Welcome to The Constitutional Law Group - Constitutional ...



AFFIDAVIT/DECLARATION OF TRUTH

Costco Wholesale

Corporate Headquarters 

Craig Jelinek CEO 

999 Lake Drive 

Issaquah, WA 98027 

I, _____________________, a living man/woman, the undersigned, make this Affidavit/Declaration of Truth of my own free will, and I hereby affirm, declare and swear, under my oath and under the pains and penalties of perjury under the laws of the United States of America and of Washington State, that I am of legal age and of sound mind and hereby attest that the statements, averments and information contained in this Affidavit/Declaration are true and correct to the best of my knowledge.

This Affidavit/Declaration of Truth is lawful notification you, and is hereby made and sent to you pursuant to the national Constitution, specifically, the Bill of Rights, in particular, Amendments I, IV, V, VI, VII, IX and X, and The Bill of Rights of The ________________ State Constitution in particular Article 1, Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 10, 11, 29, 30, 32 and 35 and requires your written rebuttal to me, in kind, specific to each and every point of the subject matter stated herein, within ten (10) business days, via your own sworn and notarized affidavit, using true fact, valid law and evidence to support your rebuttal of the specific subject matter stated in this Affidavit/Declaration. You are hereby noticed that your failure to respond, as stipulated, and rebut, with particularity and specificity, anything with which you disagree in this Affidavit/Declaration, is your lawful, legal and binding tacit agreement with and admission to the fact that everything in this Affidavit/Declaration is true, correct, legal, lawful, and fully binding upon you in any court in America, without your protest or objection and that of those who represent you.

1. December 31st, 2020, I decided to go shopping at the ___________Costco Wholesale to buy steaks for New Years Eve. I entered the warehouse about 10:00 am and showed the security person my membership card. I heard someone say that I needed to wear a mask. I continued to walk in with my shopping cart because I know for a fact that I am not required by law to wear a mask. These unlawful edicts are not law and have not gone

AFFIDAVIT/DECLARATION OF TRUTH

through legislation and are in clear violation of well-established law. I walked back to the meat department and picked out two packages of steaks. Before I knew it there was a Staff Manager named ___________________ directly in front of me. He said that I had to wear a mask if I wanted to shop. I said, “No I do not, and it is against my religious conviction to do so.” I handed______________ my business card . He replied with,” it does not matter these are our rules.” By then there were two more men that showed up. ________________ the Assistant General Manager and_______________ the Front-End Manager. They were trying to intimidate and coerce me by ganging up and surrounding me. I was completely humiliated. One of them said they will refund my membership and I replied with, “I did not want to.” They again said that I must wear a mask and that I was making a scene and if I do not comply, I cannot shop. Clearly it was them that were making a scene. If I had not been discriminated, harassed, and humiliated and allowed to shop and provide for my family nothing would have transpired. They continued to discriminate against me as a group. I informed them that if you are a private business then you are a public accommodation that is open to the general public and engaged in commerce. Staff Manager______________________ said that if I do not leave, he will call the police and I replied with, “go ahead, then I will call the Sheriff.” At this point another supervisor named ___________________ showed up. I let them all know that if they violate my rights, I will sue them in their official and private capacity and wrote down their names. I proceeded to call Sheriff of _________________________ County.

2. I told the Sheriff what had transpired so far and that all I wanted to do was shop and buy groceries for my family. He was a witness to the managers and supervisors telling me to wear a mask and that I needed to leave the warehouse. I told the Sheriff how they are violating the law and quoted U.S.C. Title 18 section 242 Deprivation of Rights under Color of Law and U.S.C. Title 18 section 241 Conspiracy Against Rights, which was clearly taking place. I was completely humiliated and could not believe that this was happening in my lifetime. I asked the Sheriff what I should do? He replied with, well it sounds like they are denying you service, and he mentioned how it is not as bad on the east side of the state and I replied with, “well before long it will be on your side too and that it is just a matter of time.” I continued to talk with the Sheriff as I slowly walked away from my shopping cart and the group of managers and supervisors that unlawfully violated my constitutionally protected rights. Manager__________________ stalked and followed me as I made my way to the exit.

AFFIDAVIT/DECLARATION OF TRUTH

Before I exited, I turned around and took a photo of him because I felt intimidated and was unsure of what he was up to. I knew that he was breaking the law and I wanted to have evidence that I was there and that he followed me out of Costco Wholesale’s warehouse. My camera time stamp was 10:18am when I turned around to take a photo of Costco’s entrance while I exited the building. Attached as Exhibit A, 1 through 6 are photos and records from my Samsung phone showing the time the photos were taken.

