Herbert, M - Chesapeake Bay Trust
Bibliography of
Stream Restoration
Compiled
by
Jennifer Saville
Maryland Department of Natural Resources
Maryland Department of Natural Resources
Annapolis, MD
2014
Note: This abridged bibliography is currently in development and represents the latest version as of December 8, 2014.
CONTENTS
FISH 1
BANK/CHANNEL STABILITY 3
PHYSICAL HABITAT METRICS 3
THEORY and PLANNING 4
EVALUATION AND MONITORING OF STREAM RESTORATION PROJECTS 6
WATER QUALITY 9
TEMPERATURE 9
RIPARIAN RESTORATION 10
BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES 11
MODELLING 13
GEO and HYDROMORPHOLOGY 14
POLICY 16
INSTREAM HABITAT (LARGE WOODY DEBRIS) 17
BEAVER 18
MISCELLANEOUS 19
FISH
Aadland, L. P. 1993. Stream habitat types: their fish assemblages and relationship to flow. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 13: 790-806.
Baldigo, B. P., A. G. Ernst, D. R. Warren, and S. J. Miller. 2010. Variable responses of fish assemblages, habitat, and stability to natural-channel design restoration in Catskill Mountain Streams. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 139: 449-467. DOI: 10.1577/T08-152.1
Baldigo B. P. and D. R. Warren. 2008. Detecting the response of fish assemblages to stream restoration: effects of different sampling designs. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 28: 919-934. DOI: 10.1577/M06-171.1
Baldigo, B. P., D. R. Warren, A. G. Ernst, and C. I. Mulvihill. 2008. Response of fish populations to natural channel design restoration in streams of the Catskill Mountains, New York. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 28: 954-969. DOI: 10.1577/M06-213.1
Bayley, P. B. and H. W. Li. 2008. Stream fish responses to grazing exclosures. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 28: 135 147. DOI: 10.1577/M05-165.1
Beechie, T. and S. Bolton. 1999. An approach to restoring salmonid habitat forming processes in Pacific Northwest watersheds. Fisheries 24(4): 6-15. DOI: 10.1577/1548-8446(1999)0242.0.CO;2
Bergerot , B., E. Lasne, T. Vigneron, and P. Laffaille. 2008. Prioritization of fish assemblages with a view to conservation and restoration on a large scale European basin, the Loire (France). Biodiversity and Conservation 17: 2247-2262. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-008-9331-6
Boavida, I., J. M. Santos, R. Cortes, A. Pinheiro, and M. T. Ferreira. 2012. Benchmarking river habitat improvement. River Research and Applications 28: 1768-1779. DOI: 10.1002/rra.1561
Boavida, I., J. M. Santos, C. Katopodisc, M. T. Ferreira, and A. Pinheiroa. 2013. Uncertainty in predicting the fish-response to two-dimensional habitat modeling using field data. River Research and Applications 29:1164- 1174. DOI: 10.1002/rra.2603
Champoux, O., P. M. Biron, and A. G. Roy. 2003. The long-term effectiveness of fish habitat restoration practices: Lawrence Creek, Wisconsin. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 93(1): 42-54. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8306.93104
Diebel, M. W., J. T. Maxted, O. P. Jensen, and M. J. Vander Zanden. 2010. A spatial autocorrelative model for targeting stream restoration to benefit sensitive nongame fishes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 67:165-176. DOI: 10.1139/F09-156
Hilderbrand, R. H. 2002. Simulating supplementation strategies for restoring and maintaining stream resident cutthroat trout populations. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 22: 879-887. DOI: 10.1577/1548-8675(2002)0222.0.CO;2
Hilderbrand, R. H. and J. L. Kershner. 2000. Conserving inland cutthroat trout in small streams: how much stream is enough? North American Journal of Fisheries Management 20:513-520. DOI: 10.1577/1548 8675(2000)0202.3.CO;2
Hoffman, R., and J. Dunham. 2007. Fish-movement ecology in high-gradient headwater streams: its relevance to fish passage restoration through stream culvert barriers. U.S. Department of the Interior and U.S. Geological Survey, Open-File Report 2007–1140. 40 pgs.
Kemp, S. The potential and limitations of linking biological monitoring data and restoration needs of urbanized waterways: a case study. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. In Press. DOI 10.1007/s10661-014-3663-3
Kinsolving, A. D. and M. B. Bain. 1993. Fish assemblage recovery along a riverine disturbance gradient. Ecological Applications 3(3): 531-544.
Koning, C. W., P. A. Slaney, M. N. Gaboury, and M. D. Feduk. 1998. Techniques to evaluate the effectiveness of fish habitat restoration works in stream impacted by logging activities. Canadian Water Resources Journal 23: 191-203. DOI: 10.4296/cwrj2302191
Lee, K. E., R. M. Goldstein, and P. E. Hanson. 2001. Relation between fish communities and riparian zone conditions at two spatial scales. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 37:1465-1473.
Liermann M. and P. Roni. 2008. More sites or more years? Optimal study design for monitoring fish response to watershed restoration. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 28: 935-943. DOI: 10.1577/M06-175.1
Luhta, P.-L., A. Huusko, and P. Louhi. 2012. Re-building brown trout populations in dredged boreal forest streams: in-stream restoration combined with stocking of young trout. Freshwater Biology 57:1966-1977. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2012.02850.x
Lyons, J., T. Zorn, J. Stewart, P. Seelbach, K. Wehrly, and L.Wang. 2009. Defining and characterizing coolwater streams and their fish assemblages in Michigan and Wisconsin, USA. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 29: 1130-1151. DOI: 10.1577/M08-118.1
Marks, J. C., G. A. Haden, M. O’Neill, and C. Pace. 2010. Effects of flow restoration and exotic species removal on recovery of native fish: lessons from a dam decommissioning. Restoration Ecology 18: 934-943. DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2009.00574.x
Moerke, A. H. and G. A. Lamberti. 2003. Responses in fish community structure to restoration of two Indiana streams. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 23: 748-759. DOI: 10.1577/M02-012
Moerke, A. H. and G. A. Lamberti. 2006. Scale-dependent influences on water quality, habitat, and fish communities in streams of the Kalamazoo River Basin, Michigan (USA). Aquatic Sciences 68:193-205. DOI: 10.1007/s00027-006-0837-2
Mollot, L. A. and R. E. Bilby. 2008. The use of geographic information systems, remote sensing, and suitability modeling to identify conifer restoration sites with high biological potential for anadromous fish at the Cedar River Municipal Watershed in western Washington, U.S.A. Restoration Ecology 16: 336–347.
Opperman, J. J. and A. M. Merenlender. 2004. The effectiveness of riparian restoration for improving instream fish habitat in four hardwood-dominated California streams. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 24: 822-834. DOI: 10.1577/M03-147.1
Pease, A. A. 2010. Patterns in functional structure and diversity of stream fish assemblages related to environmental factors at multiple scales. Doctoral dissertation. Texas A&M University.
Pierce, R., C. Podner, and K. Carim. 2013. Response of wild trout to stream restoration over two decades in the Blackfoot River Basin, Montana. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 142: 68-81. DOI:10.1080/00028487.2012.720626
BANK/CHANNEL STABILITY
Acharya, K. and M. Gautam. 2012. Evaluation of bendway weir bank stabilization techniques for stream restoration. International Journal of River Basin Management 10(2): 171-176. DOI: 10.1080/15715124.2012.679737
Baublys, R. 2006. Investigation of deformation processes in channels of regulated streams. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management 14: 141-148.
Hammersmark, C. T., S. Z. Dobrowski, M. C. Rains, and J. F. Mount. 2010. Simulated effects of stream restoration on the distribution of wet-meadow vegetation. Restoration Ecology 18(6): 882-893.
Krymer, V. and A. Robert. 2013. Stream restoration and cribwall performance: a case study of cribwall monitoring in southern Ontario. 2013. River Research and Applications. DOI: 10.1002/rra.2684
Langendoen, E. J., R. R. Lowrance, and A. Simon. 2009. Assessing the impact of riparian processes on streambank stability. Ecohydrology 2: 360-369. DOI: 10.1002/eco.78
PHYSICAL HABITAT METRICS
Al-Chokhachy, R., B. B. Roper, and E. K. Archer. 2010. Evaluating the status and trends of physical stream habitat in headwater streams within the interior Columbia River and Upper Missouri River Basins using an index approach. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 139: 1041 1059. DOI: 10.1577/T08-221.1
Baker, D. B., R. P. Richards, T. T. Loftus, and J. W. Kramer. 2004. A new flashiness index: characteristics and applications to Midwestern Rivers and streams. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 40: 503-522.
Booth, D. B., J. R. Karr, S. Schauman, C. P. Konrad, S. A. Morley, M. G. Larson, and S. J. Burges. 2004. Reviving urban streams: Land use, hydrology, biology, and human behavior. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 40:1351-1364.
Ernst, A. G., B. P. Baldigo, C. I. Mulvihill, and M. Vian. 2010. Effects of natural channel-design restoration on habitat quality in Catskill Mountain Streams, New York. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 139: 468-482. DOI: 10.1577/T08-153.1
THEORY and PLANNING
Allen, E. B., W. W. Covington, and D. Falk. 1996. Supporting research in restoration biology. Restoration and Management Notes 14: 148-153.
Beechie T., G. Pess, P. Roni and G. Giannico. 2008. Setting river restoration priorities: A review of approaches and a general protocol for identifying and prioritizing actions. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 28: 891-905. DOI: 10.1577/M06-174.1
Benda, L.E., N. L. Poff, C. Tague, M.A. Palmer, J. Pizzuto, N. Bockstael, S. Cooper, E. Stanley, and G. Moglen. 2002. Avoiding train wrecks in the use of science in environmental problem solving. BioScience 52: 1127 1136.
Bernhardt, E. S. and M. A. Palmer. 2007. Restoring streams in an urbanizing world. Freshwater Biology 52: 738–751. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365 2427.2006.01718.x
Blignauta, J., J. Aronsonb, and R. de Groot. 2013. Restoration of natural capital: a key strategy on the path to sustainability. Ecological Engineering. In Press.
Bohn, B. A. and J. L. Kershner. 2002. Establishing aquatic restoration priorities using a watershed approach. Journal of Environmental Management 64: 355–363. DOI: 10.1006/jema.2001.0496
Bond, N. R. and P. S. Lake. 2003. Local habitat restoration in streams: constraints on the effectiveness of restoration for stream biota. Ecological Management and Restoration 4:193-198.
Choi, Y. D., V. M. Temperton, E. B. Allen, A. P. Grootjans, M. Halassy, R. J. Hobbs, M. A. Naeth, K. Torok. 2008. Ecological restoration for future sustainability in a changing environment. Ecoscience 15(1): 53-64.
Cockerill, K. and W. P. Anderson Jr. 2014. Creating false images: stream restoration in an urban setting. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 50: 468-482.
Davis, M. A. and L. B. Slobodkin. 2004. The science and values of restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology 12(1): 1-3.
