ANNOTATION RUBRIC - murrieta.k12.ca.us



ANNOTATION RUBRIC **DO NOT MERELY SUMMARIZE**

| |25-23 Advanced |22-20 Proficient |19-16 Basic |15-11 Below Basic |10-0 Far Below Basic |

|Completion & |EXCEEDS completion and |GOOD, fairly thorough |BASIC completion. Meets|WEAK completion. At |Lack of annotations |

|Thoroughness |thoroughness. EXCEEDS |completion. |minimum requirements. |least half the pages |shows no effort. |

| |expectations. | |Lacks thoroughness. |annotated, but lacking |Less than half the |

| | | | |thoroughness in many |pages annotated; |

| | | | |areas. |overall lacking in |

| | | | | |thoroughness. |

|Insightful & Analytic |Extremely MEANINGFUL |Some insightful |Mediocre analysis. |Shallow analysis. |No analytical thinking |

|Thinking |annotations. EXCEEDS |annotations; some not |Summarizes. |Summarizes. |shown. |

| |expectations. |as in-depth. | | |Shallow analysis. |

| | |Summarizes. | | |Summarizes. |

|Inferences & |Makes inferences about |Makes some inferences |Sometimes makes |Rarely makes |No inferences made at |

|Explanations |the reading and |and mostly explains |inferences; minimal |inferences; minimal |all. Highlights, but |

| |EXPLAINS the |significance of |explanation of |explanation of |does not explain |

| |significance of the |highlighting. |highlighting. |highlighting. |significance. Rarely |

| |highlighting. EXCEEDS |Summarizes. |Summarizes |Summarizes. |makes inferences; |

| |expectations. | | | |minimal explanation of |

| | | | | |highlighting. |

|Focus Elements & Active|EXCELLENT. Identifies |GOOD. Recognizes focus |BASIC. |WEAK. Only |LITTLE TO NONE. Does |

|Reading Strategies |and ANALYZES the |elements, but does not |Only recognizes/labels |recognizes/labels focus|not identify focus |

|(ARS) |significance of the |always analyze. |focus elements, but |elements, but weak |elements; does not |

| |focus elements. |Practices some ARS. |mediocre analysis of |analysis of their |analyze significance. |

| |Practices ARS. EXCEEDS |Summarizes. |their significance. |significance. Practices|Practices few or no |

| |expectations. | |Practices few ARS. |few ARS. Summarizes. |ARS. Summarizes. |

| | | |Summarizes. | |Labels. Identifies. |

|Chapter Analysis |EXCELLENT chapter |GOOD chapter analyses; |BASIC chapter analyses;|WEAK chapter analyses; |LITTLE TO NO chapter |

| |analyses; excellent |good understanding of |LACK of understanding |LACK of understanding |analyses; little to no |

|DO NOT COPY FROM |understanding of the |the reading is |of the reading is |of the reading is |understanding of the |

|EXTERNAL SOURCES |reading is |demonstrated; ties |demonstrated; partially|demonstrated; partially|reading is |

|(PLAGIARISM) |demonstrated; ties |together predictions |ties together |ties together |demonstrated. |

| |together predictions |and outcomes. |predictions and |predictions and |Summarizes. |

| |and outcomes. EXCEEDS |Summarizes. |outcomes. Summarizes. |outcomes. Summarizes. | |

| |expectations. | | | | |

[pic]

ANNOTATIONS COMMENT CODE

1. Keep up the good work!

2. Good start – add more detail to explanations.

3. Better – showing improvement.

4. When you ask questions in the reading, infer the answers and write them, as well.

5. Chapter analyses are weak.

6. Remember to write an analysis after each chapter.

7. Not enough to grade—work on time management.

8. Not enough to give a higher score – work on time management.

9. Good content, but not enough to grade or to give a higher score – work on time management.

10. Analyses are from Sparknotes or similar site – PLAGIARISM! Analyses should be based on what you think, and not taken from an external source.

11. Illegible – cannot grade or score higher because handwriting cannot be read.

12. Add more focus to literary elements and EXPLAIN the literary elements with more detail.

13. Add more focus to ARS (Active Reading Strategies).

14. Look at “A” work example of annotations.

15. Did not follow comments from previous annotation check.

16. Summarizes. No analysis.

17. Vague; unclear. Be more specific with details during explanations.

18. Emerging analysis—expand details.

19. Combination of summary and analysis. Work on more analysis.

20. Missing chapter analyses. Where are they?

21. Incomplete chapter analyses.

22. GOOD use of semester vocabulary!!

23. Highlighted text, but no annotations.

24. Did not follow focus requirements for chapter analysis.

25. Be more specific with what occurs throughout the chapter and with whether or not your predictions were correct or incorrect.

................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download