Javascript must be enabled on your web browser



[pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic]Javascript must be enabled on your web browser.

Fields marked with * are mandatory.

[pic][pic]

Top of Form

INSPIRE Annex II+III Data Specification Testing Report

| |

|*Testing coordinator |[pic]    | |

|Testing Contact Point |[pic] | |

| | | |

|*Name | | |

|*Surname (Family name) |[pic] | |

|*e-mail |[pic] | |

|*Tel. |[pic] | |

|Fax |[pic] | |

|*What kind of test |[pic]Feasibility Testing | |

|would you like to |[pic]Fitness for purpose testing | |

|report? | | |

|How many other | | | |

|organanisations | | | |

|participated in the |[pic] | | |

|testing? | | | |

|You will be asked to | | | |

|provide the name and | | | |

|role of each | | | |

|organisaion | | | |

|[pic]*Name of organisation 1 | | |

|By typing the first letters of the organisation name you will be prompted with | | |

|the names of organisations already registered in the INSPIRE SDIC/LMO database. | | |

|However you can also also enter the name of an organisation not registered in | | |

|the INSPIRE database | | |

|State Nature Conservancy of the Slovak Republic      | | |

| | | |

|*Role of organisation 1 in the testing | | |

|Please select any that apply | | |

|[pic]DATA PROVIDER | | |

|[pic]INFRASTRUCTURE PROVIDER | | |

|[pic]DATA MAPPER | | |

|[pic]DATA TRANSFORMER | | |

|[pic][pic]OTHER | | |

|[pic]If you selected "OTHER" please specify | | |

|[pic] | | |

| | | |

| | |

Bottom of Form

[pic]

Top of Form

Feasibility Testing Step 1/4

|  |Feasibility Testing Description |

| |

|  |*Methodology used in the |[pic] |

| |testing | |

| |Short description of the | |

| |methodology/process used | |

| |in the testing | |

| |

|  |*Description of software |[pic] |

| |and tools used in the | |

| |testing | |

| |Short description of | |

| |software and tools used | |

| |in the testing | |

| |

|  |*How many source/input |[pic] |

| |datasets did you use in | |

| |the testing. | |

| |For each dataset you will| |

| |be asked to provide the | |

| |following information: | |

| |Dataset name, | |

| |description, URL and URL | |

| |for metadata and data | |

|  | |

Bottom of Form

[pic]

Top of Form

Feasibility Testing Step 2/4

|Source dataset description (Dataset 1) |

|You have already entered this dataset. |

| |

|  |

|  |*Dataset Name |[pic] |

| |Title of the dataset (including the name of the dataset) | |

| |Example: | |

| |Biogeographical regions (biogeograficke_regiony) | |

| |

|  |

|  |*Dataset description |[pic] |

| |Short description of the input dataset used in the testing | |

| |Example: | |

| |Biogeographical regions of Slovakia | |

| |

|  |

|  |URL for Metadata |[pic] |

| |If possible provide a URL of the metadata for the input dataset | |

| |Example: | |

| | |

| |1-d3f8-4429-be24-6ca73d929fb3 | |

|  |  |

|  |URL for Dataset |[pic] |

| |If the metadata does not contain a direct link to the dataset, please provide the | |

| |dataset URL here | |

| |Example: | |

| | | |

| |

| |

|  |  |  |

|Source dataset description (Dataset 2) |

|You have already entered this dataset. |

| |

|  |

|  |*Dataset Name |[pic] |

| |Title of the dataset (including the name of the dataset) | |

| |Example: | |

| |Biogeographical regions (biogeograficke_regiony) | |

| |

|  |

|  |*Dataset description |[pic] |

| |Short description of the input dataset used in the testing | |

| |Example: | |

| |Biogeographical regions of Slovakia | |

| |

|  |

|  |URL for Metadata |[pic] |

| |If possible provide a URL of the metadata for the input dataset | |

| |Example: | |

| | |

| |1-d3f8-4429-be24-6ca73d929fb3 | |

|  |  |

|  |URL for Dataset |[pic] |

| |If the metadata does not contain a direct link to the dataset, please provide the | |

