OPENING COMMENTS – OPEN/CLOSED



CONFIRMED MINUTESOCTOBER 22-24, 2018PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA, USAThese minutes are not final until confirmed by the Task Group in writing or by vote at a subsequent meeting. Information herein does not constitute a communication or recommendation from the Task Group and shall not be considered as such by any agency.MONDAY, 22-OCT-2018 to WEDNESDAY, 24-OCT-2018OPENING COMMENTS – OPEN/CLOSEDCall to Order / Verbal Quorum Check – OPEN/CLOSEDThe Materials Testing Laboratories Task Group (MTLTG) was called to order at 08:10 a.m., 22Oct-2018It was verified that only SUBSCRIBER MEMBERS were in attendance during the closed portion of the meeting.A minimum of three (3) Subscriber Voting Members representing three (3) different Subscribers were present in the meeting.Introductions were made of all in attendance.A quorum was established with the following representatives in attendance:Subscriber Members/Participants Present (* Indicates Voting Member)NAMECOMPANY NAME*ShamimAbbasThe Boeing Company*DaveBalePratt & Whitney Canada*ChristineBrassineSAFRAN GroupMatthewChottThe Boeing Company*RobertClarkEaton, Aerospace Group*AshleyClark-O’SheaThe Boeing Company*JonathanCohronGE Aviation*ChristianFilionGulfstream AerospaceAlbertoGonzalezHoneywell Aerospace*ClaudiaGranadosHoneywell AerospaceVice Chairperson*DanGravesUTC Aerospace (Goodrich)ChairpersonBillHaselrickLockheed Martin Corporation*SvenJohanssonGKN Aerospace Sweden AB*KarenKimPratt & WhitneyAndyMurphyThe Boeing Company*JeremyPhillipsTextron Aviation*DonRobertsonSpirit AeroSystemsSecretary*AlexandraSauxAirbus Commercial Aircraft*ChristianSchwamingerMTU Aero Engines AG*MarcoSimonLiebherr-Aerospace SAS*JoakimSkoogGKN Aerospace Sweden AB*VirgilWatsonLockheed Martin – Sikorsky AircraftJeremyWeinerBell Helicopter TextronOther Members/Participants Present (* Indicates Voting Member)NAMECOMPANY NAMEPietroAbateRTM Breda SrlMikeBarsoskiOrion IndustriesBrentBartlettOerlikon Metco CanadaVictorBetanzosEUTKTOID SA DE CVBrunoBilleciPTPDanielBrimTimetHughCasperMTS Systems CorporationAlexChavezCassavant Assembly & Processing*JohnChirCarpenter Latrobe Specialty MetalsBrandonCiscoMetaltest, Inc.MarkCrevierMorton ManufacturingMatthewChornickTimet*DeenaCrossmoreIMR Test LabsArlindo AnastacioDe CamposCBMM*LeeDilksLaboratory Testing, Inc.EricDiratsDirats LaboratoriesNiallDoddsWestmoreland Mechanical Testing & Research, Ltd.ZacharyDraganPerryman CompanyAndreiaDuarte MenezesCBMMAndrewDuddyStack Metallurgical ServicesTimEsauElement Materials Technology*JonathanFaiaLaboratory Testing, Inc.*DavidFluckHaynes International, Inc.TeresaFullerAcuren InspectionRichardGassetLisi AerospaceDanielGeistRocky Mountain Reference Materials, LLCAdamGorczewskiOerlikon Balzers*CourtneyGrimesSturbridge Metallurgical ServicesLuisGuelbenzuAPPLUS LGAI Technological Center S.A.*CynthiaHaganNSL Analytical Services, Inc.JonathanHarmonJoliet Metallurgical Laboratories, Inc.RobertHayesM.T.I.ChristophHenkelAMAG Rolling*KevinHinemanATI Flat Rolled ProductsDanielHuntHaynes InternationalSusanJettSturbridge Metallurgical ServicesNiJinArconicRickJohnsonAdvanced Heat Treat Corp.*MichelleJonesTimet UKGoktugKaraTEI-TUSAS Engines Industries, Inc.JeffKeeferNF&M International, Inc.*BobKemmererCarpenter Technology Corporation*ViktoriaKravchenkoWESCO Aircraft, Inc.ShellyLawlessMeyer Tool, Inc.*GregLoboskyElement Materials Technology*DavidLuoniElement Materials TechnologyConnieMackeyAdvanced Heat Treat Corp.AlexanderManukTensile Testing Metallurgical Laboratory*GiuseppeMarzanoMagellan Aerospace, HaleyJacobMcCannAdvanced Heat Treat Corp.*MichelleMcDonaldArconic Howmet Research CenterMichaelMcMillanMaterials Engineering & Testing, Ltd.