Thephilsopherprophetoftheedenprotocols.files.wordpress.com



Mock Trial

Members of an established cult have the power to define a new upstart, or old rival, with less power, as a ‘cult’, while defining themselves as a ‘religion’. That is the main difference between a ‘cult’ and a ‘religion’. The power to define. The hegemonic power granted to it by having ‘established’ itself, in a society, over many generations, or at least the one generation, from birth, so that it has managed to condition its members with a particular ‘shared subjective reality’. When it becomes truly hegemonic, this often approximates a consensual ‘social reality’ among the entire society. Those who do NOT share the beliefs will act as if they do, or at minimum say or do nothing to contradict that ‘social reality’ or ‘consensus official fiction’, for fear of negative consequences. So there is will little if any open rejection of it for what it is. A social construct. Often very far from convergent with ‘objective’ facts. And those who do openly challenge it will be labelled as mentally ill, ignorant, evil, ‘aberrant’ etc…

Judaism began as a cult, with just one family. It’s head was clearly a competent master of the arts of ‘persuasion’, as a priest trained in Ur, in Sumer. His cult was later taken over by a magician / priest we call ‘Moses’. He was tyrannical and brutal, as cult leaders tend to be. He brooked no challenges. He was quite willing to massacre thousands of his more ‘lukewarm’ followers, to ensure total compliance and submission to his tyrannical will, which he expressed in the typical fashion, employing the ‘transferred authority’ of his ‘God’, ‘YHWH’.

The fact of all cults is that you get dissension, often resulting in ‘schisms’ within the cult, and the formation of a number of ‘similar’ cults, with some shared beliefs, and some divergent beliefs, and practices, and rituals, and rites, and holidays, and clothing, and dance, and food, which become ‘traditional’ over many generations.

We see this with the ‘mixed multitude’ that came out of Egypt with Moses, which reverted to, or continued, many of their own ‘traditions’. Moses had them massacred by his more ‘orthodox’ cult followers. This is the simplest way to prevent ‘dissension’, and to maintain the ‘orthodoxy’, the ‘cult dogmas’, the ‘cult tenets of belief’, the unreflecting, totally uncritical, unthinking compliance with the dogmas, beliefs, rules, and codes of the cult. This willingness to employ the most brutal of violence, including ‘ripping up pregnant women’ is a clear indicator that you are dealing with a ‘cult’ mentality. And what most people would think of as a ‘dangerous cult’.

Scientology is a tame kitten compared to the cult of Judaism. But while Royal Commissions and public enquiries are launched into ‘Scientology’, anyone who dares criticize the ‘cult of judaism’ is soon silenced. Like during the times of the Jewish run Jew.S.S.R Soviet system, most people avoid challenging the cult of Judaism, and its powerful members, not so much from fear of being killed (yes they had the death penalty for that in the U.S.S.R, as the first order of business after the ‘jews’ gained power there), or being sent to a labor camp, but simply a fear of jeopardizing their career chances, or losing their job. Which is today the main reason YOU won’t hear what I’ve got to say here, almost anywhere else. Simple fear of jeopardizing careers, being labelled with one of the many terms copyrighted by jews such as ‘anti-semitic’, or ‘holocaust denier’ or ‘tin foil hat conspiracy nutter’, or ‘irrational’, and even ‘mentally ill’. At very least ‘aberrant’. The favorite term of lawyers and judges these days.

But please let me clarify. There ARE people who are ‘antil-semitic’ in the ‘official’ sense of harboring an irrational hatred of all jews.

You see you can have an irrational hatred of something even though you would, if you were informed, find a thousand RATIONAL reasons to hate it.

The point is that you haven’t looked, or been informed, and have no idea of the many RATIONAL reasons to hate the thing, and yet you still hate it. Just because you need to hate something, and that is the thing available. The thing offered to you as a ‘legitimate’ target of your hatred, by parents, significant others, the mass media, your teachers, your own cult priests, the legal system, and so on.

Today most of the hatred of Islam is of such an IRRATIONAL nature. Deliberately manufactured by the mass media propaganda, and government propaganda such as ‘911 was an act of Islamic terrorism’. The same goes for most ‘Jewish’ hatred of Nazi Germany, and Germans. It is irrational. Deliberately conditioned by cradle to grave propaganda, presented in the education system, the mass media, the popular media, the controlled alternative media. It is ubiquitous. Literally.

So this document is not intended for those with an IRRATIONAL hatred of ‘Jews’. It is NOT intended to incite anyone to violence against any Jew. However it is intended to open a dialog with the members of the Jewish community who are unaware of what many of their members are doing. IN fact of what their belief system itself contributes to. To inform them. If they then consent to continue defining themselves as ‘Jewish’, and engaging in criminal behavior, like any criminal, they must be prosecuted. And as many criminal gangs share a common culture, with identifyable membership rites, clothing, rituals, etc, by being affiliated with that ‘cult’ that ‘community’ that ‘criminal organisation’, they must be willing to allow the maximum transparency, so that WE can see who is the active criminal within the organisation, and who just happens to be affiliated with them, by birth, by family, by peer group, by pure chance of geography and so on.

If you are affiliated with an organisation whose leadership are abusing it for their own criminal gain, you must see that it is in your interest to publicly and openly distance yourself, and help us investigate your organisation. So we can rid it of the criminal element, and salvage what is good of your cult, group, organisation, etc.

Everyone has some degree of emotional investment in their affiliation with the group. They associate loving parents with it. They associate landmark moments of their lives with it. The day they were initiated, and felt part of something bigger than themselves. They felt part of a tradition. They felt the security of belonging. Acceptance. Approval. The ‘coming of age’ ceremonies. The annual get togethers when all group members, they knew, would carry out the same rituals, reinforcing their sense of belonging to a group. The group may have a shared history, real or mythical, which gives life greater meaning and gives it a context. A context of pride and endurance. Of traditions. Feeling part of something that is much more enduring than a mere individual life. Feeling part of a ‘nation’ or ‘tribe’ or ‘tradition’ can be a very rewarding, satisfying experience that gives ‘meaning’ to a life otherwise quite devoid of meaning, satisfaction, achievement, status, pride, acceptance, approval, etc.

These can be very good things. Real ‘goods’. These can bring out the best in individuals and help them ‘bond’ with others, to form strong communities, encourage sharing and caring and social action, conscientious action, provide continuity of culture, and offer a basis for justice, peace, law, order, …

Even though I am convinced that ‘cults’ a.k.a ‘religions’ are NOT the optimal way to achieve all these good things, I am willing to tolerate them as most intellectual throughout time have, because for most people, the alternatives, though superior, are too morally and intellectually demanding.

So this paper is not about eliminating ‘Judaism’, or any other ‘cult’. It is about minimizing the risks / costs / dangers / threats, and optimalising the positive outcomes from such ‘group affiliation’ or ‘belief systems’.

No organisation can be allowed to glorify past genocides and slavery. No organisation can be allowed to incite its members to genocide and slavery.

The problem is that the very clever and powerful cult leadership, which in this case also ‘manages’ other ‘cults’, with or without the putative leaders of those cults being aware of this fact, has the power to ensure that some cults remain above criticism. Above the law. They are ‘protected’ by the law. By their power. They misdirect all investigations into other cults. Cults they themselves either set up, or infiltrated and took control of, as part of their ‘divide and conquer’ strategy, and to use these other cults as mere means to their own ends. Usually without those other cult members having any idea. In fact these other cult members will have been conditioned to hate each other, usually irrationally, and often due to orchestrated acts of violence carried out by each cult, against the others….to give the members genuine reasons to hate and fear the other cults.

But remember that most of these other cults were established, or taken over, by our dominant hegemonic cult. Yes, the same people who established the cult of Judaism, also established, or gained control of, Christianity, which it splintered into violently opposed sects, then Islam which it again splintered into violently opposed sects, the Freemason lodges, the Illuminati, the cult of Marxism, and even ‘Krony Capitalism’ a.k.a ‘Banksterism’, until it came to control all the other cults it wanted to, and had the power and money to corrupt any cults that arose independently of it, or splintered off from its controlled groups.

So ‘Judiasm’ itself is an expression of the cult, while being one of the earliest continual cults itself. It’s leaders learned their cult trade in Sumer, then Egypt, then Babylon, and then spread throughout the world, gaining control of every important power node, from banking, to news, to mass media, to film and music, to the judiciary.

This is not some lame half-baked conspiracy theory. These are facts that many people are quite capable of lucidly proving to anyone willing and able to accept facts, and compelling arguments. Which is very few, given the total conditioning, from birth to death, of most people on this planet today.

I have spent a great deal of time and energy investigating what the best interrogators of reality have to offer. And now I intend presenting this data. My earlier books were banned. Because I was naïve in how I presented the information. Straight to the point. Clearly. I felt rushed, with a sense of urgency. Not free to take my time to express myself ideally. Of course it doesn’t matter how you say these things, in the end, because IF you merely SAY them, in ANY way, you will be shot down, locked up, ruined, and worse.

So I don’t expect to find a way to express truth without paying dearly for it. But what I do take seriously is that I can avoid automatically alienating a lot of potential readers by being more careful and considered in how I express what I have to say. Like when you try to be assertive with people with more power thanyou, or hostile to you.They will of course claim you are being aggressive. Abrasive. Non-cooperative. Not a team player. Difficult. Bitchy. All manner of perjoratives can be flung at you to silence you. But you yourself will be able to be more sure that you are NOT these things, if you take the effort to consider your language, body language, tone, choice of timing, location, manner etc. Just to fill your OWN criteria as a conscientious person. You want to give the truth the best chance of being heard. Let alone accommodated / accepted / acted on / beleved / etc.

Many of us, like Brendon O’Connell, will read things we wrote, or watch ourselves saying things in videos, and cringe at our choice of expression, our tone, our ‘ranting’, our emotional tone, etc… We ‘say’ things that do NOT really reflect our overall intention / meaning / what we have to say / how we feel…or we realise how what we say can so easily be misunderstood by anyone who doesn’t know us, and our entire body of work…and worse, deliberately misrepresented out of that context, to the benefit of our shared, mutual, violent, desperate, deluded, vicious, malicious, often psychotic, delusional, enemies.

The enemies of freedom, truth, justice, fairness, and beauty. Even though these enemies are entirely convinced of their ‘righteousness’, as a typical ‘cult’ mentality, and believe they ARE the truth, and what they want MUST be right, and good, because it ‘suits’ them. It ‘satisfies’ them. It ‘feels right’ to them. They ‘know’ it to be true. And anyone who opposes them, and their cult, MUST necessary be wrong, evil, criminal, demonic…everyone ahs a sense of entitlement…some feel entitled to much more than others…these are the cult leaders…

So to make things clear, this is NOT about ‘hating jews’. It is about self interest. Public interest. National interest.

If ‘Judaism’ has nothing to hide, then it will welcome our interrogations and investigations. IT will open its doors to us. And if it won’t, then we will need to compel compliance, just like we would with any other terrorist investigation, criminal investigation, national security issue, threat to the public good issue.

Sadly the cult members, as in all cults, are conditioned from birth to fear ‘outsiders’ who do not ‘understand’, or are ‘evil’ or ‘enemies’ as god chose that, or working for some ‘devil’ /adversary of the cult…with the worst intentions, malicious intentions…to the point of planning the death of every cult member, at any moment…LITERALLY in the case of many members of the cult of Judaism.

This cult originally maintained inbreeding for many generations, after genocidally occupying other nations lands and territories. So there was, for a time, some biological element. Members of the cult leadership were literally ‘bred’ from a ‘common stock’. Those who did no fully share the cults values / beliefs / rituals etc were ‘excommunicated’ literally kicked out of the gene pool, the common breeding stock…retaining only the phenotypes and genotypes most accommodating to / able and willing to adapt to, the cult beliefs…it took Moses 40 year to breed the first whole-hearted/ fully brain washed cult membership, that he would direct to commit the first documented acts of genocide. Since then this cult has had thousands of years to internally ‘breed’ a particular ‘type’ of person to fill the leadership positions in this cult.

However most cults tend to schism. There will always arise people who reject total conformity with absurd dogma, or who will not submit to others, and thus take the existing dogma, tweek it a bit, to form their own ‘cult’. So after Moses initial success at cult brainwashing with total centralised power structure, which lasted a few generations, of tight ‘inbreeding’ and ‘exclusivity’ and ‘isolation’ of the cult membership from external influences / ideas / challenges to its absurd dogmas and centralised power structures, things fell apart, and the newly found cult state of Israel fell into civil war, with factions fighting for power, and ultimately breaking off into two states.

The cult then began seeking converts to increase its power base. To find ‘new talent’ and to ‘infiltrate’ every power structure in the world.

The cult formed a simple philosophy…money is power…lend money at interest, and never borrow…and in this way you will gain effective control of all the ‘nations’ of the earth…you will be able to buy and rent anyone, and anything…preselect the rulers of every nation, so that even when their populations get to ‘vote’ on them, the successful candidate will ALWAYS be one of your own guys…man or woman…you can back the princes and kings who serve you best…finance weaker powers so they can become threats to rival states, breed insecurity in this way…lend money to anyone who can bring chaos to order…bring about wars…so nations become indebted to you…so you can determine their policies…

Sure, every now and then the host nations will wise up to your cult actions, and carry out pogroms, and evictions…but you know you can use this to your cult advantage, to breed fear into your cult members…the feeling of shared history of victimisation, proof that they are being attacked by the devil, who hates all good things like your cult…because your cult is gods cult…all proof to the cult member that they must be the ‘chosen people’…in fact the one defining element of the entire cult, over time, and the entire planet, is this shared sense of being the ‘victim’ of others evil, their envy of your ‘chosen people’ status…proof of what you’ve been conditioned to believe and feel from birth, that you are special, and god has chosen you, and the rest of the world hates you for this, and persecutes you…so you must help your cult gain total power, so that one day the cult, with gods blessing, at his command, can kill every man woman child and animal of those who will not join your cult, and serve your cult leaders, as you do…

This is not some far fetched fantasy conspiracy theory…we can prove / demonstrate / back up all these arguments..if we were free to…of course we are not…the cult which is contained within, which dominates, Judaism, and which has gained control of all the other ‘secret societies’ and ‘nodes of power’, will of course stop us informing you. Waking you up to the threat they pose. To what I call their ‘jew world order’, for want of a better descriptor.

Jew world order refers to the core of this conspiracy which has operated since at least the days of Moses, or the days when the ‘myths’ of Moses were being written in Babylon, often using much earlier Sumerian myths as a basis.

The core of this ‘new world order’ is associated an affiliated and operates within a community we know as ‘Jews’. Of course many of them operate as ‘Catholics’ and ‘Protestants’ and ‘Muslims’ and ‘Freemasons’ and ‘Illuminati’, or ‘Central Banksters’ or ‘Hollywood’. However they are all leaders of this cult with its ‘roots’ in Judaism. So the most apt title is ‘Jew’ world order.

This does NOT mean that every self-defined ‘Jew’ is aware of this, condones this, etc. But they DO at miminum passively support it, by simply accepting some parts of the dogma of the cult as true. By supporting the ‘Shoa’ Business. The ‘myths that ‘jews’ do NOT control Hollywood, the mass media, the legal system, the eduation system, the world financial system, to various degrees ranging from total control, to enough control to manufacture consent and manipulate public opinion just enough to ‘manouevre’ the worlds powers in the directions they require, to realise their publically stated ambiton of a ‘jew world order’.

Not all ‘jews’ will agree with the Rabbi in the video. But given how brazenly he commits crimes which would put me in jail for life, if I merely repeated his words, but replaced the term ‘Amalek’ with ‘Jew’, or even ‘Jew world order Jew, he must feel confident of a mass of popular support. I could not get Youtube or the ADL or The southern poverty law center to even censor his video, let alone prosecute him for hate crimes, racial vilification (of all opposed to the jew world order whom he calls AMALEK), incitement to genocide etc.

So the mere fact that he can get away with these crimes must be a red flag. That he will never be censored or prosecuted for his statements. His crimes.

If L Ron Hubbard uttered anything close to these statements then Scientology would be at minimum closely investigated, probably banned.

So while I don’t assume this Rabbi speaks for all ‘jews’, what he does do is repeat what all of us who have investigated the cult of Judaism know to be core beliefs and intentions stated clearly, unequivocably, in their ‘books’ and ‘teachings’. He is a Rabbi, not some ‘crazy woman in a bus’. And yet he is saying the same things. Serve the jew world order or die. If a Rabbi has 1 million people turn up for his funeral procession, then you have to consider that his beleifs are shared by them e.g that non jews are mere cattle, fit only to serve the jews…as organ donors, slaves, donkeys, cattle…our lives of no consequence…like our Rabbi, only ‘jews’ have ‘souls’…enough ‘divinity’ in them to qualify as ‘human’…all the rest of us are irrational, dumb beats…incapable of logic or reason..unworthy of any more empathy than we would show a donkey, a beast of burden…who exists as a mere means to our ends…

If you are too lazy to bother reading what I have to offer, then I can’t save you. IF you are too cowardly to risk being embarrassed as politically incorrect, as an abolitionist would have been if they’d publically opposed slavery just a few hundred years ago, or a female suffrage supporter, opposed to women being denied the vote, just a few decades ago, or ‘blacks’ being denied basic human rights, and the vote, even fewer decades ago…then I cannot save you.

If you really ARE dumb cattle, I can’t save you.

In fact I cannot save you. Only YOU can save YOU. If you get informed now. Insist via all legal means to open a public investigation, not like the ‘official 911’ or ‘Nuremberg show trials’ investigations, but one inviting everyone to participate. Peacefully.

Or soon you will be fighting and dieing in the next jew world order orchestrated war. Or rotting in some prison cell for not being actively enough PRO the jew world order. Remember all the millions of Russians who were SURE that someone had made a mistake, and that as soon as Stalin learned of it, THEY and their families would be freed from the Gulag, the forced labor / slave labor camp…

I am going to try to present everything I’ve learned in the form of a trial process. So you can follow, and come to you own verdict. So far no-one has ever been allowed the resources, preparation, and opportunity to be given such a trial.

So this is my attempt to prove my ‘innocence’ in the court of public opinion, before the inevitable prosecution for one or other ‘hate crimes’, ‘holocaust denial’, incitement, vilification etc. I know if allowed to, I can easily prove my case. But of course I won’t be allowed to. I don’t have the resources to find the expert witnesses, and so allow their evidence to become admissible. I wouldn’t be given the time to present all this information. Or to give the jury the chance to ask questions, to gain clarifications…it would be much too much information for the average, brainwashed person to be able to digest, process, accept, come to terms with…too sudden a shock from their ‘social reality’ for it to have a chance to sink in. Most juries won’t have months to form a verdict. But YOU, the reader, or viewer of this, listener, if I get to finish it, will have the time to check for yourself..

NOTE that the jury during a trial are NOT allowed to research the case online, themselves, or even talk to other people about it…this is the biggest challenge…imagine being Brendon O’Connell,, trying to convince randomly chosen average people of things they ‘KNOW’ are NOT true…because they’ve been conditioned since birth to reject them etc…and then the jury being told they may NOT, CAN NOT, go online to check what he is saying…to view the original documents he is referring to…EVER…AT ALL…during the trial…what does THAT say about the system? The prosecution had their pick of ‘expert witnesses’…could chose the ones who would say what suited their case…while Brendon had ZERO chance to bring his evidence before the court as ‘admissible’ evidence…and even if he HAD…his trial was given only a few days duration…he even lost a large proportion of this time due to jury member illness..

So…this work attempts to open dialog with the ‘innocent’ dupes of the cult of Judaism, to save them, free them from their cult mentality prison, and the consequences coming their way due to the plans of their cult leadership…and to g ive the only ‘fair trial’ any of us are going to get. In the process these materials should be of use to anyone attempting to mount a defence, or willing, like Brendon, to risk a long prison sentence, by deliberately provoking their prosecution, so that they can have the details in this work made public knowledge, enetered inot the record…by arranging ‘expert witnesses’ and being able to prepare to counter and neutralize all the enemies stratagies, tricks, NLP, ploys, cons, etc…So please help me realise this project. And please go vegan, so you deserve the justice and freedom you want for you and yours. For as you do unto others, so shall be done unto you, to quote one of the wisest people associated with the cult of Judaism. Obadiah.

The only fair and balanced trial we are ever going to get, with all the appropriate expert witnesses, to tell something even approximating, ‘the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth’, to bring a jury ‘up to speed’ so that any ‘defence’ by a ‘holocaust deniar’ or ‘hate speech’ or ‘racial vilification’ or ‘incitement’ trial, involving ‘Jews’ as the ‘prosecution’ and ‘victim’, is if we carry out a mock trial. One we can control, and revise, and edit, until it is a reasonable approximation i.e has some correspondence to, what the ‘ideal’ trial would look and sound like…a trial in which we gave a jury every chance to overcome their lifelong conditioning and programming, stimulus response conditioning, brainwashing, misinformation, propaganda, etc…

I would love to have the ‘peak’ representatives of anti-zionism, historical revisionism re: ‘the holocaust’, finance, mass media etc experts… in this ‘mock’ trial, the irony is that it will be just and fair…to date all such trials have been a ‘mockery OF’ the very principles of ‘the truth, whole truth, nothing but’ and justice, and fair play etc…

In this ‘mock trial’ the audience, the viewer, the reader, the listener, would be the ‘Jury’, and we would allow each viewer the chance to register their ‘verdict’ re: is there reason to doubt the ‘holocaust’ narrative? Is there genuince reason for concern re: ‘the cult of judaism’, and grounds for official, transparent, investigations into the teaching of Judaism? Were the past ‘pogroms’ and ‘evictions’ of jews en masse from many nations in the past based on an irrational hatred? Or on reasonable, rational, grounds? Do ‘Jews’ have ‘too much’ power? Do they abuse it to manipulate public opinion, and to increase their power? Do they believe they have a right to rule the world etc and to commit genocide on all who would oppose them? is there a sect within world Judaism, / world jewry, we could fairly refer to as ‘the jew world order’..?

We will have the authors / researchers, or actors representing them, present the cases for the Holodomor, the faking of the holocaust ‘research’ and lack of any real proof…have representative ‘jews’ give testimony e.g the Shoa interviews, where we show what most people never see, the ‘eyewitness’ stating they never SAW with their own eyes, ANY gassings etc…but ‘believed’ what they had been told would happen, had happened, when they lost contact with family members after separation etc…

Have a Faurrison and any other ‘expert’ who actually proved that documents were ‘fake’, and that ‘zero reside of zyklon B gassings in supposed gas chambers…and have Ausschwitz head director admit ‘peer reviewed’ i.e did own tests and found same findings , admitting ‘gas chambers’ were ‘built by Russians after nazi’s left, using the air raid shelter / temporary morgue…and explain location to ‘jury’ so clear no possible way would have located gas chamber where supposedly did…show swimming pool, all photos…have ‘eyewitnesses’ or their children ‘admit’ went swimming in the pool etc, and that the ‘wall’ had zero traces of any ‘firing squads’ etc…

Have ‘expert’ appear i.e veteran of U.S.S Liberty…proving incontrovertibly that before 911, Operation Synaid carried out with same intention…i.e to justify war on Arabs … that time Egypt etc…on side of Israel…at time Israel had launced aggressive war…have U.N expert on Nuremberg laws testify that that represents a war crime, in combination with ‘The General’s son’ that writer who discovered that Israel had been aggressor…in 6 day war etc…

Have ‘eyewitness’ or their child appear stating they ‘saw’ with own eyes, Germans being tortured to force confessions re: death camps…

Have that 94 year old man appear stating he was threatened with terrible sentence if did no ‘go along with’ the ‘death camp’ story i.e the bookkeeper who still got 4 years…

In other words put together all the info I have…present it as ‘expert testimony’ from experts in the field…ideal actually living experts with reputations…we can ‘interview them’ in ‘mock trial’…and have chance to go over again and again, until we get clarity…i.e in real trial too confusing…back and forth, lose track…too much divergence between what jury ‘think they know’ and what being told …

Have ‘children of survivors’ explain what their parents told them…

Have ‘famous survivors’ either in box, or represented by actors…don’t go beyond ‘survivors’ own words in their memoirs / books… but like Hollywood, allow self ‘artistic’ freedom to ‘make truth clearer by introducing fictions that are ‘true’ as ‘representative’ and ‘consistent’ and ‘communicate message etc…can’t get that person’s comments? Was it on steemit? Check comments of steemit…can’t get on facebook? Or wayback machine? I like the way he put it…can’t remember exactly what he said…but was defending ‘fiction’ as ‘truthful’ etc…i.e ‘schindler’s list work of fiction…but who takes it that way? He defended as ‘truth’ though admitted fiction…in clevery way that almost convincing, but only if assume underlying assumptions ARE true…and they are not…so if O.K for Hollywood to do this, we can…and will state why…and use the very challenge to explain what Hollywoood has been doing, lying, pretending it was ‘artistic license’ ie ‘communicating the truth better than mere ‘facts’…etc…when really propaganda…any criticism they could make about our efforts here would only reveal their own lies … draw attention to them…of course we can…

Point is that we have no legal way to state the truth / facts / compelling arguments … but this ‘film’ / ‘play’ / ‘book’ / ‘radio play’ would be ‘art’…and never meet any reasonable charges of vilification etc…and if so, then who? The ‘eyewitnesses?’…if can get real ones…include REAL footage of interviews from Spielberg’s Shoa interviews…gas chambers were warm soapy water fell to their shock…’we were told X’…’did you see? Well no, tall walls between us, but we knew? Knew how? We were told. And we never saw our families again…after iron curtain…taken to either side of it…have case of t.v show reunion etc…

Write up first as information, hinting at use in ‘mock trial’…then later if get help, write up a screen play for it…invite ‘experts’ or ‘actors’ to portray…they will be reading scripts, which they can improvise so THEIR words…but we have a point to make…THEY have had it ALL THEIR WAY...they will say the truth is ‘biased’ and ‘unbalanced’…but we have no obligation to include their lies…accept where it proves our point e.g different colored gas, elevators, rate of incinerations etc…i.e that fucking lying cunt actor…

Also include ‘mock’ interrogation of Wiesel and Anne Frank copyright holders…stuff like that and all the other ‘faked’ biographies…we can ‘interrogate’ them without a judge ‘interfering’ because of his own assumptions / bias / fears of being labelled ‘holocaust denier’ or ‘sympathetic to national socialism’ etc…

Also interview that Rabbi have saying Hitler’s behavior WAS rational

And the Rabbi stating about murdering us all as Amalek

And the Rabbi saying that book is NOT the last word / definitive word / l.a.w law…defining Judaism…then go over all the quotes from the Talmud etc…maybe in form of interrogation…asking ‘does this book state this? Is this a misreading on my part? Bad translation?

Use all the legal stuff gleaned / learned from Brendon’s trial…get him chance to say what was prevented i.e all the evidence we have / he had but was not allowed to present…and all the witnesses he should have had / been allowed to bring / had been given resources to contact and arrange video conferencing etc..

Can do many ‘experts’ as video conferencing…i.e have expert ‘on site’ e.g at Auschwitz, showing evidence…in labs…in document centers, in Israel, etc…

Dedicate to all the brave souls who have been defamed in WWII and after, at Nuremberg, and since e.g Ernst Zundel etc…do brief biographies of all the ‘victims’ of ‘the jew world order’ including statistics on Palestininan casualties…etc…

Then invite ‘jury’ to decide’…and give them chance to ‘question’ anyone they wish…which NOT case in court…so can make up their mind…

Then give a few months for people to ‘report’ their ‘verdict’…then publish results…

I will start writing the basis for this project…collating the information and working out how best to ‘include’ it as testimony, evidence, who to have present it…etc …

Use all my books, and notes / essays never published…bible quotes…

Incorporate stuff on U.S constitution and how most current laws violate it, therefore unconstitutional, and thus the U.S citizen has no obligation to respect, and in fact every right to deny monopoly of force to its tyrannical, occupied govt…

Include facts that indicate Europe has been ‘occupied’ by the jew world order…central banksters … kalergi plan etc…find way ot incorporate as much info as possible, while remaining ‘coherent’ and ‘organic’ i.e fitting in idea of a ‘trial’ with viewer the ‘jury’…this time with access to ‘the whole truth’ and protected from clever ploys, lies, deceptions, propaganda, misrepresentation, and denial of US the right to present our case / arguments / facts / experts etc…evidence…

From Brendon O’Connell’s own notes

Discussion points for OPENING the URGENT and PRESSING IMMEDIATE dialog we MUST have with the ‘Jewish’ world

80G. Defences (1) It is a defence to a charge under section 78 or 80B to prove that the accused persons conduct was engaged in reasonably and in good faith - (b) in the course of any statement, publication, discussion or debate made or held, or any other conduct engaged in, for - 10205 (ii) any purpose that is in the public interest; and (c) in making or publishing a fair and accurate report or analysis of any event or matter of public interest.

One problem with most materials relating to ‘The Jew World Order’ is that they are written in haste, often of a relatively high emotional content, in response to some blatant lies, deafening hypocrisy, straight out misreprentation etc e.g a heated street debate, or quickly written blog, or hastily put together video. We simply do not have the luxury our ‘adversaries’ have, to draft, re-draft, get third party editors and proof readers, and legal opinions, to ensure our writing is as balanced, cool, calm, collected, precise, politically correct (if that is at all possible given the deliberate intention of our adversaries to weaponise the legal system, mass media, education systems etc as their offensive weapons, and weapons to prevent, deter, censor, and make virtually impossible, any sort of articulate response on our part…)…so they can ‘strain at our gnats’, so to speak, while forcing us, through their control and ownership and influence over the mass media, legal system, and education system, thus over public opinion, and all public discourse, and thus ‘social reality’ and ‘manufactured consent’ e.g that 911 was Muslims and ‘The Holocaust’ as portrayed by Hollywood, and ‘The Nuremberg show trials’, was ‘real’ and ‘really happened’, or that ‘Judaism, whatever that is to whichever particular self defined ‘Jew’ you are speaking to, with, or about, at the time, is a ‘race’, or an ‘ethnic group’ or a ‘religion’, based on peace, justice, goodwill…

Most articles written by our ‘adversary’ are paid for by someone, edited by professionals, ‘focus group tested’, and audited by legal counsel and other professionals such as marketing professionals, public relations professionals, and the usual editors and proof readers. The writers can spend days of their own time, as this is their paid occupation. Add to that the ‘days’ of other person’s editing, proofreading, researching, tinkering, polishing, legal wrangling, etc, and even the simplest article in a supposedly ‘independent’ blog, has benefitted from weeks of human mental exertion by professionals paid to do what they do.

On top of this, our adversaries have special legal protection to be able to (now I may not legally say ‘lie’) ‘assert’ many things as ‘factual’ and ‘historically accurate’ that have been disproven over and over again, by independent, competent, expert, peer-reviewed, researchers and investigators, from chemists, to document specialists, to archeaologists, to CIA analysts, and Formerly highly respected historians and even the former head of the U.S Army School of …. Etc…

‘Legal fictions’ are commonplace. Such as the ‘legal fiction’ that a corporation is a ‘person’, with all the same ‘rights’ as a ‘legal person’, like you or me.

So I assume it is not a crime to state that ‘The Holocaust’ is such a legal fiction in many nations, such as Germany. In Germany, it is defined as a legally ‘established’ fact, and any ‘objective evidence that contradicts this legal fiction is inadmissible in court’. In fact, even referring to it will get you a huge fine and lengthy prison sentence in a high security prison, in solitary confinement, with no access to the usual resources and rights most other prisoners are entitled to. As a ‘though criminal’ you are considered too dangerous to allow to ‘infect’ other minds. A.k.a ‘educate’ or ‘inform’ people about objective, scientific facts, and compelling arguments.

We walk a legal minefield, requiring to use language in very precise, exact, ways, to even have a chance at avoiding being dismissed by our readers as ‘irrational haters’ and ‘conspiracy theorists’, and at being fined and imprisoned.

The judges and prosecutors of the trials are as shamefully irresponsible and unconscientious as they make out the defendants to be. The defendents, with zero resources, are expected to know every possible detail of everything they are speaking about, or otherwise be defined as ‘ill informed’ and ‘ignorant’ and irresponsible, and unconscientious. At the same time, the Judges and prosecutors, like the juries, have made ZERO effort to inform themselves of the facts. They simply assume they ‘know’ the facts. What they have been told is accepted without the slightest sense of responsibility to verify what they’ve been told. If an ‘authority’ says it, they accept it. That is the limit of their own responsibility. Their onu probandi. At the same time they hypocritically demand of the accused / defendants that they be experts, with precision, on every single utterance they make. With zero toleration. Straining at every gnat. While the judges and juries and prosecutors have swallowed the camels of ‘The holocaust’ and ‘911 was Islamic hijackers’ whole. Without even chewing. Like a huge python.

Consensus is the last likely candidate for ‘truth’ among genuine scientists and philosohpers and historians. It is a fact that ‘the majority are usually wrong’. About almost everything.

Public opinion is as misinformed today as it has ever been. Probably more so.

What we face is a situation similar to the Spanish Inquisition. We have all powerful inquisitors, with their spies, kidnappers, judges, and ‘experts’, ranged against us. All that has changed is the particular ‘dogma’ and ‘articles of faith’ that are being forced on us. The fates worse than death may be a little less extreme, however strong enough to be effective. Loss of job, career, reputation, income, family, freedom, and bankruptcy, are just a few of the ‘costs’ associated with battling this leviathan conspiracy, much more powerful than the Catholic Church ever was.

However there are many similarities. Opponents of the Church must go into exile, to avoid the centralised power of the the adversary. And there are few places ‘free’ from the adversary. The adversary ‘kidnaps’ people from such ‘neutral’ ‘safe havens’, to bring them to ‘trials’.

The ‘trials’ today are every bit a mockery of justice and due process as were the ‘trials’ of ‘The Inquisition’.

The dogmas are ‘The Holocaust’, ‘Man-made global climate crisis’, ‘911 was Muslim hijackers’, ‘WOMAD in Iraq’, Assad is killing his own people, ‘Vaccines are safe and necessary and in the public interest and if YOU don’t vaccinate yourself and YOUR kids, you are a public menace and immoral’…

They are presented as ‘facts’. But they are all ‘legal fictions’. Just like granting a huge international corporation the s tatus of ‘legal person’. All legal fictions. Am I breaking the law in stating this? I am stating that ‘legally’, they are to be treated as ‘facts’. I have not said they are lies, as that WOULD be a crime in many countries. So don’t bother accusing me of doing so.

Of course like every other free thinking independent researcher and writer, I will be accused of harboring ulterior motives. Our adversary will claim that even if I haven’t SAID anything wrong or DONE anything wrong, I have ONLY told the truth, and done good things, out of an irrational hatred, with the intent to ‘vilify’ a particular group of people, and to ‘incite’ you, the reader, to go out and commit crimes against them.

No matter how carefully I present what I am now going to present, there is no way to stop someone falsely attributing such motives to me. THAT is the RUB, as Hamlet would put it.

So I will leave it to YOU to decide if YOU feel my motives are malicious, intended only to harm, to damage, to hurt. Or if maybe I have no ulterior motives other than a desire to free every sentient being from cruelty, slavery, abuse, exploitation, and any other form of violence or injustice.

If I wanted to harm, to do damage, I would have joined MOSSAD or the CIA. They would be the first to give me all the resources required to carry out a devastating attack on ‘Jews’. THAT is what they do themselves. THAT is what they DESIRE most ardently of all of us. That we lose our patience, and courage, and respond to the violence commited against us, and planned to be committed against us, using physical force. The moment we do THAT they can justify activating all the executive orders and total martial law conditions they have prepared.

So beware of ANY supposed ‘independent’ ‘alternate’ writer or activist calling for ‘violent protest’ or ‘violent action’. They are either fools, or working for the CIA / MOSSAD, or both. If anyone offers you hard to attain C4, or other resources, politely explain that you are not interested in anything they have to offer. They are working for the adversary. They WANT you to commit acts of violence so they can say ‘see, told you all along, Amalek, yep, Amalek’, and use this as an excuse to do the most horrific things, all the while feeling completely justified. ‘It was necessary to destroy you, your family, your children, your animals, because you were AMALEK’. Watch the video, read my notes on that video. If you don’t understand.

Of course if we fail to do what they want, they simply carry out ‘false flags’ and attribute them to us.

But they do such a bad job that we soon expose them. Which is what I do in this book. Have done in my books. From The Oklahoma city bombing to demonise gun owners / constitutionalists, to 911 to demonise Islam, to ‘The Holocaust’ to demonise western Europeans, Germans in particular. Rabbi’s painting swastikas on their own walls, and Jews calling in bomb threats, and threats of violence against ‘Jewish’ children, are common, and documented. We have also documented the facts, not the ‘legal fictions’ about ‘The Holocaust’, 911, man-made climate crisis, Sandy Hook etc etc…

Now on the subject of ‘our adversary’,particular care must be taken. I need you to take your time to understand who ‘our adversary’ are. And who they are NOT. This will avoid any ‘anti-semitism’, using that term as the legal system, mass media, education system, dictionaries, and the general public use it, to refer to ‘an irrational hatred of Jews’.

So firstly, there is no such thing as ‘The Jews’. There are so many different types of ‘SELF’-defined ‘Jews’ that to use a generic term like ‘The Jews’ is unfair to millions of ‘Jews’.

There are at least 42 officially, legally, statistically, bureaucratically, technically, defined, GENERAL, groups withing the rubric ‘The Jews’.

There are …. Jews, and ….Jews….and Jews…. So please in future do not use the term ‘The Jews’.

Now I realise it is very frustrating, especially in the heat of some frustrating encountger with some infuriatingly fatuous writer, blogger, street debater, mass media presenter, judge, prosecutor…etc

We must identify the enemy, if we are to put defences in place, to protect ourselves against them, and to identify potential threats to others, to protect ourselves, our families, our friends, our nations.

And we cannot shrink from identifying our adversay as ‘Jewish’, or fear being labelled ‘anti-semitic’.

What we need to do is force interlocutors to be as precise in their use of language and categories as I am now asking you to be. And requiring of myself.

When we define an Islamic terrorist as a threat, the rational and informed among us do not mean Islam as a whole. We mean a particular group that affiliates with Islam. A particular sub-set of ‘Muslims’.

When we train children to identify ‘rabid dogs’, and avoid them, and inform adults if they see them, we are not training our children in an irrational hatred and fear of all dogs.

The Spanish Inquisition gave Catholicism a terrible name, but most Protestants made a distinction between moderate catholics and the extremists.

Not all Catholics would torture you until you ‘confessed’ that their ‘truth’ their ‘legal ficiton’ their ‘social reality’ their ‘articles of faith’ e.g whether Jesus owned his own sandals or not’. So you didn’t hate ALL catholics.

That said, your hatred for SOME catholics WAS rational. Totally rational. The ‘fundamentalists’ were a mad deluded violent cult. Genocidal. Think of the St Valentines day massacre, where thousands of people were murdered, on the site where the Eifel tower was later built, just because of some narrow ‘dogma’.

We need to find a term to refer to our adversary that does not unfairly include people who are not ‘guilty’.

That said, we have a very high bar historically. We are setting the bar low, as we are superior morally. However our ‘adversary’ sets the bar extremely high. ANYONE opposed to the ‘god-given’ mission of the cult of Judaism to realise it’s ‘jew world order’, is Amalek.

During every war, millions of ‘innocents’ were killed along with ‘guilty combatants’, without anyone really batting an eyelid, let alone holding war crimes trials afterwards.

Dresden is a case study in point. In fact all the firebombing in Germany and Japan deliberately targeted old people, women, and children, as the men were mostly underground in factories, or out on the relatively safe battle field. During WWII civilian casualties were much higher than military casualties. The safest place to be during WWII in Europe, was in the military.

So while our adversary it completely hypocritical, we can still use them to discipline ourselves, because we chose to. We chose to be superior to them in every way, morally. Ethically. In terms of avoiding harm. Of avoiding injustice. And not simply accepting mass million deaths and misesry as ‘collateral damage’, as ‘justified’ as means to our ends. Every psychotic, genocidal, rapacious, thieving piece of scum will define their own pleasure, their own relief, as ‘justifying’ any amount of harm, pain, cost, misery, burden, to OTHERS. So the absurd notion that ‘the ends justify the means’ is rejected by US. Even as it puts us at a disadvantage in many ways.

Because it puts us at the moral advantage. We may lose, but we will be in the right. And that may make all the difference, one day. To us in our future lives. And to those who replace us in this world.

So how do we ‘identify’ our ‘adversary’. WHO is ‘The Jew World Order’.

It is NOT ‘The Jew’. There is no such entity as ‘The Jew’. There are at least 42 recognised, clearly identifyable, broad ‘types’ of ‘Jew’. And most of these ‘Jews’ are NOT our adversary.

Now I do feel they are demonstrably irresponsible, are not conscientious, and are morally lazy, and intellectually culpable, but they are not active in ‘The Jew World Order’. They may be passively contributing to ‘The Jew World Order’, but then so is EVERY religious person, ANYONE who subscribes to ANY dogma, and who is NOT adequately skeptical, conscientious, and ambitious in seeking to understand TROONATNOOR…

I would ban all dogma. Religious or ‘scientific’. Any real philosopher would. Any real ‘conscientious’ person would. And Humean Skeptic, or Zen practitions, DOES. Any REAL scientist DOES.

But that would make our adversary almost everyone on this planet.

And the immediate threat, the danger, to our freedom, and our lives, is much more specific.

I can only hope you will be genuine in your approach to reading this. If you are disingenuous, nothing I write will avoid your malicious desire to destroy me, as an opponent of the jew world order…someone you are legally allowed to hate, and maliciously seek to harm, commit ‘legal’ acts of violence against, as an expression of your self-loathing, YOUR irrational need to HATE someone, and harm SOMEONE…and given how few ‘legal’ and ‘socially acceptable’, ‘socially allowed’ targets there are today, Historical revisionists and ‘anti-semites’ are about the last remaining ‘legitimate’ targets for it…we are ‘free game’ for anyone who needs someone to hate, to feel superior to, to feel morally superior to, to feel ‘better’ than…

There used to be loads of people / groups you could chose from….other religions, homosexuals, transvestites, other nationalities, other ethnic groups…but today you have few choices for venting your irrational need to hate, and feel superior to, someone…Freud noted this irrational / emotional need…and the need for some outlet…today it is ‘Holocaust deniers’ , ‘Nazis’, Islamic terrorists (most of whom are almost totally constructs of CIA / MOSSAD, set up by, resourced by, trained by, and given targets by, U.S and Israeli ‘leaders’ from ‘Al Queda’ , the CIA base in Virginia…

But first, remember that SOME Hate Is RATIONAL. Hating gays or Asians is NOT. Hating ALL ‘Jews is NOT rational either. Such official definitions for ‘anti-semitism’ are the equivalent of a phobia.

But there are MANY people and organisations and institutions that define THEMSELVES as ‘Jewish’ or ‘Israeli’ (again don’t refer to “israeli’s in general, but be more specific), that we SHOULD RATIONALLY HATE, but don’t. In fact we send our taxes to support them. We buy their products. We pay them interest. Etc

When Hitler wrote about the German’s CONSCIENCE being their downfall, he didn’t mean he wanted Germans to be ruthless pyschotics. He meant that Chrisitanity, a Jewish invention, had left them without the healthy HATRED of things and people that were out to destroy or enslave them. It is HEALTHY to HATE the thing, person, animal, institution etc that is out to harm you and your family. There is NOTHING irrational in self-preservation. Turning the other cheek, and avoiding looking on as the men rape your daughter to death, might be a ‘Christian’ virtue, but it is NOT a virtue in any other sense. In fact it is a real ‘VICE’. For there always will be people, at least 1% of the human population, who will treat you and yours as mere means to their own pleasure, relief, gratification, fun, amusement…and gain great pleasure from inflicting pain upon you and yours, in enslaving you, even if it brings them no real benefit…just to feel the power…etc

So if you have an ‘irrational’ hatred of ‘all jews’, please treat it as a phobia, and learn to overcome it. We do NOT want such irrational hatred

But if you treat ALL ‘Jews’ as your friend, as allies, as harmless, as beneficient, then you are really a HUGE threat to our life and freedom. You are an extreme LIABILITY.

You must learn to distinguish the rabid dog from the loyal friendly loving harmless, dog.

Our adversary will just edit this and publish it, claiming I am defining all jews as ‘rabid dogs’. When in fact my purpose and intent is the opposite.

To help all the ‘good ‘Jews’ or ‘no more or less harmfull than the average religious affiliate’, I intend to do my best to isolate out the ‘harmful’ jews, the ‘threats’. The ‘Jews’ that carry the virus / plague called ‘The ideology of Semitism, which has concepts like ‘god-given right to rule the planet’ and ‘the command to kill all men, women, children, and animals of anyone or anything that resists, opposes, ridicules, hinders, or fights against this ‘mission’ a.k.a ‘Amalek’, a.k.a me, all of the U.S, Germany, France, Italy etc etc…any nation / any group that does anything to prevent, resist, oppose etc these particular ‘Jew world order’ jews in their plans to become the masters and rullers of this entire planet, with all other people as their servants, slaves, worshippers.

So how do you tell if a dog is Rabid? How do you tell if a particular ‘Jew’ carries this dreadfully dangerous, genocidal, vicious, malicious, infectious ‘virus’ I call ‘The ideology of Semitism’?

Well, many, like the Rabbi in the video, are so confident and deluded, so indoctrinated and entranced and hypnotized by the dogma, the ideology of Semitism, that they openly confess and proclaim what they believe. They actually tell you what they think of you, and what they are planning to do. Mass genocide. Why would a ‘true believer’ hide what they KNOW to be the truth, with the full confidence that GOD is on their side and will protect them.

But most won’t flat out tell you to your face. They will of course ‘deceive’ you. ‘By deception we will wage war’, is MOSSAD’s official motto. Of course MOSSAD is clearly a jew world order operation. Their mission is to realise the destruction of AMALEK, and bring in the jew world order.

Of course millions of jews are totally oblivious to this. Or don’t take it seriously. Or they are fearful of becoming a target, of becoming ‘AMALEK’.

But they will be. All of them. They are slated, all 6 million ‘Jews’ living in Israel, to be destroyed. As are all the ‘jews’ living in Germany, America, Italy, and so on. But of course they will earn their rewared in some vague after life. So of course they don’t mind being ‘offered to the flame’ in the REAL holocaust the jew world order has planned for them. And most of us.

They only need 2800 non-jews for each jew world order jew. So you do the calculations. If there are to be 144,000 ‘jews’ in the jew world order, when it finally takes absolute control of everything and everyone in the entire world, well you can do the math.

Dogma is everything to a cult mentality. Remember that. They are fixated on specific numbers. Specific rituals. Specific dates. Like any compulsive obsessive. Their true strength lies in their simplicity of mind. They simply accept the dogma, the articles of faith, without reflection, thought, analysis. That is how cults work. Keep the cult membership isolated, marrying only among themselves, or new converts, so there is zero chance of anyone every thinking for themselves…no mental quagmires, no ethical dilemmas…just kill everyone who does anything to stop the cult taking over the entire world, and enslaving everyone else…why? Well watch the video. God just didn’t command it, he stated that HE knew that all the non-cult members were planning to kill every cult member, the moment they found the opportunity…another reason for exclusivity and inbreeding and the need to stay separate, isolated, and maintain deception…act nice but don’t socialize etc…so it was perfectly justified, as a self-defence , to carry out preventative strikes…to kill every man woman child and their animals, of anyone who might stop the cult realising its ambitions to rule the entire world…as god commanded, as god wanted…who were THEY to question GOD’s will…imagine having been conditioned from birth, every moment of every day, to believe what the Rabbi believes?

Now I would never assume, nor want you to assume, that EVERY ‘jew’ believes what the Rabbi clearly believes…but we should be wary of all dogs, until the ‘rabies’ epidemic is over…give every dog a chance ot prove it does NOT have rabies…but at first assume all are potential threats, until they prove otherwise…don’t go out shooting every dog…just take care…

And ‘Jews’ are NOT dogs. So we wouldn’t shoot them, just because they had rabies. But we WOULD need to isolate them, to prevent them infecting others dogs / jews / people.

Probably have to re-write that bit. But have to include it. For otherwise I would be being irresponsible. NOT acting in good faith, or in the public interest.

And I am doing both those things. Acting in good faith. Acting in the public interest. On a matter or dire urgency. For the jew world order, that cult, appears to be on the cusp of realising their plans. Which will mean bye bye to most ‘jews’ and ‘gentiles alike…

So my PUBLIC includes not just non-jews, but the jews themselves. All of them. Inclluding the ones infected with the virus of the ideology of Semitism, like the Rabbi in the video. Like the woman in the video shouting ‘serve the jews or die’.

I am actining in good faith, with the best intentions, conscientiously, responsibly, to avoid harm, and damage, to all humans and their animals.

I am trying to protect us all from that cult. Including the cult members. Even the leaders. They are deluded. They have been brainwashed, conditioned, etc … or they were born with some defect, that leads them to act out how they do.

While most of the people are just lazy dupes of the jew world order. Manyy of them, like judges, media presenters, teachers, police etc are ACTIVELY aiding and abetting them, … often with the best of intentions…deluded and conditioned and brainwashed…they will need special education…like what this book hopes to offer…we will ALL need some ‘de-briefiting’ and ‘re-education’, as horrible as that sounds, given the typical ‘abuses’ of such programs to do the exact opposite i.e to brainwash people a=la 1984…

INTERVIEW / INTERROGATION OF THAT GENOCIDAL RABBII AS PERFECT WITNESS BRENDON AND OTHERS NEVER GOT TO HAVE SPEAK AT THEIR TRIALS A clear example of what I call the ‘Ideology of Semitism’, and compelling reasons to investigate to what extent this ‘ideology of Semitism’ is shared among the self-defined ‘Jewish’ community, and where necessary, take concrete steps to eradicate this ideology as an extreme threat to our personal and national security, and as repugnant, and morally and ethically and legally unacceptable

PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS A WORK IN PROGRESS, I WILL POST IT AS I WORK ON IT, IN CASE I DO NOT GET TO FINISH IT, IN WHICH CASE SOMEONE ELSE WILL BE ABLE TO USE THESE NOTES TO COMPLETE THE TASK FOR ME, FOR THEMSELVES, FOR ALL OF HUMANITY, AND ALL OF OUR ANIMALS

There are ZERO justifications for Jewish Hollywood film makers to depict insane KZ commandants shooting boys in the back for having failed to perfectly clean their bathtub, or as homicidially smug and complacent psychopaths shooting Jewish architects in the head for having been ‘clever’, or malicious young Nazi’s casually pushing old men in wheelchairs from third floor balconies. Jews will defend such blatant vilification as ‘artistic truth that transcends the known facts and thus presents the truth more clearly than the facts’, or something like that. Jews get away with the most scandalous fabrications and falsifications and vilifications and demonisations and defamations.Yes Jews force us to swallow their ‘camels.’ Every year adds to the sheer volume and weight of such intentional, willful, racial vilification, abuse, ridicule, hate speech, and incitement.

Decades of such films accumulate as a perceived ‘history’. How many people are aware that ‘Schindler’s list’ is pure fiction, and willfully vilifying and motivated by pure malicious and hate, for ‘Amalek’, anyone who would deny the ‘Jew’ their rightful place as rulers of this entire planet. A people who would rule according to the 600 or so ‘laws’ regarding which direction to fart in, and which fabrics you may ‘lawfully’ mix and match?

I felt emotionally traumatized for days after watching Schindler’s list. It never crossed my mind that this was a work of fiction. Pure fiction. The words ‘based on a true story’, in Hollywood, are often overlooked by the audience who are totally unfamililar with ‘the true story’ itself.

Writers often go to great pains to avoid allowing Hollywood to make film version of their novels. Consider J.D Salinger, offered millions, over and over, but refusing. Because Hollywood always has an agenda of its own. It always distorts the content as part of a longer term social conditioning agenda.

In the case of most ‘Holocaust’ films, even the novels they are based on are pure fiction. And while there may be some brief not inside the cover to this effect, we all tend to consume them as ‘historical’ narratives. As ‘what really happened. Or at least faithfully reflecting, in principle, what happened. But it didn’t happen. And there is no ‘good faiith’ in any reporting on the experience of Jews in World War Two Nazi Occupied Europe by either official historians, academics, or the writers of such works of fiction.

There are hundreds of now proven ‘faked’ histories and biographies written by supposed ‘survivors’ of ‘The Holocaust. Fiction one and all. As fictional as ‘The Nuremberg trial’ official verdicts that Germans made lampshades from the skin of Jews, used their body fat to make soap, put live Jews into cages with wild bears and eagles, to be literally eaten alive, killed jews using electrified floors, and so on. These propaganda myths were as honest as any war propaganda before or since. Clearly intended to vilify Germans racially and/or ethnically and/or as a nation, and to incite enough hatred towards them that even Americans who had never suffered one iota at the hands of any Germans, and who themselves had ‘German ancestry’, were willing to commit the most atrocious war crimes and crimes against humanity, upon German civilians, man, woman, child, and yes, animal. Did you know that after firebombing Dresden, fighter pilots would strafe the civilian emergency workers, and civilians who had sought refuge in the parks, deliberately machine gunning men, women, and children civilians, and then actually killing the animals in the zoo in the same way. Remember this when the Rabbi speaks of Amalek, and killing ALL their men, women, and children, and animals.

So you will always be given a free hand to present the most patent of lies, wilfull misrepresentations, maliciously motivated lies, racial vilifications, abuses, ridicules, and totally unsubstantiated slander and libel, and defamation, and calculated incitement, and legally FORCE the entire world to ‘swallow camels’, if your target is Amalek, that is, anyone who is not actively or passively aiding and abetting the Jew World Order in its cult monomaniacal obsession to gain total control of us, and our world.

But when it comes to anyone making any sort of comment that does not support the jew world order, or worse, actually reveals the jewish elites plans for a jew world order, and challenges it, resists it, and defies and opposes it, you literally get the most fatuous ‘straining at gnats’. So I wouldn’t get away with any accidental exaggeration or unwitting, undesired, implied or explicit assumptions I cannot absolutely prove, or depictions that are not perfectly convergent and ‘one to one scale’ with the most rigorously specific, concrete, demonstrable facts.

So if I do edit the original video, to lessen the viewer burden, and clarify the meaning, where conditioning might otherwise lead people to ‘not see what is right in front of them, ‘miss the point’ and instead ‘see’ things as their jew world order mind controllers have conditioned them to ‘interpret’ and ‘see’ and ‘give knee-jerk, conditioned, stimulus-reaction responses to, then I will provide a complete, unedited version of the video afterwards, for anyone who, as they should, is skeptical, and wants to see the original, to form their own conclusions.

I just checked, and Windows Movie Maker cannot edit the file type this video was uploaded in. So for now no editing. You will have to watch the full video. Which is probably better. You probably would ‘turn off’ any edited version very quickly, feeling certain that I MUST be misrepresenting it by clever editing.

Sadly many of you will still probably remain in the trance you’ve been put in since birth, and fail to see even the most blatant threats. I can’t perform miracles. I can only make the able more able. Give the sighted greater clarity. Improve the hearing of those with intact ear-drums.

If I had the resources of the ADL I could ‘nail’ this perfectly. If anyone wants to help me help them, and the entire world, including the 6 million ‘Jews’ soon to be offered as a ‘burned offering’ to the Jew world order, please contact me with your offers. And please be willing to let me delegate tasks, based on ‘The Fuhrer Principle. I will take the final responsibility, but also require to have control over MY final product. You of course are free to use any materials I produce in your own way. Only don’t put my name to them. This is the basis of ‘The Fuhrer Principle’. Giving people the resources and control so they are response-ABLE, and then them taking full respons-I-bility for the outcome. And if they fail, they take responsibility for that. But they need to have the chance to do things as they see fit. And the resources.

But anyone is free to adopt their own strategy. Only I think I’ve demonstrated my potential, and we are all better off allowing me to ‘do my thing’, until someone proves they can do it better.

In fact this project will probably be the end of markus rehbach. I think my potential would become too obvious to our Jew world order elites. They would then either seek to co-opt me, and convince me of their great intentions. Which would be hard after all the heartless and totally conscience-less mass murder they have committed, and intend to commit.

So my first point is to highlight the total hypocrisy of this speaker, the Rabbi. His exceptionalism. The idea that there is one rule for ‘the chosen people’, who self-selected, that is, chose themselves, and another for everyone else. How infantile is THAT? To say that Hitler may not wish his defenders of Germany and the other Western European people’s had been left undamaged by a Christianity which made them too ‘nice’ to do what was required to protect their own people, but ‘the Jews’ have every right to being ‘merciless’ and ‘ruthless’ and genocidal. Literally ‘cruel’ and without mercy.

Please note the total non-sequitur delusion this Rabbi suffers under. He states the Jews must be cruel and without mercy, while claiming that only the ‘Jews’ have the highest level of ‘good’ within them. The greatest innate sense of justice, and compassion. Something he claims his ‘adversary’ a.k.a ‘Satan’ a.k.a ‘Amalek’ lacks.

All the Rabbi has to ‘justify’ himself and his supposedly ‘Torah’ based views, is a totally circular argument. We can kill them pre-emptively as if we don’t, they will kill us’. Even though ‘WE’ have had every chance to do so, and haven’t. Ever. Didn’t. Never did. Are not doing. Though in the face of his own logic, if we don’t, then we really are crazy, and as Hitler feared, devoid of the necessary will to live. The instinct to survival. Conditioned out of us by Christianity. THAT is what Hitler feared. That ‘conscience’ had made cowards of us all, as Hamlet put it.

The ‘Jews’, according to this Rabbi, who claims the authority of god via the Torah, in his ‘world view’, has no conscience Vis a Vis anyone who would deny the Jews their total domination of this planet. He simply ‘believes’ that anything he does was commanded by his ‘God’, and justified by the self-serving, convenient, belief that WE are all ‘out to get the Jews’. So genocide is purely self-defence, according to his convenient logic.

And this makes sense if you read the Old Testament. ‘Ripping apart pregnant women’ was fine, because they wrote a book in which a character they invented called Yahweh commanded them to. And the subtext was that God knew that that woman, and the unborn child, intended killing all the Jews when it grew up.

I have not come across a more diabolical ‘logic’ than that presented in this video by this Jewish Rabbi, who claims it is the ‘law’ of ‘Judaism’. Not his mere opinion. And thus ‘the law’ for ‘all ‘Jews’.

Unless we can discount everything in this video, we must accept that we need to carry out a very deep investigation into the ‘Jewish’ community and its beliefs. It is literally a community OF beliefs. Beliefs of shared persecution. Beliefs of a shared destiny as the rulers of this planet.

This is the most serious challenge facing us right at this moment. The Jew world order is literally on the verge of become an irreversible reality. Who is in charge of this, no-one outside the ‘top levels’ can say for sure. But it is ‘jews’ who are the agents of this Jew world order. And if they share the beliefs of this Rabbi, then we are in really big trouble.

Those of us who have investigated ‘Judaism’ have found the most terrifying of beliefs and threats to our very existence in the ‘holy books’ of the ‘Jewish’ ‘faith’. We are then told to ignore these, as they have been superceded by the ‘new law’ of Judaism. The Shulchan Aruch. But whey did 5000 Russians denounce this supposedly new ‘ethical’ Judaism ‘law’ as ‘hate speech’? And then why are these old books, like the Talmud and Torah, and even Old Testament, still printed? Why don’t ‘modern’ Jews openly renounce and denounce the very idea of a ‘mission’ and ‘right to rule’ us all? Why don’t they tell us of the ‘scary old-school’ ideas of their predecessors that they have rejected outright and totally as insane and deluded and totally unacceptable?

Why hasn’t the ADL prosecuted this Rabbi for hate speech? Racial vilification? Incitement? I have lodged a report with them. I have lodged a report with the other Jew world order controlled organ ‘The Southern Poverty Law Center’ as well. Let’s see how they respond. Who wants to bet I end up in trouble, and not this Rabbi? Who wants to bet they will ascribe my ‘complaint’ and ‘report’ to an irrational hatred of Jews, and thus dismiss my report, but attack me for ‘anti-semitism’?

I am going to do my best to edit this document, and invite others to proof-read and edit this document. So please pick me up on any ‘gnats’ that require ‘improvement’, even though we must ‘swallow’ the ‘camels’ of the jew world order propaganda and obfuscation machine.We must patiently allow our sworn blood enemy to compel us to the greatest self-discipline, in true Zen fashion. We must treat our enemy as our best ally. For such an enemy demands the best from us. Forces us to be our best. Pushes us beyond our limits. Motivates us to be the best we can be. Better than we may have ever become, in the absence of such enemies.

Note that Prosecutor Eyers even played with this famous quote, as if Jesus was referred to ‘chopped up’ camel meat? Wait till I’m finished with Brendon O’Connell’s trial notes. That trial was a real ‘piece of work’. They really ‘played’ the jury with subconscious suggestion, obfuscation, misrepresetantion, non-sequitur non-arguments, sentences where what came later, neutralized the ‘admission’ that came first, and on and on.

I seek to ensure that the language is in keeping with what a lawyer or diplomat might employ, in order to avoid any possibility of having my intent intentionally misrepresented by third parties. However I am going to fall short. Because this should be a 500 page book, merely as an introduction and guide. But you don’t have the motivation yet to invest the time that would take to read and digest. So I am trying to present something that WILL motivate you to read my books, and watch my selection of videos. And then do some soul searching and reflecting yourself. After all it is YOUR life. YOUR family. YOUR nation whose survival is in the balance. If YOU do NOT value YOUR life, or the lives of your loved ones, or the lives of your people, then what is the point? If you don’t have the will to live, and the courage to fight for your freedom, then who am I to try to lead you? If you are mere cattle, happy to have enough to eat, and to imagine your ‘masters’ will take care of you, and have your best interests at heart, then by all means, follow the ‘judas goats’ to the slaughter yards. Why spoil your illusions?

But, as ‘Jews’ keep stating, we are allowed to think what we like. However we must be very careful in what we express, and how we chose to express it.

That said, the ‘rules’ they impose on us are so extreme that to remain within them would prevent us effectively communicating anything of importance. The actual message, for example. So I will never be able to ‘satisfy’ the ‘’censors’ in reality. So I will seek to put off the invetible censorship and trial by being as careful in my use of language as I can, without utterly defeating the purpose of writing this.

Now the speaker in this video clearly did not feel any need to ‘equivocate’ in any way. He expresses himself quite clearly and directly. Something quite rare in my experience, in any human being. And this is in keeping with my experience of the ‘best’ ‘Jews’. The ones I dearly love. For the best ‘Jews’ are not like the trolls and lawyers and lobbyists at all. These trolls, lobbyists, impression managers, perception engineers, lawyers and the like, are the worst examples of ‘equivocation’, and non-sequitur, self-negating, obfuscation. But these creatures come in ‘Gentile’ as often as ‘Jewish’ form. This Rabbi is at least honest about what he believes. That may be a product of his self-deluded confidence as a self-induced-trance victim-cult-leader, but I will give him credit for talking straight. He has a sort of integrity. Even if he has no idea of logic, of what a compelling argument is, what specious sophistry is, and so on. Even if he one moment accuses others of employing circular arguments, when his whole argument is itself circular.

It is as if he believes, well, we wrote this book first, we made the assumptions first, we gave ourselves the rights first, so we have a patent, a copyright, and we can get away with this, in the true spirit of exceptionalism, but others who do exactly what we do can’t be allowed to get away with it. We ‘called’ it first. We own the strategy. It is corporate property. We have a registered trademark for ‘circular arguments’ and ‘self-serving assumptions’. We did it first. Now it’s our exclusive right to do it.

In fact the ‘Jews’ ‘borrowed’ most of their ideas and stories from the Sumerians. No wonder, Abraham ‘went over’ from Sumeria, across the Euphrates, out of Mesopotamia, into Egypt. He came from Ur, where he was a priest. They picked up a lot of Egyptian stuff there too, which originated in Sumeria, and Arratta.

It’s all so infantile, his ‘logic’. An argument so feeble that he dare not expose it to the slightest ‘questioning’, and so he commands his ‘Jews’ to simply take everything on faith, even if it makes no sense. Never reflect. Never think critically. Always live in abject, paranoid mistrust and fear of anyone who is not in the cult, and doesn’t share the cult’s beleifs.

Now I understand why it is impossible to get most ‘Jews’ to ever ‘debate’ ‘The Holocaust’ with anyone. Some ‘Jews’ actually were among the first to ‘debunk’ the ‘Holocaust’ hoax, as a religion. But most ‘Jews’ simply will not engage with them at all. They just assume these ‘self-hating Jews’ have been corrupted by Amalek, and have thus become Amalek.

According to what this Rabbi says in this video, his presentation, ‘Jews’ area taught by their leaders to simply avoid allowing Amalek, a Gentile / Goy, to ever challenge their beliefs, to get them to question their beliefs, to even reflect critically on their beliefs. The ‘Jew’ is simply to remain in a trance, repeating mantra’s to themselves such as ‘I don’t understand the Torah but it is the best thing for me to believe, the best lifestyle, that god chose for me, so just go along with whatever the Rabbi says, kill every man woman and child of dozens of nations, billions of people, and their animals, just because the Rabbi has some books written by people like the Rabbi that say this is good, and god’s will.

It is very hard for me to keep my patience with such insanity as you find in the Jewish belief system, such deceptiveness, such paranoia, such arrogance, such specious sophistry. However don’t worry that I have any more patience for the same qualities among non-Jews. I don’t play favorites. I don’t even ‘see’ a ‘Jew’ or a ‘Gentile’. I see a human. I see a reasonable, logical, coherent, beneficient, acting-in-good-faith, decent, ethical, conscientious HUMAN, or something less than that. Those are the qualities that interest me. Not whether your mother believed she was ‘Jewish’ or not. Totally irrelevant. But it can give you clues as to what that person may have been exposed to. The sort of beliefs this Rabbi is expressing in this video, for starters.

So first I want to thank this speaker for having the strength of his convictions, and not shying away from stating what he TRULY believes, and what we MUST, if we have any instincts of self-preservation at all, consider just MIGHT represent a large enough proportion of the ‘Jewish’ community for us to accept it as a GENUINE, PRESENT threat to our personal and national security.

As a ‘terminated’ Youtube ex-account holder, I am of course painfully aware of the apparent hypocrisy of Youtubes ‘Community standards’. I have often quipped that the ‘community’ it is ‘protecting’ and whose interests it is using as its ‘standard’, must be the Jewish community. Because it is posts and videos like mine that challenge the Jew World Order, which, it appears, are the real target of such ‘censorship’.

Now as far as I can tell, if Youtube was genuine in applying its ‘moderation / curation’ rules’ across the board, then the speaker appears to have stepped far over the line in terms of Youtube’s ‘community standards’.

I have reported the original video. And saved the report as a HTML page. I wonder if it will take longer than the year or so it took facebook to consider my ‘complaint’ that the ‘Kill Donald Trump Inc.’ might be in breach of its community standards?

You see I am Amalek, as is anyone who dares raise questions about whether or not the entire world should be ruled by ‘Jews’. As long as you don’t commit THAT cardinal sin, you can get away with a LOT. Even posting videos of your very young daughter in underwear, on the pretext of it being a video of ‘my morning routine’, or posting videos criminalising ‘being white’, and calling for the genocide of all white people.

In fact if this presentation had occurred in Australia, then I would feel compelled, morally, and legally, to report this man and his statements to the Police, under the racial vilification, hate speech, and incitement laws.

I wonder if the current prime minister of Australis has ‘blacklisted’ this man, in the same way Paul Keating, alleged pedophile necrophiliac, made it impossible for the world renowned and respected historian David Irving to get an entry visa and thus thwart his plans for a nation-wide speaking tour on the topic of ‘The Holocaust’ and ‘Adolf Hitler’.

According to the notes in the ‘description’ section of this youtube video, the speaker is one Rabbi ………

This legal argument refers to a video found on youtube, on various channels, each of which had at least 20,000 ‘hits’. The video must certainly contravene the Youtube community standards, with specific reference to hate speech, racial vilification, and incitement to violence, in this case, incitement to genocide. Incitement to the murder of every man, woman, child, and their animals, of the people of Germany, The U.S.A, and Italy, to name just a few.

The speaker in this video presentation, which was originally made before a live, public, audience, insists that God has commanded every ‘Jew’ to carry out these genocides, as soon as it is within their power to do so.

The speaker insists that every German, American, Italian, and so on, intends to murder every ‘Jew’.

This allegation is of course nonsensical, given the fact that these nations have had every opportunity in the past of carrying out such an intention. Ipso Facto, this proves that this intention does not exist. For if the intention existed, there would be no Jews in Germany, The U.S.A, Italy, or any other of the nations defined as ‘Amalek’, by the speaker. However the speaker inisists that the ‘Jews’ must make a pre-emptive strike upon Germany, The U.S.A, Italy, and so on, killing every man, woman, child, and animal.

Basically it is a moral ‘carte blanche’ to kill anyone who might oppose the jew world orders megalomaniac, paranoid fear driven, excessively bloated narcissistic ego –driven, desire to rule the world. Think pinky and the brain, with a god-given right to rule the planet, and murder anyone who just might, one day, decide they don’t want to be ruled by the Jews.

Serve the Jews or die? You’ve seen and heard that in some of my videos. Now we know where it comes from. That quote was from a bloated Israeli woman. But it shares all the qualities of this Rabbi’s speech here. So to claim that this Rabbi is totally unrepresentative would seem pretty specious and disingenuous.

The ‘Jews’ did not come to occupy every position of power in the Western world, directly or indirectly, just by accident. It was planned. An orchestrated communal effort went into it.

Tell me of another ‘religion’ which tells people which direction to face while defacating, and also how to gain domination of the world by lending money to the nations, and never borrowing? Over 600 very specific ‘laws’ covering every aspect of life. A real micro-manager, that YahWeh fellow. Dare I be a little facetious? Of course Jews may make ‘fun’ of any other religion, but if anyone dares for a moment to take a light hearted look at THEIR god and THEIR religion, well woe betide him.

You see everyone ELSE is wrong. Cos they said so. They published it first. Got it in writing. They own the ‘rights’ to all of it. Specious sophistry. Circular arguments. Dogma. ‘It is because we said so, first’. You can’t say it too cos we said it first. It’s now proprietary. Our property. We can say the most nonsensical and arrogant things simply because we ‘claimed’ it first. It’s in our books. Our books are older than your books. Ha Ha.

Of course clay tablets thousands of years older, literally ‘written in stone’ ‘trump’ some pieces of paper claiming to be the written version of a much older verbal tradition. But hey, who’s gonna hear about it in the mass media owned by the ‘Jews’, and operated as a part of their Jew world order full spectrum hegemony?

Much of the suffering the ‘Jews’ have endured was brought upon themselves. By their self-fulfilling prophecies. Behave as the Jews behave, and honor and cherish books the ‘Jews’ do, and you are going to pose a REAL threat to your host nations. Even if most of you do not really subscribe to the dogma. The host nation will eventually get wise to what is written in your ‘holy books’ and from a natural instinct for self-preservation, not being able to determine which ‘Jew’ subscribes to the insane genocidal ideology, and which don’t, are going to expel all the Jews. For the sake of their own self-preservation and peace of mind. Justifyably. With every sound reason to do so. Logically.

This is exactly what the Rabbi’s want. They can say, ‘See, we told you so. They hate us. For NO reason. Totally irrational.’ And so they get to reinforce their hysterical world view on their cult members. And this gives the disparate members, with little in common, a sense of identity. As victims. A shared history of victimisation. Just ask Professor Markus, a witness in Brendon O’Connells trial.

We have to get into this, and you have to make a little effort, if you are not already familiar with self-fulfilling prophecies. Even if you are, please bare with me. Help me if I miss the mark. Unlike cult members, I live by self-reflection, challenging my own beliefs about everything, from moment to moment, in true Humean Skeptic, ZEN, fashion.

A self-fulfilling prophecy is where people assume something, and then act as if it were true, and in doing so, bring about the state, condition, or situation which they originally assumed.

Imagine being told from birth that an omnipotent but ineffable ‘God’ existed. And that this ‘God’ commanded you to kill every German, Amercian, and Italian, man, woman, child, and animal. That you must kill every ‘suckling infant’ because it would grow up to become your enemy, and kill you, and your family. That you must ‘rip up pregnant women’ because the unborn child would one day kill you, if you did not kill it first.

Now imagine you were a member of the German, American, Italian, and so on, nations that currently ‘hosted’ a ‘Jewish’ community, and discovered that each ‘Jew’ was conditioned, from birth, to hold those aforementioned beliefs.

How long would it take for you to define every ‘Jew’ as a threat to your life, and the lives of your loved ones?

How long would it take before you demanded, as rational, reasonable, people, that these ‘Jews’ leave your nation, never to return?

Now most people, including the Prosecutor and jury in the Brendon O’Connell criminal trial in Perth, Western Australia, claim that the hundreds of nations and states that carried out ‘pogroms’ and ‘expulsions’ of ‘Jews’ over the last two millennia, were motivated by an irrational hatred. That their ‘claims’ that the ‘Jews’ represented a threat to their personal and national security were simple fabrications trumped up to justify their irrational hatred of ‘Jews’.

Brendon O’Connell was never allowed to present any evidence. Brendon O’Connell would not have been allowed to present this video in evidence, had he known of its existence.

But of course if the ideas presented in this video are common to even a few thousand powerful ‘Jews’, then millions of people have a rational and reasonable motive for wanting them ‘expelled’, and for having their access to the means to carry out their ‘Gods’ ‘commands’ strictly prohibited.

If the ideas presented in the video are representative of the ‘Jewish’ community, or at least the most powerful members of this community, who already have access to nuclear weapons, then we have much to fear.

But of course you can see, can’t you, that if these views were in fact held by the Jewish community, the members of it would hardly be willing to share this fact with us openly.

If they have been conditioned from birth to fear us, because we are going to kill them, then they are unlikely to reveal their plans to destroy us, according to their ‘Gods command’, ‘as soon as they have the means to’, wouldn’t you agree?

So is it not reasonable to expect that if in fact they do hold these beliefs, they would do everything in their power to ensure that we never learned of this fact?

Now what if the real reason the Egptians chased after the ‘Jews’ was because they had stolen a whole lot of gold, silver, precious gems, and other valueables? What if somehow they had killed all their first born children? These are two things that the ‘Jews’ own ‘holy books’ claim the Jews in fact had done.

Given the past two millennia of ‘expulsions’ of ‘Jews’ from hundreds of nations and states, is it more probable that the ‘Jews’ had been ‘slaves’ in Egypt, and had escaped, or had in fact been kicked out, just like in the hundreds of cases since their supposed ‘escape’ from Egypt?

Any person can claim that some ‘God’ had chosen them, and their ‘people’, and had given them a thus ‘holy’ ‘mission’. The Jews, as far as I have gleaned from every one of their holy books, do share a belief, expressed by this speaker in this video that their god-given destiny is to rule the world.

And thus I find my concept of a ‘Jew World Order’ totally justified, reasonable, rational, legitimate, and precise.

We are limiting ourselves to the content of this video, however I assure you that anyone who devotes just a few hours to researching the Talmud and Torah and other ‘holy books’ of the ‘Jews’, will discover dozens of horrifying quotes relating to the relationship ‘Jews’ are expected to have vis a vis ‘non-Jew’, a.k.a ‘Goys’ or ‘Gentiles’.

Would you expect the ‘Jews’ to admit that they revere and honor all these horrific quotes in their ‘holy’ books, and thus let us in on their plans? Given that they assume we are planning to murder them all, and their only defence is to murder us first, the moment they get the chance. But up until now they have not had that chance. And so must wait patiently, in fear, for the day that they do have the power to kill us all?

Or would you expect them to want to keep the ‘offending’ contents of their ‘holy’ books secret? And failing that, to insist that ‘oh, that’s just out of date / old school Judaism. Since then we have totally reformed our religion and culture, and rejected such horrific notions’? To insist that we can totally ignore all that horrific stuff in the Torah, Talmud, and other ‘religious’ texts. That Judaism today is universally defined by a book called the Shulchan Aruch?

That this new ‘holy book’, the Shulchan Aruch, is the definitive, last word on Judaism. ‘The L.A.W law’. Undisputed. Universally accepted by all Jews, everywhere, with complete consensus?

If you’ve listened to presentations and arguments made by authoritative sources such as Rabbi David Bar-Hayim, you will dismiss the very notion of ‘consensus’ on this matter. You will take confidently expressed opinions by ‘expert witnesses’ such as Rabbi Freilich with more than a grain of salt. You will probably dismiss them as mere ‘orthodoxy’ which is not shared by 90% of the ‘Jewish’ community.

Of course as intellectually rigorous, skeptical, scientific reasoners, we accept that we cannot ‘know’ anything for sure. And this applies even more so to human behavior, than it does to more mechanical interactions in the natural world, or the world of physics and chemistry.

We can only operate according to ‘rules of logic’. Laws of propabability. Heuristics. Making reasonable assumptions about how humans behave, and what they are most likely to do, given the assumptions they are known to have made, or can reasonably be expected to make.

If you’ve studied the Torah and Talmud you will make different assumptions to someone ignorant of the contents of these ‘holy’ books. You won’t be aware of all the horrific, repugnant, racial supremacist, genocidal, exceptionalist beliefs expressed in those books. You won’t be aware of ‘commands’ by ‘god’ to the ‘Jews’ to set out to create a ‘Jew World Order’.

Until you actually hear a Rabbi express the belief, derived from the Torah and Talmud and other ‘holy’ books of the ‘Jews’, that the Jews are to seek total world domination, and destroy anyone, any nation, that resists being ruled by the Jews, you are unlikely to believe it when one of your own people, desperately trying to inform and protect you, says exactly the same thing.

But now you have a Jewish Rabbi, and authority on ‘Jewish’ law, belief, and culture, stating these facts directly. On camera. A Rabbi spends their entire life studying ‘The Torah’, and the other religious books of the Jews. If anyone is going to know what the Jewish holy books mean, it is a Rabbi.

Until I heard the words from a Rabbi, I was entitled to be a little skeptical myself, of my own understanding of what I had read in the English translations of the Jewish Holy Books. But as you can hear for yourself, this Rabbi speaks Hebrew. He can read the books in Hebrew. We need have no doubt that his understandings of the texts are likely to be correct. Sound. Accurate. Precise.

In fact he has such confidence in the correctness of his understandings that he feels no need to hesistate in sharing them with us. In his mind he is doing God’s work. Completing the mission God has given the Jews. He is calling the ‘Jews’ to complete their mission. And this mission, to install a ‘Jew World Order’ requires that all the men, women, and children, and animals, of the German nation, the U.S.A, Italy, and all the former lands that were once ecompassed by the Roman Empire, such as Spain and Portugal, be totally annihilated. Gods will is genocide. And who is he to challenge God’s will? He is openly reminding all Jews of their ‘Holy’ mission. The Jews are commanded to do worse than any ‘conspiracy theorist’ has ever suspected, let alone accused the ‘Jews’ of.

All mad-men and ‘holy’ men have this clarity of mind. He criticizes Hitler’s Nietzschen demand for ‘overriding the conscience’, but what he is calling for is for every ‘Jew’ to do just that. To take up the mission commanded by their ‘God’. To destroy Amalek. Which he states clearly is most of us. Germans. Americans. Italians. Anyone living in a territory once governed by the Roman Empire.

Life is simple when you are totally mad. Deluded. Brought up in a cult. When you know you are doing ‘Gods’ work.

And so let’s get to the ‘cult’ mentality bit of his speech. Another aspect of ‘Judaism’ that people like Brendon O’Connell try to communicate to the world, but are derided, insulted, shamed, ridiculed, and ultimately imprisoned, for trying to do.

Think of the typical ‘cult’ behaviors. Isolation. Being told that everyone not in the group is ‘out to get you’. Being told that everyone not in the group is ‘evil’. Out to trick you.

Consider the definition of scientific method as skepticism. As always seeking to challenge assumptions. Seeking to prove a theory wrong. Seeking to dis-prove a theory. Continually testing it. Never assuming anything. Always critically reflecting on what we think we know.

Now listen to our typical cult leader Rabbi, and decide for yourself if his Judaism meets the necessary and sufficient conditions to define it as a cult. Or not. I don’t want to use subconsiocusly powerful suggestions like Mr Eyers, the Prosecutor in the Brendon O’Connell trial.

All most people have to go on is the constant conditioning they have experienced by the mass media, Hollywood, education systems, and literature

Imagine how easy it must be to decide between ‘good’ and ‘evil’ if you are a Jew, like this Rabbi. Good is everyting that promotes the Jew World Order. Evil is anything that opposed this Jew World Order in any way. Anything which opposes it in any way is to be annihilated. And HE know in advance who is going to oppose this Jew World Order. The Germans, Americans, Italians, and so on. And their children, YOUR children, will grow up to oppose the Jew World Order, and so YOUR children must be killed too. Infants, and even the unborn. ‘Rip up the pregnant women’. And kill all their animals too. Keep it terribly simple. Just to prevent any potential ethical dilemmas from EVER arising in the closed minds of our cult members in the ‘Jewish’ community’.

All cult leaders fear most of all anyone who might challenge their own dogma. Anyone who might lead their brainwashed members to critically reflect on the beliefs they’ve been conditioned to have. Anyone and anything that might lead to a cult member questioning their ‘implanted’ assumptions and beliefs. The dogma they have been induced to accept as ‘unquestionable’. As ‘self-evident’. As ‘obvious’. As ‘natural’. As ‘given’.

The latest dogma is called ‘The Holocaust’. Even the supposed ‘eyewitnesses’ only ‘believed’ their loved ones had been gassed and thrown into ovens. Watch the actual interviews. When challenged ‘did you actually see anyone gassed?’, they all admitted, no, but we KNEW they were gassed. Because that is what they had been lead to believe by their own cult leadership. And so you can guess how surprised they were when they entered the ‘gas chambers’, and instead of Zyklon B gas pouring out from the ‘shower heads’, warm soapy water rained down upon them. Of course their heads had been shaved. The same procedure was followed in all shelters and camps, for Jews and ‘Gentile’ Germans alike. And their shoes were taken from them, and they were given ‘work boots’ suitable for their work camps. And of course their valuables were confiscated. No-one ever denied that the Jews were treated horribly. Even Hitler bemoaned this long before the camps began operating. But considering all the factors we have just glossed over, what choice did he have?

Imagine you were the leader of a nation host to a powerful group of people who intended, as soon as they could, to kill you, and every other man, woman, child, and animal, in your nation. Wouldn’t rounding them up and putting them in concentration camps be the very LEAST thing you would consider? And given that during wartime labor was critical to the defence of your nation, would anything be more logical than to put them to work, while you work out what to do with them?

What to do with millions of powerful people intent on committing genocide on your people? Simply because they had literally been brainwashed to believe their god had commanded them to? Because they ‘knew’ that you were going to kill them, the moment you got the chance.

Now the cult leader will NOT under any circumstances want me to put questions in his member’s heads. Like the obvious question. ‘How come they haven’t killed us all long before this? They’ve always had the power?

Well one way to avoid such questions is to fabricate a ‘Holocaust’. To claim that the Germans DID intend to kill every Jew, and were in fact in the process of doing so, and had already managed to kill 6 million of them, before god stepped in and said ‘enough’, and allowed the allies to destroy Germany, and save the Jews.

Can you see now how ‘The Holocaust’ fits into the bigger picture?

And why anyone who promotes ‘The Holocaust’ is criminally culpable for the genocide of the entire German nation?

And why anyone who challenges ‘The Holocaust’ is ‘opposing’ the chances of the Jew World Order succeeding, and thus become, automatically, because they are ‘interefering’ with god’s plan that the Jews should rule the world, Amalek?

And so do you now see why the ‘Jews’ go all out in demonizing, and destroying, discrediting, ruining, and imprisoning, and beating, and killing, anyone who challenges the ‘Holocaust’ dogma even one iota?

Why they went after David Irving, even though all he ever questioned, really, was the official figure of ‘6 million’? A figure that even the Directors of the Auschwitz museum in Poland ‘revised’ downward by many millions?

Like all cult leaders, the Rabbi’s thinking is terrifyingly confused and riddled with unreconcilable contradictions. At least at first glance. But is there method in his madness?

Exceptionalism is key to the ideology of Semitism. If you give people the right to rape, murder, and steal, among themselves, you get chaos. Your cult won’t last long. It will destroy itself. But what if you give your ‘community’ a free card to steal from ‘others’, to rape the daughters and sons of ‘others’, and murder and enslave ‘others’? What if you make it your God’s will that ‘others’ should be your slaves? Now imagine how popular that will be among ‘your’ people. And what if you make it a sin NOT to follow these supposed ‘commandments’ of this supposed ‘God’? If you punish fellow members of your community if they REFUSE to actively participate in the rape, murder, and theft? Just like has occurred in almost every nation, at every time, when a ‘conscript’ refused to ‘do their patriotic duty’ and go and kill ‘others’ so that their own leaders could steal their land, and enslave them, and assume ownership of all their possessions? Remember that the Soviet (mostly Jewish) commissars ORDERED their troops to rape millions of German girls, women, and grandmothers. FACTS people. FACTS you can verify for yourself.

The acts of ‘goodness, brotherliness, and kindness’ are to be exclusively exercised upon fellow cult members. Upon the ‘Jewish’ community. Exclusively. To treat ‘others’, ‘non-members’, ‘goys’, ‘Gentiles’ the same way would be tantamound to ‘aiding and abetting’ ‘Amalek’. As acts of ‘treason’. At a time of war. The constant war against Amalek. Against paranoid, delusional fantasies of persecution.

Remember, the leaders know that their ‘host’ ‘Amaleks’ have no specific malice towards any of their cult members, their ‘Jewish’ community. Not until the elites in that community conspire against their hosts to commit acts of financial fraud, econcomic warfare, huge scale crimes, and maybe the occasional ‘live sacrifice’ of a few of their children. So in committing such crimes, the perpetrators help ‘bind’ the ‘Jewish’ community, the cult membership, into a more cohesive group.

How? Well if a few of the cult members, the ‘Jewish’ community commit crimes, and spread fear and mistrust of the entire ‘Jewish’ community among their hosts, their hosts are likely to react with pogroms and expulsions. This way all the gang start feeling like a true ‘community’. A community defined by ‘shared persecution’.

This is what gets me most of all about the ‘Jews’. Most of them are no different to you or me. They just want to live in peace and prosperity. But they are constantly the victim of their elites willfully, carefully orchestrated and planned, crimes against ‘Amalek’, which are intended to incite hatred and distrust of all ‘Jews’, so as to provoke pogroms and expulsions. So as to give a ‘mixed mutitude’ with no natural sense of ‘cohesion’ or ‘community’ or ‘belonging’, the very sense of shared identity that is naturally lacking.

Among themselves they insist that no Jew committed any crime that would justify or provoke anything at all like a pogrom or expulsion. The elites who cunningly conspire to commit those crimes against their host communities in order to instill mistrust, fear, and a desire to be ‘rid of’ the ‘Jews’, devote great energy within their own community to ‘paint’ any just retribution or justice, pogrom, or expulsions, as totally unjustified and uncalled for. As motivated by an irrational hatred of the Jews. An irrational desire to destroy the Jews. Just like their ‘Torah’ claims. They are ‘Amalek’. They have always desired to destroy the Jews. And so the Jews may NEVER trust them. The Jews must ‘stick together’ and do what their cult leaders tell them to do. Commit crimes as pre-emptive strikes. As defensive measures. Against an enemy that is implacable. Insanely envious of the cult’s status as Gods ‘chosen people’.

They say ‘all is fair in love and war’. So the cult leaders ensure that the ‘Jews’ always feel as if they are ‘at war’ with Amalek. That anti-semitism, an irrational hatred of Jews, is always ‘on the rise’ and that Amalek, their hosts, are constantly planning to kill off every last Jew. All the ‘Jew’ can do is remain on guard 24/7, and wait patiently, with faith in their divine mission, until they have the power, at the last minute before Amalek strikes, to strike at Amalek, and kill every last man, women, and suckling child, and animal, of Amalek. In a preemptive, defensive, strike.

Here I will not shy from using the term ‘cult’. Because ‘Judaism’ demonstrates all the necessary and sufficient forms and expressions to quality as a ‘cult’. In the same way that Nazism displayed all the necessary and sufficient elements to qualify as a religion. A secular religion. And in fact if you look closely at Judaism, you will find that it worships itself as god. So Judaism is essentially also a secular religion. Like Nazism.

Consider all the ‘compulsive obsessional disorders’ displayed by man ‘Orthodox’ Jews. The compulsive need to repeat certain utterances, or actions, for fear that failure to do so will result in some general calamity. Some unspecified, horrific, consequence. Just as we see with any othe compulsive obsessive in a psychiatric ward.

Consider the irrational fear ‘Jews’ are conditioned to have towards all non-Jews. Watch the movied ‘Defamation’ to get a quick impression of the process, and results. Don’t take my word for it.

Consider that there has NEVER been an open, peer-reviewed, free, scientific debate about ‘The Holocaust’ in any nation where ‘Jews’ have power. The same applies to 911, Sandy Hook, The Oklahoma City Bombing, The U.S.S Liberty, and this list goes on and on. Why? Who has such power to stifle historical and scientific research to such a degree? To even falsify ‘man made global climate crisis’ research, and totally censor anyone who seeks to ‘challenge’ the ‘official fiction’?

The Rabbi, like any cult leader, needs to ‘immunise’ his cult followers against the ‘logic’ and ‘reason’ and ‘facts’ and ‘sense impressions’ that would ‘wake’ his members from their ‘trance state’. The trance state the cult leadership invested so much in, from cradle to grave, to keep their ‘community’ totally entranced, in a state of walking hyponosis, their entire lives.

The ‘clarity’ required to maintain a total ‘break from reality’ is immense. It takes incredible resources. Censorship. Propaganda. Deception. Control. To retain a clear lie, in the face of an external reality that insists on communicating with it. The ‘impressions’ reality creates must be contradicted and resisted with incredibly simplistic, repetitive, trance forming propaganda. Every moment of every day.

And so we are all immersed in a sea of propaganda, misinformation, misdirection, fake news, controlled media. Deceptive education, and on and on, simply to maintain that ‘clarity’ and ‘immunity’. To make the illusion seem real, by constant, vivid, simplistic reinforcement in every media, at every moment. To make the cult member, and the host, ‘immune’ from reality.

Immune from logic, reason, compelling argument, sensory impressions, and any appeal to reality.

To retain the lie as ‘clearly’ as possible. A simple ‘truth’ that ‘transcends’ all apparent reality.

To avoid self-reflection at all costs. To dismiss, as malicious and willful deception, any argument or statement made by ‘an outsider’. For anyone not in the cult is Amalek.

The cult members are to distrust anyone who does not agree with what they’ve been told from birth. That they are the chosen people. That they have a mission, to take total control of earth. That the ‘outsiders’ envy them this divine destiny. That they are plotting at every moment to kill all the cult members. So ‘all is fair’ for the cult members. No deception is too great. Murder 3000 of them in brought daylight, in the middle of New York, on 9/11, why not? They are, after all, all planning to murder every Jew, the moment they have the power.

And the only reason they have failed so far, is that god has been protecting his ‘chosen people’. Otherwise they would have done so already. So we cannot afford to have any empathy or sympathy for ‘them’, for they are ‘Amalek’. Our sworn enemy. Even when they appear nice, friendly, helpful, and kind. They are just secretly waiting for a chance to slit all our throats as we sleep. That deceptive Amalek. That ‘adversary’. That ‘Satan’ called ‘The nations’. The ‘goys’. The ‘goyim’. The ‘Gentiles’.

So ‘serve the Jews or die’ is a fitting motto for this cult community membership. Any cult members who break from the cult are immediately defined as ‘evil’ and ‘Amalek’. ‘Self-hating Jews’. They have been corrupted by Amalek, and are now to be considered Amalek.

And so cult members are commanded to break off all ties with anyone ‘excommunicated’ from the ‘Jewish’ community. The cult. To distrust them. To define them as evil.

This is just one more way to maintain ‘clarity’ and ‘immunity’.

So the ‘Jews’ off this cult are to remain ‘isolated’, just as if their hosts carried some pathogen, some disease, some plague. That plague is doubt. Self-reflection. Self-questioning. Questioning of the cults dogma. The danger for any cult is that for a single moment, one member might ‘awake’ from their ‘trance’ state, and realise they have been deceived by their cult leaders. That their host’s are NOT evil, but just like themselves. That their own cult leaders are exploiting them to their own selfish ends. For personal wealth, power, and status.

So the cult leaders do everything they can to instill an irrational mistrust and fear of ‘Gentiles’ among their cult membership. They do all they can to ensure that cult members only socialize with, associate with, and marry, other cult members, to maintain continuity of indoctrination, conditioning, mind control.

Even Professor Markus, called as witness for the prosecution in Brendon O’Connell’s trial, offered survey results which proved that the Jewish Community in Perth kept mostly to itself. Most members maintained close relationships exclusively with other Jews. See my notes on that trial for blatant, deliberate, corruption of the survey methodology and thus results, with a particular end in mind.

‘The Holocaust’ myth is not just an economic windfall for ‘Jews’, and Israel, but a key element in maintaining the cult mentality. The idea of being a persecuted people. Even Professor Markus and Rabbi Freilich, at Brendon O’Connell’s trial, admitted that the BELIEF in a‘shared history of persecution as a people’ was one of the few things ‘binding’ the ‘Jews’ together as a supposed unified community. Given that 90% of Jews are NOT ‘orthodox’. That many are completely secular. It is in fact myths like ‘The Holocaust’ that define the ‘Jewish’ people per se.

The moment we debunk ‘The Holocaust’ myth, it seems, the entire concept of ‘Jewish’ identify may fall apart. Implode. Evaporate. This is what the cult leaders’ fear so much. Why they will spend 13 million dollars in just one single trial to ensure that the ‘6 million’ myth is maintained. For the cult leaders fear that the moment a ‘Jew’ questions any single element of their ‘belief system’, the entire belief system will come crashing down, like a house of cards, or a set of dominoes. They know just how precarious their ‘deceptions’, propaganda, lies, myths, and ‘beliefs’ are. The very ‘identity’ ‘Jew’ is dependent upon the lies. Myths. Beliefs.

Beliefs that can be shattered at any moment by a simple self-reflection on the part of any ‘Jew’. What if ‘The Holocaust’ never happened? What if some Jews did really bad things that justified the responses of the host nations, over the last few hundred years? What if they weren’t slaves in Egypt at all? What if the ‘Gentiles’ are NOT ‘Amalek’? What if it is our own leaders that are leading us to our destruction, for their own selfish motivations? What if?

You start a chain reaction when you challenge any dogmatic system of beliefs. And system of beliefs held purely on ‘faith’. Without any basis in logic, reason, experience, or sensory perception.

And this is why the ‘Jews’ must be ‘immunized’ against any such reflections, doubts, and questions, relating to their ‘belief system’.

It is clear, based on the ‘expert witness’ testimony at Brendon O’Connells trial, that the entire notion OF a ‘Jewish community’, in fact of ‘A Jew’, is based on nothing more than BELIEFS. And humans are prone to BELIEVE LIES.

Especially when they are promised the right to own 2800 slaves each, and live as an ‘Efffendi’, in houses others built for them, driving cars others manufacture and service for them, eating food others grew and prepared for them.

But remember that the ‘judas goat’ is treated especially nice to give it the higest status in the herd. So that the others desire to ‘be’ that goat. They pay attention to what that goat does. They imagine a cause and effect relationship between how the master treats that goat, and how that goat behaves. They try to mimic that goat, hoping that the master will then shower them with the same benefits. The same status. That is how marketing works. You get an Alpha Male and Alpha Female to consume your products and services. The others will want to ‘ape’ that alpha apes behavior, in the hope of enjoying all the privileges and benefits tha alpha male appears to be enjoying, in the television commercial ,movie, billboard poster, and so on.

But that judas goat is merely being used as a ‘democratically elected leader’, like Trump, to ensure the others follow his example. And when the time comes, that goat will lead the others to their death.

And it is no different with this cult called ‘Judaism’. The elites are right at this moment planning to sacrifice the 6 million ‘Jews’ in Israel to their Jew World Order ambitions.

If you listen to this Rabbbi, you will understand that he is telling us that this moment is close at hand. That ‘the nations’ will attack Israel, and destroy it. But out of these ashes the Jew World Order that they have been promised will emerge. For in this world war three Germany, most of Europe, and the U.S.A, will be destroyed utterly, man, woman, child, and animal, just as in the ‘good old days’ of the Old Testament.

Oh, but don’t worry, he promises those 6 million Jews will be rewarded in some vague ‘after life’. Some sort of ‘heaven’.

Meanwhile back on earth the cult leaders will be enjoying total and utter domination of this entire planet, having enslaved the survivors of World War Three to their Jew World Order.

FACTS people FACTS that the cult leaders will ‘protect’ themselves from at any price. ANY price.

So do you think I expect to ‘enjoy’ this existence much longer?

Please help me do as much good as I can in the time I have left. In the time WE have left.

I’m sorry I do not have any superpower. Except honesty. Intelligence. Logic. Reason. And a little courage to employ these in seeking, and publishing, utterances that are as close to the truth as I can get.

Judaism is a cult. We must save the cult members from their cult leadership. If only to save ourselves.

I wish to not only save the 6 million humans slated for death by fire, but all of humanity. The hundreds of millions, probably BILLIONS of those people defined as ‘Amalek’ by the Jew World Order.

The first step is to bypass the cult leader’s censorship. To simply ‘COOL’ the ‘Jew’ just enough so that they are amenable to logic, to appeals to reason, to appeal to demonstrable facts.

Consider what a challenge this is, given that even the ‘host’ nations the cult is embedded in have been totally conditioned since birth to ACCEPT most of the same illusions and lies that the cult leaders have programmed their cult members with.

Rabbi David Bar-Hayim's views on the supposed consensus opinion that there is a definitive ‘last word’ on the meaning of the Torah and Talmud, as expressed in the uploaded video

Amalek are defined very simply as any person, idea, institution, organisation, belief, fact, or utterance that resists, opposes, defies, seeks to prevent, or to stop, or reduce, the power of the Jew World Order, in any way that might restrict, regulate, or prevent the ‘Jews’ from realising their god given, god commanded, destiny to rule the entire planet.

So Amalek is not a particular ‘tribe’ or ‘race’ of men. It is anyone and anything that might in theory or practice, prevent the realisation of a Jew World Order. Anyone or anything that might seek to reduce this Jew World Orders total hegemony. Absolute power. Total control.

Rabbi David Bar-Hayim riducules as fatous the very notion that the ‘Shulchan Aruch’ is the ‘definitive final word’ and ‘L.A.W law’ of Judaism.

The Shulchan Aruch is simply a compilation made at two distinct places and times, by two Torah scholars - Rabbis, that reflects the current beliefs of the ‘Jews’ in those places, at those times, according to these two writers.

What is represents is a ‘snapshot’ of Jewish beliefs at two distinct times, in two distinct places, namely Iraq and Krakow, in Poland.

The ‘Jews’ in those two places, at those specific times, ‘accepted’ these particular interpretations of the ‘Torah’.

But that does not in any way make these beliefs ‘binding’ on all ‘Jews’. The utterances in these books could never be considered ‘the last word on judaism’. The ‘definitive Torah interpretation’.

This is consistent with the friendly joke current among ‘Jews’ themselves that if you put five ‘Jews’ in a room wit a Torah, you will get at least SIX different interpretations.

This is why the cult leaders cling so desperately to ‘The Holocaust’ and seek to have their members attacked by ‘outsiders’, even faking ‘anti-semitic attacks’ themselves, and totally misrepresenting the criminal statistics, to give ‘Jews’ a sense of impending threat at the hands of the ‘outsiders’ the ‘goys’, the ‘gentiles’.

There is little ‘unity’ among the ‘Jewish’ community. This is in fact why there are so many brilliantly iconoclastic and lovable ‘Jews’ in the world. They make the best comedians and social reformers, simply as they ARE by nature iconoclastic. They are individual. They use their own reason and intellect to form conclusions. They question EVERYTHING and ANYTHING. They LOVE doing so. They are BORN skeptics. THAT is why Freudian analysis came from a ‘Jew’. Someone raised in a tradition of speculation and skepticism. To challenge every assumption. That is why EINSTEIN could take the work of ‘Gentiles’ and turn it into a huge theory of everything. THAT is why David Lee Roth is ‘Diamond David Lee Roth’ and not just another hack frontman. That is why I LOVE these ‘Jews’ so much. They are iconoclasts. THAT is why JESUS was produced by the ‘Jewish’ community. A true iconoclast. Questioned everything.

It is like cult communities, by their very attempts to totally squash any creative thought, any skepticism, and any self-reflection, actually produce what they sought to prevent. Iconoclasts of the highest order. People able to poke fun at ANYTHING. To poke holes in ANY belief system. To challenge ANY assumption. To be bold and courageous. Free of inhibitions.

When you take a certain nature, and bring it face to face with the 24/7 mind controls of the cult leadership, it provokes a reaction. The intelligence is there. The cult behavior becomes transparent and so obvious to the intelligence. That intelligence is presented with a very clear case. An obvious case. It cannot avoid seeing through the lies, deceptions, attemps at isolatin, at mind control, at social conditioning. And it rejects these as alien. They are not subtle, as might be the case in the wider community. They are clear and obvious. No way to dismiss them. No way to look past them. No way to ‘deny’ them. And this intelligence then has something like what Plato would call the ‘blueprint’ for ALL other social conditioning attempts. The ‘ideal’ pattern or mold for ALL the less obvious conspiracies, mind controls, propaganda, dogmas, and deceptive, manipulative, misdirective, sleight-of-thought, systems that exist on this planet.

THAT explains my LOVE of so many ‘Jews’.

They were brought face to face with clear attempts to control them. They saw the principles at work. They could then extrapolate them to all other systems of control on this planet. They saw the key elements at work in all the other systems of mind control, of social conditioning, of mind imprisonment. Whether at a conscious or unconscious level, they ‘realised’ this. They became ‘awake’. And as Nietzsche says in ‘Thus spake Zarathustra’, ‘Once you are awakened, you remain awake for eternity’.

Even the ‘Jews’ who don’t consciously reject ‘Judaism’, have still learned the sub-conscious lessons from their cult of Judaism. They can now make fun of things without shame, fear, or inhibition. They can see the emperor is naked, and feel no qualms about laughing at him, and bringing us in on the fun. They can be totally uninhibited. Exactly what Christianity had stolen from the ‘Gentiles’. This irreverence for status, tradition, power, authority. For good or bad, humanity has benefitted, or paid, for this. This is why ‘Jews’ have been at the head of almost every revolutionary movement in history. Either obtrusively as the leaders of the revolutionary movements, or as the ‘puppet masters’ in the background, pulling the strings.

This is why I have some hope that in fact it WILL be ‘Jews’ themselves who defeat the Jew World Order. Maybe they are using Judaism as a mere means to their own, more desirable, ends. I can only hope. We can only hope.

It is to THESE Jews that I write all my books. And to all the ‘awake’ non ‘Jews’ who have a chance to benefit from any insights I have gleaned over the last few decades, as an ‘old soul’ and true philosopher.

The Shulchan Aruch (Hebrew: שֻׁלְחָן עָרוּך‎ [ʃulˈħan ʕaˈʁuχ], literally: "Set Table"),[1] also known by various Jewish communities but not all as "the Code of Jewish Law," is the most widely consulted of the various legal codes in Judaism. It was authored in Safed (today in Israel) by Joseph Karo in 1563 and published in Venice two years later.[2]Together with its commentaries, it is the most widely accepted compilation of Jewish law ever written.

The halachic rulings in the Shulchan Aruch generally follow Sephardic law and customs, whereas Ashkenazi Jews will generally follow the halachic rulings of Moses Isserles, whose glosses to the Shulchan Aruch note where the Sephardic and Ashkenazi customs differ. These glosses are widely referred to as the mappah (literally: the "tablecloth") to the Shulchan Aruch's "Set Table". Almost all published editions of the Shulchan Aruch include this gloss, and the term "Shulchan Aruch" has come to denote both Karo's work as well as Isserles', with Karo usually referred to as "the mechaber" ("author") and Isserles as "the Rema" (an acronym of Rabbi Moshe Isserles).

Karo evidences not only an astonishing range of reading, covering almost the entire rabbinic literature up to his time, but also remarkable powers of critical investigation. He evidences no inclination to simply accept the opinions of ancient authorities, notwithstanding his great respect for them.

In the introduction to his monumental compilation, Karo clearly states the necessity of, and his reasons for undertaking such a work. The expulsion of the Jews from the Iberian peninsula and the invention of printing had endangered the stability of religious observances on their legal and ritual sides. By the 15th century, the Jews in Spain and the Jews of Portugal followed two main traditions: the older tradition of Maimonides, whose school of thought is heir to the Talmudic academies of Babylonia via the scholars of North Africa; and the Ashkenazi school of the Tosafists whose tradition is based on analytical thinking (related to pilpul), a methodology that was developed in the yeshivot of France and Germany that taught the importance of the minhagim or "customs" of the country. Jews then living in the different kingdoms of Spain had their standard authorities to which they appealed. The most prominent of these were Maimonides (Rambam), whose opinions were accepted in Andalusia, Valencia, Israel and the Near East; Nahmanides and Solomon ben Adret, whose opinions were accepted in Catalonia; and Asher ben Jehiel and his family, of German origin, whose opinions were accepted in Castile. When the Spanish-Portuguese exiles came to the various communities in the East and West, where usages entirely different from those to which they had been accustomed prevailed, the question naturally arose whether the newcomers, some of whom were men of greater learning than the members of the host communities in Europe, should be ruled by the latter, or vice versa.

The proliferation of printed books, moreover, dramatically increased the availability of halakhic literature; so that many half-educated persons, finding themselves in possession of legal treatises, felt justified in following any ancient authority at will. Karo undertook his Beth Yosef to remedy this problem, quoting and critically examining in his book the opinions of all the authorities then known

Karo adopted the Halakhot of Rabbi Isaac Alfasi (the Rif), Maimonides, and Asher ben Jehiel (the Rosh) as his standards

In a number of cases Karo rules in favour of the Catalan school of Nahmanides and ben Adret, thus indirectly reflecting Ashkenazi opinions, even against the consensus of Alfasi and Maimonides. Karo very often decides disputed cases without necessarily considering the age and importance of the authority in question, expressing simply his own views.

the "Tur", although not considered as great an authority as Maimonides' code, was much more widely known; the latter being recognized only among the Spanish Jews, while the former enjoyed a high reputation among the Ashkenazim and Sephardim, as well as the Italian Jews.

Major criticisms regarding what many viewed as the arbitrary selection of the three authorities upon whose opinions Karo based his work

The author himself had no very high opinion of the work, remarking that he had written it chiefly for "young students" (Shulchan Aruch, Introduction). He never refers to it in his responsa, but always to the Beth Yosef.

The Shulchan Aruch achieved its reputation and popularity not only against the wishes of the author, but, perhaps, through the very scholars who criticized it. The history of the Shulchan Aruch is, in a way, identical with the history of rabbinical literature of the Jews in Poland for a period of two centuries. Recognition or denial of Karo's authority lay entirely with the Polish Talmudists. German Jewish authorities had been forced to give way to Polish ones as early as the beginning of the sixteenth century. Karo had already been opposed by several Sephardic contemporaries, Yom-Tob Zahalon, who designated the Shulchan Aruch as a book for "children and ignoramuses" (in his responsa, no. 67, beginning), and Jacob Castro, whose work Erekh ha-Shulchan consists of critical glosses to the Shulchan Aruch. Moses Isserles and Solomon Luria—the Maharshal, were Karo's first important adversaries in Eastern Europe. Further in response to those who wished to force the rulings of the Shulchan Aruch upon those communities following Rambam, Karo wrote:

 [the Talmudic Sages] said 'if [one practices] like the School of Shammai [he may do so, but] according to their leniencies and their stringencies': The RaMBaM, is the greatest of all the Torah authorities, and all the communities of the Land of Israel and the Arab-controlled lands and the West [North Africa] practice according to his word, and accepted him upon themselves as their Chief Rabbi. Whoever practices according to him with his leniencies and his stringencies, why coerce them to budge from him? And all the more so if also their fathers and forefathers practiced accordingly: for their children are not to turn right or left from the RaMBaM of blessed memory. And even if communities that practice according to the Rosh or other authorities like him became the majority, they cannot coerce the minority of congregations practicing according to the RaMBaM of blessed memory, to practice like they do. And there is no issue here concerning the prohibition against having two courts in the same city ['lo tithgodedu'’], since every congregation should practice according to its original custom 

Eventually though, the rulings of the Shulchan Aruch became the accepted standard not only in Europe and the diaspora, but even in the land of Israel where they had previously followed other authorities

Rabbi Judah Loew ben Bezalel[edit]

Rabbi Judah Loew ben Bezalel (1520–1609), known as the "Maharal", (1520–1609) writes in Netivoth Olam-Netiv HaTorah (end of chapter 15)" :

|“ |To decide halakhic questions from the codes without knowing the source of the ruling was not |” |

| |the intent of these authors. Had they known that their works would lead to the abandonment | |

| |of Talmud, they would not have written them. It is better for one to decide on the basis of | |

| |the Talmud even though he might err, for a scholar must depend solely on his understanding. | |

| |As such, he is beloved of God, and preferable to the one who rules from a code but does not | |

| |know the reason for the ruling; such a one walks like a blind person. | |

Rabbi Shmuel Eidels[edit]

Rabbi Shmuel Eidels (1555–1631), known as the "Maharsha", criticizes those who rule directly from the Shulchan Aruch without being fully conversant with the Talmudic source(s) of the ruling: "In these generations, those who rule from the Shulchan Aruch without knowing the reasoning and Talmudic basis ... are among the 'destroyers of the world' and should be protested."[10]

Rabbi Yoel Sirkis[edit]

Another prominent critic of the Shulchan Aruch was Rabbi Yoel Sirkis (1561–1640), author of a commentary to the Arba'ah Turim entitled Bayith Chadash, commonly abbreviated as Bach, and Rabbi Meir ben Gedaliah: "It is impossible to rule (in most cases) based on the Shulchan Aruch, as almost all his words lack accompanying explanations, particularly (when writing about) monetary law. Besides this, we see that many legal doubts arise daily, and are mostly the subject of scholarly debate, necessitating vast wisdom and proficiency to arrive at a sufficiently sourced ruling...."[11]

Other criticisms[edit]

The strongest criticism against all such codes of Jewish law is the contention that they inherently violate the principle that halakha must be decided according to the later sages; this principle is commonly known as hilkheta ke-vatra'ei ("the halakha follows the later ones").

A modern commentator, Rabbi Menachem Elon explains:

|“ |This rule dates from the Geonic period. It laid down the law and states that "until the time |” |

| |of Rabbis Abbaye and Rava (4th century) the Halakha was to be decided according to the views | |

| |of the earlier scholars, but from that time onward, the halakhic opinions of post-talmudic | |

| |scholars would prevail over the contrary opinions of a previous generation" (see Piskei | |

| |Ha'Rosh, Bava Metzia 3:10, 4:21, Shabbat 23:1 and also the Rif writing at the end of Eruvin | |

| |Ch.2.) | |

|“ |If one does not find their statements correct and is able to maintain his own views with |” |

| |evidence that is acceptable to his contemporaries...he may contradict the earlier statements,| |

| |since all matters that are not clarified in the Babylonian Talmud may be questioned and | |

| |restated by any person, and even the statements of the Geonim may be differed from him ... | |

| |just as the statements of the Amoraim differed from the earlier ones. On the contrary, we | |

| |regard the statements of later scholars to be more authoritative because they knew the | |

| |reasoning of the earlier scholars as well as their own, and took it into consideration in | |

| |making their decision (Piskei Ha'Rosh, Sanhedrin 4:6, responsa of the Rosh 55:9). | |

the Shulchan Aruch faced significant opposition, and was NOT intended by its author to be any sort of ‘last word’ etc…

MHR Moses could not convince the original ‘Jews’ to commit genocide against the Canaanites etc… Moses had to indoctrinate first a new generation, to condition them from birth, and then their children, to ensure a ‘cult’ mentality, total submission to arbitrary laws, and to the command to commit mass murder of men, women, children, and animals. It took Moses 40 years, of 24/7 indoctrination, conditioning, threats and punishments, to ‘produce’ a generation of genocidal zombies capable of carrying out the commands of the ‘Jewish’ elites at that time. This is why it took 40 years before Joshua could command an army of zealouts. Of genocidal psychopaths. Totally mindcontrolled. Totally entranced. Totally hypnotized. True cult members. With no personal will. Mere means to their leader’s own ends. Capable of the worst atrocities such as ‘ripping apart pregnant women’ and ‘putting suckling infants to the sword.

Second video I found on the Shulchan Aruch, the book Brendon and most of us have never heard of, and shamed Brendon for not being aware of, the book Freilich claimed was 'binding' and 'last word' and 'consensus beliefs' on torah, talmud etc i.e over-rule all these earlier books where all the horrible quotes we find are contained...well this guy is a Rabbi, Jewish, and has videos on Youtube i.e 'expert' ..., Rabbi David Bar-Hayim stated it was NOT binding i.e last word for all jews...NOT NOT NOT ... Shulchan Aruch_- Interview with Rabbi David Bar-Hayim ...says just cos jewish people at a particular time 'accepted' it, does NOT make it binding...circular argument he claims...being accepted does not make it correct ... many views accepted by entire world since proven wrong...e.g earth flat, at center of solar system...the fact that jewish people accept something does not automatically make it correct...same for Shulchan Aruch...jews enjoyed autonomony in Babylon as compared to roman persecution previously...romans never controlled babylon, and under caliphate also flourished...the talmud that 'sums up' became standard text for jews worldwide...Baghdad was historical N.Y i.e center of world finance system...all roads lead to Baghdad under Caliphate...center of jewish world located here...to benefit of arab empire...center of trade to and from Europe...Babylonian judaism became world judaism...Babylonian model became universal 'jewish' model...coerced minorities to adapt Babylonian practises...Babylonian tradition won for these reasons...NOT because 'correct'...just ultimately 'accepted'... but in which way? referendum? vote? who got to vote? how could average jew express opinion? was there a committee of Rabbis? no, never such a conscious decision or effort...just historical reality, economic and military facts...of muslim arab empire ... so this book became basic handbook for jewish world...but battle won by babylonian center, which now does not exist, and jewish history has taken new course...so claim that this book is authoritative because accepted by jewish people at the time is childish and unintellectual ... unrealistic...how was it accepted? vote? Rabbi's voted? people voted? it consists of 2 parts, ,one written by one original author, and annotations added within one generation of another person...first printed together 1580...both writers not deciding issues on own analysis, reasoning, understanding, just quoting earlier authorities from countries where these two writers came...it was the understanding of them at their time...book is snapshot of reality at that time in different parts of jewish world...'accepted' by us, so keep doing this...but...this is what you SHOULD do even if you have not been doing it up til now, is different concept...two different parts of world i.e second Krakow? Ashkednazi jew and other??? ... this is why it became a 'standard' and 'commonly accepted' book, but does not imply or prove it is superior in any way to other texts, nor more correct...so basically NO consensus...... office@...

This video, which I infer was recorded in 2009, seems too explicitly obvious proof of everything I have been arguing for the last few years, and others have been arguing for centuries, about the danger of the mental illness we call 'Judaism'. About the very real threat it poses to all of us. I would ask you to forward copies with a short note to your local police, government, public prosecutors offices, media outlets, and other community representatives.

This Rabbi is inciting all jews to commit genocide against Germany, The U.S.A, Italy, and the 'rest of the Roman Empire'.

This is the first time I have heard a 'jew' explicitly express their 'logic'. If anyone imputed this logic to a jew, they would be ridiculed, shamed, and convicted with racial vilification and incitement. It is just too absurd, and too dangerous, to believe. But here it is. A Jewish Rabbi out in the open, holding nothing back. Extreme in his self-righteousness, and totally without fear of censure, let alone criminal prosecutions. He is saying the most absurd things with a straight face, and absolutely no pangs of conscience, or embarrassment.

I have no idea how representative this Jewish Rabbi is of Judaism in general. However it represents the 'ideology of Semitism' as I have presented it in my posts and videos. And as usual I will repeat that I am not against any person. I do not hate any 'jews'. What I do hate is the sort of ideology of Semitism as expressed by this particular Jewish Rabbi. He constantly refers to the Torah as the source of authority for his comments.

Now Prosecutor Eyers, in Brendon O'Connell's court case, ridiculed and shamed Brendon for not being aware of the exact details of the 'Shulchan Aruch', which he claimed was 'the final word on Judaism' and 'over-rides' all previous commentaries in the Talmud, Torah, and other 'holy' books of the Jews. I had never heard of such a book or notion, so I did some research. At least one Jewish Rabbi, Rabbi David Bar-Hayim, himself ridiculed the very idea that this 'Shulchan Aruch' was any such thing as 'the definitive, last word' on Judaism. I have posted his video.

Which brings us back to all the horrific comments in the Torah and Talmud about 'Gentiles' / 'Goys' being mere 'cattle' with no human rights. And the subject of 'Amalek', which most Jews publically claim has no relevance for today, or the future.

I just happened to stumble upon a video of a Jewish Rabbi promoting a Judaism that the mass media, most jews, and the legal profession, want to pretend exist only in the fevered imagination of anti-semites.

Please let me know if you can identify this Rabbi, and where this hate speech, racial vilification, and incitement to genocide took place.

It seems to be a parody of every 'conspiracy theorists' worst nightmare of Judaism, and the ideology of Semitism. So I will remain skeptical until I can confirm that this is really a Jewish Rabbi.

Considering how many levels the jew world order play their games on, it might actually be part of a deliberate provocation to anti-semitism. I have always beleived that at some point the jew world order elites would turn on the average 'Jew', and literally 'throw them into the flames' of public opinion, and literally sacrifice 6 million of them in Israel to their jew world order. I believe the truth about 911 will be 'revealed' to the public at some point, to turn public opinion against Israel and Jews. Not that we have no already proven the facts of Israeli guilt. But for the average person, if some 'authority figure' does not say it, they can't hear it, and won't accept it. So I expect the jew world order mass media will itself turn on the jews, fairly soon.

I would love to have a transcript of this video. For now I have taken notes. And one thing is clear. This Rabbi claims that the Torah predicts that 'The nations' will attack Israel. And the only motive they could have is if the U.S and European publics learn the truths we have been publishing for decades now, but from their own governments and mass media. So do not let any sudden 'turn of events' make you think 'finally, we've won'. I expect we are being manipulated back and forth like any stage managed 'world wrestling federation' bout. They want world war three. This Rabbi quotes the Torah and Talmud on this issue. That the nations, the U.S and Europe, will destroy Israel, as part of the 'Judaic tradition' of the coming of their Messiah.

But now to the video, which the Rabbi himself claims to represent authentic 'Judaism'.

First we learn why 'Jews' never argue with historical revisionists, or anyone else, about anything. Or at least why this Rabbi warns his fellow jews to never attempt 'reason' or 'logic' when interacting with one of us 'Amalek'. To speed things up, I will start at the end, where he reveals that Amalek are Germany, The U.S.A, and all the nations that formed the old Roman empire, such as Italy. So we are all Amaleki. What does this mean?

Well according to this Rabbi, the Torah states that every jew must kill every man, woman, child, and beast of the Ameleki, simply as the Ameleki, us, plan to kill every jew. So it is a preemptive strike. Now when former 'host' nations learned of these facts, they kicked the jews out of their lands, or worse, in 'pogroms'. Which the jews then claimed as proof of their evil intentions towards the jews all along.

This Rabbi states that until the jews are not in a position to physically kill all of us Amaleki, they must be patient. But the time will come. It is the destiny of the Jews to exterminate all of us Amaleki. God commands it. I will include the actual notes in a moment. This is just to make you realise how important this video is, and to make it as simple to understand as possible, without misrepresenting anything.

You see God's plan is that the Jews should rule this earth. They define as 'good', anything that promotes this end. Anything that is a means towards this end is 'good'. And anything, and anyone, that resists this end is reflexively, automatically 'evil'.

It is thus commanded to kill our children, because our children will grow up to kill the Jews. Of course this sounds like I am making it up, so read the notes later, and watch the video. But that is literally what he says, to justify the murder of our children, us, our men, women, and our animals.

Now if there ever was a 'dangerous' 'logic' then the ideology of semitism, as expressed by this Rabbi, is it. If there EVER was a person, and set of beliefs, and public statements, that compelled us to create, and enact, and enforce, hate-speech and racial vilification and incitement and ridicule laws, then this man, and his statements, are they.

According to this typical cult leader, the 'jew' is never to engage in 'debate' with us Amalek. For reason, logic, empathy, compassion, and all the 'human' qualities are alien to us. So it is pointless attempting to reason with us.

Worse, we will try to 'confuse' and 'raise questions' in the 'jews' minds about their beliefs, their semitism, their judaism. So the 'jew' is simply to avoid any such self-reflection. The jew is to simply have faith in what their traditions teach, even if they cannot understand them. They are to self-hypnotise themselves into the belief that the lifestyle judaism demands of them is the best one for them, even if they cannot understand the 'logic' behind it. Just be happy that it is the lifestyle god chose for them as the best for them. They will receive their rewards in heaven. And in the meantime follow all the arbitrary rules of Judaism, and avoid letting the Amalek 'trick' them into having doubts, and raising questions in their minds about their faith.

So we have here the typical cult leader and cult practises of exclusion, avoidance of reflection, and separation, with a brainwashed sense of imminent fear of us Amaleki exterminating all Jews. A true paranoia. A fear that justifies the very worst of 'preemptive strikes', namely, genocide of every man, woman, child among us, and our animals.

He does not beat around the bush. He states these things boldly. Expecting his audience to agree. He sounds totally delusional and extremely dangerous. But would any government arrest him for racial vilification, incitement, and hate speech? If they failed to, this would be clear evidence of what many of us fear, that the laws supposedly targeting these things are really laws designed to stop any criticism of the jews in public.

So please copy this video, then send copies to your local officals and authorities, and complain to Youtube about it breaching their 'community standards'. And then keep copies of any responses you get, or lack of response. Take a screen shot of the youtube post before sending in your complaint. See how quickly the post is removed or not.

I don't know how I can add anything to what this man says, to make his repugnant belief system any more obvious, or to show how fatuous his logic is.

You don't have to argue with a goy / gentile / amalek because they are incapable of logic, reason, compassion, and they are only trying to trick you into doubting your beliefs and raising questions.

Now you see why 'alternative media' like Brendon O'Connell is considered 'criminal' by 'jews'. You see simply trying to get a jew to reflect on their beliefs, to think about them, to question them, automatically defines YOU as Amalek, and means that they are commanded to destroy you, your families, and pets, and animals, as soon as they have the physical power to do so. Until then they are to avoid you.

This Rabbi also indicates that the jews will crash the economies of the West to humble the jews who have become infatuated and seduced with worldly wealth, gratification, satisfaction, and pleasure. We are all to be made poor, so the jews will return, with humility, back to their Torah.