Dodds, W.K., W.H. Clements, K. Gido, R.H. Hilderbrand, and R.S. King. 2010. Thresholds, breakpoints, and non-linearity in freshwater systems as related to management. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 29: 988-997.
Eden, S., S. M. Tunstall, and S. M. Tapsell. 1999. Environmental restoration: Environmental management or environmental threat? Area 31(2): 151- 159.
Francis, R. A. 2014. Urban rivers: novel ecosystems, new challenges. WIREs Water 1:19-29. DOI: 10.1002/wat2.1
Gardiner, J. L. 1997. River landscapes and sustainable development: a framework for project appraisal and catchment management. Landscape Research 22(1): 95-114. DOI: 10.1080/01426399708706502
Gilvear, D. J., C. J. Spray, and R. Casas-Mulet. 2013. River rehabilitation for the delivery of multiple ecosystem services at the river network scale. Journal of Environmental Management 126: 30-43.
Graf, W. L. 2001. Damage control: restoring the physical integrity of America’s rivers. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 91: 1-27. DOI:10.1111/0004-5608.00231
Hallett, L. M., S. Diver, M. V. Eitzel, J. J. Olson, B. S. Ramage, H. Sardinas, Z. Statman-Weil, and K. N. Suding. 2013. Do we practice what we preach? Goal setting for ecological restoration. Restoration Ecology 21(3): 312- 319.
Higgs, E. S. 1997. What is good ecological restoration? Conservation Biology 11: 338-348.
Hilderbrand, R. H., A. C. Watts, and A. M. Randle. 2005. The myths of restoration ecology. Ecology and Society 10(1): 19. [online] URL: .
Hobbs, R.J. 2007. Setting effective and realistic restoration goals: Key directions for research. Restoration Ecology 15:354-357. DOI:10.1111/j.1526-100X.2007.00225.x
Hobbs, R. J. 2007. Restoration ecology: Are we making an impact? Restoration Ecology 15: 597–600.
Jackson, S. T. and R. J. Hobbs. 2009. Ecological restoration in the light of ecological history. Science 325: 567-569. DOI: 10.1126/science.1172977
Jansson, R. H. Backx, A. J. Boulton, M. Dixon, D. Dudgeon, F. M. R. Hughes, K. Nakamura, E. H. Stanley, and K. Tockner. 2005. Stating mechanisms and refining criteria for ecologically successful river restoration: a comment on Palmer. Journal of Applied Ecology 42: 218–222.
Jansson, R., C. Nilsson, and B. Malmqvist. 2007. Restoring freshwater ecosystems in riverine landscapes: the roles of connectivity and recovery processes. Freshwater Biology 52: 589-596. DOI:10.1111/j.1365- 2427.2007.01737.x
Knight, A. T., S. Sarkar, R. J. Smith, N. Strange and K. A. Wilson. 2011. Engage the hodgepodge: management factors are essential when prioritizing areas for restoration and conservation action. Diversity and Distributions 17(6): 1234-1238. DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00789.x
Kondolf, G. M. 1995. Five elements for effective evaluation of stream restoration. Restoration Ecology 3:133-136.
Kondolf, G. M. 1998. Lessons learned from river restoration projects in California. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 8: 39-52.
Lake, P. S., N. Bond, and P. Reich. 2007. Linking ecological theory with stream restoration. Freshwater Biology 52: 597-615. DOI:10.1111/j.1365- 2427.2006.01709.x
Lave, R. 2014. Freedom and constraint: Generative expectations in the US stream restoration field. Geoforum 52: 236–244.
Manning, O. D. 1997. Design imperatives for river landscapes. Landscape Research 22(1): 67-94. DOI: 10.1080/01426399708706501
Marsalek, J., D. Sztruhar, M. Giulianelli, B. Urbonas. 2004. Enhancing urban environment by environmental upgrading and restoration. Series IV: Earth and Environmental Sciences, Vol. 43. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
McDonald, A., S. N. Lane, N. E. Haycock, and E. A. Chalk. 2004. Rivers of dreams: on the gulf between theoretical and practical aspects of an upland river restoration. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 29: 257-281. DOI: 10.1111/j.0020-2754.2004.00314.x
Miller, J. R. and R. J. Hobbs. 2007. Habitat restoration-Do we know what we’re doing? Restoration Ecology 15: 382–390.
Morandi, B., H. Piégay, N. Lamouroux, and L. Vaudor. 2014. How is success or failure in river restoration projects evaluated? Feedback from French restoration projects. Journal of Environmental Management 137: 178-188.
EVALUATION AND MONITORING OF STREAM RESTORATION PROJECTS
Alexander, G. G. and J. D. Allan. 2006. Stream restoration in the Upper Midwest, U.S.A. Restoration Ecology 14: 595–604.
Alexander, G. G. and J. D. Allan. 2007. Ecological success in stream restoration: case studies from the Midwestern United States. Environmental Management 40:245-255. DOI 10.1007/s00267-006-0064- 6
Aronson, J., J. N. Blignaut, S. J. Milton, D. Le Maitre, K. J. Esler, A. Limouzin, C. Fontaine, M. P. De Wit, W. Mugido, P. Prinsloo, L.. Van Der Elst, and N. Lederer. 2010. Are socioeconomic benefits of restoration adequately quantified? A meta-analysis of recent papers (2000–2008) in Restoration Ecology and 12 other scientific journals. Restoration Ecology 18: 143- 154. DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2009.00638.x
Bash, J. S. and C. M. Ryan. 2002. Stream restoration and enhancement projects: Is anyone monitoring? Environmental Management 29(6): 877- 885. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-001-0066-3
Barnas, K. and S. L. Katz. 2010. The challenges of tracking habitat restoration at various spatial scales. Fisheries 35: 232-241. DOI: 10.1577/1548 8446-35.5.232
Bernhardt, E.S. and M.A. Palmer. 2011. River restoration: the fuzzy logic of repairing reaches to reverse catchment scale degradation. Ecological Applications 21:1926-1931.
Bernhardt, E. S., M.A. Palmer, J.D.Allan, G.Alexander, K. Barnas, S. Brooks, J. Carr, S. Clayton, C. Dahm, J. Follstad-Shah, D. Galat, S. Gloss, P. Goodwin, D. Hart, B. Hassett, R. Jenkinson, S.Katz, G.M.Kondolf, P. S. Lake, R. Lave, J. L.Meyer, T.K. O’Donnell, L. Pagano, B. Powell, and E. Sudduth. 2005. Synthesizing U.S. river restoration efforts. Science 308:636-637. Science Supporting Online Material Pages: 1-26.
Bernhardt, E. S., E. B. Sudduth, M. A. Palmer, J. D. Allan, J. L. Meyer, G. Alexander, J. Follastad-Shah, B. Hassett, R. Jenkinson, R. Lave, J. Rumps, and L. Pagano. 2007. Restoring rivers one reach at a time: results from a survey of U.S. river restoration practitioners. Restoration Ecology 15: 482–493.
Brooks, S., M. A. Palmer, C.M. Swan, B.J. Cardinale, and S. G. Ribblett. 2002. Assessing stream rehabilitation: limitations of community structure data. Restoration Ecology 10: 156-168.
Brown, K. B. Urban stream restoration practices: an initial assessment. The Center for Watershed Protection, Elliot City, MD.
Buchanan, B. P. G. N. Nagle, and M. T. Walter. 2014. Long-term monitoring and assessment of a stream restoration project in central New York. River Research and Applications 30: 245-258.
Buchanan, B. P., M. T. Walter, G. N. Nagle and R. L. Schneider. 2010. Monitoring and assessment of a river restoration project in central New York. River Research and Applications 28(2): 216-233. DOI: 10.1002/rra.1453
Cooperman, M. S., S. G. Hinch, S. Bennett, M. A. Branton, R. V. Galbraith, J. T. Quigley, and B. A. Heise. 2007. Streambank restoration effectiveness: lessons learned from a comparative study. Fisheries 32: 278-291. DOI: 10.1577/1548-8446(2007)32[278:SRELFA]2.0.CO;2
Davis, N. M., V. Weaver, K. Parks, and M. J. Lydy. 2003. An assessment of water quality, physical habitat, and biological integrity of an urban stream in Wichita, Kansas, prior to restoration improvements (Phase I). Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 44: 351-359. DOI: 10.1007/s00244-002-2043-0
Gardeström, J., D. Holmqvist, L. E. Polvi, and C. Nilsson. 2013. Demonstration restoration measures in tributaries of the Vindel River catchment. Ecology and Society 18(3): 8. [online] URL: 180308
Haase, P., D. Hering, S. C. Jähnig, A. W. Lorenz, and A. Sundermann. The impact of hydromorphological restoration on river ecological status: a comparison of fish, benthic invertebrates, and macrophytes. Hydrobiologia 704: 475-488. DOI 10.1007/s10750-012-1255-1
Hill, M. T. and W. S. Platts. 1998. Ecosystem restoration: a case study in the Owens River Gorge, California. Fisheries 23(11):18-27. DOI: 10.1577/15488446(1998)0232.0.CO;2
Humpton, J. 2009. Monitoring and evaluation of a small urban stream restoration project in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. Master’s Thesis. Shippensburg University, Shippensburg, Pensylvania.
Jähnig, S. C., K. Brabec, A. Buffagni, S. Erba, A. W. Lorenz, T. Ofenböck, P. F. M. Verdonschot, and D. Hering. 2010. A comparative analysis of restoration measures and their effects on hydromorphology and benthic invertebrates in 26 central and southern European rivers. Journal of Applied Ecology 47: 671-680. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01807.x
Katz, S. L., K. Barnas, R. Hicks, J. Cowen, and R. Jenkinson. 2007. Freshwater habitat restoration actions in the Pacific Northwest: a decade’s investment in habitat improvement. Restoration Ecology 15: 494–505.
Kondolf, G. M., S. Anderson, R. Lave, L. Pagano, A. Merenlender, and E. S. Bernhardt. 2007. Two decades of river restoration in California: what can we learn? Restoration Ecology 15(1): 516.523.
Kondolf, G. M. and E. R. Micheli. 1995. Evaluating stream restoration projects. Environmental Management 19: 1-15.
Macedo, D. R. and A. P. Magalhães Jr. 2010. Evaluation of an urban stream restoration project through water quality analysis and survey of the neighbourhood residents. 7th International Conference Sustenaible Techniques and Strategies in Urban Water Management, Lyon, France. Novatech: 1-9.
Meier, M. D. 2008. Post-restoration evaluation of two urban streams in Austin, Texas, USA. Master’s Thesis. Texas A&M University.
Miller, J. R. and R. C.Kochel. 2010. Assessment of channel dynamics, in- stream structures and post-project channel adjustments in North Carolina and its implications to effective stream restoration. Environmental Earth Sciences 59:1681-1692. DOI: 10.1007/s12665-009-0150-1
Miller, J. R. and R. C. Kochel. 2013. Use and performance of in-stream structures for river restoration: a case study from North Carolina. Environmental Earth Sciences 68:1563-1574. DOI: 10.1007/s12665-012- 1850-5
Moerke, A. H., K. J. Gerard, J. A. Latimore, R. A. Hellenthal, and G. A. Lamberti. 2004. Restoration of an Indiana, USA, stream: bridging the gap between basic and applied lotic ecology. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 23(3): 647-660.
