13-205; Affirmative defenses; justification; burden of proof
COMMENTS START_STATUTE \* MERGEFORMAT START_STATUTE13-205.??Affirmative defenses; justification; burden of proofA.??Except as otherwise provided by law, a defendant shall prove any affirmative defense raised by a preponderance of the evidence. Justification defenses under chapter 4 of this title are not affirmative defenses.??Justification defenses describe conduct that, if not justified, would constitute an offense but, if justified, does not constitute criminal or wrongful conduct. If evidence of justification pursuant to chapter 4 of this title is presented by the defendant, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant did not act with justification.B.??This section does not affect the presumption contained in section 13411, subsection C and section 13503. COMMENTS END_STATUTE \* MERGEFORMAT END_STATUTE ................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related searches
- burden of proof philosophy
- burden of proof science
- burden of proof in argument
- burden of proof examples
- burden of proof logical fallacy
- misplaced burden of proof fallacy
- burden of proof examples law
- the burden of proof fallacy
- burden of proof in law
- burden of proof vs preponderance of evidence
- burden of proof argument
- burden of proof example