PSM UNIT 3: MANAGING IN: ETHICS & CAREER …



PSM UNIT 3: MANAGING IN: ETHICS & CAREER MANAGEMENT IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR

|MINOR ASSIGNMENT – ASSESSMENT RESPONSE SHEET FOR LEARNING JOURNAL |

Participants – complete your details and submit this sheet with your learning journal assignment. Your assessor will provide feedback and your grade on this sheet.

|Participant to complete |

|Participant’s name: | |State/Territory: |

|Participant’s email: | | |

|Date of submission: | | |

|Assessor to complete |

|Assessor’s name: | |Mark: /100 |

|LEARNING JOURNAL ASSESSMENT |

|Completed both of the two compulsory and three elective activities and presented in the required sequence and structure – introduction, activities |

|and self-reflection conclusion |

| |

| |

|Any other comments (in particular what the participant would need to do to get a higher mark and what has been done well) |

| |

| |

| |

|Assessors to make comments and corrections in the document using track changes, and provide written comments above for each section. |

Participants – see over page for your Assignment Check List and Declaration, which you are required to complete before submitting your assignment.

|ASSIGNMENT CHECKLIST |

|(Double click the shaded box, select in Default Value. Click |

|Have you: |

| Completed the participant details? |

| Answered all parts of the question? Added analysis and theory? |

| Added a reference list? |

| Pages numbered? |

| Used 12-point font? |

| Justified the text? |

| Double-spaced? |

| Spell checked and grammar checked? |

| Inserted word count after final of the six activities? (Word count excludes reference list, any appendices and title) |

| Name, cohort, unit and assignment information should all be included in the header (doing this excludes this information |

|from the word count) |

| Proofread a hard copy? |

| Included the Assessment Response and Marking Criteria sheets at the front of your assignment (a single document in word |

|2003)? |

Participants, please complete

|ASSIGNMENT DECLARATION |

|(Double click the shaded box, select in Default Value. Click |

|I am aware of the University's policy on Academic Integrity, and, except where appropriately acknowledged, this assignment is |

|my own work, has been expressed in my own words and has not previously been submitted for assessment. |

| |

UNIT 3 MINOR - MARKING CRITERIA SHEET FOR LEARNING JOURNAL

|Criterion |Fail |Pass |Credit |Distinction |High Distinction |

| |0-49 |50-64 |65-74 |75-84 |85-100 |

| | | | | | |

|Analysis |Confuses fact with |Some identification of |Adequately identifies |Able to compare, contrast and |Able to critique and |

| |opinion and/or |assumptions and/or |assumptions & some |critique theories and models |evaluate a range of |

| |little evidence of |limitations of context. |evidence of critical |and demonstrate their |debates, theories and |

| |critical & |Personal and/or workplace |awareness through |application in the personal |relevant literature. |

| |analytical ability.|examples used move beyond |recognition of ‘for and |and/or workplace examples used.|Evidence of synthesis |

| |Personal and/or |description into basic |against’ positions, as |Some evaluation of evidence or |and/or original thought |

| |workplace examples |analysis. |demonstrated in the |positions. |clearly comes through |

| |used are | |personal and/or workplace | |the personal and/or |

| |descriptive and do | |examples. | |workplace examples used.|

| |not demonstrate | | | | |

| |analytical skills. | | | | |

| | | | | | |

|Argument ** |Inconsistency in |Opinions expressed but not|Statement of argument |Clear & consistent argument |Argument supported by |

| |argument. Does not |fully developed as an |made. Links between |which is supported by |convincing and |

| |use evidence or |argument. Examples and |examples and evidence and |reasonable evidence. |integrated evidence |

| |examples in support|evidence not specifically |overall argument may not | |and/or examples. Clear |

| |of views. |linked to overall concepts|be clear. | |‘case’ is built and |

| | |or may be misunderstood. | | |argument ‘signposted’. |

| | | | | | |

|Style & presentation |Does not comply |Complies with required |Good example of format or |Excellent example of format or |As for D plus high level|

| |with required |format or style |style. Language clear and|style. Clear and precise use of|of engagement of reader |

| |format or style |requirements. May be |unambiguous. Structure is |language and structure to |through compelling use |

| |requirements. |minor errors in language |coherent. |convince reader. |of language. |

| |Language may be |but meaning clear. | | | |

| |unclear or contain |Structure shows an | | | |

| |significant errors.|adequate understanding. | | | |

| |Lacks a coherent | | | | |

| |structure. | | | | |

| | | | | | |

** Note that this assignment does not lend itself to extensive argument and this element would form only a minor part of the marking.

................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download