Bureau ofConsumer Protection



|[pic] |

|Bureau of |

|Consumer Protection |

|UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |

|FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION |

|WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580 |

| |

| |

| |

|May 19, 1989 |

| |

| |

|Ms. Suellen A. Keever |

|Attorney |

|Sentara Health System |

|Finance Division |

|P.O. Box 2200 |

|Norfolk, Virginia 23501 |

|Dear Ms. Keever: |

|This is in response to your inquiry of April 26, 1989 inquiring whether your activities as in house counsel for Sentara Health |

|System fall within the purview of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). You further ask whether the institution of |

|legal action by Sentara against consumers in judicial districts other than where the consumer resides or where the consumer |

|signed the contract may violate Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act. |

|Section 8036 (A) of the FDCPA excludes from the definition of collector "any officer or employee of a creditor while, in the name|

|of the creditor, collecting debts for such creditor." This exemption also includes a creditor's salaried attorney who collects |

|debts on behalf of, and in the name of the creditor. Based upon the facts outlined in your letter, none of your collection |

|activities on behalf of Sentara would be subject to the FDCPA, including the venue requirements of Section 811. |

|Please note however that the "fair venue standard" adopted by Congress in Section 811 of the FDCPA was developed by the |

|Commission as a result of several enforcement actions brought prior to the FDCPA, and recently reaffirmed in a Commission action |

|against J.C. Penney Co. The actions were brought pursuant to the Commission's jurisdiction over unfair acts or practices in or |

|affecting commerce, as set out in Section 5 (a) (i) of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45 (a) (i). Although Sentara|

|may not be subject to the venue requirements of Section 811 of the FDCPA, the fair venue standard developed under Section 5 of |

|the Federal Trade Commission Act would, of course, continue to apply to Sentara's collection practices, including those that you |

|employ in Sentara's name. |

|I am enclosing recent staff interpretations addressed to attorneys which relate to the two issues raised in your letter;(1) a |

|copy of the Commission's Order in the J.C. Penney matter (109 FTC 54), and a copy of the FDCPA staff commentary which sets out |

|the staff's views on the various provisions of the FDCPA, including the exemptions granted to creditors and their employees.(2) |

|This constitutes an unofficial staff interpretation and is not binding on the Commission. I hope the information will be helpful.|

|Sincerely, |

|Roger J. Fitzpatrick |

|Attorney |

|Division of Credit Practices |

|1. See letters to Mr. Martin Schwam, dated October 20, 1986, and to Ronald D. Garrison, Esq. dated April 6, 1988. |

|2. Official Staff Commentary on the FDCPA, 53 Fed. Reg. 5012, par. 4 (December 13, 1988). |

................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download