PSM UNIT 3: MANAGING IN: ETHICS & CAREER …
PSM UNIT 3: MANAGING IN: ETHICS & CAREER MANAGEMENT IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR
|MINOR ASSIGNMENT – ASSESSMENT RESPONSE SHEET FOR LEARNING JOURNAL |
Participants – complete your details and submit this sheet with your learning journal assignment. Your assessor will provide feedback and your grade on this sheet.
|Participant to complete |
|Participant’s name: | |State/Territory: |
|Participant’s email: | | |
|Date of submission: | | |
|Assessor to complete |
|Assessor’s name: | |Mark: /100 |
|LEARNING JOURNAL ASSESSMENT |
|Completed both of the two compulsory and three elective activities and presented in the required sequence and structure – introduction, activities |
|and self-reflection conclusion |
| |
| |
|Any other comments (in particular what the participant would need to do to get a higher mark and what has been done well) |
| |
| |
| |
|Assessors to make comments and corrections in the document using track changes, and provide written comments above for each section. |
Participants – see over page for your Assignment Check List and Declaration, which you are required to complete before submitting your assignment.
|ASSIGNMENT CHECKLIST |
|(Double click the shaded box, select in Default Value. Click |
|Have you: |
| Completed the participant details? |
| Answered all parts of the question? Added analysis and theory? |
| Added a reference list? |
| Pages numbered? |
| Used 12-point font? |
| Justified the text? |
| Double-spaced? |
| Spell checked and grammar checked? |
| Inserted word count after final of the six activities? (Word count excludes reference list, any appendices and title) |
| Name, cohort, unit and assignment information should all be included in the header (doing this excludes this information |
|from the word count) |
| Proofread a hard copy? |
| Included the Assessment Response and Marking Criteria sheets at the front of your assignment (a single document in word |
|2003)? |
Participants, please complete
|ASSIGNMENT DECLARATION |
|(Double click the shaded box, select in Default Value. Click |
|I am aware of the University's policy on Academic Integrity, and, except where appropriately acknowledged, this assignment is |
|my own work, has been expressed in my own words and has not previously been submitted for assessment. |
| |
UNIT 3 MINOR - MARKING CRITERIA SHEET FOR LEARNING JOURNAL
|Criterion |Fail |Pass |Credit |Distinction |High Distinction |
| |0-49 |50-64 |65-74 |75-84 |85-100 |
| | | | | | |
|Analysis |Confuses fact with |Some identification of |Adequately identifies |Able to compare, contrast and |Able to critique and |
| |opinion and/or |assumptions and/or |assumptions & some |critique theories and models |evaluate a range of |
| |little evidence of |limitations of context. |evidence of critical |and demonstrate their |debates, theories and |
| |critical & |Personal and/or workplace |awareness through |application in the personal |relevant literature. |
| |analytical ability.|examples used move beyond |recognition of ‘for and |and/or workplace examples used.|Evidence of synthesis |
| |Personal and/or |description into basic |against’ positions, as |Some evaluation of evidence or |and/or original thought |
| |workplace examples |analysis. |demonstrated in the |positions. |clearly comes through |
| |used are | |personal and/or workplace | |the personal and/or |
| |descriptive and do | |examples. | |workplace examples used.|
| |not demonstrate | | | | |
| |analytical skills. | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|Argument ** |Inconsistency in |Opinions expressed but not|Statement of argument |Clear & consistent argument |Argument supported by |
| |argument. Does not |fully developed as an |made. Links between |which is supported by |convincing and |
| |use evidence or |argument. Examples and |examples and evidence and |reasonable evidence. |integrated evidence |
| |examples in support|evidence not specifically |overall argument may not | |and/or examples. Clear |
| |of views. |linked to overall concepts|be clear. | |‘case’ is built and |
| | |or may be misunderstood. | | |argument ‘signposted’. |
| | | | | | |
|Style & presentation |Does not comply |Complies with required |Good example of format or |Excellent example of format or |As for D plus high level|
| |with required |format or style |style. Language clear and|style. Clear and precise use of|of engagement of reader |
| |format or style |requirements. May be |unambiguous. Structure is |language and structure to |through compelling use |
| |requirements. |minor errors in language |coherent. |convince reader. |of language. |
| |Language may be |but meaning clear. | | | |
| |unclear or contain |Structure shows an | | | |
| |significant errors.|adequate understanding. | | | |
| |Lacks a coherent | | | | |
| |structure. | | | | |
| | | | | | |
** Note that this assignment does not lend itself to extensive argument and this element would form only a minor part of the marking.
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.