3. I walked to my automobile in utter disbelief. I cannot comprehend that the very same men who are supposed to have an ethical standard of non-discrimination that was quoted by Costco’s CEO Craig Jelinek stating that, “There can be no tolerance of racism, discrimination or harassment at Costco,” unlawfully violated my unalienable rights secured by the United States Constitution. In a matter of 18 minutes on December 31st, 2020, I was discriminated, harassed, intimidated, bullied, coerced, and terrorized by four men employed by Costco Wholesale in ____________________. I found my briefcase and pulled out four discrimination forms and immediately filled them out and traveled to the County Courthouse and delivered them to the office of Sheriff ________________ of ______________________. Attached as Exhibit B, 1-5 is a copy of the Notice of Discrimination. I traveled home afterwards and had extreme depression due to the events that transpired at Costco. It occurred to me that the reason for my severe depression was because while I was in Costco it felt as though I had been morphed to Communistic China and that I longer lived in America. This is a sad reality that is becoming more and more prominent in our world today and I pray to God that this ends soon for the sake of our future generations to come.

Any unlawful acts committed under your watch, Craig Jelinek, acting CEO of Costco Headquarters located in Issaquah, Washington, either supports and upholds both national and state constitutions, or opposes and violates them. 

The following are statements from Craig Jelinek regarding Covid19 and unlawful discrimination:

AFFIDAVIT/DECLARATION OF TRUTH

Dear Costco members,

Along with the rest of the country, we were shocked by the tragic and senseless death of George Floyd. While Costco cannot alter this terrible event, or others like it, we believe all individuals and organizations can use this moment as a catalyst for change. We must re-examine how we deal with issues of racism and injustice everywhere in our society.

Please find below a letter I shared with Costco employees earlier this week. I’m sharing this message with you to let you know that racism, discrimination and harassment are not tolerated at

Costco. We remain steadfast in our commitment to fairness and equity for our employees, members and communities.

Thank you,

Craig Jelinek

President and CEO

Costco Wholesale

To: All employees

From: Craig Jelinek

I’m writing, as others have, to acknowledge the terrible events that are occurring in a great many of our communities. Violence and demonstrations, and graphic images of a senseless killing, have combined with the effects of the pandemic to further threaten our collective sense of well-being. Although there are many voices competing to be heard, they shouldn’t distract us from a long-standing issue at the core of the unrest: racism and injustice.

I wish I had inspirational words or a grand proposal that could restore peace or make things better for our country and our world. For now, I can only do my part by focusing attention on Costco and our employees. Please know this: There can be no tolerance of racism, discrimination, or harassment at Costco.

Especially under the current circumstances, I want to remind Costco employees of our ongoing commitment to the values that are vital to our culture. We remain committed to taking care of our employees, building a diverse workforce, maintaining work environments that are free from discrimination and harassment, and treating each other in a fair, honest, respectful, and inclusive way.

As I’ve said before in many contexts, we’re not perfect. We’re proud of our efforts and our progress, but we can always do better. One of the key ways we can continue to improve as a

AFFIDAVIT/DECLARATION OF TRUTH

company and as individuals is to listen to each other’s perspectives with respect, patience and humility. Now as much as ever, we all have an important role in taking care of each other and preserving our culture and our values. I am grateful for all of you.

November 10, 2020

Dear Costco Member,

Effective Nov. 16, 2020, we will require all members, guests and employees to wear a face mask or face shield at Costco locations. Entry to Costco will only be granted to those wearing a face mask or face shield. Children under the age of 2 are exempt.

Costco has had a face mask policy in effect since May 4, 2020, but members who could not wear a mask due to a medical condition were exempt. This is no longer the case. If a member has a medical condition that prevents them from wearing a mask, they must wear a face shield at Costco.

This updated policy may seem inconvenient to some, however we believe the added safety is worth any inconvenience. Our goal is to continue to provide a safe shopping environment for our members and guests, and to provide a safe work environment for our employees.

Thank you for your cooperation and support.

Craig Jelinek

President and CEO

Costco Wholesale

Any acts committed by (list employees that violated my rights here), either supports and upholds both national and state constitutions, or opposes and violates them. 

Your unconstitutional actions, as described throughout this Affidavit/Declaration of Truth, clearly demonstrate how every one of you have violated all of the lawful positions, and the constitutions. Please note that, as stated above and below, if you fail to specifically rebut, in kind, any of the charges, claims, and positions set forth in this Affidavit/Declaration, then you tacitly admit to them, and these admissions will be lawfully used against you. The following paragraphs and others throughout this Affidavit/Declaration describe some of your unlawful, unconstitutional actions, which have harmed me and others: 

AFFIDAVIT/DECLARATION OF TRUTH

 U.S.C. 1st Amendment, the right to peaceably assemble. 

U.S.C. 4th Amendment, the right to be secure in their persons. 

