AUDIT CORRESPONDANCE AND DOCUMENTATION- …



AUDIT CORRESPONDENCE—PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS OF CLARIFIED AUDITING STANDARDS

By Larry L. Perry, CPA

CPA Firm Support Services, LLC

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

• To understand the requirements of the Clarified Auditing Standards pertaining to certain audit correspondence in AU-C Sections 210, 260, 505, 580 and 501 (Lawyers Letters)

• To learn practical ways to perform procedures and apply the requirements pertaining to certain audit correspondence

• To conduct appropriate audit procedures and prepare audit correspondence including:

o Engagement letters

o Written communications to persons charged with governance

o Accounts receivable confirmations

o Management representation letters

o Internal control letters

o Lawyers letters

INTRODUCTION

These materials focus on the following Clarified Auditing Standards:

• AU-C Section 210, Terms of Engagements

• AU-C Section 260, The Auditor’s Communication with Those Charged with Governance

• AU-C Section 505, External Confirmations

• AU-C Section 580, Written Representations

• AU-C Section 265, Communicating Internal Control Related Matters Identified in an Audit

• AU-C Section 501, Audit Evidence—Specific Considerations for Selected Items (Litigation, claims and assessments involving the entity)

Summaries of each of the above standards will be presented below, followed by discussions of practical application issues. Illustrative examples of the correspondence required by these standards will also be included.

TERMS OF ENGAGEMENT (AU-C Section 210)

Objective of the auditor

The auditor’s objective is to accept an audit engagement for a new or existing audit client only when the basis upon which it is to be performed has been agreed upon through:

Establishing whether the preconditions for an audit are present and

Confirming that a common understanding of the terms of the audit engagement exists between the auditor and management and, when appropriate, those charged with governance.

Definitions

Preconditions for an audit. The use by management of an acceptable financial reporting framework in the preparation of the financial statements and the agreement of management and, when appropriate, those charged with governance, to the premise on which an audit is conducted.

Recurring audit. An audit engagement for an existing audit client for whom the auditor performed the preceding audit.

Requirements

Preconditions for an audit—covers whether the preconditions for an audit are present which include:

1 Determining whether the financial reporting framework to be applied in the preparation of the financial statements is acceptable

2 Obtaining the agreement of management that it acknowledges and understands its responsibility for:

1 The preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework;

2 The design, implementation, and maintenance of internal controls relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and

3 To provide the auditor with:

1 Access to all information of which management is aware that is relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements, such as records, documentation, and other matters;

2 Additional information that the auditor may request from management for the purpose of the audit; and

3 Unrestricted access to persons within the entity from whom the auditor determines it necessary to obtain audit evidence.

Management-imposed limitation on scope prior to audit engagement acceptance that would result in a disclaimer of opinion. If this entity:

Imposes a scope limitation on the auditor such that the auditor believes the limitation will result in the auditor disclaiming an opinion on the financial statements as a whole, the auditor should not accept such a limited engagement as an audit engagement.

However if the entity is required by law or regulation to have an audit and it imposes such a scope limitation and a disclaimer of opinion is acceptable under the applicable law or to the regulator, the auditor is permitted, but not required, to accept the engagement.

Other factors affecting audit engagement acceptance

1 If the preconditions for an audit are not present, and the auditor is not required by law or regulation to accept the proposed audit engagement, the auditor should discuss the matter with management and decline to accept the proposed engagement.

2 If the auditor has determined that the financial reporting framework to be applied in the preparation of the financial statements is unacceptable or if the agreement referred to above has not been obtained the auditor should not accept the engagement.

Agreement on audit engagement terms

The auditor should agree upon the terms of the audit engagement with management or those charged with governance, as appropriate.

The terms of the audit engagement should be documented in an audit engagement letter or other suitable form of written agreement and should include the following:

1 The objective and scope of the audit of the financial statements.

2 The responsibilities of the auditor.

3 The responsibilities of management.

4 A statement that because of the inherent limitations of an audit, together with the inherent limitations of internal control, an unavoidable risk exists that some material misstatements may not be detected, even though the audit is properly planned and performed in accordance with GAAS.

5 Identification of the applicable financial reporting framework for the preparation of the financial statements.

6 Reference to the expected form and content of any reports to be issued by the auditor and a statement that circumstances may arise in which a report may differ from its expected form and content.

Initial audits, including reaudit engagements –Covers steps the auditor should take before accepting an engagement for an initial audit (or a reaudit engagement) including requesting:

Management to authorize the predecessor auditor to respond fully to the auditor’s inquiries regarding matters that will assist the auditor in determining whether to accept the engagement.

1 Should management refuses to authorize the predecessor auditor to respond, or limits the response, the auditor should inquire about the reasons and consider the implications of that refusal in deciding whether to accept the engagement.

2 The auditor should evaluate the predecessor auditor’s response, or consider the implications if the predecessor auditor provides no response or a limited response, in determining whether to accept the engagement.

Recurring Audits – covers requirements in assessing whether circumstances require the terms of the audit engagement to be revised.

Acceptance of a change in the terms of the audit engagement –covers the auditor’s consideration of changes to the terms of the audit engagement when no reasonable justification for doing so exists.

▪ If the terms of the audit engagement are changed by agreement, the auditor and management should agree on and document the new terms of the engagement in an engagement letter or other suitable form of written agreement.

If the auditor concludes that no reasonable justification for a change of the terms of the audit engagement exists and is not permitted by management to continue the original audit engagement, the auditor should:

1 Withdraw from the audit engagement when possible under applicable law or regulation .

2 Communicate the circumstances to those charged with governance, and

3 Determine whether any obligation, either legal, contractual, or otherwise, exists to report the circumstances to other parties, such as owners, or regulators.

Additional considerations in engagement acceptance

o Auditor’s report prescribed by law or regulation

1 If law or regulation prescribes a specific layout, form, or wording of the auditor’s report that significantly differs from the requirements of GAAS, the auditor should evaluate:

Whether users might misunderstand the auditor’s report and, if so,

Whether the auditor would be permitted to reword the prescribed form to be in accordance with the requirements of GAAS or attach a separate report.

