Argumentative Essay Rubric .edu
Argumentative Essay Rubric
| |Aspirational |Acceptable |Marginal |Unacceptable |
|Intro Paragraph |Thesis clearly states a relevant |Thesis states a relevant position, but |Thesis is largely unclear or is not |Thesis is completely unclear, not |
| |position. Argument preview complete, |is somewhat vague or unclear. Preview|directly relevant to assignment. |relevant, or missing entirely. No |
| |in same order as body of essay, not |is incomplete, not in correct order; |Little identifiable preview, or preview|preview of argument. Paragraph consists |
|Thesis |simple recitation of class material. |some recitation of class material. |is largely class material. Contains |largely of opinion, filler, or |
|Preview of argument |Contains nothing other than thesis and |Nothing other than thesis and preview. |sentences that are neither preview nor |"contextualizing" material. |
| |preview. | |thesis. | |
|Body paragraphs and |Main points directly develop preview |Main points develop preview, but not |One or more points not clearly related |Ideas have little or nothing to do with |
|Concluding paragraph |and explicitly link to thesis. No |all are explicitly linked to thesis. |to either preview or thesis. |the assignment, and/or are poorly |
| |extraneous material is included. |Little to no extraneous material is |Extraneous material is included. |developed. Evident that reading |
| |Accurate account of material from |included. Most information from |Significant errors in material from |material has not been understood. Body |
| |readings, restated in own words; any |readings is restated in own words, with|readings; most information is quoted; |is Frankensteinian: largely |
| |quotations are few, short, seamlessly |errors being few and small; one |two quotations are long, inaccurate, |stitched-together quotes, many of which |
| |integrated, and correctly referenced. |quotation is somewhat too long, not |not well-integrated, or incorrectly |may also be inaccurate. More than two |
| |Conclusion effectively restates |well-integrated, or incorrectly |referenced. Conclusion doesn't |references for quotations are missing. |
| |argument. |referenced. Conclusion restates thesis|effectively capture thesis and/or |No conclusion, or mere repetition of |
| | |but not full argument. |argument. |intro. |
|Structure |Logical progression of ideas with a |Logical progression of ideas; |Some level of disorganization/lacunae |High level of disorganization or large |
|Transitions |clear argumentative structure. |argumentative structure can be followed|disrupts progression of ideas. |lacunae. More than one transition is |
| |Transitions are graceful. |although it is not clearly developed. |Argumentative structure not easy to |missing. |
| | |All transitions are present. |follow. A transition is missing. | |
|Sentences |Writing is clear, concise, and |Writing is clear and coherent, but |Writing is clear, but sometimes lacks |Writing is unclear, confusing, |
|Diction |coherent. Sentences are strong and |sometimes wordy. Sentences have |coherence or is often wordy. Sentences|incoherent, or verbose. Contains |
|Mechanics |expressive, with varied structure. |varied structure. There are no |lack variety. One question appears. |fragments and/or run-on sentences. Two |
|Format |There are no questions. Diction is |questions. Diction is usually |Diction is often inappropriate. Two |or more questions are included. |
| |consistently appropriate to formal |appropriate to formal writing. No more|philosophical or other words are |Inappropriate diction. Three or more |
| |writing. All language is accurate and |than one philosophical or other word is|inaccurate or used incorrectly. There |philosophical or other words are |
| |used correctly. No errors in |inaccurate or used incorrectly. There |are three to five errors in |inaccurate or used incorrectly. Six or |
| |punctuation, spelling, capitalization. |are no more than two errors in |punctuation, spelling, or |more errors in punctuation, spelling, or|
| |Essay has a title, author's name on |punctuation, spelling, or |capitalization. Two format errors. |capitalization. More than two format |
| |each page, all pages numbered, 12 point|capitalization. One format error. | |errors. |
| |font, easily legible print. | | | |
My thanks to Dr DeSoto of Glendale Community College for access to her ENG 101 rubric, which helped in developing this one.
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
Related searches
- essay rubric pdf
- informative essay rubric pdf
- essay rubric examples
- college essay rubric template
- expository essay rubric high school
- college essay rubric pdf
- expository essay rubric pdf
- descriptive essay rubric college
- college essay rubric examples
- high school essay rubric examples
- narrative essay rubric high school
- narrative essay rubric pdf