Superior Court
[NOTE: This is not corrected for spelling, grammar, syntax, etc.]
Superior Court
District Columbia
500 Indiana Ave N.W
Washington, D.C.20001
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CASE # 2013 CF2 009225
District of Columbia
Foreign Plaintiff
Vs Administrative Law Judge
NASH, STUART G
Rodney-Dale; Class
Private Attorney General
xxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx
High Shoals, North Carolina America National Citizen
Declarant
MOTION TO DISMISS ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
Mistaken application of a law
Now Comes, Rodney-Dale; Class, (hereinafter “Private Attorney General “PAG”), by Congressional Legislation, under the Statutes at Large and by United States Codes created by the United States Congress within the District of Columbia Territory, in the position of Private Attorney General and Bounty Hunter, and sets forth this document. This PAG is putting this motion before the Superior Court MOTION TO DISMISS ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
In the July 19th Hearing there were only 2 types of documents before the Superior Court one was an Administrative Complaint by District Columbia Police to which is an administrative issue and non- judicial the other was for return of property with an addendum. The Superior Court has before it an administrate violation or administrative complaint which is not a criminal issue but a code violation.
Code is "not the law" (In Re Self v Rhay, 61 Wn (2d) 261) defined by Black's Law Dictionary as prima facie, which is color of law. Color is "counterfeit or feigned".
This PAG Move this Superior Court to Dismiss all Administrative Claim as these actions are administrate and are in violation of the United States Constitution to which these public officers agree to, “Upon” take their position as public officers. Under contract as public officials they agree to support and up hold this legal document knows as the United States Constitution and Acts of Congress with define definition of words pursuant to those who are defined in Title 5 USC and are required to meet these sections 3331-3333 and under 5507 in Title 5 USC.
A constitution is designated as a supreme enactment, a fundamental act of legislation by the people of the state. A constitution is legislation direct from the people acting in their sovereign capacity, while a statute is legislation from their representatives, subject to limitations prescribed by the superior authority. See: Ellingham v. Dye, 178 Ind. 336; 99 NE 1; 231 U.S. 250; 58 L. Ed. 206; 34 S. Ct. 92; Sage v. New York , 154 NY 61; 47 NE 1096.
Furthermore their administrate office is “OR” are required to come incompliance with Congressional definition and Higher Court Ruling. The District of Columbia police either due to lack of education or lack of understanding of the Congressional definition of words and Higher Court decisions has now become in violation of their administrate procedures under define definition of word define by U.S. Congress and Senate and agree to by the President.
Constitution extends to equal protection of the laws to people, not to interest. Taylor vs McKeithen, 499 F.2d 893, C.A. La 1974.
The Superior Court if acting under administrate procedures is required to “Dismiss” due to the fact this is an administrative violation, against Rodney Dale Class (PAG) as I fail to meet the requirement of employment to the District of Columbia Corporation or Political Subdivision .
and
Pursuant to the administrative procedures in order to be charge administrately one is required to be employed by that administration under Title 5 United States Codes or the District of Columbia Administration.
and
Pursuant to the administrative procedure act of 1946 ,60 stat 237,under Title 5 United States Codes only the private citizen can file a complaint for an administrative hearing against a public office or any of it officials for administrative breach of their duties.
The Superior Court if acting under the jurisdiction of “judicial Power” then any “Controversies” in law now becomes” A legal issue” in law to which the Superior Court is required to hear and settle these legal issue “OR” can Dismiss all action base under Higher Courts Ruling and upon Congressional Acts to how words are to be defined under “Legal Error” of any administration claims and action.
Definition; Legal Error “A mistaken judgment or incorrect belief as to the existence or effect of matters of fact, or a false or mistaken conception or application of the law.” A reversible error usually refers to the “mistaken application of the law” by a court, as where, for example A court may erroneously apply laws and rules to admit (or deny the admission of) certain crucial evidence in a case, which may prove pivotal or dispositive to the outcome of the trial and warrant reversal of the judgment.
Conclusion
This PAG Move the Superior Court to Dismiss this administrate complaint under “Legal Error”. “mistaken application of the law”
Rodney-Dale; Class
Private Attorney General Seal Private Attorney General
xxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx
High Shoals N.C. 28077
Bounty Hunter Seal
PROOF OF SERVICE
Now Comes Rodney–Dale; Class, by Congressional Legislation under the Statutes at Large and by United States Codes created by the United States Congress within the District of Columbia Territory, in the position of Private Attorney General and Bounty Hunter to set forth this document MOTION TO DISMISS ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT be placed before the Superior Court Judge and the Clerk of Court of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia on this ______ day of _____________ in the year of our Lord 2013 AD. Declarant also delivered a copy to the Prosecution via Registered or 1st Class U.S. Mail.
Rodney-Dale; Class Private Attorney General xxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx High Shoals N.C. 28077
itconstitutional@
Cc
District of Columbia Prosecutors office United States Attorney's Office
555 4th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20530
Atty Donald L. Dworsky P.O. Box 409 Glen Echo, Md 20812
Superior Court
District Columbia
500 Indiana Ave N.W
Washington, D.C.20001
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CASE # 2013 CF2 009225
District of Columbia
Foreign Plaintiff
Vs Administrative Law Judge
NASH, STUART G
Rodney-Dale; Class
Private Attorney General
xxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx
High Shoals, North Carolina America National Citizen
Declarant
Entry of Judgment
The Superior Court fine it lack subject matter due to legal error and Controversies in the mistaken application of the law. As the Claim is Administrate in nature, their appears to be a number of undisclosed legal error.
To avoid undue cost and expense to either the United States of America or to Rodney Dale Class This Superior Court grant MOTION TO DISMISS ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT and Dismiss this case with prejudice and all property to be returned on the foundation of undisclosed legal error.
SO ORDER on this date of ______________________
Administrative Law Judge
NASH, STUART G
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related searches
- superior court vs district court
- what does superior court handle
- guilford county superior court records
- superior court arizona
- superior court vs circuit court
- dc superior court rule 26
- dc superior court rule 33
- dc superior court rules civil
- dc superior court rule 37
- d c superior court rules
- dc superior court filing fees
- nc district and superior court calendars