Please please please make several copies of this video, and ensure as many people see it as possible. And explain to anyone who asks what the Torah and Talmud are. And what a Rabbi is. And that THEY are Amalek. And that the jews god commands them to destroy you, to kill you, and all your people and animals, the moment they are in the position to do so.

I can't say anything better than this Rabbi says it. It is like a nightmare, to watch him say the very worst that has been attributed to Judaism over the last few thousand years, since Jesus.

I will add the undedited notes right now, and edit and write them up later...just in case I don't get a chance to. I've had all sorts of strange emails and such. I've had my Jewtube and Farcebook accounts terminated. I've had people state they were reporting me to the German authorities. The irony is that this guy is really doing what we have been constantly accused of. Of inciting people to violence against entire racial groups, nationalities. Of inciting irrational hatred.

How can you defeat a logic, if accepted, that we are all evil, and out to destroy the jews, and thus they are entitled, in fact commanded by their god, to kill all of us the moment they have the power to do so? If they are commanded to avoid all discussion let alone debate with us, because we are merely out to trick them, then how on earth are we to relieve them of their paranoid fears.

'The Holocaust' hoax is clearly functioning as part of this brainwashing. Just watch the film 'Defamation' for proof. Jews are being brought up to fear and hate non-jews, and to plan to murder us all, the moment they have the power to, all based on the assumption that we are planning to do the same to them. And having 'the holocaust' myth certainly doesn't help anyone. This is clearly the main reason 'The Holocaust' was invented, as the new dogma, article of faith, that no jew dare question. Proof that Germany is Amalek. The 'logic' that the U.S.A and all the nations from the old Roman Empire are Amalek was lost on me, if there was any. Talk of 'grandson' Germany Amalek and ???. As usual, too many non-sequiturs and non-logic for me to follow. Just wait till you read my notes on the Brendon O'Connell trial.

So if you are not terrified of Jews, or at least feel you deserve an explanation of what this Rabbi is saying here, by now, well then I guess there is no hope for us. We are going to be tricked into this world war three in which Israel is totally destroyed, 6 million Jews killed, along with the entire Western Europe and U.S.A, and the jew world order will be set up on the ashes.

Seriously, if THIS video does not motivate you to invest a little time and effort into finding out what it represents, what judaism really is, what it means, then I'm wasting MY time and effort, the last years of my life as markus, on something hopeless. And I should just get back to my personal salvation, and personal projects.

If you are a Jew and dismiss this Rabbi as 'unrepresentative' then I think you don't have enough sense of urgency or survival instincts. This Rabbi is not an isolated phenommena. He is quoting the Torah and Talmud. And that other book supposed to 'revise' those earlier works is clearly NOT 'the definitive, final word, on judaism'. It seems the 'Old School' rules are held to apply by many, if not the majority of jews. The joke is going to be on them though. For even this Rabbi implicitly states that we are going to war, to destroy Israel, and that it will be destroyed, but so will Amalek. Only AFTER this will the Messiah come, and revive the poor innocent victim jews.

How innocent? Well, because WE had always planned to kill them all. They just killed us first. Do unto others what others plan to do unto you, only first.

Well, really, what has been stopping us Amalek from killing every jew, if that had been our intention? Nothing. But logic has no place here, does it, Mr Rabbi. I am just trying to trick you into doubting your absurd and dangerous non-sequitur 'logic'. Sure, you are the chosen people, god wants you to rule us all, and anything that gets in the way, anyone that opposes or resists this 'mission' you are on, is Amalek, and must be destroyed, man, woman, child, and animal.

Speechless. What to say? But try, send the video to anyone and everyone, and see how they try to 'dismiss' it.

Then make up your own video, just changing it so that the jews take the place of Amalek, and your people take the place of the jews. And see how quick you end up in jail. For saying exactly what this jew has been encouraged by the total power of the jew world order, to feel brazen and untouchable enough to not only state in public, but allow to be video'd, and posted on Youtube.

Now the notes which need editing...so don't republish, they are not meant for 'not in private' reproduction...they are private, between you and me...

Why the need to Destroy Amalek_ Can we identify who he is_ [360p]

find this again, find people who uploaded, who this Rabbi is etc...then send to German embassy / German media, any germans know, can find...THIS is clearly incitement, racial vilification, ... send to Australian govt. / newspapers...post where Brendon's stuff is posted...

Why the need to Destroy Amalek_ Can we identify who he is_ [360p]

Last of the 70 most difficult questions in judaism...?? Am-ma-leyk...Amalek...

this eveil power known to us as amalek...we are asked to / we are commanded to do so... why doesn't god / Hashem do it himself? list of 10 questions...if amalek is so bad, why doesn't got destroy them? Why does this commandment APPEAR to be so cruel..to exterminate, to kill, men women and children...but jews trained to be kind ? here asked to have no pity...no mercy... so why? remember and don't forget...two commandments? why two? ... if we have this commandment of eliminating amelek, how are we supposed to know who he is?...we are told amalek hates us very much...question is where does that hatred come from? how are we supposed to defeat amalek...why isn't Hashems chair of justice complete / intact until the day will come when Hashem eliminates amalek...what will happen in the very end to Amalek? when will this happen? will he be elminated?...we have to go back to start of creation spoken about in Talmud etc, for clarity...as to enormity of this task...of destroying amalek...Hashem created the world and two opposing powers, the ability to do good and the ability to opposed this good i.e evil...it is very subjective...ultimate good is that which brings about the fulfillment of gods will in this world...that which brings us closer to our mission...and evil is anything that detracts / opposed / moves us away from achieving this mission...these are complete opposites, one wants to fulfill the mission, and one that does not...to have free will there must be two opposites to attract / tempt / confuse us, so we have a choice to decide ...the purpose of creation is to reward man for making the right decisions...there is an afterworld, an eternal spiritual world where one will be rewarded for doing his job...

we'ver covered ' the purpose of creation' before ??? got to get THAT video

real challenge requires free will...this power called evil given right / opportunity to expose its face of evil...wars, killing, brutality (but god ordering it made THEIR genocide good? of course)...common denominator of evil is that it is against the purpose of creation...so god can hide his face...allows evil to be strong so people wonder if god exists, given so much evil...it is intentional to allow free will / reward of right choices...

the world is well designed? to vavo? before form and shape...empty, void...confused...Hashem separated light from darkness, good from evil, male from female, purity, impurity...Hashem allowed man to bring about to vavo again...i.e emptiness, confusion, ... empty of faith / belief in a supreme being...devoid of a boss...devoid of any meaning...to vavo...relativism...right and wrong not clear...man is guilty for this...any human jew or not can know the truth if chooses to seek it ... can be known...mhr non-jew know jew his master, jew know goyim his slave...!!!

Adam and his wife 'don't eat fruit of this tree'...went against god's wishes...the enemy was created by god...he's a serpent...he is the satan, etc...his job to lure you away from your mission...Adam had soul of all humanity in his body...all the potential souls that will come into the world...he allows the evil to penetrate him ... he brought in this evil...allowed forces of evil and good to mix...there was order and separation...now forces of good and evil present in each of us, fighting...some souls are more divine, and some are less divine...Rabbi's tell us our chances of being bad are greater than being good...therefore needs some tool to guide him, keep him out of trouble...you humans have to rectify this world...to strenghthen the powers of good over the evil...only someone with a more divine soul can attain this...hashem has to pick a soul and allow that soul to be the one that will fulfill this mission... a people, a soul...I.E A PEOPLE not an individual...there are no jews at the start...most died in flood, leaving Noah, who didn't get torah...torah given as blueprint / guide / map to jewish people, a nation, to rectify this world...give power of good more power over evil...only possible through the torah...this chosen people...has to filter out the evil...generation by generation removes evil from seceeding generations of jews...but have something unrefined in them yet...not righteous enough...impurities removed ... Jacob purer, symbol of truth in Kaballah, he has 12 children, but none of these are ready yet...need to be refined in Egytpt...slavery to learn to be servants of god...refined by this psychologically / mentally / emotionally...leaving egypt elevated to highest levels and ready to receive the torah...after leaving Egypt...this people have been steadily refined through generations until refined enough to be ready to embrace and do gods will, without question...

powers of evil...as filtering all the good, some unrefined souls also being concentrated...jews receiving concentrated dose of divine souls, and someone out side receiving the equivalent of unrefined souls...one area is concentrated with this evil...amalek...the grandson of another semite / jew...Hitzak?... where evil being concentrated...amalek thus becmoing the arch enemy of jews...they have their own torah to oppose our torah, to go against everything that we are for...it is evil concentrated...doesn't tolerate...feel comfortable in the presence of good...that is the nature of concentrated evil...will not tolerate the philosophy / teachings of being good, humane, nice, compassionate (this is jews??? israel??? canannite holocaust?)

how is amalek manifest, where draws power from? its angel...all nations dissappeared...their minister weakened, replaced with other peoples...'their minister'...amalek has been around a long time, just like the jews...amalek in some form will always be around...its minister is the yesara himself, the satan himself...jews have god as their minister...satan eats acts of evil for dinner...perpetrated in this world give him power, so he gains in strength, lasting forever...depends on fuel called evil...he will exist as long as evil exists...

why doesn't hashem destroy him? man is giving satan his power..it is man's job to destroy him...mostly the jewish people have the job to rectify this world...acts of kindness and goodness allow jews to drive away the forces of evil / darkness...only we can do a good job of this...only jews can make a difference, through the torah...the only way to defeat evil...only we have the power to do it...satan is the trouble maker...we cannot allow him to exist...he is interfering with our job more than anyone else in the world...how does amalek do this? the torah 'when you left egypt, he met up with you, and he already wages war with you...he came after us?...

when he came after us and waged war against us with no incitement / agression on our part, he did this on his own, why? he doesn't like us...what is there not to like about the jew? what bothers him? the jew believes in morality, ethics, being good, being nice, that bothers him...he believes in teh exact opposite...

Mein Kampf...hitler says jews brought about two blemishes on humanity /defects...one in the physcial thorugh circumcision, and one through the soul, through 'conscience'...??? claims one should not feel bad about what you do...no right and wrong? that's amalek...from his writings you can clearly see the teachings of amalek, the philosophy totally opposed to what we believe / teach...

he cooled you off...amalek can cool off a jew ...pouring cold water on?...

obviously the jew is the greatest representation of acts of goodness that there is ???? 911? King david hotel? U.S.S liberty? 6 days war? operation cast lead? ...other people taken their laws from the bible? introducing conscience, morality, and values?

amalek casts doubt on things...ask questions..intentionally cast doubt...makes a mockery of everything, makes fun of things, (ridicule!) ... to 'cool off ' the jew...put doubts in his mind...i.e mhr scientist, cynic, skeptic... jew is amaleks enemy...

He's very dangerous to the jew...he casts doubt...tactic is to cast doubt, question,

he makes a mockery of everything...

you may find an individual out there in the streeet who does not appear to be your enemy per se, he doesn't hate jews, but he makes fun of torah, he mocks what the torah writes...he does not have to be biologically amaleky ... how do you fight it? a mocker? common sense, logic, cannot defeat him...otherwise he will weaken you, cool you off, common sense is precious to us, reason, truth, won't work against a mocker...

Who is amalek?...if someone mocks the torah, that is a form of ameleky, the characteristic of amaleky, that makes him amalek...doesn't have to be a descendant...it 'cools us off'...someone makes fun of jewish beliefs...common sense and logic won't defeat him, have to stay away from him, or he will weaken you...common sense, logic, reason alien to him, you won't be able to win...

Amalek has another face...loves food...covets...ta va...amalek is a grandson...another descendant concetration of bad too...father of Edomites...many nations belong ot Edom e.g roman empire is all Edom...grandfather and grandson...where do you see this today? can recognise who amalek and who is edom in today's world...can be observed between grandfather and grandson...

amalek was scattered, including in Iran...amalek is in Iran...Syrians mixed them up...we have amalek all over...

face of edom...especially problem in our generation...heart rules his mind..mind does not have a say...so the truth can never come out...person engrossed in materialistic lifestyle...desires for food, drink, enjoyment...too hard for him to face truth...his heart is in control...has faculty to discern right and wrong but wont...has own personal agenda / interest phsycial desires of this world...mind not control over heart...

amalek is not only a nation...also a form of life...a philosohpy...a characteristic that can exist even among some jews...the jew is instructed to eradicate this amalek from world and from himself...any vestige of it...any form of evil...through study of torah ??? drive away ...

why be so cruel to him? men women and children...some people accuse us of being genocidal ... that's what this is calling for...waving hands about as if incredulous/ they don't understand ...

a woman about to give birth on cold winters night, very ill, close to death...somebody ran to get a doctor...he arrived...cold snowing....delivered the baby boy...then cut it up in pieces...stepped on it and threw it in the garbage...is he cruel? huh? what would you say? did he do a good thing or a bad thing? how does it appear to you? evil? well what if I was to tell you that baby was hitler, would you still say it was evil...true story, baby survived, Hitler's doctor was jewish...we all agree it would have been a good thing ... this explains why we are so cruel...we need to be...for that is exactly what they would do to us if they had a chance... 43 minutes...got to quote him...THIS is vilification / incitement...seek charges against this guy...

if we do not do it to him, he will do it to us...you gotta do it because he's gonna do it to you...that's in the torah...

Other Rabbi: jews are commanded to eliminate Amalek...guy who commanded didn't do it himself, but commands jews to kill men women and children and animals...of Amalek...remember and don't forget...to do this...but how supposed to know who 'amalek' is? amalek hates jews very much. how to defeat amalek? Heshem's chair of justice is not intact until the day will come when hashem eliminates Amelek... when will this happen? .... hashem created the world with two oppositing powers, ability to do good, and ability to do opposite of good i.e evil....not what WE think is good, but what hashem defines as good...ultimate good is that which brings about the fulfillment of god's will in this world and brings us closer to our mission, therefore eveil is anything that moves us away from /that is opposed to doing the will of Hashem / us realising our mission...the will of god in this world...that is good...anything preventing that / opposing that is evil...we will be tempted/ attracted / confused by ... man to be rewarded for making right decisions in eternal / spiritual / next world...this is just temporary physical world... 7 mins...get details of this Rabbi's name etc...he is saying EXACTLY the worst we feared...hidden in blah blah...if jews mission is to rule world, then anyone opposing that mission is Amalek ... clearly...and EVIL...THAT is such a typical racial supremacist idea...my 'ideology of semitism' applies 100%...they are deluded, believe what is good for THEM is good ... and anyone who opposes their desire / ambition / right / gods will that they rule us, is EVIL, and must be totally destroyed / annhilated...man, woman, child, animal...!!!

torah tells us, you've gotta do it, cos he is gonna do it to you...

why we are so cruel...we are cruel to amalek, we need to be, cos that is exactly what amalek would do to us if given a chance... men women and children...throughout history there were attempts / pogroms, of amalek...Hitler 'he didn't care, men women and babies'...is that being cruel or is that self defence? Torah tells us ...if we don't do it to him he will do it to us...you've gotta do it because he is going to do it to you

angel of god was upset because shem gave water to person who was going to be in the future he is going to be a problem for his children

Amalek is the concentration of hatred from the beginning...the greatest evil...the arch enemy of the jew...what difference does it make if it is a baby or an adult...this baby will grow up to be your enemy so you must kill the baby... mhr assumption lets them justify anything...oh, this baby was going to grow up to be amalek...this baby will eventually be and adult and try to harm you, so do it to him, before he does it to you, so you betta do it...because YOU are HIS sworn enemy, you have to make HIM YOUR sworn enemy ...WTF!!!... so we should assume they are thinking this about us now? and kill them??? ...

do it to him, and you betta do it, he is your sworn enemy, so he has to be to you a sworn enemy to...the basic idea of why there is no pity whatsoever...but the animals? animal lovers ... fish will never become extinct? hashem gave them a blessing ? but other animals can become extinct...Hashem did not want to leave any opening whatsoever for pity on anything that belongs to or is associated with amalek...first king of jews made this mistake...why its o.K .. you went aagainst gods will, your own calculations...he lost his position, killed with his children...Rabbi's tell us whoever has pity on the cruel will eventually become cruel to those who deserve compassion....first king driven crazy by some spirit, became cruel and .... if you are compassionaate and have pity over the cruel, you'll become cruel over those you should have pity on...

The best way to love what Hashem loves, is to hate what Hashem hates...and hashem hates amalek !!!

to defeat amalek...logic, commonsense does not work...he mocks...to defeat him other than physcial defeat is not to ask questions, or have any doubts... jew to survive must say 'I beleive, I know this is good for me, he gave me this formula, this lifestyle...I know, there are things I don't understand, it's for my benefit, this ' ... any jew that uses philosophy and logic to justify their lifestyle, succumb to the pressure of inquisition...that which we don't understsand we accept anyway, otherwise under pressure we can break...

So don't argue with amalek, he's your arch enemy, he rpresents evil, you have to eliminate him or he will eliminate you...many jews ahve been totally assimiliated...so defeated that way...

assimilation is part of learning from the ways of amalek...destroy him whenever you can...if you cannot wage war against him ... you'll go to jail...so how do you do it? eliminate him? when cannot do it physcially...

don't let your heart be appeased, be complacent...can't say 'they've changed', they haven't changed...amalek is amalek...torah doesn't recognise changes in amalek...don't forget what they've perpertrated through us throughout history... germans recorded it for us? romans, or ukraine and poland, and crusades, all amalek...don't forget...they are still the same today...

amalek cools us off, our enthusiasm...don't show indifference to this danger that always exists...

torah reminds us ''when will amalek come after you? when you say 'I'm tired, its hard to be a jew'...amalek has power over us when we distanced from torah...

your chance to control to be the boss...

jewish nation 'cools off'

who is he, today? amalek? a nation in the world before teh messiah comes, we'll be able to recognise...the answer is very clear, it's germany...the concentration of amalek is mostly in that country...you can see for yourself what they did...but amalek is everywhere...so we'll have a final war...last war...assembly of nations will come against the jews...of all the evil sparks scattered over the world that contain amalek...hashem will eliminate them all..it is our job to drive evil away, but Hashem will gather all nations with amalek to come against jewish nation...final assembly of amalek nations just before messiah comes...hashem says all the victims will be brought togher in final day of justice ot give them justice...

if god exists how could he have allowed the holocaust? shem has a plan...his presence will be known...his chair, his seat of justice will be intact...it will become intact and complete when he reveals himself as king over entire universe...all evil will dissappear...cease to exist...and truth comes out...

big bang, evolution, is amalek...

Adom grandfather of amalek, who is germany...who is Adom...includes most of Europe, U.S.A, Roman empire...Italy...funny italians and germans should be friends? what does italy have to do with germany? verry opposties...germans cold, italians warm...why were they allies? Italy is the seat of Adom the Roman empire / latin languages, including america...Adom is U.S.A...

what will be the end of Amalek...destroyed ...will happen in our current generation...50 year old man...any vestiges of Amalek...we have enttered the land, a new gathering taking place, we'll soon hav ea king...destruction of amalek is imminent...amalek will put up a big fight...whenever jews come back to israel...

germany STOPPED jews coming back to Israel????? seriously? Transfer agreement? holocaust myth created TO get jews to move to israel...

from 18 millions jews before wwii, only 12 million remained...

soon will be GERMANY's turn to be destroyed...

stay away from arrogance...which stops jews getting close to judaism...have to be humble...to get close to torah...

collapse of economy e.g golden calf, so jews not mislead by assimiliation 'cooled' by desires for money etc...worldly stuff...all is amalek...many jews caught up in this...Ashem will destroy money first so jews become more humble, return to torah...doing what is good and right in the eyes of Hashem...

Amalek is not just a nation GERMANY...every human being has SOME good..jews most concentrated...why would WE want to give power to jews to destroy amalek if it is US ???

acts of goodness, brotherliness, kind to one another, increase power of goodness...so amalek will be destroyed...Hashem...time is finally arrived...2009 we're very close to moment...strong 'immuna' and 'clarity' and hashem will be king...

Rabbi David Bar-Hayim's views...!!!!

Amalek not racial group but people whose ideological aim / agenda is to destroy the jewish people at all cost...even at cost of self-sacrifice, and of own people... marrying out of faith so not part of jewish people's future... applies to all gentile nations...i.e in both cases original statements were specific to specific nations but intended to imply all nations ... MHR I bet my desire to eliminate the ideology of semitism as I define it makes me Amalek...as 'jew' is NOT bloodline in reality, but 'set of beliefs' !!!

Second video I found on the Shulchan Aruch, the book Brendon and most of us have never heard of, and shamed Brendon for not being aware of, the book Freilich claimed was 'binding' and 'last word' and 'consensus beliefs' on torah, talmud etc i.e over-rule all these earlier books where all the horrible quotes we find are contained...well this guy is a Rabbi, Jewish, and has videos on Youtube i.e 'expert' ..., Rabbi David Bar-Hayim stated it was NOT binding i.e last word for all jews...NOT NOT NOT ... Shulchan Aruch_- Interview with Rabbi David Bar-Hayim ...says just cos jewish people at a particular time 'accepted' it, does NOT make it binding...circular argument he claims...being accepted does not make it correct ... many views accepted by entire world since proven wrong...e.g earth flat, at center of solar system...the fact that jewish people accept something does not automatically make it correct...same for Shulchan Aruch...jews enjoyed autonomony in Babylon as compared to roman persecution previously...romans never controlled babylon, and under caliphate also flourished...the talmud that 'sums up' became standard text for jews worldwide...Baghdad was historical N.Y i.e center of world finance system...all roads lead to Baghdad under Caliphate...center of jewish world located here...to benefit of arab empire...center of trade to and from Europe...Babylonian judaism became world judaism...Babylonian model became universal 'jewish' model...coerced minorities to adapt Babylonian practises...Babylonian tradition won for these reasons...NOT because 'correct'...just ultimately 'accepted'... but in which way? referendum? vote? who got to vote? how could average jew express opinion? was there a committee of Rabbis? no, never such a conscious decision or effort...just historical reality, economic and military facts...of muslim arab empire ... so this book became basic handbook for jewish world...but battle won by babylonian center, which now does not exist, and jewish history has taken new course...so claim that this book is authoritative because accepted by jewish people at the time is childish and unintellectual ... unrealistic...how was it accepted? vote? Rabbi's voted? people voted? it consists of 2 parts, ,one written by one original author, and annotations added within one generation of another person...first printed together 1580...both writers not deciding issues on own analysis, reasoning, understanding, just quoting earlier authorities from countries where these two writers came...it was the understanding of them at their time...book is snapshot of reality at that time in different parts of jewish world...'accepted' by us, so keep doing this...but...this is what you SHOULD do even if you have not been doing it up til now, is different concept...two different parts of world i.e second Krakow? Ashkednazi jew and other??? ... this is why it became a 'standard' and 'commonly accepted' book, but does not imply or prove it is superior in any way to other texts, nor more correct...so basically NO consensus...... office@...

1234567

Why the need to Destroy Amalek_ Can we identify who he is_ [360p]

find this again, find people who uploaded, who this Rabbi is etc...then send to German embassy / German media, any germans know, can find...THIS is clearly incitement, racial vilification, ... send to Australian govt. / newspapers...post where Brendon's stuff is posted...

Why the need to Destroy Amalek_ Can we identify who he is_ [360p]

Last of the 70 most difficult questions in judaism...?? Am-ma-leyk...Amalek...

this eveil power known to us as amalek...we are asked to / we are commanded to do so... why doesn't god / Hashem do it himself? list of 10 questions...if amalek is so bad, why doesn't got destroy them? Why does this commandment APPEAR to be so cruel..to exterminate, to kill, men women and children...but jews trained to be kind ? here asked to have no pity...no mercy... so why? remember and don't forget...two commandments? why two? ... if we have this commandment of eliminating amelek, how are we supposed to know who he is?...we are told amalek hates us very much...question is where does that hatred come from? how are we supposed to defeat amalek...why isn't Hashems chair of justice complete / intact until the day will come when Hashem eliminates amalek...what will happen in the very end to Amalek? when will this happen? will he be elminated?...we have to go back to start of creation spoken about in Talmud etc, for clarity...as to enormity of this task...of destroying amalek...Hashem created the world and two opposing powers, the ability to do good and the ability to opposed this good i.e evil...it is very subjective...ultimate good is that which brings about the fulfillment of gods will in this world...that which brings us closer to our mission...and evil is anything that detracts / opposed / moves us away from achieving this mission...these are complete opposites, one wants to fulfill the mission, and one that does not...to have free will there must be two opposites to attract / tempt / confuse us, so we have a choice to decide ...the purpose of creation is to reward man for making the right decisions...there is an afterworld, an eternal spiritual world where one will be rewarded for doing his job...

we'ver covered ' the purpose of creation' before ??? got to get THAT video

real challenge requires free will...this power called evil given right / opportunity to expose its face of evil...wars, killing, brutality (but god ordering it made THEIR genocide good? of course)...common denominator of evil is that it is against the purpose of creation...so god can hide his face...allows evil to be strong so people wonder if god exists, given so much evil...it is intentional to allow free will / reward of right choices...

the world is well designed? to vavo? before form and shape...empty, void...confused...Hashem separated light from darkness, good from evil, male from female, purity, impurity...Hashem allowed man to bring about to vavo again...i.e emptiness, confusion, ... empty of faith / belief in a supreme being...devoid of a boss...devoid of any meaning...to vavo...relativism...right and wrong not clear...man is guilty for this...any human jew or not can know the truth if chooses to seek it ... can be known...mhr non-jew know jew his master, jew know goyim his slave...!!!

Adam and his wife 'don't eat fruit of this tree'...went against god's wishes...the enemy was created by god...he's a serpent...he is the satan, etc...his job to lure you away from your mission...Adam had soul of all humanity in his body...all the potential souls that will come into the world...he allows the evil to penetrate him ... he brought in this evil...allowed forces of evil and good to mix...there was order and separation...now forces of good and evil present in each of us, fighting...some souls are more divine, and some are less divine...Rabbi's tell us our chances of being bad are greater than being good...therefore needs some tool to guide him, keep him out of trouble...you humans have to rectify this world...to strenghthen the powers of good over the evil...only someone with a more divine soul can attain this...hashem has to pick a soul and allow that soul to be the one that will fulfill this mission... a people, a soul...I.E A PEOPLE not an individual...there are no jews at the start...most died in flood, leaving Noah, who didn't get torah...torah given as blueprint / guide / map to jewish people, a nation, to rectify this world...give power of good more power over evil...only possible through the torah...this chosen people...has to filter out the evil...generation by generation removes evil from seceeding generations of jews...but have something unrefined in them yet...not righteous enough...impurities removed ... Jacob purer, symbol of truth in Kaballah, he has 12 children, but none of these are ready yet...need to be refined in Egytpt...slavery to learn to be servants of god...refined by this psychologically / mentally / emotionally...leaving egypt elevated to highest levels and ready to receive the torah...after leaving Egypt...this people have been steadily refined through generations until refined enough to be ready to embrace and do gods will, without question...

powers of evil...as filtering all the good, some unrefined souls also being concentrated...jews receiving concentrated dose of divine souls, and someone out side receiving the equivalent of unrefined souls...one area is concentrated with this evil...amalek...the grandson of another semite / jew...Hitzak?... where evil being concentrated...amalek thus becmoing the arch enemy of jews...they have their own torah to oppose our torah, to go against everything that we are for...it is evil concentrated...doesn't tolerate...feel comfortable in the presence of good...that is the nature of concentrated evil...will not tolerate the philosophy / teachings of being good, humane, nice, compassionate (this is jews??? israel??? canannite holocaust?)

how is amalek manifest, where draws power from? its angel...all nations dissappeared...their minister weakened, replaced with other peoples...'their minister'...amalek has been around a long time, just like the jews...amalek in some form will always be around...its minister is the yesara himself, the satan himself...jews have god as their minister...satan eats acts of evil for dinner...perpetrated in this world give him power, so he gains in strength, lasting forever...depends on fuel called evil...he will exist as long as evil exists...

why doesn't hashem destroy him? man is giving satan his power..it is man's job to destroy him...mostly the jewish people have the job to rectify this world...acts of kindness and goodness allow jews to drive away the forces of evil / darkness...only we can do a good job of this...only jews can make a difference, through the torah...the only way to defeat evil...only we have the power to do it...satan is the trouble maker...we cannot allow him to exist...he is interfering with our job more than anyone else in the world...how does amalek do this? the torah 'when you left egypt, he met up with you, and he already wages war with you...he came after us?...

when he came after us and waged war against us with no incitement / agression on our part, he did this on his own, why? he doesn't like us...what is there not to like about the jew? what bothers him? the jew believes in morality, ethics, being good, being nice, that bothers him...he believes in teh exact opposite...

Mein Kampf...hitler says jews brought about two blemishes on humanity /defects...one in the physcial thorugh circumcision, and one through the soul, through 'conscience'...??? claims one should not feel bad about what you do...no right and wrong? that's amalek...from his writings you can clearly see the teachings of amalek, the philosophy totally opposed to what we believe / teach...

he cooled you off...amalek can cool off a jew ...pouring cold water on?...

obviously the jew is the greatest representation of acts of goodness that there is ???? 911? King david hotel? U.S.S liberty? 6 days war? operation cast lead? ...other people taken their laws from the bible? introducing conscience, morality, and values?

amalek casts doubt on things...ask questions..intentionally cast doubt...makes a mockery of everything, makes fun of things, (ridicule!) ... to 'cool off ' the jew...put doubts in his mind...i.e mhr scientist, cynic, skeptic... jew is amaleks enemy...

He's very dangerous to the jew...he casts doubt...tactic is to cast doubt, question,

he makes a mockery of everything...

you may find an individual out there in the streeet who does not appear to be your enemy per se, he doesn't hate jews, but he makes fun of torah, he mocks what the torah writes...he does not have to be biologically amaleky ... how do you fight it? a mocker? common sense, logic, cannot defeat him...otherwise he will weaken you, cool you off, common sense is precious to us, reason, truth, won't work against a mocker...

Who is amalek?...if someone mocks the torah, that is a form of ameleky, the characteristic of amaleky, that makes him amalek...doesn't have to be a descendant...it 'cools us off'...someone makes fun of jewish beliefs...common sense and logic won't defeat him, have to stay away from him, or he will weaken you...common sense, logic, reason alien to him, you won't be able to win...

Amalek has another face...loves food...covets...ta va...amalek is a grandson...another descendant concetration of bad too...father of Edomites...many nations belong ot Edom e.g roman empire is all Edom...grandfather and grandson...where do you see this today? can recognise who amalek and who is edom in today's world...can be observed between grandfather and grandson...

amalek was scattered, including in Iran...amalek is in Iran...Syrians mixed them up...we have amalek all over...

face of edom...especially problem in our generation...heart rules his mind..mind does not have a say...so the truth can never come out...person engrossed in materialistic lifestyle...desires for food, drink, enjoyment...too hard for him to face truth...his heart is in control...has faculty to discern right and wrong but wont...has own personal agenda / interest phsycial desires of this world...mind not control over heart...

amalek is not only a nation...also a form of life...a philosohpy...a characteristic that can exist even among some jews...the jew is instructed to eradicate this amalek from world and from himself...any vestige of it...any form of evil...through study of torah ??? drive away ...

why be so cruel to him? men women and children...some people accuse us of being genocidal ... that's what this is calling for...waving hands about as if incredulous/ they don't understand ...

a woman about to give birth on cold winters night, very ill, close to death...somebody ran to get a doctor...he arrived...cold snowing....delivered the baby boy...then cut it up in pieces...stepped on it and threw it in the garbage...is he cruel? huh? what would you say? did he do a good thing or a bad thing? how does it appear to you? evil? well what if I was to tell you that baby was hitler, would you still say it was evil...true story, baby survived, Hitler's doctor was jewish...we all agree it would have been a good thing ... this explains why we are so cruel...we need to be...for that is exactly what they would do to us if they had a chance... 43 minutes...got to quote him...THIS is vilification / incitement...seek charges against this guy...

if we do not do it to him, he will do it to us...you gotta do it because he's gonna do it to you...that's in the torah...

Other Rabbi: jews are commanded to eliminate Amalek...guy who commanded didn't do it himself, but commands jews to kill men women and children and animals...of Amalek...remember and don't forget...to do this...but how supposed to know who 'amalek' is? amalek hates jews very much. how to defeat amalek? Heshem's chair of justice is not intact until the day will come when hashem eliminates Amelek... when will this happen? .... hashem created the world with two oppositing powers, ability to do good, and ability to do opposite of good i.e evil....not what WE think is good, but what hashem defines as good...ultimate good is that which brings about the fulfillment of god's will in this world and brings us closer to our mission, therefore eveil is anything that moves us away from /that is opposed to doing the will of Hashem / us realising our mission...the will of god in this world...that is good...anything preventing that / opposing that is evil...we will be tempted/ attracted / confused by ... man to be rewarded for making right decisions in eternal / spiritual / next world...this is just temporary physical world... 7 mins...get details of this Rabbi's name etc...he is saying EXACTLY the worst we feared...hidden in blah blah...if jews mission is to rule world, then anyone opposing that mission is Amalek ... clearly...and EVIL...THAT is such a typical racial supremacist idea...my 'ideology of semitism' applies 100%...they are deluded, believe what is good for THEM is good ... and anyone who opposes their desire / ambition / right / gods will that they rule us, is EVIL, and must be totally destroyed / annhilated...man, woman, child, animal...!!!

torah tells us, you've gotta do it, cos he is gonna do it to you...

why we are so cruel...we are cruel to amalek, we need to be, cos that is exactly what amalek would do to us if given a chance... men women and children...throughout history there were attempts / pogroms, of amalek...Hitler 'he didn't care, men women and babies'...is that being cruel or is that self defence? Torah tells us ...if we don't do it to him he will do it to us...you've gotta do it because he is going to do it to you

angel of god was upset because shem gave water to person who was going to be in the future he is going to be a problem for his children

Amalek is the concentration of hatred from the beginning...the greatest evil...the arch enemy of the jew...what difference does it make if it is a baby or an adult...this baby will grow up to be your enemy so you must kill the baby... mhr assumption lets them justify anything...oh, this baby was going to grow up to be amalek...this baby will eventually be and adult and try to harm you, so do it to him, before he does it to you, so you betta do it...because YOU are HIS sworn enemy, you have to make HIM YOUR sworn enemy ...WTF!!!... so we should assume they are thinking this about us now? and kill them??? ...

do it to him, and you betta do it, he is your sworn enemy, so he has to be to you a sworn enemy to...the basic idea of why there is no pity whatsoever...but the animals? animal lovers ... fish will never become extinct? hashem gave them a blessing ? but other animals can become extinct...Hashem did not want to leave any opening whatsoever for pity on anything that belongs to or is associated with amalek...first king of jews made this mistake...why its o.K .. you went aagainst gods will, your own calculations...he lost his position, killed with his children...Rabbi's tell us whoever has pity on the cruel will eventually become cruel to those who deserve compassion....first king driven crazy by some spirit, became cruel and .... if you are compassionaate and have pity over the cruel, you'll become cruel over those you should have pity on...

The best way to love what Hashem loves, is to hate what Hashem hates...and hashem hates amalek !!!

to defeat amalek...logic, commonsense does not work...he mocks...to defeat him other than physcial defeat is not to ask questions, or have any doubts... jew to survive must say 'I beleive, I know this is good for me, he gave me this formula, this lifestyle...I know, there are things I don't understand, it's for my benefit, this ' ... any jew that uses philosophy and logic to justify their lifestyle, succumb to the pressure of inquisition...that which we don't understsand we accept anyway, otherwise under pressure we can break...

So don't argue with amalek, he's your arch enemy, he rpresents evil, you have to eliminate him or he will eliminate you...many jews ahve been totally assimiliated...so defeated that way...

assimilation is part of learning from the ways of amalek...destroy him whenever you can...if you cannot wage war against him ... you'll go to jail...so how do you do it? eliminate him? when cannot do it physcially...

don't let your heart be appeased, be complacent...can't say 'they've changed', they haven't changed...amalek is amalek...torah doesn't recognise changes in amalek...don't forget what they've perpertrated through us throughout history... germans recorded it for us? romans, or ukraine and poland, and crusades, all amalek...don't forget...they are still the same today...

amalek cools us off, our enthusiasm...don't show indifference to this danger that always exists...

torah reminds us ''when will amalek come after you? when you say 'I'm tired, its hard to be a jew'...amalek has power over us when we distanced from torah...

your chance to control to be the boss...

jewish nation 'cools off'

who is he, today? amalek? a nation in the world before teh messiah comes, we'll be able to recognise...the answer is very clear, it's germany...the concentration of amalek is mostly in that country...you can see for yourself what they did...but amalek is everywhere...so we'll have a final war...last war...assembly of nations will come against the jews...of all the evil sparks scattered over the world that contain amalek...hashem will eliminate them all..it is our job to drive evil away, but Hashem will gather all nations with amalek to come against jewish nation...final assembly of amalek nations just before messiah comes...hashem says all the victims will be brought togher in final day of justice ot give them justice...

if god exists how could he have allowed the holocaust? shem has a plan...his presence will be known...his chair, his seat of justice will be intact...it will become intact and complete when he reveals himself as king over entire universe...all evil will dissappear...cease to exist...and truth comes out...

big bang, evolution, is amalek...

Adom grandfather of amalek, who is germany...who is Adom...includes most of Europe, U.S.A, Roman empire...Italy...funny italians and germans should be friends? what does italy have to do with germany? verry opposties...germans cold, italians warm...why were they allies? Italy is the seat of Adom the Roman empire / latin languages, including america...Adom is U.S.A...

what will be the end of Amalek...destroyed ...will happen in our current generation...50 year old man...any vestiges of Amalek...we have enttered the land, a new gathering taking place, we'll soon hav ea king...destruction of amalek is imminent...amalek will put up a big fight...whenever jews come back to israel...

germany STOPPED jews coming back to Israel????? seriously? Transfer agreement? holocaust myth created TO get jews to move to israel...

from 18 millions jews before wwii, only 12 million remained...

soon will be GERMANY's turn to be destroyed...

stay away from arrogance...which stops jews getting close to judaism...have to be humble...to get close to torah...

collapse of economy e.g golden calf, so jews not mislead by assimiliation 'cooled' by desires for money etc...worldly stuff...all is amalek...many jews caught up in this...Ashem will destroy money first so jews become more humble, return to torah...doing what is good and right in the eyes of Hashem...

Amalek is not just a nation GERMANY...every human being has SOME good..jews most concentrated...why would WE want to give power to jews to destroy amalek if it is US ???

MHR SO ADD A STATEMENT INCLUDING THE ABOVE ‘DEFENCE’ INTO ANYTHING I PUBLISH IN FUTURE…

MHR I need to know if Brendon KNEW for a fact that Keyser was a ‘fan’ of Chabad Lubavitch BEFORE his comments to him…and if Keyser had announced to the protestors ‘you disgust me, you are disgusting…have to check Peach’s testimony again…court notes are NOT written clearly identifying who is speaking when ACCUSED and WITNESS are interacting ???

Speech by Emma Goldman to the jury at her trial for sedition:

―Gentlemen, when we asked whether you would be prejudiced against us if it were proven that we propagated ideas and opinions contrary to those held by the majority, you were instructed by the court to say, ‗If they are within the law.‘ But what the court did not tell you, is that no new faith - not even the most humane and peaceable - has ever been considered ‗within the law‘ by those who were in power. The history of human growth is at the same time the history of every knew idea heralding the approach of a brighter dawn, and the brighter dawn has always been considered illegal, outside of the law. Gentlemen of the jury, most of you, I take it, are believers in the teachings of Jesus. bear in mind that he was put to death by those who considered his views as being against the law. ... remember that those who fought and bled for your liberties were in their time considered as being against the law, as dangerous trouble makers. They not only preached violence, but they carried out their ideas by throwing tea into Boston harbour. ... Never can a new idea move within the law. it matters not whether the idea pertains to political and social changes or to any other domain of human thought and expression - to science, literature, music; in fact, everything that makes for freedom and joy and beauty must refuse to move within the law. How can it be otherwise? The law is stationary, fixed, mechanical, a ‗chariot wheel‘ which grinds all alike, without regard to time, place and condition, without ever taking into account cause and effect, without ever going into the complexity of the human soul. ... Your verdict may, of course, affect us temporarily, in a physical sense - it can have no effect whatever upon our spirit. For even if we were convicted and found guilty and the penalty were that we be placed against a wall and shot dead, I should nevertheless cry out with the great Luther, ―Here I am and here I stand and I cannot do otherwise.‖ ... Gentlemen of the jury, whatever your verdict will be, as far as we are concerned, nothing will be changed. I have held ideas all my life. I have publicly held my ideas for twenty-seven years. Nothing on earth would veer make me change my ideas except one thing; and that is, if you will prove to me that our position is wrong, untenable, or lacking in historic fact. But never would I change my ideas because I am found guilty. I may remind you of two great Americans, undoubtedly not unknown to you, gentlemen of the jury; Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreau. When Thoreau was placed in prison for refusing to pay taxes, he was visited by Ralph Waldo Emerson and Emerson said: ―David, what are you doing in jail?‖ and Thoreau replied: ―Ralph, what are you doing outside, when honest people are in jail for their ideals?‖ ...

READ THIS SPEECH OUT VERBATIM, IT IS EXPRESSED SO WELL

Note that recently a man on the FBI ten most wanted list was found in Israel. What is intriguing is that he was the former head of a chapter of the Ku Klux Klan in the U.S ϑ Israel has some of the most tightly controlled borders in the world. How can this be? Why would someone espousing notions of White Aryan Supremacism and a with a core hatred of Jews as the racial enemy of mankind hide out in Israel? Apparently he stated that he thought Israel would be ―the last place anyone would look‖. 1340 The man - Micky Mayon - is a Jew:

Arrested KKK man turned over to Israeli police by friend Micky Louise Mayon is on the FBI‘s list of 100 most wanted criminals for several federal crimes. 1345 By Dana Weiler-Polak

An alleged Ku Klux Klan member arrested in Tel Aviv this week was turned over to police by an Israeli friend, it emerged on Tuesday. 1350 Micky Louise Mayon, 33, was detained in Tel Aviv‘s Florentin neighbourhood on Monday night by members of the newly created ―Oz‖ task force, which was formed to replace the Immigration Police.

Mayon has been on the U.S Federal Bureau of Investigation‘s list of 100 most wanted 1355 criminals for several federal crimes. He is suspected of belonging to the KKK, of burning vehicles belonging to federal U.S judges and several allegations of severe violence.

During a preliminary enquiry on Monday, Mayon said he had been living with an Israeli woman he met four months ago. He told immigration police that he informed his friend of 1360 his past after she revealed to him that she was pregnant. His activities apparently frightened her and caused her to turn him in.

Authorities do not know whether Mayon was romantically involved with the woman, given that he had never requested permission to stay in Israel on those grounds. 1365

Judges were to decide on Tuesday whether Mayon would be extradited to the United States.

1370 Jews found and lead these organizations to maintain the appearance of a dangerous hatred of Jews - ―just around the corner‖.

Also, a man named Frank Collins led a march through an American town in the late eighties. All of the participants were dressed in full Nazi regalia. He led a local chapter of the ‗American National 1375 Socialist Party‘. Little old Jewish ladies were fainting. A repeat of the HolocaustTM was mentioned. The main stream news made much of it. A few months later the local Sheriff from a nearby town came forward and local news15 noted that Mr Frank Collins real name was [CLICHÉ JEWISH NAME]16 and he was a Jew from the next town. A Jewish man, James Mitchell Rosenberg, was also caught out playing agent provocateur for the ADL: 1380

A case which has been compared to the Bullock case was that of James Mitchell Rosenberg, AKA Jim Anderson. Rosenberg/Anderson was an undercover operative of the ADL who acted as an agent provocateur, posing as a racist rightwing paramilitary extremist. He appeared in this role as part of a TV documentary 1385 entitled "Armies of the Right" which premiered in 1981. Rosenberg was arrested that same year in New York for carrying an unregistered firearm in public view. In 1984, ADL fact-finding director Irwin Suall identified Rosenberg as an ADL operative in a court deposition. Jeffrey Kaplan, Heléne Lööw, „The cultic milieu: oppositional subcultures in an 1390 age of globalization‟, ISBN 075910204X

It is widely believed that the entire neo-Nazi movement in the U.S is run at the leadership level by Jews working for the ADL and FBI – ‗sayanim‘. It is the same in most western countries where these groups pop up from time to time or have an established presence. 1395

Jews are regularly caught painting swastika‘s on their college dormitory doors and smashing synagogue windows. Faking a rise in ‗anti-Semitism‘ is a favourite method of Jewish groups in the West.17

Prisoner X Jerusalem 1615 WEST AUSTRALIAN NEWS PAPER 16th February 2013

Few facts are known about Ben Zygier. He was born in September 1976 in Melbourne and died in Israel on December 15, 2010. 1620 In between, he was active in Jewish organizations, immigrated to Israel in his early 20‘s, married an Israeli and had two children before returning to Australia in 2009 to pursue a Master‘s in Business Administration. The big mystery is why or from where Israeli agents seized him in early 2010 and isolated him in notorious Ayalon jail where not even the prison officers knew who he was 1625 or why he was there. Nor is it known how, under intense 24-hour watch in a suicide-proof cell, he hanged himself. Israeli‘s are wondering what Mr Zygier possibly did to end up in Israel‘s highest security jail.21 1630 On his death, an Israeli news website ran a brief about a man at Ayalon, identified only as Prisoner X, who killed himself but the item quickly came under a censorship order so strict even a mention of the order22 was banned. The veil finally lifted on Wednesday when the media were allowed to quote an Australian Broadcasting Corporation investigation. 1635 Since then, facts have trickled out: Zygier was a spy for Israel‘s Mossad with multiple identities.

20 Unmanned aerial drones brought from Israel. 21 I‘m wondering myself why I ended up at Western Australia‘s highest security jail - Casuarina. 22 Reminds me of when I had a gag order on me. When I mentioned the date of the trial I was re-arrested.

Page 29 of 235

Israeli friends called him Benji and he was friendly and liked to chat. ―He was always up with everything,‖ said a former colleague from a combat unit. ―He read all the papers and had opinions about them.‖ 1640 The man refused to give his name or service record in fear of being punished for speaking about the sensitive case. ―Everyone is freaked out,‖ he said. ―I really don‘t know anything sensitive or special about him, but the other guys are all wondering what the hell he could have done.‖ Another friend, who did not want to be named but was at Mr Zygier‘s wedding, said 1645 there were ―rumours and jokes‖ about him being a Mossad agent because of frequent trips abroad and obsession with Middle East politics. ―It was something a few people suspected or whispered about, but it wasn‘t serious,‖ he said. Israel‘s Justice Ministry acknowledged ―Prisoner X‖ existed for the first time on 1650 Wednesday though it did not name him. It assured Israeli‘s that whatever prisoner X did, due process was observed: his family was notified of the arrest immediately, he was held on a court arrest warrant and had a lawyer. ―National Security prevents the release of any other details,‖ it said. ―These aspects of 1655 national security have been reviewed by the Central District Court, which decided to impose a comprehensive gag order on the case.‖ Mr Zygier‘s family, including his wife, will not speak to the media. His family in Melbourne was said to be ―devastated‖ by his death. His parents, once Jewish community organisers23, quit their work shortly after he died. 1660 Local papers said the family withdrew completely after the funeral and were now rarely seen. What could Mr Zygier have done to frighten his family and Israel into utmost secrecy? The Age newspaper reported on Wednesday that when Mr Zygier died, the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation suspected him of using his Australian passport to spy for 1665 Israel. It said he was one of several people who raised suspicion by asking for new passports with more ―Anglo‖ names after moving to Israel. The newspaper said the migrants used the new passports to go to Iran, Syria and Lebanon, which do not recognise Israel or admit Israeli‘s or anyone with an Israeli stamp in 1670 their passport. Mossad relies on immigrants with foreign passports and one former agent said last year Mossad recruited agents from ―attractive Western countries‖. He said some were asked to rent apartments or buy cars in foreign countries or be active spies with delicate missions. 1675 Various theories suggest Mr Zygier might have been a double agent, was caught spying or was pressed to spy for Australia. Other reports speculated that he sold secrets to Iran or another of Israel‘s enemies. ―He did something that went to the highest level of state security and which required him being kept alive but in absolute isolation,‖ said a senior Israeli defence official, who 1680 claimed to know details of the case but could not risk violating the gag order or being identified. McClatchy

This ‗Jewish tradition‘ of marrying to enhance Jewish power goes back to the Old testament and ‗The Book of Esther‘ where beautiful Esther keeps her Jewish faith secret and marries King Xerxes of Persia to prevent the murder of Jews in the region. She organises the execution of ‗enemies of the Jews‘. This 1720 tradition is celebrated as ‗Purim‘.

ESTHER 2:1 (Old Testament) (Tanakh) Later, when the anger of King Xerxes had subsided, he remembered Vashti and what she had done and what he had decreed about her. 2Then the Kings personal 1725 attendants proposed, ―Let a search be made for beautiful young virgins for the King‖ ... 4‖Then let the girl who pleases the King be Queen instead of Vashti.‖ 5Now there was in the citadel of Susa a Jew of the tribe of Benjamin, named Mordecai son of Jair ... 6who had been carried into exile from Jerusalem by Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon, among those taken captive with Jehoichin King of 1730 Judah. 7Mordecai had a cousin named Hadassah ... This lovely girl, who was also known as Esther, was lovely in form and features ... 8When the Kings order and edict had been proclaimed, many girls were brought to the citadel of Susa and put under the care of Hegai. Esther was also taken to the Kings palace and entrusted to Hegai, who had charge of the harem. 9The girl pleased 1735 him and won his favour. ... 10Esther had not revealed her nationality and family background, because Mordecai had forbidden her to do so. ... ... 17Now the King was attracted to Estehr more than to any of the other women, 1740 and she won his favour and approval more than any of the other virgins. So he set a royal crown on her head and made her Queen instead of Vashti. ... 19When the virgins were assembled a second time, Mordecai was sitting at the Kings gate. 20But Esther had kept secret her family background and nationality just as 1745 Mordecai had told her to do, for she had continued to follow Mordecai‘s instructions as she had done when he was bringing her up. ... 3:5

24 Possibly related to ‗Operation Talpiot‘. 25 He is my brother in laws, brother in law.

Page 31 of 235

When Haman saw that Mordecai would not kneel down or pay him honour he 1750 was enraged. 6Yet having learned who Mordecai‘s people were, he scorned the idea of killing only Mordecai. Instead Haman looked for a way to destroy all Mordecai‘s people the Jews, throught the whole kingdom of Xerxes. ... 13Dispatches were sent by couriers to all the Kings provinces with the order to 1755 destroy, kill and annihilate all the Jews - young and old, women and little children - on a single day, ... ... 8:3 Esther again pleaded with the King, falling at his feet and weeping. She begged 1760 him to put an end to the evil plan of Haman the Agagite, which he had devised against the Jews. ... 9:24 For Haman son of Hammedetha, the Agagite, the enemy of all the Jews, had 1765 plotted against the Jews to destroy them and had cast the pur (that is, the lot) for their ruin and destruction. 25But when the plot came to the Kings attention, he issued orders that the evil scheme Haman had devised against the Jews should come back on his own head, and that he and his sons should be hanged on the gallows. 26(Therefore these days 1770 were called Purim, from the word pur).

‗Operation Cast Lead‘ was an attempt at this. The utterly murderous and ruthless application of firepower and deliberate targeting 1840 of civilians and civilian infrastructure was designed to create panic amongst the population of the Gaza Strip and force Egypt to open the border. This did not happen and the ethnic cleansing of the Gaza Strip was a failure. There is also gas off the coast of Gaza, something not mentioned in the mainstream press.

DEUTERONOMY 11:23 1880 Then the LORD will drive out all these nations before you, and you will dispossess nations larger and stronger than you. 24Every place where you set your foot will be yours: Your territory will extend from the desert to Lebanon, and from the Euphrates River to the Western sea. No man will be able to stand against you. The LORD your God, as he promised you, will put the terror and fear of you on the whole land, 1885 where ever you go.

Israel Shamir, easily one of the most respected Israeli activists in the world stated it even more so: 1895 Shamir took me to task, ―Eisen is too optimistic‖, he said, ―Palestine is not the ultimate goal of the Jews... ...the world is.‖

Paul Eisen - ―Jewish Power‖

ACHAR: How would you, Noam, assess the story of the Falasha, 1915 the Black Ethiopian Jews? Is it the expression of an Israeli desire to look more like the United States? CHOMSKY: Israel didn‘t want the Falasha in the worst way, and for a long time they just refused to allow them in. But there were some Jewish groups in the United States that were both Zionist and 1920 civil libertarian, and they started a big campaign, with a lot of publicity on the issue. And Israel really began to look bad. When people didn‘t know about it, people didn‘t care, but when it got to be

Page 34 of 235

known that Israel was blocking black Jews - this was after the civil rights movement - this was to ugly for them, so Israel had no choice but to take them in. But most of them are in 1925 development towns. ACHAR: Right. And that was used in turn as a propaganda tool: We resemble the United States so much - we are twin societies. CHOMSKY: Yes, but after they had their arms twisted. What they wanted was the Russians. 1930 Noam Chomsky & Gilbert Achar - “Perilous Power: The Middle East and U.S Foreign Policy”. p.183-184

chief Sephardic rabbi Ovadia Yosef's determination in 1973 that the Jews of Ethiopia were to be considered Jews 1940 according to halakha (Jewish religious law)28.

Who runs Hollywood? C‘mon December 19, 2008│JOEL STEIN 2070 ... How deeply Jewish is Hollywood? When the studio chiefs took out a full page add in the Los Angeles Times a few weeks ago to demand that the Screen Writers Guild settle its contract, the open letter was signed by: News Corp. 2075 President Peter Chernin (Jewish), Paramount Pictures Chairman Brad Grey (Jewish), Walt Disney Co. Chief Executive Robert Iger (Jewish), Sony Pictures Chairman Michael Lynton (surprise, Dutch Jew), Warner Bros. Chairman Barry Meyer (Jewish), CBS Corp. Chief 2080 Executive Leslie Moonves (so Jewish his Great Uncle was the first prime minister of Israel), MGM Chairman Harry Sloan (Jewish) and NBC Universal Chief Executive Jeff Zucker (mega-Jewish). If either of the Weinstein brothers had signed, this group would not only have the power to shut down all film production but to form a minyan with enough Fiji water on hand to fill a mikvah.29 2085

The person they were yelling at in that add was SAG President Alan Rosenberg (take a guess). The scathing rebuttal to the add was written by entertainment super-agent Ari Emmanuel (Jew with Israeli parents) on the Huffington Post, which is owned by Arianna Huffington (not Jewish and has never worked in Hollywood.) 2090

The Jews are so dominant, I had to scour the trades to come up with six Gentiles in high positions at entertainment companies. When I called them to talk about their incredible advancement, five of them refused to talk to me, apparently out of fear of insulting Jews. The sixth, AMC President Charlie Collier, turned out to be Jewish. 2095

As a proud Jew, I want America to know about our accomplishment. Yes, we control Hollywood. Without us, you‘d be flipping between ―The 700 Club‖ and ―Davey and Goliath‖ on TV all day.

I appreciate Foxman‘s concerns. And maybe my life spent in a New Jersey-New York/Bay Area-L.A pro-Semitic cacoon has left me naïve. But I don‘t care if Americans think we‘re running the news media, Hollywood, Wall Street or the government. I just care that we get to keep running them. 2105

• “But I don‟t care if Americans think we‟re running the news media, Hollywood, Wall Street or the government. I just care that we get to keep running them.”

a comment made by then Prime minister of Israel Aerial Sharon to Shimon Perez regarding Israel‘s control of the United States. The context of the conversation was with regards 2120 Perez telling Sharon that if he continued to push illegal settlements then Israel would lose support from the United States:

“I want to tell you something very clear. Don‟t worry about American pressure on Israel. We, 2125 the Jewish people control America and the Americans know it.”

Kol Yisrael Radio October 3rd 2001 2130 Reported in highly respected „The Washington Report‟, November 2001 Page 114 under section titled “American Educational trust – Publishers Page”

2135 Jewish arrogance seems to know no bounds:

• “I want to tell you something very clear. Don‟t worry about American pressure on Israel. We, the Jewish people control America and the Americans know it.”

Then 10 year Marine veteran and former head of studies of the ‗U.S Army War College‘, Dr Alan Sabrosky, had this to say regarding Israel and its involvement with the 9-11 terrorist attacks: 2145 ”What Americans need to understand is they [Israel] did it. They did it. And if they do understand that, Israel is going to flat ass disappear, Israel will flat ass disappear from this earth.”

”If Americans ever know, ever know, that Israel did this, they‟re going to scrub them off 2150 the earth and they‟re not going to give a rats ass what the cost is.”

”And my dream is that we take the U.S 5th and 6th Fleet and take Israel and cream it.”

Dr Alan Sabrosky: Interviewed by Mr Mark Glenn30 March 2010 – Internet Radio 2155



All this - from the former director of studies of the U.S Army War College. ―Abhorrent views‖? 2160 If Dr Alan Sabrosky came to Western Australia to lecture would he be deported immediately on arrival at the airport? If he lectured within WA and made these statements about Israel plotting and carrying out the 9-11 attacks on America to blame on Muslim terrorists – would he be charged under the racial vilification act? I was re-arrested for publishing his statements in a video while awaiting trial after I was given permission by DCJ Sleight to make comments online not related to my case. The 2165 DPP indicated that Israel was a ―Jewish State‖ and therefore I was violating - potentially - the racial vilification act...again.

Also refer to the book „Controversy of Zion‟ by the former long-time editor of the London Times 2200 newspaper – Sir Douglas Reid. He details through first-hand knowledge the intricacies of the Communist revolution and details the names of major and minor players. He talks openly of the ‗Jewish Conspiracy‘ which would of course find him in jail these days according to the Western Australian criminal code if the book was published and sold today. Or perhaps he would simply die in one of those unfortunate ‗fine weather‘ aircraft accidents that happen to people too well connected to 2205 deal with in any other way. The book was published in the early 1960‘s, after his death. The book is openly regarded online as a favourite of neo-Nazi‟s and anti-Semites. That a book written by one of the most prestigious and respected newspaper editors of last century (who was also Knighted), could be regarded simply as a piece of hate literature, shows the level of discourse on this subject.

comments in the English newspaper the ‗Illustrated Sunday Herald‘ published on February 8th 1920 by none other than Sir Winston Churchill himself. Here are some extracts:

31 Which killed directly 40 million people (at least) over 70 years.

Page 39 of 235

ZIONISM versus BOLSHEVISM 2215 A STRUGGLE FOR THE SOUL OF THE JEWISH PEOPLE. By the Rt Hon. WINSTON S. CHURCHILL 8th February 1920 ... 2220 And it may well be that this same astounding race may at the present time be in the actual process of producing another system of morals and philosophy, as malevolent as Christianity was benevolent, which, if not arrested, would shatter irretrievably all that Christianity has rendered possible. 2225 ...

In violent opposition to all this sphere of Jewish effort rise the schemes of the International Jews. The adherents of this sinister confederacy are mostly men reared up among the unhappy populations of countries where Jews are persecuted on account of 2230 their race. Most, if not all of them have forsaken the faith of their forefathers and divorced from their minds all spiritual hopes of the next world. This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kuhn (Hungary)32, Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world wide conspiracy for the over throw of civilization 2235 and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Webster, has so ably shown, a definitely recognizable part in the tragedy of the French revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the nineteenth century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the 2240 underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire

... 2245

There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews, it is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. 2250 Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders. Thus Tchitcherin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his nominal subordinate Litvinoff, and the influence of Russians like Bukharin or Lunacharski cannot be compared with the power of Trotsky, or of Zinovieff, the Director of the Red Citadel (Petrograd) or of Krassin or Radek – all Jews. 2255 In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing. And the prominent, if not indeed the principal part in the system of terrorism applied by the ‗Extraordinary Commissions for Combatting Counter-Revolution‘ has been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses. The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kuhn ruled in Hungary. The same 2260 phenomenon has been presented in Germany (especially Bavaria), so far as this madness has been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration of the German people. Although in all these countries there are many non-Jews every whit as bad as the worst of the Jewish revolutionaries, the part played by the latter in proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing. 2265

Again, if published today, Mr Churchill might find himself my cellmate which would make for interesting late night conversation – not unwelcome. When Mr Churchill wrote this piece for a major British newspaper, was his intention to vilify and increase hatred of Jews? Or was he trying to inform people of a great danger? As was I. I‘m genuinely sorry if I was not polite enough when I shouted 2270 ―fire‖ and offended people.

With the above article by Winston Churchill in mind, please remember this comment by Helen Thomas, former White House correspondent for 50 years, in 2010: 32 Responsible directly for the execution of 40,000 Hungarians in 1919.

Page 40 of 235

2275

“Congress, the White House, Hollywood, and Wall Street are owned by the Zionists. No question, in my opinion,” she said.

And L.A Times opinion piece writer Joel Stein in 2010: 2280 “But I don‟t care if Americans think we‟re running the news media, Hollywood, Wall Street or the government. I just care that we get to keep running them.”

And former Prime minister of Israel Aerial Sharon in 2000: 2285 “I want to tell you something very clear. Don‟t worry about American pressure on Israel. We, the Jewish people control America and the Americans know it.”

Sever Plocker (Jewish), an opinion piece writer for the mainstream online ‗Y-Net News Opinion‘, wrote that some of the greatest mass murderers of the 20th century were Jewish:

STALIN‘S JEWS We mustn‘t forget that some of the greatest mass murderers of modern times were 2295 Jewish

...

And us, the Jews? An Israeli student33 finishes high school without ever hearing the 2300 name ―Genrikh Yagoda,‖ the greatest Jewish34 murderer of the 20th century, the GPU‘s deputy commander and the founder and commander of the NKVD. Yagoda diligently implemented Stalin‘s collectivization orders and is responsible for the deaths of at least 10 million people. His Jewish deputies established and managed the Gulag system. After Stalin no longer viewed him favourably, Yagoda was demoted and executed, and was 2305 replaced as chief hangman in 1936 by Yezhov, the ―bloodthirsty dwarf.‖ Yezhov was not Jewish but was blessed with an active Jewish wife35. In his book „Stalin: Court of the Red Star‟, Jewish historian Sebag Montefiore writes that during the darkest period of terror, when the Communist killing machine worked in full force, Stalin was surrounded by beautiful young Jewish women. 2310

Stalin‘s close associates and loyalists included member of the Central Committee and Politburo Lazar Kaganovich. Montefiore characterizes him as the ―first Stalinist‖, and adds that those starving to death in Ukraine, an unparalleled tragedy in the history of human kind aside from the Nazi horrors36 and Mao‘s terror in China, did not move 2315 Kaganovich.

Many Jews sold their soul to the devil of the communist revolution and have blood on their hands for eternity. We‘ll mention just one more: Leonid Reichman, head of the NKVD‘s special department and the organization‘s chief interrogator, who was a 2320 particularly cruel sadist.

In 1934, according to published statistics, 38.5 per cent of those holding the most senior posts in the Soviet security apparatuses were of Jewish origin. They too, of course, were gradually eliminated in the next purges. In a fascinating lecture at a Tel Aviv University 2325 convention this week, Dr. Halfin described the waves of Soviet terror as a ―carnival of mass murder,‖ ―fantasy of purges‖, and ―essianism of evil.‖ Turns out that Jews too, when they become captivated by messianic ideology, can become great murderers, among the greatest known in modern history. 2330

Jews in the United States who acted as ‗Sayanims‘ to the Soviet Union and gave over the secrets of the atom bomb were: 2335 • Julius and Ethel Rosenberg (ring leaders, executed at Sing Sing prison). • David Greenglass (scientist at Las Alamos). • Theodor Hallsberg (scientist at Los Alamos). • Harry Gold (courier for group to their Soviet handler). 2340 You will find the exact same phenomena of Jews holding important posts in the United States as they did in the Soviet Union. Note this simple history of the famous ‗Silvermaster Spy Group‘, spying for the Soviet Union. Note the level of Government they have attained. Note that the much maligned Senator Joe McCarthy can hardly have been blamed for screaming ―Reds under the bed‖: 2345 • Nathan Gregory Silvermaster - Chief Planning technician, Procurement Division, United States Department of the Treasury; Chief Economist, War Assets Administration; Director of the Labour Division, Farm Security Administration; Board of Economic Warfare; Reconstruction Finance Corporation Department of Commerce. • Helen Silvermaster (wife). 2350 • Shlomo Adler37 - United States Department of Treasury. • Norman Chandler Bursler - United States Department of Justice Anti-Trust Division. • Frank Coe38 - Assistant Director, Division of Monetary Research, Treasury Department; Special Assistant to the United States Ambassador in London; Assistant to the Executive Director, Board of Economics Warfare; Assistant Administrator, Foreign Economic 2355 Administration. • Lauchlin Currie – Administrative Assistant to President Roosevelt; Deputy Administrator of Foreign Economic Administration; Special Representative to China. • Bela Gold – Assistant Head of Program Surveys, Bureau of Agricultural Economics, United States Department of Agriculture; Senate Subcommittee on War Mobilization; 2360 Office of Economic Programs in Foreign Economic Administration. • Sonia Steinman Gold – Division of Monetary Research U.S Treasury Department; U.S House of Representatives Select Committee on Interstate Migration; U.S Bureau of Employment Security. • Irving Kaplan – Foreign Funds Control and Division of Monetary research, United 2365 States Department of the Treasury Foreign Economic Administration; Chief Advisor to the Military Government of Germany. • George Silverman – civilian Chief Production Specialist, Material Division, Army Air Force Air Staff, War Department, Pentagon. • William Henry Taylor – Assistant Director of the Middle East Division of Monetary 2370 Research, United States Department of Treasury. • William Ullman – delegate to United Nations Charter meeting and Bretton Woods conference; Division of Monetary Research, Department of Treasury; Material and Services Division, Air Corps Headquarters, Pentagon. • Anatole Volkov. 2375 • Harry Dexter White – Assistant Secretary of the Treasury; Head of the International Monetary Fund.



The same Shlomo Adler seen with Mao Zedong mentioned previously. 38 The same Frank Coe seen with Mao ZeDong mentioned previously.

Just as an example, here are some more Jews advising current and former Presidents:

37 The same Shlomo Adler seen with Mao Zedong mentioned previously. 38 The same Frank Coe seen with Mao ZeDong mentioned previously.

Page 42 of 235

• Paul Wolfowitz/William Kristol/Irving Kristol – all former Trotskyite‘s, now ‗Conservative‘, adviser to George. W Bush Presidency. Co-wrote „Securing The Realm‟ and „The Project For A new American Century‟ which took the United States into war 2385 with Iraq for the benefit of Israel. Also co-written with current ultra conservative Prime minister of Israel, Benyamin Netanyahu. • Rahm Emmanuel (duel Israeli/American citizen) and David Axelrod were both close advisers to President Barak Obama. They were both ‗relieved‘ of their posts a year ago. Rahm Emmanuel is considered a ‗nut‘ by many. Even reported in the local press by the 2390 West Australian newspaper as being regarded as a nut who stabs kitchen tables with a knife yelling ―die, die, die‖ with regards his political enemies.

And finally, a simple and basic analysis of Jews who control directly the banking and financial sectors of the world, note the Bible quote that follows: 2395

• Alan Greenspan – ran the American federal reserve for over 20 years. • Ben Shalom Bernanke – took over from Alan Greenspan as the world‘s top banker. • Loyd Blankfien – head of one of the most powerful investment houses on Wall Street, Goldman Sachs. 2400 • Jamie Dimon – head of J.P Morgan Chase on Wall Street. • Mervin King – head of the Central Bank of England. • Sanford Weill – head of the largest and most powerful financial institution in the world, Citigroup. • Robert Rubin and Stephan Friedman – top executives at Goldman Sachs who went on 2405 to direct the National Economic Council directly advising both Presidents Bush and Obama. • James Wolfensohn - head of the World Bank.

DEUTERONOMY 28:12 - Old Testament (Tanakh) 2410 12You will lend to many nations but will borrow from none. 13The LORD will make you the head, not the tail. If you pay attention to the commends of the LORD your God that I give you this day and carefully follow them, you will always be at the top, never at the bottom. 2415 • 12You will lend to many nations but will borrow from none. • 13The LORD will make you the head, not the tail. • ...you will always be at the top, never at the bottom.

To this day, Orthodox Jews make a stew out of a cows head to remind them that they are to be the 2420 ―head‖, and not the ―tail‖. The notion that they will ―rule the nations‖ is a central tenant of their religion. How this escapes people is beyond me, it is right in front of peoples face and they are following it according to Scripture. Does the below quote not say it all?

GENISIS 49:8 2425 Judah, your brothers will praise you; Your hand will be on the neck of your enemies: Your fathers sons will bow down to you. 9You are a lions cub, O Judah; You return from the prey, my son. 2430 Like a lion he crouches and lies down. Like a lioness - who dares to rouse him? 10The sceptre will not depart from Judah, Nor the rulers staff from between his feet, Until he comes to whom it belongs 2435 And the obedience of the nations is his.

―The sceptre will not depart from Judah‖ and ―the rulers staff‖ will be his (Judah - from which ―Jews‖ is derived) and ―the obedience of the nations is his‖. Do we need sign language as well? Maybe a puppet show to exemplify the point? 2440

Page 43 of 235

Jewish activist Paul Eisen has more to say on this issue:

Nonetheless, an awful lot of Jews certainly do control an awful lot of America – not the industrial muscle of America – the steel, transport, etc, nor the oil and arms industries, 2445 those traditional money-spinners. No, if Jews have influence anywhere in America, it‘s not over its muscle and sinew but over its blood and its brain39. It is in finance and the media that we find a great many Jews in very influential positions. Lists abound (though you have to go to some pretty unpopular websites to find them) of Jews, prominent in financial and cultural life; Jews in banks; Jews in Forbes Magazine‘s Richest 2450 Americans; Jews in Hollywood; Jews in TV; Jewish journalists, writers, critics, etc., etc. Paul Eisen ―Jewish Power‖



MHR note that all these industries have literally been ‘exported’ to China and Asia…steel, automotive industry…etc…

I have no basic problem with the success of ―Jews‖. I have a problem that they refuse to be accountable for it, or even admit their power:

And there would probably be nothing wrong with this were it not for the fact that these same people who exert so much control and influence over American life, also seem to 2475 refuse to be held accountable. It is this surreptitiousness with which Jews are perceived to have achieved their success which arouses suspicion. Jews certainly seem cagey about the influence they have. Just breath the words ―Jewish power‖ and wait for the reaction. They claim it‘s because this charge has so often been used as a precursor to discrimination and violence against them, but never consider the possibility that their 2480 own reluctance to discuss the power they wield arouses suspicion and even hostility.

But there is another claim, subtler and more worrying. This is that it doesn‟t exist; that Jews do not wield power, that there is no Jewish lobby; that Jews in America do not exert power and influence to advance Jewish interests, even that there are no such 2485 things as Jewish interests! There are no Jewish interests in the war in Iraq, there are no Jewish interests in America; most amazing, there are no Jewish interests in even Israel and Palestine. There is no Jewish collective. Jews do not act together to advance their aims. They even say that the pro-Israeli lobby has actually not all that much to do with Jews, that the Jewishness of Israel is irrelevant and the Public Affair Committees 2490 (PACs) which lobby so hard for Israel are in fact doing no more than supporting an ally and thus looking after America‘s best interests even to the extent of concealing their true purpose behind names such as ―American for Better Citizenship‖, ―Citizens Organised PAC‖ or the ―National PAC‖ – none of which make one reference in their titles to Israel, Zionism, or Jews. 2495 Paul Eisen ―Jewish Power‖

ALL of the above information was DIRECTLY relevant to my defence under the charge 80B - ‗conduct likely to racially harass‘, and the defence: 2505

80G. Defences (1) It is a defence to a charge under section 78 or 80B to prove that the accused persons conduct was engaged in reasonably and in good faith - (b) in the course of any statement, publication, discussion or debate 2510 made or held, or any other conduct engaged in, for - (ii) any purpose that is in the public interest; and (c) in making or publishing a fair and accurate report or analysis of any event or matter of public interest. 2515 How could a jury possibly ascertain whether my statements and behaviour towards Stanley Elliot Keyser were part of a discussion or debate in the public interest if I could not show the jury the essence of what I was trying to expose?

However, it‘s clear from the wording – conduct ‗likely‘ to racially harass in Section 80B - it is an 2520 inescapable charge. All the complainant has to do is express ‗hurt feelings‘ and you are on the chopping block for three years jail. Please see page 44 of this letter for specific commentary on ‗conduct likely to racially harass‘.

Under Section 77, this information is also very valid as it goes to the heart of intent. The purpose 2525 wasn‘t to ―incite‖ against a racial group but inform the public of an extremely important matter in the public interest. That I got angry after being vilified in the Press and harassed and stalked, is a matter of circumstance, not intent.

Let‘s just recall what the head of the DPP (McGrath) said at the WASCA on 13/12/2011: 2530

MCGRATH: ... count 6 we have removed from the religiosity based denunciation to a denunciation based on the Jewish community or members of it being involved with terrorist acts. At page 17 after outlining what people in the Jewish faith have done he brings it closer to home in Western Australia and makes the most - this is 2535 the gravman of this offence, ―It is only a matter of time before they are going to do something here.‖ The ―they‖ can only read as people of the Jewish race and what they‘re going to do is the random acts of violence and terrorism which are particularised in the pages proceeding. 2540 Transcript 13/12/2011 Page 26

With ―Prisoner X‖ in mind and Israel being a KNOWN ―false flag‖ terrorist perpetrator, what is exactly is Mr McGrath trying to say? That I‘m lying? That I‘m wrong? We see again that the ―views‖ are being judged. This is right through all of the cases in all jurisdictions prosecuted so far. It is the 2545 ―views‖ that the Communist police state of W.A are concerned about.

[ix] Should All Jews Be Held Accountable?

2550 Yes. Just as I am ultimately accountable for the actions of my own Government and must speak out against decisions that go against my conscience. Just as I am accountable for the crimes of the Catholic Church hierarchy who for at least 25 years covered up child sex abuse activities within the Church. If I don‘t speak up - I must be judged by my silence.

Again, activist Paul Eisen sums up this angle of the debate which prosecutor Mr Antony Eyers raised with me at trial:

―The Jews‖ 2560 The phrase is itself terrifying. because of its past association with discrimination and violence against Jews, but Jews themselves have no problem with it. The notion of a Jewish People is at the centre of Jewish Faith with Jews of all or no degrees of religious adherence over and over again affirming its existence. It is also at the heart of Zionism even in its most secular forms and is written into the foundational texts of the State of Israel. The 2565 concept even received international legal approval when the Jewish people were declared, by the West German state, to be the post war residual heirs of interstate Jews. And yet it is an absolute article of faith for everyone, including those in the solidarity movement, that while we may criticise and confront Israel and Israeli‘s, we may not criticise and confront the Jewish people and Jews…

the 2590 Zionists do not represent all Jews but they do represent the views of very many Jews indeed, and certainly the most powerful and influential Jews. And there is no doubt that the overwhelming majority of organized Jews are fully behind the Zionist project. That ‗the Jews‘ do not have a formerly designated leadership does not mean that they have no leadership - bodies again to which the overwhelming majority of organized owe allegiance: 2595 the Israeli Government, the World Zionist Organization; numerous large and powerful Jewish organizations such as the Anti-Defamation League and The Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, The Simon Wiesenthal Centre; lesser bodies such as the Board of Deputies of British Jews and similar organizations in every country in which Jews reside. Then there is the extensive network of Jewish bodies often 2600 linked through synagogues to the whole spectrum of mainstream Jewish religious and community life. All these bodies with their vast and interconnected network do provide leadership; they do have clearly defined policies and they are all four-square behind Zionism and Israel in its assault on the Palestinians. 2605 Does this constitute a definable Jewish collective engaged in advancing Jewish interests? Officially, perhaps not, but, effectively, when one notes the remarkable unanimity of intent of all these bodies, the answer may well be yes. They do not of course represent all Jews nor are all individual Jews responsible for their actions, but nonetheless ‗the Jews‘ - organized, active and effective Jews - are as responsible for the pursuit of Jewish interests 2610 in Palestine and elsewhere as ‗the Americans‘ in Vietnam, ‗the French‘ in Algeria, and ‗the British‘ in India.

So why should our response be different? Why should ‗the Jews‘ not be as accountable as ‗the Americans‘ and even ordinary Jews as accountable as ordinary Americans?

And for those few Jews who are really prepared to stand up and be counted 2625 for their solidarity with Palestinians, why can we not still give to them due honour and regard as we did to those few Americans who opposed American imperialism and those white South Africans who opposed apartheid?

The answer is that we are frightened. Even knowing that Jews are responsible and should 2630 be held accountable, still we are frightened. We are frightened because criticism of Jews with its woeful history of violence and discrimination seems just too dangerous a position to take - it may open the flood-gates to a burst of Jew hatred. We are frightened that if we were to discuss the role of Jews in this conflict and in other areas and begin to hold Jews accountable, we might be labelled anti-Semites

Does speaking the truth about Jewish identity, power and history lead to Jews being led to concentration camps and ovens? Of course it doesn‘t! It is hatred, fear and the suppression 2640 of free thought and speech which leads to these things - whether the hatred, fear and suppression is directed against Jews or by Jews. Anyway, despite efforts to convince us to the contrary, we do not live in the thirteenth century. Californian‘s are unlikely to pour out of their cinemas showing Mel Gibson‘s ‗Passion‘ chanting ―Death to the Jews!‖ And at a time when Jews in Israel/Palestine, overwhelmingly backed by Jewish organizations in the 2645 west, are desecrating Churches and Mosques wholesale and brutally oppressing entire Christian and Muslim populations, we may be forgiven for finding it hard to get excited about graffiti daubed on some synagogue somewhere.

The anti-Semite curse has long served as a frightener to silence all criticism of Jews, Israel and Zionism, and undoubtedly will be used to discredit our cause. But so what? They call us anti-Semites anyway so what‘s to lose? Edward Said spent a lifetime picking his way through the Israel/Zionism/Judaism minefield and never once criticised Jews, and he was called an anti-2655 Semite his whole life, right up to and even after his death. As a movement we have probably spent as much time being nice to Jews as we have speaking up for Palestinians, and for what? Where has it got us? We are not racists and we are not anti-Semites, so let them do their worst. We shall speak our minds.

We are held in a moral and intellectual lock, the intention of which has been to silence all criticism of Israeli and Jewish power. In saying the unsayable we may set ourselves and others free. And think how it will feel the next time you are 2665 called an anti-Semite to say, ―Well, I don‘t know about that, but I do have some very strong but legitimate criticisms to make of Jews and the way they are behaving...and I intend to speak out‖?

paraphrasing Marc Ellis I wrote: 2685 To the Christian and to the entire non-Jewish world, Jews say this: ‗You will apologise for Jewish suffering again and again. And, when you have done apologising, you will apologise some more. When you have apologised sufficiently we will forgive you ... provided you let us do what we want in Palestine.‘ 2690

Shamir took me to task, ―Eisen is too optimistic‖, he said, ―Palestine is not the ultimate goal of the Jews... ...the world is.‖

Paul Eisen - ―Jewish Power‖ Paul Eisen is a director of ‗Deir Yassin Remembered‘ paul@eisen.demon.co.uk 2705 • Shamir took me to task, ―Eisen is too optimistic‖, he said, ―Palestine is not the ultimate goal of the Jews... ...the world is.‖

GENISIS 49:8 Judah, your brothers will praise you; 2710 Your hand will be on the neck of your enemies: Your fathers sons will bow down to you. 9You are a lions cub, O Judah; You return from the prey, my son. Like a lion he crouches and lies down. 2715 Like a lioness - who dares to rouse him? 10The sceptre will not depart from Judah, Nor the rulers staff from between his feet, Until he comes to whom it belongs And the obedience of the nations is his. 2720

DEUTERONOMY 28:12 - Old Testament (Tanakh) 12You will lend to many nations but will borrow from none. 13The LORD will make you the head, not the tail. If you pay attention to the commends of the LORD your God that I give you this day and carefully follow them, you will always be at the top, 2725 never at the bottom.

this statement from the Honourable Peter Foss in State parliament when debating the racial vilification legislation in November of 2004 and what he had to say about a member of the 2745 Jewish community who was lobbying for the legislation I‘m charged under:

One of the great supporters of the legislation was Mr Doron Ur, who was a leading figure in the Jewish community in this State. I am not sure whether he is still alive. He was certainly an elderly gentleman in 1990. He wrote a Zionist magazine that he 2750 distributed quite widely in the Jewish community. During the course of his evidence to the committee, he very kindly gave us a few copies of the magazine. We flicked through those, and it became quite clear that if an amendment of that type was drafted, he would be a prime candidate for prosecution. Anybody who has read Zionist magazines will know that they state fairly unequivocally what should happen to the Palestinians, and it 2755 is not nice. I believe it is a well-known problem. Certainly, there would be real difficulties if we tried to suppress those sort of publications. They probably do not add a lot to the quietness and good order of Western Australia, but if we tried to suppress them, I suspect we would have even bigger problems. Extract From Hansard 2760 [COUNCIL - Tuesday, 30 November 2004] p8818c-8834a

So, the right honourable Peter Foss says that by ―suppressing‖ Zionist publications that, ―state fairly unequivocally what should happen to the Palestinians, and it is not nice43‖, there would be ―real 2765 difficulties‖, and even though they, ―probably do not add a lot to the quietness and good order of Western Australia‖, if he (Peter Foss) tried to suppress them, ―I suspect we would have even bigger problems‖. Boy oh boy! I would really like to know what Peter Foss meant by ―bigger problems‖? Maybe he would get a visit from the Israeli Ambassador to Australia? Maybe he would have a stroke or heart attack in the middle of the night? Maybe his commuter plane would fall from the sky during 2770 perfect flying weather? Maybe he would not get invited to Israel with head of the Friends of Israel committee (Bob Kucera) flying business class?

It seems when it comes to Jewish racism, xenophobia and ‗abhorrent views‘, they are indeed ‗the chosen people‘. Unaccountable, untouchable, and it would seem, out of control.

This utterly offensive set of comments from the former head of the Sephardic Jewish community of Israel, Rabbi Ovadia Yosef – the virtual ‗Pope‘ of this powerful religious and political group: 2780

―Goyim44 were born only to serve us. Without that, they have no place in the world - only to serve the people of Israel,‖ he said in his weekly Saturday night sermon on the laws regarding the actions non-Jews are permitted to perform on Shabbat.45 2785 According to Yosef, the lives of non-Jews in Israel46 are safeguarded by divinity, to prevent losses to Jews.

―In Israel, death has no dominion over them...47 . With Gentiles, it will be like any person - they need to die, but [God] will give them longevity. Why? Imagine that ones 2790 donkey would die, they‘d lose their money.

41 Head Rabbi of Perth‘s Orthodox Jewish congregation who appeared at my trial via video link from Occupied Palestine. 42 Three articles in West Australian paper - 6th December 2012 - show that the West has had enough of this rogue, racist, apartheid state. 43 Kill, exterminate, ‗transfer‘ (ethnically cleans), etc. 44 Non Jews. 45 Sabbath. 46 Outside Israel, the lives of non-Jews are not protected at all according to Jewish Rabbinic law.

This is his servant... . that‘s why he gets a long life, to work well for this Jew,‖ Yosef said. 2795 ―Why are Gentiles48 needed? They will work, they will play, they will reap. We will sit like an Effendi49 and eat.

That is why Gentiles were created,‖ he added. 2800

That is why non-Jews were created? To be slaves for the Jew? He has not drawn this teaching from thin air, he is in fact drawing on both the Old Testament (Tanakh) and Babylonian Talmud and relevant Rabbinic Commentaries: 2805

ISAIAH 61:5 Aliens will shepherd your flocks; foreigners will work your fields and vineyards. 6And you will be called priests of the LORD, 2810 you will be named ministers of our God. You will feed on the wealth of nations, and in their riches you will boast.

JOSHUA 9:24 2815 They answered Joshua, ―Your servants were clearly told how the LORD your God had commanded his servant Moses to give you the whole land and to wipe out all its inhabitants from before you. So we feared for our lives because of you, and that is why we did this. 25We are now in your hands. Do to us whatever seems good and right to you.‖ 2820 26So Joshua saved them from the Israelites, and they did not kill them. 27That day he made the Gibeonites woodcutters and water-carriers for the community and for the altar of the LORD at the place the LORD would choose. And that is what they are to this day. 2825 JOSHUA 16:10 They did not dislodge the Canaanites living in Geza; to this day the Canaanites live among the people of Ephraim but are required to do forced labour.

JUDGES 1:28 2830 When Israel became strong, they pressed the Canaanites into forced labour but never drove them out completely.

DEUTERONOMY 20:10 When you march up to attack a city, make its people an offer of peace. 11If they 2835 accept and open their gates, all the people in it shall be subject to forced labour and shall work for you.

You can see how this Jewish tradition of death and forced labour (Gulags) was applied against Christians in the Soviet Union. 2840

Ovadia Yosef is no marginalised extremist in Israeli society. He is a leader of the Ultra-Orthodox Jewish based „Shas‟ political party. They wield considerable power in Israel and one of their members has a high cabinet post in the Israeli parliament. He presents a constant stream of these comments and only in the last few years has he been focussed on by the Israeli Press. You will never see these 2845 comments in the Western mainstream media. Here are some notes on the Shas Party. It is worth quoting them at length:

Shas (Hebrew: ש״ס) is a ultra-orthodox religious political party in Israel, primarily representing Sephardic and Mizrahi Haredi Judaism. 2850

Shas was founded in 1984 by dissident members of the Ashkenazi dominated Agudat Israel, to represent the interests of religiously observant Sephardic (Middle Eastern) Jews. 2855 Following the 2009 elections in which Shas won 11 seats, it joined Benjamin Netanyahu's coalition government and holds four cabinet posts. Its current leader, Eli Yishai, is one of four Deputy Prime Ministers, and Minister of Internal Affairs. ... Shas was founded in 1984 prior to the elections in the same year, through the merger of 2860 regional lists established in 1983. A Sephardi offshoot of the largely Ashkenazi Agudat Yisrael, it was originally known as The Worldwide Sephardic Association of Torah Guardians (Hebrew: , התאחדות הספרדים העולמית שומרי תורה Hitahdut HaSfaradim HaOlamit Shomrei Torah). The party was formed under the leadership of Rabbi Ovadia Yosef (a former Israeli Chief rabbi), who remains its spiritual leader today. In 2865 founding the party, Yosef received strategic help and guidance from Rabbi Elazar Shach, the leader of Israel's non-Hasidic Haredi Ashkenazi Jews. ... The majority of Shas voters are themselves not ultra-orthodox. Many of its voters are Modern Orthodox and 'traditional' Mizrahi and Sephardi Jews. Some Druze also vote for 2870 Shas, due to its alignment with the promotion of an 'authentic Middle Eastern' Israeli culture, which fits well with traditional Zionist beliefs of a revival of authentic, nonEuropeanised Jewish culture. However, they are still representing, by principle and not practice, their Sephardi and Mizrahi Haredi Jewish Sectors in the Knesset. ... 2875 In 2010, as Obama's called for talks between Netanyahu and Abbas, Ovadia Yosef called Palestinians "evil, bitter enemies of Israel" and said "Abu Mazen and all these evil people should perish from this world. God should strike them with a plague, them and these Palestinians." Saeb Erekat of PLO said Yosef's remarks were tantamount to a call for "genocide against Palestinians." Previously Yosef had called Arabs as "vipers," 2880 and called for Israel to "annihilate" Arabs. "It is forbidden to be merciful to them. You must send missiles to them and annihilate them. They are evil and damnable."



2885 I‘ll just repeat some of the above quotes to do with Palestinians:

• Previously Yosef had called Arabs as "vipers," and called for Israel to "annihilate" Arabs. "It is forbidden to be merciful to them. You must send missiles to them and annihilate them. They are evil and damnable."

Further to the above, during Operation Cast Lead in which 1500 Palestinian‘s - mostly civilians and 500 children - were killed, this is a comment from one of the most powerful world-wide UltraOrthodox sects of Judaism - Chabad Lubavitch: 2895 “I‟m not into Western morality, wage war the Jewish way. Kill men, women and children, destroy their holy sites.”

Rabbi Friedman of Chabad Lubavitch, New York. Quoted in major Israeli paper - ―Ha‘aretz‖. 2900 (These comments actually got wide media coverage because they were said in the West)

I repeat, these are not marginalised comments. It is simply that it is being reported now - at least in the Israeli press. Chabad Lubavitch are regarded as the worst of the Ultra-Orthodox sects, and the most dangerous as they move in such high circles of power. An example of its local membership is 2905 „Diamond‟ Joe Gudnik, the former head of the Melbourne football club, mining entrepreneur and dealer in diamonds.

Page 51 of 235

These sects have been indicted on drug trafficking and even drug manufacture in the United States and elsewhere. In one case, an Ultra-Orthodox sect was manufacturing Methamphetamine at a ‗Kosher‘ 2910 meat works they owned and ran. Another Ultra-Orthodox sect, originating in Syria and living in the U.S, was implicated in the trade of human body organs.

the Noahide Laws:

The Seven Laws of Noah (Hebrew: שבע מצוות בני נח Sheva mitzvot B'nei Noach), often referred to as the Noahide Laws or Noachide Code, are a set of seven moral imperatives that, according to the Talmud, were given by God to Noah as a binding set of laws for 2950 all mankind.[1] According to Judaism any non-Jew who lives according to these laws is regarded as a Righteous Gentile and is assured of a place in the world to come (Olam Haba), the Jewish concept of heaven.[2] Adherents are often called "B'nei Noach" (Children of Noah) or "Noahides" and may often network in Jewish synagogues. 2955 The seven laws listed by the Tosefta and the Talmud are[3]

1. Prohibition of Idolatry: You shall not have any idols before God.50 2. Prohibition of Murder: You shall not murder. (Genesis 9:6) 3. Prohibition of Theft: You shall not steal. 2960 4. Prohibition of Sexual immorality: You shall not commit any of a series of sexual prohibitions, which include adultery, incest, sodomy, and bestiality. 5. Prohibition of Blasphemy: You shall not blaspheme God's name. 6. Dietary Law: Do not eat flesh taken from an animal while it is still alive. (Genesis 9:4, as interpreted in the Talmud (Sanhedrin 59a) 2965 7. Requirement to have just Laws: Set up a governing body of law (eg Courts) 50 Simply look at the following quotes from the Old Testament to see what happens to ―idolators‖ on page 46 of this letter.

Page 52 of 235

Note number 1. That would necessitate the death penalty for all Christians as Chabad considers the worship of Jesus as ‗Christ/Messiah‘ and ‗the Son of God‘ as idolatry. This is openly talked about on Chabad Lubavitch internet forums. Is this ‗Noahide Law‘ just some irrelevant rambling from some 2970 marginalised Rabbi? Note:

The Seven Laws of Noah were recognized by the United States Congress in the preamble to the bill that established Education Day in honour of the 90th birthday of Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, the leader of the Chabad-2975 Lubavitch movement:

“Whereas Congress recognizes the historical tradition of ethical values and principles which are the basis of civilized society and upon which our great Nation was founded; Whereas these ethical 2980 values and principles have been the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization, when they were known as the Seven Noahide Laws.” 102nd Congress of the United States of America, March 5, 1991. 2985 Truly amazing. Slowly, knowledge about how dangerous this large and powerful Ultra-Orthodox Sect of Judaism has become is leaking out; how utterly offensive are it‘s utterances and teachings, which they do not make openly public - until recently. Many politicians will not attend ‗Chabad‘ events. Notably, most recently, prime minister Julia Gillard. Chabad Lubavitch is only one of a vast number of these Orthodox groups. 2990

I note that the most famous Chabad Lubavitch adherent in Australia is skulking about in Western Australia again after a long absence - Rabbi ‗Diamond‘ Joe Gudnick:

Please remember, both Stanley Elliot Keyser and Daniel Ari Lazareth51 are regular attendee‘s at local Perth Chabad Lubavitch managed events and their ‗home shule‘ on Alexander Drive, Mount Lawley, Perth.

Chabad Lubavitch have recently been caught up with sexual abuse claims in their Yeshiva Schools in 3020 Melbourne, Victoria. Due to the extreme insular ‗sect like‘ nature of the Ultra-Orthodox community, sexual abuse is rampant - not just in Chabad Lubavitch. This is the first time it has made the

51 Both present at the Friends Of Palestine rally where they were caught filming activists and agitating the rally - 2nd May 2009. Keyser brought the charges against me. Being labelled a ‗racist‘ by an associate of the most racist and religious supremacist organization in the world is indeed ironic.

Page 53 of 235

mainstream news as far as I am aware52. I hope this indicates a major change in the general Jewish communities tolerance of this majorly criminal outfit. From the ‗Sydney Morning Herald‘ newspaper online: 3025

Abuse endemic in Jewish schools: inquiry Paul Mulvey December 10, 2012 AAP 3030

The cover up of child sexual abuse in the Jewish community is endemic and driven by intimidating leaders who downplay the issue, an enquiry has heard.

Manny Waks is the only victim of sexual abuse at a Jewish school to go public with his 3035 experience but says he represented many others who have spoken to him and gone anonymously to police when he gave evidence at Victoria‘s parliamentary enquiry on Monday.

Mr Waks says he knows of two paedophiles still ―roaming the community‖, another 3040 who has gone to Israel where he‘s receiving psychiatric treatment and a possible link between abuse and suicide.

He also spoke of a victim‘s family who have been forced out of Melbourne because of the pressure placed on them by Rabbis, while the offender has recently held a senior 3045 position in the Jewish community.

―There is overwhelming evidence that the level of child sexual abuse within the Jewish community and the appalling way in which it has been mishandled, including through credible allegations of ongoing cover-ups, may be described as being nothing short of 3050 endemic,‖ Mr Waks told the enquiry into the handling of child abuse by religious and other organizations.

While there are two cases currently before the courts involving the Jewish community, he says recent discussions with other victims have revealed ongoing abuse. 3055

While police are aware of most of the allegations, he says Jewish authorities ―attempted to cover up these crimes against innocent children.‖

Mr Waks, who was sexually abused by two trusted mentors at Melbourne‘s Yeshiva 3060 College 20 years ago, says he‘s the only victim to have gone public so far because others feel intimidated by the leadership of the small Jewish community.

He told the enquiry one former Yeshiva student rang him to tell of his own abuse and was stunned Mr Waks had gone public. ―This just doesn‘t get spoken about,‖ he told Mr 3065 Waks.

But many alleged victims have told him of recent cases, including that of a 36 year old man alleged to have sexually abused children within the Yeshiva community who fled to Israel as soon as he heard he was under police investigation. 3070

He spoke of a 13 year old allegedly abused three years ago who has not made a formal statement because he‘s ―concerned with the possible ramifications against him as a result of going to police.‖ 3075 And he also mentioned a member of the Jewish community who was last year convicted of multiple counts of sexual assault against minors and is apparently the youngest person ever on the Sex Offenders Register in Victoria.

―The peak body of the Australian Jewish community, the Executive Council of 3080 Australian Jewry (ECAJ), has done everything it can to try and downplay this scandal,‖ he said. 52 Please read the excellent expose of Judaism - „Judaism Discovered‟ - by Michael Hoffman

Page 54 of 235

He said the ECAJ does not regard sexual abuse as a pressing issue and made no mention of it at its Annual General Meeting last month. 3085

He said students were vulnerable when exposed to influential religious leaders at events such as bar mitzvah classes and recalled his days as a teenager at the communal ritual bath. 3090 ―I‘d go every morning before prayers. It used to be a free for all, there was no supervision, adults and kids together, everyone was naked,‖ he said.

Mr Waks‘ father Zephaniah Waks also appeared at the enquiry on Monday but his evidence was suppressed. 3095 ©2012 AAP

And further, from the ‗Melbourne Age‘ newspaper online: 3100

Jewry accused of hiding sex-abuse Barney Zwartz December 11, 2012 3105 TWO paedophiles - one reportedly the youngest person ever put on the Victoian Sex Offenders Register - were ―roaming the Jewish community‖ with most members utterly unaware, the state inquiry into how religious groups handled child sex abuse was told on Monday. 3110 Community leader and abuse whistleblower Manny Waks said there was overwhelming evidence that child sex abuse was endemic in the Jewish community and ―the appalling way in which it has been mishandled‖, including credible claims of continuing coverups. 3115 He said that in the few months since his written submissions there had been more serious allegations of child sexual abuse. ―Worse, in all of these new cases, those in positions of authority attempted to cover up these crimes.‖

Mr Waks, a former vice-president of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry, last 3120 year became the first Jewish victim to publicly tell the story of his abuse at Yeshiva College in Melbourne more than 20 years ago. He gave evidence with his father, Zephaniah Waks, but Family and Community Development committee chairwoman Georgia Crozier suppressed Mr Waks senior‘s testimony. 3125 Manny Waks said several new allegations had come to him, partly because victims and families often sought his advice. In one case, he said, a family was forced to leave Melbourne under pressure from Rabbis after they made allegations against a senior figure who ―is still roaming freely within the Melbourne Jewish community‖. 3130 In another case, a young member of the Jewish community was convicted of multiple counts of sexual assault against minors - becoming the youngest listed offender - and he too was freely roaming the community, Mr Waks said.

Another man, 36, was alleged to have sexually abused several children in the Yeshiva 3135 community - part of the Orthodox Chabad movement - and fled Australia as soon as he heard police were investigating him. Mr Waks said the man was himself allegedly sexually abused repeatedly as a child by a relative, an active member of the Sydney Jewish community. 3140 In another Yeshiva case, a man, 30, is alleged to have abused a child, 13, about three years ago.

Page 55 of 235

―Most devastatingly, over the past few days, I have been informed of a possible link between an alleged incident of child sexual abuse at Yeshiva and a subsequent suicide.‖ 3145

He said he had also received a number of allegations of abuse and cover-ups within the Sydney and Perth communities.

Mr Waks said the Executive Council of Australian Jewry had ―done everything it could 3150 to downplay this scandal‖ and that in some cases ―their scant response was highly damaging‖.

He said he and other victims were deeply hurt, angry and incredulous not only about the abuse and the cover-ups, the intimidation of victims and their families, but the ―meek 3155 response‖ by Jewish community leadership.

...

3160

Perhaps these brief quotes from the holiest book of Orthodox Judaism - Babylonian Talmud - explain the endemic child sexual abuse in Jewish communities:

1. Moed Kattan 17a. If a Jew is tempted to do evil he should go to a city where he is not known and do 3165 the evil there. 2. Erubin 21b. Whoever disobeys the Rabbi‘s deserves death and will be punished by being boiled in hot excrement in hell. 3. Yebamoth 63a. States that Adam had sexual intercourse with all the animals of the garden of Eden. 4. Kethuboth 11b. ―When a grown man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing.‖ 3170 5. Sanhedrin 55b. A Jew may marry a three year old girl (specifically, three years and a day old). 6. Sanhedrin 54b. A Jew may have sex with a child as long as the child is less than 9 years old.

Or perhaps this article on Orthodox rabbis sucking the blood off baby boy‘s penises? Perhaps this might begin to explain how deep and wide this type of child sexual abuse really is in these 3175 communities and it has been covered up for decades:

City Questions Circumcision Ritual After Baby Dies New York Times Online Andy Newman 3180 August 26, 2005

Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg met with Orthodox leaders and health officials at City Hall on Aug. 11 to discuss a practice that some rabbis consider integral to God‘s covenant with the Jews requiring circumcision.53 3185

A circumcision ritual practiced by some Orthodox Jews has alarmed city health officials who say it may have led to cases of herpes - one of them fatal - in infants. But after months of meetings with orthodox leaders, city officials have been unable to persuade them to abandon the practice. 3190

The cities intervention has angered many Orthodox leaders, and the issue has left the city struggling to balance its mandate to protect public health with the constitutional guarantee of religious freedom. 3195 ―This is a very delicate area so to speak,‖ said Health Commissioner Thomas R. Frieden.

The practice is known as oral suction, or in Hebrew, metzitzah b‘peh: after removing the foreskin of the penis, the practitioner, or mohel, sucks the blood from the wound to 3200 clean it.

53 That is SPECIFICALLY sucking an infant baby boys penis with the rabbis mouth after circumcision.

Page 56 of 235

It became a health issue after a boy in Staten Island and twins in Brooklyn, circumcised by the same mohel in 2003 and 2004, contracted Type-1 herpes. Most adults carry the disease, which causes the common cold sore, but it can be life threatening to infants. 3205

Pressure from the Orthodox leaders on the issue led to Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg and health officials to meet with them on Aug. 11. The mayors comments on his radio program the next day seemed meant to soothe all parties and not upset a group that can be a formidable voting bloc: ―We‘re going to do a study, and make sure everybody is 3210 safe and at the same time, it is not the governments business to tell people how to practice their religion.‖54

The health department, after the meeting, reiterated that it did not intend to ban or regulate oral suction. But Dr. Frieden has said that the city is taking this approach partly 3215 because any broad rule would be virtually unenforceable. Circumcision generally takes place in private homes.55

Dr. Frieden said the department regarded herpes transmission via oral suction as ―somewhat inevitable to occur as long as this practice continues, if at a very low rate.‖ 3220

The use of suction to stop bleeding dates back centuries and is mentioned in the Talmud56. The safety of direct oral contact has been questioned since the 19th century, and many Orthodox and nearly all non-Orthodox Jews have abandoned it. Dr. Frieden said he hoped the rabbis would voluntarily switch to suctioning the blood through a 3225 tube, an alternative endorsed by the Rabbinical Council of America, the largest group of Orthodox rabbis.

But the most traditionalist groups, including many Hasidic sects in New York, consider oral suction integral to God‘s covenant with the Jews requiring circumcision, and they 3230 have no intention of stopping it.

―The Orthodox Jewish community will continue the practice that has been practiced for over 5000 years,‖ said Rabbi David Niederman of the United Jewish Organization in Williamsburg, Brooklyn, after the meeting with the mayor. ―We do not change. And we 3235 will not change.‖

David Zwiebel, executive vice president of Agudath Israel, an umbrella organization of Orthodox Jews, said that metzitzah b‘peh is probably performed more than 2000 times a year in New York City. 3240

The potential risks of oral suction, however, are not confined to Orthodox communities. Dr. Frieden said in March that the health department had fielded several calls from panicked non-Orthodox parents who had hired Hasidic mohels unaware of what their services entailed. 3245

Defenders of oral suction57 say there is no proof that it spreads herpes at all. They say that mohels use antiseptic mouth wash before performing oral suction, and that the known incidence of herpes among infants who have undergone it is miniscule. (The city‘s health department recorded cases in 1988 and 1998, though doctors in New York, 3250 as in most states, are not required to report neonatal herpes.)

Dr. Kenneth I. Glassberg, past president of the new York section of the American Urological Association and director of paediatric urology at Morgan Stanley Children‘s Hospital of New York-Presbyterian, said that while he found oral suction ―personally 3255 displeasing,‖ he did not recommend rabbis stop using it.

54 That‘s quite funny because all the government and media do all day is vilify Islam and tell people how terrible it is. But Jews sucking baby boys penises in a circumcision ritual is not to be interfered with? Imagine if this was an Islamic practice or a Catholic Priests practice. We would never hear the end of it. 55 Again, lots of crimes - including institutionalised paedophilia which is what this is - take place in ―private‖, they are still legislated against. 56 Yes, lots of things mentioned and encouraged in Talmud - refer Yebamoth 63a. Sanhedrin 54b.Sanhedrin 55b. Kethuboth 11b, previous page. 57 Sucking a baby boys bleeding penis.

Page 57 of 235

―If I knew something caused a problem from a medical point of view,‖ said Dr. Glassberg, whose private practice includes many Hasidic families, ―I would recommend against it.‖ 3260

But Rabbi Moshe Tendler, a microbiologist and professor of Talmud and medical ethics at Yeshiva University, said that metzitzah b‘peh violates Jewish law.

―The rule that‘s above all rules in the Torah is that you cannot expose or accept a risk to 3265 health unless there is a true justification for it,‖ said Dr. Tendler, co-author of a 2004 article in the journal Paediatrics that said direct contact posed a serious risk of infection.

―Now there have been several cases of herpes in the metro area,‖ he said. ―Whether it can be directly associated with this mohel nobody knows. All we‘re talking about now is 3270 presumptive evidence, and on that alone it would be improper according to Jewish law to do oral suction.‖

The inconsistent treatment of Rabbi Fischer himself indicates the confusion metzitzah b‘peh has sown among health authorities, who typically regulate circumcisions by 3275 doctors but not religious practitioners.

In Rockland County, where Rabbi Fischer lives in the Hasidic community of Monsey, he has been barred from performing oral suction58. But the state health department retracted a request it had made to Rabbi Fischer to stop the practice. And in New Jersey, 3280 where Rabbi Fischer has done some of his 12,000 circumcisions, the health authorities have been silent.

Rabbi Fischer‘s lawyer, Mark J. Kurzmann, said that absent conclusive proof that the rabbi had spread herpes, he should be allowed to continue the practice. Rabbi Fischer 3285 said through Mr Kurzmann that the twin who died and the Staten Island boy both had herpes-like rashes before they were circumcised and were seen by a paediatrician who approved their circumcision. The health department declined to comment on its investigation. 3290 So, just to clarify:

• The practice is known as oral suction, or in Hebrew, metzitzah b‘peh: after removing the foreskin of the penis, the practitioner, or mohel, sucks the blood from the wound to clean it. • ―The Orthodox Jewish community will continue the practice that has been practiced for over 3295 5000 years,‖ said Rabbi David Niederman of the United Jewish Organization in Williamsburg, Brooklyn, after the meeting with the mayor. “We do not change. And we will not change.”

The list of strange, bizarre and outright immoral practices and rites of Pharisaic Judaism are well 3300 hidden but one would imagine not for much longer.

Page 34 of this letter has a longer list of the strange teachings of Talmud. For a more expansive explanation of Jewish religious teachings and their application, see the excellent documentaries of reverend Ted pike - ―Why The Mid-East Bleeds‖ and ―The Other Israel‖. Available online. 3305

These Orthodox sects are also the basis for „Yeshiva Military Academies‟ in Israel that take these highly motivated and indoctrinated Jews59 and feed them into Israeli intelligence agencies, special forces, air force pilots and specialist assassination squads. Their loyalty is unquestioned. Australian/American/European Jews attend these military academies where they learn electronic data 3310 intercept, firearms training, explosives training, surveillance and counter surveillance. These people then commit war crimes in the Gaza Strip and occupied West Bank and then return home - to become a major national security risk.

58 Sucking a baby boys bleeding penis. 59 Completely instilled with Jewish racial and religious supremacism from birth.

Page 58 of 235

But the above fostered attitudes are not just limited to extremist sects of Judaism. Note these 3315 comments by mainstream Jews reported in a lecture video by independent journalist and writer Mr Michael Hoffman :

[21:46] “Israeli security minister Gideon Ezra was reported in the Sydney Morning Herald in August of 2001 of advocating the „liquidation of the fathers of Palestinian 3320 resistance fighters‟.”

[22:10] “Hannah Kasher, a researcher at Bare Lahn University in Israel, produced a thinly veiled rationalization for the collective punishment of the Palestinians in a research paper called „Rationales Justifying Collective Punishment Of Amelak‟. She 3325 writes, „the commandment to blot out Amelak has essentially not been nullified... . Any person descended of Amelak has a death sentence hanging over him from the moment of his birth even if he himself has committed no sin, his culpability is innate... . The struggle against Amelak is a war of annihilation against a contemporary foe in which one does not refrain from killing women and children.‟ A quote from a contemporary 3330 Israeli/Jewish academic... . Professor Kasher adds that the Talmudic Sage Maimonides, who justifies the collective punishment of Amelak - civilians as well as combatants - does so as a „justifiable deterrent effect‟. Prime minister Sharon [of Israel] used those very words.” 3335 ―Liquidating‖ the fathers of Palestinian resistance fighters? Can you believe that an Israeli security minister would say such a thing? A high level minister in a supposed first world State? Dr Walsh, I put to you that they say these types of things all the time. You‘re just not being told by the controlled Western mainstream press. And then to have an academic from a major Israeli university argue that the collective punishment of the Palestinian (mostly Muslim) population is justified according to Old 3340 testament scripture, and that the Amalekites from thousands of years ago are actually a ―contemporary foe‖ ie: Palestinian‘s – this is too much. And yet, par for the course when you are aware of the issues and know where to find the information that informs you of such ―abhorrent views‖.

Here is what an Israeli Defence Force chief Chaplain had to say along these same lines: 3345

“In 1986 the Israeli Chief Army Chaplain, known as Rabbi Scmule Derlich, issued an order to the Army to „annihilate all Arabs‟ because they are „Amelak‟.” The Nation Magazine August 1986 p.103

3350 Just to clarify, the term ‗Amelak‘ comes from the Old Testament (Tanakh):

DEUTERONOMY 25:19 When the LORD your God gives you rest from all the enemies around you in the land he is giving you to possess as an inheritance, you shall blot out the memory of 3355 Amalek from under heaven.

1 SAMUEL 15:3 Now go and smite Amelak and utterly destroy all that they have and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass. 3360

The Amalekites were a tribe that were continually at war with the Israelite Tribes three thousand years ago. They were considered the ―hereditary enemy‖ of the Israelites and according to the Old Testament, God commanded the Israelites to ―blot out their memory‖ and leave no trace that they ever existed. With this in mind, you see that high level Israeli ministers of state, Israeli academics and 3365 Israeli religious leaders have been continually encouraging, fomenting and inciting for the genocide of the Palestinian people. Where are the criminal courts of justice at The Hague? These views are not marginal – they are mainstream in many segments of Israeli society and found regularly in Jewish attitudes around the world. You see also how an ancient religious book and its teachings are being used to justify current day behaviours. 3370

Page 59 of 235

Here are a few more quotes from the Old Testament that are quoted by Jews in Israel (and elsewhere) to justify the collective punishment and slaughter of Palestinians and indicate the general attitude of Jews as espoused in their holiest of books. Please remember the cruel persecution of Christians in the Jewish Bolshevik Soviet Communist State - here is where the ‗unusually cruel‘ mindset comes from - 3375 here, ―The Lord‖ commands the Israelites to kill every single person that opposes them as they invade and ―ethnically cleanse‖ the land:

DEUTERONOMY 2:34 At that time we took all his towns and completely destroyed them - men, women and 3380 children. We left no survivors.

DEUTERONOMY 3:6 We completely destroyed them, as we had done with Sihon king of Heshbon, destroying every city - men, women and children. 3385

DEUTERONOMY 4:38 ...,to drive out before you nations greater and stronger than you and to bring into their land to give it to you as an inheritance, as it is today. 3390 DEUTERONOMY 7:1 When the LORD your God brings you into the land you are entering to possess and drives out before you many nations - the Hittites, Girgashites, Amorites, Canaanites, Perizzites, Hivites, and Jebusites, seven nations larger and stronger than you - and when the LORD your God has delivered them over to you and you have defeated 3395 them, then you must destroy them totally. Make no treaty with them, and show them no mercy.

DEUTERONOMY 7:16 You must destroy all the peoples the LORD your God gives over to you. Do not 3400 look on them with pity and do not serve their gods.

DEUTERONOMY 7:22 The LORD your God will drive out those nations before you, little by little. You will not be allowed to eliminate them all at once, or the wild animals will multiply 3405 around you. 23But the LORD your God will deliver them over to you, throwing them into great confusion until they are destroyed. 24He will give their kings into your hand, and you will wipe out their names from under heaven. No-one will be able to stand against you: you will destroy them. 3410 DEUTERONOMY 11:23 Then the LORD will drive out all these nations before you, and you will dispossess nations larger and stronger than you. 24Every place where you set your foot will be yours: Your territory will extend from the desert to Lebanon, and from the Euphrates River to the Western sea. No man will be able to stand against you. The LORD your 3415 God, as he promised you, will put the terror and fear of you on the whole land, where ever you go.

DEUTERONOMY 12:29 The LORD your God will cut of before you the nations you are about to invade and 3420 dispossess. But when you have driven them out and settled in their land, and after they have been destroyed before you...

DEUTERONOMY 13:15 You must certainly put to the sword all who live in that town. Destroy it completely, 3425 both its people and its livestock.

DEUTERONOMY 14:21 Do not eat anything you find already dead. You may give it to an alien living in any of your towns, and he may eat it, or you may sell it to a foreigner. 3430

DEUTERONOMY 15:6

Page 60 of 235

For the LORD your God will bless you as he has promised, and you will lend to many nations but will borrow from none. You will rule over many nations but none will rule over you. 3435

DEUTERONOMY 20:12 If they refuse to make peace and they engage you in battle, lay siege to that city. 13When the LORD you God delivers it into your hand, put to the sword all the men in it. 14As for the men and women, the children, the livestock and everything else in 3440 the city, you may take these as plunder for yourselves. And you may use the plunder the LORD your God gives you from your enemies. 15This is how you are to treat all the cities that are at a distance from you and do not belong to you and do not belong to the nations nearby. 3445 DEUTERONOMY 20:16 However, in the cities of the nations the LORD your God is giving you as an inheritance, do not leave alive anything that breathes. Completely destroy them - the Hittites, Armorites, Canaanites, Perizzites, Hivites and Jebusites - as the LORD your God has commanded you. 3450

DEUTERONOMY 26:19 He has declared that he will set you in praise, fame and honour high above all the nations he has made... 3455 JOSHUA 6:21 They devoted the city to the LORD and destroyed with the sword every living thing in it - men and women, young and old, cattle, sheep and donkeys.

JOSHUA 8:24 3460 When Israel had finished killing all the men of Ai in the fields and in the desert where they had chased them, and when every one of them had been put to the sword, all the Israelites returned to Ai and killed those who were in it. 25Twelve thousand men and women fell that day - all the people of Ai. 3465 JOSHUA 10:28 That day Joshua took Makkedah. He put the city and its king to the sword and totally destroyed everything in it. He left no survivors.

JOSHUA 10:30 3470 The city and everyone in it Joshua put to the sword. He left no survivors there.

JOSHUA 10:32 The LORD handed Lachish over to Israel, and Joshua took it on the second day. The city and everyone in it he put to the sword, just as he had done to Libnah. 3475

JOSHUA 10:35 They captured it that same day and put it to the sword and totally destroyed everyone in it, just as they had done to Lachish. 3480 JOSHUA 10:37 They took the city and put it to the sword, together with its king, its villages and everyone in it. They left no survivors. Just as at Eglon, they totally destroyed it and everyone in it. 3485 JOSHUA 10:38 Then Joshua and all Israel with him turned round and attacked Debir. 39They took the city, its king and its villages, and put them to the sword. Everyone in it they totally destroyed. They left no survivors. They did to Debir and its king as they had done to Libnah and its king and to Hebron. 3490

JOSHUA 10:40 So Joshua subdued the whole region, including the hill country, the Negev, the western foothills and the mountain slopes, together with all their kings. He left no

Page 61 of 235

survivors. He totally destroyed all who breathed, just as the LORD, the God of 3495 Israel, had commanded.

JOSHUA 11:11 Everyone in it they put to the sword. They totally destroyed them, not sparing anything that breathed, and he burned up Hazor itself. 3500

JOSHUA 11:14 The Israelites carried off for themselves all the plunder and livestock of these cities, but all the people they put to the sword until they completely destroyed them, not sparing anyone that breathed. 3505

JOSHUA 11:20 For it was the LORD himself who hardened their hearts to wage war against Israel, so that he might destroy them totally, exterminating them without mercy, as the LORD had commanded Moses. 3510

JOSHUA 11:21 At the time Joshua went and destroyed the Anakites from the hill country: from Hebron, Debir and Anab, from the hill country of Judah, and from all the hill country of Israel. Joshua totally destroyed them and their towns. 22No Anakites were 3515 left in Israelite territory, only in Gaza, Gath and Ashdod did any survive. 23So Joshua took the entire land, just as the Lord had directed Moses, and he gave it as an inheritance to Israel according to their tribal divisions.

I do not have the time to type out anymore - there are hundreds more of these quotes to go. The entire 3520 Old Testament (Tanakh), from start to finish, is full of the same stories - those who resist Israelite/Jewish domination are utterly exterminated. This is the politico/religious ideology that underpins the attitudes of ―Jews‖. if they don‘t adhere to it - then they may well have to decide if they really want to be known as...‖Jews‖? 3525 Some interesting attitudes to women:

DEUTERONOMY 22:20 If, however, the charge is true and no proof of the girls virginity can be found, 21she shall be brought to the door of her father‘s house and there the men of the town shall 3530 stone her to death.

DEUTERONOMY 22:23 If a man happens to meet in a town a virgin pledged to be married and he sleeps with her, 24you shall take both of them to the gate of that town and stone them to death - 3535 the girl because she was in a town and did not scream for help, and the man because he violated another man‘s wife. You must purge the evil from among you.

DEUTERONOMY 25:11 If two men are fighting and the wife of one of them comes to rescue her husband 3540 from the assailant, and she reaches out and seizes him by his private parts, 12you shall cut off her hand. Show her no pity.

I put these in Dr Walsh for the express purpose of asking why it is so many want to vilify and condemn Islam by ―straining at gnats‖ and quoting selectively - but they won‘t look at Judaism?

Here are some extracts from the Talmud – one of Judaism‘s holiest books:

1. Moed Kattan 17a. If a Jew is tempted to do evil he should go to a city where he is not known and do the evil there. 3560 2. Erubin 21b. Whoever disobeys the Rabbi‘s deserves death and will be punished by being boiled in hot excrement in hell. 3. Yebamoth 63a. States that Adam had sexual intercourse with all the animals of the garden of Eden. 4. Kethuboth 11b. ―When a grown man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing.‖ 5. Sanhedrin 55b. A Jew may marry a three year old girl (specifically, three years and a day old). 3565 6. Sanhedrin 54b. A Jew may have sex with a child as long as the child is less than 9 years old. 7. Erubin 21b. Whoever disobeys the Rabbi‘s deserves death and will be punished by being boiled in hot excrement in hell. 8. Moed Kattan 17a. If a Jew is tempted to do evil he should go to a city where he is not known and do the evil there. 3570 9. Baba Mezia 114a-114b. Only Jews are human (―Only ye are designated men‖). Also see Kerithoth 6b under the sub heading ―Oil of Anointing‖ and Berakoth 58a in which Gentile women are designated animals (―she-asses‖). 10. Sanhedrin 58b. If a heathen (Gentile) hits a Jew, the Gentile must be killed. Hitting a Jew is the same as hitting God (―The apple of His eye‖). 3575 11. Sanhedrin 57a. A Jew need not pay a Gentile (―Cuthean‖) the wages owed him for work. 12. Baba Kamma 37b. Jews have a superior legal status (―If an ox of an Israelite gores an ox of a Canaanite there is no liability; but if an ox of a Canaanite gores an ox of an Israelite...the payment is to be in full‖). 13. Baba Mezia 24a. If a Jew finds an object lost by a Gentile (―heathen‖) it does not have to be returned. 3580 Affirmed in Baba Kamma 113b. 14. Sanhedrin 76a. God will not spare a Jew who, ―marries his daughter to an old man or takes a wife for his infant son or returns a lost article to a Cuthean...‖ 15. Sanhedrin 57a. When a Jew murders a gentile (―Cuthean‖), there will be no death penalty. What a Jew steals from a Gentile he may keep. 3585 16. Baba Kamma 37b. Gentiles are outside the protection of the law and God has ―exposed their money to Israel‖. 17. Baba Kamma 113a. Jews may use lies (―subterfuges‖) to circumvent a Gentile. 18. Yebamoth 98a. All Gentile children are animals. 19. Abodah Zarah 36b. Gentile girls are in a state of ‗niddah‘ (filth) from birth. 3590 20. Abodah Zarah 22a-22b. Gentiles prefer sex with cows. 21. Abodah Zarah 67b. ―The vessels of Gentiles, do they not impart a worse flavour to the food cooked in them?‖ 22. Sanhedrin 106a. Says Jesus‘s mother was a whore. ―She who was the descendant of Princes and Governors played the harlot with carpenters.‖ Also in Shabbath 104b. ―Miriam the hairdresser had sex 3595 with many men.‖ 23. Sanhedrin 106. Gloats over the early age that Jesus died. ―Hast thou heard how old Balaam (Jesus) was?—He replied, ―It is not actually stated but it is written, bloody and deceitful men shall not live out half their days it follows that he was thirty three or thirty four years old.‖ 24. Sanhedrin 43a. Says Jesus {―Yeshu or ―Yeshu The Nazarene‖) was executed because he practiced 3600 sorcery. 25. Gittin 57a. Says Jesus is in hell being ―boiled in hot excrement‖. 26. Rosh Hashanah 17a. Christians (―Minim‖) and others who reject the Talmud will go to hell and be punished there for all generations. 27. Shabbath 116a. (p.569) Jews must destroy books of Christians. Professor Israel Shahak, in his book 3605 “Jewish Religion, Jewish History, The Weight of Three Thousand Years”, notes that Jews in Israel burned hundreds of New Testament books in Occupied Palestine on March 23, 1980. Page 21. 28. Gittin 69a. To heal his flesh a Jew should take dust that lies within the shadow of an outdoor toilet, mix it with honey and eat it. 29. Shabbath 41a. The law regulating the rule for how to urinate in a holy way is given. 3610 30. Yebamoth 63a. States that Adam had sexual intercourse with all the animals of the garden of Eden. 31. Yebamoth 63a Declares that agriculture is the lowest of occupations. 32. Sanhedrin 55b. A Jew may marry a three year old girl (specifically, three years and a day old). 33. Sanhedrin 54b. A Jew may have sex with a child as long as the child is less than 9 years old. 34. Kethuboth 11b. ―When a grown man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing.‖ 3615

Page 63 of 235

35. Yebamoth 59b. A woman who has intercourse with a beast is eligible to marry a Jewish priest. A woman who has sex with a demon is also eligible to marry a Jewish priest. 36. Abodah Zarah 17a. States that there is not a whore in the world that Rabbi Eleazer has not had sex with. 37. Hagigah 27a. States that no Rabbi can ever go to hell. 3620 38. Baba Mezia 59b. A Rabbi debates God and defeats Him. God admits that the Rabbi won the debate. 39. Gittin 70a. The Rabbi‘s taught: ―On coming from a privy (outdoor toilet) a man should not have sexual intercourse til he has waited long enough to walk half a mile, because the demon of the privy is with him for that time; if he does, his children will be epileptic.‖ 3625 These few quotes above are the ‗oral law‘ that was written down in 300AD as The Babylonian Talmud. There are many other Rabbinic Commentaries and the supposed ‗final argument‘ of the Rabbi‘s in the Shulkan Aruk. This is why Jesus rebuked the Pharisees for ―following the traditions of men‖, rather than the law of God. He also called these same Pharisees, ―Blind guides‖, ―children of hell‖, ―sons of their father the devil‖ and ―whitewashed tombs, all clean and fair without, but within, 3630 full of dead men‘s bones and all corruption.‖ I asked Rabbi Freilich is he was a ―Pharisee‖, just like the ones from Christs time. He answered ―Yes‖. I was then going to discredit him as a witness by commenting on what Jesus called his predecessors but DCJ Wisbey stopped that very quickly. Also note the ending of the trial suddenly when I was going to return to the stand and note that the Shulkan Aruk mentioned by Prosecutor Antony Eyers, was called to be labelled ―racist hate literature‖ by 5000 3635 eminent signatories to the Russian parliament.

