E-Commerce Risk Assessment Checklist
E-Commerce Risk Assessment Checklist
|Area of Focus: Correctness |Completed By: Date: |
|# |Question |Comments |Yes |No |N/A |Weight |Numeric Score |
| | | | | | |Factor | |
|1. |Have project requirements been documented in | |1 | | |3 |3 |
| |writing for the e-commerce site? | | | | | | |
|2. |Have functional requirements been documented in| |1 | | |1 |1 |
| |writing for the e-commerce site functions? | | | | | | |
|3. |Have test objective been defined for the | |1 | | |2 |2 |
| |e-commerce site, based on project requirements?| | | | | | |
|4. |Is there a defined process in place for | | |1 | |3 |0 |
| |developing the e-commerce site? | | | | | | |
|5. |Is a defined process followed by web developers| | |1 | |4 |0 |
| |and testers in developing the e-commerce web | | | | | | |
| |site? | | | | | | |
|6. |Have functional requirements been reviewed for | | |1 | |5 |0 |
| |correctness? | | | | | | |
|7. |Have test cases been defined to cover all | |1 | | |4 |4 |
| |business processes performed at the e-commerce | | | | | | |
| |site? | | | | | | |
|8. |Have test cases been defined to validate all | |1 | | |3 |3 |
| |edits? | | | | | | |
|9. |Have test cases been defined to test all | |1 | | |2 |2 |
| |calculations? | | | | | | |
|10. |Have tests been performed to cover all planned | | |1 | |1 |0 |
| |test cases? | | | | | | |
| | |Total | | | |28 |15 |
The weigh factor is based on relative criticality and importance to this area of assessment focus. Recommend range is from one to 5.
The numeric score is automatically calculated. To recalculate values, select the table and press F9.
E-Commerce Risk Assessment Checklist
|Area of Focus: Security |Completed By: Date: |
|# |Question |Comments |Yes |No |N/A |Weight |Numeric Score |
| | | | | | |Factor | |
|1. |Is a security policy documented in writing for | | |1 | |3 |0 |
| |the e-commerce site? | | | | | | |
|2. |Have response procedures been documented in the| |1 | | |1 |1 |
| |event of a security breach? | | | | | | |
|3. |Has a security assessment been performed for | |1 | | |2 |2 |
| |the e-commerce site? | | | | | | |
|4. |Are adequate security testing tools in place | | |1 | |3 |0 |
| |for the e-commerce site? | | | | | | |
|5. |Are adequate security preventative and | | |1 | |4 |0 |
| |detection tools in place for the e-commerce | | | | | | |
| |site? | | | | | | |
|6. |Have functional requirements been reviewed for | | |1 | |5 |0 |
| |security? | | | | | | |
|7. |Have firewall installation and maintenance | |1 | | |4 |4 |
| |procedures been evaluated? | | | | | | |
|8. |Have security functions been independently | |1 | | |3 |3 |
| |tested by a third party? | | | | | | |
|9. |Is there someone responsible for administering | | |1 | |2 |0 |
| |security of the e-commerce site? | | | | | | |
|10. |Does the security administrator keep abreast of| | |1 | |1 |0 |
| |security threats, issues, tools, and solutions.| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |Total | | | |28 |10 |
The weigh factor is based on relative criticality and importance to this area of assessment focus. Recommend range is from one to 5.
The numeric score is automatically calculated. To recalculate values, select the table and press F9.
E-Commerce Risk Assessment Checklist
|Area of Focus: Usability |Completed By: Date: |
|# |Question |Comments |Yes |No |N/A |Weight |Numeric Score |
| | | | | | |Factor | |
|1. |Are usability objectives documented in writing for| | |1 | |3 |0 |
| |the e-commerce site? | | | | | | |
|2. |Have web site standards been documented? | |1 | | |1 |1 |
|3. |Have early prototypes of the site been reviewed by| |1 | | |2 |2 |
| |representative customers? | | | | | | |
|4. |Is a usability test team in place? | |1 | | |3 |3 |
|5. |Are usability surveys and forms used by usability | | |1 | |4 |0 |
| |testers? | | | | | | |
|6. |Have functional requirements been reviewed for | | |1 | |5 |0 |
| |usability? | | | | | | |
|7. |Is usability feedback provided early in the | |1 | | |4 |4 |
| |development life cycle? | | | | | | |
|8. |Have usability functions been independently tested| |1 | | |3 |3 |
| |by a third party? | | | | | | |
|9. |Has site navigation been tested for usability? | |1 | | |2 |2 |
|10. |Have customer instructions been tested from a | |1 | | |1 |1 |
| |usability standpoint? | | | | | | |
| | |Total | | | |28 |16 |
The weigh factor is based on relative criticality and importance to this area of assessment focus. Recommend range is from one to 5.