WASHINGTON STATE CONSTITUTION 

ARTICLE I 

DECLARATION OF RIGHTS 

SECTION 11 RELIGIOUS FREEDOM. Absolute freedom of conscience in all matters of religious sentiment, belief, and worship, shall be guaranteed to every individual, and no one shall be molested or disturbed in person or property on account of religion; but the liberty of conscience hereby secured shall not be so construed as to excuse acts of licentiousness or justify practices inconsistent with the peace and safety of the state. 

WASHINGTON STATE CODE: 

RCW 42.60.010 

Findings. 

The legislature finds and declares the following: 

(1) Washington state celebrates the rich cultural heritage and diversity of its residents; and 

(2) Freedom of religion and protection from persecution on the basis of religion is one of the founding ideals of the nation. 

WASHINGTON STATE 

CERTIFICATION OF ENROLLMENT ENGROSSED HOUSE BILL 2097 

Chapter 303, Laws of 2018 (partial veto) 65th Legislature 2018 Regular Session RELIGIOUS AFFILIATION--DISCLOSURE 

[ 2018 c 303 § 1.] 

AFFIDAVIT/DECLARATION OF TRUTH

Our nation was founded by people who came to this country in search of religious freedom, a fundamental value of our republic. The establishment and free exercise clauses of the First Amendment prevents the government from promoting religion in any way, provides you with the right to worship (or not) as you wish and prohibits the government from penalizing you for your religious beliefs. The separation of church and state is one of the very reasons why individuals have sought refuge by immigrating to this country. The intent section of the bill eloquently outlines these values and I believe its codification is necessary so that the horrors of the past will not be repeated. I am, therefore, vetoing Section 6 of the bill, which will enable the Code Reviser to codify the intent language in Section 1. A veto of Section 6 does not impact the bill's policy; rather it strengthens the bill by celebrating the rich cultural p. 3 EHB 2097.SL heritage and diversity of our residents and reminding us that the freedom of religion is one of the founding ideals of the nation. In signing this bill, I want to make it clear that it is our duty as public servants to ensure that we are not only meeting the letter of the law, but the spirit as well. It is my intent that this law be implemented fully and consistently by all public agencies across the state. 

U.S.C. Title 18 section 242 deprivation of rights under the color of the law. 

To willfully deprive me of my rights and privilege to shop at a public store: Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death. 

AFFIDAVIT/DECLARATION OF TRUTH

U.S.C. Title 18 section 241 Conspiracy against rights. 

If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or 

If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured— 

They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death. 

All of the aforementioned situations are denying me my constitutional rights and denying me the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. 

Costco Wholesale is a private entity that provides goods and services to the public therefore lawful defined in both federal and state laws as a “public accommodation” and a “place of public accommodation” These are unlawful acts of discrimination, harassment, coercion, and domestic terrorism. 

The following are well established laws that have been violated by Costco Wholesale Corporation employees: (Name employees and their position here) :

AFFIDAVIT/DECLARATION OF TRUTH

Title II of the Civil Rights Act, U.S. Code 42 2000(a) 

2000cc-3(g) 

“This chapter shall be construed in favor of a broad protection of religious exercise, to the maximum extent permitted by the terms of this chapter and the Constitution.” 

2000cc-5 “The term “religious exercise” includes any exercise of religion, whether or not compelled by, or central to, a system of religious belief.” 

Title VII Civil Rights Act 

42 U.S.C. §2000e 

(j) The term "religion" includes all aspects of religious observance and practice, as well as belief, unless an employer demonstrates that he is unable to reasonably accommodate to an employee's or prospective employee's religious observance or practice without undue hardship on the conduct of the employer's business. 

The Civil Rights Act, religious observances or practices include, for example, attending worship services, praying or the wearing of any religious dress or symbols, displaying religious garb or symbols, displaying religious objects, adhering to certain dietary rules, proselytizing or other forms of religious expression or refraining from certain activities, (such as wearing a mask.) 

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act also protects all aspects of religious observance, practice, and belief, and defines religion very broadly to include not only traditional, organized religions such as Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, and Sikhism, but also religious beliefs that are new, uncommon, not part of a formal church or sect, only subscribed to by a small number of people, or may seem illogical or unreasonable to others. 

1 Corinthians 11:7 

For a man ought not to cover his head, since he is the image and glory of God, but woman is the glory of man. 

AFFIDAVIT/DECLARATION OF TRUTH

2 Corinthians 3:18 

"And we all, with unveiled faces, beholding the glory of the Lord, are being transformed into the same image from one degree of glory to another. ... And the Lord--who is the Spirit--makes us more and more like him as we are changed into his glorious image." 

There are some things the Bible tells us not to put a mask on. We should not put a mask on the Scriptures. Spread the Bible far and wide and never “sheltered-in” the Truth where no one can hear. We should never put a mask on our salvation or our faces. 