If the auditor determines that rewording the prescribed form or attaching a separate report would not be permitted or would not mitigate the risk of users misunderstanding the auditor’s report,

The auditor should not accept the audit engagement unless the auditor is required by law or regulation to do so.

An audit performed in accordance with such law or regulation does not comply with GAAS.

The auditor should not include any reference to the audit having been performed in accordance with GAAS within the auditor’s report.

Practical Note

Because an engagement letter forms a contract between the reporting entity and the auditor, and because both parties to the contract must understand its contents for it to be valid, the letter should be delivered by the engagement leader or partner. In addition to the contents of the letter other important planning considerations should be discussed and documented when the letter is delivered. Following are some specific items that should be discussed:

• Reach an understanding about the nature of the engagement, as well as client and CPA firm responsibilities.

• Discuss management’s responsibilities for selecting the most appropriate financial reporting framework, designing and maintaining internal control systems and preparing financial statements and footnotes.

• Discuss current client issues, including any affects of economic climate.

• Request management to contact the predecessor auditor (if prior period statements were audited) to obtain permission for review of the prior year audit documentation or discuss the necessary additional audit procedures applicable to opening balances.

• Make fraud inquiries.

• Arrange for proper workspace.

• Arrange for client assistance.

• Finalize dates for interim and year end fieldwork.

• Discuss target dates.

• Discuss range of audit fees and affects of variables (problems, no client assistance, etc.).

• Document discussions in partner participation memo.

• Discuss financial statements and footnotes. If possible, prepare a rough draft or block out financial statements and footnotes for discussion.

Illustrative Engagement Letter

To Dan West, President

Always Best Corporation:

You have requested that we audit the financial statements of Always Best Corporation which include the balance sheet as of December 31, 2015, and the related statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year then ended, and the related notes to the financial statements. We are pleased to confirm our acceptance and our understanding of this audit engagement by means of this letter. Our audit will be conducted with the objective of our expressing an opinion on the financial statements.

We will conduct our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAS). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor's judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

Because of the inherent limitations of an audit, together with the inherent limitations of internal control, an unavoidable risk that some material misstatements may not be detected exists, even though the audit is properly planned and performed in accordance with GAAS.

In making our risk assessments, we consider internal control relevant to the entity's preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity's internal control. However, we will communicate to you in writing concerning any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in internal control relevant to the audit of the financial statements that we have identified during the audit.

Our audit will be conducted on the basis that management acknowledges and understands that they have responsibility

• For the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America;

• For the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and

• to provide us with

o Access to all information of which management is aware that is relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements such as records, documentation, and other matters;

o Additional information that we may request from management for the purpose of the audit; and

o Unrestricted access to persons within the entity from whom we determine it necessary to obtain audit evidence.

As part of our audit process, we will request from management written confirmation concerning representations made to us in connection with the audit.

Other relevant information:

(Such as fee arrangements, billings, and other specific terms)

Reporting

We will issue a written report upon completion of our audit of Always Best Corporations financial statements. Our report will be addressed to the Don West, President, Always Best Corporation. We cannot provide assurance that an unmodified opinion will be expressed. Circumstances may arise in which it is necessary for us to modify our opinion, add an emphasis-of-matter or other-matter paragraph(s), or withdraw from the engagement.

Please sign and return the attached copy of this letter to indicate your acknowledgment of, and agreement with, the arrangements for our audit of the financial statements including our respective responsibilities.

Largess, Ottiter $ Co., CPAs

Acknowledged and agreed on behalf of Always Best Corporation by:

Don West

Don West, President

November 15, 2015

2 THE AUDITOR’S COMMUNICATION WITH THOSE CHARGED WITH GOVERANCE (AU-C Section 260)

Objectives of the auditor’s communications with those charged with governance are to:

Communicate clearly the responsibilities of the auditor in relation to the financial statement audit and an overview of the planned scope and timing of the audit and to obtain information relevant to the audit from those charged with governance.

Provide timely observations arising from the audit that are significant and relevant to their responsibility to oversee the financial reporting process. Promote effective two-way communication.

1 Definitions

Those charged with governance. The person(s) or organization(s) (for example, a corporate trustee) with responsibility for overseeing the strategic direction of the entity and the obligations related to the accountability of the entity. This includes overseeing the financial reporting process. Those charged with governance may include management personnel; for example, executive members of a governance board or an owner-manager.

Management. The person(s) with executive responsibility for the conduct of the entity’s operations. For some entities, management includes some or all of those charged with governance; for example, executive members of a governance board or an owner-manager.

2 Requirements

3 This SAS contains the following requirements:

Determine who is charged with governance of the entity.

Communications with the audit committee or other subgroup of those charged with governance may need to be supplemented by communications to the entire governing body. When all of those charged with governance are involved in managing the entity the communications do not need to be repeated to the same persons.

Matters to be communicated should include:

o Planning phase:

▪ The auditor’s responsibilities in relation to the financial statement audit.

▪ Planned scope and timing of the audit.

o Completion phase:

▪ Significant findings or issues from the audit.

▪ Uncorrected misstatements

When not all of those charged with governance are involved in management the auditor should also communicate to the governing body:

• Material corrected misstatements that were brought to the attention of management through the audit process.

• Significant findings or issues (including the Auditor’s views) that arose through audit procedures and were discussed with or communicated to management.

• Written representations that the auditor is requesting.

3 The Communication Process

Establishing the Communication Process. The form, timing and expected content of the auditor’s communication should be communicated.

Forms of Communication. The auditor should communicate the significant findings or issues from the audit, orally or in writing. The significant of the matters, whether they have been resolved, legal or regulatory requirements and other matters may affect whether the communication is oral or written. Matters arising during the performance of the audit that were communicated to those charged with governance and resolved need not be communicated again.

Restricted Use. The communication is a by-product report and the auditor should indicated its use is restricted to those charged with governance and management and should not be used by anyone other than the specified parties (AU-C Section 905).

Timing of Communications. Communications should be timely; practically they should occur before the audit report is released.

Adequacy of the Communication Process. The auditor should evaluate if the two-way communication has been adequate. If it has not been adequate, the auditor should evaluate the effect on any auditing procedures performed and take appropriate action.

Documentation. Documentation of the oral and written communications with management and the governing body should be included in engagement files.

