Marketing Plan.docx.docx



2266950981075Merrill Lynch: Retention of AssetsRobert ChristeMBA 617University of Alaska FairbanksExecutive summary (Abstract)Merrill Lynch is a global asset management company that was acquired by Bank of America during the financial crisis. The two companies were married in order to provide stability and security to the surviving financial institutions. During the crisis, Lehman Brothers, one of the oldest asset managers in the industry, had a crisis of confidence due to its highly leveraged security positions. Government Regulators wanted to send a message, a sacrificial lamb had to be chosen, and they decided to let Lehman fail. At the same time, other asset managers were poised to fall like dominoes. This prompted regulators to insist that Merrill Lynch partner with Bank of America and Bear Stearns strike a deal with JPMorgan. This turned too big to fail banks into much larger institutions which has created a far greater systemic risk profile resulting in higher capital requirements. While the famous Dodd-Frank legislation still being written, with extremely low profit margins, and the government incessantly trying to extract penalties for the housing crisis, these institutions are leaning out their workforces while planning for the future.This has lead Merrill Lynch to simplify its organizational structure to better serve its clients by moving away from single Financial Advisers managing upwards of $150 million in assets to creating financial advising teams around them. This points to the main hurdle I see for the company, dividing the commission that established Advisers have earned while rolling out the team structure. After reaching the pinnacle of your craft and becoming a million dollar producer, why would someone want to share all that hard work and money with a team? The answer is it allows the company to streamline its operations while integrating succession planning in their organizational model. The new structural model will allow the company to better achieve its goal as stated below while growing its assets under management (AUM).At Merrill Lynch, your Financial Adviser focuses on the things you care about most – family, goals, and priorities – even as they change over the anizational analysisLooking at the organizational chart taken from the Bank of America investor relations site (Appendix 1), we can see that Merrill Lynch now appears to be completely integrated. Although it looks nice and neat in the picture, Bank of America announced it was acquiring Merrill Lynch on September 14, 2008, the deal closed January 1, 2009, and the integration was complete in 2014. I personally believe the combination of two companies can take a very long time if they are to be seamlessly integrated. Currently the Merrill Lynch Wealth Management unit has an office separate from Bank of America in the Alaska region but as the team structure develops and bank branches are closed it is easy to see that both businesses will be under one roof. The complexity of the Bank of America model lends itself to simplicity as there is a tall and high vertically differentiated three tiered structure. The structural model I added for Merrill Lynch itself appears to be a flat Jack Welch style model which is extremely encouraging to see because it does not leave room for bureaucratic nonsense. This actually plays into the new team structure as each group is an independent business allowing for greater flexibility. This type of model is indicative of a wide span of management leading me to believe that the officers at Merrill Lynch are some of the top professionals in their areas. These two structures appear to oppose each other but one is just a substructure inside the other and they have leaned operations since the financial crisis due to low interest rates providing abnormally low profits. Overall the structure does not appear to be overly complex, it is simple and straight forward, but we must remember that these charts are meant to appear that way. That being said I pulled their report from the Goldman Sachs U.S. Financial Services Conference in 2014 and they appear to have simplified their business even further as shown in the third picture of Appendix 1.Looking at the total company, Bank of America looks like a tall vertically differentiated structure and Merrill Lynch looks like a flat horizontally differentiated structure. When the companies merged the Bank of America structure remained. However, when I visited the Merrill Lynch office in Anchorage, the flat horizontally differentiated structure was evident by visual inspection. I had the opportunity to sit down with three personal financial advisors in the Anchorage office and they were apprehensive about the new team structure but were willing to work towards the new objective because it would allow them to better serve their clients in the long run. There was a lot of talent, sharing of ideas, and everyone seemed to work together for the betterment of the client. It was also easy to see that there were invisible lines drawn, each Adviser has their own office and pool of clients defining their business that they were willing to guard like a shark. I did not see a strictly competitive work environment rather a seriously friendly competitive learning curve. The new team structure is organized to be led by an experienced Adviser that already has a large amount of assets under management. However, as I was entertaining the idea of working for Merrill, I was told that if I was ambitious I could go out on my own and build my team personally. This was enticing but I decided it would be much more educational to work with a seasoned professional because the environment is extremely competitive and I could always form my own business later. Making this decision was simple because there is a 90% fail rate for the new Financial Adviser program. The goals are high and if the hurdles are not met they let you go after 1 year. Specifically, a new Adviser in training has to bring in $10 million in assets per year for the first three years, then they are considered a newly minted Adviser.That being said, the company has a deep bench of proprietary technology that is available to Financial Advisers so that they can service clients adequately. Although they have basic computers in their Anchorage offices