This small amount of information I have provided to you about how Jewish religious and racial supremacism is the basis for Jewish criminal behaviour in Palestine, is also indicative of Jewish attitudes to non-Jews outside Palestine whether of the extreme/overt kind, or more subtle general 3640 arrogance.

I know of only one American Jewish activist who addresses this important subject aggressively - Max Blumenthal. Look up his video‘s on You Tube. They are excellent. 3645 My Grandmother would often say:

• “You can‟t make fig jam out of fowl shit.” • “You can‟t make a silk purse from a sow‟s ear.”

3650 And you can‘t make an all-embracing humanist and civilizing religion out of hatred and intolerance for the ―other‖ except if they ―carry water and chop wood‖ for you under ―forced labour‖ as described in Jewish holy books. As President Armedinejhad of Iran so succinctly observed recently: ―This is the age of peace and dialogue, not bullets and bombs.‖ There is no ―dialogue‖ with Judaism - just submit... or else. 3655

Activists are clearly honing in on Jewish racial and religious supremacism like never before. Here is an extract of a Press T.V online news article detailing Mr Kenneth O‘Keefe‘s comments on notions of Jewish racial and religious supremacism and how it affects Jewish behaviours in both Palestine and elsewhere. I remind you that Mr O‘Keefe is a committed activist who has been interviewed by the 3660 BBC, ITV, ABC, CNBC. He was present on a Turkish ship in 2011 that was taking humanitarian aid to Gaza when Israeli special forces lowered themselves onto the deck and shot dead 8 crew in international waters. Mr O‘Keefe does not mince his words and he would undoubtedly come under the racial vilification legislation as applied by the Western Australian D.P.P:

Surely there must be some principal in law that notes you cannot ‗selectively‘ prosecute? Or is that the beauty of State legislation - ―If you don‘t like it, leave, go somewhere else.‖ And you are marked for life as a ‗racist‘? 3720

Here is some background and some views of the famous Professor Finkelstein of the University of Chicago where he praises the supposed ―terrorist group‖60 Hezbollah:

Norman Gary Finkelstein (born December 8, 1953) is an 3725 American political scientist and author whose primary fields of research are the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the politics of the Holocaust. He is a graduate of Binghamton University and received his Ph.D. in Political Science from Princeton University. He has held faculty positions at Brooklyn 3730 College, Rutgers University, Hunter College, New York 60 They are in fact a legitimate resistance movement. A ―terrorist‖ is anyone who disagrees with Israel and fights back.

Page 65 of 235

University, and, most recently, DePaul University, where he was an assistant professor from 2001 to 2007.

Finkelstein is credited by Avi Shlaim, Adam Shatz, Noam Chomsky and others with 3735 exposing Joan Peters' book From Time Immemorial as a "fraud" and "a monumental hoax". Amidst considerable public debate, Finkelstein was denied tenure at DePaul in June 2007, and placed on administrative leave for the 2007-2008 academic year. Among the controversial aspects of this decision were attempts by Alan Dershowitz, a notable opponent of Finkelstein's, to derail Finkelstein's tenure bid. On September 5, 2007 3740 Finkelstein announced his resignation after coming to a settlement with the university on generally undisclosed terms. An official statement from DePaul strongly defended the decision to deny Finkelstein tenure, stated that outside influence played no role in the decision, and praised Finkelstein "as a prolific scholar and outstanding teacher." 3745 ""DePaul, embattled professor settle dispute"". The Chicago Tribune, republished by . ... 3750 Finkelstein indeed visited southern Lebanon and conducted meetings with Lebanese families. During the 2006 Lebanon War, Israeli warplanes bombed a Qana apartment building where two families were seeking refuge in the basement, killing 28, among them 16 children.[59] Finkelstein visited the location of the bombing. He stated: 3755 ―First of all I want express my horror and the difficulty it is to be in the presence of people who are the survivors of those who died. And it should be obvious that there are no words to convey those feelings of horror. 3760 Number two, [I want to express] those feelings of shame, because the simple fact is that the war and those deaths were caused by the US government. People should not fool themselves that this war was done by Israel; this was an American war and for American interests. 3765

The third feeling I have is disgust; Why are the Lebanese welcoming the US president here? Whenever a foreign diplomat travels to Israel, he or she has to go to Yad Vashem [the Israeli holocaust memorial]. So why don‘t the Lebanese have at least 3770 that much dignity to say that [US President George W.] Bush has to come here before he meets them?

The last thing I want to say is: After the horror and after the shame and after the anger, there still remains the hope. And I 3775 know I can get in a lot of trouble for what I‘m about to say, but I think that Hezbollah represents the hope. They are fighting to defend their homeland, they are fighting to defend the independence of their country, they are defending themselves against foreign marauders, vandals and murderers61 and I 3780 consider it to be genuinely to be an honour to be in their presence.‖

„Finkelstein visits Sabra, Shatila and Qana‟

Professor Finkelstein also writes extensively on the Holocaust and it‘s use by "a repellent gang of plutocrats, hoodlums and hucksters" to gain sympathy for Israel and extort money. Please remember the ‗tame‘ comments I made about the Holocaust62 – Professor Finkelstein would get a year in jail at least here in Western Australia: 3790 61 That‘s Israel. 62 On page 37 of this letter.

Page 66 of 235

„The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering‟ was published in 2000. Here, Finkelstein argues that Elie Wiesel and others exploit the memory of the Holocaust as an "ideological weapon." This is so the state of Israel, "one of the world's most formidable military powers, with a horrendous human 3795 rights record, [can] cast itself as a victim state" in order to garner "immunity to criticism."[18] He also alleges what he calls a "double shakedown" by "a repellent gang of plutocrats, hoodlums and hucksters" seeking enormous legal damages and financial settlements from Germany and Switzerland, moneys which then go to the lawyers and institutional actors involved in procuring them, rather than actual 3800 Holocaust survivors.[19][20][21] ... Finkelstein also had his supporters however. Raul Hilberg, widely regarded as the founder of Holocaust studies,[24] said the book expressed views Hilberg himself subscribed to in substance, in that he too found the exploitation of the Holocaust, in 3805 the manner Finkelstein describes, 'detestable.' Asked on another occasion if Finkelstein's analysis might play into the hands of neo-Nazis for anti-semitic purposes, Hilberg replied: 'Well, even if they do use it in that fashion, I'm afraid that when it comes to the truth, it has to be said openly, without regard to any consequences that would be undesirable, embarrassing.‘[25] 3810

[19] Finkelstein, N. (2003). The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering ((2nd ed.) ed.). Verso. pp. xiii.

[20] Where did the Shoah money go? Ynetnews October 12, 2006 3815

[21] Lawyer's $4.1 Million Fee Angers Holocaust Survivors New York Times February 25, 2006 3820 [24] Felix Kellerhoff (25 January 2003). ""Raul Hilberg und die Quellen des Holocaust"". Die Welt.

[25] Roberto Antonini (31 August 2000). ""Interview with Raul Hilberg"". Swiss National Radio (SBCSSR).

In a radio interview with ‗Democracy Now‘ presenter Amy Goodman - also released as a video on You Tube - a former member of the Israeli Knesset/Parliament (Shulamit Aloni) stated that Israel uses the HolocaustTM and the ‗anti-Semite‘ tag as a weapon to deflect criticism of Israel:

“Yes, if Europe criticises Israel we mention the HolocaustTM, when the United States 3845 criticises Israel we call them anti-Semites, it‟s a trick, we always use it”.

Professor Noam Chomsky comments on these tactics:

After the Larry Summers - Dershowitz hysteria about anti-Semitism at Harvard and 3850 MIT, the head of the Anthropology Department at Harvard, a progressive African American, asked me to give a talk on anti-Semitism to his race seminar at Harvard. I

Page 67 of 235

laughed and asked, what are you talking about? The president is Jewish, many of the faculty is Jewish, many students are Jewish, what‘s the issue? It‘s a joke, I said. He said, yes, it was a joke, but it was a very contentious issue on campus. So I agreed to go. I 3855 gave a talk, approximately along the lines of my remarks above: I said, yes, there was anti-Semitism, and I went through the background and how it had changed. At the end of the talk I came up with something I thought was going to be a great punch line, but it fell totally flat. I concluded by saying you no longer read things like the following written by distinguished and respected Harvard professors; then I gave a bunch of actual 3860 quotes from people like Michael Walzer, Ruth Wisse, and Martin Peretz - but they had been talking about Arabs, and at this point in the talk I replaced the word ―Arab‖ in their quotes with ―Jew‖. The quotes sounded like they came out of the nazi archives, about Jews, and there were gasps from the audience: How could Harvard professors ever have done this? And then I said, well, I misled you, those quotes weren‘t really about Jews, 3865 they were about Arabs, and, interestingly, there was a sigh of relief in the audience. I hadn‘t anticipated this reaction; apparently, as long as extreme racist comments of the kind that sound like nazi‘s are about Palestinians and Arabs, then it‘s fine. But if you were to say anything like that about Jews, the place would blow up. I think that‘s basically the answer to the question about the extent of anti-Semitism. 3870 There‘s manufactured anti-Semitism. Its manufactured by the Jewish organizations, very consciously. Take the Anti-Defamation League. It‘s hard to believe, but years ago it used to be an authentic civil rights organization. Now it‘s a kind of Stalinist-style apologetics for Israel organization. In 1982 they got worried about the lack of anti-Semitism in the 3875 country because that‘s their business. So they published a book by their national director called ‗The Real Anti-Semitism in America‘ - with the words ―Real‖ italicised. The book says there is old fashioned anti-Semitism - holocaust denial, calls to kill Jews, and so on - but that‘s marginal and boring. There‘s a new kind of anti-Semitism however, that is much more serious than the old kind. The new kind of anti-Semitism 3880 consists of peace makers of Vietnam vintage who want to undermine and attack the Pentagon budget or people who join the nuclear freeze campaign, and the book goes on like that. Why is that the new anti-Semitism? Because they‘re undermining the power and violence of the US Government, and Israel relies on that. So therefore, indirectly, they‘re undermining Israel; so therefore, they‘re ‗real‘ anti-Semites. It‘s really quite 3885 incredible.

Noam Chomsky & Gilbert Achar 2006 “Perilous Power: The Middle East and US Foreign Policy” p.201-202

3890 Professor Finkelstein also had this to say about Israel:

Finkelstein is a sharp critic of Israel and Israeli society in general. In a telephone interview with Today's Zaman, in 2009, Finkelstein stated that Israel was a "satanic" "terrorist" "insane" and "lunatic" state, and that "sometimes I feel that Israel has come 3895 out of the boils of the hell."

Norman Finkelstein. “Israel is committing a holocaust in Gaza”, Today's Zaman, 19 January 2009. 3900

So Professor Norman Finkelstien called the ―Jewish State‖:

• Satanic. • Terrorist. 3905 • Insane. • Lunatic.

The above is another year or so in jail according to the State of Western Australia. It would have been nice to be able to present Professor Finkelstein‘s ‗abhorrent views‘ to the jury. It would have also been 3910 nice to have him appear at my trial via video link.

Judge faces anti-Semitism probe after speech attacking Israel helps free arms factory protestors 3925 By Steve Doughty, Social Affairs Correspondent Last updated at 2:52 AM on 24th July 2010

A senior judge was under investigation yesterday after being accused of making antiSemitic remarks in court that may have swayed his jury into acquitting a group of 3930 protestors.

Judge George Bathurst-Norman was said by critics to have persuaded a jury to clear a group of campaigners who smashed up a factory making parts for Israeli war planes. 3935 Summing up in the criminal damage trial, he compared Israel to the Nazi regime and accused the country of ignoring international law.

The judge added that, ―there may be much to be admired‖, about the chief protestor, and that, ―in the last war he would probably have received a George Medal‖. 3940

The Office for Judicial Complaints, which deals with objections over the conduct of judges and magistrates, confirmed that an enquiry into how Judge Bathurst-Norman handled the trial of five political activists at Hove Crown Court in June is under way. 3945 It‘s findings will be considered by Lord Chief Justice Lord Judge and Lord Chancellor Kenneth Clarke, who have the final say on any disciplinary action.

A number of complaints are said to have accused the judge not just of anti-Israel rhetoric but specifically of anti-Semitism. 3950

The case involved a group of activists who broke into and vandalised a Brighton factory run by engineering firm EDO MBM.

The company was making parts for use in the bomb aiming equipment on Israeli F-16 3955 war planes.

The invasion shut the factory for a week and caused £187,000 worth of damage. But five men and women who appeared in court claimed they had done nothing wrong under criminal damage law. 3960

The law says someone is not guilty of causing damage if they believed it was necessary for the immediate protection of someone elses property. ... Several similar defences by protestors have been successful in recent years. 3965 ... Describing evidence shown in court, Judge Bathurst-Norman told the jury that he could only describe the ―horrific‖ events shown as, ―scenes which one would rather have hoped to have disappeared with the Nazi regimes of the last war‖. 3970 In his summing up, he gave his backing to his evidence of one defendant, Ornella Saibene, a former Greenham Common activist.

Page 69 of 235

The judge said, ―She took us through the horrors, and there is really no other word for it than horrors, that emerged in the press and on the news and the footage as to what the 3975 Israeli‘s were doing in Gaza.

You may think that perhaps ‗hell on earth‘ would be an understatement of what the Gazan‘s endured.‖ ... 3980

This is how a U.K judge saw things. What a contrast with local Perth District Court Judge Wisbey. 3985

Please consider all of these views and facts when considering my charges and the constant use of the term ―abhorrent views‖ by the DPP etc.

ALL of the above information was DIRECTLY relevant to my defence under the charge 80B - 3990 ‗conduct likely to racially harass‘, and the defence:

80G. Defences (1) It is a defence to a charge under section 78 or 80B to prove that the accused persons conduct was engaged in reasonably and in good faith - 3995 (b) in the course of any statement, publication, discussion or debate made or held, or any other conduct engaged in, for - (ii) any purpose that is in the public interest; and (c) in making or publishing a fair and accurate report or analysis of any event or matter of public interest.

MHR clear precedent…trying to prevent a crime is not criminal…so any actions to stop any illegal action e.g Israeli occupation, MUST qualify…

prosecutor Antony Eyers and the Western Australian Department of Public Prosecutions considered ‗abhorrent views‘ designed to ‗incite‘ and worthy of 3 years jail and hundreds of thousands of tax payers‘ dollars in court costs. Prosecutor Eyers pointed out these comments from my blog in particular – extremely serious section 77 charges: 4010

―1,500 Gazan‘s are dead, one million plus Iraqi‘s. We can only hope and pray that the international community strikes hard and makes sure that gaggle of Satan‘s children in occupied Palestine are brought to justice.‖ 4015 Transcript Page 626

―Fairly soon Jews will realise that people are thoroughly sick of them, their whining, their perpetual victimhood and their demands for people to bow down and worship their dodgy religion of Holocaustianity.‖ 4020

Transcript Page 630

―The Jew community could of at least made their lies and slander half believable, but I guess after years of inventive and over the top Holocaust memoirs they‘ve 4025 gotten lazy.‖

Transcript Page 632

―Former Ku Klux Clown lectures Aussies to stamp out racism. Unfortunately our 4030 former clown has never read the Talmud, so he forgot to mention Jews as the biggest racists of all.‖

Mr O‘Keefe has risked his life bringing humanitarian supplies to Gaza when Israeli Commando‘s boarded their ship in international waters. Eight of his fellow activists were murdered when they defended themselves against armed pirates65 with broomsticks and iron bars. MHR if THIS is ‘preventing a crime’ and ‘justifyable’ in international opinion / law…then compare this action to the brits who were let off, for similar reasons…if killing 8 people is ‘O.K’, why is saying words to a person NOT ? words worse than killing them?

In the Dutch weekly paper ―Elsevier‖ in September 2003, an Israeli military historian Mr Martin Levi Van Creveld stated that Israel had 200 nuclear weapons and some were aimed at European cities. He stated that if Europe pulled support for Israel they would, “Take the world down with us”. Yes, I kid you not - they are lunatics and I reserve the right to say it as often as possible.

the Nine Network outdid itself with a grossly defamatory hit piece done on me. Easily one of the worst in the country in recent memory.

63 All are major, mainstream media outlets. 64 That‘s ‗Jews‘. 65 Israeli Commando‘s.

Page 71 of 235

It was the local production of ‗A Current Affair‘. A ten minute segment where it was clearly 4090 imputated I was somehow affiliated with white supremacist groups and neo-Nazi‘s.

It was broadcast on the 26th May 2009, exactly one week after my May 19th 2009 appearance in the Magistrates court where I had plead not guilty. 4095 The most outrageous statement was that I had called for, ―All Jews to be wiped out.‖ Never have I stated publicly or privately such a thing. I have not even thought it. It was a complete fabrication, a criminally defamatory concoction, in my opinion as part of a concerted and co-ordinated plan between the Jewish Community, D.P.P and police to deprive me of general public support and pressure me into a guilty plea. 4100

The editor of the segment had also re-edited my video. Something I have NEVER seen done before in the media. He had not just ‗chopped‘ the video at a point for a good ‗sound bite‘ leaving the quote out of context - a common media tactic. The editor had in fact ‗overlayed‘ sound onto another part of the video covering over Mr Stanley Elliot Keyser stating in the video, ―Come on, you can film this one‖. I 4105 have never seen this done before.

When I complained to police I wanted the Nine Network charged with contempt of court they basically laughed at me. Detective Paini stated this sort of reporting was ―normal‖. He then added one week later that he had contacted the Nine Network and asked them to stop producing such material. I 4110 have not the slightest doubt Detective Paini was right in on this reporting. The Nine Networks relationship with the Western Australian police and D.P.P is legendary. Their vilification of Islam and Muslim‘s in general is also quite legendary over and above any other commercial network.

One week after I put these allegations on the record at a hearing before Acting Chief Judge Martino, 4115 the Nine Network axed the local production of ‗A Current Affair‘, quoting ―poor ratings‖ as the reason.

But not only the official media, Blogs were set up to vilify me and they repeated (and still do) that I had been stalking the Jewish community for ten years and threatened their kids and other members of 4120 it. The jury could have found these sites easily just by Googling my name. In fact many of them were top of the list on Google. This is important as it formed part of an overall co-ordinated campaign to end any chance of ordinary people supporting my case as a free expression issue.

This reporting by the Nine Network totally destroyed any faith I had in the Western Australian legal 4125 system. When I defend myself online after such a shocking defamation by a major media outlet I am charged 5 more times! I am threatened with contempt of court and criminal defamation! The Nine Network got away with murder and to this day I cannot find a lawyer to represent me in a defamation case against the Nine network.

On , Perthguy posted the following reply:

―And I have news for you. Hate crimes have taken place. This lunatic has threatened the lives of men, women and children in the Jewish community 4150 personally, by phone and email. On the very night he was charged he rang a Perth based Jewish centre and told them he was coming around to ‗finish them off‘. The centre, which was full of children, had to have a police guard. This is beyond harassment. This guy just hasn‘t made video‘s out of the blue in the background, like the media is making out. 4155 He‘s been assaulting and threatening to kill Jews, in person, by email and by telephone, for almost a decade.‖

Gedalia66 responded as follows: 4135

―I had a personal encounter with Brendon – not pleasant. He has physically threatened people and is quite capable of crazy actions.



.was posted all over the internet. Again, THIS is the reason why I put up my own Blog to defend myself from these ridiculous accusations that are clearly defamatory. I would never have received two years jail because of the Blog if police and the courts had taken my complaint 4185 seriously. Every time I would investigate having the media, blogs etc... charged with contempt of court, I was basically laughed at and told this is ―normal‖. That it‘s, ―just the way it is‖. The same people making these accusations are the same people from the Jewish community who told police that I had been stalking them for ten years and threatened to kill their children and also threatened females at a Israeli run stall in the Joondalup shopping centre. ALL, is and was, outright patent lies

So Mr Troy believes that, “there is clear authority that a favourable comment, such as an assertion 4235 that an accused is innocent, to the media during the course of a trial can amount to a contempt.” Well then, what about a ten minute segment on a state wide current affairs show where it is asserted I have stated I want to ―wipe out all Jews‖ and they even go so far as to re-edit the video I was arrested for by moving audio around. They then ―impute‖ and give the clear inference that I am somehow involved with ‗neo-nazi‘s‘ and ‗white supremacist‘ groups! But this is not ‗criminal defamation‘ 4240 and ‗contempt of court‘

what about if the ―mob‖ is all over the internet telling ridiculous lies about you? What about if a major news network has done it and no one 4300 gives a shit about it when you complain? Then, to add insult to injury, when I put up my own Blog with my own version of events I am charged again – 5 more times! It absolutely stinks. I seethe at it all.

How was I supposed to get witnesses to appear after this reporting? How was I to get expert witnesses 4305 to appear on my behalf? The fact is, THIS was the intended result of the Nine Networks reporting and the DPP and police was right in there with them - I have not forgotten the former Senior Prosecutor Mr Alan Troy and his boss Mr Robert Cock of the DPP.

I wrote this letter and sent it by fax to the Nine Network, Perth on 22nd of May 2012:

Attention: Nine Network News Director Perth, W.A 4355

From: Brendon Lee O‘Connell c/- Locked Bag 1 Kwinnana, W.A 6966 4360 **** ** **** - Mr Mark ******, Acting for myself.

Alternative Contact: P.O Box *** Mundaring, W.A 4365 6073 1) On May 26th 2009, your local production of ‗A Current Affair‘, hosted by Louise Momba, was aired in Perth. 2) A 10 (Ten) minute segment was aired in which your producer, reporter (Simon Bailey) did criminally defame me (Brendon Lee O‘Connell). 4370 3) Your reporter – Simon Baily – did state that I had verbalised wanting to, ―Wipe out all Jews‖. 4) At no time have I thought, stated or written, anywhere and at any time, the wish to, ―Wipe out all Jews‖. This was a fiction, a fabrication, invented by your production of ‗A Current Affair‘. 4375 5) Your segment did by way of imputation and inference lead a reasonable viewer to believe I was a member of, or shared the politico/racial ideology of neo-Nazi‘s and White Supremacist groups such as the Ku Klux Klan. 6) Your editor did re-edit the video for the specific purpose of quoting me out of context by cutting short the words, ―Your days are numbered‖, and also with deliberate and 4380

Page 76 of 235

calculated intent, re-edit the video I had produced by taking audio from another part of my video and laying it in a different location – 10 seconds previous – to cover over Mr Stanley Elliot Keyser saying, ―Come on, you can film this one‖, showing him clearly inviting me to film him despite claiming to police he was scared and intimidated. 7) By the totality of these actions, coming exactly one (1) week after I plead not guilty to 4385 charges of Racial Vilification in the Perth‘s Magistrates Court on May 19th 2009, you showed a clear intent to criminally defame me knowing that what you were doing was a false and deliberate fabrication of my character, politics, beliefs and intent when producing the video in question. 8) I put to you that the intent was to so defame me in the public‘s eye as a racist and man 4390 calling for mass murder, that I would lose all support in the public‘s eye as a free expression issue. 9) I put to you that you worked in conjunction with the police, d.p.p and Jewish Community leaders while producing your segment that criminally defamed me, to pressure me into an early guilty plea, and so avoid further publicity to my intent of 4395 calling the public‘s attention to Jewish racial and religious supremacism that underlies the criminal, racist apartheid state of Israel‘s war crimes committed against the people of Gaza during Operation Cast Lead. 10) Before issuing a Writ against your company and possibly individuals, I give you the chance to remedy the situation by correspondence with me and/or my associate Mr 4400 Mark ******. 11) Further, it is noted that in 2010, two days after I wrote via email to the Nine Networks lawyers Freehill‘s, Mr Adrian Beatty, news director for Nine Network Perth, resigned suddenly and it was reported in the West Australian paper, ―Staff Shocked At T.V News Chiefs Sudden Departure‖ by Angela Pownhall; ―Channel 9 Perth and WIN W.A‘s news 4405 director Adrian beatty abruptly left the station yesterday after a reportedly rocky relationship with WIN owner Bruce Gordon. Station staff said they were shocked about Beatties sudden departure...‖

Looking forward to your reply, 4410

Brendon O‘Connell

MHR Here is the proof the friends of Israel rally was arranged for Brendon O’Connell’s trial … don’t know why this article not mentioned elsewhere?

Friends of Israel WA launched in Perth...with astounding success | JWire August 8, 2010 by Henry Benjamin

1500 West Australians, including over 100 Federal and State Parliamentarians and 4455 community leaders converged on the Victory Life centre in Osborne Park to stand up and support Israel.

In May 2009, footage shot by 39-year-old Brendan O‘Connell sent waves of anguish throughout the cities 9000 strong Jewish community. 4460

O‘Connell, took his viewers on a trip across the Swan River to a demonstration in South Perth being held by the Friends of Palestine, protesting outside an IGA supermarket selling Israeli Jaffa oranges. O‘Connell told his ―viewers‖ that he was hoping to find some Jews67 at the scene...and he did. He videoed himself harassing two young Jewish 4465 men and creating an argumentative situation. He faces trial in Perth this month, in only the second case in WA invoking the racial vilification act. The Friends Of Palestine group distanced itself from O‘Connell.

Community leader Steve Lieblich told J-Wire: ―The Jewish community wanted to show 4470 support for Israel after O‘Connell had been charged and a group of us got together with one purpose in mind...to find support for Israel not just from the Jewish community but from all Australians. Today‘s event was the culmination of this initiative. Instead of the usual 300-4-- diehard Jewish supporters we got 1500 of which about 75% were not Jewish.‖ 4475

Steve Lieblich reports: The Centres main auditorium, which seats 800 was quickly filled to capacity, followed by the second overflow auditorium (linked by video to the proceedings), necessitating a third overflow room to set up in the Centres lobby. 4480 Attendances at the prelaunch seminar and book launch were also beyond expectation demonstrating a powerful bond between Western Australia and Israel.

The event was chaired by inaugural Chairman of the FOIWA, former State Minister Bob Kucera and Vice Chairman, former State Upper House member Ray Halligan. 4485 Apologies included Hon. Julie Bishop, Deputy leader of the Opposition but her statement of support was made by Ray Halligan.

Bob Kucera passionately expressed the importance of support for Israel as a ―friend in need‖ and urged everyone present to join the organisation and look forward to hearing 4490 quality speakers, seminars and being kept informed. Foreign Minister Stephen Smith reiterated Australia‘s support for Israel‘s right to live in peace and security, from the outset and across the political spectrum.

Customs urged all Australian‘s to support Israel, especially our leaders. Keenan delivered a message of support from Leader of the Opposition Tony Abbot.

Deputy Speaker of the State Legislative Assembly Michael Sutherland and Deputy State Opposition Leader Kate Doust are co-conveners of the State Parliamentary Friends of 4500 Israel. They spoke of their recent study tour of Israel and urged all West Australians to join the organization and help it work for peace. The meeting was addressed by Israeli Ambassador to Australia, Yuvel Rotem and through a video link by Israel‘s Deputy Foreign Minister, Danny Ayalon. Lieblich told J-Wire that O‘Connell was ranting outside the meeting and was moved on 4505 by police.

Comments:

Stanley Keyser68 says: 4510 August 11, 2010 11:21 am

When I was asked to run an educational session two hours before the launch of Friends of Israel W.A I thought I would be lucky if I got to speak in front of a crowd larger than 50 people. This was the furthest thing from the truth. By the time I started at 2pm there 4515 were over 400 people in the auditorium, at 2.30pm the main hall which I was speaking in was almost at capacity with over 700 people present. By the time the official launch had begun at 4pm there were over 1500 people at the Victory Life Centre. Our kind hosts had to open two extra over flow rooms. Being on stage and viewing these large numbers was incredibly uplifting and beautiful experience. For that I thank you. I thank 4520 the non-Jewish and Jewish communities for coming out in support of Israel, freedom and democracy. I just hope Friends of Israel W.A can go from strength to strength and continue demonstrating how wonderful Israel is to the wider Western Australian community. If you have not signed up to become a Friend Of Israel yet please head to .au 4525

MHR ‘run and educational session? He is a teacher? Educator? THAT is why he was invited? NOT in connection with Brendon O’Connell’s trial? Come on…

WA leaders join forces to rally for Israel Daniel Mercer August 4th 2010

Prominent West Australians have cast aside their political differences and joined 4540 forces to voice their support for Israel and the role of democracy in the Middle East.

The Friends of Israel WA group, which will be chaired by former police minister Bob Kucera and include deputy Federal Opposition leader Julie Bishop and State Labor MP Kate Doust, will be launched on Sunday. 4545

Israel‘s Ambassador to Australia, Yuval Rotem, is expected to attend.

Mr Kucera said the group aimed to advance Israel‘s right to exist as a recognised Jewish state, supported it‘s right to defend itself and encourage accurate and fair 4550 reporting on issues in the Middle East.

Jewish Community Council of WA public affairs director Steve Leiblich said the organisation was being set up partly in response to what he called a campaign by some elements of the Western Australian media and academia to delegitimise and 4555 vilify Israel.69

He was not surprised by the bipartisan support for the group from both sides of Australian politics, saying the issues confronting Israel transcended the ―finer points‖ of political debate between the major parties. 4560

―The bond between Israel and Australia is extremely strong and deep and goes back a very long way,‖ he said.

―It comes down to common, shared values with respect to freedom of the individual, 4565 respect for human life, democracy, orderly transition of power by the people – all of these things are common to the Judeo-Christian ethic and the basic values of Australian society.‖

Please note that last paragraph Dr Walsh. With all I have indicated to you on Jewish racial and 4570 religious supremacism, I‘m sure you can find this at least amusing. Note also that when the Palestinian‘s on the Gaza Strip had a ‗democratic vote‘, and Hamas won, the U.S and Israel withheld taxes ($200 million worth) in an attempt to intimidate the Gazan‘s into getting rid of Hamas and putting in place the more co-operative Fatah leadership. So much for: 4575 ―It comes down to common, shared values with respect to freedom of the individual, respect for human life, democracy, orderly transition of power by the people – all of these things are common to the Judeo-Christian ethic and the basic values of Australian society.‖

MATTHEW 23:33 4595 ―You snakes! You brood of vipers! How will you escape being condemned to hell?

SERVE THE JEWS OR DIE?

– has weighed in on the current debate on new legislation related to W.A racial vilification legislation. It is centred on the argument that speech which merely ―offends‖ should not be made unlawful. This has particular relevance to section 80B of the legislation under which I was charged:

80B. Conduct likely to racially harass 4615 Any person who engages in any conduct, otherwise than in private, that is likely to harass a racial group, or a person as a member of a racial group, is guilty of a crime and is liable to imprisonment for 3 years. Summary conviction penalty: imprisonment for 12 months and a fine of $12 000. [Section 80B inserted by No.80 of 2004 s.6; amended by No. 70 of 2004 s.38(2).] 4620

Here are some extracts from the former Chief Justice and now Chairman of the ABC James Spigelman:

Human Rights Day Oration – delivered by the Honourable James 4625 Spigelman AC QC

The Human Rights Day oration was delivered by James Spigelman, Chairman of the ABC and former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of NSW from 1998 until 2011. His keynote speech tackled the topical issue of ‗Where do we draw the line between hate 4630 speech and free speech?‘

I wish to discuss the boundary between hate speech, a significant factor in social inclusion, and free speech, perhaps the most fundamental human right underpinning participation in public life.

The key criticism was directed to the fact that the section made speech which merely ―offends‖ unlawful.

Professor Waldron‘s hate speech book… I do not believe that it should be the aim of these laws to prevent people from being offended. Protecting people‘s feelings against offense is not an appropriate objective of the law. 4690 To protect people from offense or from being offended is to protect them from a certain sort of effect on their feelings. And that is different from protecting their dignity and the assurance of their decent treatment in society.‖[7]…

The freedom to offend is an integral component of freedom of speech. There is no right not to be offended.

Stanley Keysers comments on his deep hurt and how offended he was:

Mr Eyers: And as – as matters continued – as the engagement continued, how – how did you feel as a result of this engagement and the way Mr O‘Connell was 4745 speaking and behaving?---Well, I felt very – like, very threatened71 and – and I guess I got quite emotional, because it was – you know, someone‘s – I‘ve – I‘ve brought up – my whole life been taught that I must be proud of who I am and that being Jewish is – is a great thing. That‘s my culture and my heritage72. And there‘s someone in front of me telling me that I‘m – I come from a people who – 4750 who love to torture73 and – and commit genocide and – and I come from a religion of 2,000 years of hate. And that‘s definitely not what – what I know and what I‘ve been taught. I‘ve been taught that my religion is – is – is a religion of – of peace and tolerance. 4755 Mr Eyers: Were these – were these comments – did you find them upsetting?--Yeah, very much so.

Transcript 17/01/2011 Page 291

4760 Yes, he‘s deeply hurt here ϑ Note...‖a religion of peace and tolerance‖. Now that is funny. Obviously he‘s never read the Old Testament and Babylonian Talmud and Shulkan Aruk. That‘s actually a very funny statement. Please refer to page 58 of this letter for the list of ―peace and tolerance‖ statements from Judaism‘s holiest of book.

At no time did I accuse him or Jews of ―loving to torture‖. He‘s made that one up himself. Perhaps a guilty mind?

I am now cross examining Keyser and asking what he did with the photo‘s he took:

Accused: What did you do with them?---They were not used at all. I was gonna - - - 4770 Not at all?---My plan was to write an article for the Jewish newspaper, The Maccabean, and the intent of it was to say that – cos a lot of Jews in the community get very upset and worked up that there‘re these friends of Palestine protests and they think – a lot of people in the community see that that – see that these people are – they think they‘re anti-Semitic and attacking Jewish people 4775 and the intent –after we saw what was going on, I was gonna write an article and actually explain that these people were not anti-Semitic, not Brendon, but the people that were there were not anti-Semitic and they were merely there protesting for the Palestinian cause. That was – that was the intent of the article I was gonna write. 4780

A good hearted soul, you – oh my – that‘s wonderful.

Accused: So did you – I remember on at least four occasions in that video; and we‘ll go back over it once I‘m set up; all my computer, tomorrow and the next day. Under duress, of course. You say on four separate occasions in that video; and I‘ve watched it 1,000 times, ―What you‘re doing is disgusting‖. You seem to be saying to the jury you‘re just there wanting to be friends. You said, ―What 4795 you‘re doing is disgusting‖. The Friends of – friends of – Friends of Palestine were there to protest the slaughter of 1,500, mostly women and children and innocent bystanders, in an 8 kilometre by 20 kilometre cage in Gaza. And you said, ―What you‘re doing is disgusting‖. You seem to be inferring to the jury – imputing that you were just there to be nice. I put to you that‘s a load of garbage. 4800 You were there to entrap people and photograph Palestinian activists to send it back to Israel so their families could be intimidated, so they would shut up and stop protesting the slaughter of their friends and family. True or false?---I don‘t know what you‘re – you‘re – I don‘t – you haven‘t asked me - - - 4805 Transcript 17/01/2011 Page 297

Keyser knew the legislation despite claiming he had never read it. He knew exactly what he was doing. 4810 I find the whole debate around separating ―hate speech‖ from ―freedom of speech‖ disturbing. Professor Noam Chomsky of M.I.T makes this simple observation on the Freedom of Speech debate:

“There are two views you can have on freedom of speech. You can be either for it, or against it. You can‟t say you are for this speech, but not that speech, and say you 4815 support freedom of speech.”

Remember, it was the Soviet State that first introduced this kind of 4820 ―hate speech‖ legislation for the specific task of protecting Jews who were instigating the violent revolution and persecuting Christians.

The United States has the right idea – free speech...period. If a person crosses a line where the relevant criminal code is enacted then he or she can be charged with: 4825

• Disorderly conduct. • Disturbing the peace. • Threats to kill. • Threats to harm. 4830 • Trespass. • Conspiracy to commit... • Incitement

All of the above are available to the State right now. Racial Vilification legislation is merely a 4835 convenient and easy track to take when the moment suites.

There is nothing so noble as the fulfilment of a promise.ere is nothing so noble as the fulfilment of a promise, and breach of promise is an act against God

Know the dire consequences which follow from the breaking of covenants. So never make excuses in discharging your responsibilities and never break a promise, nor cheat your enemy, for 13595 breach of promise is an act against God

So, do not make any such promise which you cannot fulfil

Never execute a pact open to interpretations, but once it is executed, don‘t exploit 13605 equivocation, if an

Of all the ruses to undo good deeds of pious men, Satan relies most upon praise and flattery.

Breach of promise annoys God and man alike. God, the Most Exalted, says in the Qur‘an: “God is much displeased if you do not act upon what you say”.

Some say, and I do tend to agree (at least anecdotally), the entire debate and process of limiting peoples freedom of expression is being led by Jews for the express purpose of deflecting, inhibiting and challenging those who raise issues of Jewish power in the world. And they do wield great power 4840 as a group, without doubt. However, it appears to even ‗whisper‘ this is to invite the claim of ―abhorrent views‖.

On the issue of Jews leading the way on limiting freedom of speech, Barbara Spectre, leading exponent of multiculturalism (and Jewish) stated on a recent documentary that [paraphrasing], “Jews 4845 are leading the way to multiculturalism. Europe just hasn‟t learnt to be multi-cultural yet but they will. Meanwhile, Jews will be the targets of a lot of animosity because of their leading roles in this.” I like the way Jews are leading figures in making the world ―multicultural‖ while Israel stands alone as a ―Jewish state‖ and the word ‗Jew‘ apparently denotes a racial group – hence Israel is a racist apartheid state with a vast segment of its population (Israeli Muslims/Christians) treated as second 4850 class citizens. They can‘t have it both ways. Professor Shlomo Sand (Israeli/Jewish Academic) writes about this:

―And now the last, perhaps the hardest question of them all: To what extent is the Jewish Israeli society willing to discard the deeply embedded image of the ―chosen 4855 people‖, and cease isolating itself in the name of a fanciful history or dubious biology and excluding the ―other‖ from its midst‘s?‖

Professor Shlomo Sand 2008 “The Invention Of The Jewish People” p.313 Verso

Even the Hansard of the debate surrounding W.A‘s racial vilification bill bore this out as the 4865 Honourable Peter Foss noted that Mr Doron Ur of the local Perth Jewish community was a leading figure in pushing for the relevant legislation I‘m charged under. Peter Foss also noted that Mr Ur would also be one of the first people to be charged under sections of the legislation due to the publication of his Zionist magazine. See page 24 of this letter. 4870 The ultimate legal move and goal is towards ―group defamation‖ based on ―group identity‖ which comes out of the Professor Andrew Markus testimony discussed later in this letter. Anyone can have a ―group identity‖, especially politicians. Stalin would love it. It all ties in with the online ―bullying‖ debate that is raging right now. It is media contrived and is bursting with a larger, long term objective tied in with limiting freedom of speech and severely curtailing the flow of information over the 4875 internet that is proving uncomfortable for some ―groups‖ on the planet with a drive for power and domination.

The problems with vilification legislation Bill Muehlenberg – posted Wednesday, 7 September 2005.

When the Victorian legislation was first debated, the government received 5,500 submissions on the issue, with almost all of them against it. 4925 And the Victorian opposition received 10,000 letters and emails, with nearly all of them unhappy with the Bill. In spite of this huge outcry by the community, a handful of politicians, influenced by a handful of minority activists, foisted this unpopular and unnecessary law upon all Victorians. So much for democracy at work. Muslims and Jews driving the laws, not public opinion.

Most Western nations and states already have legislation on the books that makes certain activities illegal, be it assault, incitement to violence, defamation, slander or libel. All serious activities that do warrant political and 4940 legal sanction are already covered. So why the need for these extra laws, unless there is an attempt to promote someone‘s agenda, or to engage in social engineering and manipulation?

When State authorities make decisions on questions of political and religious truth, we have then moved away f4rom democracy and into tyranny.

The answer to bad speech is not shutting speech down. It is rebutting it with good speech.



High price to pay in defence of free speech Have we become so politically correct that we can‘t separate racism from stupidity? 2nd February 2011 WEST AUSTRALIAN NEWSPAPER 5080 Make sense of this. Someone reacts to words said in a Perth nightclub and slashes the offenders face open with a broken glass. Court penalty: 18 months jail. Another person reacts to words said outside a South Perth supermarket and gives the offender a nasty racist spray, which he later posts triumphantly on the internet. Court penalty: three years jail. 5085 Is that balanced justice?

Justice Wisbey, labelling O‘Connell an ―intelligent man with an irrational hatred of Jewish people,‖ said the only appropriate form of punishment would be an immediate term of ―severe‖ imprisonment and‘ strangely, that he was sending a message to people who 5095 might share the convicted man‘s views.

MHR whole point was that Brendon was NEVER given a chance to explain his RATIONAL reasons i.e witnesses, present evidence…this was reason for preventing him doing so, not helping him arrange witnesses…then he would have been an intelligent man with valid / rational reasons to hate ‘jews’…like Keyser appeared to be from his actions and statements…!!!

Mr Peach 19 told the court he was ―angry‖, ―confused‖ and ―offended‖ by O‘Connell when he started to film the two Jewish men and argue with them about their religion. What should a Jew expect at an anti-Israel protest?

MHR the journalist ‘nailed it’ with that reflection !!!

When I debated the issue on air with Steve Lieblich, the director of public affairs for the 5125 Jewish Community Council of WA, he said O‘Connell should have drawn a distinction between the Jewish religion and the State of Israel. Paul Murray presents the morning program on 882 6PR

Racist homicidal maniac ??? Where is the distinction? The origin story is EXACTLY THAT and it is the origin story for the religion and the state of Israel, and the actual reason Brendon was upset i.e current Israeli behavior very ‘Old Testament… so this is mere obfuscative non-sequitur self-cancelling specious sophistry

The then Minister of Corrective Services (Terry Redman) telling prison staff to harass my ability to prepare for the appeal by limiting access to computers and photocopiers.

WHEN POLITICAL DEBATE TURNS HATEFUL WA NEWSPAPER February 4th 2011 It is beyond my comprehension that someone like Paul Murray cannot see the difference 5210 between legitimate political debate and vile, hateful anti-Semitism. I am not quite sure what point Mr Murray is trying to make in his opinion piece (High price to pay in defence of free speech, 2/2). Is it that words don‘t make a difference? That would be strange coming from a journalist. Is it that it is OK to make threats against entire communities in WA? 5215 It is perhaps that Murray thinks that being a racist is acceptable as long as there are lots of other racists too? I am not really sure about Murray‘s intentions but I do know that I am lucky to live in a country where the freedom to practise my own religion is protected and where I cannot be persecuted for the colour of my skin. 5220 Brendon O‘Connell was not jailed for participating in a pointless and immoral protest. If that was the case then all the other ―useful idiots‖ at the friends of Palestine protest would have been jailed too. If Murray had used his journalistic skills to undertake any research then he would see that O‘Connell has a history of intimidating Jews and of inciting others to hatred through 5225 his YouTube channel and blogs. By the way Paul, there is no ―Jewish lobby‖. Perhaps you heard about that fictional organization once from someone who was inciting hatred. Navit Shchigel, Noranda

MHR Any time you start thinking maybe someone went too far in what they said, you read some garbage like the above, and you are speechless again…how obvious do jews have to be that they are lying, and deceiving, and WHAT are they covering up? If there was NOTHING TO COVER UP they would NEVER tell such blatant lies…so they just motivate us to get back to work !!!

SENTENCE RIDICULOUS WA NEWSPAPER February 4th 2011 Paul Murray was correct in his views on the ridiculous sentence given to Brendon O‘Connell. The two Jewish people who went to the demonstration should have expected some sort of tongue-lashing, considering the reason for the demonstration was an objection 5275 against Israel. If you think I may get three years jail for this letter, please don‘t publish. Rosanna A. Bunting, Spearwood

Muslims do not have the protection of Racial Vilification laws as do Jews ????

Roxon orders law rethink Canberra WEST AUSTRALIAN PAPER 1st February 2013 5480

Page 95 of 235

Attorney-General Nicola Roxon has sent a proposed overhaul of anti-discrimination laws back to the drawing board and wants a controversial section dumped. Department officials are reworking the contentious draft and will remove a controversial section prohibiting conduct that offends, insults or intimidates. Ms Roxon said officials from her department would present a series of new options to 5485 the parliamentary inquiry examining the Bill. Asked why the section was put in the draft in the first place, Ms Roxon said it was an attempt by the drafters to consolidate existing laws and take court decisions into account. She denied the wording was clumsy. ―It‘s a difficult job when you‘re putting pieces of legislation into one,‖ Ms Roxon told 5490 ABC radio. ―I don‘t think this attempt was successful.‖ The controversial section has been described as an attack on free speech by the Opposition and legal and human rights experts. The draft legislation is designed to amalgamate five statutes covering age, disability, race, sex and other forms of discrimination into a single statute. 5495

Well then, this is good news:

• “Department officials are reworking the contentious draft and will remove a controversial section prohibiting conduct that offends, insults or intimidates.” 5500

I guess that ends Section 80B of the ‗racial vilification‘ legislation in this State, does it not?

80B. Conduct likely to racially harass Any person who engages in any conduct, otherwise than in private, that is likely 5505 to harass a racial group, or a person as a member of a racial group, is guilty of a crime and is liable to imprisonment for 3 years. Summary conviction penalty: imprisonment for 12 months and a fine of $12 000. [Section 80B inserted by No.80 of 2004 s.6; amended by No. 70 of 2004 s.38(2).]

I received 1 year‘s jail for apparently ―offending‖ and ―intimidating‖ Mr Stanley Elliot Keyser by calling him:

• A racist Jew • You have a religion of racism, hate, homicide and ethnic cleansing 5515 • You are anti-Goy • You are a bunch of racist homicidal maniacs

...at a political rally that he attended of his own free will. He took photos of people and intimidated them and agitated quite deliberately. He lied to protestors. He invites me to film him. He stood his 5520 ground and argued vigorously. He then ran immediately to police - before the video was ever online - and complained he had been ―vilified‖.

Benjamin Franklin said in 1775: ―They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety‖. MHR That is the definitive quote for ‘The Patriot Act’ etc…

[G] Hansard of Debate – W.A Racial Vilification Legislation

―This legislation is atrociously drawn up. It will not achieve what it is intended to 5615 achieve, although I am not sure what the intent is. The Government has introduced the legislation and I do not believe there has been any consultation with the general public. I believe this legislation has been brought on as a red herring. From the people I have spoken to, I believe that this legislation will do the Government a great deal of harm. It represents without doubt, a los of freedom of speech and a loss of freedom of knowledge. 5620 ... I believe these laws will increase problems. The whole of the legislation will be thrown out. It is absolutely pathetic. I cannot emphasise enough that this is probably some of the worst legislation I have read.‖ Hon John Fischer. Extract from Hansard 5625 [COUNCIL - Tuesday, 30 November 2004] p8806b-8810a

The most obvious feature of this rights discourse is its unremitting focus on the rights of minorities. New constitutionalists are relatively uninterested in the rights of common or 5630 garden Australians to live dull, secure lives in dull, secure suburbs, unmolested alike by burglars and intrusive governmental gate crashers. They are transfixed, however, by the rights of minority groups: indigenous people, ethnic minorities, sexual and gender groupings though not (of course) by the rights of unfashionable minorities such as conservative religious groups or right wing nutters. New constitutionalists argue, with 5635 obvious force, that it is the rights of minorities that most need protection. But there is more than necessity at work here. Page.88 Greg Craven, „Conversations With The Constitution: Not Just A Piece Of Paper‟. UNSW PRESS. 5640

One of the great supporters of the legislation was Mr Doron Ur, who was a leading figure in the Jewish community in this State. I am not sure whether he is still alive. He was certainly an elderly gentleman in 1990. He wrote a Zionist magazine that he distributed quite widely in the Jewish community. During the course of his evidence to 5645 the committee, he very kindly gave us a few copies of the magazine. We flicked through those, and it became quite clear that if an amendment of that type was drafted, he would be a prime candidate for prosecution. Anybody who has read Zionist magazines will know that they state fairly unequivocally what should happen to the Palestinians, and it is not nice. I believe it is a well-known problem. Certainly, there would be real 5650 difficulties if we tried to suppress those sort of publications. They probably do not add a lot to the quietness and good order of Western Australia, but if we tried to suppress them, I suspect we would have even bigger problems. Hon Peter Foss. Extract From Hansard [COUNCIL - Tuesday, 30 November 2004] 5655 p8818c-8834a

Anti-Semitism was branded as being counter-revolutionary in nature, and persons participating in pogroms or instigating them were outlawed (by a special decree issued by the Council of Commissars in July of 1918, signed and personally amended by Lenin 5660 to sharpen its tone). A statement against anti-Semitism made by Lenin in March 1919 was one of the rare occasions on which his voice was put on a phonograph record, to be used in a mass campaign against the counter-revolutionary incitement against the Jews. The regime made every effort to denounce the pogroms and punish the persons taking part in them, even when they were Red Army personnel. When the civil war came to an 5665 end, a law was passed against “incitement to hatred and hostility of a national or religious nature,” which in effect, also applied to anti-Semitism, including the use of the pejorative Zhid. Encyclopedia Judaica, Volume 5 Produced and printed in Jerusalem, Israel 5670 Library of Congress Catalogue Card Number 72 9075

Section 77 was specifically mentioned as being enacted to deal with people like Jack van Tongeren 5705 and the ANM. It enabled a 14 year prison sentence for ―inciting‖ others to racial animosity:

77. Conduct intended to incite racial animosity or racist harassment Any person who engages in any conduct, otherwise than in private, by which the person intends to create, promote or increase animosity towards, or harassment 5710 of, a racial group, or a person as a member of a racial group, is guilty of a crime and is liable to imprisonment for 14 years. Alternative offence: s. 78, 80A or 80B. [Section 77 inserted by No. 80 of 2004 s. 6; amended by No. 70 of 2004 s. 38(3).]

let me now quote the words that were said to be so offending they must come under section 77 and subsequently send me to jail 5755 for 2 of the 3 years total. These next 5 paragraphs were highlighted by prosecutor Mr Antony Eyers with much ‗gusto‘. Taken from my Blog which I put up after I was vilified in the local Press:

―1,500 Gazan‘s are dead, one million plus Iraqi‘s. We can only hope and pray that the international community strikes hard and makes sure that gaggle of 5760 Satan‘s children in occupied Palestine are brought to justice.‖

Transcript Page 626

Professor Norman Finkelstien and his attitude to the Israeli State and its actions over many years, taken from page 53 of this letter:

• ...‖but I think that Hezbollah represents the hope. They are fighting to defend their homeland, they are fighting to defend the independence of their country, they are 5790 defending themselves against foreign marauders, vandals and murderers and I consider it to be genuinely to be an honour to be in their presence.‖

Imagine if I had said such glowing statements about Hezbollah? Maybe I would be up on terrorism charges? I agree with Professor Finkelstein‘s assessment of Hezbollah. I admire their leader Hasan 5795 Nezrallah immensely. Professor Noam Chomsky has also met the leader of Hezbollah - but you can‘t mention that in the mainstream press.

Professor Finkelstein has also called the ―Jewish State‖80: 5800 • Satanic. • Terrorist. • Insane. • Lunatic. • ...Israel has come out of the boils of hell. 5805

I would love to see Professor Finkelstien come to Australia to lecture. I wonder if he would get in?

Onto the next comment that was so upsetting to prosecutor Eyers: 5810 ―Fairly soon Jews will realise that people are thoroughly sick of them, their whining, their perpetual victimhood and their demands for people to bow down and worship their dodgy religion of Holocaustianity.‖

Transcript Page 630

Norman Finkelstein. “Israel is committing a holocaust in Gaza”, Today's Zaman, 19 January 2009.

I tried very hard to explain to Mr Eyers that to make an alleged historical event a ―dogma‖ from which you cannot deviate - risking career and financial ruin if you do - makes that a ―religion‖ - by definition. Just like if you ―denied‖ the resurrection of Jesus, the Catholic Church might invite you to a ―barbecue‖ in your honour in the bad old days. He tried to say at trial that calling the persecution of 5820 European Jewry ―Holocaustianity‖, I was minimising the event and questioning the facts surrounding it81. I had to correct him repeatedly that was not the case. I was questioning making a historical event a religious event from which ‗heretics‘ may not deviate under threat of persecution. Let us, in the next paragraph go over some of that ‗persecution‘.

80 Page 55 of this letter: Norman Finkelstein. “Israel is committing a holocaust in Gaza”, Today's Zaman, 19 January 2009. 81 This shows that even smart people like Mr Eyers are stupid when it comes to notions of free expression and questioning history. I don‘t need to apologise for expressing doubt about the HolocaustTM narrative.

Page 101 of 235

5825

• Ernst Zundel questioned aspects of the official HolocaustTM narrative in a pamphlet titled ―Did 6 Million Really Die?‖ He was taken to court twice in Canada on this issue. He won both times. Married to a U.S citizen and living in the U.S legally, he was suddenly transferred to a U.S prison and held for a year before being extradited to Germany to face charges of “Defaming the Memory of the Dead”. He spent six 5830 years in jail in total...for ―questioning history‖ in a polite pamphlet.

• Professor Faurisson in France - an expert in documents - published material that exposed many of the documents alleged to show a planned industrial scale extermination of European Jewry as bad forgeries. For this he has been beaten 5835 (badly), publicly humiliated, issued death threats and hounded daily.

• Fred Leuchter JNR was in charge of all execution equipment in the United States. He built it, he repaired it. Ernst Zundel used Leuchter to gather evidence that rooms at Auschwitz allegedly used to gas concentration camp inmates were never used for 5840 such purposes. He showed clearly, by a thorough examination of the buildings and testing of their walls, that they were never used for such purposes. For his exacting analysis he was rewarded with job loss, death threats and intimidation.

• Dr. Germar Rudolf was a chemist at the prestigious ‗Max Plank Institute‘ in 5845 Germany. He verified Fred Leuchter‘s work on samples from rooms allegedly used as gas chambers. He found that Leuchter‘s work was valid and the tests were correct - there was no cyanide residue in any of the rooms alleged to have been used to gas concentration camp inmates. For his work he was rewarded with job loss and sent to prison for three years for “Defaming the Memory of the Dead” under Section 130 of 5850 the German Penal Code. When his lawyer tried to defend him - ―too vigorously‖ - she was sent to jail for a year for raising the issue of whether what Dr Rudolf had reported was the ‗truth‘. You can‘t make this stuff up Dr Walsh. It‘s so bad it‘s funny. Comrade Stalin would be beaming ϑ 5855 • A New Zealand academic questioned HolocaustTM dogma in an academic paper using excellent evidentiary material. His name escapes me. He was hounded out of his job at the University and attempted suicide. Under extreme pressure he ‗recanted‘. He now teaches at the Royal Military College in England. He learnt his lesson ϑ 5860

• David Cole is a Jewish man who produced an excellent video called ―The Truth Behind the Gates of Auschwitz‖. In it he exposes the ridiculous logic and outright impossibility of the official HolocaustTM narrative. He appeared on the ‗Phil Donahue Show‘ in the U.S. Again, he was hounded, harassed and issued death 5865 threats. He made a paragraph statement where he recanted his views based on his research. He is still alive as far as we know but has disappeared from public life. His video is available online.

• Dr Frederick Toben is a PHD in Philosophy and has a master‘s in Education. He 5870 questioned the official HolocaustTM narrative on both his website - ‗The Adelaide Institute‘ - and in a video production called . Again, hounded in the courts, harassed, arrested in three countries and jailed in three countries and forced into bankruptcy. Recently, he prepared a submission to the parliamentary debate on Australia‘s new Human Rights Act and out of 600 submissions his was the only one 5875 to be made ―confidential‖ and not available to the general public.

The above but are a few who have dared to speak out. There are many more.

More of my comments that are regarded as ―incitement‖: 5880

Page 102 of 235

―The Jew community could of at least made their lies and slander half believable, but I guess after years of inventive and over the top Holocaust memoirs they‘ve gotten lazy.‖ 5885

Transcript Page 632

If I had a dollar for every ‗fake‘ HolocaustTM memoir released to ‗rave reviews‘, I would have enough money to buy a nice café meal with latte and after dinner mint thrown in. Pretending to be a 5890 ‗HolocaustTM survivor‘ and writing an unreliable memoir (Clive James style), or outright faking out of thin air a survivor story, has become a cottage industry. It has tapered off somewhat after some very high profile outings. There have been hundreds of them over the years.

My favourite was a man who appeared on Oprah with a ‗love story‘ in 2011. He wrote that he met a 5895 young woman in the camps and daily threw her an apple over the barbed wire. Miraculously they both survived and they met again in America and married. They were ‗weeping in the aisles‘ when he recounted his story on Oprah. Then he was outed as a complete fake. None of it was true. He returned to Oprah to explain himself - most thought he would of course be apologising but he didn‘t. Instead he stated that the story was ―true in his head‖ so it was technically true. This is a common occurrence. 5900

Let me quote a little from my favourite Professor Finkelstien from page 53 of this letter and his book „The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering‟:

• Finkelstein argues that Elie Wiesel and others exploit the memory of the Holocaust as an 5905 "ideological weapon." This is so the state of Israel, "one of the world's most formidable military powers, with a horrendous human rights record, [can] cast itself as a victim state" in order to garner "immunity to criticism.‖ • He also alleges what he calls a "double shakedown" by "a repellent gang of plutocrats, hoodlums and hucksters" seeking enormous legal damages and financial settlements from 5910 Germany and Switzerland... • Raul Hilberg, widely regarded as the founder of Holocaust studies, ... Asked on another occasion if Finkelstein's analysis might play into the hands of neo-Nazis for anti-semitic purposes, Hilberg replied: 'Well, even if they do use it in that fashion, I'm afraid that when it comes to the truth, it has to be said openly, without regard to any consequences that would be 5915 undesirable, embarrassing.‘

Enough said, I guess. Remember, this is an eminent Professor. Highly respected who is best friends with arguably the most celebrated and famous Jewish Professor in the world - Professor Noam Chomsky. Hope he doesn‘t get a court date with Mr Eyers and the W.A DPP. 5920

My offensive and ―inciting‖ comments continue:

―Former Ku Klux Clown lectures Aussies to stamp out racism. Unfortunately our former clown has never read the Talmud, so he forgot to mention Jews as the 5925 biggest racists of all.‖

Transcript p.633

With regards the above statement written on my Blog, I will simply refer you Dr Walsh back to the 5930 background submissions for this synopsis:

• [v] Zionists Control United States Foreign and Domestic Policy - page 26 • [vi] Jewish Founding Of The Soviet State and Use Of „Sayanims‟ In Past - page 29 • [B] Clear Western Australian Establishment Position To Stifle Knowledge In The Public Interest 5935 (Jewish Racial and Religious Supremacism)- page 36

Page 103 of 235

―Jews‖ are indeed, as a group, based on their holiest books and public statements from their secular and religious leadership, the ―biggest racists‖ of all. Without doubt. 5940 I hope that puts some of my statements in perspective. I hope it underlies the fact that it was wrong to charge me under section 77 of the legislation. Let me again quote from the Hansard on this point of section 77 being designed to prevent the rise of the National Socialist party and people out to kill Jews:

It has been said that the intention of the legislation is to prevent the types of crimes that occurred against a group of people under Hitler in Nazi Germany…the Government in Germany did at that time, and it did so by standing and saying that it would legislate to protect people that deserved to be protected… the Reichstag thought they were acting with the best of intentions …*why ludicrous? Only to ignorant brainwashed fools !!! Extract from Hansard [COUNCIL - Tuesday, 30 November 2004] p8806b-8810a

MHR THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT IT IS DESIGNED TO DO…TO STOP PEOPLE WAKING UP AND DEFENING THEMSELVES…THERE WAS NO HOLOCAUST, JUST LABOR CAMPS IN WHICH THOUSANDS DIED, OFTEN DUE TO ALLIED BOMBING ATTACKS CUTTING SUPPLY LINES, AND DIRECTLY BOMBING AND MACHINE GUNNING KZ HOSPITALS ETC…ALL DOCUMENTED AND PROVABLE…SO FACT IS THAT THE LAWS ARE TRYING TO STOP NATIONAL SOCIALIST STYLED SELF DEFENCE OF NATURAL SELF INTEREST, NATIONAL INTEREST ETC…

The most serious counts - 2 & 3 - I believe, were me stating on the DVD: “Your days are numbered”, referring to Jews who support the dominant repulsive sect of Judaism known as ‗Rabbinic Pharisaic Judaism‘ and you are now aware Dr Walsh of just how sick and repulsive are its teachings and tenants from previously in this letter. The statement of putting Jews, “in camps with the rest of them,” forms part of that same count. Just as there were de-Nazification camps set up after the second world war to de-programme Germans imbued with a sense of racial and national superiority; there will need to be camps set up for Jews. These camps set up for Germans were pleasant and well run and taught Germans who were deemed in

82 I‘ve just gone over them.

Page 104 of 235

need of ‗de-programming‘ that they were not ―the master race‖ and returned them to the notion of 5995 parliamentary representative democracy instead of dictatorship. I have no doubt the millions of adherents of Orthodox Judaism and its basic tenants will need much therapy and intensive supervision to cure them of years of brainwashing and imbued hatred. It will be no easy task but if we love them (Jews), we will seek to curb this abhorrent and ancient religious cult and the personal beliefs it imbues in the interests of public safety and the good order of the State. I hope this explains somewhat what I 6000 meant and the context. I apologise to Jews who do not adhere to this set of beliefs.

I have taken a fairly moderate approach. I could of taken the approach of the great man of history and conscience, Dr Martin Luther, who didn‘t just write a thesis or two and pamphlets on corruption and bad practices within the Catholic Church, he also wrote a book called ―On the Jews and Their Lies‖. After learning ancient Hebrew (Luther was a gifted academic) and reading the Babylonian Talmud, he 6010 was so outraged he called for Jews to be expelled from the country and their Synagogues burnt down.

It is as clear as crystal that my views have ALWAYS centred on Jewish BEHAVOUR based on their religious teachings and in particular Jewish behaviour in Israel. Jews are 6020 not a vulnerable minority group, they are a world power.

MHR that is the point…the laws prove jewish power, but are pretended to reflect jewish minority vulnerability, and need for protection…the laws used to institutionalise their dogma / lies / stories / myths e.g holocaust, 911 Muslims, U.S.S Liberty a mistake, jews don’t control world etc…jews nice…not planning to take total control of world…even though their ‘mission’ and ‘definition as a group’ is based on this assumption…they are ‘divine’, the best goy COULD never be as divine as a simple average Jew…as if ethics / morality / laws jewish invention…foundation of western values? Wtf ???

Toben case, holocaust denial is ‘affront’ ? i.e ‘likely to ‘offend’ jews? Well they are likely to ACT offended…like a criminal ‘accused’ of a crime i.e forgery, fakery of history, fraud, biggest ‘emotional blackmail’ of all time…’how dare you accuse of me of …. Typical first response when guilty person accused ‘I’m terribly offended, how dare you… etc…

this offence, ―It is only a matter of time before they are going to do something here.‖ The ―they‖ can only be read as people of the Jewish race and what they‘re going to do is the random acts of violence and terrorism which are particularised in the pages proceeding. 6055 Transcript 13/12/11 Page 25 - 26

But your Honour, I am angry and frustrated. I‘m being sent broke. My name is slandered. I can‘t get any work. They have forced me against the wall, and then it‘s 6095 any wonder I get angry. Okay?

I will re-iterate, I have been too harsh. I have lashed out in some manner at the Jewish community and members within it...

Hon KIM CHANCE: Hon Frank Hough asked me why proposed section 77 provides for 6140 imprisonment for 14 years. Why is it such a serious offence? The 14 years that is provided as a maximum penalty is proposed section 77 relates to inciting others to do things that are prohibited in the legislation. Proposed section 77 does not apply to an unwise comment made in error or in anger. In the example given by the Hon Frank Hough he said, ―If I have had a few sherbets or I am angry about something and I say something that offends people, 6145 will I be caught by proposed section 77?‖

Extract from Hansard [COUNCIL - Tuesday, 30 November 2004] p8806b-8810a

I never encouraged people to acts of violence. I encouraged people to get out on the street and protest the racist apartheid state of Israel and the Jewish racial and religious supremacism that supports the violence of the state against the indigenous Palestinian, mostly Muslim 6180 population. I say in the video: “Time to get angry, time to get out there”, and I have footage of a couple getting a video camera and running out onto the street to protest. How could it be any more obvious than that?

When I make the statements in the video, “Your days are numbered”, I clarify that I am speaking 6185 about those within the Jewish community who foster and adhere to the ideology and religion of ‗Rabbinic Pharisaic Judaism‘ (Orthodox Judaism) and Jewish mysticism (Kabbalah) and now you know Dr Walsh just how bad those religious practices are and you know how so many so called ―secular Jews‖ quote from and draw strength from those teachings. Let us make no bones about it - the greatest inciters of racial hatred are Jews themselves who conveniently label themselves a religion one 6190 minute, then a race, and then the following week an ethnicity - whatever suits at the time. It is a wellknown joke amongst Jews:

So these secular Jews often end up being just another round of Michael Neuman‘s ―veritable shell game‖ of Jewish identity. “Look! We‟re a religion! No! a race! No! a 6195 cultural entity! Sorry–a religion!” Because this is the key to maintaining Jewish power – if it‘s indefinable, it‘s invisible. Like a Stealth Bomber (you can‘t see it on your radar but you sure know when you‘ve been hit) Jewish power, with its blurred outlines and changing forms, becomes invisible. And if you can‘t see it you can‘t fight it. Meanwhile the assault on the Palestinians continues. 6200

Paul Eisen ―Jewish Power‖

the DPP 6220 wrote to the WASCA at appeal about the seriousness of the offending:

56. The evidence led at trial established that the appellant holds a deep seated hatred of Jews and the Jewish people. The dissemination of this hate and discrimination with the specific intention of inciting racial hatred and contempt constitutes serious offending.

57. When considering the convictions pursuant to s 77 it is significant to note that in this case the relevant counts in the indictment were pleaded solely as an allegation of an intent to create or promote animosity towards a racial group. ―Animosity towards‖ is defined in s 76 of the Code as meaning ―hatred of or serious contempt for‖. Section 77 allows the option to allege an intent to create or promote ‗harassment‘, which includes ―to threaten, seriously 6235 and substantially abuse or severely ridicule‖. However, the prosecution did not allege that arguably less serious intention, but rather alleged that the appellant did what he did with the specific intent of creating and promoting hatred and serious contempt for Jewish people (not merely abuse of ridicule). By their verdicts the jury were satisfied, beyond reasonable doubt, that the appellant acted with that intent.

60. However, the respondent accepts that the fact that the appellant did not specifically exhort anyone to engage in acts of violence against the Jewish people is relevant in 6265 categorising the conduct. The respondent submits, however, that the pernicious and insidious feature of his offending is that the publication and the dissemination of the material the subject of the charges has the potential to inflame, incite and encourage other like-minded individuals, who may not demonstrate the same degree of restraint when it comes to violence. As the learned sentencing judge correctly observed, the conduct ―has the 6270 potential to be catalytic of civil unrest‖.

But that‘s not the point according to the Hon Kim Chance in the Hansard: “A person probably would not appear in court until such time as something like this had happened.”

MHR so we are all royally fucked…the truth might of course move some people with less impulse control to be more active in defending themselves from the jewish threat to them and their family and descendants THAT is exactly WHY the laws were pushed by jews…to prevent the facts coming out, being broadcast…because like any criminal, they fear being ‘found out’ and ‘punished’ , or even just stopped from continuing with their conspiracies, plans, crimes, criminal plans etc…even THIS statement must qualify under the laws…so NO way I can go back to Australia…

N.B THE NEW BOOK WILL BE THE MOST CALM, RATIONAL, REASONED, COOL HEADED ATTEMPT TO DEFEND MYSELF FROM THE CHARGES JUST WAITING TO BE MADE IF THEY HAVE NO ALREADY BEEN…A FORWARD DEFENSE…FOR WHAT I WILL NOT BE ABLE TO GET ADMITTED TO COURT, IF I GET A TRIAL…AND TO LODGE WITH IRAN / MALAYSIA TO SEEK ASYLUM FOR POLITICAL PERSECUTION I.E FACT THAT I WILL BE IMPRISONED AS PRISONER OF CONSCIENCE…TRY FOR NORWAY…OR ICELAND…

61. As an example, the conduct the subject of Count 3 included the phrase, ―we‘ve had enough of you and those bells toll for you. Your days are numbered‖. The respondent submits if anyone harboured a belief that violence against Jewish people or their property was legitimate, then exposure to that kind of material could only reinforce and legitimise that belief. The incitement of others to violence against others may not have been the 6280 offenders specific intent but it is certainly a very realistic potential consequence of his conduct. When an offender carries out acts with the intention of creating or promoting hatred or serious contempt for a racial group then the risk of violence being visited upon members of that racial group is substantially increased. 87 Which was directed at me.

Page 109 of 235

6285 As for the ―seriousness‖ of my charges, perhaps Justice Buss in the WASCA says it best when he states I would have received a suspended sentence if I had of said ―sorry‖:

JA BUSS: One can readily understand that a suspended sentence would have been appropriate had someone in your clients position pleaded guilty even if not 6290 at the first opportunity, had expressed some remorse at some stage or even given an apology. If these had been the facts, then it is very difficult to see how a term of immediate imprisonment could possibly have been justified, but those are not the facts. 6295 Transcript 13/12/2011 Page 18 WASCA

MHR SO IF CHARGED, BEG FORGIVENESS, PLEAD GUILTY? OR WILL THEY JUST ABUSE THAT TO VICTIMISE ME? WOULD THEY LET ME OFF WITH A CAUTION? WHAT IS BEST STRATEGY? THERE WOULD BE A ‘GOOD BEHAVIOR BOND’ / WITH CONDITIONS…THOSE CONDITIONS WOULD BE ‘GAG ORDER’…AND IF BROKE, IN GOOD FAITH, DUE TO CONSCIENCE, CONSCIENTIOUSNESS, THAT MIGHT QUALIFY / SPEED UP APPLICATION FOR POLITICAL ASYLUM?

Dr Frederick Toben was incarcerated for contempt of court in South Australia for his comments on ‗The HolocaustTM

MHR why would people bother reading a book anyway? If it worth bothering any more? Write up all notes / videos / books info, in new book to replace them all, on these themes? More professional, like Brendon’s notes here, i.e quotes…and now with all the ‘false flag and faked incidents info spread out over all my stuff, put in order…final statement before focusing on things I need to do for ME ?

I do not hold ―animosity towards‖ Jews because they are ―Jews‖, I hold animosity towards ―Jews‖ because of what they do, say and write and the fact they wield enormous power. I get angry that few people in power try to stop them. This creates anger and frustration. Even Jewish activist Paul Eisen writes about this. Here is a long quote but it sums everything up perfectly: 6340

Page 110 of 235

No-one wants to oppose any Jews simply for being Jews, or even for what they believe, but only because of what they do. The problem is that since, according to Shamir88, what Jews believe and even do is precisely what makes them into Jews, so opposition to Jewishness as an ideology surely comes dangerously close to opposition to Jews simply for being Jews. But for Shamir, Jews are Jews because they choose to be Jews. Someone may be born of 6345 Jews and raised as a Jew but they can if they wish reject their Jewish upbringing and become a non-Jew. And many have done just that including such famous escapee‘s as Karl Marx, St Paul, Leon Trotsky (and Shamir himself), etc. Opposition to Jews is not, therefore, like opposition to blacks or to Asians or to other common racist attitudes since the object of the opposition is perfectly able to relinquish the ideology in question. 6350

Shamir has never in any way called for any harm to be done to Jews or anyone else, nor for Jews or anyone else to be discriminated against in any way. Adherence to this Jewish ideology is, for Shamir, regrettable, but not, in itself, a matter for active opposition. Nor does this mean that Shamir is opposed to any individual Jew just because he or she is a Jew. 6355 What Shamir actively opposes is not ―Jews‖ but ―Jewry‖. Analogous to say, the Catholic Church, Jewry consists of those organised Jews and their leaders who actively promote corrosive Jewish interests and values, particularly now in the oppression of the Palestinians.

One doesn‘t have to be in complete agreement with Shamir to understand what he is talking 6360 about. Why should Jews not have a ―spirit‖; after all, such a concept has been discussed with regard to other nations?

―It is dangerous, wrong, to speak about the ―Germans‖, or any other people, as if a single undifferentiated entity, and include all individuals in one 6365 judgement. And yet I don‘t think I would deny that there exists a spirit of each people (otherwise it would not be a people) a Deutschtum, an italianitia, an hispanidad: they are the sums of traditions, customs, history, language, and culture. Whoever does not feel within himself this spirit, which is national in the best sense of the word, not only does not entirely 6370 belong to his own people but is not part of human civilization. Therefore, while I consider insensate the syllogism, ‗All Italians are passionate; you are Italian; therefore you are passionate,‘ I do however believe it legitimate, within certain limits, to expect from Italians taken as a whole, or from Germans, etc., one specific, collective behaviour rather than another. There 6375 will certainly be individual exceptions, but a prudent, probabilistic forecast is in my opinion possible.‖ Primo Levi

And for Jews it is, perhaps, even more appropriate. The place of Judaism as an ideology at the centre for all Jewish identity may be debated, but few would dispute that Judaism is at 6380 least at the historic heart of Jewishness and, whatever else may bind Jews together, it is certainly true that religion plays an important part. Second, for a group of people who have retained such a strong collective identity with no shared occupation of any land, language, nor even, in many cases, a culture, it is hard to see what else there could be that makes Jews into Jews. Surely for Jews, in the absence of other, more obvious factors, it is precisely 6385 such a spirit that has enabled them to retain their distinctive identity for so long in the face of such opposition.

Paul Eisen - “Jewish Power”

Hon KIM CHANCE: The big issue with Irving is that he is denying that the Holocaust ever happened. He said that all those Jews died of cholera or something… so Brendon must read every jewish book ever published or be defined as ‘inrresponsible’ and ‘rash’ but people can be as irresponsible when talking about David Irving etc i.e totally off the mark, no idea what they are talking about, having done zero research…Irving NEVER denied ‘holocaust’…just shaved a few million off the figures…and YES, most deaths in KZ’s due to Cholera, especially AFTER no more Zyklon B arrived…

Hon KIM CHANCE: It would raise some interesting questions. If one were to remake The Bridge on the River Kwai today, one would be talking not about historical material but a film made in December 2004. Would it be deemed to be in the public interest or would it be 6405 deemed to be in the same category as archival material?

Hon PADDY EMBRY: When a film is an attempt at accuracy, the law would not apply, but if it were fictitious, it might apply. 6420

Extract from Hansard [COUNCIL - Tuesday, 30 November 2004] p8806b-8810a

So there’s the rub…and it HELPS me…Schindler’s list FICTIONAL, like ALL Holloywood ‘holocaust’ films…NONE are documentaries…!!!!

Hon PETER FOSS: As I have said, I do not have a problem with the word ―intends‖. However, I do have a problem with the words ―is likely to‖. There is some law on this matter. The law is very simple. Unfortunately, to a large extent we can prove that a certain action ―is likely to‖ by proving its impact on just one person. That is why it is such a 6435 dangerous concept and why the Standing Committee on Legislation recommended that those words not be in the Bill.

Extract from Hansard [COUNCIL - Tuesday, 30 November 2004] 6440 p8806b-8810a

Stanley Elliot Keyser did not have to come up with some ―evidence‖ that he had been ―offended‖ or emotionally ―hurt‖ in any way - he just had to say he was. Keyser is THE perfect example of why the legislation is dangerous. He intended to agitate and catch someone out under the legislation no matter 6445 how much he denied this at the trial. It is self-evident in the video as he ―plays up‖ the ―hurt‖ on camera and ran up to people stating loudly: “Did you know this man says all Jews are racist! I‟m offended!”

Hon PETER FOSS: I do not think they did because memories are short. Fourteen years have passed since all the ethnic communities said that we should pass legislation because they wanted a problem dealt with. That legislation coincided with the last time Mr Van Tongeren was involved in events. Bad law makes bad cases and that is what will happen 6475 with this legislation. It will create a bad situation. Rather than work harder on the legislation, people seek to make easier laws. That creates bad law and this is bad law. A law will be passed that will make things simple for the prosecution, the police and the complainant. It will also catch a lot of people whom we do not want to catch. 6480 Extract from Hansard [COUNCIL - Tuesday, 30 November 2004] p8806b-8810a

A society divided is a society that cannot come together to resist government tyranny. Just study the tactics of the Soviet Government or watch the lecture series ‗The Pentagon‘s New Map‘ where Dr Thomas Barnett discusses the ―reshaping‖ of the Middle East for the benefit of Israel and economic and political control. Right now, Syria is feeling the pinch as it disintegrates into 6585 sectarian violence making it far easier for Israel and the pro-Zionist US Government to play groups off against each other. The same effect was accomplished in Iraq. Paul Wolfowitz, Bill and Irving Kristol and the current Israeli PM (Benyamin Netanyahu) wrote ‗The Project For The New American Century‘ and ‗Securing The Realm‘ - all speaking of removing Governments not to Israel‘s liking. Iran is next. I see the same methods of ―divide and conquer‖ at work in the prison system. As the 6590 French monarchy were apt to state: ―Better they march on each other than the palace gates‖. Jews regularly lead the charge for this type of legislation. It started in 1919:

Anti-Semitism was branded as being counter-revolutionary in nature, and persons participating in pogroms or instigating them were outlawed (by a special decree issued 6595 by the Council of Commissars in July of 1918, signed and personally amended by Lenin to sharpen its tone). A statement against anti-Semitism made by Lenin in March 1919 was one of the rare occasions on which his voice was put on a phonograph record, to be used in a mass campaign against the counter-revolutionary incitement against the Jews. The regime made every effort to denounce the pogroms and punish the persons taking 6600 part in them, even when they were Red Army personnel. When the civil war came to an end, a law was passed against “incitement to hatred and hostility of a national or religious nature,” which in effect, also applied to anti-Semitism, including the use of the pejorative Zhid. 6605 Encyclopedia Judaica, Volume 5 Produced and printed in Jerusalem, Israel Library of Congress Catalogue Card Number 72 9075

The law is part of a multifaceted social engineering program to ―keep the barbarians from coming together‖, nothing more, and the crusade for this type of legislation is more often than not led by ‗Jews‘ for obvious reasons - they‘re ―leading the revolution‖, just as they did in Russia, the Ukraine, Hungary 6675 and the Baltic states in 1919 and later.

The effect of the 6685 legislation has been to intimidate people, not free up society for polite and courteous debate.

I remember Alexander Solzinhitzen writing in his book ‗Gulag 6695 Archipelago‘ that the crimes of the Soviet State were carried out by bureaucratic minions, not motivated by fear of Stalin‘s wrath, but by fear of job loss.

The human rights violating Chinese Communist Government is treated with ―dialogue‖ and ―engagement‖ by our own 6720 Government while people from all levels of the political spectrum here at home are vilified as ―haters‖ and ―HolocaustTM deniers‖ for questioning Jewish power and its intentions. Are we subhuman or regarded as worse than the Chinese Communist Government for questioning history and other aspects of the odious behaviour of a group who call themselves ‗Jews‘. Are we not worthy of ―engagement‖ and ―dialogue‖? Does the ‗Truth‘ hurt? For a little while, but if you let it fester, drive it underground 6725 and fail to give attention to the supering wound you will end up with a systemic infection that will kill you. The symptoms are fever and occasional cold shivers that run down the spine from time to time. The aspirin of legislation works a treat in the short term but it will rise up and kill you if you do not address the underlying social problem - lack of dialogue and fear of speaking out. As the saying goes: “If we can‟t face it, God can‟t fix it.”

The ultimately unsuccessful attempt by the Melbourne Underground Film Festival to screen the David Irving film The Search for Truth in History.[11

we have already witnessed an upsurge in racial vilification against Australian Muslims, Arabs and Jews since the September 11 attacks on the World Trade Centre in New York and the 6760 ongoing ‗war against terrorism‘ that they triggered.[12] MHR this is my point the ‘official’ fiction is racial vilification, and HAS incited people etc…

Totalitarian thought control via legislation - what I cannot speak, or can only speak in whispers, I do not think.

Dr Walsh, should I be punished for shouting ―fire‖? Should I be punished for not shouting ―fire‖ in a ―nice-enough way?‖ Or should I be thanked - as should many others - who have the simple, innocent and decent community-oriented intention of pointing out a great danger to our national security and way of life?

If someone had, like us, incontrovertible proof of an immediate threat to peace, security etc, but it ‘was likely to offend’ someone, e.g a Jew, would they pay the price of going to prison, losing everything, to save YOU / why the fuck SHOULD THEY?

They promised it would not stifle notions of ―free

91 Page 69 of this letter - ―Department officials are reworking the contentious draft and will remove a controversial section prohibiting conduct that offends, insults or intimidates‖ - WEST AUSTRALAIN NEWSPAPER

Page 118 of 235

speech‖ because the legislation was to be always about HOW information was offered rather than WHAT information was offered. They clearly lack understanding of their own legislation. 6800

The fact that this information ―offends‖ Jews is a no brainer.

Recounting simple history is being criminalised by criminal‘s. Do we have to go through a long period of a police type, ―thought crime‖ State to get the message that Russians, Ukrainians, Poles, Lithuanians, East Germans and Hungarians had to go through during the Soviet Empire period? 40+ million dead? Incalculable suffering? 6810

Do we have to suffer the same murderous, psychotic mentality that the majority Muslim people of the Middle East have had to endure from the Israeli ―Jewish‖ State and its religious books of hatred, slaughter, ethnic cleansing and genocide which they apply with glee? In fact, BOASTING from their books what they do, what they want, and how they will get it and a compliant Western Media lets them 6815 do it - scared they will be labelled anti-Semites or HolocaustTM deniers, or they will lose their jobs and even be harassed, or worse?

What will it take to break the ―spell‖ that has been weaved by a group of common criminals in suits, inculcated from birth to believe they are ―the chosen people‖ of God? It is right before our eyes. But as 6820 the Prophet Isaiah wrote three thousand years ago:

I have found myself burnt out Dr Walsh so I‘ll have to leave the ―analysis‖ for another time.

'the law must be capable of guiding the behaviour of its 6830 subjects'.[17]

The application of racial vilification laws in Australia has exhibited this undemocratic quality. 6860 Consistent with democracy and the principle of popular sovereignty that underpins the Australian Constitution, legislative power ought to be exercised by our elected not unelected representatives.[25] Moreover, Geoffrey de Q Walker has noted that when 'law is simply a series of pattern less exercises of state power ... the outcome of any encounter with government can no longer be predicted and equality before the law is also lost.'[26]

When is conduct that occasions racial vilification done 'reasonably 7310 and in good faith'?

(1) 'Good faith' This aspect of the additional requirement has been uncontroversial.[129] The case law reveals reasonably widespread agreement that 'good faith' in the context of these defences 7315 'appears to imply the absence of "spite, ill-will or other improper motive".'[130] This definition again owes a significant debt to defamation law, in particular, the definition of 'good faith' in the statutory qualified privilege defences available under the defamation laws in Queensland and Tasmania.[131] However, this definition (spite, ill-will or other improper motive) does not constitute the full meaning of 'good faith' for purposes of those 7320 laws. For example, the definition of 'good faith' in Tasmania further requires that 'the manner and extent of the publication does not exceed what is reasonably sufficient for the occasion' and that the defendant 'does not believe the defamatory matter to be untrue'.[132] Interestingly, the 'manner and extent of the publication' aspect of this 'good faith' definition closely approximates to one of the interpretations given to the term 'reasonably' for the 7325 purposes of the 'free speech/public interest defences'. That is, 'reasonably' relates to the manner or method of the conduct which occasioned the racial vilification not the message that the conduct conveyed.[133] Why then, one might ask, did the parliaments choose to incorporate an additional term ('reasonably') when a natural reading of 'good faith' may have covered the necessary definitional ground and fulfilled their legislative purpose? 7330 Considering the stated intention of the New South Wales Parliament outlined above, it is reasonable to assume that they wanted to make clear that an honest belief of itself (arguably one possible reading of 'good faith') was not enough to bring conduct that occasions racial vilification within the province of the 'free speech/public interest defences'. However, the addition of 'reasonably' into the legislative mix has unfortunately served to confuse rather 7335 than clarify the precise scope of the defences as is detailed below. McNamara has, however, criticised the meaning ascribed to 'good faith' detailed above. He considers that it effectively introduces a subjective mens rea component into the definition of racial vilification — at least in circumstances where the conduct in question comes within the 7340 forms of communication (including artistic, scientific or academic expression) included in section 18D(a)–(c).[134] To be sure, the incorporation of 'good faith' in s 18D and the other related provisions imports a subjective notion into the content of the 'free speech/public interest defences'. But this does not change the definition of racial vilification nor the objective nature of the test 7345 used for determining whether conduct crosses the relevant harm threshold. For it is only when that objective harm threshold is crossed that the defences may come into play. In other words, the relevant conduct has by definition (in an objective sense) occasioned racial vilification but may nevertheless escape legal sanction if one of the defences can be established.

Moreover, to interpret 'good faith' in a manner that strips it of any subjective connotation (which is what I understand McNamara to be suggesting in the context of racial vilification law) would fly in the face of both the natural meaning of the words and the technical meaning the phrase has acquired over time in this area of law and a range of others besides.[135] A reasonable definition of 'good faith' lacking a subjective component seems 7355 a contradiction in terms. McNamara further argues that to interpret 'good faith' in this manner 'is inconsistent with the legislation's primary focus on regulating conduct which has the effect of vilifying a particular racial or ethnic group, irrespective of the actor's motive or intention.'[136] This may of course represent McNamara's view that no defences should be available to a person whose conduct crosses the objective harm threshold. But to my 7360 knowledge he has not expressly made this argument. His primary concern is that decisionmakers may in some instances have given the defences an overly broad reading which could seriously undermine both the substantive content of the racial vilification laws and their long-term utility.[137] Understood in this context, McNamara's criticism of the 'good faith' definition seems misconceived. For it falls on the respondent to establish that, 7365 amongst other things, he or she acted in 'good faith'.[138] The opposite is true in defamation law where a heavy onus falls on the plaintiff to establish that a defendant acted maliciously or for an improper purpose in order to defeat an otherwise arguable claim of qualified privilege.[139] Indeed, in an important respect the 'good faith' requirement narrows the scope of the 'free speech/public interest defences' as a respondent will not avoid 7370 liability for conduct that occasions racial vilification which otherwise satisfies one of the defences and was reasonable in the circumstances if the actions were motivated by spite, illwill or any other improper purpose.

MHR THIS LITERALLY MEANS NO-ONE WILL EVER SAY ANYTHING THAT MIGHT GET THEM IN TROUBLE…WHICH IS THE WHOLE POINT OF FACEBOOK / YOUTUBE RANDOM CENSORSHIP…TO GET SELF-CENSORSHIP…AND TO ‘STOP SEEING’ THINGS THAT MIGHT ‘GET YOU IN AN ETHICAL DILEMMA I.E SHOULD I RISK MY OWN WELLBEING / FAMILY’S WELLBEING, TO ATTEMPT TO INFORM PEOPLE ? AFTER SEEING OTHER ‘VICTIMS’ OF THE LAWS, WHO WOULD BOTHER? END UP WITH SOVIET ZOMBIES, ALCOHOLICS, ZERO MOTIVATION, ETC…

MHR assumption of malice i.e ‘irrational hatred’ willful incitement, willful intention to damage / harm / incite to damage / harm, ridicule, debase, humiliate etc…THIS IS THE TIME OLD CLAIM OF JEWS THAT WE HATE THEM…AMALEK…INTEND TO DESTROY THEM…BUT SOMEHOW WE ARE TOO INCOMPETENT TO DO SO? HITLER COULDN’T HAVE KILLED EVER JEW IF HE’D WANTED TO? GERMANS TOO INCOMPETENT? SO A FEW SURVIVED TO ‘TELL THEIR TALES’? ALL THROUGHOUT HISTORY THE ‘HOSTS’ JUST TOO INEPT TO DO WHAT THEY INTENDED? AND THAT WE HATE WITH ZERO REASON…JEWS JUST DO US GOOD AND WE HATE THEM BECAUSE WE ARE ALL AMALEK?

(2) 'Reasonably' 7375 (i) Message or method?

Two views as to the correct meaning of the term have been advanced in the case 7380 law. One set of decisions considers the term to refer to the reasonableness of the message that a respondent's conduct has conveyed.[140] Whilst another considers it to refer not to the content of the message per se, but to the reasonableness of the respondent's method or manner by which they have conveyed their message.[141]

An interpretation that requires the message to be reasonable rather than the method would clearly effect a more significant narrowing

This prima facie precludes from protection conduct which conveys an extreme racist message whereas under the method interpretation there is scope for such conduct to be protected so long as the method or manner for conveying the message is reasonable.

Parliament must have intended 'reasonably' to possess a different meaning, one that was not totally subsumed by the phrase it immediately 7395 precedes.[143] MHR THIS IS AN EXPERT NOTING WHAT I HAVE BEEN CALLING ‘NON SEQUITUR SELF-CANCELLING STATEMENTS’, WHICH BRENDON’S TRIAL WAS FULL OF, AND IT SEEMS THE LAW WAS WRITTEN IN…WHAT IS THIS ‘TRICK’ OR ‘SCAM’ OR ‘MANIPULATION’ OF LANGUAGE? WHERE DO THEY LEARN IT AND TEACH IT? IT IS LIKE A SUBLMINAL ATTACK ON REASON…SPEAKING AS IF MAKING SENSE, AND AS IF COMPLYING WITH JUDGES ORDER TO ANSWER, BUT NEVER ANSWERING, ALWAYS SAYING ONE THING VERBALL, THEN IMMEDIATELY SEEDING THE OPPOSITE MEANING, SUBLIMINALLY EVEN THOUGH VERBALLY I.E WHAT WE ATTEND TO IS THE MESSAGE WE GET, NOT WHAT IS SAID, AND THE END STATEMENT IS TYPICAL OF HYPNOTIC SUGGESTIONS I.E THE END BIT SLIDES PAST CONSCIOUSNESS, SPEAKS TO UNCONSCIOUS DIRECTLY I.E SO WE ‘HEAR’ YES, SO JUDGE IS APPEASED, BUT THE UNCONSCIOUS TAKES AWAY THE MESSAGE ‘NO’, THE FINAL CONFUSING, CONTRADICTORY PART OF THE S TATEMENT WHICH THE CONSCIOUS MIND TENDS TO OVERLOOK…IT GOT ITS ‘YES’, AND PAYS LITTLE HEED TO THE NEGATION THAT FOLLOWS, BUT THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT THE UNCONSCIOUS ATTENDS TO,,,THE BIT THE CONSCIOUS MIND DOES NOT FILTER, AS IT MAKES NO SENSE, JUST BABBLE…YES BUT NO? CONSCIOUS MIND ACCEPTS THE ‘YES’, IGNORES THE NO, LEAVES IT FOR THE UNCONSCIOUS TO ‘HEAR’ AND ACT ON…AND ANYONE WHO KNOWS ANYTHING ABOUT THE MIND KNOWS THAT THE UNCONSCIOUS MIND IS THE POWERFUL PART, THE CONSCIOUS MIND IS ALWAYS SUBSERVIENT TO IT, MERELY RATIONALISING WHAT THE UNCONSCIOUS MIND MOTIVATES / GETS / PROGRAMS ETC THE MIND / CONSCIOUSNESS TO ‘SEE’, ‘HEAR’, ‘FEEL’, ‘UNDERSTAND’ ETC…

when one considers why the defences were included in the first place and then reads the racial vilification provisions as a whole, the better view is that 'reasonably' refers to the method by which the message is conveyed not the content of the message itself. This interpretation is supported by a closer examination of the extrinsic 7400 parliamentary materials. For example, the explanatory memorandum to the RHB stated in relation to the proposed s 18D that [i]t [was] not the intention of that provision to prohibit a person from stating in public what may be considered generally to be an extreme view, so long as the person making the 7405 statement does so reasonably and in good faith and genuinely believes in what he or she is saying.[144] In his second reading speech for the RHB, then Attorney-General Michael Lavarch said that '[t]he bill does not prohibit people from expressing ideas or having beliefs, no matter how unpopular the views may be to many other people.'[145] In a similar though more 7410 subtle vein, Steve Bracks said in his second reading speech for the Racial and Religious Tolerance Bill 2001 (Vic) in relation to the exemptions for conduct or discussion done for

Page 128 of 235

an artistic, academic, religious, scientific or any other purpose in the public interest, 'that the requirement that the conduct be done "reasonably and in good faith" prevents immoderate or inflammatory conduct from being protected.'[146]

These parliamentary materials suggest that even extreme racist messages can be protected if the method or manner in which they are made is reasonable. Indeed the whole point of the defences is to protect debate on sensitive matters of academic, scientific and public interest even when some points of view may be for some (by definition) offensive, humiliating or even intimidating. This point was illustrated in Deen. The case involved a pamphlet 7420 distributed within an electorate by a political candidate that was critical of the teachings of the Koran, particularly its purported edict to Muslims not to obey secular governments. The President of the Queensland Anti-Discrimination Council in dismissing the application said: The public has an interest in knowing the opinions of candidates, even when those views 7425 are unreasonable, unsupportable, one sided or even plainly wrong; and perhaps particularly when they are of that character. ... It is enough for this case to observe that the pamphlet has been written in moderate language. It is concise and there is no suggestion that it has been published or disseminated other than in the electorate.[147] Moreover, it is submitted that an extreme racist message is necessarily unreasonable if it is 7430 the content of the message that is being assessed as to its reasonableness. Therefore, for better or worse, if the purpose of the 'free speech/public interest defences' is to protect in certain circumstances even extreme and unpopular racist messages, the provisions would come to naught if the message must be reasonable rather than the method of conveying that message. As the Equal Opportunity Tribunal of New South Wales wrote in Hellenic 7435 Council No 1: The Tribunal agrees that the words 'done reasonably' relate to the nature of the public act and the way in which it was done and do not require consideration of whether in this case the beliefs stated in the article were in fact reasonable. As argued by counsel for the Second Respondent, 'It is usually the very reasonableness of any particular position which is what 7440 is most hotly contested at the front line of any academic discipline'.[148]

(ii) Consequences of the method interpretation This interpretation of 'reasonably' (method rather than message) is consistent with the view that Australian racial vilification laws are primarily concerned with 'incivility in the style 7445 and content of publication of racist material, not racist content as such.'[149] But this preferred and apposite interpretation of the 'free speech/public interest defences' creates a further, some argue more sinister, problem for the operation of Australian racial vilification laws.[150] For 'if we limit censorship to the epithet, we create a two-tier approach: chilling of blue-collar muck and preservation of upper-crust mud.'[151] In other 7450 words, protection is accorded to a racist communication so long as it is made articulately, using scholarly language or socially acceptable conventions. It amounts to a triumph of form over substance if the method rather than the content of the message determines the availability or otherwise of a defence. Whilst this dichotomy may be consistent with the underlying purpose of the racial vilification provisions, the protection of 'upper-crust mud' 7455 represents for some a serious and dangerous flaw in Australian racial vilification laws: [It is a] clear manifestation of the social reality that racist acts of social elites are privileged, even though the harm occasioned by such acts may be more pervasive than that arising from a crude tract.[152

MHR meaning those with luxury of time, editors, proof readers, eloquence, huge vocabulary, peace and quiet, zero sense of urgency (protected from real world by money and power) can take their time to craft a statement with the same understood meaning, but without the use of words and tone and emotion that ‘trigger’ the laws i.e angry street debate with heated exchanges, provocations etc Vs cool, calm, collected, well resourced, comfortable writer with no immediate emotional tone…can write and redraft and ‘test’ on ‘focus groups’ and send to lawyers for legal advice, before publishing…and this would allow the very worst outcomes…protect no-one, and imprison people ‘caught in the heat of the moment’ or without the education, skills, talent, eloquence to express themselves inside what the law ‘allows’…

I am correct in suggesting that, properly interpreted, the defences will, in some circumstances, protect extreme and unpopular racist messages that are necessarily offensive, humiliating and even intimidating. It appears to 7475 protect vile and hateful acts of racial vilification so long as they are communicated in a civil manner. However in practice, the 'good faith' requirement has operated to preclude the availability of a defence in most cases involving extreme racist conduct. For example in Scully, Hely J did not doubt the sincerity of the particularly extreme views expressed by the respondent 7480 which, amongst other things, included that the Jews controlled global pornography, had invented the holocaust for financial and political gain and engaged in sexual practices against their children. These were the reasons the respondent proffered to justify the distribution of her leaflets. But as Hely J considered that vilification of Jews was the underlying purpose behind the distribution of the leaflet, 'then reasonableness, good faith 7485 and genuineness of purpose would not be found.'[154] Similarly, in Toben No 2, Carr J considered that in the appellant's circumstances, 'a reasonable person acting in good faith would have made every effort to express the challenge and his views with as much restraint as was consistent with the communication of those views.'[155] These cases, whilst tending to conflate the 'reasonably' and 'good faith' analysis, suggest 7490 that the more extreme the racist message the more likely a decision-maker will find that the conduct was in fact done for a purpose other than to further public debate on a matter of academic, artistic, scientific or public interest. In other words, the application of the 'good faith' requirement has served to evaluate the racist content of a message and effectively limited how extreme it can be. 7495 But the precise scope of the defences will remain elusive and contested so long as the word 'reasonably' constitutes a key legal standard. And without legislative clarification the interpretive schism that has developed in the case law is likely to deepen. In blurring the line between lawful and unlawful racial vilification and leaving so much of the interpretive work to the relevant decision-makers in individual cases, we can conclude that the 'free 7500 speech/public interest defences' lack sufficient precision and clarity. It denies to the citizenry ascertainable racial vilification laws and, therefore, the ability to arrange and conduct their affairs accordingly. Moreover, the indeterminacy of the defence provisions compounds the unpredictable nature of the decision-making process. It leaves more to intuition (and therefore subjective conceptions of justice) than principled legal reasoning. 7505 Equality before the law is lost and our system of parliamentary democracy undermined when so much law is left to unelected judges and administrators to create then apply on an individual case basis.

Hely J considered that vilification of Jews was the underlying purpose behind the distribution of the leaflet, 'then reasonableness, good faith 7485 and genuineness of purpose would not be found MHR THIS IS THE RUB…ANYONE CAN JUST ASSUME YOUR INTENT IS MALICIOUS, NOT ‘GOOD FAITH’ AND ‘PUBLIC INTEREST’…THIS IS THE AGE OLD JEWISH PROPAGANDA…THAT ANY CRITICISM OF JEWS MUST BE MOTIVATED BY IRRATIONAL HATRED OF JEWS, AS JEWS NEVER DO ANYTHING WRONG? AND ALL THE POGROMS COULD TEACH JEWS NOTHING ABOUT HOW TO ‘GET ALONG WITH OTHERS’ ? SO CAN BE ‘SINCERE’ BUT STILL MOTIVATED BY MALICE? I BELIEVE YOUR POINTS TO BE TRUE, BUT ONLY PUBLISHING THEM AS HATE JEWS !!! AND IRRATIONALLY…THERE IS ZERO ROOM FOR RATIONAL HATRED…AS IF THERE COULD NEVER BE A RATIONAL REASON TO HATE ANYONE / ANY GROUP? SO WHY MAY JEWS HATE AMALEK? ISN’T THE BOLLLOCKS ABOUT AMALEK REALLY A MISDIRECTION FROM THE FACT THAT IT IS THE JEWS WHO PLAN EVERYTHING THEY HAVE ASCRIBED TO AMALEK, FOR AMALEK? AND EVEN THEIR OWN WHO WILL NOT GO ALONG WITH THE CHOSEN PEOPLE’S SELF GIVEN MISSION ? LIKE MOSES MURDERING TENDS OF THOUSANDS OF HIS ‘MIXED MULTITUDE’ AFTER JUST PROCLAIMING ‘THOUGH SHALT NOT KILL?’…ISN’T THAT THE EASIEST WAY FOR ANY CRIMINAL SYNDICATE TO DIVERT ATTENTION FROM ITSELF, BY BEING THE LOUDEST IN DECRYING SOME OTHER GROUP AS HAVING THE SAME MOTIVES AND BEHAVING HOW THEY ARE ACTING? SURELY THE ‘VICTIM’ COULD NEVER BE VIEWED AS ‘PERPETRATOR’, ONCE THEY HAVE GOTTEN THEIR DEFINITION SUCCESSFULLY EMBEDDED IN THE UNCONSCIOUS MINDS OF EVERYONE IN THE UNIVERSE? WHO WOULD LOOK FOR THREATS WITHIN THE POOR, POWERLESS GROUP OF VICTIMS? WHEN THAT ‘VICTIM’ CONTROLS THE MEDIA, AND ALL PUBLIC DISCOURSE … AND CRIMINALISES ANY ATTEMPT TO TURN THE SPOTLIGHT BACK ONTO THE SUPPOSED ‘VICTIM’ … SHAME ON THEM, HAVEN’T THE JEWS SUFFERED ENOUGH (FICTIONAL SUFFERING, AND COMPARED TO EVERY OTHER GROUP, CERTAINLY NO MORE THAN AVERAGE, IN FACT PROBABLY MUCH LESS THAN MOST ‘RACES’ / ‘GROUPS’ / ‘RELIGIONS’…THINK OF THE ST. VALENTINES DAY MASSACRE ON THE SITE OF THE EIFEL TOWER…IS IT REALLY ANOTHER VERSION OF THE STONE ‘PENIS OF OSIRIS’ WE FIND EVERYWHERE FROM VATICAN, TO LONDON CITY, TO WASHINGTON D.C, ALL ‘FREE STATES’ THAT CONTROL THE WORLD ?

Core democratic principles such as legal equality, personal liberty and freedom of speech become empty, rhetorical slogans if routinely denied (by law) to minority racial and ethnic groups who lack political clout…EXACTLY THE HOLOHOAX LOBBY IS POWERLESS COMPARED TO THE SHOA BUSINESS LOBBY…THE ANTI-ZIONIST LOBBY POWERLESS COMPARED TO THE ZIONIST LOBBY…THE MASS MEDIA POWER OF THE JEWS MASSIVELY OUT-GUNS ANY POSSIBLE RESISTANCE FROM ALTERNATE, INDEPENDENT MEDIA…IT IS TIME TO VIEW ‘HOLOCAUST DENIAL’ AND ‘ANTI-SEMITISM’ AS MINORITY GROUPS REQUIRING THE PROTECTION OF THE LAW TO ENSURE THAT THEIR ‘VOICE’ IS HEARD…AND NOT IMMEDIATELY SHUT DOWN AND SILENCED AS ‘HATE SPEECH’ AND ‘VILIFICATION’ AND ‘INCITEMENT’…IF THE ENEMY IS INSIDE THE WALLS, MODERATE LANGUAGE / AND AVOIDING ‘OFFENDING’ SOME MINORITY GROUP WITHIN THE WALLS, OR ATTACKING FROM OUTSIDE, MAY NOT BE THE PRIORITY…IF A GROUP ACTS VILELY, THEN VILIFICATION IS APPROPRIATE…LIKE VILIFYING CRIMINALS, PEDOPHILES, … WELL WE VILIFY EVEN HISTORIANS AND PHILOSOHERS DON’T WE? SO WE NEED ANTI-VILIFICATION OF HISTORIANS, HISTORICAL REVISIONSISTS, AND ANTI-SEMITES, DON’T WE? AND ESPECIALLY INCITEMENT TO CRIMINALISE /// AND WHAT ABOUT AMALEK AND GENOCIDE INCITEMENT BY THE HEADS OF THE JEWISH ‘PEOPLE’ ???

My case analysis shows that decision-makers have attempted to rectify the problem by effectively elevating the harm threshold. Whilst this approach may have delivered just and reasonable 7540 results in individual cases, it cannot secure the long-term interpretive clarity that is needed as not all decision-makers subscribe to this harm threshold interpretation.[159] Secondly, s 18C is now ten years old. The harm threshold has already been the subject of considerable case law analysis but the indeterminacy that has plagued its interpretation still persists

MHR RIDICULE OF STUPID IDEAS IS THE MOST POWERFUL ANTIDOTE TO THEM…HENCE THE USE OF SATIRE, COMEDY ETC TO REVEAL ‘THE EMPEROR IS NAKED’ ETC…IT IS THE MOST HUMANLY ACCEPTABLE OF ALL FORMS OF SOCIAL CRITICISM…THE JESTER WAS GIVEN ‘LEAVE’ TO MOCK THE KING EVEN, WHEN NO OTHER PERSON DARED…THIS IS THE ROLE OF COMEDIANS, TO OFFER UNPALATABLE REALITY TO PEOPLE IN A PALATABLE FORM WHICH PEOPLE WOULD OTHERWISE NEVER EVEN ‘LISTEN TO’…AND ‘RIDICULE’ THUS SHUTS DOWN ANYONE WHO EMPLOYS THIS AGE OLD ACCEPTED CUSTOM OF SAYING THINGS YOU CAN’T NORMALLY SAY, IF IT IS AS A JOKE…SATIRE…IF YOU ARE NOT FREE TO RIDICULE WHAT IS RIDICULOUS, THEN ALL THAT IS LEFT IS PURE PHYSICAL VIOLENCE TO MAKE YOUR POINT…BEGINNING WITH SIMPLY ‘SHUTTING DOWN’ AND ‘NOT SOCIALISING’ WITH A GROUP, EXCLUDING THEM AS MUCH AS YOU CAN, ISOLATING YOURSELF FROM THEM…SIMMERING WITH DISGUST AND HATRED AND MISTRUST…WHICH SOONER OR LATER BOILS OVER INTO POGROMS NOT EVEN A DICTATOR CAN PREVENT…SUCH AS THE LITHUANIAN MASSACRES OF JEWS, ROGUE SS MASSACRES, THE KIELCE MASSACRE…OPEN DISCUSSION AVOIDS THE WORST, AND REVEALS THE FACTS AND TRUTH, WHERE THE FEAR, MISTRUST, HATRED ARE UNFOUNDED…TO SIMPLY CLAIM ANYONE WITH A GRIEVANCE AGAINST ANY JEW IS SIMPLY ‘AMALEK’ IRRATIONAL ILLOGICAL, MALICIOUS, IS A COP OUT…THE AVERAGE JEW ENDS UP PAYING AS THE ELITES SCURRY OFF TO THEIR LUXURY VILLAS IN SWITZERLAND OR THE U.S, THESE DAYS AUSTRALIA OR N.Z…

IF SOMETHING IS CONTEMPTIBLE, WHY HAVE I NO RIGHT TO EXPRESS MY LEGITIMATE CONTEMPT…IS THERE NOTHING ANYONE IS ALLOWED TO HAVE CONTEMPT FOR?

IS THERE NOTHING WE ARE ALLOWED TO HATE? THE CRIMINAL INTENT ON OUR DESTRUCTION? ON TAKING OUR PROPERTY? ON ENSLAVING US? ON SEXUALLY ENSLAVING OUR VIRGIN DAUGHTERS FOR LIFE? ON KILLING EVERY MAN, WOMAN, AND CHILD, AND ANIMAL OF US ???

SMART PEOPLE WANT TO KNOW WHAT OTHERS THING ABOUT THEM, WHAT MOTIVES THEY HAVE ASCRIBED, IF THEY TRUST OR MISTRUST THEM AND WHY, SO THEY CAN ADDRESS ANY MISUNDERSTANDINGS, ERRORS, FAULTY LOGIC, UNJUSTIFIED FEARS, MISCONCEPTIONS ETC…TO ‘CLEAR THE AIR’ TO HAVE GOOD RELATIONS BUILT ON TRUST AND UNDERSTANDING…

CRIMINALS AVOID ANY TRANSPARENCY…AS THE WORST OTHERS FEAR ABOUT THEM IS ACTUALLY TRUE, THEY HAVE NOTHING TO GAIN FROM TRANSPARENCY, DISCUSSION, OPEN DEBATE…THEY COULD ONLY REVEAL THEMSELVES IN THEIR TRUE COLORS…SO TELL ME WHICH BEHAVIOR HAS HISTORICALLY DESCRIBED THE JEWS ? TRANSPARENCY? OPEN DIALOGUES? TOLERATION OF ‘OFFENSE’ ? A DESIRE TO ‘CLEAR THE AIR’ OF ANY MISUNDERSTANDINGS? OR PURE DENIAL OF OBVIOUS FACTS E.G MEDIA OWNERSHIP, LOBBY POWER, POWER, FINANCIAL POWER, PROGANDA POWER, THAT THE HOLOCAUST NEVER HAPPENED, THAT 911 WAS NOT ARABS BUT THEIR OWN MOSSAD AND CIA…

NOTE OF COURSE I DO NOT BLAME EVERY JEW FOR WHAT THEIR MOSSAD AND LEADERS AND ELITES HAVE DONE…BUT THEY WILL SUFFER AS ALWAYS FOR THE ACTS OF THEIR ELITES…AND VERY FEW OF THEM DO ANYTHING ABOUT THEIR OWN GOVERNMENT…IN THE SAME WAY WE ‘HATE’ AMERICANS BECAUSE THEY PASSIVELY ALLOW THEIR GOVERNMENT TO CONTINUALLY COMMIT WAR CRIMES, ACTS OF TERRORISM, ECONOMIC HITS, ETC…THOUGH WE GIVE EVERY INDIVIDUAL A CHANCE, IN FACE TO FACE, TO PROVE THEY ARE NOT COMPLICIT, AND ARE WITH US IN DENOUNCING AND RENOUNCING THEIR GOVERNMENTS AND ELITES ACTIONS…BRENDON WAS AIMING FOR THIS FROM KEYSER…KEYSER SAID ‘YES ISRAEL HAS MADE SOME MISTAKES’…WHICH WAS POSITIVE…BUT THEN ‘YOU PEOPLE DISGUST ME’…SURE BRENDON JUMPED A BIT FAST ETC TO THE ‘ASSUMPTION’ BUT KEYSER HAD EVERY CHANCE TO DEBATE HIM ON THE FACTS…AND DIDN’T…JUST GOT ABUSIVE AND IN HIS FACE…OVER AND OVER …

With the so-called 'war on terror' in full swing and the political prominence of border protection issues, the publication of a strong antiArab immigration tract constitutes perfectly legitimate communication for some. But for 7575 others, it represents classic racial vilification and for the same reasons. MHR AGAIN THIS LAWYER TOTALLY BRAINWASHED, BELIEVING THE JEWISH PROPAGANDA THAT ARABS ARE TERRORISTS, AND BORDER CONTROLS ARE EFFECTIVE,…. WHEN IT WAS JEWS WHO DID 911 WITH CIA ETC…TOTALLY CIRCULAR SITUATION…YOU CANNOT INFORM PEOPLE ABOUT THE FACTS WITHOUT GOING TO JAIIL, BECAUSE THE FACTS ARE NO DEFENCE, THEY CAN CLAIM YOUR MOTIVE IS IRRATIONAL HATRED OF JEWS…NOT INFORMING THE PUBLIC…

SO WE NEED ONE LAST CLEAR PROOF FOR EVERYONE…THE MOST CAREFULLY WRITTEN DOCUMENT THAT SAYS EVERYTHING WE HAVE BEEN SAYING IN WAYS THAT THE JEWS WILL OF COURSE CLAIM IS ‘MOTIVATED BY IRRATIONAL HATRED’, BUT WHICH THE AVERAGE PERSON WILL NOT SEE AS SUCH, AND THUS MAY BEGIN TO REALISE THAT ALL THIS RUBBISH ABOUT INTENT AND MALICE WAS ALWAYS A SMOKE SCREEN…BUT DO WE HAVE THE TIME…THAT IS THE PROBLEM…TIME AND RESOURCES…TO GET SUCH A CLEAR STATEMENT OUT, SUCH AN AWARENESS RAISED…BEFORE TOTAL TYRANNY IS ACTIVATED, AND IT WON’T MATTER…PEOPLE WILL SEE THE PRISON, BUT IT WILL BE TOO LATE…THEY WON’T NEED OUR BOOKS…OR THEY MAY LIVE IN A PRISON, AND NOT C ARE WHO BUILT IT FOR THEM…AND ATTRIBUTE IT TO ‘ARABS’ OR ‘PROTECTIVE CUSTORY I.E NANNY STATE ACTING IN THEIR OWN GOOD’..IN WHICH CASE THE BOOK MAY STILL BE VALUABLE…BUT WHO WOULD READ IT? HAVE TIME TO? RISK FATES WORSE THAN DEATH OR DEATH TO GET OTHERS TO READ???

The fields of science, academia and public 7580 affairs are replete with instances of vigorous but honest opinions that are clearly racist.[162] Whilst these views will be insulting and offensive to some, free speech and communication interests ought to prevail at the lower end of the racial vilification spectrum.

But clearly ‘whites’ and ‘christians’ are NOT the focus of ‘protection’ from vilification, incitement, hate speech…they are ‘free game’ right? Blame everything on ‘whites’ e.g slavery…pollution, inequality…ban all Christian stuff…??? So who is REALLY being protected, a-la the original ‘thought crimes’ in soviet Russia … and why? To stop what exactly? The truth coming out !!! hey, you do not HAVE to define YOURSELF as ‘jewish’ and there is no reason a social, rational, logical, reasonable, ‘nice’ person would feel any need to…look at the origin story? Is Judaism ‘open’ and ‘social’ oor exceptionalist, exclusive, and ‘building walls around people’, literally in Palestine, and socially, culturally, … over 50% of jews have more jewish friends etc …Prof. Markus ‘survey’ showed…and in reality, as deliberately badly written question, it could really MEAN that most jews have ONLY jewish friends…etc…

MHR HARD TO WORK OUT WHO BRENDON IS QUOTING IN ALL THIS LEGAL OPINION…IS IT ? Greg Craven, „Conversations With The Constitution: Not Just A Piece Of Paper‟. UNSW PRESS.

(d) Legislative clarification required as to the scope of the defences, in particular, the meaning of 'reasonably and in good faith' In addition, the RDA harm threshold problem is compounded by the language of the 'free speech/public interest defences' and the indeterminacy they engender. It stems from the requirement that public acts be done 'reasonably and in good faith' for academic, artistic, 7590 scientific or research purposes or other purposes in the public interest. This is a standard (and therefore problem) reproduced in the racial vilification laws of the Australian Capital Territory, New South Wales, South Australia, Queensland, Victoria and Tasmania. On a broad view of the 'reasonably and good faith' requirement and the defences more generally, there is the danger that the exceptions may in fact swallow the rule. 7595 There must therefore be, at minimum, legislative clarification of the meaning of 'reasonably' and, inferentially, the precise content of the 'reasonably and good faith'

Page 131 of 235

requirement. This must necessarily follow the antecedent procedure of parliamentary reevaluation of to what extent acts of racial vilification should receive legal protection — a process of added significance in the States and the ACT where, by definition, extreme acts 7600 of racial vilification (those that incite hatred towards, serious contempt for, or severe ridicule of a person or group on the grounds of race or ethnicity) can still be lawful

[I] Government Censorship

If people do not think it possible that a Government could use the existing group defamation type legislation now92 - and in the future - as a tool of censorship and oppression, then harken back to 1963: 7615 The communications minister has the power to order any commercial station not to broadcast any material at all and he could require any station to broadcast free of charge any material which the Minister says was in the national interest. This means the Government has the power to keep the opposition off the air altogether, including during an election campaign, and to commandeer free air time for its own candidates and policies. 7620 Though this behaviour is usually associated with military and communist dictatorships and is unconstitutional under the implied free speech guarantee it has remained under both conservative and Labor governments for 50 years. All we require for a Government takeover of the electronic media was a crisis deep enough to push a Prime Minister to use it. When Prime Minister Robert Menzies Post Master general, Alan Davidson, ordered the 7625 ABC not to telecast a BBC interview with M.Georges Bidault, a former French Premiere, was a political opponent of the then Premiere Charles de Gaulle. Menzies told the ABC manager Charles Moses that he did not want to embarrass France, a friendly country. The interview, which had already been broadcast in Britain, was offensive to France. France was never embarrassed but Charles Moses was. On Monday 11 march the Sydney Daily 7630 Mirror, learning that the interview had been banned, asked Moses why - Moses: After viewing the film on Friday evening it was decided the sound and vision were very bad. Daily Mirror: Was the decision not to show it a political one? Moses: No. 7635 Daily Mirror: Will it be shown here? Moses: It will definitely be shown here. Three days later it was clear there was nothing wrong with the sound and vision and that Davidsons ban was an immature bungle. Robert Pullan “Guilty Secrets: Free Speech and Defamation in Australia” p.61

Perhaps in reality this racial vilification type legislation was pushed for primarily by Jewish groups to limit the ability of the general public gaining knowledge of Jewish subversion, spying and social 7650 engineering along lines in congruence with their politico/religious cults stated aims and goals? As Western Australia is the only State to have such steep penalties (14 years), perhaps it has more to do with the $Billion dollar plus full fee paying overseas student market?

92 Which is what this racial vilification legislation is - watered down defamation and incitement laws.

Page 132 of 235

Perhaps the vehemence of the prosecution, behaviour of DCJ Wisbey, Minister of Corrective Services 7655 Terry Redman instructing prison staff to impede my ability to conduct my appeal, and harassment before the trial has something to do with stuff like this:

Goldman Sachs signals its WA commitment Sean Smith 7660 WEST AUSTRALIAN NEWSPAPER 12th February 2013

It may be a late arrival in Perth, but Goldman Sachs says there now should be no illusions about its commitment to WA…. ―Although we have been late in many markets, including building out only recently in China and India, when Goldman Sachs decides to open an office, which happens very rarely, we are always making a very deliberate decision that signals our commitment, determination and willingness to invest for the long-term… Beijing-based Mr Schwartz, who re-joined Goldman Sachs last year after a 12 year absence 7690 during which he ran his own investment firm and headed billionaire George Soros‟ funds management business...

Speaking of subversion, spying and social engineering, here we have good old George Soros - another ―Jew made good‖. A poor Hungarian refugee from National Socialist persecution who went from 7695 ‗nothing‘ to ‗everything‘ - just like Hungarian Jew Frank Lowey. The man who financed the ―Orange Revolution‖ in the Ukraine. The man who Prime Minister of Malaysia, Dr. Mahathir bin Mohamad, denied a visa, stating that when billionaire Jews like Soros come calling he expected trouble. Dr. Mahathir bin Mohamad had a lot to say about Jews and their activities the world over: 7700 On 16 October 2003, shortly before he stepped down as prime minister, Mahathir said during a summit for the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) in Putrajaya, that:

“We [Muslims] are actually very strong, 1.3 billion people cannot be simply wiped out. … today the Jews rule the world by proxy. They get others to fight and die for them. They invented socialism, communism, human rights and democracy so that persecuting them would appear to be wrong so they may enjoy equal rights with others. With these they have now gained control of the most powerful countries. And they, this tiny community, have become a world power.” ""Malaysian Leader: 'Jews Rule World by Proxy'". Fox News. 16 October 2003. . Retrieved 2008-01-26. 7720 He also named Israel as "the enemy allied with most powerful nations."

Mahathir later defended his remarks, saying: "I am not anti-Semitic ... I am against those Jews who kill Muslims and the Jews who support the killers of Muslims." He tagged the West as "anti-Muslim", for double standards by "protecting Jews while 7730 allowing others to insult Islam." He also said "But when somebody condemns the Muslims, calls my prophet, "terrorist", did the European Union say anything?"

"Mahathir hits back in Jewish row", CNN News, 21 October 2003.

He also had much to say on the 9-11 attacks on New York and Washington93: 7745 In January 2010, Mahathir stated the September 11 attacks would have been "staged" by a US government conspiracy to justify attacking Muslims,[80] a 9/11 conspiracy theory. He also said he was "more sensitive to the victims as I am saying this is done deliberately" and rejected comments that interpreted his statement as a publicity stunt. He added Jews "had always been a problem in European countries. They had to be confined to ghettoes and 7750 periodically massacred. But still they remained, they thrived and they held whole governments to ransom... they survived to continue to be a source of even greater problems for the world."



Not reported in this article is the full speech made by Dr. Mahathir bin Mohamad. In it, he also praised Jews who were fighting injustice and the criminal activities of other Jews and Israel.

With all of the above in mind, I repeat my offer made to the State of Western Australia that I first made in my submissions to the WASCA in December of 2011 after I was offered ―exile‖ and release by forensic psychiatrist Dr Mark Hall on the 1st of September 2011 at Acacia prison

the Papal Decree ordering the arrest of Dr. Martin Luther for the ―words‖ he used that upset the powerful Catholic 7790 Church. Please keep in mind the words used by DCJ Wisbey in sentencing and the DPP and WASCA in their denial of appeal submissions - they are uncannily similar:

FROM THE EDICT OF THE DIET OF WORMS MAY, 1521 7795 1. ... …although, after the delivery of the Papal Bull and the final condemnation of Luther, we proclaim the Bull in many places ... nevertheless, Martin Luther has taken no account of it, nor lessened nor revoked his errors, nor sought absolution from his papal Holiness or grace from the holy Christian Church; but like a madman plotting the manifest destruction of the holy Church, he daily scatters abroad much worse fruit and effect of his depraved 7815 heart and mind through very numerous books, both in Latin and German, done by himself, or at least under his name which are full of heresies and blasphemies, not only new ones but also those formerly condemned by holy councils. ... 11. He not only holds the priestly office and order in contempt, but also urges secular and 7820 lay persons to bathe their hands in the blood of priests; and he uses scurrilous and shameful words against the Chief Priest of our Christian faith, the successor of Saint Peter and the true Vicar of Christ on earth, and pursues him with manifold and unprecedented attacks and invectives. ... 12. ... Especially does he impugn the authority of the holy fathers, as they are received by 7825 the Church, and would destroy obedience and authority of every kind. Indeed, he writes nothing which does not arouse and promote sedition, discord, war, murder, robbery and arson and tend towards the complete downfall of the Christian faith. For he teaches a loose, self-willed life, severed from all laws and wholly brutish; and he is a loose, self-willed man who condemns and rejects all laws; for he has shown no fear or shame in burning publicly 7830 the decretals and canon law. And had he feared the secular sword no more than the ban and penalties of the pope, he would have committed much worse offences against the civil law. ... ... 18. And as soon as these books were enumerated he acknowledged them as his own, and 7835 more over declared that he would never deny them. And he also says that he has made many other books which we have not mentioned herein because we have no knowledge of them. ... ... 25. Accordingly, in view of all these considerations and the fact that Martin Luther still 7840 persists obstinately and perversely in maintaining his heretical opinions, and consequently all pious and God fearing persons abominate and abhor him as one mad or possessed by a demon ... we have declared and made known that the said Martin Luther shall hereafter be held and esteemed by each and all of us as a limb cut off from the Church of God, an obstinate and manifest heretic. ... 7845 ... 29. Consequently we command you, each and all, under the penalties already proscribed, that hence forth no one shall dare to buy, sell, read, preserve, copy, print or cause to be copied or printed, any books of the aforesaid Martin Luther, condemned by our holy father the Pope as aforesaid, or any other writings in German or Latin hitherto composed by him, 7850 since they are foul, harmful, suspected, and published by a notorious and stiff necked heretic. neither shall any dare to approve his opinions, nor to proclaim, defend or assert them, in any other way that human ingenuity can invent, notwithstanding he may have put some good in them to deceive the simple man. ... ... 7855

James Robinson ed. “Readings In European History” Vol II

―A deeper exploration of the ways of life and communication in past Jewish communities might further expose a wicked little fact: that the further we move from religious norms and the more we focus our research on diverse daily practices, the more we discover that there never was a secular ethnographic common denominator between 7915 the Jewish believers in Asia, Africa and Europe. World Jewry had always been a major religious culture. Though consisting of various elements, it was not a strange, wandering nation‖.

