Proliferation- the US should impose sanctions on China to ...
Case Suggestions
Proliferation- the US should impose sanctions on China to get them to stop selling nuclear by agreeing to weapons to countries such as India/Pakistan. Ratify MTCR- missile tech control regime/stop prolif (Chico/LACC)
Human Trafficking- China should be moved from tier 2 to tier 3 by US state department for their rampant human trafficking. (San Francisco)
IPR (intellectual property rights)- the US should complain to the WTO (world trade organization) that china is not complying with international IPR laws. (CSUN/Pepperdine/Sacramento)
N. Korea-the US should impose sanctions on China until they agree to engage in six party talks with N. Korea to stop proliferation (Cal Poly SLO)
Tiananmen Square- Free Speech –the US should impose sanctions on China until they establish a committee to resolve the Tiananmen square incident (Cal Poly SLO)
Olympics- the USFG will not take part in the Chinese Olympics unless China reforms its HR policy (FCC)
Tibet-the USFG will impose parent sanction on China until they recognize Tibet as an independent state
Case Suggestions
Proliferation- the US should impose sanctions on China to get them to stop selling nuclear by agreeing to weapons to countries such as India/Pakistan. Ratify MTCR- missile tech control regime/stop prolif (Chico/LACC)
Human Trafficking- China should be moved from tier 2 to tier 3 by US state department for their rampant human trafficking. (San Francisco)
IPR (intellectual property rights)- the US should complain to the WTO (world trade organization) that china is not complying with international IPR laws. (CSUN/Pepperdine/Sacramento)
N. Korea-the US should impose sanctions on China until they agree to engage in six party talks with N. Korea to stop proliferation (Cal Poly SLO)
Tiananmen Square- Free Speech –the US should impose sanctions on China until they establish a committee to resolve the Tiananmen square incident (Cal Poly SLO)
Olympics- the USFG will not take part in the Chinese Olympics unless China reforms its HR policy (FCC)
Tibet-the USFG will impose parent sanction on China until they recognize Tibet as an independent state
COMS 151 Fall 2005
Professor Cruz-Boone Policy Debate Handout
Policy debate is a research-based activity. Students are judged based on their ability to provide relevant evidence supporting the arguments they make. You are strongly encouraged to take notes.
Voting Affirmative
In the first speech the affirmative team will provide a plan they will defend for the entire round. The affirmative team should win, if you observe that they have disproved all of the negative arguments. Three parts to the plan that the affirmative must adequately defend/prove with evidence in their first speech are
1. Harms-proof of a significant problem that currently exists.
2. Inherency-establishing that something is stopping that problem from being fixed
3. Solvency- the plan of action they advocate fixes the “harm” or problem they posed
Voting Negative
In order to win, the negative must use evidence to disprove any of the aforementioned 3 areas. Two other kinds of arguments the negative might make are
1. Topicality- if the plan fits into the parameters of the provided resolutions.
2. Disadvantages- something bad that happens as a result of supporting the aff’s plan
The negative should win, if the affirmative does not adequately respond/disprove any of the arguments presented & explained by the negative.
COMS 151 Fall 2005
Professor Cruz-Boone Policy Debate Handout
Policy debate is a research-based activity. Students are judged based on their ability to provide relevant evidence supporting the arguments they make. You are strongly encouraged to take notes.
Voting Affirmative
In the first speech the affirmative team will provide a plan they will defend for the entire round. The affirmative team should win, if you observe that they have disproved all of the negative arguments. Three parts to the plan that the affirmative must adequately defend/prove with evidence in their first speech are
1. Harms-proof of a significant problem that currently exists.
2. Inherency-establishing that something is stopping that problem from being fixed
3. Solvency- the plan of action they advocate fixes the “harm” or problem they posed
Voting Negative
In order to win, the negative must use evidence to disprove any of the aforementioned 3 areas. Two other kinds of arguments the negative might make are
1. Topicality- if the plan fits into the parameters of the provided resolutions.
2. Disadvantages- something bad that happens as a result of supporting the aff’s plan
The negative should win, if the affirmative does not adequately respond/disprove any of the arguments presented & explained by the negative.
HARVARD:
Ob1 Chinese wildlife
Demand for wildlife products = rapid extinction
Trade in wildlife products exploits neighbors in SE Asia
Ad1 Pathogens
Pathogens in SEA jump from animals to humans
Wildlife products uniquely dangerous (bird flu)
Human actions threaten disease worldwide
Illegal wildlife trade risks widespread disease spread
= Avian Influenza
Dwarf previous outbreaks
Pandemic risks human extinction
Viruses = biggest threat
Diseases Collapse China == global economic collapse and Chinese instability
SARS empirically proves our argument
Diseases hurt every economic indicator
Global interdependence exacerbates problem
Economic collapse = NW (Bearden)
Controlling illegal wildlife key
Any solution must include china
Ad 2 Ecocatastrophe
Lots of species at risk
Key to biodiversity hot spots
Trafficking for bushmeat = biggest threat to survival of extinctions
= rapid increase in human induced extinctions
Threatens critical ecosystems
Unsustainable use threatens ecosystems
Rate key
SEA focus = best strategy for slowing rate
Focus on hot spots key
Rate key to ecosystem resiliency
Adaptation fails
Plan : USFG dip/ec pressure through CITES to stop wildlife trade
(paraphrased)
Solvency
CITES can solve China
External Pressure on SARS gave domestic political capital to act –
plan is the same
US CITES pressure on China empirically solves
Econ/Dip pressure from CITES solves
Olympics = unique opportunity to act w/ pressure
CITES = best forum
Carrots/sticks good
New dip incentives into CITES solves in long term
Plan empirically effective
cites:
Solvency
US Law vital to cites
UC Davis Jnl of Int'l Law 00
"the lacey act provides the real teeth behind CITES"
Integrating new diplomatic efforts into CITES solves china
"In considering china's approach to wildlife"
Empirically dip/ec pressure solves
Bear Alliance 95
animalalliance.ca/projects/bearlliance.html
the new non-exploitative consciousness
Olympics = unique window
Animal People 01
a seven-year window of opportunity
CITES solves with carrots and sticks
Reeve 01
assets/VY01.Reeve.pdfp
147
the combination of carrots, in the form of
SARS proves international pressure couched in the issue of disease
prevention is effective and acceptable to the PRC
Temple Law Review 2004
China was responsible for the problem the world was calling
External Pressure to stem sars gave PRC political capital to act
Temple law review again
"Chinese authorities took visible . . . confiscated tens of thousands
of animals"
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- collapse of chinese imperial rule
- chapter 29 collapse of the old order
- questions about china
- proliferation the us should impose sanctions on china to
- ap world history study guide and graphic organizers unit
- impending water crisis in china university of utah
- in 1912 you may recall a revolution overthrew the qing
- epoch times commentaries on the chinese communist party
- is mao zedong a hero or a villain us china institute
- ancient river valley civilizations
Related searches
- latest news on china tariffs
- requirements to become the us surgeon general
- articles on the us government
- should the us convert to metric system
- should the us switch to metric system
- what happened to the us after ww2
- latest news on the us stock markets
- amendments to the us constitution pdf
- first amendment to the us constitution text
- amendments to the us constitution
- articles on the us economy
- was the us founded on christian principles