Moerke, A. H. and G. A. Lamberti. 2004. Restoring stream ecosystems: lessons from a Midwestern state. Restoration Ecology12: 327-334. DOI: 10.1111/j.1061-2971.2004.0340.x
Morley, S. A. and J. R. Karr. 2002. Assessing and restoring the health of urban streams in the Puget Sound Basin. Conservation Biology 16: 1498-1509.
Mueller, M., J. Pander, and J. Geist. 2014. The ecological value of stream restoration measures: an evaluation on ecosystem and target species scales. Ecological Engineering 62:129-139.
WATER QUALITY
Anders, P. J. and K. I. Ashley. 2007. The clear-water paradox of aquatic ecosystem restoration. Fisheries 32:125-128. DOI: 10.1577/1548 8446(2007)32[125:TWPOAE]2.0.CO;2
Cormier, S. M. and G. W. Suter II. 2013. A method for deriving water-quality benchmarks using field data. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 32(2):255-262. DOI: 10.1002/etc.2057
Craig, L. S., M.A. Palmer, D.C. Richardson, S. Filoso, E.S. Bernhardt, B.P. Bledsoe, M.W. Doyle, P.M. Groffman, B.A. Hassett, S.S. Kaushal, P.M. Mayer, S.M. Smith, and P.R. Wilcock. 2008. Stream restoration strategies for reducing river nitrogen loads. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 6:529-538. DOI: 10.1890/070080
Filoso, S., and M.A. Palmer. 2011. Assessing stream restoration effectiveness at reducing nitrogen export to downstream waters. Ecological Applications 21: 1989-2006.
Hamilton, S. K. 2012. Biogeochemical time lags may delay responses of streams to ecological restoration. Freshwater Biology 57: 43-57. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2011.02685.x
Hoellein, T. J., J. L. Tank, E. J. Rosi-Marshall, S. A. Entrekin, and G. A. Lamberti. 2007. Controls on spatial and temporal variation of nutrient uptake in three Michigan headwater streams. Limnology and Oceanography 52(5): 1964-1977.
Kaushal, S. S., P. M. Groffman, P. M. Mayer, E. Striz, and A. J. Gold. 2008. Effects of stream restoration on denitrification in an urbanizing watershed. Ecological Applications 18:789–804. DOI:10.1890/07-1159.1
Merovich, Jr., G. T., J. M. Stiles, J. T. Petty, P. F. Ziemkiewicz, and J. B. Fulton. 2007. Water chemistry-based classification of streams and implications for restoring mined Appalachian watersheds. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 26(7):1361-1369.
TEMPERATURE
Anderson Jr., W. P., R. E. Storniolo, J. S. Rice. 2011. Bank thermal storage as a sink of temperature surges in urbanized streams. Journal of Hydrology 409: 525–537.
Beschta, R. L. 1997. Riparian shade and stream temperature: an alternative perspective. Rangelands 19(2):25-28.
Cross, B. K., M. A. Bozek, and M. G. Mitro. 2013. Influences of riparian vegetation on trout stream temperatures in central Wisconsin. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 33:682-692. DOI: 10.1080/02755947.2013.785989
RIPARIAN RESTORATION
Andrews, D. M., C. D. Barton, R. K. Kolka, C. C. Rhoades, and A. J. Dattilo. 2011. Soil and water characteristics in restored canebrake and forest riparian zones. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 47: 772-784. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2011.00555.x
Carline, R. F. and M. C. Walsh. 2007. Responses to riparian restoration in the Spring Creek Watershed, Central Pennsylvania. Restoration Ecology 15: 731-742.
DeWalle, D. R. 2008. Guidelines for riparian vegetative shade restoration based upon a theoretical shaded-stream model. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 44:1373-1387. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752 1688.2008.00230.x
Dosskey, M. G., P. Vidon, N. P. Gurwick, C. J. Allan, T. P. Duval, and R. Lowrance. 2010. The role of riparian vegetation in protecting and improving chemical water quality in streams. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 46: 261-277. DOI: 10.1111 ⁄ j.1752 1688.2010.00419.x
Dwire, K. A. and R. R. Lowrance. 2006. Riparian ecosystems and buffers- Multiscale structure, function, and management: introduction. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 42: 1-4.
García-Arias, A., F. Francés, T. Ferreira, G. Egger, F. Martínez-Capel, V. Garófano-Gómez, I. Andrés-Doménech, E. Politti, R. Rivaes, and P. M. Rodríguez-González. 2013. Implementing a dynamic riparian vegetation model in three European river systems. Ecohydrology 6:635-651. DOI: 10.1002/eco.1331
Golet, G. H., T. Gardali, J. W. Hunt, D. A. Koenig, and N. M. Williams. 2011. Temporal and taxonomic variability in response of fauna to riparian restoration. Restoration Ecology 19: 126-135. DOI: 10.1111/j.1526- 100X.2009.00525.x
Groffman, P. M., D. J. Bain, L. E. Band, K. T. Belt, G. S. Brush, J. M. Grove, R. V. Pouyat, I. C. Yesilonis, and W. C. Zipperer. 2003. Down by the riverside: urban riparian ecology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1(6): 315-321.
Haberstock, A. E., H. G. Nichols, M. P. DesMeules, J. Wright, J. M. Christensen, and D. H. Hudnut. 2000. Method to identify effective riparian buffer widths for Atlantic salmon habitat protection. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 36: 1271-1286.
Hall, A. A., S. B. Rood, and P. S. Higgins. 2011. Resizing a river: a downscaled, seasonal flow regime promotes riparian restoration. Restoration Ecology 19: 351-359.
Horwitz, R. J., T. E. Johnson, P. F. Overbeck, T. K. O’Donnell, W. C. Hession, and B. W. Sweeney. 2008. Effects of riparian vegetation and watershed urbanization on fishes in streams of the Mid-Atlantic Piedmont (USA). Journal of the American Water Resources Association 44: 724-741. DOI: 10.1111 ⁄ j.1752-1688.2008.00201.x
Januschke, K., S. Brunzel, P. Haase, and D. Hering. 2011. Effects of stream restorations on riparian mesohabitats, vegetation and carabid beetles. Biodiversity and Conservation 20: 3147-3164. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-011- 0119-8
Jowett, I. G., J. Richardson, and J.A.T. Boubée. 2009. Effects of riparian manipulation on stream communities in small streams: two case studies. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 43: 763-774. DOI: 10.1080/00288330909510040
Kaase, C. T. and G. L. Katz. 2012. Effects of stream restoration on woody riparian vegetation of southern Appalachian mountain streams, North Carolina, U.S.A. Restoration Ecology 20: 647-655. DOI: 10.1111/j.1526- 100X.2011.00807.x
Kauffman, J. B., R. L. Beschta , N. Otting, and D. Lytjen. 1997. An ecological perspective of riparian and stream restoration in the western United States. Fisheries 22(5):12-24. DOI: 10.1577/1548 8446(1997)0222.0.CO;2
Laub, B. G., O. T. McDonough, B. A. Needelman, and M. A. Palmer. 2013. Comparison of designed channel restoration and riparian buffer restoration effects on riparian soils. Restoration Ecology 21: 695-703. DOI: 10.1111/rec.12010
Lennox, M. S., D. J. Lewis, R. D. Jackson, J. Harper, S. Larson, and K. W. Tate. 2011. Development of vegetation and aquatic habitat in restored riparian sites of California’s north coast rangelands. Restoration Ecology 19(2): 225-233.
Lorenz, A.W. and C. K. Feld. 2013. Upstream river morphology and riparian land use overrule local restoration effects on ecological status assessment. Hydrobiologia 704: 489-501.
BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES
Blakely, T. J. and J. S. Harding. 2005. Longitudinal patterns in benthic communities in an urban stream under restoration. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 39: 17-28. DOI: 10.1080/00288330.2005.9517291
Blakely, T. J., J. S. Harding, A. R. McIntosh, and M. J. Winterbourn. 2006. Barriers to the recovery of aquatic insect communities in urban streams. Freshwater Biology 51: 1634-1645. DOI:10.1111/j.1365- 2427.2006.01601.x
Friberg, N., B. Kronvang, H. O. Hansen, and L. M. Svendsen. 1998. Long-term, habitat-specific response of a macroinvertebrate community to river restoration. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 8: 87-99.
Garcia, X.-F., I. Schnauder, and M. T. Pusch. 2013. Complex hydromorphology of meanders can support benthic invertebrate diversity in rivers. Hydrobiologia 685: 49-68. DOI: 10.1007/s10750-011-0905-z
Herbst, D. B. and J. M. Kane. 2009. Responses of aquatic macroinvertebrates to stream channel reconstruction in a degraded rangeland creek in the Sierra Nevada. Ecological Restoration 27: 76-88.
Hoellein, T. J., J. L. Tank, S. A. Entrekin, E. J. Rosi-Marshall, M. L. Stephen, and G. A. Lamberti. 2012. Effects of benthic habitat restoration on nutrient uptake and ecosystem metabolism in three headwater streams. River Research and Applications 28: 1451-1461. DOI: 10.1002/rra.1547
Imbert, J. B., J. M. Gonzalez, A. Basaguren, and J. Pozo. 2005. Influence of inorganic substrata size, leaf litter and woody debris removal on benthic invertebrates resistance to floods in two contrasting headwater streams. International Review of Hydrobiology 90: 51-70. DOI: 10.1002/iroh.200410739
Jähnig, S. C., A. W. Lorenz, and D. Hering. 2009. Restoration effort, habitat mosaics, and macroinvertebrates - does channel form determine community composition? Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 19: 157-169. DOI: 10.1002/aqc.976
Korsu, K. 2004. Response of benthic invertebrates to disturbance from stream restoration: the importance of bryophytes. … show all 4 hide
Hydrobiologia 523: 37-45.
Laasonen, P., T. Muotka, I. Kivijärvi. 1998. Recovery of macroinvertebrate communities from stream habitat restoration. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 8: 101-113.
Louhi, P., H. Mykrä, R. Paavola, A. Huusko, T. Vehanen, A. Mäki-Petäys and T. Muotka. 2011. Twenty years of stream restoration in Finland: little response by benthic macroinvertebrate communities. Ecological Applications 21(6): 1950-1961.
Morris, M. W. L., M. Hondzo, M. E. Power. 2011. Scaling Glossosoma (Trichoptera) density by abiotic variables in mountain streams. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 30(2): 493-506. DOI: 10.1899/10-068.1
Palmer, M.A., C.M. Swan, K. Nelson, P. Silver Botts and R. Alvestad. 2000. Streambed landscapes: evidence that stream invertebrates respond to the type and spatial arrangement of patches. Landscape Ecology 15: 563 576.