| |dataset URL here | |

| |Example: | |

| | | |

| |

| |

|  |  |  |

|Source dataset description (Dataset 3) |

|You have already entered this dataset. |

| |

|  |

|  |*Dataset Name |[pic] |

| |Title of the dataset (including the name of the dataset) | |

| |Example: | |

| |Biogeographical regions (biogeograficke_regiony) | |

| |

|  |

|  |*Dataset description |[pic] |

| |Short description of the input dataset used in the testing | |

| |Example: | |

| |Biogeographical regions of Slovakia | |

| |

|  |

|  |URL for Metadata |[pic] |

| |If possible provide a URL of the metadata for the input dataset | |

| |Example: | |

| | |

| |1-d3f8-4429-be24-6ca73d929fb3 | |

|  |  |

|  |URL for Dataset |[pic] |

| |If the metadata does not contain a direct link to the dataset, please provide the | |

| |dataset URL here | |

| |Example: | |

| | | |

| |

| |

|  |  |  |

Bottom of Form

[pic]

Top of Form

Feasibility Testing Step 3/4

|*Which INSPIRE Themes did you test? |ANNEX 2 |

| |[pic] |

|Please select the theme(s) tested. |Elevation |

|Annex I themes are also listed so that you|  |

|can report testing results related to |[pic] |

|inter-connections between Annex I and |Land cover |

|Annex II+III themes. |  |

|On the next page you will be able to |[pic] |

|associate your input datasets to the |Orthoimagery |

|selected themes |  |

| |[pic] |

| |Geology |

| |  |

| | |

| |ANNEX 3 |

| |[pic] |

| |Statistical units |

| |  |

| |[pic] |

| |Buildings |

| |  |

| |[pic] |

| |Soil |

| |  |

| |[pic] |

| |Land use |

| |  |

| |[pic] |

| |Human health and safety |

| |  |

| |[pic] |

| |Utility and governmental services |

| |  |

| |[pic] |

| |Environmental monitoring Facilities |

| |  |

| |[pic] |

| |Production and industrial facilities |

| |  |

| |[pic] |

| |Agricultural and aquaculture facilities |

| |  |

| |[pic] |

| |Population distribution and demography |

| |  |

| |[pic] |

| |Area management/restriction/regulation zones |

| |& reporting units |

| |  |

| |[pic] |

| |Natural risk zones |

| |  |

| |[pic] |

| |Atmospheric conditions |

| |  |

| |[pic] |

| |Meteorological geographical features |

| |  |

| |[pic] |

| |Oceanographic geographical features |

| |  |

| |[pic] |

| |Sea regions |

| |  |

| |[pic] |

| |Bio-geographical regions |

| |  |

| |[pic] |

| |Habitats and biotopes |

| |  |

| |[pic] |

| |Species distribution |

| |  |

| |[pic] |

| |Energy Resources |

| |  |

| |[pic] |

| |Mineral Resources |

| |  |

| |[pic] |

| | |

| |ANNEX 1 |

| |[pic] |

| |Coordinate reference systems |

| |  |

| |[pic] |

| |Geographical grid systems |

| |  |

| |[pic] |

| |Geographical names |

| |  |

| |[pic] |

| |Administrative units |

| |  |

| |[pic] |

| |Addresses |

| |  |

| |[pic] |

| |Cadastral parcels |

| |  |

| |[pic] |

| |Transport networks |

| |  |

| |[pic] |

| |Hydrography |

| |  |

| |[pic] |

| |Protected sites |

| |  |

|  |  |

|  |  |

Bottom of Form

[pic][pic][pic]

Top of Form

Feasibility Testing Step 4/4

[pic]

|Bio-geographical regions |

|*Which datasets did you use|[pic] |

|to test this theme ? |Bio-geographical regions (Bio-geographical_regions.shp)   |

| | |

| |[pic] |

| |Habitats and biotopes (Habitats_and_biotopes.shp)   |

| | |

| |[pic] |

| |Species distribution (Species_distribution.shp)   |

|*Select the application schema(s) used for |[pic] |

|testing |Bio-geographicalRegions |

|*Feasibility of the transformation |

|[pic]Fully feasible |

|(It was possible to transform all relevant spatial objects in the input data sets (and their |

|attributes/relationships) into a corresponding structure of the proposed INSPIRE schemas, and all transformed |

|objects are compliant with the requirements of the proposed INSPIRE schemas (e.g. multiplicity, voidability of |

|attributes). |

| |

|[pic]Partly feasible |

|(Some of the relevant spatial objects in the input data sets (and/or their attributes/relationships) could not be|

