COUNCIL ON FACULTY WELFARE



COUNCIL ON FACULTY WELFARE

ANNUAL REPORT

2005-06

To the Irvine Divisional Senate Assembly:

INTRODUCTION

The Council on Faculty Welfare (CFW) considers faculty issues that are relevant to faculty welfare, academic freedom, affirmative action and diversity, and emeritae/i affairs. The Council’s membership and duties are stated in Irvine Bylaw 99. Professor Pauline Yahr chaired the Council this year and also served as the Council’s representative to the Senate Cabinet and the Irvine Divisional Senate Assembly. The Council sent representatives to three UC committees: University Committee on Faculty Welfare, University Committee on Academic Freedom, and University Committee on Affirmative Action and Diversity. The Council’s standing subcommittee for Emeritae/i Affairs consisted of three emeritae/i members and the Chair of the UCI Emeritae/i Association. The Council’s faculty members also served on one of the following three subcommittees: Faculty Welfare, Academic Freedom and Affirmative Action & Diversity.

CFW had nine monthly meetings during the fall, winter and spring quarters of the 2005-06 academic year. Additional discussions were conducted electronically. The Council reviewed and discussed the following issues, proposals, policies, and reports. When appropriate, the Council has responded to the Chair of the Academic Senate, UCI administrators, or University Senate committees:

SUMMARY OF COUNCIL’S DISCUSSIONS AND ACTIONS

Issues Under Review

1. Campus Nuclear Reactor

In response to Professor Graham’s request for Senate review of the UC Irvine Nuclear Reactor, Professor George Miller, Supervisor of the Nuclear Reactor Facility, was invited to the CFW meeting to discuss its purpose, safety, and security procedures. The Council did not see any evidence that the reactor poses a threat to faculty welfare or the campus community, were generally supportive of the reactor’s continued existence, and suggested that more public information is needed to allay the fears of the campus and local community. CFW members concluded that it does not have the expertise needed to make a final judgment. A committee of scientists with related expertise should be convened if the Academic Senate wants to examine the issue further. A cost/benefit study is needed that will look at the cost of removing the reactor versus the potential benefits of future research. However, it was noted that the issue may be moot as decommissioning the reactor is already under consideration. (11/8/05)

2. Automated Download of W-2 Data

David Tomcheck, Associate Vice Chancellor of Administrative and Business Services, requested the Council’s advice on providing W-2 earnings data to a third party vendor so that UC employees who use automated tax programs, like Turbo Tax or H&R Block’s tax program, could do an automated download of their W-2 data. UC San Diego currently offers this program.

The Council voted against having an automated download of W-2 data because members were more concerned about the security of their data in the hands of a third party vendor than they were with typing a few numbers into their tax software programs. Should the Administration decide to offer this service, the Council recommended that it should be optional, not mandatory. (11/8/05)

3. Affirmative Action and Diversity

The Council forwarded several requests to the Senate Chair for action:

• Discrepancies were identified between UCI Senate and UCI administrative statements on which parameters can be addressed by the Career Review process. The Council asked that the Senate remove its reference to salary as a pertinent parameter from the Council on Academic Personnel's FAQs as a basis for a Career Review until Academic Personnel adds salary to its policies, which would be consistent with UCOP guidelines. (2/14/06)

• While UCI allows faculty to request Career Reviews to evaluate rank or step, the focus is on step adjustments within rank, conforming to CAP preferences. Equity is one basis on which faculty may initiate review of their step, yet UCI does not provide data on faculty members’ step placement within rank or on rank/step equity. The Council recommended that the Senate ask the administration to provide data on rank/step equity, or publish a list of rank and step for all faculty members, so that faculty can make informed decisions. (2/14/06)

• Senate members were not informed of the changes in Career Review procedures that Academic Personnel (AP) implemented in October 2004. AP intended to notify faculty, as indicated by the cc notation, but did not follow through. This is the second recent situation in which faculty or Senate officers did not receive correspondence from the administration that was intended for them. (The EVC’s 7/05 memo on child care was the other.) The Council asked the Senate Chair to alert EVC/Provost Gottfredson or his senior staff to these problems so that reliable communication will remain the norm. (2/14/06)