Professor Shlomo Sand 2008 “The Invention of the Jewish People” p.284 Verso

―The Russian Jews are a separate component; I think there are about a million of them now; and with very few exceptions, they‘re extremely hawkish and very much opposed to any of the social democratic policies. ... Actually, a lot of them aren‘t Jews. The 7925 Rabbinate, which is very corrupt, is willing to accept them as Jews – mostly because they‘re blond and blue-eyed, figuratively speaking. They don‘t look like Arabs, they look more like northern Europeans. ... The typical model of the Sabra, an Israeli Jew born in Israel, is supposed to be red haired and strong, rather like a movie hero in the West. The Russian so-called Jews help with that. I think some of the estimates were that 7930 maybe half did not fit the criteria for being Jewish.‖

Professor Noam Chomsky.“Perilous Power: The Middle East And U.S Foreign Policy” 2007, p.186

the definition of ‗Ethnic‘ 7990 contained in the Australian Oxford Dictionary as including ‗a social group having common national, racial, cultural and religious ... characteristics‘. 12. The Macquarie Dictionary (Third Edition) however defines ‗Ethnic‘ as including 1. Relating to or peculiar to a population, especially a speech group, 7995 loosely also to race and 2. Relating to the origin, classification, characteristics, etc, of such groups. Even by the definition in the Australian Oxford Dictionary, the word ‗and‘ suggests more than one of the characteristics referred to should be present to 8000 satisfy the definition. 14. All Jews, of course, have the same religion but that is the only common denominator between all Jews.

The history of this Directions hearing is as follows:

Ms Abou-Merhi: We‘d like a Directions Hearing to determine the issue of whether 7945 Jews can be considered a racial group. We anticipate one day is required. And Mr Troy would like a ruling for the state to file submissions by 23rd of December. And the accused to provide his response in the New Year, a couple of weeks after that.

The above was the first indication that the DPP wanted this defence heard as a matter of law so that the matter could not be raised at trial by me.

I will begin by putting down the points contained in the ―DEFENCE SUBMISSIONS ON NO CASE TO ANSWER‖ prepared by Mr John Bougher for the Directions Hearing that took place on 19/11/2010. In this document, the basic argument of Jews not being a ‗racial group‘ is argued:

1. Count one on the Indictment refers to Stanley Keyser as a member of a ‗racial 7960 group‘. 2. Counts 2-7 on the Indictment refer to animosity by the accused towards a ‗racial group‘. 3. By letter dated 28 July 2010 the Director of Public Prosecutions on behalf of the State asserts that the ‗racial group‘ referred to in all counts on the 7965 Indictment is ‗the Jewish people‘. 4. The question arises as to whether the Jewish People are a ‗racial group‘, or just a religious group or some other type of group or not a group at all. 5. The Criminal Code Act 1913 Section 76 defines ‗racial group‘ as meaning any group of persons defined by race, colour or ethnic or national origins. 7970 6. The State by the letter of 28 July 2010 referred to is relying to include the Jewish People as a ‗racial group‘ on the words ‗ethnic origins‘ contained in that definition. 7. The State does not rely on other words in that definition, namely ‗race‘ (which it is assumed is accepted must contain some element of common 7975 descent/ancestry involving a biological component or shared genetic traits), ‗colour‘ or ‗national origins‘. 8. It is submitted that the question whether the Jewish People are a ‗racial group‘ is a matter of interpretation and as such is a question of law to be determined by a Judge pursuant to Section 98(2)(a) of the Criminal Procedure Act 2004. 7980 9. If a Judge cannot be satisfied as to that question then it is submitted that the Accused has no case to answer and should be discharged in relation to the 7 counts on the Indictment pursuant to Section 98(2)(c) of the Criminal Procedure Act 2004. 10. Social Scientists, Historians, Academics and a variety of published works do 7985 not give a consensus or clear definition of the meaning of ‗ethnic origins‘. A schedule of quotations from published works that refute the inclusion of the Jewish People as an ethnic group will be provided prior to the Directions hearing. 11. The State by its letter of 28 July 2010 is relying on the definition of ‗Ethnic‘ 7990 contained in the Australian Oxford Dictionary as including ‗a social group having common national, racial, cultural and religious ... characteristics‘. 12. The Macquarie Dictionary (Third Edition) however defines ‗Ethnic‘ as including 1. Relating to or peculiar to a population, especially a speech group, 7995 loosely also to race and 2. Relating to the origin, classification, characteristics, etc, of such groups. 13. Even by the definition in the Australian Oxford Dictionary, the word ‗and‘ suggests more than one of the characteristics referred to should be present to 8000 satisfy the definition. 14. All Jews, of course, have the same religion but that is the only common denominator between all Jews. 15. They do not have common ‗national‘ characteristics – many different nations including Australia, the USA, Israel, the UK, etc have Jewish communities. 8005 16. They do not have common ‗racial‘ characteristics – there are many different races (for example Arab, Ethiopian, Indian, Japanese, European, Russian etc) in which there are Jewish communities but none of which have any common ancestry and/or biological link – there is no separate DNA database for Jewish people (in Australia or the USA or probably elsewhere). 8010

Page 138 of 235

17. They do not have common ‗cultural‘ characteristics – Russian, Arab, African, European etc, Jews all have different languages, books, foods, music and clothes. 18. The diversity of the many Jewish groups spread across the globe, and the large degree of conversion to the Jewish faith, mitigate against the concept that the 8015 Jewish people have a common ethnicity and hence form a single ethnic group. 19. The Macquarie Dictionary (Third Edition) defines ‗Ethnic group‘ as ‗a group of people, racially or historically related, having a common and distinctive culture‘. 20. There is no common and distinctive culture between the widespread sections of 8020 the Jewish People across the globe, which is recognised by the Australian Standard Classification of Cultural and Ethnic Groups (ASCCEG). 21. The ASCCEG skates around the issue but under ‗Definition of Ethnicity‘ (page 4) refers to the Macquarie Dictionary (Third Edition) definition and also adopts what is referred to as ‗The Borrie Report‘ and quotes (at the top of page 5) a 8025 number of distinguishing characteristics that may be taken into account in determining ‗Ethnicity‘, they being: • A long shared history, the memory of which is kept alive; • A cultural tradition, including family and social customs, sometimes religiously based; 8030 • A common language (but not necessarily limited to that group); • A common literature (written or oral); • A common religion; • Being a minority (often with a sense of being oppressed); • Being racially conspicuous. 8035 22. It cannot be said that all the various Jewish groups across the globe share more than a common religion. 23. ASCCEG nevertheless for reasons of statistical convenience and practicality (quoting the last paragraph on page 5 ‗considering ethnicity as a multidimensional concept based on a number of distinguishing characteristics using 8040 a self-perception approach allows for a practical and useful classification attuned to generally accepted notions of what constitutes ethnicity and cultural identity. This approach supports the collection and use of data in statistical, administrative and service delivery settings.‘) classifies Jewish People in Australia as Broad Group 4 North African and Middle Eastern (third last 8045 paragraph on page 9) ‗as this is the area of the world in which this cultural and ethnic group originated and developed. because there are no other cultural and ethnic groups in this broad Group with which the Jewish group shares similar social and similar social and cultural characteristics, they form a single entity narrow group.‘ 8050 24. This statistical classification only makes reference to North African and Middle Eastern derivatives and makes no mention of Jewish People originating from other areas of the world such as the Ashkenazi whose origin is Eastern European/Russian and therefore it is submitted cannot be used as any authority to support the contention that the Jewish People form an ethnic group. On the 8055 contrary in the same paragraph at page 9 ASCCEG speaks of 42 separate Jewish groups and does not specify whether the inclusion of these groups into the broad Group 4 category is based on ethnic or cultural entity. 25. The Borrie report referred to above appears to have taken its distinguishing characteristics from the House of Lords case of Mandala v Dowell Lee [1983] 8060 2 AC 548, which case when dealing with the question of whether the Sikh people constituted an ethnic group94 stated that the following characteristics were essential: • A shared history of which the group was conscious as distinguishing it from other groups, and the memory of which it keeps alive; and 8065 • A cultural tradition of its own, including family and social customs and manners, often but not necessarily associated with religious observance.

94 The Sikhs have even less of a case than Jews do – they are essentially Indians who have only a religious marker to define them as separate from the Indian population. And yet, they were accepted – this is simple ridiculous ignorance built on convenience.

Page 139 of 235

... and that the following characteristics were relevant, but not essential, to a finding that a group constitutes an ‗Ethnic Group‘: 8070 • A common geographical origin or descent from a small number of common ancestors; • A common language, not necessarily peculiar to the group; • A common literature peculiar to the group; • A common literature peculiar to the group; 8075 • A common religion different from that of neighbouring groups of the general community surrounding it; • Being a minority or an oppressed or a dominant group within a larger community. 26. Point 1 – A shared history – the only shared history for the Jewish People is 8080 religious history based on religious beliefs. 27. Point 2 – A cultural tradition of its own – cultural traditions of the various Jewish communities around the world vary greatly. 28. Point 3 – Common geographical origin or descent from common ancestors – neither of these criteria are applicable to the Jewish identity – this is without 8085 taking into account the vast number of Jewish people who are converts. 29. Point 4 – common language – many different languages are spoken (Hebrew, Yiddish, English, Japanese etc). 30. Point 5 – Common literature – the only common literature is of religious origin, otherwise literature like music varies greatly between different groups. 8090 31. Point 6 – A common religion – this is the only common factor apart from a shared religious history. 32. Point 7 – Oppressed minority/dominant group – sometimes but not universally present. 33. The different cultural traditions (the second of the essential characteristics 8095 referred to in the Mandala case) of the various Jewish communities around the world it is submitted preclude the Jewish People from being categorised as an ‗Ethnic Group‘ and hence the Jewish People do not have the requisite ‗Ethnic Origins‘ required for the purposes of Sections 76 and 77 of the Criminal Code. hence the accused has no case to answer.

It must be noted that the issue at hand is not that the ‗Jews‘ specifically bringing the complaint are not part of a ‗racial group‘95 (but there exists a Jewish racial group, at some time and some place...somewhere), but that there has never been a Jewish ‗racial group‘ - only a group of people that are bound by religious belief who were converts at the beginning (starting with Abraham), and who 8105 have been intermarrying and converting proselytes ever since – no different to Christians and Muslims: ―...Roman Empire, as well as in the Parthian territory in the east, in numbers vastly exceeding those of the inhabitants of Judea. From North Africa to Armenia, from Persia 8110 to Rome, there were thriving Jewish communities, primarily in large cities but also in towns and even villages. Josephus, quoting Strabo, the Greek historian and geographer, wrote: ‗Now these Jews are already gotten into all cities; and it is hard to find a place in the habitable earth that hath not admitted this tribe [phylon] of men, and is not possessed by them.‖ 8115 Professor Shlomo Sand 2008 “The Invention of the Jewish People” p.146 Verso

As he saw it, the reason for the great Jewish increase was mass conversion. This process was driven by a policy of proselytizing and dynamic religious propaganda, which achieved decisive results amid the weakening of the pagan worldview. In this, Rapaport 8120 joined a (non-Jewish) historiographic tradition that included the great scholars of ancient history – from Ernst Renan and Julius Wellhausen to Eduart Meyer and Emile Schurer – and asserted, to use the sharp words of Theodor Mommsen, that ―ancient Judaism was not exclusive at all; it was, rather, as keen to propagate itself as Christianity and Islam would be in the future. If propagating the faith began in the late Persian period, under 8125

95 As argued by Olga Skully and Bible Believers (Anthony Griggor Scott) – that the complainant (Jeremy Jones) was a convert to a religion and not a ‗racial Jew‘, therefore they could not use the Racial Vilification Act (HEROC). They never argued that ‗racial Jews‘ did not exist – just that the complainants were not.

Page 140 of 235

the Hasmonean‘s it became the official policy. It was the Hasmonean‘s who truly produced a large number of Jews and a great ‗people‘‖. Professor Shlomo Sand 2008 “The Invention of the Jewish People” p.154 Verso

―But though the whole world did not convert to Judaism, as the Jewish historian might 8130 have hoped, the large numbers of gentiles who were drawn to Judaism, and the full conversion of many of them, added up to the presence of hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions of Jews around the south eastern Mediterranean‖. Professor Shlomo Sand 2008 “The Invention of the Jewish People” p.165 Verso

One would have thought “common geographical origin” and “descent from a small number of common ancestors” would have been ―essential‖. On this point: 8155 ―It is fair to say that the majority opinion about ethnicity among anthropologists and sociologists, as well as by other scholars who draw upon their work, is that ethnicity entails claims of common kinship or descent from a common group or ancestor. That is, such claims are generally viewed as a necessary criterion of ethnicity – if we find these claims, we might have ethnicity; if we do not, then we do not have ethnicity.‖ 8160 Denise Kimber Buell 2005 “Why This New Race: Ethnic reasoning in Early Christianity” p.9 Columbia University press

It is the ―majority opinion‖ of experts in the field that ―common kinship or descent from a common group or ancestor‖ is a necessary 8165 criterion of ethnicity. The Mandala v Dowell Lee [1983] 2 AC 548 case is used as a major precedent by courts and the characteristic: ―a common geographical origin or descent from a small number of common ancestors,‖ is regarded as only a ―relevant‖ characteristic.

... And that the following characteristics were relevant, but not essential, to a 8170 finding that a group constitutes an ‗Ethnic Group‘: • A common geographical origin or descent from a small number of common ancestors; •

When kinship and descent are privileged as necessary to ethnicity, these other factors are dismissed as mere ‗markers‘ or attributes of ethnicity, rather than being ethnicities constitutive elements‖. Denise Kimber Buell 2005 “Why This New Race: Ethnic reasoning in Early Christianity” p.9 Columbia University press

If we take the ―essential elements‖ only, then so called ‗Outlaw Motor Cycle Gangs‘ are an ethnic group without doubt and they fit the essential definition far better than Jews do. They also fill the ―relevant‖ characteristics except: ―a common geographical origin or descent from a small number of common ancestors‖, but then Jews do not fill that criteria either

The critical question which no one wants to answer is what are the secular customs, beliefs, dress, music, literature, cinema, TV, art, food, festivals that bind ‗Jews‘ all over the world in the same way we can all identify ITALIAN SECULAR customs, dress, music, literature, cinema, TV, art, food, 8200 festivals which bind Australian and American ‗ethnic Italians‘? This is a simple question and it should be the most simple basis for the application of the law.

Jews may be concerned about the fate of other Jews, yet have no wish to share a national 8225 life with them...‖ Professor Shlomo Sand 2008 ―The Invention of the Jewish People‖ p.303 Verso

What one can say is that there is a ‗Jewish Identity‘, but there is not a ‗Jewish Ethnicity‘. The legislation cannot confuse ‗identity‘ with ‗ethnicity‘ as it has, especially at my trial. As Professor 8230 Shlomo Sand has stated: ―Even cat lovers are an identity‖. So too Motorcycle Gangs‘ with their similar taste in music, dress, tattoo‘s, choice of transport, language and customs. They fit the ‗ethnic profile‘ just as well as ‗Jews‘. In fact, exactly so. They are oppressed and persecuted by a larger group called ‗The Police‘, an even better fit according to the legislation.

―... no one can prove that their ancestors were really Biblical Israelites. Their descent 8240 has to be taken on faith.‖ Steven M. Lowenstein “The Jewish Cultural Tapestry: International Jewish Folk Traditions” p.4

My lawyer Mr Bougher opens the hearing to clarify why we‘re there:

Mr Bougher: The application‘s brought today on behalf of the accused man, Mr O‘Connell, to seek a ruling that there is no case for him to answer in this matter and seek orders dismissing these charges against him, and discharging him, in 8280 effect. The basis of it is a consideration of the definition, meaning and effect of the term in the indictment, of a racial group.

The words, racial group, of course appear in all seven counts on the indictment and the defence‘s contention is that if the prosecution cannot establish that the 8285 Jewish people constitute a racial group, then there is no case for my client to answer. The charge simply cannot be made out. I suppose the preliminary issue is whether or not – and there‘s some debate over this and some contention as to whether it‘s a factual question that should be decided by the jury in due course. 8290 In my submission, it is a question of law, because it‘s an interpretation of a term and a section of the Criminal Code where the wording appears, and therefore it should be a matter that can be ruled or should be ruled upon by a judge. I don‘t know whether the State agrees with that proposition at this stage but it‘s certainly a preliminary point, I suppose. 8295

DCJ McCann: Now, when you say ruled on by a judge, does that mean that I can try the case and hear it and enter judgement of acquittal, or is this a no case submission?

Page 143 of 235

8300 Mr Bougher: A no case submission

Transcript 19/11/2011 Page 168

DCJ McCann: Well, that‘s not really the issue, is it? I‘m not concerned here today with whether or not the Jewish people are a racial group. I‘m concerned with whether there‘s enough evidence to persuade a jury beyond reasonable doubt that they‘re a racial group. That‘s the issue, isn‘t it?

DCJ McCann: Mr O‘Connell seeks a legal ruling today. In my opinion, if the State witnesses come up to proof and their evidence is accepted by the jury, then as a matter of law, the jury must proceed on the basis that the Jewish people are a 8365 racial group by reason of their ethnic origins within the meaning of section 76 of the Criminal Code.

Transcript 19/11/2011 Page 209

I can summarise this entire debate with the one simple question that everyone is avoiding: What are the COMMON SECULAR marker that links a Jew in Yemen, with a Jew in Russia and a Jew in 8385 Ethiopia? The answer to that question is that there is no link other than a religious belief and the attendant practices surrounding that belief. It is really that simple.

―If world Jews were indeed a nation, what were the common elements in the ethnographic cultures of a Jew in Kiev98 and a Jew in Marrakech99, other than religious 8390 belief and certain practices of that belief? Despite perhaps everything we have been told, Judaism was simply an appealing religion that spread widely until the triumphant rise of its rivals, Christianity and Islam ...‖ Professor Shlomo Sand 2008 “The Invention of the Jewish People” p.21 Verso

The Jewish people don‘t constitute an 8425 ethnic group; they can‘t be categorised as an ethnic group because of all the various cultural differences.

ASCCEG100 nevertheless for reasons of statistical convenience and practicality … using a self-perception approach allows for a practical and useful classification attuned to generally accepted notions of what 8455 constitutes ethnicity and cultural identity. This approach supports the collection and use of data in statistical, administrative and service delivery settings.‘)

MHR as in TESS ABS survey ‘religion’ … operationalized as ‘affiliation’ re: religion defined by respondents self-definition of being ‘affiliated’ with a particular religion e.g Judaism, would make them ‘Jewish’, Catholicism, would make them ‘Catholic’…for the purposes of collection and statistical analysis…

questions arose about the extent to which it was feasible to speak of a ‗Jewish identity‘ existing anywhere as a uniform entity; it was argued by some that the variations which had developed around the quintessential common core were such as to make it more appropriate to think in terms of a pluralistic Jewish society allowing for a diversity of ‗Jewish identities‘‖.

Ignored by DCJ McCann, ―they can‘t be categorised as an ethnic group because of all the various cultural differences‖ :

―A deeper exploration of the ways of life and communication in past Jewish communities might further expose a wicked little fact: that the further we move from 8510 religious norms and the more we focus our research on diverse daily practices, the more we discover that there never was a secular ethnographic common denominator between the Jewish believers in Asia, Africa and Europe. World Jewry had always been a major religious culture. Though consisting of various elements, it was not a strange, wandering nation‖. 8515 Professor Shlomo Sand 2008 “The Invention of the Jewish People” p.284 Verso

The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) is an international Jewish non-governmental organization based in the United States. Describing itself as "the nation's premier civil rights/human relations agency", the ADL states that it "fights anti-Semitism and all 8525 forms of bigotry, defends democratic ideals and protects civil rights for all" while it "[advocates] for Israel [...] with policymakers, the media and the public" and "defends the security of Israel and Jews worldwide".

Founded in 1913 by The Independent Order of B'nai B'rith, a Jewish service 8530 organization in the United States, its original mission statement was "to stop, by appeals to reason and conscience and, if necessary, by appeals to law, the defamation of the

Page 147 of 235

Jewish people. Its ultimate purpose is to secure justice and fair treatment to all citizens alike and to put an end forever to unjust and unfair discrimination against and ridicule of any sect or body of citizens."[1] The ADL has 29 offices in the United States and three 8535 offices in other countries, with its headquarters located in New York City. Since 1987, Abraham Foxman has been the national director in the United States. The national chairman in the United States is Robert Sugarman.

8540

It has a huge budget of $70 million dollars per year and is feared by policy makers around the world due to its strong links to Israel and powerful Jewish interest groups.

MHR DEFMATION?? Actually it is a public relations service to protect the ‘Jewish enterprise’ a.k.a it’s self (ascribed to god of course) given ‘mission’ to become masters of a one world government ruled by ‘Jews’…itself…defamation is a public relations matter here…to prevent bad public relations and to ‘hide’ the jew world order until it has total control, and can ‘come out’…

Here is what it has to say on what a ‗Jew‘ is: 8545

“Confronting Anti-Semitism, Myths...Facts...”:

MYTH 5 : JEWS ARE A RACE, NOT A RELIGION 8550 ―The idea that Jews are not only a religious group, but also a racial group, was a centrepiece of Nazi policy, and was the justification for killing any Jewish person who came under Nazi occupation – regardless of whether he or she practised Judaism.‖ p.28

―What unites Jews as a people, whether they come from Europe, Asia, Africa, or the 8555 America‘s is a common culture, rooted in a common religion. Jews throught the world are joined by a religious and cultural heritage101 rather than a racial sameness.‖ p.29

―Can someone be born a Christian and become Jewish? The answer to each of these questions is yes – and together they refute the idea of a Jewish race as anything other 8560 than a figment of the anti-Semitic imagination.‖ p.29 (Downloaded as .pdf file from )

No doubt, knowing this, the prosecution was keen for the services of Professor Andrew Markus and 8575 his study on specific attitudes of Australian Jews. If Professor Markus‘s study is regarded as right and true, it brings into the whole legal argument that an ethnic group can be defined from country to country based on a ‗self-perception‘ model. This opens up a can of worms. If ‗self-perception‘ is granted as a major component of what constitutes ethnicity in the eyes of the law, then all someone has to do is sincerely self-perceive their ethnic status. This appears to be the way it is going. 8580

It is noted that when the legislation was debated politicians noted specifically that they wanted Jews under the legislation.

MHR entire POINT of ‘Jewishness’ is jew world order one world government…the ‘chosen people’ are ‘self-selecting’… from a ‘mixed multitude which became increasingly mixed with active recruitment / conversions of individuals and entire nations…planned to expand to entire world, until Jesus and Mohammed threw a spanner in the works…!!!

MHR Aboriginality ‘operationalised’ as ‘self-perception’ and ‘acceptance by an aboriginal community as one of them’ … which is the best definition you could find for ‘Jew’ today…

Stanley Elliot Keyser believed he was ‗Jewish‘ and that being Jewish was a matter of ‗race‘:

Accused: And you‘re a Jew – are Jews a race, a literal race, a genetic race? Like 8625 an African, Anglo Saxon, European, just loosely. Are Jews a race?---I believe we are. We are a religion and a race, yes.

You‘re a religion and a race?---Yes. 8630 So when an Ethiopian man or an Indian man converts to Judaism he now becomes, by race, a Jew? Is that correct?---If that‘s the way you put it, then yes.

Transcript 17/01/2011 Page 309-310

markers that might define a worldwide secular Jewish existence – except for some depleted, secularized remnants of religious folklore – the collective identity needs a misty, promising image of an ancient biological common origin. Behind every act in Israel‘s identity politics stretches, like a long black shadow, the idea of an eternal people and race.‖ 8645 Professor Shlomo Sand 2008 “The Invention of the Jewish People” p.280 Verso

My mother being Jewish makes me Jewish. And my mother is Jewish. 8655 Transcript 17/01/2011 Page 299

So, the secular Mr Keyser, who hangs with the Ultra-Orthodox sect Chabad Lubavitch has adopted the Halakic religious view of what makes him Jewish.

Keyser also stated in his police statement at Point 7:

POINT 7: ―When I say that I was brought up as Jewish I mean that I have a cultural and spiritual connection with Israel and the heritage of the Jewish people.‖ 8665 On the push for the founding of the Israeli state by a small section of the Jewish world community based in Eastern Europe:

―The Zionist idea102 ... While a significant number of its ideological progenitors belonged more or less to the Germanic culture – Moses Hess, Theodor Herzl, Max 8670 Nordau – those who developed, disseminated and implemented its theories came from the intelligentsia of the wide spread Yiddish speaking population, which was densely packed into the cities and towns of Poland, the Ukraine, Lithuania, Russia and Romania. As noted in the second chapter, in these regions there was a secular, modern Yiddish civilization such as did not exist in Jewish communities elsewhere, neither in London 8675 nor in Marrakech103. It was this distinctive culture, rather than religion, that incubated the proto-nationalist and nationalist ferment ...‖. Professor Shlomo Sand 2008 “The Invention of the Jewish People” p.252 Verso

MHR if you tell someone something, and they believe it, they would feel a ‘spiritual connection’ with whatever place their belief locates it…their ‘origin myth of their people’…all psychological…like the ‘feeling’ jews claim to ‘feel’ at Auschwitz…

―But the main unifying basis for international Jewry, apart from the painful memory of the Holocaust – which unfortunately grants anti-Semitism a permanent, if indirect say in defining the Jew – remains the old, depleted religious culture (with the genetic demon slithering quietly behind). There has never been a secular Jewish culture common to all 8690 the Jews in world, and the well-known argument of Rabbi Yeshaiahu Karelitz – that ‗the [secular Jewish] cart is empty‘ – was and remains correct. But in his traditionalist naiveté, the great Rabbinical scholar expected the empty secular cart to make way for the loaded religious cart.‖ Professor Shlomo Sand 2008 “The Invention of the Jewish People” p.285 Verso 8695

―...seeking to build a bridge that could connect Jewish Believers – mainly former believers, whose languages and secular customs were polyphonus and diverse – they were unable to build on the lively popular mores and turn them into a homogenous, domesticated modern culture, as the Bund tried to do. To achieve their aim, the Zionists 8700 needed to erase existing ethnographic textures, forget specific histories, and take a flying leap backward to an ancient, mythological and religious past.‖ Professor Shlomo Sand 2008 “The Invention of the Jewish People” p.255 Verso

MHR for some reason fe w Jews will look into ‘The Holocaust’ fiction and realise IT is THE DEFINITIVE ‘shared’ myth i.e of persecution…watch out, it could happen again (because you believe it happened once)…clearly ‘The Holocaust’ is THE biggest ‘uniting’ principle in ‘Jewishness’ and ‘Israel’… apart from the ‘mission’ to rule the world and exterminate AMALEK, anyone who opposes this mission…this was the SALES PITCH offered to new converts…join the people whose destiny it is to rule the world…exceptionalism, supremacism, special privileges and rights, a-la the Old Testament genocide, theft of land and property, and sexual enslavement of virgins…the ‘usury’ road to domination…

EVERYONE imagines THEIR religion to be the religioin of peace, justice, love…while ALL religion is about slavery…deception…zombification…

in any concrete form until the advent of the Zionist movement in the late 1800‘s on. It has been ―invented‖ and propagated for multiple purposes including money: 102 Stanley Keyser is a member of the Zionist Youth Group ‗Habonim Dror‘. 103 Yemen, Middle East.

Page 150 of 235

―Amid all these developments, Jewish ‗ethnicity‘ has enjoyed a resurgence. In the United States this has been a noticeable fashion for some time... The person may not 8710 have preserved elements of the great Yiddish culture, but the need to belong to a particular community meant finding a focus of identity amid the sweeping cultural vortex ... Since the late 1970‘s, the perpetuation of the Jewish ethnos state has paid handsome dividends ... It is not only rested on the weighty mythological past and was sustained by simple ignorance – it has also been reinforced by profit and power derived 8715 from the existence of the overseas ethnos, which is content to subsidize it‖. Professor Shlomo Sand 2008 “The Invention of the Jewish People” p.310 Verso

...and as justification for colonization of the largely Muslim lands of Palestine: 8720 ―The concept of the nation as an ethnic entity was upheld, with varying intensity, by all the different Zionist camps, which was why the new biological science captivated so many. The idea of heredity helped justify the claim to Palestine – that ancient Judea that the Zionists ceased to view as a sacred centre from which deliverance would come, and by a bold paradigmic shift revamped as the destined national homeland of all the Jews 8725 of the world. The historical myth required the appropriate ‗scientific‘ ideology – for if the Jews of modern times were not the direct descendants of the first exiles, how would they legitimize their settlement in the Holy Land, which was the exclusive homeland of Israel‘?‖ Professor Shlomo Sand 2008 “The Invention of the Jewish People” p.257 Verso 8730

Author Allan C. Brownfeld comments on this:

There can be little doubt that the philosophy of Zionism - Jewish Nationalism - is in retreat among American Jews. Zionism holds that Judaism is not a religion of universal 8735 values, but an ethnicity. It believes that Israel is the ―homeland‖ of all Jews and that those living outside of Israel are in ―exile‖. Zionists urge immigration to Israel, ―Aliyah‖, as the highest Jewish value.

Most American Jews, quite to the contrary, believe that Judaism is a religion, not a 8740 nationality. They believe that they are American by nationality and Jews by religion, just as other Americans are Protestant, Catholic or Muslim. While they wish Israel well, they believe themselves to be fully at home in America. This is nothing new. As early as 1841, at the dedication ceremony of Temple Beth Elohim in Charleston, South Carolina, Rabbi Gustav Poznanski declared: ―This country is our Palestine, this city our 8745 Jerusalem, this house of God our temple.‖ Allan C. Brownfeld reviewing Peter Beinharts book “The Crisis of Zionism” Allan C. Brownfeld is a nationally syndicated columnist and serves as associate editor of „Issues‟. The author of five books, he has served of the staff of the U.S Senate, House of Representatives and the Office of the Vice President.

MHR got to go to that video…and my notes…check Abraham was Sumerian from Ur…a priest…went to Canaan, then Egypt with his family…so ‘Jews’ originally ‘sumerian’ and ‘Canaanite’ ? then mixed with Egyptians…did Egyptians really keep slaves? Check history books…were they conquering at that time, and bringing back slaves? Like rome? And then the slaves outnumbered the Egyptians, and they revolted, and escaped with the loot? A mixed multitude then formed the people under Moses leadership…he murdered thousands of them for failing to respect HIS new religion…then Israel, then civil war…so how long a united Israel at all? How could there be ’10 generations’ of Jewishness required to ‘prove’ ‘pure blood’ ? and If only a religion, why bother? What is the REAL story behind the myths?

My history, my heritage and my culture is what makes me Jewish. So says Keyser…as he is NOT religious…but he won’t go into details, as any detail would refer back to religion, and he isn’t…so…a hat, a few holidays, a few stories, and belief that those stories are of his ancestors, cos his mum’s jewish ?

the common heritage/history is one of a religion based in religious books – not history books. Professor Shlomo Sand points this out: 8770

―Yet, as this chapter has tried to show, it was only the appearance of pre nationalist Jewish histography in the latter half of the nineteenth century that gave the Bible a leading role in the drama of the rise of the modern Jewish nation. The book was transferred from the shelf of theological tracts to the history section, and adherents of 8775 Jewish nationalism began to read it as if it were reliable testimony to processes and events. Indeed, it was elevated to the status of mythistory, representing incontrovertible truth. It became the locus of secular sanctity that was not to be touched, and from which all consideration of people and nation must begin. Above all the Bible became an ethnic marker, indicating a common origin for people of very different backgrounds and 8780 secular cultures yet all still hated for their religion, which they barely observed‖. Professor Shlomo Sand 2008 “The Invention of the Jewish People” p.127 Verso

MHR is ‘self-hating jew’ person with irrational hatred of themselves?

Consider WHY Judaism may have been hated…killed Jesus, who called them nasty things like ‘children of Satan’…refusing to acknowledge him / the religion / faith / beliefs of their host nations…isn’t that ridicule to say jesus is boiling in his own excrement? That the virgin mary was a prostitute, or at best a slut? That jesus was illegitmate i.e son of a roman soldier ‘Panthera’? abuse? Vilification of host nation as ‘amalek’ and follower of a madman, magician, and worse? And then to practice usury, compound interest which even today most people can’t calculate, and have no real comprehension of…belief in own superiority, and right to rule the entire world? Even Nazi’s never claimed that right. So what’s NOT to hate about Judaism? What’s so irrational about wanting such people to leave your nation? And since that time they have been responsible for the Jew.S.S.R and Holodomor, the war crimes against Germans, Ukrainians, Poles, Estonians, Latvians, Lithuanians…Kissinger and Vietnam etc…Maoist genocides…911, the NeoCons, Patriot Act…Palestinian war crimes … ???

―Yes, but only in the Hitlerian sense‖, answered philosopher Maxime Rodinson when asked if he still considered himself a Jew. For many of these Jews it is their identity as a threatened and victimized people that makes them Jews. ―Hitler said I was a Jew, so I may as well be a Jew‖ is one response or ―To 8815 be a Jew somehow denies all those who have ever persecuted Jews a victory – so I‘m a Jew‖. Paul Eisen ―Jewish Power‖

MHR but he can’t see the point, that the holocaust myth was generated TO justify Israel and the idea of a Jewish nation…a need for one…when Jews were doing very well in the U.S, Australia , South Africa, etc…lends credence ot the idea that Nazi regime fully funded / supported / promoted by Zionists to this end…but some Nazi’s didn’t realise it was all about ‘work camps’ and NOT genocide, and decided to machine gun as many as they could get their hands on, until Hitler found out…but a few thousand such deaths were ideal for the Zionists…to put fear into European jews, so they’d leave their comfy lives to move to the stinking hot, dusty, desert…

The TM is there because the extremely powerful Jewish defense group the ADL demanded of several groups that they refrain from using the term ‗Holocaust‘ when describing their own suffering - such as the Ukrainians, with 7 million dead from a deliberate famine brought on by Stalin. They withdrew the term ‗Holocaust‘ from official descriptions. Clearly it‘s a trademark and an excellent money maker.

‘The Holocaust’ is literally a monopoly…term ‘appropriated’ by jewish lawyers, like ‘coca cola’, to stop others using it, and reminding us that there were REAL holocausts done BY jews…to monopolise sympathy…’holocaust’ museums NOT genocide museums…all for Zionist idea…fear…and sympathy…

Matthew 15:1…you nullify the word of God for the sake of your tradition. 7You hypocrites! Isaiah was right when he 8845 prophesised about you: ‘These people honour me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me. 9They worship me in vain; 8850 their teachings are but rules taught by men.‘‖

Rabbi Freilich‘s admitted occupation as head ‗Pharisee‘ of Perth. I asked him directly if he was a ‗Pharisee‘ like those described in the Old Testament and he 8855 answered in the affirmative. He didn‘t like being asked that but I wanted to point out that Jesus considered his ilk as liars and ―children of hell‖ so why should a word he says be taken at face value?

The dominant sect of Judaism is Rabbinic Pharisaic Judaism - Orthodox Judaism. They have completely turned the Old Testament and its straightforward commandments on its head via their 8860 ‗commentaries‘ and ‗rabbinic debates‘ recorded in the ‗Babylonian Talmud‘ and ‗Shulkan Aruk‘.

It should also be noted that page 495 of his testimony is missing from both my copy and yours. This days transcript was the only one removed from me on walking out of the court. It has been heavily altered

FRIELICH: so they can never lose, either by bloodline or by conversion to Judaism, once they‘re accepted to be part of the nation of Israel, whether they keep the laws or not, they are then Jews for eternity. 8875

Transcript 21/01/2011 Page 486

FRIELICH: ... but the truth of the matter is they‘re - there is - they are still part of the Jewish race, they still have a Jewish bloodline.

ACCUSED: I merely quote that to you to point out that Rabbi Yeshaya Karelitz is an Orthodox Jewish Rabbi, I believe, in Israel, and that is in direct contrast to your 8915 statement that Jews are, most assuredly a race, which I presume contains a heavy biological component?

FREILICH: It does contain a biological component because as I mentioned before, it - it also contains a common culture, language and history. 8920

ACCUSED: That - that aside from religious culture, could you explain to the jury, what are the common secular cultural traditional markers outside of religion, that link a Jew in Yemen, a Jew in Ethiopia and a Jew in Moscow outside of religious observance, religious clothing, religious texts, religious history, religious music and 8925 so on. What, outside of the religious side of things, links all these people into an ethnic group? Or race, if you were to say that?

FREILICH: The - the yearning to one day return to the land of Israel rebuilt, and to see the - the - the establishment of what we know as the - the temple - what - in - in 8930 its full glory, which will be in the Messianic Era where peace will - will reign all around the world. Peace for every human being.

ACCUSED: Rabbi, respectfully, that‘s taken from religious books. I‘ve asked you, is there any music and - - - 8935

DCJ WISBEY: You - you tell him it‘s taken from religious books. He‘s just told you - you asked him a question and he‘s answered it in that way, so - - -

ACCUSED: Well, he‘s failed to - he‘s just quoted back to me in religious - - - 8940

DCJ WISBEY: He hasn‘t failed to.

Page 154 of 235

ACCUSED: From a religious book. 8945 DCJ WISBEY: He‘s given you an answer.

no one can give me a ―secular‖ marker that links all Jews all over the world. Of course they can‘t - because they are a religion only. Wisbey knows this, that‘s why he‘s moving me on. He has been instructed to do this and he did it throught the trial.

For the Temple to be rebuilt will mean the tearing down and destruction of the Muslim Mosque that sits on the alleged site: ‗The Dome of the Rock‘. This would guarantee an all-out war with the Arab 8965 Muslim world and the Muslim world in general, without doubt. But this is central to Judaism. It is no secret in Israel/Palestine that this is fully what the Jews intend to do. They even have little stalls in Jerusalem where you can go and see models of the new Temple to be built when the Dome of the Rock is destroyed. This is throught the Old testament: 8970 ISAIAH 61:4 They will rebuild the ancient ruins and restore the places long devastated; they will renew the ruined cities that have been devastated for generations. 8975

There are also several million Arab Muslims and Christians living in the area. They will have to go of course unless they are happy to live as ―aliens‖ in the region and be ―water carriers‖ and ―wood cutters‖ and do ―forced labour‖ for their Jewish masters as also directed by their holy books explained previously.

ACCUSED: Well, Rabbi, I‘ll put to you; you just quoted me back a religious aspect of Judaism 8985 which is the return to the land of our fathers.

FREILICH: No, a secular Jew would believe that.

MHR so WHY would a ‘secular’ jew believe a dogmatic tenant of the faith of Judaism? Based on ??? what??? Apart from the religious dogma? ‘Spiritual’ connection for a secular jew? POINT 7: ―When I say that I was brought up as Jewish I mean that I have a cultural and spiritual connection with Israel and the heritage of the Jewish people.‖

I get the Rabbi to admit that his identity is based on a religious book:

ACCUSED: So you have an identity? A group identity based on religious books? 9015 FREILICH: Based on religious books - well, it‘s based on the Bible, yes.

Transcript 21/01/2011 Page 499

Rabbi Freilich deliberately lied when he stated he had never heard of the „Anti-Defamation League of „Bnai B‟rith‟ - the most well-known and powerful Jewish lobby in the world:

ACCUSED: Are you aware, rabbi - and I hope to get this ADL publication up. You‘re aware of course of the Anti-Defamation League of B‘Nai ‗Brith based in 9025 New York?

FREILICH: No.

ACCUSED: Forgive me rabbi. I am astounded that you, as a leader of your 9030 community - - -

DCJ WISBEY: We‘re not - we‘re not interested in whether you‘re astounded or not. 9035 Transcript 21/01/2011 Page 499

You see DCJ Wisbey immediately protecting Freilich from any meaningful cross examination. I contrast that with the recent trial of a Mr Troy Mercanti - well known bikie personality - where his former partner was grilled for 5 days under cross examination without a single objection from the 9040 prosecutor or judge. I would have liked the same opportunity.

Rabbi Freilich did not like it when I pointed out that he was a ‗Pharisee‘ - the same people Jesus rebuked 2000 years ago. The transcript in my opinion is not accurate on the following example. I remember clearly Rabbi Freilich stating unequivocally ―Yes‖ to my question which is not apparent in 9045 the transcript:

ACCUSED: And Jews at that time were severely persecuted by the Rabbinic Elite, of which you would be regarded as one. They would be your spiritual forefathers, would they not? The Pharisees, Sadducees? 9050

FREILICH: The - the Pharisees actually were the Rabbinic - were the founders of the Rabbinic traditions of Judaism, yes.

ACCUSED: And you would therefore be a modern day Pharisee. Would that be 9055 correct?

Page 156 of 235

I remember quite distinctly Rabbi Freilich stating a firm and straightforward ―Yes‖. That is not in the transcript, it follows straight on:

FREILICH: Well, I -I have been asked to give testimony at this court on the - on the issue of Judaism being a race or religion or both. This - this is particularly - this is - I don‘t see the relevance to - to my - to - to my -my evidence here.

2000 years ago. Here is what Jesus had to say about the ‗Pharisees‘, a ‗Rabbinic Sect‘ that Rabbi Freilich belongs:

JOHN 8:13 The Pharisees challenged him, ―Here you are, appearing as your own witness; your 9090 testimony is not valid‖. ... 19Then they asked him, ―Where is your father?‖ ―You do not know me or my Father,‖ Jesus replied. ―If you knew me, you would know my Father also.‖ ... 9095 37‖I know you are Abrahams descendants. Yet you are ready to kill me, because you have no room for my word.‖ ... 39‖Abraham is our father,‖ they answered. If you were Abrahams children,‖ said Jesus, ―then you would do the things 9100 Abraham did. 40As it is, you are determined to kill me, a man who has told you the truth that I heard from God. Abraham did not do such things. 41You are doing the things your105 father does.‖ ―We are not illegitimate children,‖ they protested, ―the only father we have is God himself.‖ 9105 42Jesus said to them, ―If God were your Father, you would love me, for I came from God and now am here. I have not come on my own; but He sent me. 43Why is my language not clear to you? Because you are unable to hear what I say. 44You belong to your father the devil, and you want to carry out your fathers desire. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in 9110 him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies. ... 45Yet because I tell the truth, why don‘t you believe me? 46Can any of you prove me guilty of sin? If I am telling the truth, why don‘t you believe me? 47He who belongs to God hears what God says. The reason you do not hear is that you do not belong to God.‖

So, so far Jesus has pointed out that Rabbi Freilich belongs to a religious sect that has as its ―father‖, ―the devil‖ and that he is the ―father of lies‖ - meaning, the Pharisees were congenital liars.

But wait there‘s more. Jesus had plenty more to say about the ‗Pharisees‘ to which Rabbi Freilich 9120 belongs:

MATTHEW 23:2 ―The teachers of the law and the Pharisees sit in Moses seat. 3So you must obey them and do everything they tell you. But do not do what they do, for they do not 9125 practice what they preach. 4They tie up heavy loads and put them on men‘s shoulders but they themselves are not willing to lift a finger to move them. 5‖Everything they do is done for men to see; they make their phylacteries wide and the tassels on their garments long; 6They love the place of honour at banquets 9130 and the most important seats in the synagogues; 7they love to be greeted in the market places and to have men call them ‗Rabbi‘.

MATTHEW 23:13 ―Woe to you teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You shut the 9135 kingdom of heaven in men‘s faces. You yourselves do not enter, nor will you let those enter who are trying to.‖

MATTHEW 23:15 ―Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You travel over 9140 land and sea to win a single convert, and when he becomes one, you make him twice as much a son of hell as you are.‖106

MATTHEW 23:25 ―Woe to you teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You clean the 9145 outside of the cup and dish, but inside they are full of greed and self-indulgence. 26Blind Pharisee! First clean the inside of the cup and dish, and then the outside will be clean.‖

MATTHEW 23:27 9150 ―Woe to you teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You are like white washed tombs, which look beautiful on the outside but on the inside are full of dead men‘s bones and everything unclean. 28In the same way, on the outside you appear to people as righteous but on the inside you are full of hypocrisy and wickedness.‖ 9155

MATTHEW 23:29 ―Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You build tombs for the prophets and decorate the graves of the righteous. 30And you say, ‗If we had lived in the days of our forefathers, we would not have taken part with them in 9160 shedding the blood of the prophets.‘ 31So you testify against yourselves that you are the descendants of those who murdered the prophets. 32Fill up then the measure of the sin of your forefathers.‖

MATTHEW 23:33 9165 ―You snakes! You brood of vipers! How will you escape being condemned to hell? 34Therefore I am sending you prophets and wise men and teachers. Some of them you will kill and crucify; others you will flog in your synagogues and pursue from town to town.‖ 9170 I guess that‘s about as discredited a witness as you could possibly get. DCJ Wisbey was not, under any circumstances, going to let me show what Rabbi Freilich is all about. This is why I said so plainly later on in the trial that the man is a congenital liar - not just from his reputation according to Jesus, but on what he had stated under an oath/affirmation.

6 I guess that puts pay to the notion that Judaism is not a ―proselyting‖ religion. i.e one seeking converts…actively…to expand its power…

[D] Professor Andrew Markus‘s Comments At Trial

Professor Andrew Markus makes the claim that ‗Jews‘ are an ethnic group based on his ‗study‘. It‘s worth going into this in detail. 9185 An interesting comment is made by Professor Markus that relates to the fact that in his much referred to ‗report‘ – out of 144 questions and 5100 respondents – not once is the pre-eminent question in Jewish communities asked:

“Do you consider yourself as being Jewish as defined by race? By 9190 ethnicity? By religion? Or by a combination of both?”

Imagine, the ‗defining‘ question is not asked at all! The very question that is the defining point of what constitutes a ‗racial group‘ under incredibly important legislation is not asked by the premiere „Professor of Jewish Civilization‟ in Australia, in his landmark study. I point this out to Professor 9195 Markus:

Accused: Well, I am charged under the racial vilification legislation, sub group ethnicity. And yet your paper doesn‘t even mention, perhaps a question such as; ―Do you regard being Jewish as a race or ethnicity?‖ Not a single question. Is 9200 that so?---On that specific question, yes, that is correct.

So I put to you then that the issue amongst Jews, the issue of being a race or ethnicity? Is it not an issue? I would presume it would have been in your paper?--Is – no, it‘s not an issue. It‘s not an issue.

Accused: Is – is being regarded as a race or ethnicity – and this is a question to you personally as – could I gather, professor, you regard yourself as a ―Jewish 9260 person‖?---Yes.

So if I was to say, ―Are you a member of the Jewish race?‖ how would you reply to me?---I‘d say no, I‘m not. 9265 Do you believe a Jewish race exists?---No.

Do you believe there‘s such a thing as Jewish ethnicity?---Yes.

Would you – I‘m just curious. Would you not have found that an important 9270 question to put in your paper?---

How fucking disingenuous can you get…he admits jews are NOT a race, assumes then must be an ethnic group, because many are not religious, but why NOT ask such a definitive question? Unless you did NOT want the answer ???

When you do a survey, if I could just explain this to you, you don‘t necessarily ask people straight out. Like, for example, I wouldn‘t put in a survey, ―Are you a racist?‖ What I would do would be to ask a series of questions and then, by analysing the responses to a series of questions, determine the answer to that question. So that‘s what this report does. It gives 9275 you a response from a number of different angles which establish that the Jews form an ethnic community without question, just as the Italians do, just as Chinese Australians do, just as a number of groups in Australia do. So in other words HE gets to ‘construct’ the jewish ‘ethnic group’ HIMSELF…literally ‘without question’ !!!

But the title of the Professors study is „Jewish Identification In Australia‟. The term ‗identification‘ is 9295 used throughout the paper. Nowhere is any conclusion reached; nowhere is it mentioned; inferred; discussed; re-iterated; stated; that the study is making findings as to the terms ‗Jews‘ or ‗Jewish‘ being an ‗ethnicity‘.

The 10 page report – ‗Jewish Identification In Australia‘ – simply lists these commonalities as part of the grouped together findings:

[1] Knowledge of the Holocaust 9315 [2] Fear of/experience of anti-Semitism [3] Bar/ Bat-mitzvah [4] Passover Seder [5] Family Connectedness [6] Jewish identity 9320 [7] Friendship patterns [8] Israel

MHR note the first two are about anti-semitism…one the myth, the other the illusory self-defined ‘oh I’m a victim, I’m so perfect, but they didn’t give me the job / award / sex / praise / position BECAUSE I’m Jewish, not because I’m a git !!!

over 15,000 school children from nonJewish schools visit the Jewish Holocaust Centre in Melbourne each year. To be brainwashed / deceived / humbled by lies !!!

Note the constant use of the term ‗Nazi‘. The correct term is ‗National Socialist‘. Imagine if it was worded, ―...indicated that they had lived under a ‗Commie or Commie collaborator regime‘.

Simply Google ―jews + religion + race + ethnicity‖ and you will get hundreds of thousands of hit‘s with the vast majority of definitions claiming ―religion‖ or ―family‖. In fact, I could not find a single web site dedicated to describing Jews as a race or ethnicity.

A large number of survivors of the Holocaust migrated to Australia in the period 1947-61. Some 25% of respondents to the Gen08 survey across Australia indicated that they had lived under a ‗Nazi or Nazi collaborator regime‘.110 Alarger proportion indicated that family members (grandparents, parents, other 9345 relatives) had been in concentration camps during the Second World War – 37% in Melbourne, 31% in Sydney, 17% in Perth. MHR how to explain the nazi incompetence and inefficiency, assuming they had orders to kill all these people? How did so many ‘survive’ if nazi’s were hunting them down for several years, with the overwhelming support of the local populations? Who would much preferred to have shot them on sight, rather than round them up for transportation!!!

[2] Fear of/experience of anti-Semitism 9350 There is a relatively high level of discrimination in the form of anti-Semitism reported by Jewish Australians. 60% of respondents in Melbourne, 57% in Sydney and %57 in Perth reported that they had experienced anti-Semitism in Australia. In Melbourne 29%, in Sydney 26% and in Perth 30% reported experience of one or more incidents of anti-Semitism over the last 12 months. In 9355 most cases the reported experience was of verbal abuse.

[3] Bar/ Bat-mitzvah

A Bar / Bat-Mitzvah ceremony is an important rite of passage for a young Jewish 9360 person. According to Jewish law, when Jewish children reach 13 years of age for boys and 12 years for girls they become responsible for their actions, and ―become a Bar or Bat Mitzvah‖ (Daughter (Bat) or Son (Bar) of the commandments). This follows a period of intense Jewish learning and includes reading in Hebrew from the Bible during a Saturday service in a synagogue. Of 9365 all respondents to the Gen08 survey, 64% in Melbourne, 67% in Sydney and 65% in Perth had a Bar/ Bat-Mitzvah. The proportion is considerably higher amongst the younger generation, highlighting the strengthening of socialisation experiences in the Jewish communities of Australia: over 80% of Jewish respondents aged 18-34 had a Bar/ Bat Mitzvah.

MHR but if they are secular, what could this mean? Apart from a party and gifts? They don’t BELIEVE in the commandments / torah / mitzvah, so how can they ‘honor’ it etc? The ‘commandments’ are religious…613…few jews EVER obey ALL of them, let alone KNOW what they are…should have asked Keyser THAT question then !!!

[4] Passover Seder

Each year, Jewish families gather with family and friends for a festive meal to celebrate Passover. This occasion commemorates liberation from Egypt, as told 9375 in the Book of Exodus. The occasion can also serve to remembering other times of suffering endured by Jewish people during their long history. Although the Passover Seder is of deep religious significance, with it‘s origin in Exodus: ―And you shall tell it to your son on that day, saying ‗Because of this God did for us when He took me out of Egypt‘‖, it is commemorated by religious and many 9380 secular Jews alike. The Gen08 survey indicates that 86% of respondents in Melbourne, 84% in Sydney and 87% in Perth attend a Passover Seder every year.

[5] Family Connectedness 9385 An important distinguishing characteristic of Jews in Australian society is the strength of family ties. In both Melbourne and Sydney more than 70% of respondents indicated that they spent Friday evening Sabbath with their family on a regular basis, with 50% of respondents indicating that they spent ‗every week‘ with their family and 23% ‗most weeks‘. In Perth 52% indicated that they 9390 spend every Friday evening Sabbath with their family, 26% most weeks, a total of 78%.

[6] Jewish identity 9395 Jewish identity continues to be of central importance in the lives of Jewish Australians. When asked ‗how important is being Jewish in your life today?‘ close to 90% of respondents in Melbourne and Sydney and 91% in Perth indicated that being Jewish was ‗very important‘ or ‗important‘ for them.

MHR what does this question even MEAN ? how about his ‘construction’ theory vs direct question on ‘ethnicity’ v ‘race’…why not ask…is being jewish more important than BEER? Etc :D would you rather be ‘jewish’ or have a good job? Etc

[7] Friendship patterns

Jews see themselves as very much part of Australian society: 95% were either born in Australia or are naturalised; they have a ‗very strong‘ or ‗strong‘ sense of belonging in Australia, indicated by 84% of respondents in Melbourne, 82% in 9405 Sydney, and 82% in Perth. There were almost no respondents who indicated lack of belonging in Australia. But Jewish Australians also maintain strong Jewish friendship networks. Thus 89% of respondents in Melbourne, 86% in Sydney, and 86% in Perth indicated that ‗half or more‘ of their close friendships are Jewish. MHR again deliberately mixed in two categories, to avoid the horrible fact of anti-social exclusivity i.e could easily indicate that these people had 100% exclusively ‘Jewish’ friends… e.g fact is only around 10% of respondents had at least half of their friends from NON-jewish community…THAT is something the jews want to claim is ‘anti-semitic lies’…why combine two groups if not to avoid the FACTS? That being ‘Jewish’ is ‘anti-social’…self ghetto-izing…a CULT … which doesn’t like to ‘mix’ with ‘unclean / cattle / fools / AMALEK’ !!!

[8] Israel

Identification with Israel unifies the Jewish community. close to 80% of respondents indicated that they regarded themselves as Zionist (82% in Melbourne, 78% in Sydney and 85% in Perth), while only 13% did not

It is common for visitors to Australia to comment on the strength of identification with Israel and Zionism within Jewish communities. Thus Professor Fania Oz-9425 Salzberger of Monash and Haifa Universities recently observed:

I am yet to find a single Australian Jew who is indifferent towards Israel. There is a level of proximity here that one cannot find amid British or American Jewry, where many 9430 individuals are unstirred by their Jewish ancestry, uninvolved with Israel, or both. I like telling my Jewish-Australian friends that they are first cousins to us Israelis, while many other communities are second cousins at best. (AJN, 5 June 2009) 9435 When asked for their reaction to international events which put Israel in danger, a large majority indicated that they felt a ‗special alarm‘ (56%) or as if their ‗own life was in danger‘ (20%)

Close connection with Israel is maintained by regular visits. 87% in Melbourne, 9440 86% in Sydney and 89% in Perth indicated that they had visited Israel at least once. In the last four years, some four out of ten respondents had visited Israel; 45% in Melbourne, 38% in Sydney and 39% in Perth. 79% of Melbourne respondents have family in Israel, over 68% in Sydney and 79% in Perth. 9445 What has just been described by Professor Markus is Jewish Identity and NOT Jewish ethnicity. By the definitions described above, Catholics, Muslims, Scientologists, Motorcycle Clubs, Bogans, Fat People, Surfers, Cat Lovers, Heavy Metal Music Lovers and ANY other identifiable group can fit the definition of ethnicity. 9450 Professor Shlomo Sand111 points this out:

―...nationality is not merely a sense of belonging to some collective body; it is more than a feeling of solidarity and a common interest, for otherwise Protestants would be a nation, and so would cat lovers.‖ 9455 Professor Shlomo Sand 2008 ―The Invention of the Jewish People‖ p.303 Verso

Mr Eyers: And did you find under the broad heading of ―Commonality‖ that there were a number of different aspects of life and culture and – and, the broader sense, the way in which Jews looked at the world that founded points of commonality?---Yes. And that‘s what is illustrated then in this report. 9470 Transcript 19/01/2011 Page 436

―No one confuses the Catholic faith with the ethnic culture of Italians, Poles, Austrians, Spaniards, or Brazilians – Catholics all. To be a Lutheran is not necessarily to be a Finn, Dane, Swede, Norwegian, or German. Everyone understands that there is a Catholic or a Lutheran faith that is distinct from the various ethnic cultures that take shape in dialogue with that faith, that transcends the particularities of circumstance. Brazilian and 9485 American Pentecostals know the difference between nationality and religion. So, too, Judaism is not an ethnic religion, and the opinions of an ethnic group cannot serve to define that religion‖. Craige R. Prentiss 2003 “Religion And The Creation Of Race And Ethnicity: An Introduction” p.88 New York University Press.

Let me apply these standards to a group commonly referred to as ‗Bikies‘. Here is Professor Andrew Markus‘s „commonalities‟ again:

[1] Knowledge of the Holocaust 9495 [2] Fear of/experience of anti-Semitism [3] Bar/ Bat-mitzvah [4] Passover Seder [5] Family Connectedness [6] Jewish identity 9500 [7] Friendship patterns [8] Israel

Let‘s apply it to ‗Bikies‘: 9505 [1]Knowledge of Eureka Stockade and Ned Kelly112 [2]Fear of/experience of being targeted by police [3]Associate status [4]Patched Member [5]Club connectedness 9510 [6]Bikie identity [7]Friendship patterns [8]Clubhouse

‗Bikies‘ wear the same clothes, use the same language and ‗slang terms‘ that 9515 is unique to the culture, they go to the same bars, listen to the same music, watch the same movies, ride the same motor bike, have a Clubhouse where they can be amongst other ‗bikies‘ and feel safe (their Israel), have initiation rites, rites of passage etc.

Without:

• A common geographical origin or descent from a small number of common ancestors... 9545

...as being utterly essential, ethnicity becomes meaningless, indistinguishable from other ‗grouping definitions‘ as this previous quote warns:

―Foregrounding fixity/fluidity, rather than some specific content like kinship and 9550 descent, risks making ethnicity/race indistinguishable from other cultural categories, such as religion and citizenship, since both of these could also be said to share this dynamic of fixity and fluidity.‖ Denise Kimber Buell 2005 “Why This New Race: Ethnic reasoning in Early Christianity” – p.10 Columbia University Press

MHR so the ‘nation’ of ‘Israel’ set up to give ‘Jews’ a ‘national’ identity? A ‘longing for return’ RETURN? Having never been there? They nor any ancestor, EVER…thus jews from Oz ‘go once’ so they can ‘return’ later…and WHY? To live? NO…who wants to live in Israel? … Why then? Because their RELIGIOUS texts say that the messiah will return, and Israel / Jerusalem will be the capital of a jew world order…there will be peace, yes, the peace of submission to brute force and coercion a-la ‘serve the jews (remain peaceful and do what you’re told) or die’…as AMALEK…anyone who resists, opposes, or rejects the ‘jew world order’ the ‘jewtopia’ under a jewish tyranny…THAT is why people ‘long to return’, not to the desert, but to POWER…Christian Zionists have same motive for founding and defending / extending the state of Israel…the ‘rapture’ cannot happen otherwise i.e they cannot ascend, living, to heaven if no state of Israel exists….AND IF NO THIRD WORLD WAR OCCURS I MIGHT ADD, SAME WITH THE AMALEK MYTH, WE MUST ALL JOIN FORCES TO DESTROY ISRAEL, IN ORDER TO REALISE THE JEWTOPIA AND RAPTURE, ACCORDING TO THE RELIGIOUS TEXTS / BELIEFS OF JEWS AND ZIONISTS / CHRISTIAN ZIONISTS / RAPTURISTS…

Mhr I want to note my great respect for all the hard working Israeli’s of high moral caliber and ethics, who just want to work hard and live in peace and prosperity…from honest hard work…that it appears that Israeli’s DO make more of the land than many other Arab peoples…and if they had better leaders, and were willing to live in the same multiculturalism their own leaders force on US, then their would be no problem…before I understood the situation, I expected any day the Arabs would accept the Jews, respecting them for the works they have achieved…but I had no idea of the real history and current practices…always wondering WHY the Arabs wouldn’t accept ‘peace deals’ etc…i.e victim of propaganda…

And if Judaism with its silly 613 clearly man-made rules, and arrogance, didn’t tell me I was inferior, never capable of ‘ethics’ or ‘morals’ as a non Jew, and hadn’t firebombed Germany and Japan, and carried out the Jew.S.S.R massacres and centuries of gulags etc, or 911 (which set me off on this journey), or the u.s..S liberty, or patriot act, or martial law, or put kind intellectuals in prison for over 10 years for stating clear facts…I would be much more open to the idea of anyone at all bringing in a one world government…but we MUST judge people by their acts, the means they employ, not just their ends / objectives…and I do NOT see the old testament / torah as a ‘role model’ for a philosopher king…as a model for anything we’d want to reproduce…racial supremacism, slavery, rape, ‘ripping up pregnant women’, a cult mentality with zero tolerance or dialog, totally closed minded moronic , zombie cult membership and leadership…Most JEWS wouldn’t want to live under a jew world order…they imagine it will be communism 2.0 ‘done right this time’…or some other utopia…but what you’ll get is the Jew.S.S.R on an international level…

Accused: ... And perhaps your Honour could prompt me? Have I asked the 9605 question to the professor; do Jewish religious books such as the Tanakh or Old Testament or the Babylonian Talmud, Rabbinic commentaries, which describe in a lot of detail, Jewish life and you could say, not that I believe it, but you could say Jewish ethnic markers, are they reliable history books or are they religious books? 9610

Prof Markus: My understanding is that they are religious books.

Accused: And as a well-respected academic who – who conducts fairly in-depth studies, would you say it‟s wise to base legislation on a religious book? 9615

DCJ Wisbey: Well, that‘s not relevant and you needn‘t answer that, professor?--Thank you.

Transcript 10/01/2011 Page 462

Why not relevant…THAT IS THE POINT…being a ‘jew’, (vs being an Israeli) is about religion…here are 42 distinct ‘sub-groups’ already identified earlier in this document…Rabbi Frelich represented, at best , ONE out of these 42, or in the prosecutions own words, and his, at best 10% of all jews…making his sub-group simply one of the larger minority groups…I’d say MORE jews are secular, with zero interest in religion / Israel / Zionism…

Professor Shlomo Sand asks the simple question in his book „The Invention Of The Jewish People‟: ―What are the secular markers that denote an ethnic connection between Jews all over the world?‖

The answer is there aren‘t any and it‘s time someone made obvious that the emperor has no clothes 9625 on. The legislation has moved into ‗self-perception‘ as a defining argument which again opens up a Pandora‘s box for ANYONE who wants to have a weapon they can use against critics.

MHR yep, that IS the operationalization of the concept by statisticians…self perception / definition, and acceptance by others as members of a group i.e group self-definition / inclusion….just like Bikies, or Scientologists…who of course DO have their own ‘language’ e.g O.T, Clear, etc, in fact ANY CULT CAN CLAIM PROTECTION / ABUSE THIS LAW… !!! Judaism is a cult, as are all religions and many very exclusive, closed, groups e.g bikies…

Here is a quote from a random Jewish website that discuss what the definition of ‗Jewish‘ is. It would have been good to have been able to go ONLINE114 and show the jury – in real time – that not one 9630 website describes themselves as a ‗race‘ nor ‗ethnic‘ group. NOT ONE. I went through at least 20 popular Jewish websites dealing with the issue

With such unique legislation and the internet being such a big part of it, they should have been able to go online – in the court room - and see what is freely on offer as ‗information‘. They would also see that while I was being prosecuted, hundreds of websites and blogs, maintained by Australians, are not. This would show the highly selective manner in which the legislation was being applied.

Most secular American Jews think of their Jewishness as a matter of culture or ethnicity. When they think of Jewish culture, they think of the food, of the Yiddish language, of some limited holiday observances, and of cultural values like the emphasis on education.

Those secular American Jews would probably be surprised to learn that much of what 9640 they think of as Jewish culture is really just Ashkenazic Jewish culture, the culture of Jews whose ancestors come from one part of the world. Jews have lived in many parts of the world and have developed many different traditions. As a Sephardic friend likes to remind me, Yiddish is not part of his culture, nor are bagels and lox, chopped liver, latkes, gefilte fish or matzah ball soup. His idea of Jewish cooking includes bourekas, 9645 phyllo dough pastries filled with cheese or spinach. His ancestors probably wouldn‘t know what to do with a dreidel.

There are certainly cultural traits and behaviours that are shared by many Jews, that make us feel more comfortable with other Jews. Jews in many parts of the world share 9650 many of those cultural aspects. However, that culture is not shared by all Jews all over the world, and people who do not share that culture are no less Jews because of it. Thus, Judaism must be something more than a culture or an ethnic group.

MHR I think ‘OTHER THAN’ would be more apt / precise / accurate

As the United States is the culture from which all of these new laws are springing, it is only natural that the concepts - philosophical, historical and legal - are based around the American experience. With ‗Jews‘, that means Ashkenazi Jewish experience from the Jewish peoples of Poland, Russia and 9665 to some extent Germany. This is a very specific Yiddish culture that has some claim to a specific ethnicity in the traditional sense...but it is not found anywhere else in the world and does not in any way cross the cultural divide – only the Jewish faith does that.

When the average person thinks ―Jewish‖, he or she is thinking of Ashkenazic Jewish American culture which has stemmed from the vast immigration of Jews from Russia and Poland from the late 18th century on. ―Seinfeld‖, the hugely popular American comedy series, is based on American Jews; their ethnic background as the average person would know it is Polish and Russian; their genetic makeup indistinguishable from their surrounding neighbours; their day to day secular habits 9680 indistinguishable from the people in their village and towns back in Europe and Russia.

Here, the major Israeli newspaper Haaretz quotes U.S government education officials not deeming Jews a racial group: 9685 Can the U.S government officially protect Jewish students?

115 Sephardic = Arab Jew 116 These are specifically ‗Arab‘ culture foods.

Page 167 of 235

Jewish groups exert communal effort to get the U.S Department of Education more deeply involved in probing the allegations of anti-Semitism 9690 on college campuses.

Published 12:51 19.04.10 Latest update 08:52 20.04.10

By The Forward and Josh Nathan-Kazis 9695

Are Jews an ethnic or a religious group?

This perennial question is now at the heart of a Jewish communal effort to get the U.S Department of Education more deeply involved in probing allegations of 9700 anti-Semitism on college campuses.

Thirteen national Jewish organizations have sent a letter to Secretary of Education Arne Duncan arguing that the department‘s Office for Civil Rights has adopted a policy that fails to protect Jewish students from anti-Semitic 9705 harassment on college campuses.

The March 16 letter urges the department to address incidents of campus antiSemitism under its mandate to investigate instances of discrimination on the basis of race and national origin. The Jewish groups letter expressed concern that 9710 the department is treating campus anti-Semitism solely as a manifestation of religious bias, over which the Education Department lacks jurisdiction.

―Jewish students should have some recourse and some remedy if they‘re subject to intimidation or harassment on the basis of their identity of being Jewish,‖ said 9715 Richard Foltin, director of national and legislative affairs at the American Jewish Committee. ―We want to make sure that the resources of our national institutions, our federal government, are in place for those students when they‘re needed.‖

... 9720

―The current policy is not to address anti-Semitism at all,‖ said Kenneth Marcus, who headed the department‘s civil rights office from 2003 to 2004. ―The only way a complaint will be addressed is if it‘s by a black Jew who faces racism, or a female Jew who faces sexism, or a disabled Jew who faces disability 9725 discrimination. But a Jew who faces anti-Semitism will not be addressed.‖

...

Jewish organizations point to written statements from Education Department 9730 officials as evidence that the OCR has changed its policy. In a series of letters issued between 2006 and 2009, officials wrote that the office will not investigate allegations based purely on religious discrimination. They do not, however, definitively state whether a student‘s Jewishness constitutes a solely religious identity. 9735

In a 2009 letter responding to an enquiry from Rep. Brad Sherman, a California Democrat, Ali wrote: ―It has long been OCR‘s policy...that title VI does not cover discrimination based solely on religion, including anti-Semitic harassment, intimidation, and discrimination... However, when cases include allegations of 9740 race, colour, or national origin discrimination in addition to religious discrimination, OCR would have jurisdiction over the portion of the complaint alleging discrimination on the basis of race, colour, or national origin.‖

There is that word ―identity‖ again and again. Race and ethnicity are not identity. As Professor 9745 Shlomo Sand points out again and again in his book „The Invention Of The Jewish People‟, even ―cat lovers‖ are an identity.

―veritable shell game‖ of Jewish identity. “Look! We‟re a religion! No! a race! No! a cultural entity! Sorry–a religion!” Because this is the key to maintaining Jewish power – if it‘s indefinable, it‘s invisible. Like a Stealth Bomber (you can‘t see it on your radar but you sure know when you‘ve been hit) Jewish power, with its blurred outlines and changing forms, becomes invisible. And if you can‘t see it you can‘t fight it. Meanwhile 9765 the assault on the Palestinians continues. Paul Eisen ―Jewish Power‖

MHR you cannot fight an opponent / enemy / adversary if you cannot name it…like a shape-shifter…’quick, grab that gir, ah, fox, ah, bird, ah tree’…how to do it? Everyone will be ‘chasing’ and ‘defending’ against something different…look for a different suspect…

MHR seems every current definition should identify 42 different ‘jewish’ groups / communities, based on THEIR shared beliefs, ancestry, language, dress, customs, festivals, foods, etc !!! So no such thing, legally, as ‘A Jew’…but An Ashkednazi jew, a sepphardic jew…etc…divided by real measures of ethnicity or even ‘race’ if you will e.g Ethiopian jew…otherwise we aer clearly talking about RELIGION…and THEN we will need the same sorts of sub-groups as Christians and Muslims have e.g Catholic, protestant, Sunni, etc

The marker that makes the legislation what it was meant to be – what the ―man/woman on the street‖ took it to be – is “a common geographical origin or descent from a small number of common ancestors” as part of the essential components that define ethnicity. Then it makes some sense.

Prejudicial evidence leads to new trial Natasha Boddy THE WEEKEND WEST December 15-16, 2012 9845

Two men convicted of drug offenses have won a retrial because a detective was allowed to give ―inadmissible‖ and ―prejudicial‖ evidence to the jury at their District Court trial. In a decision published yesterday, the Court of Appeal ruled that the convictions of Domenic Italiano and Cameron and Robert Barnes for drug offenses should be 9850 overturned after finding there had been a miscarriage of justice during their trial in June last year. Following a 17-day District Court trial, Mr Italiano was found guilty of a charge of possessing methamphetamine with intent to sell or supply while Mr Barnes was convicted of a charge of supplying methamphetamine. 9855 This week, Chief Justice Wayne Martin and Justices Pullin and Robert Mazza found the trial had been tainted by the ―inadmissible‖ and ― prejudicial‖ evidence of Det-Sen Const. Peter Gerard Shanahan. Justice Mazza said it was extraordinary ―how much inadmissible opinion evidence was adduced which was prejudicial‖ to the two men. 9860 Which was inadmissible opinion evidence anyway. He added that ―equally as extraordinary was the failure of defense counsel to object to it‖.

Please note DCJ McCann‘s comment at the November 2010 directions hearing on Jews being a racial group: 9865

DCJ McCann: The State‘s case relies on two expert witnesses and the case law in various jurisdictions. The expert witnesses are Rabbi David Freilich and Professor Andrew Markus and the State also relies on the evidence of Mr Keyser. I‘ll come back to that evidence later. At the moment there is no challenge to the 9870 qualifications of any of these witnesses to give opinion evidence.

Neither Professor Andrew Markus‘s opinion evidence nor Rabbi Dovid Freilich‘s opinion evidence 9875 was admissible and I should have vigorously opposed its introduction by the prosecution. This includes Professor Andrew Marcus‘s ―study‖ which was hearsay, nothing more.

DCJ Wisbey‘s summing up is extremely important: 9880 DCJ Wisbey: Now, there is one matter that I must specifically refer to and that‘s what we call expert evidence. You‘ve heard evidence from Professor Markus, the foundation research professor for Jewish Civilization at the Monash University and you have his research paper, which is exhibit 4, and you also heard from Rabbi Freilich, the Chief Rabbi of the Perth Hebrew Congregation. Their 9885 evidence was directed to the issue of whether the Jewish people are a race or ethnic group and in terms of the offence, whether they constitute a racial group. As I say, that evidence was lead because the state must establish as one of the elements of the offence that Jewish people are a racial group.

MHR again totally dumbfounded…Prof. Markus emphatically stated NO they are NOT a race…!!!

Rabbi Freilich was not an ―expert witness‖. He was specifically a ―lay witness‖ giving ―opinion evidence‖. Professor Andrew Markus was an ―expert witness‖ giving ―opinion evidence‖. In other words, they were talking about what they ‗think‘ other people ‗think‘ (in the case of Professor 9895 Markus) and Rabbi Freilich was merely extrapolating on his ‗beliefs‘ via an interpretation of a religious book along the lines of his specific Jewish religious sect – Orthodox Judaism. Even the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court agrees. Here are his comments from the appeal hearing on 13th December 2011 on another point which have direct relevance to Rabbi Freilich‘s inadmissible opinion evidence: 9900

CJ MARTIN: Asking the Rabbi whether other people can be proud of their race and their culture and their heritage and wish to marry amongst their own is plainly an irrelevant question. It is asking the Rabbi to speculate about other people‘s state of mind. 9905 ... None of that is evidence, is it? How would the Rabbi know the position of Anglicans in England? How would he know the position of other people in Western Australia and whether they are proud of their race on the face that the question was plainly objectionable? 9910

Transcript CACR 28&29 of 2011 13/12/2011 Page 2

Besides the Chief Justice explaining that the Rabbi should never have been allowed in the court room (which of course I agree with) - he got the gist of the question wrong. I was asking the Rabbi‘s 9915 opinion of whether ―other‖ people are allowed to be proud of their race, culture and heritage, and demand to marry amongst their own ―race‖, as he demands. The point was to show that by definition

Page 171 of 235

the Rabbi sounds like a racial supremacist - which he is; and Israel is a racist apartheid state - again, by definition. They can‘t have it both ways.

At a Directions Hearing two months before the trial, these comments were made that are instructive on this point:

Mr Bougher: Well, I think, whether or not the State considers that those witnesses need to be called, depends a bit upon the rulings that your Honour 9925 makes today. It seems to me that Marcus is merely relating statistics, which is really hearsay evidence, and I don‘t see that that has any probative value at all. That‘s another issue that may be taken up. ... DCJ McCann: But for the purposes of this hearing this morning I‘m going to 9930 proceed

Mr Bougher: No, your Honour. Although, as I say, I comment that the statistical evidence really is hearsay and it‘s not probative, so I think that it can be disregarded. The Rabbi‘s opinion and evidence in his statement is something that 9935 at this stage, of course, can be taken into account by your Honour.

DCJ McCann: Sorry, I was making a note and I missed half of what you just said. I can take into account Rabbi Freilich‘s evidence? 9940 Mr Bougher: Yes. As it‘s here on the papers; as it stands now. It‘s untested, of course. But the statement of Markus – I think it‘s Professor Markus, is it? – he really just gives a statistical outline, basically, which in my submission doesn‘t have any probative value. 9945 Transcript 19/11/2010 Page 183-184

DCJ McCann at the 19 November Directions Hearing makes some more comments on the status of both Rabbi Freilich and Professor Andrew Markus: 9950 DCJ McCann: The State‘s case relies on two expert witnesses and the case law in various jurisdictions. The expert witnesses are Rabbi David Freilich and Professor Andrew Markus and the State also relies on the evidence of Mr Keyser. I‘ll come back to that evidence later. At the moment there is no challenge to the qualifications of any of these witnesses to give opinion evidence. 9955

Transcript 19/11/2010 Page 204

On the point of Rabbi Freilich, he was making statements only in his capacity as head of the Hebrew Orthodox Religious Community – not as a representative of ―Jews‖ in general. It was as if the Arch 9960 Bishop of the Perth Catholic Community was making ‗defining‘ statements as to what a ―Christian‖ was and believes, all while the fact that there are wildly differing interpretations amongst dozens of different Christian sects is ignored. DCJ Wisbey should have clarified and amplified to the jury that Rabbi Freilich was only a ―lay witness‖ and only expressing his ―opinion‖ on what a Jew was/is in his capacity as the specific head of the Perth Hebrew congregation. The simple fact is he should never 9965 have been on the stand.

Let me quote from Professor Andrew Markus‘s much discussed ‗report‘ on the above specific point to do with Rabbi Freilich. Under the heading „Divisions Amongst Jewish Australians‟118: 9970 Divisions amongst Jewish Australians

Amongst Jewish Australians, as amongst all groups of people, there are significant divisions. There are marked divisions, for example, along lines of

118 Full report name „Jewish Australians And Jewish Identification‟.

Page 172 of 235

religious belief119 (and non-belief), with the main forms of identification being 9975 the Ultra-Orthodox, Strictly Orthodox, Modern Orthodox, Conservative, Traditional, Progressive and Secular. These divisions impact on the way people lead their lives – for example, the frequency of synagogue attendance, the following of religious observances, including dietary laws and the way children are raised. 9980

So, Rabbi Freilich is representative of the Perth Jewish Community and Jews in general? DCJ Wisbey‘s summing up ‗on the evidence‘ on this vital point was grossly inadequate and one sided.

Rabbi Freilich‘s testimony is not even relevant as he is a religious leader and there was never any 9985 contention that Jews were not a religious group. Mr Justin Whalley in a letter to my lawyer dated 28th of July 2010 made this statement about Rabbi Freilich‘s statement and testimony to come at trial:

... Whilst the definition of ‗racial group‘ in Code s.76 makes no reference to 9990 religion it does refer to “ethnic origins.” The dictionary definition of ―ethnic‖ includes “a social group having common national, racial, cultural and religious...characteristics.” Accordingly the State will contend that the evidence of Rabbi FREILICH is relevant to this issue. 9995 Freilich was never relevant to the case and his testimony and statement should not have been allowed. It was never in dispute that Jews were a ‗religious group‘. I object to him taking the stand early on:

DCJ Wisbey: Mr O‘Connell, I‘ve got three applications for the evidence of Mr 10000 Peach, who‘s in the United Kingdom, Mr Markus, who is in Melbourne, and Mr Freilich, who is in Israel, to give evidence by video-link. Do you have any problem with that?

Accused: Adjudicator, other than it‘s merely hearsay. I mean, Rabbi Freilich is a 10005 religious man. That‘s hearsay. He‘s going to be talking from a religious perspective. That‘s not relevant at all to this – to this matter. That‘s faith. That‘s not relevant at all.

... 10010

DCJ Wisbey: In the circumstances, having regard to the provisions of the Evidence Act, in particular section 121, I propose to make orders that the evidence of the witnesses Peach, Freilich and Markus be taken by way of video link. 10015

Transcript 17/01/2011 Page 313

On specifically Professor Andrew Markus‘s ‗report‘, becoming an ‗exhibit‘ – this made what is essentially hearsay from un-named sources into something it was not, in the eyes of the jury. I should 10020 have refused to allow it to be entered as an ‗exhibit‘ and fought sternly to have it labelled hearsay and inadmissible, just as both DCJ Wisbey and prosecutor Eyre‘s had done to me. I discussed this with Mr Eyers before the commencement of proceedings and agreed to let him have it entered because I thought that be being ‗nice and co-operative‘ I might get my own material entered onto the record. Please don‘t laugh, that‘s the way I ‗think‘. I realise that is not the way to think in court.

Accused: ... Your Honour, the only thing I have with the material is that it‘s – it‘s basically hearsay. And as long as the jury know that it‘s pretty much hearsay, then the professor can - - - 10050 DCJ Wisbey: Well, the issue is whether the jury get the report as an exhibit. Do you wish them to have it as an exhibit or do you just wish the witness - - -

Accused: Yeah. They can knock themselves out, have a read. I‘m happy with that, your Honour. 10055

Mr Eyers: Yes. So it was an application by consent. I did canvass it with Mr O‘Connell.

DCJ Wisbey: Yes. Well, in those circumstances, perhaps we should have the 10060 jury in and start.

Transcript 19/01/2011 Page 424-425

Before going on, please refer back to page 67 of this letter and the article about a British Judge, Bathurst-Norman, who made positive comments about the accused in a trial where the accused had 10080 damaged property to prevent harm coming to the Palestinians in Gaza:

Describing evidence shown in court, Judge Bathurst-Norman told the jury that he could only describe the ―horrific‖ events shown as, ―scenes which one would rather have hoped to have disappeared with the Nazi regimes of the last war‖. 10085

Evidence ―shown‖. Exactly what I wanted to do so the Jury could see the psychological motivating factors behind my behaviour. This is extremely important.

It‘s not like the court didn‘t know from very early on that I wanted to present large amounts of 10090 material to dispel the prejudice of the jury:

Page 174 of 235

ACCUSED: Just finally, I‘m very happy with that - was it five to ten days for a trial? That‘s wonderful because there will be extensive background information needed to be given to the jury from my part, including documentaries - mainstream 10095 documentaries.

Transcript 24/04/2010 Page 93

As you are aware, I was continually promised the chance to present evidence by first presenting it to 10100 DCJ Wisbey who was concerned it would violate the premise of ‗hearsay‘. I was promised by both DCJ Wisbey and prosecutor Antony Ayres that chance. I had argued that section 80B (Conduct likely to racially harass) was defensible under 80G (b) (ii) and (c) and I was at least entitled to present the material that formed my views so the jury could ascertain if in fact my actions were in the public interest etc. 10105

80G. Defences (1) It is a defence to a charge under section 78 or 80B to prove that the accused persons conduct was engaged in reasonably and in good faith - (b) in the course of any statement, publication, discussion or debate made 10110 or held, or any other conduct engaged in, for - (ii) any purpose that is in the public interest; and (c) in making or publishing a fair and accurate report or analysis of any event or matter of public interest. 10115 Also, what I have read, watched, and listened too over ten years regarding Jewish power and the underlying racial and religious supremacism goes to the heart of intent under section 77 of the code as well as the argument that the jury is so tainted and prejudiced from the beginning on matters of Jewish persecution and their status as a vulnerable minority group that I should have been allowed to clarify this heavily. ‗Jews‘ are without doubt, I repeat, without doubt, the most powerful ―group‖ of people in 10120 the world. This is a matter of the simple historical and present day record. This influenced my behaviour and would go a long way to creating inferences for the jury as to my state of mind and subsequent intent.

From page 662 to 667 of the Transcript you see me arguing that I should be able to present material. 10125 DCJ Wisbey and the prosecution raise the issue of hearsay again despite stating earlier that I would be able to present material for the inspection of both Judge and Prosecutor.

Mr Eyers has finished his cross examination of me. Now DCJ Wisbey is inviting me to raise any matters that have come out of cross examination: 10130

The Witness: Will I be able to - when do I get to present my material? So it goes to the heart of intent, good faith, innocent intentions.

DCJ Wisbey: Are there - are there any matters you wish to raise arising out of 10135 cross examination? ---I just raised these matters, and we can move on when - when that is respected. Perhaps - - - 120

The Witness: I have mountains of material. 10140 DCJ Wisbey: - - - ladies and gentlemen, would you retire for a short time, and perhaps you‘ll use the time to select a new foreperson. Thank you.121

(At 11.11 am the jury retired)

MHR jews portray selves, and most of public define, as ‘victims’ as ‘the underdog’, so Keyser went into trial as ‘the underdog’ and Brendon the ‘bully’…in fact other way around … a-la hitting you, then screaming ‘help’, to attract attention to anything YOU do to defend yourself / retaliate in kind…Brendon’s ENTIRE defence rested on ‘correcting’ these views…a life of propaganda…but he was NOT allowed to do this…so had ZERO defence re: public interest, good faith motivations / state of mind…i.e INTENT was not to harm anyone, but to do GOOD…

Previously I had been told that I would be able to present the 120 This appears to me be me saying this but I suspect this is the prosecutor, not me. 121 A new foreperson so late in the game?

Page 175 of 235

individual evidence that would elucidate for the jury my ‗intent‘ to DCJ Wisbey for him to review individually. Clearly they had no intention of ever doing this. Pages 662 to 667 27/01/2011 11:10: 10150 DCJ Wisbey: So are there any issues that have arisen out of the crossexamination? Which is probably unlikely since you refused to answer most of the questions. Are there any issues that you wish to raise?--I wish to present material to the jury. It‘s as simple as that. I mean, how much simpler - look, I want to conduct a defence. Is that too hard for you, Mr Wisbey? Which - - - 10155

Well - - -?---Which law school did you go to?

It‘s not too hard for me, but it appears to be too hard for you?---Can I read stuff into the record? 10160

No, you - - -?---Could I read it to the jury?

Well, if you can - first of all, what do you want to do? And for what purpose?--Well, it goes to the heart of intent, sir. 10165

No, what do you want - what do you want to read to the jury?---I can conduct a defence based on 80G, which is the first - the first matter of the indictment.

Did you - did you hear what I asked you?---What I want to present? What is it to 10170 you what I present?122 He can cross examine on that. He can be advised for his little - his little rabbis that are coming in.123 They can advise him on that at a later date. I‘d like to read about ―The King‘s Torah: A Rabbinic Text or a Call to Terror‖ by Haaretz, one of the major newspapers in Israel. I want to read it to them. 10175

Mr Eyers: Well, I‘d object on the basis of, firstly, relevance; secondly, it‘s hearsay - - -

The Witness: What are you talking about? Straight out of the rabbi‘s mouth. 10180

...

Which is backing my material. This is the material that‘s formed my world view.

Note DCJ Wisbey‘s question from above: ―So are there any issues that have arisen out of the crossexamination? Which is probably unlikely since you refused to answer most of the questions.‖ I should have said, ―Yes, I wish to cross examine myself.‖ He knew that is what I wanted to do – to cross examine myself with access to the material I wished to make known to the jury so I could answer Mr Eyers questions in detail and in context. Because I do not state clearly that I wish to cross 10190 examine myself, Wisbey can claim he had every right to end the trial.

I might add he ended it (trial) on January the 27th, 2011 - HolocaustTM Remembrance Day. A nice touch. Maybe DCJ Wisbey got a free trip to Israel, business class, to see the HolocaustTM memorial there? 10195

The debate rages on for several pages. How could I then at least defend myself (using 80G) on charge 1 of the indictment - 80B. Conduct likely to racially harass.

10200

80G. Defences (1) It is a defence to a charge under section 78 or 80B to prove that the accused persons conduct was engaged in reasonably and in good faith - (b) in the course of any statement, publication, discussion or debate made or held, or any other conduct engaged in, for - 10205 (ii) any purpose that is in the public interest; and (c) in making or publishing a fair and accurate report or analysis of any event or matter of public interest.

Prosecutor Mr Ayres had an Orthodox Jew barrister in his ear when I came in that morning advising him.

How could I show the jury that my conduct was engaged in reasonably and in good faith for a 10210 purpose that is in the public interest while making or publishing a fair and accurate report or analysis of any event or matter of public interest? I can‘t show anything?

I insist on the above point almost continuously throughout the trial. In particular, in relation to the confrontation with Stanley Elliot Keyser and section 80B:

Page 600 on... Page 609: ―Can I please present to the jury the documentary video‘s I have describing how Brendon 10220 Lee of the family O‘Connell came to these assumptions?‖ Page 610: ―Mr Eyers, I‘d like to answer your question by showing to the jury some of the material of how I‘ve come to believe Mr Keyser as having said he‘s a member of the Jewish community, why I can make these assumptions reasonably. Let me show those documentaries.‖ Page 611: ―In my heart of hearts made perfectly reasonable assumptions, based on my knowledge 10225 and direct experience, and the direct experiences of others. Let me show that to the jury.‖ Page 614: (Mr Eyers) - ―This is your assertion of views into a factual vacuum, isn‘t it?---According to you.‖

It is constantly stated outright or insinuated by the prosecution that, “a little bit of knowledge is a 10230 dangerous thing”, that I have no idea what I am talking about. Surely, it would be prudent to show a jury EXACTLY how I came to my ‗views‘ which are directly related to the defence of 80G:

prosecutor Mr Antony Eyers claims my ―intention‖ must have been to vilify Jews because I had not properly researched the subject matter!

MHR IF HE CAN SAY THAT, WE CAN SAY THE PROSECUTIONS INTENT WAS TO VILIFY ALL PEOPLE LIKE BRENDON O’CONNELL, AS HE HAS NOT DONE HIS RESEARCH I.E JEWS NOT RACE, CLEAR IN HIS OWN WITNESSES WORDS, AND RABBI FREILICH ONLY REPRESENTS 10% OF THE ‘JEWISH’ WORLD, SO ALSO MERE HEARSAY / UNREPRESENTATIVE…SO WHO DIDN’T DO THEIR HOMEWORK RE; CONSCIENTIOUS / RESPONSIBLE ? AND WHO WAS ALLOWED TO PRESENT THEIR ‘EVIDENCE’ WHICH WAS FLAWED / MISLEADING, DELIBERATELY SO, AND WHO WAS NOT ALLOWED TO PRESENT THEIR VALID LEGITIMATE PROVABLE FACTUAL OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE?

The most important book is the Shulkan Aruk, which is the final decisions of those particular discussions by the rabbi‘s and from – from the Torah down to the Mishna, the Gemera 10265 and then finally the Shulkan Aruk gives the final Halakah.124 according to the Rabbi…who represents only 10% of ‘jews’ at best, and it is HIS particular narrow cult view, NOT widely accepted e.g by secular jews, or MOST OTHER JEWS…as shown in my video…GET THAT GUY AS WITNESS >>> and the other AMALEK guy…THAT would change a jury’s perceptions…but why would they appear? Over confidence? Arrogance? Honesty? Integrity?

the rabbi said this:

The Torah has laws which of course are very – are actually very straightforward but again they have – they‘re discussed in the Talmud 10290 and then finally, the final decisions are in the Shulkan Aruk. Now – now, there are many opinions by a number of the rabbis in the Talmud discussing those laws in the Torah and in fact you could – you could take any of those opinions out of context and say, you know, ―This is the opinion of Judaism‖. But it‘s not. The final – the – and as – as it is 10295 with many law books, you can have various opinions of various judges, but – but there‘s – there‘s a – there‘s a final decision on a situation.

All right. Well, that‘s a very important point - 10300

Said Mr O‘Connell. And then the rabbi finished in this way:

Now, the same as with Judaism, the Shulkan Aruk is the final decision.

MHR TOTALLY MISLEADING…EVIDENCE TAMPERING IN EFFECT, AS EYERS, IT HE’D DONE ANY RESEARCH AT ALL, CONSCIENTIOUS AND RESPONSIBLE, AND NOT SHAMEFULLY IGNORANT / LAZY / IRRESPONSIBLE, HE MUST HAVE KNOWN THAT THE RABBI’S VIEWS WERE LIMITED TO HIS OWN 10% SECT AT BEST…AND NOT ACCEPTED BY WIDER JEWISH RELIGIOUS COMMUNITY, LET ALONE THE SECULARS LIKE KEYSER, WHO PROBABLY MAKE UP THE MAJORITY, AS MOST CHRISTIANS ONLY BORN TO IT, AND DON’T GO TO CHURCH ETC OR DO WHAT POPE ETC SAYS…

I just want to re-iterate that the rabbi has just given the classic answer to deflect criticism of the Talmud etc. He is lying and he knows he is lying. The various Rabbinic Commentaries ALL give a final answer on many subjects. Also, one must ask whether it is necessary to debate whether sex with an animal is the right thing to do or whether sex with a 9 year old boy or a 3 year old girl is the right 10310 things to do or whether Noah had sex with all the animals on the Ark126 – obviously they had some weird legal problems in those days.

Just to give an example of the way the Talmud and other Commentaries are twisted to deceive Gentile eyes - there was the case of Hollywood director Steven Spielberg using a quote from the 10315 Talmud on the poster advertising the movie „Schindlers List‟. It said: “He who saves a life, it is as if he has saved the whole world”. The ‗Jewish Talmud‘ is quoted as the source on the poster. What the Talmud actually says is: “He who saves a Jewish life, it is as if he has saved the whole world.” You

124 ―Religious Law‖ 125 This is a common lie by the rabbi‘s to deflect away criticism of the sick and twisted ravings contained within their various Rabbinic Commentaries. 126 No! I‘m not making this up!

Page 178 of 235

see the difference a word makes. This is in perfect congruence with Talmud and other Commentaries stating that non-Jewish lives are worthless. That the difference between a Jewish soul and a non-10320 Jewish soul is like that of a human to an animal. Or such classic Talmud comments as: “The best of the Gentiles should be killed. The best of snakes should have their heads crushed.” This is a classic comment from who is said to be the ―nicest‖ of the great Rabbi‘s, Maimonides.127

the legislation is being used to stifle knowledge, not encourage reasoned debate. 10335 Mr Eyers continues:

But when he expresses himself in public, when he publishes, when he cranks up the modern day equivalent of the medieval printing presses, ask yourself this: in light of that breath taking omission to read a book advanced as the final word, is he 10340 intending to approach the subject on a balanced, rational basis or is he intending, through the omission of his research and the partialness of his approach – is he intending not to enter into a reasoned, balanced, rational debate in possession of all possible materials to enter such a debate – for instance, actually doing his homework, as you‘d have expected, being armed with requisite knowledge to enter a 10345 debate, a free and open and fair debate, an exchange of ideas and opinions, or is he intending to create, promote and increase animosity towards the Jewish people?

THERE YOU SEE THE SHEER HYPOCRISY OF EYERS…MISREPRESENTING AND OBFUSCATING TO THE JURY, USING HEARSAY EVIDENCE OF A TOTALLY UNREPRESENTATIVE WITNESS WITH ZERO QUALIFICATIONS TO SPEAK ABOUT ‘JEWS’ IN GENERAL, AS HAVING A VERY DOGMATIC, LIMITED, CULT VIEW OF JUDAISM WHICH IS NOT SHARED BY 90% OF ‘JEWS’…AND TO SHAME BRENDON INTO THE BARGAIN? HOW UNPROFESSIONAL…SUPPOSED TO ASSUME HE IS INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN OTHERWISE BY EVIDENCE? WHY SLANDER HIM IN COURT…IF MERELY OBJECTIVE ‘FACTS’ INVOLVED…WHY USE SUCH SUBJECTIVE AND COLORFUL LANGUAGE?

Mr Eyers even states: ―for instance, actually doing his homework, as you‘d have 10355 expected, being armed with requisite knowledge to enter a debate, a free and open and fair debate, an exchange of ideas and opinions‖, so, is Mr Eyers saying that only ―fully informed‖ and ―suitable qualified‖ persons may enter a ―free and open debate‖? This argument reminds me of the Soviet Union where a young poet was charged with ‗seditious poetry‘. When he told the judge he was a legitimate poet the Communist Judge roared back, “You have no qualifications as a poet! Which 10360 university did you attend?” I kid you not. In the Soviet Union you really DID have to attend a State approved course to comment on anything. Sound familiar?

BUT POINT REALLY IS THAT EYERS AND FREILICH WRONG…TOTALLY WRONG…DID NOT DO THEIR HOMEWORK…BEHAVING SHAMEFULLY…MISREPRESENTING = LYING = NOT THE WHOLE TRUTH…WHICH IS THAT THAT BOOK IS ONLY ‘THE FINAL WORD’ FOR VERY FEW JEWS LIKE THE RABBI, LIKE SAYING ‘THE PAPAL DECREE’ IS THE LAST WORD FOR ALL CHRISTIANS…NONSENSE…WITH JEWS OF ALL PEOPLE, TO EXPECT ANY ‘LAST WORD’…’FINAL PROPHETS’, … AND WHAT ABOUT ‘SIMPLE RULES IN THE TORAH’ ACCORDING TO THE RABBI…613 RULES, AND 36 BOOKS OF THE TALMUD FOR ‘SIMPLE RULES’? ???

My 10375 view of Stanley Elliot Keyser was perfectly reasonable under the circumstances of having known him for 5 minutes before I called him a racist. For instance - he was at the rally stalking people and photographing them. He yelled repeatedly that, ―What you‘re doing is disgusting!‖ He lied to the F.O.P organisers by stating the shopping centre security had asked them to move on. He was obviously a committed activist and Zionist. With all of that in mind, and what you know now Dr 10380 Walsh about mainstream Jewish racial and religious supremacism from this synopsis – was it so unreasonable to call him a ―racist homicidal maniac‖? If I had of been able to present the material that formed my views to the jury they would have seen that I obtained my ―views‖ from perfectly reasonable sources and my delivery was understandable under the circumstances. But even that‘s not the point. The point is Mr Eyers is making the mistake of linking ‗truth‘ and ‗accuracy‘ to the 10385 legislation. It has been said over and over that ‗Truth‘ is not a defense in this watered down ‗group defamation‘ legislation as someone could ostensibly use ‗Truth‘ with the ―intent‖ of creating animosity against a racial group. Like having a knife in your possession, it is not the possession of the legal knife, but your ―intent‖ while carrying it. If Mr Eyers wishes to raise the accuracy of my ―views‖ then he should have had the decency not to object to me presenting evidence to the jury of 10390 where I had gotten my views from and that many other high profile and highly respected activists also shared my views and expressed them forcefully.

Mr Eyers continues: 10395 And that‘s the danger in the approach, and that‘s why we submit to you that Mr O‘Connell‘s intention is precisely that; to generalise deliberately the particular with a view of creating, promoting and increasing animosity towards the Jewish people. And that is borne out, we say, if you put into context that final exchange with rabbi Freilich and the breath taking omission – conceded omission in the learning of Mr 10400 Brendon Lee O‘Connell.

Thank you your Honour.

Transcript 27/01/2011 Page 684-687

I WOULD SUGGEST THE RABBI AND EYERS BE CHARGED WITH CONTEMPT OF COURT…AND HAVE THEIR VIEWS INVESTIGATED…THEY MADE CLAIMS THAT ARE FALSE…BOTH OF THEM…AND PREJUDICIAL…WITH THE INTENT OF DEMONISING , RIDICULING, ABUSING, AND VILIFYING BRENDON O’CONNELL, AND THE ENTIRE ‘FREE INDEPENDENT MEDIA’ … ‘A LITTLE KNOWLEDGE IS A DANGEROUS THING’ NOT JUST FOR CONSPIRACY THEORISTS BUT FOR RABBI’S AND PROSECUTORS..IN FACT SURELY MUCH MORE SO, FOR THEY OCCUPY POSITIONS OF PUBLIC RESPONSIBILITY, AUTHORITY, STATUS, PRESTIGE, RESPECT ETC…WHAT A BLOGGER SAYS CAN BE DISREGARDED BY MOST, BUT WHAT A RABBI / PRIEST OR PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SAY IS HARDER FOR MOST PEOPLE TO ‘SHRUG OFF’…HENCE THE GREATER BURDEN OF CONSCIENTIOUS PROOF / RESEARCH / LIMITING SELF TO WHAT CAN BE PROVEN / DEMONSTRATED, RATHER THAN MERE ‘HEARSAY’ AND ‘OPINION’…ETC…

Mr Eyers contends that his view that I was not fully informed of certain matters meant that I could only have had the intent of increasing hatred of Jews. This is ridiculous logic. It shows that Mr Eyers ―intent‖ was to get a conviction at any cost.

Brendon NEVER allowed to show/prove / justify / provide evidence to the fact that etc … that his behaviour was not based on an ‗intent‘ to vilify and incite against him and his family out of an irrational hatred based on his ‗ethnic origins‘, but on a sincere belief that he posed a great danger to my community

The jury does not have to assess whether the material is true, just that any reasonable person would react similarly in such a situation after having been informed by the material – no matter if it turned out to be true or false. There was no ‗intent‘, just an understandable reaction on having viewed perfectly reasonable material on the subject. I was never able to clarify this for the jury. The jury are poisoned and biased 10445 from the beginning.

the blog is going to be read out then surely intent, part of that is convincing the jury that what I had written about or made statements of is reasonable and in good faith. Now, if I were to produce even non-academic or even non mainstream sources which are perfectly reasonable in the eyes of the jury – to make a decision, they will make a – a judgement as the highest authority in the court, whether that‘s a 10455 reasonable point of view to take, which then goes to the heart of intent.

Transcript 27/01/2011 Page 519

I need to clarify that I had prepared a detailed list of evidence including written, audio and audiovisual. It was headed ―JURY PRESENTMENT AND CLARIFICATION OF PARTICULARS‖. It 10480 contained my defense, the relevant legislation, and a detailed and explanatory accounting of what was on the 17 DVD disks I had prepared for each member of the jury and the prosecution. I had planned to enter it into evidence as to my state of mind under Section 77 of the legislation and under Section 80b with regards to ―in the public interest‖. Some of it I planned to show to the jury during the trial itself to answer specific questions and some of it I expected the jury would watch while they 10485 made deliberations after closing arguments.

Page 181 of 235

I initially did not know how to do this. I watched prosecutor Antony Eyers give material to the jury at the beginning of the trial and it did not occur to me that I could do the same. Several days into the trial I was told that I should be doing the same. Over the weekend I worked 18+ hours a day to 10490 prepare the material and by the Monday I had it ready. DCJ Wisbey would not let me present it as you are aware. Whenever you see the argument on ―presenting evidence‖, please be aware that it refers to the document ―JURY PRESENTMENT AND CLARIFICATION OF PARTICULARS‖ and the associated material that had been meticulously collected and presented. 10495 On page 620 Mr Eyers states outright the problem:

Mr Eyers: Your Honour, again, as an officer of the court in a broader sense, rather than merely prosecuting counsel, Mr O‘Connell has referred repeatedly, or made mention repeatedly before the jury to material which he‘s been prevented 10500 from putting before the jury.

Now, initially, of course, I made the submission and your Honour agreed with the basic principal that out-of-court statements, by persons not called as witnesses, or opinions by persons who were neither present nor expert witnesses, were prima 10505 facie inadmissible.

Now, that‟s a general statement of principal, legal principal. It‟s very basic. If Mr O‘Connell wishes to seek a separate ruling in relation for his satisfaction on - or he believes he‘s got any evidence which he wishes to put before the jury 10510 which is properly admissible, in other words, it‘s not hearsay or the opinions of others who aren‘t experts, then I would invite him and I‘d invite your Honour, as the officer of court and a duty to see that these matters are conducted properly to make an application and put the evidence before your Honour. 10515 Because I‘m just concerned that if he feels aggrieved or he feels that he has any evidence which isn‘t categorised as inadmissible in the way that I‘ve outlined, he should properly be given the opportunity to draw it to your Honours attention and if it is admissible rely upon it before the jury. 10520 It‘s been mentioned repeatedly that I think we have to grasp the metal, with respect, your Honour.

Let me continue along the same theme, page 624, I state: 10525 Witness: So just quickly - just, sorry, very brief - just to quickly clarify. So what I find difficult is your asking me a question and I wish to - not - I‘m - I‘m - not going to give a yes/no answer. I‘m going to say, ―Well, let me show to the jury on that point how I came to that assumption.‖ You keep saying, ―You‘re making assumptions.‖ Well, let me show you how I made that assumption. 10530

If you‘d been living the same way of life three to four thousand years long, and your heritage and your culture is based on those religious books, I mean, what else is there? Your holiest of teachings. The law. Then you wont let me show you what they are, then it‟s going to sound funny when I say, “You‟re a bunch of 10535 racist, homicidal maniacs.” But if I could show the jury and the context, and suddenly they go, “Oh, that‟s how he came to that conclusion.” But I can‘t do that, according to you.

You are fairly aware of the above argument which I put to you in previous submissions which the 10540 WASCA refused to consider, stating the submissions were not put in on time. ???? need to work out from Brendon how NEXT accused should proceed…???

In my opinion there was never any intention of letting me present material and I draw your attention Dr Walsh to the official critique of racial vilification legislation (‗So Far So Good‘) where they state the greatest fear of using the legislation is that ‗abhorrent views‘ may be spread about the 10545 community. This was a constant theme of both the trial and appeal process. It was even stated to me by a prison officer at Casuarina prison that the Minister of Corrective Services himself (Redman) had issued instructions that I was to be prevented from spreading ‗my views‘ using DCS computers and photocopiers, hence why I had so much difficulty in accessing them, and my WASCA submissions disappeared and the Sworn Affidavit to this effect disappeared from my mail sent to 10550 you.

Both lawyers - Rod Keeley and John Bougher - had been briefed (in my opinion) to only allow a defence of ―bad temper‖ with no ‗intent‘ under section 77 but I would not be able to spread my abhorrent views129 to the jury and accompanying media. This meant I would not be able to remove 10555 the prejudice the jury is bound to have against anyone claiming Jews or Judaism are anything other than collective Saints.

[6] Accusing the Senior Prosecutor of Corruptly Colluding With the Local Jewish 10560 Community and the Nine network

Before making these statements at the 20/11/2009 hearing, it is worth noting that I had been harassed intensely including: 10565 • Car brake lines interfered with - mechanics report. • Turning off of house alarm, front door left unlocked and ajar. • Outside bedroom door unlocked during night. • Being regularly followed. I have footage of this. One person in particular had been present at two rallies in support of the people of Gaza filming protestors. The same man had followed 10570 me to the Bell Tower and sat next to me listening while I filmed (I have this on video). Followed me to a café, when I pulled out a camera he about faced and almost ran to get away from me (I have a photo of this). The same man was security at the ‗Friends Of Israel‘ gathering which the Israeli Ambassador attended (I have this on video). He is an Israeli. • A local production of ‗A Current Affair‘ had made grossly defamatory statements against me. 10575 They had imputated and inferred I was somehow affiliated with neo-Nazi and white supremacist groups. They had grossly re-edited the video at the heart of the case. I am an avid critic and observer of the media and I have never seen a more grossly done ‗hit piece‘ as produced by the Nine Network. They were the only media outlet to do this to me. • A friend in the United States had been harassed intensely. Stalked at her home, her work. Her 10580 cat and chickens killed. Her dogs tasered. People entering her house regularly. • Both myself and my friend in the United States had our computers hacked. Files deleted - material I had collected on Stanley Elliot Keyser. Emails deleted off both our computers and our relevant I.S.P email servers. In one case, my friend in the U.S had her Yahoo email account give the official Yahoo site ―email sent‖ confirmation message, not as the name she 10585 was using on that particular account, but as her well known online name ―America‖ - as in “Your message has been sent America ϑ ”. This is an astounding degree of high end hacking. • Telephone conversations interfered with - important points in messages were garbled such as the giving of Western Union money transfer numbers. The line was clear until the number was given and then electrical interference would obscure the voice on the other end. This 10590 happened numerous times when either myself or my friend were attempting to give the number so money could be collected by the other. Please note, the Israeli company ‗Verint‘ have access to the U.S and Australian telephone exchanges in their capacity as hardware and software providers for state and federal police data intercepts. A local Western Australian police officer - Mr Robert Critchlie - was found guilty of tipping off the leader of a local neo-10595 Nazi gang (Daniel Hort) that his telephone communications were being intercepted. Clearly, this specialist police unit might have a few problems in it. Incidentally, the above member of that gang received a paltry 7 month suspended sentence for firing three high powered rifle rounds into the rook of a local Perth Mosque. • Threatened by police, ―When this court case is over, it won‘t be over.‖ 10600 129 All mainstream views easily knowable by a person interested in the subject. Most people know nothing about Quantum Physics but they can find out if they want. I had told police at the initial raid on my house - on video - that I would be using the trial to highlight Israeli Intelligence activity. Perhaps this explains the harassment? Later, Inspector Barry Shelton (Counter terrorism) would comment via email, that, ―We all respect your work‖. Perhaps this explains the Israeli Ambassador‘s arrival at a ‗Friends Of Israel‘ rally a few months later? 10605

On 20/11/2011 I was brought back to court and charged again 5 more times after I had put up a blog to defend myself from the grossly defamatory media reporting. The start of the postings happened 2-3 months after I was initially charged. 10610 I had no doubt the Nine Networks reporting was not a random event but part of a co-ordinated campaign by the Western Australian D.P.P, Jewish Community and Nine Network to prevent me garnering general public support as a ‗Free Expression‘ issue, hence why I was so grossly defamed in the way I was.

I state at page 3 of the 20/11/2009 transcript: 10615 Accused: Your Honour, before we go on, is this Mr Alan Troy?

DCJ Martino: This is Mr Troy, yes.

Accused: It is Mr Troy. Your Honour, Mr Alan Troy has literally conspired with 10620 the media, Channel 9, and members of the Jewish community, it‟s come to my attention, to slander me, to intimidate me. The State Security Investigation Group under Detective or Comrade Detective Timothy Richard Paini and his boss from the State Security Investigation Unit - - - 10625 DCJ Martino: Mr O‘Connell - - -

Accused: - - - have sought to intimidate me.

DCJ Martino: Mr O‘Connell, stop. Mr O‘Connell, stop. This is not the position 10630 for you to make speeches. I‘ll give you an opportunity to make submissions - - -

Accused: Your Honour, I‘m just making a statement that I am being harassed intensely and - - - 10635 Transcript 20/11/2009 Page 3

DCJ Martino stated shortly after this exchange...”Mr O‟Connell, I will allow your allegations to stand on the record.” This does not appear in the transcript. 10640 Shortly after this hearing, Mr Alan Troy resigned from the D.P.P. It was said he was going anyway. One week after this hearing the local Nine Network production of ‗A Current Affair‘ was axed. I remind you Dr Walsh that on contacting the Nine Networks lawyers (Freehills) on this matter, the head of Nine News resigned suddenly (Mr Adrian Beatty) just two days later it was reported in the West Australian newspaper that colleagues were ―shocked‖ at his sudden departure.

MHR just like the ‘friends of genocidal sociopathic cult X’ rally just happened to occur, for the first time ever, a few days before his trial…just coincidences, for all you ‘coincidence theorists’ out there …

Difficulty Contacting Expert Witnesses

At a Directions Hearing on 19/11/2011, my lawyer (Mr John Bougher) and DCJ McCann discussed variations to my bail conditions to facilitate my ability to contact expert witnesses. This is an 10650 important point as much was made that I should have ensured I had ‗experts‘ of my own to present material that would add to my defence. Mr Bougher makes it clear to DCJ McCann that I am having extreme difficulty doing this.

Mr Bougher: Excuse me your Honour. 10655

Your Honour, my client is indicating that there is difficulty making communication with some of these people who we‘re talking about because

Page 184 of 235

of their involvement, because of the subject matter, because of the exposure that some of these people have had that have caused them difficulties. Hence, 10660 they are difficult to make contact with.

So in other words, my client is saying that he needs to go to forums via the internet to try and find these people in the first place. So although I know we have some names, we don‘t have all of those names and I wouldn‘t be able to 10665 provide your Honour with an exhaustive list of contacts that we‘d need. We‘re talking about the never-never, the internet, the stratosphere, virtually, and my client - - -

DCJ McCann: It sounds to me like a fishing expedition and - - - 10670

Mr Bougher: Well, with respect, your Honour, it‘s not a fishing expedition. My clients been charged with these serious criminal offenses and he is striving to obtain evidence to defend himself, and that‘s what it‘s all about. It‘s not a fishing expedition. 10675

DCJ McCann: Well, what I‘m driving at, he doesn‘t even know who his experts are. You see, if it was Professor Bloggs of such and such a university, just email the fellow saying, ―Dear Professor, are you available to give a report on these issues?‖ and he comes back and says, ―Yes, no problem at all. 10680 Here‘s my fee.‖

Mr Bougher: If it were that simple your Honour - - -

DCJ McCann: ―Once you pay the fee to me, I‘ll start work.‖ That‘s the way 10685 it usually operates.

Mr Bougher: If it were that simple your Honour, that‘s what would have been done, but it‘s not that simple, unfortunately. 10690 DCJ McCann: Look, I‘m sympathetic to your position, but there have to be rules. Is he the only one who‘s prohibited from using – it‘s only him that‘s prohibited from using the internet?

Mr Bougher: Prohibited; yes, our Honour. I don‘t think I‘m prohibited from 10695 doing anything at the moment, as far as I‘m aware, but that‘s the case.

...

DCJ McCann: I can‘t see why you cant come back to us with a list of people 10700 that your client wants to communicate with via the internet. He can ring them up, if he likes. He can get on a plane, if he likes. He can write to them. The only prohibition is on using the internet. He can get someone else to contact them on the internet. 10705 ...

DCJ McCann: Okay, Well, I‘m not going to give legal advice on the meaning of those bail conditions, but you might want to look at them carefully and then make a decision as to whether emailing a named person 10710 seeking their assistance in a court case was a breach, and if you have any doubt about it, you‘ve got liberty to apply on an urgent basis.

Mr Bougher: Very well, thanks. 10715 DCJ McCann: But speaking for myself, I‘d be very sympathetic to allowing a communication with a nominated person, particularly if that person – I had reason to believe that that person would not find the approach unwelcome.

MHR THAT LAST LINE IS THE KEY POINT BRENDON WAS MAKING, THAT THE DEMONISATION CAMPAIGN AGAINST HIM, WHICH HE WAS TRYING TO CORRECT, WOULD PREVENT PEOPLE ‘WELCOMING’ HIS REQUESTS TO ACT AS THE WITNESS FOR A NEO NAZI, RACIST, JEW LIFE THREATENING, ETC ACCUSED IN A VERY HIGH PROFILE CASE THAT THE ISRAELI GOVT HAD COME OUT AGAINST WITH SUPPORT OF HIGHEST RANKING AUSTRALIAN LEADERS ETC…JUDGE MAKES THE POINT HIMSELF…

Mr Bougher: Your Honour, can I give you one name? That name is Mark Glenn, G-l-e-n-n. He‘s in the US. He‘s a contact that is believed will be able to source the other witnesses involved. 10725 DCJ McCann: Is there any reason why you can‘t email him? Or phone him, or write him a letter?

Mr Bougher: There‘s many reasons. I‘m not sure that there‘s any your Honour wants to hear, but there are numerous reasons. 10730

DCJ McCann: It‘s just that it‘s the traditional manner of getting expert evidence. It‘s highly undesirable for a client to be briefing the witness. Its all very well to make a couple of phone calls, find out if Professor Bloggs or so and so is available, but then the solicitor should contact that person and say, 10735 ―I understand you‘re available‖ and then send them a brief.

Mr Bougher: Your Honour, I could certainly make contact with Mark Glenn, but what I‘m saying about him is that he is the person in the US who can coordinate these witnesses. 10740

DCJ McCann: Yes, okay. Well, I don‘t know who Mark Glenn is, so you‘ll probably have to give me a bit more information if you want the bail conditions varied to explicitly stipulate that that communication is allowed. Whether or not you need that is debateable. 10745

Transcript 20/11/2011 p.212-216

This comment by DCJ McCann, taken from above, shows the disconnect between the judiciary and the unique problems I faced in this case: 10750

DCJ McCann: I can‘t see why you can‘t come back to us with a list of people that your client wants to communicate with via the internet. He can ring them up, if he likes. He can get on a plane, if he likes. He can write to them. The only prohibition is on using the internet. He can get someone else 10755 to contact them on the internet.

Not only could I not ―get on a plane‖ as my passport and visa to the U.S had been confiscated and I was declared a ‗flight risk‘, my own telephone and mail had been interfered with. Here is an extract from a letter I recently wrote to Mr Mark Glenn asking him to provide a Sworn Affidavit as to the 10760 difficulties he had been experiencing in contacting ‗expert witnesses‘ for me. Included in the below extract of that letter dated 3rd December 2012, is background information that explains to some degree the involvement of the Israeli Ambassador to Australia in my case:

START OF LETTER 10765 ... The State of Western Australia seemed to lack understanding of the complexities of the issues involved and the ‗sensitivities‘ in that many people would be reluctant to come forward and expose themselves. Also, I had been so vilified in the press and online it would obviously have been better for a well-respected independent journalist such as yourself to co-ordinate 10770 contacting people.

As you know, I attempted to contact you for nearly a year with no success. Then, all of a sudden, you received one of my emails. 10775 Mark, many people as you know, simply do not understand the power of the Israeli state and independent operators affiliated with various Jewish defence groups (ADL, JDL etc) to interfere with a political dissident‘s ability to communicate. Such things as:

• Hacking an email account and either deleting emails or moving them to the ‗spam‘ folder. 10780

Page 186 of 235

• Interference in telephone calls. The Israeli state runs most billing services for telecommunication providers via ‗AMDOC‘s‘. Hence they can see immediately who is calling whom and when and how many times. Within a day of obtaining a Telstra Mobile Broadband connection I was intensely hacked. I know this because of the software firewall I was using. AMDOC‘s do the billing for Australia‘s largest telco Telstra. When I obtained an Optus 10785 connection in a fake name I had no problems. • The Israeli company ‗Verint‘ do data intercept work for various policing and intelligence agencies around the world. You will remember Fox News doing the four part series (available on YouTube) on the Drug Enforcement Agency circulating a top secret memo complaining that DEA Agents believed Verint had hardware ‗backdoors‘ in their data intercept equipment and 10790 were warning Jewish American and Israeli drug dealers. • Under „Operation Talpiot‟, the Israeli State trained Military Intelligence Officers in the art of hardware and software design in communications – both corporate and military – database security, encryption etc, giving the Israeli State unprecedented access to other nations most sensitive communications and information. 10795 • Internet social networking/communication services like Facebook, Google and G-mail (your particular email provider) are owned and operated by American Jews. Israel fosters close relationships with Jews outside it‘s borders. Viktor Ostrovsky, a former Mossad Officer wrote in his book - “Wage War By Deception: The Unmasking Of A Mossad Officer”, that the Israeli state uses these Jews as Sayanim‟s or ‗helpers‘ in matters important to the Israeli state. 10800 • My writing on these matters that lead to the local head of Counter Terrorism stating in an email, ―We all respect your work‖. • The arrival in Western Australia of the Israeli Ambassador to Australia to support the complainant in my matter – Stanley Elliot Keyser – at a ‗Friends Of Israel‘ rally where 30 local and federal members of parliament attended and over 100 expressed their support but did not 10805 attend. This, just two weeks out from the original August 16th start of my trial should leave no one in any doubt that the State of Israel was DIRECTLY interested in my case.

I had tried repeatedly to communicate with people such as: 10810

• Professor Shlomo Sand. Professor of history at an Israeli university and author of ―The Invention of the Jewish People‖. • Kay Griggs. Wife of Marine Colonel George Griggs who Kay stated ran the assassination and dirty tricks program for NATO. She speaks in some detail about the actions of the Israeli state 10815 in such programs. • Professor Kevin MacDonald. Professor of Psychology at California State University. I contacted him repeatedly without success for a year and then suddenly, after this hearing, he replied to an email. I kept regularly in touch and he agreed to appear via video link on my behalf on the issue of Jewish power and control in the United States, and elsewhere. 10820 Unfortunately, with the case so rigged and Professor MacDonald agreeing with the prosecution that Jews conformed to the definition of a ‗racial group‘, I decided not to use him which was a mistake in hindsight. • Doctor Alan Sabrosky. Ten year Marine veteran and ‗Director of Studies U.S Army War College‟ for 5 years. You interviewed Dr Sabrosky at some length about Israeli involvement in 10825 9-11 where he verbalised his belief that:

[QUOTE]‖What Americans need to understand is they [Israel] did it. They did it. And if they do understand that, Israel is going to flat ass disappear, Israel will flat ass disappear from this earth.‖[END QUOTE] 10830 [QUOTE]‖If Americans ever know, ever know, that Israel did this, they‘re going to scrub them off the earth and they‘re not going to give a rats ass what the cost is.‖[END QUOTE] [QUOTE]‖And my dream is that we take the U.S 5th and 6th Fleet and take Israel and cream it.‖[END QUOTE] 10835

• Lebanese Ambassador to U.S. I believe you were trying to contact him without success.

Mark, you verbalised to me over the phone that you were having an incredible amount of trouble contacting people – more than usual. With the above information as background, it is 10840

Page 187 of 235

understandable why this was so. Especially now that you have such a close relationship with close advisers to the President of Iran, I expect it will get worse. Certainly they are listening closely to your telephone and email communications.

The key with having the above people appear on my behalf was to remove from the jury the 10845 extreme prejudice that the main stream media and movie industry has instilled in the average person – that Jews are a powerless minority, eternal victims of an irrational oppressor when in fact they are a world power, dominating the most influential points on the planet. This was the heart of my defence, that I had no ‗intent‘ to vilify Jews but was at worst, simply expressing my anger and frustration at dealing with such a powerful criminal network. I was never allowed to 10850 do this in court as you well know, and I was mocked and vilified by both the media and Jews online after the case. Still to this day Jews online continue to spread the lies that I had been physically threatening them and their children and had been stalking them for ten years.

With the above background in mind, would you be able to complete a Sworn Affidavit detailing 10855 who you are, who you have interviewed, your relationship with the Islamic Republic of Iran and Press T.V, and the impossibility you found in contacting people? ... END OF LETTER

Note that on obtaining back a encrypted laptop from the W.A D.P.P, my Internet Service Provider I.P ceased going from the CBD of Sydney and instead went into the middle of the South Australian desert. I believe that I.S.P trace location was the last public exchange point before my internet connection was routed 10865 into Pine Gap and Defence Signals Directorate. On enquiring about this, a Telstra employee stated he had never seen anything like it.

This was an important point. ―He‖ engaged with the group with the deliberate intention of causing a scene131. I approached this at the trial from page 354-363 on 18/01/2011. I ask him about standing near to the group (listening in) and buying a grapefruit which I had him doing on film132. He actually reaches across me and gets one off the shelf while I talk to Alex Whisson. He was trying to make a point, to provoke the group. He instigated the confrontation 10890 by walking through our group, refusing a flyer and stating these exact words from halfway up the steps, ―We‘re Jews from Melbourne and what you‘re doing is disgusting!‖ You will see

130 As I did not inform him I was recording him. 131 Interestingly, Stanley Keyser‘s ‗mentor‘ – Steve Lieblich – did this to a group of us outside the District Court. He burst through the centre of the group, mounted the top of the steps and beckoned me to join him. I refused to do so believing he was quite capable of instigating a scene and then claiming I had assaulted/abused him. 132 ALL of the original unedited footage was deleted off my hard drive which included Stanley Keyser standing around us. Detective Sargent Mark Rubidge of W.A Technology Crime stated during a phone call that only he had access to my lap top.

