Why do you want student participation in your classroom



Why do you want student participation in your classroom?

Student participation in the form of class discussion can be useful for many reasons, but those reasons vary according to the particular class you are teaching and what you want the discussion to accomplish. Before you begin to work on how to initiate or manage discussion in your classroom, consider the following for each of the classes you teach:

• How much of each class period do you want to devote to class discussion? It would be helpful to establish a goal for the percentage of class time that will be devoted to discussion as a general guideline for planning your material.

• What exactly do you want the students to discuss? Is this about exploring theories and concepts from the assigned reading, providing examples or applications, or an opportunity for students to express their opinions?

• How flexible are you about maintaining complete control of the classroom and the content of the discussion? Is this a large lecture class in which you need maximum control or is it a small seminar class where the students can take primary responsibility for leading/guiding the discussion?

Be realistic about your expectations for a particular class and group of students. Examine your assumptions:

• Are you assuming that all students are coming to class fully prepared? If so, how are you going to make sure that happens?

• Are you assuming that all students can pull their ideas together and respond thoughtfully to your questions? Consider whether these students are freshmen or seniors, majors or nonmajors.

• Are you assuming that all students are comfortable talking out loud in class and believe they have something useful to contribute?

Choose a particular course in which you would like to enhance the student participation and make some basic notes about the nature of the content, students, and level of participation desired:

Course number/title: _________________________________

Level of student: _______________________

Majors/nonmajors: ______________________

Percentage of class time that you would like to devote to discussion: ______

Type of discussion content: ________________

Size of class: ___________

Room set up/seating arrangement: ________________

Degree of instructor control desired: _________________

Other notes:

Setting yourself up for success

• Clearly define your expectations to the students. Talk about why participation and discussion are an important part of the course on the first day of class. Your syllabus should contain a specific statement such as the one I include in my COM 233 syllabus:

You will be expected to complete the readings and homework and contribute to the class discussion for each day. Your participation grade will be based on the degree to which you make meaningful contributions to the class discussion on a regular basis. You will also be required to make postings to the MySCSU course homepage and these will count toward your class participation grade.

• Optimize the physical arrangement of the classroom. Examine the classroom space and make certain that the chairs are arranged in a manner that facilitates discussion. After deciding on the room arrangement, I ask the students to set up the room each day before class (and then remember to put it back for the next class!)

• Learn their names. There is something about making the effort to learn a student’s name that shows them you value their presence in class. (I have to take pictures!) It also allows you to call on students by name when their hands are raised or solicit their input when they are quiet.

• Build rapport with the class members. Come early. Stay late. Encourage them to come during office hours. Collect basic personal information and make connections. Additional information on this topic is provided in the next section on Instructor Immediacy.

Other ideas for setting yourself up for success from workshop participants:

Instructor Immediacy

In the Communication literature, once of the key concepts that has been investigated in regard to instructional effectiveness and affective learning is the concept of immediacy.

Instructor immediacy is generally described as communication behaviors that enhance the sense of physical and psychological closeness that students have toward a particular instructor. This perception is closely associated with instructors whom students perceive to be likeable and approachable. Researchers have identified specific verbal and nonverbal communication behaviors that promote a sense of immediacy:

Verbal Immediacy Nonverbal Immediacy

Uses students’ names Maintains eye contact

Uses “we” instead of “I” Smiles

Talks to students before and after class Moves around while teaching

Uses personal examples Uses vocal variety while talking

Uses humor in class Uses relaxed body posture

Solicits input from students Uses gestures while talking

Willing to change topics as needed Touches others while talking

Willing to have unplanned conversations Is animated while talking

Instruments to measure verbal and nonverbal immediacy have been developed and validated. There is a substantial body of Communication research that has demonstrated the connection between both verbal and nonverbal immediacy and positive outcomes related to classroom climate and affective learning.

Copies of these instruments are included in this package. If you are uncertain of your immediacy behaviors, invite someone to visit your class or ask your students to complete the instrument.

Meta-Discussion

Having a discussion about discussions is probably one of the best things you can do to help facilitate a classroom atmosphere that is conducive to participation. Here are some ideas for how to do that:

1. Lead a brain-storming session in which students are prompted to list pros and cons of class discussions or characteristics of effective/ineffective class discussions and write them on the board.

2. Ask the students to identify reasons why they do NOT like to participate in class or reasons they might be concerned or uncomfortable about speaking out in class and then address these concerns.

3. Ask students to talk about turn-taking issues (see page 11) and establish some ground rules about turn taking.

4. Set up message board topics so students can discuss or “vote” on preferred discussion rules.

5. Print or post discussion rules so that you and the students may refer back to them later in the semester—especially if there are frequent violations.

6. Emphasize the shared responsibility of managing good classroom discussion. Encourage self-monitoring and peer feedback.

7. Highlight any discussion rules you want to enforce and make certain to include them in the syllabus. For example:

Please respect the confidences of your classmates. This is a class that often involves the discussion of personal issues and relationships and what is discussed in class should stay in class.

