County and City Base and Excess Distribution (S-2) - Idaho
County and City Base and Excess Distribution (S-2)
Quarter Ending: March 31, 2012
April 11, 2012
Statewide Dollar Distribution Information:
City and County Total Actual Base: 9,538,821.12
Population Information:
Total City Excess Distribution: 1,281,525.53
Population all Counties July 2010 Population all Cities July 2009
1,584,985 1,056,669
Total County Excess Distribution: 1,281,525.53 City and County Distribution: 12,101,872.17
(1) County or City
(2)
(3)
Hypothetical
Population1
Base
(4) Factor2
(5)
Actual Base Distribution
Col 3 X Col 4
(6)
% Based on Population3
(7)
New Excess4
(8)
Total to be Distributed Col 5 + Col 7
Ada Boise City Eagle Garden City Kuna Meridian Star
400,842 205,707 19,668 11,891 13,909 68,516
5,040
536,100.55 657,095.91
6,313.16 19,746.09 2,775.37 36,602.30 1,051.34
1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050
562,905.57 689,950.64
6,628.82 20,733.39 2,914.14 38,432.42 1,103.91
25.290% 19.467%
1.861% 1.125% 1.316% 6.484% 0.477%
323,210.50 249,480.91 23,853.30 14,421.38 16,868.80 83,096.03
6,112.50
886,116.07 939,431.54 30,482.12 35,154.77 19,782.94 121,528.45
7,216.41
Subtotal:
1,259,684.72
1,322,668.89
717,043.41 2,039,712.30
Note:Calculations may not agree due to rounding. 1-Most current census info. 2-Lesser of 1.05 or total City/Cnty dist divided by total City/Cnty hypo base. 3-Col. 2 divided by statwide pop. of Counties or Cities. 4-Col. 6 X total City or Cnty excess.
Page 1 of 44
EPB00676_04-11-2012
County and City Base and Excess Distribution (S-2)
Quarter Ending: March 31, 2012
April 11, 2012
Statewide Dollar Distribution Information:
City and County Total Actual Base: 9,538,821.12
Population Information:
Total City Excess Distribution: 1,281,525.53
Population all Counties July 2010 Population all Cities July 2009
1,584,985 1,056,669
Total County Excess Distribution: 1,281,525.53 City and County Distribution: 12,101,872.17
(1) County or City
(2) Population1
(3) Hypothetical
Base
(4) Factor2
(5)
Actual Base Distribution
Col 3 X Col 4
(6)
% Based on Population3
(7)
New Excess4
(8)
Total to be Distributed Col 5 + Col 7
Adams Council New Meadows
3,977 678 490
73,813.67 5,105.61 3,278.59
1.050 1.050 1.050
77,504.35 5,360.89 3,442.52
0.251% 0.064% 0.046%
2,941.81 822.28
1,002.55
80,446.16 6,183.17 4,445.07
Subtotal:
82,197.87
86,307.76
4,766.64
91,074.40
Note:Calculations may not agree due to rounding. 1-Most current census info. 2-Lesser of 1.05 or total City/Cnty dist divided by total City/Cnty hypo base. 3-Col. 2 divided by statwide pop. of Counties or Cities. 4-Col. 6 X total City or Cnty excess.
Page 2 of 44
EPB00676_04-11-2012
County and City Base and Excess Distribution (S-2)
Quarter Ending: March 31, 2012
April 11, 2012
Statewide Dollar Distribution Information:
City and County Total Actual Base: 9,538,821.12
Population Information:
Total City Excess Distribution: 1,281,525.53
Population all Counties July 2010 Population all Cities July 2009
1,584,985 1,056,669
Total County Excess Distribution: 1,281,525.53 City and County Distribution: 12,101,872.17
(1) County or City
(2) Population1
(3) Hypothetical
Base
(4) Factor2
(5)
Actual Base Distribution
Col 3 X Col 4
(6)
% Based on Population3
(7)
New Excess4
(8)
Total to be Distributed Col 5 + Col 7
Bannock Arimo Chubbuck Downey Inkom Lava Hot Springs McCammon Pocatello (part)
83,691 337
12,483 592 784 523 865
54,856
270,650.62 539.66
29,133.00 3,562.38 2,758.40 2,471.62 2,211.55 369,327.33
1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050
284,183.15 566.64
30,589.65 3,740.50 2,896.32 2,595.20 2,322.13 387,793.70
5.280% 0.032% 1.181% 0.056% 0.074% 0.049% 0.082% 5.191%
68,222.02 408.71
15,139.35 717.98 950.83 634.29
1,049.07 66,529.22
352,405.17 975.35
45,729.00 4,458.48 3,847.15 3,229.49 3,371.20 454,322.92
Subtotal:
680,654.56
714,687.29
153,651.47 868,338.76
Note:Calculations may not agree due to rounding. 1-Most current census info. 2-Lesser of 1.05 or total City/Cnty dist divided by total City/Cnty hypo base. 3-Col. 2 divided by statwide pop. of Counties or Cities. 4-Col. 6 X total City or Cnty excess.