Page 188 of 235

It would have been extremely beneficial to have witnesses from the „Friends Of Palestine‟ (F.O.P) appear to back up my side of the story. When I rang the head of the F.O.P – Alex Whisson – to ask him and others to do this, he said he was extremely reluctant to become involved. Mr Whisson refused to give a statement to police. I asked Mr Whisson about others who were present appearing as witnesses 10875 and he stated they were reluctant to become involved for various reasons - one of which was the fear of harassment or words to that effect. I actually recorded that phone call to Alex Whisson. Admittedly unethical,130 but I felt ‗under siege‘ and was sure Mr Whisson would not play ball before I rang due to his refusal to give a statement and the comments he had made about me in the press. 10880 Mr Bougher (lawyer at this stage) suggested it was not wise to force the F.O.P witnesses to appear but I certainly wish I did. I believe they would have given vital testimony about exactly what happened that day. Simple issues like: from those pages him at first denying, then not remembering etc... He continues the claim that ―I‖ came up to him. This was a rehearsed theme he was sticking to. With witnesses from the friends Of Palestine group in court this could have been cleared up quickly.

2) Keyser‘s general behaviour on that day. Provoking the group. Claiming that IGA ‗security‘ had asked the F.O.P to move on. Continually stating, ―What you‘re doing is disgusting!‖133 Taking peoples photo‘s, quite deliberately, quite openly and more than once. This could have been extrapolated on by several of the F.O.P. 3) My general behaviour that day at the IGA Supermarket on May 2nd 2009. What we were 10900 talking about. How we were quietly going about our business. Members of the F.O.P could have commented on my demeanour

Alex 10905 Whisson stated they were keen not to appear due to fears of harassment. I have that on audio.

I would also have liked to subpoena the producers of ‗A Current Affair‘ who did the media hit piece 10915 on me. This was relevant to my ‗state of mind‘ when I put up the blog 6 weeks after my arrest. I had been so vilified in the media and online I felt I had to defend myself. Had this not occurred, I would never have put up the blog which has resulted in two years jail. I also wanted to show the jury the actual media reporting which I had recordings of. This was all deemed inadmissible by DCJ Wisbey

This is very important. On page 233-234 – 17/1/2011 – Mr Bougher states he has gone through the entire trial procedure with me. He states he has a detailed note about this. But in fact Mr Bougher went 10965 over nothing with me except the jury selection process (briefly in court) and we discussed out of court - briefly – my wish to present evidence that attested to my state of mind which would give the jury a chance to ascertain my ‗intent‘ more clearly under both section 77 and 80B of the legislation. Ultimately, on this issue, it would have been beneficial if Mr Bougher had suggested that instead of trying to ‗lead evidence‘, an alternative strategy of a long and detailed statement could have been read 10970 onto the record from the witness stand. Mr Bougher had clearly, in my opinion, been asked to LIMIT my options to an ‗anger‘ defence with no ‗intent‘ involved. Again, in my opinion, this was to prevent/limit, ‗abhorrent views‘ becoming more widely known by the public.

So these secular Jews often end up being just another round of Michael Neuman‘s ―veritable shell game‖ of Jewish identity. “Look! We‟re a religion! No! a race! No! a cultural entity! Sorry–a religion!” Because this is the key to maintaining Jewish power 11160 – if it‘s indefinable, it‘s invisible. Like a Stealth Bomber (you cant see it on your radar but you sure know when you‘ve been hit) Jewish power, with it‘s blurred outlines and changing forms, becomes invisible. And if you cant see it you cant fight it. Meanwhile the assault on the Palestinians continues. Paul Eisen ―Jewish Power‖ 11165

[B] Wisbey Misleads Jury That There is No Opposing View To Expert Evidence 11170

DCJ Wisbey: As I say, these two witnesses gave what is called expert evidence. That is, evidence from persons having special expertise in a particular subject or area, and thus possessing knowledge of that subject over and above that generally possessed by lay members of the community. In each case their evidence was 11175

Page 193 of 235

tested by cross-examination. There is no opposing view expressed by any other expert.

Transcript 27/01/2011 Page 720

11180 That is an extremely prejudicial statement – ―There is no opposing view expressed by any other expert‖. He should of added – ―in this court,‖ at least. The jury would naturally be led to believe that what Rabbi Freilich and Professor Markus stated was uncontested in any manner, anywhere and at any time. 11185 I quoted extensively from works by ‗experts‘ during the trial.

[C] Prejudicial Comment By Wisbey Against Me

11190 Wisbey makes a statement to the jury that is extremely prejudicial against me:

DCJ Wisbey: Now, you may think, and it‘s a matter entirely for you, that in his alleged conduct and in his evidence before you the accused has demonstrated that he views Jews as a distinct group within the world community. He does not 11195 differentiate between them, you may think.

Transcript 27/01/2011 Page 721

Neither before this statement nor after does DCJ Wisbey elaborate on this comment. It comes from 11200 left field. He appears to be leading the jury down some track. The only ―distinct group within the world community‖ that I believe Jews belong to is a ―religious group‖. This is the only point I can think DCJ Wisbey is referring to. In which case why doesn‘t he say ―religious group‖. The term ―religious group‖ is never uttered by him even though I am stating it over and over in my defense. All of the prosecution‘s witnesses – except Professor Markus – did everything in their power to never 11205 admit to any concept of Jews being called a ‗religious group‘.

[D] Wisbey Misdirects Jury – Definition Of Jews/Jewish

11210 Again, DCJ Wisbey misdirects the jury with his instructions on establishing whether Stanley Elliot Keyser is a member of a ‗racial group‘.

DCJ Wisbey: And the fifth element that the State must establish is that Mr Keyser was a member of a racial group. The racial group means a group defined 11215 by reference to race, colour or ethnic or national origins. So that‘s what the law defines as a racial group; a group defined by reference to race, colour or ethnic or national origins. The Oxford Dictionary defines ethnic as including:

Pertaining to race, ethnological, peculiar to a race or nation, 11220 indigenous, of a population group sharing a distinctive cultural and historical tradition, often associated with nationality or religion, by which the group identifies itself and others recognise it belonging to or characteristic of such a group. 11225 So that‘s the definition of what ethnicity is, that it refers to pertaining to a group, pertaining to ethnological, pertaining peculiarly to a race or nation, indigenous, of a population group sharing a distinctive cultural and historic tradition, often associated with race, nationality or religion, by which the group identifies itself and others recognise it belonging to or characteristic of such a group. For a group 11230 to constitute an ethnic group, it must regard itself and be regarded by others as a distinct community by virtue of certain characteristics.

Page 194 of 235

Some of the characteristics are essential; others are not essential, but one or more of them will commonly be found and will help to distinguish the group from the 11235 surrounding community.

The essential conditions are that they have a long-shared history of which the group is conscious as distinguishing it from other groups, and the memory of which it keeps alive the long-shared history. 11240

And the second essential condition is that it has a cultural tradition of its own including family and social customs and manners often but not necessarily associated with religious observation. 11245 In addition to the essential characteristics, the following characteristics are relevant and often present. Firstly, are a common geographical origin or descent from a small number of common ancestors. Secondly, a common language not necessarily peculiar to the group. Thirdly, a common literature peculiar to the group. Fourthly, a common religion different from that of neighbouring groups or 11250 from the general community surrounding it. And fifthly, being a minority or being oppressed or a dominant group within a larger community.

And as I say those characteristics are relevant and are often present. You don‘t need to have them all to say you have an ethnic group, but they‘re characteristics 11255 that are commonly found in an ethnic group.

And race is defined in the Oxford Dictionary as:

A group of persons connected by common descent or origin. A 11260 group of several tribes of people forming a distinct ethnical stock, one of the great divisions of mankind or having certain physical peculiarities in common.

So it‘s a matter entirely for you but it would be open to you to conclude that 11265 you could be both an ethnic group and a race or one other. But you look to those characteristics in making a determination.

Transcript 27/01/2011 Page 723-724

Not once – and I cannot emphasise this enough –not once, anywhere, at any time, does DCJ Wisbey state explicitly or subtly, the option that Jews are a ‗religious group‘ only. He uses the term, ―or one other‖ – does that mean religious group? He simply avoids mentioning my long discussions along these lines with Professor Andrew Markus, Stanley Keyser or Rabbi Dovid Freilich where I argue this over and over. This was a major part of my defense – that as a matter of law and fact, Jews do not fit 11275 the legal definition of ‗racial group‘ but are a ‗religious group‘ only. THIS IS A MAJOR MISDIRECTION.

I stated over and over to all prosecution witnesses: ―What are the ―secular markers‖ (outside of religion) that bind a ‗Jew‘ in Yemen to a ‗Jew‘ in Russia and a ‗Jew‘ in Ethiopia? Answer – none. The 11280 witnesses all avoided answering the question directly by referring to vague notions of ‗history and culture and heritage‘, as did DCJ McCann at the directions hearing in November 2010 on this very issue.

DCJ Wisbey has not even mentioned that my belief to their being a Jewish racial group is relevant. It 11285 was argued very heavily by the prosecutor Antony Eyers that ―I‖ believed they were a racial group because I said in the offending video...”It‟s in your religion and race.‖ There is context to that statement made in a street debate. Mr Eyers focus‘s heavily on that because of this sub section to the legislation: 11290 80F. Belief as to existence or membership of racial group For the purposes of proceedings for an offence under section 77, 79, 80A, 80C, 313, 317, 317A,338B or 444 it does not matter whether a group of persons was a racial group or whether a person was a member of a racial group as long as the accused person believed at the time of the alleged offence that the group was a racial group or that the 11295 person was a member of a racial group, as the case may be.

Nowhere does DCJ Wisbey sum up the relevant issues on my behalf raised at trial. He does not mention that MY belief is relevant and that I have argued vigorously that they are a religious group only. He will not even mention ―religious group‖, just, ―or one other‖... 11300

So it‘s a matter entirely for you but it would be open to you to conclude that you could be both an ethnic group and a race or one other. But you look to those characteristics in making a determination.

Accused: - - - they could be used against their families back in Palestine. This is common practice---I explained what it was used – what the photos were going to be used for.

Why didn‘t you do it? What happened to the article?---Because I got racially 11460 assaulted. And it then wasn‘t appropriate to write an article to The Maccabean at that point.

Really? And yet all those Jewish blogs and Jewish things were – were running around claiming I‘d threatened to wipe out all Jews. Channel Nine said I‘d 11465 threatened to wipe out all Jews. [Rare] did a video. And we‘ll show that to the jury at a later stage. And you‘re saying you were so concerned about, what, my reputation?---It wasn‘t about your reputation.

DCJ Wisbey: No. What he‘s saying is that he was racially assaulted, he went to 11470 the police, and it wasn‘t appropriate to take the matter further.

Page 198 of 235

Transcript 17/01/2011 Page 297-298

DCJ Wisbey: Yes. The question effectively is you were seeking to engage the racial vilification legislation by your behaviour?---No. As I said before, I‘ve – I‘ve never read the Racial Vilification Act. 11490

Accused: Okay. Are you aware that part of the Act is that you must be humiliated in public, preferably with as many people as possible?

DCJ Wisbey: Don‘t answer that. 11495

The Witness: As I said, I‘ve never read it.

DCJ Wisbey: Don‘t answer that, thank you.

MHR ‘not having read the Act’ is a totally different matter to not being aware of the spirit of it, and what would be necessary to abuse it to attack someone !!! The answer is very precise, and avoids answering the actual question…Brendon hadn’t asked if hed READ the entire Act, but if he was AWARE OF the Act !!! So the judge let him avoid answering, claiming he already HAD, but he had NOT answered…never did…

When I read the transcript I cringe at my behaviour. At times I am quite embarrassed. I am embarrassed for DCJ Wisbey as well. He has a reputation as a unpopular Judge amongst legal professionals. He was dragged out of retirement at the age of 77 because of a shortage of District Court judges. He was 80 years old when he presided over my trial.

Despite 10 letters (over 18 months) to both Michael Gething at the Perth District Court and Registrar Bush at the W.A Supreme Court, they have refused to allow me access to the audio. 11555

DC Registrar Michael Gething has offered to allow me to send him corrections and he would review the audio. I have written to him repeatedly that the transcript is so inaccurate, with so many blatantly missing comments, I would need to review the entire trial.

My belief, based on ignorance of the W.A legal system, was that I could obtain bail on leave to appeal being granted after the initial submission of grounds of appeal and then correct the transcript whilst outside the prison system. In hindsight this was obviously 11610 a mistake. An innocent one.

Mr Michael Gething of the Perth District court has indicated to me that he is prepared to correct the transcript on submission from me of a hard copy of the transcript page with my correction on it – presumably drawn from memory of a trial from two years ago. 11615

I have submitted to Mr Gething that there are several matters that relate to comments made by DCJ John Wisbey that are not present in the transcript. Also, the testimony of Mr Stanley Elliot Keyser does not ring true to my memory, nor Professor Andrew Markus. Of particular note is the testimony of Rabbi Dovid Freilich where the transcript was removed 11620 from my bag on leaving court that day by security and not given to me until the next day.

Respectfully, it is not a matter of a line here and a word there – there are entire conversations missing such as a discussion with the jury not present - between myself, prosecutor Antony Eyers and DCJ Wisbey where I request time to stay in court during the 11625 afternoon break to look up a reference in a book that the prosecution had referred to. Discussions had also taken place as to myself returning to the stand to cross examine myself. This is important as DCJ Wisbey suddenly ended the trial knowing it was my intention to return to the stand as discussed – a discussion not in the transcript.

Pre-trial hearings are also not correct to my memory. One particular incident is acting Chief Judge Martino stating to me, ―I will allow your allegations to stand on the record‖ after I accused the Senior Prosecutor of corruption. That statement is not in the transcript.

Mr Michael Gething wants me to point out individual sections – there are too many and I 11635 suspect more to find.

In the interest of justice, a correct transcript is vital especially as I prepare paperwork to go to the High Court. 11640 I am imprisoned in a high security prison. There are facilities here to go over the audio and correct the transcript and surrounding hearings including the very important directions hearing under DCJ McCann on whether Jews constituted a racial group.

I am asking you to instruct Registrar Gething of the Perth District Court to send me the 11645 audio as he has done before so I can correct the transcript and surrounding hearings.

So, even the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court passes the buck. Michael Gething refuses to allow me access to the audio. Michael Gething will give no reason as to why. Where does one go from here? Are these people accountable in any way? 11680

[15] Prejudiced By State Dignitary Protection Unit Being Present In Court

On page 235 – 17/1/2011 – Mr Eyers states, ―But he needs particular security arrangements in place. 11685 We have no objection‖, in relation to me sitting at the Bar table.

The next day, two large men in suits from the State Dignitary Protection Unit sat behind me. This would have created a great bias in the jury against me as a ‗dangerous man‘. Strangely, when I asked trouble makers to be removed, G4S guard ‗Neville‘ stated the judge would have to order it. DCJ 11690 Wisbey did eventually remove one trouble maker several times but allowed him back the next day for another run. Surely the effect of two large men in suits – clearly police – sitting behind me was extremely prejudicial and angered me to a great extent.

11695

[16] Lack Of Detailed Indictment

I remember several rulings of the High Court being made known to me by Mr Wayne Glew. The most recent ruling was March 2010(I think) – Kirk v Industrial Relations Commission. The High Court insisted that an accused was entitled to a ‗detailed indictment‘. 11700

The hearing was under DCJ Sleight on the matter of a more detailed indictment with new and better particulars. On page 2 DCJ Sleight says:

DCJ Sleight: There‘s three applications before me this morning as I understand it. 11705 An application by Mr O‘Connell seeking an amendment to his bail conditions; an application by him relating to either having the indictment dismissed or an order for particulars; and thirdly, an order seeking a return of a video camera.

My complaint had been that the indictment was extremely vague. I noted that in three previous similar matters which were argued before the Federal Court – Jones v Toben, Jones v Anthony Griggor Scott (Bible Believers), Jones v Scully – that the respondent had received a detailed indictment that laid out exactly the words, phrases, sentences that were believed to constitute racial vilification albeit in a 11725 differing legal jurisdiction. The difference in detail is stark compared with what I had received from the W.A D.P.P. Jeremy Jones lays out, line by line, the exact words that he believed constituted vilification of the Jewish ‗race‘.

Mr John Bougher – barrister who appeared for me later in the year – agreed in principal with my 11730 argument and commented that he too could not identify what words and actions the state believed to constitute the offence. It was my opinion that the state should identify exactly what words and actions constituted the offence. It should not be up to me to ‗guess‘ and build my defence. I should add that the only defence the state seemed content for me to take was that I was simply angry and did not ‗intend‘ to racially vilify anyone even if it did happen, hence I would be innocent of the more serious 11735 Section 77 charges of which there were six – ‗engaged in conduct intended to create racist animosity/hatred‘. My argument, as you know, is that I would first need to diffuse the obvious bias of the jury towards the issue of Jewish power and behaviour by presenting my ‗views‘136 as based in fact or at least ‗facts‘ that were reasonable to believe by the average person – even if found to be wrong. Only then would a jury be able to make a clear judgement on my ‗intent‘ when presenting these ‗facts‘ 11740 under the particular circumstances of the time whether on the blog or on the video.

The state seemed to believe that the jury would decide ‗what‘ constituted the offence with the D.P.P just giving a ‗broad outline‘.

MHR remininiscient of Youtube and Facebook et al’s ‘community guidelines’ and Amazons ‘conditions’ … they block / terminate / ban you, but leave you to guess exactly why… hoping you’ll ‘get the point’ that you are not to ‘be amaleky’ in any way…without having to admit they are jew world order critieria…

You‘ll remember D.P.P head Mr Mcgrath stating my views were ‗abhorrent‘ at the December 13th 2011 appeal. Views that are a matter of the undisputed historical record and expounded by highly respected authors, journalists, politicians.

Mr Whalley: There is no transcript of it, but it is essentially every word spoken between - - - 11795 CJDC Kennedy: But you‘re going to show the video to the jury?

Mr Whalley: Yes, that‘s - - -

CJDC Kennedy: And it‘s every word spoken. 11800

Mr Whalley: Yes, essentially.

CJDC Kennedy: And how long does it go on for? 11805 Mr Whalley: Well, it will be about nine minutes for that particular charge. The entire thing - - -

Transcript 26/02/2010 p.28 11810 ...

CJDC Kennedy: Well, that doesn‘t really matter, we‘re asking for particulars. The particulars on count 1 are every word you said to these people on that DVD. 11815 Accused: I think the prosecution needs to be a bit more specific.

CJDC Kennedy: Well, I just don‘t understand in what way you mean they need to be more specific.

because the charge is harassment. It‘s the entire conduct and the words that‘s spoken, rather than and specific words.

CJDC Kennedy: I can understand your frustration Mr Whalley. But the fact is that this man is acting for himself, he is likely to go on acting for himself. And 11830 therefore greater attempts to assist him are going to have to be made. And I‘m just not quite sure whether – so when you say the whole nine minutes, are there actions, or is it only words?

Mr Whalley: No, there are actions your Honour, in terms of following the 11835 individual, coupled with the words. It‘s difficult to isolate it. It‘s really the totality of the conduct that the State will be putting to the jury and saying ―That‘s harassment‖. And then obviously that‘ll be a matter for the jury to determine.

CJDC Kennedy: No. Well, what they are saying – but what they are saying, they‘re saying you used words that were racially harassing. 11855 Accused: Sorry, sorry. Surely they should name those words.

CJDC Kennedy: Well, they are telling you, ―Every word you said in the nine minutes.‖ There you are. Every single word you said in that nine minutes, they‘re relying on. And they‘re relying on everything - - - 11860

Accused: Every single word? So ―and‖, ―if‖, ―where the suns shining‖?

CJDC Kennedy: Yes, that‘s right, yes. Yes, you can put those – if you think that that‘s a valid argument, you can put that to the jury. 11865

Accused: But your Honour, you said ―every single word‖.

CJDC Kennedy: Yes, I did. No, ―every single word‖ they‘re relying on, and your actions as well in the video. So that‘s what they‘re relying on in relation to 11870 that. So - - -

Accused: But they also – well, I have to say, your Honour, I mean, obviously I‘m very naïve with the matters of the law. But I had to – could the record just show that I object to this? I think that it‘s up to the prosecution to be very 11875 specific. These are serious charges from the start. It is now 37 weeks in and I‘ve just received a new indictment. And also, in the whole thing, they had not specifically stated once. They just say ―search video‖ or ―transcript‖, or can they actually just give me a list of the words, actions, give me the specifics that were to create racial harassment or animosity? It‘s a fairly – I thought it was a fairly 11880 simple point your Honour.

CJDC Kennedy: I‘ve made my ruling. I‘ve just made a ruling. I‘ve just made a ruling, and the ruling that I have just made is this. The whole of the blog is what they are referring to. The whole of the blog, they are saying, is conduct intended to incite racial animosity or racial harassment. 11915

Transcript 26/02/2010 p.33

Accused: But surely, the prosecution can actually hone in on something.

CJDC Kennedy: But they don‘t have to. They don‘t want to hone in, and they don‘t have to. 11925 Accused: Your Honour, this is bizarre. Surely they have looked through and gone, ―Yes, that is a passage. That is the statement right there.‖

CJDC Kennedy: No.

On the 20th of July 2010, my lawyer Mr Bougher wrote to the D.P.P: 11940

Dear Sir

I have now looked through a great deal of material relating to this matter and request that by way of further and better particulars you provide the following 11945 details:

Page 206 of 235

1. In relation to count 1, details of what statements it is alleged constitute or partly constitute the conduct that was likely to harass Mr Kaiser; 2. In relation to counts 2-7, details of the statements in each case alleged to 11950 have been made with intent to create or promote animosity towards a racial group; and 3. In relation to all Counts on the Indictment, what is the ‗racial group‘ referred to in each case.

On 28 July 2010 Mr Justin Whalley of the D.P.P replied:

Dear Mr Bougher,

Thank you for your letter of 20 July 2010. I apologise for the delay in replying. I 11965 will respond to your queries as they are enumerated in your letter.

4) It is not realistic to isolate individual statements or utterances in an attempt to particularise the conduct that was likely to harass Mr Kaiser. It is the totality of the conduct that represents the particulars of this count. The States position is that whilst 11970 any given statement in isolation may not constitute their combined effect is capable of constituting harassment.

In addition, the verbal statements cannot be viewed in isolation divorced from physical conduct and demeanour. The State relies on the totality and combined 11975 effect of the conduct, words, gestures and demeanour as particulars of the harassment the subject of Count 1.

5) The same principal applies to Counts 2 – 7, particulars of which are contained in a Schedule of Particulars that has previously been provided to Mr O‘Connell.137 11980

Individual comments in the blogs the subject of Counts 4 – 7, regarded in isolation, may not ground an inference that their posting on the internet evinces an intention to incite racial animosity / harassment but, viewed as a whole, they are capable of doing so. There is really nothing that I can usefully add to the 11985 information provided in the aforementioned Schedule of Particulars.

With the above in mind, at the trial summing up, Mr Antony Ayers went about directing the jury to exact paragraphs of what he thought constituted ‗racial vilification‘. On the 27th January 2011, starting from roughly page 672 to 680, Mr Ayers goes to specific points of reference in the video and blog but the D.P.P was unable to do this on the indictment particulars giving me a chance to hone in 11995 on their argument before the trial

MHR so in other words they DID know EXACTLY what conduct, actions, words, phrases, utterances of Brendon’s they were claiming met the legal requirements to be found guilty…so why withhold these from HIM ?

DCJ Wisbey does not interject again. I noted the discomfort when this issue came up. The judge 12075 knows that I have been charged surrounding comments I made about the so called HolocaustTM. He knows very well the statements are relevant. I make extensive statements in the offending video as well where I defend the right of people to question history without being the subject of persecution.

I am still astounded that people would be so sensitive about simple facts related to the subject coming 12080 up in a public forum. They were certainly terrified (in my opinion) of Dr Frederick Toben appearing. Unfortunately, Frederick was in the U.S and could not make it. I link this in with their general attempt to prevent material being presented at the trial and the spreading of ‗abhorrent views‘.

No, he took many photographs and stalked the ‗Friends Of Palestine‘ group. He listened in and stood next to the group for over an hour with Timothy John Peach at his side. His accomplice Daniel Ari Lazareth had joined the F.O.P for the express purpose of infiltration. All of these three are members of the Australian Union of Jewish Students, Habonim Dror and/or Chabad Lubavitch – a violent racist 12235 criminal cult by any measure. These three were not little Boy Scouts out for an outing. They were committed Jewish activists, out for a confrontation.

Page 211 of 235

13) After leaving the store, the appellant, who was present to observe and record the protest, approached Mr Keyser and Mr Peach. 12240

I approached them AFTER Mr Keyser took our photo, walked through the group, refused a pamphlet and said from half way up the steps at the back of the store, ―We are Jews from Melbourne, and what you are doing is disgusting‖. Justice Mazza could of added, ―Mr O‘Connell then commenced filming the two men and said, ‗You‘re Jews from Melbourne, you were taking our photo, why didn‘t you just 12245 come up to us, shake our hand, introduce yourself and give us your side of the story?‘‖138 But I guess that would make me look half way decent and rational.

13) The appellant made statements to Mr Keyser such as, ―You are a racist homicidal maniac‖139, ―You are a racist Jew‖, ‗You belong to a racist 12250 homicidal organization‖, ―You are anti-Goy...it is in your religion and race‖, and ―You kill little Palestinian children and you support it‖ (count 1). The State alleged that the appellants statements seriously or substantially abused or severely intimidated Mr Keyser as a member of a racial group.

Note that Justice Mazza has listed the statements as being a part of count 1. That‘s nice. Why were those statements not listed to me in the indictment? Why was the D.P.P so determined not to give me the specific statements that Justice Mazza chose to quote?

I made it known to the prosecutor that I knew Stanley Elliot Keyser 10 minutes before those comments were made as we debated vigorously. I know exactly what he is about. I know he is a committed activist – why else is he down there and by the force of his views he is a committed hard core Zionist140 and therefore – ergo sum, a racist homicidal maniac who defends the slaughter of 1,500 12270 largely innocent civilians (500 children) by a first world military juggernaut within a 8km (at its widest) and 20 km long cage called The Gaza Strip.

I could have shown to the jury EXACTLY why I could reasonably have that view and why it was fair and reasonable to call Mr Stanley Keyser exactly those things. But, as you know, I could not show 12275 anything so the jury made a reasonable conclusion that I was at least an emotionally unstable man with an irrational hatred of Jews and Judaism. I would have done the same thing under the circumstances.

Note the term ‗pursuing‘. I never ‗pursued‘ Keyser. He was at our protest. He was pursuing us. He was stalking us. I followed him as he went up to F.O.P members, the general public, and the F.O.P table out the front of the shopping centre where he attempted to make a scene and even lied to the organizer 12290 telling him that store security had asked us to move on. In fact, he is clear, calm and devious in word and deed. It‘s right there on the video. He is a highly experienced political activist and organizer –

138 This is not in contention. My words and actions are on the video. 139 No, I actually said, ―You are a BUNCH of racist homicidal maniacs‖. There‘s a big difference. 140 The foundation of Zionism is Jewish racial and religious supremacism expounded on in their religious books.

Page 212 of 235

playing victim. He knows exactly what he is doing. His friend and mentor – Steve Lieblich – is a Jewish community leader and lawyer. They were both instrumental in organizing the ‗Friends Of Israel‘ gathering that the Israeli Ambassador to Australia attended. I accused Stanley Keyser of 12295 deliberately making statements to entrap me in the legislation which he denied. He denied he knew anything about the racial vilification legislation or in fact he actually specifically stated:

Accused: ... I put to you that if a man emphatically states that he‘s hurt and he‘s upset and he just wants to get away but I‘m allegedly, according to you, yelling 12300 and screaming and following you, that casually wandering; and I call it casually wandering, and just going, ―Come on. You can film this one‖, to a complete stranger is the behaviour of a man seeking to enact the racial vilification legislation?---Is that a question? 12305 You can answer yes or no.

DCJ Wisbey: Yes. The question effectively is you were seeking to engage the racial vilification legislation by your behaviour?---No. As I said before, I‘ve – I‘ve never read the Racial Vilification Act. 12310

―I‘ve never read the Racial Vilification Act.‖ Yes, but he knows all about it even if he‘s never read it. He knew what he was doing.

When I said to him in court he could at least have the decency to answer my questions as I was looking 12315 at 4 years jail he hissed back at me, “I hope you get more. It‟s 14 years actually”.

The sycophantic approach many court reporters adopt in dealing with prominent legal figures. He says, ―This kind of journalism simply adds to the mystique of lawyers and judges as wise and intellectually adroit combatants to whom we all should pay due respect. In fact they are no more special than any other senior public servant. They are fallible, subjective 12490 and in some cases as ill equipped as anyone else working in the higher levels of our large public bureaucracies.‖ Robin Bowles 2007 “Rough Justice - No Justice” The Five Mile Press. p.162

―I unreservedly apologise for my behaviour in court. I am 40 years old and should have taken into account that the court system in general, and DCJ Wisbey in particular, was not responsible for the emotional stress I suffered in the lead up to the trial. With a good working knowledge of psychology and human behaviour, I should have taken measures to 12670 gain insight into, and improve my physical and emotional well-being well before the trial began. I should have been aware of the limits of the legal system and taken into account there are well defined and appropriate ways to settle matters which will not always be to my liking but are appropriate under the circumstances. I treated the legal process as a game of sport between myself and Stanley Keyser - a game I wanted to win out of personal pride 12675 where I forgot even about the reason I went to the IGA in the first place; to protest the slaughter of innocent human beings in Gaza. All that became forgotten in the events that followed. The Australian legal system is not perfect but it could be said to be the envy of many around the world. Finally, in the Orthodox Christian tradition it is said...‘God brings together, Satan tears apart.‘ I hope my sincere apology to the court and W.A Legal system 12680 in general, including Mr John Wisbey, court staff on the day, Mr Antony Eyers, G4S staff, police, Mr Justin Whalley and DPP staff is seen and accepted as sincere.‖ COPY OF HANDWRITTEN LETTER TO PERTH SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL IN THE MATTER OF CACR 27&28 OF 2011

I have subsequently been assaulted again. I am a minimum prisoner (4 points) constantly over ridden to medium security. In the assault that took place on September the 11th 2012 in Casuarina maximum security prison, I suffered a significant loss of consciousness, displaced fracture of my right Ulna and severe bruising down the right side of my body. I was rushed to Royal Perth Hospital. 12690 With over 2 years already of my 3 year sentence completed, my apology to the court should have added sincerity. I do not have to apologise. I remain of the view I was treated badly and continue to be treated badly by the Western Australian legal system. Some things are outright corruption and gross abuse of the legal process. However, I can only account for my own behaviour and would most certainly do things differently with the knowledge I have now. 12695

I continue to apologise for my bad behaviour in court but insist that DCJ Wisbey MUST be held accountable also. DCJ Wisbey absolutely added fuel to the fire with his unprofessional comments and constant sarcasm and baiting. My previous comments apply:

Further to DCJ Wisbey‘s behaviour, which was raised in relation to mine, is the fact that DCJ John Wisbey is a paid professional with many years‘ experience. His job is maintain an attitude ―above the fray‖ and not descend into it. He mocked me continually from literally the moment I stood and many of his comments have been removed from the record which is perhaps why, after 4 months of begging, I am being refused the right to correct the 12705 trial transcript.

The transcript as I have mentioned before, is missing large chunks and that is no accident. COPY OF HANDWRITTEN LETTER TO PERTH SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL IN THE MATTER 12745 OF CACR 27&28 OF 2011

DCJ John Wisbey is notorious amongst both criminals and lawyers as being thoroughly disliked. He is an obnoxiously arrogant character.

I feel shame at my 12755 behaviour. Even reading the transcript has been difficult as I ‗cringe‘ at my comments. The whole experience with John Wisbey in his capacity of a Judge of the District Court reminds me of the popular joke amongst Nurses about Doctors:

Q: What‘s the difference between God and a Doctor? 12760

Page 220 of 235

A: God knows he‘s not a Doctor.

I again apologise - sincerely - for my behaviour in court. I have paid dearly for it with over two years served in jail so far. I have been seriously assaulted in jail. I have been vilified in the press and was not 12765 able to defend myself. When I tried from Hakea prison to write a letter correcting media reporting I was told by the Senior Officer I would be charged with ―stalking‖ and my letter to the West Australian newspaper editor was shredded.

It is time judges in superior courts in Western Australia143 understood their loyalty is to the rule of law 12770 and the rules of court - not their ―Brother Judge‖.

On the specific comments that the DPP and WASCA 12820 found so ―abhorrent‖ there is plenty of examples.

You used Jones v Toben 2002 [FCA] as the main example but this was not the best. The two best examples are: 12825 Jeremy Jones, and on behalf of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry v The Bible Believers Church [2007] FCA 55 (2 February 2007)

Jones v Scully (2002) 120 FCR 243

12830 In the Bible Believers case, Mr Anthony Griggor Scott ran a website that made regular comments along the same lines as myself. He was charged under Section 18C of the HREOC Act which is almost identical to Section 80B of the W.A Criminal Code Racial Vilification Act. The key words being ―likely‖ and ―offend‖. Here, to give you an idea, is the complaint written to the Federal Court by Jeremy Jones: 12835

We write to lodge a formal complaint under the anti-racial-hatred provisions (Part IIA) of the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth) in respect of material published on the Australian website (―The Website‖). 12840 The Executive Council of Australian Jewry, the peak representative organisation of the Australian Jewish community, complains that:

(I) the material on the website is reasonably likely in all circumstances to offend, insult, humiliate and intimidate Jewish Australians; and 12845 (II) one of the reasons that the material has been published is the race or national or ethnic origin of Jewish people, including Jewish Australians.

The specific matters complained of are as follows: 12850 1. At under the heading ‗Lies and the First Anniversary of the 9/11 Conspiracy‘ where the following words appear:

We have all seen how the holocaust hoax of six-million Jews claimed to have been gassed and cremated by Germany in World War 1 failed to deceive the mob in 1919. Whereas 12855 monopolistic control of the media, film, and more boldly pursued holocaust hoax of sixmillion Jews gassed and cremated by Germany in World War 11 has produced such powerful psychological and material results the entire world is enslaved to the beneficiaries of the lie and temples of Equivocation affront the intelligence of humanity in major cities world-wide. 12860

2. At the following words appear:

The Holocaust has become the greatest instrument of sympathy which any nation has ever been able to use to gain support for wars, expansion and foreign-aid: This has made Israel 12865 the world‟s sixth strongest military power. The gravest threat to all this wealth and influence is the growing doubt over the question of whether or not a real holocaust of 6 million Jews actually took place.

3. At the "wasthere.htm" webpage the following words appear at the conclusion: 12870

The main theme of Jewish fund-raising is the holocaust and has been for 38 years. When they don‟t use the holocaust the money collection sharply drops off. Thus the more the Press, TV and Hollywood promotes the holocaust the more money the United Jewish Appeal and other Zionist funds can extract from gullible people... Jewish leaders have 12875 discovered that by repeating holocaust stories over and over again they can instil a guilt

Page 222 of 235

complex within all Gentiles. This effectively silences most critics of Zionist political goals... Why doesn‟t the Jew-controlled press, TV and film industry give massive media attention to real victims and to prove holocausts of Gentiles in recent history. 12880 Let me now contrast the above comments with professor Norman Finkelstein and his book ―The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering” which has been mentioned previously:

„The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering‟ was 12885 published in 2000. Here, Finkelstein argues that Elie Wiesel and others exploit the memory of the Holocaust as an "ideological weapon." This is so the state of Israel, "one of the world's most formidable military powers, with a horrendous human rights record, [can] cast itself as a victim state" in order to garner "immunity to criticism."[18] He also alleges what he calls a "double shakedown" by "a repellent 12890 gang of plutocrats, hoodlums and hucksters" seeking enormous legal damages and financial settlements from Germany and Switzerland, moneys which then go to the lawyers and institutional actors involved in procuring them, rather than actual Holocaust survivors.[19][20][21] ... 12895 Finkelstein also had his supporters however. Raul Hilberg, widely regarded as the founder of Holocaust studies,[24] said the book expressed views Hilberg himself subscribed to in substance, in that he too found the exploitation of the Holocaust, in the manner Finkelstein describes, 'detestable.' Asked on another occasion if Finkelstein's analysis might play into the hands of neo-Nazis for anti-semitic 12900 purposes, Hilberg replied: 'Well, even if they do use it in that fashion, I'm afraid that when it comes to the truth, it has to be said openly, without regard to any consequences that would be undesirable, embarrassing.‘[25]

[19] Finkelstein, N. (2003). The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering 12905 ((2nd ed.) ed.). Verso. pp. xiii.

[20] Where did the Shoah money go? Ynetnews October 12, 2006 12910 [21] Lawyer's $4.1 Million Fee Angers Holocaust Survivors New York Times February 25, 2006

[24] Felix Kellerhoff (25 January 2003). ""Raul Hilberg und die Quellen des Holocaust"". Die Welt. 12915

[25] Roberto Antonini (31 August 2000). ""Interview with Raul Hilberg"". Swiss National Radio (SBCSSR).

Finkelstein argues that Elie Wiesel and others exploit the memory of the Holocaust as an "ideological weapon." This is so the state of Israel, "one of the world's most formidable military powers, with a horrendous human rights record, [can] cast itself as a victim state" in order to garner "immunity to criticism."[18]

It would seem that the sole problem these various Acts and Statutes have is that the framers of the legislation, and the judiciary applying the Acts, have literally ZERO historical knowledge of ‗Jewish

Page 223 of 235

Issues‘. They believe that the ONLY reason people could have for raising these issues in public is to ―exterminate Jews‖ because they have some ―irrational hatred‖. The decision of these two judges of 12940 the Federal Court bears this out:

9. I observe moreover that in the concurring appellate judgment of Kiefel J in Toben [2003] FCAFC 137; 129 FCR 515, her Honour concluded, at [77], that: 12945 ‗[t]he likelihood that the appellant wrote only to pursue the truth of those subjects is rendered implausible by this unnecessary aside, which appears to have no real purpose in such a debate other than to disparage Jewish people. In my view, it confirms what a reading of the article as a whole raises as a prospect, namely that it was published with Jewish people in mind, as those 12950 responsible for concocting the Holocaust and, indeed, as an attack upon them.

DCJ John Wisbey when sentencing me on 31/01/2011 where he stated I had an ―irrational hatred of Jews‖ and my comments and actions were ―catalytic of civil unrest‖. 12990 The fact that we could all be simply ordinary people concerned at the actions of a seemingly out of control ‗psychopathic cult‘ escapes apparently intelligent judges and legislators. I hope the last 200 odd pages of information - gleaned from mainstream sources - on Jewish Power and machinations can begin to dispel such ―abhorrent views‖ from judges and legislators and we can have an adult discussion about this very important subject. 12995

In the end, both Olga Scully and Anthony Griggor Scott of ‗The Bible Believers‘ had their convictions over turned on appeal. You can find no mention of this online.

Olga Scully‘s case has disappeared from the online case library. 13000

In Jones v Toben (2002), Dr Frederick Toben was simply asked to remove the ―offending passages‖ from his website. This he refused to do. He served 3 months at Yatala Prison in South Australia for contempt of court. His website - ‗The Adelaide Institute‘ - continues to be published by a supporter. It has not been altered in any way or complied with the Federal Courts instructions. 13005

It is clear that it is not the WAY people express their views but WHAT people are expressing that troubles the interpreters of the relevant legislation in all jurisdictions. They state it quite clearly from the beginning where they judge the ―views‖ themselves. It was said from the outset that the legislation would not impinge on notions of ―free expression‖ because it would focus on the WAY people 13010 expressed things and this is clearly not the way judges and prosecutors are using the legislation. Simply look at the way the prosecutor and judges use the term ―aberrant views‖ in my matter:

DCJ WISBEY: There can be no doubt that imprisonment to be immediately served is the necessary sentencing decision required to act as a specific deterrent for you 13015 and a general deterrent to others, including particularly the small group of supporters whose behaviour in court during the trial suggests that they share your aberrant views.

Transcript 31/01/2011 Page 746

MHR So the trial was to ‘send a message’ and NOT about Brendon O’Connell and his actions / words / posts AT ALL…’aberrant views’ ? Lets list all the ‘Aberrant views’ STILL MAINTAINED as dogma and articles of faith of the Rabbi in that video…

Do my views sound so ―aberrant‖ now Dr 13025 Walsh? Certainly you could argue that I could have articulated them better but that is not the point. It is not the ―Speak Nicely Act‖.

Here, head of the DPP McGrath makes the same mistake at the WASCA on 13/12/2011: 13030 The appellant was not a young man, being 40 years of age, and was firmly entrenched in his aberrant views, despite being an intelligent man holding tertiary qualifications. Those personal features, combined with the appellants demonstrated repeated course of offending, as well as his complete lack of remorse, reinforced the need for the sentence to reflect specific deterrence, given what could only be 13035 assessed by the learned sentencing judge as the appellants high risk of re-offending in a similar way. Point 68

MHR have to get dictionary definitions of ‘aberrant’ and see what criterion we have here…it is NOT an everyday word…

MCGRATH: In my submission your Honour Buss JA, whilst I would accept that the two videos are the high water mark144, these blogs remain extremely serious offending because of what is said in there and they require, with respect, very close reading and the significance is, as the Law Reform Commission says quite properly, the correlation between exhortations and actual acts of violence. 13050

Transcript 13/12/2011 Page 26

144 I state that I am angry in the video‘s. I also clarify in the video‘s what I mean by, ―Your days are numbered‖ and ―camps‖.

Clear to me Brendon meant the ‘cults’ days are numbered…i.e the ideological Semitism…genocide of amalet etc…so be careful don’t express things in ways that make it too easy to misrepresent…in any situation…

Again - judged for WHAT I said. As for the Law Reform Commission, just WHAT ―exhortations‖ and ―actual acts of violence‖ are they talking about? The only acts of violence I see being perpetrated in 13055 WA are by neo-Nazi‘s shooting up Muslim Mosques and they walked away with a suspended sentence.

And finally McGraths last statements at the WASCA on 13/12/2011: 13075

MCGRATH: Three is the actual circumstances of the offending. It‘s not a momentary act of madness where a person enters into a fray. This was extremely well considered for it reflects a deeply held set of beliefs which the appellant does not resile from. Counts 5 and 7 - three counts were committed after the charging of 13080 the appellant which in itself shows is an aggravating factor and the fifth is the simple no remorse whatsoever.

Transcript 13/12/2011 Page 27

MHR the whole point is to get a public ‘renunciation’ of the truth i.e 1984…how many fingers am I holding up? And to believe you were ‘wrong’ i.e ‘just angry words, lost temper, didn’t mean it, and regret having uttered them as lies … unfair to poor powerless ‘jews’ after all they’ve already been through’ etc…3 years was because Brendon remained ‘amaleky’ i.e determined to oppose the jew world order…even if it ‘offended’ some ‘potentially innocent / only ‘passively’ guilty, jews…

MHR Point is that if I ‘go along to get along’ with my nations, religions, ethnic groups criminal actions and horrific ‘philosophies’ i.e ‘beliefs’ and actions, and passively do nothing, say nothing, just ignore it…I am complicit in their crimes…and worse, if I actively seek to promote it, as Keyser was doing, I am ACTIVELY complicit and guilt, not just of ‘saying nothing’, but of actively promoting the jew world order, and its genocide of all ‘opposition’ and ‘resistance’ to its cult mentality / delusions of grandeur…a.k.a ‘amaleky’…

No, I do not ―resile‖ from simple facts of history. I do not ―resile‖ from the truth of a matter no matter how much it offends Mr McGrath, the Jewish community or DCJ John Wisbey.

It is actually incredible that they could all be so dead bones ignorant of history. 13090 And what of Brendon Lee O‘Connell? He got three years but if he had said ―sorry‖ it would have been suspended? The senior prosecutor Justin Whalley was going to take the matter back to the Magistrates Court. I have been denied justice, vilified by the media and Jewish community and had my ability to prepare for the appeal severely hampered quite deliberately. I have served just over two years now. I have not seen my family in that time. I have been held in maximum security despite being a minimum 13095 security prisoner. I have been badly assaulted and hospitalised on September the 11th 2012.

AT NO TIME DID THE COURT REQUEST MY VIDEO‘S OR BLOG BE TAKEN DOWN. NOT AT ANY STAGE. 13100

My ―abhorrent views‖ were so bad - the court decided they should just stay there?

My ―abhorrent views‖ were so capable of creating ―civil unrest‖ the court never asked for them to be taken down? 13105

I took my blog down out of fear for my own safety and as a last gesture to the Jewish community to begin a dialogue. If they do not own up to their behaviours and cease their criminal and subversive activities then I will have no option but to continue highlighting them to the public.

MHR surely this proves they were disingenuous after ‘fears’ of ‘actual incitement’ to criminal actions against ‘jews’ ???

CONCLUSION

1) The Hansard indicates that the legislation was designed to nab ―racists‖ and ―extremists‖. It is even stated explicitly that it was directed at the activities of the ‗Australian nationalist 13115 Movement‘. The legislation is therefore no different from the National Socialist party in German outlawing the Communist Party. 2) The Hansard specifically indicates it is not to be used for words said in anger. It is aimed at a particular type of activity. 3) Jews do not fit the definition ‗racial group‘ in the standard sense. No one is able to state 13120 explicitly WHAT are the common secular markers linking ―Jews‖ around the world. The question is avoided at all times by all parties. 4) Under the definition ―racial group‖ as used by both Australian and English courts, the marker ―descent from a small number of common ancestors‖ and ―common geographical location‖ has been made optional. This makes the term ‗racial group‘ indistinguishable from ANY 13125 ―identifiable group‖. 5) The further 5 counts under section 77 only occurred after I was vilified in the press and was stalked. I put the blog up to defend myself. I went to the relevant authorities - no one gave a damn. 6) My behaviour in court was based on various types of harassment over the 18 month lead up to 13130 the trial and DCJ Wisbey‘s dismissive and mocking tone to me. 7) I was never accorded procedural fairness. 8) Both Rabbi Freilich and Professor Andrew Markus‘s testimony was ‗prejudicial inadmissible opinion evidence‘. 9) My ―views‖ were continually judged instead of the ―intent‖ behind those views. 13135 10) Clearly few people know what Judaism is and how it feeds Jewish racial and religious supremacism. 11) Jews are a world power. This should not be in contention. 12) I‘m sick of being labelled a racist, nazi and hater for pointing out the self-evident. 13) I again apologise to both the court and general Jewish community for losing my temper. I 13140 hope they have all learnt a lesson too. Let‘s move on? As President Armedinejhad of Iran stated so eloquently: ―This is the age of peace and dialogue, not bullets and bombs.‖

USEFUL QUOTES ON JEWS…so don’t have to say it myself…can simply say…this is what THEY said…and leave it to YOU to decide if YOU should not at least take a closer look at my contention of there being a ‘jew world order’ consistent with the lecture given by the Rabbi, and thousands of quotes from the religious texts of the jews, which have NOT been ‘denounced’ and ‘renounced’ by the jewish community, in favor of some supposed ‘last word on judaism’ which does NOT contain them…or does it? Shulchran Aruch ??? in any case it is just one more ‘religious’ book of ‘the jews’ and no more definitive and ‘last word’ as any other book…except to a small minority of ‘jews’ who ‘accept’ it as such. Like claiming ‘Mein Kampf’ is the definitive last word of all Germans…note it was written a few decades ago, compared to 500 years ago !!!

When the Jews first began to immigrate to America the early colonialists in New York, Charleston and Savannah tried to ban their entry. Benjamin Franklin pleaded with the members of the Continental Congress to enter a specific ban against Jewish immigration into the U. S. Constitution to bar them for all time to come.

Less than 30% are members of any Synagogue. Whether they are Orthodox religious, atheists, capitalists or communists — they still claim to be Jews 

 Slavery, usury, and a loathing for “productive labor” which is scorned as beneath the dignity of the Jews in their “bible” called “THE TALMUD.”

While only 3% of the population, the Jews control over 90% of the nation’s wealth and this percentage rises every year. They are the only racial group totally organized to work for political domination over the planet.

Opposition to the Jews did not begin in Germany but dates back before the birth of Christ over 2,000 years ago! Study the statements made by “The world’s greatest men.” They reveal why the “wandering Jews” have made enemies out of every host country that ever accepted them.

CICERO (Marcus Tullius Cicero). First century B.C. Roman statesman, writer.Cicero wrote: “The Jews belong to a dark and repulsive force. One knows how numerous this clique is, how they stick together and what power they exercise through their unions. They are a nation of rascals and deceivers.”

SENECA (Lucius Annaeus Seneca). First century Roman philosopher. “The customs of that most criminal nation have gained such strength that they have now been received in all lands. The conquered have given laws to the conquerors.” (De Superstitione)

DIO CASSIUS. Second century Roman historian. Describing the savage Jewish uprising against the Roman empire that has been acknowledged as the turning point downward in the course of that great state-form: “The Jews were destroying both Greeks and Romans. They ate the flesh of their victims, made belts for themselves out of their entrails, and daubed themselves with their blood… In all, 220,000 men perished in Cyrene and 240,000 in Cyprus, and for this reason no Jew may set foot in Cyprus today.” (Roman History)

AQUINAS, THOMAS, Saint. 13th century scholastic philosopher. In his “On the Governance of the Jews,” he wrote: “The Jews should not be allowed to keep what they have obtained from others by usury; it were best that they were compelled to worked so that they could earn their living instead of doing nothing but becoming avaricious.”

HILAIRE BELLOC, in the book THE JEWS, page 9 “There is already something like a Jewish monopoly in high finance . . . There is the same element of Jewish monopoly in the silver trade, and in the control of various other metals, notably lead, nickel, quicksilver. What is most disquieting of all, this tendency to monopoly is spreading like a disease.”

W. HUGHES, Premier of Australia, Saturday Evening Post, June 19, 1919 “The Montefiores have taken Australia for their own, and there is not a gold field or a sheep run from Tasmania to New South Wales that does not pay them a heavy tribute. They are the real owners of the antipodean continent. What is the good of our being a wealthy nation, if the wealth is all in the hands of German Jews?”

POPE CLEMENT VIII “All the world suffers from the usury of the Jews, their monopolies and deceit. They have brought many unfortunate people into a state of poverty, especially the farmers, working class people and the very poor. Then as now Jews have to be reminded intermittently anew that they were enjoying rights in any country since they left Palestine and the Arabian desert, and subsequently their ethical and moral doctrines as well as their deeds rightly deserve to be exposed to criticism in whatever country they happen to live.”

FRANZ LISZT, famed composer quoted in Col. E. N. Sanctuary’s Are These Things So?, page 278 “The day will come when all nations amidst which the Jews are dwelling will have to raise the question of their wholesale expulsion, a question which will be one of life or death, good health or chronic disease, peaceful existence or perpetual social fever.”

JESUS CHRIST, speaking to the Jews in the Gospel of St. John, 8:44 “Ye are of your father the devil, and the lust of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is not truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar and the father of it. – then answered the Jews — ” (which makes it clear that Christ was addressing the Jews.)

REV. MARTIN LUTHER, sermon at Eisleben, a few days before his death, February, 1546 “you, Milords and men of authority, should not tolerate but expel them. They are our public enemies and incessantly blaspheme our Lord Jesus Christ, they call our Blessed Virgin Mary a harlot and her Holy Son a bastard and to us they give the epithet of changelings and abortions. Therefore deal with them harshly as they do nothing but excruciatingly blaspheme our Lord Jesus Christ, trying to rob us of our lives, our health, our honor and belongings.”

MARIA THERESA, Queen of Hungary and Bohemia (1771 – 1789) “Henceforth no Jew, no matter under what name, will be allowed to remain here without my written permission. I know of no other troublesome pest within the state than this race, which impoverished the people by their fraud, usury and money-lending and commits all deeds which an honorable man despises. Subsequently they have to be removed and excluded from here as much as possible.”

(The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia states that “The Talmud is the real “bible” of the Jews and that it supersedes the Old Testament. 

MOHAMMED, in the Koran “Whoever is a friend of a Jew, belong to them, becomes one of them, God cannot tolerate this mean people. The Jews have wandered from divine religion. You must not relent in your work which must show up Jewish deceit.”

LUTHER, MARTIN. 16th century German religious reformer. “They are the real liars …who desire to and think they must murder and crush the heathen. And the foremost undertaking which they expect of their Messiah is that he should slay and murder the whole world with the sword. …They also find comfort with this: “When the Messiah comes, He shall take all the gold and silver in the world and distribute it among the Jews…Therefore know, my dear Christians, that next to the Devil, you have no more bitter, more poisonous, more vehement and enemy than a real Jew who earnestly desires to be a Jew….They do not work, do not earn anything from us, neither do we donate or give it to them. Yet they have our money and goods and are lords in our land where they are supposed to be in exile! If a thief steals ten gulden he must hang; if he robs people on the highway, his head is gone. But a Jew, when he steals ten tons of gold through his usury is dearer than God himself! Do not their TALMUD and rabbis write that it is no sin to kill if a Jew kills a heathen, but it is a sin if he kills a brother in Israel? It is no sin if he does not keep his oath to a heathen. Therefore, to steal and rob (as they do with their moneylending) from a heathen, is a divine service . . . And they are the masters of the world and we are their servants — yea, their cattle!... Now what are we going to do with these rejected, condemned Jewish people? . . . Let us apply the ordinary wisdom of other nations like France, Spain, Bohemia, et al., who made them give an account of what they had stolen through usury, and divided it evenly; but expelled them from their country….. Maybe mild-hearted and gentle Christians will believe that I am too rigorous and drastic against the poor, afflicted Jews, believing that I ridicule them and treat them with much sarcasm. By my word, I am far too weak to be able to ridicule such a satanic brood. I would fain to do so, but they are far greater adepts at mockery than I and possess a god who is master in this art. It is the Evil One himself. Even with no further evidence than the Old Testament, I would maintain, and no person on earth could alter my opinion, that the Jews as they are today are veritably a mixture of all the depraved and malevolent knaves of the whole world over, who have then been dispersed in all countries…

WASHINGTON, GEORGE, in Maxims of George Washington by A. A. Appleton & Co. “They (the Jews) work more effectively against us, than the enemy’s armies. They are a hundred times more dangerous to our liberties and the great cause we are engaged in… It is much to be lamented that each state, long ago, has not hunted them down as pest to society and the greatest enemies we have to the happiness of America.”

This prophecy, by Benjamin Franklin, was made in a “CHIT CHAT AROUND THE TABLE DURING INTERMISSION,” at the Philadelphia Constitutional Convention of 1787. This statement was recorded in the dairy of Charles Cotesworth Pinckney, a delegate from South Carolina. “I fully agree with General Washington, that we must protect this young nation from an insidious influence and impenetration. The menace, gentlemen, is the Jews. In whatever country Jews have settled in any great number, they have lowered its moral tone; depreciated its commercial integrity; have segregated themselves and have not been assimilated; have sneered at and tried to undermine the Christian religion upon which that nation is founded, by objecting to its restrictions; have built up a state within the state; and when opposed have tried to strangle that country to death financially, as in the case of Spain and Portugal. For over 1,700 years, the Jews have been bewailing their sad fate in that they have been exiled from their homeland, as they call Palestine. But gentlemen, did the world give it to them in fee simple, they would at once find some reason for not returning. Why? Because they are vampires, and vampires do not live on vampires. They cannot live only among themselves. They must subsist on Christians and other people not of their race. If you do not exclude them from these United States, in their Constitution, in less than 200 years they will have swarmed here in such great numbers that they will dominate and devour the land and change our form of government, for which we Americans have shed our blood, given our lives our substance and jeopardized our liberty. If you do not exclude them, in less than 200 years our descendants will be working in the fields to furnish them substance, while they will be in the counting houses rubbing their hands. I warn you, gentlemen, if you do not exclude Jews for all time, your children will curse you in your graves. Jews, gentlemen, are Asiatics, let them be born where they will nor how many generations they are away from Asia, they will never be otherwise. Their ideas do not conform to an American’s, and will not even thou they live among us ten generations. A leopard cannot change its spots. Jews are Asiatics, are a menace to this country if permitted entrance, and should be excluded by this Constitutional Convention.

STYVESANT, PETER. 17th century Dutch governor in America. “The Jews who have arrived would nearly all like to remain here, but learning that they (with their customary usury and deceitful trading with the Christians) were very repugnant to the inferior magistrates, as also to the people having the most affection for you; the Deaconry also fearing that owing to their present indigence they might become a charge in the coming winter, we have, for the benefit of this weak newly developing place and land in general, deemed it useful to require them in a friendly way to depart; praying also most seriously in this connection, for ourselves also for the general community of your worships, that the deceitful race — such hateful enemies and blasphemers of the name of Christ — not be allowed further to infect and trouble this new colony. (Letter to the Amsterdam Chamber of the Dutch West India Company, from New Amsterdam, September 22, 1654.) The Jews whom he attempted to oust merely applied to their fellow Jews in Holland, and the order came back from the Company countermanding the expulsion. (For a similar situation during the Civil War, see ULYSSES GRANT). Among the reasons given by “their worships” for over-ruling their governor, one stands out rather glaringly, in view of the usual Jewish contention that their people were ‘poor and persecuted:’ ” . . . and also because of the large amount of capital which they have invested in shares of this Company.” (Harry Golden and Martin Rywell, THE JEWS IN AMERICAN HISTORY) THE GEORGIA COLONY IN AMERICA. On January 5, 1734, the trustees ordered that three Jews who had been sending coreligionists into the colony without authorization “use their endeavors that the said Jews may be removed from the Colony of Georgia, as the best and only satisfaction that they can give to the Trustees for such an indignity offered to Gentlemen acting under His Majesty’s Charter.” (C. Jones, HISTORY OF SAVANNAH)

HARRINGTON, LORD. 19th century British statesman. Opposed admission of Jewish immigrants to England because: “They are the great moneylenders and loan contractors of the world… The consequence is that the nations of the world are groaning under heavy systems of taxation and national debt. They have ever been the greatest enemies of freedom. (Speech in the House of Lords, July 12, 1858)

WALTER CRICK, British Manufacturer, in the NORTHAMPTON DAILY ECHO, March 19. 1925) “Jews can destroy by means of finance. Jews are International. Control of credits in this country is not in the hands of the English, but of Jews. It has become the biggest danger the British Empire ever had to face.”

The Communist philosophy was drawn up by Karl Marx who descended from a long line of Rabbis. His ideology of anti-Christian and Socialist thought is outlined in the Jewish “TALMUD” which is the “bible” of the Jews. Of the four political groups which overthrew the Christian Czar of Russia two were 100% Jewish. They were the Mensheviks and The Jewish Bund. The other two were the Socialist Revolutionary Party and the Bolsheviks. Both were headed by Jews but had some Gentile members. Today we now know that Lenin was Jewish and all of the leaders of his first government were Jews. They were Trotsky, Zinoviev, Kamenev and Sverdlow. The wealthiest Jewish banker in the world at that time, Jacob Schiff of Kuhn, Loeb investment bank of New York City, gave Trotsky and Lenin $20 million to overthrow the Czar and establish the Soviet tyranny (according to the “NEW YORK JOURNAL-AMERICAN” of February 3, 1949.)

 CHURCHILL, WINSTON. 20th century British politician. In 1920, he wrote a long newspaper article of the recent Bolshevik seizure of Russia.From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxemburg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide revolutionary conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Webster has ably shown, a definite recognizable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworlds of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of the enormous empire. There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creating of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistic Jews. It is certainly the very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders . . . In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astounding. And the prominent if not the principal part in the system of terrorism applied by the extraordinary Commissions for combating Counter Revolution has been take by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses. The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany (especially Bavaria), so far as this madness has been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration of the German people. Although in all these countries there are many non-Jews every bit as bad as the worst of the Jewish revolutionaries, the part played by the latter in proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing. (“Zionism versus Bolshevism: A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People.” ILLUSTRATED SUNDAY HERALD, London, February 8, 1920.)

BAKUNYIN, MIKHYL. 19th century Russian revolutionary. “Marx is a Jew and is surrounded by a crowd of little, more or less intelligent, scheming, agile, speculating Jews, just as Jews are everywhere, commercial and banking agents, writers, politicians, correspondents for newspapers of all shades; in short, literary brokers, just as they are financial brokers, with one foot in the bank and the other in the socialist movement, and their arses sitting upon the German press. They have grabbed hold of all newspapers, and you can imagine what a nauseating literature is the outcome of it. Now this entire Jewish world, which constitutes an exploiting sect, a people of leeches, a voracious parasite, Marx feels an instinctive inclination and a great respect for the Rothschild’s. This may seem strange. What could there be in common between communism and high finance? Ho ho! The communism of Marx seeks a strong state centralization, and where this exists there must inevitably exist a state central bank, and where this exists, there the parasitic Jewish nation, which speculates upon the labor of the people, will always find the means for its existence . . . In reality, this would be for the proletariat a barrack regime, under which the workingmen and the working closely and intimately connected with one another, regardless not only of frontiers but of political differences as well — this Jewish world is today largely at the disposal of Marx or Rothschild. I am sure that, on the one hand, the Rothschild’s appreciate the merits of Marx, and that on the other hand, women, converted into a uniform mass, would rise, fall asleep, work and live at the beat of the drum; the privilege of ruling would be in the hands of the skilled and the learned, with a wide scope left for profitable crooked deals carried on by the Jews, who would be attracted by the enormous extension of the international speculations of the national banks . . . (Pol Emique contres les Juifs) This startling piece of prediction is particularly impressive to those who have observed the Soviet scene and notice its strange relationship with capitalist financiers — overwhelmingly Jewish – since the revolution. The line runs from Olof Aschberg, self-described “Bolshevik banker” who ferried to Trotsky the huge sums raised for the revolution by financiers in Europe and America, to Armand Hammer in the 1970s, who has specialized in multimillion-dollar trade concessions with the now supposedly ‘anti-Semitic’ commissars.

WILHELM II. German Kaiser. “A Jew cannot be a true patriot. He is something different, like a bad insect. He must be kept apart, out of a place where he can do mischief – even by pogroms, if necessary. The Jews are responsible for Bolshevism in Russia, and Germany too. I was far too indulgent with them during my reign, and I bitterly regret the favors I showed the prominent Jewish bankers.” (CHICAGO TRIBUNE, July 2, 1922)

CARDINAL MINDSZENTY, of Hungary quoted in B’nai B’rith Messenger, January 28, 1949 “The troublemakers in Hungary are the Jews… they demoralize our country and they are the leaders of the revolutionary gang that is torturing Hungary.”

ADRIEN ARCAND, New York speech, October 30, 1937 “When it came to Mexico, the promoters of Communism were the Jews Calles, Hubermann and Aaron Saenz; in Spain we saw Azaa and Rosenberg; in Hungary we saw Bela Kun, Szamuelly, Agoston and dozen other Jews; in Bavaria, we saw Kurt Eisner and a host of other Jews; in Belgium Marxian Socialism brought to power Vadervelde alias Epstein, and Paul Hymans, two Jews; in France, Marxian Socialism brought forth the Jews Leon Blum (who showed so well his Jewish instincts in his filthy book Du Mariarge), Mandel, Zyromsky, Danain and a whole tribe of them; in Italy we had seen the Jews Nathan and Claudio Treves. Everywhere, Marxism brings Jews on the top…”

HILAIRE BELLOC, renown historian in G. K.’s WEEKLY, February 4, 1937 “The propaganda of Communism throughout the world, in organization and direction is in the hands of Jewish agents. As for anyone who does not know that the Bolshevist movement in Russia is Jewish, I can only say that he must be a man who is taken in by the suppression of our deplorable press.”

A. HOMER, writes in Judaism and Bolshevism, page 7 “History shows that the Jew has always been, by nature, a revolutionary and that, since the dispersion of his race in the second century, he has either initiated or assisted revolutionary movements in religion, politics and finance, which weakened the power of the States wherein he dwelt. On the other hand, a few far-seeing members of that race have always been at hand to reap financial and political advantage coincident with such upheavals.”

CAPTAIN MONTGOMERY SCHYLER, American Expeditionary Forces, Siberia, in a military intelligence report dated March 1, 1919, to Lt. Col. Barrows in Vladivostok “It is probably unwise to say this loudly in the United States but the Bolshevik movement is and has been since its beginning guided and controlled by Russian Jews of the greasiest type, who have been in the United States and there absorbed every one of the worst phases of our civilization without having the least understanding of what we really mean by liberty.”

MRS. CLARE SHERIDAN, Traveler, Lecturer in NEW YORK WORLD, December 15, 1923 “The Communists are Jews, and Russia is being entirely administered by them. They are in every government office, bureau and newspaper. They are driving out the Russians and are responsible for the anti-Semitic feeling which is increasing.”

MAJOR ROBERT H. WILLIAMS, in Fecp and the Minority Machine, page 10 “B’nai B’rith, the secret Jewish fraternity, was organized in 1843, awakening world Jewish aspirations, or Zionism, and its name, meaning “Sons of the Covenant,” suggests that the 12 men who organized the fraternity aimed at bringing about the fulfillment of “the Covenant,” or the supposed Messianic promise of rulership over all peoples. To rule all peoples, it is first necessary to bring them together in a world federation or world government — which is the avowed aim of both Communists and Zionists.”

JOSEPH STALIN in a reply given on January 12, 1931 to an enquiry made by the Jewish Telegraphic Agency of America (Stars and Sand, page 316)… anti-Semitism is strictly prosecuted as a phenomenon hostile to the Soviet system. According to the laws of the U.S.S.R. active anti-Semites are punished with death.”

HENRY FORD in (The Dearborn Independent, 12-19 February 1921 “Jews have always controlled the business . . . The motion picture influence of the United States and Canada . . . is exclusively under the control, moral and financial, of the Jewish manipulators of the public mind.”

M. OUDENDYK, the Netherlands’ Minister to Petrograd on September 6, 1918, to the British Government, published in the unexpurgated edition of A Collection of Reports on Bolshevism in Russia, April, 1919 “. . . I consider that the immediate suppression of Bolshevism is the greatest issue before the World, not even excluding the war which is till raging, and unless, as above stated, Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately, it is bound to spread in one form or another over Europe and the whole World, as it is organized and worked by Jews who have no nationality, and whose one object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things.”

A. N. FIELD, in Today’s Greatest Problem “Once the Jewishness of Bolshevism is understood, its otherwise puzzling features become understandable. Hatred of Christianity, for instance, is not a Russian characteristic; it is a Jewish one.”

FATHER DENIS FAHEY; in his book The Rulers of Russia, page 25 “The real forces behind Bolshevism is Russia are Jewish forces, and Bolshevism is really an instrument in the hands of the Jews for the establishment of their future Messianic kingdom.”

A. N. FIELD, The Truth About the Slump, page 208 “The World today, however provides a spectacle of a great concentration of Jewish power. In New York there is a concentration of Jewish financial power dominating the entire world in its material affairs, and side by side with it is the greatest physical concentration of the Jews ever recorded. On the other side of the globe, there has taken place in Russia the greatest concentration of the Jewish revolutionary activity in all history . . . The enormously significant thing in the world today is that both this power of the purse (Theodor Herzl’s “terrible (Jewish) power of the purse”) and revolutionary activity are working in the direction of destroying the entire existing order of things, and not only are they working in a common direction, but there is a mass of evidence that they are working in unison.”

ADRIEN ARCAND, Canadian political leader in New York Speech, October 30, 1937 “There is nothing else in Communism — a Jewish conspiracy to grab the whole world in their clutches; and no intelligent man in the world can find anything else, except the Jews, who rightly call it for themselves a “paradise on earth.”

Jews are eager to bring Communism, because they know what it is and what it means. It is because Communism has not been fought for what it really is — a Jewish scheme invented by Jews — that it has progressed against all opposition to it. We have fought the smoke-screen presented by Jewish dialecticians and publicists, refusing to fight the inventor, profiteer and string-puller.

REV. KENNETH GOFF, in STILL ‘TIS OUR ANCIENT FOE, page 99 “The Frankenstein of Communism is the product of the Jewish mind, and was turned loose upon the world by the son of a Rabbi, Karl Marx, in the hopes of destroying Christian civilization — as well as others. The testimony given before the Senate of the United States which is take from the many pages of the Overman Report, reveals beyond a shadow of a doubt that Jewish bankers financed the Russian Revolution.”

POPE JULIUS III. Contra Hebreos retinentes libros (1554) ordered the TALMUD burned “everywhere” and established a strict censorship over Jewish genocidal writings — an order that has never been rescinded and which presumably is still binding upon Catholics.

PIUS IV. Condemned Jewish genocidal writings.

PIUS V. Hebraeorum gens (1569) expelled all Jews from the Papal States.

GREGORY XIII. Declared that Jews “continue to plot horrible crimes” against Christians “with daily increasing audacity.”

CLEMENT VIII. Condemned Jewish genocidal writings.

ALEXANDER VIII. Condemned Jewish genocidal writings.

BENEDICT XIV. Quo Primum 1751) denounced Jewish control of commerce and “systematical despoliation” of the Christian through usury.

BENEDICT XV. Warned, in 1920, against “the advent of a Universal Republic which is longed for by all the worst elements of disorder.” This is resented by some Jews because of their active sponsorship and direction of such projects as the League of Nations and United Nations. — And in effect, all Popes who have issued editions of the Index Expurgatorius, in which Jewish genocidal and anti-Christian writings are condemned, according to the instructions of the Council of Trent.

GRANT, USYSSES S. 19th century American general, politician. While in command of the 13th Army Corps, headquartered at Oxford, Mississippi, he became so infuriated at Jewish camp-followers attempting to penetrate the conquered territory that he finally attempted to expel the Jews: “I have long since believed that in spite of all the vigilance that can be infused into post commanders, the special regulations of the Treasury Department have been violated, and that mostly by Jews and other unprincipled traders. So well satisfied have I been of this that I instructed the commanding officers at Columbus to refuse all permits to Jews to come South, and I have frequently had them expelled from the department, but they come in with their carpet-sacks in spite of all that can be done to prevent it. The Jews seem to be a privileged class that can travel anywhere. They will land at any woodyard on the river and make their way through the country. If not permitted to buy cotton themselves, they will act as agents for someone else, who will be at military post with a Treasury permit to receive cotton and pay for it in Treasury notes which the Jew will buy up at an agreed rate, paying gold. (Letters to C. P. Wolcott, assistant secretary of war, Washington, December 17, 1862)

1). The Jews, as a class, violating every regulation of trade established by the Treasury Department, and also Department orders, are hereby expelled from the Department.

2). Within twenty-four hours from the receipt of this order by Post Commanders, they will see that all of this class of people are furnished with passes and required to leave, and anyone returning after such notification, will be arrested and held in confinement until an opportunity occurs of sending them out as prisoners, unless furnished with permits from these headquarters.

3). No permits will be given these people to visit headquarters for the purpose of making personal application for trade permits. By order of Major Gen. Grant Jno. A. Rawlings, Assistant Adjutant General (General Order Number 11, December 17, 1862)

The expulsion order was immediately countermanded by the general-in-chief, H. W. Halleck, in Washington. Apparently the expelled Jews had immediately contacted their kinsmen there and had pressure brought to bear.

TWAIN, MARK (S. L. Clemens). 19th century American writer. “In the U.S. cotton states, after the war . . . the Jew came down in force, set up shop on the plantation, supplied all the Negroes’ wants on credit, and at the end of the season was the proprietor of the Negro’s share of the present crop and part of the next one. Before long, the whites detested the Jew.

1). The Jew is being legislated out of Russia. The reason is not concealed. The movement was instituted because the Christian peasant stood no chance against his commercial abilities. The Jew was always ready to lend on a crop. When settlement day came, he owned the crop; the next year he owned the farm — like Joseph.

2). In the England of John’s time everybody got into debt to the Jew. He gathered all lucrative enterprises into his hands. He was the King of Commerce. He had to be banished from the realm. For like reasons, Spain had to banish him 400 years ago, and Austria a couple of centuries later. In all ages Christian Europe has been obliged to curtail his activities. If he entered upon a trade, the Christian had to retire from it. If he set up as a doctor, he took the business. If he exploited agriculture, the other farmers had to get at something else. The law had to step in to save the Christian from the poor-house. Still, almost bereft of employments, he found ways to make money. Even to get rich. This history has a most sordid and practical commercial look. Religious prejudices may account for one part of it, bit not for the other nine. Protestants have persecuted Catholics — but they did not take their livelihoods away from them. Catholics have persecuted Protestants — but they never closed agriculture and the handicrafts against them. I feel convinced that the Crucifixion has not much to do with the world’s attitude toward the Jew; that the reasons for it are much older than that event . . . I am convinced that the persecution of the Jew is not in any large degree due to religious prejudice. No, the Jew is a money-getter. He made it the end and aim of his life. He was at it in Rome. He has been at it ever since. His success has made the whole human race his enemy. You will say that the Jew is everywhere numerically feeble. When I read in the Cyclopedia Britannica that the Jewish population in the United States was 250,000 I wrote the editor and explained to him that I was personally acquainted with more Jews than that, and that his figures were without doubt a misprint for 25,000,000. People told me that they had reasons to suspect that for business reasons, many Jews did not report themselves as Jews. It looks plausible. I am strongly of the opinion that we have an immense Jewish population in America. I am assured by men competent to speak that the Jews are exceedingly active in politics. (“Concerning the Jews,” Harper’s Monthly Magazine, September 1899)

Twain’s opinion on the Jews is probably the best-kept secret in American literary history. Immediately after his death, his eccentric daughter Clara married — or was married by — the Jewish piano player, Ossip Galbrilowitsch. Twain’s publishers were given speedy instructions to delete “Concerning the Jews” from the collected works, where it had appeared in the book The Man that Corrupted Hadleybury & Other Stories.

MENCKEN, H. L. 20th century American writer. “I am one of the few Goyim who have ever actually tackled the TALMUD. I suppose you now expect me to add that it is a profound and noble work, worthy of hard study by all other GOYIM. Unhappily, my report must differ from this expectation. It seems to me, save for a few bright spots, to be quite indistinguishable from rubbish . . .”

“The Jewish theory that the GOYIM envy the superior ability of the Jews is not borne out by the facts. Most GOYIM, in fact, deny that the Jew is superior, and point in evidence to his failure to take the first prizes: he has to be content with the seconds. No Jewish composer has ever come within miles of Bach, Beethoven and Brahms; no Jew has ever challenged the top-flight painters of the world, and no Jewish scientist has equaled Newton, Darwin, Pasteur or Mendel. In the latter bracket such apparent exception as Ehrlich, Freud and Einstein are only apparent. Ehrlich, in fact, contributed less to biochemical fact than to biochemical theory, and most of his theory was dubious. Freud was nine-tenths quack, and there is sound reason for believing that even Einstein will not hold up: in the long run his curved space may be classed with the psychosomatic bumps of Gall and Spurzheim. But whether this inferiority of the Jew is real or only a delusion, it must be manifest that it is generally accepted. The GOY does not, in fact, believe that the Jew is better than the non-Jew; the most he will admit is that the Jew is smarter at achieving worldly success. But this he ascribes to sharp practices, not to superior ability.” (Minority Report: H. L. Mencken’s Notebooks)

SHAW, GEORGE BERNARD. 20th century British dramatist. “This is the real enemy, the invader from the East, the Druze, the ruffian, the oriental parasite; in a word: the Jew. (London Morning Post, December 3, 1925) This craving for bouquets by Jews is a symptom of racial degeneration. The Jews are worse than my own people. Those Jews who still want to be the chosen race (chosen by the late Lord Balfour) can go to Palestine and stew in their own juice. The rest had better stop being Jews and start being human beings. (Literary Digest, October 12, 1932)

EMERSON, RALPH WALDO. 19th century American philosopher, poet. “The sufferance which is the badge of the Jew has made him, in these days, the ruler of the rulers of the earth. (Fate an essay)

BURTON, SIR RICHARD FRANCIS. 19th century British diplomat, writer…his unsocial and iniquitous Oral Law contributed to inflame his wild lust of pelf, and to justify the crimes suggested by spite and superstition.”

LINDBERGH, CHARLES. 20th century American aviator, writer. Wednesday, August 23, 1939 “We are disturbed about the effect of the Jewish influence in our press, radio and motion pictures. It may become very serious. [Fulton] Lewis told us of one instance where the Jewish advertising firms threatened to remove all their advertising from the Mutual system if a certain feature were permitted to go on the air. The threat was powerful enough to have the feature removed.”

Thursday, May 1, 1941 “The pressure for war is high and mounting. The people are opposed to it, but the Administration seems to have ‘the bit in its teeth’ and is hell-bent on its way to war. Most of the Jewish interests in the country are behind war, and they control a huge part of our press and radio and most of our motion pictures. There are the ‘intellectuals’ and the ‘Anglophiles,’ and the British agents who are allowed free rein, the international financial interests, and many others.” (The Wartime Journals)

GENERAL GEORGE VAN HORN MOSELY, in the New York Tribune, March 29, 1939 “The war now proposed is for the purpose of establishing Jewish influence throughout the world.”

HERDER, JOHANN GOTTFRIED. 18th century German philosopher. “The Jewish people is and remains in Europe an Asiatic people alien to our part of the world, bound to that old law which it received in a distant climate, and which, according to its confession, it cannot do away with . . . How many of this alien people can be tolerated without injury to the true citizen? A ministry in which a Jew is supreme, a household in which a Jew has the key of the wardrobe and the management of the finances, a department or commissariat in which Jews do the principal business, are Pontine marshes which cannot be drained. (Bekehrung der Juden) For thousands of years, since their emergence on the stage of history, the Jews were a parasitic growth on the stem of other nations, a race of cunning brokers all over the earth. They have cause great evil to many ill-organized states, by retarding the free and natural economic development of their indigenous population. (“Hebraer,” in Ideen)

BONAPARTE, NAPOLEON. French statesman, general. “The Jews provided troops for my campaign in Poland, but they ought to reimburse me: I soon found that they are no good for anything but selling old clothes . . .” “Legislating must be put in effect everywhere that the general well-being is in danger. The government cannot look with indifference on the way a despicable nation takes possession of all the provinces of France. The Jews are the master robbers of the modern age; they are the carrion birds of humanity . . . “They must be treated with political justice, not with civil justice. They are surely not real citizens.”

“The Jews have practiced usury since the time of Moses, and oppressed the other peoples. Meanwhile, the Christians were only rarely usurers, falling into disgrace when they did so. We ought to ban the Jews from commerce because they abuse it . . . The evils of the Jews do not stem from individuals but from the fundamental nature of this people.” (From Napoleon’s Reflections, and from speeches before the Council of State on April 30 and May 7, 1806.)

“Nothing more contemptible could be done than the reception of the Jews by you. I decided to improve the Jews. But I do not want more of them in my kingdom. Indeed, I have done all to prove my scorn of the most vile nation in the world.” (Letter to his brother Jerome, King of Westphalia, March 6, 1808)

1). Every big and small Jew in the peddling trade must renew his license every year.

2). Checks and other obligations are only redeemable if the Jew can prove that he has obtained the money without cheating. (Ordinance of March 17, 1808. Napoleonic Code.)

SAND, GEORGE (Amantine Dupin Dudevant). 19th century French novelist. “I saw in ‘the wandering Jew’ the personification of the Jewish people, exiled in the Middle Ages. Nevertheless, they are once again extremely rich, owing to their unfailing rude greediness and their indefatigable activity. With their hard-heartedness that they extend toward people of other faiths and races they are at the point of making themselves kings of the world. This people can thank its obstinacy that France will be Judized within fifty years. Already some wise Jews prophesy this frankly.” (Letter to Victor Lorie, 1857)

COMMUNITY OF STRASBOURG, FRANCE. In an address to the ASSEMBLEE in 1790, the city’s revolutionary leaders opposed citizenship for Jews, because: “Everyone knew the inherent bad character of the Jews and no one doubted they were foreigners . . . Let the ‘enlighteners’ stop defaming the Gentiles by blaming them for what is wrong with the Jews. Their conduct is their own fault. Perhaps the Jews might eventually give up every aspect of their separation and all the characteristics of their nature. Let us sit and wait until that happens; we might them judge them to be worthy of equality. (Tres Humble Adresse qui Presente la Commune de la Ville Strasbourg)

ROBERTS, STEPHEN H. 20th century Australian historian. Though hostile on almost every point to National Socialism, his ‘The House that Hitler Built’ does admit that Jews were a menace in Germany: “It is useless to deny that grave Jewish problems existed in Germany. The nation was in the unfortunate geographical position of being the first stage in the perennial push westward of the Polish Jews. Unless forced on, they tended to stop in Berlin and Hamburg, where they obtained an unduly share of good professional positions. In Berlin, for example, when the Nazi came to power, 50.2 percent of the lawyers were Jews. In medicine, 48 per cent of the doctors were Jews, and it was said that they systematically seized the principal hospital posts. The Jews owned the largest and most important Berlin newspapers, and they had made great inroads on the educational system.”

PRIMO DE RIVERA, JOSE. 20th century Spanish political reformer (assassinated by the Communists). He stressed that the instruments of Jewish domination in the modern world are money and the press, and that communism is an instrument of international Jewish capitalism used to smash and afterwards rule the nations. (El Estado Nacional)

H. H. BEAMISH, in a New York address, October 30 – November 1, 1937 “In 1848 the word “anti-Semitic” was invented by the Jews to prevent the use of the word “Jew.” The right word for them is “Jew” . . . “I implore all of you to be accurate — call them Jews. There is no need to be delicate on this Jewish question. You must face them in this country. The Jew should be satisfied here. I was here forty-seven years ago; your doors were thrown open to the Jews and they were free. No he has got you absolutely by the throat — that is your reward.”

CHRISTEA, PATRIARCH. 20th century Romanian prelate. “The Jews have caused an epidemic of corruption and social unrest. They monopolize the press, which, with foreign help, flays all the spiritual treasures of the Romanians. To defend ourselves is a national and patriotic duty — not anti-Semitism. Lack of measures to get rid of the plague would indicate that we are lazy cowards who let ourselves be carried alive to our graves. Why should we not get rid of these parasites who suck Romanian and Christian blood? It is logical and holy to react against them.” (New York Herald Tribune, August 17, 1937)

ADRIEN ARCAND, Canadian political leader of the 1930s “Through their (Jew’s) international news agencies, they mold your minds and have you see the world not as it is, but as they want you to see it. Through their cinema, they are the educators of our youth — and with just one film in two hours, can wipe out of a child’s brain what he has learned in six months in the home, the church or the school.”

NESTA WEBSTER, in her book Germany and England “England is no longer controlled by Britons. We are under the invisible Jewish dictatorship — a dictatorship that can be felt in every sphere of life.”

HENRY WALLACE, Secretary of Commerce, under President Harry Truman, wrote in his dairy that in 1946 “Truman was “exasperated” over Jewish pressure that he support Zionist rule over Palestine. Wallace added “Pres. Truman expressed himself as being very much ‘put out’ with the Jews. He said that ‘Jesus Christ couldn’t please them when he was here on Earth, so how could anyone expect that I would have any luck?’ Pres. Truman said he had no use for them and didn’t care what happened to them.”

HENRY ADAMS (Descendant of President John Adams), in a letter to John Hay, October 1895 “The Jewish question is really the most serious of our problems.”

SPRING-RICE, SIR CECIL. 20th century British politician. “One by one, the Jews are capturing the principal newspapers of America. (Letter of November 1914, to Sir Edward Grey, foreign secretary. Letters and Friendships)

CAPOTE, TRUMAN. 20th century American writer. In an interview, he assailed “the Zionist mafia” monopolizing publishing today, and protested a tendency to suppress things that do not meet with Jewish approval. (Playboy magazine, March 1968)

VOLTAIRE (Francois Marie Arouet) 18th century French philosopher, writer. “Why are the Jews hated? It is the inevitable result of their laws; they either have to conquer everybody or be hated by the whole human race . . ” “The Jewish nation dares to display an irreconcilable hatred toward all nations,…

“You seem to me to be the maddest of the lot. The Kaffirs, the Hottentots, and the Negroes of Guinea are much more reasonable and more honest people than your ancestors, the Jews. You have surpassed all nations in impertinent fables in bad conduct and in barbarism. You deserve to be punished, for this is your destiny.” (From a letter to a Jew who had written to him, complaining of his ‘anti-Semitism.’ Examen des Quelques Objections . . . dans L’Essai sur le Moeurs.)

“You will only find in the Jews an ignorant and barbarous people, who for a long time have joined the most sordid avarice to the most detestable superstition and to the most invincible hatred of all peoples which tolerate and enrich them.” (“Juif,” Dictionnaire Philosophique)

“I know that there are some Jews in the English colonies. These marranos go wherever there is money to be made . . . But whether these circumcised who sell old clothes claim that they are of the tribe of Naphtali or Issachar is not of the slightest importance. They are, simply, the biggest scoundrels who have ever dirtied the face of the earth.” (Letter to Jean-Baptiste Nicolas de Lisle de Sales, December 15, 1773. Correspondence. 86:166)

“They are, all of them, born with raging fanaticism in their hearts, just as the Bretons and the Germans are born with blond hair. I would not be in the least bit surprised if these people would not some day become deadly to the human race.” (Lettres de Memmius a Ciceron, 1771)

CANNOT, E. 19th century French reformer. In La Renovation, journal of the socialist school of CHARLES FOURIER. “Jews! To the heights of your Sinai . . . I humbly lift myself. I stand erect and cry out to you, in behalf of all my humble equals, of all those whom your spoliation has brought to grief, who died in misery through you and whose trembling shades accuse you: Jews! for Cain and Iscariot, leave us, leave us! Ah, cross the Red Sea again, and go down there to the desert, to the promised land which is waiting for you, the only country fit for you; o you wicked, rude and dishonest people, go there!!!”

Gov’t Ruined 653,249 Lives Over Cannabis in 2016 Because 5 Corrupt Industries Paid Them To

[pic] September 28th, 2017 [pic] Awake Goyim

By Matt Agorist

In the land of the free, citizens found in possession of a plant — that grows wild on every continent except Antarctica — can and will be kidnapped, caged or killed. In fact, in just the short time it took you to click this article and read this first paragraph, someone was just arrested for cannabis.

According to the most recent FBI statistics available, an American citizen is kidnapped and caged for cannabis — on average — every 48 seconds.

An estimated 653,249 American citizens — who harmed no one — had their lives ruined in 2016 for possessing this plant, according to the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s annual Crime In the United States (CIUS) report.

“Arresting and citing over half a million people a year for a substance that is objectively safer than alcohol is a travesty,” said Morgan Fox, director of communications for the Marijuana Policy Project (MPP). “Despite a steady shift in public opinion away from marijuana prohibition, and the growing number of states that are regulating marijuana like alcohol, marijuana consumers continue to be treated like criminals throughout the country. This is a shameful waste of resources and can create lifelong consequences for the people arrested.”

Arresting people for cannabis is good for business — police state and big pharma business, that is. If we look at who’s lobbying to keep cops kidnapping people for a plant, we see that it is money, and not morals, that motivates this issue.

The prison-industrial complex makes obscene amounts of money kidnapping otherwise innocent people and throwing them in a cage for possessing a plant. Big pharma is also scared to death of pot because it is a cheaper, safer, and often more effective solution to sicknesses than their chemical alternatives.

According to a report out of US News, lobbyists work hard to secure for police departments millions of dollars in federal grants towards eradicating weed. Pharmaceutical companies compensate leading anti-marijuana researchers in order to keep their customers on painkillers over cannabis, which is cheaper. The prison-industrial complex would like to keep making money on building more prisons to fill with non-violent grass-smokers.

It’s not just cops and big pharma either, legal drug distributors in the alcohol and tobacco industries need to keep cannabis illegal in order maintain their monopoly on ‘taking the edge off.’

According to the report, the alcohol and beer industries have also lobbied for years to keep marijuana illegal because they fear the competition that legalized weed would bring. Howard Wooldridge, an anti-drug war activist and retired cop told the online publication Republic Report: “Marijuana and alcohol compete right today as a product to take the edge off the day at six o’clock.”

Despite the myriad of evidence showing the harmful economic and societal impacts of arresting people for cannabis, cops, prisons, big pharma, and the alcohol and tobacco industries continue to push for illegal weed. As they lie about arresting people for a plant in your best interests, the police state is wreaking havoc on liberty, freedom, and the economy. It is deadly, too.

While there’s never been a documented overdose from cannabis, if the CDC calculated the number of deaths inflicted by police while enforcing marijuana laws, that number would certainly be shocking and could even be deemed a risk to public health. Marijuana is, indeed, dangerous, but only because of what can happen to you if the police catch you with it — just ask the 653,249 people who had their lives ruined for it last year.

Nothing highlights the hypocrisy, immorality, and sheer idiocy of the drug war quite like marijuana prohibition. Here we have a medicine that kills cancer cells, saves the lives of countless epileptic children, heals broken bones, relieves pain, treats PTSD, is not dangerous, and exhibits a variety of other incredible benefits – yet the State will kill you over it.

Keeping cannabis illegal also creates more crime.

In the study, titled, “Going to pot? The impact of dispensary closures on crime,” researchers Tom Y. Chang from the USC Marshall School of Business, and Mireille Jacobson from The Paul Merage School of Business at UC Irvine, looked at what happens with the government forced medical marijuana dispensaries to close. What they found was immediately following a closure of a dispensary — crime rates went up.

“Contrary to popular wisdom, we found an immediate increase in crime around dispensaries ordered to close relative to those allowed to remain open,” Jacobson told Science Daily.

Also, in 2001, the Portuguese government decriminalized all drugs, and their crime rate dropped. Sixteen years later, drug use, crime, and overdoses have drastically declined in Portugal exposing the cruel reality of prohibition.

“Regulating marijuana for adults creates jobs, generates tax revenue, protects consumers, and takes money away from criminals,” Fox said on behalf of MPP. “It is time for the federal government and the rest of the states to stop ruining peoples’ lives and enact sensible marijuana policies.”

We agree.

The good news is that the tide is shifting. As MPP notes, there are currently eight states that regulate marijuana similarly to alcohol for adults, four of which voted to do so in November 2016. Marijuana possession is also legal for adults in the District of Columbia. Twenty-three states and D.C. considered legislation in 2017 to regulate marijuana, including in Vermont where the legislature approved such a measure before the governor vetoed it.

As more and more states refuse to kidnap and cage marijuana users, the drug war will continue to implode. We must be resilient in this fight.

If doing drugs bothers you, don’t do drugs. When you transition from holding an opinion — to using government violence to enforce your personal preference, you become the bad guy. Please, for all that is good, don’t be the bad guy and do your part to stay on the right side of history.

Matt Agorist is an honorably discharged veteran of the USMC and former intelligence operator directly tasked by the NSA. This prior experience gives him unique insight into the world of government corruption and the American police state. Agorist has been an independent journalist for over a decade and has been featured on mainstream networks around the world. Agorist is also the Editor at Large at the Free Thought Project, where this article first appeared. Follow @MattAgorist on Twitter, Steemit, and now on Facebook.

The stages of incrementalism seem to be speeding up. Nicholas West has written for Activist Post just this month about China’s high tech KFC called KPRO turning to facial recognition for payment, as well as a UK supermarket becoming the world’s first to use finger vein scans for its customers. The use of biometrics was, of course, first peddled as a necessary security measure, so we have seen it spread in that capacity from planes to trains and even for event security. Now the cashless agenda can more aggressively make its move for the full roll-out of biometric identification and payment into every facet of daily life.

The article below from MassPrivateI offers additional context for what is now leading to biometric payment systems at train stations.

MHR the more ‘crimes’ you can define, the more control you have ,the more excuse to control people, literally e.g body scans, stop and search…just to ‘train’ and ‘condition’ people into accepting total lack of freedom, privacy, rights, etc…

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

Isolate But Preserve

Brendon O'Connell's Legal Documents

February 15, 2017

These are often interfered with.

High Court Appeal Synopsis - Banned in jail as a security risk.

DROP BOX 

INDEX: 

MAIN BODY: 

GOOGLE DRIVE

INDEX: 

MAIN BODY: 

TRANSCRIPT OF TRIAL - Jan 17-Jan27 Then Verdict and Sentencing

(Please note, the transcript has been grossly tampered with. I have a recording of most of their blatant tampering. I fought for 5 years to correct the transcript. I am still to officially do it.)



Please download and re-upload the transcript - send me the new link so I have a nice database of saved version.

Sentencing Submissions. "Threat To Kill". Post Jail Charges

This 115 page document gives exacting details on the last set of charges. They were utterly ridiculous. Lawyer Simon Frietag refused to hand the document to the judge citing the material as "too controversial".

 

Please let me know if links are not working.

Either leave a message here or at - meeting@boc.rocks - tarqwin@boc.rocks

Thanks

Brendon

PayPal - boc@boc.rocks

BitCoin - meeting@boc.rocks

Popular posts from this blog

ISRAEL - THE GREATEST SPY MACHINE OF ALL TIME

November 20, 2016

[pic]

To Understand Globalist Zionist Power And How It Rules From Israel, You Must Understand These Words - "THE TALPIOT PROGRAM" and "THE TECHNION" "Information Is Power"THIS POST IS LONG, DETAILED, BUT WORTH TAKING THE TIME TO READ AND WATCH THE VIDEO'S. I AM IN EXILE IN MALAYSIA AS I UPDATE THE PAGE (4th August 2017) 

IN THIS BLOG POST YOU WILL LEARN -

1) How Israel planned over 40 years ago to dominate the high technology communications sector. 

2) How Israel trained officers from Israeli Military Intelligence to become private entrepreneurs. Now they dominate both the public and private high technology sector. 

3) How this plan was titled "Operation Talpiot - The Talpiot Program". 

4) How Israel dominates databases of all kinds from banking to medical, to policing, to NSA sub contractors, to government encrypted communications, to video surveillance systems for Class A critical infrastructure. 

5) How Israel and Jewish Power have a tradition of the Sa…

READ MORE

Why Are Countries So Terrified Of Israel?

February 21, 2014

[pic]

There are a few reasons.

Below is a picture of the Perth District Court - where I was tried. I had a hearing on January 11th 2011 requesting another venue as it was improper to be tried in a "Jewish Temple". I guess you find that notion pretty silly eh? Well, just check out the front of the court. Whats that "pyramid" emblem mean?

It should be either the state coat of arms or more properly, the "Royal Seal" -

But instead, we have a "pyramid" emblem. This is very important because it shows from where the "lawful authority" is flowing and according to that emblem on the front of the Perth District Court it isn't the Australian Commonwealth Constitution and the Monarch. It's something else. What is it?

Here is another pyramid on another court building -

The above is the Israeli Supreme Court building in Jerusalem. Shit gets deeper. Do you like the "all seeing eye" on the top of the pyramid? Looks a bit like this one -

Th…

READ MORE

CONSERVATIVE AUSTRALIAN POLITICIAN LIVES IN TERROR OF ISRAEL

March 20, 2017

[pic]

We need to help Minister Julie Bishop. An Australian fair maiden is up against "The Beast From The East", where are the manly men from Oz? 

We must help Australia's foreign minister Julie Bishop stare down Israel and Netanyahu. How do we do that? Why are powerful countries so terrified of Israel? Is it because Israel dominates the world of databases, spying, surveillance? Does the Israeli state have the dirt on EVERYONE?





 

Help Brendon O'Connell get to the High Court Brendon O'Connell is going to the High Court of Australia to have his conviction under Western Australia's Racial Vilification Laws quashed and see an end to this terrible law which is being used by Globalist Zionist Power to stifle and …

READ MORE

 Powered by Blogger

Theme images by Michael Elkan

[pic]

BRENDON O'CONNELL

VISIT PROFILE

Archive

Report Abuse

This site uses cookies from Google to deliver its services, to personalize ads and to analyze traffic. Information about your use of this site is shared with Google. By using this site, you agree to its use of cookies.LEARN MOREGOT IT

!!!!!!But the legislation deals – the gravamen of the legislation is the way in which he expresses the views, and the intention or otherwise that he holds in expressing those views. !!!!!!

MHR don't forget story where Israeli owned firm got contract for shredding documents, and in this way got their hands on the documents..i.e industrial and military etc espionage...

MHR the 'series of checks and balances' has been replaced with a series of Cheques and (Swiss) Bank balances i.e corruption ... the U.S constitution framers realised that you can never afford to give the government THE sole monopoly on violence / power / force...the militia, every armed citizen, would ensure a 'balance of power / potential use of force / potential for violence... everywhere else the government, a small group which could always be easily bought, blackmailed, greenmailed, manipulated, fooled, tricked, deceived, and ultimately 'occupied' as a 'host' for any very rich, motivated, organised group of 'internationalists' with zero 'loyalty' to any nation...could exploit nations in series, destroying them, moving on with their 'loot' to the next victim, playing nations off against each other, crashing one economy, inflating another, and then setting up a HQ in a 'neutral' land...that would NEVER be destroyed by war or economic crises...Switzerland, for the elites, and another, in a hostile barren land, Israel, for the 'Sayanim', also to be 'diapora'd' around the world, as 'helpers'...

MHR if the 'rally' was held 'coincidentally' and not to 'co-incide' with Brendon's trial, then why did they delete the web page entry for their glorious 'inauguration'? You might allow it possible that the rally was planned independently of Brendon's trial, and just happened to fall around the same date...but then why invite Keyser to give the KEYNOTE address...to show support for HIM? ... which itself legally may be contempt...but the 'tie-breaker' is the fact that the group then deleted the web pages reporting on the 'inauguration'...it was the 'founding' of this group...it was not an existing group whose regular meetings happened to coincide with Brendon's scheduled trial date start...it was something wholly NEW and NOVEL...something so important, a group so important that so many 'big shots' attended...so why 'hide' the web pages describing it? Did google take it down as 'hate speech' re: their 'community standards'? Or are they trying to hide the face that it occured? Suddenly diplomatically realising it at least appeared to be legally 'contempt' and might be SEEN to have 'perverted the course of justice' etc ??? THAT is the most incriminating act of a guilty party...that tips the balance, the scales of probability, in favor of the conclusion that Brendon is totally right in perceiving / defining the rally as a direct attempt to hinder him in his trial, to affect the trial, to intimidate witnesses, lawyers, judges, jurors, and Brendon himself...no-one gets a rally in their honor from the 'Jews' lightly...so Brendon should rightly feel 'honored' by this sign of respect ... we have to use their response to 'target in' on the most important infomation they are keeping secret...the infomation the put so many resources into so many 'false friend' 'controlled opposition ' 'kosher alternate media' to misdirect us AWAY from...like my 435 'anti-semitic' videos that apparently 'offended' no-one and did NOT violate Jewtubes community standards or 'hate speech' laws...compared to the ONE that did, and got my channel shut down, and me banned from Google even...THAT video was all about the role of Putin and Trump, and the demonisation of islam, in the jew world orders plans...so I suggest you take a look at THAT video now posted on Bitchute and Dtube.video...and also consider the full story of Brendon O'Connell...I will try to give a useful overview here, based on his own webpages, and my own insights...

Brendon was savagely beaten, in a coma for an hour, and sustained a broken arm, which was NOT seen to by any medical personnel for a month ... even though they had taken an x-ray, which they subsequently 'dissappeared'...the medical personnel who x-rayed the arm a month later were shocked, and immediately insisted on a 'pin and plate' Open Reduction, Internal Fixation ORIF..., however this x-ray was also 'dissappeared', and Brendon was simply taken back to prison where he as given a simple cast...and example of corruption and cover ups and deliberate abuse of Brendon...similar to the treatment of the German holocaust denier etc in Germany, who ended up losing his leg from the knee down...

5 people associated with Brendon and his trial died in mysterious circumstances

Minister of prisons Joe Francis chatted with him 32 minutes after Brendon's supposed 'death threat', on a 'call me Joe' basis, admitting he was more scared of his own prison officers than he was of the bikies after he'd stopped their drugs getting into jail...Joe felt prison officers were behind the burglary of his home...stated his staff were incompetent...Joe had to fight tooth and nail to get cameras put into the punishment section of Hakea Remand center to prevent prison officers beating up inmates...Brendon offered to pull down the 'offending' blog post, Joe said it was up to Brendon to decide, Brendon ultimately didn't pull it down...resulting in this 'court exchange'...

W.A police monitored the phones of a neo-nazi group 'combat-18'...alleged that four shots were fired by members ata a Mosque in a Perth suburb of Queens Park' ??? They were given a suspended sentence... compare to what Brendon suffered, relative to mere 'words' vis a vis potentially deadly shots...merely charged with 'discharging a firearm in public' and 'going armed in public'...

W.A Premiere Geoff Gallop resigned after being threatened by W.A police, in fear of his own safety, after having exposed corruption in the W.A police force.

Threat made against Senior prison officer Liam Samuel Cashman... State and Federal police have access to every phone call, email, internet browsing search, credit card purchase etc of every australian...with no over sight / checks and balances ... access to this data base is NOT regulated...

'Joe' had promised to personally oversee Brendon's case and allegations...but 3 weeks after the 'imminent threat' was hardly 'imminent', given that Brendon and 'Joe' had 'cleared up their differences'...and clearly the 'threat' was not taken seriously by 'Joe', or 'actively pursued in any way' by Brendon...apart from having left the blog containing it 'up'...and a more recent post by Brendon stated that he was now 'happy' i.e no longer angry with 'Joe'...

Magistrate Atkins demanded of the 7 police officers who turned up for no reason to the small courtroom in the magistrates court, clearly intending to 'intimidate' Brendon...

Brendon openly speculated as to how many detectives have large rental property portfolios, but are never asked to explain the source of their wealth...high quality drugs at point of arrest become low quality drugs when they get to the testing labs...he cites one clear case of each of these...

the states tactical response group officers stole a tonne of high quality cocaine and sold it on the streets of sydney, melbourne, and perth...the 2004 Kennedy commission investigated but laid no charges at all...

Brendon found his own threat 'embarrassing' and can only explain it due to his desperate state of mind at the time, the huge pressure / stress he was under...

A psychiatric assessment by Mark Hall lead to Brendon being transferred to maximum security, when he as a 'minimum security' prisoner...Mark appeared to Brendon to offer him a chance at freedom 'would you leave the state?' i.e go into exile, and thus cease being a 'fly' like Socrates, on the state of W.A...i.e offer of 'exile'... which angered him, and made him adamant that he would continue struggling for justice, and to expose the W.A corruption...leading to him being sent to Casuarina maximum security prison and the 'management unit'... n.b earlier in his 'career' as a 'dissident' he had been forcibly 'assessed' for 'delusions' in connection with his claims re: operation Talpiot etc...which many U.S experts could testify as 'real' and 'ongoing'...

Legal aid was refused Brendon for a high court appeal re: Section 80B of the states racial vilification legislation, 'conduct likely to offend'...claiming he had no chance of success, whereas many legal professionals advised him he had every chance of success and compensation...

Brendon admits he is 'naturally combative when threatened'...in my case angered by other people's smug complacency...like Hamlet...

Senior prosecutor David Thiering offered to lower the charge to 'threat to harm' and take it back to the magistrates court, inferring he would not be demanding jail...Brendon emailed his agreement, and that he was seeking legal advice...but his lawyer never contacted Thiering with his acceptance of the offer, so Brendon fired him...

Brendon admits 'I have always been rude but I have always apologized'...

Thiering left for Sydney, leaving Carmel Barbagallo to take over the case, and she insisted on a prison sentence...Brendon sacked his new lawyer when he failed to promise he would call 'Joe' to the stand...

His next lawyer dropped him...

The threat made to Liam Samuel Cashman is more serious than that made to to 'Joe' as Liam was a prison officer at the time...but who by the time of Brendon's trial had resigned...

After his beating in Casuarina prison he was offered minimum, a work camp, whatever you want' if he would keep quiet about the corruption and abuses of prisoners and violations of the prisoners act...such as leaving prisoners in a small cell for 15 hours a day, with no air conditioning, when outside temps were above 40 degree Celcius, and some cells baking in the direct sun, ranging well above that...including Brendon's...at times his cell wall was literally too hot to touch...at Hakea remand center...guards removed the 'Prisons Act' from the library, so prisoners could not know their rights and refer to it, when guards failed to meet their legal requirements...preventing prisoners from using computers etc to complete their legal paperwork for appeals etc...represented 'Impeding, Obstructing, Perverting the course of Justice...

Brendon witnessed staff simply stealing prison supplies such as food, tools, etc...when they stopped, food piled up in the kitchens etc, indicating that excess food etc had been constantly ordered to make up for the thefts...running costs massively greater than necessary...due to corruption and incompetence...why private prisons can manage with half the resources / money a public one costs the taxpayers...

His father was of all things a W.A policeman. Grandmother aboriginal heritage. Mother states family received death threats by email. Brendon's sister died suddenly 3 months after these death threats. Brendon had been nurse but left, fed up with corruption and incompetence. Sensitive to injustice / lack of fairness. Appears it was Brendon's spying allegations re: Israel / Tolpiot, that were behind massive Israeli political pressure to have him charged / convicted of racial vilification...

Brendon's 'threat to kill' a prison officer came after other prison staff and prisoners told Brendon that the officer in question had organised his beating. No-one would investigate his allegations.

Prisoners confided in Brendon that they had made huge payoffs to state and federal police for protection.

Brendon's father got out of W.A police force because of the corruption, drug trafficking etc.

Brendon's email to Minister Joe Francis contained the threat, namely, he insited that he would kill the man who he believed had set him up to be bashed if the Minister did not mount an investigation, as a means to provoking the Minister to investigate. He noted that a woman made the front page of The West Australian Newspaper after threatening to kill Premiere Colin Barnett over the culling of sharks. He wanted the same coverage for the Isreali spying allegations he had made / documented etc...

At time Brendon made the 'threats' he was homeless, couch surfing on friends sofas, and under massive stress. He had been advised that the best way to protect himself was to keep making a lot of noise, attracting a lot of attention. He feared for his own safety.

Brendon received some compensation for prison assault, most of which he spent on his helping his sister...and planned to sue several goverment departments and media outlets...

Brendon has been banned from attending university as not a 'fit and proper person' and has been told he is unemployable, and told to apply for a medical disability pension...

It is farcical that 'jews' and Israeli's of all people could have Brendon defined as 'racist'.

Brendon at time of 'threat' felt stalked, harassed, extremely isolated, and depressed, at times suicidal. His home was repeatedly raided.

Why the raids? Brendon thought to 'plant' incriminating evidence. They stole documents, files, computer hard drives etc...

Brendon has exposed zionist and Israeli racism and hatred that permeates 'jewish' / 'Israeli' society, culture, and traditions. it is common knowledge to those in the middle east but suppressed in the west by the corporate media.

Brendon often 'whinces' at his own past behavior, has reflected upon it and rejected it, and is no threat to anyone. He admits he could have expressed / articulated himself less emotionally, more appropriately. Brendon is able to criticise himself, and accept fault where it is appropriate. He didn't need a prison sentence to 'reflect' on his actions. He is calmer now, and more 'practical' in his expectations about what is possible to achieve re: his goals. That things take time, and must be handled more delicately than he has often done.

Brendon has always fought for the underdog, for justice and truth and integrity, and for 'waking up' people, even if it requires provocation / discomfort for them...he can be harsh in his interactions...(abrasive he he)...

5 minutes after Brendon expressed fears to prison staff for his own safety, he was savagely beaten...at hospital first time he was sent back with badly broken arm, and the original xrays were 'lost', and tampered with, including a denial that any xrays had even been taken...he felt he was making zero headway in gaining justice for himself, or Palestine, etc...traumatised...doctor recommeded he apply for medical disability pension for PTSD...

A friend he had lived with had his brake lines cut, and interupted two men putting something into his engine bay, at the time of the police harassment / house break-ins...house computers hacked ...

Brendon was staying in a room at a homeless shelter when police raided it and arrested him and charged with with the threat to kill...

Stanley elliot Keyser was key note speaker at a huge rally intended to intimidate local politicians, with senior members of the ISRAELI government in attendance...who know how many MOSSAD operatives ... remember that the first time in German History, armed men were allowed to attend a court hearing for David Irving when he sued for defamation...this is unheard of...armed men with guns inside a German court...it highlights the 'exceptionalism' key to 'jewishness' and the state of israel i.e the ideology of semitism...

Brendon was required to prove that 'a material particular' had been affected by the massive rally /demonstration timed to coincide with Brendon's court case, with a focus on the alleged 'victim', who had brought the original charges. To have the 'rally' recognised as an attempt to interfere with his trial , and thus represent a 'contempt of court', it must be shown to have had 'a tendency to prejudice criminal proceedings being tried before a jury'. This could include the public presentation of information that would otherwise NOT be admissible as evidence in a court e.g a prior conviction...or simple statement of opinion as to the guilt or innocence of the accused...it is possible to be held in contempt for statements that place pressure on teh parties to proceedings, or prejudgments concerning the likely outcomes, whether in trial by jury or judge...according to a June 2003 review of the law of contempt, published by the W.A law reform commission...it must, in practical reality, show a tendency to interfere with the due course of justice in a particular case...it must only MIGHT have an effect on the proceedings to have the necessary tendency...not just remote or theoretical...exceptions include fair and acccurate reporting of criminal proceedings and publication in the public interest ??? So Brendons 2011 court case, beginning just after the rally, with such a huge public and media barrage, surely qualifies? 8 days before his case, foreign senior government representatives of Israel attend a rally, ensuring massive local political support...hardly 'neutral' and certainly going to have an influence, and clearly MEANT to have such an influence...or why otherwise invite Stanley Elliot Keyser as keynote speaker? The rally acknowledged its intention to impact on Brendon's case.

Even an assertion that a defendant is guilty, can lead to charges of contempt, if occuring during the course of a trial... it seems clear that the effect of the FOI rally, eight days before the original planned start date for his trial in 2010, would have had a 'tendency to intefere with the due course of justice in his particular case'...a foreign state's direct and deliberate interference in a local criminal case surely warrants at least proceedings...MHR given that calling a man an agent of Israel lead to Brendon being detained in custody for 3 days, before the charges were dropped !!!

Aerial Sharon, Prime Minister of Israel at the time, bragged that 'We, the Jewish people, control America'... on KolY'israel Radio on October 3rd, 2001. and reported in 'The Washington Report' on November 2001.

Isreali dual nationals enjoy a revolving door between senior government positions in key industrial and tech and homeland security and military sectors, and private companies which provide the infrastructure, software, and hardware, to these same sectors, giving Israel unprecedented access to all data bases, all communications channels, all technology, all software, all hardware, all military patents, all industrial patents, top secret insider knowledge, ... it is mindboggling...a 'secret hidden out in the open', like their ideology of Semitism...and plans for world domination / conquest / enslavement ... 'serve the jews or die'...

Contempt is there to protect the rules of the trial, to prevent people publishing 'evidence' that is not deemed admissible in the court, and thus bypassing the court rules...protects the rules of evidence...protects presumption of innocence (??? then why arrest someone???)...it prevents power imbalances in the wider community from impacting on the court process !!!! meant to allow balanced presentation of defendants and prosecutors arguments...and evidence...if outside media etc introduce evidence, it bypasses this balance of power...all arguments and evidence must be introduced by parties involved during the trial...no outside intervention allowable...defamation actions against powerful external parties are often outside the financial means of most defendants...law of contempt limits info arguments evidence during court procedure to that which the parties introduce, and the judge allows...

Clearly every person involved in Brendon's trial would have been aware of the stance the state of israel had taken...consciously subconsciously aware of the power of israel, and all the 130 local and state politicians who expressed their support 'for the state of israel'. It was, after all, the state of Israel that Brendon had 'offended', via the supposed 'victim'...

MHR when had it been scheduled? was it deliberately planned for his trial date? or had it been held regularly on that date?

The 'show of power' clearly was intended to intimidate all involved, rather than merely support the traumatised poor victim / complainant. we are talking about personal criticism of the 'victim' and his 'dual nationality state'...objective given the public comments of senior Israeli polticians, military, and religous leaders.

The 'victim' admits he was 'spying' and collecting 'surveillance' photos for Israel...a very threatening act for anyone aware of MOSSADS practises and far reach...influence...he had also abused Brendon, and even 'assaulted' him, by hitting his camera and thus his head, with his hand, on film.

The lawyer would have been intimidated. Any lawyer knows the power of 'jews' to ruin your career. Also many potential expert witnesses would have been intimidated, given the historyof such witnesses and even the lawyers of defendants in cases related to Israel and 'jews', being charged and imprisoned themselves, for defending their clients too well / enthusiastically / effectively, and being savagely beaten, as in the David IRving case re: Leuchter and Irving and Ernst Zundels lawyers...

The organisers of the rally clearly, at least prima facie, 'conspired to impede, obstruct, and pervert the course of justice' in Brendon's trial. under section 143 and 132 of the Western Australian Criminal Compilation Act (1903)...their clear intent was to intimidate the perth establishment etc ...why else would Israel send such 'big guns' for such a minor incident?

Brendon was unemployed, homeless (couch surfing friends sofas),being vilified by the media as variously mentally ill and a racist and a neo-Nazi and Klu Klux Klan associate.

Various witnesses DID express unwillingess to appear in court, for fear of retaliation from the Israeli state, totally aware of its ruthless and violent predilictions.

The Israeli Ambassador and Israeli deputy Foreign Minister came to 'support' the claimant, and to undermine the defendant. The rally was scheduled to occur 8 days before Brendon's original trial start date of August 16, 2010.

There must be prima facie evidence that the person/s conduct or actions directly influenced a material particular in your criminal trial' MHR is that why the W.A authorities changed the starting date AFTER the rally ? assuming the date was changed in proximity of the rally? And so the INTENT could be proven, even if the 'effect' was less than intended, due to date changes?

Brendons' application was denied, on the grounds that the rally was 'a rally demonstrating broad support for the state of Israel', (around the time of your criminal trial) thereby not meeting this threshold...which is absurd...as the keynote speaker was the complainant....why else was he there? MHR need to know if they planned it to coincide, or was coincidence??

'As your criminal trial was based upon your racial vilification of a specific individual, a rally demonstrating broad support for the State of Israel does not meet this threshold'...but that individual was the keynote speaker...

MHR lesson is that you can never directly criticise the jewish individual for their semitic ideology...makes it too easy to charge...harder to defend...

In fact the response was wrong...only ONE charge related to the individual, and FIVE other charges involved the 'Jewish people'. Racial vilification of Stanley Elliot Keyser. And 'vilification of the jewish people'.

And again the prosecutors contradict themselves, as when Brendon reported on a radio interview between Mark Glenn and Dr Alan Sabrosky, a former Marine Corps Colonel and former director of studies (for 5 years) of the U.S Army War College in which he stated that Israel was directly involved in 911, important statement in the public interest, the DPP wanted to lock up Brendon, Because as the public prosecutor stated in court 'Israel is called a 'Jewish State', making Brendons reporting a crime of 'vilification of the jewish people'. And Brendon received 2 years jail for criticising 'the Israeli state' in his blog.

Prima facie means 'sufficient to establish a fact or raise a presumption unless dirpoved or rebutted' or 'the establishment of a legally required rebuttable presumption. A party's production of enough evidence to all the fact-trier to infer the fact at issue, and rule in the parties favor.

n.b that Keyser regularly attends meetings of Chabad Lubavitch, a jewish violent extermist race hate group.

MHR the entire output of the 'Holocaust' and 'Hollywood Nazi' industries, is racial vilification, inteded to incite, and racially vilify...to demonise Germans...since at least Bismark...war propaganda, peace-time propaganda, unrelenting demonisation, racial vilification, 'religious vilification' e.g secular religion of Nazism... INTENT clear ... war propaganda admitted to be demonisation...you cannot state a clearer case that would fit the laws on racial vilification and incitement to irrational hatred...why should an American or Australian 'hate' or 'fear' Nazi Germans? they had NO quarrel. Offered NO threat. Offered PEACE deal upon peace deal. Same for British. Even for Southern France, and MOST of Russia... how is 'lebensraum' any different to 'greater Israel' and 'illegal occupation' and the actual Israeli 'squatter' state? When did Germans deliberately target civilian populations? 'terror bombing' was RESPONSE to Churchill's bombing...came months after hopes Churchill would stop...

Current 'war on whites' racially vilify's all white people as a race, as slaver owners, environmental criminals, ...

Brendon had 'gag order' placed on him at time of trial so couldn't inform the public about it, or its wider implications / landmark nature...few people in Australia, even Perth, knew about it...

'The friends of Israel website stated clearly that the rally was organised in 'direct response' to Brendon O'Connell, the accused. ... as soon as Brendon drew attention to this website, and this statement, the website was removed by the organisers of the rally, and no further mention, in W.A of the 'Friends of Israel' has occured...with all indications being that this supposed 'spontaneous' or 'established' group was merely manufactured, at short notice, for the purposes of intimidating Brendon O'Connell, and anyone who might consider supporting him, offering him comfort or assistance, including judges, lawyers, media, and even acquaintances, many of whom did distance themselves from him, such as the Palestinian's he had been working with at the time of the 'incident' with Keyser.

The idea that the rally was organised 'out of the blue' to demostrate a general 'BROAD support for the state of Israel' seems unlikely, given the timing. All indicators are that the event had a very NARROW and SPECIFIC intent, namely, that of influencing (perverting, obstructing, preventing, or defeating a.k.a 'conspiring to defeat justice' and 'attempting to pervert the course of justice, Section 135 sand 143 respectively, of the W.A criminal code relating to 'contempt') the course justice in Brendon's trial, and the operations of the W.A legal system. Thus according to the criminal code, the organisers of the rally are liable to imprisonment for up to 7 years.

The rally was more likely instigated to intimidate potential jury members, general witnesses for Brendon, expert testimonial witnesses for Brendon, the trial judge, and Brendon personally. Brendon could simply have dropped any criticism of the Israeli state and the semitic ideology of judaism, and been given a very light sentence. THAT is what most people do, even 94 year old Germans, who are willing to defame their wartime comrades, and their entire nation and 'folk', to avoid the vicious, malicious, hate-filled, psychotic, sociopathic, 'revenge driven' jewdiciary and jewish lobby, which, as in Brendon's case, always, otherwise, seeks to do the maximum harm and damage to anyone that comes under their power...

How could the attendance of 30 local and federal members of parliament, along with letters of support from another 100 local and federal members of parliament, the Israeli Deputy foreign minister, and the Israeli ambassador to Australia, and Keyser himself giving the keynote address, NOT be connected to Brendon's trial, scheduled to being a week later? How could it be considered merely 'BROAD support for Israel' rather than an attempt, as a foreign power, to influence Brendon's trial. This becomes not just a matter for contempt, but for national security.

As Brendon puts it, it is a case of 'straining at 'material particular' gnats while swallowing such 'camels' as 'the rally had NOT connectiong with Brendon's trial, and was in no way intended to impact on it.

How would any politician anywhere in the world react to a 'request for BROAD support for Israel'? What would 'BROAD' probably be interpreted by them to mean in this context? A 'blank cheque' perhaps? Carte Blance? Do EVERYTHING and ANYTHING to support ANY actions of the state of Israel or jews in general?

Check the facts of Israeli behavior in Palestine, 911, U.S.S Liberty, the ... affair, the king david hotel bombings, and all the 'MOSSAD-CIA-FBI-MI6-NATO' war crimes and crimes against humanity before and since...millions dead in Iraq, 500,000 dead in Syria, assasination of the African continents most promising and just and competent leaders e.g Ghadafi... and tell me if the Jews 'continue to be'...'a light unto the Genitles (Nations) (Isaiah 42:6)

When the 'White House Community Church' endorse the practises of Israel as 'A great start in anticipation of mighty things to come' a shudder of horror must run up and down the spine of anyone even remotely with the record of Israel, and the Semitic Ideology's plans, and documented history, and 'origin story'.

Liz Lloyd Behjat, MLC offered 'Congratulations on the LAUNCH of the WA Friends of Israel WA'. CLEARY indicating that this was no 'regular' rally, something that just happened to occur near to the date of Brendon's trial, but planned and timed to precede it by mere days. This for me is clear evidence of the INTENT of the rally. It was organised FOR Brendon O'Connell. It was not some pre-existing, scheduled event, that had EVER been held before in W.A.

Senator Glenn Sterle, Foreign Minister, Federal member for Perth, came directly from the Pacific Islands forum to attend the INAUGURAL LAUNCH of the FOIWA...and offer 'Congratulations on the successful launch of this ground breaking initiative'...again confirming it was not a regular event, that just happened to coincide with Brendon's upcoming trial. He defined himself as 'A Western Australian, and a true friend of Israel'...so was he there in a personal capacity? or official capacity? What 'official' work had he let drop to attend this rally?

Let's see how many people turn up to the NEXT rally, if there even IS a next rally. If the rally is just to express 'BROAD support', then we should expect a similar turnout at every ANNUAL rally by the FOIWA...so lets take a look at the FOIWA's rally attendance etc since 2010, shall we?

Michael Keenan MP, Federal MP and Shadow minister for Justice and Customs was there !!!

Ambassador Yuval Rotem , Israeli Embassy to Australia flew 5000 kms to be there !!! and got a 'Standing ovation' from all the Australian politicians there...just like when Bi Bi comes to the U.S Senate, getting 33 standing ovations, as the representative of a 'foreign power'...a criminal act in the U.S...

What was Kate Doust MLC, Shadow minister for energy, science, and innovation doing there? Talpiot much?

Ben Wyatt MLA also congratulated them on their 'LAUNCH'

Rabbi Dr Shalom Coleman criticised the 'deceptions and misrepresentations' of people who had never been to Israel but presume to judge it !!! Support for 'Israel's right to DEFEND its citizens in the face of terrorism? to defend freedom and democracy? with a longing for peace and stability in the entire region? by financing and carrying out 911, ISIS, et etc ??? 'If Israel goes down we all go down'? words of former prime minister of Spain? who are 'ALL'? All the conspirators of the jew world order? all the criminals?

Bill Gaynor,the president of the W.A RSL attended...of all people...representative of all the dead and survivors of wars we fought and fight for Israel, for the ideology of Semitism...

100 other statements of support for the LAUNCH were sent by leading political figures...'LAUNCH'...how obvious does it have to be. They could not have waited to 'LAUNCH' such an event at a more appropriate time? And avoid any possible implications? And then to invite Keyser as the keynote speaker? what NOTE was he 'sounding'...what was 'key' to the rally? what was the REAL motive for the rally. How SPECIFIC and NARROW was HIS keynote address? How does HE fit into the 'BROAD support for Israel supposed motive for the rally? They couldn't find anyone else? To avoid the charge of attempt to infludence Brendon's trial adversely? For surely they were not there to offer MERCY and FORGIVENESS to Brendon, and to call for leniency? After all, Keyser stated that he wished Brendon would get 'more than 14 years' in prison for 'offending' and 'vilifying' Keyser... who had been literally 'spying' on Brendon and his colleagues from the 'Friends of Palestine' volunteer organisation, at the time of the 'incident'. Very provocative behavior especially for anyone aware of the violence the state of Israel has employed, and continues to employ, around the world, against anyone who will not 'serve the jews'.

