San Jose State University



2489835-107950003243580-13716000-10160-25336500 Call for ProposalsCCCC Regional Summer ConferenceJune 8-10, 2017San José State UniversityConference website: sjsu.edu/ccccProposals: Questions: Composition-Conference@sjsu.eduConference theme: Making Spaces for Diverse Writing PracticeIdeally conceived, college and university writing programs carve out spaces—classrooms, faculty offices, Writing Centers—in which students and faculty can explore and practice writing together. In such spaces, writing is as diverse as the people, and the spaces foster diverse, supportive, productive writing practice(s). Likewise, writing programs dedicate temporal spaces—classes, tutoring sessions, office hours—to foster best writing practices.But, as writing teachers are all too aware, the diverse needs of diverse people mean writing happens in other spaces, as well—library study tables, labs and testing rooms, galleries and theaters, but also in noisy buses, poorly lit stairwells, overcrowded coffee shops, and jail cells. Likewise, writing happens between shifts at work, after the kids are in bed, or wherever 15 minutes can be scrounged. These physical and temporal spaces, and countless others, may not foster the kind of diverse, supportive, productive writing practice(s) we hope for writers, but they are also far more common than the idyllic spaces we imagine. The 2017 CCCC Regional Summer Conference at San José State University is designed to carve out spaces to help us as writers, students, teachers, scholars, and administrators consider what it means to make spaces (temporal and physical) for diverse writing practice in a world that does not always align with our ideals. The Local Arrangements Committee is delighted to invite proposals that consider what it might meanto make spaces for writing and/or make spaces for practiceto make spaces for diversity in writing practiceto practice writing that makes space for diversityto practice diversity as we writeto practice writing diversityto practice writing diverselyWe welcome proposals that interpret our theme in creative ways, and presentations may certainly address issues of interest to writing, rhetoric, and literacy teachers and scholars that fall outside of the theme, as well. Graduate students, two-year college teachers and administrators, and non-tenure track faculty are strongly encouraged to submit proposals. In keeping with our theme, conference organizers have carved out various writing spaces during the three-day event, including: A full-day writing retreat—time and space carved out especially for writers to practice writing. This will include a limited number of writing activities and ample time to just write alongside other writers. [Availability is limited. To sign up, go to ]Concurrent sessions—proposals for individual papers, panels, roundtables, and alternative sessions are welcome. If you envision a format not mentioned, please feel free to propose it! Half-day workshops—proposals for interactive workshops that take up the conference theme are especially welcome. Workshops should include active participation by registrants.Conference registration, lodging, and travel information will be available soon, via the conference website: sjsu.edu/ccccGENERAL CCCC GuidelinesGeneral InformationMembers of CCCC and others who are interested in the goals and activities of the CCCC are invited to submit proposals for sessions and workshops at the 2017 CCCC Regional Summer Conference in San Jose, CA. The program is open to everyone, including scholars from other disciplines. Nonmembers of CCCC are welcome to submit proposals but are urged to join the organization. CCCC is a nonprofit organization and cannot reimburse program participants for travel or hotel expenses. Although there will be competition for a place on the program, our goal is to make the conference accessible to people might not otherwise attend the national convention. Proposals are evaluated by reviewers with expertise in each area, who advise the Program Chairs on proposal acceptance. These peer-reviewed submissions will comprise the greater part of the program, with the remainder consisting of sessions initiated by the Program Chairs. Deadline: To ensure participants receive timely notification of program participation, all submissions must be received by 11:59 p.m., January 16, 2017, Pacific Standard Time.Proposals should be submitted to: sign up for the Writing Retreat, go to: Sessions (Individual submissions, panels, roundtables, etc.)Members may propose whole sessions (75-minute sessions consisting of three or more participants) or submit a proposal as an individual, which will be combined into a panel by the Program Chairs. Presenters may propose separately titled papers, performances, visual presentations, etc., in whatever format best delivers the presenters’ ideas and engages the audience. In a panel where more than 3 participants are proposed, formats such as position statements and abstracts are acceptable. Workshop SessionsWorkshops provide opportunities for engaged introductions to new developments in the field and participatory discussion of current ideas and practice. Successful workshop proposals explain clearly how registrants will participate in workshop activities and must include a schedule indicating times, registrant activities, and speakers (only the first 12 names will be listed on the program). Workshops are limited to 20-30 registrants and carry an additional fee. Proposed Workshops with no evidence of active participation by registrants will not be accepted.A note on proposal review:The general criteria used for reviewing proposals are directly related to this conference’s theme of Making Spaces for Diverse Writing Practice. As they read proposals, reviewers will focus on five broad areas: 1. Connection to disciplinary contexts, issues, and practices. Is the proposal situated contextually in writing theory, the field’s research traditions, current issues, and/or practices? The connection to one or more of these and to the field’s broader identities, research, and interests should be clear to reviewers.2. Focus. Does the proposal seem focused enough for the time available, keeping in mind the need to engage audiences in discussion? Reviewers should be able to readily understand the proposal’s primary question or the idea it will explore and see potential for interaction among presenters and attendees related to that focus.3. Innovation. Does the proposal establish new ground or point wider implications or new questions based in research and experience, rather than just describing “what I did”? Reviewers should be able to identify what is new, different, and exciting about the proposal.4. Related to the theme. Does the proposal specify and elaborate on major issues and ask questions about or propose actions that others might take in relation to the conference theme(s)? The proposal should make clear the opportunities that are opened through consideration of its question or focus.5. Audience engagement. Does the proposal