Year .au



Assessment TaskYear: 7Domain: HumanitiesDate Assigned: Due Date:406400-137922000Assessment Task Title: Ancient China EssayStudent’s Name: TASK: You will write an essay which presents an argument based on evidence about the question below. Was Emperor Qin Shi Huang a good or a bad ruler of Ancient China? Your essay should be between 400 and 500 words. You are to include a primary and a secondary source (as an image if you wish) at the end of the written piece with a caption explaining how it supports your contention. Refer to the ‘Skill Drill: Presenting a Point of View’ on pages 432-3 in your text book and use the essay template in Project Space to plan your essay.Assessment criteriaAnalysis of primary and secondary source evidenceAnalysis of cause and effect of significant events and individualsEvaluation of the role and achievement of a significant individual, development or cultural achievementLanguage conventions including structure, grammar, spelling, etc.Rubric DescriptionBelow ExpectationsMeets ExpectationsMeets ExpectationsAbove ExpectationsEvaluation of historical figureYou have written a contention on the impact of Qin Shi Huang on the development of Ancient China.Fewer than three arguments have been presented OR they have very limited /or incorrect explanation The positive and negative consequences are unclearYou have written a contention on the impact of Qin Shi Huang on the development of Ancient China. Three logical arguments, with reasonable explanations have been presented.You are able to outline both the positive and negative consequences of Qin Shi Huang.You have written a contention on the impact of Qin Shi Huang on the development of Ancient China. Three logical arguments, with explanations have been presented.You are able to analyse both the positive and negative consequences of Qin Shi Huang.You have written a contention on the impact of Qin Shi Huang on the development of Ancient China. More than three logical and well developed arguments have been presented.You are able to analyse in a sophisticated and detailed manner both the positive and negative consequences of Qin Shi Huang.1-3 marks4-6 marks7-8 marks9-10 marksUse of EvidenceA primary source and/or/ secondary source and/or caption has not been submitted A primary and secondary source has been used to support their argument and has been explained adequately in a captionA related primary and secondary source has been used to support their argument and has been explained well in a captionA well -chosen primary and secondary source has been used to support their argument and has been explained and analysed well in a caption1-3 marks4-6 marks7-8 marks9-10 marksLanguage ConventionsThe ideas are not well expressed with many grammar, punctuation and spelling. errorsThe ideas are generally well-expressed, with several grammar, punctuation and spelling errors.The ideas are clearly expressed, with few grammar, punctuation and spelling errors. There is evidence of proofreading and editingThe ideas are clearly expressed in paragraphs, with flawless grammar, punctuation and spelling. There is evidence of proofreading and editing.1-3 marks4-6 marks7-8 marks9-10 marks/40% ScoreS/N ResultComments ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download