|transformed into a corresponding structure of the proposed INSPIRE schema and/or some of the transformed objects |

|are not fully compliant with the requirements of the proposed INSPIRE schemas (e.g. multiplicity, voidability of |

|attributes)). |

| |

|[pic]Not feasible |

|(None or hardly any of the relevant spatial objects in the input data sets (and/or their |

|attributes/relationships) could not be transformed into a corresponding structure of the proposed INSPIRE |

|schemas.) |

|If you selected 'partly feasible' or 'not feasible', please describe the issues and provide suggestions for |

|improvements of the tested data specifications via Testing XLS spreadsheet for comments , which you can submit on|

|the end of this webform |

| |

|*What are the feasibility |[pic][pic]Filled Matching Tables |

|testing outcomes? |[pic]Transformed datasets/services |

| |[pic]Other |

| |If you selected "OTHER" please specify |

| |[pic] |

|*How many output datasets/services were the results of the feasibility testing? |

|For each dataset/service you will be asked to provide following information: |

|Name, Description, URL for metadata and dataset |

|[pic] |

|*Name |

|Title of the dataset/service (including the local name of the dataset/service) |

|Example: INSPIRE Biogeographical regions (inspire_biogeograficke_regiony) |

| |

| |

| |

| |

|*Description |

|Short description of the output dataset/service as result of feasibility testing) |

|Example: INSPIRE compliant Biogeographical regions of Slovakia |

| |

| |

| |

| |

|URL for Metadata |

|If possible provide a URL of the metadata for the output dataset/service |

| |

| |

|URL for Dataset |

|If possible and the metadata does not contain a direct link to the dataset, please provide a URL for directly |

|accessing the output dataset |

| |

| |

| |

|[pic] |

|DATASET/SERVICE 1   |

|[pic]Remove Source Dataset |

| |

|[pic] |

|[pic] |

|[pic] |

|[pic] |

| |

|Habitats and biotopes |

|*Which datasets did you use|[pic] |

|to test this theme ? |Bio-geographical regions (Bio-geographical_regions.shp)   |

| | |

| |[pic] |

| |Habitats and biotopes (Habitats_and_biotopes.shp)   |

| | |

| |[pic] |

| |Species distribution (Species_distribution.shp)   |

|*Select the application schema(s) used for |[pic] |

|testing |HabitatsAndBiotopes |

| |[pic] |

| |HabitatsAndBiotopes Implementation |

|*Feasibility of the transformation |

|[pic]Fully feasible |

|(It was possible to transform all relevant spatial objects in the input data sets (and their |

|attributes/relationships) into a corresponding structure of the proposed INSPIRE schemas, and all transformed |

|objects are compliant with the requirements of the proposed INSPIRE schemas (e.g. multiplicity, voidability of |

|attributes). |

| |

|[pic]Partly feasible |

|(Some of the relevant spatial objects in the input data sets (and/or their attributes/relationships) could not be|

|transformed into a corresponding structure of the proposed INSPIRE schema and/or some of the transformed objects |

|are not fully compliant with the requirements of the proposed INSPIRE schemas (e.g. multiplicity, voidability of |

|attributes)). |

| |

|[pic]Not feasible |

|(None or hardly any of the relevant spatial objects in the input data sets (and/or their |

|attributes/relationships) could not be transformed into a corresponding structure of the proposed INSPIRE |

|schemas.) |

|If you selected 'partly feasible' or 'not feasible', please describe the issues and provide suggestions for |

|improvements of the tested data specifications via Testing XLS spreadsheet for comments , which you can submit on|

|the end of this webform |

| |

|*What are the feasibility |[pic][pic]Filled Matching Tables |

|testing outcomes? |[pic]Transformed datasets/services |

| |[pic]Other |

| |If you selected "OTHER" please specify |

| |[pic] |

|*How many output datasets/services were the results of the feasibility testing? |

|For each dataset/service you will be asked to provide following information: |

|Name, Description, URL for metadata and dataset |

|[pic] |

|*Name |

|Title of the dataset/service (including the local name of the dataset/service) |

|Example: INSPIRE Biogeographical regions (inspire_biogeograficke_regiony) |

| |

| |

| |

| |

|*Description |

|Short description of the output dataset/service as result of feasibility testing) |

