COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS



STATEMENT OF PROCEEDINGS

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS

REGULAR MEETING

TUESDAY, AUGUST 1, 2006, 9:00 AM

Board of Supervisors North Chamber

1600 Pacific Highway, Room 310, San Diego, California

MORNING SESSION – Meeting was called to order at 9:01 a.m.

Present: Supervisors Bill Horn, Chairman; Ron Roberts, Vice-Chairman;

Greg Cox; Dianne Jacob; Pam Slater-Price; also Thomas J. Pastuszka, Clerk.

Invocation was led by Pastor Frank Keeler of Cornerstone Community Church in Oceanside.

Pledge of Allegiance was led by the Valhalla High School’s Varsity Baseball Team.

Approval of Statement of Proceedings/Minutes for Meetings of June 7-16, 2006 Budget Hearings and July18, 2006

ACTION:

ON MOTION of Supervisor Slater Price, seconded by Supervisor Cox, the Board of Supervisors approved the Statement of Proceedings/Minutes for the Meetings of June 7-16, 2006 Budget Hearings and July18, 2006.

AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn

|Public Safety |1. |PROBATION DEPARTMENT: TRUANCY INTERVENTION PROJECT |

| | |[FUNDING SOURCE(S): CAJON VALLEY UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT (CVUSD)] |

| | | |

| |2. |MEDICAL EXAMINER FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY SERVICES CONTRACT WITH THE COUNTY OF SAN |

| | |BERNARDINO |

| | |(4 VOTES) |

| | | |

| |3. |COMPETITIVE SOLICITATION FOR POLYGRAPH TESTING SERVICES, NEGOTIATION AND AWARD OF |

| | |CONTRACT |

| | |[FUNDING SOURCE(S): COUNTY GENERAL PURPOSE REVENUE] |

| | | |

| |4. |SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR SOLE SOURCE PROCUREMENT OF CAL-ID EQUIPMENT |

| | |[FUNDING SOURCE(S): UNANTICIPATED REVENUE FROM THE SHERIFF’S FINGERPRINT ID TRUST |

| | |FUND] |

| | |(4 VOTES) |

| | | |

| |5. |SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH THE DEL MAR THOROUGHBRED|

| | |CLUB |

| | |[FUNDING SOURCE(S): REVENUE CONTRACT WITH THE DEL MAR THOROUGHBRED CLUB] |

| | |(4 VOTES) |

| | | |

| |6. |SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR PROCUREMENT OF MOBILE IDENTIFICATION |

| | |EQUIPMENT |

| | |[FUNDING SOURCE(S): REVENUE FROM THE SHERIFF’S FINGERPRINT ID TRUST FUND] |

| | |(4 VOTES) |

| | | |

| |7. |SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR THE SOLE SOURCE PROCUREMENT OF ORIGINAL EQUIPMENT |

| | |MANUFACTURER PARTS |

| | |[FUNDING SOURCE(S): GENERAL PURPOSE REVENUE] |

| | | |

| |8. |SHERIFF’S APPROVAL OF 800 MHz REGIONAL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM (RCS) AGREEMENT WITH SAN|

| | |DIEGO UNIFIED PORT DISTRICT (PORT DISTRICT) |

| | |[FUNDING SOURCE(S): REVENUE FROM THE SAN DIEGO UNIFIED PORT DISTRICT] |

| | |(4 VOTES) |

| | | |

|Health & Human Services |9. |BIRD/PANDEMIC FLU RESPONSE – STATUS REPORT |

| | | |

| |10. |SAN DIEGO HIV PREVENTION COMMUNITY PLANNING BOARD – MEMBER APPOINTMENTS |

| | | |

|Community Services |11. |REQUEST FOR APPROVAL TO CONDUCT SITE SEARCH FOR OFFICE AND WAREHOUSE SPACE |

| | | |

| |12. |DECLARATION OF ELECTION RESULTS – JUNE 6, 2006 PRIMARY ELECTION |

| | | |

|Financial & General Government |13. |SUPPORT FOR THE BIPARTISAN PUBLIC WORKS BOND PACKAGE, NOVEMBER 2006 |

| | | |

| |14. |SUPPORT FOR AB 17 (KORETZ) UNIVERSAL WASTE |

| | | |

| |15. |LOCAL COMMUNITY PROJECTS |

| | | |

| |16. |ADOPTION OF FINAL FISCAL YEAR 2006-07 BUDGET FOR THE COUNTY SERVICE AREAS, |

| | |MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS, AND PERMANENT ROAD DIVISIONS |

| | | |

| |17. |COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO FISCAL YEAR 2006-07 FINAL BUDGET RESOLUTION FOR FAMILY OF FUNDS, |

| | |ENTERPRISE FUNDS AND INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS, PRIOR YEAR ENCUMBRANCES, AND PENALTY |

| | |ASSESSMENT RESOLUTION |

| | | |

| |18. |FIXING COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT AND SPECIAL DISTRICT TAX RATES AND LEVYING TAXES FOR |

| | |FISCAL YEAR 2006/07 |

| | | |

| |19. |AMENDMENT TO THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE REGARDING THE AUTOMOBILE |

| | |ALLOWANCE |

| | | |

|Communication Received |20. |COMMUNICATIONS RECEIVED |

| | | |

|Financial & General Government |21. |ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: |

| | |SECOND CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE: AMENDMENT TO THE COMPENSATION |

| | |ORDINANCE |

| | | |

| |22. |Allocation of Community Projects Funds |

| | | |

|Community Services |23. |PROVIDING HEALTHY CHOICES IN COUNTY VENDING MACHINES |

| | | |

|Financial & General Government |24. |LOCAL COMMUNITY PROJECTS GRANTS |

| | | |

| |25. |SUPPORT FOR ASSEMBLY BILL AB 2276 (PAVLEY): ALLOWING CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD |

| | |TO REGULATE INDOOR OZONE EMISSIONS |

| | | |

|Community Services |26. |LEASE AGREEMENT WITH THE JULIAN HISTORICAL SOCIETY AT JULIAN PIONEER PARK FOR A |

| | |TRANSPORTATION MUSEUM |

| | |(4 VOTES) |

| | | |

|Appointments |27. |administrative item: |

| | |appointments |

| | | |

|Closed Session |28. |CLOSED SESSION |

| | | |

|Presentations/Awards |29. |PRESENTATIONS/AWARDS |

| | | |

|Public Communication |30. |PUBLIC COMMUNICATION |

|1. |SUBJECT: |PROBATION DEPARTMENT: TRUANCY INTERVENTION PROJECT (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |The Truancy Intervention Project (TIP) was established in 1988 as a partnership between the Juvenile Court, the Probation |

| |Department, local school districts, and the School Attendance Review Board (SARB). Currently, six Deputy Probation Officers are |

