THE FRESH CONNECTION



THE FRESH CONNECTIONFinal Consultant ReportClient: Dr Gary MortimerThe Fresh ConnectionKKLM ConsultantConsultant:Yuen Ki Kevin Chan (n9216120)Lee-Anne Rice (n91303222)Leonardo Flores Gonzales (n8934860)Maria Brandt (n8900141)Researcher ExecutiveTop Research AllianceWord count: 1,59511. October 2016Table of Content TOC \o "1-3" \h \z \u Table of Content PAGEREF _Toc463900214 \h 21.Executive Summary PAGEREF _Toc463900215 \h 42.Introduction and Background PAGEREF _Toc463900216 \h 53.Collaborative Decision-Making PAGEREF _Toc463900217 \h 63.1.Supply Chain Manager’s Report PAGEREF _Toc463900218 \h 63.2.Sales Manager’s Report PAGEREF _Toc463900219 \h 73.3.Operations Manager’s Report PAGEREF _Toc463900220 \h 83.4.Purchasing Manager’s Report PAGEREF _Toc463900221 \h 104.Conclusion and Team Management Considerations PAGEREF _Toc463900222 \h 125.Reference list PAGEREF _Toc463900223 \h 136.Appendices PAGEREF _Toc463900224 \h 156.1.Reflection Reports PAGEREF _Toc463900225 \h 156.1.1.Appendix 1: Reflection Report Leo One (Round Three) PAGEREF _Toc463900226 \h 156.1.2.Appendix 2: Reflection Report Leo Two (Round Four) PAGEREF _Toc463900227 \h 166.1.3.Appendix 3: Reflection Report Leo Three (Round Four) PAGEREF _Toc463900228 \h 176.1.4.Appendix 4: Reflection Report Leo Four (Round Five) PAGEREF _Toc463900229 \h 181.1.1.Appendix 5: Reflection Report Leo Five (Round Six) PAGEREF _Toc463900230 \h 191.1.2.Appendix 6: Component – Demand per Week PAGEREF _Toc463900231 \h 211.1.3.Appendix 7: Bottling Line utilisation rate PAGEREF _Toc463900232 \h 211.1.4.Appendix 8: Finance Overview PAGEREF _Toc463900233 \h 211.1.5.Appendix 9: Reflection Report Kevin One (Round Three) PAGEREF _Toc463900234 \h 221.1.6.Appendix 10: Reflection Report Kevin Two (Round Four) PAGEREF _Toc463900235 \h 231.1.7.Appendix 11: Reflection Report Kevin Three (Round Five) PAGEREF _Toc463900236 \h 241.1.8.Appendix 12: Reflection Report Kevin Four (Round Six) PAGEREF _Toc463900237 \h 251.1.9.Appendix 13: Reflection Report Kevin Five (Round Seven) PAGEREF _Toc463900238 \h 261.1.10.Appendix 14: Reflection Report Lee-Anne One (Round Three) PAGEREF _Toc463900239 \h 271.1.11.Appendix 15: Reflection Report Lee-Anne Two (Round Four) PAGEREF _Toc463900240 \h 281.1.12.Appendix 16: Reflection Report Lee-Anne Three (Round Five) PAGEREF _Toc463900241 \h 291.1.13.Appendix 17: Reflection Report Lee-Anne Four (Round Six) PAGEREF _Toc463900242 \h 301.1.14.Appendix 18: Reflection Report Lee-Anne Five (Round Seven) PAGEREF _Toc463900243 \h 311.1.15.Appendix 19: Reflection Report Maria One (Round Three) PAGEREF _Toc463900244 \h 321.1.16.Appendix 20: Reflection Report Maria Two (Round Four) PAGEREF _Toc463900245 \h 331.1.17.Appendix 21: Reflection Report Maria Three (Round Five) PAGEREF _Toc463900246 \h 351.1.18.Appendix 22: Reflection Report Maria Four (Round Six) PAGEREF _Toc463900247 \h 361.1.19.Appendix 23: Reflection Report Maria Five (Round Seven) PAGEREF _Toc463900248 \h 371.2.Appendix 24: Supplier Delivery Reliability PAGEREF _Toc463900249 \h 391.3.Appendix 25: Delivery Reliability and Rejection Rate PAGEREF _Toc463900250 \h 401.4.Appendix 26: Transport cost overview PAGEREF _Toc463900251 \h 411.5.Weekly Group Meetings PAGEREF _Toc463900252 \h 421.5.1.Appendix 27: Weekly Summary Round One PAGEREF _Toc463900253 \h 421.5.2.Appendix 28: Weekly Summary Round Two PAGEREF _Toc463900254 \h 441.5.3.Appendix 29: Weekly Summary Round Five PAGEREF _Toc463900255 \h 461.5.4.Appendix 30: Weekly Summary Round Six PAGEREF _Toc463900256 \h 481.5.5.Appendix 31: Weekly Summary Round Seven PAGEREF _Toc463900257 \h 50Executive SummaryThis final consultant report examines the operational activities, strategies, and tactics The Fresh Connection Company's managers have adopted for the last periods of the company. It includes report outcome for each section of the company, including purchasing, sales, supply chain management, and operations. Initial proposed strategies and directions for the company and actual results of the objectives and targets discovered through the simulation rounds. In addition, the report includes critical reflection explanations for each area of management, which were vital for the progress leading to our objective goals as a company and as individual managers. A process which was achieved by descriptive and collaborative decision-making strategies, implemented between the team managers on a cross-functionally level to ultimately improve the value chain of the Fresh Connection Company.Introduction and Background The following report will disclose the performance of the Fresh connection company. The company's supply chain, sales, operating and purchasing department have undergone a different strategic direction over the phase of eight weeks under new management. The initial intended strategic direction of the Fresh Connection Company was to source high-quality supplies that ensure availability while maintaining cost efficiency to deliver a premium product. Selecting the right supply source was crucial in order to ensure the right materials are sourced with timely delivery. The selection of the supplier had to meet the company's main focus which is quality. Since the initial phase of the business this strategic direction changed minimally. The ROI goal was 4% and above as we intended to steadily increase about one to two percent each round. Sales: Strategic direction was clear throughout the takeover, but results of sales performance proved it did not reach full potential due to an emphasis on achieving high levels of 95% in service agreements, the team finished with 93.6%. Operations objective was based on cube utilisation, the production adherence. Target's set by the operation manager was keeping utilisations at 80%. Operations finished with cube utilizations of 85.8% in raw materials and 90.6% utilisation in finished goods warehouses which was higher than the set goal. The purchasing department has reaches its aim to obtain 95% supplier delivery reliability at least.Collaborative Decision-Making Supply Chain Manager’s Report The initial proposal for the supply chain main strategy was to decrease costs, increase efficiency, keeping high components and product availability, implementing a cost efficient supply chain strategy. This strategy would utilise maximum capacity, reducing inventories, based on costs while relying on reliability from the purchasing department ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Fischer</Author><Year>1997</Year><RecNum>228</RecNum><DisplayText>(Fischer, 1997)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>228</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="zw9zerprs5p5f3earwvvsrs5sw0rpr0v0vtr" timestamp="1475913969">228</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Newspaper Article">23</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Fischer, M.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>What Is the Right Supply Chain for Your Product?</title><secondary-title>Harvard Business Review</secondary-title></titles><volume>2016</volume><number>September 30</number><dates><year>1997</year></dates><urls><related-urls><url>;(Fischer, 1997).The implementation of this strategy can be observed in round 3 (see Appendix 1) with a positive ROI of 4.82%. ?Decreasing unused components and finished goods by calculation of demand and value per week (see Appendix 6); consulting the operations manager, reducing warehousing and stock costs increasing operating profit margins. A group planning approach was vital to estimate a healthy amount of safety stock and lot sizes needed per period; reducing obsoletes and stock costs where necessary, and increasing overall profit ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Lee</Author><Year>1992</Year><RecNum>229</RecNum><DisplayText>(Lee &amp; Billington, 1992)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>229</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="zw9zerprs5p5f3earwvvsrs5sw0rpr0v0vtr" timestamp="1475914092">229</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Lee, H. L.</author><author>Billington, C.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>MANAGING SUPPLY CHAIN INVENTORY - PITFALLS AND OPPORTUNITIES</title><secondary-title>SLOAN MANAGEMENT REVIEW</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>SLOAN MANAGEMENT REVIEW</full-title></periodical><pages>65-73</pages><volume>33</volume><number>3</number><keywords><keyword>J DI BUSINESS</keyword><keyword>J PC MANAGEMENT</keyword><keyword>Inventory control</keyword><keyword>Supply and demand</keyword><keyword>Management</keyword></keywords><dates><year>1992</year></dates><pub-location>CAMBRIDGE</pub-location><publisher>MASS INST TECHNOL</publisher><isbn>0019-848X</isbn><urls><related-urls><url>;(Lee & Billington, 1992).The following rounds aimed to increase stock value, reducing indirect costs, keeping a healthy stock, and maintaining almost the 100% in availability of components in order use efficiently the production line (See Appendixes 2 to 4).Following rounds 5, 6, and 7, there was a problem regarding obsoletes that was turned in the last round 8 (See Appendix 5) by reducing safety stock and increasing production intervals. Calculating efficient production intervals and stock for the finished products in the DC Netherlands warehouse for availability and distribution in the sales department ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Meyer</Author><Year>2016</Year><RecNum>230</RecNum><DisplayText>(Meyer &amp; Bishop, 2016)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>230</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="zw9zerprs5p5f3earwvvsrs5sw0rpr0v0vtr" timestamp="1475914158">230</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Meyer, Brad C.</author><author>Bishop, Debra S.</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Stock Control: Learning Inventory Concepts by Beating Levels and Winning Prizes: Stock Control</title><secondary-title>Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education</full-title></periodical><pages>315-336</pages><volume>14</volume><number>3</number><dates><year>2016</year></dates><isbn>1540-4595</isbn><urls><related-urls><url>;(Meyer & Bishop, 2016)The initial objective for the supply chain was to manage the costs of keeping the correct amount of stock, space and interest costs. Aiming to reduce Stock costs below 150,000€. This was not completely achieved at 250,000€ in stock costs in the last round, but managed to keep a reliable availability of components through all rounds and low costs in rounds 3 and 7 (See Appendix 8). Aiming for 95% utilisation rate on the bottling lines that resulted in 70%. As well as managing frozen period of production times to have more fixed production plans ensuring deliveries and production times (See Appendix 7).Sales Manager’s Report From the collection of information through critical reflections and weekly reviews, it was evident that our teams’ strategic approach surrounded joint operational objectives, especially in providing a premium product to the market. This strategy was set from the beginning of the takeover. As research suggest PEVuZE5vdGU+PENpdGU+PEF1dGhvcj5BPC9BdXRob3I+PFllYXI+MjAwMjwvWWVhcj48UmVjTnVt

PjIzODwvUmVjTnVtPjxEaXNwbGF5VGV4dD4oRC5BLiAmYW1wOyAmYW1wOyBQcmlvbmksIDIwMDIp

PC9EaXNwbGF5VGV4dD48cmVjb3JkPjxyZWMtbnVtYmVyPjIzODwvcmVjLW51bWJlcj48Zm9yZWln

bi1rZXlzPjxrZXkgYXBwPSJFTiIgZGItaWQ9Inp3OXplcnByczVwNWYzZWFyd3Z2c3JzNXN3MHJw

cjB2MHZ0ciIgdGltZXN0YW1wPSIxNDc1OTE1OTEyIj4yMzg8L2tleT48L2ZvcmVpZ24ta2V5cz48

cmVmLXR5cGUgbmFtZT0iSm91cm5hbCBBcnRpY2xlIj4xNzwvcmVmLXR5cGU+PGNvbnRyaWJ1dG9y

cz48YXV0aG9ycz48YXV0aG9yPkhlbnNoZXIgRC5BLjwvYXV0aG9yPjxhdXRob3I+JmFtcDsgUHJp

b25pLCBQLjwvYXV0aG9yPjwvYXV0aG9ycz48L2NvbnRyaWJ1dG9ycz48dGl0bGVzPjx0aXRsZT5B

IFNlcnZpY2UgUXVhbGl0eSBJbmRleCBmb3IgQXJlYS13aWRlIENvbnRyYWN0IFBlcmZvcm1hbmNl

IEFzc2Vzc21lbnQ8L3RpdGxlPjxzZWNvbmRhcnktdGl0bGU+Sm91cm5hbCBvZiBUcmFuc3BvcnQg

RWNvbm9taWNzIGFuZCBQb2xpY3kgKEpURVApPC9zZWNvbmRhcnktdGl0bGU+PC90aXRsZXM+PHBl

cmlvZGljYWw+PGZ1bGwtdGl0bGU+Sm91cm5hbCBvZiBUcmFuc3BvcnQgRWNvbm9taWNzIGFuZCBQ

b2xpY3kgKEpURVApPC9mdWxsLXRpdGxlPjwvcGVyaW9kaWNhbD48cGFnZXM+OTMtMTEzPC9wYWdl

cz48dm9sdW1lPjM2PC92b2x1bWU+PG51bWJlcj4xPC9udW1iZXI+PGtleXdvcmRzPjxrZXl3b3Jk

PkNPTVBFVElUSVZFTFkgVEVOREVSRUQgQ09OVFJBQ1RTPC9rZXl3b3JkPjxrZXl3b3JkPlRSQU5T

UE9SVEFUSU9OPC9rZXl3b3JkPjxrZXl3b3JkPkVDT05PTUlDUzwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5J

bmR1c3RyeSBTdHVkaWVzOiBVdGlsaXRpZXMgYW5kIFRyYW5zcG9ydGF0aW9uOiBHb3Zlcm5tZW50

IFBvbGljeSAoTDk4KTwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5EZXJlZ3VsYXRpb248L2tleXdvcmQ+PGtl

eXdvcmQ+Q29tcGFyaXNvbiBvZiBQdWJsaWMgYW5kIFByaXZhdGUgRW50ZXJwcmlzZXMgYW5kIE5v

bnByb2ZpdCBJbnN0aXR1dGlvbnMsIFByaXZhdGl6YXRpb24sIENvbnRyYWN0aW5nIE91dCAoTDMz

KTwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5PY2VhbmlhPC9rZXl3b3JkPjxrZXl3b3JkPlByaXZhdGl6YXRp

b248L2tleXdvcmQ+PGtleXdvcmQ+UmFpbHJvYWRzIGFuZCBPdGhlciBTdXJmYWNlIFRyYW5zcG9y

dGF0aW9uIChMOTIpPC9rZXl3b3JkPjxrZXl3b3JkPkVjb25vbWljcyBvZiBSZWd1bGF0aW9uIChM

NTEpPC9rZXl3b3JkPjxrZXl3b3JkPkF1c3RyYWxpYTwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5CdXM8L2tl

eXdvcmQ+PGtleXdvcmQ+UmVndWxhdGlvbjwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5QZXJmb3JtYW5jZSBl

dmFsdWF0aW9uPC9rZXl3b3JkPjxrZXl3b3JkPlF1YWxpdHkgb2Ygc2VydmljZTwva2V5d29yZD48

a2V5d29yZD5FY29ub21pYyBtb2RlbHM8L2tleXdvcmQ+PGtleXdvcmQ+VHJhbnNwb3J0YXRpb24g

ZWNvbm9taWNzPC9rZXl3b3JkPjxrZXl3b3JkPlN0YXRpc3RpY2FsIGFuYWx5c2lzPC9rZXl3b3Jk

PjxrZXl3b3JkPlN0dWRpZXM8L2tleXdvcmQ+PGtleXdvcmQ+QnVzZXM8L2tleXdvcmQ+PC9rZXl3

b3Jkcz48ZGF0ZXM+PHllYXI+MjAwMjwveWVhcj48L2RhdGVzPjxwdWItbG9jYXRpb24+QkFUSDwv

cHViLWxvY2F0aW9uPjxwdWJsaXNoZXI+Sm91cm5hbCBvZiBUcmFuc3BvcnQgRWNvbm9taWNzIGFu

ZCBQb2xpY3k8L3B1Ymxpc2hlcj48aXNibj4wMDIyLTUyNTggVTYgLSBjdHhfdmVyPVozOS44OC0y

MDA0JmFtcDtjdHhfZW5jPWluZm8lM0FvZmklMkZlbmMlM0FVVEYtOCZhbXA7cmZyX2lkPWluZm8l

M0FzaWQlMkZzdW1tb24uc2VyaWFsc3NvbHV0aW9ucy5jb20mYW1wO3JmdF92YWxfZm10PWluZm8l

M0FvZmklMkZmbXQlM0FrZXYlM0FtdHglM0Fqb3VybmFsJmFtcDtyZnQuZ2VucmU9YXJ0aWNsZSZh

bXA7cmZ0LmF0aXRsZT1BK3NlcnZpY2UrcXVhbGl0eStpbmRleCtmb3IrYXJlYS13aWRlK2NvbnRy

YWN0K3BlcmZvcm1hbmNlK2Fzc2Vzc21lbnQmYW1wO3JmdC5qdGl0bGU9Sm91cm5hbCtvZitUcmFu

c3BvcnQrRWNvbm9taWNzK2FuZCtQb2xpY3kmYW1wO3JmdC5hdT1IZW5zaGVyJTJDK0RhdmlkK0Em

YW1wO3JmdC5hdT1QcmlvbmklMkMrUGFvbGEmYW1wO3JmdC5kYXRlPTIwMDImYW1wO3JmdC5pc3Nu

PTAwMjItNTI1OCZhbXA7cmZ0LmVpc3NuPTE3NTQtNTk1MSZhbXA7cmZ0LnZvbHVtZT0zNiZhbXA7

cmZ0Lmlzc3VlPTEmYW1wO3JmdC5zcGFnZT05MyZhbXA7cmZ0LmVwYWdlPTExMyZhbXA7cmZ0LmV4

dGVybmFsREJJRD1uJTJGYSZhbXA7cmZ0LmV4dGVybmFsRG9jSUQ9MzQ2OTY2MjYmYW1wO3BhcmFt

ZGljdD1lbi1VUyBVNyAtIEpvdXJuYWwgQXJ0aWNsZTwvaXNibj48dXJscz48cmVsYXRlZC11cmxz

Pjx1cmw+aHR0cDovL3F1dC5zdW1tb24uc2VyaWFsc3NvbHV0aW9ucy5jb20vMi4wLjAvbGluay8w

L2VMdkhDWE13cFYxTGI5UXdFTFo0SEFBaEJJWFNVSkJ5NElTMDNUaDJIdWEyVkYxUlRoektlV1E3

dGxqVWJxUEdaZW1fNzR6ejJLVndRT0pnS1ZKR2xqMmYxNTdKLXZ1R01aRWZaYk03ZTRKcU1wVVo0

N0xLZWxsNVU0bUc2eXh2dkREV3lVanIzdjMtTmxVXzJteU9CbzZScFhzZk52UTBCeEp1V29jNUho

N3pIOEcxYzdwcEVIVVlTVjVsZU1qNEhKMVBEOFY5ek1sS3F1dXdQUDB5YmRNaUh5V2FLUnVqa3U5

Yk9sTl9OZkczb1BQaGxXdWRKVUZSZTlsZWQzODlwLUtadEh6T25nM0JaTHJvMFhfQjdybjFIbnMw

Y28yN1BmWmtSMjd3SlR0WnBNUFdrUGJTR1RmcEtZa2xwaGk0WWlkT3p6YXJ4cVVrV0VYY3FmVHJs

bFNRTGlZRnoxZnMyX0xrN1BqemJDaWpNRnNKakJabVZoYmNLQzJiSXRlTnFMaFR4Z2hYLWRyeXl0

VUZaa3kxejcyckt5ZktRaXN2RUNLdFhGbWJnbnVKNGNNLWU2cnB1djA2UkZwZWM4QlNiMHBiWV9R

bU1WeVRYdGVLX2lybXRURk5sbHNwODRSOUdKd0ozWVUtUDhlMTFRRWwxV2Q0NUFEaUJvUWJpQkk0

RkFuNy1LZnhaRVBZd29ndGpOakNpRzNDOWlOWTBQYnFIR1NQbTdpU0NUc2MwUU50dXVpNERncEsy

RENrM0gwN19Hbzd5RWxMaUdwMEpleFRoSHZxTkxRT0IyUGJTX2dKUXVNNGhMN0JGc2NtOUFvYng0

WVQwa3BnVWlYZ2U3aEkyUHQtcld5SEJoMU9CYUlHa0tveE1ZYndLeVRzOVIweklVdE1Rdk1TTzlo

ZFk5TjdtbjlGY2JnWVBNRF94ZXg0MEh3bnJZUHc1bjljZnNnZXg1bzQ4VVBVV19ZZ1hGMjdkNUVv

ZXd2Qm1ER1E8L3VybD48L3JlbGF0ZWQtdXJscz48L3VybHM+PC9yZWNvcmQ+PC9DaXRlPjwvRW5k

Tm90ZT4A

ADDIN EN.CITE PEVuZE5vdGU+PENpdGU+PEF1dGhvcj5BPC9BdXRob3I+PFllYXI+MjAwMjwvWWVhcj48UmVjTnVt

