Here is some text - Michigan



CR-05 - Goals and OutcomesProgress the jurisdiction has made in carrying out its strategic plan and its action plan. 91.520(a) This could be an overview that includes major initiatives and highlights that were proposed and executed throughout the program year.The State believes the activiites and strategies funded through the Consolidated Plan are making an impact on identified needs.? The demand for the programs funded under CDBG, HOME, ESG and HOPWA remain greater than the funding available.? As demonstrated by the 2015 production numbers, federal funding is being used to accomplish the major goals cited in the State of Michigan Consolidated Plan.??The State does not believe an adjustment to its strategies is needed at this time.Furthermore, the staff of the Division of Housing and Homeless Services has been able to train providers on key areas of the Homeless Management Information System which has requested a major update of the data quality enhancement of the information that is being collected.? The Division has also been able to hire a new Program Specialist that was able to revise and update the monitoring materials so that the providers are able to be evaluated on the current program requirement for the HOPWA program.? These program system updates will allow for a more dteailed evaluation of the program going forward and help to identify any issues that may be occurring in order to assist the providers with the administration of the parison of the proposed versus actual outcomes for each outcome measure submitted with the consolidated plan and explain, if applicable, why progress was not made toward meeting goals and objectives. 91.520(g)Categories, priority levels, funding sources and amounts, outcomes/objectives, goal outcome indicators, units of measure, targets, actual outcomes/outputs, and percentage completed for each of the grantee’s program year goals.GoalCategorySource / AmountIndicatorUnit of MeasureExpected – Strategic PlanActual – Strategic PlanPercent CompleteExpected – Program YearActual – Program YearPercent CompleteBlight Elimination - MSF CDBGNon-Housing Community DevelopmentCDBG: $OtherOther52 40.00%52 40.00%Community Dev. Infrastructure & Facades - MSF CDBGNon-Housing Community DevelopmentCDBG: $OtherOther1094009 940,090.00%1094009 940,090.00%Community Development Jobs - MSF CDBGNon-Housing Community DevelopmentCDBG: $Jobs created/retainedJobs2083 415.00% Community Development Jobs - MSF CDBGNon-Housing Community DevelopmentCDBG: $Businesses assistedBusinesses Assisted02 202 10.00%Economic Development Jobs - MSF CDBGNon-Housing Community DevelopmentCDBG: $ / HOPWA: $ / HOME: $ / ESG: $Jobs created/retainedJobs400302 75.50%400302 75.50%ESGHomelessESG: $Tenant-based rental assistance / Rapid RehousingHouseholds Assisted00 2060 0.00%ESGHomelessESG: $Homelessness PreventionPersons Assisted00 4130 0.00%ESGHomelessESG: $OtherOther2060 0.00% HOME DPAAffordable HousingHOME: $Direct Financial Assistance to HomebuyersHouseholds Assisted8378 93.98%8380 96.39%HOPWANon-Homeless Special NeedsCDBG: $ / HOPWA: $ / HOME: $ / ESG: $Tenant-based rental assistance / Rapid RehousingHouseholds Assisted100100 100.00%100106 106.00%HOPWANon-Homeless Special NeedsCDBG: $ / HOPWA: $ / HOME: $ / ESG: $Housing for People with HIV/AIDS addedHousehold Housing Unit106106 100.00%10663 59.43%HOPWANon-Homeless Special NeedsCDBG: $ / HOPWA: $ / HOME: $ / ESG: $HIV/AIDS Housing OperationsHousehold Housing Unit4444 100.00%4444 100.00%MSHDA HOME and MSF CDBG Housing ActivitiesAffordable HousingCDBG: $ / HOME: $Rental units constructedHousehold Housing Unit100 0.00%250 0.00%MSHDA HOME and MSF CDBG Housing ActivitiesAffordable HousingCDBG: $ / HOME: $Rental units rehabilitatedHousehold Housing Unit1008 8.00%758 10.67%MSHDA HOME and MSF CDBG Housing ActivitiesAffordable HousingCDBG: $ / HOME: $Homeowner Housing AddedHousehold Housing Unit010 510 200.00%MSHDA HOME and MSF CDBG Housing ActivitiesAffordable HousingCDBG: $ / HOME: $Homeowner Housing RehabilitatedHousehold Housing Unit4022 55.00%3022 73.33%MSHDA HOME RentalAffordable HousingHOME: $Rental units constructedHousehold Housing Unit150260 173.33%150260 173.33%MSHDA HOME RentalAffordable HousingHOME: $Rental units rehabilitatedHousehold Housing Unit6000 0.00%6000 0.00%Table SEQ Table \* ARABIC 1 - Accomplishments – Program Year & Strategic Plan to DateAssess how the jurisdiction’s use of funds, particularly CDBG, addresses the priorities and specific objectives identified in the plan, giving special attention to the highest priority activities identified.There was a transition during the year of the housing CDBG program being moved from MSHDA to the MEDC.? A tremendous amount of staff time was attributed to the transition and ensuring that the awarded projects continued to progress and a plan for the future developed along with policies and procedures.? The goal of expanding economic opportunities for low and moderate income persons is being met with CDBG economic development program.? All CDBG downtown programs are designed to increase the availability/accessibility of economic opportunities in Michigan's smawll downtown areas in order to revitalize their living/working environments and improve the quality of life; with emphasis placed on assisting low and moderate income persons.? The overall goals of providing affordable housing and a suitable living environment are being accomplished with our homeowner, homebuyer, rental housing development as well as the blight elimination/demolition programs.?The goal of providing housing and/or assistance to persons with disabilities, the homeless and persons with HIV/AIDS are being funded through the Rental and Homeless Housing Programs and the HOPWA Program.? The households that were using the HOPWA program are currently using more of the main stream resources than in previous years which may be the primary reason that the short-term rent, mortgage, and utility assistance was lower than expected.? The assistance that was provided for this year was more long term than short term, which means that many of the eligible households that were being assisted in previous years have found ways of being self-sufficient and stably housed.CR-10 - Racial and Ethnic composition of families assistedDescribe the families assisted (including the racial and ethnic status of families assisted). 