COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
STATEMENT OF PROCEEDINGS
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
REGULAR MEETING
TUESDAY, MAY 9, 2006, 9:00 AM
Board of Supervisors North Chamber
1600 Pacific Highway, Room 310, San Diego, California
MORNING SESSION – Meeting was called to order at 9:02 a.m.
Present: Supervisors Bill Horn, Chairman; Ron Roberts, Vice-Chairman;
Greg Cox; Dianne Jacob; Pam Slater-Price; also Thomas J. Pastuszka, Clerk.
Invocation was led by Minister Steve Turner of First Christian Church.
Pledge of Allegiance led by Julian Lady Eagles Basketball Team.
Approval of Statement of Proceedings/Minutes for the Meeting of April 25, 2006
ACTION:
ON MOTION of Supervisor Slater-Price, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board of Supervisors approved the Statement of Proceedings/Minutes for the Meetings of April 25, 2006.
AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn
|Category |Agenda No. |Subject |
| | | |
|Public Safety |1. |SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT ACCEPTANCE OF A GRANT FROM THE INDIAN GAMING LOCAL COMMUNITY |
| | |BENEFIT COMMITTEE FOR THE ALPINE STATION CONSTRUCTION PROJECT |
| | |[FUNDING SOURCE(S): IGLCBC] |
| | |(4 VOTES) |
| | | |
| |2. |DISTRIBUTION OF FAMILY DISASTER PLAN AND PERSONAL SURVIVAL GUIDES TO ALL COUNTY |
| | |RESIDENTS |
| | |(4 VOTES) |
| | | |
| |3. |REQUEST FOR APPLICATION AND ACCEPTANCE OF MULTI-SYSTEMIC THERAPY (MST) TITLE V |
| | |PREVENTION GRANT PROGRAM FUNDS |
| | |[FUNDING SOURCE(S): FEDERAL TITLE V PREVENTION GRANT ADMINISTERED BY THE STATE |
| | |CORRECTIONS STANDARDS AUTHORITY. THIS GRANT REQUIRES 50% MATCH TO BE PROVIDED BY |
| | |SAN DIEGO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT] |
| | | |
| |4. |REQUEST FOR APPLICATION AND ACCEPTANCE OF PUTTING JUVENILE OFFENDERS BACK ON TRACK|
| | |FUNDS |
| | | |
| |5. |OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES – HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM APPLICATION AND |
| | |UPDATE OF SIGNATURE AUTHORITY |
| | | |
|Health & Human Services |6. |AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE RELATING TO THE FIRST 5 |
| | |COMMISSION OF SAN DIEGO |
| | | |
| |7. |BLACK INFANT HEALTH PROGRAM SERVICES |
| | | |
| |8. |AVIAN AND PANDEMIC FLU EDUCATION/INFORMATION CAMPAIGN |
| | |[FUNDING SOURCE(S): GENERAL PURPOSE REVENUE] |
| | | |
| |9. |LONG TERM CARE INTEGRATION PROJECT |
| | | |
| |10. |SUPPORT SENATE BILL 103 (DUCHENY) IF AMENDED |
| | | |
| |11. |DONATIONS TO THE HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY FOR THE A.B. AND JESSIE POLINSKY|
| | |CHILDREN’S CENTER |
| | | |
|Community Services |12. |EDGEMOOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT UPDATE AND REQUEST TO ESTABLISH APPROPRIATIONS FOR |
| | |CAPITAL PROJECT AND FOR PAYMENT TO LEASE FINANCING CERTIFICATE HOLDERS |
| | |[FUNDING SOURCE(S): FUND BALANCE AVAILABLE IN THE GENERAL FUND] |
| | |(4 VOTES) |
| | | |
| |13. |FINAL PROPOSED FY 2006-07 ANNUAL FUNDING PLAN FOR CDBG, HOME, ESG, AND HOPWA |
| | |PROGRAMS; REALLOCATION OF PREVIOUS YEARS’ CDBG AND HOME FUNDING; AND, |
| | |AUTHORIZATION OF TWO REQUESTS FOR PROPOSALS |
| | | |
| |14. |DISCARDED LIBRARY BOOK PROCESSOR AND SALES SUPPORT: REQUEST FOR PROCUREMENT |
| | | |
| |15. |BUDGET AMENDMENTS RELATED TO 2005 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY GILLESPIE FIELD PROJECT |
| | |BOND ISSUE |
| | |(4 VOTES) |
| | |(Relates to Redevelopment Agency Agenda No. 1) |
| | | |
|Financial & General Government |16. |COMPUTER DONATIONS TO SUPPORT GULF COAST HURRICANE RECOVERY |
| | | |
| |17. |CONDEMNING THE MEXICAN CONGRESS FOR APPROVAL OF LEGISLATION LEGALIZING DRUGS IN |
| | |MEXICO |
| | | |
| |18. |ALLOCATION OF COMMUNITY PROJECTS FUNDS |
| | |[FUNDING SOURCE(S): FY 05-06 DISTRICT TWO COMMUNITY PROJECTS] |
| | | |
| |19. |LOCAL COMMUNITY PROJECTS |
| | | |
| |20. |NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING: |
| | |THE ISSUANCE OF TAX-EXEMPT OBLIGATIONS BY THE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL FINANCE |
| | |AUTHORITY ON BEHALF OF THE ST. AUGUSTINE’S SCHOOL OF SAN DIEGO |
| | | |
| |21. |NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING: |
| | |THE ISSUANCE OF TAX-EXEMPT OBLIGATIONS BY THE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL FINANCE |
| | |AUTHORITY ON BEHALF OF THE AMERICAN HERITAGE FOUNDATION |
| | | |
|Communications Received |22. |COMMUNICATIONS RECEIVED |
| | | |
|Health & Human Services |23. |ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: |
| | |SECOND CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE: HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY |
| | |SUNSET REVIEW OF BOARD POLICIES AND ADMINISTRATIVE CODE |
| | | |
| |24. |ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: |
| | |SECOND CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE XVI |
| | |OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE RELATING TO THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY CHILD|
| | |CARE AND DEVELOPMENT PLANNING COUNCIL |
| | | |
|Financial & General Government |25. |ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: |
| | |SECOND CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE: AMENDMENT TO THE COMPENSATION |
| | |ORDINANCE |
| | | |
|Appointments |26. |ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: |
| | |APPOINTMENTS |
| | | |
|Financial & General Government |27. |LOCAL COMMUNITY PROJECTS GRANTS |
| | | |
| |28. |THE COST OF ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION TO SAN DIEGO COUNTY |
| | | |
| |29. |ALLOCATION OF COMMUNITY PROJECTS FUNDS |
| | | |
|Closed Session |30. |CLOSED SESSION |
| | | |
|Presentations/Awards |31. |PRESENTATIONS/AWARDS |
| | | |
|Public Communications |32. |PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS |
|1. |SUBJECT: |SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT ACCEPTANCE OF A GRANT FROM THE INDIAN GAMING LOCAL COMMUNITY BENEFIT COMMITTEE FOR THE |
| | |ALPINE STATION CONSTRUCTION PROJECT (DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |The Sheriff’s Department intends to construct a new station in the community of Alpine and raise the level of law enforcement service|
| |for the Barona, Sycuan, and Viejas Tribes and the surrounding East County communities. The existing leased substation cannot |
| |accommodate the current staffing level and the anticipated expansion of operation in and around the Alpine Community. The projected |
| |growth of the rural East County, the significant expansion of tribal gaming, and the need to expand the geographical area serviced |
| |requires a full-service Sheriff’s Station, rather than a substation. |
| | |
| |The Sheriff’s Department was awarded $750,000 from the Indian Gaming Local Community Benefit Committee (IGLCBC) to help fund the |
| |construction of a new Sheriff’s Station in Alpine. In addition to the grant funds provided by the Barona, Sycuan, and Viejas Tribes,|
| |General Purpose Revenue and Proposition 172 Revenue have been appropriated to fund the construction of the new station. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |Funds for this request are not budgeted. The funding source is the IGLCBC. If approved, this request will result in $750,000 in costs|
| |and revenue. Total project costs are estimated to be between $6,000,000 and $7,500,000. There will be no change in Net General Fund |
| |Cost and no additional staff years as a result of this action. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |SHERIFF |
| |Waive Board Policy A-91, Mid-Year Budget Changes. |
| |Waive Board Policy B-29, Fees, Grants, Revenue Contracts – Department Responsibility for Cost Recovery, which requires full cost |
| |recovery for grants and requires that Board approval be given in advance of application for funds. |
| |Ratify the Sheriff’s Department submission and authorize the acceptance of a grant from the Indian Gaming Local Community Benefit |
| |Committee (IGLCBC) in the amount of $750,000. |
| |Authorize the Sheriff to execute the Indian Gaming Local Community Benefit Committee (IGLCBC) grant documents and any extensions, |
| |amendments, or revisions thereof that do not materially impact or alter the grant program or funding level. |
| |Establish appropriations of $750,000 in Contributions to Capital Outlay Fund (Operating Transfer Out), for the construction of a new |
| |Sheriff’s Station in Alpine, based on awarded grant revenue from the Indian Gaming Local Community Benefit Committee. (4 VOTES) |
| | |
| |Establish appropriations of $750,000 in the Justice Facility Construction Fund for Capital Project 1006585, Alpine Station, based on |
| |an Operating Transfer from the General Fund. (4 VOTES) |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Roberts, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|2. |SUBJECT: |DISTRIBUTION OF FAMILY DISASTER PLAN AND PERSONAL SURVIVAL GUIDES TO ALL COUNTY RESIDENTS |
| | |(DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |On March 15, 2006 (1), your Board held a Board Conference on Emergency Preparedness to ensure the message of “Preparedness Starts |
| |with You” is distributed to all households in the County. Your Board directed the Chief Administrative Officer to return within 60 |
| |days with a strategy to distribute the County’s Family Disaster Plan and Personal Survival Guide to County residents. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |Funds for this request are not included in the Office of Emergency Services’ Fiscal Year 2005-06 Operational Plan. The total cost of|
| |printing, copying and postage is estimated to be $1,000,000. These estimates also include the costs of offering the Family Disaster |
| |Plan and Personal Survival Guide in Spanish, Tagalog, and Vietnamese. The funding source is Fund Balance available in the General |
| |Fund. There will be no additional staff years as a result of this request. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |
| |Receive the strategy to distribute the County’s Family Disaster Plan and Personal Survival Guide. |
| |Authorize the Chief Administrative Officer to implement the Family Disaster Plan and Personal Survival Guide distribution strategy. |
| |Waive Board Policy A-91, Mid-Year Budget Changes. |
| |Establish appropriations of $1,000,000 in the Office of Emergency Services for Services and Supplies based on General Fund Fund |
| |Balance. (4 Votes) |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Horn, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board took action as recommended. |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|3. |SUBJECT: |REQUEST FOR APPLICATION AND ACCEPTANCE OF MULTI-SYSTEMIC THERAPY (MST) TITLE V PREVENTION GRANT PROGRAM FUNDS |
| | |(DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |This is a request to submit an application and accept Federal Title V Prevention Grant funds, administered by the State Corrections |
| |Standards Authority, formerly known as the Board of Corrections, and to adopt a resolution for the Multi-Systemic Therapy (MST) |
| |Program Grant in the amount of $398,077 for the period July 1, 2006 through June 30, 2007. The target population of the MST Program |
| |is youth with conduct disorder who are at-risk of entering the juvenile justice system, or are first time offenders who have |