Parkyn, S. M., and B. J. Smith . 2011. Dispersal constraints for stream invertebrates: setting realistic timescales for biodiversity restoration. Environmental Management 48:602-614. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-011- 9694-4
Purcell, A. H., D. W. Bressler, M. J. Paul, M. T. Barbour, E. T. Rankin, J. L. Carter, and V. H. Resh. 2009. Assessment tools for urban catchments: developing biological indicators based on benthic macroinvertebrates. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 45: 306-319. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2008.00279.x
Selvakumar, A., T. P. O’Connor, and S. D. Struck. 2010. Role of stream restoration on improving benthic macroinvertebrates and in-stream water quality in an urban watershed: case study. Journal of Environmental Engineering 136(1): 127-139. DOI: 10.1061/_ASCE_EE.1943- 7870.0000116
Spänhoff, B. and J. Arle. 2007. Setting attainable goals of stream habitat restoration from a macroinvertebrate view. Restoration Ecology 15: 317 320.
Stewart, B. A., P. G. Close, P. A. Cook, and P. M. Davies. 2013. Upper thermal tolerances of key taxonomic groups of stream invertebrates. Hydrobiologia 718: 131-140. DOI 10.1007/s10750-013-1611-9
Sundermann, A., C. Antons, N. Cron, A. W. Lorenz, D. Hering, and P. Haase. 2011. Hydromorphological restoration of running waters: effects on benthic invertebrate assemblages. Freshwater Biology 56:1689-1702. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2011.02599.x
Utz, R.M. and R.H. Hilderbrand. 2011. Interregional variation in urbanization induced geomorphic change and macroinvertebrate habitat colonization in headwater streams. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 30: 25-37.
Utz, R.M., R.H. Hilderbrand, and D.M. Boward. 2009. Identifying regional differences in threshold responses of aquatic invertebrates to land cover gradients. Ecological Indicators 9: 556-567.
Walter, C. A., D. Nelson, and J. I. Earle. 2012. Assessment of stream restoration: Sources of variation in macroinvertebrate recovery throughout an 11-year study of coal mine drainage treatment. Restoration Ecology 20(4): 431-440.
Wang, L. and P. Kanehl. 2003. Influences of watershed urbanization and instream habitat on macroinvertebrates in cold water streams. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 39:1181-1196.
MODELLING
Bockelmann, B. N., E.K. Fenrich, B. Lina, and R. A. Falconer. 2004. Development of an ecohydraulics model for stream and river restoration. Ecological Engineering 22: 227-235.
Bond, N., S. McMaster, P. Reich, J. R. Thomson, and P. S. Lake. 2010. Modeling the impacts of flow regulation on fish distributions in naturally intermittent lowland streams: an approach for predicting restoration responses. Freshwater Biology 55: 1997-2010. DOI:10.1111/j.1365- 2427.2010.02421.x
Cluer, B. and C. Thorne. 2014. A stream evolution model integrating habitat and ecosystem benefits. River Research and Applications 30:135-154. DOI: 10.1002/rra.2631
Davies-Colley, R. J., M. A. Meleason, R. M. J. Hall, and J. C. Rutherford. 2009. Modelling the time course of shade, temperature, and wood recovery in streams with riparian forest restoration. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 43: 673-688. DOI: 10.1080/00288330909510033
Fullerton, A. H., E. A. Steel, I. Lange, and Y. Caras. 2010. Effects of spatial pattern and economic uncertainties on freshwater habitat restoration planning: a simulation exercise. Restoration Ecology 18: 354-369. DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2009.00620.x
Harmsen, P., R. Palmer, and G. Turkiyyah. 2001. Development and application of an expert system for evaluation of scour and stream stability. Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems 18(3):171-192. DOI: 10.1080/02630250108970299
Khosronejad, A., C. Hill, S. Kang, and Fotis Sotiropoulos. 2013. Computational and experimental investigation of scour past laboratory models of stream restoration rock structures. Advances in Water Resources 54:191-207.
Krapesch, G., M. Tritthart, and H. Habersack. 2009. A model-based analysis of meander restoration. River Research and Applications 25: 593-606. DOI: 10.1002/rra.1236
Lee, J. H., and K.-G. An. 2014. Integrative restoration assessment of an urban stream using multiple modeling approaches with physical, chemical, and biological integrity indicators. Ecological Engineering 62: 153-167.
GEO and HYDROMORPHOLOGY
Brockman, R. R., C. T. Agouridis, S. R. Workman, L. E. Ormsbee, and A. W. Fogle. 2012. Bankfull regional curves for the inner and outer Bluegrass regions of Kentucky. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 48: 391-406. DOI: 10.1111 ⁄ j.1752-1688.2011.00621.x
Chin, A., S. Anderson, A. Collison, B. J. Ellis-Sugai, J. P. Haltiner, J. B. Hogervorst, G. M. Kondolf, L. S. O’Hirok, A. H. Purcell, A. L. Riley, and E. Wohl. 2009. Linking theory and practice for restoration of step-pool streams. Environmental Management 43(4):645-661. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-008-9171-x
Chin, A., F. Gelwick, D. Laurencio, L. R. Laurencio, M. S. Byars, and M. Scoggins. 2010. Linking geomorphological and ecological responses in restored urban pool-riffle streams. Ecological Restoration 28: 460-474.
Cinotto, P. J. 2003. Development of regional curves of bankfull-channel geometry and discharge for streams in the non-urban, Piedmont Physiographic Province, Pennsylvania and Maryland. U.S. Department of the Interior and U.S. Geological Survey, Water-Resources Investigations, Report 03-4014.
Elosegi, A. and S. Sabater. 2013. Effects of hydromorphological impacts on river ecosystem functioning: a review and suggestions for assessing ecological impacts. Hydrobiologia 712:129-143. DOI: 10.1007/s10750- 012-1226-6
Ernst, A. G., D. R. Warren, and B. P. Baldigo. 2012. Natural-channel-design restorations that changed geomorphology have little effect on macroinvertebrate communities in headwater streams. Restoration Ecology 20(4): 532–540. DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2011.00790.x
Habberfield, M. W., S. S. Blersch, S. J. Bennett, and J. F. Atkinson. 2014. Rapid geomorphic and habitat stream assessment techniques inform restoration differently based on levels of stream disturbance. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 1-12. DOI: 10.1111/jawr.12156
Hansen, W. F. 2001. Identifying stream types and management implications. Forest Ecology and Management 143: 39-46.
Hauer, C., B. Schober, and H. Habersack. 2013. Impact analysis of river morphology and roughness variability on hydropeaking based on numerical modeling. Hydrological Processes 27: 2209-2224. DOI: 10.1002/hyp.9519
Hauer, C., G. Unfer, M. Tritthart, . and H. Habersack. 2011. Effects of stream channel morphology, transport processes and effective discharge on salmonid spawning habitats. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 36: 672-685. DOI: 10.1002/esp.2087
Herbert, M. E. and F. P. Gelwick. 2003. Spatial variation of headwater fish assemblages explained by hydrologic variability and upstream effects of impoundment. Copeia 2003(2):273-284.
Hey, R. D. 2006. Fluvial geomorphological methodology for natural stable channel design. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 42: 357-374.
Jähnig, S. C., S. Brunzel, S. Gacek, A. W. Lorenz, and D. Hering. 2009. Effects of re-braiding measures on hydromorphology, floodplain vegetation, ground beetles and benthic invertebrates in mountain rivers. Journal of Applied Ecology 46: 406-416. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01611.x
James, L. A., D. G. Watson, and W. F. Hansen. 2007. Using LiDAR data to map gullies and headwater streams under forest canopy: South Carolina, USA. Catena 71:132–144.
Kristensen, E. A., H. Thodsen, B. Dehli, P. E. Q. Kolbe, L. Glismand, and B. Kronvang. 2013. Comparison of active and passive stream restoration: effects on the physical habitats. Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography 113:109-120. DOI: 10.1080/00167223.2013.837634
Laub, B.G., D.W. Baker, B.P. Bledsoe, and M.A. Palmer. 2012. Range of variability of channel complexity in urban, restored and forested reference streams. Freshwater Biology 57:1076-1095.
Lave, R. 2009. The controversy over natural channel design: substantive explanations and potential avenues for resolution. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 45: 1519-1532. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2009.00385.x
Mason, S. J. K., B. L. McGlynn, and G. C. Poole. 2012. Hydrologic response to channel reconfiguration on Silver Bow Creek, Montana. Journal of Hydrology 438-439: 125-136. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.03.010
Moorhead, K. K., D. W. Bell, and R. N. Thorn. 2008. Floodplain hydrology after restoration of a southern Appalachian mountain stream. Wetlands 28(3):632-639.
Mulvihill, C. I. and B. P. Baldigo, 2012. Optimizing bankfull discharge and hydraulic geometry relations for streams in New York State. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 48(3): 449-463. DOI: 10.1111 ⁄ j.1752-1688.2011.00623.x
Simon, A., M. Doyle, M. Kondolf, F.D. Shields Jr., B. Rhoads, and M. McPhillips. 2008. Critical evaluation of how the Rosgen Classification and associated ‘Natural Channel Design’ methods fail to integrate and quantify fluvial processes and channel responses. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 44: 793-802.
POLICY
Bronner, C. E., A. M. Bartlett, S. L. Whiteway, D. C. L., S. J. Bennett, and A. J. Rabideau. 2013. An assessment of U, S, stream compensatory mitigation policy: Necessary changes to protect ecosystem functions and services. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 49: 449 462.
Cochran, B. and C. Logue. 2011. A watershed approach to improve water quality: case study of Clean Water Services’ Tualatin River Program. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 47: 29-38. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2010.00491.x
Doyle, M. W., R. Lave, M. M. Robertson, and J. Ferguson. 2013. River federalism. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 103(2): 290-298. DOI: 10.1080/00045608.2013.754686
Doyle, M. W. and F. D. Shields. 2012. Compensatory mitigation for streams under the Clean Water Act: reassessing science and redirecting policy. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 48: 494-509. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2011.00631.x
Gerlak, A. K. 2008. Today's pragmatic water policy: restoration, collaboration, and adaptive management along U.S. Rivers. Society and Natural Resources: An International Journal 21(6): 538-545. DOI: 10.1080/08941920801907514
Hill, T., E. Kulz, B. Munoz, and J. R. Dorney. 2013. Compensatory stream and wetland mitigation in North Carolina: an evaluation of regulatory success. Environmental Management 51: 1077-1091. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-013- 0027-7
Jørgensen, D., C. Nilsson, A. R. Hof, E. M. Hasselquist, S. Baker, F. S. Chapin III, K. Eckerberg, J. Hj¨alt´en, L. Polvi, and L. A. Meyerson. 2014. Policy language in restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology 22(1): 1-4.
Maron, M., R. Hobbs, A. Moilanen, J. W. Matthews, K. Christie, T. A. Gardner, D. A. Keith, D. B. Lindenmayer, and C. A. McAlpine. 2012. Are restoration offsets Faustian bargains? Restoration realities in the context of biodiversity offset policies. Biological Conservation 155:141-148.