The numeric score is automatically calculated. To recalculate values, select the table and press F9.
E-Commerce Risk Assessment Checklist
|Area of Focus: Performance |Completed By: Date: |
|# |Question |Comments |Yes |No |N/A |Weight |Numeric Score |
| | | | | | |Factor | |
|1. |Have performance objectives been documented in | | |1 | |3 |0 |
| |writing for the e-commerce site? | | | | | | |
|2. |Have stress points been identified in the | |1 | | |1 |1 |
| |e-commerce site? | | | | | | |
|3. |Have critical transactions been identified and | |1 | | |2 |2 |
| |documented for load testing? | | | | | | |
|4. |Are adequate load testing tools in place for the | |1 | | |3 |3 |
| |e-commerce site? | | | | | | |
|5. |Do testers understand how to use the load testing | | |1 | |2 |0 |
| |tools effectively? | | | | | | |
|6. |Have functional requirements been reviewed for | |1 | | |5 |5 |
| |performance? | | | | | | |
|7. |Have load projections been documented? | |1 | | |4 |4 |
|8. |Has site performance been adequately load tested? | |1 | | |3 |3 |
|9. |Has transaction throughput been tested for the | | |1 | |4 |0 |
| |e-commerce site? | | | | | | |
|10. |Are adequate monitoring tools in place to measure | | |1 | |5 |0 |
| |server performance and alert system administrators| | | | | | |
| |when stress conditions occur? | | | | | | |
| | |Total | | | |32 |18 |
The weigh factor is based on relative criticality and importance to this area of assessment focus. Recommend range is from one to 5.
The numeric score is automatically calculated. To recalculate values, select the table and press F9.
E-Commerce Risk Assessment Checklist
|Area of Focus: Visibility |Completed By: Date: |
|# |Question |Comments |Yes |No |N/A |Weight |Numeric Score |
| | | | | | |Factor | |
|1. |Is a marketing plan documented in writing for | | |1 | |3 |0 |
| |marketing the e-commerce site? | | | | | | |
|2. |Has the e-commerce site URL been submitted to the | |1 | | |1 |1 |
| |major search engines? | | | | | | |
|3. |Is a tool in place to measure the search engine | |1 | | |2 |2 |
| |ranking for the e-commerce site? | | | | | | |
|4. |Do site developers understand how to use META tags| | |1 | |3 |0 |
| |and titles for optimizing search engine ranking? | | | | | | |
|5. |Are features being used to both attract and retain| | |1 | |4 |0 |
| |visitors to the site? | | | | | | |
|6. |Is the site URL promoted in other advertising | | |1 | |5 |0 |
| |media than the web? | | | | | | |
|7. |Are site statistics regularly reviewed and | |1 | | |4 |4 |
| |analyzed? | | | | | | |
|8. |Is there a strategy in place to seek reciprocal | |1 | | |3 |3 |
| |links? | | | | | | |
|9. |Is there a strategy in place to keep customers | | |1 | |3 |0 |
| |aware of new site products and features? | | | | | | |
|10. |Is there a strategy in place to form alliances | | |1 | |4 |0 |
| |with related e-businesses for site promotion? | | | | | | |
| | |Total | | | |32 |10 |
The weigh factor is based on relative criticality and importance to this area of assessment focus. Recommend range is from one to 5.
The numeric score is automatically calculated. To recalculate values, select the table and press F9.
E-Commerce Risk Assessment Checklist
|Area of Focus: Integration |Completed By: Date: |
|# |Question |Comments |Yes |No |N/A |Weight |Numeric Score |
| | | | | | |Factor | |
|1. |Have project integration requirements been | | |1 | |3 |0 |
| |documented in writing for the e-commerce site? | | | | | | |
|2. |Have specific points of integration been | |1 | | |1 |1 |
| |documented in writing for the e-commerce site | | | | | | |
| |functions? | | | | | | |
|3. |Do test objectives include integration with | |1 | | |2 |2 |
| |internal business systems? | | | | | | |
|4. |Do test objectives include integration with | |1 | | |3 |3 |
| |external business systems? | | | | | | |
|5. |Do test objectives include integration with | | |1 | |4 |0 |
| |external organizations and business? | | | | | | |
|6. |Have functional requirements been reviewed for | |1 | | |5 |5 |
| |correctness regarding interfaces? | | | | | | |
|7. |Have test cases been defined to cover all | |1 | | |4 |4 |
| |points of integration with the e-commerce site?| | | | | | |
|8. |Do test scenarios span all points of | |1 | | |3 |3 |
| |integration in the e-commerce application? | | | | | | |
|9. |Have the appropriate people been contacted in | |1 | | |2 |2 |
| |other organizations to coordinate external | | | | | | |
| |interface testing? | | | | | | |
|10. |Have interfaces been tested at the unit and | | |1 | |1 |0 |
| |system levels? | | | | | | |
| | |Total | | | |28 |20 |
The weigh factor is based on relative criticality and importance to this area of assessment focus. Recommend range is from one to 5.
