. The “project is under the protection of Our Lady of Guadalupe,” the principal patron of the pro-life movement. (Columbia, 12.04:3).

“The Southern Baptist Convention and the evangelical organization Focus on the Family, have spent $20,000 to $30,000 apiece on ultrasound machines” for “Christian crisis pregnancy centers” some of which “are vying for ...state-of-the-art machines that show the fetus in three dimensions. Focus on the Family has budgeted $4.2 million in the current fiscal year for the machines and on training on how to use them” (New York Times, 2.2.05: A15). Crisis pregnancy centers that have ultrasound machines have had “startling” results, i.e. in persuading women to continue their pregnancies, abortion opponents say (ibid.)

STEM CELL RESEARCH

Researchers at Tufts led by cardiologist Douglas W. Losordo “have isolated a kind of cell from human bone marrow that they say has all the medical potential of human embryonic stem cells....When a batch of [such] cells were injected into the hearts of rats that had experienced heart attacks, some of the cells turned into new heart muscle while others became new blood vessels to support the ailing hearts. Treated rats ended up with more than twice as many small vessels feeding their hearts than those given a dummy treatment. They also ended up with less scar tissue, which can interfere with cardiac function.” Earlier research showed that mixtures of bone marrow cells “can help rebuild both hearts and blood vessels”; the Tufts work shows “that both of these repairs can be accomplished by a single type of cell. Catherine M. Verfaillie of the University of Minnesota has been doing similar research with a bone marrow cell that is “very rare and difficult to cultivate.” She is not sure if the Tufts cells are different from the similarly promising cell she has been describing; Losordo commenting on Professor Verfaillie’s reservations, says, “if nothing else...his are a lot easier to grow.” John D. Gearhart at Johns Hopkins, “a stem cell scientist at Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions” (Washington Post, 2.2.05: A3) who experiments on human embryos and is a proponent of such research “said the new work provides ‘some of the strongest evidence to date’ that marrow may contain cells with the same capacities as embryonic stem cells” but that “similar claims...proved to be incorrect” and that “The contention that we have no need for embryonic stem cells is a very premature statement.” Dr. Losordo, however, said that he thinks “embryonic stem cells are going to fade in the rearview mirror of adult stem cells....Bone marrow,” he added, “’is like a repair kit. Nature provided us with these tools to repair organ damage” (ibid.).

PROGRESS REPORT

On February 22, the Legal Committee of the United Nations recommended to the General Assembly the adoption of a declaration on human cloning calling on Member States to prohibit all forms of human cloning inasmuch as they are incompatible with human dignity. The vote was 71 in favor, 35 opposed, and 43 abstentions,

according to a press release of the U.N. Legal Committee.

“ Now crime rates have been falling [in New York] for a decade and public clamor for the death penalty has become muted. A recent poll found that 53 percent of New Yorkers favor life sentences rather than the death penalty” (Washington Post, 2.12.05: A3).

ERRATUM

On page 1, r. of the last issue (December, 2004), we mistakenly identified Evelyn Nivers as the new president of NARAL Pro-Choice America, instead of Nancy Keenan.

UFL Conference in Ann Arbor, June 3-5

-----------------------

[pic]

................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download