Motion for Remand.12.23.08 (T0066988).DOC

Tapscott v. MS Dealer Service Company, 77 F.3d 1353, 1356 (11th Cir. 1996), abrogated on other grounds. Accordingly, the district court is required to resolve all doubts about federal jurisdiction in favor of remand. Id. The court’s removal jurisdiction must be strictly construed. Burns v. Windsor Insurance Company, 31 F.3d 1092, 1095 (11th ... ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.