|Example: INSPIRE compliant Biogeographical regions of Slovakia |

| |

| |

| |

| |

|URL for Metadata |

|If possible provide a URL of the metadata for the output dataset/service |

| |

| |

|URL for Dataset |

|If possible and the metadata does not contain a direct link to the dataset, please provide a URL for directly |

|accessing the output dataset |

| |

| |

| |

|[pic] |

|DATASET/SERVICE 1   |

|[pic]Remove Source Dataset |

| |

|[pic] |

|[pic] |

|[pic] |

|[pic] |

| |

|Species distribution |

|*Which datasets did you use|[pic] |

|to test this theme ? |Bio-geographical regions (Bio-geographical_regions.shp)   |

| | |

| |[pic] |

| |Habitats and biotopes (Habitats_and_biotopes.shp)   |

| | |

| |[pic] |

| |Species distribution (Species_distribution.shp)   |

|*Select the application schema(s) used for |[pic] |

|testing |SpeciesDistribution |

| |[pic] |

| |SpeciesDistribution Implementation |

|*Feasibility of the transformation |

|[pic]Fully feasible |

|(It was possible to transform all relevant spatial objects in the input data sets (and their |

|attributes/relationships) into a corresponding structure of the proposed INSPIRE schemas, and all transformed |

|objects are compliant with the requirements of the proposed INSPIRE schemas (e.g. multiplicity, voidability of |

|attributes). |

| |

|[pic]Partly feasible |

|(Some of the relevant spatial objects in the input data sets (and/or their attributes/relationships) could not be|

|transformed into a corresponding structure of the proposed INSPIRE schema and/or some of the transformed objects |

|are not fully compliant with the requirements of the proposed INSPIRE schemas (e.g. multiplicity, voidability of |

|attributes)). |

| |

|[pic]Not feasible |

|(None or hardly any of the relevant spatial objects in the input data sets (and/or their |

|attributes/relationships) could not be transformed into a corresponding structure of the proposed INSPIRE |

|schemas.) |

|If you selected 'partly feasible' or 'not feasible', please describe the issues and provide suggestions for |

|improvements of the tested data specifications via Testing XLS spreadsheet for comments , which you can submit on|

|the end of this webform |

| |

|*What are the feasibility |[pic][pic]Filled Matching Tables |

|testing outcomes? |[pic]Transformed datasets/services |

| |[pic]Other |

| |If you selected "OTHER" please specify |

| |[pic] |

|*How many output datasets/services were the results of the feasibility testing? |

|For each dataset/service you will be asked to provide following information: |

|Name, Description, URL for metadata and dataset |

|[pic] |

|*Name |

|Title of the dataset/service (including the local name of the dataset/service) |

|Example: INSPIRE Biogeographical regions (inspire_biogeograficke_regiony) |

| |

| |

| |

| |

|*Description |

|Short description of the output dataset/service as result of feasibility testing) |

|Example: INSPIRE compliant Biogeographical regions of Slovakia |

| |

| |

| |

| |

|URL for Metadata |

|If possible provide a URL of the metadata for the output dataset/service |

| |

| |

|URL for Dataset |

|If possible and the metadata does not contain a direct link to the dataset, please provide a URL for directly |

|accessing the output dataset |

| |

| |

| |

|[pic] |

|DATASET/SERVICE 1   |

|[pic]Remove Source Dataset |

| |

|[pic] |

|[pic] |

|[pic] |

|[pic] |

| |

|[pic] |

|Costs and Benefits related to the feasibility testing |

|If possible please specify the effort required for each area of the feasibility testing activities |

|Specify the effort in person days for the whole testing period |

|Training / Studying the Data Specifications (DS) |

|[pic] |

| |

|Identifying and collecting relevat input data sets |

|[pic] |

| |

|Creating the mapping rules (e.g. matching tables) |

|[pic] |

| |

|Setting up the testing infrastructure |

|[pic] |

| |

|Executing the data transformation |

|[pic] |

| |

|Validating the testing results |

|[pic] |

| |

|Documenting the testing results |

|[pic] |

| |

|Management and coordination of testing |

|[pic] |

| |

|Total |

|[pic]Person days |

| |

| |

| |

|Please describe the benefits identified during the feasibility testing for your institution (partners, testing |

|group) |

|[pic] |

| |

|  |

| |

Bottom of Form

|INSPIRE Annex II+III testing comments |

|Comments file |Testing results file |

................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download