At any time during a particular class session that you feel things are not going well, stop and have a meta-discussion. Ask the students for feedback about what is not working and suggestions to help get things back on track.

At the midterm and the end of class it would be appropriate to do a debriefing about the discussion process. In classes where I grade participation, I have the students complete a self-evaluation form after I give them the participation tallies from individual class sessions (see Tracking & Evaluating Participation, pages 13-14).

Assignments and techniques to help initiate content-specific discussion

Before class:

• Provide a homework assignment that asks specific questions and have student provide examples or applications. During class, have students share what they have written in their homework.

• Provide reading worksheets or reading quizzes. The students can complete these online or at the beginning of class. This might help motivate the students to prepare for class.

• Have students submit discussion questions and/or responses by email before class. Assemble their responses and use them as the basis for that day’s discussion.

• Have students submit to Message Board posts like the one available through MySCSU. I read the submissions before class and then discuss some of the more thoughtful answers or report on votes and discussion outcomes.

During class

If you want to get a class discussion going and students are unresponsive or unprepared, try one of the following tactics:

• Quick list/idea generator

Have students take out a blank sheet of paper and write down three quick ideas or answers to a question (name three ways to . . . , list 3 vocabulary words from your reading, give two examples of . . . , etc.). Then go around the room and have each class member share ONE. If a lot of students pass you can go around again until you get enough ideas on the board to start a discussion. Often the discussion can be centered around categorizing the answers into groups or types or some other application of a concept from their reading.

• Borrowing from my colleagues in the English Department (, give the students a brief “freewriting” assignment. Provide a question to answer or a concept to explain (let them use their textbook or notes if they have to). After they have something written in front of them you can ask them to share answers to get the conversation going.

• Put your students in groups of 2 or 3 and have them review a specific part of their reading assignment. Have them discuss and then outline the main concepts and present them to the class. I find this works well when they clearly have NOT done the reading and I do not want to reward that by covering the reading for them.

Other ideas for assignments and techniques to help initiate content-specific discussion from workshop participants:

Potential Participation “Stoppers”

According to Bean (2001), “discussion classes often fail to produce the kind of active learning desired. Particularly problematic are

• discussions in which the teacher simply tries to elicit correct answers,

• bull sessions where the discussion wanders aimlessly, and

• guessing-game discussion where the students are not asked genuine questions but are led to guess ‘what the instructor is thinking’” (p. 173).

Some of the more common problems that discourage student responses:

• The instructor does not wait long enough for an answer—give them time to think and collect their thoughts.

• When there is silence, the instructor jumps in and fills the void with prompts and probes.

• The instructor constructs poorly worded or overly complex questions that the students do not understand.

• The instructor talks down to students.

• The instructor gives disconfirming responses.

Other ideas for potential participation “stoppers” from workshop participants:

Developing a Supportive Classroom Climate

Communication scholars have identified six communication patterns that are associated with the type of communication climate that reduces defensiveness in others (Gibb, 1961). A supportive classroom climate can help improve participation levels in your classes. Consider how your remarks and responses as well as those of the other students would contribute to either a supportive or a defensive climate.

1. Be descriptive, not evaluative.

Avoid giving direct criticism. Use I-statements. Be specific. Explain or clarify rather than judging.

2. Be problem-oriented, not controlling.

Resist the urge to be directive or tell others what to do. Invite others to help solve a problem collaboratively.

3. Be spontaneous, not strategic.

Be straightforward, direct, and honest. Avoid manipulation and hidden agendas.

4. Be empathetic, not neutral.

Show that you understand and relate. Avoid indifference.

5. Be equal, not superior.

Treat others with respect and politeness. Avoid demeaning or belittling others.

6. Be provisional, not certain.

Encourage openness to new possibilities. Avoid absolutes. Make suggestions rather than telling someone how to do something.

Providing Confirming Responses during Student Participation

Your responses to student comments and remarks can be either confirming or disconfirming (Cissna & Sieburg, 1995). Distinct from the content of the message you send, this happens when you provide an indication about whether the individual student and his/her participation is valued.

Disconfirming messages include

• Failure to notice or offer a response

• Offering an interrupting response

• Offering a tangential response

• Offering an impersonal response

• Offering an incoherent or incongruous response

Types of confirming responses:

• Recognizing the other, does not require agreement but you notice his/her presence

• Acknowledging the other, does not require agreement but you respond in a direct and relevant way

• Endorsing the other, requires agreement

How do you give a confirming response to a wrong answer?

How do you respond to an inappropriate remark?

Often the responses you give outside of class discussion time can be interpreted by students as disconfirming or make students feel defensive. Think about when they deliver a lame excuse or a late paper—how do you respond?

Managing Turn-Taking Behavior During Class Discussion

When there are a lot of students in the room, or several want to speak at the same time, it becomes important to determine who gets to speak next. If it is entirely up to you, it can be difficult to listen, respond, and still remember who goes next.

• Consider options besides hand raising. Pass a stick or ball. Have a general question or two that you could go around the entire room and have each person answer.