| |assigned to the San Diego Unified, Grossmont Unified, La Mesa/Spring Valley, Poway Unified, and Escondido Union school districts,|

| |at the expense of the school districts. These officers work with school staff and students on truancy, delinquency, and behavior|

| |issues, in an effort to maintain a safe school environment and prevent violence and drug use through effective prevention and |

| |early intervention. |

| | |

| |This is a request for the Probation Department to enter into a new two year agreement, and a potential third year, with the Cajon|

| |Valley Union School District, effective September 1, 2006. If approved, a total of seven officers will be assigned to the |

| |Truancy Intervention Project. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |Appropriations for this request are included in the Fiscal Year 2006-07 Operational Plan. If approved, this request will result |

| |in a cost of $85,166, which will be offset by unanticipated revenue of $88,786 for Fiscal Year 2006-2007 and a cost of $105,270, |

| |which will be offset by unanticipated revenue of $91,453 for Fiscal Year 2007-2008. The cost increase for the second year is due|

| |to the fact that the Probation Officer will be assigned to this position for ten months during the first year and twelve months |

| |during the second year. The funding source is the Cajon Valley Union School District (CVUSD). The school district will fund ten|

| |months per fiscal year. This action will not require the addition of staff years. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Approve and authorize the Chief Probation Officer to execute a revenue agreement with the Cajon Valley Union School District from|

| |September 1, 2006 through June 30, 2008, to provide one (1) Deputy Probation Officer for the Truancy Intervention Project; and |

| |authorize the Chief Probation Officer to review and execute subsequent renewals of this revenue agreement that do not materially |

| |impact or alter either the program or funding level. |

| | |

| |Waive Board Policy B-29, Fees, Grants, Revenue Contracts – Department Responsibility for Cost Recovery. |

| | |

| | |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|2. |SUBJECT: |MEDICAL EXAMINER FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY SERVICES CONTRACT WITH THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO (DISTRICT: ALL)|

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |This is a request to approve and authorize a revenue contract with the County of San Bernardino for forensic toxicology services.|

| |The services provided to the County of San Bernardino produce revenue that reduces the Medical Examiner Department’s Net General |

| |Fund Costs. These contracted toxicology services have been provided to the County of San Bernardino since December 1, 1998, with |

| |the most recent contract expiring on June 30, 2006. The present recommendation is for approval of a five- year contract beginning|

| |July 1, 2006, for estimated annual revenues of up to $250,000. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |The Fiscal Year 2006-07 Operational Plan anticipated providing services to the County of San Bernardino valued at $185,400 based |

| |on the Medical Examiner fee schedule as authorized by your Board on May 13, 2003 (18). Based on the requested level of service |

| |under this agreement, additional laboratory supplies totaling $64,600 would be required and revenues from the County of San |

| |Bernardino would total approximately $250,000. This agreement will recover approximately 90% of full cost because the fee |

| |schedule has not been updated since May of 2003. If approved, this request will require no additional staff years. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Waive Board Policy A-91, Mid-Year Budget Changes. |

| | |

| |Waive Board Policy B-29, Fees, Grants, Revenue Contracts – Department Responsibility for Cost Recovery. |

| | |

| |Approve and authorize the Medical Examiner to execute a Revenue Contract for Forensic Toxicology Services with the County of San |

| |Bernardino, effective July 1, 2006 through June 30, 2011, subject to County Counsel approval. |

| | |

| |Establish appropriations of $64,600 in the Medical Examiner Department for Forensic Toxicology Services based on unanticipated |

| |revenue from the County of San Bernardino. (4 VOTES) |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|3. |SUBJECT: |COMPETITIVE SOLICITATION FOR POLYGRAPH TESTING SERVICES, NEGOTIATION AND AWARD OF CONTRACT (DISTRICT: |

| | |ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |This is a request for authorization to issue a competitive solicitation, negotiate and award a contract to continue polygraph |

| |testing of sex offenders on probation. The current service agreement for polygraph testing expires October 31, 2006. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |The funds for this request are included in the Fiscal Year 2006-07 CAO Proposed Operational Plan. If approved, this request will|

| |result in a cost of approximately $20,000 in Fiscal Year 2006-07 (November 1, 2006 – June 30, 2007), and an average of $40,000 |

| |annually for the balance of the contract term. The funding source is County General Purpose Revenue. No additional staff years |

| |are requested. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |1. In accordance with Section 401, Article XXIII of the County Administrative Code, authorize the Director of the Department of |

| |Purchasing and Contracting to issue a competitive solicitation for polygraph testing services, and upon successful negotiations |

| |and determination of a fair and reasonable price, award a contract for a term of one (1) year and eight (8) months, from November|

| |1, 2006 through June 30, 2008, with an option to renew for three (3) additional one-year periods, through June 30, 2011, and up |

| |to an additional six months if necessary, and to amend the contract as needed to reflect changes to services and funding, subject|

| |to the approval of the Chief Probation Officer. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|4. |SUBJECT: |SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR SOLE SOURCE PROCUREMENT OF CAL-ID EQUIPMENT (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |On December 16, 2005 the San Diego County Cal-ID/Remote Access Network (RAN) Board, a county-wide advisory board that makes |

| |recommendations on the distribution of the Cal-ID funds, authorized the procurement of Cal-ID equipment with funding from the |

| |Sheriff’s Fingerprint ID Trust Fund. This equipment will enable latent print personnel to process latent prints and identify |

| |subjects more efficiently. This is a request for the sole source procurement of Cal-ID equipment. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |Funds for this request are not budgeted. The funding source is unanticipated revenue from the Sheriff’s Fingerprint ID Trust |

| |Fund. If approved, this request will result in estimated current year cost and revenue of $187,000 and estimated annual costs |

| |and revenue of $28,614 for ongoing maintenance. This request will not require any additional staff years. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |SHERIFF |

| |Waive Board Policy A-91 Mid-Year Budget Changes. |

| |Waive the advertising and competitive procurement requirements of Board Policy A-87. |

| |In accordance with Board Policy A-87, Competitive Procurement, approve and authorize the Purchasing and Contracting Director |

| |to enter into negotiations with Foster & Freeman, and subject to successful negotiations and determination of a fair and |

| |reasonable price, award contracts for the purchase of two Digital Capture Systems-3. |

| |In accordance with Board Policy A-87, Competitive Procurement, approve and authorize the Purchasing and Contracting Director |

| |to enter into negotiations with NEC Solutions, and subject to successful negotiations and determination of a fair and reasonable |

| |price, award contracts for the purchase of three Print Card Servers. |

| |Establish appropriations of $187,000 in the Sheriff’s Department for equipment based on unanticipated revenue from the Sheriff |

| |Fingerprint ID Trust Fund. (4 VOTES) |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