The Great Deceiver Satan has tricked the world once again. He has the governments of the world firmly in his grip and he is commanding them to implement global tyranny using a phony pandemic as a rationale. He has managed to trick the average person into believing that there is a deadly virus causing mayhem while simultaneously blinding them to official numbers from government affiliated organizations such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that suggest there is no such pandemic. He has tricked businessmen into following his plan, as well, a plan that includes forcing patrons to choke themselves, and to remake themselves in his image. The mask is a symbol of the Great Deceiver himself.

I cannot wear a mask because it is one of the many tools the Devil is using to usher in the Mark of the Beast system as foretold in the book of Revelation in the bible. I will be subjecting myself to the Wrath of God if I choose to assist the Devil in his quest to enslave and ultimately murder all humanity. In addition, I cannot wear a mask because the ensuing restriction of my ability to breathe quickly makes me dizzy, lightheaded, and makes it difficult for me to think straight.

Satan has managed to convince the people of the world to cover their faces even while study after study demonstrates that choking oneself with a mask does nothing to stop disease, and indeed may cause disease itself by restricting one’s exhalation of the product of breathing which can be toxic if it is not exhaled. A recent study by Danish researchers conclusively demonstrates the ineffectiveness of masks in controlling disease. The knowledge that masks are ineffective at protecting health has been long known and was made public knowledge at the start of the supposed pandemic by Dr. Anthony Fauci himself.

AFFIDAVIT/DECLARATION OF TRUTH

No Christian can in good conscience participate in a system that God Almighty warned us about: We are commanded to reject it in all its forms. Costco is a private business to the extent that businesses can be private in a nation where the government unconstitutionally attempts to micromanage all its citizens’ actions, and ultimately it is Costco choosing to refuse me service and thus denying me my right to breathe freely. Costco has chosen to participate in the Devil’s plan, the Great Hoax, the Great Deception, which will lead to the eradication of humanity, and will be held accountable by God.

Americans with Disabilities Act A.D.A. 

Title III Regulations 42 U.S.C. §2000a 

(a)Equal Access 

All persons shall be entitled to the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, and accommodations of any place of public accommodation, as defined in this section, without discrimination or segregation on the ground of race, color, religion, or national origin. 

(b)Establishments affecting interstate commerce or supported in their activities by State action as places of public accommodation; lodgings; facilities principally engaged in selling food for consumption on the premises; gasoline stations; places of exhibition or entertainment; other covered establishments. 

Each of the following establishments which serves the public is a place of public accommodation within the meaning of this subchapter if its operations affect commerce, or if discrimination or segregation by it is supported by State action: 

(1) any inn, hotel, motel, or other establishment which provides lodging to transient guests, other than an establishment located within a building which contains not more than five rooms for rent or hire and which is actually occupied by the proprietor of such establishment as his residence. 

(2) any restaurant, cafeteria, lunchroom, lunch counter, soda fountain, or other facility principally engaged in selling food for consumption on the premises, including, but not limited to, any such facility located on the premises of any retail establishment, or any gasoline station. 

(3) any motion picture house, theater, concert hall, sports arena, stadium or other place of exhibition or entertainment; and 

AFFIDAVIT/DECLARATION OF TRUTH

(4) any establishment (A)(i) which is physically located within the premises of any establishment otherwise covered by this subsection, or (ii) within the premises of which is physically located any such covered establishment, and (B) which holds itself out as serving patrons of such covered establishment. 

This was the ruling of the United States Supreme Court shortly after the “civil war” in Ex parte Milligan, 71 U.S. 2 (1866) which yet stands to this day.

“Neither the legislation nor any executive or judicial officer may disregard the provisions of the Constitution in the case of an emergency.” Section 98: Therefore, ANYONE who declares the suspension of constitutionally guaranteed rights to freely travel, peacefully assemble, earn a living, freely worship, etc. and or attempts to enforce such suspension within 50 independent sovereign, continental United States of America is making war against our Constitution and therefore, We the People. They violate their Constitutional oath and, thus, immediately forfeit their office and authority and their proclamations may be disregarded with impunity and that means ANYONE: even the governor and the President

The following is a copy of the Mass Tort Claim filed against 42 corrupt governors, William Henry Gates III and the C.D.C. Starting at page 12 through the 1st paragraph of page 22. Due to the massive corruption in our courts, our right to redress our grievances have been denied or suspended without due process of law guaranteed under the Constitution both state and federal:

The declaration of a State of Emergency for the COVID-19 diagnosis criteria for a series of pneumonia and influenza related symptoms and the allegations of the existence of a “novel coronavirus” is based on a series of assumptions that are patently false.

AFFIDAVIT/DECLARATION OF TRUTH

1..According to the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses’ (ICTV) Coronaviridae Study Group (CSG) publication on March 2, 2020, the preliminary data suggesting that there was sufficient variation to determine this to be a novel virus vs. a mutation of known coronaviruses, was not based on established scientific principles but was responsive to the World Health Organization’s prior unfounded declaration of novelty of both the virus and a new disease.