The numeric score is automatically calculated. To recalculate values, select the table and press F9.
E-Commerce Risk Assessment Checklist
|Area of Focus: Reliability |Completed By: Date: |
|# |Question |Comments |Yes |No |N/A |Weight |Numeric Score |
| | | | | | |Factor | |
|1. |Have reliability requirements been documented | |1 | | |3 |3 |
| |in writing for the e-commerce site? | | | | | | |
|2. |Have functional requirements been documented in| |1 | | |1 |1 |
| |writing for the e-commerce site functions? | | | | | | |
|3. |Have test objectives been defined for the | |1 | | |2 |2 |
| |e-commerce site reliability, based on project | | | | | | |
| |requirements? | | | | | | |
|4. |Is there a way to measure reliability of the | |1 | | |3 |3 |
| |e-commerce site? | | | | | | |
|5. |Is a tool in place to automate reliability | | |1 | |4 |0 |
| |testing? | | | | | | |
|6. |Have functional requirements been reviewed for | | |1 | |5 |0 |
| |reliability? | | | | | | |
|7. |Have test cases been defined to cover processes| |1 | | |4 |4 |
| |that impact reliability of the e-commerce site?| | | | | | |
|8. |Have backup and recovery procedures been | |1 | | |3 |3 |
| |defined in writing? | | | | | | |
|9. |Have backup and recovery procedures been | |1 | | |2 |2 |
| |adequately tested? | | | | | | |
|10. |Have tests been performed to cover all planned | |1 | | |1 |1 |
| |reliability test cases? | | | | | | |
| | |Total | | | |28 |19 |
The weigh factor is based on relative criticality and importance to this area of assessment focus. Recommend range is from one to 5.
The numeric score is automatically calculated. To recalculate values, select the table and press F9.
BLANK RISK ASSESSMENT FORMS
E-Commerce Risk Assessment Checklist
|Area of Focus: Correctness |Completed By: Date: |
|# |Question |Comments |Yes |No |N/A |Weight |Numeric Score |
| | | | | | |Factor | |
|1. |Have project requirements been documented in | | | | | |0 |
| |writing for the e-commerce site? | | | | | | |
|2. |Have functional requirements been documented in| | | | | |0 |
| |writing for the e-commerce site functions? | | | | | | |
|3. |Have test objective been defined for the | | | | | |0 |
| |e-commerce site, based on project requirements?| | | | | | |
|4. |Is there a defined process in place for | | | | | |0 |
| |developing the e-commerce site? | | | | | | |
|5. |Is a defined process followed by web developers| | | | | |0 |
| |and testers in developing the e-commerce web | | | | | | |
| |site? | | | | | | |
|6. |Have functional requirements been reviewed for | | | | | |0 |
| |correctness? | | | | | | |
|7. |Have test cases been defined to cover all | | | | | |0 |
| |business processes performed at the e-commerce | | | | | | |
| |site? | | | | | | |
|8. |Have test cases been defined to validate all | | | | | |0 |
| |edits? | | | | | | |
|9. |Have test cases been defined to test all | | | | | |0 |
| |calculations? | | | | | | |
|10. |Have tests been performed to cover all planned | | | | | |0 |
| |test cases? | | | | | | |
| | |Total | | | |0 |0 |
The weigh factor is based on relative criticality and importance to this area of assessment focus. Recommend range is from one to 5.
The numeric score is automatically calculated. To recalculate values, select the table and press F9.
