The author(s) shown below used Federal funds provided by ...
The author(s) shown below used Federal funds provided by the U.S. Department of Justice and prepared the following final report:
Document Title:
Author:
Document No.: Date Received: Award Number:
A Collaborative Approach to Eliminating Street Drug Markets through Focused Deterrence
James M. Frabutt, Terri L. Shelton, Kristen L. Di Luca, Lynn K. Harvey, Mary K. Hefner
239242
August 2012
2006-IJ-CX-0034
This report has not been published by the U.S. Department of Justice. To provide better customer service, NCJRS has made this Federallyfunded grant final report available electronically in addition to traditional paper copies.
Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect
the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice.
A Collaborative Approach to Eliminating Street Drug Markets through Focused Deterrence
James M. Frabutt, Terri L. Shelton, Kristen L. Di Luca, Lynn K. Harvey, Mary K. Hefner
Final Report to the United States Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs National Institute of Justice March 2009 Grant #2006-IJ-CX-0034
University of Notre Dame University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Winston-Salem State University
This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s)
and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice.
Drug Market Intervention Final Report 2
Acknowledgements
Mike Carmichael Julia Conley Jim Fealy
David Kennedy Terrell Hayes Housing Authority of the City of High Point Housing Authority of Winston-Salem
Lee Hunt Rob Lang Pat Norris Rick Pender Tom Scholten Barbara Simmons Jim Summey Marty Sumner Anna Mills Wagoner Maddie Young
This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s)
and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice.
Drug Market Intervention Final Report 3
Table of Contents
Executive Summary
4
Chapter 1: Introduction and Overview
6
Chapter 2: Intervention Sites
11
Chapter 3: Methodology
21
Law Enforcement Key Stakeholder Interviews
21
Key Community Stakeholder Interviews
22
Resident Focus Groups
23
Notified Offender Interviews
25
Systematic Neighborhood Social Observation
26
Crime Impact Indicators
29
Chapter 4: Findings
32
Law Enforcement Stakeholders Articulate the Strategy
32
Key Community Stakeholder Perceptions
57
Resident Perceptions
73
Notified Offender Findings
86
Systematic Neighborhood Social Observation Results
103
Crime Impact Indicators
109
Chapter 5: Discussion
121
Law Enforcement Stakeholders
121
Key Community Stakeholders
124
Resident Perceptions
129
Notified Offenders
138
Systematic Neighborhood Social Observation
143
Crime Impact
146
Chapter 6: General Synthesis and Future Research Directions
148
A 360? Perspective on the Intervention
148
Implementation
150
Considerations for Engaging New Sites
153
Closing
155
References
157
Appendix A: Project Log
162
Appendix B: Demographic Profiles of Intervention Sites
167
Appendix C: Data Collection Instruments
193
Appendix D: Systematic Neighborhood Social Observation Materials 197
This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s)
and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice.
Drug Market Intervention Final Report 4
Executive Summary
This report presents the evaluation process and findings from the grant, A Collaborative Approach to Eliminating Street Drug Markets through Focused Deterrence. The evaluation was conducted by a team of researchers from The University of North Carolina at Greensboro's Center for Youth, Family, and Community Partnerships, the University of Notre Dame, and the Winston-Salem State University Center for Community Safety from January 2007 through December 2008.
Drug markets that exist in public spaces are harmful to communities and cause many negative consequences, which include violent criminal behavior, social disorder, public nuisances, and decreased quality of life for community residents. In an effort to combat open-air drug markets, two mid-sized cities in North Carolina have implemented a multi-dimensional, partnershipbased, focused deterrence strategy that addresses illicit drug dealing in open-air markets and circumvents many of the problems associated with general deterrence methods in order to reduce related violent crime.
The purpose of the current project was to conduct a process and outcome analysis of the street drug market elimination strategy. Two main goals were addressed by the evaluation. The first goal was to model and describe the elements, developmental stages, and operational steps of the street-drug intervention. The second goal of the project was to measure the impact of the strategy across several levels: a) key stakeholder perception of roles and impact; b) resident perception of impact; c) observable neighborhood changes; and d) crime impact. In order to meet these objectives, several data sources were utilized including interviews with law enforcement personnel, key community stakeholders, and notified offenders; focus groups with community residents; a systematic neighborhood observation; and analysis of crime impact indicators.
The report presents an overview of the intervention sites and the methodology, findings, and subsequent discussion of the data sources utilized. The following are summaries for each data collection source:
According to law enforcement personnel, some of the most important stages and aspects of the strategy include using a data-driven approach throughout, engaging the police department internally, conducting a thorough and in-depth undercover investigation, establishing meaningful contact with the offenders' significant others, communicating with community stakeholders and residents, and sustaining the strategy.
This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s)
and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice.
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- transportation for seniors gwinnett county georgia
- created and distributed as a courtesy of swd homes inc
- 2015 here s my card matchbin assets
- 2669 buford hwy marketing piece7 17 loopnet
- option regarding property in doraville ga proposal
- georgia department of human services division of family
- u s postage paid free free classifiedsread it on line www
- the author s shown below used federal funds provided by
- what on earth is food insecurity gwinnett county georgia
- the northeast georgia presorted std shopper publisher of
Related searches
- author s argument worksheets middle school
- net cash provided by financing activities
- 4 author s purpose for writing
- 4 types of author s purpose
- examples of author s purpose
- net cash provided by operating activities
- 3 types of author s purpose
- 5 types of author s purpose
- author s purpose worksheets
- different types of author s purpose
- teaching author s purpose
- cash provided by operations formula