| |committed non-serious offenses. MST services are home- based and provide the youth’s primary caregivers with the skills and |
| |resources needed to address the difficulties that arise in raising teenagers with conduct disorder. These services will be provided |
| |by the San Diego Unified School District and administered by Probation Department staff. If approved, this request will authorize |
| |the Chief Probation Officer to submit an application for continued funding that will allow the County to receive these funds. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |Funds for this request are budgeted in the Fiscal Year 2006-07 Proposed Operational Plan. If approved, this request will result in |
| |costs of $398,077 and revenue of $398,077 in Fiscal Year 2006-07. This request will result in no additional staff years. The |
| |funding source is the Federal Title V Prevention Grant administered by the State Corrections Standards Authority. This grant |
| |requires 50% match to be provided by San Diego Unified School District. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |
| |Authorize the Chief Probation Officer to review and execute the acceptance of the Federal Title V Prevention Grant funds from the |
| |California State Corrections Standards Authority, for the period of July 1, 2006 through June 30, 2007, and to execute any related |
| |contracts, amendments, or extensions that do not materially impact or alter the program or funding level. |
| |Adopt the Resolution entitled, “A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO RELATING TO THE MULTI-SYSTEMIC |
| |THERAPY TITLE V GRANT PROGRAM.” |
| |Authorize the Director of the Department of Purchasing and Contracting to enter negotiations with the San Diego Unified School |
| |District and upon determination of fair and reasonable prices, amend the contract needed to reflect changes to services and funding, |
| |subject to approval of the Chief Probation Officer. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Roberts, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board took action as recommended, adopting Resolution No. 06-066 |
| |entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO RELATING TO THE MULTI-SYSTEMIC THERAPY TITLE V GRANT |
| |PROGRAM, on Consent. |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |
| |
|4. |SUBJECT: |REQUEST FOR APPLICATION AND ACCEPTANCE OF PUTTING JUVENILE OFFENDERS BACK ON TRACK FUNDS (DISTRICTS: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |This is a request to apply for and accept $214,903 in Juvenile Accountability Block Grant (JABG) funds from the State Corrections |
| |Standards Authority for the period July 1, 2006 through June 30, 2007. There is a required match of $23, 878. These funds will |
| |continue the “Putting Juvenile Offenders Back On Track” and Community Response Officer Program (CROP) for a seventh year. The |
| |purpose of these programs is to improve interagency communication, ensure immediate and appropriate consequences for wards violating |
| |Juvenile Court orders, and provide expanded prevention and intervention services to status offenders and at-risk youth. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |The funds for this request and for the required match of $23,878 are included in the Proposed Fiscal Year 2006-07 Operational Plan. |
| |If approved, this request will result in FY 2006-07 costs of $1,525,220 and revenue of $214,903. There is no increase in net General|
| |Fund cost or staff years as the result of this request. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |
| |Authorize the Chief Probation Officer to accept Juvenile Accountability Block Grant revenue of $214,903 for the period July 1, 2006 |
| |through June 30, 2007, from the State Corrections Standards Authority. |
| |Approve and authorize the Chief Probation Officer to sign and submit applications, related contracts, amendments or extensions for |
| |the Juvenile Accountability Block Grant with the State of California. |
| |Adopt a resolution entitled “A Resolution of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Diego Relating to Juvenile Accountability |
| |Block Grant Funds.” |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Roberts, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent, adopting Resolution |
| |No. 06-067 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO RELATING TO JUVENILE ACCOUNTABILITY BLOCK |
| |GRANT FUNDS. |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |
|5. |SUBJECT: |OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES – HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM APPLICATION AND UPDATE OF SIGNATURE AUTHORITY |
| | |(DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |The federal Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has provided funding to the Governor’s Office of Homeland Security (OHS) through |
| |the Homeland Security Grant Program (HSGP). This program incorporates the State Homeland Security Program (SHSP), the Law |
| |Enforcement Terrorism Prevention Program (LETPP) and the Metropolitan Medical Response System (MMRS). The Office of Emergency |
| |Services is responsible for administering and distributing the grant funds in the County for terrorism prevention, preparedness and |
| |response efforts. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |There is no fiscal impact associated with this resolution. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |
| |Authorize the Office of Emergency Services to submit a grant application to the Governor’s Office of Homeland Security for the FY |
| |2006 Homeland Security Grant Program. |
| |Adopt a resolution authorizing the Deputy Chief Administrative Officer, Public Safety Group, the Director and Assistant Director of |
| |the Office of Emergency Services to sign applications for Federal and State Homeland Security financial assistance. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Roberts, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent, adopting Resolution |
| |No. 06-068 entitled: GOVERNING BODY RESOLUTION. (Homeland Security Financial Assistance) |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |
| |
|6. |SUBJECT: |AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE RELATING TO THE FIRST 5 COMMISSION OF SAN DIEGO |
| | |(DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |The First 5 Commission of San Diego uses revenue from voter-approved taxes on cigarettes and tobacco products to promote early |
| |childhood development. The Commission’s long-term goal is to ensure that “all children in San Diego County enter school ready to |
| |learn.” |
| | |
| |State Assembly Bill 109 established new requirements for First 5 County Commissions. A majority of the requirements have already been|
| |instituted at the First 5 Commission of San Diego, and others are being fulfilled via administrative procedures. A minor amendment to|
| |the San Diego County Code of Administrative Ordinances, Article IIIp, First 5 Commission of San Diego is required by July 1, 2006, to|
| |achieve full compliance with the new State legislation. |
| | |
| |The amended language addresses the requirement to include a statement, in the County Administrative Code, that the Commission shall |
| |measure the outcomes of funded programs through applicable reliable indicators. The First 5 Commission of San Diego currently |
| |measures program outcomes and issues an annual report. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |There is no fiscal impact with this measure provided the County Administrative Code is amended. The Health and Safety Code grants the|
| |State Commission authority to withhold funding from any county commission failing to comply with statutory requirements in AB 109/SB |
| |35. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |
| |Approve the introduction of the Ordinance, (first reading), read title and waive further reading of the Ordinance (Attachment A). |
| |AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE IIIp OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE RELATING TO MEASUREMENT STANDARDS FOR PROGRAMS |
| |FUNDED BY THE FIRST 5 COMMISSION. |
| |Submit the Ordinance for further Board consideration and adoption (second reading) on May 16, 2006. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Roberts, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent, submitting Ordinance|
| |for further consideration and adoption on May 16, 2006. |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|7. |SUBJECT: |BLACK INFANT HEALTH PROGRAM SERVICES |
| | |(DISTRICT ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |As part of its commitment to assuring that all children are born healthy, the State of California Department of Health Services (DHS)|
| |funds counties to implement a Black Infant Health (BIH) program to address the high mortality and morbidity rates of African-American|
| |infants. Pursuant to the County of San Diego FY 2006-2011 Strategic Plan, the County also places a high priority on assuring that all|
| |children are healthy, cared for, and protected so they can reach their full potential. The Strategic Plan addresses critical health |
| |issues such as access to care and low birth weight that can negatively impact children’s well-being and quality of life into |
| |adulthood. African-American infant mortality and low birth weight rates are two times higher than other groups in San Diego as well |
| |as nationwide. To address this issue, the County’s Black Infant Health program has, for more than ten years, provided outreach, |
| |follow-up and education to African-American women at risk for poor birth outcomes. |
| | |
| |The Black Infant Health Program is administered by the Maternal, Child and Families Health Services (MCFHS) Branch, Public Health |
| |Services, County of San Diego Health and Human Services Agency. BIH services are currently provided through a contract with |
| |Comprehensive Health Center, a community-based organization, as a result of a competitive procurement authorized by the Board on |
| |February 12, 2002 (2). This contract expires on June 30, 2007. Today’s action requests permission to begin the competitive |
| |procurement process for the BIH program by authorizing the Director, Department of Purchasing and Contracting, to competitively |
| |procure BIH program services through June 30, 2012. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |Funds for this request will be included in the CAO’s Proposed Operational Plan for Fiscal Years 2006-07 and 2007-08 in the Health and|
| |Human Services Agency’s Maternal, Child and Family Health Services. If approved, this request will result in cost and revenue of |
| |$916,113 for FY06-07, $916,113 for FY 07-08 and $916,113 for FY 08-09. There will be no change in the net General Fund costs and no |
| |additional staff years. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |
| |In accordance with Section 401, et seq of the County Administrative Code, authorize the Director, Department of Purchasing and |
| |Contracting, to issue a competitive solicitation for the Black Infant Health program services; and subject to successful negotiations|
| |and determination of a fair and reasonable price, award a contract for a term of one year with four renewal option years for the |
| |period through June 30, 2012 and up to an additional six months, if necessary, pending availability of funds, and to amend the |