Practical Notes:

• Communication of the auditor’s responsibilities should include:

o A discussion of the reasonable assurance, not absolute, that is, provided by an audit in accordance with GAAS.

o That internal control is considered in designing an audit strategy but that no opinion of offered as to its effectiveness.

o That significant matters related to the audit, determined by the auditor’s professional judgment, will be communicated to those charged with governance.

• Matters related to the planned scope and timing of the audit to be communicated may include:

o How the auditor plans to address significant risks of material misstatement.

o The impact of risks of material misstatement on the consideration of materiality levels.

o Other matters related to the structure and responsibilities of the board of governance.

• Significant audit findings concerning accounting estimates and qualitative aspects of significant accounting practices may be communicated.

• Significant difficulties encountered during the audit, such as delayed or unavailable expected information, management restrictions and additional time necessary to obtain appropriate audit evidence may be communicated.

3 Illustrative Communication Letter

March 20, 2016

To the Board of Directors of Always Best Corporation

We have completed our audit of Always Best Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2015; our audit report is dated March 15, 2016. Clarified Auditing Standards require we provide you with the following information from our audit.

Our Responsibility in the Clarified Auditing Standards

Our engagement letter dated November 15, 2015 stated our responsibility is to express an opinion about the fair presentation of your financial statements (a copy of which is attached to this letter), for which you are responsible. Our audit does not relieve your management of its responsibilities.

Planned Scope and Timing of the Audit

Our audit was performed according to the planned scope and timing communicated to you in our planning discussion held via Skype on November 20, 2015. The agenda provided you included the matters discussed in our two-way communication.

Significant Findings in Our Audit

Qualitative Aspects of Accounting Practices:

Management has responsibilities for the selection of its applicable financial reporting framework and the appropriateness of accounting principles applied. The significant accounting policies of Always Best Corporation described in Note A to the financial statements were applied during the year without changes and no new policies were adopted. Transactions during the year were entered according to authoritative guidance and they have been recorded in the period of occurrence.

Management’s accounting estimates in the financial statements are based on their knowledge and experience about past and current events, as well as assumptions about future events. Certain estimates are especially sensitive because of their effects on financial statements and the possibility of future variations from expectations. The most sensitive estimate was the provision for settlement of a patent infringement lawsuit of $500,000. We evaluated the factors and assumptions used by management in developing the provision and determined the amount is reasonable.

Financial statement disclosures are complete, valid, consistent and understandable. The most sensitive disclosure is Note G which pertains to the patent infringement lawsuit mention above.

Difficulties Encountered in Performing the Audit

Completion of our audit was 14 days later than scheduled due to client personnel not providing requested information at the expected time. Management was notified that the information was not available at the expected time. As a result, our engagement team spent 30 additional hours obtaining and scheduling the requested information and the audit fee was increased $3,000.

Corrected and Uncorrected Misstatements

All known and likely misstatement discovered during the audit were communicated to management on an Error Analysis Form. Management has corrected the misstatements that were material, individually or in the aggregate.

Disagreements with Management

There were no disagreement with management regarding accounting, reporting or auditing matters during the performance of our audit.

Management Representations

We requested a management representation letter dated March 15, 2016 to be signed by Don West, President, and Wilbur Smith, Chairman of your Board of Directors. Matters included have been discussed with Mr. West and Mr. Smith and determined to be valid management representations relative to matters affecting our audit.

Management Consultation with Other Independent Accountants

We are not aware of any consultations made by management with other independent accountants regarding any matter affecting our audit. We have not been contacted by any other accountants as required by our professional standards when such consultations occur.

Other Audit Findings or Issues

A variety of matters, such as the application of accounting principles and audit standards have been discussed with management during the planning and performance phase of the audit. Our retention as auditors was not affected by the matters discussed, which occurred in the normal course of the audit.

The matters communicated in this letter are solely for the use of the Board of Directors and management of Always Best Corporation.

Sincerely,

Largess, Ottiter $ Co., CPAs

4 EXTERNAL CONFIRMATIONS (AU-C Section 505)

5 Definitions

• Exception. A response that identifies a difference between information requested to be confirmed or information from the entity's records and information provided by the party from which a confirmation was requested .

• External confirmation. Audit evidence obtained as a direct written response to the auditor from a third party either in paper form or by electronic or other medium such as the auditor's direct access to information held by a third party.

• Negative confirmation request. A request that the confirming party respond directly to the auditor only if there is disagreement with the information provided.

• Non-response. A failure of the confirming party to respond to a positive confirmation request or an undeliverable confirmation.

• Positive confirmation request. A request that the confirming party respond by providing the requested information or stating agreement or disagreement with the information in the request.

1 General External Confirmation Procedures

The auditor must maintain control over the confirmation requests, specifically including the following:

• Determining the information to be confirmed or requested;

• Selecting the correct confirming party;

• Designing the confirmation requests, including determining that requests are properly directed to a valid, existing confirming party and provide for a return directly to the auditor; and

• Sending the requests, including at least second requests when applicable, to the confirming party.

Management’s Refusal of Auditor’s Confirmation Procedures

1 When management refuses to allow the auditor to send a confirmation request, the auditor’s responsibilities include inquiries as to reasons for the refusal, evaluating alternative procedures and impact on the risk assessment procedures. When and if the auditor concludes that management’s refusal is unreasonable, or the auditor is unable to obtain relevant and reliable audit evidence from alternative audit procedures, the auditor should communicate the matter to those charged with governance. The auditor should also evaluate the effects of the refusal on the audit report and any necessary modifications (AU-C 705).

Negative Confirmations

Negative confirmations provide less reliable evidence than positive confirmations. Negative confirmation requests should not be used as the sole substantive procedure (other than risk assessment or analytical procedures) in response to an assessed risk of material misstatement at the assertion (account classification) level, unless all of the following are present:

• The auditor has assessed the risk of material misstatement as low and has obtained sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the operating effectiveness of controls relevant to the assertion.

• The population of items subject to negative confirmation procedures comprises a large number of small, homogeneous account balances, transactions, or conditions.

• A very low exception rate is expected.