*EthanMillerProduct Evaluation Systems*LindseyMillerRoss & Catherall*WaltMoorheadProduct Evaluation Systems, Inc.JulieNguyenElement Materials Technology*SharonNortonAtlas Testing LaboratoriesJuanPerezAircraft X-Ray Laboratories, Inc.CristianPoputaWestmoreland Mechanical Testing & Research, Ltd.AmyPowersMeyer Tool, Inc.*SaraRandallLucideon M+PAdrianRossiWestmoreland Mechanical Testing & Research, Inc.JeffRossiWestmoreland Mechanical Testing & Research, Inc.*JimRossiWestmoreland Mechanical Testing & Research, Inc.JeffRygJoliet Metallurgical Laboratories, Inc.*PeterScrimshireSpecial Metals Wiggin, Ltd. – IncoTestDerekSicotteDirats Laboratories*KatieSmallSPS TechnologiesLucasSmithTeledyne CETAC TechnologiesHowardSpaderInstronMarkStapeCarpenter TechnologiesJamesStoneArconic*DougTannenbaumJoliet Metallurgical Laboratories, Inc.TsunaoTezukaIHI CorporationDerekThibaultConnecticut Metallurgical, Inc.*T. RaoTipirneniL.I.T Labs, Inc.*HelenTurnerTimet UK, Ltd.*AwwenTyrssonBarnes Aerospace Ogden DivisionEstebanUrquizoCassavant Assembly & ProcessingJoshuaValkoATI Flat Rolled Products*MatthewVanDykeCannon-Muskegon Corp.*JeffVineyMetcut Research, Inc.*KevinVonScioPerryman CompanyLaniWilliamsDanville Metal Stamping*MargaretWillisATI Specialty MaterialsVerlWisehartHaynes International*JasonWrightMetals Technology, Inc.PRI Staff Present RobHoethJenniferKornrumpfJimLewisKevinWetzelSafety Information – CLOSED/OPENEmergency Exits and how to vacate the building were reviewed. Attendees were requested to notify PRI Staff of any emergencies.Review Code of Ethics and Meeting Conduct – CLOSED/OPENCodes of Ethics, Antitrust, and Meeting Conduct were reviewed with the meeting rules and meeting voting protocol.Subscriber responsibilities to support the Task Group were presented.Present the Antitrust Video – CLOSED/OPENThe antitrust video was viewed.Review Agenda – CLOSED/OPENThe agenda was reviewed and agreed upon without modification.All presentations from the meeting are to be posted on ? under Resources → Documents → Public Documents → Task Groups → Materials Testing Laboratories → Meeting Presentations → October 2018.Acceptance of Meeting Minutes– OPENJason Wright moved to accept the minutes from the June 2018 meeting as written. Ben Clark seconded. Motion passed unanimously.review delegation status – CLOSEDThe Metrics tab on the eAuditNet Dashboard and the Delegation Tracking Forms, t-frm-07, were presented. After review of all comments addressed in t-frm-07s, there were no issues that required additional actions for delegated reviewers Kevin Wetzel, Rob Hoeth, Jim Lewis, Justin Rausch, and Bob Lizewski as they continue to meet the current requirements defined in OP 1115.Liz Bojan, a consultant reviewer for the MTLTG, is currently non-delegated, but no concerns were raised with her performance to date.new task group subscriber business – CLOSEDThe Heat Treat Task Group (HTTG) Auditor Advisory HT 18-002 Direct Verification of Hardness Testers was reviewed and discussed.Direct verification is a requirement of ASTM E10, E18, E92, E384 and ISO 6508, 6507, 6506. Following discussions with the HTTG at the June 2018 meeting, MTLTG planned to issue an open Auditor Advisory similar to the HTTG Auditor Advisory, to ensure consistency in verifying the same requirements across Task Groups. However, the MTL Audit Advisory instructing auditors to verify evidence that hardness testers have had a direct verification completed, and the report is available/maintained, was prepared but not released due to concerns raised by some MTL Subscribers regarding the ability of legacy machines to comply to current requirements (not the requirements existing at the time the instrument was manufactured), and costs associated with bringing legacy machines into compliance if direct verification is failed. Ben Cark motioned to accept the MTLTG Auditor Advisory for Direct Verification as drafted. Christian Filion seconded. Motion