• Following up on last year's request to the Academic Senate, the Council's resubmitted its memo, dated May 12, 2005, asking for broader oversight of affirmative action and diversity by expanding other Senate committee's duties to include a direct role in increasing the number of underrepresented minorities at all levels of campus life. This spring, the University Committee on Affirmative Action and Diversity (UCAAAD) forwarded a related request to all UC Senate offices, "Recommendations for Local Diversity Committee Empowerment," and the Irvine Division responded by appointing a special committee to review the report's recommendations. Representatives from various Senate committees will review the UC report and identify specific actions for improving the effectiveness of UCI's oversight of diversity. The Council will follow-up during the next academic year on the committee's progress. (5/9/06)

4. Infant/Toddler Child Care

The Council unanimously endorsed the suggestions from the Council on Planning and Budget (CPB) regarding UCI’s new infant/toddler care facilities and joined CPB in commending Provost Gottfredson’s actions to improve the availability of such facilities at UCI. Guaranteed access to infant/toddler care to faculty within nine months of indicated need would enhance the welfare of the faculty. The Council also reiterated its support of outside fundraising to support UCI’s future childcare. UCI's childcare services compare favorably to other those of other UC campuses, of which we are proud, but it is important to UCI’s recruiting efforts and faculty productivity that UCI maintains this edge. (3/14/06)

5. University Hills Issues

The Council considers campus housing for faculty to be a major faculty welfare issue. Last spring the Council discussed University Hills residents' concerns with ICHA Administrators and Board members. CFW's Subcommittee on Faculty Housing identified the management of the priority list for sales and resales of homes as a major concern. This year, members of the Homeowners Representative Board were invited to provide their perspective on this tool for recruitment and retention. The Council requested that the Academic Senate endorse and forward its request to the Administration that an administrative review be conducted of the Irvine Campus Housing Authority's operating procedures and policies. (3/14/06)

6. Gay/Lesbian/Bisexual/Transgender (GLBT) Issues

After a presentation to the Irvine Divisional Senate Assembly that included a discussion of the President's Task Force Report on Diversity, concerns were raised about whether there is a "chilly climate" at UCI for faculty who happen to be gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgendered. It was noted that the report did not mention such issues. The Council agreed to continue the dialogue next year, and the Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity agreed to review options to provide resource information for GLBT persons on its website, including links to publications, organizations, and other web sites. (4/11/06)

7. UC Dental Benefits

The Council was contacted by several faculty members who were concerned that the dental plan coverage has not changed over the years but the costs of dental procedures continue to rise, which decreases the value of the benefit. Other complaints were received about the number of dentists leaving the Delta Dental network and the lack of advance information on reimbursement rates for non-Delta dentists. Joseph Walsh, UCI Health Care Facilitator, and Gina Merriott, Human Resources' Benefits Program Manager, joined the discussion and provided an overview of the history of the UC's dental benefit and data on benefits offered at comparable institutions. In response to the Council's request, Joseph Walsh reported back to the Council that Delta Dental was not willing to provide a published list of standard reimbursement amounts for the various dental procedures because this would encourage dentists who were charging below the average rates to increase their charges to the maximum allowable. In turn, Delta Dental's costs would increase. (4/11/06)

8. Proposed Cuts in Retiree Health Benefits

The Council urged the Academic Senate to oppose current efforts by UCOP and The Regents to cut health benefits for UC retirees. The Council agreed that reductions in health benefits for UC retirees would be a cruel betrayal of the efforts of the Federal government and the State of California to provide adequate health benefits to retirees. Reductions being considered include: a) increasing the cost of retiree health benefits by the elimination of the refund of the Medicare Part B premium; b) increasing the monthly premium for UC health plans for retirees; and c) capping UC liability for increases in health plan costs. (5/9/06)

At the Irvine Divisional Senate Assembly meeting on May 25, 2006, Julian Feldman, the Council's representative to the University Committee on Faculty Welfare reported on his concerns about the proposed cuts and the following motion was passed by acclamation: The Divisional Senate Assembly urges Chancellor Drake and Senate Chair Janda to obtain permission to tell the Senate the details of the recommendations being considered by the Regents and UCOP to reduce retiree health benefits so that the Senate can voice its support or opposition. (5/25/06)