their proprietary technology comes from a central research department. I believe it is an industry standard but the company has its own methods and world class analysts.The company’s organizational culture is seriously fun and friendly. I talked with Nancy Olzack on the phone and met with her in person at the Anchorage office on the 12th floor of the Frontier Building located at 3601 C St, Anchorage, AK 99503. I also had a phone conversation with Mike Maroni, the Regional Director out of Seattle. Both represented the company in a professional business manner and wanted me to reach my personal goals as well as succeed at Merrill Lynch. I entertained the idea of working at the company and they both agreed that I should finish my MBA in Capital Markets first as it would make me a more knowledgeable Adviser. Throughout our conversations, both Ms. Olzack and Mr. Maroni exemplified the company’s statement of putting the ideals first, family, goals, and priorities. The company is centered on taking care of the client and maintaining happy employees. This works to their advantage because happy employees keep clients happy and represent the company well in the community. Overall, Merrill has an excellent culture and is accepting of anyone willing to work hard. There are no barriers and other than the securities licensing and 4 year college degree requirement. The company is a very green company in that it really has little or no waste or carbon emissions due to it being in the financial industry. I imagine that the floor of the building in Anchorage they rent does have a carbon footprint but related to other industries it is rather small. Regarding diversity, I looked at the top six managers in the company and it was amazing to find they were very diverse in education, background, and both sexes were represented. I have looked over quite a few companies in my research and I never found such a diverse group as these six. The company is also committed to social responsibility and taking care of its stakeholders. This is very desirable so that the opening of new wealth management offices are well accepted by local communities throughout the globe and the company is seen as taking a holistic approach to their external environment. With the playing field for the financial industry being global, the competition is fierce and companies fight for top performing Financial Advisers. This is obvious a weakness for the new team structure but from the Advisers in the Alaska office I have spoken with, they welcomed the change because they can increase their assets under management, they can take more vacations, and they can secure their own retirement. The possibility of Merrill Lynch being acquired for its financial team is nonexistent because the acquiring company would have to absorb Bank of America. I do see Bank of America spinning off Merrill in the future and making it a completely stand-alone public entity. This would come close to eliminating the “too big to fail” capital requirements and reduce the burden of over regulation. Even then I don’t think the possibility of a merger or acquisition is in the cards. The company is already global and operates in the markets listed below. As far as regulations they are the same or similar around the world, I hear that a lot of traders like Thailand because they have not taxes on capital gains. The company is internationally diversified but Mexico and India are the emerging markets with the most favorable demographic distributions and I believe they should expand further in those regions. Their competitors at home would be the same competitors abroad because international clients look to American’s financial prowess. As far as expanding the team model into these two regions, I would suggest the company recruit individuals specifically from India and Mexico, develop a team around them, and then send them back into the field. It is rather obvious to see that this model would be the most efficient if we use Indra Nooyi, the CEO of Pepsi, as an example. She has unique insight into the fast growing Indian market in specifically areas such as, tastes, habits, culture, and product placement. In this respect I think Merrill Lynch should follow Pepsi’s model and in the process they will win the hearts and minds of the clients they seek to capture. ConclusionIn conclusion, I can see seasoned Financial Advisers that are $1 million or greater producers, meaning that they have $100 million or more under management at a 1% fee rate, being apprehensive. Some might even follow the approach of the Adviser I talked to at Wells Fargo Wealth Management in Fairbanks, Alaska and leave Merrill Lynch. This particular Adviser, in a three hour conversation, told me that he was the largest producer at the Anchorage office and was fine working alone. This was exactly why he moved to Wells Fargo, he had developed a fantastic business and could work it by himself with a single secretary. In my opinion, there will be seasoned professionals that take this approach because they want their money and hard work to themselves and I can completely respect that. However, this may come at the expense of strained service to the client as well as difficulty finding a suitable trainee for retirement. The new team structure that Merrill Lynch has envisioned solves all these problems and is the best approach for its business. This may not be concurrent with the interests of a seasoned Financial Adviser in the beginning, but from the talented professionals I have had the pleasure of sitting down with, they like the idea of mentoring their replacement and agree it is best for the long run of the business.Appendix 1Organizational ChartsReferencesMaroni, Mike. "Interview with Mike Maroni." Business review. Self-sponsored. Merrill Lynch Wealth Management, Anchorage. 9 Feb. 2015. Lecture.Olzack, Nancy. "Interview with Nancy Olzack." Business review. Self-sponsored. Merrill Lynch Wealth Management, Anchorage. 9 Feb. 2015. Lecture.Merrill Lynch Wealth Management. (2015, January 1). Retrieved March 13, 2015, from Lynch Wealth Management. (2015, January 1). Retrieved March 13, 2015, from , Robert. "Interview with Robert Bell." Business review. Self-sponsored. Wells Fargo Wealth Management, Anchorage. 13 Feb. 2015. Lecture. ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download