| |contracts as needed to reflect changes in services and funding allocations, subject to approval of the Director, Health and Human |
| |Services Agency. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Roberts, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|8. |SUBJECT: |AVIAN AND PANDEMIC FLU EDUCATION/INFORMATION CAMPAIGN (DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |The threat of an avian influenza pandemic is currently at the forefront of media and public interest due to the potential for serious|
| |societal and public health impacts. An influenza (flu) pandemic is a global outbreak of disease that occurs when a new influenza |
| |virus appears in the human population, spreads easily from person to person worldwide, and causes serious illness. Public health |
| |officials are concerned about the risk of a flu pandemic arising from avian influenza that has recently been infecting birds in Asia |
| |and is spreading rapidly to other parts of the world. |
| | |
| |Today’s action requests Board authorization to issue a competitive solicitation for an avian and pandemic flu education/information |
| |campaign not to exceed $250,000 in costs. The goal of this campaign is to increase public awareness of avian and pandemic |
| |influenzas; promote preparedness and protection efforts for individual citizens, communities and businesses; and explain local |
| |government’s preparedness efforts and ability to respond. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |Funds for this request will be included in the CAO’s Proposed Operational Plan for Fiscal Years 2006-07 and 2007-08 for the Health |
| |and Human Services Agency. The funding source is General Purpose Revenue. There will be no increase in General Fund cost and no |
| |additional staff years. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |
| |In accordance with Section 401 et seq. of the County Administrative Code authorize the Director, Department of Purchasing and |
| |Contracting to issue a competitive solicitation for an avian and pandemic flu education/information campaign, and upon successful |
| |negotiations and determination of a fair and reasonable price, award a contract for an initial term through June 30, 2007, with two |
| |additional option years and up to an additional six months if needed, and to amend the contract as needed to reflect changes to |
| |services and funding, subject to approval of the Director, Health and Human Services Agency. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Roberts, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|9. |SUBJECT: |LONG TERM CARE INTEGRATION PROJECT (DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |The Long Term Care Integration Project (LTCIP) has been a multi-year collaboration between the County’s Health and Human Services |
| |Agency (HHSA) and a large group of community stakeholders that includes service providers, consumers, and caregivers. This project |
| |seeks to improve the delivery of health and social services to elderly and disabled persons in San Diego County. At Board direction, |
| |this collaboration has developed three strategies to improve care: the Network of Care Strategy, the Physician Strategy, and the |
| |Healthy San Diego Plus (HSD+) Strategy. |
| |On July 13, 2004 (17), the Board was updated on the three strategies, took related actions to implement the Network of Care Strategy,|
| |and authorized continued planning activities for the Physician and Healthy San Diego Plus (HSD+) strategies. On December 14, 2004 |
| |(13), the Board took action to ratify a grant application, accept and appropriate grant funds from the State Department of Health |
| |Services, and authorized necessary procurements to continue work on the HSD+ strategy. Together, all three strategies offer the most |
| |comprehensive way of creatively meeting the needs of San Diego’s elderly and disabled residents, their caregivers and service |
| |providers. |
| |Board action is requested today to accept reports on two Long Term Care Integration Project strategies, approve applications for |
| |grant funding to support the development of a voluntary pilot project and authorize the establishment of Healthy San Diego Plus |
| |(HSD+). |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |The HSD+ pilot will be developed using grant funding from the State Department of Health Services or the California Health Care |
| |Foundation (Recommendation 4). The amount of funds available is unknown at this time, but staff will return to the Board to accept |
| |the revenue and establish appropriations when a grant is awarded. Staff will also return to the Board for approval of grant |
| |applications if additional grant funding is identified for the HSD+ pilot strategy. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |
| |Accept the Annual Report on the Network of Care Strategy. |
| |Accept the Physician Strategy Final Planning Phase Report and proposed Implementation Plan. |
| |Approve the development of a voluntary pilot called Healthy San Diego Plus (HSD+) for acute and long term care integration, subject |
| |to the attainment of grant funding, and based on the Governor’s “Access Plus” proposal. |
| |Authorize the CAO to advocate the County of San Diego’s continued participation in the Long Term Care Integration Project’s pilot |
| |program and approve grant applications to the State Department of Health Services and the California Health Care Foundation to |
| |complete readiness activities for HSD+. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Roberts, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |
| |
|10. |SUBJECT: |SUPPORT SENATE BILL 103 (DUCHENY) IF AMENDED (DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |On March 2, 2006, Senator Denise Ducheny introduced Senate Bill 103, sponsored by the San Diego Business Healthcare Connection. SB |
| |103 would establish, until January 1, 2013, the San Diego Health Care Connection Demonstration Project. The bill would require the |
| |State to contract with a local non-profit to operate a project that would assist employers in San Diego County to provide healthcare |
| |coverage to full-time employees. It would also provide a premium assistance program for employees. The bill would appropriate an |
| |unspecified sum from the State General Fund for the project, require the California Department of Health Services (DHS) to secure |
| |federal waivers required for the project and establish data collection and reporting procedures. |
| |Board action is requested to support SB 103 (Ducheny), if amended to specify that implementation will not reduce funding for existing|
| |healthcare programs or local hospitals. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |There is no fiscal impact as a result of this action. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |
| |Direct the Chief Administrative Officer to authorize the County’s legislative representatives to convey the County’s support for |
| |Senate Bill 103, if amended to provide full State or federal funding with no reduction in funding to local healthcare programs or |
| |hospitals. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Roberts, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |
| |
|11. |SUBJECT: |DONATIONS TO THE HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY FOR THE A.B. AND JESSIE POLINSKY CHILDREN’S CENTER (DISTRICT:|
| | |ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |County Administrative Code Section 66 (Acceptance of Gifts) and Board Policy A-112 (Acceptance of Gifts and Donations) require Board |
| |approval for the acceptance of gifts and donations over $5,000. The Health and Human Services Agency periodically receives cash |
| |gifts and in-kind donations worth $5,000 or more to benefit resident children at the A.B. and Jessie Polinsky Children’s Center, the |
| |County-operated emergency shelter care facility for abused, neglected, and abandoned children. The Board last accepted 19 donations |
| |valued at $254,099.27 on June 14, 2005 (7). Board action is requested today to accept cash and in-kind donations, totaling |
| |$236,113.28, for the benefit of children at the A.B. and Jessie Polinsky Children’s Center. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |Approval of these recommendations will add over $236,000 in gifts and donations to the resources available to support the activities |
| |for the children at the A. B. & Jessie Polinsky Children’s Center. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |
| |Accept gifts and donations totaling $236,113.28 to the A.B. and Jessie Polinsky Children’s Center from: Pure Flo Water Company & |
| |Patrons; County of San Diego Assessor/Recorder/Clerk’s Office; Volunteers of America SWCAL; the Saberi Family Charitable Fund; |
| |American Internet Mortgage; Tommy Hilfiger #035; Lend a Hand, Inc.; Azure Salon & Spa; San Diego Style Weddings; La Ranchita; |
| |Colliers International; the Marx Foundation; East San Diego County Association of Realtors; Mr. Rodney Niebuhr; Chula Vista High |
| |School; LPL Financial Services; Ms. Arianne Condrick; AMN Healthcare, Inc.; Ms. Veronica Gasparro; O’Harley’s; and Bad Boy Brands. |
| |Authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to send letters of appreciation to the donors. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Roberts, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|12. |SUBJECT: |EDGEMOOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT UPDATE AND REQUEST TO ESTABLISH APPROPRIATIONS FOR CAPITAL PROJECT AND FOR |
| | |PAYMENT TO LEASE FINANCING CERTIFICATE HOLDERS (DISTRICT: 2) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |On June 15, 2004 (13), your Board authorized the Director of the Department of Purchasing and Contracting to advertise and award a |
| |contract for the construction of the new Edgemoor Geriatric Hospital, a distinct part of SDCPH (Edgemoor), subject to issuance and |
| |sale of certificates of participation. |
| |On January 12, 2005 (13), your Board approved issuing up to $90 million in Certificates of Participation through San Diego County |
| |Capital Asset Leasing Corporation for construction of the skilled nursing facility project. On February 2, 2005, $77.5 million of |
| |the proceeds from the sale of the Certificates of Participation were placed in a construction fund with Zions First National Bank |
| |(the “Trustee”). The Edgemoor project was expected to be completed in October 2006 and sufficient funds were made available to pay |
| |rent to the certificate holders through a portion of 2007. However, due to delays related to design issues with steel fireproofing, |
| |steel fabrication, and San Diego’s heavy rains last winter, the County will not have use and occupancy by July 5, 2007, the date on |
| |which the County’s rental obligation for fiscal year 2007-08 is due. It is recommended that the County take action to transfer to |
| |the Trustee the balance of $4.5 million of the rental payment due for fiscal year 2007-08. |
| |A contract for construction of the facility was awarded to Sundt on February 3, 2005 and work started on February 11, 2005. In |
| |addition, a contract was awarded to Turner Construction Co. (Turner) to provide construction management and contract administration |