9. Academic Senate-Emeritae/i Association (UCIEA) Liaison

The Council discussed the UCI Emeritae/i Association's request to have a Senate Cabinet member attend the UCIEA's monthly meetings. UCIEA members would like to be more broadly informed about Senate activities, and would like to have a stronger voice on behalf of its retired members. Proposed cuts to retirement and health care benefits are of particular concern. In lieu of the requested action, the Council suggested that the Academic Senate consider making the Chair of the Emeritae/i Association an ex officio member of the Council, which could facilitate a higher level of interaction and communication. It was noted that the Council currently has three emeritae/i representatives who bring pertinent issues to the Council, and when deemed appropriate, the issue(s) are forwarded to the Senate Cabinet. (6/6/06)

10. Open Letter on Tolerance and Free Speech

The Council was asked to respond to concerns expressed by some faculty members that Senate Chair Janda, by endorsing a statement made by colleagues from the Center for the Scientific Study of Ethics and Morality when he addressed Senate Members in his May 18 email about Free Speech and Campus Civility, advocated condemning some speech because the public may not understand UC’s obligation to provide a forum for controversial events. The text at issue was:

“… because the public may not be aware of this legal requirement, the public perception may be that UCI is legitimizing an event that, in this case, includes inflammatory and inappropriate language. Thus, it is imperative that faculty speak out to note their condemnation of the use of such provocative, inflammatory language tinged with hate, whatever the source.”

With one dissention, Council members agreed that misunderstandings are better addressed by education than condemnation, and that defending the rights of others to speak is compatible with condemning what they say. All members supported Chair Janda’s other statements in the email and felt that they were in the same spirit as Chancellor Drake’s view (5/30 email on Hate Speech) that deliberately disrespectful speech, while legal, does not serve UC’s goals because it does not promote dialogue or understanding. (6/6/06)

11. The Farm School

The Council followed up on the issue of the possible closure of the UCI Farm School that was reviewed last year. New information was provided on increased enrollments of faculty members' children. The Council forwarded its concerns to the Senate Chair that the review promised by the Dean of Social Sciences had not occurred, and that the Administration has not appropriately involved the Academic Senate in this review process. (6/6/06)

Proposal Reviews

1. Proposal for a Systemwide Statement on Diversity from the University Committee on Affirmative Action and Diversity (UCAAD)

The Council voted unanimously to support the proposed Systemwide Statement on Diversity which outlines the value of diversity to the University and sends a positive message that may push UC to become more diverse. The Council hoped that the statement would be widely and publicly disseminated. (10/12/05)

2. Revised Proposal for a Program in Nursing Science at UCI

The revised proposal generated similar comments and questions to those that the Council's raised previously. The main concern was related to the impact on participating faculty and units in relation to the resource and FTE requirements of accommodating up to 200 nursing students. Most of these concerns were addressed at the Cabinet meeting’s discussion with Chancellor Drake on October 18, 2005. Notes from that discussion were circulated electronically and, with the additional information provided by Chancellor Drake, CFW supported the revised Proposal for a Program in Nursing Science because there is a critical need for more nurses in California. (10/11/05)

3. Proposal for a School of Design

The Council on Faculty Welfare discussed the proposal for a School of Design at two meetings and reviewed the original proposal from 2002. The Council was supportive of the proposal and no faculty welfare issues were identified. (1/17/06) (2/14/06)

4. Proposal for Free Evening and Weekend Parking at UCI

The Council on Student Experience recommended free evening and weekend parking as part of its anti-boring campaign. The Council was not persuaded that free parking would improve attendance at evening and weekend campus events and concluded that users of campus parking services should pay for those services. The Council was more concerned about the change in policy for student parking permits. For safety reasons, the Council strongly recommended that students, such as freshman who are currently limited to one parking lot at a remote location, should be allowed to park in any lot after 4:00 p.m. so that they are parking close to their evening class or rehearsal. (1/17/06)

Policy Reviews

1. Proposal to Amend Appendix III of the Irvine Division Senate Manual – Privilege and Tenure Policies

The Council unanimously approved the proposed amendments that bring UCI’s policies into compliance with recent changes in UC procedures and manuals. The Council noted that providing links to the related UC documents eliminates the time consuming process of cross-checking between universitywide and divisional procedures. (12/6/06)