2. There could be no independent verification of the epidemiologic models predicting dire infection and mortality rates as the underlying models and data were not published, and when sought, were reportedly corrupted so as to make their examination impossible.

3. In violation of State law, no medical or scientific evidence was provided to establish even causal links between the SARS CoV-2 and the symptoms of COVID-19, relying instead on foreign government hearsay and conjecture.

4. Since 2003, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and their subordinate organizations – the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) – maintained a patent preventing any independent organization from testing for the presence of coronavirus transmissible to humans through 2018 resulting in a complete lack of testing technologies.

5. No State official reviewed for accuracy or veracity any of the causal statements made in the Declaration of Emergency which contain false, misleading, and terror inducing statements.

AFFIDAVIT/DECLARATION OF TRUTH

6. In violation of well-established legal precedent from Jew Ho v. Williamson, 103 F. 10, 26 (C.C.N.D. Cal. 1900) and subsequent public health law, arbitrary and capricious rules were inflicted upon a part of the population that were not applied generally, resulting in the unlawful confinement of a healthy population with no basis in science or fact.

7. Governor _________________________ has failed to provide adequate testing to confirm or deny the presence or absence of “a novel coronavirus” and, based on recent reports from testing of incarcerated persons reported by Reuters, 96% of prisoners testing positive for coronavirus are asymptomatic, demonstrating a failure to establish even a statistical link between the virus and the disease.

8. Neither Governor _________________________ nor any public health officer has followed evidence-based, peer-reviewed, clinical science showing that neither social distancing (of up to 6 feet of separation), nor the wearing of masks has any clinical effect in a healthy population and that instituting such policies is exclusively for the inducement of fear and terror in the population.

As result of these and other established facts, Governor ______________unlawful orders and those that follow from these orders issued in violation of the ____________________________ State Constitution, are unlawful and unenforceable.

AFFIDAVIT/DECLARATION OF TRUTH

For your reference, please review the following facts:

Assertion:

On April 25, 2003, the United States Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (hereinafter, “CDC”) filed an application for a United States (Application Number Coronavirus isolated from humans”. Claim 3 – US46592703P, subsequently issued as U.S. Patent 7,776,521) entitled “A method of detecting a severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV) in a sample...; and, Claim 4 - A kit for detecting a severe acute respiratory syndrome associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV) in a sample..., provided the CDC with a statutory market exclusion right for the detection of and sampling for severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV). Securing this right afforded the CDC exclusive right to research, commercially exploit, or block others from conducting activities involving SARS-CoV since 2003.On September 24, 2018, the CDC failed to pay the required maintenance fees on this patent and their rights expired with no notification issued by CDC alerting the private sector to this decision.

From April 2003 until September 2018, the CDC owned SARS-CoV, its ability to be detected and the ability to manufacture kits for its assessment. During this 15-year period, the effect of the grant of this right — ruled unconstitutional in 2013 by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Association for Molecular Pathology et al. v. Myriad Genetics – meant that the commercial exploitation of any research or commercial activity in the United States involving SARS-CoV would constitute an infringement of the CDC’s illegal patent.

It appears that, during the period of patent enforcement and after the Supreme Court ruling confirming that patents on genetic material were illegal, the CDC and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases led by Anthony Fauci (hereinafter “NIAID” and "Dr Fauci", respectively) entered into trade among States (including, but not limited to working with Ecohealth Alliance Inc.) and

AFFIDAVIT/DECLARATION OF TRUTH

with foreign nations national entities (specifically, the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the Chinese Academy of Sciences) through the 2014 et seq National Institutes of Health Grant R01AI110964, to exploit their patent rights.

It further appears that, during the period of patent enforcement and after the Supreme Court ruling confirming that patents on genetic material was illegal, the CDC and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (hereinafter “NIAID”) entered into trade among States (including, but not limited to working with University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill) and with foreign nations (specifically, the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the Chinese Academy of Sciences represented by Zheng-Li Shi) through U19AI109761 (Ralph S. Baric), U19AI107810 (Ralph S. Baric), and National Natural Science Foundation of China Award 81290341 (Zheng-Li Shi) et al. 2015-2016.

It further appears that, during the period of patent enforcement and after the Supreme Court ruling confirming that patents on generic material was illegal, the CDC and NIAID entered into trade among States (including, but not limited to working with University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill) and with foreign nations to conduct chimeric construction of novel coronavirus material with specific virulence properties prior to, during, and following the determination made by the National Institutes for Health in October 17, 2014 that this work was not sufficiently understood for its biosecurity and safety standards.

