Critical Thinking Rubric
Critical Thinking Rubric
Students can effectively analyze, interpret, synthesize, and evaluate information before accepting or
formulating a hypothesis or opinion, or drawing a conclusion.
A. Evaluates information.
Behavior Absent
Does not differentiate
among fact, supported
information, and
unsupported
information.
Does not identify or
misinterprets relevant
information.
0
Behavior Emerging
Infrequently differentiates
among fact, supported
information, and
unsupported information.
Begins to identify but often
misinterprets relevant
information.
Behavior Developing
Frequently differentiates
among fact, supported
information, and unsupported
information.
Behavior Present
Consistently differentiates
among fact, supported
information, and
unsupported information.
3/4
Evaluates the validity and
source of information and
determines its relevance
to the task at hand.
Identifies and interprets most
information accurately.
1/2
Identifies and accurately
interprets relevant
information.
5
B. Identifies the connections between ideas and concepts.
Behavior Absent
Does not identify
connections between
ideas and concepts.
0
Behavior Emerging
Infrequently identifies
connections between ideas
and concepts.
Behavior Developing
Frequently identifies
connections between ideas
and concepts.
1/2
3/4
Behavior Present
Consistently identifies the
implications of
connections between
ideas and concepts.
5
C. Uses information to formulate an opinion or conclusion.
Behavior Absent
Does not offer an
opinion or conclusion.
0
Revised 2022
Behavior Emerging
Offers an inadequate or
illogical opinion or
conclusion.
Opinion or conclusion is
supported by
inappropriate or irrelevant
information or work.
1/2
Behavior Developing
Offers logical but incomplete
opinion or conclusion.
Opinion or conclusion is
partially supported by
sufficient information or
work.
3/4
Behavior Present
Opinion or conclusion is
based on pertinent
information.
Opinion or conclusion is
supported by sufficient
information or work.
5
Critical Thinking Rubric
D. Applies knowledge, concepts, paradigms, or theories to the assigned task.
Behavior Absent
Does not apply
relevant knowledge,
concepts, paradigms,
or theories.
0
Behavior Emerging
Infrequently applies
knowledge, concepts,
paradigms, or theories.
1/2
Behavior Developing
Frequently applies
knowledge, concepts,
paradigms, or theories.
3/4
Behavior Present
Consistently applies
relevant knowledge,
concepts, paradigms, or
theories.
5
E. Completes the assigned task using an efficient and effective method.
Behavior Absent
Does not complete
any requirements of
the assigned task.
0
Revised 2022
Behavior Emerging
Partially completes the
assigned task or uses a
minimally efficient or
effective method.
1/2
Behavior Developing
Completes some ofthe
requirements or uses a
moderately efficient or
effective method.
3/4
Behavior Present
Completes all
requirements of the
assigned task and uses a
highly efficient and
effective method.
5
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- critical thinking learning program self assessment veterans affairs
- 2 3 critical thinking oregon
- christ centered critical thinking shorter university
- critical thinking cambridge
- critical thinking advanced reasoning forum
- critical thinking rubric
- handout 1 critical thinking
- development of critical thinking ability through sets based learning
- critical thinking techniques 1 reading and understanding written texts
- two rubrics for critical thinking assessment a mini training session
Related searches
- fun critical thinking interview questions
- critical thinking interview questions
- critical thinking questions for interview
- good critical thinking questions examples
- sample critical thinking questions
- list of critical thinking questions
- critical thinking competency examples
- critical thinking in education articles
- critical thinking argument examples
- critical thinking and philosophy
- critical thinking competency standards
- critical thinking competency definition