University of Pittsburgh
[pic]
[pic]
[pic]
ABSTRACT
Objective: To present an integrative review of literature on the effects of gluten on gastrointestinal symptoms in individuals who do not have celiac disease.
Background: Despite a rapid increase in the number of people who identify as “gluten free,” the prevalence of celiac disease has remained roughly the same. Previous literature testing the effect of gluten on gastrointestinal symptoms has not been conclusive.
Public Health Significance: Many people believe that being “gluten free” is healthier, when in fact gluten-free products often contain more fats and sugars and cost more financially. This diet trend poses a risk on the health of our population.
Data Sources: The electronic databases of PubMed and OVID were used to identify studies using the key words “gluten free diet,” “irritable bowl syndrome,” and “non-celiac gluten sensitivity.”
Study Selection: Using exclusion and inclusion criteria 427 articles’ titles and abstracts were scanned for relevance to adhering to a gluten free diet and specifically addresses patients with non-celiac gluten sensitivity. Further review of references produced four articles. Thirteen articles were read in full. Six studies fully met inclusion and exclusion criteria for full in-depth review.
Data Synthesis: Based on their findings, studies were either categorized as concluding no significant effect of gluten or significant effects of gluten on gastrointestinal symptoms.
Conclusions: Substantially larger, multi-center research studies need to be conducted in order to truly understand the impact of gluten, if any, on gastrointestinal symptoms in non-celiac disease individuals. While some of the studies conclude there are significant detrimental effects as a result of consuming gluten, other studies conclude no significant changes in symptoms.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
preface x
1.0 Introduction 1
1.1 Purpose 3
1.2 Chapter Summaries 3
2.0 BACKGROUND 5
2.1 What is gluten? 5
2.1.1 What is celiac disease? 5
2.1.2 What causes celiac disease? 6
2.1.3 What are the negative outcomes of celiac disease? 7
2.2 Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity (NCGS) 7
2.3 Why is there an increase in identifying as “gluten-free?” 7
3.0 METHODS 9
4.0 RESULTS 10
4.1 No gluten effect 10
4.2 Gluten Effect 12
5.0 DISCUSSION 16
5.1 Implications for future research 18
6.0 PUBLIC HEALTH SIGNIFICANCE 20
7.0 CONCLUSION 21
APPENDIX A: STUDIES INCLUDED IN INTEGRATIVE REVIEW 22
APPENDIX B: DIAGRAM 24
BIBLIOGRAPHY 25
List of tables
Table 1. Gluten Products 2
Table 2. Gluten Free Products 2
Table 3. Articles synthesized by study result 22
List of figures
Figure 1. Diagram of study selection for integrative review 24
Introduction
Over the last decade, a debate has been sparked in both the food and medical worlds over gluten and if the general population should avoid eating products that contain gluten. Some people believe that everyone should avoid consuming food that contains gluten, but others believe that people should only adhere to a gluten-free diet if it is deemed medically necessary. In 2013, Harry Blazer, who is the author of Eating Patterns in America, reported that 30% of the population self-reported following a gluten free diet (Blazer, 2013). Blazer attributes this high percentage to the general population following the trendy diet of today, and compares the gluten-free diet to past health fads like avoiding sugars and fats. Not only do gluten free products cost more financially, but in reality, gluten free foods actually have a higher sugar and fat content compared to their gluten counterparts (see Tables 1 and 2).
Table 1. Gluten Products
|Food |Price ($) |Calories |Total Fat (g) |Sodium (mg) |
|No significant effect|Biesiekierski et|Double blind randomized placebo |34 participants |No significant differences|
|of gluten on |al, 2011 |controlled trial | |in biomarkers |
|gastrointestinal |Melbourne, |1/3 response rate to study | | |
|symptom |Australia |advertisements | | |
| |Biesiekierski et|Re-challenge study |37 participants for phase |No significant findings on|
| |al, 2013 |Double blind cross over trial |I |the effect of gluten, |
| |Melbourne, | |22 participants for |specific or |
| |Australia | |re-challenge |dose-dependent, in |
| | | | |participants with NCGS on |
| | | | |a low FODMAP diet |
| | | | |No significant differences|
| | | | |in symptoms between |
| | | | |treatment groups |
| | | | |(p > .209) |
|Significant effect of|Elli et al, |Double blind placebo controlled cross |140 participants enrolled |Significant increase of |
|gluten on |2016 |over trial |98 underwent challenge |symptoms when consuming |
|gastrointestinal |Italy |5.6g of gluten per day | |gluten, compared to the |
|symptoms | | | |placebo |
| |Carroccio et al,|Retrospective study to identify study |150 controls identified by| |
| |2012 |controls |medical charts | |
| |Italy |Double blind placebo controlled |920 study participants | |
| | |challenge | | |
| |Di Sabatino et |Double blind randomized placebo |61 participants enrolled, |Significant increase of |
| |al, |controlled cross over trial |59 completed study |intestinal symptoms during|
| |2015 |4.375g of gluten per day | |gluten consumption (p < |
| |Italy | | |0.0001) |
| | | | |Significant increase of |
| | | | |extraintestinal symptoms |
| | | | |during gluten consumption |
| | | | |(p < 0.0001) |
| |Shahbazkhani et |Double blind randomized placebo |148 participants enrolled,|Significant increase of |
| |al, 2015 |controlled trial |72 completed study |symptoms for participants |
| |Iran |100g of gluten per day | |in the gluten group (p = |
| | | | |0.0001) |
*NCGS – Non celiac gluten sensitivity
APPENDIX B: DIAGRAM
[pic]
Figure 1. Diagram of study selection for integrative review
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Asero, R., Fernandez-Rivas, M., Knulst, A., Bruijnzeel-Koomen, C. (2009). Double-
blind, placebo-controlled food challenge in adults in everyday clinical practice: a reappraisal of their limitations and real indications. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol, 9(4): 379-85.