91.520(a) CDBGHOMEHOPWAESGWhite3015071000Black or African American175451690Asian47130American Indian or American Native3940Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0000Total3251,0682860Hispanic1026130Not Hispanic3151,0422730Table SEQ Table \* ARABIC 2 – Table of assistance to racial and ethnic populations by source of fundsNarrativeThe ESG reports are being made avilable and provided as part of the E-CART data collection?process which is new for this CAPER and will be submitted in conjunction with the CAPER along with a copy of the Section 3 report.? Note:? ESG documentation and HOME Match sections as well as the citizen participation plan and possibly PR-28 will be modified prior to submission.CR-15 - Resources and Investments 91.520(a)Identify the resources made availableSource of FundsSourceResources Made AvailableAmount Expended During Program YearCDBG 151,191,88030,238,376HOME 56,661,8753,180,488HOPWA 5,357,3201,071,464ESG 23,645,6854,729,137Table SEQ Table \* ARABIC 3 – Resources Made AvailableNarrativeThe U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Community, Planning and Development (CPD) Programs are integral components of broader efforts by the State through the Michigan State Housing Development Authority (MSHDA), Michigan Strategic Fund (MSF)/Michigan Economic Development Corporation (MEDC), and the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (MDHHS).Identify the geographic distribution and location of investmentsTarget AreaPlanned Percentage of AllocationActual Percentage of AllocationNarrative DescriptionStatewide Distribution100100Statewide distribution via a competitive process or on a continuous basis per program parameters.Table SEQ Table \* ARABIC 4 – Identify the geographic distribution and location of investmentsNarrativeThe State uses a combination of methods for distributing funds that are described in more detail wihtin the specific CDBG, HOME, ESG and HOPWA sections below.? Methods of distribution may include:? competitive awards, need based awards, direct funded awards based on an RFP evaluation, NOFA(s) issued based on funding levels, and on-going open application windows per program parameters.LeveragingExplain how federal funds leveraged additional resources (private, state and local funds), including a description of how matching requirements were satisfied, as well as how any publicly owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that were used to address the needs identified in the plan.For CDBG grants matching funds and private investment are often required.? The MSF's goal in 2015 was to have approximately $200,000,000 in private investment associated with grants.Fiscal Year Summary – HOME Match1. Excess match from prior Federal fiscal year1,640,6222. Match contributed during current Federal fiscal year5,224,2373. Total match available for current Federal fiscal year (Line 1 plus Line 2)6,864,8594. Match liability for current Federal fiscal year1,991,6075. Excess match carried over to next Federal fiscal year (Line 3 minus Line 4)4,873,252Table SEQ Table \* ARABIC 5 – Fiscal Year Summary - HOME Match ReportMatch Contribution for the Federal Fiscal YearProject No. or Other IDDate of ContributionCash(non-Federal sources)Foregone Taxes, Fees, ChargesAppraised Land/Real PropertyRequired InfrastructureSite Preparation, Construction Materials, Donated laborBond FinancingTotal MatchCentre Street Village01,093,394000001,093,394Falcon Woods Apartments0679,67300000679,673Lincolnshire Townhomes01,053,122000001,053,122Phelps Square0192,35600000192,356Vineyard Place02,205,692000002,205,692Table SEQ Table \* ARABIC 6 – Match Contribution for the Federal Fiscal YearHOME MBE/WBE reportProgram Income – Enter the program amounts for the reporting periodBalance on hand at begin-ning of reporting period$Amount received during reporting period$Total amount expended during reporting period$Amount expended for TBRA$Balance on hand at end of reporting period$90,0772,921,7802,554,1090457,748Table SEQ Table \* ARABIC 7 – Program IncomeMinority Business Enterprises and Women Business Enterprises – Indicate the number and dollar value of contracts for HOME projects completed during the reporting periodTotalMinority Business EnterprisesWhite Non-HispanicAlaskan Native or American IndianAsian or Pacific IslanderBlack Non-HispanicHispanicContractsDollar Amount20,282,562000020,282,562Number600006Sub-ContractsNumber1531084140Dollar Amount17,326,933259,26101,471,3131,097,31614,499,043TotalWomen Business EnterprisesMaleContractsDollar Amount20,282,562020,282,562Number606Sub-ContractsNumber15314139Dollar Amount36,593,23321,407,00615,186,227Table SEQ Table \* ARABIC 8 – Minority Business and Women Business EnterprisesMinority Owners of Rental Property – Indicate the number of HOME assisted rental property owners and the total amount of HOME funds in these rental properties assistedTotalMinority Property OwnersWhite Non-HispanicAlaskan Native or American IndianAsian