outline what attendees will take away from the session in specific ways?Preregistration for Program ParticipantsCCCC depends on the support of everyone who attends. Program participants must register online and submit the registration fee when they accept their role in the program.General Guidelines for Proposals1. Follow the proposal format.2. Be as specific and clear as possible about the focus and purpose of your proposals, and provide only the information requested. The intense reviewing procedure makes supplemental material a hindrance.3. Meet the January 16th deadline for electronic proposals.4. Notify Ryan Skinnell at SJSU immediately (ryan.skinnell@sjsu.edu) of address changes.5. Official invitations will be sent to persons on accepted proposals by early March.6. Names appearing in the 2016 convention program will represent only peer-reviewed proposals and paid registrations.For more information, visit the conference website: sjsu.edu/ccccQuestions may be directed to the Local Arrangements Committee: Composition-Conference@sjsu.eduSubmit proposals: retreat sign-up: deadline: 11:59 p.m., January 16, 2017, Pacific Standard TimeAREA CLUSTERSThe clusters below are used to help organize the review of proposals and create the program. Selecting a particular cluster neither advantages nor disadvantages your proposal. Beneath each cluster area are examples of appropriate topics, but the listing is neither comprehensive nor exclusive. Sometimes a single proposal might fit into two or three areas, or a proposal might not fit well into any area. Please consider these categories as a heuristic, and understand that in making a selection, you emphasize the primary focus of and the best reviewing audience for your proposal. You may also choose 1-2 keywords in the appropriate box on the proposal form; these will provide additional information for reviewers.Deadline: To ensure participants receive timely notification of program participation, submissions must be received by 11:59 p.m., January 16, 2017 Pacific Standard Time. Proposals should be submitted to —Advanced Composition? Disciplinarity and FYC or advanced writing courses (e.g., curricular approaches and goals)? Politics of FYC/Advanced composition (e.g., required courses, dual credit/enrollment, competency-based approaches, direct assessment)? Innovative pedagogical approaches? First year/advanced writing & transfer, transformation, remix, etc.? FYC/Advanced courses & student populations? TA/graduate pedagogy? Support for writers (graduate, faculty)? WAC/WID courses or support2—Basic Writing? Politics of remediation? Innovative approaches to basic writing? Assessment and basic writing? Basic writing & transfer, transformation, etc.? Articulation with FYC? Public policy and basic writing? Basic writing and student populations3—Community, Civic & Public? Community literacy practices & programs? Civic engagement and deliberation? Community-based research or service (grant-writing, community client, etc.)? Other contexts (political, ethnic, cultural, recovery, support, prisons, adult ed. centers, religious)4—Creative Writing? Alt writing? Creative nonfiction, fiction, poetry, and drama? Digital genres? Life writing, memoir, auto/biography? Pedagogy? Publishing5—History? History of movements in CCCC? Histories of rhetoric? Histories of professionalcommunication? Histories of composition/the? Histories of writing practices/ instruction? Histories of un/schooled literacy practices? Oral traditions or cultural histories of rhetoric6—Information Technologies? Computer-based literacies? Online identities (Second Life, Twitter, Facebook, etc.)? E-learning (online, distance learning, MOOCs, blogs)? Electronic publishing practices and tools (epub, xml, iBook)? Media studies? Software development & design? Pedagogy in digital environments7—Institutional and Professional Concerns? Administration of writing programs? Working conditions (e.g., labor conditions/practices, unionization)? Cross-institutional articulation? Cross-professional articulation (AAHE, CLA, MLA, NCA, AERA, etc.)? Cross-disciplinary collaboration? Department and programs (majors, minors, graduate)? Independent writing/rhetoric programs or centers? Intellectual property? Department/division assessment or review? Teacher preparation8— Writing Across Spaces? Public advocacy/action for writing or writers [univ—to public]? 2-yr to 4-yr transitions? Student writing to professional writing? Collaboration across contexts/ distances? Adapting frameworks, theories, or methods from other contexts (community organizing, other disciplines, entrepreneurism) for writing classrooms? Collaborations across contexts (K12/University; business/higher education/ community/postsecondary; or other) ? Creating new programs, courses, labs, experiences? Analyses/changing perceptions of writing or writers? Creating new programmatic, physical, or temporal spaces for writing and/or teaching9—Language? Second language writing/writers? Language negotiation? Language policies and politics? Language identities, variation, and diversity? World Englishes? Globalization of English10—Professional & Technical Writing? Writing in the professions: business, science, public policy, etc.? Information design & architecture? Usability and user-experience design? Consulting and teaching in the workplace? Workplace studies? Intercultural communication11—Research? Use and relevance of innovative research methods (historiographic, linguistic, archival, surveys, databases, ethnographies, case studies, etc.)? IRBs and intellectual property? Politics of research? Extensions of research or instruction into new sites of inquiry? Big data? Innovative methodologies or research designs? Reporting formats? Ethics and representation? Research study results? Alignment, outcomes and/or assessment research? Undergraduate research12—Writing pedagogies and processes? Student populations and instruction? Design and evaluation of assignments? Classroom/campus situations and strategies? Collaborative writing? Assignment design/evaluation? Response to student texts? Multimedia/multimodal classrooms? Pedagogy in digital environments13—Theory? Rhetorical theory and theories of visual rhetoric? Theories of composing? Theories of reading and writing? Theories of pedagogy? Theories of learning to write and writing development? Theories of literacy? Theories of writing in society? Critical, gender, race, identity, disability, feminist, queer, and cultural theories? Theories from other disciplines (sociology, psychology, linguistics, human factors, etc.)14—Writing Programs? Program design? Administrative issues or concerns? Program-wide curriculum design? Learning communities? Tutoring? Writing centers? Adult literacy? The writing major/minor professionDeadline: To ensure participants receive timely notification of program participation, all submissions must be received by 11:59 p.m., January 16, 2017, Pacific Standard Time. Proposals should be submitted to: Retreat sign-up: website: ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download