PjIzODwvUmVjTnVtPjxEaXNwbGF5VGV4dD4oRC5BLiAmYW1wOyAmYW1wOyBQcmlvbmksIDIwMDIp

PC9EaXNwbGF5VGV4dD48cmVjb3JkPjxyZWMtbnVtYmVyPjIzODwvcmVjLW51bWJlcj48Zm9yZWln

bi1rZXlzPjxrZXkgYXBwPSJFTiIgZGItaWQ9Inp3OXplcnByczVwNWYzZWFyd3Z2c3JzNXN3MHJw

cjB2MHZ0ciIgdGltZXN0YW1wPSIxNDc1OTE1OTEyIj4yMzg8L2tleT48L2ZvcmVpZ24ta2V5cz48

cmVmLXR5cGUgbmFtZT0iSm91cm5hbCBBcnRpY2xlIj4xNzwvcmVmLXR5cGU+PGNvbnRyaWJ1dG9y

cz48YXV0aG9ycz48YXV0aG9yPkhlbnNoZXIgRC5BLjwvYXV0aG9yPjxhdXRob3I+JmFtcDsgUHJp

b25pLCBQLjwvYXV0aG9yPjwvYXV0aG9ycz48L2NvbnRyaWJ1dG9ycz48dGl0bGVzPjx0aXRsZT5B

IFNlcnZpY2UgUXVhbGl0eSBJbmRleCBmb3IgQXJlYS13aWRlIENvbnRyYWN0IFBlcmZvcm1hbmNl

IEFzc2Vzc21lbnQ8L3RpdGxlPjxzZWNvbmRhcnktdGl0bGU+Sm91cm5hbCBvZiBUcmFuc3BvcnQg

RWNvbm9taWNzIGFuZCBQb2xpY3kgKEpURVApPC9zZWNvbmRhcnktdGl0bGU+PC90aXRsZXM+PHBl

cmlvZGljYWw+PGZ1bGwtdGl0bGU+Sm91cm5hbCBvZiBUcmFuc3BvcnQgRWNvbm9taWNzIGFuZCBQ

b2xpY3kgKEpURVApPC9mdWxsLXRpdGxlPjwvcGVyaW9kaWNhbD48cGFnZXM+OTMtMTEzPC9wYWdl

cz48dm9sdW1lPjM2PC92b2x1bWU+PG51bWJlcj4xPC9udW1iZXI+PGtleXdvcmRzPjxrZXl3b3Jk

PkNPTVBFVElUSVZFTFkgVEVOREVSRUQgQ09OVFJBQ1RTPC9rZXl3b3JkPjxrZXl3b3JkPlRSQU5T

UE9SVEFUSU9OPC9rZXl3b3JkPjxrZXl3b3JkPkVDT05PTUlDUzwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5J

bmR1c3RyeSBTdHVkaWVzOiBVdGlsaXRpZXMgYW5kIFRyYW5zcG9ydGF0aW9uOiBHb3Zlcm5tZW50

IFBvbGljeSAoTDk4KTwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5EZXJlZ3VsYXRpb248L2tleXdvcmQ+PGtl

eXdvcmQ+Q29tcGFyaXNvbiBvZiBQdWJsaWMgYW5kIFByaXZhdGUgRW50ZXJwcmlzZXMgYW5kIE5v

bnByb2ZpdCBJbnN0aXR1dGlvbnMsIFByaXZhdGl6YXRpb24sIENvbnRyYWN0aW5nIE91dCAoTDMz

KTwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5PY2VhbmlhPC9rZXl3b3JkPjxrZXl3b3JkPlByaXZhdGl6YXRp

b248L2tleXdvcmQ+PGtleXdvcmQ+UmFpbHJvYWRzIGFuZCBPdGhlciBTdXJmYWNlIFRyYW5zcG9y

dGF0aW9uIChMOTIpPC9rZXl3b3JkPjxrZXl3b3JkPkVjb25vbWljcyBvZiBSZWd1bGF0aW9uIChM

NTEpPC9rZXl3b3JkPjxrZXl3b3JkPkF1c3RyYWxpYTwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5CdXM8L2tl

eXdvcmQ+PGtleXdvcmQ+UmVndWxhdGlvbjwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5QZXJmb3JtYW5jZSBl

dmFsdWF0aW9uPC9rZXl3b3JkPjxrZXl3b3JkPlF1YWxpdHkgb2Ygc2VydmljZTwva2V5d29yZD48

a2V5d29yZD5FY29ub21pYyBtb2RlbHM8L2tleXdvcmQ+PGtleXdvcmQ+VHJhbnNwb3J0YXRpb24g

ZWNvbm9taWNzPC9rZXl3b3JkPjxrZXl3b3JkPlN0YXRpc3RpY2FsIGFuYWx5c2lzPC9rZXl3b3Jk

PjxrZXl3b3JkPlN0dWRpZXM8L2tleXdvcmQ+PGtleXdvcmQ+QnVzZXM8L2tleXdvcmQ+PC9rZXl3

b3Jkcz48ZGF0ZXM+PHllYXI+MjAwMjwveWVhcj48L2RhdGVzPjxwdWItbG9jYXRpb24+QkFUSDwv

cHViLWxvY2F0aW9uPjxwdWJsaXNoZXI+Sm91cm5hbCBvZiBUcmFuc3BvcnQgRWNvbm9taWNzIGFu

ZCBQb2xpY3k8L3B1Ymxpc2hlcj48aXNibj4wMDIyLTUyNTggVTYgLSBjdHhfdmVyPVozOS44OC0y

MDA0JmFtcDtjdHhfZW5jPWluZm8lM0FvZmklMkZlbmMlM0FVVEYtOCZhbXA7cmZyX2lkPWluZm8l

M0FzaWQlMkZzdW1tb24uc2VyaWFsc3NvbHV0aW9ucy5jb20mYW1wO3JmdF92YWxfZm10PWluZm8l

M0FvZmklMkZmbXQlM0FrZXYlM0FtdHglM0Fqb3VybmFsJmFtcDtyZnQuZ2VucmU9YXJ0aWNsZSZh

bXA7cmZ0LmF0aXRsZT1BK3NlcnZpY2UrcXVhbGl0eStpbmRleCtmb3IrYXJlYS13aWRlK2NvbnRy

YWN0K3BlcmZvcm1hbmNlK2Fzc2Vzc21lbnQmYW1wO3JmdC5qdGl0bGU9Sm91cm5hbCtvZitUcmFu

c3BvcnQrRWNvbm9taWNzK2FuZCtQb2xpY3kmYW1wO3JmdC5hdT1IZW5zaGVyJTJDK0RhdmlkK0Em

YW1wO3JmdC5hdT1QcmlvbmklMkMrUGFvbGEmYW1wO3JmdC5kYXRlPTIwMDImYW1wO3JmdC5pc3Nu

PTAwMjItNTI1OCZhbXA7cmZ0LmVpc3NuPTE3NTQtNTk1MSZhbXA7cmZ0LnZvbHVtZT0zNiZhbXA7

cmZ0Lmlzc3VlPTEmYW1wO3JmdC5zcGFnZT05MyZhbXA7cmZ0LmVwYWdlPTExMyZhbXA7cmZ0LmV4

dGVybmFsREJJRD1uJTJGYSZhbXA7cmZ0LmV4dGVybmFsRG9jSUQ9MzQ2OTY2MjYmYW1wO3BhcmFt

ZGljdD1lbi1VUyBVNyAtIEpvdXJuYWwgQXJ0aWNsZTwvaXNibj48dXJscz48cmVsYXRlZC11cmxz

Pjx1cmw+aHR0cDovL3F1dC5zdW1tb24uc2VyaWFsc3NvbHV0aW9ucy5jb20vMi4wLjAvbGluay8w

L2VMdkhDWE13cFYxTGI5UXdFTFo0SEFBaEJJWFNVSkJ5NElTMDNUaDJIdWEyVkYxUlRoektlV1E3

dGxqVWJxUEdaZW1fNzR6ejJLVndRT0pnS1ZKR2xqMmYxNTdKLXZ1R01aRWZaYk03ZTRKcU1wVVo0

N0xLZWxsNVU0bUc2eXh2dkREV3lVanIzdjMtTmxVXzJteU9CbzZScFhzZk52UTBCeEp1V29jNUho

N3pIOEcxYzdwcEVIVVlTVjVsZU1qNEhKMVBEOFY5ek1sS3F1dXdQUDB5YmRNaUh5V2FLUnVqa3U5

Yk9sTl9OZkczb1BQaGxXdWRKVUZSZTlsZWQzODlwLUtadEh6T25nM0JaTHJvMFhfQjdybjFIbnMw

Y28yN1BmWmtSMjd3SlR0WnBNUFdrUGJTR1RmcEtZa2xwaGk0WWlkT3p6YXJ4cVVrV0VYY3FmVHJs

bFNRTGlZRnoxZnMyX0xrN1BqemJDaWpNRnNKakJabVZoYmNLQzJiSXRlTnFMaFR4Z2hYLWRyeXl0

VUZaa3kxejcyckt5ZktRaXN2RUNLdFhGbWJnbnVKNGNNLWU2cnB1djA2UkZwZWM4QlNiMHBiWV9R

bU1WeVRYdGVLX2lybXRURk5sbHNwODRSOUdKd0ozWVUtUDhlMTFRRWwxV2Q0NUFEaUJvUWJpQkk0

RkFuNy1LZnhaRVBZd29ndGpOakNpRzNDOWlOWTBQYnFIR1NQbTdpU0NUc2MwUU50dXVpNERncEsy

RENrM0gwN19Hbzd5RWxMaUdwMEpleFRoSHZxTkxRT0IyUGJTX2dKUXVNNGhMN0JGc2NtOUFvYng0

WVQwa3BnVWlYZ2U3aEkyUHQtcld5SEJoMU9CYUlHa0tveE1ZYndLeVRzOVIweklVdE1Rdk1TTzlo

ZFk5TjdtbjlGY2JnWVBNRF94ZXg0MEh3bnJZUHc1bjljZnNnZXg1bzQ4VVBVV19ZZ1hGMjdkNUVv

ZXd2Qm1ER1E8L3VybD48L3JlbGF0ZWQtdXJscz48L3VybHM+PC9yZWNvcmQ+PC9DaXRlPjwvRW5k

Tm90ZT4A

ADDIN EN.CITE.DATA (D.A. & & Prioni, 2002), the most effective way of judging premium pricing comes from using service quality as an index for assessing actual contract performance. Changes in round three (See Appendix 9) saw an increase in contract indexes due to increased shelf life and service level agreements. Such actions allowed a higher product quality perception to the market. In relation, promotional pressure was only used lightly to guide premium prices. For example, In round three (see Appendix 11) we shifted promotions for our largest customers Food and Grocers from medium to low. Researchers find that fresh produce in particular face unexpected spoilages that can lead to excess waste and thereby economic losses as products are perishable PEVuZE5vdGU+PENpdGU+PEF1dGhvcj5CcnVja25lcjwvQXV0aG9yPjxZZWFyPjIwMTM8L1llYXI+

PFJlY051bT4yMzc8L1JlY051bT48RGlzcGxheVRleHQ+KEJydWNrbmVyLCBBbGJyZWNodCwgUGV0

ZXJzZW4sICZhbXA7IEtyZXllbnNjaG1pZHQsIDIwMTMpPC9EaXNwbGF5VGV4dD48cmVjb3JkPjxy

ZWMtbnVtYmVyPjIzNzwvcmVjLW51bWJlcj48Zm9yZWlnbi1rZXlzPjxrZXkgYXBwPSJFTiIgZGIt

aWQ9Inp3OXplcnByczVwNWYzZWFyd3Z2c3JzNXN3MHJwcjB2MHZ0ciIgdGltZXN0YW1wPSIxNDc1

OTE1ODg3Ij4yMzc8L2tleT48L2ZvcmVpZ24ta2V5cz48cmVmLXR5cGUgbmFtZT0iSm91cm5hbCBB

cnRpY2xlIj4xNzwvcmVmLXR5cGU+PGNvbnRyaWJ1dG9ycz48YXV0aG9ycz48YXV0aG9yPkJydWNr

bmVyLCBTdGVmYW5pZTwvYXV0aG9yPjxhdXRob3I+QWxicmVjaHQsIEFudG9uaWE8L2F1dGhvcj48

YXV0aG9yPlBldGVyc2VuLCBCcmlnaXR0ZTwvYXV0aG9yPjxhdXRob3I+S3JleWVuc2NobWlkdCwg

SnVkaXRoPC9hdXRob3I+PC9hdXRob3JzPjwvY29udHJpYnV0b3JzPjx0aXRsZXM+PHRpdGxlPkEg

cHJlZGljdGl2ZSBzaGVsZiBsaWZlIG1vZGVsIGFzIGEgdG9vbCBmb3IgdGhlIGltcHJvdmVtZW50

IG9mIHF1YWxpdHkgbWFuYWdlbWVudCBpbiBwb3JrIGFuZCBwb3VsdHJ5IGNoYWluczwvdGl0bGU+

PHNlY29uZGFyeS10aXRsZT5Gb29kIENvbnRyb2w8L3NlY29uZGFyeS10aXRsZT48L3RpdGxlcz48

cGVyaW9kaWNhbD48ZnVsbC10aXRsZT5Gb29kIENvbnRyb2w8L2Z1bGwtdGl0bGU+PC9wZXJpb2Rp

Y2FsPjxwYWdlcz40NTEtNDYwPC9wYWdlcz48dm9sdW1lPjI5PC92b2x1bWU+PG51bWJlcj4yPC9u

dW1iZXI+PGtleXdvcmRzPjxrZXl3b3JkPlByZWRpY3RpdmUgbWljcm9iaW9sb2d5PC9rZXl3b3Jk

PjxrZXl3b3JkPk1lYXQ8L2tleXdvcmQ+PGtleXdvcmQ+RGVjaXNpb24gbWFraW5nPC9rZXl3b3Jk

PjxrZXl3b3JkPkFycmhlbml1cyBtb2RlbDwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5Qc2V1ZG9tb25hcyBz

cDwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5Hb21wZXJ0eiBtb2RlbDwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5BU1NV

UkFOQ0UgU1lTVEVNPC9rZXl3b3JkPjxrZXl3b3JkPk1JQ1JPQklPTE9HSUNBTCBRVUFMSVRZPC9r

ZXl3b3JkPjxrZXl3b3JkPldBVEVSIEFDVElWSVRZPC9rZXl3b3JkPjxrZXl3b3JkPk1FQVQtUFJP

RFVDVFM8L2tleXdvcmQ+PGtleXdvcmQ+TElTVEVSSUEtTU9OT0NZVE9HRU5FUzwva2V5d29yZD48

a2V5d29yZD5UUkFOU0lFTlQgVEVNUEVSQVRVUkVTPC9rZXl3b3JkPjxrZXl3b3JkPkdST1dUSCBS

RUdJT048L2tleXdvcmQ+PGtleXdvcmQ+Rk9PRCBTUE9JTEFHRTwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5T

QUxNT05FTExBLVRZUEhJTVVSSVVNIExUMjwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5TUE9JTEFHRSBPUkdB

TklTTVM8L2tleXdvcmQ+PGtleXdvcmQ+Rk9PRCBTQ0lFTkNFICZhbXA7IFRFQ0hOT0xPR1k8L2tl

eXdvcmQ+PGtleXdvcmQ+UG9yazwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5TY2hvb2wgY29uc3RydWN0aW9u

PC9rZXl3b3JkPjxrZXl3b3JkPlF1YWxpdHkgY29udHJvbDwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5RdWFs

aXR5IG1hbmFnZW1lbnQ8L2tleXdvcmQ+PC9rZXl3b3Jkcz48ZGF0ZXM+PHllYXI+MjAxMzwveWVh

cj48L2RhdGVzPjxwdWItbG9jYXRpb24+T1hGT1JEPC9wdWItbG9jYXRpb24+PHB1Ymxpc2hlcj5F

TFNFVklFUiBTQ0kgTFREPC9wdWJsaXNoZXI+PGlzYm4+MDk1Ni03MTM1PC9pc2JuPjx1cmxzPjxy

ZWxhdGVkLXVybHM+PHVybD5odHRwOi8vcXV0LnN1bW1vbi5zZXJpYWxzc29sdXRpb25zLmNvbS8y

LjAuMC9saW5rLzAvZUx2SENYTXdsVjNManRNd0ZMVVFZZ0ZDdkJfaElkMEZMQXVPWGR2cGNoZ1k4

UUd3dHZ6VUZFSXlhbEtKLVh2dWRacXFkQVpwMkNXSzR5UzI0M3RzbjNQTW1CUWYtT0tvVDhDd3FM

aU1YcnZhcEtVV1hnZWZvLURLdTl3RWVUel94di14b0YtSVdibnZJX0c0aVpjbGl1M21rc1MtWkhS

SE5vLWZQLTFYRVF3dmJnVEZhNC0yb2p0UUNGLWZ6Vl9CYWRkRjN5RjV5SGE0TmpDVklIVDJrTTAw

NDNsS3JMMmlPYmhxOG5qamIzdkVIdXpBS1p4TXJla3h1NVc2Si16ZWdXWGhVOWFld01XR0ZuZW9t

NFRoUExVWjJuVk9VTGJVQVRlQWc3SHZXMEF3REFndVlWMW1MY29rSlBRWkpoSG5KZnphMDI1ZzNR

RU9BbjZDNnlJZWJOdHhjd25oM0syNzRSbjdmdmJsMi1uWHhXN0hoa1ZBM0ZBdjFNcUhGSlZmSmNS

cDJXa1ZGQThwU3hPU2tVbWtsSFRRSnNiSWZSSWgtRVl1dlV1SVdTUUd5dFRVOGptNzc0alozNDFG

QVJoZk1oQk9JVXFKd2ZBbUwyT0RUeERSR0JJSU4xd25yU3IyY2E0emV6RTVkTmladXZiRHpnVnFx

VUF0VnhZTHRHSXZxR290X2NManhnV0xZZHlzT0w1eXhkNVB0YjNQU2RnQmI3TU5HUk55aEVaYTJ2

SDNpRGtjcFZQWWxoRXByU3IyN3JDWjdLX1QyTE1tTEV2U0tGRlhyTDVKc3RPZFR6djVFNHl2X3Z0

RFg3TzdkRGJ4TTktdzItTm1tOTRXUmVzZjV4SVVJUTwvdXJsPjwvcmVsYXRlZC11cmxzPjwvdXJs

cz48ZWxlY3Ryb25pYy1yZXNvdXJjZS1udW0+MTAuMTAxNi9qLmZvb2Rjb250LjIwMTIuMDUuMDQ4

PC9lbGVjdHJvbmljLXJlc291cmNlLW51bT48L3JlY29yZD48L0NpdGU+PC9FbmROb3RlPgB=

ADDIN EN.CITE PEVuZE5vdGU+PENpdGU+PEF1dGhvcj5CcnVja25lcjwvQXV0aG9yPjxZZWFyPjIwMTM8L1llYXI+