2. Establishment of Systemwide Standards for Review of Institutional Review Boards

The Council met with Professors Robert Burger and Anton Hasso (IRB Chairs for Human Research), Professor James Hicks (IACUC Chair for Animal Research); Alisa Irwin (RGS Director of Research Protections), and Professor Sidney Golub (Stem Cell Research Review Board Chair) and discussed the University Committee on Academic Freedoms’ concerns about IRB’s possible interference and/or delays to faculty research. The Council concluded that there were a sufficient number of issues that merit further UC review and suggested that consideration should also be given to developing procedures that will expedite the review process. The Council's views were conveyed to the university committee by Professor Robert Josephson, UCI's representative to UCAF. (1/17/06)

3. Draft White Papers and Proposed Policy from the Special Committee on Scholarly Communications

The Council reviewed the issues related to the rapidly changing world of publication created by electronic publishing and online access. UC libraries are faced with an increasing number of more expensive journals while trying to maintain comprehensive collections on limited budgets. The Council endorsed the general direction of the proposed policy, but recommended two changes in its wording:

“. . . . University of California Faculty shall routinely are encouraged to grant to the Regents of the University of California a . . . . ;" and,

"In the event that a faculty member assigns all or a part of the faculty member’s copyrights to a publisher as part of a publication agreement, the faculty member must should seek to retain the right to grant this license to the Regents.” (2/14/06)

4. Proposed Revision to APM 220-28 b (4) Criteria for Advancement to Professor VI and to Professor Above Scale – Formal Review

The Council endorsed six recommendations of the report of the Task Force on the Professional Step System's during its informal review last year, including the recommendation to eliminate Step VI. For this second round of review, the Council had no concerns about the proposed rewording for Professor, Above Scale. However, for Professor, Step VI, the Council continued to question both the rewording’s effect and value. (2/14/06)

5. Proposed Revisions to APM 700, 710, 711 and 080 – Formal Review

The Council on Faculty Welfare concluded that the proposed revisions related to paid sick leave, reasonable accommodation, medical separation and constructive resignation were appropriate and unanimously approved them as presented. During the informal review last year, the Council forward several recommendations and were pleased to note that two recommendations were incorporated into the final version being circulated in the formal review. (4/11/06)

6. UCPB's Proposed Principles on Private Funding for Senior Leadership Salaries at the Level of Dean and Above

The Council unanimously endorsed the principle not to use private funding to pay salaries of senior leadership as stated in the University on Planning and Budget's Proposed Principles on Private Funding for Senior Leadership Salaries at the Level of Dean and Above because this would move UC away from transparency and the public trust. (4/11/06)

7. Establishing Interdisciplinary Graduate Programs at UCI – Suggested Guidelines

The Graduate Council approved a revised guideline for, "Establishing Interdisciplinary Graduate Programs at UCI" in November 2005, and the Council endorsed the document as useful to faculty interested in creating such programs. The Council's recommendations included: the addition of links or references to more detailed information on the initial review process, if available; the programs should be more widely advertised; and UCI should periodically review interdisciplinary programs, and/or impose sunset provisions when they are approved that would require them to be terminated, converted into regular academic units or actively renewed after 5-10 years. (5/9/06)

8. Proposed Amendment of Senate Bylaw 185. University Committee on Library (UCOL) – Systemwide Review

The University Committee on Library proposed adding oversight of scholarly communications to its duties and title. The Council was concerned that conflicting interests may arise between the UC Libraries and those entities currently publishing scholarly communications, in which case, the evolving issues of scholarly communication may be better served by a separate committee. After more consideration and an electronic vote, the Council approved the proposed amendment. (6/6/06)

9. Student Freedom of Scholarly Inquiry Principles – Draft Statement

The Senate-Administrative committee created by the University Committee on Academic Freedom drafted a statement on student academic freedom similar to APM 010's principles of faculty academic freedom. The Council agreed that the statement was reasonable, had undergone a full review by Senate committees, student groups and others, and would be helpful to students. The Council unanimously approved the draft statement as written. (6/6/06)

Report and Resolution Reviews

1. Report of the Ad Hoc Summer Session Committee

Several Council members favored developing a summer session into a complete fourth quarter, to eliminate the need for a separate administrative structure and to ensure that the instructional quality matched that of the other quarters. Two faculty welfare issues were identified: 1) It would be difficult to maintain shared governance with an uneven availability of faculty for Senate and departmental service when faculty took other quarters off; and 2) Additional summer child care would be needed. Surveys are needed to determine what incentives would encourage students to attend and faculty to teach in summer, and data from other UC campuses that are further along in summer session development would be useful. (11/8/05 & 12/6/05)

