Washington Times, December 2, 2002

The court differentiated that case from Naartex Consulting Corp. v. Watt, 722 F.2d 779 (D.C. Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1210 (1984), "in which the court held that the district court did not abuse its dis-cretion in denying further jurisdictional discovery when the … ................
................