passed unanimously.ACTION ITEM: Kevin Wetzel to issue the Auditor Advisory instructing the auditors to verify evidence that hardness testing machines have had a direct verification completed and the report is available/maintained. (Due Date: 16-Nov-2018)The MOU with HTTG for use of AC7101/4 Metallography and Microindentation Hardness was discussed. The MOU for Metallography and Microindentation Hardness was revised to add new test codes and update the existing test codes to the current scopes. For facilities that hold MTL accreditation, AC7101/4 shall be performed as part of the MTL audit, rather than as part of the Heat Treat audit.The internal round robin (IRR) requirements identified by the MTLTG in AC7101/1 Appendix B are applicable, as required for accreditation. The sections for failure eligibility and future document revisions were removed because they are no longer applicable to the MOU. Document revisions shall comply with OP 1120 requirements.Shamim Abbas motioned to accept Metallography and Microindentation Hardness MOU as revised. Joakim Skoog seconded. Motion passed unanimously.A presentation developed by the HTTG describing differences in methodologies of MTLTG and HTTG with respect to laboratory testing audit criteria and accreditation processes (e.g., failure criteria differences) were presented and discussed. The MTLTG recommends that further pursuit of this topic be done through a joint team that can work through issues together.HTTG is concerned of the potential for Auditees to “game the system” due to these differences. HTTG is asking for either:HTTG develop their own Audit Criteria for metallography and mechanical testing for HT process acceptance, orMTLTG to revise their audit methodology to require every audit to review checklists concerning MOU scopes, MTL to use the same audit intervals as other TGs, and MTLTG and HTTG to implement a system to allow NCRs to be combined between HT and MTL auditsNo definite outcome was obtained.Lucas Smith, Teledyne CETAC Technologies, Omaha, NE, gave a presentation entitled “Laser Ablation ICP-MS”. The presentation was requested by Mr. Smith after the open portion of the meeting had already adjourned. Teledyne’s Laser Ablation technology is an alternative to acid digestion as a method for preparing samples for introduction into an ICP-MS elemental analysis instrument. A laser is used to ablate microparticles from a solid surface (e.g., an alloy or a glass) under vacuum and introduce them into a typical ICP-MS instrument for detection and quantitation. Advantages of the technique compared to chemical digestion sample preparation are no chemical waste (e.g., acids), improved chemical safety, reduced risk of sample contamination, and ability to analyze different areas of the same surface (high special resolution). The Nadcap process was discussed, and Lucas was advised to contact ASTM Committee E01 regarding their revision of applicable standards to incorporate laser ablation technology so that MTL can include it in audit criteria.auditor consistency (op 1117) – CLOSEDReview Observation PlanThe progress with the observation plan developed in January 2018 was reviewed. Seven observations of five auditors that were performed since January 2018 were reviewed; four auditors still need to be observed in 2018.Review Auditor Consistency DataThe following data were reviewed with no concerns.Standard Data / MTL TG Auditor Consistency ToolSupplier FeedbackAuditor Evaluations and TrendsObservation Feedback (t-frm-01)Summarize Actions TakenDavid Bale motioned to accept the list of remaining four auditors for observation in 2018. Virgil Watson seconded. Motion passed unanimously.ACTION ITEM: Rob Hoeth to provide a schedule of audits for the targeted auditors to the Subscribers for observation. (Due Date: 16-Nov-2018)Review Dashboard