| |services. Overgaard Construction Inspection Management was included as part of the Turner construction management contract to |
| |provide inspection services required by the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD) during the construction of |
| |the new Edgemoor facilities. OSHPD subsequently requested that the inspection contract be transferred to the County to eliminate any|
| |potential conflict. |
| |To date, 31% of the project has been completed. The foundation for the building has been laid, utilities have been placed, slabs |
| |have been poured, and approximately 80% of steel columns and beams have been erected. |
| |Based on the known issues and the estimates to date, $15 million is required to maintain progress on the project. The County will |
| |aggressively defend against all unwarranted requests for additional compensation from the general contractor and/or its |
| |subcontractors. In addition, the County will diligently pursue all responsible parties for recovery of any additional costs incurred|
| |because of the design issues and the resulting delays. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |Capital Outlay Fund |
| |Funds for this request are not budgeted in the Fiscal Year 2005-06 Operational Plan. If approved, this request will result in |
| |$15,000,000 costs and revenue. The funding source is fund balance available in the General Fund. There will be no additional staff |
| |years. |
| |Lease Payment Bonds |
| |Funds for this request are not budgeted in the Fiscal Year 2005-06 Operational Plan. If approved, this request will result in |
| |$4,503,000 of current year costs and revenue. The funding source is fund balance available in the Edgemoor Development Fund. There |
| |will be no net General Fund cost and no additional staff years. |
| |Assignment of Inspector of Record Services |
| |Funds for this request are included in the capital project budget. There will be no net General Fund cost and no additional staff |
| |years. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER: |
| |1. Establish appropriations of $15,000,000 in Contributions to Capital Outlay Fund (Operating Transfer Out), for the Edgemoor Skilled|
| |Nursing Facility project, based on available Fiscal Year 2004-05 General Fund Fund Balance. (4VOTES) |
| |2. Establish appropriations of $15,000,000 in the Capital Outlay Fund for Capital Project 1000235, Edgemoor Skilled Nursing Facility,|
| |based on an Operating Transfer from the General Fund. (4 VOTES) |
| |3. Authorize the Director, Department of Purchasing and Contracting, to enter into contract change order negotiations with Sundt |
| |Construction and Turner Construction and upon determination of fair and reasonable prices, approve the change orders to Contracts |
| |#505386, Sundt Construction, and #5052379, Turner Construction, in a total amount not to exceed $15,000,000. Authorize the Director,|
| |Department of Purchasing and Contracting to approve plans and specification changes associated with the contract changes. (4 VOTES) |
| |4. Establish appropriations of $4,503,000 in the Edgemoor Development Fund (Operating Transfer Out), for the Fiscal Year 2007-08 |
| |lease payment to the Edgemoor Certificate Holders, based on available Fiscal Year 2004-05 Fund Balance in the Edgemoor Development |
| |Fund. (4 VOTES) |
| |5. Establish appropriations of $4,503,000 in the Lease Payments Bonds budget, for the Fiscal Year 2007-08 lease payment to the |
| |Edgemoor Certificate Holders based on an operating transfer from the Edgemoor Development Fund. (4 VOTES) |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |6. Authorize the Director, Department of Purchasing and Contracting, subject to successful negotiations, to amend the Turner |
| |Construction Company contract to remove the Inspector of Record services provisions from that contract, and, subject to successful |
| |negotiations, accept the subsequent assignment of the Inspector of Record services provisions of the Turner Construction Company |
| |contract to Overgaard Construction Inspection Management in an amount not to exceed $590,000. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Roberts, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|13. |SUBJECT: |FINAL PROPOSED FY 2006-07 ANNUAL FUNDING PLAN FOR CDBG, HOME, ESG, AND HOPWA PROGRAMS; REALLOCATION OF PREVIOUS|
| | |YEARS’ CDBG AND HOME FUNDING; AND, AUTHORIZATION OF TWO REQUESTS FOR PROPOSALS (DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |This County of San Diego Consortium Consolidated Annual Funding Plan is the culmination of community meetings held throughout the |
| |County to solicit proposals for revitalization of qualified communities and development of affordable housing for lower income |
| |residents. On March 14, 2006 (4), the Board of Supervisors conducted a public hearing on the Draft County Consortium Fiscal Year |
| |2006-07 Annual Funding Plan for the Community Development Block Grant, HOME Investment Partnerships (including the American Dream |
| |Downpayment Initiative), Emergency Shelter Grant, and Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS Programs, and approved the Plan, in|
| |principle. |
| |The four federal programs will provide $11,675,691 in Annual Plan funds, a decrease of $845,560 from the four entitlement program |
| |funding levels in Fiscal Year 2005-06. In addition, an estimated $1,450,000 in Fiscal Year 2006-07 Program Income will be received, |
| |primarily from loan repayment proceeds, providing a total of $13,125,691 in Fiscal Year 2006-07 for community revitalization and |
| |affordable housing that benefits low-income residents and persons with special needs. |
| |The proposed recommendations will accomplish four objectives: first, approve the County Consortium Fiscal Year 2006-07 Annual Funding|
| |Plan; second, reallocate $392,126 from previous years’ budgets for funding of six additional Community Development Block Grant |
| |projects; third, authorize County Purchasing and Contracting to issue two Requests for Proposals; and, finally, reallocate up to |
| |$1,715,156 from previous years’ budgets for four HOME Investment Partnerships projects. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |Funds for this request in the amount of $13,125,691 are included in the Fiscal Year 2006-07 CAO Proposed Operational Plan. The |
| |funding sources are Community Development Block Grant ($4,847,948), HOME Investment Partnerships ($3,997,828 plus $72,878 in American|
| |Dream Downpayment Initiative), Emergency Shelter Grant ($208,037), and Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS ($2,549,000) |
| |programs, and expected Program Income from the Community Development Block Grant Program ($850,000) and HOME Investment Partnerships |
| |Program ($600,000). If approved, this request will also result in the reallocation of $392,126 in prior year Community Development |
| |Block Grant funds and reallocation of up to $1,715,156 in prior year HOME Investment Partnerships funds. This will require the |
| |addition of no staff years and there is no General Fund cost. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |
| |Approve for submittal to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development the attached County Consortium Fiscal Year 2006-07 |
| |Annual Funding Plan for the Community Development Block Grant, HOME Investment Partnerships (including the American Dream Downpayment|
| |Initiative), Emergency Shelter Grant, and Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS Programs. |
| |Adopt the Resolution certifying compliance with the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, and authorizing |
| |transmittal of the Fiscal Year 2006-07 Annual Funding Plan to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. |
| |Authorize the Director, Department of Housing and Community Development, to execute Certification forms required by the U.S. |
| |Department of Housing and Urban Development for the Fiscal Year 2006-07 Community Development Block Grant, HOME Investment |
| |Partnerships (including the American Dream Downpayment Initiative), and Emergency Shelter Grant programs, and other relevant |
| |documents on behalf of the County Consortium. |
| |Approve and authorize the Director, Department of Housing and Community Development, to execute Fiscal Year 2006-07 Community |
| |Development Block Grant, HOME Investment Partnerships (including the American Dream Downpayment Initiative), and Emergency Shelter |
| |Grant agreements, between the County of San Diego and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, when received. |
| |Approve and authorize the reallocation of $392,126 in Community Development Block Grant funds to the following six projects: City of |
| |Coronado Public Facilities ADA Improvements ($91,309); City of Lemon Grove Street Rehabilitation Program Additional Reimbursement |
| |($15,116); Boulevard Fire Department Well Supplement ($16,000); Urban County Fair Housing Program ($80,000); East County Shared |
| |Housing Program ($18,000); and, Spring Valley Teen Center Supplement ($171,701), from the following completed or cancelled Community |
| |Development Block Grant projects: cancelled 2005-06 City of Coronado-Building Demolition for Affordable Housing ($74,309); cancelled |
| |2005-06 City of Coronado-Municipal Boat Dock Access Ramps ($17,000); completed 2000-01 City of Lemon Grove-Sanford Drive Drainage |
| |Improvements ($14,781); completed 2005-06 City of Lemon Grove Senior Center Accessible Door ($335); cancelled 2004-05 East County |
| |Shared Housing Program-Elderhelp ($18,000); cancelled 2004-05 North County Shared Housing Program-Lutheran Social Services ($18,000);|
| |cancelled 2004-05 South Bay Shared Housing Program-Lutheran Social Services ($18,000); cancelled 2004-05 Minor Home Repair |
| |Program-Lutheran Social Services ($33,000); and, cancelled 2004-05 Fallbrook Mental Health Services Building Expansion ($198,701). |
| |In accordance with Section 401 of Article XXII of the County Administrative Code, authorize the Director of the Department of |
| |Purchasing and Contracting to issue a Request for Proposal to procure services related to implementation of the Urban County Fair |
| |Housing Program; and upon successful negotiations, award a contract with up to three one-year options; and to amend any awarded |
| |contract, as required, to reflect changes to service and funding allocations, subject to the approval of the Director of the |
| |Department of Housing and Community Development. |
| |In accordance with Section 401 of Article XXII of the County Administrative Code, authorize the Director of the Department of |
| |Purchasing and Contracting to issue a Request for Proposal to procure services related to implementation of the East County Shared |
| |Housing Program; and upon successful negotiations, award a contract with up to two one-year options; and to amend any awarded |
| |contract as required to reflect changes to service and funding allocations, subject to the approval of the Director of the Department|
| |of Housing and Community Development. |
| |Approve and authorize the reallocation of up to $1,021,855 in HOME Investment Partnerships Program funds from the cancelled Carlsbad |
| |Roosevelt Street Apartments Project to the Carlsbad Roosevelt Garden Condominiums Housing Project, contingent upon final approval by |
| |the Carlsbad City Council. |
