Oral Evaluation Rubric, Based on: Iowa State University, 2005



|Oral Evaluation Rubric, Based on: Iowa State University, 2005. Oral Presentation Rubric, |

|, accessed 19 May 2005. |

|Criteria |Distinguished |Proficient |Basic |Unacceptable |

|Organization |-- Extremely well |-- Generally well |-- Somewhat organized. |-- Poor or non existent |

| |organized. |organized. | |organization. |

| | | |-- Introduces the purpose| |

| |-- Introduces the purpose|-- Introduces the purpose|of the presentation |-- Does not clearly |

| |of the presentation |of the presentation | |introduce the |

| |clearly and creatively. |clearly. | |purpose of the |

| |--Effectively includes | |-- Includes some |presentation |

| |smooth, clever | |transitions to | |

| |transitions which are |-- Include transitions to|connect key points but |-- Uses ineffective |

| |succinct but not choppy |connect |there is difficulty in |transitions that |

| |in order to connect key |key points but better |following presentation. |rarely connect points; |

| |points |transitions from idea to | |cannot understand |

| | |idea are noted. | |presentation because |

| |-- Student presents | |-- Student jumps around |there is no sequence for |

| |information in logical, | |topics. Several points |information. |

| |interesting sequence | |are confusing. | |

| |which audience can | | |-- Presentation is |

| |follow. |-- Most information | |choppy and disjointed; no|

| | |presented in logical | |apparent logical order of|

| | |sequence; A few minor | |presentation |

| |-- Ends with an accurate |points may be confusing |-- Ends with a summary or|-- Ends without a summary|

| |conclusion showing | |conclusion; little |or conclusion. |

| |thoughtful, strong | |evidence of evaluating | |

| |evaluation of the |-- Ends with an summary |content based on | |

| |evidence presented. |of main points showing |Evidence. | |

| | |some evaluation of the | | |

| | |evidence presented. | | |

|Oral Evaluation Rubric, Based on: Iowa State University, 2005. Oral Presentation Rubric, |

|, accessed 19 May 2005. |

|Criteria |Distinguished |Proficient |Basic |Unacceptable |

|Content: Depth and |--Speaker provides an |--For the most part, |--Explanations of |--No reference is made to|

|Accuracy Content |accurate and complete |explanations of concepts |concepts and/or theories |literature or theory. |

| |explanation of key |and theories are accurate|are inaccurate or |Thesis not clear; |

| |concepts and theories, |and complete. Some |incomplete. Little |information included that|

| |drawing upon relevant |helpful applications of |attempt is made to tie in|does not support thesis |

| |literature. Applications |theory are included. |theory. There is a great|in any way. |

| |of theory are included to| |deal of information that | |

| |illuminate issues. | |is not connected to the | |

| | | |presentation thesis. | |

| | | | | |

| | |-- Presents evidence of | | |

| |-- Provides evidence of |valid |-- Presents evidence of | |

| |extensive |research with multiple |research |- Presents little or no |

| |and valid research with |sources. |with sources. |evidence of |

| |multiple (you provide | | |valid research. |

| |number) | | | |

| |and varied sources. | | | |

| | | | | |

| | |-- Combines existing | | |

| |-- Combines and evaluates|ideas to form |-- Combines existing |-- Shows little evidence |

| |existing |new insights. |ideas. |of the combination of |

| |ideas to form new | | |ideas. |

| |insights. |-- No significant errors |-- Enough errors are made|-- Information included |

| | |are made; a few |to distract a |is sufficiently |

| |-- Information completely|inconsistencies or errors|knowledgeable listener, |inaccurate that the |

| |accurate; all names and |in information. |but some information is |listener cannot depend on|

| |facts were precise and | |accurate. |the presentation as a |

| |explicit | | |source of accurate |

| | |-- Level of presentation | |information. |

| | |is generally appropriate.|-- Portions of |-- Presentation |

| | | |presentation are too |consistently is too |

| |-- Level of presentation | |elementary or too |elementary or too |

| |is appropriate for the | |sophisticated for |sophisticated for the |

| |audience. | |audience. |audience. |

|Oral Evaluation Rubric, Based on: Iowa State University, 2005. Oral Presentation Rubric, |

|, accessed 19 May 2005. |

|Criteria |Distinguished |Proficient |Basic |Unacceptable |

|Research Effort |--Went above and beyond |--Did a very good job of |--Used the material |--Did not utilize |

| |to research information; |researching; utilized |provided in an acceptable|resources effectively; |

| |solicited material in |materials provided to |manner, but did not |did little or no fact |

| |addition to what was |their full potential; |consult any additional |gathering on the topic. |

| |provided; brought in |solicited more than six |resources. | |

| |personal ideas and |types of research to | | |

| |information to enhance |enhance project; at times| | |

| |project; and utilized |took the initiative to | | |

| |more than eight types of |find information outside | | |

| |resources to make project|of school. | | |

| |effective. | | | |

|Creativity |--Uses the unexpected to |--Some originality |--Little or no variation;|-- Bland, predictable, |

| |full advantage; very |apparent; clever at |a few original touches |and lacked “zip. |

| |original, clever, and |times; good variety and |but for the most part |Repetitive with little or|

| |creative approach that |blending of |material presented with |no variety; little |

| |captures audience's |materials/media. |little originality or |creative energy used. |

| |attention. | |interpretation. | |

| | | | | |

|Use of Communication Aids|--Graphics are designed |--While graphics relate |-- occasional use of |--Student uses |

|(e.g., Transparencies, |reinforce presentation |and aid presentation |graphics that rarely |superfluous graphics, no |

