Cognitive Demand Defined Participant Handouts
[Pages:84]Cognitive Demand Defined
Participant Handouts
Elementary Mathematics
Los Angeles Unified School District
Paint the Building
? On Monday, a painter had to paint a building that was shaped like a cube. When she read the label on the can of paint, she realized one can of paint would cover one face of the building. She had to paint all four sides and the roof of the building.
? On Tuesday, she had to paint the building next door. It was the size of two of the first buildings put together.
? On Wednesday, she had to paint the third building on the block. It was the size of three of the cubic buildings put together.
? On Thursday, she had to paint yet another building that was, of course, like four of the cubic buildings put together.
Your job is to figure out how many gallons of paint she would need each day. Continue this pattern up to ten cubic units put together? Use the T chart to help you. Create a formula to help you figure out how many gallons of paint it would take to paint a building 23 cubic units long.
The formula is__________________. It would take __________ gallons of paint to cover a building 23 cubic units long.
HO # 1
HO # 2
HO # 3
HO # 3b
Identifying Cognitive Demand: Task Analysis Guide
Lower-Level Cognitive Demands
Memorization Tasks
Procedures Without
Connections Tasks
Higher Level Cognitive Demands
Procedures With
Doing Mathematics Tasks
Connections Tasks
? Involves either producing ? Are algorithmic. Use of ? Focus students' attention on the use ? Requires complex and non-
previously learned facts,
the procedure is either
of procedures for the purpose of
algorithmic thinking (i.e., there is not
rules, formulae, or
specifically called for or
developing deeper levels of
a predictable, well-rehearsed
definitions OR committing
its use is evident based
understanding of mathematical
approach or pathway explicitly
facts, rules, formulae, or
on prior instruction,
concepts and ideas.
suggested by the task, task
definitions to memory.
experience, or placement ? Suggest pathways to follow
instructions, or a worked-out
? Cannot be solved using
of the task.
(explicitly or implicitly) that are
example).
procedures because a
? Require limited cognitive broad general procedures that have ? Requires students to explore and to
procedure does not exist or
demand for successful
close connections to underlying
understand the nature of
because the time frame in
completion. There is
conceptual ideas as opposed to
mathematical concepts, processes, or
which the task is being
little ambiguity about
narrow algorithms that are opaque
relationships.
completed is too short to
what needs to be done
with respect to underlying concepts. ? Demands self-monitoring or self-
use a procedure.
and how to do it.
? Usually are represented in multiple
regulation of one's own cognitive
? Are not ambiguous ? such ? Have no connection to
ways (e.g., visual diagrams,
processes.
tasks involve exact
the concepts or meaning
manipulatives, symbols, problem ? Requires students to access relevant
reproduction of previously
that underlie the
situations). Making connections
knowledge and experiences and
seen material and what is
procedure being used.
among multiple representations
make appropriate use of them in
to be reproduced is clearly ? Are focused on
helps to develop meaning.
working through the task.
and directly stated.
producing correct
? Require some degree of cognitive ? Requires students to analyze the task
? Have no connection to the
answers rather than
effort. Although general procedures and actively examine task constraints
concepts or meaning that
developing mathematical
may be followed, they cannot be
that may limit possible solution
underlie the facts, rules,
understanding.
followed mindlessly. Students need strategies and solutions.
formulae, or definitions
? Require no explanations,
to engage with the conceptual ideas ? Requires considerable cognitive
being learned or
or explanations that focus that underlie the procedures in order effort and may involve some level of
reproduced.
solely on describing the
to successfully complete the task
anxiety for the student due to the
procedure that was used.
and develop understanding.
unpredictable nature of the solution
process required.
? 2001 University of Pittsburgh
HO # 4
Thinking Through a Lesson Protocol
Considering and Addressing Student Misconceptions and Errors
Los Angeles Unified School District Elementary Mathematics Participant Handouts Fourth Grade 2007-2008
HO # 1
Overview of Activities
? Examine Thinking Through a Lesson Protocol (TTLP) ? Engage in Fourth Grade Lesson considering components of
the TTLP that the facilitator demonstrates ? Debrief the lesson with the TTLP as a frame for discussion ? Anticipate student misconceptions ? Review concept lesson and consider how student
misconceptions are addressed
HO # 2
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- thinking deeply thinking differently untangling the web
- deeper learning through questioning lincs
- knowing god more deeply
- beyond postmodernity living and thinking a nietzschean
- grimsby fish dock number two 8way thinking and around
- critical thinking glossary quia
- chapter 1 what is critical thinking
- cognitive demand defined participant handouts
- creative approaches to problem solving
Related searches
- vanguard retirement plan participant website
- defined benefit vs defined contribution
- john hancock 401k participant website
- participant modeling definition psychology
- 401 k participant loan rules
- participant loan fund
- deemed distributions of participant loans
- empower retirement 401k participant loan
- start now participant workbook
- all of us participant portal
- participant fee disclosure notice
- annual participant recordkeeping fees o