'Israel is the most isolated, lonely country in the world'? With 1000% support from Trump, and most of the former U.S presidents, PUtin, Merkel, ... ??? so it is more isolated and lonely than Palestine? or Syria? Or Iraq? Or Afghanistan? quote from former Israeli ambassador to the UN..quoted by Keith Buxton, who spoke on behalf of all Christians? in affirming 'Australia's' ....'Unconditional support of Israel'...unconditional? no conditions? so they can do ANYTHING and Australia will support them? ... now THAT is what BROAD support means in this context...a blank Cheque to do ANYTHING...'For too long the Jewish community has had to fight its battles alone'? with 1000% support from the U.S.A president and congress, and Merkel, and Putin, and NATO...???That's a pretty crowded, powerful sort of 'alone'...he wanted to 'speak up for the people who gave us the bible?'...genocide? ripping apart pregnant women? mass sexual slavery? theft? deception? the ideology of semitism? racial supremacism? exceptionalism? slavery? rape? total world domination by a tiny elite 144,000 'jews'? ... he says 'We are committed to countering the CURSE of anti-semitism and incessant media bias AGAINST ??? Israel?

All from the official 'original' website that was pulled, by accessed via 'WayBack Machine' (will all my youtube videos be there?...have to check...can link to them this way?...

For a particularly 'savvy' and 'educated' and 'culturally rich' 'Jew' to hold their 'inaugural' first time rally and invite Keyser as keynote speaker, a week before the trial of Brendon, shows at minimum a huge lack of delicacy, respect for the laws of the land, the customs of the people, the legal processes of their 'host' nation...especially on the part of a Diplomat of all people...an Ambassador of all people...if anyone is aware of 'the law', it is 'Jews'...they could NOT possibly have been ignorant of Keysers part in Brendon's trial, or that his trial was to take place soon after their 'first ever' rally. At the very least the organisers and Ambassador should be expected to apologise, formally, to the W.A people, the W.A judiciary, the W.A government, and to Brendon personally, for what was at best a 'faux pas' of a huge magnitude. A clear lack of sensitivity and respect was shown, at very least. But given the comments made, and the entire context, it seems that the least we should expect is a formal enquiry, followed by charges where appropriate. Keyser himself should enjoy being 'judged by the same measure he applied to Brendon O'Connell', and receive the exact same amount of MERCY and FORGIVENESS as he showed Brendon O'Connell. If Brendon can admit to his own imperfections, and reflect critically on his own actions, and express regret for any 'excesses' in his expressions of frustration, anger, and fear, then surely we can ask the same of Keyser? Surely Keyser can admit how provocative his own actions were, in taking photos of Brendon and other participants of a peaceful rally? How would people at the rally he was keynote speaker at have reacted if neo-nazi types were going around taking photographs of everyone present at HIS rally? And then to physically attack Brendon, by hitting at his camera, while it was connected to his face, was not 'perfect' behavior? If you take photos of someone, and they start filming YOU, and demanding you explain yourself, can you really claim to be the 'innocent' victim of someone ELSE's injustice? Didn't Keyser insult Brendon and defame and libel him? (got to get Keysers exact words)...And if Keyser, as is likely, subscribes to the ideology of Semitism, then everything Brendon accused him of was, in principle, correct. However Brendon did go too far, in the heat of the moment, and made personal accusations that he could not know were true, had no 'legal' evidence for, but which were fair to impute / acribe / imply / assume given many of Keysers behaviors and self-definitions, and group memberships. While he may not be 'homicidal' in practise, yet, in principle, he supports homicide, even genocide, by subscribing to the ideology of semitism, as manifest by the actions of the state of israel, and the behavior of the Israelites under Joshua and Moses, and the actions of the state of Israel known as 911, the U.S.S liberty mass murders, the kind david hotel bombing, and 'the levant affair', to name a few of the now proven cases of Isreali state terrorist acts committed against foreign nations...not to mention the open air prison they turned Palestine into, for the rightful legal owners of Palestine, the Palestinians.

go to web.web/20100828042352/ for the original webpage they removed, due to its clearly self-incriminating nature...

Brendon was charged with the crime of 'making a private telephone call public'...it was the call he made to the electorate office of Julie Bishop (a public office where anyone could go, and overhear any 'public' discussions that took place?) in August 2014, where Brendon politely complained he had never received any responses to his emails and letters demanding that the Isreali state be rebuked for interfering in a 2011 trial. Youtube deleted this video. which shows you the TRUE business of Youtube, as an agent of the jew world order...what on earth could 'violate community standards' in this video, unless the 'benchmark' or 'standard' is 'does this video help or hinder the jew world order gaining total control of the entire planet to manifest the natural consequences of its ideology of semitism'? Hate-speech is also any speech the jew world order hates...as it reveals its plans, operations, ideology, intentions, and power...etc...

The Chamber magistrate hearing Brendon's case directed legal aid to offer Brendon immediate assistance in gaining access to legal advice regarding what evidence would be admissible in his case, but legal aid delayed him 6-8 weeks...all the while the actual court case, had already been delayed 2 years, after Brendon pleaded 'not guilty', and thus left him on bail? and with a gag order? and 'in limbo'...

Brendan claimed he had 'lawful excuse' for making the allegedy private telephone call public (mhr how could a conversation with a public servant, as part of their job, be considerd 'private'? if Brendon, the public, considered it 'public' and the 'servant' was doing their official job at the time?) ...that it was 'in the public interest' to do so and also the protection of his 'lawful interests'...but in order to explain how / why this was so, Brendon had first to be allowed to enter evidence into court proceedings, to make known the facts of the Israeli Embassadoor to Australia and the Deputy foreign minister and Australian foreign minister interfering in his trial in late 2010.

By delaying Brendon's trial, the police etc effectively 'gagged' him, and prevented Press TV airing an interview with him recorded in 2015. i.e his 'bail conditions'...after 2 years delay already...'out on bail' and thus 'gagged'...and effective way to silence ANYONE who would try to wake people up to the facts of the jew world order...effectively a legal way of totally censoring anyone...and for someone like Brendon that is room 101...

5 days after his 79 day hunger strike Brendon was attacked from behind and beaten by 5 inmates...his arm badly broken but he was denied treatment for it for a month, despite repeatedly pleading for medical treatement... he had a 'blown pupil' and was rushed to hospital, unconcious for up to 90 minutes...but treated as if he had 'bumped his head' at the end of his bed. Xrays were dissappeared and incident reports falsified...Royal Perth hospital claimed they had 'never' done an xray of his arm...when it was the first xray they took...the Dept. of Corrective services refused to release their findings after Brendon forced them to investigate...

The 'Threat to kill' charge was scheduled for june 2016. Brendon had threatened to kil Senior Officer Liam Samual Cashman if the minister did not investigate him for organising Brendon's beating. So it was NOT a death threat as such, for all they had to do to 'neutralise' the warning was to do their legal duty, and investigate Cashman. Brendon had no intention of carrying out the threat, but was merely trying to provoke a response. If everyone who had ever 'threatened to kill someone' was charged and put in prison, I think most people would have served time in prison at some point in their lives for making such 'threats'. In normal circumstances, police and others have told me that unless someone is specific, e.g I am going to stab you with this knife', and they actually have a knife, the 'threat to kill' is never followed up by the police. For example family disputes, relationship break-ups, divorces...'If you take my kids I will kill you'...'you do X and again and I'll kill you'... it has to be a 'concrete risk / threat'...

Brendon reported prison guards stealing 'mountains of food', power tools, other goods, dealing drugs, organising prisoners to bash other prisoners, tormenting mentally ill prisoners, messing with prisoners court paperwork...

Brendons room in a homeless shelter as raided in october 2014...the detective who carried this out was professional...maybe why he was then transferred !!!

Then Brendon found accomodation, but lost it after 7 police raided it...only 1 of the three charges made was followed up, and given 2 years good behavior...hardly 'crimes' requiring 7 police, and such drastic 'hysterical' actions...

Detective Vuleta claimed to anyone who would listen that Brendon had threatened her, was mentally ill, and delusional, that he was sending her 'intense' emails which in reality were merely requests for unedited footage of the raid on his new accomodation, as she repeatedly instructed the other 6 police conducting the raid with her to 'be on the lookout for material on the 'Jet Propulsion Laboratory', which I assume refers to the U.S investigation into Israeli spying, documented proof of Israeli spying...into U.S hi tech and defence industries...

Brendon edited and published 'Smuggler' Roger Reaves-A Memoir, the memoires of Roger Reaves, held in Acacia prison with Brendon, for 18 to life for smuggling one tonne of cocaine...for the Medellin Cartel...Reaves was a personal friend and associate of Pablo Escobar and Jorge Ochoa, and the employer and friend of the Iran-Contra operative Barry Seal, whom Reaves paid 125,000 dollars each time he landed at the infamous Mena, Arkansaw airfield...loaded with up to 1,500 kg of cocaine per run...the money went all the way to the top, including Bill Clinton...illegal arms shipments, tons of cocaine, 100 million a month in drug money laundering...Tom Cruise plays Seal in a recently released movie 'Mena'. Which of course fails to inform people about the MOST relevant details and implications...

Calling the jewish community? Israelis? Jews? 'a bunch of racists' is racial vilification? MHR how can you even HAVE such a term, as the term itself is racist...assuming 'races' exist? or just that the 'offender' is claiming races exist? which is it? that races exist but none should be vilified? that all races are nice and warm and fuzzy? why can you 'vilify' nazi germans ? hitler?

If an Israeli leader tells people to murder women, children, and men, don't they deserve to be vilified? even if they happen to be 'Jewish'? exceptionalism much? isn't the actual origin story / basis for self definition as 'jew' based in genocide, rape, murder, theft, ethnic cleansing?

Brendon is one of the very few in the 'truth' movement who motivate people to stop blogging, and start real political activity...and to focus on 'Israeli intelligence activity' and 'Jewish racial and religious supremacism and its application in the real world'...

But I need time to grok it all...he did after all threaten a public offical with death, though not in a way the police would normally follow up on e.g typical domestic disputes involves similar threats...need to be 'credible threats' i.e specific, and have the skills / tools /weapons etc that would be required to carry out the threats... he did personally call someone a homicidal etc...which is different to general criticisms of Israel / mossad / semitic ideology etc...and he admits he could have taken many offers and backed down from his public campaigning...

The Australian public had expressed no interest in the case, and the media could not comment on a case being investigated / trial in progress...the rally came 2.5 months after the head of W.A Counter Terrorism (Inspector Barry Shelton) sent Brendon an email saying 'We respect your work', and promising to catch up with Brendon at a later date over coffee. The topic of discussion was to be centered upon Israeli intelligence activity in Australia, and elsewhere. So the rally can be seen as a 'show of power' to intimidate everyone so Brendon, homeless, dependant on the kindness of friends, would be left totally isolated.

Any professional has seen what happens to anyone who challenges 'the holocaust' propaganda, or criticises 'Israel', let alone expresses legitimate / conscientious / well meaning / well intentioned / beneficient concerns about the ideology of 'semitism' that the majority of 'Jews' appear to subscribe to, and which the clear public leadership of Israel, from military to government to religious spheres, openly endorse and promote, especially to Israeli children, from birth, with the intent of breeding an irrational fear and hatred of all non-jews, and a desire to 'kill' all germans, as documented in 'Defamation' the movie...

RAD is about high speed and wireless communication, working with all world's major telecommunciations networs incl. AT&T, and British, Deutsche, France, and Japan Telecom. It provides telecommunications tools to banking, commerce, education, finance, government, military, transportation, and utility sectors. Founders of RAD were trained at the Israeli 'Technion', Israeli Institute of Technology, part of the Israeli Defence sector...RAD have full access to most govt. data bases around the world...RAD provide mass surveillance systems such as in place around London...

N.B that VERINT, an Israeli firm, was handling security for the London Tube / underground railway system at the time of the 2005 'terrorist' attack...only no 'terrorists' were EVER seen by any witnesses... and these intitial witnesses stated that the alleged suspects were NOTanywhere near the blast site, nor any backpacks...the floor of the train was blown 'upwards', as if from beneat the train...the police told victims of the blast to be careful of the hole where the bomb had exploded 'from underneath the train'...

TaKaDu, another Israeli firm, was working with Sydney water on water conservation efforts...

VERINT market themselves as a solutions to help detect, investigate, and neutralise threats...to anticipate, prepare, and respond to security threats to people, property, and assets...( oh, like the WTC security headed by a Bush family business, check my own notes / books)

FOX news 4 part series on Israeli spying in the U.S named 'VERINT' as a security threat...spying on America via phone billing and data intercept companies Amdocs and Comverse Infosys/ Verint...in 2001...

Steve Lieblich 'Jewish community leader'trained at the 'Technion' in electrical engineering, got Brendon arrested, he was held for 3 days, after Brendon accused him of being a 'Katsa' a.k.a 'case officer' for Israeli intelligence...taking advantage of the local jewish population as a a resource for the Israeli state...recruiting sayanim from jewish community groups andy youth groups like Habonim Bror (which Keyser a member of) and Chabad Lubavitch. These 'helpers' then mhr using their connections and secret control of Freemasonry and Marxist organistions, are helped into positions of power, or with access to vital information / data / resources in the local jewdiciary, policing, private security firms like G4S, industry and military and government ... and ensure local governments and industry adopt Israeli owned telecom and hi tech services and hardware, giving Israel access to materials to be used for coercion, blackmail, greenmail,corruption, lobbying, perception management, public opinion manipulation and manufacture etc...basically to compromise foreign nationals, and 'hack' their systems to steal valuable infomation, patent, technology, and 'direct' foreign mass media and government policy e.g have Brendon arrested for 'offending' a jew...the main motive appearing to be the 'gag orders' associated with arrest, and bail conditions, with the trial continually 'put off' and 'delayed' ... which meant that as long as they could have Brendon awaiting a trial, the longer they could keep him silent...a typical 'delay tactic' to 'silence' whistleblowers etc...

Brendon also arrested for allegedly 'Utilizing a carriage device to menace, threaten, or cause offense' (what does 'carriage device refer to? email? ) ... Lieblich alleged that 'This email offended me. It accuses me of deceit, and it is also replete with anti-Semitic lies about the Jewish people which I find offensive'...'I find this comment offensive because it falsely implies that I am an Israeli spy'...this lead to a raid on his accomodation...the warrant for the search instructed the police to look out for material on 'Jet Propulsion Laboratories'...this is due to Brendon's references to Whistleblower Sandra Troian's 2014 research into allegations that Caltech, where Troian was a Professor of applied physics, simply dismissed her own concerns re: the NASA Jet Propulsion Lab managed by Caltech...Troian hired Amir Gat, a recen Ph.D from the Technion-Israel Institute of Technology in 2010 to help design a new type of space micropropulsion system...financed by DARPA...Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency...which was subject to federal export control laws governing unauthorized sharing of information...and which required Gat to sign an agreement that he would NOT share any sensitive information...of course one reason for the vilification of 'anti-semitism' and 'whistleblowers on Israel' as 'hate speech' is that no-one would ever hire such a person for such a sensitive job if they were aware of the conspiracy in place...of course Caltech victimised Troian instead, and accused her of 'sour grapes' more or less...in 2010, after Gat continued to store sensitive data on his personal laptop, in violation of the declared procedures, and had allegedly purposely entered erroneous numbers into design software codes, a computer virus attack on Troian's work computer resulted in hundreds of files being uploaded to an IP address outside Caltech, and interruptions to Troian's network. Gat literally admitted, after repeated questioning by Troian, that he had in fact shared details about the micropropulsion system with Daniel Weihs, his doctoral thesis adviser at Technion, without permission. Weihs is heavily involved in Israeli ministry of science, and space research and space infrastructure research (Israel in space???)...Gat allegedly made 65 internet posts about operating principles for hte system, and was caught wandering around, alone, in an access-restricted experimental area. He stated that he was 'looking around' and that he 'hoped to be hired by Technion when he returned to Israel...Gats behaviors would have violated the terms for the NASA contract, which was at that time up for renewal, and the breaches may have cost Caltech the massive research funding for the joint project...In fact Gat DID return to Israel in 2012 and began working at Technion...the FBI approached Troian two years after her first report to Caltech...and still feared retaliation from Caltech, her boss at the time, for sharing such information with them...in fact she was vicimised for even speaking to the FBI (of course her reports had been ignored and no investigation by Caltech into Gat had ever occured) ...she was basically mobbed in typical style (see my book 'An education in Victimisation') by her supervisors and the Provost at Caltech...they finally falsely accused HER of research misconduct and denied her research funding, alleging colleagues had filed 'serious complaints' against her...Caltech denied any wrongdoing, or that any breaches of 'Federal export control laws and International traffic in arms regulations', claiming it 'cooperated with government agencies including the FBI...then why did it take 2 years before the FBI contacted Troian about her allegations? Gat was already back working for his 'REAL' boss, the Technion, the Israeli state by that time.

Now if you thought it could all be mere 'sour grapes' and 'anti-semitism', consider the fact that today, Gat denies he ever worked at the Jet Propulsion Lab', and that he has ever been an Israeli spy...as a foreign national, he claims, he did not have any security clearance to work on secret projects ????

Caltech tried to 'undermine her credibility' by referring to a research paper in which she put her cat's name as a placeholder, while working out who, if anyone, to cite as co-author. She notes that Nobel Prize Laureate Physicist Andre Geim once listed his hamster as a co-author on a research paper. Surely anyone knows that cats are excellent 'muses' !!! But it goes to show how far workplace mobbers will go in trying to undermine the credibility of their victims. Again, refer to my book 'An education in victimisation' for details of just some of my personal experiences, which lead to me research the international situation vis a vis mobbing and workplace victimisation.

In 2012 a federal investigation revealed that NASA networks had suffered thousands of security breaches between 2010 and 2011 alone.

So why would a judge note 'Jet propulsion lab' materials on the warrant to search Brendon O'Connell's accomodation? What was it they were trying to ensure YOU NEVER found out about?

The thing with 'publically available information' is that it is VERY easy to make it virtually impossible for 'the public' to ever 'find', let alone have their attention deliberately drawn to...Jewtube videos are 'removed' along with the entire channel, regulary. Web sites are 'taken down', Google search data is modified so no matter what you type in the search bar, you won't find the information that is 'publically available'...what you WILL find is controlled opposition etc blog posts deriding the 'conspiracy theory', relating to that information, dismissing it , and claiming it 'does not exist'...just like 'Operation Talpiot'. do some searches now and see what Google brings up as 'relevant'...

CAltech let a suspected spy or 'Sayanimm' / assistant for the Israeli govt, Amir Gat, a recent graduate of the Technion institute in Israel, keep working at its Jew Propulsion Lab on a new type of space micropropulsion system in2010, to protect an 8 billion dollar NASA contract, reported by Colleen Flaherty...Gat allegedly stored senstive info on his personal laptop, against required procedures, and purposely entered erroneous numbers into design software codes... Sayanim are Jews approached and asked to 'help save the jewish people in the diaspora' by 'helping'..Mossad Officer Viktor Ostrovskys stated that thousands of 'Sayanim' provide services for Mossad such as a jewish rental car provider, a 'car sayan' would provide cars without requiring the usual documentation...an 'apartment sayan' would find accomodations for mossad agents, free from paperwork that might draw attention to them...a 'bank sayan' would provide banking services e.g the kind terrorists require to bypass security surveillance etc to transfer funds around the world, and provide cash...a 'doctor sayan' could treat bullet wounds etc without reporting the incident to the authorities, as required by law...these 'sayan' would provide services, and keep quiet...they are paid only costs...often their help is abused by mossad agents for their private / personal use, there is no way for a sayan to know if the request is of a personal nature, or for the Israeli state...a jew may decide not to help you, but he would never consider betraying you...so you have a risk free pool of millions of potential 'helpers' ...they are not supposed to ever be put at risk, and they are never privy to classified infomation...'By Way of Deception: The Unmasking ofa Mossad Officer' p.86-87...Viktor Ostrovsky...

Intelligence and security nalysts believe Israel hacks police databases that their 'sayanim' manage, to engage in 'identity theft' among other things...

Why is a pyramid prominently on dispaly in front of the Perth District court building?

Trevor LaBonte told Brendon he feared for his life if he interviewed Brendon.

N.B something key to understanding 'security breaches'...if you have produced some hi tech that gives your research funder / client / nation 'the edge', it can put you out of business...what you need is a constant and credible threat to motivate your client to 'fear' being 'caught behind' so that they will be happy to continue funding you to do further research, to produce new products, to 'retain the edge'....so if you are too good at your job, and thus the 'enemy' is no viable threat, you are shooting yourself in the foot...so what you want to do is produce great products, get the contracts, get paid, and then 'leak' the new technology to 'enemies', so that they can catch up, and your client will once more need your help... this is how arms races work...you need to manufacture / stimulate / assist 'enemies' so that there appears some 'real and credible threat' which you can be hired to neutralise...THAT is how the business works...

Brendon's case revealed practises within the policing and legal community that few people are aware of, or would credence. For example blatant lies given to judges as part of their briefing, which the accused is never privy to. Can you imagine being called before a judge who has been told you have previously been 'diagnosed' with a delusional disorder that incorporates fixed paranoia ideas in relation to Government departmens and other agencies. The ordered mental health assessment of Accused states that he has a history of paranoid delusions' ... THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT ANYONE WHO EVER CHALLENGES ANYONE IN AUTHORITY, SINCE AT LEAST THE DAYS OF CATHERINE THE GREAT EMPRESS OF RUSSIA, IS DOOMED TO SUFFER...I HAVE BEEN WRITING ABOUT THIS ISSUE FOR DECADES...IT IS THE MOST REPUGNANT OF STRATEGIES AFTER PHYSICAL TORTURE...AND OFTEN MORE DAMAGING TO A PERSON...YOU CAN GET A JOB AFTER BEING TORTURED...TRY GETTING A JOB, OR PARTNER, OR BANK LOAN, AFTER BEING DEFINED AS 'MENTALLY ILL'... As is usual, the 'allegations' are presented as 'diagnoses' and kept secret from the victim, so they have no way to counter the allegations. They are NOT given the chance to undergo independent pyschiatric assessments even though they have that legal right...it is like 'publically available information'...it is never available to the public...like that legal right to an independant assessment...ever Govt. Dept. will use its own 'hired guns' to do their 'credibility assassinations'of hapless victims verbally told to appear for a 'routine medical checkup in relation to their employment, only to find it is a pyschiatric assessment...then in court the dept. will deny they failed to inform the person, they will issue a SECOND, this time WRITTEN direction to attend a 'pyschiatric assessment', and in court claim the first, secret direction, the spoken one, never happened, and that this written SECOND directive was the first i.e that they never tried to trick the person into attending a psychiatric assessment unawares of its true nature...it is one matter to know in advance, and be ready, it is another to be put in a the threatening position (for anyone who knows how common 'community orders' are, and how easy it is for a a government to have you 'placed in involuntary psychatric treatment facilities a.k.a 'prisons' with no charges...ask the former heads of the CIA, who stated that this is normal practise, openly, in public, and themselves would NEVER attend such an 'assessment' out of a legitmate and well founded terror of the potential consequences...read my other books and watch my other videos for the actual video presentations and transcripts of former heads of the FBI and CIA on this subject.

In Brendon's case the judge was lied to about his mental condition, in a way that would totally undermine and discredit any arguments he put forward, including factual details...the judge would simply dismiss them all as 'delusions', and instruct any jury to do the same...this is the dirtiest trick...the most effective, when all else fails...undermine your credibility by defining you as mentally ill, and anything you have to say as the rantings of a delusional, insane, mad, mentally ill person, so that anything you say can be simply dismissed out of hand, without anyone expecting you to investigate, disprove, our counter your allegations and compelling arguments. The false reports / lies were made by 'the community forensic mental health service (Court) Liaison Service who 'spoke to the accused' (and made their 'diagnosis on this basis?) and gave the perth magistrates court a 'report' containing all these lies, fabrications... this character assassination... this global discrediting vilification of his state of mind... Brendon only got to see the documents 'Notes to Prosecutor' after he had fired his legal representative. He would never otherwise have come to know about the lies.

Detective Valueta also claims Brendon threatened to harm her. His interactions were too 'intense' for her, and she directed him to cease contact with her. After which Brendon again contacted her.

Brendon rightly recognised the clear strategy employed by the jew world order, and tyrants and corrupt officials since at least Empress Catherine's time. A person stumbles upon facts in the public domain, by chance. However these public domain facts are kept 'hidden' from the public by clever censorship, search engine algorithm manipulation, and so on...the TRUE business of Google, Youtube, Amazon, and Facebook is control of information in the public domain...whether facebook posts, amazon books, youtube videos, or anything else a 'google search' would normally come up with i.e public domain information put out by the public, in the interests of the public...is to be made so 'unavailable' to the public, that when someone states these publically known facts, they sound 'crazy', and can easily be discredited and dismissed...even trying to find web pages a writer refers to can become impossible, if you don't know how e.g 'WayBack machine' for deleted web pages...and Google can simply NOT list a webpage that exists...it claims its business is 'private' and that it can do as it pleases...you can simply go elsewhere? to where? and who is going to realise they should NOT trust Google? if all the articles explaining WHY you should NOT trust google, have been deleted, or removed from the web search algorithms? how will you know not to trust them, or the govt., if every argument and fact that would lead you to mistrust them is effectively 'censored' and 'dissappeared'? People can go on naively trusting their govt, google etc, their entire lives, until they are the victim of govt., or google etc...then no-one is going to listen to them...why should they?...lone voices in the wilderness...especially if they have been 'diagnosed' as 'delusional' or of 'bad character' or simply 'not a team player' and 'disliked by everyone' etc etc...

You will never get to form and informed, holistic, valid, correct view of the world, if you are denied the most important information...if it is 'hidden away', even if 'in plain sight'...see something, say nothing, that is the motto of todays jew world order occupation governments...If someone holds up three fingers, and asks you to tell them how many fingers they are holding up, you'd better refer to people around you for the 'official fiction' and act like your really believe it...or look for hints from the person asking...as to how many fingers you are 'supposed' to see...before risking actually giving a factual answer...or you may find yourself defined as 'mentally ill', 'a terrorist', 'of poor character', 'unemployable', 'delusional'...

People around the world have been forcibly medicated, under 'community orders', and involuntarily 'treated' with electroshock, insulin 'shock therapy', and locked up in solitary confinement, never having committed any crime, let alone having been charged with one...even before 'The Patriot Act' dismissed our hard won right to 'Habeus Corpus', which we enjoyed since the days of the 'Magna Carter'. Today we have FEWER rights and freedoms than our serf / peasant ancestors did a thousand years ago. While imagining we are 'free'.

Soon 'conspiracy theorists' i.e people who have proven 911 was a CIA Mossad joint false flag, and that 'the holocaust' never happened, or that the Oklahoma city bombing was an FBI, CIA etc false flag, or that 'Sandy Hook' and most other 'mass shootings, were faked, with crisis actors, and already dead 'shooters'...and anyone who states any obvious fact, or offers any 'publically available' document, will simply be 'diagnosed' as 'delusional' and if they persist, will be detained under 'community orders' and forcibly 'treated' and 'medicated' and 'restrained', with fewer rights than a mass murderer enjoys under the prison system and legal codes...you think I'm exagerating...high profile public figures have already suggested such a response to '911 truthers' and even 'man-made global climate crisis' 'deniers'. Heard of 'Authority Defiance Disorder' yet? That's the new mental illness you can 'paint' anyone who defies ANYTHING any authority says or does...a 'blanket' psychiatric illness that would cover any and all 'lack of total belief, faith, submission to, and collaboration with, any form of authority'...in other words if you do NOT trust your mass media, your lying scoundrel corrupt police or politicians, then you are mentall ill, and can be forcibly medicated, 'treated', and imprisoned.

In fact in 2000 Brendon was 'admitted' to a psychiatric facility, and medicated , and placed in a 'locked ward'. I'm not clear on whether he did this voluntarily after sleep deprivation? Of course they used this against him. And here is another point I wish to make about most people's assumption of 'doctor client confidentiality'. It does NOT exist. Any court can order a doctor to reveal any and all information about you. What you thought was 'private and confidential' is really totally open and public. So take care next time you seek any sort of medical help. If you simply complain, 'Oh things have been so depressing lately', this can end up being presented in a court as 'proof that you were suffering depression, and therefore were / are mentally ill'...employers can use this against you in workplace victimisation cases...the prosecutor in any trial can enter it as evidence in court of your mental illness / unbalance nature etc...and any other lawyer can take advantage of it in any other case, such as a child custody hearing...so do NOT trust ANYONE fully...be wary..cautious...never assume ANYthing is 'confidential', because it isn't. All your emails, telephone calls, are recorded, and can be accessed. Surveillance equipment is monitoring your every move, every keystroke, ever utterance...your own phone and television and laptop may be recording you right now, even if you turned them 'off'...there is NOT 'off' button for big brother, just like in the book / film '1984'...you may imagine you have the freedom to 'turn off your phone / t.v / laptop', but that is just part of the total illusion of freedom you are under...we are slaves...right now...and if we do not reverse all the 'Patriot Acts' and 'Executive orders' and other unconstitutional 'laws' around the world, soon we will have NO way of reversing them...soon the ONLY information you will have access to with be pure propaganda...pure dis-information and mis-information, pure lies...the truth will be impossible to discover...data will have been 'dissappeared'...you will be defined as mentally ill merely for wondering if this may have happened...let alone if you insist it DID happen...that you REMEMBER reading a particular book, blog, watching a video, that suddenly has been erased not just from the internet, but from every browsing history of every laptop, removed from every public library, etc etc...as if it never existed...and only a crazy person would insist such a conspiracy to deny you 'reality' exists, that your 'caring and honest government would ever even consider such a dastardly scheme...that 'private' corporations would ever conspire against hte public good, that it would even be possible for thousands of independent (all owned and managed by the same small group of people in reality) companies could even agree to do such a thing, let alone actually manage it...it is just absurd to imagine such a thing possible...delusional...madness...insanity...false flags? your own government blowing up buildings and murdering thousands of its own voters? crazy talk. though documented in every form...just ask anyone you know about the 'U.S.S Liberty' and see what response you get. And yet the facts, the documents, the testimonies, the 'publically' admitted guilt, are all 'out there', if you bother to look...and manage to find...at least today...in a few years they will all be 'dissappeared' as if they never existed, and it never happened...

I had a heavy metal song I'd written years before, and accidentally included in a copy of a philosophy treatise I'd given a colleauge to get her boyfriends opinion on, used against me. A whole dramaturgy was built around it. other staff members maliciously circulated it among staff at the school whom I had never intended to see the philosophy treatise, let alone that song...they then hired security to protect the school staff from me...and reported me as a terrorst threat to the N.S.W anti-terrorism unit...and had detectives coming to my house to 'search' for weapons...all documented in my book 'An education in victimisation'.

Brendon was alleged to have threatened detective Elisabeth Vuleta, and they carried out the whole dramaturgy thing, placing her under special 'police protection' reserved for targest of credible threats...like when a drug lord threatens to kill an honest cop...as if any drug lord who wasn't CIA / MOSSAD / POLICE etc could possibly do business, and as if , well, maybe there are a few honest cops...but if they were really honest, they would get fired for reporting the crimes of their colleagues...

The Perth Jewish community even claimed Brendon threatened to kill their children. But given the fact that the police lock Brendon up at the slightest 'allegation' from his enemies, there COULD not have been anything at all to such libelous, defamatory, vilifications.

Brendon merely emailed, using polite and reasoned language, for an UN-edited copy of the video of the police raid on his accomodation...as if overwhelmed and threatened...she felt his emails were 'increasingly intense'...??? of course the truth is threatening to criminals, and corrupt police etc...the truth is kyrptonite to the jew world order, and any other tyrant, as the truth will set you, their slave, free...free of their lies, which are used to control you, and get your voluntary submission, much cheaper than having slave drivers with whips...

'Increasingly intense'? So if you start off submissive, and gradually become more assertive, the police can refuse to respond to you? And if you continue to email them, you've become a criminal?

so if the police don't do their job, and you keep asking them to do their job, and obey the law, that makes YOU the criminal? Is it legal to maintain the original intensity, whatever that was? is it just a crime to 'increase' your 'intensity', whatever level you started at?

There are at least 5 obvious instances in the video footage where 'edits' have occured...where the footage leaves off suddenly, then starts again, with no 'continuity', and clear 'edits'. The standard protocol for 'breaks in continuity of recording', such as for replacing memory cards etc, is to state, clearly, before turning off the camera 'we are now turning off the video recorder', and yet for none of the 5 'breaks', often in mid-sentence when someone is talking, does anyone say this. Brendon reminded Valueta of the case of Professor Robert Cunningham, a Law Professor of all things, in which police edited the CCTV footage of him and another person being tasered by police, for no reason...while the unedited footage he had copied himself, and kept in his UWA university of Western Australia office, were stolen (allegedly by police). Brendon also referred to the case where Labor MP Tonny Buti alleged police were trying to intimidate Ms Atoms by sending police to her home and claiming that 'your car has been involved in a hit and run accident'. He also referred to the indictments of two Israeli nationals, Gery Shalon and Ziv Grenstein for multiple counts of fraud, CONSPIRACY, and other charges related to a massive hack of, among other targets, JP Morgan Chase.

He also 'reminded' Valueta, who was an officer of the State security investigation unit (Counter terrorism), but insisted he stop 'emailing her' with what he has 'seen and heard' a-la see something, say something...that : Stephen Lieblich (a dual national Israeli-Australian citizen), electrical engineer who trained at the Israeli Military Intelligence founded 'The Technion'...the fact that Australia's private, government and military encrypted radio communications, databases (Telstra / Sensis ???Census?), hardware routers, SAS and Commandon regiment encrypted radio communications, Collins class submarine weapons and sensor systems, Wedgetail early warning radar, drone technology, etc etc...including Sydney's Rail Transit security system (VERINT, as used at the time of the London 'underground' supposed 'terrorist attack'..and on and on...use Israeli software, hardware, and systems, and personnel...

Brendon makes the point that he managed to 'discover' all these important facts for national security and espionage using Google, while the 'professionals' in Australia seem oblivious to these potential threats to national security, and worry about harmless 12 year old Muslim boys instead.

The Corruption and Crime Commission, in relation to the law professors stolen / edited CCTV footage, found 'In a scathing report released yesterday, the CC said the Warneke case highlighted wider issues with police training, the general competence of some officers and their ability to understand and apply the law correctly. 'In many cases the errors of individual officers reflect a deeper malaise and systemic weakness which permeates criminal investigations in this state', the CCC said.

Valueta had lied to Brendon's friends, that she needed his new phone number and address to return property to him...

Brendon claims a detective threatened him, with the words 'Brendon, when this case is over, it won't be over' , implying the harassment etc..

W.A police threatened a serving minister who then resigned.

Valuenta yelled, on camera, at Brendon that 'Steve Lieblich had nothing to do with the rally!'...now WHO is delusional here? Lieblich was the 'President' of the W.A jewish community at the time, how could he NOT have been involved? In fact the West Australian Newspaper did a full page article on him and the rally ...

!!!!! N.B THAT THE 'RACIAL VILIFICATION LEGISLATION' COVERS 'RACE, ETHNICITY, NATIONAL ORIGINS'.

A man appeared at the shop of an Arab-Australian Muslim and threatened to kill him ... 3 eyewitnesses testified it was a police officer from the Northam police station...Hodgkinson' wife works with the Northam police, she admitted on facebook...the police refused to allow them to 'see' Jason Hodgkinson to determine if it was in fact him that made the threats to kill Mustafa, in front of his kids.

Do '3000 jews have the political class in W.A by the balls?'

The Police alledged Brendon had 'Radical material' on his computer ??? including Video, Photo's,and documents...

Brendon plead 'not guilty' to the 'threat to kill' charge which made it a matter for the District Court, but was offered that if he plead guilty to a 'threat to harm' charge, it would be moved back to the magistrates court, where I assume different penalties apply, where the 'publishing/communicatoin of private conversations' charge was to be heard. Even though the video had 'dissappeared' and no copy was provided in the 'evidence' briefing Brendon was given, implying maybe the police had no actual record of it, were just taking the 'victim' at her word?

N.B that Brendon's publishing of emails from the David Thiering / the DPP in W.A, is also strictly prohibited ...

'we are looking for stuff like ... jet propulsion laboratories' Vuleta's words in the edited video of the raid.

In the video Vuleta states that Brendon 'Does not want to be present for the search'...why would he say that? there is no record in the video of his stating that....

'The scope of the warrant is STEVE LEIBLICH and JET PROPULSION LABORATORIES and HODGKINSONS'...

Vuleta waved the warrant claiming Brendon had to give her the passwords to his computers..he insists she read him his rights ... re: right to remain silent? law vague, along lines of 'police must hold a firm belief? that evidence is to be found on the device ' !!!

Vuleta 'tampered with evidence', editing emails she had sent to Brendon, and removing some from evidence, for some unknown reason.

Johnny Rizzo's High court hearing included 'editing of surveillance material'...

Jason Hodgkinson, according to Brendon, thanks to his wife's friendships among the Northan police force, got let off with a 'disorderly conduct' charge after being one of 7 thugs who appeared at Mustafa's shop, threatening to kill Mustafa Atieh... an Arab Muslim, in front of his 14 year old daughter Miriam Atieh, and her two younger brothers... There is no police record of anyone being arrested for 'threats to kill', only 'disorderly conduct'...

Later veiled threats were that Mustafa 'might want to look after his children' ???

Israel and W.A now have a hi-technology agreement !!!

Apparently during the 'Lindt Cafe' raid all the police radios failed...and who manages their telecommunications? remember same at time of 911 with mobile phones and during Princess diana's death the camera's were 'not working'... !!!

All federal and state police intercepts in Australia are handled by an Israeli company, VERINT...

Our enemies are who Jesus called 'children of hell' and 'sons of your father the devil'...

Around 80% of jews self-identify as Orthodox, and thus Pharisaic, the same 'Pharisees that crucified jesus after he 'outed' them for what they are...not 'true jews' at all...Rabbinic Pharisaic Judaism is the dominant sect of 'Judaism' today. Their Babylonian Talmud, Shulkan Aruk, and 'Mishna' (oral law) incite / direct their 'followers' to an irrational hatred, and desire to kill, all non-members of their cult / semitic ideology ... that includes anyone who will not 'submit' to what they believe, among the jews, and all non-jews who will not 'serve the jews'...

Old Testament 'Tanakh' ... contains 'ripping up pregnant women', genocide, mass rape and enslavement...of not just 'amalek', but anyone who will not give up their land , possessions, and virgin daughters , to the 'israelites'....

Sects like the Kairites have been persecuted by orthodox rabbinical pharisaic jews for centuries, for their humanistic, more christian 'take' on the old testament...

Hasidm are the most 'fundamental / extreme' cult in Judaism.

Jewish racial vilification of the NATION of Germany has been institutionalised as 'The Holocaust' industry a.k.a 'Shoah Business'...

Jews at the top of the U.S power structure have zero loyalty to the U.S, and refuse to serve in the U.S military as soldiers, but are more than happy to serve the Israeli military. quote of Dr Steve Pieczenik...he is calling for the 'overthrow of the tyrants by force i.e the zionist occupation government ZOG / the jew world order occcupation govt, on Alex Jones...who kept interupting him this time, when in the past he has let him talk on for long periods, happy to listen...???

Dr Alan Sabrosky was head of the U.S Army War College for 7 years, a Marine Colonel, he stated that it was a fact that Israel did 911...he stated that if the U.S population realised, they would, 'creme Israel', which he himself would enjoy seeing happen...!!! mhr which seems he is controlled opposition i.e too extreme, discrediting the story he supposedly is promoting???

Brendon was threatened with further charges of inciting racial hatred for re-posting these comments, and was told that doing so constituted 'racial hatred' ...

MHR biggest info is that racial vilification includes NATION and ETHNICITY so it includes the german nation and germans...so 'The Holocaust' in all its expressions clearly constitutes 'racial vilification' and 'hate speech' ... in court it would be easy to provide a 'prima facie' case that 'The holocaust' is fictional, and intended to racially vilify and incite...a-la that girl in 'Defamation'...could easily find jews who would make similar statements regarding how they feel about 'Germans' and Germany, based on the 'incitement' of 'racial vilification' contained in most 'Holocaust' movies, books, videos, public statements...lets start with Putin ...and then get Trump and everyone else who pushes the racial vilification, demonisation of islam / arabs that is 'the official 911 narrative' etc...

73 /107 Sentencing Submission Rasterized...

UNDERSTAND THE NOTION OF THE 'SAYANIM' - 'HELPER'

A quote from former Mossad Officer Viktor Ostrovsky...

“The next day Ran S. delivered a lecture on the sayanim, a unique and important part of the Mossad’s operation. Sayanim—assistants — must be 100 percent Jewish. They live abroad, and though they are not Israeli citizens, many are reached through their relatives in Israel. An Israeli with a relative in England, for example, might be asked to write a letter saying the person bearing the letter represents an organization whose main goal is to help save Jewish people in the Diaspora. Could the British relative help in any way?

There are thousands of sayanim around the world. In London alone, there are about 2,000 who are active, and another 5,000 on the list. They fulfill many different roles. A car sayan, for example, running a rental agency, could help the Mossad rent a car without having to complete the usual documentation. An apartment sayan would find accommodation without raising suspicions, a bank sayan could get you money if you needed it in the middle of the night, a doctor sayan would treat a bullet wound without reporting it to the police, and so on.

The idea is to have a pool of people available when needed who can provide services but will keep quiet about them out of loyalty to the cause. They are paid only costs. Often the loyalty of sayanim is abused by katsas who take advantage of the available help for their own personal use. There is no way for the sayan to check this.

One thing you know for sure is that even if a Jewish person knows it is the Mossad, he might not agree to work with you — but he won’t turn you in. You have at your disposal a non risk recruitment system that actually gives you a pool of millions of Jewish people to tap from outside your own borders.It’s much easier to operate with what is available on the spot, and sayanim offer incredible practical support everywhere. But they are never put at risk — nor are they privy to classified information.

“By Way Of Deception: The Unmasking Of A Mossad Officer” p.86-87

DR STEVE PEICZENIK (Jewish) NAMES RABBI DOV ZACKHEIM AND MICHAEL CHERTOFF AS TRAITORS TO AMERICA AND INVOLVED IN THE 9-11 TERROR ATTACKS

RABBI DOV ZACKHEIM IS THE 2IC AT "BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON". SUBCONTRACTOR TO THE NSA AND FORMER EMPLOYER OF EDWARD SNOWDEN

MICHAEL CHERTOFF IS THE FORMER HEAD OF HOMELAND SECURITY AND NOW CEO OF A PRIVATE SURVEILLANCE COMPANY SUB CONTRACTING TO HOMELAND SECURITY.

How many times will I be recommended for a psychiatric review for pointing out the same thing psychiatrist and top psychological warfare specialist Dr Steve Piecezenik does?

JFK last president to insist equivalent of AIPAC register as foreign lobby group... have to sign pledge that will put interests of Israel against those of U.S ...to get funding...if don't sign, your opponent will get funded, electoral boundaries changed etc...

focus on national security issues? Brendon thinks this is way around? why? even if can prove jews about to nuke australia, they'll say 'well your motivation in telling us is your irrational hatred of jews' ... so how would any fact help?

the truth is no defence i.e they will claim that you are employing the truth with malicious intent i.e BECAUSE you are anti-semitic... being anti-semitic BECAUSE of the facts is ???

mass mailout Mail merge...attach to email client thunderbird...will allow mass mailings that bypass spam filters...looks like personal email...stores email addresses etc...can re-use for mailouts...Brendon O'Connell used / recommends...

Hate crime dependant on proving 'intent' ... your intention ... 'public interest' and 'my lawful interest' ...to have 'expert' evidence introduced as evidence to show jury what motivated your actions i.e sudden awareness of FACTS...rather than premeditated / irrational hatred / desire to incite violence against 'Jews'...rather than to protect own nation state...

'the scepter (symbol of earthly rule) shall not depart from judah until the obedience of the nations is his'...'you shall lend to the nations and borrow from none'...

Bi-ble...Yah and Weh...law masculine and compassion feminine

Noahide laws...7 laws...90s Bush before Clinton...passed bill to introduce 7 Noahide laws in U.S...rainbow...Kohenim above Levites ... caste system...Sephardim , Misrahim, Obadiah Yosef...Goyim exist to serve the jews...obadiah of all names...

Operation trial...Brendan O'Connell using legal system...only way forward...to get charged, so could introduce facts into legal record...but court would not allow him to introduce / present the evidence justifying his anger / assertiveness i.e no intent of irrational hate... inadmissible hearsay...but discovered way, while in prison... have a directions hearing (don't wait for trial) on the presentation of evidence which is normally inadmissible hearsay evidence, but then comes until the legislation of self-intent...??? claims has already prepared total case...Hofman, Jones, whole list of people and materials...argue that intent is irrational hatred of jewish people, directly related to 1930s legislation in German to remove jews from all positions of power...prove criminal investigation of criminal group supported by vast majority of jews worldwide is your intent...to reveal this...O'Connell WANTS to go back to prison, and high court case...would get 400,000 dollars compensation...but strategy of enemy is to delay, demoralise...so you give up before get to court...

The top 1% ? 42% of international jewish commmunity...at least 42% of 1% implicitly admitted by jews i.e claim attacks on 1% are anti-semitic...they gave away their own 'secret'...implicitly...they going after as 'hate crime'...i.e to criticise the top 1% is intended to irrationally hate attack incite against the Jews, as 42% of the top 1% are admittedly jews...

I apologize, I went to far, go to jury trial in magistrates court...find all published...in misdemeaner magistrates court... people give up as soon as charged with minor misdemeanour...shut down own channels etc...accept will be strip searched, thrown in cell, to get trial...get the experts to appear to show that NOT irrational...that motive NOT irrational hatred...

Lubovitch is city of brotherly love...Philadelphia U.S equivalent city name...also outpost of Russian Jewish mafia in 1800, 1900, then Mayer Lansky mafia boss...of Philly...

Jewish owned companies get hi tech stolen by Mossad, and free finance...kill switches and viruses placed in their products...work with most nations federal policing and military...very long term...plant viruses in thumbdrives knowing one day One of the many million sold will be plugged into the computer of a company they want to infect / infiltrate...Unit 8200 ... so many proven incidents...Intel chips all designed in Israel since 2006, so have hardware backdoors everywhere...Israel inside / Intel inside...secret of 'success' of Silicon Wadi...allowing Russians seeking better life to convert, and accepting as 'jewish' when zero background...not integrating, not jewish...just taking opportunity...Russian christians emigrating...new russian areas of Israel...jewish russians feel russian...do not remotely qualify as jewish...electrical engineers being imported...white ... tel aviv beach party life... this is russia's source of hi tech...russians and jews in Israel....Mossad and 'jews' worldwide steal the patents / tech / software etc...

gasprom 20 year contract to transport LPG by ship...delek main israeli contractor...owns 60% and Noble energy texas U.S trump people own 40% ... gas fields are really a dud..in deep water, cost fortune to run...to supply less than 10% of E.U gas...Russia assisted them in setting up project...

Intel set up really front for Mossad theft / spy - sourced tech...all these jews proud of Silicon Wadi, when just like the guy you sell stolen goods to, who can then find a market for...

Sons of the city of london...netanyahu, trump, putin...luciferian transylvanian nazis...same for iranian elites...german and swiss banking seduced them...won't dare criticise Israel...why O'Connell left after 2.5 months of being treated so well...new clothes, computers, apartment, travel, offers of great job with Press TV...keen to get started on mission, they just delaying, didn't want him to talk about Israel...misdirect to Saudi etc...

In Malaysia if got asylum, believes (based on what?) that although Malaysia states Israel did 911 etc, they had their own way of doing things, and would expect him to live a quiet life, not be political...so couldn't do his 'work' there...only alternative to return to Oz, go to prison, try to use system to raise public awareness, get facts on legal record...which didn't realise how to do at time of his original arrest...as didn't go about the 'legal system' way, court never allowed him to present facts of his case i.e what motivated his actions...

Russian technology parks half empty...do they plan a pogrom in U.S to force U.S jews out of U.S into Israel / Russia ? i.e planned rise in anti-semitism

are the 'alt right' 'white supremacists' part off WWF theatre? i.e so extreme, suspiciously absurd...to discredit / divide rational / non-racist alt right...

UNIT 8200 and Talpiot...

Syria Girl won't touch Talpiot / Israeli high tech sector...now in Russia...getting orders from Putin...why promoting her? seducing audience with tricks of camera angles, appearing submissive, sexy ...

Facebook profiling you based on your likes etc, activity on social media

alt right and white supremacists co-opted by jew world order...russian influence...

controlled opposition...alt right ceo of national policy institute after organising conference in Hungary which was banned...Richard Spencer...his wife Nina Byzantina translated Russian books to english for alexander doogan...

Paul Maniford, conneticut...WWF WWE, trump, stone, Yale university...associated construction company given bid for cleanup and demo of 911 tower debris...Paul Maniford and sons his own company also offered services to demolish and clean up sandy hook demolition...Newtown school...

MHR are the swiss guards there to protect the pope? or to protect the templars interests in the Vatican? i.e 'body guard' VS 'templar muscle to ensure Popes / vaticans toe the templar line ? Switzerland was basically founded by Templar soldiers who escaped pogroms against them by French king etc...Founded city of london...Knights of Malta including original Bauer / Rothschild...have automatic immunity from prosecution i.e diplomatic passport and black credit card with unlimited withdrawals...recognised by U.N as nation within nation, have own currency, passports, rothschilds guardians of vatican treasure according to encyclopedia Judaica...jesuit general is black pope...vs white pope official public figure...

common sense call for unity...put aside all differences until have solved the jew world order issue...threat too urgent...trump, putin, iran, no-one is our savior...anyone pushing divisions is our enemy...

IRan...satellites for press t.v jewish controlled...promised documentary while pushing for high court...trying to push issues...Iranian consulate...no official money but private support offered...no release from bail conditions so can't do work...fled to Iran...but Press TV run by bunch of tossers, embezzeling funds of senior international correspondent i.e wouldn't finance projects of their top guy to report from germany etc...in Iran they were not interested in talking about Israel...had to force issue... Lawyer and persian gulf studies center...asked why no pushing israel issues...press t.v lost their satellite for 2 years last time criticised Israel...govt. state approved t.v station using Israeli satellite? ... organ of state intelligence apparatus...was given cash debit card with daily limit of 300 dollars a day...

ngo with no money? but work for govt...intelligence analysts...want to slag off gulf states, won't criticise Israel...

Let my no be no and my yes be yes ... rather than 'swear'...

Iran promisted all the 'stans' i.e afghanistan, turkmenistan etc i.e new persian empire by german and swiss banks...

james packer son of kerry packer...notorious media moguls from australia, in Australia even more powerful than rupert murdoch...abraham saffron heroin importer...packers personal pilot known to him...using cattle station runways etc...'goanna' code word for mooney laundering, gold bullion, murder,extortion i.e packer's father...

sold of 9 network to Lichtenstein...criminal defamation of O'connel ... suing for later...

packer's own casinos and ASIO assets...nugen hand CIA banking scandal ended reign of anti CIA Gough Whitlam...1973 heroine drug laundering bank air america and cia ties, to borrow money ?

packer ASIo and Mossad agent most likely

Skull and Bones, Goldman-Sachs, ...

Packer engaged to Mariah Carey? left after connection with Scientology and Tom Cruise

packer bit of wimp...dissappointment to 'hard' father...

elite judaics ufo theology...ezekiels story of ufo , moses on mt. sinai ufo...old testament ... battle in heaven...giants crashed to earth and mated with human women...nephalim...cave in patmos...John's vision...new jerusalem descends from heaven and takes up the 144,000, the tribe of Dan not included...

state of mind and intent ... Israel did 911 Steve Piecezenik former head of psychological operations CIA...reasonable person test...my intent...I was angry, upset...but my intent was to end the violence, not incite violence...offer jury background to prove intent and staTE OF MINd.... never inadmissible as hearsay...would a reasonable person, on taking in this information, lose temper...but intent was to promote awareness of what is going on, not some irrational hate...that is approach to take in court...

FROM HIS TRIAL NOTES

judge worded charge as 'likely to harass Stanley Elliot Keyser as a member of a racial group, engaged in conduct other than private, namely, pursuing Stanley Elliot Keyser and making a series of statements... (plead not guilty) and vis a vis the video, 'you, with intent to create or promote animosity toward a racial group, engaged in conduct other than private, namely, publishing on the internet a series of statements concerning Jewish people'...(plead not guilty)... AND 'with intent to create or promote animosity toward a racial group engaged conduct otherwise than in private, namely, publishing on the Internet a series of statements concerning jewish people.' AND 'you, with intent to create or promote animosity toward a racial group, engaged in conduct other than in private, namely, publishing on the Internet a series of statements concerningg the Jewish people'... So it seems 'the jewish people' are at being treated as 'a racial group'... so the law is racist???

N.B the court listed EVERY internet post individually, by date ...

Keyser was introduced to the jury as 'A student in ...early 20s'...Professor Andrew Markus and Rabbi David Freilich...The Rabbi was to give evidence by video link from Israel !!!

The 'evidence' was videos and blogs downloaded / 'captured' from the internet...

Judge: ...he doesn't come here having to prove his innocence. He's presumed innocent. ... unless and until the state establish his guilt beyond reasonable doubt...the burden of proof is on the state...the standard of proof in a criminal trial is beyond reasonable doubt...you give those words their ordinary English meaning...there is no obligation on the accused person to prove anything...if...you have a reasonable doubt as to the proof of an element of the offence...then the state has failed to discharge the burden of proof upon it... 7 counts or charges in the indictment...each charge must be separately considered...(independent of the others)...on the evidence that's placed before you during the trial and on no other material ... (so what witnesses / evidence is 'allowed' has huge impact)...evaluation of the evidence is your responsibility...alone...

Count 1 section 80B and counts 2 to 7 section77, of the Criminal code of Western Australia.

Case predicated upon the nature and substance of the statements made (by O'Connell in the video and blogs)...

Alleged he made 'statements against the Jewish race and against Keyser as a member of the Jewish race.

'Jews as a racial grouping' ??? Absurd notion...totally absurd...how does W.A state define 'race' then? I assume I could be defined as Aboriginal if I self-define as such, and other Aboriginals accept me as such?

'Harass includes to threaten, seriously and substantially abuse, or severely ridicule. A member of a racial group includes a person associated with a racial group. And racial group itself is defined under chapter 11 of the Criminal code, meaning any group of persons defined by reference to race, color or ethnic or national origins' ...

MHR so clearly a Hollywood movie 'Nazi' is a GERMAN ... and 911 hijackers in the propaganda are ARABS and MUSLIMS and thus ... !!!

Publish simply means to publish to the public or a section thereof...so posting a blog or video on the internet amounts to publication...

consider the overall context, within each blog / video, of the particular expressions...

...a racial group obviously in this context are the jewish people... ???? really? so if Brendon invited 'jews' from Africa, germany, asia , the jury would identify each as belonging to the same 'race' of 'jews'???

MHR why are the professor and Rabbi witnesses giving EVIDENCE? WHAT evidence exactly? Why wasn't Brendon allowed to call his own witnesses? By video-link?

...at the time Mr Keyser was...an undergraduate of the WA branch of something called the Australasian union of jewish students... he'd gone to the store after hearing about a planned ...The Friends of Palestine' protest ....with the intention of countering the protest by providing some literature from the Simon Wiesenthal foundation' ... (mhr no mention of taking photos to identify the participants to Mossad etc !!)

...made further statements of a general and specific nature on the subject of the Jewish people ...

Keyser made a complaint to the police on the monday after the saturday confrontation...

2 days later a warrant for a search of O'Connell's home lead to police raiding and seizing his video camera and laptop (???) He was arrested and taken to the police station, and charged...

He then appeared in the magistrates court.

...you, the jury, are ... tasked with judging a case and returning verdicts once you've heard...all of the evidence in this case (mhr...really? so they'd have to reall all my books, watch all my videos, listen to all my witnesses???)

...in effect, 7 seperate trials are running concurrently...the counts are to be seperately considered indivually in relation to the evidence that supports that particular count...you may find him innocent or guilty of all or none, or one or more...etc... you must believe him guilty beyond reasonable doubt to find him guilty of one or more of the charges...

...approach your consideration of the evidence in this case dispassionately and forensically...

...3 of the 5 'witnesses' appearing via video link...not in person...

Brendon brought up several issues ...the commonwealth of australia is a corporation and registered with the united states security and exchange commission, number 0000805157 ...the state government of western australia created a monopoly called the department of the attorney-general, ABN number: that's a business number, 70598519443 ...contrary to Statute of Monopolies 1623 Imperial...The state government of Western Australia is a company, ABN 66012978629...both the State government of WA and the Attorney-General's Office of WA are subsidiary companies of the commonwealth of Australia registered as a corporation with the US Securities and Exchange Commission, registration number 0000805757...there are no courts in australia at this time that sit under and comply with chapter 3 of the commonwealth of australia constitution aact 1900 except the high court of australia. This is the utlimate arbiter of the law...the attorney-general is a politician and he runs the courts, so there is no separation of powers between the govt. and the courts...no court in australia can make rules of court and apply them with any force to stop the sovereign people exercising their rights or will as this would grant legislative authority to courts contray to section 71 of the commonwealth of australia constitution act 1900 and high court of australia 29 of 2009, Lang v Morrison...

Brendon: '...he's obviously operating in admiralty law...we're in common law jurisdiction...

quoting the magna carter: It shall be lawful for everyone in our realm to rise against us, to use all the ways and means they can hinder us, until that in which they have transgressed and offered shall have been born again into due state...?

I'm asking for a common law court under the constitution...when this court comes under a common law court I will face these charges...

Brendon was supposed to 'demean' himself approapriately???

...you were brought up in a jewish family, and does it follow therefore that you are Jewish? yes...the AUJS 'it's an organisation to give Jewish students a meaningful Jewish experience' ??? ... there's occasionally anti-semitic incidences ... that go on on campus...help them deal with such issues... 'Is it a religious based or a secular based organisation? 'It encompasses both.

!!! so a Secular JEW is part of the RACE of jews? So is there such a thing as an african secular jew ? i.e black / asian / german secular jew?

Keyser went to hand out info, and counter protest, and just have a look ??? what about photographing participants like O'Connell? no mention of THAT ??? was not asked about it?

the flyers explained why the Palestinian friends protest was 'illegitimate' ???

did you hand out the flyers? no we didn't...??? but you said that was your reason for going there???

'they weren't doing anything' we didn't hand our any flyers...so why take their photographs?

we walked around ... no mention of reason Brendon approached him, as clearly stated in the video...and Brendon and his friend approached them, for no reason???

admits that Brendon asked him to speak out against the atrocities israel was committing in palestine...he refused to... sounds fair then, gave him a chance to show he was not a 'semitic ideolog !!! ... I got suckered in and started to engage with him... so sounds like he AGREED to argue with him...agreed he engaged with brendon for some time...admits brendon let him finish what he wanted to say before continuing...then afterwards brendon said 'that's it, that jews are responsible for what happened (how fucking NOT???) and that we're a 'racist' (by definition, own books / origin story / own religious practises), homicidal (well you murdered 3000 in cold blood in 911, proudly document your origin story genocides etc) religion (what is a 'secular jew'???)...Keyser than asked brendon if he was anti-jew or pro palestinianb...then brendon becacme more aggressive about how jews are racist and homicidal and that we're based on a history of genocide (really???and you are denying THAT? no one asked him if he was secular or religious i.e has he ever read the torah / old testament at all??? ... I've been brought up my whole life been taught that I must be proud of who I am and that being Jewish is-is a great thing' !!!!! I've been taught that my religion is-is-is a religion of- of peace and tolerance (what the fuckety fuckkety fuck !!!) ...again, no-one asked him if he was secular or 'religious'??? Keyser admits he 'knocked it up - I closed his - the flap'...and then he 'slapped me across the face'...It was more of a slap, it wasn't a punch...

would you classify yourself as an anti-racist? I - yeah. (!!!)

'I am a big fan of Chabad-Lubavitch' on Keyser's Facebook page...'Yes, the Synagogue I attend' (so is religious you might assume, but then later he states 'I'm not a religous jew but I have attended and attend that synagogue' why the fuck??? , and attends Chabad-Lubavitch'... So you are a big fan of Chabad-Lubavitch? Yes...Regarded as the most racist, homicidal lunatic ultra orthodox jewish sect on teh planet next to the Kahunas? admits he is friends with Danial Ari Lazareth, who was also present...but never mentioned it, only Timothy John Peach. This is when Keyser admits he is not religious, so why does he attend a synagogue??? and THAT one in particular??? ... 'I'm in close contact with the Rabbi there, yes' Why the fuck??? Keyser claimed he didn't know what a Sayanim is...??? 'Yes we did take photos'. Admitted no-one was menacing anyong, and didn't hand out flyers for THAT reason? though THAT was purpose of their visit? then he admits his intent was to write an article for a jewish newspaper, the maccabean ... to explain that the protestors were NOT anti-semitic...that was the intent of the article of was gonna write... but when then tell Brendon 'What you're doing is disgusting' ? ...Brendon asked if he was not really there to take photos to send back to israel to intmidate the families of the protestors...Keyser says was going to write the article, needed the photos, but then Brendon racially assaulted him and it was no longer appropriate...but then why not mention the article and photos when asked by the prosecutor what he was doing there / why went there???

Channel 9 'reported' that Brendon had 'threatened to wipe out all jews'...

Keyser said 'I'm circumcised, my parents are jewish. I had a Bar Mitzvah' and that makes him jewish ... defines him as member of 'jewish race' though he is NOT religious...

Brendon asked to see his penis to verify it was circumcised, and a sworn affadavit...was told it was for the jury to believe him or not, that his parents jewish, etc...why no right to demand proof?

It is for the jury to decide to accept his sworn statement that he is jewish? even though NOT religious?

'We have a common culture and heritage' ??? of genocide? racism? 'We have a common link of 2000 years of heritage' ???? 'based on going back all the way to Talmudic times. From our Rabbis and forefathers and forefathers'...so Keyser admits HE is a TALMUDIC jew...but not all 'jews' Talmudic, so how can it be a 'shared' tradition? and tradition of what? ritual sacrifice of european babies? genocide? racism? 'The religion is all the same language'...but HE stated HE is not religious...so therefore shares NOTHING in common with them??? The state of israel is NOT a religious state' according to Keyser...but it is 'the religious observance and the culture and practises that arise out of that'..that they share in common...fuckety fuck...a secular talmudic jew admitting they share the talmud in common, and the 'practises' e.g genocide, deception etc of the TALMUD ... fffff...keyser referred to the hat in common...Keyser knows basic Hebrew, but it is not his 'standard' language... and isn't religious...but has the hat??? Brendon refers to four mass conversions i.e entire peoples, to becoming 'jews'...so it is religion that clearly defines 'jewishness'...and if Keyser admittedly NOT religious, how is he a jew? ... quotes Professor Schlomo Sand of Bar-Iland University, Tel Aviv: there is not a single cultural indicator outside of religion that links jews around the world'. ,,, why did Brendon refer to death camps and sent to the slaughter in nazi germany???...death camps in Auschwitz, Treblinka, and Birkenau ...

The National Socialist regime declared jews a race !!! And so Keyser doing so makes HIM a nazi !!!

Keyser pretty much admitted the whole point why zionists promoted Hitler...it is their common experience of persecution under 'the nazi's' that defines them...gives them a 'shared tradition' and sense of identity and unity...one more reason they need their 'Holocaust' lies...they are a race because Hitler declared them a race, and treated them all as 'jews' no matter if they were secular or religious, or how they dressed etc...Keysers words I think, not clear in trial transcript...

then Keyser states ; 'My common heritage is it didn't matter who your are or where you came from, you whould have been sent to the slaughter just because you were jewish'. that's what I said.

Keyser kept avoiding admitting that the 'common heritage' is made up of stories in books that are all RELIGIOUS books...kept acting dumb... as if an Ethiopian jew gets his 'racial' identity as a jew from books about the inquisition, the holocaust. ..but note, all books about 'persecution'...not real 'history' books as such outside of the religious myths / talmud etc commentaries etc...Schindler's list is supposed to be a 'shared history / heritage/ culture?'...

Brendon asks 'What are the main group of books that tell you all about yourself? Stanley 'oh, ah, what, err...I don't know what you are asking ... as fucking if...'My history, my heritage, and my culture is what makes me jewish'. THOSE BOOKS are part of my history, a part of the jewish people story, yes'...but won't admit they are RELIGIOUS books...WTF !!!...I don't know what you're implying I don't understand you question...keeps sayin 'Like', 'I, ah, I-I ah, like...

so far they are a 'race' merely as nazi germany defined them as a race...

Are jews a race? 'I believe we are. We are a religion and a race, yes.

Claims that when someone converts to judaism, they become a member of the jewish 'race' !!!

Jewishness is a 'factual' issue, not a legal issue, according to Wisbey DCJ i.e district court judge !!!!! thus the 'expert' witnesses ie professor and Rabbi...but since when could two jews agree on anything, let alone THIS...and tell this to african jews wanting to marry a cohen girl !!!

Brendon rightly noted that the Rabbi is a religious man, and his evidence is 'hearsay' i.e what makes either an 'expert' on what defines a 'race' ??? any 'expert' will say race is a social construct...with no biological or other basis... but the law seems to include 'nationality' and 'ethnic group', though the prosecutor and judge seem to be treating the 'race' as something more conventional or ???

they are very lenient on him...suprised he wasn't given contempt of court many times...they really humor him...but won't answer his technical questions...???

First day finished ....

Day two...

Wisbey DCJ...videolink witnessess is a 'normal' procedure...arranged beforehand with judge

Mr Peach says he is jewish, but his dad is not jewish...says purpose of trip was to 'observe' the protestors...no mention of flyers...!!! admits they took photos...AFTER...clearly nothing to report on...so why take photos?...states Keyser was taking photos with Peach's phone...a photo of a group of protestors standing at the back of the supermarket...to show the rest of teh AUJS committee...claims photo was of poor quality and deleted it...so why not tell Brendon that?

claims Brendon approached them as they went into the store with his camera ??? didn't see THAT in the video??? claims brendon started saying stuff about about Jews and judaism, quoting the talmud...admits Brendon sort of pushed Keyser on the chest / chin area, to stop him blocking his camera lens...Admits he started searching for the video 'a day or a few days after'...

My name is Brendon Lee of the family O'Connel, and the sovereign subject to Queen Elizabeth II and I'm a free man. I'm here under duress in common Law. I will not continue with my questions under duress with fear of loss or damage.

then claims had leaflets were going to hand out if it turned out to be a large scale protest, it wasn't, so they didn't, just observed...

Brendon claims they had no leaflets, Peach claims he had them in his hand...in the video??? Keyser held leaflets he'd gotten off the friends of palestine, in the video...none of THEIR pamphlets etc...Peach insists he did have...while the videoing was occuring etc...???

Peach claims 'I had no idea racial vilification legislation existed'...a jew ignorant of THAT? beggars belief, sorry...

Chabad Lubovitch 'they're just more religious jews'...Brendon says they are an ultra-orthodox sect of jews...Peach admitted 'we think some of the ultra-jewish laws are a bit ridculous when we're from the secular community...but they're with us, they're jews...we just have different levels of osbervance, different values...

Brendon explained to the judge that Chabad-Lubavitch are known as extreme racial supremacists. Brendon said he wanted to ask Peach 'Are you aware that Rabbi Friedman, a well respected Chabadd-Lubavitch member in New Yor, stated that, 'Wage with the jewish way. Kill men, women, and children, destroy their holy sites', in reference to the Palestinians. Peach and Keyser claimed they were anti-racists, and judaism a religion of peace...equivalent of witness claiming 'I am anti-racist, ask my neo-Nazi Aryan nation friends' ... it would discredit me...

Prosecutor claimed irrelevant...only facts relevant were whether Brendon's actions were NOT private (were other than in private) and his actions were 'likely to harass; meaning threaten seriously or substantially abuse, or severely ridicule, a racial group or person...the jews as a racial group...

Prosecutor claimed witnesses association with Chabad-Lubovitch would not in any way discredit them...???

So now we have TWO secular jews...claiming to be part of a 'race' of jews, which includes racial supremacist jews...??? ???

Brendon trying to prove they went to the protest with the intent to entrap somoeone like him...and did...

Remember Keyser and Danial Ari Lazareth admitted a relatively close relationship with Chabad-Lubavitch, without ever have expressed any reservations...indicating they must be happy with the racial supremacist ideology they profess... of ultra-orthodoxy...very strange given Keyser is secular / not religious...of all groups to visit with 'every saturday' or whatever ???

Peach considers himself a committed anti-racist...(so why all the talk about race then???) that anyone espousing racist supremacist views, take the national socialist party, calling themselves 'the chosen people' 'the master race' and so on would be deeply upsetting to you? YES... then when Brendon tried to quote the racial supremacist comments of Chabad Lubovitch, Mr Eyers, prosecutor, objected...so Brendon never got to ask for his response to that...and why he wasn't actively fighting THAT racism etc...i.e hypocrite...only when JEWS the target does he care...

Peach had only been a member ofthe AUJS for a few months before and after the incident, was no longer at time of the trial...Admitted has been a member of HABONIM DROR ...'yeah, I have been a member of that'...only socially because a few of my friends were in that group... Keyser had described it as similar to a boy scout movement, in his statement to police... Peach stated 'Habonim Dror's nothing like that'...they just teach kids about Israel, they teach socialist values ...and its Zionist things...not that I'm a socialist....they raised awareness about the 17 year lower life expectancy of aboriginals vs general population...but never about the life expectancy of Palestinians !!!..Brendon asked Peach if they teach firearms training, he says no, Brendon tells him in the U.S they DO...they teach kids good social values...they teach them about ZIONISM ???? good social values ???? terrorism??? genocide? theft? deception? killing children???? seriously???? they teach them to have respect for pepole, and including Palestinians ??? really??? I'd love to attend that workshop !!! After someone finishes school they go to Israel for a year, help Arabs learn english in arab schools...(so they can emigrate out of Gaza and leave it for israel? why teach them english? why not agriculture, farming, building, website design??? bit suspicious...why English? because they are Australian?

'I know him' , I wouldn't say I was friends, with Danial Ari Lazareth...I don't dislike him...

Keyser on 4 occasions, stated in the video that he found the 'Friend's of Palestine' action disgusting'...and Peach finds that Keyser's choice of words is fine by him.. they want to boycott Israel because they are anti-zionist, they don't like Israel...wtf???

Peach admits Lazareth was 'pretending to be interested' in the friends of palestine...brendon knew he had attended several meetingss and was handing out flyers in support of them... i.e SPYING and INFILTRATING...'hey, he was separate from us'...that's why he joined, signed his name to it and attended several meetings....!!! then the prosecutor and judge tried to claim peach had NOT just admitted that Lazareth had 'pretended' to be interested, attend meetings, sign up etc??? very suspicious...

Peach says 'in defence'...'you sort of pushed him back...wouldn't agree that Keyser had pushed the camera into Brendon's face, just covered the lens... n.b compare to Keyser's 'slap' with open palm...!!! 'with the palm of your hand, you just pushed him away, I guess you didn't want your camera to be broken or something'...

Keyser had run up to several people, during the interaction on video, stating 'Did you know this man says 'All jews are racist'...'Yeh I remember it' i.e peach admits...that Keyser kept rejoining the interaction...extending it...actively engaging...not just walking away...

Keyser told Peach Lazareth was coming when Keyser picked up peach at his house to drive to the rally...

PEACH LITERALLY RACIALLY VILIFIED PALESTINIANS, anyone who wears 'that scarf' as a terrorist ... in court...no-one was offended? Brendon even??? literally said '...He (Lazarus) was standing at the littel set-up that the Friends of palestine had when they were, you know --- So---? --- they had their little table and - and their little terrorist scarves and they were handing out leaflets. ...'Yeah, you know, you - what the terrorists wear...it's...a symbol of ... terrorism'... FUCK then judge ordered Peach not to answer the obvious questions this statement of Peach's clearly provokes i.e clear racial / national / ethnic group vilification as 'terrorists' 'not in private' and with the intent to indicate that anyone wearing a certain clothing ...equivalent of a yarmaluka jewish hat, was a terrorist...FUCKITY FUCK...you can't get better than this...so fucking blatant...surprised O'Connell did not report it to the police that afternoon???

then again Peach admits Lazareth was handing out flyers with the Palestinian protest group 'He was pretending to be enthusiastic and---'...

Keyser 'knows Lazareth for a very long time' but they were not friends...from the same community...

Keyser claims he had not interacted with any of the protestors until Brendon and his companion walked up to them...Brendon put it that Keyser had walked through the crowd, stood up, and said ' What I think you're doing is disgusting'. 'We are jews from melbourne on holidays. And what you are doing is disgusting'. ' I - I - I can't remember !!!! then later says 'I do remember saying that I was a Jew from Melbourne i.e just contradicted self...and had lied to group, as he was clearly from PERTH...so admitted he is a liar...and also lied in court a-la 'I can't remember' then does remember...then admits lied because 'I didn't want you or the people knowing who I was'...the same guy who has just taken their photo, to identify THEM... Keyser 'to be honest, no, I don't remember' after has just lied, and admitted lied to protestors...and just earlier Peach has stated that HE can remember Keyser having said that many times ... then Keyser lies again 'I don't remember engaging with them', but 'We did take their photo'...'You could be right' but 'I don't remember'...'It could have been a passing gesture' ????

Brendon ;It was YOU that started this whole confrontation...you approached us...you took our photo...you expressed your disgust with us as a group 'YOU' as in 'the group of protestors' in their 'terrorist' scarves... fuck, then the hats israeli's wear / jews wear, must be validly called a 'terrorist' hat ???

FUCK ... just like the old polish saying...Keyser insists he was the victim, that Brendon 'started it' when in fact HE had started it...approached them, took their photo, expressed his disgust loudly for the entire group (disgust for peaceful protestors? REAL victims relations?), and then walked off...and Brendon and his friend followed...clearly having been 'provoked'...just like when he 'pushed Keyser off his camera'... so fucking obvious WHO instigated / incited this interaction...and who continued to 'come back for more' ...but then cries to police that he is the victim...while he just earlier claimed he had no idea there as a law for 'racial vilification'...then why did he go to police? why not sue for libel? why would he think it a police / criminal matter? if naive about the law ? Brendons claim he came with the intention of instigating / inciting something seems quite likely so far !!!

We didn't want to engage, we weren't there for a confrontation, in response to Brendons request for them to comment on the slaugher of small children in Gaza...and we said no... !!!!!

Typical to start a fight, throw a punch i.e 'disgusting' provocation, lie to them, abuse them, then walk off ... like a real coward...then complain YOU are the victim when YOUR victims respond...did they take YOUR photo? how would YOU have liked THAT?

'Please call me Mr Kee-zer' ... again Brendon had at start of this interview asked him about his name, commenting that it was written differently in different documents...now Keyser is playing games again...???

Now the judge actually puts the question direct to Keyser...and all he comments is 'yes, we took a photograph before', when the judge had asked 'you engaged Mr O'Connell and the frineds of palestine, he did not engage YOU'...so as typical 'jew' he evade the question even when the judge asks it...directly...not 'yes, we engaged first' but 'yes, we took a photograph'...when even his friend Peach admits he went on over and over again expressing his 'disgust' for YOU i.e as a group...a nationality...an ethnic group...for what? peacefully protesting? he himself admitted they weren't doing anything 'wrong' etc...so what was so 'disgusting'? that they are mere animals, how dare they confront a real human i.e a non-jew protest a jew ???

He keeps playing with words 'I keep saying I don't remember engaging. I said before I took a photograph. no idea why court notes written in way not clear who is speaking when 'witness' present ??? here he claims he can't remember having said 'We're jews from melbourne. We're on holiday. And what you are doing is disgusting'...even though Peach recalled him saying this several times...

Like with the grapefruit...'no I don't remember doint that, then 'mabye I did'...how the fuck can you get a jew to answer a fucking direct question honestly, I guess ask Jesus !!!

then Brendon refers to the actual police statement Keyser made, in which he told police he said 'I said we were Jews from melbourne because I didn't want...'I said to the Friends of Palestine at that teim we were jews from melbourne'...in your police statement...

Keyser claims he took the photo because he was going to write an article explaining that the Friends of Palestine maybe anti-Israel but they are not anti-Semitic. That was the original intent. I explained this yesterday'...??? wow, so why the 'disgusting' commment? several times? why engage at all, with the group, about being a jew on holidays from melbourne? why was your 'colleague' pretending to be one of them? ???

and then again 'Maybe I did', when asked about the 'disgusting' comment...though has denied emphatically many times...'I might think its disgusting. Yeah, I don't agree with them protesting. That's why we were there. But that's a personal opinion' ???? WTF ???? is he mentally ill and the judge deaf? complicit?

First he says Brendon ran up to him, then he admits maybe he didn't...its just 'he came up to us'...did he run up to you? I don't know. Probably not, no. What a pattern...no, then, maybe, then yes, and yes, then maybe not, then no...wtf is going on with this fucker jew ???

the record shows he constantly accused Brendon of 'running up / after him...video shows fast walk...Keyser changes tact 'you are a far larger man than me'...what has THAT to do with the speed he approaced at ???

Keyser made several statements to jury that Brendon came running up to him yelling and screaming.

'maybe it was at a face pace, or maybe it was jogging, I don't see the relevance' and now even the judge again has to step in 'it's the jury's task and mine to worry about the releveance. What's being put to you, did he run up to your or did he come at a fast pace...He came at a - I -I don't know. So you don't know now? No. A few moments before, over and over, he'd stated Brendon had 'run' up to him... again judge interjected 'do you know whether -as you sit here- do you know whether he ran up to your or not? -- NO. FUCK...then immediately after admitting 'NO' to the judge', he answers Brendon 'I - I can't-I don't know. then judge interjects when brendon recapitulates and says 'He doesn't know whetther you were running or not', when he had just a few moments before admitted 'NO', Brendong wasn't running...this is a fucking circus clown show...???

then judge asks Keyser same question brendon has been asking 'did he compe up to you yelling and screaming?' 'So I'll say yes, I'd say yes. then again Keyser using phrase '...you came running-you came up to use with the video camera...fucking fuckity fuck...

then he states '...you started yelling and screaming at us'...'you're trying to entrap me'...!!!! i.e a jews idea of being 'tricked' into telling the truth ... that's entrapment...how dare a goy demand a jew be honest !!!...in a court of law of all places...read your Talmud / torah on what is expected of jews in such situations...if races exist, and a jewish race exists, defined by the talmud, torah etc i.e shared books, then that race is as jesus described the pharisees !!!

Was I stopping you from simply walking off in silence and going about your business? NO!

So YOU chose to engage, seeing my camera pointing at you, and you chose to stay engaged.YES!

10 times Keyser re-engages with Brendon...i.e is walking away, then turns, and comes back to the camera to 'engage'...

Keyser admits 'I only watched the video once. It was incredibly distressing. It brought my mother to tears. It brought my grandmother to tears.

Brendon exclaims how he wantsa straightt answer from Keyser, for once, rather than having to show the video, and wait to see what he can get away with i.e sick of him saying, then retracting, so it doesn't mean anything. How could a jury possibly follow ? Given how people have been conditioned to fear being seen as 'anti-semitic' and NOT sympathetic enough to the poor jews...who have been through so much already ... !!!

In the video Keyser asserts 'You support Hamas', which Brendon now adds for jury, 'a legitimately elected government, I might add, of the palestinian people...then Keyser interjects in court 'You do support them. as if that is a crime, as Brendon has just clarified, the legitmately elected govt. of palestine...how could THAT be an accusation / worthy of note? and he has never asked brendon, just asserted, and as a perjorative...

A shop owner asks them to move on, but Keyser won't...

admits nothing constraining him from moving away and going home, he CHOOSES to re-engage with Brendon... while Keyser keeps saying he as intimidated / scared of Brendon, then why not just walk away....though looked to me like he kept chasing him ???

Keyser is on screen, re-engaging, wagging his finger at Brendon, and even goes up and pushes the camera into his face...he is so 'intimidated' by Brendon ??? Is THAT how intimidated / scared people behave?

Then brendon plays video...

Keyser keeps insisting over and over that he felt intimidated, but agrees he was free to leave at ANY point in the video (though looked to me like Brendon following him, or following after him, but Keyser moving faster, getting away, then coming back, to re-engage...why then? because he is not a coward he says...so why blame Brendon for the interaction, as if it was one sided and he was the victim? ... Keyser agrees with Brendon that he has continually continued the debate of his own free will...so why call it 'harassment'?...Keyser states he would consider himself a 'left winger'...how typical...secular jew infiltrating and inciting then calling 'help, police, I'm a poor innocent victim' ... but NOT a Socialist ??? His facebook page states that 'I am a big fan of Chabad - Lubavitch', but he won't use those words in court, will only admit, YES, I attend the synagogue Chabad House... like with judge, he answers YES to the actual question but then anyone listening would be hear a non-sequitur...YES to 'he was NOT running' to judge then 'Yes, he came at me' i.e NOT restating the actual question, but saying YES, but then as if saying YES to something totally different, and NOT what the judge / brendon just asked...so legally admitting, but his statement is NOT coherent / consistent (MHR as if asked .Did you steal X and he answering YES, I borrowed X...very odd way of responding...not untyically jewish from all accounts... YES, agreeing he stated he was a 'big fan', but running on with 'I attend Chabad House synagogue'...totally frustrating weasling...I wonder why judge let him get away with it...seems his legal instinct was to get him to answer, but something else reminded him ... maybe that huge recent rally?, not to behave 'as usual' ???

now it's reduced to 'I go high holidays, some friday nights, no regularly...'I'm not an expert on them'...I'm not a religious person (but still somehow a Jew???)...so the 'race' of 'jews' is NOT based on religion...and how could it possibly be based on biology, if anyone can become a jew?...transubstantiation? does the law recognise 'magic' now, as long as a 'jew' requires it to?

as usual Brendon asks the question again, Keyser complains he's already answered, but gives a different answer this time, again, now its 'some fridays AND saturdays', but not very often, but won't put a yearly figure on it...

though representing himself,once he arrives, Brendon had no access to coffee....during breaks he is taken down 'into the dungeons'...not allowed coffee !!! funny, given that the judge has claimed they are assuming he is innocent unless the jury can be convinced he is guilty...but I thought the prosecutor also assumed he was innocent, so why would he try to convince anyone he was guilty? I really do NOT get that ????

Keyser states that he is emphatically sure that he asked Brendon 'Do you hate all jews?'... that Brendon 'started yelling about how jews killed 40 million people here and there...well how would HE put it? HE just stated that HE is 'jewish' because his MOTHER is jewish...so if any of the people who ran the revolution, gulags, etc had jewish mothers, they were by definition jewish,...to be consistent with his own definition...and it is a FACT that more than 40 million people were therefore 'killed by jews'...lenin, trotsky, et etc ... heads of the red guard, revolution, gulags, torture , KGB...and today Putin...if Putin kills muslims, and his mother was jewish, which she was, then a 'jew' killed those muslims...

Keyser alleges Brendon said 'All jews are racist', but it is NOT in the video...

Judge hears 'Are you saying all jews are racist? and Brendon hears 'So you're saying all jews are racist' ... Keyser wants to act like it is a question, not an assertion i.e a question and not a 'vilification' of brendon as an anti-semite...which of course for keyser and co anyone pro palestine is that BECAUSE they hate jews irrationally...

at point in discussion where Keyser libelled Brendon as 'saying all jews are racist', Brendon had NOT said any such thing...Keyser was baiting him...as usual... doing the 'anti-semitism' thing to 'totally discredit' Brendon ... with vilification of a RACE or NATION or Ethnic group, rather than what he said,which might be considered LIBEL or SLANDER but THIS case was about racial / group vilification, NOT the vilification of an individual, Keyser !!!

Keyser asserts Brendon is IMPLYING jews are racist...but that is his opinion...unjustified by the actual statements brendon has made to this point...

During breaks he does not even get FOOD...what the fuck? all day representing himself,under massive stress, and not even food ???

Brendon had said 'So the world revolves around you, your pain, and your suffering?'...YOU YOUR not 'YOU JEWS', 'The Jew's pain and sufffering !!! so far all about Keyser, NOT 'jews' in general as some sort of group...though 'What about the 40 million russians' DOES agree with Keyser BUT then Keyser asserts 'YOU blame the jews for killing 40 million russians', and admits he got THAT assertion from 'the truth movement' web sites... but Brendon never said this...he just implied that jews care about their own suffering, but what about the even greater suffering of the Russians etc...who just happened to be the victims of 'Jews', by Keysers own definition, and the Rabbi's later...they don't have to be religious...they can be secular, and have nothing to do with Rabbi's etc...though marx was son of one...and clearly they left the Jewish religious sites alone and exclusively destroyed christian churches etc...

Keyser asserted Brendon was part of a group...he himself used the words 'YOU, to refer to the group...'YOU disgust me'...meaning the friends of Palestine...a group...vilifying them as a group, as disgusting...

Keyser asserts Brendon told him his religion was racist...HIS RELIGION ? HE is NOT religous, so what could he possibly mean ?????? THAT is why he asked for Brendon's name, so he could go to the police when he got home and report it...so it was NOT the video that set him off...this was planned...he put words into Brendon's mouth, lied in his police statement / told police he'd lied to everyone...told them he found them ALL disgusting...he was Not OFFENDED or intimidated at all...he was playing games...claimed in court he did NOT know there was anything like racial vilification laws...so why go to the police? ???

But Brendon didn't know he was secular...when said 'your religion is based on homicide, hatred, and ethnic cleansing'...which is clearly is 'based' on i.e their 'origin story'...it is the WAY they originally 'took' Palestine...and they are almost literally repeating that multiple millenia old story... and no-one seems to notice or care...THAT IS what defines judaism / Israel...the origin story of ISRAEL is genocide, ethnic cleansing, homicide, mass sexual slavery, etc etc...and eternal HATRED of AMALEK...totally irrational hatred...why? ... something supposed to have happened many millenia ago to people not even related to most self defined jews... like someone immigrating to Germany, not even speaking german, living in their own commmunity, then hating romefor some war it fought against some germanic tribes thousands of years ago...

the security guard had asked Keyser to move on, to leave, and NOT the friends of palestine, so clearly the security guard had identified KEYSER as the one making trouble...abusing them as 'disgusting' for absolutely NO reason...he admitted as much himself earlier...they were doing NOTHING at all wrong or provocative or causing ANY disturbance to ANYONE...it was KEYSER who approacted them, engaged, insulted them as 'disgusting', several times, lied to them for some reason e.g guilt ... then both he and Brendon were asked to leave ...

Keyser kept saying he was 'empatic', now he is 'pretty sure', that he asked a question 'ARE you...' rather than asserted / vilified Brendon, saying 'YOU are...'

of all things Keyser accuses BRENDON of 'pick up on small words to entrap me'...HIM...when brendon is facing 4 years in prison, because of KEYSER...

Keyser admits he only ever watched the video ONCE...and earlier said he'd asked for his name so he could report him to police BEFORE ever having seen the video...but he had no idea such laws existed by which his report would have any context ???

Keyser says '14 actually', after Brendon refers to his possible prison sentence...all the while Keyser acts so 'disinterested' and 'naive' and 'uninformed about the law' etc ???

Judge ruled Brendon must stop 'harrassing, oppressing, intimidating Keyser...???

In video Keyser and Peach walk away, Brendon does not follow, but keeps talking and they come back to HIM...

In video Keyser keeps running up to people yelling at them that he, keyser,is very offended...why chose those particular words? he claims he didn't even know that such laws against 'offending someone' existed...so why is he trying to get witnesses to his 'being offended' ??? i.e in video he is running up to total strangers yelling 'did you know that this man just said 'All jewish people are racist? I'm incredibly offended'! Firstly HE is the one vilifying Brendon who had not at any point up to then stated what Keyser is slandering him /libelling him / vilifying him with having said...and why do this? use those particular words as if quoting legislation? not 'angry' or 'upset' or 'incredulous' but literally 'offended'...

'I was hoping people would stand up' ... because of Brendon's comments about his religion being racist and his cutulre and heritage of genocide and racism...running around to total strangers, expecting they would care? 'stand up'? harassing people in the street? rather than just walking away...what, the whole world spends all its time worrying about someone criticizing jews...you are such a megalomaniac cult you think EVERYONE has nothing better to worry about then you hearing words you don't like...but which you continually return to re-engage...why not leave Brendon to rant...was anyone listening? were they being 'incited' to hate and kill you? who was engaging with people? you or Brendon? you engaged with him via the group, then re-engaging...he was not bothering anyone who had not engaged with him, taken his photo...and told him he was 'disgusting'...so why is brendon on trial and not YOU???

Brendon then puts the question, which the judge tells Keyser he must respond to, that Keyser was going around making sure as many people as possible heard he was 'offended' so he could report him and exploit the legislation...

then Keyser claims 'I've never read the legislation in my life. I don't even know what it is now ??? how is THAT possible? he laid charges vis a vis it. A whole rally was organised around it. He is now a witness in the case. But he, a jew, doesn't know anything about it? ???

Brendon walked away as Keyser suggested he 'film this one' some stranger...brendon was walking away and Keyser was following him...you claim to be offended and anxious and scared...but you are following us now...

The judge insisted Keyser respond to Brendon's question ''The question effectively is you were seeking to engage the racial vilification legislation by your behavior? Keyser, 'No, I've never read the racial vilification Act (again very specific for someone who uses the term 'offended' and keeps re-engaging after being the person to initially engage...

Keyser says 'You support Hamas' i.e the group of protestors...that's fine, but he finds it offensive to be included in a group himself as 'you' i.e 'Jews'...hypocrite...

You're and admitted Zionist? 'Yes I am'...fuck!!!I support the Israeli govt. but not all the policies of israel....so why can't someone wear a headscarf, support palestine, or even Hamas, and be 'disgusting' ... couldn't THEY maybe not support everything Hamas has done / does?

Keyser's police report says he 'pushed brendon away', now he says he just closed his camera...why though? couldn't he have just walked away, and this time stayed away, and not returned...???

Keyser pronounces his name 'KEEZER' which is odd...european name, probably originally Kaiser, KEEZER would be KIESER, if german origin...so Brendon seems to have his name right too...but it keyser say's it's kee-zer... but from South Africa, so maybe Boer, dutch version of name...

prosecutor refers to experts who will 'prove' if jews a race or not...and brendon rightly catches him on this, as if only an expert can prove if keyser is really a jew, if jews are really a race at all...but prosecutor says brendon has to accept that keyser has said he is jewish, and his parents are jewish...so why does keyser get to? is he an expert? i.e brendon asking him why he thinks jews are a race, and he is part of that race, if he is not even religious...so cannot be on 'religious' grounds, must be race, as he is Australian, not jewish, and in terms of 'ethnic group' there is little similar between jews in that scope...so...very interesting...

What 'evidence' is the professor supposed to give??? he is a professor of 'Jewish religious studies' and keyser stated he is a 'secular' jew i.e NOT religious...so how can this guy be an expert on ANYTHING relate to THIS trial? because he published something? prosecutor stumbling over own words, first it's 'informative', then 'objective', then its important because he published it ??? why should the jury read this publication? it goes to the question of 'race' ... fuck, I could find professors all over who'd state race is a social construct of zero validity...

an expert witness is entitled to give opinion 'evidence' ??? why? why 'expert' ? who makes him an 'expert' ? his jewish mates?

why use 'voir dire' language? what does that mean? how should brendon know? 'hold a voir dire' as to his expertise...what expertise could that be? specious sophistry? there are NO races...could he bring in an expert in Phrenology? ???

The prosecutor didn't want brendon to have the right to re-examine Detective Paini...

Brendon forms the logical conclusion that Keyser had set him up / entrapped him...why otherwise provoke a whole group of people by yelling out that THEY, as a GROUP, disgust him? why? because they were palestinian? peacefully protesting the sale of oranges grown on land stolen from their relatives by the jews ???? THAT is disgusting? how could it be? unless you were a racial supremacist with really twisted logic and ideas of 'right 'and 'good' ??? serve the jews or die? you disgust me, cos you won't serve the jews? god's chosen people? even though he does not even believe in god ????? wtf ????

Judge ruled would not accept 'the report' into evidence as an exhibit...what does this mean? Prosecutor asks Brendon if he would agree, he does, so judge DOES allow it...??? otherwise jury would only get to listen to 'witness', not read report...Brendon calls it mere 'hearsay', but lets the jury have it...I would have wanted to read it myself first...most people 'bluffed' by 'research' i.e don't grok how it is constructed etc....

Pratt Foundation Research Professor for Jewish Civilisation at Monash ??? So his position is only due to some rich jew paying for him to promote Israeli propaganda?

He's been researching 'race relations' since 71 ? what are THEY then?

Author or editor of 10 books...wow, imagine that , a jew getting published / work in industry...

author of a 'report' 'Jewish Australians and Jewish identification'...see IDENTIFICATION...like 'religious AFFILIATION', when you OPERATIONALISE 'race' re: Jews it comes down to totally subjective 'IDENTIFICATION'...not a speck of 'objective' or 'scientific' data possible as 'race' purely subjective, especially re: jewishness...which has NOTHING to do with race per se...and even prosecutor referred to that report as research as to whether the jewish community constituted a religious group narrowly defined, or could be better understood more in terms of ethnicity... nearly 6000 respondents (who completed entire questionnaire? or who were SENT it?)...

admits there is a wide differentiation within the 'jewish' community just as there is in the wider australian community (n.b race debunked as difference within at least as great as differences without, and statistically likely to be greater, as sample size smaller?)...

His Doctoral thesis 'Burden of Hate, the Australian interracial experience between 1850 and 1901'.

HATE?

...the idea of commonality as we deal with groups which are ethnic groups, sometimes called racial groups, is that there is something that binds them together. (mhr whole point, again, 'race' barely hinted at, tacked on, 'sometimes called racial groups' ??? by whom? when? what context outside 'racial vilification context'? so his research was to find out what it is that binds them together in this way so that they self-identify as a jewish person' ...??? keyser said parents jewish, and hats??? report illustrated that there is a commmon way in which 'jews' look at the world...a sense of a shared history, a shared fate, that binds people together...'knowledge of 'the holocaust'...'how could it occur?' well it didn't, but you never seem to be under any pressure to prove it...!!!...we have this direct transmission through families .. of 'holocaust survivors...37% of jews in melbourne have a direct family connect to 'the holocaust' (lived in any nazi german occupied territory for any period, during wwii... ) 'and in effect fin the whole wider community this is a formative experience in the lives of people...like the 'stolen generations' gives aboriginies a shared commmonality (though very disparate tribes)...the holocaust is taught in schools, there's museums, there's commemorations...there's a 'March of the Living' i.e tour of 'holocaust' places...and then the history of Israel which followed...

"If I'm a jewish person and you're not, one of the things that differentiates us is my direct connection to the holocaust as opposed to someone who does not have it, that experience' (experience? of being in europe during wwI? 'For an example, I had an Aunt, who at the age of 16 lost her life in the Holocaust'. (How old is this Prof. Markus? Did she fall from a tree in some territory the nazi's had occupied for a few months?)

And I have a great Aunt, who is still alive, who was in Auschwitz'..so this is someting immedate and central to my being !!!

Jewish people are very sensitive to anti-semitism...part of my research was into jewish organisations monitoring anti-semitism...and so 'whereas most australians go on with their lives and sport and work and family, one of the issues that is still of central importance for jewish australians is the threat of anti-semitism and sensitivity to antil-semitism...and I think we can all, members of the jury included, understand why ???? why??? really? you want them to really understand why??? because as you make clear, it is THE thing that defines their 'sense of being jewish' a shared supposed history of ... being kicked out of how many nations? the good professor doesn't comment...might not look good...better to let it look like just the germans were irrationally hate filled etc...

research indicates that if you have a much stronger sense of jewish identity, and connection to Israel, you will be more sharply attuned to anti-semitism...but all jews to greater or lesser extend define self vis a vis this...how absurd, to define self based on some story of victimisation...what bout the torah? genocide???

12 year old girls Bat Mitzvah, 13 for boys Bar Mitzvah, coming of age ceremony...takes place in religious context, even for secular jews ... i.e read passage and commentary on Torah in hebrew, in synagagoge on a saturday morning... around 80% of Australian 'jews' whether secular or religious, follow this tradition... if they do NOT, Markus just stated that 'a certain way of life would be closed' to them...??? no-one asked him to explain what THAT means???

2 biggest Jewish festivals are new year Rosh Hashanah, and Passover Seder, time of liberation from Egypt and escape to their promised land (funny he fails to mention how they 'acquired' this promised land !!!...

The 'Seder' is a book...describes stages of liberation from Egypt, and families discus 'the holocaust' etc also a 'Secular Seder' where secular jews celebrate liberation and the tribulations of a common history' (no other people have these, just jews...and they are always innocent little lambs wondering why people can be so mean to them, over and over !!!)

'Family connectiveness' is more signficant among jews than wider community? smaller sample???

Is another indicator for anti-social behavior? in-breeding? closed society?

Jews treated their old parents better? put them in retirement homes aged 89 rather than 84 !!!

Sydney resondents CLAIMED they spent friday evening Shabbat with their family on a regular basis...70% ?

50% claimed they spent EVERY week with their family !!! what is 'regular'? how did you 'check' if jews claim to be more family orientated, aren't they going to be too ashamed to admit they aren't? and MORE LIKELY to lie i.e more pressure on them to conform to this stereotype?

Professor describes some idyllic family sitting around table discussing important political issues, social issues etc !!!

only 10% of the jewish community in Australia is 'strictly religious'...!!! a much higher proportion is totally secular (but he won't quote figure? why not? he is so happy with his stats, but this one he'll leave vague?)...

professor has the hide to claim this sort of idyll is NOT typical of anglo-australian families...what a fucker...did he actually research this? or just assume this? his opinion as a fucking jew? his words...'I would suggest to you, certainly my experience (as a fucking Jew?), is not typical of the mainstream anglo australian culture...wtf...??? as an expert witness...his fucking experience of anglo australian culture???

90% of respondents stated that 'being jewish for them was very important or somewhat important'...now THAT is a HUGE fucking range of 'importance', and so why would you combine them into one category, when you could simply make them two possible responses, except that you WANT to skew the data / misrepresent...how can WE know if 99.9% of them meant 'somewhat' and what the fuck does 'somewhat' even mean? the fate of fish in amsterdam is 'somewhat' important to me...and to lump me in with 'very important' would totally misrepesent me...and propably MOST respondents...we have NO way to know...VERY bad research...deliberate ploy I'd suggest...to misrepresent 'unity' of 'jewish community' 'sense of being Jewish' etc... of course they got results around the 90% figure...of COURSE it is going to be 'somewhat' important...given their 'fear of holocausts' brainwashing / conditioning ...

HAH...facts...the 'older community' all know 'the holocaust' never happened and this is borne out by the research...with younger people more 'sensitive'/ fearful than older i.e older had actual reality experience, younger have only propaganda / hollywood version...why Professor claimms 'older people had much more negative experiences' and then they are less sensitive to anti-semitism...surely proof they KNOW what did and didn't happen, and have a much more 'rational' view of the world...vs irrational fear of their brainwashed children... jewish uni students show 'very high sensitivity to anti-semitism'... but not huge differences by age ??? which one is it? you didnn't quote all the findings, just the ones 'very high'...why not tell us EXACTLY what the 'older ones' responded??? cos it doesn't help your 'impression management' / 'perception engineering' strategy???

'the importance of jewish identity' (somewhat to very?) was 80 to 90% across all age groups...but like Keyser, 'YES, followed by non-sequitor that negates the yes... i.e yes 'somewhat' becomes 'IMPORTANT' i.e it is 'IMPORTANT' but in fact merely 'somewhat important'...VERY DIFFERENT THINGS being paraded as if the same...so typical, it seems, of 'jews' involved at least in this case...

Even prosecutor is about to say 'the jewish race' but doesn't, leaves sentence unfinished, and continues with 'people who define themselves as jewish'...why?

then prosecutor refers to 'Jewish Ethiopians' etc, none of whom lived in nazi german occupied areas, and thus were not 'holocaust victims / survivors'...in this context Professor starts talking about things he has not referred to at all vis a vis his 'research' ...'It's not about strict racial descent, there are jews of every conceivable race, however race is defined' wtf? what forms the group is this commonality, but now he is referring to a NEW utterance, and NOT his research, though you'd have to pay attention...'It's the common culture and history, and traditions of faith...so now it IS religion...what is the 'common culture and history' for an Ethiopian and German 'jew'? apart from tthe stories in the religious texts...there are no other 'histories' independent of this, e.g written by Roman historians etc are there??? Irrespective of nationality. So clearly 'jewishness' is NOT race, nationality, or ethnic group, but a shared 'history' totally based upon jewish religious texts and later religion of 'holocaust' propaganda...and so a secular jew just takes the 'history' at face value, though shouldn't, and certainly 'the holocaust' though fictitious, and most African jews etc were never put in Kz or lived under nazi german occupation, ever in their family history...

anti-social much? integration? proud of being 'Australian', but 82 to 89 % of 'jews' surveyed stated that MORE than half their friends are jewish... AGAIN why not include further categories, e.g 90%, 100%, and 50%, in absolute terms, unless YOU WANT TO AVOID THE TRUTH THAT JEWS ARE ANTI-SOCIAL AND KEEP TO THEMSELVES I.E DO NOT INTEGRATE / PARTICIPATE AS AUSTRALIANS BUT LIVE AS JEWS...very key difference...this time the questionnaire appears to deliberately try to downplay something, vs make 'sensitivity to anti-semitism' appear greater, and anti-social nature of ideology of semitism appear less.../ weaker... and to highlight this, he felt the need to state 'So an Australian Jew is very much an Australian as well as being very much a Jewish person'...

MHR if 'jews' not 'racial', 'national', or 'ethnic' or 'regional' then clearly what unites them is 'the ideology of semitism' and a 'shared history of fictitious victimisation' ... which is EXACTLY what the nazi's feared i.e they are a people unto themselves, internationalist jews...no loyalty to anything but their own sense of identity as 'jews'...based in their 'ideology of semitism'...

Prof's research indicated 'what unites them is a deep profound concern for the survival of Israel, that Israel should GROW...a-ha...so much for respect of the U.N charter etc...GROW...80 to 90 % strongly 'identify' with Israel, though doesn't explain what this means in concrete terms...

Prof stated that the survey asked about 'The Palestinians' with options of 'make peace tomorrow', 'giving land and WHATEVER...??? but of course did NOT give us specifics here...why not? not flattering to the 'Jews' ? ...to a very , you know (do I, what do I know?) hard-nosed approach...please explain? I know, do I? what do I know? Was one of the responses 'exterminate all the Palestinians tomorrow? why not tell us the possible responses and what they responded ??? not flattering to 'jews' ??? there were 'five different options', so why not give them to us, instead of , 'you know', hard-nosed ???? You are so precise you EXPERT dickhead...

86 to 89% of respondents had visited Israel at least once !!! how many have visited Canberra?

Claims Israel a 'secular state', then in same breath reminds us that 'dietary laws are mandated to be kosher within the army', and every Israeli MUST do 2 years ? service in the army...so they are forced to be 'kosher' ...why? if so secular a state?...

'How important is being jewish today? 59.8 to 66...but what does that mean even? ??? just relatively stable independant of online, paper, volunteered, or asked participation...claims 'reliable' but have already two HUGE examples of being deliberately misrepresentative ... doesn't matter if equally misrepresentative across each type of survey, the interesting thing is that it is misrepresentative...but jury not aware of this...just prosecutor trying to impress them with how 'scientific' the study was so his witness has 'authority' over their minds...

n.b some people actively sought participation in the survey...I wonder who ??? and how they came to learn about it? and what their motives were??? less than 6000 respondents...surely 'indifferent' jews LESS likely to participate than 'highly motivated jews with an intention / objective' ? though claims representative i.e didn't just get the most motivated ??? or that all jews are equally motivated, and thus participated? another amazing superior characteristic of jews????

Brendon reminded us he was being charged under 'racial vilification' laws and NOT 'group vilification or identity vilification' laws.

AGAIN this typical response of YES, followed by a non-sequitur negation of the YES...Brendon asks Prof. Markus about Professor Schlomo Sand, an eminent professor at the Bar-Ilan University in Tel Aviv, who wrote the book 'The INVENTION of the jewish people'... 'YES, his views are very controversial and they're challenged'... but the question was whether he was an eminent, JEWISH professor in Tel Aviv... probably with more 'prestige' than this guy...can't / won't give a straight answer...doesn't 'lie' and 'refute' but muddles, obfuscates, takes a legal YES but turns it into a no, maybe, don't remember...as usual... is this a trained strategy? some biological quirk ? then Prof adds...'They're not regarded as orthodox / widely accepted'...not 'regarded' as...are they or are they not 'widely accepted'? of course not 'orthodox' what a stupid thing to say, totally pointless meaningless thing to add...not orthodox...you just said only 10% of Australian jews even identify as 'orthodox' so why make this utterance at all???

Brendon gets him to admit he is an eminent professor, but again YES, followed by a negation / non-sequitur 'his views are not regarded as representative and not accepted' ???

Admits that Professor Shlomo is a professor of HISTORY, which our prof is NOT.

Prof defends his 'hearsay' as a 'scientific study approved by the aust. research council'

But he has to admit it is about 'identification' and Schlomo stated you can 'identify' as a 'goth' or 'cat lover'...and Brendon is NOT being charged under 'Identification' vilification ...no such laws exist... it is racial vilification, with subset of ethnicity, and I think nationality and religion...and we've had it admitted Keyser is NOT religious, and Jewishness is NOT about religion per se...or ethnic group...in fact it IS about shared history, and Schlomo proved that is pure fantasy...that 'shared history'...and WE know it is 'religious history book based / story based / faith of books'...so WHAT is our prof. here to do? He is always talking about 'sense of identity as jewish' ... NOT race, ethnicity, nationality, (Keyser is australian, not religious, not 'ethnic' merely 'identifies' as 'jew')

Brendon reminds us that the prof's survey did NOT ask 'Do you believe that being jewish is based on ethnicity or race?

refered to 'Joan Peters' book which got rave revies as 'definitive' then year later Prof. Finkelstein checked her 'research' and debunked it as a total fraud, and the book was removed from bookstores i.e after a year on the N.Y times bestseller list...rave reviews...i.e was idea that Palestinians not at all interested in the land, until the jews 'turned the desert green' etc...there was no 'Palestinian' people before that...etc...

Brendon makes point that the idea of 'race' or 'ethnicity' must not be important to Jews, if the prof. didn't ask one single question relating to 'race' or 'ethnicity' ... such as asking THEM if 'race' or 'ethnicity' were important to 'Jews' and 'being jewish'...

then Professor Markus states: ...there is no such thing as 'The Jews'. Jews today are not obsessed with whether they are a race, or an ethnicity, or a religion'... he deliberately makes it out to sound like a GOOD thing...but the actual statement should have been 'Jews do NOT define their jewishness as a 'race' or 'ethnicity'...

Brendon: If I asked you (Prof. markus), are you a member of the jewish race?' 'I'd say no, I'm not'...Do you believe a jewish race exists? No. Do you believe there's such a thing as a jewish ethnicity? Yes.

Prof. admits he would never ask 'are you a racist', he would ask a bunch of questions and from those answers determine THE answer to that question !!!

Brendon refers to the 'Australian Standard Classification of Cultural and Ethnic groups'...uses concept of 'A long shared history , the memory of which is kept alive'...MHR how is it SHARED by the new generation? by faking anti-semitism... PROF: Jews suffering through the ages, the holocaust, the struggles to establish the state of Israel ... MHR why are they shared by ethiopean jews? and orthodox jews against the state of israel?, or those who admit 'the holocaust' is ficitious / fantasy / propaganda? ... they are still 'jewish'...and many most people would look at, listen to, and believe 'they are jewish'...!!!

the jews in this trial (arechetypal ? typical? ) continue to play with words in 'typically' jewish fashion...a fashion associated with jews since at least Jesus' times...Prof. insists "It's not an opinion' then continues with something that pretty much exactly defines / describes an opinion, the old NO, non sequitor and YES non sequitur negations...'there are a number of views on that. ...its not to say one view is correct and another not correct'...sounds EXACTLY like an 'opinion to me, what about YOU?'...'For a range of people there may be different answers'.. so basically each to their own OPINION ????

Common genetic stock, or geographical location NOT pre-requisite, our Prof. insists, to sharing a common ethnicity ???

'What we're dealing with is people who are bound by belief' e.g in the holocaust (most brainwashed zombies believe that hollywood tale), 'we're not talking biology, we're talking belief', which is odd, because if my mother is NOT jewish, it doesn't matter what I beleive, does it? or what if I believe I am NOT jewish, but my mother is jewish ? surely 'mother' is about genes? Or is it about what my mother believes? if my ethiopian mother believes she is jewish, then I am jewish? If I believe I am jewish am I? If I beleive in 'the holocaust' and that everyone hates me and wants to kills me? especially germans? ????

Brendon states the obvious fact that the average person in the street would assume biological and geographical content to 'ethnicity', so our jew claims 'I don't know what the average person would believe'? really? a professor? has 'no idea'? 'The average person may have all sorts of misconceptions, but that's not what we're dealing with'? So now its ridiculing the average person, and failing to see that a concept must be operationalised, and if in doing so the operational definition is at odds with 'the average persons understanding' then how could you ever ask a question of them? commmunicate with them? and what does it say about YOUR definition's value for social science etc ?Do you really impose definitions on respondents, without first field testing YOUR definition, to see if it is shared? focus group your survey? test it? He is actually a demographer, of all people, and does not care what the average person understands his 'questionnaire terms' to mean to them, the people whose 'valid' responses he needs to collate...

Keyser insisted that jews were a biological race. And brendon is being charged for 'racial vilification'...so it is key to this trial...if jews are not a race, then the jury would have to acquit Brendon...the case is not libel or slander,...it is 'racial' vilification...

Prof. admits the 'government based definition of 'a long shared history' is the technical definition, and not shared by most high school educated people...so who wrote this law? and for whom? his 'academic, rigorous, government-based definition' ??? somehow superior? to ??? logical / reasonable notion of biology?

AND of course, again, he contradicts himself during the space of a breath...'we're dealing with identity, we're NOT dealing with something that's rigorous, when dealing with ethnicity...yes but Bredon is dealing with 'race', and the question was about race, and now you admit it is NOT rigorous, the definition, and NOT about race ??? how could ANY jury keep up with this / comprehend it ???

Denise Buell 'the majority opinion about ethnicity among anthropologistsand sociologists, and other scholars who draw upon their work, is that ethnicity entails claims of common kinship or descent from a common group or ancestors'

Prof...'there is a BELIEF among jews of common descent'...absolute RUBBISH...any Ashkednasi jew knows they have ZERO connection to the 'bible' jews.../israelites...and I could convert tomorrow, knowing full well I had ZERO biological relationship to any of the israelites etc

Prof refers to 'social construction of reality'...imagine getting that admission in a holocaust hoax trial !!! ... perception of common kinship and descent...rubbish, I could become a jew, without that 'perception'...knowing full well I have ZERO to do with the history of the 'Jews'...

Prof: the jewish bible and the the old testament tells the history of the jewish people...!!!! religous texts...dogma...NOT secular history texts...but then claims, in total non sequitur fashion overlooking the fact that the bible is NOT a historical document but a religious narrative / dogma...''so in response to your question, there's any number of books'...in other words same old non sequitur self cancelling statements...Are you fat? Yes, I don't know if I'm thin or not...Are you are convicted pedophile? Yes, I don't have any criminal history.???

The Tanakh (Old testament) ... same book of 'history' also claims jesus rose from the dead, red sea parted etc...'Is that a history book or an religious book?'...

Prosecutor steps in claiming witness is there with limited brief / expertise...not expert on bible / not historian, so doesn't have to give an answer...and thus prove Brendon's point that there are only RELIGIOUS 'stories' and ZERO 'histories' of 'the jewish people', so that makes it religion, and NOT race etc...

So now witness ADMITS that they are not history books, they are religious books..

Ethnicity was brought in as a legal concept after it proved impossible for anyone to prove their biological ancestry i.e 'race'...

The second 'official' part of 'ethnicity' is a cultural tradition inlcuding family and social customs, sometimes religiously based...

What we do have in common is a sense of 'jewishness' ??? which is interpreted in different ways by different groups ??? how is THAT for a non-sequitur...COMMMON but DIFFERENT ??? so is it common? yes of course, but different? So is it different or common? common but different/ /????

Now he illustrates the motive behind his question 'somewhat or very important' by stating, misleadingly, 'eighty to ninety percent of jewish australians consider that being jewish is very important in their lives...a survey cannot 'show' anything about a population...it can be used as an indicator...and in fact the ninety percent may have intended / meant 'somewhat important' but were NOT given that option ... reveals the deliberate formulation of questions to generate a particular, desired, response, long before anyone got to respond...any field testing / focus group would have picked up on this and the other problematic questions...and this guy is so 'rigorous' ... a Professor...etc, what are the odds it was 'accidental', or pure 'incompetence'???

Prof: If you want me to say there's somethin common to which is NOT religious to all of those groups, the definition doesn't go to that extent'...well then why USE such a definition, unless you are deliberately trying to mislead people that jewishness is NOT essentially religious, as most people / non jew / laymen, normal average people who must abide by these laws, understand 'jewishness' to be...a religion... based on the religious books ... even admits that if you were 'precise' and 'rigorous' as Brendon wants / needs him to be, there would be NO ethnic groups at all !!!!

Brendon notes that ALL the cultural traditions, markers, holidays, observances, rituals, clothing and so on are specifically religious in nature. Brendon notes that catholics in africa are not considered the same 'race' or 'ethnic group' as german catholics...so why do jews insist on doing this? and not simply defining themselves by their religion? mhr especially as anyone can 'convert' to become a jew...

Brendon states fact that ALL the cultural traditions, markers, holidays, observances, rituals, clothing which are 'common' to all 'jews' worldwide, are religious in nature...NOT historical...NO histories outside of the religious texts... it IS a religion...MHR even secular 'jews' 'shared' 'common' 'culture' is based on these religious texts / holidays / clothing / food / 'traditions'... didn't they BECOME 'jews' by accepting Moses version of 'god' ? YHWH ? though some claim adam and eve were jews ???

Prof. claims it would be 'totally misleading and misrepresent the reality' to identify 'jews' as being 'linked' ONLY by common beliefs of a 'religious' nature... claims 'Passover Seder' originally had a religious origin / meaning (actually I bet it was like Dec. 25th an ASTRONOMICAL / ASTROLOGICAL meaning !!!) , but today has different meanings for the 'jews' who practise it...(mhr so how is it 'common' if just a day on which DIFFERENT jews do DIFFERENT things for DIFFERENT reasons? ... 'it's not narrowly religious'...secular jews share in that tradition ... mhr yes and I celebrate CHRISTmas as a secular HUMAN by 'tradition', that is 'shared' by others...doesn't make me and a japanese family related or part of some EXCLUSIVE 'race' does it? a 'race' based on celebrating Christmas?

'Jewish' schools ... so what, catholics have schools too...are THEY an exclusive RACE?

Prof. lame goes on 'what binds together (no fucker, what SEPARATES / EXCLUDES OTHERS) is a BELIEF SYSTEM ... a sense of 'peoplehood' (new word , need a new term cos 'race' clearly aint appropriate) a sense of commonality (NO A SENSE OF EXCLUSIVITY / SUPERIORITY / EXCEPTIONALISM / SEPARATION / DEMARCATION / EXCLUSION YOU FUCKER BE HONEST)...that makes up the 'jewish ethnic group'...

Prof:.there's a saying, 2 jews, 5 different opinions...there are a million different 'jewishnesses'...highly INDIVIDUAL experience / subjective, complex,

Brendon ' 10 psychiatrists, 10 different diagnoses'...that isn't a basis for an ethnic group..

.that's just being human...

Brendon quotes 'Steven M Lowenstein' 'The jewish cultural tapestry' 10 million Ashkednazi (spelling of court typist!) jews traditional language was Yiddish, mainly germanic in origin. 470,000 jews speak Judea Arabic. Yemeni jews very different traditions. Arabic speaking jews in most Arab nations. Some jews spoke languages of 'romance' origin e.g Sephardim 400,000 spoke 'Judaismo or Ladino, in greece, bulgaria, romania, and Bosnia. 90,000 jews speak languages of persian origin. 15,000 jews in Kurdistan/Iraq speaking Aramaic. 3,500 in Ukraine/Crimea speaking a Tatar language. Some speak jewish dialect of greek, some Judea Spanish...2000 in India spoke Malayam... so massive degree of language diversity...

Prof claims their 'common language' is Hebrew ??? really? quoting a few lines from the Torah like Keyser gives him a common language with all these diverse peoples? WHICH THEY WOULD LEARN AT THEIR RELIGIOUS SCHOOLS... !!!! Like Catholics around world share common 'latin mass' they learn at religious school ??? but why compare religions to ethnic groups now? obfuscation !!! non-sequitur...he is agreeing it is RELIGIOUS but speaking as if it supports his argument of 'Ethnic group'...

Prof tries to claimm 'catholicism is primarily a religion, but there would be catholics who you could, I think, well arguably call allso having a strong ethnic identity' REALLY? COULD YOU? YOUR REALLY THINK THAT DO YOU? ARGUABLY? is this how 'expert witnesses' talk? could, arguably, I think...based on ZERO research / surveys ???

Aparently legislation of racial vilification does NOT cover category 'MUSLIM' as an ethnic group? how convenient? they were looking at including it but didn't? Oh, I wonder WHY they didn't !!! I wonder how many 'Islamic' lawyers were involved in drafting the 'racial vilification' legislation??? any guesses???

An 'ethnic group' requires a 'common literature, written or oral'.....but jews TOTALLY based on these...it is the ONLY basis i.e their origin story...publically they focus on their 'suffering' but their books glorify / document their CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY...and define NON-jews as animals, with no human rights...consider what would happen if the Hollywood movies focussed on the genocide THEY committed in stealing Palestine in the first place...and the passages in the Talmud etc about 'goys' as 'cattle' etc with no legal rights...etc...if I made such films, I'd end up in jail, the film banned etc...

Prof: their common literature are their 'holy' BOOKS (notice avoids using term 'religious' books as they are exclusively 'religious' texts where the stories appear...NOT secular books)...Zohar written in ARamaic then translated into Ladino ... 'then there's a whole range of secular writers who are seen as the touchstone for jewish literature and jewish writing'... are there? like 'schindler's list?' books that deal with the lives of jews in different countries...in different historical contexts (I wonder how often they are presented as perpetrators being justly punished / feared / kicked out...or always victims? Diary of Anne Frank fraud written by 3 writers, sexed up by adults, written in ball point pens not invented till long after Anne had died...after having been given a choice, and chosing the destination where she died...not being dragged off etc...

'Being a minority often with a sense of being oppressed'...are jews in the U.S an oppressed minority?...as their common identity seems based on this, Prof has admitted as much...it is obvious to anyone, if you read their 'literature' etc...THAT is what unites them in their beliefs that a 'jewish' people / ethnic group exists...they were oppressed and poor before they went on to become billionaires !!!

Given the fact that there are 'Indian, Japanese, Ethiopian, Arab, Russian, and Slavic jews, could I walk up to any 'jew' and 'know' by looking at them, that they are 'Jewish'? ARe they 'conspicuous' as a 'race' ? Yarmulke covering their hair, other markers such as the hats, armanic black suits and coats, long 'bangs', etc...

Brendon is great "Do you mean in a scientific sense or is it an issue of perception?' i.e something measurable / objective, or purely subjective, in some person's mind? ... many people might see a man and perceive him as being African, then narrow it down to 'Sudanese' or 'Bushman' or Nigerian, based on broad 'indicators' they have 'learned' to identify with these 'nationalities ' ethnic groups'...

Gets Prof to admit that 'No, there is not' and scientific study, 'There are no people who are racially distinct because race itself is a social construct'...finally...so we have a law regarding vilification of a social construct ??? 3 years in prison for offending a social construct???

Africans are not a 'race' in any scientific sense. Agreed.

Nazi's tried to come up with a 'racial' taxonomy to define jews by and THEY FAILED... as hitler said, WE decide who is jewish and who is not... so they got people to wear those yellow stars, as otherwise how would other people KNOW they were JEWS !!! because it is NOT objective / possible to 'know' by appearance if someone is Jewish...even NAZI's failed to find a 'common denominator' outside of their 'beliefs' a.k.a ideology of semitism / self-definition as 'jewish'...rather than 'German' or 'Human' !!!

Final 'operationalisation' of the term 'jew' by Nazis was that if you had a great grandmother / granmother / mother who was 'jewish', so were YOU...a 'racial jew'...no interest in whether you had 'converted' etc...

Prof was one vice president of the 'Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith' in Australia...

'And you will understand why there's oversensitivity, to hostile intent, given the recent history of the jewish people' (meaning they are mass murderers? criminals? did 911? the U.S.S liberty? King David HOtel bombing? millions of dead arabs all over middle east thanks to their U.S lobby / power?, they continue to defame the german people, like the treaty of Versailles? like all the economic crashes? like their money debt slavery? their conspiracy to enslave all of human kind? putting people in prison for questioning obvious lies / fabrications / propaganda? You might expect some retaliation for that? a guilty conscience / mind, fearing that at any moment their host nations might realise what they've done, and plan to do? maybe THAT accounts for their hypersensitivity to any possibility of their hosts 'waking up' and 'defending themselves' and 'seeking justice'? No, I guess you mean all the faked shit you made up in your hollywood shoa-business...

ADL is there to 'monitor hostile intent towards the jews in the societies in which they live' ... !!! like any slave master has spies to keep slave rebellions in check ???

Brendon mentioned an ADL document...and Prof admitted he has once been the Deputy president of the Victorian branch of the ADL equivalent in Australia...but prosecutor Mr Eyers claims prof. is NOT expert witness in relation to ADL ??? Prof claims this organisation has NO affiliation with the ADL in the u.s.a ??? really??? wtf ???

Judge explains how to put forward question to witness ; 'Do you agree that ...' and the 'evidence' is the witnesses response / reply, that jury should consider...

in Australian Census there are people who respond as belonging to the 'Jedaiah' religion, but there is no 'jedaiah' ethnic group / category i.e no-one identifies as belonging to a jedaiah 'ethnic' group, just that religious group...or would Prof define them as a 'community' and 'ethnic group' ..sense of 'peoplehood' (what a fucking term, people-hood', how vague, yes, we are a 'people' ???) BUT 'A group such as the jewish community (see how goes from one concept to another, as if the same, but 'group' and 'community' are very different concepts) meets as well as any other ethnic group that you could reasonably discuss' ... really? ??? Brendon makes it obvious how stupid that statement is, given his own ability to define his 'ethnic group' back to a particular place, common to HIS ancestors, so many commonalities independent of religion etc, which would make the Professors last comment seem absurdly fatuous...Brendon could give his EXACT lineage, common kinship, common ancestry, common geographical location ... 'the 'average man on the street' would NOT agree with the Professor...

Judge claims the jury understands everything...as if...did they ask ANY questions? were given the chance to? NO! was any 'conclusion' stated ? NO...so how could the average jury person have formed a distinct, clear, understanding???

