Valuing Amazon Using Its Financials
[Pages:5]October 23, 2019
Client Update
Valuing Amazon--Using Its Financials
EXEQUITY
Independent Board and Management Advisors
It is widely accepted among investors that compensation committees should align executive pay with performance in part by using incentive metrics that contribute directly to shareholder value. For this reason, it is common for incentive metrics to overlap with performance highlights relayed in press releases communicating quarterly earnings. Planting its latest performance measurement flag in the ground, Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) introduced economic value added (EVA), contending that EVA is better than commonly used metrics such as EBITDA, EPS, and others. Compensation committees may wonder, is EVA really a better gauge of value than their earnings release metrics? Does ISS know something these boards do not?
Exequity responded to several contentions in an earlier Client Briefing,1 but to test EVA versus earnings release metrics (not just EBITDA), we analyzed , Inc., which ISS Senior Advisor Bennett Stewart suggests is "a very good example to illustrate why EVA is so superior to the other measures."2 Historically, Amazon has not used EVA. Rather, for more than 10 years, Amazon has cited operating cash flow first in its earnings releases. How do Amazon's earnings release metrics compare to EVA?
We find Amazon's reported earnings correlate better with stock price than EVA. Over a 10-year period, correlations between stock price and operating cash flow, net sales, operating income, net income, and EPS range from 0.86 to 0.97. To further test the validity of these measures, we performed a multiple regression to determine the combined explanatory power, finding a multiple correlation of 0.99. In plain English, this means that Amazon's stock price closely tracks its reported earnings metrics. In stark contrast, EVA has a correlation of 0.28 with Amazon stock price.3
Companies commonly use earnings releases to communicate what they believe are their key value drivers. The implication is that investors should follow those measures closely. Given the diversity of business models, it is common for value drivers to differ between companies. At Amazon, operating cash flow and revenues are key, but for others, net income and return on invested capital (ROIC) may be most appropriate. If the Amazon example is any indication, compensation committees should feel comfortable in applying their own business judgement, rather than feeling the need to turn to ISS's one-size-fits-all notion that EVA presides over all.
1 In Exequity's Client Briefing, ISS, EVA, and Economic Voodoo, we responded to contentions made by ISS about EVA presented in EVA, not EBITDA: A Better Measure of Investment Value. Our calculations did not find EVA to be "superior" to EBITDA.
2 Source: The Link Between TSR and EVA, published by ISS on April 4, 2019. Metrics referenced include total revenue, EBITDA, EPS, return on capital, and free cash flow, among others.
3 In the multiple regression, four of the five variables highlighted by Amazon are statistically significant at p < 0.01 (i.e., four are statistically very meaningful). When EVA is added to these five, p = 0.25 for the EVA variable and three of the five Amazon metrics are significant at p < 0.01 and one at p < 0.05.
$2,000 $1,500 $1,000
$500 $0
AMZN Stock Price
Net Sales Operating Cash Flow
Operating Income Free Cash Flow Net Income EPS EVA
Amazon Stock Price--Actual and Projected Using EVA vs. Reported Earnings Metrics
Projected Price Using EVA
10-Year Correlation Between Amazon Stock Price and Reported Earnings Metrics
0.97 0.96 0.91 0.90 0.86 0.86 0.28