Page 3 of 44
EPB00676_04-11-2012
County and City Base and Excess Distribution (S-2)
Quarter Ending: March 31, 2012
April 11, 2012
Statewide Dollar Distribution Information:
City and County Total Actual Base: 9,538,821.12
Population Information:
Total City Excess Distribution: 1,281,525.53
Population all Counties July 2010 Population all Cities July 2009
1,584,985 1,056,669
Total County Excess Distribution: 1,281,525.53 City and County Distribution: 12,101,872.17
(1) County or City
(2) Population1
(3) Hypothetical
Base
(4) Factor2
(5)
Actual Base Distribution
Col 3 X Col 4
(6)
% Based on Population3
(7)
New Excess4
(8)
Total to be Distributed Col 5 + Col 7
Bear Lake Bloomington Georgetown Montpelier Paris St. Charles
6,001 224 464
2,350 483 130
60,780.77 356.50 687.27
22,771.24 1,753.44 600.26
1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050
63,819.81 374.33 721.63
23,909.80 1,841.11
630.27
0.379% 0.021% 0.044% 0.222% 0.046% 0.012%
4,735.64 271.67 562.74
2,850.07 585.78 157.66
68,555.45 646.00
1,284.37 26,759.87 2,426.89
787.93
Subtotal:
86,949.48
91,296.95
9,163.56 100,460.51
Note:Calculations may not agree due to rounding. 1-Most current census info. 2-Lesser of 1.05 or total City/Cnty dist divided by total City/Cnty hypo base. 3-Col. 2 divided by statwide pop. of Counties or Cities. 4-Col. 6 X total City or Cnty excess.
Page 4 of 44
EPB00676_04-11-2012
County and City Base and Excess Distribution (S-2)
Quarter Ending: March 31, 2012
April 11, 2012
Statewide Dollar Distribution Information:
City and County Total Actual Base: 9,538,821.12
Population Information:
Total City Excess Distribution: 1,281,525.53
Population all Counties July 2010 1,584,985 Population all Cities July 2009 1,056,669
Total County Excess Distribution: 1,281,525.53 City and County Distribution: 12,101,872.17
(1) County or City
(2)
(3)
(4)
Hypothetical Factor2
Population1 Base
(5)
Actual Base Distribution
Col 3 X Col 4
(6)
% Based on Population3
(7)
New Excess4
(8)
Total to be Distributed Col 5 + Col 7
Benewah Plummer St. Maries Tensed
9,209 984
2,609 124
52,500.82 1,834.39
17,074.85 160.98
1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050
55,125.86 1,926.11 17,928.59
169.03
0.581% 0.093% 0.247% 0.012%
7,461.26 1,193.39 3,164.19
150.39
62,587.12 3,119.50 21,092.78
319.42
Subtotal:
71,571.04
75,149.59
11,969.23
87,118.82
Note:Calculations may not agree due to rounding. 1-Most current census info. 2-Lesser of 1.05 or total City/Cnty dist divided by total City/Cnty hypo base. 3-Col. 2 divided by statwide pop. of Counties or Cities. 4-Col. 6 X total City or Cnty excess.
Page 5 of 44
EPB00676_04-11-2012
County and City Base and Excess Distribution (S-2)
Quarter Ending: March 31, 2012
April 11, 2012
Statewide Dollar Distribution Information:
City and County Total Actual Base: 9,538,821.12
Population Information:
Total City Excess Distribution: 1,281,525.53
Population all Counties July 2010 Population all Cities July 2009
1,584,985 1,056,669
Total County Excess Distribution: 1,281,525.53 City and County Distribution: 12,101,872.17
(1) County or City
(2) Population1
(3) Hypothetical
Base
(4) Factor2
(5)
Actual Base Distribution
Col 3 X Col 4
(6)
% Based on Population3
(7)
New Excess4
(8)
Total to be Distributed Col 5 + Col 7
Bingham Aberdeen Atomic City Basalt Blackfoot Firth Shelley
45,952 1,775
25 425 11,153 493 4,366
231,180.43 11,358.22 48.07 315.46 91,713.00 1,801.84 21,421.67
1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050
242,739.45 11,926.13
50.47 331.23 96,298.65 1,891.93 22,492.75
2.899% 0.168% 0.002% 0.040% 1.055% 0.047% 0.413%
37,149.39 2,152.72
30.32 515.44 13,526.33 597.91 5,295.07
279,888.84 14,078.85
80.79 846.67 109,824.98 2,489.84 27,787.82
Subtotal:
357,838.69
375,730.61
59,267.18 434,997.79
Note:Calculations may not agree due to rounding. 1-Most current census info. 2-Lesser of 1.05 or total City/Cnty dist divided by total City/Cnty hypo base. 3-Col. 2 divided by statwide pop. of Counties or Cities. 4-Col. 6 X total City or Cnty excess.
