ASN Systematic Evaluation Plan - Cox College

ASN Systematic Evaluation Plan

STANDARD 6: Outcomes Program evaluation demonstrates that students and graduates have achieved the student learning outcomes, program outcomes, and role-specific graduate competencies of the nursing education unit.

Criteria 6.1 The systematic plan for evaluation of the nursing education unit emphasizes the ongoing assessment and evaluation of each of the following: ? Student learning outcomes; ? Program outcomes; ? Role-specific graduate competencies; and ? The ACEN Standards.

The systematic plan of evaluation contains specific, measurable expected levels of achievement; appropriate assessment methods; and a minimum of three (3) years of data for each component within the plan.

Planning

Goal The systematic plan of evaluation contains specific, measurable expected levels of achievement; appropriate assessment methods; and a minimum of three (3) years of data for each component within the plan.

Frequency Every 3 years

Evidence of Goal Achievement Measurable outcomes collected over 3 years for criterion 1-5

Results of Data

Implementation and Evaluation

UND Evaluation team Meeting

Minutes

Action Plan

Date

Although data has been collected on an ongoing basis, this is the first year (2015-2016) of a formal SEP review. The evaluation of this outcome will be ongoing.

11/30/15 eval Ongoing review of data

team minutes

Action Plan: Redesign following evaluation tools

..\2015-

1. Graduate satisfaction survey tool for 6 and 12 months after

2016\Minutes and attachments\Nove mber 30 2015 minutes and attachments\Evalu ation Team

graduation (qualitative and quantitative) 2. Program Completion Survey 3. Employer satisfaction survey at 6 and 12 months after

graduation--both qualitative and quantitative 4. Evaluation of students and faculty by clinical site representatives

minutes 11 30

5. Evaluation of clinical sites by students related to program

15.docx

outcomes

ASN Systematic Evaluation Plan

Pending data ? Planned distribution of tools 5/2016.

Student Evaluation of clinical Experience ASN ..\2016 Newly Approved Evaluation Tools\Student Evaluation of Clinical Experience--ASN--Approved 2-1-16 UND.docx

Eval team minutes

4/25/16

Tool: Evaluation of clinical sites by students - Approved by UGN

..\2015-

meeting. Distribution by course coordinators to be dispersed 5/2016.

2016\Minutes and

attachments\April

25

2016\Evaluation

Team minutes

April 25 2016.docx

Pending data ? Continuing revision of tools. Evaluation of student and faculty by clinical sites tools approved.

..\2016 Newly Approved Evaluation Tools\Staff nurse Evaluation of Faculty--Undergrad_Final 8-1-2016.docx

..\2016 Newly Approved Evaluation Tools\Staff nurse evaluation of student--Undergrad--Final 8-1-2016.docx

Eval team minutes Continue on revising survey tool with recommended plan to go to UND in

4/25/16

May.

Final approval of Final approval of tools via e-mail vote.

tools UND

8/10/2016

Action plan: Need to identify how distributed and where noted.

..\..\Undergraduat

e

Nursing\Approved

Minutes\8.10.2016

meeting.docx

Undergraduate Nursing approved the following revised tool.

9/22/16 Eval team Tool approved. Beginning Dec. 2016 Program Coordinators will send out

minutes

Program Completion survey & 1 year graduate Survey each Dec. and

1 Year Graduate Nursing Survey approved

May.

..\2016 Newly Approved Evaluation Tools\1 Year Graduate Nurse ..\2016-

Survey COMBINED.doc

2017\Minutes and

attachments\Evalu

Program Completion Survey approved

ation Team

..\2016 Newly Approved Evaluation Tools\ASN Program Completion minutes Sept 22

Survey.docx

2016.docx

ASN Systematic Evaluation Plan

Minutes note follow-up questions and answers per Amy Townsend regarding evaluations process. Discussion noted in minutes

10/27/16

Continue to monitor

..\2016-

2017\Minutes and

attachments\Evalu

ation Team

minutes Oct 27

2016.docx

Discussion regarding how to improve survey response rate.

12/1/2016 Eval Continue to collect and tabulate data.

team minutes

..\2016-

Recommendations for completion of surveys:

Fall 2016 Clinical site evaluations from staff to evaluate faculty and 2017\Minutes and 1. Have capstone/final professor collect this data or facilitate

students distributed with 20 returned already. Data to be tabulated and attachments\Evalu

survey completion.

presented in future meeting.

ation Team

2. Encourage capstone/final professor to give "heads up" to

minutes Dec 1

students that surveys are coming.