2. UC Irvine Childcare Advisory Committee Report - 2005

The Council voted unanimously to endorse the report's main recommendations: 1) that new campus childcare centers are needed, and 2) that outside fundraising is needed to ensure that facilities, particularly for infant-toddler care, will be available to UCI faculty and staff in the long-term. The need for childcare is likely to expand more rapidly than the campus’s ability to build more facilities, and other creative solutions may be needed. The Council commended the Executive Vice Chancellor/Provost for responding to the petition circulated by the Faculty Women’s Association. (12/6/05)

3. The Strategic Plan – 2005-06

The Council discussed the six page “Introduction” of the draft “Strategic Plan” and concluded that, like the plan itself, it provided a rosy view of UCI’s future, but did not provide details on how that future would be created. The Council was concerned that the document did not exemplify the kind of analytical sophistication that UCI teaches to its students and California’s business and community leaders expect from UCI. (12/6/05)

4. Report from President Dynes Task Force on Diversity

Guests: Sheila O'Rourke, UCOP's Executive Director of Academic Compliance, Lisa Frehill, Co-Director of UCI's Advance Program, and Douglas Haynes, UCI's representative to the President's Task Force on Faculty Diversity, attended the Council's June 6 meeting and gave a preview of the data and conclusions from the report, which is now published on the UCOP's web site at:



The Council concluded that the ADVANCE Program appears to be a success in recruiting a more diverse faculty, but efforts at retention need more attention. (6/6/06)

Information Items

1. UCI Parking and Transportation Services

Stacey Murren, Director, and Ron Fleming, Event Manager, from the Office of Parking and Transportation Services attended the June 6 meeting and presented an overview of the parking office's principles of providing convenient, sufficient, and economical parking to the campus while balancing the needs of faculty, staff and students. She discussed policies instituted last year, new services, future plans including an increase in parking permit rates. (6/6/06)

Status Reports

The following subcommittees have the opportunity to provide status reports at each meeting on issues under review at the campus level and by the UC Senate committees: Faculty Welfare, Affirmative Action and Diversity, Academic Freedom, and Emeritae/i Affairs.

Consultants from the Offices of Human Resources and the Equal Opportunity and Diversity also have the opportunity to provide status reports at each Council meeting. The Council would like to thank Kirsten Quanbeck, Gwen Kuhns Black, Anne Fink and Gina Merriott for their important contribution.

Issues for 2006-07

A number of issues from 2005-06 will continue to be reviewed during the 2006-07 academic year: faculty housing, infant/toddler care for faculty, health care benefits for active and retired faculty, gender equity, and the proposed broader oversight of equal opportunity and diversity by the Academic Senate committees. For University Hills, the Council will be interested in following up on its continuing concerns about the priority list procedures for sales and resales.

The minutes of the monthly meetings are on file in the Academic Senate Office.

On behalf of the Council on Faculty Welfare,

[pic]

Pauline Yahr, Chair

Faculty Members: Representatives:

Pauline Yahr, Chair Emeritus Representatives: (3)

Alison Brysk (FQ) Julian Feldman, Emeritus Rep

Nancy Burley (WQ) Myron Simon, Emeritus Rep

Alison Clarke-Stewart Jerome Tobis, Emeritus Rep

Imran Currim

Peter Ditto Representatives:

Roland Giolli Kathryn Kjaer, LAUC-I Rep

Svetlana Jitomirskaya

Robert Josephson

Janice Plastino Consultants:

Richard Robertson Anne Paden, Human Resources

John Smith (F&SQ) Gina Merriott, Human Resources

Howard Tucker Gwen Kuhns Black, OEOD

Charles (Ted) Wright

Attachments:

Reports from the Council's Subcommittees

REPORT BY THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON ACADEMIC FREEDOM (UCAF)

The Council’s Subcommittee on Academic Freedom sent a UCI representative to the University Committee on Academic Freedom’s meetings. UC issues on academic freedom for 2005-06 included:

• Restoration of Research and Instruction (R&I) Funding to Academics – The merits of restoring R&I funding to academics, rather than routing it to each campus administration was considered.

• A statement on academic freedom for students, similar to APM 010 for faculty, was discussed.