PFJlY051bT4yMzc8L1JlY051bT48RGlzcGxheVRleHQ+KEJydWNrbmVyLCBBbGJyZWNodCwgUGV0

ZXJzZW4sICZhbXA7IEtyZXllbnNjaG1pZHQsIDIwMTMpPC9EaXNwbGF5VGV4dD48cmVjb3JkPjxy

ZWMtbnVtYmVyPjIzNzwvcmVjLW51bWJlcj48Zm9yZWlnbi1rZXlzPjxrZXkgYXBwPSJFTiIgZGIt

aWQ9Inp3OXplcnByczVwNWYzZWFyd3Z2c3JzNXN3MHJwcjB2MHZ0ciIgdGltZXN0YW1wPSIxNDc1

OTE1ODg3Ij4yMzc8L2tleT48L2ZvcmVpZ24ta2V5cz48cmVmLXR5cGUgbmFtZT0iSm91cm5hbCBB

cnRpY2xlIj4xNzwvcmVmLXR5cGU+PGNvbnRyaWJ1dG9ycz48YXV0aG9ycz48YXV0aG9yPkJydWNr

bmVyLCBTdGVmYW5pZTwvYXV0aG9yPjxhdXRob3I+QWxicmVjaHQsIEFudG9uaWE8L2F1dGhvcj48

YXV0aG9yPlBldGVyc2VuLCBCcmlnaXR0ZTwvYXV0aG9yPjxhdXRob3I+S3JleWVuc2NobWlkdCwg

SnVkaXRoPC9hdXRob3I+PC9hdXRob3JzPjwvY29udHJpYnV0b3JzPjx0aXRsZXM+PHRpdGxlPkEg

cHJlZGljdGl2ZSBzaGVsZiBsaWZlIG1vZGVsIGFzIGEgdG9vbCBmb3IgdGhlIGltcHJvdmVtZW50

IG9mIHF1YWxpdHkgbWFuYWdlbWVudCBpbiBwb3JrIGFuZCBwb3VsdHJ5IGNoYWluczwvdGl0bGU+

PHNlY29uZGFyeS10aXRsZT5Gb29kIENvbnRyb2w8L3NlY29uZGFyeS10aXRsZT48L3RpdGxlcz48

cGVyaW9kaWNhbD48ZnVsbC10aXRsZT5Gb29kIENvbnRyb2w8L2Z1bGwtdGl0bGU+PC9wZXJpb2Rp

Y2FsPjxwYWdlcz40NTEtNDYwPC9wYWdlcz48dm9sdW1lPjI5PC92b2x1bWU+PG51bWJlcj4yPC9u

dW1iZXI+PGtleXdvcmRzPjxrZXl3b3JkPlByZWRpY3RpdmUgbWljcm9iaW9sb2d5PC9rZXl3b3Jk

PjxrZXl3b3JkPk1lYXQ8L2tleXdvcmQ+PGtleXdvcmQ+RGVjaXNpb24gbWFraW5nPC9rZXl3b3Jk

PjxrZXl3b3JkPkFycmhlbml1cyBtb2RlbDwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5Qc2V1ZG9tb25hcyBz

cDwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5Hb21wZXJ0eiBtb2RlbDwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5BU1NV

UkFOQ0UgU1lTVEVNPC9rZXl3b3JkPjxrZXl3b3JkPk1JQ1JPQklPTE9HSUNBTCBRVUFMSVRZPC9r

ZXl3b3JkPjxrZXl3b3JkPldBVEVSIEFDVElWSVRZPC9rZXl3b3JkPjxrZXl3b3JkPk1FQVQtUFJP

RFVDVFM8L2tleXdvcmQ+PGtleXdvcmQ+TElTVEVSSUEtTU9OT0NZVE9HRU5FUzwva2V5d29yZD48

a2V5d29yZD5UUkFOU0lFTlQgVEVNUEVSQVRVUkVTPC9rZXl3b3JkPjxrZXl3b3JkPkdST1dUSCBS

RUdJT048L2tleXdvcmQ+PGtleXdvcmQ+Rk9PRCBTUE9JTEFHRTwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5T

QUxNT05FTExBLVRZUEhJTVVSSVVNIExUMjwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5TUE9JTEFHRSBPUkdB

TklTTVM8L2tleXdvcmQ+PGtleXdvcmQ+Rk9PRCBTQ0lFTkNFICZhbXA7IFRFQ0hOT0xPR1k8L2tl

eXdvcmQ+PGtleXdvcmQ+UG9yazwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5TY2hvb2wgY29uc3RydWN0aW9u

PC9rZXl3b3JkPjxrZXl3b3JkPlF1YWxpdHkgY29udHJvbDwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5RdWFs

aXR5IG1hbmFnZW1lbnQ8L2tleXdvcmQ+PC9rZXl3b3Jkcz48ZGF0ZXM+PHllYXI+MjAxMzwveWVh

cj48L2RhdGVzPjxwdWItbG9jYXRpb24+T1hGT1JEPC9wdWItbG9jYXRpb24+PHB1Ymxpc2hlcj5F

TFNFVklFUiBTQ0kgTFREPC9wdWJsaXNoZXI+PGlzYm4+MDk1Ni03MTM1PC9pc2JuPjx1cmxzPjxy

ZWxhdGVkLXVybHM+PHVybD5odHRwOi8vcXV0LnN1bW1vbi5zZXJpYWxzc29sdXRpb25zLmNvbS8y

LjAuMC9saW5rLzAvZUx2SENYTXdsVjNManRNd0ZMVVFZZ0ZDdkJfaElkMEZMQXVPWGR2cGNoZ1k4

UUd3dHZ6VUZFSXlhbEtKLVh2dWRacXFkQVpwMkNXSzR5UzI0M3RzbjNQTW1CUWYtT0tvVDhDd3FM

aU1YcnZhcEtVV1hnZWZvLURLdTl3RWVUel94di14b0YtSVdibnZJX0c0aVpjbGl1M21rc1MtWkhS

SE5vLWZQLTFYRVF3dmJnVEZhNC0yb2p0UUNGLWZ6Vl9CYWRkRjN5RjV5SGE0TmpDVklIVDJrTTAw

NDNsS3JMMmlPYmhxOG5qamIzdkVIdXpBS1p4TXJla3h1NVc2Si16ZWdXWGhVOWFld01XR0ZuZW9t

NFRoUExVWjJuVk9VTGJVQVRlQWc3SHZXMEF3REFndVlWMW1MY29rSlBRWkpoSG5KZnphMDI1ZzNR

RU9BbjZDNnlJZWJOdHhjd25oM0syNzRSbjdmdmJsMi1uWHhXN0hoa1ZBM0ZBdjFNcUhGSlZmSmNS

cDJXa1ZGQThwU3hPU2tVbWtsSFRRSnNiSWZSSWgtRVl1dlV1SVdTUUd5dFRVOGptNzc0alozNDFG

QVJoZk1oQk9JVXFKd2ZBbUwyT0RUeERSR0JJSU4xd25yU3IyY2E0emV6RTVkTmladXZiRHpnVnFx

VUF0VnhZTHRHSXZxR290X2NManhnV0xZZHlzT0w1eXhkNVB0YjNQU2RnQmI3TU5HUk55aEVaYTJ2

SDNpRGtjcFZQWWxoRXByU3IyN3JDWjdLX1QyTE1tTEV2U0tGRlhyTDVKc3RPZFR6djVFNHl2X3Z0

RFg3TzdkRGJ4TTktdzItTm1tOTRXUmVzZjV4SVVJUTwvdXJsPjwvcmVsYXRlZC11cmxzPjwvdXJs

cz48ZWxlY3Ryb25pYy1yZXNvdXJjZS1udW0+MTAuMTAxNi9qLmZvb2Rjb250LjIwMTIuMDUuMDQ4

PC9lbGVjdHJvbmljLXJlc291cmNlLW51bT48L3JlY29yZD48L0NpdGU+PC9FbmROb3RlPgB=

ADDIN EN.CITE.DATA (Bruckner, Albrecht, Petersen, & Kreyenschmidt, 2013). To make sure our quality approach was effective, we discussed new agreements with our customers. Contracted sales revenue remained strong throughout the takeover, but penalties lured around (see Appendix 9 to 11). Some decisions that did not work so well for the fresh connection became evident by the final round; Penalty rates were a sign of over promising in our agreements with customers, while research ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Eriksson</Author><Year>2013</Year><RecNum>236</RecNum><DisplayText>(Eriksson et al., 2013)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>236</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="zw9zerprs5p5f3earwvvsrs5sw0rpr0v0vtr" timestamp="1475915884">236</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Eriksson, David</author><author>Hilletofth, Per</author><author>Hilmola, Olli-Pekka</author><author>J. T. H. Forskningsmilj? Industriell produktion</author><author>Tekniska, H?gskolan</author><author>H?gskolan i, J?nk?ping</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Creating value through wholesaler and retailer interface</title><secondary-title>Industrial management + data systems</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>Industrial management + data systems</full-title></periodical><pages>1169</pages><volume>113</volume><number>8</number><dates><year>2013</year></dates><isbn>0263-5577</isbn><urls><related-urls><url>;(Eriksson et al., 2013) states that penalties are a case of ineffective management of the customers expectation. In other words, service level agreements were not altered accordingly to performance. The initial sales objective of obtaining a service level of 95% was not achieved as we just fell short finishing on 93.3%, but we learnt from round 4 (see Appendix 10) when our service levels were at 98.6% that our consumers receive most satisfaction from receiving realistic agreements in areas such as shelf life and on-time delivery. Overall, setting these high benchmarks allowed The Fresh Connections full potential to be exposed, now sitting in a profitable position. ?Operations Manager’s ReportThe following summary of weekly critical reflections is based on decisions made by the company (See Appendix 16). Initially the facilities and warehouse management strategies from round one to three focused on increasing capacity usage (See Appendix 14) as utilisation fluctuated. An overflow of 50% pallet locations in round one. Thereafter in rounds two and three reducing wastage was the focus (See Appendix 14 and 15). Additional mixers and bottling lines then became available in round three. Selecting the most cost-effective strategy became an ongoing issue.Onwards from rounds four to six managing wastage was the focus in pallet locations (See Appendix 15 to 17). The decisions made in operations during these rounds confirmed with joint forecasting gained through meetings with the supply chain and marketing managers on a constant basis (See Reflection). The company gained good profit. However, our small efforts to expand saw the team ’s ROI decline. (See Appendix 16) This lead to more reductions in capacity and exhibited that our wait-and-see approach in expanding supply chains and operations was not effective. Round six results proved problematic as our team’s ROI was at a low of 2.56% since the initial training round ROI of -11.93 (See Appendix 17). This elevated our attention to more aggressive expansion as the team re-evaluated the wait-and-see approach we had undertaken. Life cycle and capacity are tightly linked and as our decisions did not account for the life cycle changes and being limited by time (See appendix 17) the appraised changes in operations such as new bottling lines and mixers to reduce costs and improve efficiencies were not feasible.?The strategy for operations was to maintain flexible operations leading to low costs, high reliability and product availability. Referring to research ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Simchi-Levi</Author><Year>2010</Year><RecNum>241</RecNum><DisplayText>(Simchi-Levi &amp; ebrary, 2010)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>241</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="zw9zerprs5p5f3earwvvsrs5sw0rpr0v0vtr" timestamp="1476013945">241</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Book">6</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Simchi-Levi, David</author><author>ebrary, Inc</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Operations rules: delivering customer value through flexible operations</title></titles><number>Book, Whole</number><keywords><keyword>Consumer satisfaction</keyword><keyword>Business logistics</keyword><keyword>Operations research</keyword></keywords><dates><year>2010</year></dates><pub-location>Cambridge, Mass</pub-location><publisher>MIT Press</publisher><isbn>9780262289764;0262289768;</isbn><urls><related-urls><url>;(Simchi-Levi & ebrary, 2010), the company aimed to move from a static sourcing strategy to a dynamic one through optimising production sourcing decisions, taking into account demand, supply, various costs and the company's constraints. Through lateral linkages between functional departments flexibility was gained ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Mills</Author><Year>1985</Year><RecNum>242</RecNum><DisplayText>(Mills &amp; Harvard University. Graduate School of Business, 1985)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>242</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="zw9zerprs5p5f3earwvvsrs5sw0rpr0v0vtr" timestamp="1476015255">242</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Book">6</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Mills, Daniel Quinn</author><author>Harvard University. Graduate School of Business, Administration</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>The new competitors: a report on American managers from D. Quinn Mills of the Harvard Business School</title></titles><number>Book, Whole</number><keywords><keyword>Executives</keyword><keyword>United States</keyword><keyword>Industrial management</keyword></keywords><dates><year>1985</year></dates><pub-location>New York</pub-location><publisher>Wiley</publisher><isbn>0471810266;9780471810261;</isbn><urls><related-urls><url>;(Mills & Harvard University. Graduate School of Business, 1985). However, there was a shortfall in reaching full flexibility due to organisational structure that did not plan to expand. Flexibility was incorporated in the goal of 80%. This allowed leeway for changes and fluctuations but contributed to wastage. Taking a leaner approach would be highly recommended for future. Purchasing Manager’s Report The procurement primary assist with quality, availability and cost and waste elimination, low prices and high product component reliability. To ensure this, supplier reliability of 95% at least is required. As all supplier must be constantly evaluated to ensure the products fit for use. There are several criteria to consider.Firstly, the correlation between supplier reliability and contract index must be taken into account. Supplier reliability developed well since round 6 as three from five could meet the delivery reliability of 99% and 4 hours’ delivery windows (see Appendix 24). With the further rounds, the delivery reliability had developed better and all five suppliers could meet the agreed delivery reliability of 95% and 4 hours’ delivery window. It can be assumed, that the supplier might have been high pressured to delivery in too high terms as well as other changes such as dual sourcing, certification or shorter lead time have influenced the excellent performance in the last round. It can be said that the best contract index is 95% and 4 hours’ delivery, as supplier had the best performance based on the average and median with the lowest value below 50% and the greatest amount of above 80% (see Appendix 25). The contract index should be considered carefully as it affects sales department. In round three, the index effects Dominick`s in their performance.However, the largest cost factor was the dual sourcing. This is commonly applied to allow supply flexibility and availability of a high demand product. However, it leads to higher cost and has not improved lead times. Based on the financial figures in round six, the activity has increased cost in transport and therefore results in termination of the activity (see Appendix 26). Based on the round figure, dual sourcing lead to high cost, high wastage and there is no evidence for higher product component reliability.The focus on shorter lead time in the supply source can be seen. It has benefited the company with the flexibility in its order schedule, enhance fewer lost orders and increases cash flow. As research suggest inventory shortage is less likely to occur if lead-time is under 7 days PEVuZE5vdGU+PENpdGU+PEF1dGhvcj5CYW5kYWx5PC9BdXRob3I+PFllYXI+MjAxNjwvWWVhcj48

UmVjTnVtPjI0MDwvUmVjTnVtPjxEaXNwbGF5VGV4dD4oQmFuZGFseSwgU2F0aXIsICZhbXA7IFNo

YW5rZXIsIDIwMTYpPC9EaXNwbGF5VGV4dD48cmVjb3JkPjxyZWMtbnVtYmVyPjI0MDwvcmVjLW51

bWJlcj48Zm9yZWlnbi1rZXlzPjxrZXkgYXBwPSJFTiIgZGItaWQ9Inp3OXplcnByczVwNWYzZWFy

d3Z2c3JzNXN3MHJwcjB2MHZ0ciIgdGltZXN0YW1wPSIxNDc2MDEzMzk1Ij4yNDA8L2tleT48L2Zv

cmVpZ24ta2V5cz48cmVmLXR5cGUgbmFtZT0iSm91cm5hbCBBcnRpY2xlIj4xNzwvcmVmLXR5cGU+

PGNvbnRyaWJ1dG9ycz48YXV0aG9ycz48YXV0aG9yPkJhbmRhbHksIERpYTwvYXV0aG9yPjxhdXRo

b3I+U2F0aXIsIEFobWV0PC9hdXRob3I+PGF1dGhvcj5TaGFua2VyLCBMYXRoYTwvYXV0aG9yPjwv

YXV0aG9ycz48L2NvbnRyaWJ1dG9ycz48dGl0bGVzPjx0aXRsZT5JbXBhY3Qgb2YgbGVhZCB0aW1l

IHZhcmlhYmlsaXR5IGluIHN1cHBseSBjaGFpbiByaXNrIG1hbmFnZW1lbnQ8L3RpdGxlPjxzZWNv

bmRhcnktdGl0bGU+SW50ZXJuYXRpb25hbCBKb3VybmFsIG9mIFByb2R1Y3Rpb24gRWNvbm9taWNz

PC9zZWNvbmRhcnktdGl0bGU+PC90aXRsZXM+PHBlcmlvZGljYWw+PGZ1bGwtdGl0bGU+SW50ZXJu

YXRpb25hbCBKb3VybmFsIG9mIFByb2R1Y3Rpb24gRWNvbm9taWNzPC9mdWxsLXRpdGxlPjwvcGVy

aW9kaWNhbD48cGFnZXM+ODgtMTAwPC9wYWdlcz48dm9sdW1lPjE4MDwvdm9sdW1lPjxrZXl3b3Jk

cz48a2V5d29yZD5TaW11bGF0aW9uLWJhc2VkIG9wdGltaXphdGlvbjwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29y

ZD5TdG9jaGFzdGljIGxlYWQgdGltZTwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5SaXNrIG1hbmFnZW1lbnQ8

L2tleXdvcmQ+PGtleXdvcmQ+T3Bwb3J0dW5pdHkgY29zdDwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5CZWVy

IHN1cHBseSBjaGFpbjwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5TdXBwbHkgY2hhaW4gbWFuYWdlbWVudDwv

a2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5TdG9jaGFzdGljIG1vZGVsczwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5CcmV3