| |Approve and authorize the reallocation of $242,384 in HOME Investment Partnerships Program funds from the completed Encinitas Ranch |
| |Apartments Project ($889); the completed Encinitas Cantebria Senior Apartments ($20,347); the cancelled Encinitas Downpayment |
| |Assistance and Counseling Program ($130,770 (including program income)); and, the Encinitas City-administered Tenant Based Rental |
| |Assistance Program ($90,378) to a future Encinitas Transitional Housing Project, contingent upon final approval by the Encinitas City|
| |Council. |
| |Approve and authorize the reallocation of $8,000 in HOME American Dream Downpayment Initiative funds from the cancelled Encinitas |
| |2005-06 HOME American Dream Downpayment Initiative Program to the Urban County HOME American Dream Downpayment Initiative Program. |
| |Cancel appropriations and budgeted revenue in the amount of $8,000 in the Housing and Community Development Special Revenue Fund from|
| |the cancelled Encinitas 2005-06 HOME American Dream Downpayment Initiative Program (Org. 55930/Acct. 53666/Acct. 45812). |
| |Approve and authorize the reallocation of $442,917 in HOME Investment Partnerships Program funds from the La Mesa 2004-05 uncommitted|
| |HOME Program ($227,763) and the La Mesa 2005-06 uncommitted HOME Program ($215,154) to a La Mesa Downpayment and Closing Costs |
| |Assistance Program, contingent upon final approval by the La Mesa City Council. |
| | |
| | |
| |Authorize the Director, Department of Housing and Community Development, to execute all necessary documents for the submittal, |
| |regulatory processing and/or implementation of the County Consortium Fiscal Year 2006-07 Annual Funding Plan for the Community |
| |Development Block Grant, HOME Investment Partnerships (including the American Dream Downpayment Initiative), Emergency Shelter Grant,|
| |and Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS programs, and recommended projects described in Recommendations #5 through #12. |
| |Authorize the publication of any required "Notices to the Public of Request for the Release of Funds" for previously approved |
| |projects, recommended projects in the Fiscal Year 2006-07 Annual Funding Plan, and projects described in Recommendations #5 through |
| |#12; authorize the Director, Department of Housing and Community Development, to execute Requests for Release of Funds; and, direct |
| |staff to transmit these requests to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development upon completion of any mandatory waiting |
| |period. |
| |15. Authorize the Director, Department of Housing and Community Development, in consultation with County Counsel, to negotiate |
| |and award contracts, or contract amendments, to recipients of the recommended projects in the Fiscal Year 2006-07 Annual Funding Plan|
| |and in Recommendations #5 through #12, following the completion of environmental processing and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban |
| |Development release of funds, if applicable. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Roberts, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent, adopting Resolution |
| |No. 06-069 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO APPROVING THE 2006-2007 ANNUAL FUNDING |
| |PLAN. |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|14. |SUBJECT: |DISCARDED LIBRARY BOOK PROCESSOR AND SALES SUPPORT: REQUEST FOR PROCUREMENT (DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |The County Library seeks a service provider to sort, price, and post library discards on Marketplace and other sales |
| |channels. After the sale, the provider will choose, assemble, pack, and ship orders to customers and provide associated reports, |
| |credit verification, payment clearance, and distribution. Currently, this service is successfully being provided by bLogistics. |
| |The requested action will authorize the Director, Purchasing and Contracting to enter into negotiations with bLogistics and, subject |
| |to successful negotiations, award a contract to facilitate disposal of unneeded Library materials for the period of July 1, 2006 to |
| |June 30, 2007. The requested action will also authorize the Director, Purchasing and Contracting to issue a Request for Proposal |
| |(RFP) and award a contract for these services for the period of July 1, 2007 to June 30, 2012. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |Revenues resulting from the current contract are included in the FY 2006-06 Operational Plan. If approved, this request will allow |
| |the continuance of revenues of approximately $20,000 in FY 2006-07, and estimated annual revenue of up to $20,000 for subsequent |
| |fiscal years, based on results of a two-year pilot project. No additional funding or staff years are required for this proposal. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |
| |In accordance with Board Policy A-87, Competitive Procurement, approve and authorize the Director, Purchasing and Contracting to |
| |enter into negotiations with bLogistics; and subject to successful negotiations and determination of a fair and reasonable price, |
| |award a contract for discarded book processing services and sales support for one year through June 30, 2007, and up to an additional|
| |six months if needed, and to amend the contracts as needed to reflect changes to services and funding, subject to approval of the |
| |Director of the County Library. Waive the advertising requirement of Board Policy A-87. |
| |In accordance with Section 401, Article XXIII of the County Administrative Code, authorize the Director, Department of Purchasing and|
| |Contracting to initiate a competitive solicitation to procure Discarded Library Book Processor and Sales Support Services through a |
| |Request for Proposal (RFP). If, through the RFP process, there is only one respondent, authorize the Director, Department of |
| |Purchasing and Contracting, to enter into negotiations with respondent for Discarded Library Book Processor And Sales Support |
| |Services; and subject to successful negotiations and determination of a fair and reasonable price, enter into a contract with |
| |respondent for a period of July 1, 2007 through June 30, 2010 with two (2) option years through June 30, 2012, and up to an |
| |additional six months if necessary, pending availability of funds; and to amend the contract as required for changes that do not |
| |materially impact or alter the program or funding level, subject to the approval of the Director, San Diego County Library. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Roberts, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |
| |
|15. |SUBJECT: |BUDGET AMENDMENTS RELATED TO 2005 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY GILLESPIE FIELD PROJECT BOND ISSUE |
| | |(DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |On December 6, 2005 (22), your Board approved issuance of not-to-exceed $17.5 million in tax allocation bonds for the County of San |
| |Diego Redevelopment Agency Gillespie Field Project. The bond sale was completed on December 22, 2005, and tax allocation bonds of |
| |$16 million were issued and named the County of San Diego Redevelopment Agency, 2005 Gillespie Field Project. Proceeds from Bond |
| |sales will: 1) repay a prior debt that was incurred to complete capital projects within the Gillespie Field Redevelopment Project |
| |Area; 2) refund outstanding 1995 County of San Diego Redevelopment Agency Gillespie Field Project bonds; 3) fund certain costs |
| |related to issuance of the new bonds; and 4) establish a debt service reserve fund. |
| |This is a request to amend the current year budgets of both the Redevelopment Agency Gillespie Field Project and the Airport |
| |Enterprise Fund to reflect Bond issuance impacts. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |The recommendations in this letter are necessary to properly reflect sale and disbursement of 2005 County of San Diego Redevelopment |
| |Agency Gillespie Field bonds and close-out of the 1995 County of San Diego Redevelopment Agency Gillespie Field financing on the |
| |County’s books. These actions, if approved, will not result in any additional staff years or in any additional cost to the Agency |
| |or the County. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |
| |Find that the proposed action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of State|
| |CEQA Guidelines because it is not a project as defined by Section 15378. |
| |Establish appropriations of $4,247,177.19 in the 2005 Redevelopment Agency Gillespie Field Project Airport Revenue Fund (23205) for |
| |payment to escrow agent for refunding Agency 1995 bond issue, based on bond proceeds from 2005 Redevelopment Agency Gillespie Field |
| |bond issuance. (4 VOTES) |
| |Establish appropriations of $386,381.25 in the 2005 Redevelopment Agency Gillespie Field Project Airport Revenue Fund (23205), |
| |Operating Transfer Out, for transfer to 2005 Redevelopment Agency Gillespie Field Project Expense Fund (23206) based on bond |
| |proceeds from the 2005 Redevelopment Agency Gillespie Field Project bond issuance. (4 VOTES) |
| |Establish appropriations of $386,381.25 in the 2005 Redevelopment Agency Gillespie Field Project Expense Fund (23206) for payment of |
| |bond issuance expenses, based on an Operating Transfer from the 2005 Redevelopment Agency Gillespie Field Project Airport Revenue |
| |Fund (23205). (4 VOTES) |
| |Establish appropriations of $686,900.18 in the 2005 Redevelopment Agency Gillespie Field Project Airport Revenue Fund (23205), |
| |Operating Transfer Out, and the related Operating Transfer In, in the 2005 Redevelopment Agency Gillespie Field Project Debt Service |
| |Reserve Fund (23202), based on bond proceeds from 2005 Redevelopment Agency Gillespie Field Project bond issuance. (4 VOTES) |
| |Ratify an increase in appropriations of $468,092 in the 1995 Redevelopment Agency Gillespie Field Project Reserve Debt Service Fund |
| |(23075), Operating Transfer Out and the related Operating Transfer In, in the 2005 Redevelopment Agency Gillespie Field Project Debt |
| |Service Reserve Fund (23202), based on fund balance available. (4 VOTES) |
| |Establish appropriations of $457,774.42 in the 1995 Redevelopment Agency Gillespie Field Project Airport Fund (23150), Operating |
| |Transfer Out and the related Operating Transfer In, in the1995 Redevelopment Agency Gillespie Field Project Capital Project Fund |
| |(28020) to close out remaining funds held with the trustee under the old indenture based on fund balance available. (4 VOTES) |
| |Establish appropriations of $50,000.00 in the 1995 Redevelopment Agency Gillespie Field Project Capital Project Fund (28020), |
| |Operating Transfer Out, for transfer to the 2005 Redevelopment Agency Gillespie Field Project Expense Fund (23206) based on a |
| |transfer in from the 1995 Redevelopment Agency Gillespie Field Project Airport Fund (23150) (4 VOTES) |
| |Establish appropriations of $50,000 in the 2005 Redevelopment Agency Gillespie Field Project Expense Fund (23206) for payment of bond|
| |issuance expenses, based on a transfer in from the 1995 Redevelopment Agency Gillespie Field Project Capital Project Fund (28020). |
| |(4 VOTES) |
| |Establish appropriations of $236,850.42 in the 1995 Redevelopment Agency Gillespie Field Project Capital Project Fund (28020), |