• Encourage students to point out hands that you might have missed. Often there are blind spots on either side of you and students across the room get selected more often because you can see them better.

• When you call one student’s name, you can name the next two students so they can put their hands down without losing their spot. (Kara, then Sue, then Greg.)

Managing Difficult Students

The student that sits on the front row and always has a hand up first: Ask them to sit in the back and observe the class for a few days. Then talk with them about what they observed.

The student that talks too frequently or talks too long:

• Ask them privately to change their behavior

• Email them about their behavior if it persists

• Use “Let’s hear from someone who has not contributed yet” often.

• Give out a limited number of tokens or vouchers. When the student runs out, his/her turns are gone for the day.

A member of the class says something thoughtless that could offend another student: Say “OUCH” and give other members of the class permission to do the same.

Interruptions: Hold your hand up in a “stop” position toward the interrupting speaker until the current person finishes speaking. Maintain eye contact with the current speaker to encourage him/her to finish.

Irrelevant contributions:

• “Perhaps the question wasn’t as clear as I thought it was, let me rephrase.”

• “That’s an interesting idea. I hadn’t thought of it that way. Could someone else connect this back to the reading for us?”

Failure to contribute: I usually talk to this person privately and ask what I can do to encourage them to talk. Sometimes I tell them to give me a signal when they want to talk or to plan a contribution in advance.

Other ideas for managing turn taking or difficult students from workshop participants?

Tracking participation

One of the biggest challenges for me is to somehow keep track of student participation in order to give the student’s feedback (whether it is for grading purposes or not). I know instructors who are clever enough to make tally marks on a role sheet during class or remember who has participated and make notes after class. I have finally chosen to have a class member track the participation of class members. I use a different volunteer for each class period.

Having a student who tracks class member participation serves several purposes:

• It relieves the instructor of the responsibility/distraction of record-keeping

• It helps students learn each other’s names

• It improves the awareness of the student who is keeping the record for the day and is especially useful for those who talk too much

• I have a written record of daily class participation for each student

Online participate through MySCSU or WebCT/Vista is easy to track since the individual contributions are clearly identified.

Other ideas for tracking student participation from workshop participants:

To grade or not to grade?

The Decision to Evaluate Classroom Participation

Whether or not you choose to base part of the students’ course grade’ on their classroom participation is a difficult decision. It can be a motivator for students to participate but it can also put those who are communication apprehensive in a difficult spot. I have often had outstanding students who do excellent written work but despite all my efforts will not speak in class. Online participation is certainly a viable alternative here.

PROS CONS

References and Additional Resources

Barton, J., Heilker, P., & Rutkowski, D. Fostering effective classroom discussions.

Written by three professors in the English Department at Virginia Tech, this article provides six strategies for improving classroom discussions. No date or bibliography.

Bean, J. C. (2001). Engaging ideas: The professor’s guide to integrating writing, critical thinking, and active learning in the classroom. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Chapter 10: Alternative approaches to active learning in the classroom (pp. 169-182). This chapter discusses ways to increase active learning in both lecture and discussion classes. A variety of methods including classroom debates, panels, and games are described. This book is available through interlibrary loan (ILL) from CCSU PE1404 B35 2001

Brookfield, S. D., & Preskill, S. (1999). Discussion as a way of teaching: Tools and techniques for democratic classrooms. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Available in Buley LB2331.B679 1999

Cissna, K., & Sieburg, E. (1995). Patterns of interactional confirmation and disconfirmation. In Redmond, M. (Ed.) Interpersonal communication: Readings in theory and research. Forth Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.

This book is not currently available in the CSU library system. Information on confirming and disconfirming messages is also available in many undergraduate textbooks on interpersonal communication.

Davis, B. G. (1993). Tools for teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Chapter 9: Encouraging student participation in discussion is provides a good general overview of the basics of classroom discussion techniques. This book is available in Buley LB2331 D37 1993

Faculty and TA Development website, Ohio State University

Classroom strategies: Effective Discussions



I was originally introduced to this source in graduate school and it is still one of the best resources I have found. The site is maintained by the faculty development (FTAD) office at Ohio State University and includes instructional goals for discussion, setting discussion objectives and formats, setting expectations and establishing ground rules, getting discussions started, managing discussions, and creating closure.

Gibb, J. (1961). Defensive communication. The Journal of Communication, 11, 141-148.

The original journal article that explores the concept of supportive and defensive communication and introduces the six dimensions. Most undergraduate textbook on interpersonal communication will have a good treatment of this topic.

Gorham, J. (1988). The relationship between verbal teacher immediacy behaviors and student learning. Communication Education, 37, 40-53.

The original journal article that explores the development of the scale to measure verbal immediacy. This measure can also be found in Rubin, R.B., Palmgreen, P., & Sypher, H. E. (Eds.) (1994). Communication measures: A sourcebook. New York: Guilford Press.

McCroskey, J. C.



This website has copies of the instruments used to measure Communication Apprehension, Nonverbal Immediacy, and Willingness to Communicate.

................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download