| |

|5. |SUBJECT: |SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH THE DEL MAR THOROUGHBRED CLUB (DISTRICT: |

| | |ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |The County of San Diego through the Sheriff’s Department provides annual law enforcement services to the Del Mar Thoroughbred |

| |Club (DMTC) during the horse racing season. The law enforcement services are provided through a revenue contract in accordance |

| |with County Administrative Code Section 123, which allows the Chief Administrative Officer’s approval of revenue contracts of |

| |$50,000 or less. This is a request for approval for the execution of a five-year and one month revenue agreement for law |

| |enforcement services between the County of San Diego and the DMTC for the period beginning September 1, 2006 through September |

| |30, 2011. If approved, this request will provide supplemental law enforcement services in and around the Del Mar Fairgrounds for|

| |the DMTC. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |Funds for this request are not budgeted. The funding source is a revenue contract with the Del Mar Thoroughbred Club. If |

| |approved, this request will result in estimated current year costs of $50,500 and unanticipated revenue of $55,000. The remaining|

| |revenue of $4,500 will be used to offset overhead costs. Subsequent year costs and revenues will be included in the Sheriff’s |

| |Operational Plan for each of the contract years and will be adjusted for negotiated salary increases, other cost adjustments or |

| |service level changes. If approved, this request will require the addition of no staff years. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |SHERIFF |

| |Waive Board Policy A-91, Mid-year Budget Changes. |

| |Waive Board Policy B-29, Fees, Grants, Revenue Contracts – Department Responsibility for Cost Recovery. |

| |Approve and authorize the Clerk of the Board to accept and execute, upon receipt, the five-year and one month revenue agreement |

| |between the County of San Diego and the Del Mar Thoroughbred Club for law enforcement and traffic control services for the period|

| |September 1, 2006 through September 30, 2011. |

| |Authorize the Sheriff to execute any amendments, and/or revisions due to changes in service level that do not materially impact |

| |or alter either the program or funding level. |

| |Establish appropriations of $50,500 in the Sheriff’s Department based on unanticipated revenue from the Del Mar Thoroughbred |

| |Club. (4 VOTES) |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|6. |SUBJECT: |SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR PROCUREMENT OF MOBILE IDENTIFICATION EQUIPMENT (DISTRICT: |

| | |ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |The Sheriff's Department requests authority to issue a Request For Proposal (RFP) for Mobile Identification (Mobile ID) equipment|

| |for the Sheriff’s Department and the San Diego Police Department. On December 16, 2005, the Remote Access Network (RAN) Board, a|

| |county-wide advisory board that makes recommendations on the distribution of the Cal-ID funds, approved procurement of Mobile ID |

| |equipment for the Sheriff’s Department and the San Diego Police Department. The Mobile ID allows an officer to remotely identify |

| |an individual in the field by transmission of an individual’s fingerprints to a local criminal database. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |Funds for this request are not budgeted. The funding source is the revenue from the Sheriff’s Fingerprint ID Trust Fund. If |

| |approved, this request will result in estimated costs and revenue of $260,000. This request will not require any additional |

| |staff years. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |SHERIFF |

| |Waive Board Policy A-91, Mid-Year Budget Changes. |

| | |

| |In accordance with Section 401 et seq, of the County Administrative Code, authorize the Director of Purchasing and Contracting, |

| |to issue a Competitive Solicitation to acquire forty (40) Mobile ID units for the Sheriff’s Department and the San Diego Police |

| |Department. Upon successful negotiation and determination of a fair and reasonable price, award a contract subject to the |

| |approval of the Sheriff. |

| | |

| |Establish appropriations of $260,000 in the Sheriff’s Department for equipment based on unanticipated revenue from the Sheriff |

| |Fingerprint ID Trust Fund. (4 VOTES) |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|7. |SUBJECT: |SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR THE SOLE SOURCE PROCUREMENT OF ORIGINAL EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURER PARTS |

| | |(DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |The Sheriff’s Facility Services Division provides maintenance support to nine patrol stations, three substations, seven detention|

| |facilities, the crime laboratory and several other support facilities. On a daily basis, the maintenance staff needs to purchase|

| |parts to replace, repair and maintain equipment such as cell door locks, water heaters, security systems and other equipment |

| |critical to the safety of the public, inmates and staff. Many of these parts can only be obtained from the Original Equipment |

| |Manufacturers (OEMs) or their authorized distributors. |

| | |

| |This request is for approval of the sole source procurement of OEM parts for all Sheriff’s facilities from the OEMs or their |

| |authorized distributors. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |Funds for this request are budgeted. The funding source is general purpose revenue. If approved, this request will result in |

| |current year estimated costs of $2,000,000 and estimated annual costs of $2,000,000 and will not require additional staff years. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |SHERIFF |

| |Waive the advertising and competitive procurement requirements of Board Policy A-87. |

| | |

| |In accordance with Board Policy A-87, Competitive Procurement, subject to the determination of a fair and reasonable price, |

| |approve and authorize the Purchasing and Contracting Director to purchase repair or replacement parts from the Original Equipment|

| |Manufacturers or their authorized distributors for all Sheriff’s facilities for a five year period. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|8. |SUBJECT: |SHERIFF’S APPROVAL OF 800 MHz REGIONAL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM (RCS) AGREEMENT WITH SAN DIEGO UNIFIED PORT|

| | |DISTRICT (PORT DISTRICT) (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |At the direction of the Regional Communications System (RCS) Board of Directors, an agreement has been developed to formalize the|

| |use of the RCS network by the San Diego Unified Port District (Port District). The RCS Board of Directors requests approval of |

| |the agreement from the Board of Supervisors. The Port District agrees to make one payment of $1,057,500 for participating in the|

| |RCS and agrees to pay on-going annual network operating costs (NOC) of $68,503 for the remainder of Fiscal Year 2006-2007, and |

| |approximately $74,730 beginning in Fiscal Year 2007-2008. The one-time payment will allow the Port District to add 235 radios to|

| |the network at $4,500 per radio. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |Funds for this request are not included in the Fiscal Year 2006-07 Operational Plan. The funding source is revenue from the San |

| |Diego Unified Port District. If approved, this request will result in one-time revenue of $1,057,500 deposited to the Regional |

| |Communications System (RCS) Trust Fund and annual costs and revenue of $68,503 within the Sheriff’s Department for RCS network |

| |operating costs in Fiscal Year 2006-2007. If approved, this request will not require the addition of staff years. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |SHERIFF |

| |Waive Board Policy A-91, Mid-Year Budget Changes. |

| | |

| |Waive Board Policy B-29, Fees, Grants, Revenue Contracts - Department Responsibility for Cost Recovery. |

| | |

| |Approve and authorize the Clerk of the Board to accept and execute, upon receipt, the agreement between San Diego Unified Port |