6/30/2009 9/30/2009 12/31/2009 3/31/2010 6/30/2010 9/30/2010 12/31/2010 3/31/2011 6/30/2011 9/30/2011 12/31/2011 3/31/2012 6/30/2012 9/30/2012 12/31/2012 3/31/2013 6/30/2013 9/30/2013 12/31/2013 3/31/2014 6/30/2014 9/30/2014 12/31/2014 3/31/2015 6/30/2015 9/30/2015 12/31/2015 3/31/2016 6/30/2016 9/30/2016 12/31/2016 3/31/2017 6/30/2017 9/30/2017 12/31/2017 3/31/2018 6/30/2018 9/30/2018 12/31/2018 3/31/2019 6/30/2019
Projected Price Using Earnings Metrics
Client Update Page |2
Client Update Page |3
EVA, Reported Operating Cash Flow, and Stock Price at Amazon
$1,502
$1,169
$30.7
EVA ($B) Operating Cash Flow ($B) Amazon Stock Price
$135
$180
$173
$0.9 $3.3 $1.1 $3.5 $0.7 $3.9
$251
$399
$4.2 $0.4 $5.5
$310
$676 $11.9
$750 $16.4
$18.4
$6.8 $0.2
$1.6
$0.4
$5.7
-$0.1
-$0.3
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
EVA, Reported Net Sales, and Stock Price at Amazon
$1,502
EVA ($B) Net Sales ($B) Amazon Stock Price
$135
$180
$173
$48.1 $0.9 $24.5 $1.1 $34.2 $0.7
$399
$251 $61.1
$74.5
$0.4
$310 $89.0
$676 $107.0
$1,169
$750 $136.0
$177.9
$232.9
$0.2
$1.6
$0.4
$5.7
-$0.1
-$0.3
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
EVA, Reported Operating Income, and Stock Price at Amazon
$1,502
$1,169
$12.4
EVA ($B) Operating Income ($B) Amazon Stock Price
$135 $0.9 $1.1
$180 $1.1 $1.4
$173 $0.7 $0.9
$251
$399
$0.7 $0.4 $0.7
$676
$750
$310
$5.7
$4.2
$4.1
$0.2 $0.2 $2.2 $1.6
$0.4
-$0.1
-$0.3
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Client Update Page |4
EVA, Reported Free Cash Flow, and Stock Price at Amazon
$1,502
$1,169
$19.4
EVA ($B) Free Cash Flow ($B) Amazon Stock Price
$135
$180
$173
$0.9 $2.9
$1.1 $2.5
$0.7 $2.1
$251
$399
$0.4 $0.4 $2.0
$676
$750
$310
$9.7 $8.4
$7.3 $5.7
$1.6
$1.9 $0.2
$0.4
2009
2010
2011
-$0.1
2012
2013
-$0.3
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
EVA, Reported Net Income, and Stock Price at Amazon
$1,502
$1,169
$10.1
EVA ($B) Net Income ($B) Amazon Stock Price
$135 $0.9 $0.9
$180 $1.1 $1.2
$173 $0.7 $0.6
$251
$399 $0.4
$0.3
$310
$750 $676
$5.7
$2.4
$2.2
$0.2 $0.6 $1.6
$0.4
2009
2010
2011
-$0.1 $0.0
2012
2013
-$0.3 -$0.2
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
EVA, Reported EPS, and Stock Price at Amazon
$1,502
$1,169
$20.14
EVA ($B)
EPS Amazon Stock Price
$676
$750
$135
$180
$173
$0.93 $2.04 $1.14 $2.53 $0.70 $1.37
$251
$399 $0.42 $0.59
$310
$5.73
$4.90
$4.55
$0.23 $1.25 $1.59
$0.40
2009
2010
2011
-$0.12 -$0.09
2012
2013
-$0.28 -$0.52
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Client Update Page |5
If you have any questions about this Client Update, please contact Ben Burney ((847) 996-3970 or ben.burney@) or any of the following:
Steven Dolan Chris Fischer
Robbi Fox Mark Gordon
Ed Hauder Jeff Hyman
Lynn Joy Stacey Joy Chad Mitchell Jeff Pullen Dianna Purcell Bob Reilley Mike Sorensen Jim Woodrum Ross Zimmerman
(949) 748-6132 (847) 996-3972 (847) 996-3978 (925) 478-8294 (847) 996-3990 (203) 210-7046 (847) 996-3963 (847) 996-3969 (949) 748-6169 (847) 996-3967 (718) 273-7444 (856) 206-9852 (847) 996-3996 (847) 996-3971 (847) 996-3999
Steven.Dolan@ Chris.Fischer@
Robbi.Fox@ Mark.Gordon@ Edward.Hauder@ Jeff.Hyman@
Lynn.Joy@ Stacey.Joy@ Chad.Mitchell@ Jeff.Pullen@ Dianna.Purcell@ Bob.Reilley@ Mike.Sorensen@ Jim.Woodrum@ Ross.Zimmerman@
Headquarters ? 1870 West Winchester Road, Suite 141 Libertyville, IL 60048 East Region ? 309 Fellowship Road, Suite 200 Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054 West Region ? 2 Park Plaza, Suite 820 Irvine, CA 92614
You are receiving this Client Update as a client or friend of Exequity LLP. This Client Update provides general information and not legal advice or opinions on specific facts. If you did not receive this directly from us and you would like to be sure you will receive future Client Updates and our other publications, please click on the following link to add yourself to our subscription list: . If you want to unsubscribe from our list, please click on "Manage Subscription" at the bottom of the e-mail sent to you.
PUB/CU/Valuing Amazon_20191023
? 2019 Exequity LLP. All Rights Reserved.
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.