ZXJpZXM8L2tleXdvcmQ+PGtleXdvcmQ+T3BlcmF0aW9ucyByZXNlYXJjaDwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5

d29yZD5Qcm9kdWN0aW9uIG1hbmFnZW1lbnQ8L2tleXdvcmQ+PGtleXdvcmQ+U3R1ZGllczwva2V5

d29yZD48L2tleXdvcmRzPjxkYXRlcz48eWVhcj4yMDE2PC95ZWFyPjwvZGF0ZXM+PHB1Yi1sb2Nh

dGlvbj5BbXN0ZXJkYW08L3B1Yi1sb2NhdGlvbj48cHVibGlzaGVyPkVsc2V2aWVyIFNlcXVvaWEg

Uy5BPC9wdWJsaXNoZXI+PGlzYm4+MDkyNS01MjczPC9pc2JuPjx1cmxzPjxyZWxhdGVkLXVybHM+

PHVybD5odHRwOi8vcXV0LnN1bW1vbi5zZXJpYWxzc29sdXRpb25zLmNvbS8yLjAuMC9saW5rLzAv

ZUx2SENYTXdsVjFMVDhNd0RMWVFCd1JDUEFab2d5SGxEa1ZwMDZ6SkNmR2E0QTduS0UwYnNXbU1p

VzFJLV9mWWZXbHNJTUV4U3VXcWNlcll6dWZQQUNLNjRzR0tUY2dvanh3cUcxb2hFLUdFU0hVY3h3

bFBuVllXemNWS191M3lsd3Y5QXBnMUdFNkkzeklzV1RlTEp0WkVja2NVal9lM2pSVkdtMXRZWVIz

SmdFakdxb0tabjBWOFA1U1dQRTBxRFpsUGwwNmNfajdVRU93Nl96VmFLekJZWjNUODA0Y2N3Rjds

aGJLYmN0c2N3a1ktYnNGV0RZSnZ3YzRTVGVFUlhEOFZwWlRzM2JNUmJnbEdfZWpaSndiWkpjZjNn

ZzNHYkVyZFFSZk12Vm9jRUY2ZHZUWEFtbU40NlQ4ODN6MEdWZU9Gd0lXb3FFRHBsTzRuczR6bkxy

S1p0TEhNaFhTSmQ1R0xwWkEtU1lobTM4bk1lblJRdUxmTy14VG5mS3ExbFZxY3dLNGxnUDU0VmhU

eVpXMWcxdVdodExrUFpZNHlsRS1WMHFySEZUN1ByWXRVQnk1cUZaaEpTYlJoYWdUYTBOQlNHVm9x

d3hPRFM5V0JicTBsVV8xMFU0UE9pcVpZWC1KMHU5UmNJNnBIdldzd2VOT25fM3JQR1d6VHFFVHZk

V0Z6OWpIUHo0dWEwQy1KMXRPUzwvdXJsPjwvcmVsYXRlZC11cmxzPjwvdXJscz48ZWxlY3Ryb25p

Yy1yZXNvdXJjZS1udW0+MTAuMTAxNi9qLmlqcGUuMjAxNi4wNy4wMTQ8L2VsZWN0cm9uaWMtcmVz

b3VyY2UtbnVtPjwvcmVjb3JkPjwvQ2l0ZT48L0VuZE5vdGU+

ADDIN EN.CITE PEVuZE5vdGU+PENpdGU+PEF1dGhvcj5CYW5kYWx5PC9BdXRob3I+PFllYXI+MjAxNjwvWWVhcj48

UmVjTnVtPjI0MDwvUmVjTnVtPjxEaXNwbGF5VGV4dD4oQmFuZGFseSwgU2F0aXIsICZhbXA7IFNo

YW5rZXIsIDIwMTYpPC9EaXNwbGF5VGV4dD48cmVjb3JkPjxyZWMtbnVtYmVyPjI0MDwvcmVjLW51

bWJlcj48Zm9yZWlnbi1rZXlzPjxrZXkgYXBwPSJFTiIgZGItaWQ9Inp3OXplcnByczVwNWYzZWFy

d3Z2c3JzNXN3MHJwcjB2MHZ0ciIgdGltZXN0YW1wPSIxNDc2MDEzMzk1Ij4yNDA8L2tleT48L2Zv

cmVpZ24ta2V5cz48cmVmLXR5cGUgbmFtZT0iSm91cm5hbCBBcnRpY2xlIj4xNzwvcmVmLXR5cGU+

PGNvbnRyaWJ1dG9ycz48YXV0aG9ycz48YXV0aG9yPkJhbmRhbHksIERpYTwvYXV0aG9yPjxhdXRo

b3I+U2F0aXIsIEFobWV0PC9hdXRob3I+PGF1dGhvcj5TaGFua2VyLCBMYXRoYTwvYXV0aG9yPjwv

YXV0aG9ycz48L2NvbnRyaWJ1dG9ycz48dGl0bGVzPjx0aXRsZT5JbXBhY3Qgb2YgbGVhZCB0aW1l

IHZhcmlhYmlsaXR5IGluIHN1cHBseSBjaGFpbiByaXNrIG1hbmFnZW1lbnQ8L3RpdGxlPjxzZWNv

bmRhcnktdGl0bGU+SW50ZXJuYXRpb25hbCBKb3VybmFsIG9mIFByb2R1Y3Rpb24gRWNvbm9taWNz

PC9zZWNvbmRhcnktdGl0bGU+PC90aXRsZXM+PHBlcmlvZGljYWw+PGZ1bGwtdGl0bGU+SW50ZXJu

YXRpb25hbCBKb3VybmFsIG9mIFByb2R1Y3Rpb24gRWNvbm9taWNzPC9mdWxsLXRpdGxlPjwvcGVy

aW9kaWNhbD48cGFnZXM+ODgtMTAwPC9wYWdlcz48dm9sdW1lPjE4MDwvdm9sdW1lPjxrZXl3b3Jk

cz48a2V5d29yZD5TaW11bGF0aW9uLWJhc2VkIG9wdGltaXphdGlvbjwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29y

ZD5TdG9jaGFzdGljIGxlYWQgdGltZTwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5SaXNrIG1hbmFnZW1lbnQ8

L2tleXdvcmQ+PGtleXdvcmQ+T3Bwb3J0dW5pdHkgY29zdDwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5CZWVy

IHN1cHBseSBjaGFpbjwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5TdXBwbHkgY2hhaW4gbWFuYWdlbWVudDwv

a2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5TdG9jaGFzdGljIG1vZGVsczwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5CcmV3

ZXJpZXM8L2tleXdvcmQ+PGtleXdvcmQ+T3BlcmF0aW9ucyByZXNlYXJjaDwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5

d29yZD5Qcm9kdWN0aW9uIG1hbmFnZW1lbnQ8L2tleXdvcmQ+PGtleXdvcmQ+U3R1ZGllczwva2V5

d29yZD48L2tleXdvcmRzPjxkYXRlcz48eWVhcj4yMDE2PC95ZWFyPjwvZGF0ZXM+PHB1Yi1sb2Nh

dGlvbj5BbXN0ZXJkYW08L3B1Yi1sb2NhdGlvbj48cHVibGlzaGVyPkVsc2V2aWVyIFNlcXVvaWEg

Uy5BPC9wdWJsaXNoZXI+PGlzYm4+MDkyNS01MjczPC9pc2JuPjx1cmxzPjxyZWxhdGVkLXVybHM+

PHVybD5odHRwOi8vcXV0LnN1bW1vbi5zZXJpYWxzc29sdXRpb25zLmNvbS8yLjAuMC9saW5rLzAv

ZUx2SENYTXdsVjFMVDhNd0RMWVFCd1JDUEFab2d5SGxEa1ZwMDZ6SkNmR2E0QTduS0UwYnNXbU1p

VzFJLV9mWWZXbHNJTUV4U3VXcWNlcll6dWZQQUNLNjRzR0tUY2dvanh3cUcxb2hFLUdFU0hVY3h3

bFBuVllXemNWS191M3lsd3Y5QXBnMUdFNkkzeklzV1RlTEp0WkVja2NVal9lM2pSVkdtMXRZWVIz

SmdFakdxb0tabjBWOFA1U1dQRTBxRFpsUGwwNmNfajdVRU93Nl96VmFLekJZWjNUODA0Y2N3Rjds

aGJLYmN0c2N3a1ktYnNGV0RZSnZ3YzRTVGVFUlhEOFZwWlRzM2JNUmJnbEdfZWpaSndiWkpjZjNn

ZzNHYkVyZFFSZk12Vm9jRUY2ZHZUWEFtbU40NlQ4ODN6MEdWZU9Gd0lXb3FFRHBsTzRuczR6bkxy

S1p0TEhNaFhTSmQ1R0xwWkEtU1lobTM4bk1lblJRdUxmTy14VG5mS3ExbFZxY3dLNGxnUDU0VmhU

eVpXMWcxdVdodExrUFpZNHlsRS1WMHFySEZUN1ByWXRVQnk1cUZaaEpTYlJoYWdUYTBOQlNHVm9x

d3hPRFM5V0JicTBsVV8xMFU0UE9pcVpZWC1KMHU5UmNJNnBIdldzd2VOT25fM3JQR1d6VHFFVHZk

V0Z6OWpIUHo0dWEwQy1KMXRPUzwvdXJsPjwvcmVsYXRlZC11cmxzPjwvdXJscz48ZWxlY3Ryb25p

Yy1yZXNvdXJjZS1udW0+MTAuMTAxNi9qLmlqcGUuMjAxNi4wNy4wMTQ8L2VsZWN0cm9uaWMtcmVz

b3VyY2UtbnVtPjwvcmVjb3JkPjwvQ2l0ZT48L0VuZE5vdGU+

ADDIN EN.CITE.DATA (Bandaly, Satir, & Shanker, 2016). It is recommended to prioritise this as a criterion when evaluating supplier.The implementation of the contract index of 95% and 4 delivery window; shorter lead time; and elimination of dual sourcing, has help the organisation to lower prices, eliminate low wastage within the supply source process and enhance high product component reliability to assist the supply chain department with the availability of products.Conclusion and Team Management Considerations Today’s organisations are commonly faced with the rapidly changing environment and constant pressure to deliver quality on time. Good communication is a key to success to ensure common understanding in the workplace.One important aspect of the consultant activity was the focus on communication in two aspects by emphasising collaborative decision making across the departments and by creating a common communication platform. Each department manager had made individual decisions while working closely with other departments on a cross-functionally level to ensure process efficiency. For example, the supply chain management collaborates with the sales department by reducing shelf life while increasing production interval and increase the frozen period to reduce product obsolete and promote flexibility. This cross-cultural teamwork should be implied to benefit from varying sources of expertise and knowledge which promote better decisions making in product development ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Holland</Author><Year>2000</Year><RecNum>182</RecNum><DisplayText>(Holland, Gaston, &amp; Gomes, 2000)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>182</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="zw9zerprs5p5f3earwvvsrs5sw0rpr0v0vtr" timestamp="1472477608">182</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Holland, Sarah</author><author>Gaston, Kevin</author><author>Gomes, Jorge</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Critical success factors for cross‐functional teamwork in new product development</title><secondary-title>International Journal of Management Reviews</secondary-title></titles><periodical><full-title>International Journal of Management Reviews</full-title></periodical><pages>231-259</pages><volume>2</volume><number>3</number><dates><year>2000</year></dates><pub-location>Oxford, UK and Boston, USA</pub-location><publisher>Blackwell Publishers Ltd</publisher><isbn>1460-8545</isbn><urls><related-urls><url>;(Holland, Gaston, & Gomes, 2000). Also, this eliminated common problems early PEVuZE5vdGU+PENpdGU+PEF1dGhvcj5KYWJlcjwvQXV0aG9yPjxZZWFyPjIwMTU8L1llYXI+PFJl

Y051bT4xNzk8L1JlY051bT48RGlzcGxheVRleHQ+KEphYmVyLCBNYXJsZSwgJmFtcDsgSmFua292

aWMsIDIwMTUpPC9EaXNwbGF5VGV4dD48cmVjb3JkPjxyZWMtbnVtYmVyPjE3OTwvcmVjLW51bWJl

cj48Zm9yZWlnbi1rZXlzPjxrZXkgYXBwPSJFTiIgZGItaWQ9Inp3OXplcnByczVwNWYzZWFyd3Z2

c3JzNXN3MHJwcjB2MHZ0ciIgdGltZXN0YW1wPSIxNDcyMzg5MDY5Ij4xNzk8L2tleT48L2ZvcmVp

Z24ta2V5cz48cmVmLXR5cGUgbmFtZT0iSm91cm5hbCBBcnRpY2xlIj4xNzwvcmVmLXR5cGU+PGNv

bnRyaWJ1dG9ycz48YXV0aG9ycz48YXV0aG9yPkphYmVyLCBIYWRpPC9hdXRob3I+PGF1dGhvcj5N

YXJsZSwgRnJhbmNrPC9hdXRob3I+PGF1dGhvcj5KYW5rb3ZpYywgTWFyaWphPC9hdXRob3I+PC9h

dXRob3JzPjwvY29udHJpYnV0b3JzPjx0aXRsZXM+PHRpdGxlPkltcHJvdmluZyBDb2xsYWJvcmF0

aXZlIERlY2lzaW9uIE1ha2luZyBpbiBOZXcgUHJvZHVjdCBEZXZlbG9wbWVudCBQcm9qZWN0cyBV

c2luZyBDbHVzdGVyaW5nIEFsZ29yaXRobXM8L3RpdGxlPjxzZWNvbmRhcnktdGl0bGU+SUVFRSBU

cmFuc2FjdGlvbnMgb24gRW5naW5lZXJpbmcgTWFuYWdlbWVudDwvc2Vjb25kYXJ5LXRpdGxlPjwv

dGl0bGVzPjxwZXJpb2RpY2FsPjxmdWxsLXRpdGxlPklFRUUgVHJhbnNhY3Rpb25zIG9uIEVuZ2lu

ZWVyaW5nIE1hbmFnZW1lbnQ8L2Z1bGwtdGl0bGU+PC9wZXJpb2RpY2FsPjxwYWdlcz40NzUtNDgz

PC9wYWdlcz48dm9sdW1lPjYyPC92b2x1bWU+PG51bWJlcj40PC9udW1iZXI+PGtleXdvcmRzPjxr

ZXl3b3JkPm9yZ2FuaXphdGlvbmFsIGRlY2lzaW9uIHByb2Nlc3Nlczwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29y

ZD5wcm9qZWN0IHRlYW1zPC9rZXl3b3JkPjxrZXl3b3JkPkFsZ29yaXRobSBkZXNpZ24gYW5kIGFu

YWx5c2lzPC9rZXl3b3JkPjxrZXl3b3JkPk9yZ2FuaXphdGlvbmFsIGFzcGVjdHM8L2tleXdvcmQ+

PGtleXdvcmQ+b3JnYW5pemF0aW9uIGRlc2lnbjwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5SZXNlYXJjaCBh

bmQgZGV2ZWxvcG1lbnQgbWFuYWdlbWVudDwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5DbHVzdGVyaW5nIGFs

Z29yaXRobXM8L2tleXdvcmQ+PGtleXdvcmQ+Q29sbGFib3JhdGl2ZSB3b3JrPC9rZXl3b3JkPjxr

ZXl3b3JkPlByb2R1Y3QgZGV2ZWxvcG1lbnQ8L2tleXdvcmQ+PGtleXdvcmQ+RGVjaXNpb24gbWFr

aW5nPC9rZXl3b3JkPjxrZXl3b3JkPk5ldyBwcm9kdWN0IGRldmVsb3BtZW50PC9rZXl3b3JkPjxr

ZXl3b3JkPkNvbGxhYm9yYXRpb248L2tleXdvcmQ+PGtleXdvcmQ+dGVjaG5pY2FsIG9yZ2FuaXph

dGlvbnM8L2tleXdvcmQ+PGtleXdvcmQ+cHJvamVjdCBhbmQgUiZhbXA7RCBtYW5hZ2VtZW50PC9r

ZXl3b3JkPjxrZXl3b3JkPk1BTkFHRU1FTlQ8L2tleXdvcmQ+PGtleXdvcmQ+UklTSzwva2V5d29y

ZD48a2V5d29yZD5ORVRXT1JLUzwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5FTkdJTkVFUklORywgSU5EVVNU

UklBTDwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5NT0RFTDwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5DT01NVU5JVFkg

U1RSVUNUVVJFPC9rZXl3b3JkPjxrZXl3b3JkPkRFU0lHTiBTVFJVQ1RVUkUgTUFUUklYPC9rZXl3

b3JkPjxrZXl3b3JkPkFSQ0hJVEVDVFVSRTwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5CVVNJTkVTUzwva2V5

d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5Qcm9kdWN0IGRlc2lnbjwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5BdXRvbW9iaWxl

IGluZHVzdHJ5PC9rZXl3b3JkPjxrZXl3b3JkPkFsZ29yaXRobXM8L2tleXdvcmQ+PGtleXdvcmQ+

U3R1ZGllczwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5wcm9qZWN0IGFuZCBSYW5kRCBtYW5hZ2VtZW50PC9r

ZXl3b3JkPjxrZXl3b3JkPkluZHVzdHJpYWwgcmVzZWFyY2g8L2tleXdvcmQ+PGtleXdvcmQ+TWF0

aGVtYXRpY2FsIHN0YXRpc3RpY3M8L2tleXdvcmQ+PGtleXdvcmQ+RGVjaXNpb24tbWFraW5nPC9r

ZXl3b3JkPjxrZXl3b3JkPkFuYWx5c2lzPC9rZXl3b3JkPjxrZXl3b3JkPlVzYWdlPC9rZXl3b3Jk

Pjwva2V5d29yZHM+PGRhdGVzPjx5ZWFyPjIwMTU8L3llYXI+PC9kYXRlcz48cHViLWxvY2F0aW9u

PlBJU0NBVEFXQVk8L3B1Yi1sb2NhdGlvbj48cHVibGlzaGVyPklFRUU8L3B1Ymxpc2hlcj48aXNi

bj4wMDE4LTkzOTE8L2lzYm4+PHVybHM+PHJlbGF0ZWQtdXJscz48dXJsPmh0dHA6Ly9xdXQuc3Vt

bW9uLnNlcmlhbHNzb2x1dGlvbnMuY29tLzIuMC4wL2xpbmsvMC9lTHZIQ1hNd2pWMUxUeHN4RUxa

UVR5RFVVa3BKZ0VnLWNPa2h3WS0xZF9jWXBhQmVrSHBJejVZZmE0cVVCcFJzLVAyZDhUNlNRS1Z5

Vy0xN1BiUDJmUFA0aGhBcEptejhhazRJM0dudGxZeldnYjB0TVdicXdGVGdsb25LU19YYV85YlJi

bU9fazVTS1ZrMXdNMFgydzVQZm9PUHNKaGNLVm5kRVBwenJvaW5kNmdNSW1Xb1pHVG44ejNCV0Y2

Rms1YzM4OWg1VHV0UkVZTXhRaXIwVnFaMlhVNmVWZmFNVHEwUTI2My11VDJrdHV2dEVPcEtGempP

MmVGTjY4SmJyOFQyZmVFSS10dVlwblRiNjlKa2NWTXRUY3JSRFd2aUZQUFItQ0RyYkt0RkxSYi0z

N1hyb2ZlcHdSUi1YRktaUS1yUGhsS1U3NlVtNERfMF9hNW95RnVoc3NVRy1CdHljTGg2ZVZvXzE3

el9yTV9McjduWS0tekZ1MnpXTXZjaVZHbGZSaTFEa1ZnY1J3WTRJdG96QkJyUkFYQldkNWhXQVVS

MXpDWGpjOGxoa3JrU2E1Rkk0bnp0VzJrSi1KY2NXMF9xWGRTcl9Dd05DQWV3RW1YbVpPWUNOTVZj

bFU1Rnp6MlRRb29oYUQ4bTNUbmJtdWFIbk1BbldzTktBbkEzSzJiUnlIcEp6Rks3QlA3ZGVXV19B

RnRNRlJxS0haSVJqMzktQkpkTlpaMFZXUnVrenVITFVLWUt4RGwxUU1FSUdURF9RTElDRGNQMVZm

N3lkQXZZUER4cmw2UjhBcUJGNWxncTQ4X1d1T20zZkFIbUNKTUE5N0ZmQjFKRHc5NXcyYTJuZGtj

Nmd2dmpQUjEyU1F4eWR4cDEwUlQ3VXEwMDFTdVd1ZndFSVl4eF88L3VybD48L3JlbGF0ZWQtdXJs

cz48L3VybHM+PGVsZWN0cm9uaWMtcmVzb3VyY2UtbnVtPjEwLjExMDkvVEVNLjIwMTUuMjQ1ODMz

MjwvZWxlY3Ryb25pYy1yZXNvdXJjZS1udW0+PC9yZWNvcmQ+PC9DaXRlPjwvRW5kTm90ZT5=

ADDIN EN.CITE PEVuZE5vdGU+PENpdGU+PEF1dGhvcj5KYWJlcjwvQXV0aG9yPjxZZWFyPjIwMTU8L1llYXI+PFJl

