Home - Austin Bar Association
Turning to attorney’s fees, the court declined to address whether the employee was a “prevailing party” under Section 21.259 (and therefore entitled to attorney’s fees). Instead, the court held that because the employee failed to obtain a jury finding on attorney’s fees, when the amount of reasonable attorney’s fees was disputed ... ................
................
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- fee agreement and authority to represent flat fee
- payment of attorney or agent fees u s department of
- crown attorneys act r s o 1990 c c 49
- sample written fee agreements forms state bar of california
- in the circuit court of the 11th
- practicing law institute
- home austin bar association
- u s v cinemark usa inc