or Pacific IslanderBlack Non-HispanicHispanicNumber000000Dollar Amount000000Table SEQ Table \* ARABIC 9 – Minority Owners of Rental PropertyRelocation and Real Property Acquisition – Indicate the number of persons displaced, the cost of relocation payments, the number of parcels acquired, and the cost of acquisitionNumberCostParcels Acquired961,048,400Businesses Displaced00Nonprofit Organizations Displaced00Households Temporarily Relocated, not Displaced00Households DisplacedTotalMinority Property EnterprisesWhite Non-HispanicAlaskan Native or American IndianAsian or Pacific IslanderBlack Non-HispanicHispanicNumber000000Cost000000Table SEQ Table \* ARABIC 10 – Relocation and Real Property AcquisitionCR-20 - Affordable Housing 91.520(b)Evaluation of the jurisdiction's progress in providing affordable housing, including the number and types of families served, the number of extremely low-income, low-income, moderate-income, and middle-income persons served.One-Year GoalActualNumber of Homeless households to be provided affordable housing units17,0000Number of Non-Homeless households to be provided affordable housing units2060Number of Special-Needs households to be provided affordable housing units2500Total17,4560Table SEQ Table \* ARABIC 11 – Number of HouseholdsOne-Year GoalActualNumber of households supported through Rental Assistance00Number of households supported through The Production of New Units1750Number of households supported through Rehab of Existing Units675381Number of households supported through Acquisition of Existing Units010Total850391Table SEQ Table \* ARABIC 12 – Number of Households SupportedDiscuss the difference between goals and outcomes and problems encountered in meeting these goals.Will be completed prior to submission.Discuss how these outcomes will impact future annual action plans.It is not anticipated that future annual action plans will be impacted as it is too early to determine if 5 year goals will need to be ajusted.Include the number of extremely low-income, low-income, and moderate-income persons served by each activity where information on income by family size is required to determine the eligibility of the activity.Number of Persons ServedCDBG ActualHOME ActualExtremely Low-income80148Low-income127102Moderate-income0103Total207353Table SEQ Table \* ARABIC 13 – Number of Persons ServedNarrative InformationAbove in the table identifying number of persons served, this is based on CDBG and HOME households assisted (completd) by income range and component.CR-25 - Homeless and Other Special Needs 91.220(d, e); 91.320(d, e); 91.520(c)Evaluate the jurisdiction’s progress in meeting its specific objectives for reducing and ending homelessness through:Reaching out to homeless persons (especially unsheltered persons) and assessing their individual needsIn the 2015 program year,the Michigan State Housing Develpment Authority (MSHDA) distributed its FY 2015 allocation of $4,729,137 in federal Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) funds to community based agencies and organizations.? 100% of these federal funds were obligated within 180 days of their award date.? No federal funds were withheld for administrative expenses, and MSHDA's governing authority contributed an additional $4,730,000 in matching funds for ESG program activities.Throughout 2015, MSHDA continued to make significant progres toward its primary goal fofr homelss programming within the Consolidated Plan (i.e. "make homeless assistance more effective and responsive to local need through local autonomy and movement toward Continuum of Care").? All ESG funds were awarded through a formula based statewide process.? Funds were distributed in Continuum service areas, repesenting all 83 counties in the State.? These funds supported a broad array of eligible activities, including homelessness prevention, emergency shelter/transitional housing operations and essential services.Throughout 2015, the Authority continued to work to end homeless in Michigan.? Through MSHDA's 10-Year Campaign to End Homelessness, communities are collaboratively strategizing and developing best practice models that can be shared with others in their region.? On October 28th and 29th MSHDA held its 10th Annual Summit to End Homelessness; there were over 30 sessions, all presented by Michigan providers showing new, best practice models.? Michigan is the only state in the nation that has partnered at the state and local level to end homelessness.Addressing the emergency shelter and transitional housing needs of homeless personsMSHDA provides Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) funding to community based agencies and organizations.? ESG funds are awarded through a statewide formula based allocation in conjunction with a community based Continuum of Care planning process.? These funds support a broad array of eligible activities, including homelessness prevention and rapid rehousing, shelter operations and essential services.MSHDA has aligned their 10-Year Plan with HUD's.? In working to end homelessness, MSHDA preferences all of our Housing Choice Vouchers (approximately 28,000+) to people who are living in homelessness, i.e. people on the homeless preference waiting list are given a voucher before people on the regular (non-homeless preference) waiting list.? Through the federal Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) Program MSHDA creates housing for all homeless populations.? In 2015, MSHDA provided a dollar-for-dollar match to HUD's ESG funding.? In addition, MSHDA mandates that Coca use a percentage of their ESG for rapid re-housing.? MSHDA works to keep ESG case management costs reasonable