• The auditor is not aware of circumstances or conditions that would cause recipients of negative confirmation requests to disregard such requests (such as in the trucking industry with freight bills).

2 Additional Application Material in the Standard

1 It clarifies that the receipt of an oral response to a confirmation request does not meet the definition of an external confirmation. It does permit, however, the use of an oral response as part of alternative procedures performed in order to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence.

2 The definition of confirmation has been changed to include direct access by the auditor to information held by a third party.

3 The impact of these changes affect primarily the reliability of information summarized in the confirmation statistics. An oral request will be presented as an alternative procedure in these statistics; documentation of direct access to third party information will be presented as a confirmation.

Practical Note:

Electronic confirmation processes must be secure and controlled. A secure confirmation environment depends on the auditor’s and respondent’s processes or mechanisms that minimize the possibility of compromise.

Practical Considerations for the Confirmation Process

Confirmations and Risk

Confirmations are obtained from third parties to obtain evidence about financial statement assertions. As RMM (the combination of inherent and control risk) increases, more and better evidence is needed to evaluate financial statement assertions. As an example, possible effects of high and low risk on accounts receivable confirmation procedures are outlined in the following table.

| | |

|Level of Risk of Material Misstatement |Illustrative Procedures Based on Risk |

|High risk |Send positive confirmations covering all ISIs above the |

| |calculated lower limit based on risk and a number of units |

| |selected by using a non-statistical sampling model or an |

| |extensive non-sampling plan at the engagement date. |

|Moderate risk |Send positive confirmations covering all ISIs above a higher |

| |calculated lower limit based on risk and a small number of units |

| |in the remaining population based on the model approach or a |

| |non-sampling plan at the engagement date or one month before. |

| |Perform roll-forward procedures for the period from the |

| |confirmation date to the engagement date. |

|Low risk |Send positive confirmations for all ISIs above a calculated lower|

| |limit based on risk (which should be higher than moderate risk). |

| |A small number of units should also be judgmentally selected from|

| |the sampling population that are representative of the |

| |transactions it includes for negative confirmation or tracing to |

| |supporting sales and collection documents. Confirmation |

| |procedures may be performed 30 or 60 days before the engagement |

| |date. Perform roll-forward procedures. |

The Confirmation Process

Auditing standards stress the importance of control over the confirmation process for both hardcopy and electronic confirmations. Control over the process from beginning to end is the key to gathering sufficient, competent evidence to enable an auditor to evaluate relevant financial statement assertions.

Following is a summary of the accounts receivable confirmation process:

1.  Obtain an aged trial balance of accounts and reconcile it to the general ledger.

2.  Decide on a selection method (random-number, systematic or haphazard), calculate the desired sample size based on risk and materiality at the assertion level.

3.  Select accounts for confirmation preparation and decide on positive or negative requests.

4.  Prepare confirmations (or supervise client preparation).

5.  When the client prepares confirmations, make sure all those requested are completed and that names, addresses and amounts agree to client records.

6.  Independently verify a sample of customer addresses (phone book, Google, remittance advices, etc.). Failing to perform this step can invalidate all evidence from the confirmation process.

7.  Make copies of confirmations to use as second requests.

8.  Stuff envelopes, or supervise client stuffing.

9.  Insert CPA firm return address envelopes into confirmation request envelopes.

10. Obtain postage and deliver to an off site mail drop.

11. Clear exceptions from replies by inquiries of client personnel and inspection of supporting records.

12. Send second requests on non-replies by repeating steps 7 through 11.

13. Perform alternative procedures on non-replies to second requests by inspecting supporting documents (records for sales, shipments and subsequent collections).

14. Consider proposing adjustments or recording errors on an Error Analysis Worksheet and performing qualitative error analysis for confirmations of individually significant items.

15. Project sample error rate to the sampling population for sampling applications.

16. Summarize confirmation statistics to support the relevant assertions.

Because of the substantial time required to prepare, control and send confirmations, an auditor’s objective should be to select just enough confirmations to satisfy the audit objectives. Here are a few of the ways this can be accomplished:

• Pay attention to the risk assessment process.  Whenever risk of material misstatement at the assertion level is less than high, an auditor has opportunities to reduce the number of confirmations. Considering the confirmation process above and the number of confirmations sent, the average time spent by an auditor is usually 20-30 minutes per confirmation. Even an assessed level of risk at slightly less than high could raise the lower limit for individually significant items, reduce the number of confirmations and save several hours of an auditor’s time.

• Base the lower limit for individually significant items at the assertion level on tolerable misstatement (performance materiality) determined at the lowest risk level possible (as risk goes down tolerable misstatement and the lower limit for individually significant items goes up).

• At lower risk levels, use the higher calculated amount of tolerable misstatement in the model approach to sampling described in the Clarified Auditing Standards.

• When risk is moderate to low, consider using negative confirmations for smaller account balances.

Many auditors are learning that the time charges for the confirmation process can be reduced significantly by sending electronic confirmations. Electronic confirmation capability for accounts receivable is available through Capital Confirmation, Inc. (). These electronic confirmations are secure, save substantial preparation time, reduce turn around time and are economically priced.

WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS (AU-C Section 580)

Written Representations as Audit Evidence

Audit evidence–the information used by the auditor in arriving at the conclusions on which the auditor’s opinion is based.

Written representations–necessary information that the auditor requires in connection with the audit of the entity’s financial statements. Similar to responses to inquiries, written representations are audit evidence.

Written representations provide necessary audit evidence, complement other auditing procedures and do not provide sufficient appropriate audit evidence on their own about any of the matters with which they deal. They do not affect the nature or extent of other audit procedures that the auditor applies to obtain audit evidence about the fulfillment of management’s responsibilities or about specific assertions.

Objectives of the Auditor

To obtain written representations from management (those charged with governance when appropriate) that they believe that they have fulfilled their responsibilities:

1 For the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements and

2 For the completeness of the information provided to the auditor.

2 To support other audit evidence relevant to the financial statements or specific assertions in the financial statements by means of written representations if determined necessary by the auditor or required by other AU-C sections; and

3 To respond appropriately to written representations provided by management (when appropriate, those charged with governance) or

4 To respond appropriately if management (when appropriate, those charged with governance) do not provide the written representations requested by the auditor.