In this inquiry, it is presumed that the CDC and its associates were: a) fully aware of the work being performed using their patented technology; b) entered into explicit or implicit agreements including licensing, or other consideration; and, c) willfully engaged one or more foreign interests to carry forward the exploitation of their proprietary technology when the U.S. Supreme Court confirmed that such patents were illegal and when the National Institutes of Health issued a moratorium on such research.

Reportedly, in January 2018, the U.S. Embassy in China sent investigators to Wuhan Institute of Virology and found that, “During interactions with scientists at the WIV laboratory, they noted the new lab has a serious shortage of

AFFIDAVIT/DECLARATION OF TRUTH

appropriately trained technicians and investigators needed to safely operate this high containment laboratory.” The Washington Post reported that this information was contained in a cable dated 19 January 2018. Over a year later, in June 2019, the CDC conducted an inspection of Fort Detrick’s U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (hereinafter “USAMRIID”) and ordered it closed after alleging that their inspection found biosafety hazards. A report in the journal Nature in 2003 (423(6936): 103) reported cooperation between CDC and USAMRIID on coronavirus research was followed by considerable subsequent collaboration. The CDC, for what appear to be the same type of concern identified in Wuhan, elected to continue work with the Chinese government while closing the U.S. Army facility.

The CDC reported the first case of SARS-CoV like illness in the United States in January 2020 with the CDC’s Epidemic Intelligence Service reporting 650 clinical cases and 210 tests. Given that the suspected pathogen was first implicated in official reports on December 31, 2019, one can only conclude that CDC: a) had the mechanism and wherewithal to conduct tests to confirm the existence of a “novel coronavirus”; or, b) did not have said mechanism and falsely reported the information in January. It tests credulity to suggest that the WHO or the CDC could manufacture and distribute tests for a “novel” pathogen when their own subsequent record on development and deployment of tests has been shown to be without reliability.

Around March 12, 2020, in an effort to enrich their own economic interests by way of securing additional funding from both Federal and Foundation actors, the CDC and NIAID’s Dr Fauci elected to suspend testing and classify COVID-19 by capricious symptom presentation alone. Not surprisingly, this was necessitated by the apparent fall in cases that constituted Dr. Fauci’s and others’ criteria for depriving citizens of their 1st Amendment rights. At present, the standard according to State and Territorial Epidemiologists Interim-20-ID-01 for COVID-19 classification is:

In outpatient or tele-health settings at least two of the following symptoms must be indicated: fever (measured or subjective), chills, rigors, myalgia, headache, sore throat, new olfactory and taste disorder(s)

AFFIDAVIT/DECLARATION OF TRUTH

OR at least one of the following symptoms must be indicated: cough, shortness of breath, or difficulty breathing OR Severe respiratory illness with at least one of the following:

● Clinical or radiographic evidence of pneumonia, or

● Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). AND No alternative more likely diagnosis Laboratory Criteria for Reporting

● Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in a clinical specimen using a molecular amplification detection test.

● Detection of specific antigen in a clinical specimen.

● Detection of specific antibody in serum, plasma, or whole blood indicative of a new or recent infection serologic methods for diagnosis are currently being defined

After inflicting grave harm to the people of the United States of America through economic hardships resulting from their allegations of an “epidemic” or “pandemic”, the CDC and the NIAID set forth, and the President of the United States and various Governors in the respective States promulgated, standards for lifting restrictive conditions which are in violation of the 1st Amendment to the Constitution and serve exclusively to enrich themselves. Both the presence of a vaccine or treatment and, or, the development of testing — each of which solely benefit the possible conspiring parties and their coconspirators — are set forth as a condition for re-opening the country. This appears to be an unambiguous violation of the Sherman Act and, if so, should be prosecuted immediately to the full extent of the law.

AFFIDAVIT/DECLARATION OF TRUTH

The C.D.C. and W.H.O. elected to commit to a narrative of a novel coronavirus – exhibiting properties that were anticipated in the U.S. Patent 7,618,802 issued to the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill’s Ralph Baric – and, in the absence of testing protocols, elected to insist that SARS-CoV-2 was the pathogen responsible for conditions that were consistent with moderate to severe acute respiratory syndrome.

U.S. Constitution:

Article One, Section 8, clause 8,

To promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries By Renewing their Illegal Patents on February 17, 2014 the CDC violated Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 of the U.S. Constitution By Renewing their Illegal Patents on February 17, 2014 the CDC willfully violated the law using taxpayer funds in light of the Supreme Court ruling on June 13, 2013 Article One, Section 9, clause 2, Which states that "The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus (a recourse in law challenging the reasons or conditions of a person's confinement) shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it."