Y051bT4xNzk8L1JlY051bT48RGlzcGxheVRleHQ+KEphYmVyLCBNYXJsZSwgJmFtcDsgSmFua292

aWMsIDIwMTUpPC9EaXNwbGF5VGV4dD48cmVjb3JkPjxyZWMtbnVtYmVyPjE3OTwvcmVjLW51bWJl

cj48Zm9yZWlnbi1rZXlzPjxrZXkgYXBwPSJFTiIgZGItaWQ9Inp3OXplcnByczVwNWYzZWFyd3Z2

c3JzNXN3MHJwcjB2MHZ0ciIgdGltZXN0YW1wPSIxNDcyMzg5MDY5Ij4xNzk8L2tleT48L2ZvcmVp

Z24ta2V5cz48cmVmLXR5cGUgbmFtZT0iSm91cm5hbCBBcnRpY2xlIj4xNzwvcmVmLXR5cGU+PGNv

bnRyaWJ1dG9ycz48YXV0aG9ycz48YXV0aG9yPkphYmVyLCBIYWRpPC9hdXRob3I+PGF1dGhvcj5N

YXJsZSwgRnJhbmNrPC9hdXRob3I+PGF1dGhvcj5KYW5rb3ZpYywgTWFyaWphPC9hdXRob3I+PC9h

dXRob3JzPjwvY29udHJpYnV0b3JzPjx0aXRsZXM+PHRpdGxlPkltcHJvdmluZyBDb2xsYWJvcmF0

aXZlIERlY2lzaW9uIE1ha2luZyBpbiBOZXcgUHJvZHVjdCBEZXZlbG9wbWVudCBQcm9qZWN0cyBV

c2luZyBDbHVzdGVyaW5nIEFsZ29yaXRobXM8L3RpdGxlPjxzZWNvbmRhcnktdGl0bGU+SUVFRSBU

cmFuc2FjdGlvbnMgb24gRW5naW5lZXJpbmcgTWFuYWdlbWVudDwvc2Vjb25kYXJ5LXRpdGxlPjwv

dGl0bGVzPjxwZXJpb2RpY2FsPjxmdWxsLXRpdGxlPklFRUUgVHJhbnNhY3Rpb25zIG9uIEVuZ2lu

ZWVyaW5nIE1hbmFnZW1lbnQ8L2Z1bGwtdGl0bGU+PC9wZXJpb2RpY2FsPjxwYWdlcz40NzUtNDgz

PC9wYWdlcz48dm9sdW1lPjYyPC92b2x1bWU+PG51bWJlcj40PC9udW1iZXI+PGtleXdvcmRzPjxr

ZXl3b3JkPm9yZ2FuaXphdGlvbmFsIGRlY2lzaW9uIHByb2Nlc3Nlczwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29y

ZD5wcm9qZWN0IHRlYW1zPC9rZXl3b3JkPjxrZXl3b3JkPkFsZ29yaXRobSBkZXNpZ24gYW5kIGFu

YWx5c2lzPC9rZXl3b3JkPjxrZXl3b3JkPk9yZ2FuaXphdGlvbmFsIGFzcGVjdHM8L2tleXdvcmQ+

PGtleXdvcmQ+b3JnYW5pemF0aW9uIGRlc2lnbjwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5SZXNlYXJjaCBh

bmQgZGV2ZWxvcG1lbnQgbWFuYWdlbWVudDwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5DbHVzdGVyaW5nIGFs

Z29yaXRobXM8L2tleXdvcmQ+PGtleXdvcmQ+Q29sbGFib3JhdGl2ZSB3b3JrPC9rZXl3b3JkPjxr

ZXl3b3JkPlByb2R1Y3QgZGV2ZWxvcG1lbnQ8L2tleXdvcmQ+PGtleXdvcmQ+RGVjaXNpb24gbWFr

aW5nPC9rZXl3b3JkPjxrZXl3b3JkPk5ldyBwcm9kdWN0IGRldmVsb3BtZW50PC9rZXl3b3JkPjxr

ZXl3b3JkPkNvbGxhYm9yYXRpb248L2tleXdvcmQ+PGtleXdvcmQ+dGVjaG5pY2FsIG9yZ2FuaXph

dGlvbnM8L2tleXdvcmQ+PGtleXdvcmQ+cHJvamVjdCBhbmQgUiZhbXA7RCBtYW5hZ2VtZW50PC9r

ZXl3b3JkPjxrZXl3b3JkPk1BTkFHRU1FTlQ8L2tleXdvcmQ+PGtleXdvcmQ+UklTSzwva2V5d29y

ZD48a2V5d29yZD5ORVRXT1JLUzwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5FTkdJTkVFUklORywgSU5EVVNU

UklBTDwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5NT0RFTDwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5DT01NVU5JVFkg

U1RSVUNUVVJFPC9rZXl3b3JkPjxrZXl3b3JkPkRFU0lHTiBTVFJVQ1RVUkUgTUFUUklYPC9rZXl3

b3JkPjxrZXl3b3JkPkFSQ0hJVEVDVFVSRTwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5CVVNJTkVTUzwva2V5

d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5Qcm9kdWN0IGRlc2lnbjwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5BdXRvbW9iaWxl

IGluZHVzdHJ5PC9rZXl3b3JkPjxrZXl3b3JkPkFsZ29yaXRobXM8L2tleXdvcmQ+PGtleXdvcmQ+

U3R1ZGllczwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5wcm9qZWN0IGFuZCBSYW5kRCBtYW5hZ2VtZW50PC9r