Definition

Written representation –. A written statement by management provided to the auditor to confirm certain matters or to support other audit evidence. Written representations in this context do not include financial statements, the assertions therein, or supporting books and records.

Requirements

Management from whom written representations are requested includes management with appropriate responsibilities for the financial statements and knowledge of the matters concerned.

Written representations are required about management’s responsibilities for:

The preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in accordance with an appropriate financial framework.

Information provided and completeness of transactions.

Other Written Representations – The auditor should request management to provide written representations concerning:

Fraud—its responsibility for the design, implementation and maintenance of internal controls to prevent and detect fraud, any necessary disclosures from internal risk assessment that financial statements may be materially misstated as the result of fraud, and any known, suspected or alleged fraud.

Laws and Regulations—identified or suspected non-compliance with laws and regulations have been disclosed to the auditor.

Uncorrected Misstatements—the effects of identified uncorrected misstatements individually or in the aggregate are immaterial.

Litigation and Claims—the effects of all known actual or possible litigation and claims that should be considered in the preparation of financial statements and disclosures for the applicable financial reporting framework.

Estimates—the reasonableness of significant assumptions used in making accounting estimates.

Related Party Transactions—the disclosure of all related party relationships and transactions of which it is aware.

Subsequent Events—all subsequent events requiring adjustment or disclosure required by the applicable reporting framework.

Additional Written Representations about the Financial Statements

Other AU-C sections require the auditor to request written representations. If, the auditor determines that it is necessary to obtain one or more written representations to support other audit evidence relevant to the financial statements or one or more specific assertions in the financial statements, he or she should request such other written representations.

Date of, and Period(s) Covered by, Written Representations

Should be as of the date of the auditor’s report on the financial statements.

Should be for all financial statements and period(s) referred to in the auditor’s report.

Form of Written Representations – should be in the form of a representation letter addressed to the auditor.

Doubt about the Reliability of Written Representations

If the auditor has concerns about the competence, integrity, ethical values, or diligence of management or about management’s commitment to, or enforcement of, these, the auditor should determine the effect that such concerns may have on the reliability of representations (oral or written) and audit evidence in general.

If written representations are inconsistent with other audit evidence, the auditor should perform audit procedures to attempt to resolve the matter.

If the matter remains unresolved, the auditor should reconsider the assessment of the competence, integrity, ethical values, or diligence of management or of management’s commitment to, or enforcement of, these and should determine the effect that this may have on the reliability of representations (oral or written) and audit evidence in general.

The auditor should take appropriate action, including determining the possible effect on the opinion in the auditor’s report in accordance with the SAS Modifications to the Opinion in the Independent Auditor’s Report, if the auditor concludes that the written representations are not reliable.

Written Representations about Management’s Responsibilities

Disclaiming an opinion or withdrawing from the engagement. The auditor should disclaim an opinion on the financial statements in accordance with the SAS Modifications to the Opinion in the Independent Auditor’s Report or withdraw from the engagement if:

The auditor concludes that sufficient doubt exists about the integrity of management such that the written representations required are not reliable or

Management does not provide the written representations required.

Requested Written Representations Not Provided – When management does not provide one or more of the requested written representations, the auditor should:

Discuss the matter with management;

Re-evaluate the integrity of management and evaluate the effect that this may have on the reliability of representations (oral or written) and audit evidence in general; and

Take appropriate actions, including determining the possible effect on the opinion in the auditor’s report in accordance with the SAS Modifications to the Opinion in the Independent Auditor’s Report, considering the requirement in paragraph 25 of this SAS.

Illustrative Representation Letter

To Largess, Ottiter $ Co., CPAs

March 15, 2015

This representation letter is provided in connection with your audit of the financial statements of Always Best Corporation, which includes the balance sheet as of

December 31, 2015, and the related statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year then ended, and the related notes to the financial statements, for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the fair presentation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (U.S. GAAP).

Certain representations in this letter are described as being limited to matters that are material. Items are considered material, regardless of size, if they involve an omission or misstatement of accounting information that, makes it probable that the judgment of a reasonable person relying on the financial statements would be changed or influenced by the omission or misstatement.

Except where otherwise stated below, immaterial matters less than $10,000 collectively are not considered to be exceptions that require disclosure for the purpose of the following representations. This amount is not necessarily the same threshold as for adjustments to or disclosures in the financial statements.

We confirm that as of December 31, 2015:

Financial Statements:

• We have fulfilled our responsibilities in the engagement letter dated November 15, 2015, for the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

• We acknowledge our responsibility for the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements free from material misstatement due to fraud or error.

• We acknowledge our responsibility for the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal controls for fraud detection and prevention.

• Significant assumptions used by us in making accounting estimates are reasonable, including fair value estimates.

• Related party relationships and transactions have been appropriately accounted for and disclosed as required by U.S. GAAP.

• All events subsequent to the date of the financial statements for which U.S. GAAP requires adjustment or disclosure have been adjusted or disclosed.

• The effects of uncorrected misstatements are immaterial, both individually and in the aggregate, to the financial statements as a whole. A list of the uncorrected misstatements is attached to this representation letter (an Error Analysis Form or Audit Difference Evaluation Form).

• The effects of all known actual or possible litigation and claims have been accounted for and disclosed in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

• Any other matters the auditor may consider appropriate (see illustrations in Exhibit B in AU-C Section 580:

o Unaudited interim information accompanies the statements.

o The effect of a new accounting principle is not known.

o Uncertainties as to the going concern assumption exist.

o The value of certain long-lived tangible or intangible assets may be impaired.

o The Corporation has a variable interest in another entity.

o The work of a specialist has been used by management.

o Other assets, liabilities or equity issues (detailed in Exhibit B of AU-C Section 580)

Information Provided

• We have provided you with:

o Access to all information, of which we are aware that is relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements such as records, documentation and other matters;

o Additional information that you have requested from us for the purpose of the audit; and

o Unrestricted access to persons within the entity from whom you determined it necessary to obtain audit evidence.

• All transactions have been recorded in the accounting records and are reflected in the financial statements.

• We have disclosed to you the results of our assessment of the risk that the financial statements may be materially misstated as a result of fraud.

