Comparison of Three Beginning Band Methods
qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmrtyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmrtyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmrtyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmrtyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmrtyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmrtyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmrtyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmComparison of Three Beginning Band MethodsWilliam A. VliekJump Right InStandard of Excellence (Enhanced)Essential Elements 2000PublisherGIa Publications, Inc.Neil A. Kjos Music CompanyHal Leonard CorporationPrice$16.50$9.95$8.99CD/DVD included?CDCDBothFirst NoteBb concertD concertF concertLocation of first key other than BbPg. 19 of 48Pg. 16 of 48 (#65)Pg. 16 of 48 (#76)Introduction of Triple MeterPg. 13Not done in Book 1Not done in Book 1First Note “over the break”Pg. 12Concert APg. 27 (#118)Concert EbPg. 24 (#119Concert DSoftware on CDNoneiPasFinale Notepad, SmartMusicBiggest AdvantagesUse of several keys , Introduction of accompaniment roles,Use of several metersEasy to understand,Software, Many instrument-specific pagesPrice, Software, Easy to understandBiggest DisadvantagesPrice, Difficult for students to teach themselves, Only 9 tunesNo use of triple meter,Heavy emphasis on Bb major No use of triple meter, Heavy emphasis on Bb majorObjective and PurposeWith so many method book options for band directors to choose from, what should the essential beginning band method look like? The answer to this question can spark some heated debate, as it gets down to educational philosophy. Consequently, this review is meant to mix objective fact with subjective opinions gained from my experience teaching in all three method books. For this comparison, only the student book is evaluated. This study is, by no means, meant to serve as an in depth philosophical inquiry into different ideologies, but rather as a quick reference for a young band director trying to see the trees through the forest, or potentially the music from the noise, in this case. In addition, the primary instrument used for comparison is the clarinet, as this is one of the most common beginning instruments and also possesses one of the largest hurdles during the beginning stages of learning, namely that of playing over and through “the break”.ComparisonPhilosophical differencesWhile this might seem to contradict what was stated earlier, the differing philosophies in these books dictate one of the largest differences between them; the way in which the beginning student learns and differing priorities held by the different authors.The “odd man out” in the trio is Jump Right In. The authors, Richard Grunow, Ed Gordon, and Chris Azzara, are proponents of a methodology known as Music Learning Theory. Without going into too much detail, this ideology places priority on training the ear before the eye. Consequently, the Jump Right In series utilizes solfege syllables in place of standard note names. For example, when the band learns their first note, Bb concert, they do not learn in as Bb, they learn it as “Do” in the key of Bb. The note “C”, would then be taught as “Re” and so on. In contrast, both of the other methods use standard note names. In addition to the use of solfege, the Jump Right In books place value on the “audiation” (being able to hear the music before you play it) of melody, counter-melody, harmony, and bass line. Consequently, all of the music taught in the Jump Right In series is displayed in several forms. For example, when the students learn “Pierrot” on page 21, they not only learn the melody, but also the harmony, bass line, and even have a line open for improvisation.Ease of UseHaving attended a university which taught Music Learning Theory (Michigan State University), I graduated with a knowledge of how to teach the basics of audiation. However, Jump Right In is still a learning method that is hard to successfully execute in the beginning band setting. Due to the fact that the method is primarily teacher-taught, the book does not contain student-friendly terminology. The writing contained within the method is written at a higher level, using terms like “macrobeat”, “tonality”, “tonal syllables”, and “enrhythmic reading”. In contrast, the other two methods contain text sections meant to allow advanced or enthusiastic students to move ahead in the book ahead of the rest of the class. There are also text boxes which highlight important composers throughout history, such as the brief paragraph on Mozart immediately preceding “A Mozart Melody” on page 8. While some might view Jump Right In’s methods as more difficult and less beneficial, others will say that it helps build concepts such as balance, listening across the ensemble, and independence as the students are challenged in different ways.Pros and ConsThe Jump Right In books present students with so many ways to develop advanced musicianship skills. Ideas like intonation and tone are fostered earlier than normal with heavy emphasis placed on singing and listening before playing. The inclusion of harmonies, counter-melodies, and bass lines with every tune allows for students to form their own chamber ensembles or play along with the CD on whichever part they wish. There is much missing from Jump Right In, though. Due to the fact that there are so many parts to each tune, only 9 tunes are taught in the entire first book. This does not count the “Major and Minor Duples and Triples”, meant only to establish tonality. In addition, any tune that is taught in both major and minor, or duple and triple is only counted once. Added to this is the fact that the first tune is not taught until page 21 (once again, not counting “Major and Minor Duples and Triples”). In the wrong hands, this can lead to a very boring and monotonous beginning band class.The Essential Elements 2000 is boasts many sections that have been common in beginning band through the years. It utilizes traditional note naming as well as text boxes meant both to supplement the music as well as teach about historical musicians or other non-performing musical elements. The tunes are fun for beginning instrumentalists and include many songs that the students are familiar with, such as “London Bridge”, “Jingle Bells”, and “William Tell”, all which are taught within the first 10 pages. In addition, the inclusion of basic Finale software on the CD is a fantastic way to incorporate basic composition at the earliest levels. In contrast to the Jump Right In books, the Essential Elements 2000 series does not include harmonies or bass lines as standard learning tools. There are duets and arrangements, but they are not included in the standard learning process as they are in the Gordon book. In addition, the entire book is spent in duple meter. This may be a large reason why many of our young bands struggle when trying to play in 6/8, as it was not taught to them as a standard time signature.The Standard of Excellence series shares many common characteristics with the Essential Elements books. Like the Essential Elements series, there are many tunes that the students will recognize and enjoy. In addition, there is a nice few pages at the beginning both explaining and showing how to put the instrument together properly as well as form the embouchure correctly. In addition, there is a thorough glossary at the back of the book for quick review when needed. The Standard of Excellence series share the same weak points with their Essential Elements competitors. The book is exclusively in duple meter and spends are large amount of time in the key signature of Bb major or g minor. ConclusionOnce again, this comparison is not meant to be taken as complete fact, but rather as a mixture of objective information and subjective experiences. The only way to find out which method truly works in any given class is through years of experience and endless hours of toying and tinkering with different ideas and methodologies. I hope this review can serve as a quick reference guide and I wish you the best in your aspirations of creating engaged and musical young adults. ................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- unit what is fair
- note to students for the quiz know the pros and cons of
- 6th grade reading writing argumentative texts unit
- competency examples with performance statements
- comparison of three beginning band methods
- chapter 6 mobile wireless and pervasive computing
- information systems for business and beyond
- the lively art of writing
- english weekly daily planning week beginning
- basic research methods
Related searches
- comparison of educational philosophy
- comparison of type 1 and 2 diabetes
- comparison of rental car rates
- comparison of photosynthesis and respiration
- comparison of credit card benefits
- comparison of email service providers
- comparison of economic systems worksheet
- comparison of economic systems answers
- comparison of personality assessment tools
- comparison of mutual funds
- comparison of arbs for hypertension
- comparison of percentages statistics