UNITED STATES ARMY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

The victim countered that the appellant could borrow $40.00 or $50.00, but the appellant stated that such a low amount would barely provide his transportation. At this point, the stories diverge. The victim testified that he did not waver from the previous $40.00 or $50.00 limit when he then gave the appellant his automatic teller machine (ATM ... ................
................