| |District and the County of San Diego for use of the Regional Communications System network effective August 1, 2006. |

| | |

| |Establish appropriations of $68,503 in the Sheriff’s Department for the Regional Communications System network maintenance based |

| |on unanticipated revenue from San Diego Unified Port District. (4 VOTES) |

| | |

| |Authorize the deposit of $1,057,500 in the Regional Communications System Trust Fund by the San Diego Unified Port District, to |

| |help offset future network enhancement costs. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|9. |SUBJECT: |BIRD/PANDEMIC FLU RESPONSE – STATUS REPORT (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |One of the most serious public health issues our nation and the world faces is the threat of a global disease outbreak also known|

| |as a pandemic. There is particular concern about the avian influenza referred to as H5N1, currently circulating in Asia and |

| |parts of Europe. If pandemic influenza occurs, it has the potential to cause more death and illness than any other public health|

| |threat. |

| | |

| |Being prepared to respond effectively to a pandemic will involve individuals, communities, businesses, and local, state and |

| |federal agencies. Much is being done to prepare locally for disasters and emergencies in general, and specifically for pandemic |

| |influenza. On December 6, 2005 (1), under the leadership of Supervisor Ron Roberts, your Board received a presentation on |

| |pandemic influenza including local efforts in surveillance and monitoring, preparedness and response with our healthcare and law |

| |enforcement partners, State and federal government roles in emergency preparedness and response, and what the public can do in |

| |anticipation of a pandemic. At that time, we established a number of goals to be accomplished to further our preparedness. |

| |Today’s item provides a status report on San Diego County’s action plan for enhanced preparedness and response to an avian |

| |pandemic event. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |N/A |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Receive the report on Bird/Pandemic Flu Preparedness and Response. |

| |ACTION: |

| |The Board received the report. |

| |

| |

|10. |SUBJECT: |SAN DIEGO HIV PREVENTION COMMUNITY PLANNING BOARD – MEMBER APPOINTMENTS (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |The Board of Supervisors adopted a Resolution on May 9, 1995 (1) establishing the HIV Prevention Community Planning Board. This |

| |planning board is a requirement to ensure that the County of San Diego may receive HIV education and prevention funds from the |

| |State Office of AIDS, which is part of the California Department of Health Services. |

| | |

| |Today’s action recommends appointments and a reappointment to fill vacancies on the HIV Prevention Community Planning Board. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |N/A |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Make the following new appointments to the HIV Prevention Community Planning Board, for terms to begin August 1, 2006 and to |

| |expire July 31, 2009: |

| |Kim Herbstritt |

| |Rose Ochoa |

| |Wayne Rafus |

| |Carl Wolter |

| |Stephanie Young |

| |Francisco Marroquin |

| | |

| |Make the following reappointment to the HIV Prevention Community Planning Board, for a second, three-year term to begin August 1,|

| |2006 and to expire July 31, 2009: |

| | |

| |Patricia McCree |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|11. |SUBJECT: |REQUEST FOR APPROVAL TO CONDUCT SITE SEARCH FOR OFFICE AND WAREHOUSE SPACE (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |The Department of Purchasing and Contracting is the primary tenant of Building 11 at the County Operations Center and occupies |

| |approximately 51,780 square feet of warehouse and office space in and near the building. A recent space study conducted by the |

| |Department of General Services has validated a 59,930-square-foot need for this department over the next five years. |

| |Additionally, the Health and Human Services Agency, Farm and Home Advisor, District Attorney, and Sheriff use approximately |

| |29,300 square feet of Building 11 warehouse space. |

| | |

| |In anticipation of constructing a new office building for the Medical Examiner at the County Operations Center, which will |

| |include demolishing Building 11, the Board of Supervisors is requested to authorize the Director, Department of General Services,|

| |to conduct a site search for approximately 86,230 square feet of replacement facilities. Staff anticipates returning to your |

| |Board with a report and recommendations within 150 to 180 days. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |Funds for this proposal are not included in the CAO’s Approved Operational Plan for Fiscal Year 2006-07 for the Department of |

| |Purchasing and Contracting and three other County departments (Health and Human Services Agency, Farm and Home Advisor, and |

| |Sheriff). The projected relocation and net lease costs will be determined and included in the report and recommendations to be |

| |made to your Board. No additional staff years are required. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Find that the proposed action is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Article 5, Section |

| |15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, because it is not a project as defined by Section 15378. |

| | |

| |Authorize the Director, Department of General Services to conduct a search for office and warehouse facilities suitable to house |

| |the Department of Purchasing and Contracting and warehouse space for other County departments, and return to the Board of |

| |Supervisors with a report and recommendations within 150 to 180 days. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|12. |SUBJECT: |DECLARATION OF ELECTION RESULTS – JUNE 6, 2006 PRIMARY ELECTION (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |State law (Elections Code Sec. 15400) requires that the Board of Supervisors declare the election results for those offices and |

| |measures under its jurisdiction. |

| | |

| |Additionally, State law (Elections Code Secs. 7228, 7423, and 7772) requires that the Board of Supervisors declare elected the |

| |candidates who have been nominated to County Central Committees/County Councils when the number of nominees for a position did |

| |not exceed the number of candidates to be elected and, therefore, in accordance with the law, the names were not printed on the |

| |ballot. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |If approved, this request will result in no additional County cost and the addition of no staff years. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Adopt the Resolution declaring the results of the June 6, 2006 Primary Election relating to the offices of the Board of |

| |Supervisors – Districts 4 and 5, Assessor/Recorder/County Clerk, San Diego County District Attorney, Sheriff, and Treasurer/Tax |

| |Collector, and the results of Propositions A and B. |

| | |

| |Adopt the Resolution declaring the election of specified Democratic, Republican, and Peace & Freedom County Central Committee and|

| |Green County Council members. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent, adopting |

| |Resolution No. 06-127 entitled: DECLARATION OF RESULTS OF THE JUNE 6, 2006 PRIMARY ELECTION RELATING TO COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO |

| |OFFICES AND MEASURES and Resolution No. 06-128 entitled: DECLARATION OF ELECTION TO SAN DIEGO COUNTY CENTRAL COMMITTEES/COUNTY |

| |COUNCILS RELATING TO THE JUNE 6, 2006 PRIMARY ELECTION. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|13. |SUBJECT: |SUPPORT FOR THE BIPARTISAN PUBLIC WORKS BOND PACKAGE, NOVEMBER 2006 (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |Four ballot measures have been placed on the November 2006 ballot as part of a bipartisan public works bond package. A fifth |

| |proposition, 1A will severely limit the State’s ability to divert gasoline tax funds for non-transportation based projects. |

| |These five propositions, numbered by the Secretary of State at the direction of the Legislature as proposition 1A, 1B, 1C, 1D, |