THERE IS NO CLINICAL DATA SHOWING THAT THE “RESTRAINT OF HEALTHY INDIVIDUALS” HAS ANY EMPRICAL DATA SUPPORTING ITS USE. NO EVIDENCE SUPPORTING EMERGENCY DECLARATIONS HAVE BEEN OFFERED WITH THE EXCEPTION OF STATEMENTS MADE BY COLLUDING PARTIES SEEKING TO BENEFIT FROM VACCINATIONS, TESTING OR THE COMBINATION – NEITHER OF WHICH CAN BE REASONABLY EXPECTED GIVEN THE PATENTS GRANTED TO AND HELD BY THE COLLUDING PARTIES.

AFFIDAVIT/DECLARATION OF TRUTH

The Sherman Act and Clayton Act violations consist of receiving and directing funding only to those parties colluding around the infringement of the CDC’s illegal patent.

• CDC; NIAID; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; Wuhan Institute of Virology; National Institutes of Health; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; President’s Task Force; Governors except North Dakota, Nebraska, Arkansas, Utah, Wyoming, South Dakota, and Oklahoma

Possible violation of 15 U.S. Code § 19

• Dr. Fauci is on the Leadership Council of the Bill and Melinda Gates

• Global Vaccine Action Plan

DOMESTIC TERRORISM - Still in Effect as of January 4th, 2021

Section 802 of the USA PATRIOT Act (Pub. L. No. 107-52) expanded the definition of terrorism to cover ""domestic,"" as opposed to international, terrorism. A person engages in domestic terrorism if they do an act "dangerous to human life" that is a violation of the criminal laws of a state or the United States, if the act appears to be intended to: (i) intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion.

Current policing, fining, arrests and harassment throughout the country and State/Name of County in this case, is in violation of not only First Amendment “abridging the right of people to peaceably assemble” but more narrowly:

AFFIDAVIT/DECLARATION OF TRUTH

Title 18 U.S.C., Section 242 Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law:

Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

As a concerned Patriot, proud American and citizen of _________________ County____________________, I willfully submit the above statements for your consideration. It is my assertion that the above facts must be considered for the immediate removal and suspension of any and all continued unlawful, unconstitutional and draconian measures adversely affecting citizens. Henceforth any measures related to and known as ‘shelter in place,’ quarantine, ‘non-essential’ work, social distance, and the closure of public spaces will be considered unconstitutional and nothing more than an unlawful attempt at ‘social engineering.’ Finally, I request your support and immediate investigation of any ‘sworn’ Governmental official at local, State or Federal levels for their willfully complicit or knowingly criminal misconduct of their Constitutional duties in the service of their office.

AFFIDAVIT/DECLARATION OF TRUTH

I welcome your correspondence and am hopeful that you take this matter seriously on behalf of my family and fellow U.S. citizens currently being impacted by the ‘unlawful’ actions outlined above. I will be submitting this same letter to all related local, State and Federal Government representatives including the United States Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen, _____________ County Sheriff ____________________and I will be filing this Affidavit in the __________________________County Court house for considered legal action on behalf of myself and fellow citizens across the State of ___________________ and the entire nation.

22 American Jurisprudence 2d Damages Summary

This article covers general principles of the law of damages. It includes a discussion of the various kinds of damages-compensatory damages, nominal damages, liquidated damages, and exemplary and punitive damages-as well as of such concepts as general and special damages, prospective damages, and mitigation of damages. The elements and measure of damages in breach of contract, personal injury, and property damage cases are also covered as are the pleading, proof, and determination of the amount of damages to be awarded in a lawsuit.

American Jurisprudence 2d - Damages § 559

V. Exemplary or Punitive Damages, A. In General, § 559 - Purposes; punishment and deterrence

The view has been followed that punitive damages are awarded for the sake of example[1] and to punish the defendant,[2] thereby deterring others from similar behavior.[3] Indeed, courts have stated that the primary purpose of a punitive award is to deter misconduct or improper conduct.[4] However, punitive damages must not be so oppressive or so large as to shock the sense of fair-minded persons.[5] The purpose of punitive damages is not served by financially destroying a defendant.[6]

Punitive damages have been said to be awarded to punish the defendant and deter or warn others from the same conduct[7] or to punish or deter conduct deemed wrongful when the availability of a cause of action and compensatory damages are considered an insufficient punishment or deterrence.[8] Many holdings also expressly state that the purpose of punitive damages is to deter the defendant him- or herself, as well as others, from repeating the wrongful act in the future.[9] Thus, exemplary damages have been said to serve a threefold purpose:

• punishment

• specific deterrence

• general deterrence[10]

 AFFIDAVIT/DECLARATION OF TRUTH

Other courts simply state more generally that the dual or twin purposes of punitive damages are punishment and deterrence[11] or that punitive damages are aimed at deterrence and retribution.[12]

In this regard, it has been stated that punitive damages may properly be imposed to further a state's legitimate interests in punishing unlawful conduct and deterring its repetition[13] and that an award of punitive damages serves the purpose of protecting or benefiting the public generally.[14] Similarly, it has been stated that the basis of the doctrine of punitive damages is that a person whose conduct amounts to a criminality should be punished for the good of society.[15]

