Scoring Rubric for Critical Analysis ( points possible)
Scoring Rubric for HYDCE 483 Critical Analysis Paper (25 points possible)
|Component |Excellent |Satisfactory |Unsatisfactory |
| |4-5 points |2-3 points |0-1 point |
| | | | |
|Analysis of author’s|Provides a thorough, accurate |Provides a description, but only |Student does not accurately assess |
|justification |analysis of the author’s |minimal analysis, of the author’s |the author’s arguments justifying the|
| |justification of the worth and |justification of the worth and |study. |
| |significance of the study |significance of the study | |
|Analysis of author’s|Provides a thorough, accurate |Provides a description, but only |Student does not accurately assess |
|methods |analysis of the study design, |minimal analysis, of the study |study design, sample selection, and |
| |sample selection, and data |design, sample selection, and data |data collection methods used in this |
| |collection methods used in this |collection methods used in this |study |
| |study |study | |
|Analysis of validity|Provides a thorough, accurate |Provides a description, but only |Student does not assess accurately |
|and credibility of |analysis of study bias, |minimal analysis, of study bias, |study bias, reliability, author |
|the study |reliability, author credentials, |reliability, author credentials, |credentials, and publication |
| |and publication venue |and publication venue | |
|Writing |Overall, writing was clear, |Overall, writing was organized but |Overall, writing was disorganized and|
| |succinct, and reflects the depth |lacked some polish, and might not |did not reflect a deep understanding |
| |of student thinking/ analysis. |convey the true depth of student |of the topic. |
| |Paper is organized logically with|understanding of the topic. | |
| |adequate transitions between | | |
| |sections. | | |
|Mechanics |Consistently grammatically |Few errors in spelling and grammar |Utilizes poor spelling and grammar. |
| |correct with rare misspellings. |evidenced. | |
| | | |Project is not in NLM style/format; |
| |Project adheres to the NLM |Project generally adheres to NLM |references are incomplete. |
| |style/format; references are |style/format but has some errors. | |
| |complete; cover page is correct. | | |
-----
Goals for this rubric – Anne, did I get this rubric to address these??
• Can students assess if article authors justified their purpose with lit review and introduction. Analyzing worth and significance of the study – should it have been studied in the first place?
• Can students assess if article authors pursued a scientifically appropriate method of studying their question: study design, sample selection, data collection methods
• Can students recognize validity and credibility of the study: bias, reliability, credentials of authors, venue of publication
• Students clearly express their ideas: not only understand, but can articulate what they understand
• Mechanics: spelling, grammar, cover page, references
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- sample outline for case study
- scoring rubric for critical analysis points possible
- at105 formal analysis paper assignment
- i am a change agent a mixed methods analysis of
- research paper instructions university of richmond
- information paper united states army
- great basin college home
- rubric for literary analysis papers
- ierc 2012 paper formatting guidelines
- student handout
Related searches
- scoring rubric template
- critical analysis essay conclusion sample
- critical analysis essay template word
- critical analysis essay template
- critical analysis thesis statement generator
- apa critical analysis template
- critical analysis research paper example
- critical analysis essay example
- critical analysis format
- critical analysis template example
- critical analysis example
- what is a critical analysis paper