• We have no knowledge of any fraud or suspected fraud that affects the entity and involves:

o Management;

o Employees who have significant roles in internal control; or

o Others when the fraud could have a material effect on the financial statements

• We have no knowledge of any allegations of fraud, or suspected fraud, affecting the entity's financial statements communicated by employees, former employees, analysts, regulators or others.

• We have disclosed to you all known instances of non-compliance or suspected non-compliance with laws and regulations whose effects should be considered when preparing financial statements.

• We have disclosed to you all known actual or possible litigation, claims, and assessments whose effects should be considered when preparing the financial statements.

• We have disclosed to you the identity of the entity's related parties and all the related party relationships and transactions of which we are aware.

• Other matters: (From Exhibit B of AU-C Section 580)

Don West, President

Don West

Wilber Smith, Chairman of the Board

Wilbur Smith

Illustrative Updating Representation Letter

May 1, 2016

To Largess, Ottiter $ Co., CPAs

In connection with your audit of the financial statements of Always Best Corporation as of December 31, 2015 and for the period then ending for the purpose of expressing an opinion as to whether the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows of Always Best Corporation in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, you were previously provided with a representation letter as of March 15, 2016.

No information has come to our attention that would cause us to believe that any of those previous representations should be modified. To the best of our knowledge and belief, no events have occurred subsequent to December 31, 2015 and through the date of this letter that would require adjustment to or disclosure in the aforementioned financial statements.

Don West

Don West, President

Wilber Smith

Chairman of the Board and Chief Financial Officer

COMMUNICATING INTERNAL CONTROL MATTERS IDENTIFIED IN AN AUDIT (AU-C Section 265)

Objective of the Auditor

The objective of the auditor is to appropriately communicate to those charged with governance and management significant deficiencies in internal control that the auditor has identified during the audit and that, in the auditor’s professional judgment, is of sufficient importance to merit attention by governance and management persons.

Definitions

Deficiency in internal control—a deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, misstatements on a timely basis.

A deficiency in design exists when a control necessary to meet the control objective is missing or an existing control is not properly designed so that, even if the control operates as designed, the control objective would not be met.

A deficiency in operation exists when a properly designed control does not operate as designed or when the person performing the control does not possess the necessary authority or competence to perform the control effectively.

Material weakness—a deficiency or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the entity’s financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis.

Significant deficiency--a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is less severe than a material weakness yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance.

Requirements

This SAS covers the following requirements which are discussed further below:

• Determination of Whether Deficiencies in Internal Control Have Been Identified

• Evaluating Identified Deficiencies in Internal Control

• Communication of Deficiencies in Internal Control

This SAS contains illustrative written communications:

• Exhibit A: Illustrative Written Communication (presented below)

• Exhibit B: Illustrative No Material Weakness Communication

• Exhibit C: Examples of Circumstances That May Be Deficiencies, Significant Deficiencies, or Material Weaknesses

Practical Note:

Internal control is always relevant to the nature, size and complexity of a reporting entity. Therefore, so should be the contents of the internal control communication letter. Smaller entities will ordinarily have more informal control activities Performed by one or a few individuals. For smaller entities, key controls performed at the entity level will ordinarily have the most pervasive effects for preventing errors or fraud from occurring and going undetected.

PRACTICAL ISSUES RELATING TO INTERNAL CONTROL COMMUNICATIONS

Identifying and Reporting Control Deficiencies

Other important issues from AU-C 265, Communicating Internal Control Related Matters Identified in an Audit, are:

• Evaluating control deficiencies: likelihood of occurrence and magnitude or materiality.

• Deciding on the severity of deficiencies.

• Determining when control deficiencies become risks of material misstatements.

• Reporting deficiencies in subsequent years.

Evaluating Control Deficiencies

Consideration of the magnitude of a potential deficiency and whether there is a reasonable possibility that controls will not prevent, detect or correct it is necessary to determine its severity.

The magnitude of a deficiency is related to financial statement amounts or totals of transactions considering both volume and activity.

A reasonable possibility of preventing, detecting or correcting a potential misstatement is affected by risk factors that could cause a misstatement of an account balance. Those risk factors include:

• Nature of accounts, transactions classes and relevant assertions involved—the risk inherent in the information can be significant or not.

• Susceptibility of loss or fraud of related asset or liability—ease of misappropriation or misstatement will affect risk.

• Ability to determine the amount involved—the subjectivity, complexity or amount of judgment required may increase risk.

• Offsetting controls—they may or may not prevent, detect or correct misstatements.

• Relationship to other deficiencies—the number of deficiencies could increase the risk of misstatement.

• Future effects of the deficiency—probable changes in size of the entity, volume of transactions, increases or decreases in personnel and other factors may increase or decrease risk.

Deficiencies affecting the same account, transaction, disclosure, assertion or component of internal controls should be considered together to determine significant deficiencies or material weaknesses. Offsetting or compensating controls may limit the severity of a deficiency, but tests of controls or more extensive systems walk-through procedures must be performed to evaluate their operating effectiveness.

Following is a list of situations that may result in control deficiencies, significant deficiencies, or material weaknesses:

• Inadequate or insufficient design of internal control over:

o Financial statement preparation.

o Significant transactions or account balances.

o The control environment.

o Segregation of duties among personnel.

o Information processing.

o Hiring qualified personnel.

• Properly designed controls that are not operated properly for:

o A significant transaction, process or account.

o Producing complete and accurate reports.

o Safeguarding assets.

o Reconciliation of subsidiary ledgers.

o Preventing management override of controls.

Some deficiencies that are commonly considered at least significant deficiencies and must be separately identified in the letter:

• The absence of anti-fraud programs.

• No controls over non-routine transactions are operating.

• No controls over the use of accounting principles.

• No controls over general ledger accounting activities and the financial reporting process.

Certain circumstances are always indicative of material weaknesses, which must be separately identified in the letter:

• Any fraud by senior management, regardless of amount.

• Prior period restatements due to error or fraud.

• An auditor’s identification of a material misstatement that was not detected by controls. These usually will result in proposed journal entries.

• Ineffective governance over financial reporting and internal control.