MetricThe Dashboard Metrics in eAuditNet were reviewed. It was pointed out where in eAuditNet Subscribers can view current status of auditor consistency and observations.audit effectiveness – CLOSEDThe Audit Effectiveness presentation made by the NMC Audit Effectiveness Sub-Team at the MTL Auditor Conference was reviewed. The NMC Audit Effectiveness sub-team has now become the NMC Continuous Improvement Committee.mtl tg leadership succesion plan – CLOSEDThe MTLTG Leadership Succession Plan developed at the June 2018 meeting was reviewed. The implementation of the Succession Plan is in effect as of this meeting, rather than at the end of this meeting, due to the absence of retiring Chair, Amanda Rickman.Ben Clark motioned to accept and implement the Succession Plan immediately. Shamim Abbas seconded. Motion passed unanimously.VOTING MEMBER updates & COMPLIANCE WITH VOTING REQUIREMENTS – OPENConfirm any New Voting Member ApplicationsThe following requests for additions or changes to voting membership were received and confirmed by the Task Group Chairperson pending verification of PD 1100 requirements:Subscriber Voting Member: UVMSupplier Voting Member: SVMAlternate: ALTTask Group Chairperson: CHRVice Chairperson: VCHSecretary: SECNew Voting Members:First NameSurnameCompanyPosition:(new / updated role)Meetings Attended(Month/Year)JonathanCohronGE AviationUVM06-201810-2018JonathanFaiaLaboratory Testing, Inc.SVM10-201710-2018DavidFluckHaynes International, Inc.ALT/SVM06-201810-2018SvenJohanssonGKN Aerospace Sweden ABUVM06-201810-2018MichelleJonesTimet UK, Ltd.ALT/SVM06-201706-2018BobKemmererCarpenter Technology CorpALT/SVM02-201810-2018LindseyMillerRoss & CatherallALT/SVM06-201810-2018JeremyPhillipsTextron AviationUVM06-201810-2018SaraRandallLucideon M+PSVM10-201410-2018AlexandraSauxAirbus Commercial AircraftUVM06-201810-2018MarcoSimonLiebherr-Aerospace SASUVM06-201810-2018HelenTurnerTimet UK, Ltd.SVM06-201706-2018Changes to Voting Memberships Since the Last Meeting:First NameSurnameCompanyPosition:(new / updated role)SaeedCheemaTextron AviationALT/UVMRebeccaFinlayGE AviationALT/UVMClaudiaGranados TorresHoneywell AerospaceVCH/UVMDanGravesUTC Aerospace (Goodrich)CHR/UVMDonRobertsonSpirit AeroSystemsSEC/UVMJoakimSkoogGKN Aerospace Sweden ABALT/UVMThe new voting members, and the member changes above were approved by individual voice vote by the attending Subscribers and Suppliers, facilitated by the Task Group Chair. All changes are pending completion of all required steps on the Nadcap Membership Form (m-frm-01). Review Compliance with Voting Requirements of Present Voting MembersVoting Membership Removed:The following people had their voting membership removed due to no longer representing a Nadcap Subscriber/Supplier in meetings.First NameSurnameCompanyBallot Response Met (Y/N)Meeting Attendance Met (Y/N)LauraCoffeyLucideon M+PN/AN/ADavidDeMarcoTimetN/AN/ALeeDilksLaboratory Testing, Inc.N/AN/ASteveKeckCarpenter Technology CorpN/AN/AMurielMalhommeAirbus Commercial AircraftN/AN/ARalphMastVDM Metals GmbHN/AN/AJenniferMcKeeganTextron AviationN/AN/ABenjaminPetersonHoneywell AerospaceN/AN/Amtl nadcap overview – openMTL TutorialMTL Task Group Tutorial slides were presented, describing the Nadcap audit process and the procedures of the MTLTG. Key contacts, MTLTG leadership team, the MTL Staff Engineers, and the MTL Coordinator, were shown and their roles described.Supplier Support CommitteeSharon Norton described the role and responsibilities of SSC Task Group Representative.MTLTG Supplier NMCPeter Scrimshire described the role and responsibilities of MTL TG Supplier NMC Representative.RAIL ReviewThe MTL Task Group RAIL status was reviewed, and completed action items were described. The location within eAuditNet where the current MTL Task Group RAIL could be accessed was described.review