Allocation - American Psychological Association



Sample FiguresThe figures in this document demonstrate APA Style formatting for figures as described in the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). The figures are labeled (e.g., sample bar graph) to assist users in understanding the formats. These labels would not appear in an actual paper. For more information on tables, please see the APA Style website. Sample Bar Graph Figure 1Framing Scores for Different Reward SizesNote. Framing scores of adolescents and young adults are shown for low and high risks and for small, medium, and large rewards (error bars show standard errors).Sample Line Graph Figure 3Mean Regression Slopes in Experiment 1Note. Mean regression slopes in Experiment 1 are shown for the stereo motion, biocularly viewed monocular motion, combined, and monocularly viewed monocular motion conditions, plotted by rotation amount. Error bars represent standard errors. From “Large Continuous Perspective Change With Noncoplanar Points Enables Accurate Slant Perception,” by X. M. Wang, M. Lind, and G. P. Bingham, 2018, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(10), p. 1513 (). Copyright 2018 by the American Psychological Association.Sample CONSORT Flowchart Figure 2-387985636270Analyzed (n = 41)Excluded from analysis (n = 4)Unusable data (excessive motion; n = 2)Unable to complete scan (insufficient compatible corrective lenses; n = 1)No longer met inclusion criteria (emergent psychosis at follow-up; n = 1) Lost to follow-up (n = 0)Discontinued intervention (n = 4)Withdrew voluntarily (n = 4)Completed intervention and follow-up (n = 45)Allocated to intervention (n = 49)Received allocated intervention (n = 49)Did not receive allocated intervention (n = 0)Lost to follow-up (n = 0)Discontinued intervention (n = 0)Completed intervention and follow-up (n = 21)Allocated to intervention (n = 21)Received allocated intervention (n = 21)Did not receive allocated intervention (n = 0)Analyzed (n = 21)Excluded from analysis (n = 0)AllocationFollow-UpAssessed for eligibility (n = 100)Excluded (n = 30)Did not meet inclusion criteria (n = 21)Declined to participate (n = 9)EnrollmentRandomized (n = 70)Analysis00Analyzed (n = 41)Excluded from analysis (n = 4)Unusable data (excessive motion; n = 2)Unable to complete scan (insufficient compatible corrective lenses; n = 1)No longer met inclusion criteria (emergent psychosis at follow-up; n = 1) Lost to follow-up (n = 0)Discontinued intervention (n = 4)Withdrew voluntarily (n = 4)Completed intervention and follow-up (n = 45)Allocated to intervention (n = 49)Received allocated intervention (n = 49)Did not receive allocated intervention (n = 0)Lost to follow-up (n = 0)Discontinued intervention (n = 0)Completed intervention and follow-up (n = 21)Allocated to intervention (n = 21)Received allocated intervention (n = 21)Did not receive allocated intervention (n = 0)Analyzed (n = 21)Excluded from analysis (n = 0)AllocationFollow-UpAssessed for eligibility (n = 100)Excluded (n = 30)Did not meet inclusion criteria (n = 21)Declined to participate (n = 9)EnrollmentRandomized (n = 70)AnalysisCONSORT Flowchart of ParticipantsSample Path ModelFigure 1Path Analysis Model of Associations Between ASMC and Body-Related Constructs144780135890Appearance-Related Social Media Consciousness (ASMC)Time Spent on Social MediaBody EsteemBody ComparisonBody Surveillance?0.32***?0.020.56***0.54***?0.080.070.20***?0.50***0.41***?0.42***Appearance-Related Social Media Consciousness (ASMC)Time Spent on Social MediaBody EsteemBody ComparisonBody Surveillance?0.32***?0.020.56***0.54***?0.080.070.20***?0.50***0.41***?0.42***Note. The path analysis shows associations between ASMC and endogenous body-related variables (body esteem, body comparison, and body surveillance), controlling for time spent on social media. Coefficients presented are standardized linear regression coefficients. ***p < .001.Sample Qualitative Research FigureFigure 1Organizational Framework for Racial Microaggressions in the WorkplaceRacial microaggressions in the workplaceEnvironmentalStereotypes of Black womenAssumed universality of the Black experienceInvisibilityExclusionReligion and spiritualityArmoringShiftingSupport networkSponsorship and mentorshipSelf-carePerception of racial microaggressionsReactions to racial microaggressionsConsequences and the impact of racial microaggressionsRacialmicroaggressionsProcessesCopingstrategiesRacial microaggressions in the workplaceEnvironmentalStereotypes of Black womenAssumed universality of the Black experienceInvisibilityExclusionReligion and spiritualityArmoringShiftingSupport networkSponsorship and mentorshipSelf-carePerception of racial microaggressionsReactions to racial microaggressionsConsequences and the impact of racial microaggressionsRacialmicroaggressionsProcessesCopingstrategiesSample Mixed Methods Research FigureFigure 1-28575308610ConstructTraditionalismCultural traditionalismFamily traditionalismRural lifestyleTheoryStagesDesignOpen-ended questionsItems, scalesCollectionRecording: written, audio, videoResponses to surveysConversionTranscription, translation, generative thematic categoriesCodes, scalesAxial codingItem analysisRe-contextualizationAnalysisDescriptive analyses, multivariate analysesContent analysis, thematic variablesInterpretationAnalysis of quotations, story linesModel interpretationIntegrationIntegrative analysis, drawing conclusionsQualitative Textual EvidenceQuantitative Numeric Evidence123456ConstructTraditionalismCultural traditionalismFamily traditionalismRural lifestyleTheoryStagesDesignOpen-ended questionsItems, scalesCollectionRecording: written, audio, videoResponses to surveysConversionTranscription, translation, generative thematic categoriesCodes, scalesAxial codingItem analysisRe-contextualizationAnalysisDescriptive analyses, multivariate analysesContent analysis, thematic variablesInterpretationAnalysis of quotations, story linesModel interpretationIntegrationIntegrative analysis, drawing conclusionsQualitative Textual EvidenceQuantitative Numeric Evidence123456A Multistage Paradigm for Integrative Mixed Methods Research4245610246380003485515248920002580005249555001831975255905000249555000345440003206115250825118110013208028498802863851181100277495-31757874000Sample Illustration of Experimental StimuliFigure 4Examples of Stimuli Used in Experiment 1Note. Stimuli were computer-generated cartoon bees that varied on four binary dimensions, for a total of 16 unique stimuli. They had two or six legs, a striped or spotted body, single or double wings, and antennae or no antennae. The two stimuli shown here demonstrate the use of opposite values on all four binary dimensions.Sample MapFigure 1 Poverty Rate in the United States, 2017 Note. The map does not include data for Puerto Rico. Adapted from 2017 Poverty Rate in the United States, by U.S. Census Bureau, 2017 (). In the public domain. ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download