Page 6 of 44
EPB00676_04-11-2012
County and City Base and Excess Distribution (S-2)
Quarter Ending: March 31, 2012
April 11, 2012
Statewide Dollar Distribution Information:
City and County Total Actual Base: 9,538,821.12
Population Information:
Total City Excess Distribution: 1,281,525.53
Population all Counties July 2010 1,584,985 Population all Cities July 2009 1,056,669
Total County Excess Distribution: 1,281,525.53 City and County Distribution: 12,101,872.17
(1) County or City
(2)
(3)
(4)
Hypothetical Factor2
Population1 Base
(5)
Actual Base Distribution
Col 3 X Col 4
(6)
% Based on Population3
(7)
New Excess4
(8)
Total to be Distributed Col 5 + Col 7
Blaine Bellevue Carey Hailey Ketchum Sun Valley
21,199 2,229
538 8,075 3,376 1,483
43,329.86 1,141.30
143.20 9,871.11 13,191.48 13,931.19
1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050
45,496.35 1,198.37
150.36 10,364.67 13,851.05 14,627.75
1.337% 0.211% 0.051% 0.764% 0.319% 0.140%
17,583.69 2,703.33
652.49 9,793.34 4,094.40 1,798.58
63,080.04 3,901.70
802.85 20,158.01 17,945.45 16,426.33
Subtotal:
81,608.14
85,688.55
36,625.83 122,314.38
Note:Calculations may not agree due to rounding. 1-Most current census info. 2-Lesser of 1.05 or total City/Cnty dist divided by total City/Cnty hypo base. 3-Col. 2 divided by statwide pop. of Counties or Cities. 4-Col. 6 X total City or Cnty excess.
Page 7 of 44
EPB00676_04-11-2012
County and City Base and Excess Distribution (S-2)
Quarter Ending: March 31, 2012
April 11, 2012
Statewide Dollar Distribution Information:
City and County Total Actual Base: 9,538,821.12
Population Information:
Total City Excess Distribution: 1,281,525.53
Population all Counties July 2010 1,584,985 Population all Cities July 2009 1,056,669
Total County Excess Distribution: 1,281,525.53 City and County Distribution: 12,101,872.17
(1) County or City
(2)
(3)
(4)
Hypothetical Factor2
Population1 Base
(5)
Actual Base Distribution
Col 3 X Col 4
(6)
% Based on Population3
(7)
New Excess4
(8)
Total to be Distributed Col 5 + Col 7
Boise Crouch Horseshoe Bend Idaho City Placerville
7,025 160 849 475 56
37,746.98 -
3,314.36 996.56 160.15
1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050
39,634.33 -
3,480.08 1,046.39
168.16
0.443% 0.015% 0.080% 0.045% 0.005%
5,948.64 194.05
1,029.67 576.08 67.92
45,582.97 194.05
4,509.75 1,622.47
236.08
Subtotal:
42,218.05
44,328.96
7,816.36
52,145.32
Note:Calculations may not agree due to rounding. 1-Most current census info. 2-Lesser of 1.05 or total City/Cnty dist divided by total City/Cnty hypo base. 3-Col. 2 divided by statwide pop. of Counties or Cities. 4-Col. 6 X total City or Cnty excess.
Page 8 of 44
EPB00676_04-11-2012
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- county and city base and excess distribution s 2 idaho
- county and city base and excess distribution s 2
- county base and excess distribution s 2 idaho
- american journal of obstetrics and gynecology
- understanding base excess be merits and pitfalls
- diagnostic use of base excess in acid base disorders
- acid base emcrit blog
- base excess a marker of chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure and
- understanding base excess be merits and pitfalls springer
- acid base sheet emcrit project
Related searches
- base and strong adjectives
- m 2 s 2 to kj
- kg m 2 s 2 to pascal
- m 2 s 2 to kj kg
- power and ground distribution block
- rate base and portion calculator
- 1099 r distribution code 2 exceptions
- binomial and normal distribution examples
- direct and indirect distribution channels
- 2 4 state and city income taxes
- base and strong adjectives exercises
- amount base and percent calculator