Moran, S. 2010. Cities, creeks, and erasure: stream restoration and environmental justice. Environmental Justice 3(2): 62-69. DOI: 10.1089/env.2009.0036
INSTREAM HABITAT (LARGE WOODY DEBRIS)
Cordova, J. M., E. J. Rosi-Marshall, A. M. Yamamuro, and G. A. Lamberti. 2007. Quantity, controls and functions of large woody debris in Midwestern USA streams. River Research and Applications 23: 21-33. DOI: 10.1002/rra.963
Costigan, K.. H. and M. D. Daniels. 2013. Spatial pattern, density and characteristics of large wood in Connecticut streams: implications for stream restoration priorities in southern New England. River Research and Applications 29: 161-171. DOI: 10.1002/rra.1589
Entrekin, S. A., J. L. Tank, E. J. Rosi-Marshall, T. J. Hoellein, and G. A. Lamberti. 2009. Response of secondary production by macroinvertebrates to large wood addition in three Michigan streams. Freshwater Biology 54: 1741 1758. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02223.x
Gerhard, M. and M. Reich. 2000. Restoration of streams with large wood: effects of accumulated and built-in wood on channel morphology, habitat diversity and aquatic fauna. International Review of Hydrobiology 85(1): 123-137.
Harrison, S. S. C., J. L. Pretty, D. Shepherd, A. G. Hildrew, C. Smith, and R. D. Hey. 2004. The effect of instream rehabilitation structures on macroinvertebrates in lowland rivers. Journal of Applied Ecology 41: 1140-1154.
Herbst, D. B., M. T. Bogan, S. K. Roll, and H. D. Safford. 2012. Effects of livestock exclusion on in-stream habitat and benthic invertebrate assemblages in montane streams. Freshwater Biology 57: 204-217. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2011.02706.x
Hilderbrand, R. H., A. D. Lemly, C. A. Dolloff, and K. L. Harpster. 1997. Effects of large woody debris placement on stream channels and benthic macroinvertebrates. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 54: 931-939.
Hilderbrand, R. H., A. D. Lemly, C. A. Dolloff, and K. L. Harpster. 1998. Design considerations for large woody placement in stream enhancement projects. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 18: 161-167.
Jones, T. A., L. D. Daniels, and S. R. Powell. 2011. Abundance and function of large woody debris in small, headwater streams in the Rocky Mountain foothills of Alberta, Canada. River Research and Applications 27: 297 311. DOI: 10.1002/rra.1353
Kail, J., D. Hering, S. Muhar, M. Gerhard, and S. Preis. 2007. The use of large wood in stream restoration: experiences from 50 projects in Germany and Austria. Journal of Applied Ecology 44: 1145-1155.
Kasprak, A., F. J. Magilligan, K. H. Nislow, and N. P. Snyder. 2012. A LiDAR derived evaluation of watershed-scale large woody debris sources and recruitment mechanisms: Coastal Maine, USA. River Research and Applications 28: 1462-1476. DOI: 10.1002/rra.1532
Koljonen, S. , P. Louhi, A. Mäki-Petäys, A. Huusko and T. Muotka. 2012. Quantifying the effects of in-stream habitat structure and discharge on leaf retention: implications for stream restoration. Freshwater Science 31(4):1121-1130.
Lawrence, J. E., V. H. Resh, and M. R. Cover. 2013. Large-wood loading from natural and engineered processes at the watershed scale. River research and Applications 29:1030-1041. DOI: 10.1002/rra.2589
Lemly, A. D., and R. H. Hilderbrand. 2000. Influence of large woody debris on stream insect communities and benthic detritus. Hydrobiologia 421: 179 185.
Lepori, F., D. Palm, E. Brännäs, and B. Malmqvist. 2005. Does restoration of structural heterogeneity in streams enhance fish and macroinvertebrate diversity? Ecological Applications 15(6): 2060-2071.
Linløkken, A. 1997. Effects of instream habitat enhancement on fish populations of a small Norwegian stream. Nordic Journal of Freshwater Research 73: 50-59.
Miller, S. W., P. Budy, and J. C. Schmidt. 2010. Quantifying macroinvertebrate responses to in-stream habitat restoration: applications of meta-analysis to river restoration. Restoration Ecology 18(1): 8-19.
Muotka, T., R. Paavola, A. Haapala, M. Novikmec, and P. Laasonen. 2002. Long-term recovery of stream habitat structure and benthic invertebrate communities from in-stream restoration. Biological Conservation 105: 243–253.
Shields Jr., F. D., S. S. Knight, N. Morin, and J. Blank. 2003. Response of fishes and aquatic habitats to sand-bed stream restoration using large woody debris. Hydrobiologia 169: 251-257.
Testa III, S., F. D. Shields Jr., and C. M. Cooper. 2011. Macroinvertebrate response to stream restoration by large wood addition. Ecohydrology 4: 631-643. DOI: 10.1002/eco.146
BEAVER
Curran, J. C. and K. M. Cannatelli. 2014. The impact of beaver dams on the morphology of a river in the eastern United States with implications for river restoration. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms. DOI: 10.1002/esp.3576
DeVries, P., K. L. Fetherston, A. Vitale, and S. Madsen. 2012. Emulating riverine landscape controls of beaver in stream restoration. Fisheries 37: 246-255. DOI: 10.1080/03632415.2012.687263
MISCELLANEOUS
Al-Chokhachy, R., B. B. Roper, E. K. Archer, and S. Miller. 2011. Quantifying the extent of and factors associated with the temporal variability of physical stream habitat in headwater streams in the interior Columbia River Basin. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 140: 399 414. DOI: 10.1080/00028487.2011.567865
Ames, G. M. 2012. Using species functional traits to predict community dynamics . Doctoral dissertation. Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado.
Burbidge, A. H., M. Maron, M. F. Clarke, J. Baker, D. L. Oliver, and G. Ford. 2011. Linking science and practice in ecological research and management: How can we do it better? Ecological Management and Restoration 12(1):54-60. DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-8903.2011.00569.x 54-60
Cabin, R. J., A. Clewell, M. Ingram, T. McDonald, and V. Temperton. 2010. Bridging restoration science and practice: results and analysis of a survey from the 2009 Society for Ecological Restoration international meeting. Restoration Ecology 18: 783-788. DOI: 10.1111/j.1526- 100X.2010.00743.x
Collins, A., R. Rosenberger, and J. Fletcher. 2005. The economic value of stream restoration. Water Resources Research 41(2): W02017. DOI: 10.1029/2004WR003353.
Cox J., C. Hendrickson, R. Suffling, I. Skelton. 1996. Watershed planning for urbanization to avoid undesireable stream outcomes. Canadian Water Resources Journal 21: 237-251. DOI: 10.4296/cwrj2103237
de Boer, C. and H. Bressers. 2012. New strategies for implementing locally integrated stream restoration projects. Environmental Practice 14: 26-34. DOI:10.10170S1466046611000500
Doheny, E. J., J. J. A. Dillow, P. M. Mayer, and E. A. Striz. 2012. Geomorphic responses to stream channel restoration at Minebank Run, Baltimore County, Maryland, 2002-08. U.S. Geological Survey, Scientific Investigations, Report 2012–5012. 61 pgs.
Engström, J., C. Nilsson, and R. Jansson. 2009. Effects of stream restoration on dispersal of plant propagules. Journal of Applied Ecology 46:397-405. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01612.x
Follstad Shah, J. J., C. N. Dahm, S. P. Gloss, and E. S. Bernhardt. 2007. River and riparian restoration in the Southwest: Results of the National River Restoration Science Synthesis Project. Restoration Ecology 15: 550–562.
Gillespie, N., A. Unthank, L. Campbell, P. Anderson, R. Gubernick, M. Weinhold, D. Cenderelli, B. Austin, D. McKinley, S. Wells, J. Rowan, C. Orvis, M. Hudy, A. Bowden, A. Singler, E. Fretz, J. Levine, and R. Kirn. 2014. Flood effects on road–stream crossing infrastructure: economic and ecological benefits of stream simulation designs. Fisheries 39: 62-76. DOI:10.1080/03632415.2013.874527
Gordon, R. P., L. K. Lautz, and T. L. Daniluk. 2013. Spatial patterns of hyporheic exchange and biogeochemical cycling around cross-vane restoration structures: Implications for stream restoration design. Water Resources Research 49: 2040-2055. DOI:10.1002/wrcr.20185
Hassett, B. A., M. A. Palmer, and E. S. Bernhardt. 2007. Evaluating stream restoration in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed through practitioner interviews. Restoration Ecology 15: 563–572.
Hassett, B., M.A. Palmer, E.S. Bernhardt, S. Smith, J. Carr, and D.D. Hart. 2005. Restoring watersheds project by project: trends in Chesapeake Bay tributary restoration. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 3: 259 267.
Hester, E. T. and M. N. Gooseff. 2010. Moving beyond the banks: Hyporheic restoration is fundamental to restoring ecological services and functions of streams. Environmental Science and Technology 44:1521-1525.
Hilderbrand, R. H., A. D. Lemly, and C. A. Dolloff. 1999. Habitat sequencing and the importance of discharge in inferences. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 19:198-202.
Hilderbrand, R.H., R.M. Utz, S.A. Stranko, and R.L. Raesly. 2010. Applying thresholds to forecast potential biodiversity loss from human development. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 29:1009-1016.
Huang, J., W. J. Mitsch, and A. D. Ward. 2010. Design of experimental streams for simulating headwater stream restoration. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 46(5):957-971. DOI: 10.1111 ⁄ j.1752 1688.2010.00467.x
Hughes, F.M.R., W. M. Adams, E. Muller, C. Nilsson, K. S. Richards, N. Barsoum, H. Decamps, R. Foussadier, J. Girel, H. Guilloy, A. Hayes, M. Johansson, L. Lambs, G. Pautou, J. -L. Peiry, M. Perrow, F. Vautier, and M. Winfield. 2001. The importance of different scale processes for the restoration of floodplain woodlands. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 17: 325–345. DOI: 10.1002/rrr.656
Hughes, S. J., J. Santos, T. Ferreira, A. Mendes. 2010. Evaluating the response of biological assemblages as potential indicators for restoration measures in an intermittent Mediterranean river. Environmental Management 46: 285-301. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-010-9521-3
Iacob, O., J. Rowan, I. Brown, and C. Ellis. 2012. Natural flood management as a climate change adaptation option assessed using an ecosystem services approach. British Hydrological Society, Eleventh National Symposium, Hydrology for a changing world, Dundee 2012. DOI: 10.7558/bhs.2012.ns26
Jähnig, S. C., A. W. Lorenz, D. Hering, C. Antons, A. Sundermann, E. Jedicke, and P. Haase. 2011. River restoration success- a question of perception. Ecological Applications 21(6): 2007-2015.
Jenkinson, R. G., K. A. Barnas, J. H. Braatne, E. S. Bernhardt, M. A. Palmer, J. D. Allan, and the National River Restoration Science Synthesis. 2006. Stream restoration databases and case studies: a guide to information resources and their utility in advancing the science and practice of restoration. Restoration Ecology 14:177-186.
Johnson, P. A. 2002. Incorporating road crossings into stream and river restoration projects. Ecological Restoration 20: 270-277.