ZXl3b3JkPjxrZXl3b3JkPkluZHVzdHJpYWwgcmVzZWFyY2g8L2tleXdvcmQ+PGtleXdvcmQ+TWF0

aGVtYXRpY2FsIHN0YXRpc3RpY3M8L2tleXdvcmQ+PGtleXdvcmQ+RGVjaXNpb24tbWFraW5nPC9r

ZXl3b3JkPjxrZXl3b3JkPkFuYWx5c2lzPC9rZXl3b3JkPjxrZXl3b3JkPlVzYWdlPC9rZXl3b3Jk

Pjwva2V5d29yZHM+PGRhdGVzPjx5ZWFyPjIwMTU8L3llYXI+PC9kYXRlcz48cHViLWxvY2F0aW9u

PlBJU0NBVEFXQVk8L3B1Yi1sb2NhdGlvbj48cHVibGlzaGVyPklFRUU8L3B1Ymxpc2hlcj48aXNi

bj4wMDE4LTkzOTE8L2lzYm4+PHVybHM+PHJlbGF0ZWQtdXJscz48dXJsPmh0dHA6Ly9xdXQuc3Vt

bW9uLnNlcmlhbHNzb2x1dGlvbnMuY29tLzIuMC4wL2xpbmsvMC9lTHZIQ1hNd2pWMUxUeHN4RUxa

UVR5RFVVa3BKZ0VnLWNPa2h3WS0xZF9jWXBhQmVrSHBJejVZZmE0cVVCcFJzLVAyZDhUNlNRS1Z5

Vy0xN1BiUDJmUFA0aGhBcEptejhhazRJM0dudGxZeldnYjB0TVdicXdGVGdsb25LU19YYV85YlJi

bU9fazVTS1ZrMXdNMFgydzVQZm9PUHNKaGNLVm5kRVBwenJvaW5kNmdNSW1Xb1pHVG44ejNCV0Y2

Rms1YzM4OWg1VHV0UkVZTXhRaXIwVnFaMlhVNmVWZmFNVHEwUTI2My11VDJrdHV2dEVPcEtGempP

MmVGTjY4SmJyOFQyZmVFSS10dVlwblRiNjlKa2NWTXRUY3JSRFd2aUZQUFItQ0RyYkt0RkxSYi0z

N1hyb2ZlcHdSUi1YRktaUS1yUGhsS1U3NlVtNERfMF9hNW95RnVoc3NVRy1CdHljTGg2ZVZvXzE3

el9yTV9McjduWS0tekZ1MnpXTXZjaVZHbGZSaTFEa1ZnY1J3WTRJdG96QkJyUkFYQldkNWhXQVVS

MXpDWGpjOGxoa3JrU2E1Rkk0bnp0VzJrSi1KY2NXMF9xWGRTcl9Dd05DQWV3RW1YbVpPWUNOTVZj

bFU1Rnp6MlRRb29oYUQ4bTNUbmJtdWFIbk1BbldzTktBbkEzSzJiUnlIcEp6Rks3QlA3ZGVXV19B

RnRNRlJxS0haSVJqMzktQkpkTlpaMFZXUnVrenVITFVLWUt4RGwxUU1FSUdURF9RTElDRGNQMVZm

N3lkQXZZUER4cmw2UjhBcUJGNWxncTQ4X1d1T20zZkFIbUNKTUE5N0ZmQjFKRHc5NXcyYTJuZGtj

Nmd2dmpQUjEyU1F4eWR4cDEwUlQ3VXEwMDFTdVd1ZndFSVl4eF88L3VybD48L3JlbGF0ZWQtdXJs

cz48L3VybHM+PGVsZWN0cm9uaWMtcmVzb3VyY2UtbnVtPjEwLjExMDkvVEVNLjIwMTUuMjQ1ODMz

MjwvZWxlY3Ryb25pYy1yZXNvdXJjZS1udW0+PC9yZWNvcmQ+PC9DaXRlPjwvRW5kTm90ZT5=

ADDIN EN.CITE.DATA (Jaber, Marle, & Jankovic, 2015). The communication channel had encouraged proactive behaviour and the organisation should emphasise this for future activities.We will focus on the maintenance of these factors to continue the current leading position within the simulation to achieve a respective goal in maintaining the current leading position with an ROI of 7%. We will continue the weekly meetings and protocol taking as it assist the group to reflect on both individual and group performance.Reference list ADDIN EN.REFLIST Bandaly, D., Satir, A., & Shanker, L. (2016). Impact of lead time variability in supply chain risk management. International Journal of Production Economics, 180, 88-100. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.07.014Bruckner, S., Albrecht, A., Petersen, B., & Kreyenschmidt, J. (2013). A predictive shelf life model as a tool for the improvement of quality management in pork and poultry chains. Food Control, 29(2), 451-460. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.05.048D.A., H., & & Prioni, P. (2002). A Service Quality Index for Area-wide Contract Performance Assessment. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy (JTEP), 36(1), 93-113. Eriksson, D., Hilletofth, P., Hilmola, O.-P., produktion, J. T. H. F. I., Tekniska, H., & H?gskolan i, J. (2013). Creating value through wholesaler and retailer interface. Industrial management + data systems, 113(8), 1169. Fischer, M. (1997). What Is the Right Supply Chain for Your Product? Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from , S., Gaston, K., & Gomes, J. (2000). Critical success factors for cross‐functional teamwork in new product development. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2(3), 231-259. doi:10.1111/1468-2370.00040Jaber, H., Marle, F., & Jankovic, M. (2015). Improving Collaborative Decision Making in New Product Development Projects Using Clustering Algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 62(4), 475-483. doi:10.1109/TEM.2015.2458332Lee, H. L., & Billington, C. (1992). MANAGING SUPPLY CHAIN INVENTORY - PITFALLS AND OPPORTUNITIES. SLOAN MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 33(3), 65-73. Meyer, B. C., & Bishop, D. S. (2016). Stock Control: Learning Inventory Concepts by Beating Levels and Winning Prizes: Stock Control. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 14(3), 315-336. doi:10.1111/dsji.12102Mills, D. Q., & Harvard University. Graduate School of Business, A. (1985). The new competitors: a report on American managers from D. Quinn Mills of the Harvard Business School. New York: Wiley.Schmitz, J., & Platts, K. W. (2004). Supplier logistics performance measurement: Indications from a study in the automotive industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 89(2), 231-243. doi:10.1016/S0925-5273(02)00469-3Simchi-Levi, D., & ebrary, I. (2010). Operations rules: delivering customer value through flexible operations. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.The Fresh Connection. (2016). Analysis. Retrieved from ReportsAppendix 1: Reflection Report Leo One (Round Three)Why I made the decisions I did:There was a lack of stock for the raw Mango material component and finished product leaving warehouse with unused space. Decrease the Orange component and finished product by little as it is the main product due to a high level of obsoletes compared to the other products and components. In overall, small changes (Except mango components and materials) to reduce costs from warehousing and stock.This week changes: Components - Increased safety stock and lot sizes for Mango a little as stock was running low , but didn’t want to have too much stock on hand like 1st roundChanged orange, reduced in safety stock and lot sizes.Finished product – Decreased the orange 1L safety stock by 0.1 Reduced production interval for fressie Orange/Mango 1L by a small amountWhat was the outcome (results) of the decisions I made:Increase in availability of components, reduction of investment in inventory stock for components and finished goods.Who did I consult with on my team:I spoke with Sales and Operations managers in order to analyse the previous round compared to the recent one, after consulting with one another we decided the changes that needed to be done to improve the company’s performance.What did I learn from the decisions and processes in this round:An important link between the operations and sales manager in order to focus on areas of more importance (Sales) and warehousing stock, to ensure our decisions are aiming for the same outcome and that can help one another.How will I address/approach my decisions in the next round:Focus on the new tools available (Production interval tool) to try to get the best outcome. Weekly meeting with the team members, aiming to improve KPI’s relating to the other manager’s decisions affecting supply chain management.Appendix 2: Reflection Report Leo Two (Round Four)Why I made the decisions I did:Similar to last week, there was a lack of safety stock and lot sizes for the Orange, Mango and Vitamin C components and finished product leaving warehouse with unused space. Increased frozen period of production to have more fixed production plans to ensure deliveries and production times. Increased products safety stock in order to use warehousing space more efficiently.This week changes: For components: Increase safety stock of Orange, Mango, and Vitamin C as well as lot sizes. For Production changed from 1 week to 3 weeks in Frozen period of production. For Products: Increased safety stock for Orange/Mango and Orange/Vitamin C Liter and Pet.What was the outcome (results) of the decisions I made:Overall ROI% increased. Increase in stock value and almost 100% in the availability of components. Keeping Product obsoletes less than 3%.Who did I consult with on my team:I the meeting everyone spoke with every branch of the organisation. My main relation being the supply chain manager was with purchasing and operation managers. We agreed in the utilisation space and how much I should increase stocks for the warehouses, as well as delivery reliability with the purchasing department. What did I learn from the decisions and processes in this round:An important link between the operations and purchasing departments in order to keep reducing costs and increasing space efficiency in the warehouses.How will I address/approach my decisions in the next round:Keep focusing on the (Production interval tool) to try to get the best outcome, reducing costs overall. Aim for efficient utilisation rates on the bottling lines. And regular weekly meeting with the team members, aiming to improve KPI’s relating to the other manager's decisions affecting supply chain management.Appendix 3: Reflection Report Leo Three (Round Four)Why I made the decisions I did:Similar to previous weeks, there was a lack of safety stock and lot sizes for the Orange, Mango and Vitamin C components and finished product leaving warehouse with unused space and with pallet locations open. Increased frozen period of production from 3 to 4 weeks to have more fixed production plans ensuring deliveries and production times. Increased products safety stock in order to use warehousing space more efficiently.Changes in the supply chain: For components, increase the safety stock of Pack 1 liter, and Pet packs by 0.4 (weeks). In production increase the frozen period of production from 3 weeks to 4 to ensure delivery rates and quantity for suppliers. In product, production interval (days) changed from 6, 7, 9, 5, 6, 5, to 6, 7, 9, 6, 6 8 respectively. Calculating reduction in total costs of almost 10k maintaining 80% utilization rate in the bottling line. Kpis returned to Availability of components, Stock components, and stock products.What was the outcome (results) of the decisions I made:Overall positive ROI% but decreased from 7.3% to 6.7%. Reduction in indirect costs by 15,000 and 99.9% in the availability of components. Keeping Product obsoletes less than 2%Who did I consult with on my team:Everyone spoke with every branch of the organisation. We agreed on the changes with my most relation being with the operation managers. We agreed in the utilisation space and how much I should increase stocks for the warehouses (an increase from 50% to 70% utilisation rate), as well as delivery reliability with the purchasing department. What did I learn from the decisions and processes in this round:Links between the operations and purchasing departments in order to keep reducing costs and increasing space efficiency in the warehouses. How will I address/approach my decisions in the next round:Keep focusing on the (Production interval tool) to try to get the best outcome, reducing costs overall. Aim for efficient utilisation rates on the bottling lines. And regular weekly meeting with the team members, aiming to improve KPI’s relating to the other manager's decisions affecting supply chain management.Appendix 4: Reflection Report Leo Four (Round Five)Why I made the decisions I did:There was a lack of safety stock and lot sizes for the Orange, Mango and Vitamin C components and finished product leaving warehouse with unused space and with pallet locations open from the previous week to this week, 50% to 70%. Keep frozen period of production at 4 weeks. Increased products safety stock in order to use warehousing space more efficiently, aiming for 80% usage.Changes in the supply chain: For components, increase the safety stock of Orange, Mango, and Vitamin C by 0.2 (weeks). Production interval (days) changed from 6, 7, 9, 6, 6, 8 to 6, 7, 10, 6, 6, 11 respectively. Calculating reduction in total costs of almost 3k, reducing total time (hours), maintaining 79% utilization rate in the bottling line.What was the outcome (results) of the decisions I made:Overall positive ROI% but decreased from 6.7% to 5.27%. Reduction in indirect costs by 3,000 and 100% in the availability of components. Product obsoletes increased a lot specially Freddie Orange/C-power PET at 10%, Fressie Orange 1 liter at 8.3%; Fressie Orange/C-power 1 liter & Fressie Orange PET surrounding 7%. And Fressie Orange/C-power 1 liter has a low level of stock.Who did I consult with on my team:As every week, everyone spoke with every branch of the organisation. We agreed on the changes, relating supply chain more to operations management. We agreed in the utilisation space and how much I should increase stocks for the warehouses (an increase from 70% to 80% utilisation rate).What did I learn from the decisions and processes in this round:Links between the operations and purchasing departments in order to keep reducing costs and increasing space efficiency in the warehouses. This week, there was a problem regarding obsoletes which could have been avoided by increasing sales in the sales department after deciding to increase stock and finished goods (by promotions e.g).How will I address/approach my decisions in the next round:For this week result of 5.27% ROI, decreasing over the last 2 weeks will be of concern to the team. I will continue aim for efficient utilisation rates on the bottling lines. Additionally, in order to answer to the high % of obsoletes, optimize planning,?demand forecasting?and replenishment?processes (through stock and order sizes). Increase the safety stock or manufacture the product in larger batches for Fressie Orange/C-Power 1 Liter due to low levels of stock. Continue regular weekly meeting with the team members, aiming to improve KPI’s relating to the other managers decisions affecting supply chain management.Appendix 5: Reflection Report Leo Five (Round Six)Why I made the decisions I did:There was a lack of safety stock for Fressie Orange/C-Power 1 liter and Fressie Orange/Mango 1 liter. Increased safety stock to ensure finished product reliability. Change frozen period of production from 3 to 4 weeks to increase customer levels and flexibility of production.Changes in the supply chain:Products:The finished products Fressie Orange/C-power PET, Fressie Orange 1 liter and Fressie Orange PET have a high obsoletes percentage.Fressie Orange PET Safety stock (weeks) from 2.3 to 2.1 decreasing safety stock but reducing production interval (days) from 6 to 5 days. Fressie Orange/C-power PET Safety stock (weeks) from 1.9 to 1.7 decreasing production interval from 10 to 9 (days).Fressie Orange 1 liter Safety stock (weeks) from 2.2 to 2.0, decreasing production interval as well from 6 to 5 days.Fressie Orange/C-power 1 liter & Fressie Orange/Mango 1 liter has a low level of stock, Increase the safety stock (weeks) 1.6 to 1.8 & 10 to 8 / 7 to 6 respectively reduction in production intervals. Frozen period of production (weeks) changed from 3 to 4 weeks to increase customer levels. What was the outcome (results) of the decisions I made:Overall positive ROI% increased from 2.56% to 3.45%. 100 % in the availability of components. Product reduced and increased stock safety for Orange/Mango 1 liter which had low levels of stock.Who did I consult with on my team:As every week, everyone spoke with every branch of the organisation. We agreed on the changes, this week relating more with the sales manager. We agreed on the changes needed to be made to reduce high levels of obsoletes products and stock forecasting.What did I learn from the decisions and processes in this round:Links between the purchasing department in order to solve the issue regarding obsoletes which could have been avoided by better forecasting in stock and production intervals, as well as self-life of the products. How will I address/approach my decisions in the next round:For this week result of 3.45% ROI, finally increasing from three weeks going down. Future possible changes outside the simulation would still aim for efficient utilisation rates on the bottling lines. Additionally, in order to answer to the high % of obsoletes, deeper planning involving the operations manager should be looked at. Continue regular weekly meeting with the team members, aiming to improve KPI’s relating to the other manager’s decisions affecting supply chain management.Appendix 6: Component – Demand per WeekSource: ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>The Fresh Connection</Author><Year>2016</Year><RecNum>239</RecNum><DisplayText>(The Fresh Connection, 2016)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>239</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="zw9zerprs5p5f3earwvvsrs5sw0rpr0v0vtr" timestamp="1476009591">239</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Web Page">12</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>The Fresh Connection,</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Analysis</title></titles><volume>2016</volume><number>October 4</number><dates><year>2016</year></dates><urls><related-urls><url>;(The Fresh Connection, 2016)Appendix 7: Bottling Line utilisation rateSource: ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>The Fresh Connection</Author><Year>2016</Year><RecNum>239</RecNum><DisplayText>(The Fresh Connection, 2016)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>239</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="zw9zerprs5p5f3earwvvsrs5sw0rpr0v0vtr" timestamp="1476009591">239</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Web Page">12</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>The Fresh Connection,</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Analysis</title></titles><volume>2016</volume><number>October 4</number><dates><year>2016</year></dates><urls><related-urls><url>;(The Fresh Connection, 2016)Appendix 8: Finance OverviewSource: ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Connection</Author><Year>2016</Year><RecNum>239</RecNum><DisplayText>(The Fresh Connection, 2016)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>239</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="zw9zerprs5p5f3earwvvsrs5sw0rpr0v0vtr" timestamp="1476009591">239</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Web Page">12</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>The Fresh Connection,</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Analysis</title></titles><volume>2016</volume><number>October 4</number><dates><year>2016</year></dates><urls><related-urls><url>;(The Fresh Connection, 2016)Appendix 9: Reflection Report Kevin One (Round Three)Why I made the decisions I did:This round I decided to only make slight alterations in the Sales department as I wanted our incoming profit to remain stable. We focused on other departments that were struggling and needed a bit more attention.Contract Index was increased for Dominick’s as we negotiated a new deal to extend their order line.What was the outcome (results) of the decisions I made:Contracted sales revenue remained the same for Food and Groceries and Land Mark but it increased for Dominick’s. The higher Contract Index must have had an impact on the sales of our juices. However, penalties increased and this affected our profits.Who did I consult with on my team:I consulted with our purchasing manager over facebook, and met up with the operationsand supply chain manager to work together on making decisions.What did I learn from the decisions and processes in this round:I must be more aware of the practices in other departments which may affect salesperformance. Extending an order line till 10PM may be a great option for the customer,but it may be an issue with getting the stock out on time from the warehouse.How will I address/approach my decisions in the next round:Go through and study to performance of other areas of the business, particularly supplychain, and discuss with group members on how we can push sales revenue back up.Appendix 10: Reflection Report Kevin Two (Round Four)Why I made the decisions I did:This week's changes were based on the fact that penalty rates have been increasingand service levels were not flowing as well as previous weeks. I had to not only work on making strategic sales decisions but work with other functional areas. What was the outcome (results) of the decisions I made:The outcome of the changes in promotional pressure from medium to light for food andgroceries which altered contract index proved to be promising and service levels wereback on the rise. Changes made from other department managers had a positive effecton the outcome also. ROI has increased once again.Who did I consult with on my team:We had a full team meeting, which was vital in making collaborative decisions.What did I learn from the decisions and processes in this round:Collaborative decisions in logistic operations are important as decisions flow from onedepartment to another.How will I address/approach my decisions in the next round:Examine how the other areas are performing, and elaborate to the group salesperformance in particularly service levels outbound.Appendix 11: Reflection Report Kevin Three (Round Five)Why I made the decisions I did:This week’s decisions were based of a team decision, to approach a conservative approach as we were hitting most targets. We want to maintain the ROI and not fluctuate it by doing any major changes to the business.What was the outcome (results) of the decisions I made:Apart from the group's conservative approach, the decisions I made was to communicate to operations and supply chain managers that obsolete products were extremely low, so more space production of goods can be produced. ??The outcome saw that utilization in the warehouse improved but there are still empty spaces around, our service level dropped as well leading to penalties.Who did I consult with on my team:Every manager was spoken with, met with purchasing and supply chain managers once, and spoke to operations manager via social media. I mainly discussed the approach we should take with Supply chain manager.What did I learn from the decisions and processes in this round:That demand and market movements are continuously changing, it is vital to be able toadapt to these changes quickly so that the business isn’t harmedHow will I address/approach my decisions in the next round:I will approach my decisions next week with a view on how our business processes are flowing through each channel and the effect each decision has on sales figures. Data should be looked further into to try and forecast demand for next round. Appendix 12: Reflection Report Kevin Four (Round Six)Why I made the decisions I did:Based on service levels dropping rapidly and increases in penalties, these issues were looked into. Something had to be altered across our whole supply chain, from our sales strategy to operations through to procurement. We decided to do more changes across every platform this round. Contract indexes had to be increased.What was the outcome (results) of the decisions I made:The outcome of the decisions I made as sales manager saw increases in obsolete products and contract indexes as expected, also directly increasing the sales revenue. But there was very little improvement in terms of penalties.Who did I consult with on my team:I consulted with every manager on the team this week. We had more of a team approach and were able to discuss every decision in person, making an overall collaborative strategy in our business functions.What did I learn from the decisions and processes in this round:Small changes in operations have not been helping the penalty rate in recent rounds. We must better utilize our warehouse and forecast accordingly.How will I address/approach my decisions in the next round:Look more carefully into the results, find correlations and links across all departments. Penalties need to be reduced and service levels need to increase.Appendix 13: Reflection Report Kevin Five (Round Seven)Why I made the decisions I did:After analysing the business performance and having discussions with the team, this rounds decisions were made based on utilization in operations, and also to try reducing obsoletes and increasing service levels outbound.What was the outcome (results) of the decisions I made:Improve in Sales rev, but big increases in penalties.The resulting outcome of my decisions was different for each customer as tailored changes were made.-Land market improved dramatically in Sales revenue (^40,800) after high promotional pressure, however, penalties were also incurred (-19,219).-Food and Grocer improved slightly in sales revenue, but we suffered a dramatic cost increase in penalties.- Dominick’s had little movement in position from last round, although sales revenue figures dropped a little, with penalties also reducing a little.Who did I consult with on my team:I met face to face again this week in order to try and collaborate ideas. Every manager was present for the meeting so we discussed every department.What did I learn from the decisions and processes in this round:-Although Promotional pressure can have positive results, it can also have costly effects.- The supply chain is underperforming as penalties and operating profit is at an all time low since taking over the business.How will I address/approach my decisions in the next round:Before making changes in the next round, careful examination between this rounds figures and round 3’s figures will be compared. Hopefully pointing out obvious areas that need changing.Appendix 14: Reflection Report Lee-Anne One (Round Three)Why I made the decisions I did:Reduce pallet locations in fixed and raw materials according to results of the previous week. However, changes were kept minimal according to changes the supply chain manager was going to make. ?Fixed goods- 1200 to 1000Raw materials- 1950 to 1500What was the outcome (results) of the decisions I made:The outcome was a reduction in warehousing expenses and the maximum utility of pallet use. Reducing costs.Who did I consult with on my team:I consulted with the Sales and Supply chain manager on the decisions. The supply chain manager noted an increase in raw materials hence the minimal What did I learn from the decisions and processes in this round:Consulting with one another is vital as different areas have an add-on effect when changes are made. How will I address/approach my decisions in the next round:Make better-informed decision based on results and consultations with team membersAppendix 15: Reflection Report Lee-Anne Two (Round Four)Why I made the decisions I did:The raw materials warehouse was relatively empty, with pallet locations open. Pallet locations in raw materials were at 33.6% utilization. Therefore a reduction of pallet locations was carried out and the number of FTE’s was reduced as well.What was the outcome (results) of the decisions I made:Who did I consult with on my team:Similar to the previous week I mainly consulted with the supply chain manager. Also got input from the purchasing and sale team. What did I learn from the decisions and processes in this round:I’ve learnt that communicating with more than just one member of the team is vital because their decision can affect operations in positive or negative ways. How will I address/approach my decisions in the next round:Consult with more than one department of the team and base decisions on Appendix 16: Reflection Report Lee-Anne Three (Round Five)Why I made the decisions I did:In operations, our main focus for round 7 was in reducing costs. The quality control measures were reduced by removing all raw material inspections from suppliers due to them being costly, and increasing lead times. Moreover, the purchasing department has decided upon having suppliers that have certification and good quality so there is little need for them either way. Furthermore, from last week decisions; the increase of employees and their intake time were also very costly. So these were reduced in both raw materials and the finished goods warehouse from 4 to 2 full-time employees. Pallet locations were reduced in the finished goods warehouse from 1100 to 800 to reduce wastage as utilization was at 67%. What was the outcome (results) of the decisions I made:The outcome of the decisions made was increased utilisation of cubes in the raw and finished goods warehouse and a 92.7% production adherence. However, noted by the results from the game management that operations in our team has been slipping backwards. Who did I consult with on my team:I consulted with the Sales and Supply chain manager on the decisions. The supply chain manager noted an increase in raw materials hence the minimal What did I learn from the decisions and processes in this round:This week the decisions made were still very minimal and new bottling lines and mixing lines will be investigated. How will I address/approach my decisions in the next round:I will look towards adding new bottling lines and mixing lines as these have not been changed or investigated. Appendix 17: Reflection Report Lee-Anne Four (Round Six)Why I made the decisions I did:Decisions made in operations this week included : added inspections in raw materials (NO8DO Mango and SYI "vitamin C) 1 extra FT employee in raw and finished materials warehouse in response to the new packaging of trade units.What was the outcome (results) of the decisions I made:Utilization in the raw materials warehouse has improved to 85%, however, utilization in the finished goods warehouse it has dropped this week to 67.1%. Therefore this week I will consult with supply chain and purchasing managers on how this surplus has come about. Who did I consult with on my team:I consulted with the supply chain manager. Also got input from the purchasing and sale team. What did I learn from the decisions and processes in this round:The forecasting method is going in the right direction.How will I address/approach my decisions in the next round:Consult with the purchasing and supply chain managers in the empty space and what caused it. ?Appendix 18: Reflection Report Lee-Anne Five (Round Seven)Why I made the decisions I did:In operations, our main focus for round 7 was in reducing costs. The quality control measures were reduced by removing all raw material inspections from suppliers due to them being costly, and increasing lead times. Moreover, the purchasing department has decided upon having suppliers that have certification and good quality so there is little need for them either way. Furthermore, from last week decisions; the increase of employees and their intake time were also very costly. So these were reduced in both raw materials and the finished goods warehouse from 4 to 2 full-time employees. Pallet locations were reduced in the finished goods warehouse from 1100 to 800 to reduce wastage as utilization was at 67%. What was the outcome (results) of the decisions I made:The outcome of the decisions made was increased utilisation of cubes in the raw and finished goods warehouse and a 92.7% production adherence. However, noted by the results from the game management that operations in our team has been slipping backwards. Who did I consult with on my team:I consulted with the Sales and Supply chain manager on the decisions. The supply chain manager noted an increase in raw materials hence the minimal What did I learn from the decisions and processes in this round:This week the decisions made were still very minimal and new bottling lines and mixing lines will be investigated. How will I address/approach my decisions in the next round:I will look towards adding new bottling lines and mixing lines as these have not been changed or investigated. Appendix 19: Reflection Report Maria One (Round Three)Why I made the decisions I did:I selected another supplier for the packing supply by changing from our current German supplier, with 10 lead time days, to an English supplier who offers half of the lead time (5 days). The contract had negotiated to the standard of 1-day delivery windows with 98% reliability level and illustrate an excellent contract index (above one).As we are focusing on bringing high quality to the customer and to keep our cost to a minimum. I made the decision in changing the supplier to take advantage of the shorter lead time so that small lot sizes can be ordered on a more frequent basis to reduce cost in holding inventory. Also, geographical location is an important criterion to consider as it impacts the delivery lead time. England is close to our production location in the Netherlands.What was the outcome (results) of the decisions I made:The delivery rate of the English supplier in pack supply is very good and is currently 96.6 under 1-day delivery windows and 98% reliability. Therefore, the supplier is consistent with its delivery within the promised time.Who did I consult with on my team:We are emphasising on communication across the organisation to ensure a very clear communication across the operation management, supply chain management, and sales department. This allows us to take advantage of different perspectives.What did I learn from the decisions and processes in this round:I have learnt that we are on the right path by focusing in supplier in high-quality products and short lead time. Moreover, the certification for the supplier is important as well. Particular in this round, I have learnt that the constant evaluation of supplier is crucial in order to eliminate early problems within the supply chain, for example, long delivery, as it has an impact on the organisation performance. How will I address/approach my decisions in the next round:For the next round, I will continue in the evaluation of each required product that meets our key source requirement and strategy and making the product available in a timely manner. I will also pay more attention to the supplier rejection rate and will calculate transport cost when evaluating supplier to take advantage of cost methods that ensure cost efficiency.?Appendix 20: Reflection Report Maria Two (Round Four)Why I made the decisions I did:I changed the terms of each supplier contract by delivering within 4-hours delivery windows with a 99% delivery reliability instead of 1-day delivery windows with 95% delivery reliability. Supplier performance has developed well over the last three rounds which show that the supplier is performing well in terms of its quality. In order to benefit from higher product availability, I changed the delivery window to ensure reliability.Refer to my KPI changes, I change to the raw material COGS while maintaining performance measurement in rejection component and delivery reliability supplier to focus on cost, rejection, and quality.What was the outcome (results) of the decisions I made:Each of our suppliers is a meet expectation in delivery reliability by performing above the 98%. Therefore, the supplier is consistent with the delivery within the promised time window and have very low rejection rate. However, I will focus on the PET supplier, which is one of the most ordered amounts as the rejection rate is still very low, but with 3.1% above the average of 1.9% rejection rate. Similar with the supplier of the Pack 1 Litre, which has a rejection rate of 2.9% which is also below the average of 1.9% and is the second most important material we are purchasing. The COGS are at its best score, but having changed much since Round One, currently 48.6%.Who did I consult with on my team:We need to emphasise on the important role of selecting the right supplier to ensure availability and quality of our products. We will continue to emphasise the importance of communication across the organisation, for example, I will work closely with the supply chain management in the next week to assess if enough products are available.What did I learn from the decisions and processes in this round:I have learnt that we are on the right path by focusing in supplier in high-quality products and short lead time. Moreover, the certification for the supplier is important as well. Particular in this round, I have learnt that shorten the delivery window is crucial in order to receive the products in a timely manner. I will do some further research in order to solve the rejection rate of the Pack 1 Litre and PET supply source. How will I address/approach my decisions in the next round:For the next round, I will do some further research in order to solve the rejection rate of the Pack 1 Litre and PET supply source. I will calculate transport cost when evaluating supplier to take advantage of cost methods that ensure cost efficiency.?Appendix 21: Reflection Report Maria Three (Round Five)Why I made the decisions I did:For this week, I have not made many changes in the procurement department. Supplier performance has been excellent in terms of delivery reliability and low level of rejection rate. In order to benefit from the further price reduction, dual-sourcing is targeted.Refer to my KPI changes for this week, I have changed in COGS, Handling cost and availability component.What was the outcome (results) of the decisions I made:The firm's supplier have performed well. In order to implement further cost reduction, the KPI in handling cost and availability component have been adapted to undertake further analysis. By doing so, I can analyse each supplier and might take advantage of dual-sourcing to benefit from cost reduction.Who did I consult with on my team:Cost analysis and preparation will be conducted to take advantage of cost reduction in dual-sourcing.What did I learn from the decisions and processes in this round:We are in the right track and past decision in the procurement department has been done well based on excellent supplier performance.How will I address/approach my decisions in the next round:I will calculate handling cost when evaluating supplier to take advantage of cost reduction in the dual-sourcing process.?Appendix 22: Reflection Report Maria Four (Round Six)Why I made the decisions I did:I selected another supplier for the packing supply by changing from our current German supplier, with 10 lead time days, to an English supplier who offers half of the lead time (5 days). The contract had negotiated to the standard of 1-day delivery windows with 98% reliability level and illustrate an excellent contract index (above one).As we are focusing on bringing high quality to the customer and to keep our cost to a minimum. I made the decision in changing the supplier to take advantage of the shorter lead time so that small lot sizes can be ordered on a more frequent basis to reduce cost in holding inventory. Also, geographical location is an important criterion to consider as it impacts the delivery lead time. England is close to our production location in the Netherlands.What was the outcome (results) of the decisions I made:The delivery rate of the English supplier in pack supply is very good and is currently 96.6 under 1-day delivery windows and 98% reliability. Therefore, the supplier is consistent with its delivery within the promised time.Who did I consult with on my team:We are emphasising on communication across the organisation to ensure a very clear communication across the operation management, supply chain management and sales department. This allows us to take advantage of different perspectives.What did I learn from the decisions and processes in this round:I have learnt that we are on the right path by focusing in supplier in high-quality products and short lead time. Moreover, the certification for the supplier is important as well. Particular in this round, I have learnt that the constant evaluation of supplier is crucial in order to eliminate early problems within the supply chain, for example, long delivery, as it has an impact on the organisation performance. How will I address/approach my decisions in the next round:For the next round, I will continue in the evaluation of each required product that meets our key source requirement and strategy and making the product available in a timely manner. I will also pay more attention to the supplier rejection rate and will calculate transport cost when evaluating supplier to take advantage of cost methods that ensure cost efficiency.?Appendix 23: Reflection Report Maria Five (Round Seven)Why I made the decisions I did:Changes in supplier have been made. Pack supplier changes from English supplier to German Supplier. Change has been made based on high rejection rate of English supplier. The German supplier has 10 days’ lead time compare to 5 days’ lead time. By doing this changes, we are hoping to take advantage of making products more available as English supplier has not performed well (see picture below) when comparing reliability performance with the rejection rate.Vitamin C supplier from the Netherlands changes to a French supplier with certification as the current Dutch supplier has no certification. This change is due as all current supplier are performing under certification and have excellent supplier performance based on the firm's strict policies in 99% delivery rate and 4 hours delivery windows. By choosing a supplier with certification, we can reduce cost in the reduction of quality inspection in the operation section while taking advantage of time reduction for the inspection.A French supplier in the PET segment has been compared to the current Dutch supplier which has low performance (illustrates in the table above). Comparing both contract index to each other, the Dutch supplier's contract index would indicate a value of 0.988 while the current supplier would perform better with an index of 1.03. Taking this into consideration, no changes in supply has been made. A similar decision has been made in the Vitamin C by changing from the current Dutch supplier to a French competitor in order to take advantage of the certification while reducing cost in the quality inspection cost in the operations sector.No changes in KPI this week and maintain in COGS, Handling cost and availability component.What was the outcome (results) of the decisions I made:The firms supplier have performed well. In order to implement further cost reduction, the KPI in handling cost and availability component have been adapted to undertake further analysis. By doing so, I can analyse each supplier and might take advantage of dual-sourcing to benefit from cost reduction.Purchase value of orders have increased which might be a result of the dual sourcing and changes in supplier. The PACK supplier was unable to meet services deliveries, therefore the English supplier (Brit Pack) changed to the German merchant (Smurfat Kippa Cartons) which result in increased cost from 108,685 with Brit Pack to 112,999 with Smurfat Kippa. Similar case can be applied to the Vitamin supply changed which result in very small cost increase. Overall, the supplier changed have results in overspendings of $20,000.Who did I consult with on my team:I spoke to the Operations manager, and will work closely together in the future. What did I learn from the decisions and processes in this round:I need to look at purchase value and consider more increase cost. As procurement is an excellent way to provide quality, make the product available and save cost. I do not need to purchase via dual sourcing as current supplier performance is excellent and dual sourcing results in high cost.How will I address/approach my decisions in the next round:We are holding the groups weekly meeting on Thursday to discuss our approach in the upcoming final round. I suggest the procurement department is looking to decrease further cost while focus on quality and high availability to ensure constant product flow. I will suggest that supply chain management and operation management should empathise further qualitative cost reduction by adapting to adequate operations facility and service level.?Appendix 24: Supplier Delivery Reliability Source: ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Connection</Author><Year>2016</Year><RecNum>239</RecNum><DisplayText>(The Fresh Connection, 2016)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>239</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="zw9zerprs5p5f3earwvvsrs5sw0rpr0v0vtr" timestamp="1476009591">239</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Web Page">12</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>The Fresh Connection,</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Analysis</title></titles><volume>2016</volume><number>October 4</number><dates><year>2016</year></dates><urls><related-urls><url>;(The Fresh Connection, 2016)Appendix 25: Delivery Reliability and Rejection RateSource: ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>The Fresh Connection</Author><Year>2016</Year><RecNum>239</RecNum><DisplayText>(The Fresh Connection, 2016)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>239</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="zw9zerprs5p5f3earwvvsrs5sw0rpr0v0vtr" timestamp="1476009591">239</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Web Page">12</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>The Fresh Connection,</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Analysis</title></titles><volume>2016</volume><number>October 4</number><dates><year>2016</year></dates><urls><related-urls><url>;(The Fresh Connection, 2016)The table below compares the rejection rate to delivery rate by using a 99% contract index with 1-day delivery windows and 97% contract index with a 4 delivery hours to estimate the best terms of contract to achieve supplier reliability.As the tables shows, the 97% contract index and 4 hours’ delivery window has a best outcome based on better performance figures as outcomes are above 80 and it has a higher average and median. Research shows that automotive companies have strict delivery windows and less strict contract index to ensure higher reliability PEVuZE5vdGU+PENpdGU+PEF1dGhvcj5TY2htaXR6PC9BdXRob3I+PFllYXI+MjAwNDwvWWVhcj48