| |Operating Transfer Out for transfer to the 2005 Redevelopment Agency Gillespie Field Project Debt Service Fund (23185) based on a |
| |transfer in from the 1995 Redevelopment Agency Gillespie Field Project Airport Fund (23150) (4 VOTES) |
| |Establish appropriations of $236,850.42 in the 2005 Redevelopment Agency Gillespie Field Project Debt Service Fund (23185), Operating|
| |Transfer Out, for transfer to the 2005 Redevelopment Agency Gillespie Field Project Interest Account (23200) based a transfer in from|
| |the 1995 Redevelopment Agency Gillespie Field Project Capital Project Fund (28020). (4 VOTES) |
| |Establish appropriations of $236,850.42 in the 2005 Redevelopment Agency Gillespie Field Project Interest Fund (23200) for payment of|
| |debt service interest expense on the 2005 Redevelopment Agency Gillespie Field Project Bonds, based on a transfer in from the 2005 |
| |Redevelopment Agency Gillespie Field Project Debt Service Fund (23185). (4 VOTES) |
| |Cancel appropriations and related revenue of $135,903 in the 1995 Redevelopment Agency Gillespie Field Project Tax Allocation Debt |
| |Service Fund (23025) due to closing out the 1995 Redevelopment Agency Gillespie Field Project. |
| |Cancel appropriations and related revenue of $135,903 in the 1995 Redevelopment Agency Gillespie Field Project Interest Fund (23125) |
| |due to closing out the 1995 Redevelopment Agency Gillespie Field Project. |
| | |
| |Establish appropriations of $135,903 in the 2005 Redevelopment Agency Gillespie Field Project Debt Service Fund (23185), Operating |
| |Transfer Out, for transfer to the 2005 Redevelopment Agency Gillespie Field Project Interest Fund (23200) for payment of debt service|
| |interest expense on the 2005 Redevelopment Agency Gillespie Field Project Bonds, based on tax increment apportionment. (4 VOTES) |
| |Establish appropriations of $135,903 in the 2005 Redevelopment Agency Gillespie Field Project Interest Account (23200) for payment of|
| |debt service interest expense on the 2005 Redevelopment Agency Gillespie Field Project Bonds, based on an operating transfer in from |
| |the 2005 Redevelopment Agency Gillespie Field Project Debt Service Fund (23185). (4 VOTES) |
| |Establish appropriations of $10,633,591.68 in the 2005 Redevelopment Agency Gillespie Field Project Airport Revenue Fund |
| |(23205)-Operating Transfer Out and the related Operating Transfer In, in 1995 Redevelopment Agency Gillespie Field Project Capital |
| |Project Fund (28020) based on bond proceeds from the 2005 Redevelopment Agency Gillespie Field bond issuance. (4 VOTES) |
| |Establish appropriations of $10,400,000 in the 1995 Redevelopment Agency Gillespie Field Project Capital Project Fund (28020), Note |
| |Redemption (53432) for partial loan repayment to the Airport Enterprise Fund (30050) based on an Operating Transfer In from the 2005|
| |Redevelopment Agency Gillespie Project Airport Revenue Fund (23205) (4 VOTES) |
| |Amend the FY 2005-06 Airport Enterprise Fund (30050) spending plan in the amount of $10,400,000 to provide funding for an operating |
| |transfer to the Alternative Minimum Tax Fund (30051) ($5,917,341.18) and Non AMT Fund (30052) ($4,482,658.82) based on fund balance |
| |available. |
| |Amend the Alternative Minimum Tax Fund (30051) spending plan in the amount of $5,917,341.18 to provide funding for capital projects |
| |based on bond proceeds from the 2005 Redevelopment Agency Gillespie Field bond issuance transferred in from the Airport Enterprise |
| |Fund (30050). |
| |Amend the Non Alternative Minimum Tax Fund (30052) spending plan in the amount of $4,482,658.82 to provide funding for capital |
| |projects based on bond proceeds from the 2005 Redevelopment Agency Gillespie Field bond issuance transferred in from the Airport |
| |Enterprise Fund (30050). |
| | |
| |Relates to Redevelopment Agency Agenda No. 1. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Roberts, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|16. |SUBJECT: |COMPUTER DONATIONS TO SUPPORT GULF COAST HURRICANE RECOVERY (DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |Hitting the Gulf coast in late August 2005, Hurricane Katrina caused devastation for more than 100 miles from its center, including |
| |major catastrophic damage along the coastlines of Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama. Schools and their libraries were not immune |
| |from the damage wrought by these devastating storms. This damage made the public computer resources ordinarily available at these |
| |facilities useless to many individuals and families struggling to find employment, access aid, complete their education, and put |
| |their lives back together. |
| |Although many organizations, including the Laura Bush Foundation for America’s Libraries and the American Red Cross, are working to |
| |provide materials and technology to restore schools and libraries in hurricane-damaged communities, a significant need remains for |
| |computers at these public facilities. |
| |Today’s recommendations would support the one-time donation of refurbished County computers by the San Diego Futures Foundation to |
| |aid schools, libraries, and nonprofit organizations in hurricane-damaged communities along the Gulf Coast in their recovery and will |
| |authorize the San Diego County Library Director to assist the San Diego Futures Foundation in identifying schools and libraries in |
| |the Gulf Coast area that could benefit from the use of donated computers. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |There is no fiscal impact associated with this proposal. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |SUPERVISOR COX: |
| |Support the one-time donation of refurbished County computers by the San Diego Futures Foundation to schools, libraries and nonprofit|
| |organizations in hurricane-damaged communities along the Gulf Coast. |
| |Direct the Chief Administrative Officer to draft a letter for the Chairman’s signature to the San Diego Futures Foundation expressing|
| |the Board of Supervisors’ support for the one-time donation of refurbished County computers outside San Diego County to benefit |
| |schools, libraries, and nonprofit organizations in hurricane-damaged communities along the Gulf Coast. |
| |Direct the Chief Administrative Officer to authorize the San Diego County Library Director to assist the San Diego Futures Foundation|
| |in identifying schools and libraries in the Gulf Coast area that could benefit from the use of donated computers. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Roberts, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |
| |
|17. |SUBJECT: |CONDEMNING THE MEXICAN CONGRESS FOR APPROVAL OF LEGISLATION LEGALIZING DRUGS IN MEXICO |
| | |(DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |Today’s action will adopt a resolution by the San Diego County Board of Supervisors condemning the Mexican Congress for their |
| |approval of legislation that would legalize the possession of an assortment of drugs from marijuana to heroin in Mexico. In |
| |addition, the action would direct the Chief Administrative Officer to draft a letter for the Chair’s signature to send to the |
| |President of Mexico urging him to veto the legislation and to forward a copy of the County’s letter to the President of the United |
| |States and the County’s federal elected representatives. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |There are no fiscal impacts associated with this recommendation. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |SUPERVISOR JACOB: |
| |Adopt the attached Resolution condemning the Mexican Congress for approval of legislation that would legalize the possession of |
| |certain drugs in Mexico. |
| |Direct the Chief Administrative Officer to draft a letter for the Chair’s signature to the President of Mexico urging his veto of the|
| |legislation and to send a copy of the County’s letter to the President of the United States and the County’s federal representatives.|
| |ACTION: |
| |Changing recommendation 2 to read: Direct the Chief Administrative Officer to draft a letter for the Chairman’s signature, urging |
| |President Fox to maintain his opposition to the legalization of street drugs, in the event the idea is resurrected in the future; ON |
| |MOTION of Supervisor Roberts, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent, adopting Resolution No.|
| |06-070 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO CONDEMNING THE MEXICAN CONGRESS FOR APPROVING |
| |LEGISLATION THAT WOULD EASE DRUG POSSESSION LAWS IN MEXICO. |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|18. |SUBJECT: |ALLOCATION OF COMMUNITY PROJECTS FUNDS |
| | |(DISTRICT: 2) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |Several communities in East County have demonstrated a need for improvements to their community or recreational facilities, and have |
| |shown that they are prepared to work together with other jurisdictions and community members to provide their communities with |
| |opportunities to stay active. This action will provide funds to several organizations to improve community or recreational facilities|
| |in East County. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |The fiscal impact of these recommendations is $43,000. The funding source is FY 05-06 District Two Community Projects. This action |
| |will result in the addition of no new staff years and no future costs. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |SUPERVISOR JACOB: |
| |Authorize Ramona Parks & Recreation Association to use $23,400 of previously awarded District Two Community Projects funds (FY 04-05)|
| |to upgrade the existing lighting at the Fred Grand Arena with more energy efficient arena lighting fixtures. |
| |Allocate $43,000 from the District Two Community Projects Fund (Org. 0262) to the Boys & Girls Club of East County for the La Mesa |
| |Teen Center Capital Campaign to purchase carpeting and flooring, game tables, computers and kitchen equipment. |
| |Authorize the Chief Financial Officer to execute an amendment to the grant agreement with Ramona Parks & Recreation Association and a|
| |grant agreement with the Boys & Girls Club of East County, establishing terms for the receipt of the funds described above. |
| |Find that these grant awards have a public purpose. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Roberts, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|19. |SUBJECT: |LOCAL COMMUNITY PROJECTS (DISTRICT: 1) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |The County of San Diego is fortunate to have an opportunity to reinvest taxpayer money into our communities for the benefit of the |
| |public. This action will assist the County in meeting the needs of individuals and families. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |The fiscal impact of the proposed recommendations is $322,500.00. These actions will result in the addition of no staff years and no|
| |future costs. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |SUPERVISOR COX: |
| |Allocate $10,000 from the Community Projects budget (org 15650) to Accessible San Diego for costs associated with printing of the |
| |Access In San Diego guide for persons with disabilities. |
| | |
| |Allocate $75,000 from the Community Projects budget (org 15650) to the Balboa Theatre Foundation for costs associated with the |
