Superior Court, State of California
Nov 12, 2020 · District contends Plaintiff relies on Civil Code section 1714.1 and Government Code section 815.2 to support her common law claims. District argues it is not liable under Civil Code section 1714.1 because that statute only imposes liability on the parents or guardians of minors who commit torts and it is neither a parent nor guardian of Adam Roe. ................
................
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- void and illegal contracts
- anglo saxon constitutional history cont d
- articles on law truth never damages a cause that is
- home uw school of law
- enacted law versus common law
- superior court state of california
- introduction to legal system
- chapter 5 evaluating evidence and making a decision u s
- constitutional case law
Related searches
- state of california municipal bonds
- state of california treasurer checks
- state of california check verification
- state of california education dept
- state of california gis data
- state of california real estate license
- state of california treasury department
- state of california unclaimed money
- state of california department of consumer affairs
- state of california department of education
- state of california department of aging
- state of california department of real estate