2015-2016 Bill 4846: Anderson and Oconee counties' Master ...



South Carolina General Assembly121st Session, 2015-2016H. 4846STATUS INFORMATIONConcurrent ResolutionSponsors: Reps. Sandifer, Gambrell, Gagnon, Hill, Putnam, Thayer, White and WhitmireDocument Path: l:\council\bills\ggs\22824zw16.docxIntroduced in the House on February 4, 2016Introduced in the Senate on March 3, 2016Currently residing in the Senate Committee on JudiciarySummary: Anderson and Oconee counties' Master-in-equityHISTORY OF LEGISLATIVE ACTIONSDateBodyAction Description with journal page number2/4/2016HouseIntroduced (House Journalpage?6)2/4/2016HouseReferred to Committee on Judiciary (House Journalpage?6)2/25/2016HouseCommittee report: Favorable Judiciary (House Journalpage?2)3/2/2016HouseAdopted, sent to Senate (House Journalpage?45)3/3/2016SenateIntroduced (Senate Journalpage?5)3/3/2016SenateReferred to Committee on Judiciary (Senate Journalpage?5)3/11/2016SenateReferred to Subcommittee: Malloy (ch), Campsen, CorbinView the latest legislative information at the websiteVERSIONS OF THIS BILL2/4/20162/25/2016COMMITTEE REPORTFebruary 25, 2016H.?4846Introduced by Reps. Sandifer, Gambrell, Gagnon, Hill, Putnam, Thayer, White and WhitmireS. Printed 2/25/16--H.Read the first time February 4, 2016.????????????THE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARYTo whom was referred a Concurrent Resolution (H.?4846) to urge the governing bodies of Anderson and Oconee Counties to dissolve their thirtytwo year old agreement to have one masterinequity to serve both counties, etc., respectfullyREPORT:That they have duly and carefully considered the same and recommend that the same do pass:F. GREGORY DELLENEY, JR. for Committee.????????????A CONCURRENT RESOLUTIONTO URGE THE GOVERNING BODIES OF ANDERSON AND OCONEE COUNTIES TO DISSOLVE THEIR THIRTYTWO YEAR OLD AGREEMENT TO HAVE ONE MASTERINEQUITY TO SERVE BOTH COUNTIES, AND TO ESTABLISH A MASTERINEQUITY COURT IN EACH COUNTY PURSUANT TO SECTION 141110 OF THE 1976 CODE.Whereas, pursuant to H.3996 of 1984, the South Carolina General Assembly resolved that one masterinequity could adequately serve both Anderson and Oconee Counties; andWhereas, in the thirtytwo years since the governing bodies of both counties formally agreed to share one masterinequity, the population of Anderson County has increased by approximately 55,000 residents, while the population of Oconee County has increased by approximately 26,000 residents; andWhereas, this significant increase in population justifies the establishment of a masterinequity court in each of these two counties; andWhereas, according to the latest official United States Decennial Census, and pursuant to Section 141110 of the 1976 Code, the population of Anderson County significantly exceeds the requisite minimum to have a fulltime masterinequity, and Oconee County is authorized to have its own parttime masterinequity. Now, therefore, Be it resolved by the House of Representatives, the Senate concurring:That the members of the South Carolina General Assembly, by this resolution, urge the governing bodies of Anderson and Oconee Counties to dissolve their thirtytwo year old agreement to have one masterinequity to serve both counties, and to establish a masterinequity court in each county pursuant to Section 141110 of the 1976 Code.Be it further resolved that a copy of this resolution be forwarded to the governing bodies of Anderson and Oconee Counties.XX ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download