| |restoration and installation of the historic Wonder Morton Organ in the newly restored Balboa Theatre. |
| |Allocate $13,600 from the Community Projects budget (org 15650) to Campfire USA San Diego and Imperial Counties Chapter for equipment|
| |and supplies for the After School Apartment Programs in Chula Vista and transportation and attendance fees for Summer Day Camp. |
| |Allocate $100,000 from the Community Projects budget (org 15650) to the City of San Diego Park and Recreation Department for part of |
| |the costs to construct a ranger station in the Otay River Valley Regional Park. |
| |Allocate $10,000 from the Community Projects budget (org 15650) to the San Diego Blood Bank Foundation for the purchase of a |
| |refrigeration system for the San Diego Blood Bank. |
| |Allocate $15,000 from the Community Projects budget (org 15650) to San Diego Coastkeeper for costs associated with the cleanup |
| |efforts of the 2006 California Coastal Cleanup Day, San Diego County. |
| |Allocate $5,000 from the Community Projects budget (org 15650) to the San Diego Hunger Coalition for costs associated with the South |
| |Bay Kickoff Event for the 2006 Summer Lunch Program. |
| |Transfer $5,900 from the Community Projects budget (org 15650) to the Office of Emergency Services (org 52550) for the purchase of |
| |Earthquake Safety Kits for Earthquake Safety Workshops in the First Supervisorial District. |
| |Transfer $60,000 from the Community Projects budget (org 15650) to the Department of Parks and Recreation (Org 52806 Account 54976) |
| |to purchase a fully loaded tractor with rear power take off, for use in the Otay Valley Regional Park. |
| |Transfer $28,000 from the Community Projects budget (Org 15650) to the Department of Parks and Recreation (Org 52806 Account 54976) |
| |to purchase a chipper and large-scale aerification machine for use in the Tijuana River Valley Regional Park. |
| |Find that the grant awards described above have a public purpose. |
| |Authorize the Chief Financial Officer to execute grant agreements with the organizations listed in recommendations 1 through 7, |
| |establishing terms for the receipt of the funds described above. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Roberts, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|20. |SUBJECT: |NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING: |
| | |THE ISSUANCE OF TAX-EXEMPT OBLIGATIONS BY THE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL FINANCE AUTHORITY ON BEHALF OF THE ST. |
| | |AUGUSTINE’S SCHOOL OF SAN DIEGO |
| | |(DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |Approve the tax-exempt financing by the California Municipal Finance Authority (the “Authority”), for the benefit of St. Augustine’s |
| |School of San Diego (the “School”). The Authority is a Joint Powers Authority created to strengthen local communities by promoting |
| |economic development and charitable activities throughout the state of California. |
| |The School, through an application process, applied with the Authority requesting the issuance of tax-exempt obligations in an amount|
| |not to exceed $12,000,000 (the “Bonds”). The proceeds will be used to finance, refinance or reimburse the School for the cost of (a)|
| |the construction of buildings, (b) the acquisition and installation of equipment, furniture and furnishings, and (c) to pay for |
| |certain costs of issuance related o the Bonds. |
| |The only role of the County of San Diego in this project is to approve the financing solely for purposes of satisfying the public |
| |approval requirement of Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Similar approvals have been given to other issuances by|
| |the Authority. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |If approved, this proposal will result in $1,000 of revenue to be used to fund the County’s Investor Relation Programs as approved by|
| |the Board of Supervisors in the County’s Debt Management Policy (B-65). No additional staff years will be required. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER AND DEBT ADVISORY COMMITTEE |
| |Pursuant to Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code, hold a public hearing regarding the financing of the project. |
| |Adopt the resolution approving the Authority’s issuance of tax-exempt obligations in an amount not to exceed $12,000,000 of |
| |tax-exempt obligations for the benefit of the St. Augustine’s School of San Diego. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Roberts, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board closed the Hearing and took action as recommended, on |
| |Consent, adopting Resolution No. 06-071 entitled: RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO AUTHORIZING AND |
| |APPROVING A LOAN AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO WHICH THE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL FINANCE AUTHORITY WILL MAKE A TAX-EXEMPT LOAN TO ST. |
| |AUGUSTINE’S SCHOOL OF SAN DIEGO OR A RELATED ENTITY IN AN AGGREGATE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $12,000,000 FOR THE PURPOSE OF FINANCING OR |
| |REFINANCING THE COST OF THE ACQUISITION, CONSTRUCTION, REHABILITATION, INSTALLATION AND EQUIPPING OF CERTAIN PROPERTY, PROVIDING THE |
| |TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR SUCH LOAN AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO. |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|21. |SUBJECT: |NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING: |
| | |THE ISSUANCE OF TAX-EXEMPT OBLIGATIONS BY THE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL FINANCE AUTHORITY ON BEHALF OF THE AMERICAN |
| | |HERITAGE FOUNDATION |
| | |(DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |Approve the tax-exempt financing by the California Municipal Finance Authority (the “Authority”), for the benefit of the American |
| |Heritage Education Foundation (“American Heritage”), Escondido Charter High School District (“Escondido Charter”) and Heritage K-8 |
| |Charter School (“Heritage Charter” and, together with American Heritage and Escondido Charter, the “Borrowers”). The Authority is a |
| |Joint Powers Authority created to strengthen local communities by promoting economic development and charitable activities throughout|
| |the State of California. |
| | |
| |American Heritage, through an application process, applied with the Authority to issue tax-exempt obligations in an amount not to |
| |exceed $26,000,000 (the “Bonds”). The proceeds of the Bonds will be used to (a) finance on behalf of the Borrowers the acquisition, |
| |construction, improvement, rehabilitation, furnishing and or equipping of certain public charter school facilities, (b) refund one or|
| |more outstanding indebtedness and (c) to pay for certain costs of issuance related to the Bonds. The only role of the County of San |
| |Diego in this project is to approve the financing solely for purposes of satisfying the public approval requirement of Section 147(f)|
| |of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Similar approvals have been given to other issuances by the Authority. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |If approved, this proposal will result in $1,000 of revenue to be used to fund the County’s Investor Relation Programs as approved by|
| |the Board of Supervisors in the County’s Debt Management Policy (B-65). No additional staff years will be required. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER AND DEBT ADVISORY COMMITTEE |
| |Pursuant to Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code, hold a public hearing regarding the financing of the project. |
| | |
| | |
| |Adopt the resolution approving Authority’s issuance of tax-exempt and/or taxable obligations in an amount not to exceed |
| |$26,000,000 for the benefit of American Heritage, Escondido Charter and Heritage Charter. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Roberts, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board closed the Hearing and took action as recommended, on |
| |Consent, adopting Resolution No. 06-072 entitled: RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO AUTHORIZING AND |
| |APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF REVENUE BONDS BY THE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL FINANCE AUTHORITY FOR THE BENEFIT OF AMERICAN HERITAGE EDUCATION |
| |FOUNDATION, ESCONDIDO CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT AND HERITAGE K-8 CHARTER SCHOOL, OR ONE OR MORE RELATED ENTITIES, IN AN AGGREGATE |
| |PRINCIPAL AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $26,000,000 FOR THE PURPOSE OF FINANCING OR REFINANCING THE COST OF THE ACQUISITION, CONSTRUCTION, |
| |REHABILITATION, INSTALLATION AND EQUIPPING CERTAIN PROPERTY, PROVIDING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR SUCH REVENUE BONDS AND OTHER |
| |MATTERS RELATING THERETO. |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|22. |SUBJECT: |COMMUNICATIONS RECEIVED (DISTRICTS: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |Board Policy A-72, Board of Supervisors Agenda and Related Process, authorizes the Clerk of the Board to prepare a Communications |
| |Received for Board of Supervisors' Official Records. Routine informational reports, which need to be brought to the attention of the|
| |Board of Supervisors yet not requiring action, are listed on this document. Communications Received documents are on file in the |
| |Office of the Clerk of the Board. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |Not Applicable. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER: |
| |Note and file. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Roberts, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|23. |SUBJECT: |ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: |
| | |SECOND CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE: HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY SUNSET REVIEW OF BOARD |
| | |POLICIES AND ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |On April 25, 2006 (4), the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent, introducing Ordinance for further |
| |consideration and adoption on May 9, 2006. |
| |In accordance with Board of Supervisors Policy A-76, Sunset Review, the Health and Human Services Agency periodically reviews certain|
| |Board policies and the Administrative Code to ensure that obsolete policies and Code provisions are deleted and remaining policies |
| |and code provisions reflect current standards and practices. |
| |Based on the Sunset Review Process, Agency staff has reviewed Board Policy A-99 (Tobacco Use/Prevention and Cessation), County |
| |Administrative Code Article XV-B (Health and Human Services Charges and Fees) and County Administrative Code Article XLVIII (San |
| |Diego County Veterans Advisory Council) and recommends revisions for Board approval. |
| |Proposed changes are technical in nature and include updating statistical numbers and clarifying language to strengthen policy and |
| |reflect current Board practice. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |
| |Adopt ordinance titled: |
| | |
| |AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE RELATING TO HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY CHARGES AND |
