Gregory Friedman v - Indiana - Cast of after we collided

Appellant’s Br. at 5. After examination of the instructions that were given, we agree. Further, Friedman concedes that, although the tendered instruction did not follow Indiana Pattern Instruction No. 6.19 verbatim, the tendered instruction was “basically a correct statement of the law.” Id. We agree. ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.