thereby enabling ESG dollars to reach the public in the form of prevention and rapid re-housing. Helping low-income individuals and families avoid becoming homeless, especially extremely low-income individuals and families and those who are: likely to become homeless after being discharged from publicly funded institutions and systems of care (such as health care facilities, mental health facilities, foster care and other youth facilities, and corrections programs and institutions); and, receiving assistance from public or private agencies that address housing, health, social services, employment, education, or youth needsMSHDA's ESG follow the HUD Hearth regulations in making maximum amounts of ESG available to Coca bodies to provide to shelters.? MSHDA provides a Domestic Violence (DV) grant to the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (MDHHS).? These funds are awarded to DV shelters statewide.? MSHDA works closely with the MDHHS who has contracts with the Salvation Army to provide hotel/motel rooms when shelters are full.? Cocas use a state-wide common assessment and prioritization tool to ensure resources are used efficiently and households are provided the most appropriate housing intervention. Helping homeless persons (especially chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth) make the transition to permanent housing and independent living, including shortening the period of time that individuals and families experience homelessness, facilitating access for homeless individuals and families to affordable housing units, and preventing individuals and families who were recently homeless from becoming homeless againThrough the ESG and the PATH Program Coca’s provide outreach to people living on the streets and in shelters.? Through a MSHDA grant to the Michigan Coalitions Against Homelessness (MCAH), Continua of Care hold Project Homeless Connect events to provide housing outreach to people living in homelessness, food, haircuts, dental work, etc.? MSHDA also provides media/awareness and training on conducting a Point in Time account. CR-30 - Public Housing 91.220(h); 91.320(j)Actions taken to address the needs of public housingThe State does not own or operate public housing in Michigan; consequently no initiatives are planned in this area.Actions taken to encourage public housing residents to become more involved in management and participate in homeownershipNot applicable.Actions taken to provide assistance to troubled PHAsNot applicable.CR-35 - Other Actions 91.220(j)-(k); 91.320(i)-(j)Actions taken to remove or ameliorate the negative effects of public policies that serve as barriers to affordable housing such as land use controls, tax policies affecting land, zoning ordinances, building codes, fees and charges, growth limitations, and policies affecting the return on residential investment. 91.220 (j); 91.320 (i)The Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (MDHHS), Division of Housing and Homeless Services, strives to assure that comprehensive housing and support services are available to meet the needs of people and families living with HIV and AIDS.? Project Sponsors assure that all persons living with HIV/Aids have access to:? direct housing assistance, case management focused on housing, permanent housing placement services, housing information services, and resource identification.? The new MDHHS Program Specialist completed on-site monitoring at three sites on June 28 and June 29, 2016, encouraging increased coordination with other homeless service providers in order to leverage other sources of homeless assistance dollars to support HOPWA participants.? Additionally, the Program Specialist encouraged each sponsor agency to increase their focus on employment activities in resonse to HUDs Getting to Work Initiative and training curriculum recently completed by MDHHS staff and sponsor agencies.Actions taken to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs. 91.220(k); 91.320(j)MSHDA is in the process of finalizing an update to the Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (AI) in Michigan's CDBG non-entitled communities.? It is anticipated that ne AI will be adopted by the MSHDA Board in October 2016.? Once the new data is available, we will analyze our programs and policies to make sure that they are aligned with meeting the underserved needs identified within the plan.Actions taken to reduce lead-based paint hazards. 91.220(k); 91.320(j)During FY15, MSHDA issued a Request for Proposals to update the AI and awarded a contract.? The contractor has been holding sessions, collecting data and drafting a report which has been presented to MSHDA and is in the final stages of being completed.Actions taken to reduce the number of poverty-level families. 91.220(k); 91.320(j)The State programs are designed to provide affordable housing to families and/or to provide additional economic opportunities through job creation.? All CDBG funded jobs must be made available to at least 51% low or moderate income people.Actions taken to develop institutional structure. 91.220(k); 91.320(j)The Regional Prosperity Initiative is aligning services and programs offered by the State of Michigan to better serve the population. In additon, streamlining of policies, programs and paperwork was a top priority in FY2015.Actions taken to enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies. 91.220(k); 91.320(j)As a part of the ICC's comprehensive agenda, conducting assessments of local needs in conjunction with local leaders to create greater community prosperity was undertaken in FY15.? A major component of each assessment was to identify programs and funding that would support initiatives of both the public an private sector on a regional basis.Identify actions taken to overcome the effects of any impediments identified in the jurisdictions analysis of impediments to fair housing choice. 