If the circumstance is determined not to be a material weakness, the auditor must consider what “prudent officials” would conclude in the same circumstances. In a seminar on fraud in Miami, participants were asked what standard they use to determine if a fraud occurred. A participant responded his standard was the Miami Herald (local newspaper) standard! In other words, what a newspaper reporter might define as fraud could differ from audit standards. What a prudent official might define as a material weakness could be different than an auditor’s definition!

Determining Reportable Control Deficiencies

According to AU-C Section 265, only significant deficiencies and material weaknesses are required to be included in the internal control communication letter. Significant deficiencies and material weaknesses arise from risks of material misstatements. For small audits, risks of material misstatements are primarily the absence of key controls at the entity level, either in design or in operation. For larger entities with more accounting personnel, key controls will exist at both the entity and activity levels. An identified risk of material misstatement will be reported to management in the internal control letter, even though it may have been corrected.

To facilitate the risk assessment process, and the ultimate reporting of significant deficiencies and material weaknesses, it is imperative key controls be identified and evaluated during the planning and risk assessment phases of an audit. Based on internal control documentation, identified risks will impact the development of cost-beneficial audit strategies, the audit plan (program) and the internal control communication letter.

Reporting Deficiencies in Subsequent Years

For some smaller clients, changes in accounting policies and procedures are slow. Employees that lack necessary qualifications to make accounting or internal control decisions, no free time to design and administer internal controls improvements and lack of understanding of the importance of internal controls, among other reasons, can hinder reception of an auditor’s suggestions for improving internal controls.

In these situations, auditing standards require reporting significant weaknesses and material weaknesses until management takes appropriate corrective action. If an auditor’s attempts to help a client improve are not acknowledged or acted on, or if the recommendations to correct deficiencies are not considered practical by management, the suggestions must be communicated in the letter each year after the first.

Suggestions that may fall into this area are:

• Significant deficiencies

o Management’s expertise for selecting and applying accounting principles is lacking

o No designed or operating anti-fraud programs

o No controls over unusual or extraordinary transactions

o No controls over monthly or annual closing in the financial reporting process

• Material weaknesses

o Ineffective governance over controls and reporting

o Material misstatements requiring adjustment

o Identification of any management fraud

o Management’s failure to assess the effects of previous deficiencies and take action or decide not to take action

o A large number of control deficiencies indicating a weak control environment

Illustrative Internal Control Communication Letter

To: Don West, President

Always Best Corporation

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements of Always Best Corporation (the "Corporation") as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, we considered the Corporation's internal control over financial reporting (internal control) as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Corporation's internal control. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the Corporation's internal control.

Our consideration of internal control was for the limited purpose described in the preceding paragraph and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control that might be material weaknesses or material weaknesses or significant deficiencies and therefore, material weaknesses or material weaknesses or significant deficiencies may exist that were not identified. However, as discussed below, we identified certain deficiencies in internal control that we consider to be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies.

A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the entity's financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis.

We consider the following deficiencies in the Corporation's internal control to be material weaknesses (actual letter descriptions would be specific and describe potential effects):

o Ineffective governance over controls and reporting

o Material misstatements requiring adjustment

o Identification of any management fraud

o Management’s failure to assess the effects of previous deficiencies and take action or decide not to take action

o A large number of control deficiencies indicating a weak control environment

A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance. We consider the following deficiencies in the Company's internal control to be significant deficiencies (actual letter descriptions would be specific and describe potential effects):

o Management’s expertise for selecting and applying accounting principles is lacking

o No designed or operating anti-fraud programs

o No controls over unusual or extraordinary transactions

o No controls over monthly or annual closing in the financial reporting process

(When only significant deficiencies are being communicated, a statement would be added indicating none of the significant deficiencies are material weaknesses.)

This communication is intended solely for the information and use of management and the board of directors of Always Best Corporation.

Largess Ottiter & Co., CPAs

Anywhere, USA

March 15, 2016 (the letter normally should be dated the date financial statements are available for issue)

AUDIT EVIDENCE—LITIGATION, CLAIMS AND ASSESSMENTS (AU-C Section 501)

The auditor is required to design and perform audit procedures to identify any litigation, claims, and assessments involving the entity that could cause a risk of material misstatement, including:

• Inquiring of management and others within the entity, including in-house legal counsel;

• Obtaining from management a description and evaluation of litigation, claims, and assessments that existed at the date of the financial statements and during the period from the reporting date to the date the information is furnished, with an identification of the matters referred to legal counsel;

• Reviewing minutes of meetings of boards of governance; documents obtained from management concerning litigation, claims, and assessments; and correspondence between the entity and its external legal counsel; and

• Analyzing legal expense accounts and invoices from external legal counsel.

For actual or potential litigation, claims, and assessments identified during the audit, the auditor should obtain audit evidence relevant to the following:

• The period in which the underlying cause for legal action occurred

• The degree of probability of an unfavorable outcome

• The amount or range of any potential loss

Communication with the Entity’s Legal Counsel

Unless audit procedures indicate that no actual or potential litigation, claims, or assessments causing a risk of material misstatement exist, the auditor should seek direct communication with the entity's external legal counsel. The auditor should do so through a letter of inquiry prepared by management and sent by the auditor requesting the entity's external legal counsel to communicate directly with the auditor (request for a lawyer’s letter).

In addition to the direct communications with the entity's external legal counsel, the auditor should also seek direct communication with the entity's in-house legal counsel when such in-house counsel exists. Audit evidence obtained from in-house legal counsel is not, however, a substitute for direct communication with the entity's external legal counsel.

The auditor should document the reasons for any decision not to seek direct communication with the entity's legal counsel. Management’s refusal to permit the auditor to communicate with legal counsel and/or the auditor’s inability to perform appropriate audit procedures may cause the auditor to issue a qualified opinion or a disclaimer of opinion.

The auditor should request management to authorize the entity's legal counsel to discuss requested matters with the auditor. The auditor should request the entity's legal counsel to inform the auditor in writing of any litigation, claims, assessments, and unasserted claims that the counsel is aware of, together with an assessment of the outcome of the litigation, claims, and assessments, and an estimate of the possible costs involved. Each lawyer’s letter should include at least the following matters:

A. Identification of the entity, including subsidiaries, and the date of the audit.

B. A list prepared by management (or a request by management that the legal counsel prepare a list) that describes and evaluates pending or threatened litigation, claims, and assessments for which the legal counsel has been engaged and to which the legal counsel has devoted significant attention on behalf of the company.

