PDF Kieper (The Cadmus Group) Project Results

Evaluating ESPC Project Results

Alice G. Dasek (DOE), Robert Slattery (ORNL), Peter Larsen (LBNL), and Torsten Kieper (The Cadmus Group)

Better Buildings ESPC Webinar Series Session 5 ? Evaluating ESPC Project Results September 13, 2018

Overview

Overview of the ESPC Toolkit Guidelines for ESPC Measurement & Verification ESPC Project Benchmarking Tools for Economic Impact Analysis

2

Accelerator Profile

Timeframe 2014-2016

Partners 25 partners (18 states, six cities, one school district)

Purpose Expand access to Energy Savings Performance Contracting (ESPC) as a promising option for financing energy efficiency retrofits in the public sector

Outcome 3More than $2 billion invested in MUSH ESPC contracts

Accelerator Activity Areas

Area 1: Streamlining the ESPC Process ? Partners reviewed existing model ESPC documents

Area 2: Empowering the Market ? Partners participated in ePB feedback & training

Area 3: Resolving Individual ESPC Barriers ? Support successful, permanent, innovative, and

replicable resolution of individual partner barriers

4

The ESPC Toolkit



Considering ESPC Implementing ESPC Establishing ESPC Expanding ESPC Evaluating ESPC

5

Evaluating ESPC Project Results

Guidelines for M&V

Benchmark Sheets

State & Local Governments K-12 Schools Colleges & Universities Public Housing

-- Overview of Economic Impact Analysis Tools

6

Guidelines for ESPC Measurement & Verification

Webinar: Evaluating ESPC Results FEMP M&V Guidelines v4.0

Bob Slattery - Oak Ridge National Laboratory

(supporting DOE FEMP)

Sept 13, 2018

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY & RENEWABLE ENERGY

8

 ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download