DEATH ROW U.S.A.
[Pages:61]DEATH ROW U.S.A.
Fall 2020
A quarterly report by the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.
Deborah Fins Consultant to the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.
Death Row U.S.A. Fall 2020
(As of October 1, 2020)
TOTAL NUMBER OF DEATH ROW INMATES KNOWN TO LDF:
2553 (2553 ? 180* - 877M = 1496 enforceable sentences)
Race of Defendant: White Black Latino/Latina Native American Asian Unknown at this issue
1,076 1,062
343 24 47 1
(42.15%) (41.60%) (13.44%) (0.94%) (1.84%) (0.04%)
Gender: Male Female
2,502 51
(98.00%) (2.00%)
JURISDICTIONS WITH CURRENT DEATH PENALTY STATUTES: 30
Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, CaliforniaM, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, OregonM, PennsylvaniaM, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Wyoming, U.S. Government, U.S. Military.
M States where a moratorium prohibiting execution has been imposed by the Governor.
JURISDICTIONS WITHOUT DEATH PENALTY STATUTES:
23
Alaska, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Hampshire [see note below], New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin.
[NOTE: New Hampshire repealed the death penalty prospectively. The man already sentenced remains under sentence of death.]
* Designates the number of people in non-moratorium states who are not under active death sentence because of court reversal but whose sentence may be reimposed. M Designates the number of people in states where a gubernatorial moratorium on execution has been imposed.
Death Row U.S.A. Page 1
In the United States Supreme Court
Update to Summer 2020 Issue of Significant Criminal & Other Pending Cases for Cases to Be Decided in October Term 2019 or October Term 2020
1. CASES RAISING CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTIONS
Fourth Amendment
Torres v. Madrid, No.19-292 (Parameter of "seizure") (decision below 769 Fed.Appx. 654 (10th Cir. 2019))
Question Presented: Is an unsuccessful attempt to detain a suspect by use of physical force a "seizure" within the meaning of the 4th Amendment, as the 8th, 9th, and 11th Circuits and the New Mexico Supreme Court hold, or must physical force be successful in detaining a suspect to constitute a "seizure," as the 10th Circuit and the D.C. Court of Appeals hold?
Sixth Amendment
Edwards v. Vannoy, No. 19-5807 (Retroactivity of Ramos) (decision below Case No. 18-31095 (5th Cir. 5/20/19 denial of COA))
Question Presented: Does the Court's decision in Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 U.S. ___ (2020), apply retroactively to cases on federal collateral review?
Eighth Amendmentp
Jones v. Mississippi, No. 18-1259 (Juvenile LWOP decisions) (decision below 2015-CT-00899SCT Miss. 2018))
Question Presented: Does the 8th Amendment require the sentencing authority to make a finding that a juvenile is permanently incorrigible before imposing a sentence of life without parole?
2. CASES RAISING OTHER IMPORTANT FEDERAL QUESTIONS
Borden v. United States, No. 19-5410 (Scope of ACCA crimes) (decision below 769 Fed.Appx. 266 (6th Cir. 2019))
Question Presented: 1. Does the "use of force" clause in the Armed Career Criminal Act (the "ACCA"), 18 U.S.C. ? 924(e)(2)(B)(i) encompass crimes with a mens rea of mere recklessness?
Brownback v. King, No. 19-546 (Interplay of FTCA and Bivens) (decision below 917 F.3d 409 (6th Cir. 2019))
Question Presented: Does a final judgment in favor of the United States in an action brought under ? 1346(b)(1) [Federal Tort Claims Act], on the ground that a private person would not be liable to the claimant under state tort law for the injuries alleged, bar a claim under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), that is brought by the same claimant, based on the same injuries, and against the same governmental employees whose acts gave rise to the claimant's FTCA claim?
Death Row U.S.A. Page 2
Carpenter v. Murphy, No. 17-1107 (Jurisdiction, "Indian reservation") (decision below 875 F.3d 896 (10th Cir. 2017))
Question Presented: Do the 1866 territorial boundaries of the Creek Nation within the former Indian Territory of eastern Oklahoma constitute an "Indian reservation" today under 18 U.S.C. ? 1151 (a)?
Decision: Yes. In a per curiam opinion citing McGirt (see below), the Court affirmed the 10th Circuit's decision that the Creek Nation remains intact and Oklahoma did not have jurisdiction over major crimes. McGirt v. Oklahoma, No. 18-9526 (State court jurisdiction in "Indian Country") (decision below pc-2018-1057 (OK CCA 2019))
Question Presented: Can Oklahoma courts continue to unlawfully exercise, under state law, criminal jurisdiction as "justiciable matter" in Indian Country over Indians accused of major crimes enumerated under the Indian Major Crimes Act - which are under exclusive federal jurisdiction?