| |and 1E, have received overwhelming bipartisan support from both the California State Legislature and Governor Arnold |

| |Schwarzenegger. |

| | |

| |Proposition 1B, authored by Senator Perata (SB 1266), is a $19.9 billion bond that will pay for road repairs and expansions, |

| |repair bridges, expand public transportation networks and improve security at California’s ports. Proposition 1C, also authored |

| |by Senator Perata (SB 1689), is a $2.85 billion bond that will pay for affordable-housing assistance, and local government |

| |infrastructure projects that will help facilitate the development of additional affordable housing. Proposition 1D, authored by |

| |California State Assembly Speaker Nunez (AB 127), would allow the State to issue $10.4 billion in bonds to help our local schools|

| |tackle the problem of school overcrowding. Proposition 1E, also authored by California State Assembly Speaker Nunez (AB 140), |

| |would allow the State to issue $4.09 billion in bonds that would pay for levee repairs and improvements, upgrade flood protection|

| |for urban areas, improve emergency response capabilities, and provide grants for stormwater flood management projects. All four |

| |measures have received strong support from business and labor leaders throughout the state. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |There are no fiscal impacts associated with today’s action. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |SUPERVISOR COX |

| |Adopt a resolution entitled: |

| |Resolution of the San Diego County Board of Supervisors supporting Propositions 1A, 1B, 1C, 1D, and 1E on the November 2006 |

| |general election ballot. |

| |Direct the Chief Administrative Officer to draft a letter for the Chairman’s signature, to the Governor and respective authors of|

| |the propositions expressing the San Diego County Board of Supervisors strong support for Propositions 1A, 1B, 1C, 1D, and 1E. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Roberts, seconded by Supervisor Horn, the Board of Supervisors: |

| | |

| |Approved support for Proposition 1A, adopting Resolution No. 06-129 entitled: RESOLUTION OF THE SAN DIEGO Board of supervisors |

| |supporting proposition 1a ON THE NOVEMBER 2006 GENERAL ELECTION BALLOT; |

| | |

| |Directed the Chief Administrative Officer to draft a letter for the Chairman’s signature, to the Governor and respective authors |

| |of the propositions expressing the San Diego County Board of Supervisors strong support for Propositions 1A; and |

| | |

| |Referred Propositions 1B, 1C, 1D, and 1E to the Chief Administrative Officer for further study. |

| | |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|14. |SUBJECT: |SUPPORT FOR AB 17 (KORETZ) UNIVERSAL WASTE (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |Assembly Bill 17 (Koretz) requires the California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB) in coordination with the DTSC, to |

| |develop an action plan that will assist state and local governments in handling universal waste. The legislation also requires |

| |the CIWMB to propose funding mechanisms in the plan for State and local universal waste collection and recycling programs. CIWMB |

| |would be required to submit the action plan to the Legislature by January 1, 2008. |

| | |

| |Today’s recommendations put San Diego County on record in support of Assembly Bill 17 and authorizes the County’s Sacramento |

| |Representative to convey the County’s support of Assembly Bill 17 to appropriate members of the Legislature and the Governor’s |

| |administration. I am also recommending that this Board direct the CAO, once AB 17 is signed, to work with State agencies to |

| |ensure that the action plan submitted to the Legislature subsequent to this legislation supports and enhances San Diego County’s |

| |local universal waste collection and outreach activities. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |There are no fiscal impacts associated with today’s action. |

| | |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |SUPERVISOR COX |

| |Direct the Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) to draft a letter for the Chairman’s signature to Assembly member Koretz and all |

| |members of San Diego County’s State Senate and Assembly delegation supporting Assembly Bill 17 and authorize the County’s |

| |Sacramento Representative to convey the County’s strong support of Assembly Bill 17 to appropriate members of the State |

| |Legislature and the Governor’s administration. |

| |Direct the Chief Administrative Officer, once AB 17 is signed, to work with the Department of Toxic Substances Control and the |

| |Integrated Waste Management Board to ensure that the action plan submitted to the State Legislature subsequent to this |

| |legislation supports and enhances our local universal waste collection and outreach activities. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|15. |SUBJECT: |LOCAL COMMUNITY PROJECTS (DISTRICT 1) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |The County of San Diego is fortunate to have an opportunity to reinvest taxpayer money into our communities for the benefit of |

| |the public. This action will assist the County in meeting the needs of individuals and families. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |The fiscal impact of the proposed recommendations is $31,960.00. These actions will result in the addition of no staff years and|

| |no future costs. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |SUPERVISOR COX |

| |Allocate $10,600 from the Community Projects budget (Org 15650) to Barrio Station for the purchase of furniture and equipment for|

| |the Barrio Youth Center. |

| | |

| |Allocate $1,360 from Community Projects budget (Org 15650) to the San Diego County Employees Charitable Organization (CECO) for |

| |equipment, supplies, printing and postage costs associated with the CECO 50th Anniversary Celebration in September, 2006. |

| | |

| |Allocate $20,000 from the Community Projects budget (Org 15650) to the San Diego County Hispanic Chamber of Commerce for IT |

| |equipment, furniture, and facility improvements at their new offices at 1250 Sixth Avenue, Suite 1200, San Diego 92101. |

| | |

| |Find that the grant awards described above have a public purpose. |

| | |

| |Authorize the Chief Financial Officer to execute grant agreements with the organizations listed in recommendations 1 through 3, |

| |establishing terms for the receipt of the funds described above. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|16. |SUBJECT: |ADOPTION OF FINAL FISCAL YEAR 2006-07 BUDGET FOR THE COUNTY SERVICE AREAS, MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS, AND |

| | |PERMANENT ROAD DIVISIONS (DISTRICTS: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |Pursuant to California Government Code Section 29088, this request proposes the adoption of the final budget for the County |

| |Service Areas, Maintenance Districts, and Permanent Road Divisions. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |The recommended action provides spending authority of $12,140,058 for the Service Areas, $3,810,136 for the Maintenance |

| |Districts, and $4,925,495 for the Permanent Road Divisions for Fiscal Year 2006-07. In addition, the recommendation approves |

| |reserve designation increases of $165,200 in various Districts for FY 2006-07. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Approve a resolution adopting the final budget and funding for Fiscal Year 2006-07 for the County Service Areas, Maintenance |

| |Districts, and Permanent Road Divisions. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent, adopting |

| |Resolution No. 06-130 entitled: ADOPTION OF THE FINAL BUDGET FOR CERTAIN MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS, COUNTY SERVICE AREAS, PERMANENT |

| |ROAD DIVISIONS, AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 2006. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|17. |SUBJECT: |COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO FISCAL YEAR 2006-07 FINAL BUDGET RESOLUTION FOR FAMILY OF FUNDS, ENTERPRISE FUNDS |

| | |AND INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS, PRIOR YEAR ENCUMBRANCES, AND PENALTY ASSESSMENT RESOLUTION (DISTRICTS: ALL)|

