Is Commercial Speech Permitted on Government Access …
Is Commercial Speech Permitted on Government Access Channels?
By Neil Lehto
Whether commercial speech is permitted on a government access channel depends on the complex interweaving of local, state and federal law regulating cable television. While some cable television franchises specifically prohibit advertising or require that public, educational and governmental (“PEG”) access channels be operated on a non-commercial basis, that is not uniformly the case. Statutes or administrative rules in some states prohibit the commercial use of PEG channels. New York State’s rule has been the subject of at least two reported court cases. [i]
In the absence of prohibiting language in the local franchise or state law, some government access channels managers may be surprised to learn that the U.S. Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984, as amended, does not specifically preclude commercial speech on PEG channels. What is particularly important to note is that the U.S. Congress did not import the Federal Communications Commission’s (“FCC”) noncommercial limitation on PEG channels when drafting the 1984 Act. In fact, the FCC’s 1972 PEG rules prohibited the presentation of any advertising material designed to promote the sale of commercial products or services including political advertising on public and educational channels only -- not government access channels. [ii]
Cable television franchises that make no prohibition on commercial speech, satisfy what U.S. Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy noted in his opinion in the Denver Area: “Substantive limitations on the types of programming on [PEG] channels … [are] left to franchise agreements, so long as the channels comport in some sense with the industry practice to which Congress referred in the statute.” Few courts have addressed complaints by cable operators about advertising on governmental access channels under federal law. The two courts that have addressed the issued carefully avoided deciding that a government channel can never run advertiser-supported or commercial programming under the First Amendment or the 1984 Cable Act.[iii] Quite to the contrary, the lower court in the Time Warner case explicitly ruled: “If a municipality determines advertising is useful to fund programming on local government at work or other appropriate PEG programming, I find nothing in the Cable Act that would prevent a municipality from doing so.” [iv]
In the last few years, an increasing number of government access channels have accepted commercial advertising. For example, the City of Richmond, California, is selling advertising packages on its government access channel. The most expensive 30-day package is $475 for 32 plays with 24 during prime time (5 – 11 p.m.). Each advertisement is 30 second, produced by the city staff. Richmond’s franchise prohibits the commercial use of its government access channel and so the sale of advertising packages is designed to come within if not barely exceed the enhanced underwriting and donor acknowledgement rules adopted by the FCC and followed by public broadcast stations. [v] Even a community where the franchise specifically prohibits the commercial use of PEG channels can legally seek underwriting.
In fact, it may be advisable for communities to limit the types of advertising it accepts. Cities that accept advertising may create a public forum for all kinds of objectionable advertising. Therefore, they should exercise care in developing a written policy setting forth types of acceptable advertising. In doing so, the City should be careful to avoid creating opportunities for arguments that it is engaged in viewpoint discrimination. [vi] They should consider the implications of accepting birth control or pregnancy advice clinic advertising, for example. A similar issue arose when MTV just recently turned down a commercial that was against the war because it has an advertising policy against advocacy.
Perhaps an issue more unique to government access channels is the area of conflict of interest. Should a government access channel accept sponsorship funding from an entity that bids on City contracts, provides services to the City or is currently lobbying controversial legislation under the purview of the City? It is a good idea to involve legal counsel in the process of developing advertising rules. A clear written policy, well-trained employees, and an established line of authority not only help to prevent violations of the First Amendment, but also send a positive message to the public that the City is an active participant in the tradition of respecting and upholding the right to free speech.
Finally, the City might choose to adhere as closely as possible to the guidelines followed by public broadcast stations – using logos and slogans, which identify rather than promote and value neutral descriptions of products and services. [vii] Price information is forbidden. Announcements containing a call to action are not permissible. Announcements containing an inducement to buy, sell or rent are not allowed. These kinds of policies will help convince cable operators to avoid court challenges to advertising on a government access channels.