91.520(a)Through a number of community and economic development programs, the MSF promotes job creation in the private sector in all areas of the state.CR-40 - Monitoring 91.220 and 91.230Describe the standards and procedures used to monitor activities carried out in furtherance of the plan and used to ensure long-term compliance with requirements of the programs involved, including minority business outreach and the comprehensive planning requirementsThe MSF CDBG staff provides on-site monitoring for construction projects to verify program and labor standards compliance.? CDBG funded job creation projects verify job creation annually during the project timeline.? CDBG staff also closely monitors semi-annual progress reports submitted by the communties.? Single audit reviews are also a part of the monitoring process for applicable communities.? The MSF does take relative risk into consideration when making decisions on the need for onsite or desk monitoring.? Projects that are very low risk; awards under $25,000, RLF/CDBG Loan administrative funds and planning grants may rely on desk monitoring only.? MSHDA's community develpment division utilized a yearly monitoring plan for its CDBG grant recipients through January 2016.? After January 2016, CDBG housing grants will be monitored under the regular MSF CDBG monitoring guidelines.For ESG, the fiduciary agencies are required to submit documentation with each billing detailing expenditures, which are reviewed by Homeless Assistance Specialist(s) to ensure funds are expended only for allowable activities.? MSHDA does on-site monitoring and reviews of fiduciary financial records, sub-grantee documents and client files.? A monitoring letter is sent to each fiduciary identifying findings and corrective acgtion needed including follow-up technical assistance.? Staff also conducts an Annual Risk Assessment of all fiduciary agencies to determine the need for an on-site monitoring review and/or technical assistance.MSHDA’s Compliance unit (Rental Development Division) and Asset Management Division jointly monitor the Authority’s portfolio of HOME rental developments in accordance with HOME regulations throughout the affordability period. The Compliance unit’s contracted inspectors conduct the on-site physical inspections and tenant file reviews.? Compliance provides oversight of this process and the owner/manager annual reporting process (Annual Owner Certification of Continuing Program Compliance/Rent and Occupancy Reports). ?Both Compliance and Asset Management review the Annual Compliance Certifications/Rent and Occupancy Reports for compliance.? Asset Management approves tenant selection plans, conducts annual reviews of budgets, financial statements, management/operations, and annually approves the rents and utility allowances for HOME-assisted developments.? HOPWA Project Sponsors are monitored on-site once a year (minimum) to ensure long-term compliance with program requirements. The items to be included in monitoring reviews are: housing assessments, household income, number in household, tracking of STRMU, assuring the accuracy of the CAPER, assuring that time sheets are kept, assuring that a plan is in place for meeting project outcomes, assuring that regulations regarding eligibility of the person and the activity are met, assuring that contract requirements are met, assuring that the tenant pay portion is accurate for TBRA, assuring that housing habitability standards are met, assuring that records are maintained for 4 years, assuring that adequate financial and program records are kept, assuring tracking on program income, and assuring adequate documentation of expenditures.Citizen Participation Plan 91.105(d); 91.115(d)Describe the efforts to provide citizens with reasonable notice and an opportunity to comment on performance reports.The CAPER report is posted on the MSHDA website to provide for a two week?public comment period prior to submission of the report.?The public comment period?is Thursday, September 14, 2016 at noon - Wednesday, September 28th at?noon. In additon, the final report is posted on MSHDA's website and is retained on the website as part of the five year Action Plan documents.?CR-45 - CDBG 91.520(c)Specify the nature of, and reasons for, any changes in the jurisdiction’s program objectives and indications of how the jurisdiction would change its programs as a result of its experiences.The State modified its program objectives slightly as a part of the five year consolidated planning process.? Since this is year one of the new consolidated plan no specific changes are deemed applicable to this reporting period.Does this Jurisdiction have any open Brownfields Economic Development Initiative (BEDI) grants?No[BEDI grantees] Describe accomplishments and program outcomes during the last year.CR-50 - HOME 91.520(d)Include the results of on-site inspections of affordable rental housing assisted under the program to determine compliance with housing codes and other applicable regulations Please list those projects that should have been inspected on-site this program year based upon the schedule in §92.504(d). Indicate which of these were inspected and a summary of issues that were detected during the inspection. For those that were not inspected, please indicate the reason and how you will remedy the situation.Multi-Family HOME Assisted Projects:? During the reporting period, 7/1/15-6/30/2016, (4454) units in (308) developments assisted with HOME were still in the compliance period. MSHDA’s Physical Inspection Contractors inspected (145) HOME assisted projects. MSHDA’s contractors conduct inspections on the timeframe required by HUD using a varying sample of the total number of units in a project.? During the reporting period, (722) units were inspected in these (145) developments. (459) units were found to have violations.? At the time of reporting, (426) units of the (459) with findings had been brought into compliance within 45-90 days of their inspection, and (26) had not yet hit the 90-day limit. Provide an assessment of the jurisdiction's affirmative marketing actions for HOME units. 