Johnson, P. A. 2013. Defining a standard of care for urban stream restoration projects. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice. Pages: 04013018-1-04013018-5. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943- 5541.0000187
Johnson, P. A. and E. R. Brown. 2001. Incorporating uncertainty in the design of stream channel modifications. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 37:1225-1236.
Julien, P., G. Richard, and J. Albert. 2005. Stream restoration and environmental river mechanics. International Journal of River Basin Management 3: 191-202. DOI: 10.1080/15715124.2005.9635258
Kasahara, T. and A. R. Hill. 2007. Lateral hyporheic zone chemistry in an artificially constructed gravel bar and a re-meandered stream channel, Southern Ontario, Canada. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 43: 1257-1269. DOI: 10.1111 ⁄ j.1752-1688.2007.00108.x
Katopodis, C. and L. P. Aadland. 2006. Effective dam removal and river channel restoration approaches. International Journal of River Basin Management 4(3): 153-168. DOI: 10.1080/15715124.2006.9635285
Kenney, M. A., P. R. Wilcock, B. F. Hobbs, N. E. Flores, and D. C. Martínez. 2012. Is urban stream restoration worth it? Journal of the American Water Resources Association 48: 603-615. DOI: 10.1111 ⁄ j.1752 1688.2011.00635.x
Kibler, K., D. Tullos, and M. Kondolf. 2011. Evolving expectations of dam removal outcomes: downstream geomorphic effects following removal of a small, gravel-filled dam. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 47:408-423. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2011.00523.x
Kondolf, G. M. 2006. River restoration and meanders. Ecology and Society 11(2): 42. [online] URL: http:// vol11/iss2/art42/
Lamy, F., J. Bolte, M. Santelmann, and C. Smith. 2002. Development and evaluation of multiple-objective decision-making methods for watershed management planning. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 38: 517-529.
Langhans, S. D., V. Hermoso, S. Linke, S. E. Bunn, and H. P. Possingham. 2014. Cost-effective river rehabilitation planning: Optimizing for morphological benefits at large spatial scales. Journal of Environmental Management 132: 296-303.
Larson, M. 1995. Developments in river and stream restoration in Germany. Restoration and Management Notes 13(1): 77-83.
Lepori, F., D. Palm, and B. Malmqvist. 2005. Effects of stream restoration on ecosystem functioning: detritus retentiveness and decomposition. Journal of Applied Ecology 42: 228-238.
Lorenz, A. W., T. Korte, A. Sundermann, K. Januschke and P. Haase. 2012. Macrophytes respond to reach-scale river restorations. Journal of Applied Ecology 49:303-212. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02082.x
Mantyka-Pringle, C. S., T. G. Martin, D. B. Moffatt, S. Linke, and J. R. Rhodes. 2014. Understanding and predicting the combined effects of climate change and land-use change on freshwater macroinvertebrates and fish. Journal of Applied Ecology. In Press. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12236
Mcdonald, M. 1995. A combination in behalf of restoration “The coalition to restore urban waters.” Restoration and Management Notes 13: 98-103.
Merovich Jr, G. T., and J. T. Petty. 2007. Interactive effects of multiple stressors and restoration priorities in a mined Appalachian watershed. Hydrobiologia 575:13-31. DOI 10.1007/s10750-006-0277-y
Merill, L. and D. J. Tonjes. 2014. A review of the hyporheic zone, stream restoration, and means to enhance denitrification. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology. In Press. DOI:
10.1080/10643389.2013.829769
Middleton, J. V. 2001. The Stream Doctor Project: community-driven stream restoration. BioScience 51(4): 293-296. DOI: 10.1641/0006 3568%282001%29051%5B0293%3ATSDPCD%5D2.0.CO%3B2 .
Moran, S. 2007. Stream restoration projects: a critical analysis of urban greening. Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability 12: 111-128. DOI: 10.1080/13549830601133151
Mueller, M., J. Pander and J. Geist. 2011. The effects of weirs on structural stream habitat and biological communities. Journal of Applied Ecology 48: 1450-1461. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02035.x
Muotka, T. and P. Laasonen. 2002. Ecosystem recovery in restored headwater streams: the role of enhanced leaf retention. Journal of Applied Ecology 39: 145-156.
Muotka, T. and J. Syrjänen. 2007. Changes in habitat structure, benthic invertebrate diversity, trout populations and ecosystem processes in restored forest streams: a boreal perspective. Freshwater Biology 52: 724-737. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2007.01727.x
Nassauer, J. I., S. E. Kosek, and R. C. Corry. 2001. Meeting public expectations with ecological innovation in riparian landscapes. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 37: 1439-1443.
Nelson, K. C., M.A. Palmer, J.E. Pizzuto, G.E. Moglen, P.L. Angermeier, R.H. Hilderbrand, M. Dettinger, and K. Hayhoe. 2008. Forecasting the combined effects of urbanization and climate change on stream ecosystems: from impacts to management options. Journal of Applied Ecology 46: 154-163.
Newbold, J. D., S. Herbert, B. W. Sweeney, P. Kiry, and S. J. Alberts. 2010. Water quality functions of a 15-year-old riparian forest buffer system. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 46: 299-310. DOI: 10.1111 ⁄ j.1752-1688.2010.00421.x1
Newman, L., A. Dale, and D. Nixon. 2012. The Frog Dilemma: Urban stream restoration and the nature/culture dialectic. Environments Journal 38: 19- 32.
Niezgoda, S. L. and P. A. Johnson. 2005. Improving the urban stream restoration effort: identifying critical form and processes relationships. Environmental Management 35(5): 579-592. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-004- 0088-8
Niezgoda, S. L. and P. A. Johnson. 2006. Modeling the long term impacts of using rigid structures in stream channel restoration. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 42: 1597-1613.
Nilsson, C., L. E. Polvi, J. Gardeström, E. M. Hasselquist, L. Lind, L. and J. M. Sarneel. 2014. Riparian and in-stream restoration of boreal streams and rivers: success or failure? Ecohydrology. In Press. DOI: 10.1002/eco.1480
Norman, E. S. 2013. Fields and streams: stream restoration, neoliberalism, and the future of environmental science. Social and Cultural Geography. DOI: 10.1080/14649365.2013.858890
Northington, R. M., E. F. Benfield, S. H. Schoenholtz, A. J. Timpano, J. R. Webster, C. Zipper. 2011. An assessment of structural attributes and ecosystem function in restored Virginia coalfield streams. Hydrobiologia 671: 51-63. DOI: 10.1007/s10750-011-0703-7
O’Connor, B. L., M. Hondzo, and J. W. Harvey. 2010. Predictive modeling of transient storage and nutrient uptake: implications for stream restoration. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 136(12): 1018-1032. DOI: 10.1061/_ASCE_HY.1943-7900.0000180
O’Donnell, T. K. and D. L. Galat. 2008. Evaluating success criteria and project monitoring in river enhancement within an adaptive management framework. Environmental Management 41:90-105. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-007-9010-5
Omernik, J. M. and R. G. Bailey. 1997. Distinguishing between watersheds and ecoregions. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 33: 935-949.
Ormerod, S. J. 2004. A golden age of river restoration science? Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 14: 543-549. DOI: 10.1002/aqc.663
Opperman, J. J., R. Luster, B. A. McKenney, M. Roberts, and A. W. Meadows. 2010. Ecologically functional floodplains: connectivity, flow regime, and scale. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 46: 211 226. DOI: 10.1111 ⁄ j.1752-1688.2010.00426.x
Orzetti, L. L., R. C. Jones, and R. F. Murphy. 2010. Stream condition in Piedmont streams with restored riparian buffers in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 46: 473-485. DOI: 10.1111 ⁄ j.1752-1688.2009.00414.x
Osborne, L. L., and D. A. Kovacic. 1993. Riparian vegetated buffer strips in water-quality restoration and stream management. Freshwater Biology 29: 243-258.
Palmer, M.A. 2010. Water resources: Beyond Infrastructure. Nature 467: 534 535.
Palmer, M. A. 2009. Reforming watershed restoration: science in need of application and applications in need of science. Estuaries and Coasts 32: 1559-2723.
Palmer, M.A. and J.D. Allan. 2006. River restoration: as the need for river restoration grows, supporting federal policies should follow. Issues in Science and Technology, National Academy of Science 22: 40-48.
Palmer, M., J. D. Allan, J. Meyer, and E. S. Bernhardt. 2007. River restoration in the twenty-first century: Data and experiential knowledge to inform future efforts. Restoration Ecology 15: 472–481.
Palmer, M.A., R.F. Ambrose, and N.L. Poff. 1997. Ecological theory and community restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology 5: 291-300.
Palmer, M.A. and E.S. Bernhardt. 2006. Hydroecology and river restoration: ripe for research and synthesis. Water Resources Research 42(3):W03S07. DOI: 10.1029/2005WR004354.
Palmer, M. A., E. S. Bernhardt, J. D. Allan, P. S. Lake, G. Alexander, S. Brooks, J. Carr, S. Clayton, C. N. Dahm, J. F. Shah, D. L. Galat, S. G. Loss, P. Goodwin, D. D. Hart, B. Hassett, R. Jenkinson, G. M. Kondolf, R. Lave, J. L. Meyer, T. K. O’Donnell, L. Paganom and E. Sudduth. 2005. Standards for ecologically successful river restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology 42: 208-217.
Palmer, M. A. and S. Filoso. 2009. Restoration of ecosystems services for environmental markets. Science 325: 575-576.
Palmer, M. A., S. Filosoc, and R. M. Fanellic. 2013. From ecosystems to ecosystem services: Stream restoration as ecological engineering. Ecological Engineering In Press. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.07.059
Palmer, M. A., D. D. Hart, J. D. Allan, E. Bernhardt, and the National Riverine Restoration Science Synthesis Working Group. 2003. Bridging engineering, ecological, and geomorphic science to enhance riverine restoration: local and national efforts. Proceedings of A National Symposium on Urban and Rural Stream Protection and Restoration, EWRI World Water and Environmental Congress, Philadelphia, Pa. Published by the American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston Va.
Palmer, M. A., H. L. Menninger, and E. Bernhardt. 2010. River restoration, habitat heterogeneity and biodiversity: a failure of theory or practice? Freshwater Biology 55: 205–222. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02372.x
Palmer, M.A., G.E. Moglen, N. E. Bockstael, S. Brooks, J.E. Pizzuto, C. Wiegand, and K. Van Ness. 2002. The ecological consequences of changing land use for running waters: the surburban Maryland case. Yale Bulletin of Environmental Science 107: 85-113.
Palmer, M.A., L. Wainger, L. Craig, C. Febria, J. Hosen, and K. Politano. 2011. Promoting Successful Restoration through Effective Monitoring in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed: Streams. National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, Washington, D.C.
Palmer, M.A., L. Wainger, L. Craig, C. Febria, J. Hosen, and K. Politano. 2011. Promoting successful restoration through effective monitoring in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed: Non-Tidal wetlands. National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, Washington, D.C. (appendix).