E-Commerce Risk Assessment Checklist
|Area of Focus: Security |Completed By: Date: |
|# |Question |Comments |Yes |No |N/A |Weight |Numeric Score |
| | | | | | |Factor | |
|1. |Is a security policy documented in writing for | | | | | |0 |
| |the e-commerce site? | | | | | | |
|2. |Have response procedures been documented in the| | | | | |0 |
| |event of a security breach? | | | | | | |
|3. |Has a security assessment been performed for | | | | | |0 |
| |the e-commerce site? | | | | | | |
|4. |Are adequate security testing tools in place | | | | | |0 |
| |for the e-commerce site? | | | | | | |
|5. |Are adequate security preventative and | | | | | |0 |
| |detection tools in place for the e-commerce | | | | | | |
| |site? | | | | | | |
|6. |Have functional requirements been reviewed for | | | | | |0 |
| |security? | | | | | | |
|7. |Have firewall installation and maintenance | | | | | |0 |
| |procedures been evaluated? | | | | | | |
|8. |Have security functions been independently | | | | | |0 |
| |tested by a third party? | | | | | | |
|9. |Is there someone responsible for administering | | | | | |0 |
| |security of the e-commerce site? | | | | | | |
|10. |Does the security administrator keep abreast of| | | | | |0 |
| |security threats, issues, tools, and solutions.| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |Total | | | |0 |0 |
The weigh factor is based on relative criticality and importance to this area of assessment focus. Recommend range is from one to 5.
The numeric score is automatically calculated. To recalculate values, select the table and press F9.
E-Commerce Risk Assessment Checklist
|Area of Focus: Usability |Completed By: Date: |
|# |Question |Comments |Yes |No |N/A |Weight |Numeric Score |
| | | | | | |Factor | |
|1. |Are usability objectives documented in writing for| | | | | |0 |
| |the e-commerce site? | | | | | | |
|2. |Have web site standards been documented? | | | | | |0 |
|3. |Have early prototypes of the site been reviewed by| | | | | |0 |
| |representative customers? | | | | | | |
|4. |Is a usability test team in place? | | | | | |0 |
|5. |Are usability surveys and forms used by usability | | | | | |0 |
| |testers? | | | | | | |
|6. |Have functional requirements been reviewed for | | | | | |0 |
| |usability? | | | | | | |
|7. |Is usability feedback provided early in the | | | | | |0 |
| |development life cycle? | | | | | | |
|8. |Have usability functions been independently tested| | | | | |0 |
| |by a third party? | | | | | | |
|9. |Has site navigation been tested for usability? | | | | | |0 |
|10. |Have customer instructions been tested from a | | | | | |0 |
| |usability standpoint? | | | | | | |
| | |Total | | | |0 |0 |
The weigh factor is based on relative criticality and importance to this area of assessment focus. Recommend range is from one to 5.
The numeric score is automatically calculated. To recalculate values, select the table and press F9.
E-Commerce Risk Assessment Checklist
|Area of Focus: Performance |Completed By: Date: |
|# |Question |Comments |Yes |No |N/A |Weight |Numeric Score |
| | | | | | |Factor | |
|1. |Have performance objectives been documented in | | | | | |0 |
| |writing for the e-commerce site? | | | | | | |
|2. |Have stress points been identified in the | | | | | |0 |
| |e-commerce site? | | | | | | |
|3. |Have critical transactions been identified and | | | | | |0 |
| |documented for load testing? | | | | | | |
|4. |Are adequate load testing tools in place for the | | | | | |0 |
| |e-commerce site? | | | | | | |
|5. |Do testers understand how to use the load testing | | | | | |0 |
| |tools effectively? | | | | | | |
|6. |Have functional requirements been reviewed for | | | | | |0 |
| |performance? | | | | | | |
|7. |Have load projections been documented? | | | | | |0 |
|8. |Has site performance been adequately load tested? | | | | | |0 |
|9. |Has transaction throughput been tested for the | | | | | |0 |
| |e-commerce site? | | | | | | |
|10. |Are adequate monitoring tools in place to measure | | | | | |0 |
| |server performance and alert system administrators| | | | | | |
| |when stress conditions occur? | | | | | | |
| | |Total | | | |0 |0 |
The weigh factor is based on relative criticality and importance to this area of assessment focus. Recommend range is from one to 5.
The numeric score is automatically calculated. To recalculate values, select the table and press F9.