C. A list prepared by management that describes and evaluates unasserted claims and assessments that management considers to be probable of assertion and that, if asserted, would have at least a reasonable possibility of an unfavorable outcome with respect to which the legal counsel has been engaged and to which the legal counsel has devoted significant attention on behalf of the entity.

For item B above, the letter should include a request that the legal counsel either provide the following information or comment on those matters on which the legal counsel's views may differ from those stated by management:

• A description of the nature of the matter, the progress of the case to date, and the action that the entity intends to take (for example, to contest the matter vigorously or to seek an out-of-court settlement).

• An evaluation of the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome and an estimate, if one can be made, of the amount or range of potential loss.

• With respect to a list prepared by management (or by the legal counsel at management's request), an identification of the omission of any pending or threatened litigation, claims, and assessments or a statement that the list of such matters is complete.

For item C above, the letter should include:

• A request that the legal counsel comment on those matters on which the legal counsel's views concerning the description or evaluation of the matter may differ from those stated by management.

• A statement that management understands that whenever, in the course of performing legal services for the entity with respect to a matter recognized to involve an unasserted possible claim or assessment that may call for financial statement disclosure, the legal counsel has formed a professional conclusion that the entity should disclose or consider disclosure concerning such possible claim or assessment, the legal counsel, as a matter of professional responsibility to the entity, will so advise the entity and will consult with the entity concerning the question of such disclosure and the requirements of the applicable financial reporting framework

When the entity has changed legal counsel or counsel has resigned, the auditor should inquire of management about the reasons for any changes in legal counsel.

Practical Note

Auditing procedures regarding unasserted and asserted claims and assessments normally begin with an analysis of professional services expense accounts. Coupled with inquiries of management and persons charged with governance, reading minutes of board and/or committee meetings and information obtained while performing other auditing procedures, an auditor will obtain information as to the existences of legal counsel and potential claims or assessments.

Should no information be discovered in carrying out the procedures above, and the client represents there have been no services obtained from legal counsel during the year, the requirements of AU-C Section 501 normally will be satisfied. When facts indicate the services of legal counsel were used and management does not permit the auditor to investigate the issues further, or when management refuses to send a letter of inquiry, the auditor should consider modification of the audit report to either qualify or disclaim an opinion depending on the pervasiveness and financial statement effects of the issues.

Illustrative Audit Inquiry Letter to Legal Counsel

To: Strong Arm Lawyers

Anywhere, USA

In connection with an audit of our financial statements at December 31, 2015 and for the year then ended, management of the Corporation has prepared, and furnished to our auditors, Largess, Ottiters $ Co., CPAs, Anywhere, USA,, a description and evaluation of certain contingencies, including those set forth below involving matters with respect to which you have been engaged and to which you have devoted substantial attention on behalf of the Corporation in the form of legal consultation or representation. These contingencies are regarded by management of the Company as material for this purpose.

Your response should include matters that existed at December 31, 2015 and during the period from that date to the date of your response.

Pending or Threatened Litigation (Excluding Unasserted Claims)

This section ordinarily would include the following: (1) the nature of the litigation, (2) the progress of the case to date, (3) how management is responding or intends to respond to the litigation (for example, to contest the case vigorously or to seek an out-of-court settlement), and (4) an evaluation of the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome and an estimate, if one can be made, of the amount or range of potential loss.

This letter will serve as our consent for you to furnish to our auditor all the information requested herein. Therefore, please furnish to our auditors such explanation, if any, that you consider necessary to supplement the foregoing information, including an explanation of those matters for which your views may differ from those stated and an identification of the omission of any pending or threatened litigation, claims, and assessments or a statement that the list of such matters is complete.

Unasserted Claims and Assessments (Considered by Management to be Probable of Assertion and That, if Asserted, Would Have at Least a Reasonable Possibility of an Unfavorable Outcome)

This section ordinarily would include the following: (1) the nature of the matter, (2) how management intends to respond if the claim is asserted, and (3) an evaluation of the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome and an estimate, if one can be made, of the amount or range of potential loss.

Please furnish to our auditors such explanation, if any, that you consider necessary to supplement the foregoing information, including an explanation of those matters for which your views may differ from those stated. We understand that whenever, in the course of performing legal services for us with respect to a matter recognized to involve an unasserted possible claim or assessment that may call for financial statement disclosure, if you have formed a professional conclusion that we should disclose or consider disclosure concerning such possible claim or assessment, as a matter of professional responsibility to us, you will so advise us and will consult with us concerning the question of such disclosure and the applicable requirements of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 450,

Contingencies. Please specifically confirm to our auditors that our understanding is correct.

The auditor may request the client to inquire about additional matters, for example, unpaid or unbilled charges or specified information on certain contractually assumed obligations of the Corporation, such as guarantees of indebtedness of others.

Please specifically identify the nature of and reasons for any limitations on your response. Our auditors expect to have the audit completed about March 1, 2016. They would appreciate receiving your reply by that date with a specified effective date no earlier than February 15, 2016.

Wording that could be used in an audit inquiry letter, instead of the heading and first paragraph, when the client believes that there are no unasserted claims or assessments to be specified to the lawyer for comment that are probable of assertion and that, if asserted, would have a reasonable possibility of an unfavorable outcome as specified by Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification 450, Contingencies, is as follows:

Unasserted claims and assessments

We have represented to our auditors that there are no unasserted possible claims that you have advised us are probable of assertion and must be disclosed, in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification 450, Contingencies. . (The second paragraph in the section relating to unasserted claims and assessments would not be altered.)

Don West. President

Always Best Corporation

CONCLUSION

Audit correspondence provides significant substantive evidence supporting audit conclusions. Compliance with the requirements in the Clarified Auditing Standards relating to audit correspondence must be documented in engagement files. Ensuring that all required correspondence is identified during planning, prepared in the proper form, sent and obtained on a timely basis and considered with other substantive evidence gathered by the auditor is necessary to achieve high-quality audit engagements.

................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download