Instrument Title: Attachment Style Classification ...

Instrument Title:

Instrument Author: Cite instrument as:

Attachment Style Classification Questionnaire for Latency Age Children Ricky Finzi-Dottan Ricky Finzi-Dottan. (2012) . Attachment Style Classification Questionnaire for Latency Age Children . Measurement Instrument Database for the Social Science. Retrieved from midss.ie

ASCQ ? Ricky Finzi-Dottan Attachment Style Classification Questionnaire for Latency Age Children (English translation of Hebrew version)

Here are 15 sentences. How true is each of the sentences for you? Everyone has his or her own answer. Try to answer only what you feel. This is not a test, and there are no right or wrong answers. Read each sentence carefully. Then choose one of the five answers in the box below. Every answer has a number. Circle the number of the answer that best describes you.

1 All wrong

2

3

4

5

Wrong A bit wrong/a bit right Right Very right

1. I make friends with other children easily 2. I don't feel comfortable trying to make friends 3. It is easy for me to depend on others, if they're

good friends of mine 4. Sometimes others get too friendly and too close to me 5. Sometimes I'm afraid that other kids won't want

to be with me 6. I'd like to be really close to some children and

always be with them 7. It's all right with me if good friends trust and

depend on me 8. It's hard for me to trust others completely 9. I sometimes feel that others don't want to be

good friends with me as much as I do with them 10. I usually believe that others who are close to me

will not leave me 11. I'm sometimes afraid that no one really loves me 12. I find it uncomfortable and get annoyed when

someone tries to get too close to me 13. It's hard for me to really trust others, even if

they're good friends of mine 14. Children sometimes avoid me when I want to

get close and be a good friend of theirs 15. Usually, when anyone tries to get too close to me

it does not bother me

1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5

1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5

1 2 3 4 5

1 2 3 4 5

1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5

1 2 3 4 5

1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5

1 2 3 4 5

1 2 3 4 5

1 2 3 4 5

1 2 3 4 5

I am the author of this instrument, and I agree for it to be included in the MIDSS database in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 3.0 license

Items # for each type: Secure- 1 3 7 10 15

Anxious ? 5 6 9 11 14

Avoidant ? 2 4 8 12 13

ASCQ ? Ricky Finzi-Dottan

Attachment Style Classification Questionnaire (Finzi et al., 1996; Finzi et al., 2000). This questionnaire is an adaptation for children of the Hebrew version (Mikulincer et al., 1990) of Hazan and Shaver's (1987) questionnaire for the classification of attachment styles in adults. The questionnaire contains 15 items, divided into three factors, which taped the Ainsworth's three attachment patterns: secure (e.g. "I usually believe that others who are close to me will not leave me"), anxious/ambivalent (e.g. "I'm sometimes afraid that no one really loves me"), and avoidant (e.g. "I find it uncomfortable and get annoyed when someone tries to get too close to me"). The children were asked to read each item and to rate the extent to which the item described themselves on a 5-point scale, with scores ranging from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much). (For details regarding the psychometric properties and concurrent validity of the questionnaire, see, Finzi et al., 1996; Finzi et al., 2000).

In this study (Finzi-Dottan, R., Manor, I. & Tyano, S. (2006). ADHD, temperament, and parental style as predictors of the child's attachment patterns. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 37, 103-114) we used the continuous method for evaluating the children's

attachment styles, which enables taping two basic dimensions of attachment organization: anxiety and avoidance (Brennan, Clark & Shaver, 1998). The decision to use this method was based on Fraley and Spieker's (2003) that categorical measures do not provide a complete picture of variability in attachment patterns. In the present study the internal consistency for the anxious subscale was =.80 and for the avoidant subscale = .70. On this basis, two total scores were computed by averaging items that corresponded to each factor. Higher scores reflect higher anxiety and high avoidance. Importantly, Pearson correlations revealed that the anxiety and avoidance scores were not significantly associated (r=.32; p>.05).

Finzi, R., Cohen, O., Sapir, Y., Weizman, A. (2000) Attachment Styles in Maltreated children: A comparative Study. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 31, 113-128.

Finzi, R., Ram, A., Har-Even, D. Shnit, D. & Weizman, A. (2001). Attachment

ASCQ ? Ricky Finzi-Dottan

styles in physically abused and neglected children. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 30, 769-786.

Finzi, R., Har-Even, D., Shnit, D., & Weizman, A. (2002). Psychosocial Characterization of Physically Abused Children from Low Socio-economic Households in Comparison to Neglected and Non-Maltreated Children. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 11, 441-453.

Finzi, R., Cohen, O., Iwaniec, D., Sapir, Y. & Weizman, A. (2003). Attachment styles in the families of the drug-using father. Substance Use and Misuse, 38, 271-292.

Finzi-Dottan, R., Cohen, O., Iwaniec, D. Sapir, Y., & Weizman, A. (2006).The child in the family of a drug-user father: Attachment styles and family characteristics. S.L. Ashenberg Strassner & C. Huff Fewell (Eds.). Impact of substance abuse in children and families (pp. 89-111). Binghamton, NY: Haworth.

 ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download