• Institutional Review Boards – Issues included: Are they interfering in faculty research? Should UC guidelines be established?

• Corporate Influence on Research – The impact on freedom of research and research integrity was reviewed.

• Academic Freedom at UC – The draft statement was discussed.

• Misconduct in Research Policy – UC Davis policy was considered as a possible model for a UC policy.

The Council on Faculty Welfare, with advice from the Subcommittee, reviewed and commented on several academic freedom issues.

For the Subcommittee on Academic Freedom,

Robert Josephson, Chair

Subcommittee members:

Robert Josephson, Chair and UCI Representative to UCAF

Alison Clarke-Stewart

Howard Tucker

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

REPORT BY THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND DIVERSITY

The Subcommittee on Affirmative Action and Diversity sent a UCI representative to the University Committee on Affirmative Action and Diversity's meetings. UC issues on affirmative action and diversity for 2005-06 included:

• Implementation of last year's modifications to APM 210, 240, and 245;

• Proposed Systemwide Statement on Diversity;

• Recommendations for Local Diversity Committee Empowerment;

• Formal Review of Systemwide Academic Personnel Policies, APM 220-18.b.(4) – Criteria for Advancement to Professor VI and to Professor Above-Scale Salary Levels;

• Report from the President's Task Force on Faculty Diversity;

• Consultation with UCOP on pay equity data for women and minorities; and

• Adding diversity language to graduate applications and faculty bio-bibliographies.

The Subcommittee met several times prior to Council meetings to discuss UCI’s Affirmative Action Plan, progress by schools in hiring faculty as diverse as their applicant pools, progress toward meeting the State requirement for sexual harassment training, steps that UCI Senate Councils could take to implement recent changes to the APM. Other issues brought to the Council are discussed above.

For the Subcommittee on Affirmative Action and Diversity,

Pauline Yahr, Chair

Subcommittee members:

Pauline Yahr, Chair and UCI Representative to UCAAD

Alison Brysk (FQ '05)

Nancy Burley (WQ '06)

Peter Ditto

Richard Robertson

John Smith, (FQ '05 & SQ '06)

Charles (Ted) Wright (SQ '6)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

REPORT BY THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON EMERITAE/I AFFAIRS

The Subcommittee on Emeritae/i Affairs met prior to the Council meeting and considered the following issues in 2005-2006:  

• Changes in retirees' pensions and health plans benefits, including UC's version of Medicare Part D.

• Worked on plans to conduct a survey of academic units about the services and privileges offered to emeritae/i, with the goal of developing a list of best practices which will be circulated across campus. The goal is to improve benefits/services to retired faculty members. The UCI Emeritae/i Association provided funding for a consultant to assist with the survey development.

For the Subcommittee on Emeritae/i Affairs,

Julian Feldman

Subcommittee members:

Julian Feldman, Chair

Myron Simon

Jerome Tobis   

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

REPORT BY THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON FACULTY WELFARE

The Subcommittee on Faculty Welfare provided comments to CFW on faculty welfare items mentioned in the CFW report. The Subcommittee on Faculty Welfare sent a UCI representative to the University Committee on Faculty Welfare's monthly meetings. UC issues on faculty welfare for 2005-06 included:

• Consultation with UCOP regarding: Electronic Communications Policy, Open Enrollment, Loan Programs, Human Resources, Benefits, Budget, Senior Management Policies

• Reports from the UCFW Health Care Task Force

• Reports from the UCFW Task Force on Investment and Retirement

• Childcare, Adoption Benefits, Tuition Fee Waivers

• UCAAD Statement on Diversity

• UC Retirement Program – resumption of contributions and other possible changes

• Retiree Health Benefits – possible reductions

• Faculty Off-Scale Salaries, Recruitment, and Retention

• UC Parking Principles

• Proposed Principles on Private Funding for Senior Leadership Salaries

• Formal Review of Proposed Revisions to AMPs Related to Sick Leave, Reasonable Accommodation, Medical Separation and Constructive Resignation (APMs 700, 710, 711, and 080)

• UCFW Business & Systemwide Academic Senate Reviews

For the Subcommittee on Faculty Welfare,

Julian Feldman

Subcommittee members:

Julian Feldman, Chair

Imran Currim

Roland Giolli

Svetlana Jitomirskaya

Janice Plastino

................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download