2016.docx

Continuing to review eval tools, reviewing SEP and discussion on how to enter data into the SEP for tracking.

1/30/2017 Eval Continue to review, refine and monitor

team

Action Plan:

..\2016-

? Chair and Program Coordinators will clarify and communicate

2017\Minutes and

process of distribution and dates surveys are sent out.

attachments\Evalu

ation Team

minutes Jan 30

2017.docx

3/27/17 Eval min ..\20162017\Minutes and attachments\Evalu ation Team minutes March 27 2017.docx

ASN Systematic Evaluation Plan

With review of the new SEP program outcomes, it was identified that 2/6/2017 UND Action Plan: For transitioning data collection with old curriculum plan

one item for evidence of goal achievement is to be tied to the new minutes

prior to new curriculum implementation.

Learning Management System (LMS). Full utilization of the LMS is not

Summary from UND 2/6/2017:

yet implemented and program outcome data not available. Discussion ..\..\Undergraduat ? Support courses--Must have at least one assignment that ties to

in UND meeting regarding plan and process of how to measure programe

program outcomes. If no other assignment is applicable, use the

outcomes with attaching course assignment in CANVAS (LMS).

Nursing\Approved final exam. ON the final exam, label each question according to the

Minutes\2.6.17

appropriate program outcome that it measures (i.e. decision making,

Meeting

discovery, etc.,). Then, on the item analysis, for whatever outcome

minutes.docx

you are measuring, add the percentages that got it correct for every

question that measures that outcome and then divide by the

"n". Use this as the percentage able to .....whatever outcome you

are measuring. Support courses should address at least 2 of the

program outcomes and should let the curriculum team know which

outcomes your course is measuring so they can be sure that all

outcomes are being addressed.

? Major clinical courses--Each course should have at least 3-4

tools/assignments that tie to program outcomes. These can include

the final exam if desired although that is not a requirement. Again,

each course coordinator should let the curriculum team know which

outcomes they are measuring in their course.

? Amy Townsend will pull all data off of Canvas at the end of each

semester as requested.

? The above should be implemented Spring 2017 semester with at

least one item for support courses and at least 2 for major clinical

4/2017 Follow up on Process of communication and distribution of 4/2017 Eval min Actiocnou?rismesplweimthenaltl aatstsaecshsemdepnltasnt.o be fully implemented by fall.

surveys.

Minutes

Document made by Program Chair and Coordinators for:

..\2016-

"Creating and sending surveys 101 for Cox College Program

"Creating and sending surveys 101 for Cox College Program 2017\Minutes and Coordinators"

Coordinators"

attachments\Eval

..\..\..\Program Coordinators\Creating and Sending Surveys

uation Team

101 for Cox College Program Coordinators.docx

minutes April 10

2017.docx

ASN Systematic Evaluation Plan

3/2017 Review of data from 2016 revised tool "Student Evaluation of Clinical Site Experience" first implemented Fall 2016 shows a couple of the items do not link back to the program competencies that the student should be able to achieve.

4/2017 UGN

4/2/17 Recommendation to UND for revision to the "Student Evaluation

minutes

of Clinical Site Experience" tool to make verbiage more congruent with

..\..\Undergraduat program competencies.

e

ASN Revised tool approved 4/2/2017

Nursing\Approved

..\2016 Newly Approved Evaluation Tools\Student Evaluation

Minutes\4.3.17

of Clinical Experience--ASN-Approved 4 2 2017.docx

Meeting

BSN Revised tool approved 4/2/2017

minutes.docx

..\2016 Newly Approved Evaluation Tools\Student Evaluation

of Clinical Experience--BSN--Approved 4 2 2017.docx

4/2017 ? Outstanding times to roll into Fall 2017 Semester Items in Red font are Evaluation team outstanding Agenda items to roll into the Fall 2017 Semester. Also includes:

? Faculty Evaluation of clinical sites/experiences ? Course Evaluation by Students ? Possible identification of additional items

Fall 2017

? Faculty Evaluation of clinical sites/experiences

Action ? Implementation of online link for Nurse Managers and staff to evaluate Nursing Faculty and students.

ASN Systematic Evaluation Plan

Criteria 6.2 The program demonstrates evidence of achievement in meeting the program outcomes. Performance on licensure exam: The program's 3-yearmean for the licensure exam pass rate will be at or above the national mean for the same3-year period.