UmVjTnVtPjIyNzwvUmVjTnVtPjxEaXNwbGF5VGV4dD4oU2NobWl0eiAmYW1wOyBQbGF0dHMsIDIw

MDQpPC9EaXNwbGF5VGV4dD48cmVjb3JkPjxyZWMtbnVtYmVyPjIyNzwvcmVjLW51bWJlcj48Zm9y

ZWlnbi1rZXlzPjxrZXkgYXBwPSJFTiIgZGItaWQ9Inp3OXplcnByczVwNWYzZWFyd3Z2c3JzNXN3

MHJwcjB2MHZ0ciIgdGltZXN0YW1wPSIxNDc1ODc2NDQ0Ij4yMjc8L2tleT48L2ZvcmVpZ24ta2V5

cz48cmVmLXR5cGUgbmFtZT0iSm91cm5hbCBBcnRpY2xlIj4xNzwvcmVmLXR5cGU+PGNvbnRyaWJ1

dG9ycz48YXV0aG9ycz48YXV0aG9yPlNjaG1pdHosIEouPC9hdXRob3I+PGF1dGhvcj5QbGF0dHMs

IEsuIFcuPC9hdXRob3I+PC9hdXRob3JzPjwvY29udHJpYnV0b3JzPjx0aXRsZXM+PHRpdGxlPlN1

cHBsaWVyIGxvZ2lzdGljcyBwZXJmb3JtYW5jZSBtZWFzdXJlbWVudDogSW5kaWNhdGlvbnMgZnJv

bSBhIHN0dWR5IGluIHRoZSBhdXRvbW90aXZlIGluZHVzdHJ5PC90aXRsZT48c2Vjb25kYXJ5LXRp

dGxlPkludGVybmF0aW9uYWwgSm91cm5hbCBvZiBQcm9kdWN0aW9uIEVjb25vbWljczwvc2Vjb25k

YXJ5LXRpdGxlPjwvdGl0bGVzPjxwZXJpb2RpY2FsPjxmdWxsLXRpdGxlPkludGVybmF0aW9uYWwg

Sm91cm5hbCBvZiBQcm9kdWN0aW9uIEVjb25vbWljczwvZnVsbC10aXRsZT48L3BlcmlvZGljYWw+

PHBhZ2VzPjIzMS0yNDM8L3BhZ2VzPjx2b2x1bWU+ODk8L3ZvbHVtZT48bnVtYmVyPjI8L251bWJl

cj48a2V5d29yZHM+PGtleXdvcmQ+U3VwcGxpZXIgZXZhbHVhdGlvbjwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29y

ZD5JbnRlci1vcmdhbmlzYXRpb25hbCBjb250cm9sPC9rZXl3b3JkPjxrZXl3b3JkPkxvZ2lzdGlj

cyBtZWFzdXJlczwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5QZXJmb3JtYW5jZSBtZWFzdXJlbWVudDwva2V5

d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5BdXRvbW90aXZlIGluZHVzdHJ5PC9rZXl3b3JkPjxrZXl3b3JkPkVOR0lO

RUVSSU5HLCBNVUxUSURJU0NJUExJTkFSWTwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5DSEFJTjwva2V5d29y

ZD48a2V5d29yZD5FTkdJTkVFUklORywgTUFOVUZBQ1RVUklORzwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5T

RUxFQ1RJT048L2tleXdvcmQ+PGtleXdvcmQ+UHJvZHVjdGlvbiBNYW5hZ2VtZW50IChNMTEpPC9r

ZXl3b3JkPjxrZXl3b3JkPk9yZ2FuaXphdGlvbiBvZiBQcm9kdWN0aW9uIChMMjMpPC9rZXl3b3Jk

PjxrZXl3b3JkPkF1dG9tb3RpdmU8L2tleXdvcmQ+PGtleXdvcmQ+VHJhbnNhY3Rpb25hbCBSZWxh

dGlvbnNoaXBzLCBDb250cmFjdHMgYW5kIFJlcHV0YXRpb24sIE5ldHdvcmtzIChMMTQpPC9rZXl3

b3JkPjxrZXl3b3JkPkF1dG9tb2JpbGVzLCBPdGhlciBUcmFuc3BvcnRhdGlvbiBFcXVpcG1lbnQg

KEw2Mik8L2tleXdvcmQ+PGtleXdvcmQ+TG9naXN0aWNzPC9rZXl3b3JkPjxrZXl3b3JkPlJlc2Vh

cmNoPC9rZXl3b3JkPjxrZXl3b3JkPkF1dG9tb2JpbGUgaW5kdXN0cnk8L2tleXdvcmQ+PGtleXdv

cmQ+SW5kdXN0cmlhbCBvcmdhbml6YXRpb248L2tleXdvcmQ+PGtleXdvcmQ+U3R1ZGllczwva2V5

d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5QZXJmb3JtYW5jZSBldmFsdWF0aW9uPC9rZXl3b3JkPjwva2V5d29yZHM+

PGRhdGVzPjx5ZWFyPjIwMDQ8L3llYXI+PC9kYXRlcz48cHViLWxvY2F0aW9uPkFNU1RFUkRBTTwv

cHViLWxvY2F0aW9uPjxwdWJsaXNoZXI+RWxzZXZpZXIgQi5WPC9wdWJsaXNoZXI+PGlzYm4+MDky

NS01MjczPC9pc2JuPjx1cmxzPjxyZWxhdGVkLXVybHM+PHVybD5odHRwOi8vcXV0LnN1bW1vbi5z

ZXJpYWxzc29sdXRpb25zLmNvbS8yLjAuMC9saW5rLzAvZUx2SENYTXdwVjFSYjlNd0VMWVFEd2lF

R0F3WTJVRHlBd193a05XeDNjVGhqUlVtZUFhZVQ0N3RpRWlzaTVwMFl2LWVPeWRwU3djQ3dVT1V5

cjY2OGZsNmR6bmZmV1pNeVZPUjd1bUVyTTVwLWIxSGV5SzlxalBscEtuOHZLdzE0YTNrZV9HM3M1

MGt5OUVTREJvLTZ1NnhaVGJ5ZHRZMnpleVRLR1VFRXhQREt4X2hmNUp2VDhDUDc4NDJ1aGsxY2RU

TlNKd1M5YmFtWnhnaE5yNFM4blVjSkZXX3MxYjc2aHRkMjFWb2d5UEFVWGZacnJ0ZjJyRm9zODRQ

MkxRX1BFWFF2dDBvVWJpSkNma2ZySGpJSG96ZUxYODcwRDFpdDhMeWtOMlprdXNQMmIwZC1NUEhE

T0tSb2poVFB0UWhOYTdqN2JhUWdWOXM0NWR2LU1lbG44S0xuR3BpdU9VUkdwYzNTNDVPTExmclBp

WVdYZ1ZzaWNlUlhEOWhYODdmZjE1OFNNY0RIMUtIYWtlbVFmazVnZE80UEJkR2E5cGkxSE1yYkY1

cFo5RVZxMHdkVEtWMGhjSlVaMVh0S2hXSzJnU1JPWnRWV3FpbjdMNmx3b0JsSHdzSV9UUEdGYW9v

WFZycE5RNHBmSUgtV0duUlN3MGVfME9sTEJKMk9xMHd0QVBBQjJ3ejM1Q1RRS3dFSVNFeUUxVEN6

Q1FIOE5PQ0FCcWhQMzMxaU9RR1NIZjBLLXNpMG5xaFM0MDlKNU1vZ2Ewb3lPWDZEbENBQ1ZzbzIt

MGRWVXdIbE95bTV6bzNDVnRFMmRzOGZnZ0J5WU83aEN0UTF1QVAyMnU4U0JydzF0Qkh2RnE2cXd5

a1Z2QzF2MGpZeTBGeU44Tkk2UERKUVNvdGRZRXpFZEJfNzNFS2UyVEtvTkpIVHc4SDJKWDRUWC1F

V01LWDdyaVRsTW1FWlg5RHRoZ1I2Z21ab1RfLWQ1YWZzTHREcmhVRnpaNnoyXzFxSFY3RW90NGZu

MzVtRVE8L3VybD48L3JlbGF0ZWQtdXJscz48L3VybHM+PGVsZWN0cm9uaWMtcmVzb3VyY2UtbnVt

PjEwLjEwMTYvUzA5MjUtNTI3MygwMikwMDQ2OS0zPC9lbGVjdHJvbmljLXJlc291cmNlLW51bT48

L3JlY29yZD48L0NpdGU+PC9FbmROb3RlPgB=

ADDIN EN.CITE PEVuZE5vdGU+PENpdGU+PEF1dGhvcj5TY2htaXR6PC9BdXRob3I+PFllYXI+MjAwNDwvWWVhcj48

UmVjTnVtPjIyNzwvUmVjTnVtPjxEaXNwbGF5VGV4dD4oU2NobWl0eiAmYW1wOyBQbGF0dHMsIDIw

MDQpPC9EaXNwbGF5VGV4dD48cmVjb3JkPjxyZWMtbnVtYmVyPjIyNzwvcmVjLW51bWJlcj48Zm9y

ZWlnbi1rZXlzPjxrZXkgYXBwPSJFTiIgZGItaWQ9Inp3OXplcnByczVwNWYzZWFyd3Z2c3JzNXN3

MHJwcjB2MHZ0ciIgdGltZXN0YW1wPSIxNDc1ODc2NDQ0Ij4yMjc8L2tleT48L2ZvcmVpZ24ta2V5

cz48cmVmLXR5cGUgbmFtZT0iSm91cm5hbCBBcnRpY2xlIj4xNzwvcmVmLXR5cGU+PGNvbnRyaWJ1

dG9ycz48YXV0aG9ycz48YXV0aG9yPlNjaG1pdHosIEouPC9hdXRob3I+PGF1dGhvcj5QbGF0dHMs

IEsuIFcuPC9hdXRob3I+PC9hdXRob3JzPjwvY29udHJpYnV0b3JzPjx0aXRsZXM+PHRpdGxlPlN1

cHBsaWVyIGxvZ2lzdGljcyBwZXJmb3JtYW5jZSBtZWFzdXJlbWVudDogSW5kaWNhdGlvbnMgZnJv

bSBhIHN0dWR5IGluIHRoZSBhdXRvbW90aXZlIGluZHVzdHJ5PC90aXRsZT48c2Vjb25kYXJ5LXRp

dGxlPkludGVybmF0aW9uYWwgSm91cm5hbCBvZiBQcm9kdWN0aW9uIEVjb25vbWljczwvc2Vjb25k

YXJ5LXRpdGxlPjwvdGl0bGVzPjxwZXJpb2RpY2FsPjxmdWxsLXRpdGxlPkludGVybmF0aW9uYWwg

Sm91cm5hbCBvZiBQcm9kdWN0aW9uIEVjb25vbWljczwvZnVsbC10aXRsZT48L3BlcmlvZGljYWw+

PHBhZ2VzPjIzMS0yNDM8L3BhZ2VzPjx2b2x1bWU+ODk8L3ZvbHVtZT48bnVtYmVyPjI8L251bWJl

cj48a2V5d29yZHM+PGtleXdvcmQ+U3VwcGxpZXIgZXZhbHVhdGlvbjwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29y

ZD5JbnRlci1vcmdhbmlzYXRpb25hbCBjb250cm9sPC9rZXl3b3JkPjxrZXl3b3JkPkxvZ2lzdGlj

cyBtZWFzdXJlczwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5QZXJmb3JtYW5jZSBtZWFzdXJlbWVudDwva2V5

d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5BdXRvbW90aXZlIGluZHVzdHJ5PC9rZXl3b3JkPjxrZXl3b3JkPkVOR0lO

RUVSSU5HLCBNVUxUSURJU0NJUExJTkFSWTwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5DSEFJTjwva2V5d29y

ZD48a2V5d29yZD5FTkdJTkVFUklORywgTUFOVUZBQ1RVUklORzwva2V5d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5T