Decision: No. The state courts have no jurisdiction in Indian Country over Indians accused of crimes enumerated in the IMCA. The land reserved for the Creek Nation in Oklahoma has not been ceded to the state, and remains "Indian Country."
Death Row U.S.A. Page 3
Execution Update
As of October 1, 2020
Total number of executions since the 1976 reinstatement of capital punishment:
1526
100
98 85
80
74 68
60
56
45
38
40
31 31
20
1 0 2 0 1 2 5 21 18 18 25 11 16 23 14
0
66 71 65 59 60 53
52
42 37 46 43 43 39 35
28 20 23 25 22
14
1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Race of defendants executed
total number 1526
White
855 (56.03%)
Black
519 (34.01%)
Latino/a
128 (8.39%)
Native American
17 (1.11%)
Asian
7 (0.46%)
Gender of defendants executed
Female
16 (1.05%)
Male
1510 (98.95%)
Race of victims
total number 2229
White
1687
Black
339
Latin
155
Native American
7
Asian
41
(75.68%) (15.21%) (6.95%) (0.31%) (1.84%)
Female Male
Gender of victims
1099 (49.30%) 1130 (50.70%)
Defendant-victim racial combinations
White Victim Black Victim Latino/a Victim
White Defendant 791
Black Defendant 294
Latino/a Defendant 55
Asian Defendant
2
Native Amer. Def. 14
TOTAL:
1156
51.83% 21 19.27% 176 3.60% 3 0.13% 0
.92% 0 75.75% 200
1.38% 18 11.53% 20 0.20% 62
0% 0 0% 0 13.11% 100
1.18% 1.31% 4.06%
0% 0% 6.55%
Asian Victim
6
0.39%
16
1.05%
2
0.13%
5
0.33%
0
0%
29
1.90%
Native American
Victim
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
3 0.20%
3 0.20%
Note: In addition, there were 38 defendants executed for the murders of multiple victims of different races. Of those, 21 defendants were white, 11 black and 6 Latino. (2.49%)
Death Row U.S.A. Page 4
Execution Breakdown by State
State # % of Total
Racial Combinations
(see codes below)
1. TX 570 37.35 227 W/W (40%); 109 B/W (19%); 67 B/B (12%); 55 L/L (10%); 45 L/W (8%); 18 B/L (3%); 13 W/L, 10 B/A ( 2% each); 6 W/mix (1%); 4 W/B (.7%); 3 L/mix (.5%); 2 L/B, 2 L/A, 2 A/A, 2 N/W, 2 W/A, 2 B/mix (.4% each)
28* 13# 6^
2. VA 113
7.40 48 W/W (43%); 36 B/W (32%); 13 B/B (12%); 4 W/B, 4 W/mix (4% EACH); 3 L/W (3%); 1 B/L, 1 B/A, 1 W/A, 1 A/W, 1 B/mix (.9% each)
10* 3# 1^
3. OK 112
7.34 61 W/W (55%); 17 B/W (15%); 14 B/B (13%); 5 N/W (5%); 3 7* 2# 3^ W/A (3%); 2 W/B, 2 B/A, 2 A/A, 2 W/mix (2% each); 1 N/N, 1 W/L, 1 B/L, 1 L/L (.9% each)
4. FL 99 6.49 58 W/W (59%); 18 B/W (18%); 8 B/B (8%); 4 L/W (4%); 3 10*
2^
W/mix (3% each); 2 L/L, 2 B/mix (2% each); 1 N/W, 1 L/B, 1
W/L, 1 L/mix (1% each)
5. MO 90
5.90 54 W/W (60%); 17 B/W, 17 B/B (19% each); 1 N/W, 1 W/B (1% each)
5* 1#
6. GA 76 4.98 48 W/W (63%); 18 B/W (24%); 10 B/B (13%)
1* 2# 1^
7. AL 67 4.39 37 W/W (55%); 18 B/W (27%); 10 B/B (15%); 1 W/B, 1
7*
1^
B/mix % each)
8. OH 56 3.67 34 W/W (61%); 8 B/W, 8 B/B (14% each); 2 W/mix, 2 B/mix 6* (4% each); 1 B/A, 1 W/B (2% each)
9. NC 43 2.82 28 W/W (65%); 7 B/B (16%); 6 B/W (14%); 1 W/B, 1 N/N
4*
1^
(2% each)
10. SC 43 2.82 20 W/W (47%); 11 B/W (26%); 5 W/B (12%); 4 B/B (9%); 2 10* 1# W/mix (5%); 1 B/A (2%)