|Slides, Posters, |thesis and maximize |thesis, these media are |support presentation |graphics, or graphics |

|Handouts, |audience understanding; |not as varied and not as |thesis; visual aids were |that are so poorly |

|Computer-Generated |use of media is varied |well connected to |not colorful or clear |prepared that they |

|Materials) |and appropriate with |presentation thesis. |Choppy, time wasting use|detract from the |

| |media not being added | |of multimedia; lacks |presentation. |

| |simply for the sake of | |smooth transition from | |

| |use. |--Font size is |one medium to another. | |

| | |appropriate for reading. |--Font is too small to be|--Font is too small to be|

| | | |easily seen. |easily seen |

| |--Visual aids were |--Appropriate information| | |

| |colorful and large enough|is prepared. Some |--Communication aids are | |

| |to be seen by all be even|material is not supported|poorly prepared or used | |

| |those in back of the |by visual aids. |inappropriately. Too much| |

| |class | |information is included. | |

| | | |Unimportant material is | |

| | | |highlighted. | |

| |--Media are prepared in a| | | |

| |professional manner. | | | |

| |Details are minimized so | | | |

| |that main points stand | | | |

| |out. | | | |

|Criteria |Distinguished |Proficient |Basic |Unacceptable |

|Use of Language: Grammar,|-- Poised, clear |-- Clear articulation but |-- Audience occasionally |-- Presenter is obviously|

|Word Choice, Voice |articulation; proper |not as polished; slightly |has trouble hearing the |anxious and cannot be |

| |volume; steady rate; |uncomfortable at times |presentation; seems |heard or monotone with |

| |enthusiasm; confidence; |Most can hear |uncomfortable. |little or no expression. |

| |speaker is clearly |presentation. | |-- Student mumbles, |

| |comfortable in front of |- Student pronounces most | |incorrectly pronounces |

| |the group. |words correctly. |-- Student incorrectly |terms incorrectly. |

| |-- Correct, precise |-- Selects words |pronounces terms. |- Selects words |

| |pronunciation of terms |appropriate for | |inappropriate forcontext;|

| |-- Selects rich and |context and uses correct |-- Selects words |Uses incorrect grammar. |

| |varied words for |grammar. |inappropriate for |-- Student's presentation|

| |context and uses correct | |context; uses incorrect |has four or more spelling|

| |grammar. |-- Presentation has no |grammar. |errors and/or grammatical|

| |-- Presentation has no |more than two misspellings| |errors. |

| |misspellings or |and/or grammatical errors | | |

| |grammatical errors. | |-- Presentation has three|-- Cannot focus on the |

| | |-- For the most part, |misspellings and/or |ideas presented. Because |

| |-- Sentences are complete|sentences are complete and|grammatical errors. |of difficulties with |

| |and grammatical, and they|grammatical, and they flow| |grammar and appropriate |

| |flow together easily. |together easily. With a | |vocabulary. |

| |Words are chosen for |few exceptions, words are | | |

| |their precise meaning. |chosen for their precise |-- Can follow the | |

| | |meaning. |presentation, but some | |

| | | |grammatical errors and | |

| | | |use of slang are evident.| |

| | | |Some sentences are | |

| | | |incomplete/ halting, | |

| | | |and/or vocabulary is | |

| | | |somewhat limited or | |

| | | |inappropriate. | |

|Eye Contact |-- Maintains eye contact;|-- Student maintains eye |-- Some eye contact,but |-- Student reads all or |

| |seldom returning to |contact most of the time |not |most of report with no |

| |notes; presentation is |but frequently returns to |maintained and at least |eye contact. |

| |like a planned |notes. |half the time reads most | |

| |conversation. | |of report. | |

| | | | | |

| | | | | |

|Personal Appearance | --Personal appearance is|--For the most part, |-- Personal appearance is|-- Personal appearance is|

| |completely appropriate |personal appearance is |somewhat inappropriate |inappropriate for the |

| |for the occasion and the |appropriate for the |for the occasion and |occasion and audience. |

| |audience. |occasion and the audience.|audience. | |

|Criteria |Distinguished |Proficient |Basic |Unacceptable |

|Audience Interaction, |--Encourages audience |--Encourages audience |--Reluctantly interacts |--Avoids or discourages |

|Questions and Answers. |interaction. Calls on |interaction. |with audience. |active audience |

| |classmates by name. | | |participation. |

| | | |--Demonstrates some |--Demonstrates incomplete|

| |--Demonstrates extensive |--Demonstrates knowledge |knowledge of rudimentary |knowledge of the topic by|

| |knowledge |of the |questions by |responding inaccurately |

| |of the topic by |topic by responding |responding accurately |and |

| |responding |accurately and |to questions. |inappropriately to |

| |confidently, precisely |appropriately addressing | |questions. |

| |and |questions . At ease with | | |

| |appropriately to all |answers to all questions | | |

| |audience |but fails to elaborate. | | |

| |questions. | | | |

|Audience Response |--Involved the audience |--Presented facts with |--Some related facts but |--Incoherent; audience |

| |in the presentation; held|some interesting "twists";|went off topic and lost |lost interest. |

| |the audience's attention |held the audience's |the audience. | |

| |throughout. |attention most of the | | |

| | |time. | | |

|Length of Presentation |--Within ? minutes of |--Within ? minutes of |--Within ? minutes of |--Too long or too short; |

| |allotted time +/– |allotted time +/– |allotted time +/– |? or more minutes above |

| | | | |or below the allotted |

| | | | |time |

................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download