RUxFQ1RJT048L2tleXdvcmQ+PGtleXdvcmQ+UHJvZHVjdGlvbiBNYW5hZ2VtZW50IChNMTEpPC9r

ZXl3b3JkPjxrZXl3b3JkPk9yZ2FuaXphdGlvbiBvZiBQcm9kdWN0aW9uIChMMjMpPC9rZXl3b3Jk

PjxrZXl3b3JkPkF1dG9tb3RpdmU8L2tleXdvcmQ+PGtleXdvcmQ+VHJhbnNhY3Rpb25hbCBSZWxh

dGlvbnNoaXBzLCBDb250cmFjdHMgYW5kIFJlcHV0YXRpb24sIE5ldHdvcmtzIChMMTQpPC9rZXl3

b3JkPjxrZXl3b3JkPkF1dG9tb2JpbGVzLCBPdGhlciBUcmFuc3BvcnRhdGlvbiBFcXVpcG1lbnQg

KEw2Mik8L2tleXdvcmQ+PGtleXdvcmQ+TG9naXN0aWNzPC9rZXl3b3JkPjxrZXl3b3JkPlJlc2Vh

cmNoPC9rZXl3b3JkPjxrZXl3b3JkPkF1dG9tb2JpbGUgaW5kdXN0cnk8L2tleXdvcmQ+PGtleXdv

cmQ+SW5kdXN0cmlhbCBvcmdhbml6YXRpb248L2tleXdvcmQ+PGtleXdvcmQ+U3R1ZGllczwva2V5

d29yZD48a2V5d29yZD5QZXJmb3JtYW5jZSBldmFsdWF0aW9uPC9rZXl3b3JkPjwva2V5d29yZHM+

PGRhdGVzPjx5ZWFyPjIwMDQ8L3llYXI+PC9kYXRlcz48cHViLWxvY2F0aW9uPkFNU1RFUkRBTTwv

cHViLWxvY2F0aW9uPjxwdWJsaXNoZXI+RWxzZXZpZXIgQi5WPC9wdWJsaXNoZXI+PGlzYm4+MDky

NS01MjczPC9pc2JuPjx1cmxzPjxyZWxhdGVkLXVybHM+PHVybD5odHRwOi8vcXV0LnN1bW1vbi5z

ZXJpYWxzc29sdXRpb25zLmNvbS8yLjAuMC9saW5rLzAvZUx2SENYTXdwVjFSYjlNd0VMWVFEd2lF

R0F3WTJVRHlBd193a05XeDNjVGhqUlVtZUFhZVQ0N3RpRWlzaTVwMFl2LWVPeWRwU3djQ3dVT1V5

cjY2OGZsNmR6bmZmV1pNeVZPUjd1bUVyTTVwLWIxSGV5SzlxalBscEtuOHZLdzE0YTNrZV9HM3M1

MGt5OUVTREJvLTZ1NnhaVGJ5ZHRZMnpleVRLR1VFRXhQREt4X2hmNUp2VDhDUDc4NDJ1aGsxY2RU

TlNKd1M5YmFtWnhnaE5yNFM4blVjSkZXX3MxYjc2aHRkMjFWb2d5UEFVWGZacnJ0ZjJyRm9zODRQ

MkxRX1BFWFF2dDBvVWJpSkNma2ZySGpJSG96ZUxYODcwRDFpdDhMeWtOMlprdXNQMmIwZC1NUEhE

T0tSb2poVFB0UWhOYTdqN2JhUWdWOXM0NWR2LU1lbG44S0xuR3BpdU9VUkdwYzNTNDVPTExmclBp

WVdYZ1ZzaWNlUlhEOWhYODdmZjE1OFNNY0RIMUtIYWtlbVFmazVnZE80UEJkR2E5cGkxSE1yYkY1

cFo5RVZxMHdkVEtWMGhjSlVaMVh0S2hXSzJnU1JPWnRWV3FpbjdMNmx3b0JsSHdzSV9UUEdGYW9v

WFZycE5RNHBmSUgtV0duUlN3MGVfME9sTEJKMk9xMHd0QVBBQjJ3ejM1Q1RRS3dFSVNFeUUxVEN6

Q1FIOE5PQ0FCcWhQMzMxaU9RR1NIZjBLLXNpMG5xaFM0MDlKNU1vZ2Ewb3lPWDZEbENBQ1ZzbzIt

MGRWVXdIbE95bTV6bzNDVnRFMmRzOGZnZ0J5WU83aEN0UTF1QVAyMnU4U0JydzF0Qkh2RnE2cXd5

a1Z2QzF2MGpZeTBGeU44Tkk2UERKUVNvdGRZRXpFZEJfNzNFS2UyVEtvTkpIVHc4SDJKWDRUWC1F

V01LWDdyaVRsTW1FWlg5RHRoZ1I2Z21ab1RfLWQ1YWZzTHREcmhVRnpaNnoyXzFxSFY3RW90NGZu

MzVtRVE8L3VybD48L3JlbGF0ZWQtdXJscz48L3VybHM+PGVsZWN0cm9uaWMtcmVzb3VyY2UtbnVt

PjEwLjEwMTYvUzA5MjUtNTI3MygwMikwMDQ2OS0zPC9lbGVjdHJvbmljLXJlc291cmNlLW51bT48

L3JlY29yZD48L0NpdGU+PC9FbmROb3RlPgB=

ADDIN EN.CITE.DATA (Schmitz & Platts, 2004). This is also likely to decrease cost based on the lower contract index and requirements. In round 6 (see Appendix 22), changes in several supplier selections have been made based on high rejection rate and results improved in the upcoming rounds.Appendix 26: Transport cost overviewSource: ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>The Fresh Connection</Author><Year>2016</Year><RecNum>239</RecNum><DisplayText>(The Fresh Connection, 2016)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>239</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="zw9zerprs5p5f3earwvvsrs5sw0rpr0v0vtr" timestamp="1476009591">239</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Web Page">12</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>The Fresh Connection,</author></authors></contributors><titles><title>Analysis</title></titles><volume>2016</volume><number>October 4</number><dates><year>2016</year></dates><urls><related-urls><url>;(The Fresh Connection, 2016)Weekly Group MeetingsAppendix 27: Weekly Summary Round OneThursday 11. August 2016Fresh Connection – Summary Round 1 Our Mission: to delivery qualitative products to our customerOUTCOME FROM PREVIOUS ROUNDReturn on Investment: -11.38%Bonus: $23,155 (from reducing shelf space in the practise round)Overflow raw materials warehousing: 361,794 (previous 42,014)Space: 595,167 (previous 308,676)PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSISSales have been not developed well based on the ROI; Gross Margin Service Level. Obsolesced level of products is okay. Based on figures in overflow raw material warehousing, changes within the supply chain are required. Particular procurement section and supplier selection are both requiring careful changes to take advantage of cost reduction.Purchasing DepartmentSupplier performance is okay. Seitan Vitamins could improve delivery reliability from previous changes in delivery windows and reliability. We focus on short lead time and high quality, particular for the most popular products orange and PET orange. All of the supplier are required to delivery within one day, 98% agree reliability rate and certification.Problem zone: PET TRIO PLSPoor Delivery reliability of 88.4% and highest purchased amount of 5,586,742 with 10 days’ lead time.Solution: Change PET supplier with better performance in reliability, delivery windows and lead time of 5 days. Changes of 1-day delivery windows and 98% reliability.Other: Overall supplier performance is satisfied and doesn’t require changes at this stage. However, it is recommended to watch this important section of the supply chain to eliminate early problems within the value chain. There is no certification for our Vitamin C supplier.Current Supplier: Pack (Germany); PET (Netherlands); Orange (Spain); Mango (Spain); Vitamin C (France)Operations DepartmentRaw materials warehousing is doubled in its usage than it has capacity. Currently 900 pallets location compare to 1826.Problem zone: Capacity of raw material warehousing palletsSolution: 1. Change to larger capacity as utilisation is larger which currently results in an overflow of approximately 50%. Change from 900 to 1950.2. Change employee in raw material warehousing from 3 to 5 to adapt to change in capacity to adapt low level in flexible manpower and taking advantage of casual payment.3. Raw material inspection per supplier to ensure quality in production process. To manage an effective quality inspection while maintaining cost efficiency, the inspection focus on the two major supplier Arancia D`Espana and Phillip Jones Plastics as these are the firms most popular products.4. Change employee in finished goods warehousing from 4 to 3 based on hours per week, which are currently 117. No changes in pallets location.Other: Changing the order line which is currently 1.Supply Chain Management High overflow of raw materials is likely to be a result of inefficient safety stock. Problem zone: Safety StockPack 1l: 1PET: 1Orange: 1 Mango: 1Vitamin C: 1Lots Size1.52.0 most popular2.01.01.0Solution: changing the safety stock to make a product available to customer instead of running out.Appendix 28: Weekly Summary Round TwoFresh Connection – Summary Round 2 Our Mission: to deliver qualitative products to our customerSupply Chain;Components - Increased safety stock and lot sizes for Mango a little as stock was running low, but didn’t want to have to much stock on hand like 1st roundChanged orange, reduced in safety stock and lot sizes Finished product – Decreased the orange 1L safety stock by 0.1 Reduced production interval for fressie Orange/Mango 1L by a small amountOperations; Warehousing – Reduced pallet locations and fixed raw materials according to results from round 2. From 1950 down to 1500 for raw materials, as space was not being fully utilizedPurchasing; Selecting another supplier for pack supply. Changed from German supplier with 10 lead time days to an English supplier with half of the lead time (5days). Contract has a 1 day delivery windows with 98% reliability and excellent contract index.Sales; Sales was only slightly altered considering that we increased stock for mango, which running low. With Better space utilization of our warehousing, We negotiated a new deal with Dominicks to extend the order deadline, which increased the overall contract index for them. We made the smallest revenue last week through Dominicks so hopefully this change will see an increase in revenue. Fresh Connection – Summary Round 4 Our Mission: to deliver qualitative products to our customerOUTCOME FROM PREVIOUS ROUNDReturn on Investment: 4.82Bonus: - $31,478PURCHASINGChanged terms of supplier contract by delivering within 4 with 99% reliability instead of 1-day delivery to 95% reliability. Supplier performance has developed well, however, I evaluate supplier constantly to ensure quality and low price of raw material. KPIS are currently: Raw Material cost, rejection component, delivery reliability supplier. Changed from the raw material cost of goods while maintaining performance measurement in rejection component and delivery reliability supplier to focus on cost, rejection, and quality.OPERATIONSThe raw materials warehouse was relatively empty, with pallet locations open. Pallet locations in raw materials were at 33.6% utilization. Therefore, a reduction of pallet locations was carried out and the number of FTE’s (full-time employees) was reduced as well and intake time. Finished goods pallet locations were left as it is from previous weeks decisions. As it had a and 80% utilization and more stock is expected to be ordered therefore it allows flexibility if more pallets are needed. KPI choices included - Cube utilization - Flexible labor raw materials warehouse - Production plan adherence No other changes were made in operations.SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENTFor components: Increase safety stock of Orange, Mango, and Vitamin C as well as lot sizes. For Production changed from 1 week to 3 weeks in Frozen period of production. For Products: Increased safety stock for Orange/Mango and Orange/Vitamin C Liter and Pet.SALESAltered promotional pressure from middle to light for Food and Grocers in order to lift Contract Index above 1, we must do so to keep our product premium. No other drastic changes in sales, relying on Operations and Supply chain management to increase service levels through utilization of raw materials and production of finished goods. Changed KPI from gross margin to availability components to see the percentage of components that was available for production when demanded.Appendix 29: Weekly Summary Round FiveFresh Connection – Summary Round 5Our Mission: to deliver qualitative products to our customerOUTCOME FROM PREVIOUS ROUNDReturn on Investment: 6.74 (from 7.36%)Bonus: -43,910PURCHASINGDual sourcing in Orange supplier, which is the most popular product. Current supplier is a Spanish supplier (high quality, short lead time of 10 Days and Certification). Dual sourcing would be made from another Spanish supplier, with similar features (15 days lead time, middle quality and certification). Dual-sourcing would be made with US Supplier (high quality, 30 days’ lead time and certification). Dual sourcing will allow the business to take advantage of flexibility in not rely on supplier to handle the current demand and to ensure availability. Dual sourcing is costly is expensive, but provides product to our customer. And when managed adequantly, it can lead to cost savings as well service lea times improvements.KPI in shelf availability (sales) and safety stock of finished product (Supply Chain) is important. KPIs are changed to fit the purpose of dual-sourcing. Current KPIS are distribution cost, handling cost and availability components.Changed terms of supplier contract by delivering within 4 with 99% reliability instead of 1-day delivery to 95% reliability. Supplier performance has developed well, however, I evaluate supplier constantly to ensure quality and low price of raw material. KPIS are currently: Raw Material cost, rejection component, delivery reliability supplier. Changed from the raw material cost of goods while maintaining performance measurement in rejection component and delivery reliability supplier to focus on cost, rejection, and quality.OPERATIONSDecisions made in operations this week included : added inspections in raw materials (NO8DO Mango and SYI "vitamin C) 1 extra FT employee in raw and finished materials warehouse in response to new packaging of trade units.SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENTThere was a lack of safety stock and lot sizes for the Orange, Mango and Vitamin C components and finished product leaving warehouse with unused space and with pallet locations open from previous week to this week, 50% to 70%. Keep frozen period of production at 4 weeks. Increased products safety stock in order to use warehousing space more efficiently, aiming for 80% usage. Changes in the supply chain: For components, increase the safety stock of Orange, Mango, and Vitamin C by 0.2 (weeks). Production interval (days) changed from 6, 7, 9, 6, 6, 8 to 6, 7, 10, 6, 6, 11 respectively. Calculating reduction in total costs of almost 3k, reducing total time (hours), maintaining 79% utilization rate in the bottling line.SALESBased on service levels dropping and increases in penalties the following changes occurred; Sales; changed shelf life agreement for food and grocers from 75-80%. Closed off order deadline fromm 8pm to 5pm, but gave them the option to have there units in boxes rather then pallet layers, this means they are allowed to order smaller units and more frequently. Contract index agreement is now 1.0421, from 1.014. Changed trade unit pallet layer to pallets, and shelf life agreement up to 80% from 75%. Contract index went from 0.962 to 0.988 Changed shelf life agreement from 75 to 80% for Dominicks. This increased contract index from 1.027 to 1.041. Appendix 30: Weekly Summary Round SixFresh Connection – Summary Round 6Our Mission: to deliver qualitative products to our customerOUTCOME FROM PREVIOUS ROUNDReturn on Investment: 5.3Penalties: (-46,344)PURCHASINGChanges in supplier have been made. Pack supplier changes from English supplier to German Supplier. Change has been made based on high rejection rate of English supplier. The German supplier has 10 days’ lead time compare to 5 days’ lead time. By doing this changes, we are hoping to take advantage of making products more available as English supplier has not performed well (see picture below) when comparing reliability performance with the rejection rate.ProductSupplierAgreed Reliability (%)RejectionAgreed Reliability / Rejection RatePackBrit99.12.638.1PetPhilip98.92.934.1Vitamin CSyi99.13.726.8MangoMango98.81.758.1OrangeArancia97.8197.8OrangeMedina1000#DIV/0! Vitamin C supplier from the Netherlands changes to a French supplier with certification as the current dutch supplier has no certification. This change is due as all current supplier are performing under certification and have excellent supplier performance based on the firm's strict policies in 99% delivery rate and 4 hours delivery windows. By choosing a supplier with certification, we can reduce cost in the reduction of quality inspection in the operation section while taking advantage of time reduction for the inspection.A French supplier in the PET segment has been compared to the current Dutch supplier which has low performance (illustrates in the table above). Comparing both contract index to each other, the Dutch supplier's contract index would indicate a value of 0.988 while the current supplier would perform better with an index of 1.03. Taking this into consideration, no changes in supply has been made. A similar decision has been made in the Vitamin C by changing from the current Dutch supplier to a French competitor in order to take advantage of the certification while reducing cost in the quality inspection cost in the operations sector.OPERATIONSIn operations, our main focus for round 7 was in reducing costs. The quality control measures were reduced by removing all raw material inspections from suppliers due to them being costly, and increasing lead times. Moreover, the purchasing department has decided upon having suppliers that have certification and good quality so there is little need for them either way. Furthermore, from last week decisions; the increase of employees and their intake time were very costly. So these were reduced in both raw materials and the finished goods warehouse from 4 to 2 full-time employees. Pallet locations were reduced in the finished goods warehouse from 1100 to 800 to reduce wastage as utilization was at 67%.SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENTChanges in the supply chain: Stock management components: Pack 1 liter, Orange, Vitamin C, Safety stock (weeks) changed from 1.4 to 1.3 / 1.5 to 1.4 / 1.4 to 1.3 respectively to reduce costs in the warehouse from unnecessary inventories for these components. Products: The finished products Fressie Orange/C-power PET, Fressie Orange 1 liter and Fressie Orange PET have a high obsoletes percentage. Fressie Orange PET Safety stock (weeks) from 2.2 to 2.3 to increase safety stock. Fressie Orange/C-power PET Safety stock (weeks) from 1.8 to 1.9 due to increasing safety stock. Fressie Orange 1 liter Safety stock (weeks) from 2.2 to 2.0 Fressie Orange/C-power 1 liter has a low level of stock, Increase the safety stock (weeks) 1.4 to 1.8. Frozen period of production (weeks) changed from 4 to 3 weeks to increase customer levels.SALESChanges made in the sales area were made after discussing the strategic approach we should be making to reduce penalties and handling costs (direct and indirect) although revenue has increased. After discussing with the supply chain manager on stock levels and quality management, changes were made in regards to reducing the obsolete costs, trying to achieve better service level agreements. Specific changes in every customer sales category were made to tackle these issues: -Increases in promotional activity was made from medium to high for Land Market, hopefully reducing obsoletes by increasing turnover of products from better sales. -Payment terms for Food and Grocer were extended from 4-5 weeks with an aim to increase service level. Increasing contract index from 1.038 to 1.044. - Pallet Layer has been selected over pallets for Dominick’s In a way to approach better service delivery and meet required orders. The promotion has been changed from Medium back down to light to continue our quality/fresh Brand image. As a result, overall contract indices increased to 1.050.Appendix 31: Weekly Summary Round SevenFresh Connection – Summary Round 7Our Mission: to deliver qualitative products to our customerOUTCOME FROM PREVIOUS ROUNDReturn on Investment: 2.56Bonus: -154,302PURCHASINGRemoved the dual sourcing in the orange product to reduce cost. Due to financial figure, the dual sourcing has led to increased cost and supplier performance nor higher product availability has not been achieved. Change the contract index from 99% to 97% as current delivery reliability has an average of 98.3%, with the lowest value of 97.7%. The figures are excellent and have been achieved since the earlier rounds, however in reducing the contract index will allow every supplier to meet current delivery requirements. OPERATIONSFor round 7 operations is performing at an optimal level with cube utilization in raw materials warehouse at 86.9%, cube utilization in the finished goods warehouse at 93.1% and 92.7% production plan adherence. The only issue that was raised was the hours for workers in the finished goods warehouse where between two workers there was 115 hours reducing the delivery efficiency of finished goods. Therefore, an additional worker has been added to resolve this issue.SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENTThere was a lack of safety stock for Fressie Orange/C-Power 1 liter and Fressie Orange/Mango 1 liter, Increased safety stock to ensure finished product reliability. Change frozen period of production from 3 to 4 weeks to increase customer levels and flexibility of production. Changes in the supply chain: Products: The finished products Fressie Orange/C-power PET, Fressie Orange 1 liter and Fressie Orange PET have a high obsoletes percentage. Fressie Orange PET Safety stock (weeks) from 2.3 to 2.1 decreasing safety stock but reducing production interval (days) from 6 to 5 days. Fressie Orange/C-power PET Safety stock (weeks) from 1.9 to 1.7 decreasing production interval from 10 to 9 (days). Fressie Orange 1 liter Safety stock (weeks) from 2.2 to 2.0, decreasing production inverval as well from 6 to 5 days.Fressie Orange/C-power 1 liter & Fressie Orange/Mango 1 liter has a low level of stock, Increase the safety stock (weeks) 1.6 to 1.8 & 10 to 8 / 7 to 6 respectively reduction in production intervals. Frozen period of production (weeks) changed from 3 to 4 weeks to increase customer levels.SALESThis round we aim to not trigger too many promises that are unrealistic, performances must be inline with agreements and agreements must be inline with our performance. Therefore we will focus on changes in service level and shelf life agreements, whilst keeping obseletes in mind. Changes in our Sales:Food and Groceries - Service level agreement was altered from 95% down to 92%, as this is the level we are performing at for them currently. We do not want to over promise, performance should meet our agreement. Shelf life agreement is currently at 80% but we are performing close to 90%. Therefore shelf life has been changed to 85%. Agreed Contract index therefore dropped from 1.0439 to 1.0034. Although the drop, the index is still above 1 and gives Food and Groceries a perceived premium quality.LAND market- Service level was changed from 95 to 92%. Promotional pressure has been changed from Heavy to middle to aim for consistency. Overall agreed Contract index dropped from 0.987 to 0.9523, closer to where land market is performing (0.951)Dominick’s – they are performing well within our agreements and it is seen in to be a financially stable investment for TFC. Contract index agreement was at 1.0503 – changed to 1.0188 Closer to the Performance in the market which is 1.036 ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download