Goal First time NCLEX pass rates at or above national mean

Planning

Frequency Annually

Evidence of Goal Achievement First time NCLEX pass rates at or above 80%

Results of Data

Implementation and Evaluation UND

Action Plan

Evaluation

Team

Meeting

Minutes

2015 NCLEX first time pass rate of 98.18%

Eval teaDmatme inutes No action needed. Will continue to monitor each Spring semester.

See included documents; PDFs with exact numbers and detailed data. and attachments

National mean is below 90% and Cox College rates are above 90% for 2/29/16

2015.

State to State comparison

..\2015-

ASN NCLEX Pass Rates\Criterion 6.4 -

2016\Minutes and

2015_Q4_Report1_FirstTimeMB-EdResults_USA_NCLEX-RN_JAN attachments\Febr

2016.pdf

uary 29 2016

Missouri ASN program comparison

ASN NCLEX Pass Rates\Criterion 6.4 -

2015_Q4_Report4_ResultsByEdProgNCLEX-RN_Missouri Board of

Nursing_JAN 2016.pdf

2016 NCLEX first time pass rate 87.1% See included documents; PDFs with exact numbers and detailed data.

State to State comparison ASN NCLEX Pass Rates\2016_Q4_Report1_FirstTimeMBEdResults_USA_NCLEX-RN_RollingQtr_JAN 2017.pdf.pdf

Missouri ASN program comparison ASN NCLEX Pass Rates\2016_Q4_Report4_ResultsByEdProgNCLEXRN_RollingQtr_Missouri Board of Nursing_JAN 2017.pdf.pdf

2/27/17 Eval min Goal met ? Continue to monitor ..\20162017\Minutes and attachments\Evalu ation Team minutes Feb 27 2017.docx

ASN Systematic Evaluation Plan

2017 NCLEX first time pass rate 78.29%

12/4/17 UND Goal not met ?

See included documents; PDFs with exact numbers and detailed data meeting minutes

for both ASN and BSN.

Action plan:

NCLEX pass rates\2017 NCLEX pass rates ASN BSN\2017 ..\..\Undergraduat

Chief Nurse Administrator is requesting actions and plans by

State to State comparison ASN BSN NCLEX pass rate data.pdf e

course coordinators for improvement of pass rate.

Missouri ASN/BSN data program comparison

Nursing\Approved

NCLEX pass rates\2017 NCLEX pass rates ASN BSN\2017 Minutes\12.4.17

Missouri ASN BSN data program compairson Q4 Report 4.pdf Meeting

Minutes.docx

3/26/18 ? Preliminary report for Chief Nurse Administrator indicating 3/26/18 Eval NCLEX first time pass rate is met. A few student results still pending but minutes with students that have passed the goal is met.

Action Plan: Continue to monitor

ASN Systematic Evaluation Plan

Criteria 6.3 The program demonstrates evidence of achievement in meeting the program outcomes.

Program Completion Rates

Planning

Goal Students will complete each program option in no more than 150% of the stated program length for each program option beginning with enrollment in the first nursing course.

Frequency Annually

Evidence of Goal Achievement 85% of students who begin the first nursing course will graduate from the ASN program within 150% of the timeframe allotted for the program

2/6/2017 UND approved revised: Goal of 70% graduate within 150% of the program length and with a Target of 85% of graduates compete within 150% of program length.

Results of Data

Implementation and Evaluation

Evaluation Team

Meeting Minutes

Action Plan

Date

Goal not met: Based on graduation rate by semester. Withdrew/dismissal ranged 22%-36%

12/1/16

Review of the ASN Graduation rate data by semester was presented at

the Dec. 2016 Evaluation meeting. Discussion occurred. Action

H:\COLL-

Plan/Questions following review of the data by semester.

SHARED\DEPT OF

1. Is there a standard for how many students should be

NURSING\Standing

Teams\Evaluation

retained/graduated within 150%?

Team\2016-

2. How many of these students are dismissed vs withdrawing? Are

2017\Minutes and

some of the dismissals actually withdraws just classified

attachments\ASN

differently?

Graduation Rates - 3. What is an appropriate standard? Are there any programs which

Discussed 12-1-

should serve as a benchmark?

16.pptx

Further review of data and follow up to questions above to be presented

at Jan. 2017 Evaluation Team meeting.

 ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download