Summary Evidence Table - Health Equity: Year-Round Schooling
Health Equity: Year-Round Schooling
Summary Evidence Table ? Studies From the Updated Search (March 2002-August 2016)
Single-Track Calendar
Study
Population Characteristics
Intervention Characteristics
Outcome(s)
Baseline or
Comparison
Follow-up or
Intervention
Effect Size (95%
Confidence Interval or p-
value)
Summary
Author, Year: Study
Location
% higher than
In general, test
Brown, 2012
Population:
(urbanicity):
predicted score
scores of the
Public
Viriginia (mixed)
by 10 pts MINUS
general student
Study Design: elementary,
% lower than
Cross ?sectional middle, and high Intervention: Single- predicted score
population were similar at year-
Suitability of Design: Least
schools
Sample size: 31 year-round
track year-round
by 10 pts on
school calendar (most Standards of
45 days on followed by learning test
15 day break, follows scores in math
round schools and traditional calendar schools.
schools
same curriculum as among:
However, test
Quality of Execution:
traditional calendar) +
scores of certain
Good (1
Demogrpahics: intersessions (length Black students NR
NR
19%
student groups,
limitation for
Age: NR
and content differ
in particular
description)
Gender: NR
across schools;
Hispanic
NR
NR
-7%
black students,
Race/ethnicity: intersession could
students
were more likely
Description: No NR
include one or more of
to increase at a
description of SES: NR
the following:
Economically
faster rate at
study population
remedial, enrichment, disadvantaged NR
NR
13%
year-round
overall; does not
extension classes with students
schools over the
describe the
enrichment learning
nine-year period
comparison
activities
LEP students NR
NR
4%
from 2001 to
schools;
2009 and were
describes students and
Staffing: NR
% higher than predicted score
also more likely to exceed
intervention for
Implementer:
by 10 pts MINUS
predicted 2009
a sample of
School divisions
% lower than
SOL test scores.
schools but not
predicted score
for all year-
Comparison:
by 10 pts on
round schools.
traditional calendar Standards of
schools;
learning test
scores in Englsih
Study
Health Equity: Year-Round Schooling Evidence Tables
Population Characteristics
Intervention Characteristics
Study period: 20012009 (specific data from our analysis comes from 2009 only)
Outcome(s)
among: Black students Hispanic students
Baseline or
Comparison
Follow-up or
Intervention
Effect Size (95%
Confidence Interval or p-
value)
NR
NR
16%
NR
NR
7%
Economically
disadvantaged NR
NR
6%
students
LEP students NR
NR
12%
Summary
Author, Year: Study
Location
National
Results are not
Graves,
Population:
(urbanicity):
Percentile Rank
clear for single-
2010/2011
Public
California, state-wide score
track year-round
elementary and (mixed)
schools; single-
Study Design: middle schools
Math
NR
NR
-.40 pct. pts; track schools
Panel
Intervention: Single
NS
have mostly
Sample size: and multi-track year-
negative, non-
Suitability of
Total number of round school calendar: Reading
NR
NR
0.18 pct. pts; statistically
Design: Greatest
schools 8394
consists of the same number of school days
NS
significant
effects on
Demographics: Single-track year-
Language
NR
NR
-0.37 pct. pts; academic
Quality of Execution:
Age: NR
round school calendar;
NS
achievement.
Good (1
48% female
entire student body
Results become
limitation for
10% black
takes breaks at the
more negative
description)
35% white
same time intervals Among
Effects remain for overcrowded
6% Asian
overcrowded
negative and schools ;for the
Description: No 43% Hispanic description of 5% other
SES:
Staffing: NR Implementer: NR
single-track schools
become
subgroups of
statistically low SES,
significant for Hispanic, and
Page 2 of 10
Health Equity: Year-Round Schooling Evidence Tables
Study
Population Characteristics
Intervention Characteristics
Outcome(s)
Baseline or
Comparison
tracks length of breaks
24% FRPL Comparison: 48% female 10% black 22% white 5% Asian 60% Hispanic 3% other SES: 18% FRPL
Comparison:
traditional calendar
schools; same number
of school days as
Also reports
intervention schools effects for
minority and low
Study period: 1998- SES group
2005
Follow-up or
Intervention
Effect Size (95%
Confidence Interval or p-
value)
Summary
reading and language in year 2
Negative main effects for low SES students; Largely mixed results across time for all subgroups
AfricanAmerican students, effects of are less clear
Author, Year: Study
Location
National
5.2 greater Results suggest
Ramos, 2011 Population: 3 (urbanicity):
percentile rank
growth in NPR that students on
elementary
United States, 3
score (NPR):
for year-round year-round
Study Design: schools that
schools nationwide
in math;
calendars out
Retrospective offer both year- (NR)
Math
NR
NR
p ................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- should school be year round
- the impact of year round schooling on academic
- summary evidence table health equity year round schooling
- year round schools in brief
- illinois schools utilizing balanced year round
- persuasive essays should school be year round
- year round education is not a good idea
- year round schooling allan c anderson submitted in
- examiningtheeffectivenessofyear roundschool
Related searches
- disadvantages of year round school
- year round school debate
- pros and cons of year round school
- year round schooling benefits
- benefits of year round schooling
- debate against year round school
- negative effects of year round school
- statistics on year round schooling
- advantages of year round education
- year round schooling schedule
- year round schooling arguments
- why year round schooling is bad