92.351(b)Refer to IDIS reports to describe the amount and use of program income for projects, including the number of projects and owner and tenant characteristicsDescribe other actions taken to foster and maintain affordable housing. 91.220(k) (STATES ONLY: Including the coordination of LIHTC with the development of affordable housing). 91.320(j)MSHDA’s LIHTC program is fully integrated into its other affordable housing production programs, in particular the multi-family HOME program.? MSHDA’s 9% LIHTC allocation policies place a focus on preserving existing affordable housing units, creating new units in strong locations, and creating permanent supportive housing units.? ?Additionally, MSHDA also has an active tax-exempt bond lending program that also uses the 4% LIHTC for either the creation or rehabilitation of affordable housing units.? In many of these LIHTC transactions, HOME is also used a source of financing to fill funding gaps that may exist between the total costs of a development and the sources that are available to cover those costs, which helps to achieve MSHDA policy and financing objectives.? The current market for LIHTC equity is fairly strong, which means that less HOME is needed in each transaction (or not needed at all in some cases), allowing HOME and LIHTC dollars to go further, which ultimately allows for the completion of more developments in total.CR-55 - HOPWA 91.520(e)Identify the number of individuals assisted and the types of assistance provided Table for report on the one-year goals for the number of households provided housing through the use of HOPWA activities for: short-term rent, mortgage, and utility assistance payments to prevent homelessness of the individual or family; tenant-based rental assistance; and units provided in housing facilities developed, leased, or operated with HOPWA funds.Number of Households Served Through:One-year GoalActualShort-term rent, mortgage, and utility assistance to prevent homelessness of the individual or family10663Tenant-based rental assistance100106Units provided in permanent housing facilities developed, leased, or operated with HOPWA funds4437Units provided in transitional short-term housing facilities developed, leased, or operated with HOPWA funds00Total250206Table SEQ Table \* ARABIC 14 – HOPWA Number of Households ServedNarrativeThe goals were less than expected because of more households moving into a stable housing environment which has resulted in less funds being used in this budget category then what was previously expected.? The need for the previous year was for more long term assistance for the majority of the households that we assisted so that they could become more self-sufficient, which is evidenced by the data above, showing more households served in the TBRA category compared to STRMU.CR-60 - ESG 91.520(g) (ESG Recipients only)ESG Supplement to the CAPER in e-snapsFor Paperwork Reduction Act1. Recipient Information—All Recipients CompleteBasic Grant InformationRecipient NameMICHIGANOrganizational DUNS Number809037120EIN/TIN Number386000134Indentify the Field OfficeDETROITIdentify CoC(s) in which the recipient or subrecipient(s) will provide ESG assistanceMichigan Balance of State CoCESG Contact Name PrefixMrsFirst NameRENEE J.Middle NameJLast NameCONKLINSuffix0TitleBusiness ManagerESG Contact AddressStreet Address 1735 E. Michigan AvenueStreet Address 20CityLansingStateMIZIP Code-Phone Number5173738544Extension0Fax Number5173732450Email Addressconklinr@ESG Secondary ContactPrefixFirst NameLast NameSuffixTitlePhone NumberExtensionEmail Address2. Reporting Period—All Recipients Complete Program Year Start Date07/01/2015Program Year End Date06/30/20163a. Subrecipient Form – Complete one form for each subrecipientSubrecipient or Contractor Name: NORTHEAST MICHIGAN COMMUNITY SERVICESCity: ALPENAState: MIZip Code: 49707, DUNS Number: Is subrecipient a victim services provider: NSubrecipient Organization Type: Other Non-Profit OrganizationESG Subgrant or Contract Award Amount: 154476Subrecipient or Contractor Name: EIGHTCAP, INC.City: GreenvilleState: MIZip Code: 48838, 0368DUNS Number: Is subrecipient a victim services provider: NSubrecipient Organization Type: Other Non-Profit OrganizationESG Subgrant or Contract Award Amount: 134701Subrecipient or Contractor Name: NORTHWEST MICHIGAN COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCYCity: Traverse CityState: MIZip Code: 49686, 9164DUNS Number: 060177904Is subrecipient a victim services provider: NSubrecipient Organization Type: Other Non-Profit OrganizationESG Subgrant or Contract Award Amount: 516807Subrecipient or Contractor Name: MONROE COUNTY OPPORTUNITY PROGRAMCity: MonroeState: MIZip Code: 48161, 3871DUNS Number: Is subrecipient a victim services provider: NSubrecipient Organization Type: Other Non-Profit OrganizationESG Subgrant or Contract Award Amount: 140294Subrecipient or Contractor Name: BETHANY HOUSING MINISTRIES INC.City: MuskegonState: MIZip Code: 