of procedure changes – openReview of any changes to General Operating Procedures since the last meetingProcedure changes during the period October 2017 thru September 2018 were presented. Detailed changes to procedures OP 1106, OP 1108, and OP 1110 were reviewed and discussed.Review any changes to specific OP 1114 and OP 1116 Appendices since the last meetingProcedure appendix changes during the period June 2018 thru September 2018 were presented. Detailed changes to procedures OP 1114 Appendix MTL and OP 1116 Appendix MTL were reviewed and discussed.auditor conference report out – openEnsure common understanding among all attendees. Discussion will be allowed as appropriate for the objective.A presentation that was given by a member of the Audit Effectiveness Sub-Team at the Auditor Conference was reviewed, describing current status of the sub-team, accomplishments to-date, and notification that the sub-team has become the NMC Continuous Improvement Committee.Relevant Topics from the Auditor ConferenceVerl Wisehart presented a proposal for a new method for preparing AC7101/2 Figure 1 Matrix. Data from Dr. John Sieber of NIST were described and discussed that supported the proposal. A proposed Microsoft EXCEL spreadsheet tool to standardize how the quantitative analytical range was calculated from Dr. Sieber’s data was presented and discussed.Technical PresentationsDon Robertson made a presentation defining Analytical Reagent Grades and critical parameters associated with analyzing ASTM D1193 Table 1 reagent water. This was a RAIL Item from the Berlin June 2017 meeting.Major Checklist Changes and Handbook Supplements Presented at Auditor ConferenceKevin VonScio provided a detailed description of AC7101/2 checklist revisions.Derek Sicotte provided a detailed description of changes to the AC7101/1 checklist.Derek Sicotte provided a detailed description of revisions to the Audit Handbook supplements.technical presentation – openMaterial Selection for Proficiency and Round Robin Testing ProgramsRobert W. Hayes, Metals Technology, Inc, Northridge, CA, gave a presentation entitled “Deformation Mechanisms in Ni-Base Superalloys”Ni-Base Superalloys are widely used in the construction of complex gas turbine jet engines due to their high temperature resistance. Large variability has been observed when measuring mechanical properties of Ni-base superalloys, especially elevated tensile and creep. It is unclear whether the causes of this large variability in test result repeatability is caused more by the test lab personnel or the material itself. This variability can affect the accuracy of PT and IRR proficiency assessments (i.e., outliers can and often are observed). It was found that the source of the large variability is the evolution of crystal packing dislocations in the Ni-base alloy material itself, not inadequacies in the performance of the test operators.Rocky Mountain Reference Materials, LLC – Review Proficiency Testing Program Daniel Geist, Rocky Mountain Reference Materials, Inc., Golden, CO, (RMRM) gave a presentation entitled “A Benchmark Proficiency Testing Program”RMRM has been accredited to ISO 17043 and offers Proficiency Testing Program (PTP) services. Their Rocky Mountain Proficiency Testing (RMPT) program focuses on chemistry (rather than mechanical) testing and is designed to compare each PTP program participant directly against the certified reference material (CRM) and its values table. This provides a comparison to ‘true values’ (i.e., the CRM). RMRM offers very fast turnaround of results (guaranteed 72 hours when requested); that is, initial order of materials through analyses and reporting of final proficiency results, with statistics (i.e., a z-score summary report and chart). RMPT can be a useful part of a laboratory’s overall quality assurance