Pander, J., and J. Geist. 2013. Ecological indicators for stream restoration success. Ecological Indicators 30:106-118.
Pander, J., M. Mueller, and J. Geist. 2014. A comparison of four stream substratum restoration techniques concerning interstitial conditions and downstream effects. River Research and Applications. In Press. DOI: 10.1002/rra.2732
Parasiewicz, P. 2001. MesoHABSIM: A concept for application of instream flow models in river restoration planning. Fisheries 26(9): 6-13. DOI: 10.1577/1548-8446(2001)0262.0.CO;2
Parkyn, S., K. Collier, J. Clapcott, B. David, R. Davies-Colley, F. Matheson, J. Quinn, W. Shaw, and R. Storey. 2010. The restoration indicator toolkit: Indicators for monitoring the ecological success of stream restoration. National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Ltd, Hamilton, New Zealand. 134pp.
Paul, M. J., D. W. Bressler, A. H. Purcell, M. T. Barbour, E. T. Rankin, and V. H. Resh. 2009. Assessment tools for urban catchments: defining observable biological potential. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 45: 320-330. DOI: 0.1111/j.1752-1688.2008.00280.x
Petty, J. T. and D. Thorne. 2005. An ecologically based approach to identifying restoration priorities in an acid-impacted watershed. Restoration Ecology 13: 348-357. DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2005.00044.x
Phillips, G. 2003. Success and benefits of stream restoration. Watershed Update, AWRA Hydrology & Watershed Management Technical Committee 1:1-3.
Pizzuto, J., G. Moglen, M.A. Palmer, and K. Nelson. 2007. Two model scenarios illustrating the effects of land use and climate change on gravel riverbeds of suburban Maryland, U.S.A. in Gravel Bed Rivers. Pages 359- 386 In H. Habersack, H. Piegay, and M. Rinald, editors. Gravel bed rivers 6: From process understanding to river restoration. Elsevier Science, Oxford, UK.
Pohl, M. M. 2002. Bringing down our dams: Trends in American dam removal rationales. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 38: 1511-1519.
Poole, G. C. and C. H. Berman. 2001. An ecological perspective on in-stream temperature: Natural heat dynamics and mechanisms of human-caused thermal degradation. Environmental Management 27: 787–802. DOI: 10.1007/s002670010188
Poole G. C., C. A. Frissell, and S. C. Ralph. 1997. In-stream habitat unit classification: inadequacies for monitoring and some consequences for management. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 33: 879-896.
Poplar-Jeffers, I. O., J. T. Petty, J. T. Anderson, S. J. Kite, M. P. Strager, and R. H. Fortney. 2009. Culvert replacement and stream habitat restoration: implications from brook trout management in an Appalachian watershed, U.S.A. . Restoration Ecology 17(3): 404-413.
Prach, K. and R. J. Hobbs. 2008. Spontaneous succession versus technical reclamation in the restoration of disturbed sites. Restoration Ecology 16(3): 363-366.
Purcell, A. 2004. A long-term post-project evaluation of an urban stream restoration project (Baxter Creek, El Cerrito, California). Water resources and Collections Archives: Restoration of Rivers and Streams LA 227. [online] URL:
Purcell, A. H., C. Friedrich, and V. H. Resh. 2002. An assessment of a small urban stream restoration project in Northern California. Restoration Ecology 10: 685-694.
Quinn, J. M. 2009. Special issue on restoration of aquatic ecosystems. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 43: 653-657. DOI: 10.1080/00288330909510031
Rabeni, C. F. and S. P. Sowa. 1996. Integrating biological realism into habitat restoration and conservation strategies for small streams. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53: 252–259.
Rakovan, M. T. and W.H. Renwick. 2011. The role of sediment supply in channel instability and stream restoration. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 66(1): 40-50. DOI:10.2489/jswc.66.1.40
Reeve, T., J. Lichatowich, W. Towey, and A. Duncan. 2006. Building science and accountability into community-based restoration. Fisheries 31: 17-24. DOI: 10.1577/1548-8446(2006)31[17:BSAAIC]2.0.CO;2
Renwick, W. H. and M. T. Rakovan. 2010. Sediment supply limitation and stream restoration. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 65(3): 67A. DOI:10.2489/jswc.65.3.67A
Rheaume, S. J., C. M. Rachol, D. L. Hubbell, and A. Simard. 2000. Sediment characteristics and configuration within three dam impoundments on the Kalamazoo River, Michigan. U.S. Geological Survey, Water-Resources Investigations, Report 02-4098.
Rheinhardt, R. D., M. M. Brinson, R. R. Christian, K. H. Miller, and G. F. Meyer. 2007. A refernce-based framework for evaluating the ecological condition of stream networks in small watersheds. Wetlands 27(3):524-542.
Richardson, C. J., N. E. Flanagan, M. Ho, and J. W. Pahl. 2011. Integrated stream and wetland restoration: a watershed approach to improved water quality on the landscape. Ecological Engineering 37: 25-39.
Richardson, D. M., P. M. Holmes, K. J. Esler, S. M. Galatowitsch, J. C. Stromberg, S. P. Kirkman, P. Pysek and R. J. Hobbs. 2007. Riparian vegetation: degradation, alien plant invasions, and restoration prospects. Diversity and Distributions 13:126-139.
Rinaldi, M. and P. Johnson. 1997. Stream meander restoration. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 33: 855-866.
Roni, P., T. J. Beechie, R. E. Bilby, F. E. Leonetti, M. M. Pollock, and G. R. Pess. 2002. A review of stream restoration techniques and a hierarchical strategy for prioritizing restoration in Pacific Northwest Watersheds. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 22: 1-20. DOI:10.1577/1548 8675(2002)0222.0.CO;2
Roni P., K. Hanson, and T. Beechie. 2008. Global review of the physical and biological effectiveness of stream habitat rehabilitation techniques. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 28: 856-890. DOI: 10.1577/M06-169.1
Roper, B. B., J. M. Buffington, E. Archer, C. Moyer, and M. Ward. 2008. The role of observer variation in determining Rosgen Stream Types in Northeastern Oregon mountain streams. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 44: 417-427. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752- 1688.2008.00171.x
Roper, B. B., J. J. Dose, and J. E. Williams. 1997. Stream restoration: is fisheries biology enough? Fisheries 22(5): 6-11. DOI: 10.1577/1548 8446(1997)0222.0.CO;2
Rosenfeld, J., D. Hogan, D. Palm, H. Lundquist, C. Nilsson, and T. J. Beechie. 2011. Contrasting landscape influences on sediment supply and stream restoration priorities in Northern Fennoscandia (Sweden and Finland) and Coastal British Columbia. Environmental Management 47: 28-39. DOI 10.1007/s00267-010-9585-0
Ruiz-Jaen, M. C. and T. M. Aide. 2005. Restoration success: How is it being measured? Restoration Ecology 13: 569-577. DOI: 10.1111/j.1526- 100X.2005.00072.x
Rumps, J. M., S. L. Katz, K. Barnas, M. D. Morehead, R. Jenkinson, S. R. Clayton, and P. Goodwin. 2007. Stream restoration in the Pacific Northwest: analysis of interviews with project managers. Restoration Ecology 15: 506–515.
Rutherford, J. C., S. Blackett, C. Blackett, L. Saito, and R. J. Davies-Colley. 1997. Predicting the effects of shade on water temperature in small streams. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 31: 707-721. DOI: 10.1080/00288330.1997.9516801
Ryder D. S. and W. Miller. 2005. Setting goals and measuring success: linking patterns and processes in stream restoration. Hydrobiologia 552:147-158. DOI: 10.1007/s10750-005-1512-7
Sawyer, A. M., G. B. Pasternack, J. E. Merz, M. Escobar, and A. E. Senter. 2009. Construction constraints for geomorphic-unit rehabilitation on regulated gravel-bed rivers. River Research and Applications 25: 416- 437. DOI: 10.1002/rra.1173
Scarsbrook, M. R. and J. Halliday. 1999. Transition from pasture to native forest land-use along stream continua: effects on stream ecosystems and implications for restoration. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 33: 293-310. DOI: 10.1080/00288330.1999.9516878
Schiff, R., G. Benoit, and J. MacBroom. 2011. Evaluating stream restoration: A case study from two partially developed 4th order Connecticut, U.S.A. streams and evaluation monitoring strategies. River Research and Applications 27: 431-460. DOI: 10.1002/rra.1365
Schilling, K. E., T. M. Isenhart, J. A. Palmer, C. F. Wolter, and J. Spooner. 2011. Impacts of land-cover change on suspended sediment transport in two agricultural watersheds. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 47: 672-686. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2011.00533.x
Schilling, K. E., and Calvin F Wolter. 2000. Application of GPS and GIS to map channel features in Walnut Creek, Iowa. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 36:1423-1434.
Sear, D. A. 1994. River restoration and geomorphology. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 4: 169-177.
Sear, D., M. Newson, C. Hill, J. Old, and J. Branson. 2009. A method for applying fluvial geomorphology in support of catchment-scale river restoration planning. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 19(5): 506-519. DOI: 10.1002/aqc.1022
Selego, S. M., C. L. Rose, G. T. Merovich Jr., S. A. Welsh, J. T. Anderson. 2012. Community- level response of fishes and aquatic macroinvertebrates to stream restoration in a third- order tributary of the Potomac River, USA. International Journal of Ecology 2012. Article ID 753634. 9 pages DOI: 10.1155/2012/753634
Sepulveda, A. J., J. Sechrist, and L. B. Marczak. 2014. Testing ecological tradeoffs of a new tool for removing fine sediment in a spring-fed stream. Ecological Restoration 32:68-71.
Shields Jr., F. D., C. M. Cooper, and S. S. Knight. 1995. Experiment in stream restoration. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 121: 494-502.
Shields, F. D., C. M. Cooper Jr., S. S. Knight, and M. T. Moore. 2003. Stream corridor restoration research: a long and winding road. Ecological Engineering 20: 441–454.
Shields, F., Jr., R. Copeland, P. Klingeman, M. Doyle, and A. Simon. 2003. Design for stream restoration. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 129: 575- 584.
Shields Jr., F. D., S. S. King, and C. M. Cooper. 2005. Stream ecosystem restoration: is watershed-scale treatment effective without instream habitat rehabilitation? Ecological Restoration 23: 13-109.oration a
Shields Jr., F. D., S. R. Pezeshki, G. V. Wilson, W. Wu, and S. M. Dabney. 2008. Rehabilitation of an incised stream with plant materials: the dominance of geomorphic processes. Ecology and Society 13(2): 54. [online] URL:
Shoredits, A. S. and J. A. Clayton. 2013. Assessing the practice and challenges of stream restoration in urbanized environments of the USA. Geography Compass 7: 358-372. DOI: 10.1111/gec3.12039
Simpson, T. B. 2008. The dechannelization of Nippersink Creek: learning about native Illinois streams through restoration. Ecological Restoration 26: 350- 356.