| |FEES AND THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY VETERANS ADVISORY COUNCIL. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Roberts, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent, adopting Ordinance |
| |No. 9771 (N.S.) entitled: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE RELATING TO HEALTH AND HUMAN |
| |SERVICES CHARGES AND FEES AND THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY VETERANS ADVISORY COUNCIL. |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |
|24. |SUBJECT: |ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: |
| | |SECOND CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE XVI OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY |
| | |ADMINISTRATIVE CODE RELATING TO THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY CHILD CARE AND DEVELOPMENT PLANNING COUNCIL (DISTRICT: |
| | |ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |On April 25, 2006 (5), the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent, introducing Ordinance for further |
| |consideration and adoption on May 9, 2006. |
| |The Child Care and Development Planning Council (Planning Council) is advisory to the Board of Supervisors and the County Office of |
| |Education (COE). Its mandate is to assess local child care needs and to advise and advocate for child care issues. |
| |Board action is requested to approve amendments to the Child Care and Development Planning Council to: |
| |allow the Planning Council to appoint alternates previously approved by the Board and the COE to vacant membership positions, until |
| |the end of the calendar year; |
| |allow members and alternates to serve more than two consecutive terms; |
| |require 75% attendance at committee meetings as a condition of membership; and |
| |authorize other procedural changes as detailed in “Changes to Ordinance and Bylaws” below. |
| | |
| |Concurrent approval of these changes has been requested from the County Office of Education. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |
| |Adopt ordinance titled: |
| |AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE XVI OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE RELATING TO THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY CHILD CARE AND |
| |DEVELOPMENT PLANNING COUNCIL |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Roberts, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent, adopting Ordinance |
| |No. 9772 (N.S.) entitled: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE XVI OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE RELATING TO THE SAN DIEGO |
| |COUNTY CHILD CARE AND DEVELOPMENT PLANNING COUNCIL. |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|25. |SUBJECT: |ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: |
| | |SECOND CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE: AMENDMENT TO THE COMPENSATION ORDINANCE (DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |On April 25, 2006 (11), the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent, introducing Ordinance for further |
| |consideration and adoption on May 9, 2006. |
| |The proposed amendment to the San Diego County Compensation Ordinance is at the request of the San Diego County Employees Retirement |
| |Association Board and part of the ongoing effort to manage and maintain a skilled and competent workforce dedicated to sustaining |
| |operational excellence and serving the public. This amendment adjusts salaries in selected classifications to attract qualified |
| |candidates. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |The implementation of this salary adjustment will have no negative effect on the funding status of the County Employee Retirement |
| |System (CERS). Funds for this recommendation are included in the 2005-06 budget. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |
| |Adopt ordinance titled: |
| |AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COMPENSATION ORDINANCE AND ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Roberts, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent, adopting Ordinance |
| |No. 9773 (N.S.) entitled: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COMPENSATION ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING AUTHORIZED CLASSIFICATIONS, CHARACTERISTICS,|
| |AND COMPENSATION. |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |
| |
|26. |SUBJECT: |ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: |
| | |APPOINTMENTS (DISTICTS: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |These appointments are in accordance with applicable Board Policy A–74, Citizen Participation in County Boards, Commissions and |
| |Committees. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |N/A |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |SUPERVISOR JACOB: |
| |Reappoint William A. Biggs as a member to the Ramona Cemetery District Board of Trustees for a term to expire January 5, 2009. |
| |Reappoint Takao D. Takeuchi as a member to the Pomerado Cemetery District Board of Trustees for a term to expire January 4, 2010. |
| |Appoint Steven Stockwell as a member to the Lakeside Design Review Board for a term to expire May 9, 2008. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Roberts, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|27. |SUBJECT: |LOCAL COMMUNITY PROJECTS GRANTS (DISTRICT: 3) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |Funding for the Community Projects Grant program was included in the fiscal year 2005-2006 adopted budget in order to further public |
| |purposes throughout the County. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |The current year total combined cost of these 3 projects is $37,500. The funding source is the Community Projects Budget (org 0263).|
| |This will result in the addition of no staff years and no future year costs. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |SUPERVISOR SLATER-PRICE: |
| |Allocate $10,000 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to the San Diego Blood Bank Foundation to assist with the |
| |purchase of a new refrigeration system. |
| |Allocate $12,500 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to the San Diego Regional Energy Office to offset costs |
| |resulting from putting on San Diego’s largest and most successful green energy event – Solar Energy Week – which is being held |
| |September 24 – 30, 2006. |
| |Allocate $15,000 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to San Diego Coastkeeper for the 2006 California Coastal |
| |Clean-up day in San Diego County. |
| |Authorize the Chief Financial Officer to execute grant agreements with these organizations establishing terms for receipt of the |
| |funds described above. |
| |Find that all grant awards described above have a public purpose. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Roberts, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|28. |SUBJECT: |THE COST OF ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION TO SAN DIEGO COUNTY (DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |San Diego County is adversely affected by the tide of illegal immigrants entering the United States. A recent Pew Hispanic Center |
| |study estimates the number of illegal immigrants inside the U.S. has grown to at least 12 million and now makes up one in every 20 |
| |workers. |
| |According to a 2000 San Diego State University report, the annual cost of providing law enforcement, criminal justice services, and |
| |emergency medical care to criminal illegal immigrants in San Diego County is more than $50 million annually. Although that number |
| |has likely increased, it is unknown by how much. The Hospital Association of San Diego and Imperial Counties estimates that the |
| |uncompensated cost of treating illegal immigrants in San Diego County has grown by 63% in the last five years to $119 million in |
| |2005. |
| |Many core county programs, including but not limited to public health services, county jails, alcohol & drug treatment centers, and |
| |child protective services, are being used by illegal immigrants. Unfortunately, no comprehensive study has been done to determine how|
| |much that costs the taxpayers of San Diego County. |
| |The public has a right to know how much illegal immigration costs their county government. This information would also be useful in |
| |petitioning the federal government for increased reimbursement and grants. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHAIRMAN HORN: |
| |Direct the CAO to return to the Board with a report on what would be involved if the County were to conduct a study to determine the |
| |fiscal impact of illegal aliens on county services. The report should address what reliable information the study will be able |
| |to collect on the question of the fiscal impact, as well as the costs to conduct the study. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Horn, seconded by Supervisor Jacob, the Board of Supervisors directed the Chief Administrative Officer to |
| |return to the Board with a report on what would be involved if the County were to conduct a study to determine the fiscal impact of |
| |illegal aliens on county services. The report should address what reliable information the study will be able to collect on the |
| |question of the fiscal impact, as well as the costs to conduct the study, and further directed the Chief Administrative Officer to |
| |use any and all current information available from research and other institutions, such as San Diego State University and the Border|
| |Counties Coalition, for current data concerning the costs associated with illegal immigration, without duplicating the County’s |
| |efforts at the taxpayer’s expense. |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|29. |SUBJECT: |ALLOCATION OF COMMUNITY PROJECTS FUNDS |
| | |(DISTRICT: 4) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |The County’s fiscal condition has enabled it to reinvest taxpayer money in our communities for the benefit of the public. The |
| |recommended action proposes that these projects of great benefit to San Diego County be funded using Community Projects Funds. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |The total combined cost of the proposed recommendations is $293,700. Appropriations are available in the Community Projects Budget |
| |unit (0264). This action will result in the addition of no staff years and no future costs. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |VICE CHAIRMAN ROBERTS: |
| |Allocate $15,000 from the Community Projects Budget unit (0264) to Family Health Centers of San Diego ................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- county of san diego board of supervisors
- federal update november 02 2018 government affairs ca
- chapter one defining public administration
- el roadmap policy english learners ca dept of education
- bankers online
- data information knowledge american nurses association
- each of the ten massdep stormwater management policy
- final draft feb
Related searches
- san diego gs pay scale
- uchs san diego bell schedule
- san diego writer s conference 2020
- university high school san diego ca
- city of new haven board of education
- san diego city high school
- san diego high schools
- san diego county high schools
- san diego writers conference
- preliminary change of ownership san diego ca
- san diego county retirement association
- 2019 san diego county fair