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |On June 20, 2006 (16), your Board approved the Operational Plan for Fiscal Years 2006-07 and 2007-08 and on July 18, 2006 (12) |

| |approved a clarification regarding the Approved Operational Plan. Pursuant to California Government Section 29088, a resolution |

| |is submitted for formal adoption of the final budgets and funding for Fiscal Year 2006-07 for the County Family of Funds, |

| |Enterprise Funds and Internal Service Funds. |

| | |

| |Also requested is authority to carry forward prior year encumbrances and related funding and approval of a second resolution is |

| |submitted to allocate penalty assessment revenues for Fiscal Year 2006-07. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |Recommendation 1 provides spending authority of $3,959,721,465 for the County Family of Funds for Fiscal Year 2006-07 and |

| |approves a reserve designation increase of $1,200,000 in the General Fund for the Registrar of Voters. Recommendation 1 also |

| |provides spending authority of $17,762,219 for the Enterprise Funds and $319,594,254 for the Internal Service Funds. |

| |Recommendation 2 authorizes the Auditor to carryover appropriations and any related revenues for prior year encumbrances. |

| |Recommendation 3 allocates Penalty Assessment Revenue to two funds: the County Emergency Medical Services Fund $3,264,686 and the|

| |County Justice Facilities Construction Fund $10,092,672. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Approve a resolution adopting the final budget for the County Family of Funds for Fiscal Year 2006-07 and the Spending Plans for |

| |Fiscal Year 2006-07 for the Enterprise and Internal Service Funds. |

| | |

| |Authorize the Auditor and Controller to carry forward appropriations and applicable estimated revenue for prior year encumbrances|

| |in all County funds. |

| | |

| |Approve a resolution adopting the allocation of penalty assessment revenues expected to be received in Fiscal Year 2006-07. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent, adopting |

| |Resolution No. 06-131 entitled: ADOPTION OF THE FINAL BUDGET FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO INCLUDING THE COUNTY LIBRARY FOR THE |

| |FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 2006, and Resolution No. 06-132 entitled: RESOLUTION FOR ALLOCATION OF ADDITIONAL PENALTIES |

| |AUTHORIZED BY GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 76000. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|18. |SUBJECT: |FIXING COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT AND SPECIAL DISTRICT TAX RATES AND LEVYING TAXES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2006/07 |

| | |(DISTRICTS: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |This is a request to set the annual tax rates for voter-approved debt for all taxing agencies in the County of San Diego and the |

| |1% full value countywide tax rate. |

| |The Board, pursuant to Government Code Section 29100, is to fix the rates of taxes on the Secured Property Tax Roll. Government |

| |Code Section 29101 requires that as an integral part of fixing the tax rates, the Board shall levy the taxes upon the taxable |

| |property of the County. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |This action will provide tax rates for the agencies to produce property tax revenue to satisfy legally incurred debt |

| |requirements. |

| | |

| |The attached property tax rates are essential to the provision of a considerable portion of the revenue required in the operation|

| |of the County and other local governmental agencies for the Fiscal Year 2006/07. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Adopt the final form of resolution incorporating the various rates as computed by the Auditor and Controller for Fiscal Year |

| |2006/07. |

| |ACTION: |

| |Accepting a revision to Attachment A of the Resolution, ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board |

| |took action as recommended, on Consent, adopting Resolution No. 06-133 entitled: RESOLUTION REGARDING THE FIXING AND LEVYING OF |

| |THE TAX RATES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 2006. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|19. |SUBJECT: |AMENDMENT TO THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE REGARDING THE AUTOMOBILE ALLOWANCE (DISTRICTS: |

| | |ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |The County’s automobile allowance rates have not been adjusted since 1991. During the past 15 years, the costs associated with |

| |automobile use have skyrocketed. These increased costs are especially the case with regard to the price of gasoline in San Diego|

| |County and the price of an automobile (see background section). The costs associated with insurance, as well as vehicle |

| |maintenance also have increased over the past 15 years, such as tire and brake replacement. Given these factors, it is |

| |appropriate to update the County’s automobile allowance rates to reflect the increased costs associated with automobile use |

| |today. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |VICE CHAIRMAN ROBERTS |

| |Approve the introduction (first reading) of an ordinance; read title and waive further reading of the ordinance: |

| | |

| |AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SAN DIEGO COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTION 496 RELATING TO THE AUTOMOBILE ALLOWANCE |

| | |

| |Submit the ordinance for further Board consideration and adoption (second reading) on September 19, 2006. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent, introducing |

| |Ordinance for further Board consideration and adoption on September 19, 2006. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|20. |SUBJECT: |COMMUNICATIONS RECEIVED (DISTRICTS: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |Board Policy A-72, Board of Supervisors Agenda and Related Process, authorizes the Clerk of the Board to prepare a Communications|

| |Received for Board of Supervisors' Official Records. Routine informational reports, which need to be brought to the attention of|

| |the Board of Supervisors yet not requiring action, are listed on this document. Communications Received documents are on file in|

| |the Office of the Clerk of the Board. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |Not Applicable. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER: |

| |Note and file. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|21. |SUBJECT: |ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: |

| | |SECOND CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE: AMENDMENT TO THE COMPENSATION ORDINANCE (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |On July 18, 2006 (14), the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended and introduced Ordinance for further Board |

| |consideration and adoption on August 1, 2006. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Adopt Ordinance entitled: |

| | |

| |AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COMPENSATION ORDINANCE AND ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent, adopting Ordinance|

| |No. 9792 entitled: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COMPENSATION ORDINANCE AND ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|22. |SUBJECT: |ALLOCATION OF COMMUNITY PROJECTS FUNDS (DISTRICT: 5) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |Community Projects Funding assists non-profit organizations in providing essential services to citizens of San Diego County. |

| |Reinvesting taxpayer money in worthwhile organizations is a benefit to the citizens and communities of North County. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |N/A |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHAIRMAN HORN |

| |Find that the allocations to the Reche Community Club, Camp Fire USA, Rancho Santa Fe Seniors, and Valley Center Parks and |

| |Recreation District are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15301, |

| |that the allocation to Fallbrook Historical Society is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15303 and that the |

| |allocation to the Warner Springs Estates Association is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15304. |

| |Allocate $6,000.00 from Community Projects Budget (15670) to the Reche Community Club to pave a driveway and parking area for the|

| |historical one-room schoolhouse in Fallbrook. |

| |Allocate $17,500.00 from Community Projects Budget (15670) to the City of Vista to cover the costs of new computers and a golf |

| |cart for its senior center. |

| |Allocate $80,000.00 from Community Projects Budget (15670) to Mainly Mozart to cover the costs of the Mainly Mozart Spotlight |