Caution:

State courts cannot authorize procedures that create an unreasonable and unnecessary risk of confusion which leads the jury, in awarding punitive damages, to impermissibly punish a defendant for harm caused to others rather than permissibly taking that conduct into account in determining reprehensibility. Punitive-damages awards may not be used for the purpose of punishing a defendant for harming others.[16] ,[17] and both the punishment of the tortfeasor and deterrence are required to satisfy a statutory punitive-damages provision.[18] Also, under some authority, a private party seeking to recover punitive damages must demonstrate that the defendant's egregious conduct was part of a pattern of similar conduct directed at the public generally.[19]

In some jurisdictions, all awards of punitive damages must be supported by a finding that the public interest will be served by punishing the wrongdoer

Am Jurisprudence 2d - Damages § 622

V. Exemplary or Punitive Damages, H. Amount, 1. In General; Procedures and Standards for Determining Amount, § 622 - Particular factors considered

The factors for determining appropriate punitive damages, whether by the trier of fact or on review for excessiveness,[1] generally include:

• the nature of the wrong[2]

• the reprehensibility of the wrongdoing[3]

• the enormity of the wrong[4]

• the duration of the wrong[5]

• the wrongdoer's intent or motivation,[6] or awareness of any hazard which his or her conduct has caused[7]

• other circumstances attendant to the wrongdoer's actions[8]

AFFIDAVIT/DECLARATION OF TRUTH

Observation:

The degree of reprehensibility of defendant's conduct is perhaps the most important indicium of the reasonableness of a punitive-damages award.[9]

While an award of punitive damages should take into account any mitigating circumstances which may operate to reduce the award without wholly defeating it,[10] there is authority that exemplary damages are not to be reduced by reason of the plaintiff's comparative negligence.[11]  Regardless of culpability, heavier punitive awards have been thought to be justifiable when wrongdoing is hard to detect.[12]

Cases:

In weighing the degree of reprehensibility, when determining whether award of punitive damages is excessive, the district court considers whether the defendant engaged in violent conduct; acted with malice or deceit; and engaged in repeated acts of misconduct. Milfort v. Prevete, 3 F. Supp. 3d 14 (E.D. N.Y. 2014) .

Under Prison Litigation Reform Act, punitive damage awards must be no larger than reasonably necessary to deter the kind of violations that occurred, the awards imposed should be against no more defendants than necessary to serve that deterrent function and should be the least intrusive way of doing so. 18 U.S.C.A. § 3626(a)(1)(A) . Benton v. Rousseau, 940 F. Supp. 2d 1370 (M.D. Fla. 2013) .Existence of any of the factors used to determine reprehensibility of defendant, as indicium of reasonableness of punitive damages award, weighing in favor of a plaintiff may not be sufficient to sustain a punitive damages award.

AFFIDAVIT/DECLARATION OF TRUTH

 I,  First Middle Last Name am seeking lawful remedy in the amount of Twenty Million Dollars,  ($20,000,000.00)  for Costco Wholesale Corporation employees Craig Jelinek, acting as CEO of Costco Wholesale Headquarters, Issaquah, Washington and City and State, Costco Wholesale employees, ________________________________________________________, who knowingly and willingly trespassed on my unalienable rights and the rights of the public at large and for violating well established law.

Lawful notification has been provided to you stating that if you do not rebut the statements, charges and averments made in this Affidavit/Declaration, then, you tacitly agree with and admit to them. Pursuant to that lawful notification, if you disagree with anything stated under oath in this Affidavit/Declaration of Truth, then rebut to me that with which you disagree, with particularity, within ten (10) business days of receipt thereof, by means of your own written, notarized affidavit of truth, based on specific, true, relevant fact and valid law to support your disagreement, attesting to your rebuttal and supportive positions, as valid and lawful, under the pains and penalties of perjury under the laws of the United States of America and this State of______________________________. An un-rebutted affidavit stands as truth and fact before any court. Your failure to respond, as stipulated, is your tacit agreement with and admission to the fact that everything in this Affidavit/Declaration of Truth is true, correct, legal, lawful, and is your irrevocable admission attesting to this, fully binding upon you in any court of law in America, without your protest, objection and that of those who represent you.

Affiant further sayeth naught.

All Rights Reserved,

____________________________________ _____________________

First, Middle ,Last Name Affiant/Declarant Date

AFFIDAVIT/DECLARATION OF TRUTH

NOTARY STATEMENT

In the State of ________________________,

County of ____________________

I swear that on this _____day of ______________ 2021, the above-named Affiant/Declarant,

First, Middle, Last Name personally appeared before me, and of her own free will, signed and executed

this Affidavit/Declaration of Truth.

____________________________________

Notary Public

My Commission Expires:_______________

Seal:

................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download