As the federal, state and local government squeezes budgets, government access channel managers may want to experiment with other means of raising revenues using their channels. Numerous PEG channels report doing telethons in which local businesses donate items for sale or auction. There are pet adoption shows selling stray animals on-the-air, a cooking show selling cookbooks, bulletin board advertisements for garage sales (in lieu of signs in the public right of way), and an employment show selling sponsorships to local businesses. Of course, many PEG channels have successfully sought sponsorships for the broadcast of local high school athletics. Other PEG managers are talking about the impact of product placements – Indianapolis adopted a rule requiring public meeting coverage “to get tight shots of speakers in a manner to exclude commercial banners and logos wherever possible.” [viii]
Government access channels are seeking new sources of revenues in many communities and are breaking free of years of self-imposed restraint requiring the strict noncommercial use of their government access channels. Channels not turned over to
commercial programmers – as New York City proposed to do several years ago with the
Bloomberg News – may not only prosper but also develop new supporters in the community.
-----------------------
[i]. Time Warner Cable of New York City v. Bloomberg, L.P., 118 F.3d 917 (2d. Cir. 1997); Goldberg v. Cablevision Systems Corp. 2001 U.S. App. Lexis 18329 (2nd Cir. August 14, 2001).
[ii] . 1972 Cable Television Report and Order, 36 F.C.C.2d 141 (1972) (“Report”). The rule at 76.251, credited to Commissioner Nicholas Johnson and Professor George Stoney of the New York University, the father of public access cable television, said, in pertinent part:
"(3) Two-way communications. Each such system shall maintain a plant having technical capacity for nonvoice return communications; (4) Public access channel. Each such system shall maintain at least one specially designated, noncommercial public access channel available on a first- come, nondiscriminatory basis. The system shall maintain and have available for public use at least the minimal equipment and facilities necessary for the production of programming for such a channel. See also § 76.201; (5) Education access channel. Each such system shall maintain at least one specially designated channel for use by local educational authorities; (6) Local government access channel. Each such system shall maintain at least one specially designated channel for local government uses."
The FCC commented:
"With respect to the public access channel, the rules to be promulgated by the system must specify nondiscriminatory access without charge on a first-come, first-served basis. These rules shall also proscribe for all designated access channels (except the government access channel when it is being use for its designation purpose) the presentation of: any advertising material designed to promote the sale of commercial products or services (including advertising by or on behalf of candidates for public office); lottery information and obscene or indecent matter (modeled after the prohibitions in Sections 76.213 and 76.215 respectively). The regulations shall also specify that persons or groups seeking access be identified, and their addresses obtained; this information should be publicly available and must be retained by the system for at least two years. The cable operator must not in any other way censor or exercise program content control of any kind over the material presented on the public access channel. Report at 136. (Emphasis added.)
[iii]. See, e.g., Time Warner Cable v. Bloomberg supra.
[iv]. Time Warner Cable v. City of New York, 943 F. Supp. 1357, 1387 (S.D.N.Y. 1996).
[v] . In the Matter of Commission Policy Concerning the Noncommercial Nature of Educational Broadcasting 1992 Reprint excerpted from Public Notice, April 11, 1986 (FCC 86-161),
which was published at 51 Federal Register 21800, June 16, 1986, 7 FCC Record 827.
[vi] . The Putnam Pit v. City of Cookeville, 221 F.3d 834 (6th Cir. 2000).
[vii] .
[viii] . .
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- united states district court leon b artus et al
- first amendment constraints on the award of attorney s
- the first amendment right to a remedy
- constitutional law group
- yoakum run homeowners association yrhoa
- directions the situations below deal with violations of
- first amendment
- is commercial speech permitted on government access
- the first amendment
- introduction
Related searches
- essay on government and economics
- persuasive speech topics on education
- what is commercial law
- what is commercial general liability
- stop speech recognition on startup
- turn on easy access keys windows 10
- latest update on government shutdown
- current update on government shutdown
- what is a speech language pathologist
- what is reported speech grammar
- speech outline on stress
- project on government oversight