If Brendon is 'a represented accused'...how is he 'innocent until proven guilty'? 'assumed innocent'? do you accuse people you assume innocent???

'Remanded' seems to mean you are 'out on bail'...but why 'remand' someone you assume is innocent?

Day Three

Rabbi David Freilich ...Chief Rabbi of the Perth Hebrew Congregation...President of the Organisation of Rabbis of Australasia...

Prosecutor again gets tongue tied trying NOT to say something i.e 'I'd like to ask you some questions, both in relation to the religious aspect of Judaism, and in relation to the broader.....some broader questions so far as judaism is concerned ... ??? can't just say 'race' or 'ethnicity' as absurd in context, so always avoids...stops self before says...overly careful...

'The Jewish people were formed by two covenants....with Abraham, about 4500 years ago, a national covenant a.k.a 'internal covenant' binding jewish people through common language, common race, with common culture and history and tradition. About 1000 years later covenant at Mt. Sinai, where jewish people given a set of laws, the 10 and 613 commandments .. the 10 given at Mt. Sinai, a.k.a 'the external covenant'. 'the religious observance has kept the jewish people together as a people. (religious observance !!! RELIGIOUS !!!)...'Certainly NOT' re: do you need to be religious to be a jew !! again, so fucking typical, non-sequitur...defines group by religion, but you don't have to be religious to be member !!!!!... 'we are known as 'Am Israel' which means 'the nation of Israel or the race of Israel' (known as? are you?)...If you have a descendant from a Jewish mother, you are part of that race, even if you are NOT observant / religious i.e secular...that's how it's handed down from generation to generation... (anunaki bloodlines most important, not culture / beliefs !!!)... 'conversion' is possible, as we assume that the person MUST have come from 'jewish' mother at some point in their family tree, and wants to 'return'...'Are you willing, again, to rejoin or join the culture, the tradition, the nation of Israel?'...if they affirm 'Yes', they are accepted. (n.b this time he used term 'nation of israel, but earlier affirmed the term 'race of Israel' was synonymous / interchangeable terms...but it seems in terms of 'conversion' they avoid using this term?)...there are certain procedures they mustt o through (why not tell us? circumcision? promise of fealty to Israel?), and then they are asked...'Are you willing to keep the laws of the Jewish people?' Yes. Even if they cease keeping those laws, they still remain a part of the nation. again nation, not 'race'. They can NEVER lose, by bloodline or by conversion to Judaism once they've accepted to be part of the nation of Israel, whether they keep the laws or not, they are then jews for eternity !!!

Because 'jewishness'is inherited from the mother, mixed-marriages can lead to jewish women marrying men from other groups, and thus having children who were Ethiopian, German, chinese etc...so the 'jewish nation' is made up of diverse groups ... (but isn't that frowned upon? didn't they require 10 generations history of pure jewishness at one point in old Israel? and isn't it true that not just any old 'jew' may marry a 'cohen' ...and why the 'rape by deception' laws in Israel? if the 'jews' are so lenient about 'intermarriage'?)... 'they still have a jewish blood-line' (i.e assume only people with jewish bloodline would ask to 'convert' to judaism !!!)...

Rabbi misleads jury that 'modern' Hebrew is ancient hebrew implicitly by saying 'the Hebrew langugae, unlike other ancient languages, which really no longer are used, still exists today ' !!! we have a common Hebrew prayer all jews around the world share (secular jews pray?)... so Hebrew unites the 'Am Israel', 'the Jewish race', throughout the world...here he uses the 'race' and not 'nation' ...

Abraham was known as 'Abraham the Hebrew' (wasn't he Sumerian? from Ur / Or / Urak / Orak? mhr 'orac-le'?)...

DIRECT LIE BY RABBI IN COURT: 'Hebrew started with Abraham, and has been handed down from generation to generation' ... totally lie...modern Hebrew is invention...NEW language...Rabbi has just virtually stated, and at least implied / given the listener to understand, that ancient hebrew has been in continual use since Abraham, and is spoken / used today by jews around the world...rubbish...shame on you...but good jew, not respecting goy courts / rules ...!!!

Passover represents the 'jewish' nation gaining its freedom? nationhood? so 'national' meaning as well as 'religious'...7 weeks later Moses and commandments...Am Israel, the nation and the race of israel and also the religion of Israel, all associated with passover...festival thus celebrated by secular jews as day 'we became a free nation' ??? after hundreds of years of slavery in Egypt...so they claim...escaping after robbing Egyptians of everything they could carry with them...and killing their children ?

Brendon claims jews resisted being defined as a 'race', after the Nazi's were the first to define them as such... Rabbi rejects idea, claiming that jews themselves already defined themselves as both a religion and a race...

'Do you speak for jews around the world? I believe I express the mainstream jewish belief, yes.

Admits he is 'Orthodox' as compared to 'progressive' and 'liberal' and 'secular' jews... states that other jews would place more stress on the 'Am Israel' factor, the 'national factor', rather than the religious like himself...

Brendon reminds us that there was no such term 'jew' until the 12th or 13th century, up to which time they were referred to as 'the Israelites' or 'Tribe of Benjamin, Dan, etc...

Rabbi tries to imply he has 'history' books which are NOT religious...Brendon picks him up on this...

Brendon refers to stones engraved during supposed Egyptian captivity with word 'HABIRU' (nabiru?) referring to 'Abraham the Hebrew', 'Abram Al Ibri'... where 'Ibri' means 'over the other side', and Abraham wasn't in ancient Palestine, judea, samaria, or Israel, it was in ancient Iraq / mesopotamia known as 'Ur of Chaldees'...he was told to go over the river Euphrates (meso-between potamia-rivers, the rivers Tigris and Euphrates)...where he was to start a new nation, on the other side of the Euphrates...which is why he is called 'Abraham Al Ibri' Abraham the Hebrew, Abraham who went over to the other side... (the dark side? you sell your soul, irretrievably, once you 'convert', remember !!!)...

Rabbi says bible itself refers to 'the jews of judea, the tribe of Judah, who were exiled...and the term 'jew' referred exclusively to these people...

Brendon refers to the legislation used, as markers for a common ethnicity, a common geographical location, genetic stock in common (Rabbi admitted they just assumed he had this, if you chose to convert)...

Brendon states that really we and the jews must take on faith that the descriptions in the religious texts are 'historical', unlike ideas that a man walked on water, rose from the dead, carried out miracles etc, are taken on faith, rather than as 'historically proven / documented'...

Rabbi claims that archaelogical digs have proven some of the matters he has claimed for 'the jews'...but Brendon asks for particulars, and of course the Rabbi has none...so basically deceiving jury...4,500 years ago...

The Old Testament / Tanakh states the the 'Israelites came out of Egypt with a mixed multitude'. Those who wished to join 'the jews' had to convert to Am Israel. Rabbi concurs.

Prof. Markus stated emphatically in the trial that there is no such thing as a race. Quoting Professor Jared Diamond.

Rabbi admitted he represented the Orthodox faith, which means he was deceptive when claiming to speak for jews in general... Brendon calls him on this...reminding us that there is NO consensus among 'jews' and that many would take great offence at the use of the term 'jewish race'...

The Rabbi is in fact the person who determines if a person in perth is jewish or not...sends letters to israel to confirm someone is a 'jew'... Rabbi defends his use of 'race' claiming all jews have a common language, Hebrew ... which clearly they do NOT...just being able to recite a few lines from the Torah or a prayer does NOT mean you share a common language...English is probably spoken by more 'jews' than 'Hebrew', to be SURE...

'The jewish people have a common culture, language, and history which binds us as jews.'Every jew would agree with that'.

Rabbi states that the Arab people stemmed from Ishmael. The jews from Abraham. But the bible states many 'Arabs' i.e 'the multitudes' chose that time to convert to Am Israel, to become part of that nation / race ... MHR now if any of these people never married a female of Abraham's descendants, they would NOT share in the 'jewish bloodline' ???

Brendon asks Rabbi to agree or otherwise with the statement 'Judaism, as you practise it, is a religion of peace and tolerance for all peoples around the world and all peoples according to your faith are made in the image of god'...Rabbi : 'Yes, we beleive that everybody should live in harmony and peace (again non sequitur...yes, then negation...very different matter of everyone living in harmony and peace and his own religion being a religion of peace and tolerance! harmony could be of slave masters and slaves, and peace of the submissive slave AFTER the jews have enslaved all the world and subjected it to their rule)... 'we do not encourage people to join us' giving some odd explanation as to why, that is supposed to sound good...'we teach respect for every human being (which excludes all non-jews, a fact he fails to mention!!!), have just as much right to the kingdom of heaven as we do'...really? then why be so fucking exclusive? have so many fucking arbitrary rules e.g which direction to piss in? if it means nothing re: rights to the kingdom of heaven...???

Brendon reminds him he did not answer the question put to him, namely, 'is judaism itself a religion of peace, tolerance, and love, and does it include that to other people via its holy books, teachings, attitudes? And does it hold non-Jews to the same levels as Jews?

Rabbi claims 'Love they neighbour as yourself' is one of the laws of Judaism. Not as far as I know. From Leviticus. and Talmud etc states clearly that 'The goy is NOT your neighbour' in relation to this ideal / law.

Brendon then asks Rabbi Freilich, 'Am I your neighbour' ? 'You are my neighbour'...rubbish...how 'orthodox' is THAT position ??? B.S ... no way...totally UN-orthodox, unless Rabbi thinks Brendon is a 'jew' or has 'jewish bloodlines' ???

Brendon reminds us that NO jew can trace their lineage back to Abraham, it is a matter of faith, or religion, not biology, or history...all 'history' of the jews is 'religious' dogma...

Finally admits, well, it's based on the bible, yes. i.e on religious books...the whole notion of 'jewishness'...no-one kept records even 'back then'...just matter of faith...

Prof. Schlomo Sand wrote :'in a state that defines itself as jewish, yet does not present distinguishing cultural markers that might define a worldwide secular jewish existence, except for some depleted, secularised remnants of religious folklore, the collective identity needs a misty, promising image of an ancient, biological, common origin'

Rabbi expects us to believe he is NOT aware of the ADL in N.Y, U.S.A...

Rabbi had attended the 'Friends of Israel' rally held in Osborne park, a week before this trial was scheduled to start.

Jesus and his followers were persecuted by the jewish elites at that time, who were the Pharisees / Sadducees, the founders of the Rabbinic traditions of Judaism...only 2000 years ago, so very 'new' compared to the 4500 year old roots in the old testament !!!

Rabbi says 'I have been asked to give testimony on the issue of Judaism being a race, or religion, or both.

He doesn't want to answer Brendon's line of questioning here. re: what are the main holy books of Orthodox Judaism...the 4 main ones...The Babylonian Talmud, the books of the Mishnah, Gemara, Rabbinic Commentaries, VS i.e NOT the Tanakh a.k.a Old Testament (Pentateuch?)... Asks him which would be his favorite...

MHR never heard of this book...a 'final conclusion'? that would be great to read...but why is it no-one ever refers to it? ...??? Rabbi replies 'none of those, the most important book is the Shulchan Aruch, the final decisions of those particular discussions by the Rabbis and from the Torah and down to the Mishnah, the Gemara, and finally the Shulchan Aruch gives the final Halakha'...

'The final decisions are in the Shulchan Aruch. There's a final decision on a situation' in that book. i.e could take bits of the talmud etc out of context, and misrepresent judaism,...the 'shulchan Aruch' is supposedly the 'final word' on Judaism...and yet NO_ONE has EVER referred to it ANYWHERE in ANY thing I've read or watched ???

The ultimate authority of jews for Perth is 'Chief Rabbi LORD Jonathan Sacks', in London...

'we do not actually consult with the rabbis in israel from perth' !!!

again lies 'I've expressed the mainstream view, and the mainstream orthodox view and that's the view which is held' ???? again, non-sequiturs...Orthodox is by far NOT mainstream...mainstream Orthodox maybe, but not what the jury would take by 'mainstream' view...represents very FEW jews at all...so why keep lieing / deceiving the jury?

and again 'I represent the mainstream Judaic view'... re: there would be no disagreement between our Rabbi's testimony as witness and Rabbi Yosef, the head Sephardic Rabbi in Israel...

again, this absurd language play 'No, I didn't say a biological race. I said a people bound up by a common language, culture, and history'...so a RACE but not a 'biological' race, but still 'bloodlines' assumed as given in a convert as motive for conversion... ?????

'4000 or 4,500 years ago is not so far back...to actually feel that some..authenticity on, what has been handed down during that time i.e verbally i.e take people at their word 'my great great etc grandmother, and thus YOURS, was jewish, so we are all jews, I am, and thus you are ... WTF !!!!

Judge denies Rabbi used the term 'blood line' over and over...clearly did...and the term 'race' over and over...then even Rabbi claims 'I have not actually used the term blood line over and over. I used it a few times, as one of the ways in which Judaism is handed down'...seriously I had to laugh as I wrote this / read this...how fucking blatant...'not 'over and over'...NO...I didn't...then negated again, as typical non sequitor, I used the term 'a few times'... ????!!! beggars belief... 'But I've also said it's a common culture, history, language and national aspirations that bind us together' .MHR I'd love to do a survey around the world to see if this assumption is AT ALL valid...e.g check for 'Hebrew' language skills as 'living language vs mere ceremonial latin of Catholics', and 'national aspirations' ...the 'history' is all religious dogma, and the 'culture' is a hat, a few holidays, a birthday party 'coming of age' party, maybe circumcision...seems 'the holocaust' religious dogma is all they have in recent history in common...and Israel...shared guilt for Palestinian genocide / ethnic cleansing...

'Absolutely either' race or ethnic group...

'you have yet to name one single secular, cultural marker outsiide of religious observance, religious books, religious themes, religious holidays, that would link you with anyone else around the world as a jew'...

Rabbi admits that a jew can NOT marry a non-jew in Israel...they would have to go outside of Israel to be married (another example of the religious nature of the state e.g kosher food for soldiers compulsory, and as military service compulsory, it makes this religious based act compulsory...)...

Again the word games : 'Would they receive equal standing when they returned'? 'As human beings', yes...as human beings now...not as 'jews'...or 'Israelis'...why chose such obtuse expressions? either answer yes or no, be clear and seek to clarify...not obfuscate and mislead...!!!

Then admits 'It is encouraged within our religion (our religion now? but wasn't being jewish all about those other things?) to marry another jew...we want to ensure the handing down of the traditions of judaism from one generation to the next'...oh, for sake of children not having to chose between their parents RELIGION !!! (MHR how about 'is it possible to be a jew but a catholic? if it is NOT a religious group? i.e be a catholic jew? why not? if share all the other beliefs / traditions / speak hebrew ???)

A secular jew marrying out of their faith (faith now? not race / ethnic group???) is still considered a jew (why say that, should be implicit / self evident if being 'jewish' is NOT religious but 'race' nation ethnic group etc...

Rabbi was not aware of who David Duke is ??? come on...no idea of ADL or David Duke !!!

Brendon 'I am a proud white European and I would like to marry within my race' how would THAT go down in Perth??? n.b it about 'values' and 'traditions' then surely white Europeans have their own values and traditions that they would cherish???

Every jew is given a 'jewish' / Hebrew name at birth, and some jews also adopt a 'local' sounding name...e.g Rabbi's real name is Dobit... mhr like runes, to know someone's name gives you power over them, so jews use our names, but withhold their own???)

End day 4

Under Admiralty law, as opposed to chapter 3 of the Australian constitution, which his court was not sitting under i.e common law court, though judge would not admit, the defendant is mere 'cargo' and thus requires legal representation of a 'person' in the admiralty court...cannot defend himself...mhr we are arguing about ownership of cargo, not rights of persons, only the persons who own the cargo have any rights, or can represent these persons interests ???

At the directions hearing a lot off material was passed over that I could have added to...under Judge McCann... truth is no defence? ...

Has to have the third party present otherwise merely quoting them is hearsay and thus inadmissible as evidence ???

Prosecutor 'IN ORDER TO PROVE THE CASE THE STATE HAS TO PROVE THAT HE INTENDED TO CREATE OR PROMOTE ANIMOSITY'

MHR...SO ALWAYS WORD THINGS STATING THAT I DO NOT INTEND TO CREATE OR PROMOTE ANIMOSITY TO ANYONE, INCLUDING SELF-DEFINED OR OTHER-DEFINED 'JEWS'...

The writer, maker of a statement etc has to be called to give evidence before a jury, in person, the defendant can't bring in a newspaper article and read it to the jury, the author has to be present, and speak to the jury... cannot use 'the views of others expressed elsewhere and out of court'...

MHR so how to get Jesus, or a new testament writer to appear before the jury???

Brendon intended to read verse from Matthew, and to demonstrate that his accusations were reasonable and made in good faith... that it's a reasonable thing to believe or a reasonable point of view to take...that is what 'expert' would be there to assist the jury into accepting i.e authority / expert, that what Brendon stated was in fact reasonable, given the 'facts' etc...rather than malicious, intended to offend, vilify, incite hostility towards Jews

BUT MHR problem is court doesn't care if it IS reasonable to 'vilify' or 'incite people to act against the interests of the jews, as the interests of a slave master, business owner, criminal, conspirator...e.g to incite people to fear and take action against a tiger is reasonable, and while the intent is self-preservation, may still be 'incitement' ... and how to educate a jury in a few hours that they have much to fear from the jew world order etc???

'Truth is not a defence in this matter'... apparently Brendon thinks that it is 'allowable' under the law to call for the extermination of all jews as long as he presented it in an academic, ratoinal, thoughful manner ???

Brendon highlights hypocrisy of fact that 'jewishness' is all 'subjective' and 'based on personal and shared beliefs'...BELIEFS...but HIS OWN beliefs are inadmissible no matter HOW sincere and well founded....clearly MORE well founded than the 'expert' witness Rabbi...and the Prof merely reported on 'jews' own beliefs ... nothing objective at all related...but for the defendant in this case, beliefs are discarded as inadmissible???

'Lawful excuse' meaning I have an obligation as a Christian to raise matters, even firmly and even in a vigorous street debate, ... a million Iraquis are dead, 1500 Palestinians killed by Israeli defense forces (mostly children, women, and old people)...I have obligations as a christian to raise such matters...

The prosecutor claimed he had no choice but to object to any statements Brendon ascribes to anyone, ... that that person must appear in court, or their 'statements' would not be admissible... MHR would they have allowed Brendon to adjurn the trial to arrange all the 'witnesses' ? and video facilities? was he offered this?

Brendon's sincere belief in research others have done and published on blogs etc indicating that Israeli armed forces have 'kill squads' they send around the world, to carry out false flags to blame them on muslims...MHR surely 911 is by now PROVEN to be a false flag ???

BUT' Brendon can NOT say that 'So and so has stated this i.e can NOT quote authoritative sources e.g former heads of the CIA, etc...who often end up dead so can NEVER be brought before any jury...MHR could he play a video of them????

he can only state ' based on my research, my understanding and belief is that Israeli jews are doing X and Y...which goes to his state of mind at the time of the video incident and blog postings...

Brendon wants to be able to prove that the things he said in the video 'We think you're a bunch of homicidal...' Your religion of homicide, hatred, and ethnic cleansing' are actually reasonable things for a reasonable person to believe...

'A valid defence is in the public interest'...

you can NOT say what various authors / researchers / former heads of the CIA and FBI have said...you have to call them as witnesses for their comments to be admissible... and they are subject to cross examination...

Prosecutor seemed very helpful...stating 'Brendon has to challenge the state's assertion that he was engaged in, in relation to count 1, behavior that was LIKELY to harass... 'my intention was not to harass when I was angry etc, it was because of the force of my views...MHR but he just said LIKELY, didn't say WAS INTENDED...so who is to define 'likely'? as Keyser had begun by insulting them, harassing them, 'you all disgust me' and lieing to them i.e he was there to observe, his acquaintance had infiltrated them, he was NOT on holiday from Melbourne...and continued to re-engage over and over, why NOT safe to assume he had a thick skin, could take as good as he had already given, and was not LIKELY to feel 'harassed' ???

the prosecutor admitted he had to prove that he engaged in conduct 'WITH THE INTENTION...to promote ANIMOSITY'...and Mr Eyers again very helpful, almost offering Brendon the exact defence he needed ...'well no, my intention wasn't to create or promote animosity, it was to let people know the truth. And I have read....' and he can give the titles of the books, number, how long hes' been reading such material etc MHR but is the states plan to give reason to censor such books in future, as being the real cause for anti-semitism, and that behavior of people like Brendon? ???

But then prosecutor states that he will then say 'but the way in which you expressed yourself can ONLY have been intended to vilify / incite ??? why say THAT when it is patently NOT the ONLY way to interpret ANYTHING? totally mislead the jury, and trample over their OWN interpretation of his possible motives...again, MINDREADING and assertion of facts with ZERO basis...purely subjective...presented by authority figure as objective facts ???

You are entitled to hold a view ??? but this act goes to the way in which you express that view and the intention with which you express that view....THE WAY YOU EXPRESS YOUR VIEW, AND THE INTENTION WITH WHICH YOU EXPRESS THAT VIEW...how can anyone possibly know the latter? and the former is purely subjective...BUT THIS IS KEY TO FUTURE EXPRESSIONS IN PUBLIC / ONLINE ... MUST KEEP LANGUAGE AS NEUTRAL / FREE OF EMOTION AS POSSIBLE, AND STATE CLEARLY THAT MY INTENTION IS NOT TO VILIFY, GENERALISE, INCITE...BUT TO INFORM OF MY BELIEFS, AND WHAT I SEE AS THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE EVIDENCE / COMPELLING ARGUMENTS I BASED THEM ON...

Matthew 4:33 ... 'I tell you, do not swear at all... Simply let your yes be yes, and your no, no. Anything beyond this comes from the evil one'.

So court allows an 'affirmation' whereby you affirm to tell the truth', does not require an 'oath'.

I read this under duress...I do not recognise the authority of this admiralty law court, which does not sit under chapter 3 of the Judiciary Act of 1903.

N.B the affirmation states 'I sincerely declare and affirm that the evidence I will give in theis case will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth' MHR which would mean I would have to read out every line of every book, show every video, and explain the WHOLE truth !!!

'I'm passionate about the truth, and ...if you're going to do a job, don't do it just for the money. Do it right...'

Jesus accused the Pharisses (Rabbinical jews?) 'You are like whited sepulchres, all clean and fair without, but within full of dead men's bones and all corruption'...

I can't bear hypocrisy, people who play the victim, but are the worst perps in reality...'the persecution game'... 'Hypocrisy is my biggest thing'...'the past 18 months have been hell'...

...'Truth is absolutely no defence in this matter' according to the legislation... state seeks to argue that 'Brendon O'Connell intended to go out there and create racist animosity or hatred or harass Stanley Elliot as a member of a racial group' ... mhr though he states he wants to film people taking photos of protestors, and refers to ' Judaica' ... intent states was to catch them at their game...got to get quote from video...

Nazi Germany in the 30s was the only state EVER to openly declare 'Jews' a 'racial group'...and the jews at the time rejected this notion, vehemently and loudly and openly claiming this was FALSE..that the 'jews' were a RELIGIOUS FAITH ONLY... only Orthodox Rabbis and Nazis define jews as a race...and the Australian govt. !!!... mhr any 'genetic markers' of 'jews' relate exclusively to jews with a long history in Palestine, and they SHARE this marker with the Palestinians and other Arabs of the region...it is not 'Jewish' but 'Arabian', if it exists at all...and all jews admit it is merely a 'belief system', they take their ancestry 'on faith' as a 'dogma'...nothing scientific or documented to justify...

The world works off blackmail, thuggery, and bribery. Politics is power and nothing more

N.B Brendon's own life appears worthy of a book / film...corruption in nursing, living with a hooker, desire to be permaculture farmer i.e abandoning his profession as couldn't live with the corruption etc...own military working with Israel / U.S dealing drugs...his sister died of stroke at age 42...brake lines of flatmates cut...decided was never going to bring kids into this world, even to become a monk...accepted as brother by Russian Orthodox church... (but later in video online says he wants to settle down and get married? did he mention kids?)...

didn't believe all the jew world order stuff at first, took long time, and when asked jewish acquaintances to comment, they 'ran out the door' i.e never would respond...counter with 'facts' or 'compelling arguments'... I refused to beleive it at first...

Jews believe wrong to criticise other jews, all they need to do is 'survive' until their messiah comes. Christians believe just need to survive till Jesus' second coming. Muslims just need to survive until 'The second Caliphate'...i.e all see history as 'chastisement' from god before the dawn of the new utopian age...

last straw was 'Operation Cast Lead' over the Xmas and new years period in Palestine...shocked everyone that they would go so far on live t.v'....children being targetted, piles of dead bodies, which Brendon NOT allowed to present to jury...groups of Israeli and IDF troops desensitized by their religious teachings and the Rabbis in the IDF who say 'You can slaughter men, women, and children'. The Rabbis have confidently come out and said this publicly. They are not ashamed / hiding the fact. But Brendon can NOT present this evidence as to his 'state of mind' vis a vis his 'choice of expressions' in the video or during the interactions...

I can't show you on this laptop. I can't show you the internet reports / publications/ documentation...'We've had this discussion while you were out' with the judge and prosecutor. I can't show you and so you'll just have to take my word for it.

'If I was to say I wished to keep my white european heritage and to marry only within my white european race and preserve my white european culture, traditions and values, how would that be recieved...?' MHR media tells us white european culture is slavery, etc...never ONCE in my LIFE have I seen or heard or read ANYTHING in the mass media about the 'origin story' of the 'jews' i.e the genocide, sexual slavery, aggressive wars that make Hitler's SS look like boy scouts...!!!

When David Duke says 'I want to preserve my white european heritage, my white culture' he is vilified as 'racist' etc and 'racial supremacist', but you just heard the Rabbi say exactly the same thing (of course exceptionalism, jews ARE superior and thus their culture is WORTH preserving, whereas ours is NOT, as mere 'cattle' !!!)... Rabbi even stated that they BELIEVE they are a BIOLOGICAL race ... from time of leaving Egypt, those 'non-jews' who joined the Israelites defined as part of that new race...they interbred, so now today there is the BELIEF in a 'blood line', even in those who convert...assumed THEY share this bloodline, as motive for wanting to join... This is utter hypocrisy (I wonder if jury has sense to see / time enough to digest it...probably neither!!!

The Gaza strip is 8 kilometers wide at its widest point, and 24 kilometers long...1.4 million people...families...women and children...Israel dropping one tonne bombs, white phosphorous, breaking every international convention and law in the book (was this one of the 'mistakes' Keyser admitted to?)...all on live television...

MAYBE BEST QUOTE FROM TRIAL I THINK...AND DID NOT SWAY JURY ONE IOTA...WTF???

You have Chabad-Lubavitch new york Rabbi, Martin Freedman stating for the record 'We're not into Western Morality', the same Chabad-Lubavitch that Stanley Keyser said, on his facebook page 'I'm a big fan of Chabad-Lubavitch'...'Wage war the Jewish way. Kill men, women, and children, and cattle. Destroy their holy sites'... His comments were reported on the news for ONE day...then nothing...

MHR imagine some white european saying something like this? what Freedman was doing was expressing the 'Semitic ideology' which has zero respect for western european values, which it seeks to underming via mass immigration, demonisation etc...

Rabbi Yosef the Sephardic jewish religious head, promised the jews they would be immortal, only the goyim will die, which will be as sad as having your donkey die, because it was useful...that goys only exist to serve the jew, who would live as an effendi, do no work, all work done by the goys...effendi means 'master'...and 1 million people turned up for his public funeral...in case you suspect he was just some non-representative extremist and not representative of the 'jewish' culture and people...ideology of semitism...

Menachem Schneerson, the 'messiah' of Chabad-Lubavitch, quoted Maimonides, one of the most revered / respected Rabbi's of the past, who many quote as a moderate 'jew', 'The best of the gentiles should be killed. The best of snakes should have their heads crushed'...MHR n.b name america can mean 'land of the snakes'...and snake cults oldest 'religion' ... anunaki etc...???

Judaism is supposed to be as Rabbi Freilich claims, 'a religion of peace and love, including non jews' ... well the love of a donkey, that is useful, maybe, and a peace of totally submission to the jews...word games as always...

The sect that IS about peace and love and inclusion are the Karaites, who follow the Old Testament Tanakh, with 70,000 or so members...they do NOT follow the Rabbinic commentaries of the Mishnaic, the Babylonian Talmud etc ... they insist that each jew should follow the Tanakh (pentateuch, first five books of the Old Testament?) to the best of their individual conscience...mhr which I assume defines all people as 'your neighbour', and not just jews??/

The Talmud / commentaries etc turn the old testament on its head, claiming Moses was a drunk who had sex with animals , specific rules on toilet etiquette! (though that was in the bible I think from memory?), how many sheep you can count in a day...ultra orthodox women shave their heads and wear wigs...compare that to sharia headscarves for 'extremist oppression of women' !!!...

Chabad-Lubavitch and Kahunas would under normal definitions be defined as mentally ill...but have 'protection' of 'religious status'...they're getting medals in congress, while islam is demonised for its treatment of women, and Israeli - U.S terrorism... I'd love to show you all this stuff but I can't...

Brendon was trying to get the more liberal 'jews' to reform their own i.e 'nice' jews to start speaking up ... which is exactly what he was doing with Keyser at first...and clearly Keyser was 'in his face' wagging his finger, very assertive,...not at all 'intimidated'...really 'in his face' pushing up against the camera...very confident...more 'agressive' than Brendon ever was...so what gave him right to walk up to him after such agreession and whack the camera into his face?

Judaism is a crime network 'with benefits' i.e like the black credit card of the Jesuits...jews will be sympathetic to you, but will never 'give up their benefits' and never criticise their own...MHR be sure to state 'most jews' as many jews are on our side, taking huge risks as 'whistleblowers'...but their numbers are very few...and no representative of 'judaism'...which at best remains silent about their fellow 'jews' crimes / atrocities / insanity ... may appear sympathetic to you, but once you start into it, they back out...won't go any further...

Helen Thomans, whitehouse correspondent for decades, came out openly (I have the video) and stated 'Zionists run America, they run wall street, they run the government, they run the news media', after which, aged 90, she was immediately 'retired'...

Joel Stein, in the L.A Times wrote 'I don't care if people think jews are running hollywood, wall street, or the government, I just care that we get to keep on running them'...

Israel has threatened to 'instigate the Samson option' MHR the true holocaust...will blow up the middle east and Israel, literally killing themselves (the people, not the leaders) to destroy their 'enemies' !!! 'we will nuke european cities for revenge for the holocaust'...words of a jewish professor from netherlands, living in Israel, commentator on military matters...

Senator Paul Findley, in his 80s, decades a congressman and senator, stated 'They were running our government, they were the advisers to the president' (Bush) ... Paul Wolfowitz, Irving Kristol, Bill Kristol, jews from university of Chicago...

Obama's advisors from uni of chicago jews...David Axelrod, Rahm Emanuel jewish citizen, and Michael Chertoff former head of Homeland security jewish national, ... jews...Israeli citizens...running local and foreign policy in the U.S...

Israeli intelligence agencies like Variant ? do the data intercepts for local and federal police...all the databases 'Guardian', P-tech, converse, do the banking, finance, medical records, tax records...correlate databases, banking, finance, medical records, tax records...that's total control and they're all run by Israeli intelligence foreign companies out of Israel...

Amdocs had a 600 million dollar contract with Sensis recently...the Yellow Pages...to centralise 5 data bases...proved a disaster...sold off cheap to another krony group...i.e typical inflate / deflate, make money from goy's losses e.g WTC insurance scam...derivatives insurance scams...

Two jews started and still own and run Google...Sergei...etc... 'Our heartfelt desire for the state of israel'...

Fox News did a report in 2001...DEA and other intelligence and enforcement agencies in the U.S stated 'We beleive that the Israeli company, Variant, has hardware backdoors in the equipment, because every time we go after a Jewish or israeli drug dealer, they change their phone, they dissappear'... (but so naive, as if CIA are not working with them !!! probably a 'misdirection' by Fox, like current movie that says nothing about CIA, makes a sexy, fun, bank-robber type movie...very likeable character drug running for CIA...all fun and games and hot sex !!!

Christopher Bollyn...he was naming names etc about 911, they went after him in Chicago...about the nano-thermite and thermate charges used to destroy the WTC...burns thousands of degrees celcius...

Dr Alan Sabrosky, former head of studies at the the U.S army war college, and 10 year marine veteran...'The ugly truth' ...

The Project for the new (jew) american century and 'securing the realm' with Netanyahu of all people...P.M of Israel now... get rid of Israel's enemies..greater Israel project from Nile to Euphrates...'leaving mesopotamia for Iran?'..

70 members of the Samouni family were told to stay in a 'safe' house, which they then bombed with artillery and bomber planes, killing 42 members of that family (and don't forget the U.N 'safe haven' school' !!!)

There are videos of civilian dressed IDF holding up a boys arm and breaking it with rocks...israeli' insiders speak of 'death squads' that will go around shooting children in the head....YOu wan't to slaughter kids with impunity? I'm going to get in your face'.

Victor Ostrovsky was a katsa (case manager) for the Mossad, who became so disgusted with Israel and the Mossad and their unwillingness to follow the most basic precepts of international law that he left Mossad and wrote a tell all book. 'Wage war by deception: the unmasking of a Mossad officer'... he writes about the 'Kohanim', the tiny elite of Jews...and millions of potential 'Sayanims', 'helpers' Mossad can rely on to do criminal / illegal things for them...rent cars with false paperwork, operate on bullet wounds without reporting to the police etc...carrying out banking transfers outside the legal requirements / reporting requirements... including those in the military, police, administration, jewdiciary ...

'what was I thinking when I was making that video / preparing to go to make it' etc...

Israel is sick and judaism is sick and it's time that it stopped...people are going to have to speak out, preferrably from the jewish community itself, like Israel Shahack...and Norman Finkelstein, Noam Chomsky... (and Brother Nathaniel, and the holocaust debunker...etc...

Israel Shahack 'Jewish history, jewish religion, the weight of 3000 years'...

Finkelstein looked into Joan Peter's book 'From time immemorial'...got rave reviews from all quarters, best seller, worldwide... well he was loyal to the 5 books of the Septugint, Old Testament idea of 'truth' ... they kept stoning their prophets...killing them...Chomsky warned him 'I warn you now. By all means do it, but you're going to get nailed' ... a.k.a jesus...Finkelstein proved that entire book to be a fabrication, a lie...made up by Israeli intelligence, claiming there were no palestinians or arabs in Palestine when the Jews first settled...created this paradise, and THEN the arabs / palestinians flooded in... the 'transfer' a.k.a 'ethnic cleansing' was to be justified in this way...of Palestinians whose families had lived in Palestine continuously since the days of Jesus...A Semitic person is from around the Mediterranean...nothig to do with today's 'jews'...the true descendants of the ancient hebrews are arabic...??? ask Mohammed / a Muslim?...Finkelstein was still working on post-graduate work, but after completing his findings he couldn't get his Ph.D accepted? Couldn't publish his findings. He worked for 2000 a year helping underpriveleged kids in a tiny flat ???...

Also Israel Shamir, Paul Eisen, who are warning Jews it is time to stop all this, and face facts, and own up, or its gonna get real bad real soon for them...

Israeli activists get beaten up by the orthodox, IDF, and police, and settlers...

Foreign activists...that beautiful girl Rachel Corrie, buried alive by an Israeli military bulldozer, Tom Hurndall, shot through the head trying to usher little children to safety in the middle of the street...BBC reporters shot through the neck...no respect for human life or decency...

Some leftists in the U.K brok into an armaments factory and destroyed bomb-aiming sighting devices destined for Israel...they claimed 'lawful excuse', 'we have to damage those bomb-sights (court reporter wrote 'sites') so they can't be used to slaughter Palestinians in the occupied west bank and Gaza'...did 180,000 pounds damage...'I had to commit a crime to prevent a greater crime happening'...the judge stated that Israel had no respect for international law, and that these people would have been awared the St.George medal if it had been 1939...

Palestinians have told Brendon that the activists here don't dare say a word because their family back in Palestine will pay the price... When people like Keyser are taking photos, it is to send back to Palestine to intimidate their relatives there, to put pressure on them to tell their Australian relatives to stop their protesting...

These 'bullies' claim because a relative of theirs died in 'the holocaust' they can do whatever they like...cos THEY are the victims, somehow...

An Israeli politician admitted on camera that 'it was a trick' to bring up 'the holocaust' and play the 'victim' card , and 'anti-semitism' card, any time anyone was going to criticise Israel or something they did...to intimidate them...shut them down...

Brendon made the point that he didn't personally know any Jewish activists like the 10 or so he was aware of...and even if there were a few thousand, that's still not a lot, from over 20 million jews worldwide...'that's not a lot, that's not a lot'.

MHR which is our problem...in reality, MOST 'jews' are by default 'bad jews' i.e subscribe to the ideology of semitism...so generalisations are apt, but we have to deliberately avoid them, to avoid 'prejudice' of the particular jew in front of us etc...

U.S refused to let Australian technicians service the weapons and sensor systems on the Collins class submarines...claiming it was 'secret' and they couldn't trust them not to 'blab'...so Israel offered them a 'similar' set-up (probably stolen from U.S via espionage or just CIA etc) ... source of most Chinese tech i.e U.S pays for R&D, 'trust' 'their greatest ally' Israel, who gets this tech and sells it to anyone who will pay...Brendon also discovered that the Israeli's had installed some communications related gear at Campbell Barracks S.A.S base... via an acquaintance Leon Wende, who works for Israel...installing weapons and sensor systems and writing code...for the Collins Class Submarines...had been Israeli military before this...had posted stuff on his blog that was probably classified...like with the U.S researcher who claimed it was all 'public domain stuff'... Leon was also installing the Sydney Rail Transit System security systems around 2008...

Israeli company had done security for London Tube...and public claims of 'backpack' bombs...all the witnesses stated 'We never saw those men on the train, there were never any backpacks...and the security warned them, as they were getting off the train...'look out for the hole, the explosives were under the train'...

Variant are a subsidiary of Converse who do the data intercepts for local and federal police, law enforcement etc...they do wiring and wireless IP for security networks.Brendon posted a story about Leon Wende using photos from Leon's own site...Detectives claimed Leon's wife complained about Brendon 'We just want to make sure you're not going to kill his family' etc...Brendon explained the situation to Federal police who then interviewed Leon, his wife then began begging Brendon to 'stop the vendetta' as she put it...but it was just the facts...but then someone cut the brake lines of a housemate...

Never did it enter my head that 'I am ggoing to create animosity and hatred for jews or the jewish race' ...It was just, 'I'm going to give it to you because you're a damned hypocrite, and you will talk to us. You will stop hiding from these issues'

And I consider jews or judaism gernally speaking as more an organised criminal outfit than even a religion, seriously (probably NOT the best thing to say in this situation !!!) That's a big statement, but I mean it, after 5, 6 years studying it. That is my conclusion. It's not just my conclusion. Itls people like Dr Alan Sabrosky and any other respectable people, and we're calling on the jewish community to stop pretending there isn't a problem.

Brendon's Palestinian friends from the protest group Friends of Palestine expressed that 'We have to be very careful. We have families back at home' ... and Alex Wissan did not want to touch the religion angle at all...they really distanced themselves from Brendon immediately...they knew the jews would try to make them look bad...they didn't want to take any chances...

My main aim was to make a film, to catch the thugs taking photos of people...to run a counter surveillance operation...cos I'm sick of them intimidating ordinary people...

There are bad things happening and people need to wake up.

the state of israel is going to drag us all into world war III, it's the opinion of military commentators, senators, and congressmen, if we don't approach jewish power and the state of israel...

You'll find jewish symbolism everywhere within freemasonry

That pyramid is a freemason symbol (Perth courthouse?)

Jews don't serve in the U.S or Australian Army, but they volunteer to serve in the Israeli army...or they do join the local army, then go to Israel and work with the IDF murdering Palestinians...

Israeli's are over at SAS Campbell Barracks teacing Australian military personnel Arabic, Arab culture etc ???

The Bauer / Rothschilds were 'HofJuden' i.e court jews, Slavic Ashkednazi jews', money lenders to the elites in Europe / German states ... Brendon notes how hypocritical the christians often were, spitting in jews faces, but happy to borrow money from them, and to avoid paying it back 'throwing the jews down a well'...etc...

Kuhn, Loeb, Wahlberg, Schiff old family banking dynasties from Vienna, from Italy...you've never heard of them...most people don't even know...Goldman Sachs...everyone in the industry knows it, but they won't talk about it, as they know the consequences, career suicide, at least...'suicided' at worst... just state the facts and you'll be demonized as an 'anti-semite'...

The planet is run by people who call themselves jews. An organised criminal group. with a lot of ordinary people just going along with it, just like any organised criminal gang. But it has to st op.

Get a video camera and shine the light on evil, no matter what it is. that's how to be an activist. Not get a gun, a bunker, and hunker down with your survival rations...and wait for it all to go to shit then blow over???

It's like the presses...allowed people for the first time to mass produce ideas of new things, new ways of looking and being in the world...

I just want people to go out there and say 'enough'...

I don't want to look at another dead Palestinian child with its guts ripped open and his head blown off. It does things to your head and you don't want to see that stuff. ...I want it to end, because it's poison to the soul.

You can't say what other people told you because that is hearsay...you have to call them as witnesses...but prosecutor let Brendon say all that other stuff...???

At the rally Brendon had decided to 'hold his tongue' and do some video editing for them, as he liked them...

Brendon had his camera off, was sitting at the back of the group, when Keyser pointed his camera directly at him, at close range, and took his photo...told jury he was just pointing it, at a distance, at the group, and the photo was unusable...

AFter this Stanley Keyser walked through the entrance where Brendon was with a few other friends of palestine with his nose in the air, turned around, faced everyone, and said 'We are jews from melbourne. we're on holidays. or 'we're tourists, or something, 'and what I-what you're doing, I think, is disgusting' or words to that effect...And then up he went. We looked at each other and started laughing. Then I thought' he's just taken my photo (he had first assumed he was part of the rally)...so I grabbed my camera, and walked after Keyser...at a fast pace towards him...

footage he wanted to show the jury had been 'dissappeared' from his laptop after it was held in the custory of Det. mark rubidge of the technology crime division... the unedited footage not used in the published video was deleted...it showed Keyser reaching over and grabbing a grapefruit, i.e he was standing right next to us, but Brendon had not paid him any attention...

Brendon stated 'I say Israel has no right to exist whatsoever. None !!!

Palestinians have been living there for 1400 unbroken years...all the Jews have is a religious book they wrote themselves, claiming it is their land... MHR but they fail to remind us why they lost it, and what conditions god imposed on them for their return, which have NOT been met yet...and fail to remind us how their biblical ancestors originally GOT palestine for themselves...!!!

Brendon has a video of a Black Swahili jewish orthodox Rabbi of Swaziland, who converted from Christianity...now he is considered a member of the 'jewish race'...and now he has the right to move to Palestine and move into a house stolen from a palestinian family, who were either murdered or driven out of their own home, still have the door keys and property deeds...and now this guy from Swaziland can live there, but they can never return, or be compensated...

I'm telling you they literally run the planet, every power point. But their greatest danger is exposure, and they know that when the people find out, there's going to be hell to pay. Hell to pay.

I know I sound like like neo nazi propaganda ... but believe me, it's not just me saying it...I'm talking mainstream senators, congressman, women, etc...If you've got the time, have a look through youtube, it's everywhere...

They are evil? (the palestinians?). How would you like it if you were sitting in your apartment and a two ton bomb comes through the rood and kills your men, your wief and all your kids? 'Yeah, I'd be wanting them all wiped out too'

Do I have the right to a catholic state? ??? great point !!! i.e go to northern ireland and kick the protestants out after 400 years???

The jews have been studiously avoiding the place for 2000 years, and suddenly they want it? its the greatest thing for a jew?

Theodor Herzl realised 'we need to create hatred for the jews so they will pack up and leave europe' so they funded Hitler via their U.S banking cartels...

Jewish bankers funded I.G. Farben (the building in Berlin is still empty, as they cannot work out who owns it etc???)...after Hitler jews were keen to leave Europe...suddenly Palestine appeared desirable...

Israeli's say 'transfer' for 'ethnically cleanse'...funny, same word the Nazi's used in their 'transfer agreement' before wwII !!!

Keyser's statement 'so you're saying all jews are racist' comes as a non-sequitur...brendon has said 'So what is it with all you peopld? its all about you. Your pain and your suffering. So you're saying all jews are racist?

Channel 9 stuck me on a current affair, and stated I wanted to wipe out all jews, implied I was with neo nazi's and the klu klux klan...but when does the media EVER report on the racist comments and actions of israeli's and jews? and their 'holy' books?

Keyser is trying to be 'humiliated in public' by approaching strangers, calling out that Brendon has called him a racist etc...to turn it into something he could use the new racial vilification legislation ...

Hannah Kasher, an Israeli academic, is claiming that israel has a moral right / religious duty to collectively punish the palestinians for anything any individual does e.g rocket , throw stone...by claiming that the biblical religious duty re; Amalek, the eternal enemy of the jew, was still active , and the palestinians were amalek, and eve nthe children or sons of palestinian resistance fighters now in prison in israel were as guilty as their fathers and should be murdered...kill them all, men, women, children... but does Channel 9 report of this most extreme form of racial vilification, and incitement to murder children???

When Israeli activists wanted a Rabbi sacked for telling the soldiers to kill every man, woman, and child, they were ignored...

A Swahili woman could convert to Orthodox Judaism, marry a chinese Buddhist, and their baby, born in Iceland, would automatically be 'jewish' by 'race', a part of the 'jewish race'...by default...the assumption the Rabbi would make is that she has a 'jewish' blood-line...a biological connection...has 'jewish blood'...

MHR remembering religion is slavery, it is like selling your soul to the devil in order to access the benefits of group membership...and selling your future children into slavery into the bargain...this means Hitler could easily have 'converted' to Orthodox Judaism, and served the jew world order...in theory...and practise...

MHR Tay Sachs disease Newfoundland and Ashkednazi jews?

Keyser clearly NOT terrified, scared, intimidated, if anything, quite aggressive, 'in your face' literally...comes up to camera...after walking away repeats...though Brendon does follow on occasion and at first viewing the impression I got was of him 'pursuing' him, but now in hindsight seems Keyser was quite aggressive the whole time...

The jury was not supposed to know the penalty? and when Brendon mentions it, the prosecutor claims his comment was 'incorrect', and he is not allowed to mention it to jury anyway...implying that the prison sentence for a guilty verdict would NOT be 4 years, but it was...so why not let jury decide if it is 'reasonable' to do this to Brendon for what he did...no, the jury is not supposed to know the consequences of their 'guilty' verdict...does the jew world order fear they would find it unacceptable, and declare him innocent, to avoid such a draconian outcome???

The 'Jews' came out of Egypt as 'a mixed multitude' who converted to this new religion...and since then at least 4 mass conversions, The Berbers of North Africa, the Khazars, the Russian Slavs, as Matthew says 'For ye compass sea and land to make on proselyte, only to make him twice the child of hell as yourself'...

This makes the idea of a biologically coherent 'race' absurd...

Jews want to claim that all non-jews hate them, like Jacob and Esau, with an irrational hatred the jews can do nothing about ... as if innocent victims...

It is a form of child abuse, making kids paranoid, fearful of goys, as likely to 'turn on them' at any time i.e never trust the goys, or their governments, which leads to them having control manias...i.e to control the whole world, everyone their potential enemy at any moment...don't trust the goys...'the holocaust', 'the inquisition', 'the pogroms', as if they are the only victims ever, and never did anything ever to deserve being 'pogrommed'...

IDF soldiers off their heads on drugs, like the U.S pilots on speed during Bosnia / Yugoslavian bombing raids...paranoid...shooting at anything...

Judge warns jury before dismissing for lunch that they are NOT to go searching on the internet as Brendon suggested...they must base their decisions on what they hear in the courtroom...fuck...so they are NOT allowed to inform themselves? got to trust YOU, the state, the prosecutors, after Brendon clearly stated he was NOT allowed to present the evidence he had...???

Some of the Psalms of David even refer to standing ankle deep in the blood of my enemies !!! I missed so much it seems, in my translation of the bible...???

Lots of jews will tell you the old testament is about spaceships...

Brendon believes the propaganda that babies were being sacrificed to Moloch...making the old testament genocide O.K ???

Brendon notes that the laws only apply to jews, not non-jews i.e ethics only exclusive, exceptional, apply ONLY to other jews...the goy is not your neighbour...

Rabbinic Pharisaic Judaism is clear that you can steal, murder, rape etc goys, just not other jews...

Rabbi Freilich admitted that as an Orthodox Jew he is the heir to the Pharisaic tradition, the ones Jesus condemned as 'hypocrites all'...'Yes, I'm a Pharisee'...

They are the original lawyers, literally, they interpret 'the law' which Jesus so critical of...'straining at gnats while swallowing camels' i.e typical lawyer / court stuff...misses principle of justice totally, and makes huge deal about technicalities...'Bow before the letter of the law but violate the heart of the law'...Jesus in the temple...

The 'good jews', the 70,000 or so 'Karaites', have been persecuted by the Rabbinic authorities for centuries, for rejecting the post-old testament books / rulings / interpretations...interpreting the original biblical texts according to their own conscience...they are whipped, beaten, and murdered...they are the 'jews' we imagine jews to be like, whom the bulk of judaism rejects...ironically...the entire judaism benefits from this delusion of ours, which they like to project, while victimising any jew that really IS like that public relations version in any way...

The idea that WE share OUR ethics, christian ethics, with judaism, is a joke...propaganda...foolish notion...totally at odds with reality...we did not get our ethics from them, and they do NOT include US in their ethical system as equals ... we have our own germanic traditions of equality, egalitarianism, meritocracy, democracy 'the thing' etc...

Brendon explains how the whole 'russian' revolution was a jewish thing...jews ran the whole thing...quotes Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn' ... jewish bankers Rothschild, Kuhn and Loeb, Schiff, Warburg...funded Hitler's nazi regime... Christians were given 10 years in a gulag for wearing a crucifix or icon of the virgin mary...tens of millions murdered...churches destroyed, all while the death penalty awaited for 'anti-semitism' and the synagogues left untouched...christianity became a crime, semitism was 'protected' at all levels...10,00 churches destroyed, 40,000 monks, priests, nuns murdered...bullets to the back of the head, beaten to death, murdered the royal family, head of the Russian orthodox church...run mostly by Khazarian 'jews' who had converted en masse in the 1800s...around 40 million people, at the most conservative, with 70 million often quoted by Solzehnitsyn... when does the mass media or hollywood speak about that? all you hear is 'holocaust'...and only 'jews' were the victims, not gypsies, homosexuals, polish catholics...only jews suffer...nobody else has ever suffered...mhr because only jews count, the rest are just cattle...like todays average person never thinks about the suffering they inflict on animals etc...

A jew in israel wrote an article' Stalin's willing helpers' in which he proved that jews were some of the greatest mass murderers of all time...a jew in israel wrote this...the russian archives are open to more people now...

Jews will claim dresden was 30,000, when it was over 150,000, full of refugees fleeing the russians...and put David IRving in jail for 'underestimating' the number of jews who died in nazi germany...six million germans died...13 million 'displaced' after 1945...doesn't mention the millions displaced after Versailles...fire bombings of 40 german cities...children piled up on wooden crates and cremated...the REAL 'burned offering' 'holocaust' 'fed to the flames'...not the faked Auschwitz holocaust...

'Your days are numbered'. Israel will be gone in 5 years, jews won't move there, they are leaving for Australia, for Perth, North-West Australia, and Tasmania...

Glad Brendon brought up holocaust denial...and supported it...Frederick Toben, Ernst Zundel, Fred Leuchter, even Winston Churchill did NOT mention 'the holocaust' in his memoirs...nor did Eisenhower...mhr its as if they knew it would be debunked sooner or later, and didn't want to be associated with the propaganda ... good Brendon doesn't doubt tens, maybe hundreds of thousands died in labor camps after being separated from their families...but 50 million died in WWII, not just jews...it was horrific...everyone needs to be brought to justice...all their jewish advisors... Roosevelt's war cabinet was nearly ally Jewish...Schlomo Sand, Frank Coh, were supporting Mao, the communist mass murderer...Fred Leuchter was the U.S prison systems expert on gas chambers...Ernst Zundel called him as an expert witness...he took samples of supposed 'GAS CHAMBERS' and found ZERO trace of blue staining / residue / cyanide...he had his life destroed for seeking the truth...then Piper did the same tests, the head of the Auschwitz museum in poland...he got the same results...zero residues...no way ANYONE was EVER gassed in that supposed 'gas chamber' the Russians fabricated out of an air-raid shelter / temporary morgue...one of his staff took his research results, photocopied them, and released them... vindicating Leuchter and every 'holocaust denier' ... that man was locked up for 3 years simply for replicating Leuchter's work...typical 'peer review'...a PhD in chemistry...

Prof. Finkelstein, who claims his mother? relatives died in the death camps, still wrote a book on 'The Holocaust Industry'.

Fred Toben was locked up in Australia for talking about all that. This is soviet russia.

Laurie Faurisson was an expert on documents...French...he found that there was no documentary evidence for 'the holocaust'...just a lot of fakes, forgeries, and forced confessions...

'These vampires' refers to Deborah Lipstadt (13 million in admitted court costs to defeat David Irving's libel lawsuit, the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith etc...

An opinion poll among the Perth jewish community found 90% of the jews there applauded 'operation cast lead', so they are just as culpable for the Palestinian genocide / ethnic cleansing as the jews in Israel committing the war crimes...

Chertoff is an Israeli citizen, was head of Homeland security DHS and all the FEMA camps...

Brendon had been accused, all over the media, of having rung the Jewish day caare center and threatened to kill all the kdis. They had to post a police guard and the children needed counselling. That was all over the media. (mhr probably a jew called in, as usual)

This is what the police interrogated Brendon about. And some jewish women he'd threatened at some secret store?

It gets down to 'did I intend to vilify a racial group or an ethnic group? The answers NO.

I can't even present stuff to you to prove that my behavior / comments have all been in good faith. See those big bags over there? I was up till 2/3 in the morning getting those ready. I can'tt show you it. This is evidence... to prove that what I write about is general knowldedge and even mainstream in many cases...SBS documentaries...Jews, Israeli jews, are running around assassinating people...

Kay Griggs was the wife of a marine colonel who ran the assassination and dirty tricks program for the marine corps. She publically came out against her husbands former employers...she stated in 1998 that the pentagon and the united states govt. is run by perverts, sexual deviates, closet homosexuals, pedophiles of the worst kind...7 hours long video she made...

They are running around committing false flag terrorist attacks to blame on Muslims, they are mass murdering people for gun control (faking mass shootings !!!), and I put to you that Port Arthur massacre was NOT done by a man with an IQ of 60, who was making cups of tea and feeding biscuits to his hostages...lead to the disarming of the Australian public...at huge cost to the tax payers...basically making the Australian population unable to defend itself against its coming tyrant / rogue government...

Brendon's research / evidence on the Esperance bird deaths / chemtrails was not on his hard disc when he finally got his laptop back after it was taken by the police...

Judge stated that the fact that so many jews have been 'done' for painting swastikas on their own doors / synagogues etc was 'not relevant in any way' ??? really? persecution manufacture? not relevant...to Keyser claiming total ignorance of the legislatioin, but provoking Brendon and running around trying to get 'witnesses' ...

Prosecutor: what do you say to the proposition that generalising is unfair and risks grossly misrepresenting and attacking any individual? The jew Morgenthau was behind the bombing of Dresden (and machine gunning, don't forget! makes a HUGE diference when inferring motives etc i.e war crime, NOT strategic bombing)...P: so does that make every british person culpable? because the RAF carried out the bombings? Yes, but the british people today openly condemn that bombing...the jews do NOT condemn Morgenthau or Palestinian atrocities...etc... so P moves on quickly, having failed and actually made a point for Brendon against the jews...'they speak openly about it and how bad it was...and no-one goes to jail for vilifying the british people...

P goes onto IRA ... are all Irish responsible for an IRA bomb? 'yes, if they support it, then yes'... P so you'd have to first find out IF they support it, to be fair?

Brendon replies that in the course of a heated street debate such niceties sometimes fall short of the ideal...and he DID give him a chance to renounce / denounce Israeli actions, and he admitted 'Israel has made some mistakes' but then did NOT denounce /renounce their actions, so I'd say the P's argument has fallen flat, Brendon wins the point...he WAS trying to get him to distance himself, and instead Keyser indicated his support for Israel...???

Keyser repeated 'You guys' in reference to Brendon, thus assuming / generalising about Brendon, so why does HE get off, but Brendon has to 'explain' HIS generalisations, in the heat of the moment...?

But I'd agree the video was not appropriate i.e libel, slander, unless knows for fact / or Keyser clearly is zionist??? not sure???

Brendon states that some things are totally indefensible...like 'Operation cast lead'...totally indefensible...not question of getting particulars before making this statement...it was an atrocity...a war crime...mass murder...totally unacceptable by any standards of 'modern' law or 'warfare'...

P wants to portray Brendon as having assumed things not reasonable...about Keyser's views...really? would a moderate, anti-zionist jew be there taking photos? go to all that effort? to aid the palestinian cause? for justice? was he there for THAT purpose? 'You people disgust me?' did he say that, check notes, to see if his companion agreed he'd said that before the video began ???

'What you, what you're doing is disgusting' ??? why??? justice disgusts him? peaceful demonstration disgusts him? didn't judeah declare total embargo / war on germany? ban all its exports worldwide? ???

supporting the massacre of 1500 Palestinian women, children, and men, by his silence...

P: did keyser accuse you of being a racist, homicidal maniac? why ask such a stupid question? how is it relevant? as Brendon states HE and HIS people were not the ones carrying out the atrocities...

Brendon was attacking Keyser as a representative of all jewish people (make special notes of all 'legal angles' to 'train' people to avoid being charged / convicted in future ...including when make own public statements / charge jewish inciters / vilifiers / ..

P says 'don't we see on the vvideo you simply leaping to assumptions, ascribing them to Mr Keyser and then attacking him personally and as a representative of the jewish people?'...

P disingenously asks why Brendon 'imports' references to germany into his attack on Keyser...and its connotations with 'the holocaust' which he states 'the context of germany from history as we all do, in relation to the jews' i.e 'we all know 'the holocaust' etc...'by suddenly importing german and its connotations with the holocaust, aren't you directly and inferentially, seriously and substantially, abusing this jewish man' ???? wtf is THAT supposed to mean? deliberately trying to obfuscate to get the jury's 'we all know' sympathy for the poor jewish man? as 'expected' of any 'good' person? according to the holocaust religion / myth ?

Then P adds 'ridiculing' to his list of holocaust crimes Brendon has repeated !!!

Brendon's point was CLEARLY that if GERMANS did 'the holocaust' crimes, then Israel should have been given GERMAN territory as compensation, NOT Palestinian territory, so P MUST be being disingenous and that would make him a total fucker...jew world order operative...his comments were NOT salient, relevant, appropriate, unavoidable, compelling etc in relation to the facts in the video and the intent of the trial...fucker

P 'I'm sure you can take it as a fact that all the questions are being put seriously... Why? clearly NOT serious question...deliberate ploy...digression...disingenous...irrelevant...and NOT implied by ANYTHING brendon has said or done in the video or in the court room or on any of his blog posts...

P admits 'you see I'm suggesting you deliberately mentioned germany to a jewish person to abuse and ridicule him' ... of course we know that, but how is THAT your job? how is THAT appropriate? clearly Brendon gave him NO reason to 'suggest' this i.e nothing in brendon's behavior 'suggests' this...he has been 'fed' this comment...NOT derived from proceedings or any evidence...

Again the P repeats the unnecessary non-sequitur claim / suggestion / charge...clearly deliberate ploy...to gain audience's sympathy, to 'instruct the jury as to how it 'should' feel about Brendon...poor jewish man survived the holocaust and brendon wants to murder him all over again shit...

Again P repeats 'you import for no obvious reason, save to ridicule and abuse directly, german and slaughter of jews?' IMMEDIATELY after Brendon has just explained it was the Iranian president's idea / comment, and had explained the logic, AGAIN AND AGAIN that if GERMANY is guilty, then why punish Palestinians? Why not give Jews a homeland in Germany? There is NO connection between 'the holocaust' and Palestinians... so now it is as clear as anything that the P has been instructed to introduce this non-sequitur argument, and behave just like our 'archetypal jew' in introducing non-sequiturs, acting like what was just said has not been said, and 'implanting' the idea in the juries mind, for no reason, with no foundations, that brendon intended to ridicule and laugh at and terrorise this poor jewish survivor of 'the holocaust'...that brendon is evil, devious, malicious...over and over...it can't be a 'question' because Brendon has already answered it repeatedly...it is a 'seed' to be 'planted' in the juries minds...it is NOT a genuine question...he had the answer, has the answer...and there was NEVER any reason to even ask the question...so it is clearly disingenous and this Mr Eyers prosecutor fucker is a real fucker...

fuck...AGAIN the P fucker repeats the 'suggestion' as if it is a question, always adding, slying 'And the jury will determine', which is a CLEAR form of trance suggestion...repeated in the boring courtroom ritual...over and over ... 'And YOU the jury WILL determine' i.e conclude... and continues 'Without any context or historical reference'...wtf ??? he just repeated several times the EXACT historical reference and context...jews cannot claim a blank check to commit atrocities on PALESTINIANS because of anything GERMANS did to them... and again ASSERTS as if a question that brendon 'imported for no obvious reason (he just repeated the Obvious reason several times before this statement, a repeated 'suggestion' to 'implant' in the jury, who WILL determine it to be as he has repeatedly said 'import for no obvious reason, save to ridicule and abuse directly'...'that's abuse and ridicule' not rational debate....wtf...how clear could Brendon have been...how more perfectly rational a statemente could you make, but that X doing Y to Z does not justify Z doing Y to A ... THE most rational argument I've heard in any court transcript EVER...

Brendon quotes 'When we want to strike down Europeans from criticizing Israel we bring up the Holocaust' this is a verbatim quote recorded on video for anyone to watch and hear...and 'When Americans bring it up we call them anti-semites. It's a trick. We always use it.'

P then claims 'we've heard in this courtroom that only 10 percent of jews are religious !!!!'...based on one cult priest yes, as he defines his belief system as the only 'true' religion, of course...only 10% of jews are orthodox, and Keyser was NOT, so why on earth did Eyers, the P, bring HIM of all people in as the 'expert witness' for defining 'who is a jew' and 'what does 'jew' mean' being a jew mean etc...??? also another clue for the 'jew world order operative' detective...

Then P tries to assert 'The jury will determine THAT' again...i.e this is pure trance suggestion / hypnotists tricks !!!... P Eyers asserts only 10% of jews are religious, AGAIN ... why? absurd idea...very misleading...could NOT be genuine belief of Eyers...disingenous to the nth degree...he MUST know that there are so many different sects...like claiming that unless you are a practising 'Catholic' you are NOT christian, and don't share the beliefs of christianity...so fucking blatant...'would you accept the proposition and the fact (wtf another clear non-sequitur i.e fact andd proposition are very different, but used in run-on sentences !!! negating each other, totally obtusifying the statement, where the fuck do they train these people???)...that the MAJORITY of jews wouldn't regard themselves as RELIGIOUS ... MHR clearly attempt to distance 'jews' from 'biblical holocaust' and 'talmud' and 'chosen people' and 'right to enslave us goys' etc...

Brendon uses logic of generalizing about pitbulls i.e I've never met this particular pitbull, but I am justified / rational in making certain assumptions about the risk this one may pose...

P :'Isn't drawing an analogy between a breed of fighting dog and a complex human being generalising...and totally demeaning and misrepresenting the nature of the issues?

OOOH>..fucker town...fucker mayor...'You've DENIED it'....not 'debunked' it...DENIED...now THIS IS CLEAR EVIDENCE THAT HE IS WORKING FOR THE JEW WORLD ORDER...normal people use hte word 'denied' to mean a child lying in the face of clear evidence e.g chocolate smeared across their face 'I didn't eat any chocolate'...you do NOT use it in this legal context without intentionally aiming to distort a jury's perceptions / emotions...DENIAL is totally unacceptable in this context where 'refute' or 'disprove' or 'disagree' would be appropriate...

'Who do you people think you are'...you're generalising aren't you? of course he is...but in a particular way...and remember KEYSER used the EXACT SAME language just a little before Brendon 'You people are disgusting'...etc...

Brendon claims he 'knows exactly what Keyser was going to say' and I think he was right in his assumption, based on everything that happened...and given the informal nature of the confrontation, and Keyser making ZERO attempt to behave 'out of the mold' of someone who comes to a peaceful rally taking photos of the protestors, and lying to them, and abusing them as 'disgusting'...and proudly acclaiming he is 'a jew'...???

He is a radical student zionist, fan of Chabad Lubavitch, THE most radical / extremist / repugnant 'brand' of jewishness...'it's plainly obvious' that he represents the worst of judaism, and supports the injustices etc...he's a radical zionist..who else comes to rallies to take our photos?

Brendon was 'laughing' at Keyser, P Eyers wants the jury to define it as 'abusing, and ridiculing'. which P repeats 'the way you expressed yourself to him, in the presence of others (note this 'not in private' bit added), in public, was abusing and ridiculing him?'...then P say's 'well their not my words' ??? WTF so who just said them, to the jury, in this courtroom??? wtf?? is he a mental patient? 'not my words' so who just uttered them? his alternative personality? god? ???

THEN FUCKING AGAIN 'SO YOU WERE RIDICULING HIM AS A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE JEWISH PEOPLE?' how many times should a judge let him repeat the same question as a leading question, and suggestion to the jury...??? when brendon has explained this over and over and refuted it, disproved it, and there is NOTHING on camera etc to 'suggest' this at all to anyone...

'I was laughing, shaking my head, thinking, 'I can't believe this guy'...just too much...legitimately laughable...

now P Eyers keeps repeating 'What do you see as the difference between laughing at somebody and ridiculing them?'...this is NOT a question..it is a bunch of non-sequiturs...obviously NOT genuine question... 'You say there's a distinction' Fucking fucker how obvious... as if everyone does not immediately see a difference, after brendon gave example of P pulling down his pants and standing on his head...laughing at him because he was funny is clearly nothing to do with ridicule...yet in typical archetypical 'jew', as this case gives so many examples of, he utters non-sequiturs as if they were serious questions which 'followed from' previous statetments, the evidence, brendon's utterances etc...when clearly 'do not follow in any way' and are definitely intended to suggest things to jury that are NOT true , rational, logical, reasonable assumptions / conclusions to make / take from 'the evidence'...he is introducing suggestions like a hypnotist 'the jury will determine'...WILL DETERMINE... !!!

'You are racist, homicidal maniacs' Meaning the jews? Absolutely. Isn't that ridiculing and abusing that young man?

Brendon points to the pile of 'evidence' he has to support that claim, which the court will NOT allow him to present to the jury to justify it...as based in reality, and NOT on a desire / intent to abuse or ridicule Keyser...

So Eyers again asserts what Brendon has many times refuted and explained / contradicted / proven to be NOT the case ''You are racist, homicidal maniacs' is both abusive and ridiculing isn't it? MHR it might be abusive, but he's trying to get the jury to imagine Brendon brought up germany in the worst way, and so includes 'ridicule' ... as if Brendon laughing at jews being gassed and thrown into ovens...!!! NOT 'just doing his job'...not 'assuming brendon is innocent'...not 'sticking to the known facts / provable...why pretend 'mind reading'?

Repeats same hack...'Are you abusing and ridiculing?'... has repeated this suggestiong so many times, and look back at trial notes and see how judge and Eyers criticised Brendon for repeating the question, stepping in, over and over, claiming 'he's already answered that question' ,when in Keyser's case, he had NOT ...or had done the non-sequitur negation thing Yes, no I don't remember, NO, I might have...etc... so NOT consistent and 'playing by the books'...there is deliberate bias against Brendon...as Brendon complained of re: the 'rally' etc... and why bring in an orthodox rabbi who represented only 10% of jews according to Eyers own words? how is THAT representative? given Prof. Markus also only surveyed around 6000 'jews', out off 20 million or so...THAT is even LESS representative, despite what 'stastically representative' might or might not mean, allow us to extrapolate from...so much 'self-selection' i.e 'volunteers' ... ???

By defending the indefensible Keyser defined himself as 'one of the worst' and thus racist and homicial, which the just recent 'operation casting lead' murder of 1500 Palestinians in their open prison Gaza ghetto CLEARLY was...objectively...not subjectively...if they had been JEWISH victims, say a ghetto in Germany, and it had beeh germans doing the bombing and shooting, imagine what a media frenzy it would have produced !!!!

I'm going to call him a racist homicidal maniac a hundred times, yes....'And you're going to abuse and ridicule him?'...again with the suggestion, repeated question we've had answered directly and clearly and had explained over and over again...where did the term 'ridicule' enter into the trial though? very nasty blatant intent on Eyers part...no context for it...nothing 'mean and nasty' was in Brendon's presentation...no reason to 'add' this term / idea...anger, yes...abusive? libel? slander? maybe...but based on reasonable indicators that Keyser was 'one of the worst' jews, and responsible for Gaza etc...

Eyers says 'it's pretty abusive isn't it, to a person you've never met before'...Brendon replies (indicating the record has been edited / tampered with / stuff removed from it) 'You keep saying that Mr Eyers. I HAD met him before.

Why add that 'caveat', to a man I'd never met before, as if I knew nothing about him...had no grounds for such 'abuse'

Mr Eyers, if you're going to defend the slaughter and ethnic cleansing of an entire people...what do you want me to say? Do you want me to tickle his tummy?

I don't consider it abusive and I'd do it a thousand times again. I've answered the question.

Indeed, so many times the head spins...compared to their chastisement of his attempts to repeat questions maybe 4 times max, after getting no-sequitur answers...clear bias of judge and P...

I didn't have my caveats ready re: All jews...I have a long list of 'good' jews like Prof. Norman Finkelstein, Israel Shahak, Israel Shamir, Paul Eisen ...etc...a reasonably big list...

Brendon asks to show a documentary to substantiate his claims and justify his behavior, put it in context of 'reasonable assumption' but not allowed as it does NOT contain Keyser or Peach...and he hadn't arranged to have it given in evidence, no-one prompted him to...if indeed it would have been admissible, probably not...as NOT an actual person, live in court / by video...SO MAKE SURE WE START ARRANGING CONTACTS OF PEOPLE WE WOULD LIKE TO CALL AS VIDEO WITNESSES IN FUTURE CASES...ACTUALLY PREPARE A CASE DELIBERATELY...PROVOKE ONE...AND BE TOTALLY PREPARED ON ALL LEVELS...

Ted Pike documentary. Brendon refers to problem of police NOT being allowed to jump to any conclusions when a man dressed in the paraphanalia of a particular OUTLAWED motorcycle gang ... Keyser has identified himself as clearly as if he was wearing such a 'gang' 'uniform'...

Brendon referst to Rabbi Freilich's comment 'Judaism is a religion of peace and love' and he has documented evidence that he was lying through his teeth, but court won't let him present it...the evidence for how he jumped to this conclusion...formed this belief about Keyser, that lead to hims comments being presented as abusive and ridiculing and without basis / foundation... i.e IRRATIONAL anti-semitism...making fun even of jewish suffering in the holocaust etc ...!!!

Brendon had offered to enter into dialogue, and Keyser refused, and abused HIM 'You're all disgusting'? isn't THAT abuse and ridicule? If he said it to the palestinian protestors surely was exactly what eyers is accusing brendon of...were the comments in the trial notes about the scarves admitted by Peach? got to check...notes not written clearly i.e saying who said what...if it was a novel it would be really badly written dialogue, but for court notes, totally unfathomably incompetent or negligent or corrupt...

Brendon reminds Eyers he had 'met him' 10 minutes before...NOT just walking up to a 'stranger'...had seen his behavior 'disgusting' and deception 'I'm a jew from melbourne'...and not sure about the scarf comments in the notes, who made them ????did peach admit keyser uttered them?

Now Eyers is going on about the fact that Brendon couldn't have known if he was RELIGIOUS or not...that Brendon has conceded this ...so you are abusing him as a representative of views you can't know he shares....SO FUCKING OBVIOUS...HE HIMSELF CLAIMED ONLY 10% JEWS RELIGIOUS, AND HIS OWN WITNESSES STATED THAT BEING JEWISH NOT ABOUT RELIGION ALONE...SO WHAT IS HIS POINT? why obfuscate and confuse the jury? unless it is DELIBERATE ??? what is his objective / hidden agend / ulterior motive for this non-sequitur, as always, contradicting his own line of arguments???

Again 'I'm suggesting to you is this person who you'd only just smet was being abused and ridiculed by yhou for views and adherences and allegiances that you didn't have the least idea whether he held them or not? 'No, You're wrong'...but why repeat over and over, like a mantra, like a hypnotic suggestion, a line of interrogation that has already been disproven / debunked by the facts...with no reason to 'suggest' again, let alone for the n-th time...why obfuscate with this non-sequitur...include 'ridicule' again when has no context...there was NO ridicule intended or apparent...so why 'bundle' it up with non-related arguments unless intention is to mislead jury...'suggest' like a hypnotist...something there is no basis for...using his 'authority' as a state prosecutor....and repetition...

Eyers is using 'homicidal racist religion' ... probably why asserted earlier that only 10% jews religious...misleading jury deliberately...they are not 'orthodox' THAT is a clear 'mistrial' basis I think...to mislead the jury deliberately, that there was a 90% chance Keyser was NOT religious...just to play on Brendons words...non-sequitur fashion, for the idea of 'jews' NOT being 'religious' is NOT accurate, and NOT a belief held by brendon or most people...a 'secular jew' has almost ZERO basis for 'jewishness' OTHER THAN SHARED RELIGIOUS BELIEFS because ALL their beliefs originate in RELIGIOUS texts...beliefs... !!!!!! including that new jewish religious sect known as 'shoa' or 'the holocaust' religion / dogma / faith ... which has about as much 'proof' and 'evidence' as any other belief of victimisation / story of suffering, written and dogmatically accepted by the 'jews' as an article of faith... all so fucking messed up...

Brendon makes this clear...Keyser's heritage IS the religious stories...a belief his ancestors left Egypt after killing their first born children, stealing all the gold and valuables they could carry, then going on to slaughter entire people's who lived on the lands the jews wanted for themselves, committing genocide...THAT is the ORIGIN STORY of ALL JEWS whether or not they define themselves as 'religious' i.e 'practising'...Brendon makes this great and clear point...Keyser said he was a 'jew'...never denounced or renounced the biblical genocides or current genocide of palestinians...so does not matter ONE IOTA if he says he is 'religious'...it is ALL religion...nothing BUT religion...the whole IDEA of being 'Jewish' has NOT other basis but in the 'holy books' and shared stories, traditions, myths, which are only and exclusively presented / taken from, 'religious texts'...

Keyser DOES believe all that, THAT IS his HERITAGE...his 'basis' for being a 'jew'... there is NO connection between Eyers being related to a Briton who firebombed Dresden and Keyser stating openly that he is a 'jew'...britons don't celebrate their war crimes do they? it is NOT a defining characteristic of 'britons' is it? their 'origin story'? THE BASIS for them feeling they belong to an angle saxon community? it is NOT central to their beliefs about themselves, whether or not they bombed Dresden? so why bring up dresden AT ALL? Mr Eyers??

'Assertion of you views in a factual vacuum'? no basis for his views and assumptions about Keyser, based on him stating 'I am a jew'? Brendon happy to show all of the 'basis' but the court won't admit his evidence into the trial...because he hasn't arranged 'video witnesses' like the well heeled, internationally supported Keyser and Eyers...

'what you're doing is disgusting'. we're jews from melbourne' etc...what they were doing was trying to have sanctions put on israel, to stop Australians buying oranges etc grown on stolen palestinian territory, by 'criminals' according to every international law, and common laws of decency and morality...THAT is disgusting? THAT is not ridicule and abuse? Shouldn't THEY bring keyser to trial?

He's defending / supporting the slaughter of palestinians, so he IS responsible...unlike a briton today who admits Dresden was an atrocity, and would NEVER support it as morally etc acceptable...denounces and renounces it, once explained the facts...sad for it...would never ridicule germans who suffered fire bombing by the british / allies...

'It's in your religion and race'...I mean't 'It's in your religion and racial views'...I do NOT define jews as a race...

So of course Eyers repeats 'It's in your religion and race' to him directly, never having met him before ... wtf all non-sequiturs...a jew is X, he said 'I'm a jew', so he IS X, and brendon has every right to assume X unless Keyser, who had the chance, states he is NOT X...and clearly he IS X by every definition, according to his behavior...what, we are supposed to think he is worried that because brendon accused him of being racist and genocidal, that australian's will soon be locking jews up, gassing them, and throwing them in ovens? really? seriously? had no idea about the new laws? 14 years in prison? thinks THAT is reasonable? that anyone else but a jew would find it reasonable? NOTE, NEED TO ANALYSE EXACTLY WHAT THE JURY ACCEPTED AS BASIS FOR VERDICT...SO CAN CATCH JEWS OUT DOING EXACT SAME THING...ALSO, ANY 'MEETINGS' MUST BE DEFINED 'PRIVATE' AND NOT 'NOT IN PRIVATE' SO JEWS ATTENDING CANNOT CLAIM WAS 'PUBLIC'...AND CALL THEM OUT TO LEAVE BEFORE START MEETING...PHOTO EVERYONE ATTENDING? SIGN CLEARANCES? 'I AGREE I WILL NOT TAKE OFFENSE ETC???

Then P Eyers 'As a jew, he's anti-goy, anti gentile? Mm hmm.' MHR well a farmer is not anti-donkey, as long as the donkey will serve him, but if it gets into his garden and eats his vege patch, we'll see what esteem he really holds his donkey in!!!'

...P '...'But YOU'RE misrepresenting the picture in Palestine...??? Brendon is? Pure propaganda from the P to the jury...

P quotes Brendon 'It's in your religion and your race'...after Brendon has sworn that he does NOT consider jews a race...just a slip of the tongue in the heat of the moment...and 'race' can mean many things...a 'race of giants', a 'race of seafarers'... 'And you, and yet you've come here to dispute whether the jews are a race? Mm hmm'....more typical non-sequitur...because if it is clear Brendon rejects the idea of race, why play on his verbatim slip of the tongue, and now try to claim he does believe in race...this is totally disingenous...non-sequitur, self-negating typical of all the 'jew world order' reps in the court, from Eyers to Freilich...

'You just called all jews racist' Mm hmm. You did, didn't you? Yeah.

P : 'It would be difficult to be actually more abusive than you were, wouldn't it? You accept you were abusive? That you were ridiculing him?' ... Brendon was flippant 'Oh, I'm evil. Terrible. Yes. I'm absolutely abusive. Oh, it's terrible. 'Yeh, I was, yeah....he must have been seeing his pyschiatrist for years after this. I can't take it seriously Mr Eyers. Dry your eyes princess, have a debate, don't go around photographing people and intimidating people.

'These are dark people with a dark history and dark hearts? Mm hmm. (what's with the theatrics? Mm Hmm'ing all over the place?)...

Referring, obviously, to jewish people? Mm hmm. Well there's no qualification, is there? I'm sorry I don't have 55 caveats...

But your'e willing to publish your views? Which abused and riducules Jews in general? (again someone told him to play up 'ridicule' with is totally withhout context in Brendons videos, blogs, or behavior...the P is trying to play up on the poor victims of shoabusiness being killed all over again, that same of jew world order 'what's the word they use? >>> check wikipedia, they use it any time you challenge their myths and propaganda e.g jews control finance / media is a typical 'X'...???

...Would you accept that the effect of your approach and the words that you used to Mr Keyser were abusive and ridiculed him severely and substantially? 'according to YOU'

'No, no. It's YOUR evidence that matters? ... as if ...so why keep refuting him, he's rejected and debunked your 'ridicule' suggestion over dozen times...you just keep trying to suggest to jury, by repetition, that it is so...the jury hear it over a dozen times, half asleep, in a trance state, soon it becomes their 'reality'... P has told them 'that is for the jury to X (failing to say, OR NOT X !!!)...

then OH NO, Brendon finally says what P has been trying to trick him into saying, provoking him...'Just agree so I can characterise it. If you did abuse and ridicule him, it was all justifyable as part of what you see as a rigorous, vigorious, street debate?....YES....why brendon?? why??? couldn't you see what 'ridicule' is going to mean...that you brought up the holocaust to brutally ridicule all jews, and keyser, as a victim of a holocaust ???

Yes I admit. I admit. Everrything. Yes yes yes. Just don't hurt my family.

Brendon's intention was to say this was 'fair game' and without malice, he was always willing to have a friendly discussion, allow keyser to prove he was not 'typical' of the zionists doing the war crimes etc...but the jury only hear 'he admits to abuse and ridicule' and thus following the instructions given to them the case is over, he is guilty...but I wonder would they agree to the sentence, if allowed to 'vote' on that? sure he was abusive...but long prison sentences for a provoked heated street debate? do they realise next time they lose their temper with someone, they may end up on 'threaten to kill charges?' ... you see, this is how the police state / democracy works...you trick people into enforcing the laws for 'others' which later become their own prison walls ...

'I might just plead guilty now because I justt can't be bothered doing it anymore, Mr Eyers' !!!

'Well, feel free, go ahead? Yeah. Do you want to be rearraigned? Will I, wil I be, will I be able to show my stuff though? Well do you want to be rearraigned? No, what I want to do is be able to show my stuff and you, we all sat here and you said 'No, you can't show anything, that it's hearsay'. you need an expert witness'.

Eyers to Wisbey DCJ : ...your honour agreed with the bsic principle that out-of-court statements, by persons not called as witnesses, or opinions by person who were neither present nor expert witnesses, were prima facie inadmissible'. Wisbey: Articles and statements by persons outside the courtroom are not admissible.

Wisbey: there doesn't seem thus far to be a dispute by the state that he has seen material which causes him to have certain views... MHR but point is that the JURY empathise ... not to let them blame brendon's behavior on racist blogs / nazi propaganda, and thus have an excuse to censor the internet...but to sway the jury to SHARE his views, emotions, walk in his shoes, empathise with him, enter-into his state at the time and now... not walk into a fight just as B lands a punch, and Keyser claims 'he hit me for no reason, he is anti-semitic, just cos I'm a jew'...etc...so they are missing the point, intentionally...

Eyers...'can he simply put excerpts from those writers before the jury? 'No, because the rules of evidence do not permit it (actually cutting short Wisbey's attempt to answer him??? is this him reminding the judge who is in control of this court? what his 'role' is ? ???

then Wisbey; The answer to that is no.

And likewise with film footage or television footage or documentary footage, they are statements in video form which, unless the maker of the statement comes to give evidence, or unless it's agreed, are not probably admissible into evidence' ... so why not 'agree?'

What if I quote Encyclopaedi Judaica on jewish attitudes to non jews? It goes to the heart of their culture, traditions, heritage...

See, you're giving me no defence. this is why I'm getting angry. I cannot defend myself. Let me show you quotes from their holy books, the basis of their 'jewishness' i.e definition as 'jew'...

Let me show why my assumption about Stanley Keyser, based on his own actions and utterances, are justified in light of the jews own writings on their own 'culture' 'traditions' 'religion' 'beliefs' as 'jews'...

Quoting from Ted Pike who is quoting from jewish sources.

Eyers states 'I cannot agree the adduction into evidence of this material. It's contrary to the rules of evidence and procedure. mhr and contrary to his intent...which is NOT justice / fairplay...seems he could make an exception to work according to the SPIRIT of the law, if indeed the LAW was intended in good faith, with good intentions...rather than insist on 'the letter of the law'...which was jesus's criticism of the Pharisees, whom this court represents also, even brought one in as witness...

Wisbey invites Brendon to ask to have evidence introduced, but pretty much states it won't be...admitting that so far he has NOT ceeded to ANY request of Brendons...so why should brendon take any comfort? why expect THIS time it would be? what a fucking waste of time...

Wisbey DCJ (District Court Judge) admits 'I will decide', but It is clear that Eyers had decided for him ???

Brendon: If I call someone a racist, homicidal maniac who hangs with, say, like, Chabad Lubavitch, say, and I wish to show them to be theracist, homicidal lunatics they are, but then you say 'Sorry, you can't introduce anything. Not even a news report. Not even a written book. Not even a video showing their statements'. How is that, how can a man possibly...

Brendon is informed he has the right to make an application to your honor to adduce into evidence (mhr and have it rejected / dismissed...wow, what a bunch of great legal principles we have, all these rights to ask for rights and be refused them !!!

Brendon can tell the jury how he came to form his assumptions, but he may not 'tender' the actual materials that produced these beliefs / lead to forming these assumptions !!! So the jury has what to go on? Claims of a raving anti-semite? a crazy lunatic? a bad person? a deluded racist? ??? the defendant as his own witness? character witness? pyschiatric witness? ???? wtf???

Quoting the blog evidence for 'count 4'...'1,500 Gazans are dead, one million-plus Iraquis. We can only hope and pray that hte international community strikes hard and makes sure that gaggle of Satan's chldren in occupied Palestine are brought to justice'...

Would you agree that that is plainly a statement which creates and promotes animosity towards jews?

Brendon reminds us all that they would not give him a copy of the indictement, with 'the particulars' that would allow him to prepare his defence...they had had over a year to do so, and failed to do so...not wanting him to really know 'the particulars' he was being charged with...how is THAT in 'the spirit of justice' which is clearly the TRUE 'spirit of the law' i.e NOT justice...but doing someone's dirty business...

Lane Vs Industrial Relations comission in the high court of australia 'You must g ive the defendant a detailed indictment', like the one they gave 'Frederick Tobin'...they refused to do it in my case, to explain exactly WHAT 'racial vilification' is supposed to mean...they must state 'which statements of B;s they believe constitute racial vilification' as they did for Tobin's trial... you've failed to lay out the exact charges...the particulars...Judge Kennedy had said' Every word, Mr O'connel, every word' would be layed out in the indictement. But it is NOT as promised or as high court demands...

Eyers suggests to jury via statement to Brendon 'are you trying to distract the jury?...No, I've had enough, I came here with all this material and you all sat there and said 'No, it's not admissible'. No, no,no it's hearsay. No, no , no. (MHR clearly Brendon took the case to court, didn't accept offers, to have this case fully documented in court, in public, as 'stunt' to gain public atttention to the facts etc...and so now he is going to jail for no point...has not had the chance to make the point he came to court to make...so he is frustrated, sees no point in continuing...it can NOT achieve what he planned to achieve...though invaluable for us trying to defend ourselves against the jew world order laws...and reveal the injustices of it...etc...

'In the schedule of particulars in relation...'I'm going to ask you to go and get a detailed indictment. Then' well come back in a few months so I can defend myself.

Wisbey DCJ; We're not coming back in a few months. We're going to complete this trial.

What is it with Eyer's Mm hmm...s??? Is that latin? legalese?

Eyers quotes: 'Fairly soon jews will realise that people are thoroughly sick off them, their whining, their perpetual victimhood and their demands for people to bow down and worship their dogdy religion of Holocaustiantiy'....Eyers 'Now that's plainly, isn't it, designed and intended to create and promote animosity ? ??? why? how? B's opinion? does it call for such? or is it a prediction / his opinion? why use a leading question? allow so many leading questions...when he could ask, if he was 'neutral' and 'assumed B innocent until proven guilty', 'DOES X / IS X designed / intended to Y ? ???

BRILLIANT Brendon: 'The new religion, which you would then worship and insist others worship, like 'You must believe' like the resurrection. The Catholic Church used to do burning at the stake for all sorts of things (actually seems demonic / satanic ritual disguised as 'trial' !!! like altars used to sacrifice children and adults, though in 'official' ritual it is 'blood and flesh' in form of wine and bread !!! a satanic ritual...the real sacrament, the 'black mass'...etc) Now, they get you sacked from your job, cut, slash your tyres, beat you up, burn your house down (Zundel)...ask Ernst Zundel, Robert Faurrison, and they just question history. That's holocaustianity.

'And the holocaustinanity implied in that form of your evidence is the exaggeration or invention of the holocaust?

Brendon reminds us 'you know what they said at the Nuremberg trials (i.e official 'holocaust' and if you do NOT totally agree with it you are legally a 'denier' and criminal, he failed to mention, or am I wrong on that?) they said they had bears that ate the jews alive and then an eagle picked their bones. That was in the Nuremberg trial transcript.

Holocaustiniaty is when you make a religious dogma out of an historical even and say if you dare become a heretic and question, of course christ rose from the dead, everybody knows it, and if you don't believe it, well, we know what happens,don't we?

B: 'Holocaustianity is making a dogma, which you can never questioon, comrade. ...when you make a dogma and a religion out of a historical even and then persecute people for their beliefs because they do not co-incide with yours, that's a dodgy religion. I thought it was the year 2010, so I thought we'd sort of moved on from that.

quoting B: 'The 'Jew' community could have at least made their lies and slander half believable, but I guess after years of inventive, over the top holocaust memoirs, they've got lazy'... (mhr how true, different colored smoke, lifts to second stories of Auswhitz gas chambers, 'hello kitty' , soap, lampshades, etc etc !!!)

Eyers' Now isn't that plainly a statement intending to create and promote animosity towards jews?

No, I'm laughing at the fact that there've been hundreds of these memoirs which were found to be complete frauds.

(MHR write up a fake 'fictional' memoir based on every ludicrious claim ever made, as one book, to give overview of the fakery? how absurd it is???)

The guy on Oprah admitted it was a complete fraud, his story of touching fingers through the wire of Auschwitz, and throwing apples to each other, but 'Well, it was true in my head, so it was true' !!!!(mhr THAT is your 'holocaust' realtiy, people beleived their loved ones had been gassed and put in ovens, so it is true,,,in fact ENTIRE basis of ALL 'jewishness' is simply 'beliefs' that X happened etc...NO other basis but what is in the jews heads...!!!!!!) and Australian guy on 7.30 report, who'd tattoo'd himself, claimed he had been in Auschwitz, and survived, in fact was CAtholic in Australia at time...had written a book...his author admitted but stted ''Oh yes, but it's a beautiful story anyway' !!!!!! THAT is your 'holocaust'...

THAT DESERVES to be mocked. there's hundreds of these made up holocaust memoirs...

Eyers: 'Do you accept that there are memoirs written by survivors of the holocaust which are entirely genuine?' ... MHR what a way of asking a question... do you accept...ACCEPT...as if it is a FACT...proven FACT...beyond doubt...and you can either 'accept' this fact, or DENY it...and be mentally ill / recalcitrant...do you ACCEPT ??? THAT is NOT legalese...THAT is suggesting, implicitly, to the jury, that it is a given fact, and it is a matter of 'accepting' it or 'denying' it...like the chocolate smeared on the childs mouth...!!!

'We can't look at them and examine them. We lose our jobs and get ridiculed and called an anti-semite. (mhr the real ridicule is of the honest historian, not the jew, the problem of 'accepting' reality is for hte holocaust HOAX denier, not the revisionist...upside down world...it is the honest, conscientious historian that is ridiculed and vilified, NOT the jews...)...

'Former Klu Klux Clown lectures Aussies to stamp out racism. Unfortunately our former clown has never read the Talmud, so he forgot to mention Jews as the biggest racists of all'.... 'Absolutely, just stating a fact'.

!!! Wisbey DCJ '...I just remind you that it is not permissible for the jury to make any independent inquiries outside the court !!!!!!!!! WTF ??????? is THIS standard procedure? or response to Brendon having raised very important, key evidence, that the jury would likely find compelling enough to want to investigate, rather than have the court 'deny' brendon the right ot present such evidence / compelling arguments?

End of day FIVE

The jury foreperson was sick, couldn't attend, not known when would be able to...Eyers 'applies to' Judge to go on without her, using his discretion under section 115 of the criminal procedure act 2004, to discharge that juror, as two subs available...but half way during trial after almost a week and a half, acc. to Wisbey's own words... claims fact that she is foreman of the jury is not important??? Brendon tells us he was never given the transcipt of Rabbi Freilich...the judge ordered it be given to him, it was handed to Brendon in Court, he had to give it to the guard...and it was NOT handed to him by the guard when he left court... so he asks for it now...

Brendon: I've already made many errors and not exercised my rights as the accused and I'd ask your honour to adjorn for a full day so I can go over the court transcript of Rabbi Freilich...

Eyers reminds judge he has 'unfettered discretion' to continue without the jury forewoman...when did P's tell judges how to do their job? suspicious much? Eyers works for which group of people now? and is 'keeping our judge in line'???

Problem is that this means Brendon loses one full day i.e the trial period was set at the start ???

court adjorned until thursday, 27 january, 2011... MHR all this going on in my homeland, which I considered 'safe' and 'free' at a time I had not even STARTED to 'wake up'..and find so many commonalities of expression, arguments etc in Brendon, that I came to myself...so many correspondences in character, experiences, nature, conclusions, behaviors...I really hope we can work together productively...

DAY SEVEN note 96 pages...last 2 days only 6 pages...so almost through...:D

seems differnt format...can now COPY and paste...didn't work for earlier pages???

ACCUSED: My name is Brendon Lee of the family O’Connell. I’m a sovereign subject of Queen Elizabeth II, her heirs and successors. This court does not sit under chapter 3 of the Australian Constitution or the Judiciary Act of 1903. I do not recognise its authority. I’m here under duress at all times – at all times.

The sick juror had a medical certificate stating she could not participate until Friday of this new week.

WISBEY DCJ: It is not appropriate that this matter, this trial, be further delayed, and in the circumstances I am satisfied that the juror concerned should not be required to continue in the jury, her discharge leaving 13 members, as 14 were empanelled. I therefore propose to discharge her and continue with the trial. She's still unfit for her duties and will be so for the rest of the week. In all the circumstances and pursuant to the powers in the Criminal Procedure Act I have discharged her so that the trial will continue with the balance.

sorry, counsel, I'm not aware - there was no indication that that indicates count 5 in the indictment. The indictment doesn't say anything.

you're the author, aren't you of this material?---I'm the author of a blog.

Yes?---And this is allegedly the print-out from that blog.

Okay. Well, you accept that, these are your words, aren't they?---Well, I'd have to go over every single one to confirm that.

Well, you - - -?---We are in a legal court, it's not a dialogue on a - on a street, so

Page 81 then, if you can turn to that. And about two-thirds of the way down in bold there's this statement by you:

Please note, calling Jesus a bastard and a son of a whore is normal for Jews. They hate Christ and Christians. They just need our money and our support until the time is right when they can stop pretending.

?---Mm.

Okay? Now, would you accept that that was a statement intended to promote, create and increase animosity towards the Jews?---No, no, it was a statement to inform people of what Jews really think.

All right. In your view?---Oh no, in the views of many. Many, many people.

the aim is to keep me isolated as if I’m a marginal person. What they don’t want you to know is just how well known this stuff is.

about 2005 when I really – at that stage I still thought they were just being used by the Anglo establishment of America.

All right?---Then I found out they were running the Anglo establishment of America.

Okay. And - - -?---Through Freemasonry, of which this court is a part of.

Okay. And you’ve – you’ve done a tremendous amount of reading and research into this issue. Yes? You told the jury that?---Yes. Yeah, documentaries, speaking with people such as Father Alexis Rosenthal and Father Serge(?), 18 years in Jerusalem, the abbot.

And – and you’ve – you’ve accessed a tremendous amount of material on the Internet?---Yes, and book form and personal communications.

Yes?---Emails.

And a lot of the material that you accessed on the Internet, I think – I think you – you endorsed to – to the jury the – the value of open-source information. In other words, uncensored information which anyone can access on the Internet?---Absolutely. It’s absolutely vital. And uncensored free thought - - -

Yes?--- - - - free expression, very important. Very important. Otherwise how do you ever get to the truth?

All right. Now, anyone – let’s just accept this as a matter of common sense. Pretty much anybody with rudimentary technical IT skills can post anything on the Internet, can’t they?---That’s right.

D30/3/ACJ/WADC/CRIM/PER/IND1767/2009

27/01/2011 10:48 O'CONNELL, B.L. XXN 647 National Transcription Services

Because you’ve done that, haven’t you?---Absolutely, under many different names.

But there’s a danger with open-source information, isn’t there?---There is. Lot of danger with the mainstream media. Remember Iraq and all those weapons of mass destruction? They were never there.

Just to put it – put it – put it colloquially, anyone can post anything?---Well, if you’re a billionaire Jew you can post anything too if you own an entire media outlet, can’t you?

FUCKING BRILLIANT...THAT IS THE POINT...CENSORSHIP OF ALTERNATIVE VIEWS...THE JEWS OWN THE MASS MEDIA, THE ONLY ALTERNATIVE IS THE INTERNET...SO THEY ARE AFTER THAT...THEY HAVE A MONOPOLY ON PUBLIC OPINION FORMATION / MISINFORMATION, WHERE EYERS / STATE / JEWS PUSHING IDEA THAT INTERNET IS DANGEROUS AS 'ANYONE' CAN PUBLISH 'ANYTHING'...WHEREAS ON THE MASS MEDIA ONLY JEWS CAN PUBLISH ANYTHING, E.G LIES, FAKE NEWS, E.G WOMAD ETC...SUCH PRESENCE OF MIND IN THE SITUATION ETC SO IMPRESSIVE...

Just to put it – put it – put it colloquially, anyone can post anything?---Well, if you’re a billionaire Jew you can post anything too if you own an entire media outlet, can’t you?

But if you – if you’re a – an ignorant halfwit, for instance, you can equally post any views you choose on the Internet, can’t you? You can express any opinion you choose on the Internet, and broadcast it and publish it to others, can’t you?---Well, yeah, Jews could do that, yes.

But anybody can do it?---Yeah.

Yes?---Halfwits, Jews.

Yes?---Yeah, they can do that, yeah.

And the problem with this is, of course - - -?---Just (indistinct) - - -

- - - that - - -?--- - - - off the cuff.

- - - there’s no indicating the veracity, the balance, the prejudice, the personal acts brought to grind in each case of the author of any such information on the Internet, is there?---No, no, you can go and look stuff up on further sources. Absolutely.

And as a result of the Internet and – and other research resources, you formed an opinion that we’ve heard about. And would it be fair to characterise it in this way: you feel a tremendous animosity towards Jews?---Absolutely. Until – till otherwise they – Normal Finkelstein, Max Blumenthal, Paul Eisen - - -

Yes. Well, don’t just - - -?--- - - - Israel Shahak. Not them, because they’ve come out and spoken out. I know who they are.

But would I be fair in characterising it – and of course it’s your – it’s your evidence now, and the – I’d like the jury to understand your position?---Sure.

D30/4/JAC/WADC/CRIM/PER/IND1767/2009

27/01/2011 10:53 O'CONNELL, B.L. XXN 648 National Transcription Services

As a result of this research using open-source information and other information, you’ve reached the position, and you reached the position as at sort of May onwards 2009, in which you felt a tremendous animosity - - -?---Perhaps hatred even. Absolute hatred after what they did to me, my friend in America. Ripped all her floor tiles off and stacked them on a roof, ran her out of Chicago. Unbelievable what they do to people.

Okay. Now - - -?---Unbelievable. You should read in there. ADL.

Give – given then that that – and you make no bones about it, an absolute hatred of Jews - - -?---Absolute – no though – absolute – until otherwise.

Yes?---Till they come to me, shake my hand and explain their position.

But you see, therefore, given that that’s your expressed and settled position, everything I suggest that you thereafter write and express is informed by that absolute hatred of Jews?---No, not at all.

As a result of this research using open-source information and other information, you’ve reached the position, and you reached the position as at sort of May onwards 2009, in which you felt a tremendous animosity - - -?---Perhaps hatred even. Absolute hatred after what they did to me, my friend in America. Ripped all her floor tiles off and stacked them on a roof, ran her out of Chicago. Unbelievable what they do to people.

given then that that – and you make no bones about it, an absolute hatred of Jews - - -?---Absolute – no though – absolute – until otherwise.

Yes?---Till they come to me, shake my hand and explain their position.

But you see, therefore, given that that’s your expressed and settled position, everything I suggest that you thereafter write and express is informed by that absolute hatred of Jews?---No, not at all.

Everything that you write in these blogs forming the subject matter of the case, or the indictment

Is designed to share with others your hatred of the Jews?---Well, that’s how I was feeling. Well, I’m sure that’s in there somewhere.

But therefore, following that through as a matter of logic - - -?---Mm.

- - - these writings and the content of these blogs can only ever have been intended by you to either create, promote or increase animosity - - -?---Racial - - -

- - - towards the Jews?---Racial animosity.

is that you hate the Jews and you are sending out these messages so that other people would feel likewise?

did I intend

- - -

- - - you questions?---The answer's no. That's just a background. That's normal human emotion when you've been vilified, slandered, your life's destroyed, your profession's over, they're breaking into your house, they're throwing all through your friend's car, cutting your brake lines. I'm sorry, Mr Eyers, but guess what? You get really freaking angry.

Yes and so therefore - - -?---But if you're asking me as that time when I can't wait to create as much animosity as possible, wrong. Wrong. But of course it's there in the background. Of course, it's human nature.

It's not really just there in the background, is it, Mr O'Connell. It's right there - - -?---That's only your opinion. Let me show the background to the jury.

It's right there in the foreground, isn't it?---

But this trial, Mr O'Connell, is not about the rightness or otherwise of your views, it's about the way you express such views

until then I'm just going to sit here raving on, because until you let me show the jury - and I've already spoken to John Bougher, my lawyer, he said you must allow me to show intent by showing the background material. You're not allowing me to do that, Mr Eyers. And I've told you, I realise this is a game we're all playing and I know you're a gentleman, but I cannot continue until I get a say in that I can backup my material. You're not allowing me to do that. That's why I'm so angry. Fancy that. And I'm not intending to vilify you, Mr Eyers. I'm having a normal human response to being shafted. Funny that

You refer to an approach to hate crime legislation, that's in keeping - in other words, now it's in keeping with the Jewish kleptocracies(?), modus operandi since the days of Queen Elizabeth I and her personal assassin and Cabbalist advisor, Dr John Dee; deception, blackmail, bribery, homicide. Okay? So is this again in keeping with the fact that you think Jews consistently, going back hundreds, even 2,000 or more years, have had in effect this desire for world domination?---Absolutely - - -

Yes. They - - -?---Let me show the jury? I'll - I'll give you Helen Thomas, I'll give you heads of the Pentagon.

D30/4/JAC/WADC/CRIM/PER/IND1767/2009

27/01/2011 10:58 O'CONNELL, B.L. XXN 652 National Transcription Services

And in keeping - in keeping with that, of course - - ?---I'll show you it.

- - - the funding of the Bolshevik Revolution in the Soviet - - -?---Matter of historical record, Mr Eyers.

Former Soviet Union, - - -?---A matter of historical record.

- - - the funding of the - the - - -?---Don't forget Hitler.

- - - genocide visited upon Jews by the Nazis - - -?---Ooh which Chabad-Lubavitch say he was - he was an avenging angel. Giving - - -

- - - the - the funding of genocide - - -?--- - - - Jews what they deserve for not following the Talmud.

- - - perpetrated by Mao in China?---Yes, absolutely.

See this book? It’s the only book ever banned from Amazon in history. “Judaism Discovered”. You can buy every other bit of filth and depravity, “Mein Kampf”, you name it, but you can’t buy that book through Amazon. Ever banned. Michael Hoffmann, a respected private academic, and they just about faint if you get that book. Dare you to go and get it. Michael Hoffmann, revisionist history. It lays everything I have said out. They are lunatics.

Anyone from Orthodox Judaism is not going to tell you the truth. In – they have rules within the Talmud, “Do not let the goy know what’s in the books, and if a goy reads the Talmud you must kill him.” That’s in their religious law, which they don’t want you to know. I’m not making this up. When I first heard this stuff on the forums I said, “That’s rubbish. That’s Neo-Nazi propaganda. That’s not true. Channel Nine would have told me.” I couldn’t believe it, but that is the power they wield. And at the end of the day, when the backlash happens, they couldn’t give a damn about ordinary Jews. They couldn’t give a damn - - -

You see - - -?--- - - - and they will not allow me to present this material to you. They won’t allow me to do it.

-I’ve already had legal advice from my legal advisor, Mr John Bougher. They cannot do this. And he just said, “Push, push, push, push, push, Brendon, all day, until they allow you to present your material,” okay?

You asked him what his favourite book was, and he said to you the most important book is the Shulchan Aruch, forgive my pronunciation, but I’m just reading it, which is the final decisions, okay. The final decisions. So in other words, all that precedes it is by way of dialogue, examination, interchange. The Shulchan Aruch. Now, you – you’ve not quoted that at anybody, the settled, final decisions. Have you read the Shulchan Aruch?---Yeah, I know this argument. Hoffmann goes into it.

-I’m not going to cooperate, Mr Wisbey, until you say I can present stuff to the jury. Otherwise they’re just sitting there going, “What’s that guy talking about?”

EYERS, MR: So the text that the head of the Jewish congregation in Perth, Rabbi Freilich, regards as the most important as the settled approach of Jews, you’ve not read?---I’m not aware of it.

Isn't it - isn't a little knowledge a dangerous thing, Mr O'Connell?---Well, especially if you're a totalitarian dictator, they might find out the emperor has no clothes so you better shut everyone down and tell them they need a PhD before they can comment, Mr Eyers. Don't start me.

FUCKING MORE BRILLIANCE FROM THIS NATIONAL TREASURE BRENDON O'CONNELL...THAT IS HOW THEY WILL CONTROL PUBLIC OPINION...ONLY THE CONTROLLED AUTHORITIES WILL HAVE ANY INPUT / VOICE...TO PREVENT EVEN THAT 'LIITLE KNOWLEDGE' WHICH THE TYRANTS FIND SO DANGEROUS, AS MIGHT LEAD TO PEOPLE RAISING QUESTIONS, WHICH THE STATE CANNOT ANSWER, WHICH BY ANSWERING WOULD REVEAL ITS TRUE NATURE...

MHR point is that 'the holocaust' is imposed on sugestible kids and repeated ... they have zero choice...no-one is forcing anyone to watch a revisionist video or blog...which is likely to be potentially more dangerous? the one forced on people, the one they cannot escape, or one they may or may not take a look at out of curiousity, and can then 'check' and 'debunk' by comparing to the official version, controllled opposition, and other alternative media...independent...what damage are people fearing? some kid might read david irving and do what exactly? what is the risk? being confronted with something they should easily be able to discount / disprove, if the official version is so compelling and backed up by solid evidence? are independent writers so diabolical they can brainwash people with a blog ? when they can barely find an audience of a few hundred at most ... what do you think their motivation is? irrational hatred? surely it would be more satisfying to simply firebomb local jews, at 2am...so easy to do...and get away with...and probably get less time in jail if caught than for writing a blog or posting a video !!!

You see, you're the one who's promoting your knowledge of Judaism and understanding it and its conspiracy theories and its quest for world domination, as you see it, and yet you haven't even read what the leader of - a - an Orthodox Jewish leader says is the final expressed position of Judaism. That's pretty discourteous, isn't it, Mr O'Connell?

MHR n.b how Eyers himself stated that only 10% of people jews are 'religious' / orthodox jews...so what does it matter in the slightest what this 'representative' of only a tiny fraction of jews has to say? why should this book no-one has ever heard of be 'required reading' if only 10% of jews are living according to it...even assuming it is no 'for goy eyes only' and written merely for misdirection /propaganda purposes?

Shulchan Aruch ... find this book...supposedly overrides all previous 'jewish' religious doctrine, though Mr Eyers and Rabbi Freilich stated that only 10% of jews are 'religious', or at least follow orthodox judaism...!!!!! Eyers made big point of brendon not having read it, total non-sequitur / self-cancelling criticism if by his own words only 10% of jews are 'religious' i.e conform to its teachings...just another example of non-sequiture mind games...

You've not even read the settled and final position of Judaism before launching forth and sharing your views of Jewish people. Eyers going on and on trying to ridicule and belittle Brendon for not having read this book...when he himself stated it was irrelevant to 90% of 'jews'...pity brendon was doing many things at once and didn't pick him up on this...

I'll explain it to you. One of the arguments

D30/6/JAC/WADC/CRIM/PER/IND1767/2009

27/01/2011 11:03 O'CONNELL, B.L. XXN 659 National Transcription Services

of Judaism, when they say Mary was a whore and Jesus is boiling hot excrement in Hell and you can kill a non-Jew. All right? I'm not his neighbour. Freilich lied through his teeth. He's an Orthodox Jew, the only - his only neighbour is another Jew. Okay? He lied through his teeth. He's on the record. The transcripts, again, laughed at all over the world as we speak. Okay? And that is one of their arguments. They say, "Oh that's not the settled argument, you haven't read the book." That is actually explicitly written in this book which is a critique of what counsel is going on about, okay? That is one of their arguments. Every little argument in the Talmud they have to trick you into thinking they are just pious, wonderful people is in this one book. But you can get many others. Many others.

Is there any chance I can present to the jury some of the stuff about me that you won't let me show? They won't let me show it to you because when you do, you'll want to lynch Stanley Keyser. You'll want to lynch him. It's that bad. You'll go, "What the hell". The Jewish community is terrified, it's finally out there. I ain't backing down. I'm telling you now, they'll have to give me 100 years because I'll be back out there with a video camera doing the same thing. The same thing. I will never surrender.

-I told you that from the very beginning when I stuck my socks up on the desk and laughed at you. Because this is not a common law court and I've already told you, when you sit under chapter 3 of the Australian Constitution I'll take you seriously. When you get rid of the kangaroos and put the royal styles and titles back on as the constitution demands, I'll take you seriously, Mr Wisbey.

EYERS, MR: You see - - -?---Until then, it's all a game. It's a clown.

You see, your knowledge of the law - - -?---Where the media is these days.

WISBEY DCJ: As you're concerned about the kangaroos, they - the Coat of Arms is there as a result of the Parliament of this state - - -?---The Parliament cannot do anything

- - - passing an Act representing the people - - -?---- - - contrary to the constitution.

- - - of this state?---It's a simple matter. That's what a constitution's for, to stop the Wild West idiots in Western Australia doing whatever they feel like doing. "Oh let's pass a new law to - to shut down people so they can't criticise other people." You remember when the judge refused to even acknowledge – he didn’t want to tell you it wasn’t a common law court? Why is that? Think about that simple question. Think about it.

THE WITNESS: (Witness singing) Skippy, Skippy, Skippy, the Bush Kangaroo. Everybody now: Skippy, Skippy, Skippy, a friend ever true. (Stops singing) What a joke. The wild west, as our PhD in constitutional law, Dr John Walsh. The wild west.

it goes to the heart of intent, sir.

No, what do you want – what do you want to read to the jury?---I can conduct a defence based on 80G, which is the first – the first matter of the indictment.

Did you – did you hear what I asked you?---What I want to present? What is it to you what I present? He can crossexamine on that. He can be advised for his little – his little rabbis that are coming in. They can advise him on that at a later date. I’d like to read about “The King’s Torah: a Rabbinic Text or a Call to Terror” by Haaretz, one of the major newspapers in Israel. I want to read it to them.

EYERS, MR: Well, I’d object on the basis of, firstly, relevance; secondly, it’s hearsay - - -

THE WITNESS: What are you talking about? Straight out of the rabbi’s mouth.

EYERS, MR: It’s an out-of-court statement - - -

WISBEY DCJ: Yes.

EYERS, MR: - - - by someone who’s not been called as a witness.

THE WITNESS: Which is backing my material. This is the material that’s formed my worldview.

I wish to be able to show to the jury intent. I cannot show intent if I cannot give the background material to my views.

What – what do you wish to show to the jury?---Good faith in the public interest.

What – what do you want - - -?---I want to show the material that formed my views contained within the blog, and my statements to Stanley Keyser. “I say you’re a bunch of racist, homicidal maniacs,” and I want to show the texts that prove it, reported in the mainstream Israeli press. What – what, are you stupid? I’ve had enough of this garbage. My own lawyer says this is ridiculous. You are deliberately doing this.

Well, it’s a wonder he’s not here?---I parted company with Mr Bougher very amicably, no problems at all. He said, “I understand completely, Brendon, why you have to do this.” And as for Rod Keeley, the first one, that guy, rung for me by Detective Paini, as if I’m going to use him. Wouldn’t listen to a word I said. I asked him, “Write a letter to

D30/7/ACJ/WADC/CRIM/PER/IND1767/2009

27/01/2011 11:10 In the absence of the Jury 665 National Transcription Services O'CONNELL, B.L. XXN

the Australian Federal Police Cyber Crime. I’m being hacked, I’m being harassed, I’m being broken into.” He did nothing, so I sacked him. And don’t go out imputating that I’m just getting rid of lawyers on a whim for the fun of it.

Well, on the material, on the information that Mr O’Connell has put to me thus far, this material is not admissible.

THE WITNESS: How do you know? You haven’t even looked at it. What a farce.

WISBEY DCJ: I’m making - - - ?---What a farce.

I’m making my decision on the basis of what you are prepared (inaudible)?---I was aware of this material before it was reported, and I wish to show to the jury that my views are not marginal. They are repeated by the highest echelons of the US Government. The highest echelons of the media now are breaking it out there. Do not try and make me a marginalised fool when I am simply saying stuff which is being said by thousands of other highly respected people around the world. Are you saying Father Alexis Rosenthal is a liar? He would not be out of accord with anything I have said. Anything.

Mr Eyers, the position is that your cross-examination has not challenged the fact that Mr O’Connell has read material which has given him certain views - - -

EYERS, MR: Absolutely.

WISBEY DCJ: - - - and in those circumstances this is not relevant, and in any event it would be confronted with it being hearsay and not being presented in a proper way.

EYERS, MR: Well, precisely. We don’t challenge the fact that Mr O’Connell has read a good deal of material, material upon which he’s based his views. But the legislation deals – the gravamen of the legislation is the way in which he expresses the views, and the intention or otherwise that he holds in expressing those views.

And that’s the crucial point, not the material itself. It’s what the influence of the material has had upon him such that he expresses his views in a certain way. That’s the allegation, and that’s the matter for the jury to determine.

THE WITNESS: And they will need to know that Judaism and Jews are not some poor little thing being persecuted. They are a world power. Rick Sanchez from CNN was giggling about it. “Oh, ho, persecuted?” Giggle, giggle, giggle. “Oh, ho, no power?” Giggle. They sacked him from CNN. Rick Sanchez. Read about it. It’s a joke. And they’re an imperial power that dominate the planet. I mean, it’s embarrassing. What are you going to do? Walk down Wall Street and say Jews don’t run Wall Street? You’re going to be laughed at. They’re going to laugh at you. Jews would laugh at you. They’re very proud of their accomplishments, and I’ve got to be honest, I’m sort of semi-envious. I mean, you’ve got to admit they’ve pulled off, in the last 250 years, an incredible feat. It’s incredible. If only it was a force for good.

ACCUSED: Your Honour, my name is Brendon Lee of the family O'Connell. I don't recognise your authority. I'm a free sovereign subject of Queen Elizabeth II. This is an admiralty law court, I do recognise it.

WISBEY DCJ: Do you wish to call any witnesses?

D30/8/JAC/WADC/CRIM/PER/IND1767/2009

27/01/2011 11:39 ACCUSED 667 National Transcription Services HIS HONOUR

ACCUSED: I wish to be able to respond to Mr - Mr Eyers - - -

WISBEY DCJ: Do you wish - - -

ACCUSED: I wish to respond to Mr Eyers' stuff about the Shulchan Aruch by reading from a book. Will you allow me to present material?

WISBEY DCJ: Do you - do you wish to call any evidence - any witnesses, was the question I asked you?

ACCUSED: Yes, I'll - I'll call myself as a witness.

WISBEY DCJ: No, you've been called - - -

ACCUSED: I call the book on Michael Hoffman - - -

WISBEY DCJ: Do you - do you - - -

ACCUSED: - - - “Judaism Discovered”, as a witness.

WISBEY DCJ: Are you calling any witnesses?

ACCUSED: Can I respond to Mr Eyers' talk about the Shulchan Aruch?

WISBEY DCJ: I - I assume from the fact that you do not respond to my question that you are not calling any witnesses.

ACCUSED: I am responding to your question. You're refusing to allow me to conduct a defence.

WISBEY DCJ: And - and we'll proceed on that basis unless you indicate that you have a witness or witnesses that you wish to call.

ACCUSED: I've got the Shulchan Aruch here. Did you know 5,000 people in - - -

WISBEY DCJ: In - in those - - -

ACCUSED: - - - Russia signed that? One of - it’s rated as hate literature. Tell him to allow me to read to you from that book.

WISBEY DCJ: In those circumstances - -

D30/8/JAC/WADC/CRIM/PER/IND1767/2009

27/01/2011 11:39 ACCUSED 668 National Transcription Services HIS HONOUR EYERS, MR

ACCUSED: Tell him.

WISBEY DCJ: - - - Mr O'Connell, it is now - - -

ACCUSED: One of the highest authority in the court.

WISBEY DCJ: It is now incumbent upon Mr Eyers to address the jury. After he has done so you will have an opportunity to address the jury.

Yes, Mr Eyers.

EYERS, MR: Your Honour - - -

ACCUSED: It’s an insult to Skippy. It really is.

Eyers, after 'end of trial' basically, with Brendon NOT being allowed to present, in evidence, all the facts and compelling arguments his behavior was motivated and informed by...

Eyers to jury: You've heard all of the evidence that you'll hear now, okay? Mine is an argument, okay? I'm instructed to prosecute this case on behalf of the State of Western Australia, and plainly I'm going to advance arguments on behalf of the State of Western Australia. But they're arguments. You're entitled to accept them or reject them as you see fit.

Eyers again states Keyser is being harassed as a member of a RACIAL group...which is why he had Rabbi Freilich, but HIS testimony is moot, as Eyers himself admits only 10% jews represented by HIS views ... so why bring him? and why is his evidence at all relevant re: RACE of jews...biological race assumed / article of faith...and desirable to discourage 'out-breeding'...???

whatever his intentions, Mr O'Connell's intentions; good, bad, indifferent, when he went down to South Perth IGA, they got to the stage where he acted in such a way that he went beyond exercising his legitimate freedom of speech, his right to tell other people what he thought. We've all got freedom of speech and this isn't about freedom of speech. These allegations are about engaging in conduct which transgresses other people's rights.

MHR yes so when we are charged, and played by all the supposed rules of etiquette, despite expressing our views in a coherent, calm, reasonable, etc 'in private even' manner...we will see the REAL intent of the law, and the absolute LACK of freedom of speech which 'is likely to offend' someone, because it implicates THEM and THEIR 'race' in some crime...e.g 'the holocaust'? e.g 'WWI' e.g soap, lampshades, bears and eagles, electrified floors, and 911 Muslim Arab hijackers !!!

Nobody disparages, for a moment, the holding and expressing of views. sure, a long as they are the 'official' version and 'allowed' tiny minute and weakly expressed disagreements !!!! 'in private' so as not 'likely to offend criminals and psychopaths' by 'outing them and their TRUE beliefs'...motives, actions...

he effectively verbally attacked Mr Keyser both personally and as a representative of the Jewish race.

Now, one of the key points here is: are Jews a race? Are they just a religion? Well, you decide for yourself. You have evidence before you from Professor Markus. You have his report. You have evidence that the vast, vast majority of persons referring to themselves and regarded by others as Jews are secular. In fact, religion doesn’t enter into their lives at all.

D30/9/ACJ/WADC/CRIM/PER/IND1767/2009

27/01/2011 11:46 EYERS, MR 670 National Transcription Services ACCUSED HIS HONOUR

You also have, interestingly, on that video, Mr O’Connell addressing Mr Keyser on the basis of the Jewish religion and race. Do you remember me putting those words to Mr O’Connell? His words, at the very earliest moment, wasn’t addressing Mr Keyser.

And I’m keeping things neutral. I’m not using words as “attacking”. Just addressing Mr Keyser in the terms you see, you might find that he was addressing Mr Keyser as a Jewish – not just because of the Jewish religion, because of the race, and that’s key. And the strongest evidence of that comes at the outset of this case from the words and from the mouth of Mr O’Connell himself.

This isn’t a narrow religious argument which somehow falls through a loophole in the legislation which is predicated upon race. Look at the way in which he addressed Mr Keyser. Just to remind you but equally to assure you, you have the video footage. It’s exhibited in this case. You can watch it as many times or as little as you want to remind yourself as to what went on. But I made these notes.

Mr Keyser of course asked Mr O’Connell on the basis of what Mr O’Connell’s saying, “Are you saying that the Jews are all racist?” That seemed to be the tipping point. Remember when they’re standing outside? Been asked to move out, they’re on the steps just outside the shopping centre, and then we have a series of, “Who do you think you are?” Mr Keyser said, “I’m very offended.” Mr O’Connell: “You are a racist, homicidal maniac. You are a racist Jew. You belong to a racist, homicidal organisation. You are anti-goy. You are anti-gentile. It is in your religion and race.”

Again the non-sequitur lines ... self-negating...using one 'fact' to push one argument now, and then later the same fact to push another different, contradictory argument..if jews NOT religious and thus the testimony of 'biological basis' is irrelevant, why bring Freilich as a witness? to prove that jews are NOT a 'race' ... and if all the 'ties that bind' jews are references to religious books, how IS it possible to say they are NOT a religion? He has deliberately narrowed down 'religion' to 'orthodox judaism'...when even Nazism is a religion...and you can hold views 'religiously' and as Brendon indicated, the REAL common tie is 'victimhood' a.k.a the religion of 'holocaustianity'...with its dogmas, tenets, articles of faith, that may not be disputed, even legally, in so many nations...like the catholics during the inquisition...as Brendon brilliantly brought up and explained... you cannot have your cake and eat it too, unless you are a jew, or a prosecutor in this court, it would appear...

Also cut into that of course were images of dead babies, casualties of the Middle Eastern situation - - - (wtf 'situation' as if it has NOT been defined as genocide? or has it? got to check the U.N stuff...was it proposed and rejected by the U.S etc???

ACCUSED: Murdered, Mr Eyers. Murdered.

WISBEY DCJ: Mr O’Connell, Mr Eyers is entitled to address the jury without interruption or comment from you. Please extend him that courtesy.