| |Series 2007 events, a District-Wide Educational Program, and a public benefit concert. |

| |Allocate $10,000.00 from Community Projects Budget (15670) to Camp Fire USA to cover the cost of one or more of the following |

| |improvements: paving a driveway, building a retaining wall, tree removal, drainage improvements, fencing, window replacement, |

| |floor covering, and painting at the NoCaBa Center in Oceanside. |

| |Allocate $15,000.00 from Community Projects Budget (15670) to Community Housing Works to purchase new computers and software for |

| |three of their learning centers. |

| |Allocate $5,000.00 from Community Projects Budget (15670) to North County Serenity House for marketing and signage at their |

| |annual gala. |

| |Allocate $50,000.00 from Community Projects Budget (15670) to the Fallbrook Historical Society for the construction of a new barn|

| |to house historical exhibits. |

| |Allocate $25,000.00 from Community Projects Budget (15670) to Rancho Santa Fe Seniors, Inc. for walkway improvements at the |

| |senior center in Rancho Santa Fe. |

| |Allocate $10,549.00 from Community Projects Budget (15670) to the Ranchita Volunteer Fire Department for a new gurney. |

| |Allocate $5,000.00 from Community Projects Budget (15670) to Classics for Kids for development of a musical education program for|

| |2nd grade students. |

| | |

| |Allocate $15,000.00 from Community Projects Budget (15670) to the Fallbrook Beautification Alliance for outstanding costs for |

| |fireworks and musical entertainment associated with Fallbrook’s 2006 Grand Tradition 4th of July event. |

| |Allocate $15,000.00 from Community Projects Budget (15670) to Warner Springs Estates Homeowners Association to clear |

| |approximately 12 acres of brush at Stone Ridge Estates in Sunshine Summit for fire prevention. |

| |Authorize Welcome Home Ministries to spend $12,112.00 in previously allocated Community Project Funds to renovate its two |

| |trailers. |

| |Authorize Valley Center Parks and Recreation District to spend $10,606.72 in previously allocated Community Project Funds to |

| |re-seed the Junior Sports Field near Lilac Road, and to purchase a lawnmower and softball field groundcover for the Girls |

| |Softball Field at the same site. |

| |Rescind the May 16, 2006 allocation of $2,000.00 from Community Projects Budget (15670) to the Miss Vista Scholarship Pageant, |

| |and reallocate this $2,000.00 to the Vista Optimist Foundation to cover the cost of the 2006 Miss Vista Scholarship Pageant. |

| |Authorize the Chief Financial Officer to execute a grant agreement with the organizations listed Recommendations 2 through 13 and|

| |16 to establish terms for receipt of the funds as described above. |

| |Authorize the Chief Financial Officer to amend the grant agreements with Welcome Home Ministries and Valley Center Parks and |

| |Recreation District to change the purpose of the grants as described in Recommendations 14 and 15. |

| |Find that these grant awards have a public purpose. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|23. |SUBJECT: |PROVIDING HEALTHY CHOICES IN COUNTY VENDING MACHINES (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |Childhood obesity has reached epidemic proportions. Obesity causes extensive health consequences and results in significant |

| |financial implications to individuals and taxpayers. |

| |A Call to Action: San Diego County Childhood Obesity Action Plan was developed using an ecological model for promotion of health.|

| |This concept holds that a supportive environment is helpful for individuals to make behavioral changes. This proposal recommends|

| |a change in the County’s vending machine environment to positively impact the choices of individuals who visit our facilities. |

| |A key strategy of the Action Plan includes providing healthy choices in vending machines. High-calorie soda and low-nutrition |

| |snack foods contribute to obesity. At the same time, low-nutrition snack foods displace healthier options in vending machines. |

| |The County of San Diego must continue to take a lead role in setting an example for the community by increasing healthy choice |

| |options in vending machines at our public facilities. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |There is no fiscal impact associated with this request. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |VICE CHAIRMAN ROBERTS AND SUPERVISOR SLATER-PRICE |

| |Direct the Chief Administrative Officer to develop nutritional guidelines that can be incorporated in a policy for all county |

| |vending machine contracts and use the County Department of Park & Recreation’s Vending Machine Content Policy C-36 as a model. |

| |Include in the policy a provision that vending machines located at county facilities that primarily serve youth (i.e. juvenile |

| |hall) have 100 percent of products in compliance with the nutritional guidelines and those at other county facilities have 50 |

| |percent compliance. |

| |Implement this policy as contracts come up for renewal. |

| |Report back to the board within 90 days with a recommendation. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|24. |SUBJECT: |LOCAL COMMUNITY PROJECTS GRANTS (DISTRICT: 3) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |Funding for the Community Projects Grant program was included in the fiscal year 2006-2007 adopted budget in order to further |

| |public purposes throughout the County. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |The current year total combined cost of these 13 projects is $632,000. The funding source is the Community Projects Budget (org |

| |0263). This will result in the addition of no staff years and no future year costs. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |SUPERVISOR SLATER-PRICE |

| |Allocate $94,500 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to the Boys and Girls Clubs of San Dieguito for the purchase|

| |of games and arts and craft supplies for the Del Mar Branch ($2,300); an air conditioning unit for the computer lab and research |

| |center at the Griset Branch ($6,300); front lobby refurbishments and upgrades at the Barbara Harper Branch ($75,000); and |

| |materials to expand K-12 educational programs at the Polster Branch ($10,900). |

| |Allocate $5,000 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to the Kiwanis Club of Tierrasanta to assist with costs |

| |associated with purchasing fireworks for their Tierrafest and Oktoberfest events. |

| |Allocate $2,500 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to the San Dieguito Alliance for a Drug Free Youth to assist |

| |with “Project Yo.” |

| |Allocate $2,500 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to Rancho Bernardo Community Foundation to assist with costs |

| |associated with putting on their annual Thanksgiving Luncheon. |

| |Allocate $3,000 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to the Frontier Army of the Old West to assist with costs |

| |associated with putting on “The Raid on Rancho Penasquitos” event. |

| |Allocate $5,000 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to the Encinitas Historical Society to assist with costs |

| |associated with cataloging and archiving their inventory and placing it on the internet. |

| |Allocate $2,500 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to the Cardiff Chamber of Commerce to assist with costs |

| |associated with putting on the “Dog Days of Summer” event. |

| |Allocate $1,500 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to Hometown Efforts to Rescue our Endangered Society (HEROS) |

| |to assist with the purchase of maintenance equipment, such as a lawnmower, rakes and brooms. |

| |Allocate $7,000 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to 101 Artist’s Colony for promotional materials, including |

| |brochures and flyers, as well as web site redesign. |

| |Allocate $5,000 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to San Diego Civic Youth Ballet to assist with this season’s |