49442, 3446DUNS Number: Is subrecipient a victim services provider: NSubrecipient Organization Type: Other Non-Profit OrganizationESG Subgrant or Contract Award Amount: 278290Subrecipient or Contractor Name: EMERGENCY SHELTER SERVICES INC.City: EMERGENCY SHELTER SERVICES INC.State: MIZip Code: 99999, DUNS Number: Is subrecipient a victim services provider: NSubrecipient Organization Type: Other Non-Profit OrganizationESG Subgrant or Contract Award Amount: 230436Subrecipient or Contractor Name: City of LansingCity: LansingState: MIZip Code: 48933, 1307DUNS Number: 069835882Is subrecipient a victim services provider: NSubrecipient Organization Type: Unit of GovernmentESG Subgrant or Contract Award Amount: 211714Subrecipient or Contractor Name: MID MICHIGAN COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCYCity: FarwellState: MIZip Code: 48622, 9437DUNS Number: 069468080Is subrecipient a victim services provider: NSubrecipient Organization Type: Other Non-Profit OrganizationESG Subgrant or Contract Award Amount: 392850Subrecipient or Contractor Name: WAYNE METRO COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCYCity: WyandotteState: MIZip Code: 48192, 4064DUNS Number: 053258109Is subrecipient a victim services provider: NSubrecipient Organization Type: Other Non-Profit OrganizationESG Subgrant or Contract Award Amount: 294992Subrecipient or Contractor Name: Midland Area HomesCity: MidlandState: MIZip Code: 48642, 6956DUNS Number: 082762816Is subrecipient a victim services provider: NSubrecipient Organization Type: Other Non-Profit OrganizationESG Subgrant or Contract Award Amount: 48547Subrecipient or Contractor Name: COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCYCity: JacksonState: MIZip Code: 49203, 3037DUNS Number: 120359559Is subrecipient a victim services provider: NSubrecipient Organization Type: Other Non-Profit OrganizationESG Subgrant or Contract Award Amount: 211930Subrecipient or Contractor Name: MACOMB HOMELESS COALITIONCity: Clinton TownshipState: MIZip Code: 48036, 1030DUNS Number: 152113721Is subrecipient a victim services provider: NSubrecipient Organization Type: Other Non-Profit OrganizationESG Subgrant or Contract Award Amount: 379794Subrecipient or Contractor Name: PINES BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCity: ColdwaterState: MIZip Code: 49036, 1767DUNS Number: 004283844Is subrecipient a victim services provider: NSubrecipient Organization Type: Other Non-Profit OrganizationESG Subgrant or Contract Award Amount: 114079Subrecipient or Contractor Name: BLUE WATER CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVINGCity: Port HuronState: MIZip Code: 48060, 5867DUNS Number: 111286787Is subrecipient a victim services provider: NSubrecipient Organization Type: Other Non-Profit OrganizationESG Subgrant or Contract Award Amount: 107555Subrecipient or Contractor Name: BLUE WATER SAFE HORIZONSCity: Port HuronState: MIZip Code: 48060, 5349DUNS Number: 193984887Is subrecipient a victim services provider: NSubrecipient Organization Type: Other Non-Profit OrganizationESG Subgrant or Contract Award Amount: 186843Subrecipient or Contractor Name: SUMMIT POINTECity: Battle CreekState: MIZip Code: 49017, 3602DUNS Number: 780745493Is subrecipient a victim services provider: NSubrecipient Organization Type: Other Non-Profit OrganizationESG Subgrant or Contract Award Amount: 159341Subrecipient or Contractor Name: HOMLESS ACTION NETWORK OF DETROITCity: DetroitState: MIZip Code: 48216, 1936DUNS Number: 154693043Is subrecipient a victim services provider: NSubrecipient Organization Type: Other Non-Profit OrganizationESG Subgrant or Contract Award Amount: 306263Subrecipient or Contractor Name: UNITED WAY OF SAGINAW COUNTYCity: SaginawState: MIZip Code: 48607, 1267DUNS Number: 072785934Is subrecipient a victim services provider: NSubrecipient Organization Type: Other Non-Profit OrganizationESG Subgrant or Contract Award Amount: 166200Subrecipient or Contractor Name: METRO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTCity: FlintState: MIZip Code: 48502, 1824DUNS Number: 836594150Is subrecipient a victim services provider: NSubrecipient Organization Type: Other Non-Profit OrganizationESG Subgrant or Contract Award Amount: 281627Subrecipient or Contractor Name: OTTAWA COUNTYCity: HollandState: MIZip Code: 49424, 8943DUNS Number: 085899011Is subrecipient a victim services provider: NSubrecipient Organization Type: Unit of GovernmentESG Subgrant or Contract Award Amount: 216289Subrecipient or Contractor Name: Alliance for Housing Oakland County Continuum of CareCity: WaterfordState: MIZip Code: 48327, 4600DUNS Number: 078702098Is subrecipient a victim services provider: NSubrecipient Organization Type: Other Non-Profit OrganizationESG Subgrant or Contract Award Amount: 400010Subrecipient or Contractor Name: Upper Peninsula Community Action NetworkCity: MarquetteState: MIZip Code: 49855, 8630DUNS Number: 079573278Is subrecipient a victim services provider: NSubrecipient Organization Type: Other Non-Profit OrganizationESG Subgrant or Contract Award Amount: 497677Subrecipient or Contractor Name: Lenawee Emergency and Affordable Housing Corp.City: AdrianState: MIZip Code: 49221, 2903DUNS Number: 142907968Is subrecipient a victim services provider: NSubrecipient Organization Type: Other Non-Profit OrganizationESG Subgrant or Contract Award Amount: 130242Subrecipient or Contractor Name: Housing Services for Eaton Co.City: CharlotteState: MIZip Code: 48813, 1555DUNS Number: 158806393Is subrecipient a victim services provider: NSubrecipient Organization Type: Other Non-Profit OrganizationESG Subgrant or Contract Award Amount: 138156Subrecipient or Contractor