EYERS, MR: Then Mr Keyser says, “You’re saying every Jewish person is racist?” He says this when he manages, you may find, to get a word in. Mr O’Connell: “You have 3,000 years of racism and ethnic cleansing.” So you see,

D30/10/JAC/WADC/CRIM/PER/IND1767/2009

27/01/2011 11:53 EYERS, MR 671 National Transcription Services

what we have here is the “you”, singular “you”, “you”, “Elliot Keyser, you are a racist, homicidal Jew,” singular, but “you” as a representative of his race, both entwined – with a man who he had never previously met, with a man he’d never exchanged the least notion of views, or even taken a moment to determine what Mr Keyser’s views were or might have been, because Mr O’Connell assumed and based his addresses and his actions toward Mr Keyser on the basis of assumptions. I put this to him, and I suggest it to you. A very dangerous, very impartial way to proceed

Was this a robust debate, or was he and did he get to the stage where Mr O’Connell was seriously and substantially abusing Mr Keyser and ridiculing him? Severely ridiculing him?

mhr again this 'ridiculing' which never formed any part of Brendon's behavior...Eyers is suggesting it to the jury, though claimed he was not presenting evidence...just legal commentary...and he is in fact introducing an opinion that in no way relates to what we know happened, so why is he allowed to do this...over and over and over again...'ridicule' in this context can be expected to emotionally trigger anyone brainwashed for life with 'hollywood holocaust' vilification / demonisation / incitement propaganda...

harassing isn’t a question of frightening somebody or intimidating them or necessarily just threatening them. It includes to threaten, but it also includes seriously or substantially abuse or severely ridicule,

“You are a racist, homicidal people. You rape them and hunt them. You are a racist, homicidal maniac, and you kill little Palestinian children.” Man he’d never met before. Didn’t know from Adam. “Go and get a good Jewish lawyer.” Playing to stereotypes, playing to his assumptions. You have the words. You’ll have the meaning of “harass”. It was a public place, and we say in the plainest possible terms Mr O’Connell is guilty of the offence alleged in count 1.

"With intent to create or promote animosity towards a racial group."

MHR lets write the law plainly...reflecting its intent...'to promote animosity towards the slave owners, slave masters, and their facilitators' ... the would be enslavers of all mankind...???

So count 1 is the face-to-face what actually happened and count 2 is posting all of the footage

look at the wording, it's your surest guide. "With intent to create or promote animosity towards a racial group."

Mr O'Connell saying that the Jews had an utter hatred for Jesus Christ. "You killed Jesus", describing it to the Jews. Your average Jew or Judaic death cult member. "Jews were responsible for the Russian Revolution."

ACCUSED: Excuse me, I - I said, "They killed Jesus". Where did you dig that one up from?

EYERS, MR: Look at - look at the footage for yourselves, ladies and gentlemen. "We've had enough of you", Mr O'Connell says with reference to the Jewish people. "We'll put you in camps." Refers to Holocaustianity. You're aware what he means by that phrase. It's the exaggeration or fabrication of the Holocaust in Nazi occupied Europe.

ACCUSED: No, it's creating legitimate suffering into a religion and making it a dogma.

WISBEY DCJ: Look, Mr - -

EYERS: Can he have reasonably held any other intention?

MHR YES, to inform people of the facts and offer compelling arguments and interpretations...deliberately missing the point i.e brendon's motivation...to open dialogue, and wake people up, including jews, as to what is going on...and what is coming...

mhr and secondly...what about wartime propaganda, and current propaganda against Islam...could THAT have any other intent? and 'the holocaust' propaganda, could THAT have any other intent? so why is Brendon the one in court when jews carry out a centuries long vilification and incitement, in fact MILLENIA old, re: torah and Amalek, ,who is germany etc !!! and did 911...??? FACTS...???

He has a hatred of the Jewish people. He said that this morning. I'm not - you heard it yourself. So that's his starting point. MHR maybe for THIS blog, but NOT the conventional notion of this being the ORIGINAL starting point i.e irratoinal hatred of jews...as Torah attributes to all Amalek i.e anyone not PRO jew world order...from the very start of their religion...even before...Amalek came to them when they escaped Egypt, and had been there before, long before the Torah was written (given)...!!! THAT is the ORIGINAL vilificatioon and inictement...kill Amalek...anyone NOT helping the jews in their 'mission' to enslave all the world, in their 'jew world order'...from Day one...in the Torah, Talmud, of the 'official' written version of Judaism...and expressed in the video I found yesterday...

If you are at war, you do that, promote animosity towards the enemy...who are attacking...you don't seek a 'balanced' understanding of why these people want to kill every man, woman, child, and animal in your nation...do you??? If they have been brainwashed from birth to hate and fear US because it is a 'legal fact' / dogma / article of faith, that WE plan to kill them all, the moment we can (even though we've had thousands of years to do so and never bothered, so we can't be that highly motivated, or really incompetent, if we couldn't kill a few million people...all throughout history genocides have occured, using basic weapons like machetes, so if we had ANY intention EVER of murdering all the jews, we could have, and would have , done this hundreds or thousands of years ago...but if a jew is told 'don't listen to them' when they try to 'trick' you, raise questions in your mind about your brainwashed beliefs, conditioning etc, then what hope do WE have of ever challenging their dogma / beliefs/ brainwashing...they hate US from the moment they are taught to, as children...they FEAR us because they are told we want to kill them all, from childhoood on...and they are told 'do not listen to the gentiles / anyone who does not agree that jews should rule the world, as they are AMALEK, our age old foe...whom we are commmaned to murder the moment we have the power.... now just how many nukes in deficit are they of having this power? don't they already control NATO? doesn't this mean the U.S.A, Germany, and all the nations that evolved from the former Roman Empire are up for total destruction, total genocide, even their animals, any moment now? what weapons do they have that we don't know about? and remember, to fulfill the torah, they must get all of us to attack israel, destroy it...so happy next lives all you jews who went along with the scam...for soon you'll be as dead as the rest of us, and your supposed 'leaders' and 'priests' will rule what is left of the world, as slave masters...oh, but don't listen to me, I'm amalek, cos I don't agree jews should rule the world as slave masters...just trying to raise doubts, get you to question your brainwashing...can't expect amalek to be able to reason or logic, or to have any compassion now, can you...just cos someone told you that...and kept repeating it...and everyone around you accepts that....well happy next lives folks...

What you saw in Gaza was the essence of so-called Judaism. This is accurate, based on the last video I uploaded / reviewed...and everything else in the torah and talmud, and the fact that that latest book is NOT the last word...even if some jews say so...there is no central consensus...

MHR NO... his only logical, and manifestly his clear, intention was to create or promote animosity towards the Jews. clearly NOT...he was trying to wake all people up to the present threat, and history... ONLY ? not even MAIN motive...

EYERS: Ask yourself this; has he actually, in your opinion, properly informed himself? MHR that in reference to the 10% representative and his lies about that book, totally misrepresented by Eyers himself, DELIBERATELY...HE did not bother to inform HIMSELF...just accepted offers from jewish guest speakers who DELIBERATELY misrepresented themselves and the facts...

Consider the fact that when given an open question: what’s your favourite book, the most important book of Judaism? Rabbi Freilich responded “The Shulchan Aruch.” Okay? Because it contained, the Rabbi told you, the ... MHR total misrepresentation...it does NOT...could NOT ... no such thing in judaism as 'the final word' / decision / consensus...absolutely fatuous notion..guy who represents at best 10% of judaism...meaning his comments were totally without any significance in the court proceedings...

ACCUSED: Just as I was going to quote from the Shulchan Aruch, hate literature. 5,000 Russians signed a petition, including heads of government, that it was hate literature, and they knew I was going to tell you about it and they ended the trial. You have seen a little bit of history, jury. Unbelievable. An insult to Skippy.

On a number of occasions when I put to Mr O’Connell his writings or his statements I said, “Well, your intention was clearly in relation to Jewish people to create, promote or increase animosities.” “No, my intention was to let people know the truth.” Okay. Now, ask yourself this when you’re considering that question, Mr O’Connell’s proposition, “My intention was to let people know the truth,” ask yourself this: has Mr O’Connell endeavoured to find out the truth? Has Mr O’Connell even had the good manners - - -

MHR this is ridicule and shameing...and totally uncalled for / unjustified...because that book is NOT what the Rabbi claimed it was...and it was NOT a book that nullifies all the 'amalek' etc and 'cattle' stuff on gentiles in the books written before it or after it...it has no authority to do so, and apparently does not even do so...as the 5000 russians attested...it is simply more 'hate speech' against gentiles...racial vilification, incitement, abuse and ridicule of gentiles re: you can't discuss reasonably, logically with them...etc !!!

What is the holiest book? What - what are your main books? Just to clarify the main books. Would it be the Babylonian Talmud, the books of the Mishnah, Gemara, Rabbinic Commentaries, or would it be the Tanakh or Old Testament. Which would be your favourite and most - most important books that define whether you're a race or a religion or both?

The rabbi replied in this way:

None of those actually. The most important book is the Shulchan Aruch, which is the final decisions of those particular discussions by the rabbis and from - from the Torah down to the Mishnah, the Gemara and then finally the Shulchan Aruch gives the final Halakha.

THIS IS PATENTLY MISREPRESENTATION / LYING BY THE RABBI...GIVEN WITHOUT CAVEATS THE PROSECUTION SO KEEN ON I.E GENERALISATIONS ARE HATE SPEECH...THIS IS NOT TRUE...AND HE DOES NOT STATE WHICH 'OFFENDING' MATERIALS WERE NOT INCLUDED, FROM THE TORAH / TALMUD ETC E.G AMALEK? CATTLE? JEW WORLD ORDER?

And the rabbi said this:

The Torah has laws which of course are very - are actually very straightforward but again they have - they're discussed in the Talmud and then finally, the final decisions are in the Shulchan Aruch. Now - now, there are many opinions by a number of the rabbis in the Talmud discussing those laws in the Torah and in fact you could - you could take any of those opinions out of context and say, you know, "This is the opinion of Judaism". But it's not. The final - the - and as - as it is with many law books,you can have various opinions of various judges, but - but there's - there's a - there's a final decision on a situation.

THAT comment is basic 101 'orthodoxy' i.e assumption by one group that 'they have the answer, everyone else is wrong', that leads to schisms...leaving this Rabbi representing only 10% of jews...so why is his testimony at all relevant? a tiny minority OPINION presented as representative of all judaism, all jews...which overlooked by jury as never given any time to consider i.e just glossed over, then deliberately portrayed as 'representative' even after stating it was only 10% etc...

Now, the same as with Judaism, the Shulchan Aruch is the final decision.

fuckity fuck fuck fuck WRONG ZERO points total lie / misrepresentation...you may THINK it is, your BELIEF, and what is judaism BUT such dogmatic beliefs protected from scrutiny by brainwashing cult practises, isolation, demonisation, paranoid persecution fantasies with 'amalek' about to kill you at any moment, so you must kill anyone who does not agree with you as soon as you can..and till you can, lay low, keep isolated, till the messiah comes ... etc...!!!!!

Now, that may or may not be the case. Whether it is or not is irrelevant. But the point maybe this, for your consideration, ladies and gentlemen. Mr O'Connell has not read the Shulchan Aruch. Okay? In his critique and in reaching the views that he holds, and he's entitled to hold views and any views he wishes. That's not what this is about.

But when he expresses himself in public, when he publishes, when he cranks up the modern day equivalent of the medieval printing presses, ask yourself this: in light of that breathtaking omission to read a book advanced as the final word, is he intending to approach the subject on a balanced, rational basis or is he intending, through the omission of his research and the partialness of his approach - is he intending not to enter into a reasoned, balanced, rational debate in possession of all possible materials to enter such a debate - for instance, actually doing his homework as you’d have expected, being armed with requisite knowledge to enter a debate, a free and open and fair debate, an exchange of ideas and opinions, or is he intending to create, promote and increase animosity towards the Jewish people?

You see, at that point, that exchange with Rabbi Freilich may well shine a light upon where Mr O’Connell comes from. One can collect selective quotations from all over the place, and as you appreciate, I think Professor Markus said, “Two Jews, five opinions.” Two Australians, five opinions. We’re all entitled to hold our opinions. But the moment that we generalise the particular – an Afghani suicide bomber blows up 35 people in Kabul. The moment we attack or approach an Afghani on the streets of Perth in saying, “You are a racist, homicidal maniac,” we’re generalising the particular.

And that’s the danger in the approach, and that’s why we submit to you that Mr O’Connell’s intention is precisely that; to generalise deliberately the particular with a view

D30/16/KM/WADC/CRIM/PER/IND1767/2009

27/01/2011 12:46 In the absence of the Jury 687 National Transcription Services EYERS, MR HIS HONOUR

of creating, promoting and increasing animosity towards the Jewish people. And that is borne out, we say, if you put into context that final exchange with Rabbi Freilich and the breathtaking omission – conceded omission in the learning of Mr Brendon Lee O’Connell.

So the prosecutor is condemning himself as hypocrite, for not doing HIS homework...when did jews ever come out and reject amalek? talmud? torah? quotes of relevance? when did the jews publish a clear english version of this book to clear up any doubts, assuagge any fears, and enforce the ideas like we do, with laws, against any rabbi like the one I have the video of, claiming all the old horrible stuff is still valid? how genuine an effort have jews made, if this 'final word' is in fact a nice book, full of bunnies and rainbows for everyone? a book I'd never even HEAR about it is so obscure...and if it was full of relief for troubled anti-semitic minds, proving we have nothing to fear from jews at all, then why wouldn't they shout this from the rooftops, and make sure everyone of us had a copy to read, and be relieved and assuaged of our 'irrational' fears, which are perfectly rationaly given the 'old versions' of judaism? how disingenous can you get? Eyers takes none of this into consideration..he is a hired hitman...for hte jew world order...

If Eyers intent was not to 'spring' this obscure book upon Brendon, mid trial, why didn't he get a copy himself, so Brendon could respond..so the jury could compare the nasty old judaism with the new improved, bunnies and rainbows version that defines 'modern' jews? of course given the FACTS about 'the holocaust' hoax, and 911, and U.S.S liberty, and king david hotel, and the financial crashes and faked man made global warming international carbon tax scams etc, we'd be hard pressed to take them at their word...but at least we'd have 'the final word' on judaism to compare the actions of some 'jews' against, and thus define them as 'not typical / unrepresentative' and together with hte bunnies and rainbows jews we could tackle the problem...but hey, doesn't this all point to disingenousness and that 'amalek' is us, today, still , and nothing has changed where it counts, re: the jew world order's plans, for themselves, and us???

WISBEY DCJ: Mr O’Connell, Mr Eyers has completed his address. You now have the opportunity to address the jury. Your address must be confined to the evidence that’s before it - - - MHR and THAT is the whole point...the evidence presented was biased, deliberately...and all intended and actually preventing Brendon from presenting any 'evidence' at all...that hte jury would find 'authoritative' or 'compellinng'...Eyers deliberately ridiculed him and shamed him in the eyes of the jury....to discredit anything he said...and focus on things he did say that appeared damning, if you didn't know the truth ...and thus the motive and justified nature of it...

ACCUSED: Mr Wisbey, my name is Brendon Lee of the family O’Connell. I am a sovereign subject of Queen Elizabeth II, her heirs and successors. I’m a free man. This is an admiralty law court. This is not a common law court. I do not recognise its jurisdiction. It does not sit under chapter 3 of the Constitution, nor the 1903 Judiciary Act.

ACCUSED: Now, let me quickly go into a matter, Mr Wisbey, regarding the fact that you stated, “Are there any further witnesses?” and I said, “No, except myself,” meaning I have the right to get up there and continue to answer questions, and you stopped me from doing that. It was so blatant I was in absolute shock.

ACCUSED: I can’t comment on the Kitzur Shulchan Aruch, the book that we were talking about? I can’t - - -

WISBEY DCJ: You can’t comment on anything other than the evidence that’s been placed before the jury.

ACCUSED: Why did you cut – why did you cut the trial like that? You cut it like that. You asked me before the jury went in, “Do you have any further witnesses?” and I said, “No, except myself.”

ACCUSED: You’ve seen Judge Wisbey talk over me, do astounding things. He ended the trial like that. Why? I was just about to get into the good stuff. I – I spoke to my lawyer this – he said, “Of course you can present material. It goes to the heart of intent, it goes to the heart of good faith, innocent intentions, the whole works. Just keeping pushing it. They’ll allow you.” He’s going to have a heart attack. What’s just gone on here is – is astounding. I’m speechless.

I cannot present to you any material whatsoever by - this court has refused to allow me to quote from their own holy books. I accused them of being racist, homicidal maniacs, and I can show you how bad they are, and they are stopping me from doing it.

When I walked in here this morning, who was in Mr Eyers’ ear but a rabbi? And they went on about that book, the Shullah Akook(?), or whatever it was, and said I knew nothing about it. I said, “No, I’ve never read it directly, but I’ve read references to it,” and I was about to quote to you what they tried to do in Russia. Get it banned as hate literature. They won’t let me read that. 5,000 signatures, top people in the government, the media, the arts. They won’t let me read that. They ended the bloody trial. It’s incredible.

I’m charged under racial vilification, subgroup ethnicity. So they’ve gone off the biological angle. They have to. It’s too hard to prove anything.

MHR how can 'ethnicity' be a legal subgroup of a group even Prof. Markus stated does not exist' i.e no biological basis for race. ??? a sub-group of an empty group? THIS is the state of our legal codes?

But you heard yourself, you heard Stanley Keyser say “Are you a race, Stanley, like an African, an Asian?” and he said “Yeah, a biological race.” He goes “Yeah.”

We’ve got Rabbi Freilich saying “Oh, I speak for all Jews, all religious Jews.” It’s garbage. I want to present to you material which shows he’s lying. He’s a tiny minority. You’ve got liberal, reform – you name it, there’s all times. You’ve got sentimentalists, like a Catholic.

You don’t go to church, but you turn up on Christmas Day or Christmas morning. You go there for Easter. You might say you’re an atheist, but you still go. I never got a chance to show you any of that material. I made some pretty big calls there, they’re big calls cos you haven’t heard of it before. Cos the media doesn’t report it.

I’ll tell you why; Jews run the media. It sounds like a Nazi statement. I felt the same. I used to say “Oh, that’s garbage.” Back in 2003, “Yeah, that’s garbage.

D30/18/KM/WADC/CRIM/PER/IND1767/2009

27/01/2011 2:11 ACCUSED 693 National Transcription Services

That’s Nazi propaganda.” Then I actually started looking into it and lo and behold. I’d love to show you the evidence, but I can’t.

I’d love to show Joel Stein. Member of the Jewish community in LA, writing for the LA Times’s opinion piece. “I don’t care if Americans think we run the government, Wall Street, Hollywood. I just care that we get to keep on running them.” I told you about Helen Thomas, the doyen. She’s worshipped as one of the great reporters of all time in the United States. They bow to her when she walks into the White House. She’s interviewed everyone. She said Zionists run Wall Street. Zionists run the government. They run everything. What do you want me to do? Do you want me to say she’s lying too? Is she a great anti-Semite racial hater?

She’s half-Lebanese of course. So they brought that one up. She’s an anti-Semite. 90 years old. This stuff is breaking out all over, and that’s what they don’t want. For the first time, they are on the record and they hate it.

You heard me call Rabbi Freilich a sociopathic liar. He is a sociopathic liar. I was setting him up for today when I could start presenting stuff. I said, “Oh, that’s right, that’s very interesting, rabbi, keep going,” and then I was going to nail him. Not just with this; with the 10 tonnes of stuff I’ve collected at great expense from my support group who’ve also been through hell. Had their cars broken into, houses broken into, threatened and intimidated.

Spending their money. They said “We’ll give you some money for a suit.” I said “Damn that. Let the jury see what they’ve made me into when they made me homeless to the point where no friends would even take me in. They were too scared.” Where their cars were scratched, windows were smashed, their bonnets were jumped up and down all over. That’s the rubbish I’ve been putting up with for two freakin’ years. Almost. All because I decided that Mr Leon Wende was an intelligent(?) asset for the state of Israel. What a big mistake. I never thought in a million years what would happen has happened. And then the fools gave me a platform.

Detective Paini said, “Oh, Mr O’Connell, a lot of media interest,” and I said, “Oh, fucking ripper. Channel Seven there, Channel Nine, we’ll get to talk about all these subjects I like,” and their faces sunk. Gasp. “You’re not meant to do that, you’re meant to be intimidated and shit yourself.” And I said, “I love a crowd, bring it on.”

D30/18/KM/WADC/CRIM/PER/IND1767/2009

27/01/2011 2:11 ACCUSED 694 National Transcription Services HIS HONOUR

They gave me a platform. And what’s the biggest no-no in the racial vilification legislation in “so far, so good,” an analysis of the legislation? “The greatest risk we face with this legislation is that you’ll give publicity to the peoples’ views you’re trying to suppress.” What a bunch of idiots. Operation Get Arrested a complete success.

Did I ever think it would go this far? I thought they’d come down and after they’d told me that apparently I’d threatened to kill their kids - - -

WISBEY DCJ: Mr O’Connell. Your function at this stage is to address the evidence.

ACCUSED: Tell the truth? Yeah, I know.

WISBEY DCJ: Not to make statements like this.

ACCUSED: Well, we’ll get into that.

WISBEY DCJ: I’ve given you considerable latitude, but if you don’t want to address the evidence, then - - -

ACCUSED: We’re getting there.

WISBEY DCJ: - - - I will ask you to cease.

It’s called racial vilification. Subgroup ethnicity. Let’s get into the little directions that good old Judge Wisbey – he’s not a judge, by the way, you’re the judge. He’s the adjudicator, allegedly. He’s not taken any of the proper oaths and everything but we won’t get into that.

To come under the Act, you must first come under certain criteria, which is why I could’ve actually gone against Professor Andrew Markus and Freilich. It’s just hearsay. The same thing they’ve done with me. They said, “Your evidence is hearsay.” By putting up these expert witnesses. “Look, you can get 5,000 questionnaires all you like.” Says who? Under what authority?

Who are they? I want their names and their addresses. I don’t know who they are. Remember, this is a court of law. This isn’t the street. It’s a court of law. But I said, “Fine, counsel. Go for your life. I don’t care. I

D30/18/KM/WADC/CRIM/PER/IND1767/2009

27/01/2011 2:11 ACCUSED 695 National Transcription Services

want to cross-examine him anyway.” Professor Andrew Markus. You remember I said to Professor Andrew Markus, I said “This isn’t identity vilification. This isn’t people vilification or nation vilification or whatever else they come up with. This is racial vilification. It’s very, very specific. And under ethnicity.” A long-shared history, of which the group is conscious, as distinguishing it from other groups and the memory of which it keeps alive.

MHR If I was a member of a group that believed it had been 'holocausted' and persecuted forever, because of a few hundred quotes from my groups 'holy books' that did NOT represent my groups beliefs and attitudes, but which were clearly threatening e.g amalek, and abusive and ridiculing e'g 'cattle' etc...I would make the greatest effort to have the greatest number, especially in the 'anti-semite' community, have access to that book, and show them how the old judaism has been reformed...and that the old quotes were no longer 'believed'...i.e what i"ve always called for i.e jews to renounce and denounce amalek, genocide, the jew world order mission, the definitions of non jews etc that are so repugnant and DEMAND we fear and hate them, like we would any other plague, pestilence, agressive enemy, predator etc...of our women and children, and men, and our animals even...our pets ... THEY are amalek, accourding to the rabbi in a recent video...anyone who does not acttively assist the jews gaining control of the entire planet is amalek...so surely if there was a book that renounced all this dangerous racial vilification, incitement, abuse, ridicule, then the jews themselves would be presenting it as teh antidote to antisemitism...

if that video doesn't make you anti that particular brand of semitism the rabbi professes, then you don't have a healthy sense of self-protection...you are really mentally retarded...you have a death wish, or want to be ruled by the jews... not saying his views represent all judaism, but why would they ALLOW him to express such repugnant utterances that certainly would put any gentile in prison in germany, australia, britain, U.S.A etc ???

So MY final offer to the jew world order, and to you, is to open a dialogue...and for jews to weed out the unacceptable views among their members, and publicly osttracise and repudiate and renounce them, work with us and admit 911, U.S.S liberty etc were Israeli...renounce and denounce such acts...etc etc...or otherwise we ARE amalek, reflexively, because if WE KNOW that you intend enslaving us or murdering all of us, then WE have the same right as you believe you have, the same justificiation, to eliminate all of you, as a precaution, in self defense, a preemptive strike...as surely WE still have the power to do this, and soon YOU will have the power to act on your plan to exterminate all of us, anyone that dooesn't want to serve the jew world order, and put jews in total control of this planet...of course Eyers would edit this, take it out of context, not check the facts and compelling arguments I refer to, that are implicit in this, and would simply claim 'that rabbi is a rogue'...well if so, why not prosecute him? why don't the jews distance themselves from him and prosecute him? put him in prison for 3 years?

A long-shared history, of which the group is conscious, as distinguishing it from other groups and the memory of which it keeps alive.

Well, what’s their long-shared history? What’s it contained in? What’s it speak of? They’re all religious books. They’re a religious group. Professor Shlomo Sand, I’d love to show you all the stuff I have. His interviews where he just rips the whole thing apart. He says it’s a joke. Jewish identity is not a Jewish race or even a Jewish people or a Jewish nation. Anyone can be an identity. Cat lovers. Professor Shlomo Sand actually says that. Cat lovers are an identity. Goths are an identity. Surfers are an identity. The Coffin Cheaters are an identity. And that’s where this group defamation law – cos that’s what it is. I know the exact history of that law and what they’re trying to do.

Group defamation. So you’d better watch out they don’t start applying it to politicians. You’d better be careful what you say. Get into the particulars. You don’t want to generalise about the leader, the Fuhrer or Comrade Stalin. What do you mean; Comrade Stalin’s a mass murderer? Where are your particulars? Who says? You’re just spreading vile rumours. That’s where this legislation is heading and it’s the same people who introduced it in Soviet Russia in 1917 and 1919. What was their first law they introduced? Do you know what their first law was? A law against antiSemitism? Why? Because they had all the stuff to show you Jews ran the whole show. They ran the whole show. A matter of historical record.

Not in contest. They just don’t want you to read it. That’s why you’ve got Dancing with the Stars on the telly, okay? So you don’t get into it. They want you dumb and stupid, shopping and bored. Preferably. Never questioning.

A cultural tradition of its own. Including family and social customs and manners. Often, but not necessarily, associated with religious observance. As I wanted to ask everyone, and put big photos of an Ethiopian Orthodox Jew and a Yemeni Orthodox Jew and a Russian Orthodox Jew and an Indian Orthodox Jew, and I’d put all of those different things up there, and I wanted to ask you; what is the

D30/19/JAC/WADC/CRIM/PER/IND1767/2009

27/01/2011 2:18 ACCUSED 696 National Transcription Services HIS HONOUR

common trait? What is the common social customs, cultural tradition? What is it that links them? Food, cinema, books?

Nothing. There's one set of books; religious books. One set of clothing; religious clothing. It's a religious group only. And I'm one of the first - and in fact, you're not going to believe this, you're actually sitting in on a little bit of history. It's never been done before, because they usually get the usual suspects. Some goosestepping full Nazi, some idiot, ultra Right Wing extremist who can't string two words together. That's why they're so terrified of me and my incredible video editing skills which drive them insane. Insane.

In addition to this - remember they were the essential characteristics. And that's the question you've got to ask yourself in there, because this is really the ring that rules them all. Are they a racial group under ethnicity, according to the legislation?

Now, Mr Justin Whalley, I would have loved to have introduced to you that but I can't. He admitted on 11 February 2010, he said, and I quote:

It is not up to Brendon O'Connell, your Honour, or the DPP to prove - to say that Jews are a racial group. It is up to the jury.

That's what he said. Do you want - can I quote from that, or are you going to stop me?

WISBEY DCJ: Well, I'll only stop you if it doesn't arise out of the evidence. And it appears that it doesn't.

ACCUSED: Because I never had a chance to introduce that to you. Are you getting it yet? Why did they cut it short? Unbelievable. Unbelievable.

That's what Justin Whalley said, the senior prosecutor, decent bloke, far better than the former idiot, Senior Prosecutor Alan Troy, "He was always leaving, Brendon, it's nothing to do with you." Yeah, right. And I haven't finished with Mr Alan Troy, the former senior prosecutor. Mark my words.

So there you go and that's the key. And this is what Professor Shlomo Sand starts his book, “The Invention with the Jewish - of the Jewish People”. He asks this simple question. What is the linkage between these vastly disparate cultures around the world? What is the linkage?

D30/19/JAC/WADC/CRIM/PER/IND1767/2009

27/01/2011 2:18 ACCUSED 697 National Transcription Services

It's religion, there's nothing else. They don't share foods, they don't share - you're thinking of Seinfeld. You're thinking of Yiddish culture. That's Slavic Polish culture. When you think of - and that's what comes out of the United States. And because it's such a dominant culture, that's what you think Jews and Judaism is. It's not.

I want you to give me an example. You heard Rabbi Freilich - and I - I'm not being nasty when I say he's a sociopathic liar. I mean every word. He is a sociopathic liar and once you understand Orthodox Judaism it gives you specific religious permission to lie to a non-Jew. I said, "Am I your neighbour?" He said, "Oh yeah, I love everyone." He's a liar, I'm not his neighbour and he has specific Halakha or law. He has specific permission to lie through his teeth to me, because I'm a cattle, I'm low. I'd love to show you the quotes, but I can't. How unfortunate.

How fortunate. Where's the media? Where's the - where's the Western Australian? I spoke to her not that long ago. "Oh we're very interested, Mr O'Connell. This is a very interesting case." Where are they? Because it's been shut down. Are shitting themselves.

So let's ask - get back to the racial component. Where are the common traditional markets? Where? There are none. It's all religious in origin. All. They would say, "Oh it's a common heritage and history." Yeah, what history, what heritage? Religious history, religious books.

They say, "We came out of Egypt". I might add with a fixed multitude. They keep saying it's this racial cohesive group. It's a joke.

And I say - I tried to get him to admit. He wouldn't admit to it. They're all religious books. You heard him, "What are they again? Is it another religion?" "Oh no, no, no." You heard them yourself. I hope you've got a good memory. But that's what they were doing. They didn't want to admit they are religious books. They were doing everything not to admit it.

MHR references to novels by people defined by common religious beliefs from common religious books that lead them to identify as 'jew' and write books as 'jews'...but THAT is emergent from the religious books then, without them, no-one would be a 'jew' at all...no-one...

John Bougher said, "I'm getting paid a pittance, I don't have the money and the resources", because he had to go to volumes of material. Did - acquitted himself brilliantly in the directions hearing at such short notice. But it was abysmal. I couldn't bear it, I couldn't speak there, stuff was overdone and that's why you see me here today unrepresented. Don't think I just get rid of my lawyers on a whim. And I'll get back to that.

So this is really the ring that rules them all, whether you want to believe Jews are a racial group under ethnicity. That's really the key. Because you can't find me guilty in any way, shape or form. I don't actually even have to convince you that they are or aren't. I just have to convince you that I've never believed it. MHR brilliant...he cannot 'intend' to vilify a racial group unless HE defines them as such !!!

many of them do consider themselves a race and it's making a huge comeback. A biological race. They claim they can test your DNA and find out if you're a Jew. It's garbage. But the Israeli state is sponsoring this because they're desperate to keep Jewish - Jewish - unity together so the money keeps flowing in.

When Jews realise, as they are, that the state of Israel is the worst thing that has ever happened to them, the worst thing. They're now hated in the United States. Look, I've got my pulse in the United States; my friends are all from there. Right now everybody's talking about it. If they collapse the economy there - and they're desperate not to do it at the moment, it should have collapsed years ago - they know there's all those returned servicemen - you've heard me talk about Dr Alan Sabrosky, and that is in the evidence, former US Army War College Director of Studies, who said, "Israel did 9/11 and when the American public find out they're going to scrub Israel off the face of the map", amongst other lovely things.

When you're a returned serviceman injured, your friends are being killed, what are you going do? Your job's gone, your wife's left you, you've got nothing. But you're armed to the teeth. What are you going to do? What are you going to do? They're going to drag all of you - because it won't

D30/19/JAC/WADC/CRIM/PER/IND1767/2009

27/01/2011 2:25 ACCUSED 699 National Transcription Services

be - won't be Michael Chertoff or any of the top men; they'll all have got out. They're all coming to Australia.

They're going to drag ordinary Jews out of their rooms and just shoot them in the head. And don't laugh. It's heading that way. And all because they refuse to be drawn out and face the music. The problem is Judaism, not Zionism. Look at their books, look at what they do. "Go into the city, leave nothing alive that breatheth. Put them to the sword, man, infant, woman, suckling, camel and ass." They repeat this; their secular academics are calling for it. For the collective punishment of the Palestinians, Hannah Kasher. You heard me say that in the thing. You - you don't believe it.

The (indistinct) rabbis call for their slaughter. Kill them. No mercy. And then the little leftist activist come out with - calling for their sack, nothing ever happens. Setting up - I was setting up the rabbi for Rabbi Yosef. I was setting him up for it. "Is he one of like your spiritual” - "Oh no, he hasn't been for years." He's his Orthodox spiritual leader at the Shas Party, one of the most powerful rabbis in Israel. He called us all slaves. Our job is to be slaves for the Jew. I'm just telling you what he says.

I’m not an anti-Semite for telling you what these racist lunatics are saying. But you never heard it because I’ve been stopped from presenting this material to you. You heard me say to the rabbi, “You want to marry amongst your own”, and, “Yeah, we’re all raised,” and so on.

I said “Well, let’s get David Duke.” I was going to show his films cos they were very impertinent. Of course I can’t show you them. Cos he used to be a member of the KKK. He’s since renounced that, but he became a member of the Louisiana Legislature for four years. He’s now got himself respectable and he’s trying to get a political party going. And I wanted to use David Duke for a very specific reason; cos David Duke’s a white Nationalist.

And he said, “I love my white European heritage and I want to learn from my white European friends. I wish to marry amongst my white European people.” And you know what they say about him? He is a disgusting, despicable racist. But when you’re a Jew, “Wait that’s fine. You can marry amongst your own. That’s okay. You can have a land of your own to the exclusion of all others and call yourself a race. Even a biological race.”

Because you heard them say – you heard Stanley Keyser specifically. And I do believe the rabbi went down the same path. I’m not making this stuff up. Again, if I could have presented it to you, I could have shown you what they did to the Palestinian people in Operation Cast Lead.

You would be horrified, and then once you understand what that book said - -

WISBEY DCJ: Mr O’Connell. I’ve given you plenty of time to address the evidence. Are you going to or not?

ACCUSED: Because if you saw what they did, you’d be wanting to lynch Stanley Elliot Keyser, not Brendon O’Connell.

Anyway, getting back to the racial group category. You’ve already worked out now this identity garbage that Markus is putting up. It could be anything. Remember I said to him, “Professor Markus, did it ever occur to you to ask Jews,” seeing as I know this is a big issue, particularly in Israel cos they have to justify who a Jew is, what a Jew is, and none of them know. It’s an in-joke in Jewish circles. Paul Eisen writes about it. Again, I’d like to show you stuff but I can’t. And he said “We’re a religion this week and then if that’s not convenient, we’re a race

D30/20/KM/WADC/CRIM/PER/IND1767/2009

27/01/2011 2:25 ACCUSED 701 National Transcription Services

the next week, and then next week it might be convenient again, so we’ll be” – and that’s an inside joke in Judaism.

Keep them guessing, cos you’ll never tie them down. They have been tied down this time. 90 per cent, which is brilliant. It’s been worth it for that. And that’s the joke. I said, “Professor, did it ever occur to you, besides your Holocaust that you bring up every five minutes, and I’ve already told you about the former member of parliament Israel?” He said, “That’s a trick. We always use it. If a European criticises Israel, we bring up the Holocaust. Whenever an American criticises Israel, we call them anti-Semitic.” He said, “It’s a trick, we always use it.” I wish I could show you the video, but I can’t. And that’s the essential nature. We’re all drawn together by some common shared history, some blah blah blah.

MHR get that video, if not in my collection...

the reason he has to push these questionnaires on Jewish identity, cos they don’t have a clue what they are and they know they can’t do the racial group thing.

That’s why they’re making the definition so wide. So wide so they can stay in that legislation. Why? So they can stop people criticising Israel and Jews and Jewish history, Jewish religion. That’s the big one. They don’t want the connection between Judaism and their behaviour in Israel and their behaviour elsewhere. They do not want that connection. They want it kept in the very narrow confines of so-called Zionism. And this is the thing they’re so terrified of and why they’re so terrified of me. Just remember that. Identity is not a racial group thing. It’s not. In addition to the essential characteristics, the following characteristics are relevant and often present.

Either a common geographical origin, or descent from a small number of common ancestors. This is the thing I love the best. They state openly in their books – no one can

D30/20/KM/WADC/CRIM/PER/IND1767/2009

27/01/2011 2:25 ACCUSED 702 National Transcription Services

prove their antecedence. No one. You take it on faith. And what’s it all written about? Coming out and Moses; all the stories. Bread falling from heaven. What’s it all come out of? Religious books. That’s not a history book. Professor Shlomo Sand pushes this constantly. The Tanakh and those five books in the Talmud are not history books. They are religious books. Unless you want me to call Jesus’s raising of the dead and The New Testament, do you want me to call it a history book? That book is taken as a matter of faith.

If you want to believe Jesus rose from the dead, take it as a matter of faith. Do you want to prosecute someone for many years in gaol based on whether or not Jesus rose from the dead is a literal historical event? Cos that’s what they’re asking you to do under the racial group heading. That’s literally what they’re asking you to do. Take as a matter of faith that bread fell from heaven.

I mean, it’s all in the same books. You want to treat it like a history book then treat it as literal. Bread fell from heaven. Moses and the burning bush and so on and so forth. Treat it as literal, then. And then The New Testament is also literal, then. And I can’t wait to start prosecuting Jews for, you know, defaming the name of Christ.

Won’t that be funny? You can’t use religious books as reliable history books. You can’t do it. And any history book written on the past is based on what? Religious books. It gets back to religion, religious identity, religious clothing, religious foods. You name it. It’s all to do with religion. Religious symbols, so on and so forth. That is the common linkage that links that highly disparate group.

We can go there and do what we want,

D30/21/ACJ/WADC/CRIM/PER/IND1767/2009

27/01/2011 2:32 In the absence of the Jury 703 National Transcription Services ACCUSED HIS HONOUR

cos it’s our Holy Book. We can wipe out entire cities in Gaza cos it’s in our Holy Books. And if you say anything, you anti-Semite.

What about the Holocaust? I’m sick of hearing about the Holocaust. It’s over. Let’s talk about 27 million Russians just in the Second World War. They were decimated. It was an incredible struggle on the Eastern front.

Let’s talk about up to 40 million Orthodox Christians, Eastern Rite Ukrainian Catholics, Poles, Latvians, slaughtered for their belief in a supernatural God. Why won’t you talk about them? Oh well, that’s not important. They’re not chosen. Day after day I hear this garbage shoved down my throat.

And guess what today is? Do you know why they’re ending it – today is the 27th, I presume. Do you know what today is? It’s International Holocaust Remembrance Day. And now you know why they ended the trial today. Are you beginning to get it? You don’t know the half of it.

quoting from the Old Testament, it says we came out of Egypt in a mixed multitude, and there were dark-skinned people from North Africa. There were Africans there. Egyptians, Semitic people from the Mediterranean coast. Just there. Read in Matthew where – where Christ goes after the Pharisees and remember - - -

WISBEY DCJ: Madam Foreman, ladies and gentlemen, would you retire for a short time, thank you?

(At 2.32 pm the jury retired)

WISBEY DCJ: Mr O’Connell - - -

ACCUSED: Yes, Mr Wisbey?

WISBEY DCJ: - - - in this stage of the proceedings you can address the jury on the evidence.

D30/21/ACJ/WADC/CRIM/PER/IND1767/2009

27/01/2011 2:32 In the absence of the Jury 704 National Transcription Services ACCUSED HIS HONOUR

ACCUSED: Yeah.

WISBEY DCJ: You cannot make statements and give accounts of matters not in the evidence.

ACCUSED: I did. I – I spoke about that proselytising Book of Matthew. I spoke about that up there on the witness stand. So - saying I can’t introduce what I’ve already talked about?

WISBEY DCJ: I’m saying that you can address the evidence, but only the evidence, and - - -

ACCUSED: My evidence is – I’m a witness on the stand. That is my evidence.

WISBEY DCJ: And if you choose not to do so, then I’ll have to - - -

ACCUSED: Is it not – did I not mention the mixed - - -

WISBEY DCJ: I will have to rule that you cannot address further.

ACCUSED: Did I not mention the mixed multitude and Book of Matthew where he says:

You compass sea and land to make one proselyte, then making twice the child of hell as yourself(?).

WISBEY DCJ: I’m trying to make the position very clear - - -

ACCUSED: Is that not evidence, sir? Yes or no?

WISBEY DCJ: Do you understand what I’m saying to you?

ACCUSED: Do you understand what I’m saying?

WISBEY DCJ: When I invite the jury back, if you continue to talk about matters not in the evidence, then - - -

MHR so jews were 'recruiting' actively at the time of Matthew...why? or just sects within judaism seeking converts of other jews to their particular cult of judaism? i.e sect / sub-group / schism...???

EYERS, MR: Look, the point here is relevance. On the one hand, of course, anything that Mr O’Connell said whilst giving evidence is, on the face of it, evidence. But it’s not relevant, and strictly speaking a lot of what he said wasn’t relevant, but he was given a degree of latitude. He can’t simply get through a loophole by referring to what he said previously and then saying, “But it was in evidence because I said it before.”

In fairness, I recall – I haven’t looked it up specifically. I think he mentioned the mixed multitude before. It’s a phrase that resonates, but it’s not relevant. And to mention it now and say it was evidence, it’s not. It was a statement by him - - -

ACCUSED: Excuse me - - -

WISBEY DCJ: Sit down and be - - -

ACCUSED: - - - I also went after the rabbi on that stuff too.

WISBEY DCJ: Sit down and be quiet for a moment, thank you.

EYERS, MR: So - - -

ACCUSED: Yes, Mr Wisbey. Captain.

EYERS, MR: So generally the mandate for counsel addressing the jury is to address them on the evidence and invite them to consider the law and the legal elements in light of the evidence. And Mr O’Connell was absolutely correctly referring, for a time, to the ingredients of a racial group, the fact that they must find that the Jews are a racial group before they can convict him of anything. Absolutely, he was right.

But then dealing I think with the mixed multitude referred to in the Bible, whether the Old Testament or the New

D30/21/ACJ/WADC/CRIM/PER/IND1767/2009

27/01/2011 2:32 In the absence of the Jury 706 National Transcription Services EYERS, MR ACCUSED HIS HONOUR

Testament, perhaps transgresses the rules of relevance, even though he mentioned it strictly – I don’t mean to be unkind, but strictly irrelevantly when he was addressing the jury previously. That’s our view. He has to address them on relevant evidence.

ACCUSED: That’s not true, Mr Eyers. I also addressed it with both Rabbi Freilich and the professor as well. I went into (indistinct).

EYERS, MR: But a question is not evidence, of course.

WISBEY DCJ: They didn’t agree with you.

EYERS, MR: It’s the answer that’s the evidence.

ACCUSED: Is it – is it not true that in the Bible it says:

Ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, then making twice the child of hell as yourself.

They are clearly proselytising the whole time. There’s been four mass conversions: North African, Berbers, the Karzers(?). This is well written about.

WISBEY DCJ: Are you - - -

ACCUSED: I brought that up with the professors.

WISBEY DCJ: Are you prepared to continue to confine – are you prepared to - - -

ACCUSED: I’m prepared, under duress, yes, to follow your instructions, because I’m under duress.

WISBEY DCJ: Are you prepared to confine your address to the evidence?

ACCUSED: Yes.

WISBEY DCJ: Because unless you are prepared to do so, I’ll have to rule that you cannot continue further with your address.

ACCUSED: Mr Wisbey, I understand completely. Under duress, I will continue on after you cut – cut this trial short for International Holocaust Remembrance Day for your

D30/22/JAC/WADC/CRIM/PER/IND1767/2009

27/01/2011 2:38 ACCUSED 707 National Transcription Services HIS HONOUR

own publicity stunt. I understand that, which we all talked about online.

Thousands of people know who you are now, and they’ve got your photos, don’t worry. You’re going to be made famous, sir. Famous. That’s no threat, I might add. You’re just going to be famous, and you’re going to be held for – account – what you’ve done here today, for this whole past farcical week.

WISBEY DCJ: Look, that may excite you, but it doesn’t - - -

ACCUSED: Excites a lot of people.

WISBEY DCJ: It doesn’t excite or concern me.

ACCUSED: I’m sure not.

WISBEY DCJ: What concerns me is that you confine your address to the evidence.

the state of Israel does, setting up little - little Hebrew schools so little Jews can run along and learn a language totally foreign to them and sprout a few words. The fact of the matter is the natural languages of these people all over the world is their native languages.

It's International Holocaust Remembrance Day. It's a stunt. They did this to me when they arrested me and they tried to do - link me up with Frederick Tobin. It's a stunt. The whole thing.

A common literature peculiar to the group. You heard me ask, "Well, what's your common literature?" "Oh, oh, thousands of books." "Can you name one?" "Oh, well, there's a couple of authors." It's a joke. I just sat there laughing to myself.

The common literature is what, that links an Ethiopian Orthodox Jew to a Russian Jew? I'm not trying to get off on a technicality here. This is the very heart of the law. Really, this is not a street debate; this is in an alleged courtroom. Does the law even apply? And we've already had admissions from the former senior prosecutor, "It's not up to us, it's up to the jury to decide." Now, they don't even know what a racial group is themselves. They don't even know. Because no one's ever questioned it until now.

So a common literature. Well, that common literature - it's not Yiddish culture. You know, it's not Yiddish culture. You know Fiddler on the Roof? You know all that music? Well, that's not Jewish, that's Polish Slavic.

D30/22/JAC/WADC/CRIM/PER/IND1767/2009

27/01/2011 2:38 ACCUSED 709 National Transcription Services HIS HONOUR

It's Yiddish. Yiddish is a mixture of German, Polish, Polish Slavic and Hebrew. They have actually a very distinct ethnic group. It comes from a common geographical location, are very - many commonalities which of course they stole a lot of stuff from the local Slavic culture. So it is actually quite unique. But it's not Jewish culture.

When you see Seinfeld, that's all Yiddish, Yiddish humour. That's completely separate from what Jews are as a religious group all around the world. It's not the same thing.

A common religion. Now, there we go. Different from that of neighbouring groups and from the general communities surrounding it. Well, it's a religious group, period. Remember, you've got to link all those different societies. And I'd love to show on the big screen an Ethiopian, African, okay? Remember, all descended from the same people. All descended from the same people. It's a matter of faith. They admit that themselves. You've got to take it on faith.

The Resurrection I have to take on faith. Being a minority or being an oppressed or a dominant group within a larger community. And this is what's funny. Being oppressed. Jews run the entire planet; the media, advertising and marketing. They did 9/11, they control my special subject.

WISBEY DCJ: Now, Mr O'Connell - - -

ACCUSED: Electronics communication, data intercept - - -

WISBEY DCJ: Mr O'Connell, there is - there is no evidence of that.

ACCUSED: Well, you never let me present it. I put up this huge package. Would you - would you like to let me show it?

WISBEY DCJ: No, I wouldn't.

ACCUSED: No? No, of course not. Because they'd know the truth then, wouldn't they? And they'd know why I was arrested, charged, threatened and intimidated.

You'd then find out why, what's going on, when Mr Leon Wende, in 2008, that's when it all started. That's what it's all about. They dominate everything; banking, finance, real estate, the whole lot. You could find that out to yourselves from simple reading mainstream sources,

D30/23/KM/WADC/CRIM/PER/IND1767/2009

27/01/2011 2:43 ACCUSED 710 National Transcription Services

mainstream sites. Walk down Wall Street one day and say, "Oh Jews don't run Wall Street." You're going to be laughed at. You will be laughed at.

Their one weakness is they can't be seen to be doing it, because if they do you're going to find out what's in those Holy Books. Remember this one? The one they do not want me to read out to you. They don't want me to do it, they're shitting themselves. Shitting themselves.

Banned by Amazon. There’s no swear words in there. The only swear words in there are the Jewish swear words. The stuff I’ve repeated to you. Remember Mr Eyers brought up Jesus was a bastard, Mary was a whore? I didn’t say that. Jews said that in their Talmud. Mary was a whore. A hairdresser who slept with many men. Slept with Roman soldiers. Jesus was a bastard and he’s boiling in hot excrement in Hell. I’m not saying that; they’re saying that.

I can’t read it to you. I can’t show you the unexculpated, unredacted versions of the (indistinct) edition of the Babylonian Talmud. I can’t show you. They are refusing to allow me to show you that stuff. My lawyer is in shock. What the hell’s going on? That’s how bad it is. That’s how utterly corrupt this entire case is. To the point where I knew it was bad, but I had no idea it would be this bad.

So if you want to believe they constitute a racial ethnic group, you’ll have to believe that first. But I certainly don’t believe it. And in fact, part of the legislation as a subgroup to that whole thing is if I run up to an African and start abusing him and it turns out to be an Eskimo, it doesn’t matter that he wasn’t part of that racial group.

If I believe it, then I can still be charged. Belief is everything. You’ve heard them say “If Jews belief(?) I believe” essential to their belief? That’s fine. They can believe whatever. They can believe pink fairies. They can believe whatever they want.

My belief is central. And do you believe I have ever thought of them as anything other than a religious group? Homicidal maniacs quoting from their own Holy Books with about 10 or 15 righteous Jews – and I’ve given you them before – Shahak, Shamir, Paul Eisen, Max Blumenthal – he’s brilliant. Professor Finkelstein, brilliant. To a lesser degree, Chomsky. I could reel them off all day.

D30/23/KM/WADC/CRIM/PER/IND1767/2009

27/01/2011 2:43 In the absence of the Jury 711 National Transcription Services ACCUSED HIS HONOUR

But I know what they are about cos you know what? They dialogue and they tell you what they are about. I know what Stanley Keyser was doing that day. I know him like a book. I could sum him up in five minutes. They send these little saynims around. Jewish helpers. In formal groups. They take photos to intimidate the Palestinian and other activists. That’s what he was doing. He walked straight up to me and went “chck chck” and then made a big scene cos he was seeking to entrap me.

His friend Steve Lieblich was over there before. He’s a lawyer. He knows all about the racial vilification. You heard Stanley, “I didn’t know what it was. I know nothing about it. I’m just this innocent little – I work with autistic children. How could you say such a thing?”

Oh, bring the violins out. I know Stanley Keyser. I’d like to show you more about him, but unfortunately that’s all his writings off the web. I was running around screenshotting. My computer was being hacked. Files were being deleted left and right. I begged the Cyber Crime division to stop the hacking. I couldn’t prepare my defence. I was just ignored. I was totally ignored.

That’s why you see me here today like this. I’m a nervous wreck. A nervous wreck. And they said, “We’re going to buy you a suit.” I said “To hell with it. I’m wearing this garbage that I’ve got, cos that’s all I’ve got left. I’m not coming in a suit. Let the jury see me as I really am now.” Destitute.

My profession’s finished. I’m never going back to nursing. My role was to go to Queensland before my sister was killed. Re-get my nursing degree and then go and work with the remote Aboriginal missions, with a Jewish lady, would you believe, Dianne Stott(?). Before all this started. Well, that’s off now. I’m fighting tooth and nail now. This is it. This is war for me now. They have declared full scale war on me. I expect my family to be attacked and so full scale war it is.

WISBEY DCJ: Madam Foreman, ladies and gentlemen, please retire.

(At 2.46 pm the jury retired)

WISBEY DCJ: Mr O’Connell, it is obvious that you have no intention of following my direction. You continue to make statements that are not in the evidence, nor directed to the evidence and it has reached the stage where it cannot

D30/24/ACJ/WADC/CRIM/PER/IND1767/2009

27/01/2011 2:57 In the absence of the Jury 712 National Transcription Services HIS HONOUR ACCUSED

go on any further. It’s my intention now to instruct the jury, because the law - - -

ACCUSED: You can do whatever you like. I’m under duress. I’ve got no power in this court whatsoever.

WISBEY DCJ: Well - - -

ACCUSED: You’re an admiralty law court and you’re a fraud. I know you’re a fraud.

WISBEY DCJ: You may sit where you are, but - - -

ACCUSED: I’ll sit here because I choose to sit here. I don’t follow your instructions.

WISBEY DCJ: - - - if you make any - - -

ACCUSED: I choose to sit here.

WISBEY DCJ: If you make any comments in the course of my instructing the jury, you will be removed. Do you understand that?

WISBEY DCJ: Security, please remove him to the - - -

ACCUSED: I don’t stand under you.

WISBEY DCJ: Please remove him to the remote room.

WISBEY DCJ: Have the jury in, thank you.

(At 3.00 pm the jury returned)

WISBEY DCJ: Madam Foreman, ladies and gentlemen of the jury, as I explained to you at the start of this trial, it’s now my specific task and duty to identify and explain to you the law that applies to the matters that you have to consider, to give you some specific directions as to how you are required by law to approach your task and certain aspects of the evidence, and insofar as it is necessary or appropriate, to make some comment about the evidence that’s been placed before you.

Essentially, a lot of the evidence is in the exhibits before you, and it’s not going to be necessary for me to talk about the evidence at any length. You must of course accept that the law as now explained by me to you, and in your deliberations apply any directions that I give you.

That is, you must accept that what I’m telling you is the correct statement of the law, and then you apply the law as explained by me to you to the facts as you find them from the evidentiary factual material that’s been placed before you. And it would be obvious to you that it’s important that you pay regard to my total instruction to you on the law, and not simply isolate parts and overlook other parts of it.

And regardless of any view that you may have had prior to coming to this trial as to what the law is or ought to be, clearly it would be a violation of your oath or affirmation to apply any view other than as now set out to you.

You, the jury, of course perform the most important role in this trial. That is, the determination of the facts, making findings as to the facts that have been established by the evidence placed before you during the trial. You’re the sole judges of the facts and it’s your collective task to evaluate the evidence objectively, determine what facts have been established on that evaluation, and then determine whether the State has discharged the burden of proof upon it in all respects.

D30/25/KM/WADC/CRIM/PER/IND1767/2009

27/01/2011 3:04 HIS HONOUR 715 National Transcription Services

Anything I say to you about the evidence, any comment I make about the facts, is not binding upon you in any way at all. You’re entitled to disregard anything I say about the facts. Indeed, if you didn’t agree with it you’ve got a clear duty to disregard it, since it’s your task, not mine, to determine what is to be made of the evidence, what facts were established by the evidence.

If, in the course of speaking to you, as undoubtedly will be the case, I refer to a fact or facts and not others, it’s simply to remind you of part of the evidence, to suggest an approach that may be helpful to you, or to make the legal position clear to you. But it is very important that you not confine yourselves only to the matters of fact about which I might speak.

In performing your task, it is of course necessary that you have regard to the total factual material that’s been placed before you, that is, what has been said by the witnesses, the manner in which it has been said, and what is said by the exhibits as being put in evidence. And as I explained to you and would be obvious to you, it is the evidence and only the evidence that’s been placed before you that is available for your fact-finding exercise.

Propositions put by Mr Eyers or by Mr O’Connell is not evidence; it’s simply a proposition that’s put to the witness for the witness’s answer, but it’s the witness’s answer that is the evidence before you. Obviously it’s necessary to have regard to the nature of the question in many cases to interpret the answer, but it is the answer and not the proposition that was put by counsel or Mr O’Connell that is the evidence.

Now, those remarks that I’ve made as to how you approach any comment that I make about the facts applies with equal force to what has been said by Mr Eyers or Mr O’Connell to you about the evidence.

Comments have been made about the evidence and how you may approach that evidence; what you might make of it. That has been done in the hope that they are of advantage to you, and that was undoubtedly the case, but you’re not bound in any way by any comments that Mr Eyers has made or Mr O’Connell’s made about the evidence.

It is the evidence and only the evidence that you address in determining what facts are established by the materials that have been placed before you. Put simply, what I say to you about the evidence, what counsel says to you about the evidence, what Mr O’Connell says to you about the

D30/25/KM/WADC/CRIM/PER/IND1767/2009

27/01/2011 3:04 HIS HONOUR 716 National Transcription Services

evidence is comment and no more than that, but it is the evidence that you must address in performing your function.

Clearly, it would be a violation of your oath or affirmation to have regard to anything other than the factual material that’s been placed before you during the trial in making your determinations.

MHR the Prof and Rabbi did NOT present 'factual' evidence' at all...and Brendon was NOT allowed any witnesses i.e how could HE have arranged the same sort of witnesses? did anyone offer to do so for him? to be 'fair'? what is the 'factual' evidence the judge refers to? the 'facts' are those presented by Brendon, which he as NOT allowed to present as 'evidence'...and would have little impact on the jury, as he is the 'defendant' i.e an irrational anti-semite, according to the state, which assumes this, so why claim they assume him innocent??? when did any witness prove anything leading to a logical guilty verdict in this case?

You’ll recall an invitation was offered to you to pursue inquiries outside the courtroom, but you’ll appreciate, I’m sure, the importance of basing your factual findings on the material and only the material that has been placed before you in this trial. And in assessing and evaluating the evidence, it is of course necessary that you apply your common sense and experience to the question of the believability, reliability or acceptability of the evidence.

One of the great virtues of the jury system is that we bring together a number of members of the community randomly selected. You have between you a vast array of prior experiences and a lot of common sense, and you use them as tools as you do in everyday life in evaluating the factual material that’s been placed before you.

You cannot, of course, allow your prior experiences and common sense to replace the evidence, but as I say, you use them as you do in everyday life, as tools in its evaluation. As I also explained at the start of the trial, where there are issues of credibility – that is, evaluation of what a witness has said, the task involves more than simply determining whether a witness is truthful.

It’s obviously a fundamental starting point in evaluating a witness’s evidence, but just as importantly, of course, you have to make a determination as to whether what the witness has said is accurate and reliable. Does it appear credible? Does it accord with your common sense and experience?

Of course, in evaluating the evidence of a witness, you take into account a number of analytical techniques, as you do in everyday life when people put factual material before you, probably without actually reflecting on the analytical technique that you are applying. You look to whether the witness has made a statement on a prior occasion inconsistent with what the witness has said before you.

MHR my god, common sense? analytical skills? of the average person? that they employ every day? really? in reality he is saying 'all the stuff you've been brainwashed to believe since birth by the jew world order controlled media, education, etc, is TRUE, and 'common' and thus 'common sense'...what a fucking load...I'm sure this judge would welcome any one of the jury, randomly selected, to use their common sense and analytical skills to make the most important decisions in HIS OWN life??? really?

And in the final analysis, of course, you look to the credibility of the evidence itself. Does the account presented by the witness appear rational, logical and credible; does it accord with your common sense and experience? MHR and there's the rub...they've been conditioned to 'experience' reality in the way the jew world order wants them to...they accept 'the holocaust' as 'common sense' and 'reality', they accept Arab hijacker 911 myths, they don't know the 'bad stuff' in the shared religious traditions...hollywood movies are about jews as victims, never as perpetrators...of ANYTHING e.g u.s.s liberty, (just struck me what a choice of names of ships to send to be destroyed !!! pure propaganda? and later 'patriot' act after same false flag?)...so in the minds of the jury the jew is the victim, and any 'attack' on him is unwarranted, irrational, ...this is the commonsense experience they have, and have been directed to apply...they have not been asked to 'think outside the box' nor to see the facts of history, about jews...so of course they will come back with a guilty verdict consistent with 'jews are the eternal victims of the irrational hatred of people like Brendon O'connell'...

DCJ continued: before you can find him guilty you must be satisfied of his guilt, beyond reasonable doubt, having regard to the total factual material that has been placed before you.

You may or may not accept the accused's account in full, in part or all, but he's entitled to be acquitted unless every aspect of the State case, that is unless every element of the offences, as I'll explain those elements to you, have been proved by the State beyond reasonable doubt.

MHR EVERY element? so ridicule? so intent? so belief jews are a race himself? ???

If at the end of the day you're left with a reasonable doubt as to where the truth lies on matters fundamental to the elements of the offence, as I say I'll explain those elements to you, if you're left with a reasonable doubt as to where the truth lies on such matters, then you'll be obliged to return a verdict of not guilty since the State would have failed to discharge the obligation of proof upon it beyond reasonable doubt.

MHR so if the jury understood, they would HAVE to return an innocent verdict ???

As I say, the prosecution is obliged to prove the elements of the offence beyond reasonable doubt. That is the standard of proof in a criminal trial. You give those words their ordinary English meaning. You, the jury, would know when you have evaluated the evidence and made your findings of fact whether you have a reasonable doubt as to the proof of an element of the offence and if you have a reasonable doubt then of course the State has not discharged the burden of proof upon it and a proper verdict would be one of not guilty.

It’s part of the foundation of our criminal justice system that an accused person is presumed innocent of any charge brought against him until by verdict of the jury there is a finding of guilt. And it necessarily follows that the accused person does not have an obligation to prove his innocence, he is presumed innocent and that presumption remains unless and until the State establish the elements of the offences to your satisfaction beyond reasonable doubt.

Now, there is one matter that I must specifically refer to and that's what we call expert evidence. You've heard evidence from Professor Markus, the foundation research professor for Jewish Civilisation at the Monash University and you have his research paper, which is exhibit 4, and you also heard from Rabbi Freilich, the Chief Rabbi of the

D30/27/ACJ/WADC/CRIM/PER/IND1767/2009

27/01/2011 3:18 HIS HONOUR 720 National Transcription Services

Perth Hebrew Congregation. Their evidence was directed to the issue of whether the Jewish people are a race or ethnic group and in terms of the offence, whether they constitute a racial group. As I say, that evidence was led because the State must establish as one of the elements of the offence that Jewish people are a racial group. (They DID NOT NOR COULD NOT!!!)

Professor Markus expressed the view that the Jewish are an identifiable ethnic community, being a people who are bound by belief. As he put it, quoting from the transcript:

What binds them together is a belief, and that belief is a sense of peoplehood, a sense of commonality, and that’s what you find in the Jewish ethnic group, and that’s what you’ll find in any other ethnic groups.

He sets out in some detail in the report and in his evidence the factors of commonality. He stated that with Jewish people there was a strong identification with their history and with Israel, and a sense of Jewishness. They were also united by a common language, being Hebrew, common literature and a shared history of oppression. You’ll recall that he was of the view that they constituted an ethnic group but not a race.

Rabbi Freilich was of the view that the Jewish people constituted a race, having descended from Abraham with the two forming covenants to which he referred, with a common language, culture, history and tradition. He referred to the festivals, particularly the Passover, which he said was of great significance to Jewish people, whether they be religious or secular. He stated that although the Jewish people were dispersed around the world, their traditions, culture and religion have kept them together as a people, and whether they were religious or secular there was still a strong bond as part of the Jewish race.

As I say, these two witnesses gave what is called expert evidence. That is, evidence from persons having special expertise in a particular subject or area, and thus possessing knowledge of that subject over and above that generally possessed by lay members of the community. In each case their evidence was tested by cross-examination. There is no opposing view expressed by any other expert.

MHR of course not, Brendon was NOT allowed to present evidence, and had never been helped to arrange his own witnesses...a homeless, penniless defendant... and the witnesses contradicted each other ...THE WITNESSES CONTRADICTED EACH OTHER TOTALLY 100%...ONE SAYS YES, A RACE, THE OTHER NO, NOT A RACE...SO WHAT WAS THE JURY TO MAKE OF THIS? WHAT DO YOU MEAN 'NO OPPOSING VIEW' WHEN THE ACTUAL PROSECUTION WITNESSES OPPOSED EACH OTHER, GAVE OPPOSING VIEWS...AGAIN, A 'NON-SEQUITUR' SELF NEGATING SENTENCE...THEY OPPOSED EACH OTHERS VIEWS BUT NO EXPERT VIEW WAS GIVEN TO OPPOSE THEM? WHAT THE FUCK DOES SUCH A SET OF UTTERANCES MEAN?

The fact that someone is an expert does not mean you, the jury, must accept that evidence. You evaluate it in the same way as you evaluate

D30/27/ACJ/WADC/CRIM/PER/IND1767/2009

27/01/2011 3:18 HIS HONOUR 721 National Transcription Services

any other evidence in a commonsense way. You may properly have regard to the impression made by the expert, and should examine the nature and quality of the expert’s evidence in a commonsense way. MHR meaning totally dependent / reflexive of the same people's lifelong propganda / conditioning of your 'reality' i.e in favor of jews, as victims, and anyone who opposes the jew world order is indeed amalek, full of irrational hatred...because you are NEVER allowed to know what it is that REALLY motivates anti-semitism...that it is RATIONAL and reasonable and ANYONE with self-interest who has NOT been brainwashed from cradle to grave would be anti-semitic...but you are never allowed to see things from 'outside' the mental prison you have grown up in...etc...

You should of course be slow to reject uncontested expert evidence unless there are other facts, circumstances or evidence which you accept which throw doubt on that evidence, or you conclude that the evidence appears to be inconsistent, irrational or conflicting with common sense.

MHR after he just stated that the two witnesses 'contested' each other i.e contradicted each other i.e 'race' yes, 'race' no. and of course 'common sense' means 'whatever you've been brought up to believe by the media, school etc... and brendon was NEVER allowed to contest...to present evidence that might throw doubt upon the witnesses who have already contested each other's 'expert' testimony...with Prof contesting ALL the witnesses i.e no race...of course the evidence was 'inconsistent'...prof said no race, others said yes race...so what a load of non-sequitur, yes/but no, self cancelling statements typical of this trial...beggars belief what they've gotten away with...saying Yes, then negating, stating something, then continuing in a totally non'sequitur fashion like madmen or idiots ??? or skilfully trained manipulators !!!

Now, you may think, and it’s a matter entirely for you, that in his alleged conduct and in his evidence before you the accused has demonstrated that he views Jews as a distinct group within the world community. He does not differentiate between them, you may think. ??? what? excuse me? total non sequitur and leading suggestion...'he does not differentiate between them, you may think'...how obvious a 'sugggestion' does it have to be ? of course he has stated many times he differentiates between the 'good' jews and the rest !!!!

The law provides that conduct is taken not to occur in private if relevantly it occurs in a public place, or in the sight or hearing of people who are in a public place.

The State says that the accused’s conduct occurred in a public place, namely, a shopping centre, and in the sight or hearing of persons in that place.

The fourth element that the State must establish is that the conduct was likely to harass. The State must establish that the conduct alleged was likely to harass Mr Keyser. In this context, likely means not merely having the possibility, but a probability. So likely means having a

D30/28/KM/WADC/CRIM/PER/IND1767/2009

27/01/2011 3:25 HIS HONOUR 723 National Transcription Services

probability in the sense that it could well have the result of harassment.

??? could well have? how vague can you get...fuck...

To harass is defined as to threaten, seriously or substantially abuse, or severely ridicule. So harass is to threaten, seriously or substantially abuse, or severely ridicule. The State – it’s important to appreciate this – the State does not have to establish that the accused intended to harass Mr Keyser, but merely that his conduct was likely to have that result. So it doesn’t have to prove that he intended to harass Mr Keyser. It has to prove that the conduct he engaged in was likely to have that result. Also, it does not have to establish that it did in fact have that result. So it doesn’t have to establish that he intended to harass Mr Keyser, or that in fact he achieved that result. What it has to establish is that the conduct engaged in was of such a nature, objectively speaking, that it was likely to harass a person in the position of Mr Keyser.

??? so anytime anyone says anything against the jew world order, or against jews, or Israel, or is likely to irritate any jew, by association or implication, you are breaking the law???

And the fifth element that the State must establish is that Mr Keyser was a member of a racial group. The racial group means a group defined by reference to race, colour or ethnic or national origins. So that’s what the law defines as a racial group; a group defined by reference to race, colour or ethnic or national origins. The Oxford Dictionary defines ethnic as including:

Pertaining to race, ethnological, peculiar to a race or nation, indigenous, of a population group sharing a distinctive cultural and historical tradition, often associated with nationality or religion, by which the group identifies itself and others recognise it belonging to or characteristic of such a group.

So that’s the definition of what ethnicity is, that it refers to pertaining to a group, pertaining to ethnological, pertaining peculiarly to a race or nation, indigenous, of a population group sharing a distinctive cultural and historic tradition, often associated with race, nationality or religion, by which the group identifies itself and others recognise it belonging to or characteristic of such a group. For a group to constitute an ethnic group, it must regard itself and be regarded by others as a distinct community by virtue of certain characteristics.

Some of the characteristics are essential; others are not essential, but one or more of them will commonly be found

D30/29/JAC/WADC/CRIM/PER/IND1767/2009

27/01/2011 3:32 HIS HONOUR 724 National Transcription Services

and will help to distinguish the group from the surrounding community.

The essential conditions are that they have a long-shared history of which the group is conscious as distinguishing it from other groups, and the memory of which it keeps alive the long-shared history.

And the second essential condition is that it has a cultural tradition of its own including family and social customs and manners often but not necessarily associated with religious observation.

In addition to the essential characteristics, the following characteristics are relevant and often present. Firstly, are a common geographical origin or descent from a small number of common ancestors. Secondly, a common language not necessarily peculiar to the group. Thirdly, a common literature peculiar to the group. Fourthly, a common religion different from that of neighbouring groups or from the general community surrounding it. And fifthly, being a minority or being an oppressed or a dominant group within a larger community.

And as I say those characteristics are relevant and are often present. You don't need to have them all to say you have an ethnic group, but they're characteristics that are commonly found in an ethnic group.

And race is defined in the Oxford Dictionary as:

A group of persons connected by common descent or origin. A group of several tribes of people forming a distinct ethnical stock, one of the great divisions of mankind or having certain physical peculiarities in common.

So it's a matter entirely for you but it would be open to you to conclude that you could be both an ethnic group and a race or one other. But you look to those characteristics in making a determination.

Fourthly, that the conduct was likely to harass Mr Keyser, and as I've said that's an objective test to conduct. There must be a probability that the conduct could well have that result. The State doesn't have to establish that the accused intended to harass Mr Keyser or that in fact achieved that objective, being sufficient if you are satisfied, beyond reasonable doubt, that the conduct objectively evaluated had the probability of harassing, that is threatening seriously or substantially abusing or severely ridiculing Mr Keyser.

wtf ??? objective now means 'in your opinion might'? what is it with the non-sequiturs...saying X at the start but your definitiong being about Y ? this is class of what I write about when describing 'compelling arguments' vs junk...and this is junk...

And finally, the State must establish that Mr Keyser was a member of a racial group, meaning a group defined by reference to race, colour or ethnic or national heritage.

MHR but all valuable information to use in our charges against holohoaxers, 911 official fictioners, torah, talmud, etc...'likely to offend etc member of any national group e.g germans, arabs, etc...certainly 'might' at very least...and does, in fact...and so does not matte what intent of authors / producers / bloggers etc is...if it is 'likely to offen me as a German' then it satisfies that condition of the law...so we can prosecute...seek prosecution !!!

In respect to count 1, assuming you were satisfied that the State had established the elements of the offence that I've spoken to you about, it is a defence to this particular charge if the accused satisfies you, on the balance of probabilities - and by balance of probabilities this is distinct from the standard of proof required of the prosecution, which is beyond reasonable doubt, the balance of probabilities meaning that it was more probable than not - it is a defence to count 1, if the accused satisfies you on all the evidence on the balance of probabilities, that it was more probably than not, that the conduct was engaged in reasonably and in good faith for any purpose that is in the public interest.

So if you were satisfied on the balance of probabilities on the whole of the evidence that the conduct that was engaged in was reasonable, that is objectively reasonable, that was engaged in by the accused in good faith and that it was for a purpose that was in the public interest, then that would be a defence to the count, notwithstanding you were satisfied of the elements about which I've spoken. MHR THAT was what Brendon was NEVER allowed to prove / provide witnesses / evidence for...and any independent unbrainwashed observer would easily assume it WAS in fact brendon's motive i.e to inform / warn / open dialoge...

And the fourth element is that the State must establish an intent, as it says in the counts in the indictment, an intent to create or promote animosity. So the State must establish that when engaging in the conduct alleged – that is the publication on the Internet of the material, the accused did so with the intent to create, promote or increase animosity towards a racial group. Now, you’ll appreciate that intent is a state of mind. It’s very difficult, often, to prove intent by calling evidence.

You can’t produce an exhibit as to someone’s state of mind. Often a person may have said something which clearly indicates his intent, but intent, as I say, is a state of mind and you infer a person’s intent by what that person does, by what that person says, by that person’s particular characteristics and by all the surrounding circumstances.

And when looking at this question of intent, it will be necessary for you to bear in mind the direction I will shortly give you on the drawing of inferences. So the State has to establish that the accused person had an

D30/31/ACJ/WADC/CRIM/PER/IND1767/2009

27/01/2011 3:46 HIS HONOUR 727 National Transcription Services

intent to create or promote animosity. And animosity means hatred of, or serious contempt for, the racial group.

Once again, the State does not have to establish that the accused’s conduct produced the intended result. It doesn’t have to prove that he in fact achieved that result, it being sufficient if it establishes that he had that intent – that he had the intent to bring hatred of or serious contempt on a racial group.

And the fifth element is of course the State must establish that the Jewish people were a racial group, and I’ve already been through that in respect to count 1. So they’re the elements the State must establish in respect to counts 2 to 7. Firstly, identity, secondly, conduct. The accused engaged in conduct.

MHR clearly in this case they had no reason to ascribe this intent, and wouldn't have if he'd been allowed to present his evidence...and clearly there was NO consensus that jews were a race, in fact the Professor stated they were NOT a race, categorically...beyond doubt...and who will you believe? an academic or a priest, whose opinions are all formed merely on dogma / belief e.g no evolution, jesus rose from the dead, dead sea parted, etc ???

the State again has to satisfy you that they are a racial group. and they have proven the exact opposite...their professor witness stated they were NOT a racial group...and Rabbi simply stated it was a belief they had...that anyone who converted MUST have a blood connection etc...

Now, as I have said, you draw – it’s necessary for you to infer a person’s intent, and so it’s necessary to draw an inference, and an inference of course is simply a logical deduction which you draw from facts which you find proved. That is, you can only draw an inference that he possessed that intent if you’re satisfied that it is the only reasonable inference open on the facts.

MHR so how did / could they have????

That means that if there are competing inferences that can properly be drawn from established facts, it would not be proper for you to draw the inference adverse to the accused. You can only draw that inference if you have reached the conclusion that that inference is the only reasonable inference open on the evidence, that the evidence compels you to that conclusion,

???mhr so what did they find so 'compelling' as 'the only possible conclusion to draw from his behavior???

You must ask yourselves whether there are any other explanations that common sense and human experience tell you are not fanciful. (mhr of course they've been programmed to see any such comments about jews as irrational, based in hatred of jews...basically gentiles view anyone like Brendon as amalek...as 'common sense' given their conditioning / brainwashed view of 'reality'...'fanciful'? seems a suggestion that to NOT assume this intent would be fanciful...

In the event of any ambiguity, or if it be the case that there is more than one reasonable inference which can be drawn from the facts, the accused is entitled to the resolution of that ambiguity in his favour by your drawing the inference which is most favourable to him. ... exclude any reasonable hypothesis consistent with innocence.

And considering whether you can draw the inference which the State says you should draw from the material that has been placed before you, that is that he had the relevant intent, you would be entitled to consider not only what he has said or published, but all the surrounding circumstances, including the views he holds and has expressed before you as to his regard for Israel and Jewish people.

Those expressed views are clearly facts which you would reflect upon in looking at this question of intent, as indeed you would take into account the full surrounding circumstances and the material itself.

mhr of course everything biased in juries mind by their brainwashing over decades...from birth...so bound to interpret his intent very differently than if they were aware of all the facts brendon had NOT been allowed to enter into evidence...

the intent to create or promote animosity towards a racial group, towards the Jewish people, and that the Jewish people were a racial group as defined by the legislation. That is that they are a group defined by reference to race, colour or ethnic or national origins.

On behalf of the accused, it is said firstly that you cannot be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt, that is that you cannot be satisfied that the State has established beyond reasonable doubt that the Jewish people are a racial group.

wtf? did he just tell them that jews were NOT established as a racial group? If I can't tell wht he just said, how could the jury be expected to...bored in a trance... ?? 'you cannot be satisfied that the State has established beyond reasonable doubt that the Jewish people are a racial group. ' ??? what ??? what is he saying? yes or no? he keeps saying yes, but no, then no, but yes...total non-sequiturs...no way anyone could follow...??? Or just saying what Brendon / accused will claim? but which Prosecutors own witness upheld / stated as fact / expert opinion that jews NOT a race ...wtf???

of course brendon was acting in the public interest...we all are...why would we risk what we risk, invest so much, ??? because we are amalek???? so now the courts are in full jew world order mode...and anyone against the jew world order is amalek???

if you were satisfied as to the elements of the offence, then you would look to whether you are satisfied on the balance of probabilities that the conduct was engaged in reasonably and in good faith, and for a purpose that was in the public interest.

Because if you were satisfied as to those three factors on the balance of probabilities, then that would be a defence to the count, notwithstanding you were satisfied otherwise of the elements of the offence.

In respect to counts 2 to 7, it is the accused’s position that he, as a result of his readings and research, has a jaundiced view of the Jewish people, and that he was bringing that to public attention, but that he was not doing so with the intent of causing animosity towards them.

And I emphasise, of course, that it is for the State to establish the converse, not for the accused to prove that, but he says on the material before you, you could not be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that he had the requisite intent.

It’s important that you not engage in guessing, speculation or conjecture. Of course, your task is to address the evidence that’s been placed before you and only that evidence, and that you’re to make your findings of fact based upon an evaluation of that evidence.

mhr and of course there's the rub...brendon was DENIED the chance to offer the evidence he had, and so the jury had ZERO chance to consider its merits...ZERO... and to define his intent as acting in good faith, in the interests of hte public good...which clearly the evidence would have proven... so if we ever go to court again, we need to line up all the witnesses in advance, brief them, cover every element with an 'expert witness'...find the data, then find a 'witness' to present it...otherwise we could have sworn written testimony from millions of people, and it would not be admissible...would never be allowed to be presented...one reason they hanged all the Nazi's etc??? some jew can point the finger at someone in court, and that is 'evidence', but with noone to contraddict that jew, the person is doomed ???

Your task is to conduct an objective and analytical assessment of the evidence and make findings of fact based upon that objective assessment, and determine from those findings of fact whether the State has discharged the burden of proof upon it in all respects.

Reference was made, unfortunately, during the trial to penalty. As I indicated then, Madam Foreman, and I indicate now, it’s very important that you put out of your minds any issue of penalty. The subsequent consequences of your verdicts such as they are is my responsibility and mine alone.

the verdict such as it is must be unanimous – that is, it must be the verdict of the 12 of you.

mhr this sucks...brendon was betrayed by the people he was trying to help...one of them could easily have just decided the trial was not 'fair' and just voted 'not guilty'...but they all chose to go along with the jew world order...to go against common decency and sense of fair play...they must have had SOME confusion or doubts...yes no no yes non sequitur statements, and FACT that professor had stated 'jews NOT a race'... why would 12 people all assume they could read his mind and KNOW without doubt that he is an irrational amalek ??? fuckers...don't deserve us fighting for them...but isn't that always the case? one or up to 3 % fighting for everyone...bearing the burdens, and usually being crucified for it ... like Jesus...etc etc etc !!!

n.b one jury member was sent home...!!! always call more than needed, ... 11 are to make final decision???? 911 ??? 12??? juror 373 was discharged...

UNIDENTIFIED SPEAKER: John Wisbey, I'm placing you under citizens' arrest on behalf of the people of Australia - -

D30/33/JAC/WADC/CRIM/PER/IND1767/2009

27/01/2011 4:00 In the absence of the Jury 732 National Transcription Services HIS HONOUR EYERS, MR

WISBEY DCJ: Remove - remove that gentleman would you, please?

SECURITY OFFICER A: Absolutely(?).

The judge is asking you to leave this courthouse.

UNIDENTIFIED SPEAKER: (Indistinct).

WISBEY DCJ: He's not asking to leave, he's directing that he leave.

UNIDENTIFIED SPEAKER: (Indistinct).

SECURITY OFFICER A: For impersonating a judge

WISBEY DCJ: And Mr O'Connell, any matters you wish to raise in respect to the instruction to the jury?

ACCUSED: Yes, Mr Wisbey. Why did you cut the trial short on December - on January 27? Why did you do that?

WISBEY DCJ: Thank you. Obviously you aren't - - -

ACCUSED: How much were you paid?

WISBEY DCJ: Obvious - - -

ACCUSED: Were you paid or do they have something on you?

WISBEY DCJ: Obvious - - -

ACCUSED: Do they have something on you? Do they have photos of you and little boys?

WISBEY DCJ: Just silence him, thank you.

We'll retire until the jury has concluded its deliberations.

MHR so trial ended on international bogus holocaust day memorial? and THAT was NOT expected to impact on the Jury? was it mentioned in any media during the trial, that they would know? could they be expected to know?

ACCUSED: Oh, I don't know. Can I present any evidence or not?

WISBEY DCJ: The answer to that's no.

ACCUSED: Yeah, well we know that.

MHR we must hold a 'people's trial' i.e replay this trial, but with Brendon being allowed to present evidence...maybe have people appear in witness stand representing the authors of what he wanted to present...and the torah, talmud etc e.g our latest video on amalek ... THEN hold a public 'jury' i.e let the audience email in their 'verdicts', based on this complete trial...???

WISBEY DCJ: Immediately.

And having regard to the position taken by the State I am prepared, though not without some misgivings, to extend overnight bail, Mr O'Connell, on the terms presently existing.

And emphasising that he's to proceed - not to leave the court before a quarter to 7, he's to proceed by the most direct route to his place of residence. He's to remain there overnight, that is not to move around in the community and he's to return by the most direct route reporting to detention no later than 9 o'clock tomorrow morning.

AT 6.11 PM THE MATTER WAS ADJOURNED UNTIL FRIDAY, 28 JANUARY 2011

Last Day: Verdicts read out: WISBEY DCJ: Yes. In the circumstances I enter judgments of conviction in respect of counts 1 to 3 and 5 to 7 in the indictment consequent upon the verdicts returned by the jury. I enter a verdict of acquittal in respect of count 4.

Madam Foreman, ladies and gentlemen, as I indicated earlier, the jury performs the most important role in a trial. That is the determination of the facts. It clearly is a most exacting and responsible task, and there’s no need to bring that to your attention after two weeks of trial.

It is extremely important, of course, because it keeps the criminal law in the hands of and under the supervision of the community, where it rightfully belongs.

EYERS, MR: Thank you, your Honour. Well, the first thing to deal with of course is, consequent upon the verdicts, respective verdicts of the jury, Mr O’Connell falls to be sentenced. In relation to the offence contrary to section 77, the maximum sentence is one of 14 years’ imprisonment, and in relation to the other matter – if you’ll forgive me, your Honour, the - - -

WISBEY DCJ: Three. Three years in respect to 80B.

EYERS, MR: That’s correct. That’s correct. I was just checking the subsection. Your Honour, I don’t have – it’s a relatively recent enactment on the criminal statute books. I don’t have any particular guideline sentencing that I can assist your Honour with. In fact, I’m not sure that a good deal exists. I know that none exists in this state.

If your Honour would be assisted, then of course I would invite the file manager to undertake a search in other jurisdictions for anything which may assist your Honour so far as your approach to sentence. But so far as we stand in this sentence, so far as any superior court or District Court matter, then there is no particularly helpful sentencing guidelines available. Certainly nothing determinative from the Court of Appeal at this present moment in time.

LAST DAY OF TRIAL : SENTENCING

SENTENCING REMARKS OF PROCEEDINGS

AT PERTH ON MONDAY, 31 JANUARY 2011 AT 11.58 AM

MR J.C. WHALLEY represented the State of Western Australia

Accused in person

D32/1/ACJ/WADC/CRIM/PER/IND1767/2009

31/01/2011 11:58 HIS HONOUR 2 National Transcription Services

You were, on 28 January, convicted by verdict of the jury of 6 of the 7 counts in respect of which you were presented on indictment. The jury returned a verdict of acquittal in respect of count 3[sic].

Count 1 related to an incident on 2 May 2009 at the IGA Supermarket premises in South Perth where you pursued a Jewish student, Stanley Elliot Keyser, and made inflammatory and derogatory remarks of him because he was Jewish, and of Judaism generally, statements such as, “Your religion is a religion of racism, hate, homicide and ethnic cleansing,” and, “You are a racial, homicidal maniac.” That is an offence which carries a maximum penalty of three years’ imprisonment.

Counts 2, 4[sic], 5, 6 and 7 involve offences of conduct intended to incite racial animosity. The latter offences occurred between 2 May 2009 and 11 November 2009, when on diverse occasions you posted offensive material on the Internet in terms derogatory of Judaism, including accusations that, as an ethnic group, Jews have throughout history been responsible or agitated deception, homicide, genocide, racism and conduct directed at world domination. Indeed, your evidence disclosed that you firmly hold the view that the Jewish people have achieved world domination and are directly or vicariously responsible for universal oppression and social disadvantage.

The material published by you on the Internet speaks for itself, and no useful purpose would be served by setting it out in detail. The flavour of your conduct, your attitude and your intention can be seen from the Internet publication of 25 October 2009, when you relevantly described Jewish people as:

That gaggle of Satan’s children in occupied Palestine

- and wrote -

Fairly soon Jews will realise that people are thoroughly sick of them, their whining, their perpetual victimhood and their demands for people to bow down and worship their dodgy religion of Holocaustianity.

And:

The Jew community could have at least made their lies and slander half believable, but I guess after years of inventive, over-the-top Holocaust memoirs they have gotten lazy.

D32/1/ACJ/WADC/CRIM/PER/IND1767/2009

31/01/2011 11:58 HIS HONOUR 3 National Transcription Services

Quite clearly that type of material was published with the intent of encouraging the wider community, both here and internationally, to share your unbridled hatred of Judaism. Your evidence made that abundantly clear. You regard it as your right and obligation to engender ill will towards Jews.

!!!! fuckity fuck fuck fuck Brendon a 'bully' in court??? this is well beyond any 'legalese' the trial proves Brendon's points, and proves that I can never go back to Australia...or Germany...???

The behaviour that you exhibited during the trial, which often appeared to be primarily intended to impress yourself and/or the gathering of supporters of a like mind in the body of the court, was that of a bully, contemptuous of anyone or anything who or that stands in the way of that which you seek to achieve. Although some aspects of your behaviour constituted contempt, it does not act in aggravation of penalty, but it is eloquent of a complete lack of remorse and a belief in your right to and intention to maintain this aberrant position.

The offending behaviour the subject of counts 2, 3, 5, 6 and 7 carries a maximum penalty of 14 years’ imprisonment. The penalty provisions to which I have referred were fixed by the Parliament of this state, as the representative of the community, to appropriate mark the seriousness of this type of conduct and to indicate the manner in which the community expects that those who engage in it will be addressed.

The law requires that I impose a penalty which responds appropriately to the seriousness of the offending behaviour, and I’m to gauge that seriousness by taking into account the statutory penalty provided for the offending behaviour to which I have made reference, the circumstances relating to the offending behaviour to which I have also made reference, any aggravating circumstances and any mitigating circumstances.

The court is directed not to impose a term of immediate imprisonment unless the seriousness of the offending behaviour demands it. The aggravating circumstances here are contained within the offending behaviour itself.

In respect of matters personal, the only material available to the court is essentially that which came out during the trial. You’re 40 years old, having been born on 27 October 1970. You’re well educated, and apparently hold nursing qualifications. I’m satisfied that you are an intelligent man, although with !!!!!!!! an irrational hatred of Jewish people !!!!!!! leading you to the belief that you have a right to abuse, insult, vilify and intimidate stridently, publicly and continuously.

So there you have it, the old anti-semitism claim or 'irrational hatred' as if no-one anywhere has any reason to hate any jews for any reason...!!!!! when brendon clearly gave sound, rational reasons for his hatred of jews who will not renounce / denounce their racial supremacist etc ideology...

There can be no doubt that imprisonment to be immediately served is the necessary sentencing disposition required to act as a specific deterrent for you and a general deterrent to others, including particularly the small group of supporters whose behaviour in court during the trial suggests that they share your !!!!!aberrant views. !!!! this is NOT legalese...totally subjective...totally inappropriate...clearly 'emotional' as ALL jewish propaganda etc...NOT rational / logical...ABERRANT views? IRRATIONAL AND ABERRANT?

This type of behaviour is not only highly offensive to that section of the community to which it is directed, but has the potential to be catalytic of civil unrest. It must be demonstrated clearly that it will not be tolerated.

In respect of count 1, you’ll be sentenced to 12 months’ imprisonment.

In respect to counts 2, 3, 5, 6 and 7, in each case you’ll be sentenced to a term of 2 years’ imprisonment.

The terms imposed for counts 2, 3, 5, 6 and 7 will be concurrent, but cumulative on the term imposed on count 1, so that there will be an effective head term of 3 years’ imprisonment. There will be a declaration of parole eligibility.

Mr Whalley, I received this morning, I don’t know whether you’ve received a copy, an application signed by Mr O’Connell seeking a stay of proceeding on the basis of a miscarriage of the trial. Quite clearly there is no legal basis for such an application. Any concerns Mr O’Connell has concerning the validity of the trial process is properly addressed in the Court of Appeal.

WHALLEY, MR: Yes, quite so, your Honour.

MHR since when was the legal system supposed to 'send a message' rather than 'seek justice' for a person assumed innocent ??? This indicates what this trial was REALLY about...sending a message to 'self censor'... 'irrational and abberant' are perjoratives that have NOTHING to do with what Brendon has said or done... it is about demonising and vilifying historical revisionism, anti-zionists...etc... n.b the 'spin' applied, which Brendon brilliantly 'corrected' ... the trial was really about censorship of the internet so people would be 'protected' from the sort of 'materials' that lead to Brendon's irrational and aberrative 'hatred' of jews...pick out the previous indicators in the prosecutors language...

WHALLEY, MR: There is one matter I’m obliged to bring to your Honour’s attention, which is the matter of pre-sentence custody. I can advise the court that the accused has spent time in custody in relation to this matter, - - -

WISBEY DCJ: Right.

WHALLEY, MR: - - - those dates being from 21 to 24 May 2010 plus 28 January to today’s date, a total of 7 days, such that any sentence of imprisonment could be backdated to 24 January 2011.

WISBEY DCJ: Yes, thank you. In the circumstances the term of imprisonment that I’ve imposed will be deemed to have commenced on 24 January to give credit for time spent in custody. You may stand down.

MHR...so if ever arrested, do NOT seek bail, as they WILL convict you of something 'to send a clear message', and cheaper to stay in jail, use their resources, than to find accomodation, look for work? , legal resources etc...Brendon's time on bail sounds terrible, worse than a minimum security prison...and so might as well 'serve time' they are bound to impose, ... unless have way to escape injustice i.e seek asylum elsewhere...but how to get on a plane without your passport? and would lose bail bond...so ???

TRANSCRIPT STATEMENT

National Transcription Services Pty Ltd is contracted by the Department of the Attorney General to record and/or transcribe court and tribunal proceedings in Western Australia as specified under a government contract. This contract prescribes the recording and transcription production standards that must be adhered to.

The transcript of:

IND 1767 of 2009 State of Western Australia v Brendon Lee O'CONNELL

heard on:

20/11/2009, 11/12/2009, 21/01/2010, 01/02/2010, 11/02/2010, 16/02/2010, 19/02/2010, 26/02/2010, 14/04/2010, 23/04/2010, 06/05/2010, 10/05/2010, 24/05/2010, 31/05/2010, 14/06/2010, 28/06/2010, 10/08/2010, 27/08/2010, 22/10/2010, 19/11/2010, 11/01/2011, 17/01/2011 - 28/01/2011 and 31/01/2011

? Is a written reproduction of the audio record of the proceeding;

? Is a complete transcript except where otherwise stated; any “indistinct” notations within the transcript refer to those parts of the recording that could not be accurately transcribed due to speech clarity, recording quality or other factors impacting word intelligibility.

Certified on Monday, 31 January 2011 by:

Johanna Caddick National Transcription Services Level 1, New Kings Office Tower 533 Hay Street Perth WA 6000 Australia

MHR conscription forces you physically to participate in training and fighting...propaganda seeks to motivate you to hate and fear the people you are supposed to kill and bomb...economic crises are manufactured before the war so you have an economic need / incentive to volunteer or at least submit with less reluctance, being offered food, clothing, board, and a way to support your family, after the previous means were taken away deliberately by deflationary policies i.e 'the recession they had to have to make you desperate enough to see a 'job' in the military as attractive / necessary ...

MHR: 'jewish people'...does that mean 'as a whole' or does it mean 'particular jewish people' i.e 'particular people who happen to be jewish? This is NOT very specific given the legal context...hardly 'legaleeze' precision ??? Seems the crime is that they were jewish...so accusing any jew or anything would contravene this law???

MHR So ensure always refer to 'the ideology of semitism' and 'jew world order'... so if demonizing Nazi's is NOT about 'German people' or 'Germany', certainly 'jew world order' is NOT about 'the jewish people' ... but a particular group of self-defined jews and israeli's...

Brendon O'Connell has now been held in a maximum security detention center cell with another asylum seeker, contrary to the U.N agreements, at a cost of 250 dollars a day, by the N.Z government after arriving and seeking asylum as a political asylum seeker...has supporters sent 8500 dollars to pay his lawyer, who has done nothing to have him removed to a more suitable, and U.N convention compatible, detention center...he has had zero access to computers, internet, word processing, legal documents, etc to prepare his own case...he had to trade chocolate bars to even get his own cup, and it took a week to get a pair of 'thongs'... he is housed with violent criminals ... he does NOT get to spend ANY time in natural sunlight...it is a maximum security locked down situation...totally inexplicable...except that his 'record of criminal activity' has allowed them to define him as an 'unsuitable character' for immigration ... He does have access to a telephone and telephone card, and has the 3000 dollars he arrived with safely in a bank account...he is of relatively good spirits and calm, given the situation. As usual he is trying to help others in the detention center gain justice, and their U.N mandated rights, and is attempting to use the situation to further the cause of the truth and justice movement, especially in relation to freedom of speech / expression, and the absurd 'hate speech' and 'racial vilification' and 'incitement' laws introduced in Australia, after the jew world order occupation zones around the world have had these firmly established for years...His lawyer seems to think that two options now present are that he return to Malaysia and apply for political asylum there, or return to Australia to face 3 years more in prison, for violations of his parole conditions (which included a total gag order i.e absolute denial of his freedom of speech / expression ...which is what the laws are intended to do...to intimidate anyone from even raising simple questions about 'the jew world order' and the power of 'jews' in their nations, their jewdiciary, their mass media, their controlled opposition alternate kosher media, their education systems, their finance systems, their military, and especially in Brendon's case, their mass surveillance espionage and spying and infiltration and 'back door' software and hardware in policing, military, and business, and general private communications systems, defense systems, census, billing systems, police data bases, facebook, youtube, google, their total access to YOUR smart phone, smart t.v, ability to turn on your phone or t.v and record anything you say or do, at any time, any where, to track your ever movement, your every purchase, your ever social media post / comment / like, to know what is in your fridge, when you shower, when you flush your toilet, what toilet paper you use, your total medical history, your deepest thoughts / fears / hopes shared with 'friends' and 'family' on facebook, in emails, what videos you've downloaded, what web searches you've made...either directly as they own the social media platforms like facebook, google, youtube etc, or simply by downloading EVERY email that passes through a server that THEY own or can 're-route' from / before / after...which Brendon includes under the wider reaching 'Operation Talpiot' program to give 'Israel', the jew world order, full spectrum dominance of the information war, and ultimately access to ever secret research program and facility, every registered patent, every industrial secret, every military secret, every utterance made by every person on the planet...including your DNA, private communications, and any medical record including 'psychological' profiling / assessments...

Brendon was savagely beaten, in a coma for an hour, and sustained a broken arm, which was NOT seen to by any medical personnel for a month ... even though they had taken an x-ray, which they subsequently 'dissappeared'...the medical personnel who x-rayed the arm a month later were shocked, and immediately insisted on a 'pin and plate' Open Reduction, Internal Fixation ORIF..., however this x-ray was also 'dissappeared', and Brendon was simply taken back to prison where he as given a simple cast...and example of corruption and cover ups and deliberate abuse of Brendon...similar to the treatment of the German holocaust denier etc in Germany, who ended up losing his leg from the knee down...

5 people associated with Brendon and his trial died in mysterious circumstances

Minister of prisons Joe Francis chatted with him 32 minutes after Brendon's supposed 'death threat', on a 'call me Joe' basis, admitting he was more scared of his own prison officers than he was of the bikies after he'd stopped their drugs getting into jail...Joe felt prison officers were behind the burglary of his home...stated his staff were incompetent...Joe had to fight tooth and nail to get cameras put into the punishment section of Hakea Remand center to prevent prison officers beating up inmates...Brendon offered to pull down the 'offending' blog post, Joe said it was up to Brendon to decide, Brendon ultimately didn't pull it down...resulting in this 'court exchange'...

W.A police monitored the phones of a neo-nazi group 'combat-18'...alleged that four shots were fired by members ata a Mosque in a Perth suburb of Queens Park' ??? They were given a suspended sentence... compare to what Brendon suffered, relative to mere 'words' vis a vis potentially deadly shots...merely charged with 'discharging a firearm in public' and 'going armed in public'...

W.A Premiere Geoff Gallop resigned after being threatened by W.A police, in fear of his own safety, after having exposed corruption in the W.A police force.

Threat made against Senior prison officer Liam Samuel Cashman... State and Federal police have access to every phone call, email, internet browsing search, credit card purchase etc of every australian...with no over sight / checks and balances ... access to this data base is NOT regulated...

'Joe' had promised to personally oversee Brendon's case and allegations...but 3 weeks after the 'imminent threat' was hardly 'imminent', given that Brendon and 'Joe' had 'cleared up their differences'...and clearly the 'threat' was not taken seriously by 'Joe', or 'actively pursued in any way' by Brendon...apart from having left the blog containing it 'up'...and a more recent post by Brendon stated that he was now 'happy' i.e no longer angry with 'Joe'...

Magistrate Atkins demanded of the 7 police officers who turned up for no reason to the small courtroom in the magistrates court, clearly intending to 'intimidate' Brendon...

Brendon openly speculated as to how many detectives have large rental property portfolios, but are never asked to explain the source of their wealth...high quality drugs at point of arrest become low quality drugs when they get to the testing labs...he cites one clear case of each of these...

the states tactical response group officers stole a tonne of high quality cocaine and sold it on the streets of sydney, melbourne, and perth...the 2004 Kennedy commission investigated but laid no charges at all...

Brendon found his own threat 'embarrassing' and can only explain it due to his desperate state of mind at the time, the huge pressure / stress he was under...

A psychiatric assessment by Mark Hall lead to Brendon being transferred to maximum security, when he as a 'minimum security' prisoner...Mark appeared to Brendon to offer him a chance at freedom 'would you leave the state?' i.e go into exile, and thus cease being a 'fly' like Socrates, on the state of W.A...i.e offer of 'exile'... which angered him, and made him adamant that he would continue struggling for justice, and to expose the W.A corruption...leading to him being sent to Casuarina maximum security prison and the 'management unit'... n.b earlier in his 'career' as a 'dissident' he had been forcibly 'assessed' for 'delusions' in connection with his claims re: operation Talpiot etc...which many U.S experts could testify as 'real' and 'ongoing'...

Legal aid was refused Brendon for a high court appeal re: Section 80B of the states racial vilification legislation, 'conduct likely to offend'...claiming he had no chance of success, whereas many legal professionals advised him he had every chance of success and compensation...

Brendon admits he is 'naturally combative when threatened'...in my case angered by other people's smug complacency...like Hamlet...

Senior prosecutor David Thiering offered to lower the charge to 'threat to harm' and take it back to the magistrates court, inferring he would not be demanding jail...Brendon emailed his agreement, and that he was seeking legal advice...but his lawyer never contacted Thiering with his acceptance of the offer, so Brendon fired him...

Brendon admits 'I have always been rude but I have always apologized'...

Thiering left for Sydney, leaving Carmel Barbagallo to take over the case, and she insisted on a prison sentence...Brendon sacked his new lawyer when he failed to promise he would call 'Joe' to the stand...

His next lawyer dropped him...

The threat made to Liam Samuel Cashman is more serious than that made to to 'Joe' as Liam was a prison officer at the time...but who by the time of Brendon's trial had resigned...

After his beating in Casuarina prison he was offered minimum, a work camp, whatever you want' if he would keep quiet about the corruption and abuses of prisoners and violations of the prisoners act...such as leaving prisoners in a small cell for 15 hours a day, with no air conditioning, when outside temps were above 40 degree Celcius, and some cells baking in the direct sun, ranging well above that...including Brendon's...at times his cell wall was literally too hot to touch...at Hakea remand center...guards removed the 'Prisons Act' from the library, so prisoners could not know their rights and refer to it, when guards failed to meet their legal requirements...preventing prisoners from using computers etc to complete their legal paperwork for appeals etc...represented 'Impeding, Obstructing, Perverting the course of Justice...

Brendon witnessed staff simply stealing prison supplies such as food, tools, etc...when they stopped, food piled up in the kitchens etc, indicating that excess food etc had been constantly ordered to make up for the thefts...running costs massively greater than necessary...due to corruption and incompetence...why private prisons can manage with half the resources / money a public one costs the taxpayers...

His father was of all things a W.A policeman. Grandmother aboriginal heritage. Mother states family received death threats by email. Brendon's sister died suddenly 3 months after these death threats. Brendon had been nurse but left, fed up with corruption and incompetence. Sensitive to injustice / lack of fairness. Appears it was Brendon's spying allegations re: Israel / Tolpiot, that were behind massive Israeli political pressure to have him charged / convicted of racial vilification...

Brendon's 'threat to kill' a prison officer came after other prison staff and prisoners told Brendon that the officer in question had organised his beating. No-one would investigate his allegations.

Prisoners confided in Brendon that they had made huge payoffs to state and federal police for protection.

Brendon's father got out of W.A police force because of the corruption, drug trafficking etc.

Brendon's email to Minister Joe Francis contained the threat, namely, he insited that he would kill the man who he believed had set him up to be bashed if the Minister did not mount an investigation, as a means to provoking the Minister to investigate. He noted that a woman made the front page of The West Australian Newspaper after threatening to kill Premiere Colin Barnett over the culling of sharks. He wanted the same coverage for the Isreali spying allegations he had made / documented etc...

At time Brendon made the 'threats' he was homeless, couch surfing on friends sofas, and under massive stress. He had been advised that the best way to protect himself was to keep making a lot of noise, attracting a lot of attention. He feared for his own safety.

Brendon received some compensation for prison assault, most of which he spent on his helping his sister...and planned to sue several goverment departments and media outlets...

Brendon has been banned from attending university as not a 'fit and proper person' and has been told he is unemployable, and told to apply for a medical disability pension...

It is farcical that 'jews' and Israeli's of all people could have Brendon defined as 'racist'.

Brendon at time of 'threat' felt stalked, harassed, extremely isolated, and depressed, at times suicidal. His home was repeatedly raided.

Why the raids? Brendon thought to 'plant' incriminating evidence. They stole documents, files, computer hard drives etc...

Brendon has exposed zionist and Israeli racism and hatred that permeates 'jewish' / 'Israeli' society, culture, and traditions. it is common knowledge to those in the middle east but suppressed in the west by the corporate media.

Brendon often 'whinces' at his own past behavior, has reflected upon it and rejected it, and is no threat to anyone. He admits he could have expressed / articulated himself less emotionally, more appropriately. Brendon is able to criticise himself, and accept fault where it is appropriate. He didn't need a prison sentence to 'reflect' on his actions. He is calmer now, and more 'practical' in his expectations about what is possible to achieve re: his goals. That things take time, and must be handled more delicately than he has often done.

Brendon has always fought for the underdog, for justice and truth and integrity, and for 'waking up' people, even if it requires provocation / discomfort for them...he can be harsh in his interactions...(abrasive he he)...

5 minutes after Brendon expressed fears to prison staff for his own safety, he was savagely beaten...at hospital first time he was sent back with badly broken arm, and the original xrays were 'lost', and tampered with, including a denial that any xrays had even been taken...he felt he was making zero headway in gaining justice for himself, or Palestine, etc...traumatised...doctor recommeded he apply for medical disability pension for PTSD...

A friend he had lived with had his brake lines cut, and interupted two men putting something into his engine bay, at the time of the police harassment / house break-ins...house computers hacked ...

Brendon was staying in a room at a homeless shelter when police raided it and arrested him and charged with with the threat to kill...

Stanley elliot Keyser was key note speaker at a huge rally intended to intimidate local politicians, with senior members of the ISRAELI government in attendance...who know how many MOSSAD operatives ... remember that the first time in German History, armed men were allowed to attend a court hearing for David Irving when he sued for defamation...this is unheard of...armed men with guns inside a German court...it highlights the 'exceptionalism' key to 'jewishness' and the state of israel i.e the ideology of semitism...

Brendon was required to prove that 'a material particular' had been affected by the massive rally /demonstration timed to coincide with Brendon's court case, with a focus on the alleged 'victim', who had brought the original charges. To have the 'rally' recognised as an attempt to interfere with his trial , and thus represent a 'contempt of court', it must be shown to have had 'a tendency to prejudice criminal proceedings being tried before a jury'. This could include the public presentation of information that would otherwise NOT be admissible as evidence in a court e.g a prior conviction...or simple statement of opinion as to the guilt or innocence of the accused...it is possible to be held in contempt for statements that place pressure on teh parties to proceedings, or prejudgments concerning the likely outcomes, whether in trial by jury or judge...according to a June 2003 review of the law of contempt, published by the W.A law reform commission...it must, in practical reality, show a tendency to interfere with the due course of justice in a particular case...it must only MIGHT have an effect on the proceedings to have the necessary tendency...not just remote or theoretical...exceptions include fair and acccurate reporting of criminal proceedings and publication in the public interest ??? So Brendons 2011 court case, beginning just after the rally, with such a huge public and media barrage, surely qualifies? 8 days before his case, foreign senior government representatives of Israel attend a rally, ensuring massive local political support...hardly 'neutral' and certainly going to have an influence, and clearly MEANT to have such an influence...or why otherwise invite Stanley Elliot Keyser as keynote speaker? The rally acknowledged its intention to impact on Brendon's case.

Even an assertion that a defendant is guilty, can lead to charges of contempt, if occuring during the course of a trial... it seems clear that the effect of the FOI rally, eight days before the original planned start date for his trial in 2010, would have had a 'tendency to intefere with the due course of justice in his particular case'...a foreign state's direct and deliberate interference in a local criminal case surely warrants at least proceedings...MHR given that calling a man an agent of Israel lead to Brendon being detained in custody for 3 days, before the charges were dropped !!!

Aerial Sharon, Prime Minister of Israel at the time, bragged that 'We, the Jewish people, control America'... on KolY'israel Radio on October 3rd, 2001. and reported in 'The Washington Report' on November 2001.

Isreali dual nationals enjoy a revolving door between senior government positions in key industrial and tech and homeland security and military sectors, and private companies which provide the infrastructure, software, and hardware, to these same sectors, giving Israel unprecedented access to all data bases, all communications channels, all technology, all software, all hardware, all military patents, all industrial patents, top secret insider knowledge, ... it is mindboggling...a 'secret hidden out in the open', like their ideology of Semitism...and plans for world domination / conquest / enslavement ... 'serve the jews or die'...

Contempt is there to protect the rules of the trial, to prevent people publishing 'evidence' that is not deemed admissible in the court, and thus bypassing the court rules...protects the rules of evidence...protects presumption of innocence (??? then why arrest someone???)...it prevents power imbalances in the wider community from impacting on the court process !!!! meant to allow balanced presentation of defendants and prosecutors arguments...and evidence...if outside media etc introduce evidence, it bypasses this balance of power...all arguments and evidence must be introduced by parties involved during the trial...no outside intervention allowable...defamation actions against powerful external parties are often outside the financial means of most defendants...law of contempt limits info arguments evidence during court procedure to that which the parties introduce, and the judge allows...

Clearly every person involved in Brendon's trial would have been aware of the stance the state of israel had taken...consciously subconsciously aware of the power of israel, and all the 130 local and state politicians who expressed their support 'for the state of israel'. It was, after all, the state of Israel that Brendon had 'offended', via the supposed 'victim'...

MHR when had it been scheduled? was it deliberately planned for his trial date? or had it been held regularly on that date?

The 'show of power' clearly was intended to intimidate all involved, rather than merely support the traumatised poor victim / complainant. we are talking about personal criticism of the 'victim' and his 'dual nationality state'...objective given the public comments of senior Israeli polticians, military, and religous leaders.

The 'victim' admits he was 'spying' and collecting 'surveillance' photos for Israel...a very threatening act for anyone aware of MOSSADS practises and far reach...influence...he had also abused Brendon, and even 'assaulted' him, by hitting his camera and thus his head, with his hand, on film.

The lawyer would have been intimidated. Any lawyer knows the power of 'jews' to ruin your career. Also many potential expert witnesses would have been intimidated, given the historyof such witnesses and even the lawyers of defendants in cases related to Israel and 'jews', being charged and imprisoned themselves, for defending their clients too well / enthusiastically / effectively, and being savagely beaten, as in the David IRving case re: Leuchter and Irving and Ernst Zundels lawyers...

The organisers of the rally clearly, at least prima facie, 'conspired to impede, obstruct, and pervert the course of justice' in Brendon's trial. under section 143 and 132 of the Western Australian Criminal Compilation Act (1903)...their clear intent was to intimidate the perth establishment etc ...why else would Israel send such 'big guns' for such a minor incident?

Brendon was unemployed, homeless (couch surfing friends sofas),being vilified by the media as variously mentally ill and a racist and a neo-Nazi and Klu Klux Klan associate.

Various witnesses DID express unwillingess to appear in court, for fear of retaliation from the Israeli state, totally aware of its ruthless and violent predilictions.

The Israeli Ambassador and Israeli deputy Foreign Minister came to 'support' the claimant, and to undermine the defendant. The rally was scheduled to occur 8 days before Brendon's original trial start date of August 16, 2010.

There must be prima facie evidence that the person/s conduct or actions directly influenced a material particular in your criminal trial' MHR is that why the W.A authorities changed the starting date AFTER the rally ? assuming the date was changed in proximity of the rally? And so the INTENT could be proven, even if the 'effect' was less than intended, due to date changes?

Brendons' application was denied, on the grounds that the rally was 'a rally demonstrating broad support for the state of Israel', (around the time of your criminal trial) thereby not meeting this threshold...which is absurd...as the keynote speaker was the complainant....why else was he there? MHR need to know if they planned it to coincide, or was coincidence??

'As your criminal trial was based upon your racial vilification of a specific individual, a rally demonstrating broad support for the State of Israel does not meet this threshold'...but that individual was the keynote speaker...

MHR lesson is that you can never directly criticise the jewish individual for their semitic ideology...makes it too easy to charge...harder to defend...

In fact the response was wrong...only ONE charge related to the individual, and FIVE other charges involved the 'Jewish people'. Racial vilification of Stanley Elliot Keyser. And 'vilification of the jewish people'.

And again the prosecutors contradict themselves, as when Brendon reported on a radio interview between Mark Glenn and Dr Alan Sabrosky, a former Marine Corps Colonel and former director of studies (for 5 years) of the U.S Army War College in which he stated that Israel was directly involved in 911, important statement in the public interest, the DPP wanted to lock up Brendon, Because as the public prosecutor stated in court 'Israel is called a 'Jewish State', making Brendons reporting a crime of 'vilification of the jewish people'. And Brendon received 2 years jail for criticising 'the Israeli state' in his blog.

Prima facie means 'sufficient to establish a fact or raise a presumption unless dirpoved or rebutted' or 'the establishment of a legally required rebuttable presumption. A party's production of enough evidence to all the fact-trier to infer the fact at issue, and rule in the parties favor.

n.b that Keyser regularly attends meetings of Chabad Lubavitch, a jewish violent extermist race hate group.

36/107 Sentencing Submission Rasterized...

UNDERSTAND THE NOTION OF THE 'SAYANIM' - 'HELPER'

A quote from former Mossad Officer Viktor Ostrovsky...

“The next day Ran S. delivered a lecture on the sayanim, a unique and important part of the Mossad’s operation. Sayanim—assistants — must be 100 percent Jewish. They live abroad, and though they are not Israeli citizens, many are reached through their relatives in Israel. An Israeli with a relative in England, for example, might be asked to write a letter saying the person bearing the letter represents an organization whose main goal is to help save Jewish people in the Diaspora. Could the British relative help in any way?

There are thousands of sayanim around the world. In London alone, there are about 2,000 who are active, and another 5,000 on the list. They fulfill many different roles. A car sayan, for example, running a rental agency, could help the Mossad rent a car without having to complete the usual documentation. An apartment sayan would find accommodation without raising suspicions, a bank sayan could get you money if you needed it in the middle of the night, a doctor sayan would treat a bullet wound without reporting it to the police, and so on.

The idea is to have a pool of people available when needed who can provide services but will keep quiet about them out of loyalty to the cause. They are paid only costs. Often the loyalty of sayanim is abused by katsas who take advantage of the available help for their own personal use. There is no way for the sayan to check this.

One thing you know for sure is that even if a Jewish person knows it is the Mossad, he might not agree to work with you — but he won’t turn you in. You have at your disposal a non risk recruitment system that actually gives you a pool of millions of Jewish people to tap from outside your own borders.It’s much easier to operate with what is available on the spot, and sayanim offer incredible practical support everywhere. But they are never put at risk — nor are they privy to classified information.

“By Way Of Deception: The Unmasking Of A Mossad Officer” p.86-87

DR STEVE PEICZENIK (Jewish) NAMES RABBI DOV ZACKHEIM AND MICHAEL CHERTOFF AS TRAITORS TO AMERICA AND INVOLVED IN THE 9-11 TERROR ATTACKS

RABBI DOV ZACKHEIM IS THE 2IC AT "BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON". SUBCONTRACTOR TO THE NSA AND FORMER EMPLOYER OF EDWARD SNOWDEN

MICHAEL CHERTOFF IS THE FORMER HEAD OF HOMELAND SECURITY AND NOW CEO OF A PRIVATE SURVEILLANCE COMPANY SUB CONTRACTING TO HOMELAND SECURITY.

How many times will I be recommended for a psychiatric review for pointing out the same thing psychiatrist and top psychological warfare specialist Dr Steve Piecezenik does?

JFK last president to insist equivalent of AIPAC register as foreign lobby group... have to sign pledge that will put interests of Israel against those of U.S ...to get funding...if don't sign, your opponent will get funded, electoral boundaries changed etc...

focus on national security issues? Brendon thinks this is way around? why? even if can prove jews about to nuke australia, they'll say 'well your motivation in telling us is your irrational hatred of jews' ... so how would any fact help?

the truth is no defence i.e they will claim that you are employing the truth with malicious intent i.e BECAUSE you are anti-semitic... being anti-semitic BECAUSE of the facts is ???

mass mailout Mail merge...attach to email client thunderbird...will allow mass mailings that bypass spam filters...looks like personal email...stores email addresses etc...can re-use for mailouts...Brendon O'Connell used / recommends...

Hate crime dependant on proving 'intent' ... your intention ... 'public interest' and 'my lawful interest' ...to have 'expert' evidence introduced as evidence to show jury what motivated your actions i.e sudden awareness of FACTS...rather than premeditated / irrational hatred / desire to incite violence against 'Jews'...rather than to protect own nation state...

'the scepter (symbol of earthly rule) shall not depart from judah until the obedience of the nations is his'...'you shall lend to the nations and borrow from none'...

Bi-ble...Yah and Weh...law masculine and compassion feminine

Noahide laws...7 laws...90s Bush before Clinton...passed bill to introduce 7 Noahide laws in U.S...rainbow...Kohenim above Levites ... caste system...Sephardim , Misrahim, Obadiah Yosef...Goyim exist to serve the jews...obadiah of all names...

Operation trial...Brendan O'Connell using legal system...only way forward...to get charged, so could introduce facts into legal record...but court would not allow him to introduce / present the evidence justifying his anger / assertiveness i.e no intent of irrational hate... inadmissible hearsay...but discovered way, while in prison... have a directions hearing (don't wait for trial) on the presentation of evidence which is normally inadmissible hearsay evidence, but then comes until the legislation of self-intent...??? claims has already prepared total case...Hofman, Jones, whole list of people and materials...argue that intent is irrational hatred of jewish people, directly related to 1930s legislation in German to remove jews from all positions of power...prove criminal investigation of criminal group supported by vast majority of jews worldwide is your intent...to reveal this...O'Connell WANTS to go back to prison, and high court case...would get 400,000 dollars compensation...but strategy of enemy is to delay, demoralise...so you give up before get to court...

The top 1% ? 42% of international jewish commmunity...at least 42% of 1% implicitly admitted by jews i.e claim attacks on 1% are anti-semitic...they gave away their own 'secret'...implicitly...they going after as 'hate crime'...i.e to criticise the top 1% is intended to irrationally hate attack incite against the Jews, as 42% of the top 1% are admittedly jews...

I apologize, I went to far, go to jury trial in magistrates court...find all published...in misdemeaner magistrates court... people give up as soon as charged with minor misdemeanour...shut down own channels etc...accept will be strip searched, thrown in cell, to get trial...get the experts to appear to show that NOT irrational...that motive NOT irrational hatred...

Lubovitch is city of brotherly love...Philadelphia U.S equivalent city name...also outpost of Russian Jewish mafia in 1800, 1900, then Mayer Lansky mafia boss...of Philly...

Jewish owned companies get hi tech stolen by Mossad, and free finance...kill switches and viruses placed in their products...work with most nations federal policing and military...very long term...plant viruses in thumbdrives knowing one day One of the many million sold will be plugged into the computer of a company they want to infect / infiltrate...Unit 8200 ... so many proven incidents...Intel chips all designed in Israel since 2006, so have hardware backdoors everywhere...Israel inside / Intel inside...secret of 'success' of Silicon Wadi...allowing Russians seeking better life to convert, and accepting as 'jewish' when zero background...not integrating, not jewish...just taking opportunity...Russian christians emigrating...new russian areas of Israel...jewish russians feel russian...do not remotely qualify as jewish...electrical engineers being imported...white ... tel aviv beach party life... this is russia's source of hi tech...russians and jews in Israel....Mossad and 'jews' worldwide steal the patents / tech / software etc...

gasprom 20 year contract to transport LPG by ship...delek main israeli contractor...owns 60% and Noble energy texas U.S trump people own 40% ... gas fields are really a dud..in deep water, cost fortune to run...to supply less than 10% of E.U gas...Russia assisted them in setting up project...

Intel set up really front for Mossad theft / spy - sourced tech...all these jews proud of Silicon Wadi, when just like the guy you sell stolen goods to, who can then find a market for...

Sons of the city of london...netanyahu, trump, putin...luciferian transylvanian nazis...same for iranian elites...german and swiss banking seduced them...won't dare criticise Israel...why O'Connell left after 2.5 months of being treated so well...new clothes, computers, apartment, travel, offers of great job with Press TV...keen to get started on mission, they just delaying, didn't want him to talk about Israel...misdirect to Saudi etc...

In Malaysia if got asylum, believes (based on what?) that although Malaysia states Israel did 911 etc, they had their own way of doing things, and would expect him to live a quiet life, not be political...so couldn't do his 'work' there...only alternative to return to Oz, go to prison, try to use system to raise public awareness, get facts on legal record...which didn't realise how to do at time of his original arrest...as didn't go about the 'legal system' way, court never allowed him to present facts of his case i.e what motivated his actions...

Russian technology parks half empty...do they plan a pogrom in U.S to force U.S jews out of U.S into Israel / Russia ? i.e planned rise in anti-semitism

are the 'alt right' 'white supremacists' part off WWF theatre? i.e so extreme, suspiciously absurd...to discredit / divide rational / non-racist alt right...

UNIT 8200 and Talpiot...

Syria Girl won't touch Talpiot / Israeli high tech sector...now in Russia...getting orders from Putin...why promoting her? seducing audience with tricks of camera angles, appearing submissive, sexy ...

Facebook profiling you based on your likes etc, activity on social media

alt right and white supremacists co-opted by jew world order...russian influence...

controlled opposition...alt right ceo of national policy institute after organising conference in Hungary which was banned...Richard Spencer...his wife Nina Byzantina translated Russian books to english for alexander doogan...

Paul Maniford, conneticut...WWF WWE, trump, stone, Yale university...associated construction company given bid for cleanup and demo of 911 tower debris...Paul Maniford and sons his own company also offered services to demolish and clean up sandy hook demolition...Newtown school...

MHR are the swiss guards there to protect the pope? or to protect the templars interests in the Vatican? i.e 'body guard' VS 'templar muscle to ensure Popes / vaticans toe the templar line ? Switzerland was basically founded by Templar soldiers who escaped pogroms against them by French king etc...Founded city of london...Knights of Malta including original Bauer / Rothschild...have automatic immunity from prosecution i.e diplomatic passport and black credit card with unlimited withdrawals...recognised by U.N as nation within nation, have own currency, passports, rothschilds guardians of vatican treasure according to encyclopedia Judaica...jesuit general is black pope...vs white pope official public figure...

common sense call for unity...put aside all differences until have solved the jew world order issue...threat too urgent...trump, putin, iran, no-one is our savior...anyone pushing divisions is our enemy...

IRan...satellites for press t.v jewish controlled...promised documentary while pushing for high court...trying to push issues...Iranian consulate...no official money but private support offered...no release from bail conditions so can't do work...fled to Iran...but Press TV run by bunch of tossers, embezzeling funds of senior international correspondent i.e wouldn't finance projects of their top guy to report from germany etc...in Iran they were not interested in talking about Israel...had to force issue... Lawyer and persian gulf studies center...asked why no pushing israel issues...press t.v lost their satellite for 2 years last time criticised Israel...govt. state approved t.v station using Israeli satellite? ... organ of state intelligence apparatus...was given cash debit card with daily limit of 300 dollars a day...

ngo with no money? but work for govt...intelligence analysts...want to slag off gulf states, won't criticise Israel...

Let my no be no and my yes be yes ... rather than 'swear'...

Iran promisted all the 'stans' i.e afghanistan, turkmenistan etc i.e new persian empire by german and swiss banks...

james packer son of kerry packer...notorious media moguls from australia, in Australia even more powerful than rupert murdoch...abraham saffron heroin importer...packers personal pilot known to him...using cattle station runways etc...'goanna' code word for mooney laundering, gold bullion, murder,extortion i.e packer's father...

sold of 9 network to Lichtenstein...criminal defamation of O'connel ... suing for later...

packer's own casinos and ASIO assets...nugen hand CIA banking scandal ended reign of anti CIA Gough Whitlam...1973 heroine drug laundering bank air america and cia ties, to borrow money ?

packer ASIo and Mossad agent most likely

Skull and Bones, Goldman-Sachs, ...

Packer engaged to Mariah Carey? left after connection with Scientology and Tom Cruise

packer bit of wimp...dissappointment to 'hard' father...

elite judaics ufo theology...ezekiels story of ufo , moses on mt. sinai ufo...old testament ... battle in heaven...giants crashed to earth and mated with human women...nephalim...cave in patmos...John's vision...new jerusalem descends from heaven and takes up the 144,000, the tribe of Dan not included...

state of mind and intent ... Israel did 911 Steve Piecezenik former head of psychological operations CIA...reasonable person test...my intent...I was angry, upset...but my intent was to end the violence, not incite violence...offer jury background to prove intent and staTE OF MINd.... never inadmissible as hearsay...would a reasonable person, on taking in this information, lose temper...but intent was to promote awareness of what is going on, not some irrational hate...that is approach to take in court...

................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download