program.breakout sessions – openChecklist Revision Sub-Teams broke out into smaller groups.The AC7101/1 group discussed and resolved comments raised during revision G letter balloting. The AC7101/2 group developed checklist criteria.In the AC7101/11 group, Viktoria Kravchenko presented a status of the AC7101/11 TAG activity. Several WebEx meetings were held January - September 2018 to review TAG inquiries. AC7101/11 rev D draft is about 85% complete. A test code was added for recess torque and corrosion topics were aligned to AC7101/6. Sections were added for mechanical testing of rivets and blind fasteners, and a new section and test codes for macro etch and macro inspection were added with alignment with AC7101/4 Metallography. Discussions were held about adding criteria for Test Reports versus Test Records with reference to AC7101/1 section 13 (AC7101/11 development of own criteria for Test Reports).task group issues – openA presentation on the Technical Advisories Group (TAG) process was reviewed, covering the roles and responsibilities of the TAG; the rosters for the TAGs were also updated.Andy Murphy, the Boeing voting member of the Chemical Processing (CP) Task Group, made a presentation regarding the Boeing addition of Taber Abrasion testing codes to those that require Nadcap accreditation. Currently, this requires a Chemical Processing accreditation under AC7108/4.For Stress Rupture, ASTM E139 section 7.5 requires that weights be verified for damage. It was recommended that an Auditor Advisory or Audit Handbook guidance be developed that if a lab has its weights plated/coated, the Auditee’s procedures should refer to E139 section 7.5 to verify the plated/coated weights for wear or damage prior to use.ACTION ITEM: Kevin Wetzel to coordinate with the AC7101/3 TAG to add guidance to the Audit Handbook regarding verifying stress rupture plated/coated weights prior to use in accordance with ASTM E139 section 7.5 (Due Date: 30-Nov-2018)Updates were provided on ASTM committees.Bob Kemmerer presented a status of portable hardness testers. The E-28 Committee is reviewing the development of the test method for portable hardness under a new standard. ASTM E40 hardness conversion tables for Ni alloys are being updated. ASTM E18 is being revised to make marking HRBW Maximum Error values on test blocks as optional.John Chir presented a status of the new release of ASTM E45. 100X can now be used to discriminate type and thickness; higher may be used if desired. ASTM A370 is being balloted to revise A8.1 to make the rounding rules in Table A8.1 mandatory. ASTM A370 will also define notch orientation of impact samples.Kevin Wetzel and Sharon Norton presented that the revision of ASTM B117 has been released as B117-18. It has been updated to revise the parenthetical note that salt concentration may be measured directly by titration, rather than only by hydrometer (with conversion to concentration). ASTM E21 has been revised. Under E21 sec. 8.2, calibration frequencies were revised to make the laboratories decide calibration frequencies, but the maximum period between calibration shall not exceed one year.nadcap meeting reports – openSupplier Support CommitteeSharon Norton presented on the SSC Meeting. OP 1123 SSC operating procedure was revised and placed into ballot. Details of the SSC Leadership changes were presented. Sharon will scale back her participation as the MTLTG SSC Representative and asked the Suppliers in the TG for an Alternate. For more details, please review the SSC minutes posted on p-r-.MTLTG Supplier NMCPeter Scrimshire presented a status of the development of the NMC Checklist criteria. Duplicate Audit Criteria included in the NMC Checklist would be deleted from the individual Task Group audit checklists when the NMC Checklist is released. Management of Change will