| |promotion and marketing campaign. |

| |Allocate $3,500 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to Artsplash to assist with educational outreach in |

| |Encinitas. |

| |Allocate $300,000 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to the Old Globe Theatre to assist with theatre productions|

| |and educational and community outreach programs. |

| |Allocate $200,000 from the Community Projects Grant Budget (org 0263) to the Lux Art Institute as a matching grant for costs |

| |associated with the construction of the Artist Pavilion building at 1550 South El Camino Real in Encinitas. |

| |Authorize the Chief Financial Officer to execute grant agreements with these organizations establishing terms for receipt of the |

| |funds described above. |

| |Find that all grant awards described above have a public purpose. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|25. |SUBJECT: |SUPPORT FOR ASSEMBLY BILL AB 2276 (PAVLEY): ALLOWING CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD TO REGULATE INDOOR |

| | |OZONE EMISSIONS (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |This will allow the California Air Resources Board (ARB) to develop and adopt regulations to reduce emission of ozone from indoor|

| |air cleaning devices. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |There are no fiscal impacts associated with this recommendation |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |VICE CHAIRMAN ROBERTS |

| |Direct the Chief Administrative Officer to authorize the County’s legislative representatives to convey the County’s support for |

| |Assembly Bill 2276. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|26. |SUBJECT: |LEASE AGREEMENT WITH THE JULIAN HISTORICAL SOCIETY AT JULIAN PIONEER PARK FOR A TRANSPORTATION MUSEUM |

| | |(DISTRICT: 2) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |The Julian Historical Society has been working on the development and enhancement of a 1.5-acre parcel of San Diego County Parks |

| |and Recreation property within the Julian Historic District, known as Julian Pioneer Park, to enable local residents and tourists|

| |to celebrate Julian’s history, since 1996. In that time, the Society secured Park Land Development Ordinance funding and a |

| |Community Enhancement grant and constructed a Transportation Museum. The park is now complete and has been accepted by the |

| |Department of Parks and Recreation. |

| | |

| |The Board is requested to authorize the execution of a no-rent, two-year lease for the museum building with the Julian Historical|

| |Society, with rights to extend the lease for up to 10 years thereafter. The Society will lease the building from the County for |

| |the display of restored antique vehicles. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |No funding or staff years are required for this proposal. Utilities and custodial services at the newly constructed building will|

| |be the responsibility of the Society and the minimal maintenance required will be provided by the Society up to $2,000 per year |

| |per repair. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Find, in accordance with Section 15302 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, that the proposed lease is |

| |categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA as it is the lease of a new, small structure not exceeding 2,500 square feet in |

| |size. |

| |Waive Board Policy F-51 pertaining to Department of General Services' responsibility for revenue leasing of County real property.|

| |Approve and authorize the Director of the Department of General Services to execute four copies of the lease agreement. (4 |

| |VOTES) |

| |Authorize the Director of the Department of General Services to exercise the options to extend the lease prior to its |

| |expiration, if appropriate. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|27. |SUBJECT: |ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: |

| | |APPOINTMENTS (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |These appointments are in accordance with applicable Board Policy A–74, Citizen Participation in County Boards, Commissions and |

| |Committees, and Board Policy A-134, Procedures for Appointments to Resource Conservation District Boards of Directors. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |N/A |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHAIRMAN HORN |

| |Reappoint Nadine Scott to the Resource Conservation District of Greater San Diego County for a term to expire November 30, 2010. |

| |SUPERVISOR JACOB |

| |Reappoint Harold Hilliker to the Resource Conservation District of Greater San Diego County for a term to expire November 30, |

| |2010. |

| |SUPERVISOR SLATER-PRICE |

| |Reappoint Teresa Barth to the Resource Conservation District of Greater San Diego County for a term to expire November 30, 2010. |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Appoint Lt. Sherri Sarro to the Emergency Medical Care Committee for a term to expire January 11, 2008. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board took action as recommended, on Consent. |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|28. |SUBJECT: |CLOSED SESSION (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION |

| |Initiation of litigation pursuant to subdivision (c) of Government Code section 54956.9: (Number of Cases – 1) |

| |B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION |

| |Initiation of litigation pursuant to subdivision (c) of Government Code section 54956.9: (Number of Cases – 1) |

| |C. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION |

| |Subdivision (a) of Government Code section 54956.9) |

| |County of San Diego v. Elmo D. Webb, et al.; San Diego County Superior Court No. GIN 041749-1 |

| |D. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION |

| |(Subdivision (a) of Government Code section 54956.9) |

| |Renee Alford, et al. v. County of San Diego, et al.; San Diego County Superior Court No. GIC 841583 |

| |E. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION |

| |(Subdivision (a) of Government Code section 54956.9) |

| |James Tewksbury v. County of San Diego, et al.; San Diego County Superior Court No. GIC 856858 |

| |F. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION |

| |Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to subdivision (b) of Government Code section 54956.9: (Number of Potential Cases – |

| |1) |

| |G. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS |

| |(Government Code section 54957.6) |

| |Designated Representatives: Carlos Arauz and Susan Brazeau |

| |Employee Organizations: Deputy District Attorney Association |

| |H. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION |

| |(Government Code section 54957) |

| |Title: Chief Administrative Officer |

| |ACTION: |

| |Any other reportable matters will be announced on Wednesday, August 2, 2006, prior to the Board of Supervisors meeting. |

| |

| |

|29. |SUBJECT: |PRESENTATIONS/AWARDS |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |Vice Chairman Roberts presented a proclamation declaring today Deborah Horwitz Day throughout San Diego County. |

| | |

| |Supervisor Cox presented a proclamation declaring August 2-11, 2006 National Community Health Centers Week throughout San Diego |

| |County. |

| | |

| |Supervisor Jacob presented a proclamation declaring today the Valhalla High School’s Varsity Baseball Team Day throughout San |

| |Diego County. |

| |

| |

|30. |SUBJECT: |PUBLIC COMMUNICATION |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |John VanDoorn spoke before the Board regarding Department of Children’s Welfare. |

| | |

| |Harry Crouch spoke before the Board regarding San Diego Men’s Center. |

| |ACTION: |

| |Heard, referred to the Chief Administrative Officer. |

| |

| |

| |

There being no further business, the Board adjourned at 12:00 p.m. in memory of Jane Baker; Madeline Goldberg; Norma Rae Lonergan; Robert Sjogren; Anastasia Weil; and Mark and Shelly Gordon.

THOMAS J. PASTUSZKA

Clerk of the Board of Supervisors

County of San Diego, State of California

Consent: Vizcarra

Discussion: Hall

NOTE: This Statement of Proceedings sets forth all actions taken by the County of San Diego Board of Supervisors on the matters stated, but not necessarily the chronological sequence in which the matters were taken up.

................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download