Biesiekierski, J., Newnham, E., Irving, P., Barrett, J., Haines, M., Doecke, J., Shepherd,
S., Muir, J., Gibson, P. (2011). Gluten Causes Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Subjects Without Celiac Disease: A Double-Blind Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 106(3): 508-514.
Biesiekierski, J., Peters, S., Newnham, E., Rosella, O., Muir, J., Gibson, P. (2013). No
Effects of Gluten in Patients With Self-Reported Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity After Dietary Reduction of Fermentable, Poorly Absorbed, Short-Chain Carbohydrates. Gastroenterology. 145(2): 320-8.
Brottveit, M., Beitnes, AC., Tollefsen, S., Bratlie, J., Jahnsen, F., Johansen, FE., Sollid,
L., Lundin, K. (2013). Mucosal Cytokine Response After Short-Term Gluten Challenge in Celiac Disease and Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity. Am J Gastroenterol. 108(5): 842-50.
Bulka, C., Davis, M., Karagas, M., Ahsan, H., Argos, M. (2017). The Unintended Consequences of a Gluten-free Diet. Epidemiology. 28(3): 24-25.
Carroccio, A., Mansueto, P., Iacono, G., Soresi, M., D’Alcamo, A., Cavataio, F., Brusca,
I., Florena, A., Ambrosiano, G., Seidita, A., Pirrone, G., Rini, G. (2012). Non-Celiac Wheat Sensitivity Diagnosed by Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Challenge: Exploring a New Clinical Entity. Am J Gastroenterol. 107(12): 1898-906.
Di Sabatino, A., Volta, U., Salvatore, C., Biancheri, P., Caio, G., De Giorgio, R., Di
Stefano, M. Corazza, G. (2015). Small Amounts of Gluten in Subjects with Suspected Nonceliac Gluten Sensitivity: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Cross-Over Trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 13(9): 1604-12.
Elli, L., Tomba, C., Branchi, F., Roncoroni, L., Lombardo, V., Bardella, M., Ferretti, F.,
Conte, D., Valiante, F., Fini, L., Forti, E., Cannizzaro, R., Maiero, S., Londoni, C., Lauri, A., Fornaciari, G., Lenoci, N., Spagnuolo, R., Basilisco, G., Somalvico, F., Borgatta, B., Leandro, G., Segato, S., Barisani, D., Morreale, G., Buscarini, E. (2016). Evidence for the Presence of Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity in Patients with Functional Gastrointestinal Symptoms: Results from a Multicenter Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Gluten Challenge. Nutrients. 8(2): 84.
Mayo Clinic. (March 6, 2018). Celiac Disease. .
Mayo Clinic. (Nov 18, 2017). Irritable bowl syndrome. syndrome/symptoms-causes/syc-20360016.
McCarthy, Niall. (January 17, 2017). The Number of Americans Going Gluten Free Has
Tripled Since 2009 [Infographic].
Shahbazkhani, B., Sadeghi, A., Malekzadeh, R., Khatavi, F., Etemadi, M., Kalantri, E.,
Rostami-Nejad, M., Rostami, K. (2015). Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity Has Narrowed the Spectrum of Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Double-Blind Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial. Nutrients. 7(6): 4542-54.
Whiteman, Honor. (February 15, 2017). Gluten-free diet may have ‘unintended consequences’ for health. .
World Gastroenterology Organisation. (2016). Celiac Disease. Global Guardian of
Digestive Health. Serving the World. .
-----------------------
INTEGRATIVE REVIEW OF THE EFFECT OF GLUTEN, IF ANY, ON GASTROINTESTINAL SYMPTOMS IN NON-CELIAC DISEASE PATIENTS
by
Erin A. Caplan
BA, Franklin & Marshall College, 2016
Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of
Environmental and Occupational Health
Graduate School of Public health in partial fulfillment
of the requirements for the degree of
Masters of Public Health
University of Pittsburgh
2018
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
GRADUATE SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
This essay is submitted
by
Erin A. Caplan
on
April 26, 2018
and approved by
Essay Advisor:
Jim (James) Peterson, PhD ______________________________
Associate Professor
Department of Environmental and Occupational Health
Graduate School of Public Health
University of Pittsburgh
Essay Reader:
Martha Ann Terry, PhD ______________________________
Associate Professor and Director, MPH Program
Department of Behavioral and Community Health Sciences
Graduate School of Public Health
University of Pittsburgh
Copyright © by Erin A. Caplan
2018
Jim (James) Peterson, PhD
INTEGRATIVE REVIEW OF THE EFFECT OF GLUTEN, IF ANY, ON GASTROINESTINAL SYMPTOMS IN NON-CELIAC DISEASE PATIENTS
Erin A. Caplan, MPH
University of Pittsburgh, 2018
Table 3 Continued
Table 3 Continued
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related searches
- university of minnesota college of education
- university of minnesota school of social work
- wharton school of the university of pennsylvania
- cost of university of scranton
- city of pittsburgh jobs
- city of pittsburgh jobs website
- city of pittsburgh career opportunities
- city of pittsburgh employment
- city of pittsburgh job openings
- city of pittsburgh job postings
- university of pittsburgh the joseph m katz graduate school of business economi
- city of pittsburgh employment application