E-Commerce Risk Assessment Checklist
|Area of Focus: Visibility |Completed By: Date: |
|# |Question |Comments |Yes |No |N/A |Weight |Numeric Score |
| | | | | | |Factor | |
|1. |Is a marketing plan documented in writing for | | | | | |0 |
| |marketing the e-commerce site? | | | | | | |
|2. |Has the e-commerce site URL been submitted to the | | | | | |0 |
| |major search engines? | | | | | | |
|3. |Is a tool in place to measure the search engine | | | | | |0 |
| |ranking for the e-commerce site? | | | | | | |
|4. |Do site developers understand how to use META tags| | | | | |0 |
| |and titles for optimizing search engine ranking? | | | | | | |
|5. |Are features being used to both attract and retain| | | | | |0 |
| |visitors to the site? | | | | | | |
|6. |Is the site URL promoted in other advertising | | | | | |0 |
| |media than the web? | | | | | | |
|7. |Are site statistics regularly reviewed and | | | | | |0 |
| |analyzed? | | | | | | |
|8. |Is there a strategy in place to seek reciprocal | | | | | |0 |
| |links? | | | | | | |
|9. |Is there a strategy in place to keep customers | | | | | |0 |
| |aware of new site products and features? | | | | | | |
|10. |Is there a strategy in place to form alliances | | | | | |0 |
| |with related e-businesses for site promotion? | | | | | | |
| | |Total | | | |0 |0 |
The weigh factor is based on relative criticality and importance to this area of assessment focus. Recommend range is from one to 5.
The numeric score is automatically calculated. To recalculate values, select the table and press F9.
E-Commerce Risk Assessment Checklist
|Area of Focus: Integration |Completed By: Date: |
|# |Question |Comments |Yes |No |N/A |Weight |Numeric Score |
| | | | | | |Factor | |
|1. |Have project integration requirements been | | | | | |0 |
| |documented in writing for the e-commerce site? | | | | | | |
|2. |Have specific points of integration been | | | | | |0 |
| |documented in writing for the e-commerce site | | | | | | |
| |functions? | | | | | | |
|3. |Do test objectives include integration with | | | | | |0 |
| |internal business systems? | | | | | | |
|4. |Do test objectives include integration with | | | | | |0 |
| |external business systems? | | | | | | |
|5. |Do test objectives include integration with | | | | | |0 |
| |external organizations and business? | | | | | | |
|6. |Have functional requirements been reviewed for | | | | | |0 |
| |correctness regarding interfaces? | | | | | | |
|7. |Have test cases been defined to cover all | | | | | |0 |
| |points of integration with the e-commerce site?| | | | | | |
|8. |Do test scenarios span all points of | | | | | |0 |
| |integration in the e-commerce application? | | | | | | |
|9. |Have the appropriate people been contacted in | | | | | |0 |
| |other organizations to coordinate external | | | | | | |
| |interface testing? | | | | | | |
|10. |Have interfaces been tested at the unit and | | | | | |0 |
| |system levels? | | | | | | |
| | |Total | | | |0 |0 |
The weigh factor is based on relative criticality and importance to this area of assessment focus. Recommend range is from one to 5.
The numeric score is automatically calculated. To recalculate values, select the table and press F9.
E-Commerce Risk Assessment Checklist
|Area of Focus: Reliability |Completed By: Date: |
|# |Question |Comments |Yes |No |N/A |Weight |Numeric Score |
| | | | | | |Factor | |
|1. |Have reliability requirements been documented | | | | | |0 |
| |in writing for the e-commerce site? | | | | | | |
|2. |Have functional requirements been documented in| | | | | |0 |
| |writing for the e-commerce site functions? | | | | | | |
|3. |Have test objectives been defined for the | | | | | |0 |
| |e-commerce site reliability, based on project | | | | | | |
| |requirements? | | | | | | |
|4. |Is there a way to measure reliability of the | | | | | |0 |
| |e-commerce site? | | | | | | |
|5. |Is a tool in place to automate reliability | | | | | |0 |
| |testing? | | | | | | |
|6. |Have functional requirements been reviewed for | | | | | |0 |
| |reliability? | | | | | | |
|7. |Have test cases been defined to cover processes| | | | | |0 |
| |that impact reliability of the e-commerce site?| | | | | | |
|8. |Have backup and recovery procedures been | | | | | |0 |
| |defined in writing? | | | | | | |
|9. |Have backup and recovery procedures been | | | | | |0 |
| |adequately tested? | | | | | | |
|10. |Have tests been performed to cover all planned | | | | | |0 |
| |reliability test cases? | | | | | | |
| | |Total | | | |0 |0 |
The weigh factor is based on relative criticality and importance to this area of assessment focus. Recommend range is from one to 5.
The numeric score is automatically calculated. To recalculate values, select the table and press F9.
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
Related searches
- e commerce customer service
- e commerce customer support
- e commerce phone number
- e commerce customer service representative
- e commerce business model example
- e commerce manager job description
- e commerce sales job description
- list of e commerce businesses
- types of e commerce models
- kroger e commerce job description
- e commerce specialist job description
- e commerce coordinator job description