11. AZ 37 2.42 27 W/W (73%); 3 L/L (8%); 2 N/W (5%); 1 B/W, 1 L/W, 1
5*
W/L, 1 W/mix, 1 L/mix (3% each)
12. AR 31 2.03 20 W/W (65%); 7 B/W (23%); 3 B/B (10%); 1 L/W (3%)
4*
1^
13. LA 28 1.83 15 W/W (54%); 8 B/W (29%); 5 B/B (18%)
1* 1#
14. MS 21 1.38 14 W/W (67%); 3 B/W (14%); 2 B/B (10%); 1 B/A 1 W/B
1*
(5% each)
15. IN 20 1.31 16 W/W (80%); 2 B/W (10%); 1 B/B, 1 W/L (5% each)
4*
16. DE 16 1.05 8 W/W (50%); 5 B/B (31%); 2 B/W (13%); 1 N/W (6%)
5*
17. CA 13
.85 7 W/W (54%); 2 N/W (15%); 1 B/W, 1 W/L, 1 A/A, 1 B/mix 2* (8% each)
18. TN 13
.85 12 W/W (92%); 1 B/B (8%)
1*
19. IL 12
.79 7 W/W (58%); 2 B/W, 2 B/mix (17% each); 1 B/B (8%)
19. IL 12
Death Row U.S.A. Page 5
State
20. NV 21. US
22. UT 23. MD 24. SD 25. WA 26. NE 27. ID 28. KY 29. MT 30. PA 31. OR 32. CO 33. CT 34. NM 35. WY
# % of Total
Racial Combinations
12
.79 9 W/W (75%); 1 B/W, 1 L/W, 1 A/W (8% each)
10
.66 5 W/W (50%); 2 B/W (20%); 1 N/N, 1 W/mix, 1 L/mix (10%
each)
7
.46 5 W/W (71%); 2 B/W (29%)
5
.33 3 B/W (60%); 2 W/W (40%)
5
.33 5 W/W (100%)
5
.33 5 W/W (100%)
4
.26 2 W/W (50%); 2 B/W (50%)
3
.20 3 W/W (100%)
3
.20 3 W/W (100%)
3
.20 3 W/W (100%)
3
.20 2 W/W (67%); 1 W/B (33%)
2
.13 2 W/W (100%)
1
.07 1 W/W (100%)
1
.07 1 W/W (100%)
1
.07 1 W/W (100%)
1
.07 1 W/W (100%)
(see codes below)
11* 1*
4* 1* 4* 3* 1* 1* 2* 1* 3* 2*
1* 1*
*
Defendants who gave up their appeals (149; 10% of total) [see note to 1049 below]
#
Juveniles (under age 18 at the time of the offense) (23; 2% of total) [see note to 740, below]
^
Female (16; 1% of total)
ROSTER OF THE EXECUTED
DATE OF EXECUTION 01-17-77 05-25-79 10-22-79 03-09-81 08-10-82 12-07-82 04-22-83 09-02-83 11-30-83 12-14-83 12-15-83 01-26-84
NAME OF DEFENDANT/ NUMBER IF MULTIPLE VICTIMS 1. Gary Gilmore [*] 2. John Spenkelink 3. Jesse Bishop [*] 4. Steven Judy [*] / 3 5. Frank Coppola [*] 6. Charlie Brooks 7. John Evans 8. Jimmy Lee Gray 9. Robert Sullivan 10. Robert W. Williams 11. John Eldon Smith / 2 12. Anthony Antone
STATE
UT FL NV IN VA TX AL MS FL LA GA FL
RACE DEF / VICTIM
W/W W/W W/W W/3W W/W B/W W/W W/W W/W B/B W/2W W/W
VICTIM GENDER M M M FFF F M M F M M MF M
Death Row U.S.A. Page 6
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- inmates under death sentence uds 2018 3
- death row u s a
- dora solares an individual plaintiff complaint for
- united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit
- 1701 k st nw suite 205 death penalty information
- state of california gavin newsom governor office of the
- state of california inspection inspection dates 06 24
- chairwoman committee on oversight and reform u s house
- united states district court for the district of
Related searches
- death row inmates in texas
- mississippi death row inmates list
- alabama death row inmates pictures
- texas death row anthony haynes last words
- huntsville prison death row inmates
- new death row inmates
- women death row inmates pictures
- tdcj death row inmate
- alabama death row inmates list
- death row inmates list
- ms death row inmates
- death row inmates in alabama