Name: Washtenaw CountyCity: Ann ArborState: MIZip Code: 48104, 1413DUNS Number: 020111969Is subrecipient a victim services provider: NSubrecipient Organization Type: Unit of GovernmentESG Subgrant or Contract Award Amount: 382649Subrecipient or Contractor Name: The Heart of West Michigan United WayCity: Grand RapidsState: MIZip Code: 49503, 4106DUNS Number: Is subrecipient a victim services provider: NSubrecipient Organization Type: Other Non-Profit OrganizationESG Subgrant or Contract Award Amount: 291350Subrecipient or Contractor Name: United Way of Mason CountyCity: LudingtonState: MIZip Code: 49431, 2089DUNS Number: 044551641Is subrecipient a victim services provider: NSubrecipient Organization Type: Other Non-Profit OrganizationESG Subgrant or Contract Award Amount: 319247CR-65 - Persons Assisted4. Persons Served4a. Complete for Homelessness Prevention Activities Number of Persons in HouseholdsTotalAdults0Children0Don't Know/Refused/Other0Missing Information0Total0Table SEQ Table \* ARABIC 15 – Household Information for Homeless Prevention Activities4b. Complete for Rapid Re-Housing ActivitiesNumber of Persons in HouseholdsTotalAdults0Children0Don't Know/Refused/Other0Missing Information0Total0Table SEQ Table \* ARABIC 16 – Household Information for Rapid Re-Housing Activities4c. Complete for ShelterNumber of Persons in HouseholdsTotalAdults0Children0Don't Know/Refused/Other0Missing Information0Total0Table SEQ Table \* ARABIC 17 – Shelter Information4d. Street OutreachNumber of Persons in HouseholdsTotalAdults0Children0Don't Know/Refused/Other0Missing Information0Total0Table SEQ Table \* ARABIC 18 – Household Information for Street Outreach4e. Totals for all Persons Served with ESGNumber of Persons in HouseholdsTotalAdults0Children0Don't Know/Refused/Other0Missing Information0Total0Table SEQ Table \* ARABIC 18 – Household Information for Persons Served with ESG5. Gender—Complete for All ActivitiesTotalMale0Female0Transgender0Don't Know/Refused/Other0Missing Information0Total0Table SEQ Table \* ARABIC 19 - Gender Information6. Age—Complete for All ActivitiesTotalUnder 18018-24025 and over0Don't Know/Refused/Other0Missing Information0Total0Table SEQ Table \* ARABIC 20 – Age Information7. Special Populations Served—Complete for All ActivitiesNumber of Persons in HouseholdsSubpopulationTotalTotal Persons Served – PreventionTotal Persons Served – RRHTotal Persons Served in Emergency SheltersVeterans0000Victims of Domestic Violence0000Elderly0000HIV/AIDS0000Chronically Homeless0000Persons with Disabilities:Severely Mentally Ill0000Chronic Substance Abuse0000Other Disability0000Total (Unduplicated if possible)0000Table SEQ Table \* ARABIC 21 – Special Population ServedCR-70 – ESG 91.520(g) - Assistance Provided and Outcomes10. Shelter Utilization Number of New Units - Rehabbed0Number of New Units - Conversion0Total Number of bed-nights available0Total Number of bed-nights provided0Capacity Utilization0.00%Table SEQ Table \* ARABIC 22 – Shelter Capacity11. Project Outcomes Data measured under the performance standards developed in consultation with the CoC(s) CR-75 – Expenditures11. Expenditures11a. ESG Expenditures for Homelessness PreventionDollar Amount of Expenditures in Program Year201320142015Expenditures for Rental Assistance606,274601,879610,472Expenditures for Housing Relocation and Stabilization Services - Financial Assistance000Expenditures for Housing Relocation & Stabilization Services - Services675,326679,218762,474Expenditures for Homeless Prevention under Emergency Shelter Grants Program000Subtotal Homelessness Prevention1,281,6001,281,0971,372,946Table SEQ Table \* ARABIC 23 – ESG Expenditures for Homelessness Prevention11b. ESG Expenditures for Rapid Re-HousingDollar Amount of Expenditures in Program Year201320142015Expenditures for Rental Assistance534,991890,2971,006,103Expenditures for Housing Relocation and Stabilization Services - Financial Assistance000Expenditures for Housing Relocation & Stabilization Services - Services618,5911,015,9931,136,402Expenditures for Homeless Assistance under Emergency Shelter Grants Program000Subtotal Rapid Re-Housing1,153,5821,906,2902,142,505Table SEQ Table \* ARABIC 24 – ESG Expenditures for Rapid Re-Housing11c. ESG Expenditures for Emergency ShelterDollar Amount of Expenditures in Program Year201320142015Essential Services625,364455,768506,595Operations414,743312,263242,996Renovation000Major Rehab000Conversion000Subtotal1,040,107768,031749,591Table SEQ Table \* ARABIC 25 – ESG Expenditures for Emergency Shelter11d. Other Grant ExpendituresDollar Amount of Expenditures in Program Year201320142015HMIS89,87889,605108,052Administration222,959261,103283,097Street Outreach32,40648,49572,946Table SEQ Table \* ARABIC 26 - Other Grant Expenditures11e. Total ESG Grant FundsTotal ESG Funds Expended20132014201512,750,4433,788,1264,306,1264,656,191Table SEQ Table \* ARABIC 27 - Total ESG Funds Expended11f. Match Source201320142015Other Non-ESG HUD Funds3,884,9983,813,4264,470,772Other Federal Funds24,515,61219,405,43917,031,924State Government000Local Government4,204,6017,047,6455,515,250Private Funds6,342,6447,263,0937,008,579Other04,399,91820,345,671Fees000Program Income000Total Match Amount38,947,85541,929,52154,372,196Table SEQ Table \* ARABIC 28 - Other Funds Expended on Eligible ESG Activities11g. TotalTotal Amount of Funds Expended on ESG Activities201320142015148,000,01542,735,98146,235,64759,028,387Table SEQ Table \* ARABIC 29 - Total Amount of Funds Expended on ESG ActivitiesAttachmentCDBG and HOME Funding MapsCAPER Data MemoHousing Asset Management ReportPR-28Housing Inspection Report ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download