Smith, B., N. J. Clifford, and J. Mantz. 2014. The changing nature of river restoration. WIREs Water. DOI: 10.1002/wat2.1021
Smokorowski, K. E., K. J. Whithers, and J. R. Kelso. 1998. Does habitat creation contribute to management goals? An evaluation of literature documenting freshwater habitat rehabilitation or enhancement projects. Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. No. 2249.
Southerland, M.T., G.M. Rogers, M.J. Kline, R.P. Morgan, D.M. Boward, P.F. Kazyak, R.J. Klauda, and S.A. Stranko. 2008. Improving biological indicators to better assess the condition of streams. Ecological Indicators 7: 751-767.
Stranko, S. A., R. H. Hildebrand, and M. A. Palmer. 2012. Comparing the fish and benthic macroinvertebrate diversity of restored urban streams to reference streams. Restoration Ecology 20:747-755.
Striz, E. A. and P. M. Mayer. 2008. Assessment of near-stream ground water surface water interaction (GSI) of a degraded stream before restoration. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA/600/R-07/058.
Sudduth, E. B., B. A. Hassett, P. Cada and E. S. Bernhardt. 2011. Testing the Field of Dreams Hypothesis: functional responses to urbanization and restoration in stream ecosystems. Ecological Applications 21(6): 1972- 1988.
Suding, K. N. 2011. Toward an era of restoration in ecology: Successes, failures, and opportunities ahead. Annual review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 42:465–87.
Suding, K. N., K. L. Gross, and G. R. Houseman. 2004. Alternative states and positive feedbacks in restoration ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19: 46-53.
Sudduth, E. B., J. L. Meyer, and E. S. Bernhardt. 2007. Stream restoration practices in the southeastern United States. Restoration Ecology 15: 573–583.
Sudduth, E. B. 2011. Effects of urbanization on stream ecosystem functions. Doctoral dissertation. Duke University, Durham, NC.
Sundermann, A., S. Stoll, and P. Haase. 2011. River restoration success depends on the species pool of the immediate surroundings. Ecological Applications 21:1962-1971.
Swetnam, T. W., C. D. Allen, and J. L. Bentancourt. 1999. Applied historical ecology: using the past to manage for the future. Ecological Applications 9: 1189–1206.
Tank, J. L., E. J. Rosi-Marshall, N. A. Griffiths, S. A. Entrekin, and M. L. Stephen. 2010. A review of allochthonous organic matter dynamics and metabolism in streams. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 29(1): 118-146. DOI: 10.1899/08-170.1
Tapsell, S. M. 1997. Rivers and river restoration: a child's eye view. Landscape Research 22(1): 45-65. DOI: 10.1080/01426399708706500
Teufl, B., G. Weigelhofer, J. Fuchsberger, and T. Hein. 2013. Effects of hydromorphology and riparian vegetation on the sediment quality of agricultural low-order streams: consequences for stream restoration. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 20: 1781-1793. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-012-1135-2
Thomas, G. 2014. Improving restoration practice by deriving appropriate techniques from analyzing the spatial organization of river networks. Limnologica 45: 50-60.
Thompson, R. and S. Parkinson. 2011. Assessing the local effects of riparian restoration on urban streams. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 45:625-636. DOI: 10.1080/00288330.2011.569988
Tikkanen, P., P. Laasonen, T. Muotka, A. Huhta, and K. Kuusela. 1994. Short term recovery of benthos following disturbance from stream habitat rehabilitation. Hydrobiologia 273: 121-130.
Tockner, K. 2007. River restoration: linking science with application. Ecological and Civil Engineering 10: 15-25.
Toran, L., J. E. Nyquist, A. C. Fang, R. J. Ryan, and D. O. Rosenberry. 2013. Observing lingering hyporheic storage using electrical resistivity: variations around stream restoration structures. Hydrological Processes 27: 1411- 1425.
Trabucchi, M., P. Ntshotsho, P. O’Farrell, and F. A. Comín. 2012. Ecosystem service trends in basin-scale restoration initiatives: a review. Journal of Environmental Management 111:18-23.
Tullos, D. D., D. L. Penrose, G. D. Jennings, and W. G. Cope. 2009. Analysis of functional traits in reconfigured channels: implications for the bioassessment and disturbance of river restoration. Journal of North American Benthological Society. 28: 80–92.
Tunstall, S. M., E. C. Penning-Rowsell, S. M. Tapsell, and S. E. Eden. 2000. River restoration: public attitudes and expectations. Water and Environment Journal 14: 363-370.
Tunstall, S. M., S. M. Tapsell, and S. Eden. 1999. How stable are public responses to changing local environments? A 'before' and 'after' case study of river restoration. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 42(4): 527-545. DOI: 10.1080/09640569911046
Unghire, J. M., A. E. Sutton-Grier, N. E. Flanagan, and C. J. Richardson. 2011. Spatial impacts of stream and wetland restoration on riparian soil properties in the North Carolina Piedmont. Restoration Ecology 19: 738- 746. DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2010.00726.x
Utz, R.M., K.N. Eshleman, and R.H. Hilderbrand. 2011. Variation in physiochemical responses to urbanization in streams between two Mid- Atlantic physiographic regions. Ecological Applications 21: 402-415.
Utz, R.M., R.H. Hilderbrand, and R.L. Raesly. 2010. Regional differences in patterns of fish species loss with changing land use. Biological Conservation 143: 688-699.
Verdonschot, P. F. M. and R.C. Nijboer. 2002. Towards a decision support system for stream restoration in the Netherlands: an overview of restoration projects and future needs. Hydrobiologia 478: 131-148.
Vidon, P., C. Allan, D. Burns, T. P. Duval, N. Gurwick, S. Inamdar, R. Lowrance, J. Okay, D. Scott, and S. Sebestyen. 2010. Hot spots and hot moments in riparian zones: potential for improved water quality management. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 46: 278-298. DOI: 10.1111 ⁄ j.1752-1688.2010.00420.x
Violin, C. R., P. Cada, E. B. Sudduth, B. A. Hassett, D. L. Penrose, and E. S. Bernhardt. 2011. Effects of urbanization and urban stream restoration on the physical and biological structure of stream ecosystems. Ecological Applications 21:1932–1949.
Wade, R. J., B. L. Rhoads, J. Rodríguez, M. Daniels, D. Wilson, E. E. Herricks, F. Bombardelli, M. Garcia, and J. Schwartz. 2002. Integrating science and technology to support stream naturalization near Chicago, Illinois. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 38: 931-944.
Walsh C. J., T. D. Fletcher, and A. R. Ladson. 2005. Stream restoration in urban catchments through redesigning stormwater systems: looking to the catchment to save the stream. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 24: 690-705.
Wang, F. and B. Lin. 2013. Modelling habitat suitability for fish in the fluvial and lacustrine regions of a new Eco-City. Ecological Modelling 267: 115-126.
Weigelhofer, G., N. Welti, and T. Hein. 2013. Limitations of stream restoration for nitrogen retention in agricultural headwater streams. Ecological Engineering 60: 224-234.
Weiner, A. H. 1998. Kenai River restoration and management. Fisheries 23(1): 6-10. DOI:10.1577/1548-8446(1998)0232.0.CO;2
Weller, D. E., M. E. Baker, and T. E. Jordan. 2011. Effects of riparian buffers on nitrate concentrations in watershed discharges: new models and management implications. Ecological Applications 21(5):1679-1695.
Wheaton, J. M., S. E. Darby, D. A. Sear, and J. A. Milne. 2006. Does scientific conjecture accurately describe restoration practice? Insight from an international river restoration survey. Area 38(2):128-142.
Wheeler, A. P, P. L. Angermeier, and A. E. Rosenberger. 2005. Impacts of new highways and subsequent landscape urbanization on stream habitat and biota. Reviews in Fisheries Science 13(3): 141-164. DOI: 10.1080/10641260590964449
Wilcock, R. J., K. Betteridge, D. Shearman, C. R. Fowles, M. R. Scarsbrook, B. S. Thorrold, and D. Costall. 2009. Riparian protection and on-farm best management practices for restoration of a lowland stream in an intensive dairy farming catchment: a case study. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 43: 803-818. DOI: 10.1080/00288330909510042
Wilkerson, G. V. 2008. Improved bankfull discharge prediction using 2-year recurrence-period discharge. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 44: 243-258. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2007.00151.x
Williams, L., Hale, R., Cavagnaro, T., Reich, P. and Lake, P. S. 2011. Developing a vision for improved monitoring and reporting of riparian restoration projects. Ecological Management and Restoration 12(1): e11 e16. DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-8903.2011.00572.x
Wissmar, R.C. and R.L. Beschta. 1998. Restoration and management of riparian ecosystems: a catchment perspective. Freshwater Biology 40: 571-585.
Wohl, E. Angermeier, B. Bledsoe, G. M. Kondolf, L. MacDonnell, D. M. Merritt, M. A. Palmer, N. L. Poff, and D. Tarboton. 2005. River Restoration. Water Resources Research 41: 1-12. W10301. DOI:10.1029/2005WR003985
Wortley, L., J.-M. Hero, and M. Howes. 2013. Evaluating ecological restoration success: a review of the literature. Restoration Ecology 21: 537-543. DOI: 10.1111/rec.12028
Wu, C., Y. Fu, Z. Yang, C. Kao, and Y. Tu. 2012. Using multi-function constructed wetland for urban stream restoration. Applied Mechanics and Materials 121-126: 3072-3076. DOI:10.4028/AMM.121- 126.3072
Van Der Heijden, H.-A. 2005. Ecological restoration, environmentalism and the Dutch politics of 'new nature'. Environmental Values 14(4): 427-446.
Young, T. P. 2000. Restoration ecology and conservation biology. Biological Conservation 92: 73-83
Young, T. P., D. A. Petersen, and J. J. Clary. 2005. The ecology of restoration: historical links, emerging issues and unexplored realms. Ecology Letters 8: 662–673. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00764.x
Zaimes, G. N., R. C. Schultz, and T. M. Isenhart. 2006. Riparian land uses and precipitation influences on stream bank erosion in Central Iowa. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 42: 83-97.
Zedler, J. B. 2000. Progress in wetland restoration ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15: 402-407.
Zink, J. M., G. D. Jennings, and G. A. Price. 2012. Morphology characteristics of Southern Appalachian wilderness streams. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 48: 762-773.
Zorn, T. G. and T. C. Wills. 2012. A reconnaissance survey of the effects of sediment traps on Michigan streams. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 32: 1005-1016. DOI: 10.1080/02755947.2012.711274
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- standards virginia department of criminal justice services
- herbert m chesapeake bay trust
- mckenna school business alumni association mbaa
- the possible economic benefits of
- collaboration review remit cochrane
- althauser robert p 1989 internal labor markets
- memorandum and order maryland judiciary
- notice of docketing
- fiscal update january 15 1995
Related searches
- chesapeake high school baltimore county
- bay united credit union bay city
- george herbert mead symbolic interactionism
- chesapeake plastic surgery
- chesapeake high school essex md
- chesapeake high athletics
- chesapeake senior high school pasadena md
- chesapeake high school maryland
- chesapeake high school pasadena
- chesapeake energy stock message board
- chesapeake public schools outlook email
- chesapeake public schools website