potentially be a topic covered in the upcoming NMC Checklist. Enhancements to eAuditNet are being developed to make Subscriber-Supplier relationships more visible (i.e., when Suppliers declare the Subscribers for whom they do business). Some concerns were expressed about the overall NMC Checklist development process, in particular the perception of not being allowed to have input to the NMC Checklist balloting process. Suppliers expressed concern about being audited to criteria that were not developed and vetted through MTLTG criteria development process.ACTION ITEM: Kevin Wetzel to schedule a WebEx call to discuss how to address concerns through the NMC Checklist ballot process, particularly the potential addition of questions that are not currently included in MTLTG checklists (Due Date: 20-Dec-2018)Planning and OpsDan Graves reported on the Planning and Ops meeting. For more details, please review the Planning and Ops minutes posted on p-r-.mtl program status – openNMC MetricsSubscriber balloting performance metrics were presented for year-to-date. In September 2018, one (1) audit accreditation lapsed; two (2) initial audits and 18 reaccreditation audits were accredited. Average audit review cycle time is 74 days (goal is 53 days).Auditor CapacityMTLTG auditor capacity is at 204% for January-September 2018; 207% for January-December 2018Two auditors have left in 2018, leaving a complement of 11 auditors.meeting wrap Up – openAffirm Ad-Hoc CommitteesThe following existing Ad-Hoc Committees were reaffirmed:Auditor Consistency Team: David Bale, Hendrik Kramer, Alexandre Bourgeois, and Rob HoethMTL MOU Team: Claudia Granados, Donald Robertson, Alexandre Bourgeois, Shamim Abbas, Kevin Wetzel, and Rob HoethCP MOU Team: Claudia Granados, Donald Robertson, Alexandre Bourgeois, Shamim Abbas, Kevin Wetzel, and Rob HoethWelding-MTL Additive Manufacturing Team: Jenny McKeegan, Christian Schwaminger, Joakim Skoog, Alexandre Bourgeois, Dan Graves, Saeed Cheema, and Kevin WetzelVote on Handbook Revisions – ‘Confirmed Handbook Content’Adding guidance on acceptance limits proposed by Haynes International to the AC7101/1 Handbook, sec. 12.19 was discussed.ACTION ITEM: David Fluck to provide the proposed wording on acceptance limits to the /1 TAG. (Due Date: 2-Nov-2018)Review/Update RAILThe Rolling Action Item List (RAIL) was reviewed and updated. For further information, review the MTL RAIL posted on eAuditNet.Determine Meeting Objectives for Next MeetingThe following topics were determined to be priorities for the next meeting:Update Task Group activitiesUpdate MOU statusPossibly meet with CPTG about MOUContinue checklist revisions/TAG discussionsAC7006 TAG – changes to ISO 17025:2017 to impact AC7101/1AC7101/11 Working of Ballot CommentsAC7101/2 Ballot CommentsAC7101/5 Hardness checklist reviewAC7101/7 TAG to review PT/IRR requirements from AC7101/1; should they be added to /7?Technical Presentation by the Welding Task GroupAdditive Manufacturing Checklist (Welding-MTL Additive Manufacturing Team)Auditor Consistency Audit EffectivenessAC7101/2 Figure 1 Matrix Compliance - tentativeCompose Agenda for Next MeetingThe Task Group meeting will be four (4) days, Monday to Thursday. Monday will be a full day Closed. Breakout rooms will be used all day Tuesday. An additional two (2) to four (4) hours of Closed meeting will be held at the end of the day Thursday.ADJOURNMENT – (24-Oct-2018) – Meeting was adjourned at 03:00 p.m.Minutes Prepared by: Don Robertson, donald.t.robertson@ ***** For PRI Staff use only: ******Are procedural/form changes required based on changes/actions approved during this meeting? (select one)YES* ? NO ?*If yes, the following information is required:Documents requiring revision:Who is responsible:Due date: ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download