COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS



> |

|< |> |

|< |< |

| |FISCAL IMPACT:>> |

|< |> |

|< |< |

| |BUSINESS IMPACT STATEMENT:>> |

|< |> |

|< |< |

| |RECOMMENDATION:>> |

|< |> |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Cox, the Board continued the item to April 14, 2010 at 9:00 a.m. at the |

| |request of the Chief Administrative Officer, on Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

|< |

|> |

| |

|< |< |

| |OVERVIEW:>> |

|< |> |

|< |< |

| |FISCAL IMPACT:>> |

|< |> |

|< |< |

| |BUSINESS IMPACT STATEMENT:>> |

|< |> |

|< |< |

| |RECOMMENDATION:>> |

|< |> |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Cox, the Board closed the Hearing took action as recommended, on Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

|< |

|> |

| |

|< |< |

| |OVERVIEW:>> |

|< |> |

|< |< |

| |FISCAL IMPACT:>> |

|< |> |

|< |< |

| |BUSINESS IMPACT STATEMENT:>> |

|< |> |

|< |< |

| |RECOMMENDATION:>> |

|< |> |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Cox, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent, adopting Resolution |

| |No. 10-038, entitled: SCHEDULE FOR REPAYMENT TO COUNTY SAN DIEGO COUNTYWIDE PERMANENT ROAD DIVISION NO. 1000, ZONE NO. 1015 – |

| |LANDAVO and Resolution No. 10-039, entitled: SCHEDULE FOR REPAYMENT TO COUNTY SAN DIEGO COUNTYWIDE PERMANENT ROAD DIVISION ROAD |

| |NO. 1000, ZONE NO. 1016 – EL SERENO WAY. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

|< |

|> |

| |

|< |< |

| |OVERVIEW:>> |

|< |> |

|< |< |

| |FISCAL IMPACT:>> |

|< |> |

|< |< |

| |BUSINESS IMPACT STATEMENT:>> |

|< |> |

|< |< |

| |RECOMMENDATION:>> |

|< |> |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Horn, seconded by Supervisor Cox, the Board took action as recommended. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

|< |

|> |

| |

|< |< |

| |OVERVIEW:>> |

|< |> |

|< |< |

| |FISCAL IMPACT:>> |

|< |> |

|< |< |

| |BUSINESS IMPACT STATEMENT:>> |

|< |>|

|< |< |

| |RECOMMENDATION:>> |

|< |> |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Cox, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent, adopting Ordinance |

| |No. 10039 (N.S.), entitled: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 5 OF DIVISION 6 OF TITLE 8 OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY CODE |

| |RELATING TO THE BIOLOGICAL MITIGATION ORDINANCE. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

|< |

|> |

| |

|< |< |

| |OVERVIEW:>> |

|< |> |

|< |< |

| |FISCAL IMPACT:>> |

|< |> |

|< |< |

| |BUSINESS IMPACT STATEMENT:>> |

|< |> |

|< |< |

| |RECOMMENDATION:>> |

|< |> |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Cox, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent, adopting Ordinance |

| |No. 10040 (N.S.), entitled: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 81.102 (bb) OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY CODE TO PROVIDE A REFERENCE TO |

| |AMENDED PUBLIC ROAD STANDARDS. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

|< |

|> |

| |

|< |< |

| |OVERVIEW:>> |

|< | ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download